The Effect of Monitoring Viral Load and Tracing Patients 2s3zti5tza
The Effect of Monitoring Viral Load and Tracing Patients 2s3zti5tza
The Effect of Monitoring Viral Load and Tracing Patients 2s3zti5tza
Reference
ESTILL, Janne Anton Markus, et al. The Effect of Monitoring Viral Load and Tracing Patients
Lost to Follow-up on the Course of the HIV Epidemic in Malawi: A Mathematical Model. Open
Forum Infectious Diseases, 2018, vol. 5, no. 5
DOI : 10.1093/ofid/ofy092
PMID : 29977952
Available at:
http://archive-ouverte.unige.ch/unige:105774
Disclaimer: layout of this document may differ from the published version.
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
MAJOR ARTICLE
Background. Antiretroviral therapy (ART) reduces HIV transmission, but treated patients may again become infectious. We
used a mathematical model to determine whether ART as prevention is more effective if viral load (VL) is routinely monitored and
patients lost to follow-up (LTFU) traced.
Methods. We simulated ART cohorts to parameterize a deterministic transmission model calibrated to Malawi. We investigated
the following strategies for improving treatment and retention: monitoring VL every 12 or 24 months, tracing patients LTFU, or
a generic strategy leading to uninterrupted treatment. We tested 3 scenarios, where ART scale-up continues at current (Universal
ART), reduced (Failed scale-up), or accelerated speed (Test&Treat).
Results. In the Universal ART scenario, between 2017 and 2020 (2050), monitoring VL every 24 months prevented 0.5% (0.9%),
monitoring every 12 months prevented 0.8% (1.4%), tracing prevented 0.3% (0.5%), and uninterrupted treatment prevented 5.5%
(9.9%) of HIV infections. Failed scale-up resulted in 25% more infections than the Universal ART scenarios, whereas Test&Treat
resulted in 7%–8% less.
Conclusions. Test&Treat reduces transmission of HIV, despite individual cases of treatment failure and ART interruption.
Whereas viral load monitoring and tracing have only a minor impact on transmission, interventions that aim to minimize treatment
interruptions can further increase the preventive effect of ART.
Keywords. antiretroviral therapy; HIV; loss to follow-up; mathematical model; monitoring; transmission.
Antiretroviral therapy (ART) suppresses the HIV-RNA concen- and Test&Treat have been widely discussed, but the evidence
tration (viral load [VL]) in people living with HIV (PLHIV), is not conclusive. Some studies have suggested that successful
reducing transmission risk [1, 2]. Since 2016, the World Health Test&Treat programs could eradicate the epidemic, but others
Organization (WHO) has recommended that all PLHIV begin predict only minor benefit on the population level [4–6].
ART immediately [3]. Preventing transmission through treat- Treatment failures, poor adherence, and frequent dropout
ment—“treatment as prevention” (TasP)—was an argument from care impair the effect of TasP [7–9]. Viral load monitoring
for expanding eligibility for ART to wider groups of patients and tracing patients lost to follow-up (LTFU) can support viral
and ultimately to all PLHIV. An intensive TasP intervention suppression in treated patients. The WHO has recommended
called “Test&Treat” screens the population regularly for HIV routine VL monitoring as its preferred monitoring strategy
and immediately starts all patients who test positive on ART. In since 2013. For several years, VL monitoring in sub-Saharan
2014, UNAIDS launched its global “90-90-90” target, with the Africa was available only in South Africa and Botswana, and
goal of substantially reducing transmission. The benefits of TasP a few research sites. New testing technologies have made rou-
tine VL monitoring easier, but coverage remains limited [10].
Patients LTFU are frequently traced in sub-Saharan Africa
through phone calls or home visits to those who do not return
Received 15 November 2017; editorial decision 11 April 2018; accepted 24 April 2018. to pick up their antiretrovirals [11].
Correspondence: J. Estill, PhD, Institute of Global Health, University of Geneva, c/o IMSV,
University of Bern, Alpeneggstrasse 22, 3012 Bern, Switzerland ([email protected]). We have developed mathematical models to test the effect of
Open Forum Infectious Diseases® VL monitoring [12] and tracing patients LTFU [13] on reduc-
© The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases ing potential transmission of HIV. We found that these inter-
Society of America. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ ventions could prevent patients on ART from transmitting the
by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any infection, but our analyses only evaluated a patient’s potential
medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work
is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact [email protected]
for transmitting the virus. The future course of the HIV epi-
DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofy092 demic depends on other important factors, such as transmission
A B
Chronic Chronic
Primary
Virologically Successful Virologically Susceptible asymptomatic symptomatic Treated AIDS
Successful infection
failing 1st- 2nd-line failing 2nd- infection infection
1st-line ART
line ART ART line ART
Interrupted treatment
Death
Death
Figure 1. Schematic representation of the mathematical model. A, Flow of patients in the treatment model. White boxes represent stages with suppressed viral load, and
gray boxes represent stages with continuously elevated viral load. “Discordant” immunological failure refers to a decline in CD4 cell count fulfilling the failure criteria under
suppressed viral load; this condition will not reverse upon switch to second-line therapy. The flow described on the upper half is applicable to patients on ART, including
those who returned after ART interruption. While progressing along the stages of treatment response (upper graph), the patients may also interrupt and restart treatment or
die (lower graph). B, Transmission model. The upper graph shows the course of the HIV infection, and the lower graph the flow through age, sex, and risk group. Black arrows
show flows between compartments, and gray lines show sexual contact patterns. Abbreviation: ART, antiretroviral therapy.
2 • OFID • Estill et al
4 • OFID • Estill et al
The transmission model’s pre-2017 results were in line with relative differences remained the same across all scenarios of
observed data and the UNAIDS EPP/Spectrum predictions. treatment scale-up and retention/tracing.
Prevalence among adults aged 15–49 years followed the upper In the Universal ART scenario without viral load monitor-
limit of the UNAIDS estimates (Supplementary Figure 1) [14]. ing, actively tracing patients LTFU reduced the average number
The total number of PLHIV in 2016 was about 10% lower than of new infections in 2017–2020 by 0.3% from 53 400 to 53 300,
predicted by UNAIDS. The largest discrepancy was in annual or in 2017–2050 by 0.5% from 260 900 to 259 500 (Figure 3,
new infections, which our model predicted to be about 20% Table 3). When treatment interruptions were eliminated, the
higher until 2013. In the last few years, the new infections number of new infections decreased in 2017–2020 by 5.5% to
declined rapidly, going below the UNAIDS lower limit in 2016. 50 500, or in 2017–2050 by 9.9% to 235 100. The relative benefit
According to our model, 695 000 patients were on ART in 2016, of tracing and improved retention was similar across scenarios
in line with observed estimates (680 000). In 2016, we predicted of treatment scale-up and monitoring.
23 100 AIDS-related deaths, whereas UNAIDS predicted 24 000. The total number of PLHIV also decreased over time. In 2020,
In all scenarios, prevalence continued to decline. Prevalence we predicted 839 200–849 500 PLHIV, and in 2050, 465 300–
among adults aged 15–49 years was 7.8%–7.9% in 2020, 4.4%– 538 000 PLHIV. Because of the decreasing number of PLHIV,
4.8% in 2030, and 1.4%–1.7% in 2050, depending on the sce-
nario (Supplementary Figure 2). The number of annual new
New HIV infections in Malawi 2017–2050
infections also decreased rapidly, ranging 8800–13 400 in 2020, 18000
6400–9900 in 2030, and 3500–6100 in 2050 across the scenarios
(Figure 2, Table 3). The number of AIDS deaths was 12 000 in 16 000
10 000
new infections between 2017 and 2020, or 231 600–260 900
between 2017 and 2050. In the Failed scale-up scenario, the 8000
ranges were 56 800–60 200 until 2020 (13% higher than with
6000
Universal ART) or 288 900–326 800 until 2050 (25% higher than
with Universal ART). With Test&Treat, the ranges dropped to 4000
46 200–49 400 until 2020 or 214 900–241 500 until 2050, about
2000
7%–8% lower than with Universal ART.
The differences between monitoring and retention strategies 0
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
2036
2037
2038
2039
2040
2041
2042
2043
2044
2045
2046
2047
2048
2049
2050
Prevented infections
800
Test&Treat
49 268 (0.3%)
46 553 (5.8%)
49 175 (0.5%)
49 190 (0.5%)
46 384 (6.1%)
49 013 (0.8%)
46 163 (6.6%)
2017–2020
48 772 (1.3%)
49 422 (ref)
600
400
New Infections
200
2020
9751
9705
8904
9678
9682
8854
9630
9559
8789
0
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
2036
2037
2038
2039
2040
2041
2042
2043
2044
2045
2046
2047
2048
2049
2050
Year
Total New Infections
Figure 3. Number of annual new HIV infections prevented by routine viral load
Percentages in parentheses refer to the reduction compared with scenario (i) (first row) of the corresponding access scenario (Failed scale-up, Universal ART, or Test&Treat).
monitoring, tracing patients lost to follow-up, or other retention support interven-
tions in the Universal ART scenario. Light gray, no viral load monitoring; dark gray,
24-monthly viral load monitoring; black, 12-monthly viral load monitoring. Dotted
curves, no tracing; dashed curves, tracing patients lost to follow-up; solid curves,
Universal ART
no treatment interruptions.
New infections Total New Infections
53 262 (0.3%)
50 503 (5.5%)
53 168 (0.5%)
53 182 (0.4%)
50 331 (5.8%)
53 003 (0.8%)
50 106 (6.2%)
52 758 (1.2%)
2017–2020
53 419 (ref)
2020
9955
10 762
10 766
9903
10 712
10 638
9835
Sensitivity Analyses
2017–2050
59 927 (0.4%)
59 942 (0.4%)
57 044 (5.2%)
59 760 (0.7%)
56 815 (5.6%)
59 511 (1.1%)
2017–2020
did not differ from the main analysis (Supplementary Table 7).
60 182 (ref)
DISCUSSION
13 284
13 289
12 384
13 232
13 154
12 312
2020
interruptions
interruptions
tracing
tracing
Table 3.
6 • OFID • Estill et al
8 • OFID • Estill et al