Melhorar o Prognóstico A Longo Prazo para Sobreviventes de Ventilação Mecânica em Pacientes Com AIDS Com PCP
Melhorar o Prognóstico A Longo Prazo para Sobreviventes de Ventilação Mecânica em Pacientes Com AIDS Com PCP
Melhorar o Prognóstico A Longo Prazo para Sobreviventes de Ventilação Mecânica em Pacientes Com AIDS Com PCP
Background: Before 1987, the hospital survival of pa- lated on the basis of the life-table analysis. Median sur-
tients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, Pneu- vival was estimated by means of the product-limit method.
mocystis carinii pneumonia, and acute respiratory fail-
ure receiving mechanical ventilation was less than 15%. Results: During the 5-year follow-up of the 47 sub-
Hospital survival has improved since then, but con- jects, 31 patients died, 12 were unavailable for follow\x=req-\
cerns have been raised that the post\p=m-\hospitaldischarge up, and four were still alive at the end of the cutoff. The
survival of these patients remains extremely poor. This cumulative survival rate at 1 year was 80% (95% confi-
study evaluated the long-term survival of patients dis- dence interval, 92% to 68%); at 2 years, 49% (95% con-
charged alive after an acute episode of acute respiratory fidence interval, 65% to 34%); at 3 years, 18% (95% con-
failure caused by P carinii pneumonia. fidence interval, 32% to 4%); and at 4 years, 6% (95%
confidence interval, 17% to 0%). Median survival time
Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted for for all subjects was 602 days (1.65 years), and the long-
the 5-year period from May 1987 through May 1992 in est survival time for a single patient was 1774 days (4.86
an urban teaching hospital. Forty-seven patients dis- years).
charged from the hospital after receiving mechanical ven-
tilation and/or continuous positive airway pressure for Conclusions: Post\p=m-\hospitaldischarge survival of pa-
acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, P carinii pneu- tients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, P ca-
monia, and acute respiratory failure were followed up from rinii pneumonia, and acute respiratory failure has im-
their initial intensive care unit admission until death or proved dramatically in the past decade. Patients can
termination of the study to measure the long-term sur- undergo intubation and mechanical ventilation with the
vival and cumulative probability of survival of the study hope of reasonable long-term survival.
cohort. Actuarial life-table analysis was performed, and
long-term cumulative probability of survival was calcu- (Arch Intern Med. 1995;155:91-95)
PNEUMOCYSTIS
CARlNíi pneu¬ tilation, which had been common during
monia (PCP) remains the the early years of the AIDS epidemic,
most common opportunis¬ dropped off precipitously despite in¬
tic infection in patients with creases in the numbers of hospital admis¬
mission survival of 602 days, and maximum survival of infection and may also be a factor in increasing sur¬
4.86 years. We anticipate that as greater numbers of pa¬ vival.28·30
tients with AIDS who have PCP survive ARF and are fol¬ In identifying improved survival, two important di¬
lowed up for longer periods, these figures will continue agnostic artifacts, lead-time bias and length bias, must
to improve. Survival of at least 6 years has already been be considered.31·32 Lead-time bias confounds all studies
reported for one PCP, and ARF.20
survivor of AIDS, of survival with AIDS and refers to an artifactual, rather
Harris21 and Lemp et al22 both demonstrated im¬ than an actual, increase in survival because the diagno¬
proved survival trends for American patients with AIDS sis is made earlier in some patients than in others (in this
initially diagnosed as having PCP as the 1980s pro¬ case AIDS may first be established by the presence of PCP
gressed. During the same period, Whitmore-Overton et with ARF). Lead-time bias is unlikely to account com¬
al23 observed an improvement in survival in English pa¬ pletely for the coincidental improvements described in
tients with AIDS including, but not limited to, patients different locations. Length bias may artificially improve
presenting with PCP. Danish researchers also docu¬ survival because AIDS is not a single disease entity; rather,
mented a similar trend of increasing survival over time it is a diagnosis established when an HIV-infected per¬
for patients with AIDS in whom PCP was diagnosed.24 son develops a qualifying condition. Those HIV-
In a large-scale follow-up of 28 Danish patients with AIDS infected patients with PCP and ARF as their qualifying
who received mechanical ventilation because of PCP, condition for AIDS could conceivably have a long pre-
Nielsen et al23 observed a dramatic improvement in sur¬ clinical-but-detectable phase and thus be more easily iden¬
vival after 1986, with hospital survival of 50% and me¬ tified than other HIV-infected patients. This could ex¬
dian postepisode survival of 20.5 months, figures simi¬ plain why patients whose AIDS diagnosis is established
lar to those reported here. by PCP with ARF might have improved survival com¬
While these studies strongly suggest that survival pared with those with other qualifying conditions (dif¬
trends for patients with AIDS who have PCP have gen¬ ferent opportunistic infections, HIV-related malignant
erally improved in both the United States and Europe, neoplasms, or neurologic conditions), but it would not
the reasons for the improvement are less clear. Corti- explain the specific temporal improvement in this group.
costeroids are thought to have played a role in the A final possibility in explaining improved survival
improvement in immediate hospital survival.19·20·26 is the experience or learning curve phenomenon, in which
Most authorities believe that nonreporting of deaths is centers with extensive experience taking care of pa¬
not a major factor, since reporting and follow-up are tients with AIDS show better survival results.33 This has
reasonably complete and have generally improved in been demonstrated through variations in survival in pa¬
the past several years.27 The impact of zidovudine on tients with AIDS in different centers and may explain the
long-term survival of patients with AIDS who have tendency to improved survival in a single medical cen¬
PCP is assumed to have played a part, although there ter.19·25
is some controversy surrounding its effect.28·29 Prophy¬ This study did not allow us to identify a specific rea¬
laxis for PCP reduces the incidence of PCP during HIV son for the improved long-term survival of our patients.
0.75 0.75
200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800
Days of Survival After ICU Admission Days of Survival After ICU Admission
Figure 1. Survival curves in patients with acquired immunodeficiency Figure 2. Survival curves in patients with acquired immunodeficiency
syndrome with Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia and acute respiratory syndrome with Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia and acute respiratory
failure after mechanical ventilation. ICU represents intensive care unit. failure after mechanical ventilation according to the year in which the
patient entered the study. ICU represents intensive care unit.
We agree with Wächter et al12 that demographic, clini¬ sonably constant and we found no obvious differences
cal, and therapeutic variables do not completely explain between patients who entered the study at different in¬
why patients with AIDS, PCP, and ARF who receive me¬ tervals.
chanical ventilation are experiencing better ICU sur¬ A final caveat regarding the decision to institute
vival. They speculated that a change in either the HIV or life-support in patients with ARF and PCP is that,
the infected hosts has made PCP and ARF a less virulent because approximately half the patients die within a
process, and that this remains the leading possibility for short period, short-term mortality must be factored
improved hospital outcomes. Others have also alluded into the long-term prognosis for any individual
to an attenuation in virulence of the HIV virus.34 patient. itself, this should not be a deterrent
In and of
The main limitation of our data is that they repre¬ to ICU and mechanical ventilation.35 Currently,
care
sent a selected sample of patients with AIDS who have hospital survival of patients with PCP with ARF
PCP and ARF, excluding those who elected not to un¬ ranges between 18% and 55%, essentially equivalent to
dergo mechanical ventilation and ICU care, either be¬ survival from other noncardiogenic causes of respira¬
cause they suffered from other chronic comorbid con¬ tory failure with a similar degree of lung injury.36
ditions (eg, HIV-related malignant neoplasms, neurologic Recent data suggest that survival from HIV-related res¬
diseases, or chronic intercurrent infections) or simply be¬ piratory failure carries a survival comparable with that
cause they did not wish to undergo ICU care. The pa¬ of non-HIV-related respiratory failure.37
tients we described were primarily patients without co- In conclusion, the long-term survival for ICU sur¬
morbid conditions who were experiencing first-time vivors with AIDS, PCP, and ARF has improved dramati¬
episodes of PCP. Hospital surveillance indicated that this cally since initial reports in the mid-1980s. Combined
represented most of the patients with AIDS who had ARF with increases in recovery from ARF demonstrated at a
and PCP in our hospital. (Few patients with ARF and PCP, number of centers, these figures suggest that in HIV-
but no comorbidity, refused life support. Some patients infected patients without serious comorbid conditions,
who refused ICU care may have also refused diagnostic ARF caused by PCP is a manageable complication with
procedures to confirm PCP.) Current literature on PCP reasonable short- and long-term survival. The occur¬
and ARF suggests that this is also the experience at other rence of ARF secondary to PCP should not be consid¬
centers dealing with large numbers of HIV-infected pa¬ ered an end-stage complication of AIDS; in most cases it
tients.12·25 Nevertheless, long-term survival figures in pa¬ can be approached as a potentially treatable intercur¬
tients with ARF must be viewed with caution, because rent condition. Future studies defining the role of such
in some patients long-term survival may be related to co¬ factors as CD4 levels, antiretroviral therapy, and second¬
existing comorbidity. ary PCP prophylaxis undoubtedly will help to explain
A second limitation of the data is inherent in the these findings more completely. Our intent in this study
methods of this type of follow-up. By definition, the co¬ was to document that patients with AIDS who have PCP
hort studied was not a single prospectively identifiable who are willing to undergo intubation and mechanical
group. Entry into the study was predicated on survival ventilation for ARF and subsequently survive the acute
from ARF. Because not all patients entered the study at episode may now experience survival measurable in years,
the same time, outside factors affecting AIDS survival in contrasted with weeks or months, as previously de¬
the 5-year period could have influenced the type of pa¬ scribed.
tients who survived and became eligible for follow-up (eg,
greater numbers of healthy survivors early in the sur¬ Accepted for publication April 29,1994.
veillance period could skew the results toward greater Reprint requests Medical
toIntensive Care Unit, Cook
long-term survival). We do not believe this played a ma¬ County Hospital, 1835 W Harrison St, Chicago, IL 60612
jor role, because the acute mortality for ARF was rea- (Dr Franklin).