The KPN Committee

REPORT OF THE kPN
COMMITTEE ON
PROVISIONS OF THE
INSURANCE ACT 193

******JULY Z00******

MEMERS OF THE COMMITTEE

Chuirmun
k,P, Nurusimhun

Members
S,V, Mony
N,M, Sovurdhun
k,N, hunduri
P,C, Shosh
Liyuquut khun
S,P, Subhedur
D,D, Rusgotru
k,C, Mishru
T,S, Vishwunuth
D, Vurudurugun

Convener
k, Subruhmunyum
K.P.AARASIMHAA

Camp Hyderabad,
26
th
July 2005.

To

Shri C.S.Rao,
Chariman,
Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority,
Hyderabad.

Dear Shri Rao,

This is Iurther to my letter oI 28
th
April 2005, with which I had enclosed the Iirst report Irom our
Committee, to cover the Sections in the Insurance Act 1938 that we were primarily required to
consider. As an interim submission, it had dwelt on the recommendations that we were making,
without much oI a supporting report on the conclusions that we came to.

The IRDA was kind enough to grant extension oI time to the Committee to work on other areas
that had Iormed part oI our terms oI reIerence and the opportunity to report thereon has been
utilized to come up with a more comprehensive delineation, to Iill in too on the
recommendations that had Iormed our earlier interim report as it were. I am pleased to enclose
our Committee`s Iinal report.

To the acknowledgements oI the Committee`s indebtedness Ior all the assistance and
cooperation it received and the appreciation by all oI us, I would add here our being particularly
beholden to two oI our own Members. Dr. K.C.Mishra very kindly agreed to host one meeting
oI our Committee at the National Insurance Academy in Pune and extended all hospitality to us.
Shri D.Varadarajan agreed again to our request and mine particularly to take upon himselI to
bring together the outcomes Irom all our discussions and prepare the draIt Ior what could be our
submission to the IRDA and I must add that there was very little leIt Ior the rest oI us to suggest
by way oI change or addition.

With regards,

Yours sincerely,

/sd./
.P.NARASIMHAN)

INDEX

Chapter Contents

Page
Ao
I Introduction & Approach of the Committee 6
II Provisions relating to Investment
General approach
Recommended Amendments as regards Investments
Sections 27, 27A, 27B, 27C and 27D oI the Act.
Recommended amendments to provisions relating to investments

10
III Provisions Relating to Shareholders` Funds And Policyholders` Funds
Analysis oI statutory matrix
TransIer to meet deIicit caused by New Business Strain
TransIer to meet deIicit caused by Expense Overrun
TransIer to meet deIicit caused by impairment oI assets
TransIer to meet the cost oI New Bonus to the policyholders
International practices
IRDA initiative to evolve consensus
18
Views that emerged at the 5
th
Global ConIerence oI Actuaries
Recommendations
IV Provisions Relating to Capital, Sufficiency of Assets, Solvency Margin
and Prudential Role of Actuaries

Part A: Provisions Relating to Capital, SuIIiciency oI Assets, Solvency
Margin:

General Approach
IAIS Core Principle
Thrust oI the various documents and practices
'Deposits under Section 7 oI the Act
Extant provisions oI the Act and recommendations Ior
Iine-tuning the provisions
Some important issues
Recommended amendments

Part B : Prudential Role oI the Actuary

Subject matter
Issues
25
V Insurance Surveyors & Loss Assessors
Overview
Recommendations

38
VI Tariff Advisory Committee & Insurance Councils
General Approach
Examination oI statutory matrix
Recommendations

45
VII ther Provisions & Aspects of the Act
General Approach
Amendments to the DeIinition Clause
Amendment oI Section 6A
Deletion oI Sections 6B & 6C and Amendment oI section 11
Amendment oI section 21
Amendment oI section 48A
Amendment oI section 50 and deletion oI section 64VC
Amendment oI provisions relating to penalties and suggestion
Ior introduction oI adjudicatory mechanism
Grievance Redressal Mechanism
Amendment oI provisions relating to delegation oI powers
Amendment oI section 110G and deletion oI section 110H
Suggestions regarding other aspects to be dealt with in the Act/Regulations
Prudential supervisory provisions
Helping consumers select appropriate products
Systems control
Electronic transactions
Pronounced key objectives oI IRDA
Recognition oI 10/10 Rule in contracts oI insurance
Consumers` pre-grievance help bench
O Section 20 Custody and Inspection oI Documents and supply oI copies:
O Sections 32B and 32C Insurance Business in Rural Sector and
Obligations in Respect oI Rural or Unorganized Sector and Backward
Classes
Sections 40, 40A, 40B, 40C and 44 Relating to Agency Commission and Ceilings
on Overall Expenses oI Management, Section 41 Relating to Prohibition on
Rebating and Section 42 Relating to Licensing oI Insurance Agents
O Section 45: Policy not to be called in Question on Ground oI
Misstatement aIter two years:
O Section 118 Exemptions:
Comprehensive review oI Insurance Rules, 1939
57
Acknowledgements
Appendices
Appendix I Terms of Reference
Appendix II Extension of Time Limit
Appendix 3 IAIS - Core Principles
Appendix 4 Acronyms used in the Report
Appendix 5 List of Names of Persons who sent suggestions

CHAPTER I

IA1R&C1IA AA APPRACH 1HE CMMI11EE

1.1 The Insurance Act, 1938 (herein aIter reIerred to as the Act`), notwithstanding many an
amendment since its enactment, has retained a basic structure, despite its vintage in the context
oI contemporary insurance legislation across the globe. The amendments have varied Irom
minor changes to substantial overhaul, dictated by the necessities oI various times. To wit, the
amendments made in 1950 represented a major legislative review, thereaIter in the year 1956,
Iollowing the nationalization oI liIe insurance business, and again in the year 1972 when general
insurance business was also nationalized, the Act had undergone substantial metamorphosis, in
the sense that many oI the provisions oI the Act have not been made applicable to Government
owned insurance entities, subject as they are to the speciIic legislations that created them. In
recent times, consequent upon the opening up oI the insurance sector again and the enactment oI
the IRDA Act, 1999, the Act entailed changes, albeit not carried out completely and
comprehensively, and thereIore, anachronisms and redundancies have still remained in the Act.

1.2 The last exercise undertaken in the year 1999 and some modiIications in the year 2002 did
leave an imminent need to make a thorough review oI the Act Ior removal oI perceived
incongruities and inconsistencies and come up with a possible integrated set oI provisions to take
in what had been separately legislated Ior in the IRDA Act, 1999. The Law Commission was
requested to undertake this exercise oI reviewing the Act, in the context particularly oI the IRDA
Act, 1999. This was a major exercise and the Law Commission has since submitted its Report to
the Government oI India, vide letter D.No.6(3)(75)/2002-LC(LS) addressed by the Chairman oI
the Commission to the Union Minister Ior Law & Justice on June 1, 2004.

1.3 Whereas the Law Commission has made speciIic recommendations in regard to many an
area requiring legislative intervention, it, however, has been oI the considered view that as
regards the Iollowing specialized domain areas, a detailed examination by experts in such areas
would be necessary Ior suggesting amendments to the statutory Iramework oI the Act :

Provisions relating to Investments
Shareholders` Funds and Policyholders` Funds
SuIIiciency oI Assets
Insurance Surveyors
TariII Advisory Committee

1.4 Accordingly, the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (hereinaIter reIerred to as
the IRDA`), has, vide OIIice Order No. IRDA/Actl/KS/001/Mar-05, dated 7
th
March, 2005
(Appendix-1) constituted this Committee (hereinaIter called the Committee`), inter alia, to
examine in detail all the aIoresaid Iive areas and recommend changes that are warranted in the
statutory Iramework. Further, the Committee was also called upon to indicate any other sections
oI the Act, which need to be amended, in the light oI the developments that have taken place in
the insurance scene, other than those covered by the Law Commission`s recommendations. A
copy oI the IRDA`s OIIice Order as cited above is at Appendix I. Subsequent to the issuance oI
the OIIice Order under reIerence, and pursuant to the clariIication sought by the Committee, the
Chairman oI IRDA had also desired and empowered the Committee to also give its views,
suggestions and recommendations on such oI the areas examined by the Law Commission, as are
considered necessary by the Committee, in the light particularly oI submissions made in regard
thereto.

1.5 With the aIoresaid terms oI reIerence, the Committee has examined the various issues and
come out with its recommendations Ior the consideration oI the IRDA, as is stated hereinaIter.

1.6 With a view to evolving the approach, methodology and procedure oI working oI the
Committee, so as to consider comprehensively the terms oI reIerence and come out with speciIic
suggestions and recommendations, the Committee, at its First Meeting held on 17
th
March, 2005
at the Headquarters oI the IRDA at Hyderabad, kept in mind the Iollowing aspects:

(i) taking due cognizance oI the Core Principles evolved by the International Association
oI Insurance Supervisors (hereinaIter reIerred to as the IAIS`), as these principles
provide a globally-accepted Iramework Ior the regulation and supervision oI the
insurance sector, and examining as to how in other countries the legislations deal
with similar issues;
(ii) Iine-tuning the Act, in the context oI the mandate to stay with the basic structure oI
the Act, so as to make the statutory provisions measure up to the demands oI
contemporary times, but at the same time, recognising the diversity in the
regulatory Irameworks and supervisory approaches oI IAIS Member Countries;
(iii) providing inbuilt Ilexibility to the working oI the Act, by structuring the statutory
provisions in such a way as not to warrant Irequent legislative intervention, by
placing increased reliance on subordinate legislations, with proper checks and
balances;
(iv) evaluating the responses received on the Law Commission`s Consultation Paper;
(v) inviting views and responses Irom all concerned by soliciting the same through notice
on the website oI the IRDA;
(vi) examining the responses Irom the Insurance Councils, Insurers and other
Stakeholders.

1.7 At the First Meeting oI the Committee, it was also decided to constitute Iive Groups Irom
among the Members oI the Committee, so that each Group could consider a Iew speciIic terms oI
reIerence oI the Committee and related issues, and come out with its presentation pertaining to
the speciIic areas considered by it. The Committee has reckoned that the Act, when Iirst
enacted, had contained very detailed prescriptions with regard to what could or should be done
and correspondingly on prohibitions. There have been rules and regulations Iramed thereaIter to
lay down prescriptions in more speciIic detail. In Insurance legislation, as in other economic
and corporate legislations, the trend over the years has been to reduce progressively what gets to
be enacted in the primary legislation, leaving more and more oI details to go into subordinate
legislations, so that the Executive and/or the Regulatory Authority could, in a dynamically
evolving environment, be enabled and empowered to bring in suitable regulatory changes with
promptitude.

1.8 In this background, the Committee in its deliberations did consider to what extent, in the
areas it had speciIically to look into, to report on changes that it would recommend be leIt to
remain in the Act, and how Iar the authority could be with the Government or the IRDA to come
out with regulatory intervention, as and when warranted to deal with changing times.

1.9 In all, the Committee held six sittings besides meetings oI groups oI the Committee and had
deliberations to arrive at its recommendations. While recommending amendments to the Act, the
Committee, as Iar as possible, has endeavoured to give the draIt amendments to the Act Ior the
consideration oI the IRDA. The deliberations and recommendations with regard to the speciIic
areas oI reIerence to the Committee, aIter duly considering the presentations made by the various
Groups oI the Committee, have been dealt with in the succeeding Chapters.

CHAPTER - II

PR'ISIAS RELA1IAC 1 IA'ES1MEA1S

eneral Approach

2.1 The generally accepted approach in respect oI insurance legislation in diIIerent jurisdictions
is that the principal legislation shall lay down the policy to be Iollowed Ior investments oI
insurance Iunds and the regulations shall prescribe the details. The Committee is oI the opinion
that the same approach be Iollowed while recommending amendments to the provisions oI the
Act relating to investments. The Committee has examined the extent to which the present
provisions in the Act in regard to various aspects oI investments could be restrictive, and it is oI
the considered view that much oI the provisions could be leIt to be decided by way oI
subordinate legislation, either through Rules Iramed by the Government or by Regulations
Iramed by IRDA.

2.2 The Committee deliberated upon whole gamut oI prudent principles governing investments.
In doing so, it took cognizance oI the principles relating to investments enunciated by IAIS
(Appendix 3 to this Report), existing provisions in the Insurance Act, 1938 and other principles
such as corporate governance mechanism and robust independent mechanism Ior avoiding
conIlict oI interest.

Recommended Amendments as regards Investments - Sections 27, 27A, 27B, 27C and 27D
of the Act.

2.3 In the current context, when it is envisaged that the principal legislation would cover only
policy matters, it may not be considered necessary to have separate sections Ior dealing with
investments oI liIe and non-liIe business. Further, the issues relating to micro details oI
investments, monitoring and control can be leIt to be determined by the IRDA by way oI
regulations.

2.4 The Iollowing deIinition may be added in the Act:

'approved investments may be deIined a Iollows: approved investments` means
such investments as are defined in the regulations made by the Authority.

2.5 'Controlled Iund is deIined in the Explanation to Section 27A. This was provided in the
context oI the environment in which investment pattern Ior all the Iunds was the same. Further,
now that the shareholder Iunds are also separated Irom the policyholder Iunds, the concept oI
'controlled Iund may be dispensed with, and the concept oI controlled investible Iunds` may
be introduced. Controlled investible Iunds` may be deIined as Iollows:
' Controlled investible funds` means all the funds belonging to the policyholders in the
case of an insurer carrying on life insurance business, or attributable to the policies in the
case of an insurer carrying on general insurance business including health and agriculture
insurances), as the case may be, and such part of the funds of shareholders as may be
required to support the control level solvency as may be determined by the Authority by
way of regulations.

2.6 In the principal provision, it may be stipulated that every insurer shall invest and at all times
keep invested his 'controlled investible Iunds in the manner, viz. twenty Iive per cent oI the
said sum in Government securities, a Iurther sum equal to not less than twenty Iive per cent oI
the said sum in government securities or other approved securities and the balance in any oI the
approved investments, or other than approved investments, as may be determined by regulations
made by the IRDA.

2.7 In the proviso to clause (4) oI section 27A oI the Act ceiling on investment in the shares in
or debentures oI any one company other than a banking company or investment company has
been stipulated to the eIIect: '..nothing in this sub-section shall apply to any investment made
with the previous consent oI the Authority by an insurer with a view to Iorming a subsidiary
company carrying on insurance business . This implies that an insurer can set up a subsidiary
company Ior carrying on insurance business. In the current context, where separate entities are
required to be set up to transact liIe insurance and general insurance business, it is not considered
desirable to allow an insurer to invest in a subsidiary company Ior carrying on insurance
business in India.

2.8 The Act shall require every insurer to Iurnish returns in respect oI investments oI the
insurer to the regulatory authority as may be prescribed by the IRDA.

2.9 Insurers shall deal in derivatives only Ior hedging purposes in the manner as may be
prescribed by the IRDA.

2.10 The Committee recommends that sections 27, 27A, 27B, 27C and 27D oI the Act may be
replaced with a comprehensive section that would cover all the aspects oI investments, by laying
down the broad parameters in the section and enabling the IRDA to come out with appropriate
regulations to govern the various other aspects oI investments by insurers, as suggested in the
Iollowing proposed new section, with consequential amendments to sections 2, 27, 28, 28A, 28B
and 30.

Recommended amendments to provisions relating to investments

I. For the existing Section 27, the Iollowing may be substituted:

27. Investment of Funds.-1) Every insurer shall invest and at all times keep invested his
controlled investible funds in the manner, namely, twenty-five per cent of the said sum in
overnment securities, a further sum equal to not less than twenty-five per cent of the said
sum in overnment securities or other approved securities and the balance in any of the
approved investments or other than approved investments, as may be determined by
regulations made by the Authority.

2) The shareholders` funds not forming part of controlled investible funds shall be
invested and kept invested in the manner as may be determined by the Authority by way of
regulations.
3) An insurer may invest or keep invested any part of his funds otherwise than in an
approved investment and for this purpose the Authority may determine by regulations, the
percentage of such investments, the conditions and modalities of making such investments.

4) In computing the controlled investible funds,-
a) any investment made with reference to any currency other than the Indian
rupee which is in excess of the amount required to meet the liabilities of the
insurer in India with reference to that currency, to the extent of such excess;
and
b) any investment made in the purchase of any immovable property outside India
or on the security of any such property,

shall not be taken into account

Provided that the Authority may, either generally or in any particular case, direct that any
investment, whether made before or after the commencement of the Insurance
Amendment) Act, 2005, and whether made in or outside India, shall, subject to such
conditions as may be imposed, be taken into account, in such manner as may be specified
by the Authority in computing controlled investible funds.

5) Any funds that are required to be invested and kept invested as stated in this section
shall be invested and kept invested by every insurer free of any encumbrance, charge,
hypothecation or lien.

6) An insurer shall not invest or keep invested any part of his controlled investible funds in
the shares in or debentures or other securities of any other company, other than a public
company.

7) An insurer shall not out of his controlled investible funds invest or keep invested in the
shares in or debentures or other securities of any public company, except in accordance
with the regulations made by the Authority.

8) No insurer shall directly or indirectly invest outside India any part of controlled
investible funds, save as prescribed by the Central overnment.

) No insurer shall out of his controlled investible funds invest or keep invested in the
shares of any other insurer

Provided that shareholders` funds not forming part of controlled investible funds may be
invested in the shares of any other insurer up to five per cent of such funds within the
limits specified by regulations made by the Authority.

10) No insurer shall out of his total funds make any investment with a view to forming a
subsidiary company carrying on insurance business in India.

11) An insurer shall not invest more than five per cent in aggregate of his controlled
investible funds in companies belonging to the promoters` groups.
Explanation:- For the purposes of this sub-section, the Authority may determine by way of
regulations as to what constitutes promoters` groups.

12) Where at any time the Authority considers any one or more investments constituting
total funds of an insurer to be unsuitable or undesirable, the Authority may, after giving
the insurer an opportunity of being heard, issue to him directions as may be deemed
necessary, including treating such investments as inadmissible asset for solvency purpose, if
the circumstance so warrants, and the insurer shall comply with such directions within
such time as may be specified therein.

13) Without prejudice to the foregoing provisions of this section, the Authority may, in the
interests of the policyholders, specify by the regulations made by him, the time, manner
and other conditions of investment of controlled investible funds to be held by an insurer
for the purposes of this Act.

14) Notwithstanding the provisions contained in sub-section 6), the Authority may, give
specific directions for the time, manner and other conditions subject to which the
controlled investible funds shall be invested in the infrastructure and social sector as may
be specified by regulations made by the Authority.

15) Notwithstanding any thing contained in any other legislation for the time being in
force, an insurer shall deal in derivatives only for hedging purposes in such manner as may
be specified by the Authority.

16) Nothing contained in this section shall be deemed to affect in any way the manner in
which any moneys relating to the provident fund of any employee or to any security taken
from any employee or other moneys of a like nature are required to be held by or under
any Central Act, or Act of a State Legislature.

Explanation.- In this section and for the purposes of this Act-

a) approved investments means every investment specified as such by way of

b) approved securities means.-
i) government securities and other securities charged on the revenue of
the Central overnment or of the overnment of a State or guaranteed
fully as regards principal and interest by the Central overnment or the
overnment of any State;
ii) debentures or other securities for money issued under the authority of
any Central Act or Act of a State Legislature by or on behalf of a port
trust or municipal corporation or city improvement trust in any A Class`
city;
iii) shares of a corporation established by law and guaranteed fully by
the Central overnment or the overnment of a State as to the
repayment of the principal and the payment of dividend;
iv) such other securities specified as approved securities by the Authority
by way of regulations.

c) controlled investible funds means all the funds belonging to the policyholders in
the case of an insurer carrying on life insurance business, or attributable to
policies in the case of an insurer carrying on general insurance business including
health and agriculture insurances), as the case may be, and such part of the funds
of shareholders as may be required to support the control level of solvency as may
be determined by the Authority by way of regulations.

II. Consequential amendment to Section 2(3) regarding 'approved securities

As the deIinition oI 'approved securities as contained in Section 2(3) is sought to be inbuilt in
the newly proposed section 27, section 2(3) containing the deIinition oI 'approved securities
may be omitted.

III. The existing sections 27A, 27B, 27C and 27D may be omitted.

IV. Section 28:-

(a) Sub-section (2B) may be substituted with the Iollowing:

2B) In respect of assets forming the controlled investible funds within the meaning of
section 27, and which do not form part of the overnment securities and approved
securities invested and kept invested in accordance with section 27, an insurer shall submit,
along with the returns referred to in sub-sections 1) and 2), a statement, where such assets
are in the custody of a banking company, from that company, and, in any other case, from
the chairman, two directors and a principal officer if the insurer is a company, or from a
principal officer of the insurer if the insurer is not a company, specifying the assets, which
are subjected to a charge and certifying that the other assets are held free of any
encumbrance, charge, hypothecation, or lien, and every such statement after the first shall
also specify the charges created in respect of any of those assets since the date of the
statement immediately preceding, and, if any such charges have been liquidated, the date
on which they were so liquidated.

(b) Sub-section (4) shall be deleted and the existing sub-section (5) may be renumbered as sub-
section '(4).

V. The marginal heading oI section 28A and sub-section (1) thereoI may be substituted as
Iollows:

'28A. Return of investments relating to controlled investible fund and changes therein.-1)
Every insurer shall every year within thirty-one days from the beginning of the year submit
to the Authority a return in the form specified by the regulations made by the Authority
showing as at the 31
st
day of March of the preceding year, the investments made out of the
controlled investible fund referred to in section 27, and every such return shall be certified
by a principal officer of the insurer.

VI. Sub-section (1) oI section 28B may be amended as Iollows:

In sub-section (1) Ior the word and Iigure 'section 27B, the word and Iigure 'section 27 may
be substituted.

VII. Section 30 along with its marginal heading may be substituted as Iollows:

30. Liability of directors, etc., for loss due to contravention of sections 27 and 2.- If by
reason of a contravention of any of the provisions of section 27 or section 2, any loss is
sustained by the insurer or by the policyholders, every director, manager, officer or
partner who is knowingly a party to such contravention shall, without prejudice to any
other penalty to which he may be liable under this Act, be jointly and severally liable to
make good the amount of such loss.
CHAPTER - III

PR'ISIAS RELA1IAC 1 SHAREHLERS' &AS AA PLICYHLERS'
&AS
Analysis of statutory matrix
3.1 The provisions oI the Act, till it was amended by the IRDA Act 1999, did not require a liIe
insurer to keep separate accounts relating to the Iunds oI shareholders. The IRDA Act, 1999,
inter alia, added Clause (1B) to Section 11 (dealing with Accounts and balance sheet) oI the Act,
to require that 'every insurer shall keep separate accounts relating to Iunds oI shareholders and
policyholders. The regulations Iramed by the IRDA Ior preparation oI Iinancial statements and
auditors report require the balance sheet oI a liIe insurer to show on the liability side two
separate compartments the 'Shareholders` Iunds and 'Policyholders Iunds. The two accounts
thus are completely separate.

3.2 In accounting terms, the 'Policyholders` Iunds are nothing more than a book-keeping entry
and represent the accumulated balance oI all previous revenue accounts. It is an up-to-date
balance oI all premiums received minus all claims and expenses together with investment
income oI the 'Policyholders` Iunds. The legislation requires that the 'Policyholders` Iunds
are eIIectively held in trust Ior the beneIit oI the policyholders and that those exist to pay out
beneIits when the policies eventually result into claim or are surrendered.

3.3 In liIe oIIice operations, when a policy is sold, a negative cash-Ilow generally arises and an
immediate deIiciency is created, which may continue as a shortIall in the accumulated policy
Iund in relation to the policy reserves required to be held. In the case oI an established liIe
insurer, this deIiciency is met by the retained proIits and the surplus emerging on the existing
block oI business. However, in the case oI a new liIe insurer this deIiciency, which is higher on
account oI expense overrun till the breakeven is achieved, continues until surpluses emerging on
the business written in the past have wiped out the accumulated deIicits and the then current
year`s surplus is suIIiciently large to cover the deIiciency in respect oI the year`s new business.
This period would vary with the type and volume oI business written by a liIe insurer. Due to the
inherent conservatism in the statutory reserving basis, it may be some years beIore the technical
deIiciency is eliminated, even when the business is being written on perIectly sound basis. This
is particularly the case when the rate oI new business growth is high.

3.4 The principal or sub-ordinate legislation in India does not prescribe any line oI action Ior
dealing with these deIicits. This essentially means that the policyholders` Iunds can be allowed
to continue with the deIicit. However, the IRDA circular dated 23
rd
March 2004 requires that the
policyholders` Iunds shall not be in deIicit. The deIicit in policyholders` Iund does not in any
manner impair the security oI the policyholders because even iI the policyholders` Iunds are
allowed to remain in deIicit, the shareholders` Iunds would always be available to support the
policyholders' beneIit, iI and when needed as the aggregate oI shareholders` Iund and
policyholders` Iunds would be required to demonstrate the solvency norms prescribed by the
IRDA. However, Irom the policyholders` perspective it can be argued that the policyholders`
Iunds shall have suIIicient assets to meet the policy liabilities. II the deIicit is allowed to
continue, the policyholders in general would have to be educated that even iI the policyholders`
Iund/s are in deIicit, the ability oI the liIe insurer to meet its liabilities is not impaired as the liIe
insurer on aggregate basis remains solvent. Some may also argue that iI the policyholders` Iunds
are allowed to remain in deIicit, it would hamper the asset liability management. Further, in the
early stages oI opening up oI the insurance industry in India, this issue has another dimension as
most oI the new liIe insurers in India have chosen the route oI providing bonus to the
policyholders Iinanced through the shareholders` Iunds.

3.5 Section 49 oI the Act requires that 'No insurer, ....who carries on business oI liIe
insurance or any other class or sub-class oI insurance business.. shall, Ior the purpose oI
declaring or paying any dividend to shareholders or any bonus to the policy-holders
....utilize directly or indirectly any portion oI liIe insurance Iund or oI the Iund oI such
other class or sub-class oI insurance business, so as the case may be, except a surplus shown in
the valuation...submitted to the Authority.. as a result oI an actuarial valuation oI the
assets and liabilities oI the insurer; nor shall he increase such surplus by contributions out oI any
reserve Iund or otherwise unless such contributions have been brought in as revenue through
revenue account applicable to the class or sub-class oI insurance business on or beIore the date oI
valuation aIoresaid,...... It is thereIore necessary Ior the liIe insurers which want to provide
bonus to the policyholders Iinanced Irom the shareholders` Iund to transIer such amount Irom the
shareholders` Iund to policyholders` Iund as would be suIIicient to wipe out the deIicit in the
policyholders` Iund as also meet the cost oI new bonus to the policyholders.

3.6 In this context, the transIers Irom the shareholders` Iund to the policyholders` Iund could
take place on the Iollowing counts:
to meet the new business strain;
to meet the expense overrun;
to meet the deIicit caused by impairment oI assets; and
to meet the cost oI new bonus.

As per the provisions oI the existing legislation, the transIers Irom the policyholders` Iunds to
shareholder` Iund can be only by way oI shareholders` share oI valuation surplus.

3.7 Which oI the above transIers made Irom the shareholders` Iund to the policyholders` on the
above counts can be considered Ior being given back to the shareholders` Iund when surplus
emerges in the policyholders` Iund? This aspect was duly considered by the Committee.

3.8 This issue is relevant only Ior the participating Iund as the shareholders are entitled to the
whole oI valuation surplus in respect oI non-participating business.

Transfer to meet deficit caused by New Business Strain
3.9 When the Iirst valuation is done immediately Iollowing the date oI issue oI a policy, the
valuation will throw up new business strain because oI conservative statutory valuation basis
causing deIicit in the policyholders` Iund. II this deIicit is to be eliminated, Iunds have to be
transIerred Irom the shareholders` Iund to the policyholders` Iunds. However, iI the product
pricing is correct, then this deIicit is oI a temporary nature as the reserves built up because oI
margins built into valuations basis get released and what the shareholders are doing by such
transIer oI Iunds is to simply ring Ience` the assets in case the pricing does prove to be incorrect
and there remains a shortIall. In technical terms it is said that the valuation basis would have
Margins Ior Adverse Deviations (MADs) and these would generate Provisions Ior Adverse
Deviations (PADs) in the reserves set up. As each year passes, a release Irom risk Irom adverse
deviations will take place and the component oI PAD Ior that year gets released. When these
PADs get released, the support provided by the shareholders` Iund by way oI transIer oI Iunds to
policyholders` Iund is not needed. Could this be given back to the shareholder Iund?

Transfer to meet deficit caused by Expense Overrun
3.10 In the case oI a new liIe insurer, the actual expenses will exceed those assumed in pricing
and valuation because oI the low volume oI initial business. For a new liIe insurer, it could take
Iive / six years or thereabout to break even, i.e. actual expenses are at least equal to and then less
than those assumed. When this happens, the 'expense overrun ceases. II this does not happen,
then the liIe insurer will have to review the expense assumptions in both pricing and valuation.
These expenses do not Iorm a part oI the valuation process Iollowed Ior the business sold. The
'expense overrun is a business development expense and has to be recouped by the
shareholders only through their share oI surplus, i.e. 90/10 route.

Transfer to meet deficit caused by impairment of assets
3.10 This is a part oI business risk which has to be borne by the shareholders. Any transIer
eIIected Irom the shareholders` Iund to meet the deIicit caused in the policyholders` Iunds by
impairment oI assets has to be recouped only through the shareholders` share oI surplus, i.e.
90/10 route.

Transfer to meet the cost of New Bonus to the policyholders
3.11 The shareholders transIer Iunds Irom shareholders` Iund to meet the cost oI new bonus that
they would like to give to the policyholders. This essentially is decision taken by the
shareholders as a part oI their business development strategy and transIers to meet the cost oI
new bonus has necessarily to be recouped only through their share oI surplus.

International practices
3.12 In a Iew jurisdictions a system oI subordinated loan Irom the shareholders` Iund to
policyholders` Iund is Iollowed Ior meeting the deIicit caused by new business strain and in very
special circumstances Ior meeting the deIicit caused by impairment oI assets. In this case, the
shareholders` Iund provides loan to the policyholders` Iund to meet the deIicits and loan is repaid
when adequate surplus is generated in the policyholders` Iunds. In order to ensure that
policyholders` interests are protected at all times, any repayment oI principal (or payment oI
interest, iI allowed) on such loan must be authorized by the Board oI Directors oI the liIe insurer
on the recommendation oI the Appointed Actuary. This is also subjected to approval oI the
regulatory Authority.

3.13 Canada LiIe Assurance Co., which was a mutual liIe insurance company, was demutualized
in 1999. On demutualization, the company closed the then existing participating Iund and started
a new participating Iund and to support the new participating Iund the shareholders provided
seed capital oI $ 50 million with interest at stipulated rate. This was essentially a subordinated
loan with interest thereon. It will be useIul here to analyze the implications oI the shareholders
providing this seed capital. We may ignore here the deIicit caused in the policyholders` Iund
because oI impairment oI assets; as such deIicit is caused by major economic crisis such as the
one caused in south East Asia, an event oI not Irequent occurrence, reIerred to in the next para.
The Canada LiIe being a well established company did not have the problem oI expense overrun.
The seed capital being available to meet the new business strain immediately, there was no
deIicit caused due to new business strain. This being the case, a new policy put on the books oI
Canada LiIe would not have caused deIicit in the policyholder Iund and the surplus would have
emerged in the new participating Iund in the normal course Irom year one Ior providing bonuses
to the new policyholders. Thus the seed capital, or subordinated loan, was intended only to meet
the deIicit caused by new business strain.

3.14 In Malaysia, the insurance law requires that the deIicits must be met by transIer oI assets
Irom shareholders Iund to policyholders` Iunds. This transIer oI assets is then recognized as loss
in the shareholders` Iund. These transIers can be recouped by the shareholders` Iund only
through the shareholders` share oI valuation surplus. During the Asian Crisis and resultant severe
Iall in asset values, the regulatory authority allowed deIicits in the policyholders` Iund to be
Iunded by temporary transIers oI assets Irom the shareholders` Iund to policyholders` Iunds. This
provision was made to allow asset values to recover and a three year period was set to be a
reasonable time Ior this to happen. The shareholders were allowed to withdraw their assets
within this three year period provided such withdrawal did not leave deIicit in the policyholders`
Iunds. Any assets not withdrawn within three years were 'lost.

3.15 The UK Insurance Law also does not provide Ior pay back oI transIers Irom shareholders`
Iund to the policyholders` Iunds. The transIers Irom policyholders` Iind to the shareholders` Iund
can only be through the shareholders` share oI surplus.

IRDA initiative to evolve consensus
3.16 The Committee has noted that in December 2003, the IRDA, had called an inIormal
meeting oI Actuaries, which was attended by M/s J R Joshi, N K Shinkar, K P Narasimhan, J S
Salunkhe, (all Retired Chairmen oI LIC), Liyaquat Khan, President, Actuarial Society oI India,
P A Balasubramanian, Member (Actuary), IRDA, and S P Subhedar, Retired Managing Director,
LIC, to consider this issue. The aIoresaid Group in its Report has concluded: 'Shareholders when
deciding to transIer Assets to Policyholders` Fund to meet the deIicit in Policyholders` Iund and
also to enable availability oI surplus to declare bonus do so at their discretion and cannot expect
repayment oI the Iunds transIerred to policyholders by way oI prior charge on the distributable
actuarial surplus determined by the Appointed Actuary as a result oI valuation. They are entitled
only to their share oI actuarial surplus as per provisions oI section 49 oI the Insurance act and
relevant regulations`.

3.17 The IRDA vide its circular dated 23
rd
March 2004 on the subject oI 'Preparation oI
Iinancial statements oI liIe insurers has issued comprehensive instructions Ior dealing with the
transIers and have speciIied that 'The Iunds so transIerred to the Policyholders` A/c shall be
irreversible in nature, i.e. at no point oI time can they be recouped to the Shareholders` Fund.

Views that emerged at the 5
th
lobal Conference of Actuaries organised by the Actuarial
Society of India, FICCI and the International Actuarial Association New Delhi, February
2003)
3.18 The Committee also noted that at the 5
th
Global ConIerence oI Actuaries held in February,
2003, during the Session on 'S P Subhedar Committee Report, Mr. Shriram Mulgund, Retd.
Valuation Actuary, Canada LiIe, had suggested the Iollowing approach in respect oI shareholder
transIers made to Iund the new business strain:

- When new business is placed on the books, transIer an amount equal to the new
business strain Irom the shareholders Iund to the policyholders` Iund.
- Each year, transIer Irom the policyholders Iund to the shareholders Iund an amount
equal to the Iull release oI PADs and a designated portion oI the valuation surplus.
The net transIer will depend on sizes oI these two amounts (to and Irom the
policyholder Iund).
- Keep track oI the outstanding balance oI the amounts transIerred Irom the
shareholders Iund to meet the new business strain. When it reaches zero, the
transIer oI PADs will stop and only the designated percentage oI the valuation
surplus will be transIerred. From this point onwards, the policyholders Iund will
start accumulating retained earnings.
- In order to ensure that the seed money provided by the shareholders is redeemed in a
proper manner, IRDA approval can be required.

3.19 The Committee Ieels that the method adopted by Canada LiIe oI providing seed capital at
speciIied rate oI interest, essentially a subordinated loan, is Iine Ior Iinancing new business
strain Ior an established liIe oIIice as the established liIe oIIice would not have had the problem
oI handling expense overrun issue. The process Ior deciding pay back to the shareholder Iund oI
the amount provided by the shareholder Iund to Iinance the new business strain as suggested at
the 5
th
GCA (mentioned in para 3.8), though looks Iine theoretically, is extremely complex to
put in practice, raising concerns about the accounting treatment oI the transIers Irom shareholder
Iunds and the charge they would represent on what should be Iunds held entirely Ior the beneIit
oI policyholders.

3.20 The Committee did note some very recent changes in the legislation in Singapore but they
did not seem appropriate Ior any adapted consideration.

3.21 The Committee also examined the other provisions oI Section 49. The Iirst proviso to
Section 49 stipulates 'payments made out oI any such surplus in service oI any debentures shall
not exceed IiIty per cent oI such surplus including any payment by way oI interest on debentures,
and interest paid on the debentures shall not exceed ten per cent oI any such surplus except when
the interest paid on the debentures is oIIset against the interest credited to the Iund or Iunds
concerned in deciding the interest basis adopted in valuation disclosing the aIoresaid surplus.
This proviso, while not currently relevant, could become relevant iI the insurance companies
were to be allowed to have capital other than equity capital. It was thereIore decided to
recommend retention oI this proviso.

Recommendation
3.22 The Committee, taking an overall view, decided that no change be considered necessary in
the provisions oI Section 49, except eIIecting consequential amendments Ior removal oI
redundancies.

CHAPTER - IV

PR'ISIAS RELA1IAC 1 CAPI1AL, S&ICIEAY ASSE1S, SL'EACY
MARCIA AA PREA1IAL RLE AC1&ARIES

PART - A PROVISIONS RELATIN TO CAPITAL, SUFFICIENCY OF ASSETS AND
SOLVENCY MARIN

eneral Approach
4.1 Issues relating to capital, including minimum capital and solvency margin are interlinked.
Besides, section 7 oI the Act, which deals with Deposit`, is proxy to what is now called
minimum solvency margin, having been introduced as a requirement, when solvency margin
concept was not in vogue. The Committee, thereIore, is oI the view that issues relating to
SuIIiciency oI Assets and Solvency Margin as embodied in section 64VA oI the Act need to be
addressed in conjunction with the sections oI the Act dealing, which deal with Deposit`,
Capital` and Minimum Capital`.

4.2 The IAIS and International Actuarial Association (IAA) (Actuarial Society oI India is a
member oI IAA), have dealt with the subject matter oI Capital, Minimum Capital and Solvency
Margin in the Iollowing documents:
$
1. Guidance on Insurance Regulation and Supervision Ior Emerging Market Economies,
dealing inter alia with Capital adequacy.
2. Principles on Capital Adequacy and Solvency
3. Solvency Control level Guidance Paper

A Global Framework Ior Insurer Solvency

IAIS Core Principle
4.3 The IAIS vide Core Principle 23, deals with capital adequacy and solvency. It says that the
supervisory authority requires insurers to comply with the prescribed solvency regime. This
regime includes capital adequacy requirements and requires suitable Iorms oI capital that enable
the insurer to absorb signiIicant unIoreseen losses. The essential criteria Ior evaluation oI
attainment oI this core principle are:
a. The solvency regime addresses in a consistent manner:
valuation oI liabilities, including technical provisions and the margins contained
therein;
quality, liquidity and valuation oI assets;
matching oI assets and liabilities;
suitable Iorms oI capital;
capital adequacy requirements

b. Any allowance Ior risk mitigation or transIer considers both its eIIectiveness and the security
oI any counterparty.
c. Suitable Iorms oI capital are deIined.
d. Capital adequacy requirements are sensitive to the size, complexity and risks oI an insurer`s
operations, as well as the accounting requirements that apply to the insurer.
e. The minimum capital adequacy requirements should be set at a suIIiciently prudent level to
give reasonable assurance that policyholder interests will be protected.
I. Capital adequacy requirements are established at a level such that an insurer having assets
equal to the total oI liabilities and required capital will be able to absorb signiIicant unIoreseen
losses.
g. Solvency control levels are established. Where the solvency position reaches or Ialls below
one or more control levels, the supervisory authority intervenes and requires corrective action by
the insurer or imposes restrictions on the insurer. The control level is set so that corrective action
can be taken in a timely manner.
h. InIlation oI capital through double or multiple gearing, intra-group transactions, or other
Iinancing techniques available as a result oI the insurer`s membership in a corporate group is
addressed in the capital adequacy and solvency calculation.
i. The solvency regime addresses the requirements placed upon an insurer operating through a
branch.
j. The solvency regime provides Ior periodic, Iorward-looking analysis (e.g., dynamic solvency/
stress testing) oI an insurer`s ability to meet its obligations under various conditions.
k. The supervisory authority assesses the structure oI its solvency regime against structures oI a
peer group oI jurisdictions and works towards achieving consistency.

Thrust of the various documents and practices
4.4 The above documents and the others available and the practices in major jurisdictions lead to
the Iollowing conclusions:
(i) There should be a 2ini2:2 capital req:ire2ent Ior licensing an insurer, such
minimum being reIlective oI the class oI insurance business.
(ii) There should be requirement Ior $4lvency Margin ($M); excess oI assets over
liabilities including a 2ini2:2 s4lvency 2argin requirement which should have
relationship with minimum capital.
(iii) Breach oI SM should lead to the insurer being required to close down. However,
there should be a level spelt out in the law the c4ntr4l level - a breach oI which
should require the Regulator to trigger actions aimed at restoring the Iinancial
health oI the insurer beIore requiring the insurer to close down upon breach oI the
SM.

Deposits under Section 7 of the Act
4.5 The deposit as a Iraction oI premium with a maximum oI rupees ten crorers in respect oI a
liIe insurer, as also a general insurer, and to the extent oI rupees twenty crores in respect oI a re-
insurer is required to be maintained with Reserve Bank oI India at all times, as per the provisions
oI section 7. Consequently, section 8 deals with usage oI such deposit i. e. to meet policyholder
liabilities aIter all other resources have been exhausted. Section 9 deals with the procedure Ior
reIund oI the deposit.

4.6 The concept oI deposit is a creation oI an era, when the concept oI solvency did not exist. As
oI now, the concept oI Solvency Margin (SM) required oI an insurer at all times is embedded in
the Act (sec. 64 V and sec. 64 VA) and is regulated through IRDA regulations. As such, the
objective oI 'Deposit is met through the SM. The amount oI deposit is capped at a very low
level, as against what ought to be required to ensure solvency oI an insurer. In any case, the
continued solvency at a desired regulatory level oI conIidence has been addressed in the Act and
the regulations.

4.7 ThereIore, the Committee recommends that section 7 oI the Act be deleted with
consequential amendments to the other sections, which reIer to deposits.

Extant provisions of the Act and recommendations for fine-tuning the provisions
4.8 In respect oI Deposit, Capital and SM, currently the Act provides as under. The
recommendations in regard to these requirements are also indicated along side in the last column
oI the Iollowing Table:

Sections Subject matter Issues Recommendation
Sec. 6 Requirements as to
Capital
Needs to be amended Ior
providing diIIerent levels oI
Capital Ior certain classes oI
business, such as, Agriculture
Insurance and Health Insurance,
as suggested herein by the
Committee
Sec. 6A Requirements as to
Capital Structure and
voting rights and
maintenance oI
registers oI beneIicial
owners oI shares
Needs to be amended as
suggested in Chapter-VII.
Sec.
6AA
Manner oI divesting
excess share capital by
promoter in certain
cases
Needs to be amended as
suggested in Chapter VII
Sec 6B Provision Ior securing
compliance with
requirements relating
to capital structure

To be deleted
Sec. 6C Conversion oI
Company limited by
shares in to Company
limited by guarantee

To be deleted
Sec. 7, 8
& 9
Deposits Not needed any more
as the concept oI SM is
embedded in the Act

To be deleted
Sec 64
V
Assets and Liabilities
how to be valued
It provides Ior
exclusion oI assets and
requirements Ior
valuation oI assets in
accordance with
regulations made by
the Authority
To be substituted as suggested
herein by the Committee
Sec. 64
VA
SuIIiciency oI assets DeIines SM, sets its
minimum levels,
prescribes penalties and
course oI action.
To be substituted as suggested
herein by the Committee

Some important issues
4.9 Currently there is lack oI legal harmony between some provisions oI the Act and the
Regulations made by the Authority.

4.10 The matters currently in the Act need to be apportioned between what should remain in the
Act, in the Rules prescribed by the Central Government and the Regulations speciIied by the
Authority.

4.11 The level oI minimum capital, which, as oI now, is the same Ior both liIe and non-liIe
insurers, needs to be set at diIIerent levels Ior certain classes oI insurance business, such as,
health and agriculture.

4.12 There needs to be Iormula based linkage between minimum capital and minimum SM as
against the absolute level prescribed now.

4.13 The control level oI solvency, the solvency breach at which the IRDA shall initiate
corrective measures is not prescribed.

Recommended amendments to statutory provisions
I. For the existing section 6, the Iollowing may be substituted:
6. Requirement as to Capital.- No insurer carrying on the business of life insurance,
general insurance or re-insurance in India on or after the commencement of the Insurance
Regulatory and Development authority Act, 1, shall be registered unless he has,-

i)a paid-up equity capital of rupees one hundred crores, in case of a person carrying
on the business of life insurance or general insurance; or
ii) a paid-up equity capital of rupees two hundred crores, in case of a person
carrying on exclusively the business as a reinsurer

Provided that in determining the paid-up equity capital specified under clause i) or clause
ii), any preliminary expenses incurred in the formation and registration of the insurer
shall be excluded
Provided further that an insurer carrying on business of health insurance or agriculture
insurance exclusivesly shall be required to maintain such minimum paid-up equity capital
as may be prescribed by the Central overnment.
Provided further that an insurer carrying on the business of life insurance or general
insurance or re-insurance in India before the commencement of the Insurance Regulatory
and Development Authority Act, 1 and who is required to be registered under this Act,
shall have a paid-up equity capital in accordance with clause i) or clause ii), as the case
may be, within such period as may be prescribed by the Central overnment in this
behalf.

II. For the existing section 64V and 64VA, the Iollowing may be substituted:
64V. Assets and liabilities how to be valued.- 1) For the purpose of ascertaining
compliance with determination of solvency margin certain assets shall be excluded as
prescribed by the Central overnment.

2) Every insurer shall furnish to the Authority along with the returns required to be filed
under this Act, a statement, certified by the auditor, of his assets and liabilities assessed in
the manner required by this section as on the 31st day of March of each year within such
time as specified by regulations made by the Authority.

3) Every insurer shall value his assets and liabilities in the manner in accordance with the
regulations made by the Authority in this behalf.

64VA. Sufficiency of assets.- 1) Every insurer and reinsurer shall at all times maintain
an excess of value of assets over the amount of liabilities of, not less than fifty percent of the
amount of minimum capital as stated under section 6 of this Act, and arrived at in the
manner specified by regulations made by the Authority.

2) An insurer or reinsurer, as the case may be, who does not comply with sub-section 1)
shall be deemed to be insolvent and may be wound up by the court on an application made
by the Authority.

3) The Authority shall, by way of regulation made for the purpose, specify the level of
solvency margin, the control level of solvency as required under sub-section 1), on the
breach of which the Authority shall act in accordance with the provisions of sub-section 4).

4) If, at any time, an insurer or reinsurer does not maintain the required control level of
solvency margin, he shall, in accordance with the directions issued by the Authority,
submit a financial plan to the Authority, indicating a plan of action to correct the
deficiency within a specified period not exceeding six months.

5) An insurer who has submitted a plan, as required under sub-section 4), to the
Authority shall propose modifications of the plan, if the Authority considers the same
inadequate, and in such an eventuality, the Authority shall give directions, as may be
deemed necessary, including direction in regard to transacting any new business, and/or,
appointment of an administrator.

6) An insurer or re-insurer, as the case may be, who does not comply with provisions of
sub-section 4) shall be deemed to be insolvent and may be wound up by the court on an
application made by the Authority.

7) The Authority shall be entitled at any time to take such steps as he may consider
necessary for the inspection or verification of the assets and liabilities of any insurer or re-
insurer, or for securing the particulars necessary to establish that the requirements of this
section have been complied with as on any date, and the insurer or re-insurer, as the case
may be, shall comply with any requisition made in this behalf by the Authority, and in the
event of any failure to do so within two months from the receipt of the requisition, the
insurer or re-insurer, as the case may be, shall be deemed to have made default in
complying with the requirements of this section.

8) The provisions of this section shall not apply to an insurer specified in sub-clause c) of
clause ) of Section 2 of this Act.

) In applying the provisions of sub-section 1) to any insurer or re-insurer, as the case
may be, who is a member of a group, the relevant amount for that insurer shall be an
amount equal to that proportion of the relevant amount which that group, if considered as
a single insurer, would have been required to maintain as the proportion of his share of the
risk on each policy issued by the group bears to the total risk on that policy

Provided that when a group of insurers ceases to be a group, every insurer in that group
who continues to carry on any class of insurance business in India shall comply with the
requirements of sub-section 1) as if he had not been an insurer in a group at any time.

Provided further that it shall be sufficient compliance of the provisions of the foregoing
proviso if the insurer brings up the excess of the value of his assets over the amount of his
liabilities to the required amount within a period of six months from the date of cessation of
the group.

Provided also that the Central overnment may, on sufficient cause being shown, extend
the said period of six months by such further periods as it may think fit, so however that
the total period may not in any case exceed one year.
III. It is Iurther recommended that the present Sections 6, 6A, 6AA, 6B, 64V and 64 VA may be
grouped together under a separate Chapter.
PART - B PRUDENTIAL ROLE OF THE ACTUARY

Subject matter
4.14 On account oI the uniqueness oI the insurance business and issues oI public interest, such
as, customer-beneIits protection, soundness oI trade and industry through general insurance and
stabilization oI society through liIe insurance, social security and pensions and in recent history
the stabilization oI Iinancial services through capital and ALM management,
Governments/Regulators have, across all jurisdictions, relied upon the role, proIessional inputs
and certiIications oI Actuaries. Such actuarial roles to be undertaken by an 'Actuary have been
recognized to be distinct and unique. An Actuary is typically required to be qualiIied Irom a
recognized proIessional institute imparting proIessional qualiIication in Actuarial Science and
regulated by it Ior continuing updating oI knowledge and adherence to ediIying proIessional
conduct oI high standards. In India, such a proIessional body oI actuaries is the Actuarial Society
oI India (ASI), a society established in 1944 and structured since 1982 as an Educational and
Charitable Society and as a Trust under the Bombay Public Trust Act. Currently, the ASI is
recognized as the sole body oI actuaries in India under the Act and IRDA Act and regulations.

4.15 The IAIS, oI which the IRDA is a part, and the IAA, oI which the ASI is part, have dealt
with the subject matter oI the prudential role oI the actuary in two important documents, viz.,
The use oI Actuaries as part oI a Supervisory Model` Guidance Paper by the IAIS and The
Function oI Actuary in Prudential Supervision` by the IAA. Both these documents lead to the
concept oI 'Appointed Actuary (also with diIIerent nomenclature in some jurisdiction), which
means that the Law/Regulations require the appointment oI one single individual in respect oI an
insurer on a continuing basis, such individual perIorming speciIied prudential role in public
interest but not being part oI the Government or Regulator, the underlying assumption being that
in order to perIorm such Iunctions the Appointed Actuary needs to be in the know oI matters
which are internal to the Iunctioning oI the insurer, which he would not know about iI he were to
be part oI the Government or Regulator.

4.16 Actuarial certiIications have been in vogue in Indian Laws right Irom 1912 when the Iirst
law on liIe insurance came in to being and the institution oI Appointed Actuary was introduced
Ior all classes oI insurance business in the year 2000 through the IRDA`s Appointed Actuary
Regulations.

Issues
4.17 Whereas the IRDA (Appointed Actuary) Regulations, 2000 addressed the need Ior the
Appointed Actuary, the Act not having been amended, currently there exists lack oI legal
harmony between the substantive law and the IRDA regulations.

4.18 Reproduced herein below is a list showing the provisions oI the Act reIerring to the
actuarial Iunction in such contexts as are stated therein, and the recommendation oI the
Committee against each such provision:

Sections of the Act Title and the subject Recommendation
Section 2(1) DeIinition deIines
Actuary
Should remain as it is.
Section 3(2)I Registration
certiIication by an
Actuary oI prospectus,
etc., at the time oI
registration
To be retained.
Section 3B CertiIication oI
soundness oI terms oI
liIe insurance business -
To be retained
Section 13 Actuarial Abstract and
report
To be retained
Section 15(2) Submission oI returns -
signing
To be retained. However, Actuary` should be
replaced with Appointed Actuary`, and the
term Appointed Actuary` be deIined in the Act
in section 2 thereoI, by engraIting the
deIinition, as contained in IRDA (Appointed
Actuary) Regulations, 2000.
Section 21(1) (a) Powers oI Authority
regarding returns:
calling Ior Iurther
inIormation
To be retained. However, the current provision
'auditor or actuary gives an impression as iI
the two roles are substitutable. ThereIore, it is
suggested that the provision should be
'auditor, appointed actuary or both, as the case
may be.
Section 22(1) Powers oI Authority to
order revaluation
Section 29(1), (6) Prohibition oI loans to
actuary and penalty
thereoI
Should remain as it is. However, Actuary` to
be replaced with Actuary or Appointed
Actuary`.
Section 33 (1) Powers oI
investigations and
inspection by Authority
- Authority may employ
an actuary Ior
investigation
Section 35 (3) (d) Report on
Amalgamation and
transIer oI insurance
business
The import oI the Section should remain as it is
but should be made applicable to all classes oI
insurance business; whether liIe, general or any
other.
Clause (d) speciIying the role oI Independent
Actuary should be re-worded as Iollows:
rep4rt 4n the pr4p4sed a2alga2ati4n 4r
transfer, prepared by an independent act:ary
wh4 has n4t been pr4fessi4nally 4r 4therwise
c4nnected with any 4f the parties c4ncerned in
the a2alga2ati4n 4r transfer at any ti2e
d:ring the five years preceding the date 4n
which he signs his rep4rt.
Pr4vided that s:ch rep4rt shall be 2ade in
acc4rdance with reg:lati4ns 2ade by the
:th4rity.`
Section 40(B)(1),(3) Premium basis
certiIicate
To be retained
Section 44A (a) Power to call Ior
inIormation
To be retained. However, Actuary` to be
replaced with Appointed Actuary`.
Section 49(2) ReIerence made to
report oI actuary
Section 52(2) Prohibition oI business
on dividing principle
Section 64K (3) &
(5)
Executive Committee
oI LiIe Insurance
Council - Advise in
controlling expenses

Section 81 Provident Society -
Actuarial Abstract &
report
The Committee agrees with the suggestion oI
the Law Commission in regard to doing away
with the Chapter oI the Act dealing with
Provident Societies.
Section 82 (2) Submission oI returns
to Authority
--- do --
Section
83(1),(3),(4),(5),(6)
Provident Society -
Actuarial examination
oI schemes
--- do --
Section 85(3), (3A),
(4)
Provident Society -
Prohibition oI loan and
penalty thereoI
--- do --
Section 87 (1), (2)
(4)
Provident Society -
Inquiry by or on behalI
oI Authority
--- do --
Section 87A (3(d) Provident Society -
Amalgamation &
transIer oI insurance
business - independent

--- do --
actuary report
Section 89(d) Reduction oI insurance
contracts
--- do --
Section 91 (1) g Assistance to liquidator
appointed to wind up a
society Powers oI
liquidator

--- do --
Section 92 (6) Assistance to liquidator
appointed to wind up a
society Procedure at
liquidation

--- do --
Section 112 Declaration oI interim
bonuses
To be retained.

4.19 The Committee recommends that the Iollowing provision may be inserted in the Act to
make it mandatory Ior every insurer to engage the services oI an Appointed Actuary:
Every insurer shall appoint an actuary, who shall be known as Appointed Actuary, in
accordance with regulations made by the Authority and the scope of his duties and
responsibilities, and other matters shall be as may be considered expedient by the
Authority.

CHAPTER - V

IAS&RAACE S&R'EYRS AA LSS ASSESSRS

Overview

5.1 Surveyors and loss assessors play an important role in the process oI evaluation and
settlement oI claims pertaining to general insurance policies. Surveyors and loss assessors are
independent individuals or Iirms possessing qualiIications as laid down in section 64UM oI the
Act and the regulations Iramed there under.

5.2 The requirement oI licensing oI surveyors was introduced in the year 1968, through an
amendment oI the Act, read with the Rules/Regulations Iramed there under. The substantive and
procedural legislations deal with the licensing procedure, qualiIications, code oI conduct,
categorization, etc. To wit, section 64UM oI the Act provides that no person shall act as a
surveyor or loss assessor in respect oI general insurance business unless he holds a valid licence
issued by the IRDA and that the licence would remain in Iorce Ior Iive years, unless cancelled
earlier. Earlier, the Controller oI Insurance was the competent authority Ior grant oI licence, and
as oI now, the IRDA is the competent authority.

5.3 It has been observed by the Law Commission that it has received an overwhelming response
Irom various quarters Ior the abolition oI the system oI licensing oI surveyors. It is to be noted
that the system oI licensing oI surveyors does not exist in major insurance markets. Even in
India, there was no licensing requirement prior to 1968.

5.4 The Malhotra Committee, which went into the Iunctioning oI surveyors and loss assessors,
had highlighted a number oI lacunae in the system oI licensing, and suggested that the system
should be given up, as it did not serve any useIul purpose. It Iurther observed that insurance
companies should be Iree to empanel, in their discretion, surveyors possessing the qualiIication
laid down in law, and assign the right surveyor the right job.

5.5 The Committee oI ProIessionals constituted by the Ministry oI Finance, Government oI
India, on 9
th
December, 2002 had also gone into the issue relating to licensing oI surveyors and
recommended that licensing oI surveyors and loss assessors should be discontinued.

5.6 Thus, it has been observed time and again that the system oI licensing is a hindrance to
growth oI proIessionalism among surveyors. Mere eligibility to obtain licence as per
qualiIications prescribed by law does not ensure availability oI required expertise in insurance,
which is a technically diversiIied Iield. It also does not ensure continuing education, learning or
up-gradation oI their job skills, and there is no eIIective monitoring oI their skills, perIormance
and conduct.

5.7 The responses/suggestions received by the Committee Irom various individuals and entities
veer round to the view that:
(i) surveyors should be technically competent with sound knowledge;
(ii) independent surveyors should assess the loss in a Iair and unbiased manner;
(iii) in-house surveys system has many deIects and ills, and that the same be
reviewed;
(iv) mandatory limit oI Rs. 20,000 Ior survey should be removed and all claims
should be surveyed by independent surveyors; and
(v) independent institute oI surveyors be established.

Recommendations
5.8 On a detailed examination oI the various issues, views, current practices and Iindings oI
earlier Committees, the Committee recommends that the system oI licensing oI surveyors be
abolished.

5.9 The Committee opines that the law should only prescribe the minimum qualiIications
necessary Ior eligibility to work as a surveyor, and it should be leIt to the judgment oI an insurer
to utilize his services, as may be considered necessary.

5.10 The Committee also does not Iavour dilution oI qualiIications Ior in-house surveyors and
recommends that they should also have the some qualiIications as are required Ior external
surveyors.

5.11 The Committee Iinds no merit in continuation oI mandatory legal requirement Ior survey by
proIessional surveyors applying only to claims oI Rs. 20,000 and above. The limit was Iixed in
the year 1968, and iI inIlation, and consequent erosion in the value oI rupee is to be reckoned, it
would now translate into a very high Iigure. Instead, the Committee suggests that IRDA may be
empowered to notiIy Irom time to time limits Ior diIIerent classes oI business beyond which only
it must be made mandatory on the part oI the insurer to utilize the services oI proIessional
surveyors.

5.12 The response to the Law Commission`s Consultation Paper also yielded an important
suggestion oI constitution oI a selI-regulating institute oI surveyors on the lines oI the Institute oI
Chartered Accountants oI India. Similar such institutes oI surveyors exist elsewhere in the world.
The Malhotra Committee had also recommended establishment oI an institution oI surveyors to
usher in proIessionalism by creating and nurturing high levels oI skills and evolving a code oI
conduct. The Committee recommends that the Government, IRDA and Insurance Industry
should do every thing possible to promote establishment oI an institute oI surveyors on selI-
sustaining basis. Such an institute should undertake the responsibility oI developing courses and
training programmes, conducting examinations and awarding qualiIications.

5.13 In order to ensure that the Institute, as suggested herein above, and its members become
Iully accountable to the users and consumers Ior the quality oI their services, membership should
be restricted to individuals. However, surveyors may Iorm a company or partnership Iirm,
subject to the condition that all the directors or partners, as the case may be, shall possess the
certiIicate oI practice.

5.14 The Executive Council oI the Institute should have adequate representation Irom
Government/IRDA and general insurance industry. The Council shall have a disciplinary
committee, to take cognizance oI complaints reIerred to it by the IRDA, and also to send its
report on action taken. An appellate mechanism shall be provided to enable any aggrieved
insurer, insured or surveyor to preIer an appeal to the IRDA against an order /decision oI the
institute.

5.15 II the IRDA, at any time comes to the conclusion that the aIIairs oI the Institute are not
being carried on in accordance with the mandate given, or its activities are not conducive to the
interests oI users and consumers, it may, by an order, supersede the Executive Council oI the
Institute and appoint an Administrator in its place and such an order by the IRDA should bind all
concerned.

5.16 The IRDA should carry out a comprehensive review oI Iunctioning oI the institute at the
end oI three years Irom the date oI establishment and iI it is satisIied that the aIIairs are being
carried on in accordance with its objectives, it may persuade the Government to conIer statutory
status on the institute through an Act oI Parliament.

5.17 Till such time recognition is granted to an Institute, the IRDA shall continue to discharge
the Iunction oI granting licence in terms oI the present regulations.

5.18 The Committee recommends that the existing provisions oI section 64UM(3) and (4)
empowering the IRDA to call Ior a report Irom an independent surveyor in respect oI any claim
and issue directions as he may consider necessary with regard to settlement oI the claim be
dispensed with.

5.19 The Committee also recommends that the newly recast provisions relating to surveyors and
loss assessors, as suggested herein below, be included in Part IIA oI the Act, as section 64U,
consequent upon the recommendation oI the Committee in the next Chapter Ior doing away with
Part IIB oI the Act.

Recommended amendments to provisions relating to Surveyors and Loss Assessors

I. For the existing Section 64UM, the Iollowing may be substituted and the section may be
numbered as section 64U, to be included in Part IIA oI the Act, as has been suggested in the next
Chapter:

64U. Surveyors and loss assessors. - 1) Save as otherwise provided in this section, no
person shall act as a surveyor or loss assessor in respect of general insurance business
including health and agriculture insurance).

2) No person shall act as surveyor or loss assessor in respect of general insurance business
unless he

a) possesses one or more educational or technical qualifications as may be specified
by the Authority by way of regulations;

b) does not suffer from any of the disqualifications mentioned in sub-section 4) of
section 42;

c) is a member of a professional body of surveyors and loss assessors, by whatever
name called, duly recognized by the Authority for the purpose; and

d) holds a valid certificate of practice to work as surveyor and loss assessor granted by
the professional body as stated in clause c)

Provided that in the case of a firm or company, all the partners or directors or other
persons, who may be called upon to make a survey or assess a loss reported, as the case
may be, shall fulfill the requirements of clauses a) to d) of sub-section 2).

3) The Authority may in its sole discretion, upon receipt of application in the form as may
be specified by the Authority and on being satisfied that the applicant-institute or
association or body by whatever name called has been established as a professional body
of surveyors and loss assessors with the objective of promoting educational, technical and
professional skills of its members, may grant recognition to the applicant and may also
authorize it to issue certificate of practice to such of its members fulfilling the requirements
in this behalf as may be specified by the Authority by way of regulations.
Provided that before rejection of an application for grant of recognition, the Authority may
give a reasonable opportunity to the applicant to be heard.
Provided further that till such time recognition is granted to an applicant as stated in this
sub-section, the Authority shall continue to discharge the function of grant of licence to
persons for acting as surveyors and loss assessors, in terms of the regulations made by him
before the commencement of Insurance Amendment) Act, 2005.

4) Every surveyor and loss assessor shall comply with the code of conduct in respect of his
duties, responsibilities and other professional requirements, as may be specified by the

5) A surveyor and loss assessor shall investigate, survey, manage, quantify, appraise,
adjust and deal with losses on behalf of insurer and/or insured when appointed so to do,
arising from any contingency, carry out the assigned task with utmost objectivity and
professional integrity by strictly adhering to the code of conduct specified by the Authority
and report thereon with in the time specified
Provided that a surveyor and loss assessor shall act with reasonable dispatch while
undertaking any survey and loss assessment work, and shall complete his assigned scope of
work within a reasonable time.

6) The Authority may from time to time notify financial limits and classes of business for
which insurers shall appoint a surveyor and loss assessor and obtain his report on the loss
before settlement of claim.

Provided that nothing in this sub-section shall be deemed to take away or abridge the right
of the insurer to pay or settle any claim at any amount different from the amount assessed
by the surveyor and loss assessor, by duly recording the reasons therefor, and
communicating the same to the insured.

7) The Authority shall have power to cause investigation, in the manner laid down in the
regulations, of any complaint received against any surveyor or loss assessor alleging
professional misconduct, breach of code of conduct and ethics, any act of omission or
commission which in his opinion is unbecoming of a professional surveyor and loss assessor
or against the interests of policyholders and pass appropriate orders against such surveyor
and loss assessor within the disciplinary jurisdiction of the Authority, as may be specified
by regulations made by the Authority in this behalf, including imposition of fine and /or
disqualification of such a surveyor and loss assessor from acting as a surveyor or loss
assessor permanently or for such period as may be specified in the order, after affording an
opportunity of being heard.

) Notwithstanding any thing contained in the foregoing provisions, a person acting as a
licensed surveyor and loss assessor prior to the commencement of the Insurance
Amendment) Act, 2005 shall continue to act as such for such period as may be specified by
the Authority.

Provided that such a person as mentioned in this sub-section shall, within the period as
may be notified by the Authority, satisfy all the requirements of sub-section 2), failing
which, the person shall be automatically disqualified to act as a surveyor and loss
assessor.
CHAPTER - VI

1ARI A'ISRY CMMI11EE AA IAS&RAACE C&ACILS

eneral Approach
6.1 The provisions oI Part IIB oI the Act in regard to TariII Advisory Committee (TAC) and
Control oI TariII Rates have become a subject matter oI debate Ior quite sometime now, and the
debate got accentuated in the present context, where the insurance sector in India has been
opened up Ior private sector participation. The case Ior abolition oI tariIIs and graduation Irom a
controlled regime to a detariIIed regime has gained currency as such a regime can be considered
to be a basic component oI an open market and competitive economy.

6.2 Against this backdrop, the Committee, while considering recommendations to the provisions
relating to TAC, thought it apposite to look at some oI the other provisions oI Part IIB oI the Act
relating to Insurance Councils, etc.

Examination of statutory matrix
6.3 As had been observed by the Malhotra Committee, the amendment to the Act eIIected in the
year 1968, introducing social control on general insurance, provided Ior the TAC replacing the
TariII Committee oI the General Insurance Council and its Regional Councils. The primary
objective was to make rate setting more scientiIic and base it on statistical analysis oI data. TAC
became a statutory body with the Controller oI Insurance as its Chairman. On nationalization oI
general insurance business, the Chairman oI GIC became the Chairman oI TAC. All the
members oI TAC were nominated by the GIC with prior approval oI the Central Government to
represent the GIC, its subsidiaries, the State insurance Iunds, the Ministry oI Finance, and the
Bureau oI Industrial Costs and Prices. The Secretary oI TAC was also nominated by the
Chairman oI GIC Irom amongst the oIIicers oI GIC and subsidiary companies. TAC approves
the policy wording oI the terms and conditions oI all policies relating to tariIIed business. Now,
with the enactment oI the IRDA Act, 1999, Part IIB oI the Act has been amended, inter alia, in
regard to TAC, to give eIIect to, albeit, partially, the recommendations oI the Malhotra
Committee in regard to the Composition oI TAC. Under the present dispensation, the Chairman
oI the TAC is the Chairperson oI the IRDA.

6.4 The composition, powers and Iunctioning oI the TAC has been subject to comments Irom
several quarters, and there were many suggestions, viz., (i) abolition oI TAC; (ii) bringing TAC
under the control oI the Insurance Regulator and expansion oI the composition oI TAC by
including members outside the Industry. The Malhotra Committee also examined the relevant
aspects oI the Iunctioning oI the TAC.

6.5 In the context oI the debate in regard to tariIIed regime vers:s selI-regulated Iree pricing
regime (detariIIing), the Committee has taken cognizance oI the initiatives taken by the IRDA,
in the recent times in the constitution oI Justice Rangarajan Committee, to considering the
various aspects oI detariIIing the Own Damage (OD) Portion oI Motor Insurance, and S.V.
Mony Group, suggesting the roadmap Ior detariIIing the OD Portion oI Motor Insurance.

6.6 The Committee Iully endorses the main argument against tariII that it greatly reduces the
scope Ior competition, and that tariIIs bring about rigidity in the market, and that once the tariII
is Iramed, it becomes very diIIicult to appropriately revise the same in response to the changes in
the market.

6.7 The Committee Ieels that time is ripe Ior assigning to the General Insurance Council, the
Iunction oI selI-determination oI rates, terms and advantages, with adequate checks and
balances. In this context, the Committee endorses the recommendations made earlier to the
IRDA, while suggesting the roadmap Ior detariIIing the OD Portion oI Motor Insurance, by the
S.V. Mony Group, in regard to the role oI the General Insurance Council.

6.8 The Committee is oI the view that the determination oI rates, terms and advantages oI
insurance be taken away Irom the TAC and entrusted to the General Insurance Council, as was
the case (under the repealed section 64-O oI the Act), prior to the insertion oI Part IIB oI the Act
by the Insurance (Amendment) Act, 1968. It will be in the Iitness oI things to bring TAC under
the auspices oI the General Insurance Council, as the statistical warehouse and analytical
institution to support the endeavours oI the General Insurance Council in the determination oI
rates, terms and advantage oI general insurance products.

Recommendations

6.9 In view oI the above, the Committee recommends that :-
(a) the relevant sections oI the Act should be amended to provide merely Ior the
establishment oI LiIe Insurance Council, General Insurance Council and the TariII
Advisory Committee (to be renamed as Technical Advisory Committee`) under Part IIA
itselI. Details may be provided by the IRDA by empowering it to make the necessary
Regulations. Accordingly, Part IIB oI the Act may be deleted;
(b) in respect oI the provisions relating to the TAC it is Ielt that ultimately, rate-making
should be leIt to the insurers. This has to be done progressively. As a Iirst step, the
Iunction may be transIerred to the General Insurance Council as a SelI Regulatory
Organization within the Iramework oI Regulations to be Iramed by the IRDA, subject, oI
course ,to the Iile and use` mechanism. TAC may be brought under the auspices oI the
General Insurance Council to Iunction as 'Technical Advisory Committee ;
(c) the provisions relating to insurance surveyors (as recommended in the previous Chapter)
be brought under Chapter IIA itselI;
(d) suIIicient saIeguards may be inbuilt in the new provisions Ior protecting the terms and
conditions oI employment oI the oIIicers and employees oI the TAC;
(e) rating (pricing) along with terms and conditions oI cover, under Section 64 UA onwards
now included in the TAC Iunctions may be shiIted to Part IIA in the role and Iunctions oI
the General Insurance Council under 64 L;
(I) the General Insurance Council may have such mechanisms as are necessary to implement
the new Iunctions as suggested above;
(g) in the context oI progressively converting the Councils into SelI Regulatory
Organizations, the power oI nomination oI oIIicials conIerred on the IRDA under
sections 64F and 64L may be done away with;
(h) nomination oI Secretary oI the Councils by the IRDA may be replaced with a provision
that the Councils will appoint the Secretaries;
(i) with the rating Iunctions being shiIted to the General Insurance Council, any omission or
Iailure to submit statistics on the part oI insurers may be dealt with seriously by bringing
in deterrent provisions.

Recommended amendments to provisions relating to Insurance Councils & Tariff Advisory
Committee

I. Part IIA oI the Act, Ior the existing section 64F, the Iollowing may be substituted:
64F. Executive Committees of the Life Insurance Council and the eneral Insurance
Council.-1) The Executive Committee of the Life Insurance Council shall consist of the
following persons, namely

a) four representatives of members of the Life Insurance Council elected in their
individual capacity by the said members in such manner as may be specified by the
Authority by way of regulations in this behalf;
b) a person not connected with any insurance business, nominated by the Authority; and
c) three persons to represent insurance agents, intermediaries and policyholders
respectively as may be nominated by the Authority.

Provided that one of the representatives as mentioned in clause a) shall be elected as the
Chair person of the Executive Committee of the Life Insurance Council.

2) The Executive Committee of the eneral Insurance Council shall consist of the
following persons, namely

a) four representatives of members of the eneral Insurance Council elected in their
individual capacity by the said members in such manner as may be specified by the
Authority by way of regulations in this behalf;
b) a person not connected with any insurance business, nominated by the Authority;
and
c) three persons to represent insurance agents, surveyors and loss assessors and
policyholders respectively as may be nominated by the Authority.

Provided that one of the representatives as mentioned in clause a) shall be elected as the
Chair person of the Executive Committee of the eneral Insurance Council.

3) If any body of persons specified in sub-sections 1) and 2) fails to elect any of the
members of the Executive Committees of the Life Insurance Council or the eneral
Insurance Council, the Authority may nominate any person to fill the vacancy, and any
person so nominated shall be deemed to be a member of the Executive Committee of the
Life Insurance Council or the eneral Insurance Council, as the case may be, as if he had
been duly elected thereto.

4) Each of the said Executive Committees may make bye-laws for the transaction of any
business at any meeting of the said Committee.

5) The Life Insurance Council or the eneral Insurance Council may form such other
committees consisting of such persons as it may think fit to discharge such functions as may
be delegated thereto.

6) The Secretary of the Executive Committee of the Life Insurance Council and of the
Executive Committee of the eneral Insurance Council shall in each case be appointed by
the Executive Committee concerned.

Provided that each Secretary appointed by the Executive Committee concerned shall
exercise all such powers and do all such acts as may be authorized in this behalf by the
Executive Committee concerned.

II. Amendment oI sub-section (2) oI section 64G:
Sub-section (2) oI 64G may be substituted as Iollows:
2) Casual vacancies in the Executive Committee of the Life Insurance Council or of the
eneral Insurance Council, whether caused by resignation, death or otherwise, shall be
filled in such manner as may be specified by the Authority by way of regulations in this
behalf, and any person so nominated to fill the vacancy shall hold office until the
dissolution of the Committee to which he has been nominated.

III. The existing section 64-I may be omitted.

IV. The existing section 64L may be substituted with the Iollowing:

64L. Functions of the Executive Committee of eneral Insurance Council, - 1) The
functions of the Executive Committee of the eneral Insurance Council shall be -

a) to aid and advise insurers, carrying on general insurance business, in the matter of
setting up standards of conduct and sound practice and in the matter of rendering
efficient service to holders of policies of general insurance;
b) to render advice to the Authority in the matter of controlling the expenses of such
insurers carrying on business in India in the matter of commission and other
expenses;
c) to bring to the notice of the Authority the case of any such insurer acting in a manner
prejudicial the interests of holders of general insurance policies;
d) to examine and study pricing methodologies in select markets overseas;
e) to self-administer rates, terms and conditions of general insurance business as stated
in section 64S;
f) to have regular interface with policy makers, both at the Centre and States, to address
motor related issues, such as, initiation of effective measures for tackling the menace
of uninsured/underinsured vehicles;
g) to create robust database on repairs costs that catapult the claims cost;
h) to undertake activities such as research to identify strategies and interventions to
reduce deaths, injuries and property damage; development of complete, accurate and
accessible data; all aspects of vehicle safety including the conditioning of vehicles put
on road; education of all stakeholders about road safety; development and promotion
of strategies and interventions for increasing road safety; collection of data inter alia
from the police and enforcement agencies and statutory authorities, hospitals,
insurers and the insuring public; conduct of research and studies on various
important and relevant topics like seat belt usage, helmet usage, mobile phone usage,
road design, age of drivers and driving skills, pedestrian related, alcohol related,
poor/bad road conditions related accidents, etc., in collaboration with the specialized
agencies and institutions of repute;
i) to act in any matter incidental or ancillary to any of the matters specified in Clauses
a) to c) as with the approval of the Authority may be notified by the eneral
Insurance Council in the azette of India.

2) For the purpose of enabling it effectively to discharge its functions, the Executive
Committee of the eneral Insurance Council may collect such fees as may be decided that
Council, from all insurers carrying on general insurance business

Provided that if the eneral Insurance Council thinks fit, it may by a resolution passed by
it, waive the collection of the prescribed fees for any year and the Executive Committee of
the eneral Insurance Council shall not collect any fees in relation to that year.

V. Section 64R may be amended as Iollows:
Clause (c) may be modiIied as: 'Keep and maintain up-to-date a copy oI list oI all insurers who
are members oI the either Council.
Clause (d) oI sub-section (1) oI section 64R may be omitted.

VI. The existing Sections 64S and 64T may be omitted and the Iollowing new sections may be
added:

64S. Power of eneral Insurance Council to self-administer rates, terms, etc., of general
insurance.-1) With effect from such date or dates as may be determined by the Central
overnment, the eneral Insurance Council shall have the power to self-administer rates,
terms and conditions that may be offered by insurers in respect of general insurance
business, based on data as may be considered sufficient with respect to each of the risks
for which rates, etc., are to be self-administered, by filing the prescribed particulars with
the Authority. Such other powers as are exercised by the Tariff Advisory Committee shall
also vest in the eneral Insurance Council from such date or dates as may be specified.

Provided that the Authority may, in the interests of policyholders and/or orderly growth of
insurance industry, give directions from time to time to the eneral Insurance Council in
regard to any aspect of self-administration of rates, terms and conditions that may be
offered, and the eneral Insurance Council shall comply with such directions within such
time as stated therein.

Provided further that where the eneral Insurance Council or any insurer carrying on
general insurance business fails to comply with any of the directions as stated in the first
proviso, without sufficient cause, the Authority may, after affording a reasonable
opportunity, proceed to take such action against the Council or the insurer, or both, as the
case may be, including the removal of the elected representatives of the Council or
direction to the insurer concerned not to underwrite any business, or both, as the case may
be.

Provided further that any person aggrieved by the action of the Authority under the second
proviso, may appeal to the Central overnment within thirty days and the decision of the
Central overnment shall be final and binding.

2) Every insurer carrying on general insurance business shall file with the Authority the
rates, terms, etc. that may be offered pursuant to sub-section 1) of this section before
implementing the same.

3) Till such time the self-administration of rates, etc., is allowed by the Central
overnment as stated in sub-section 1), the Tariff Advisory Committee established under
section 64U prior to the commencement of the Insurance Amendment) Act, 2005 and in
existence on such commencement shall continue to function and shall exercise all powers
and functions conferred on it, prior to such commencement
Provided that notwithstanding any thing contained in sub-section 5) of section 64UC of the
Insurance Act, 138, where an insurer is guilty of breach of any rate, advantage, terms or
condition fixed by the Tariff Advisory Committee, he shall be proceeded against by the
Tariff Advisory Committee in terms of the regulations made by the Authority.
Provided further that the regulations made by the Authority pursuant to the above proviso
may empower the Tariff Advisory Committee to levy and recover a penalty not exceeding
rupees twenty five lakhs for each such breach, besides directing the insurer to recover the
deficiency in the premium, or where it is not practicable to recover the deficiency in the
premium, to modify suitably or cancel the contract of insurance.
Provided further that where an insurer omits or fails to submit the required statistics to the
Tariff Advisory Committee, he shall be punishable with a penalty not exceeding rupees ten
lakhs for every such omission or failure. The provisions of this proviso shall apply 2:tatis
2:tandis for every omission or failure to submit the required statistics to the eneral
Insurance Council, from such date as may be notified by the Authority.
Provided also that where an insurer is found guilty of breach of tariff on more than three
occasions, the Tariff Advisory Committee shall bring the same to the notice of the
Authority and the Authority may take such further action as may be considered expedient
against such insurer, including cancellation of his registration.

4) All rates, terms, etc., fixed by the eneral Insurance Council may cease to be self-
administered by the eneral Insurance Council with effect from a date or dates as may be
determined by regulations to be made by the Authority.

64T. Establishment of Technical Advisory Committee and matters relating thereto.-1) On
and from such date as may be determined by the Central overnment and subject to the
provisions of section 64S, the eneral Insurance Council, under its administrative control,
shall establish a Technical Advisory Committee to assist and enable the eneral Insurance
Council to carry out the functions as stated in section 64L.

2) Every whole-time employee of the Tariff Advisory Committee who was employed by
that Committee immediately before such date shall become an employee of the Technical
Advisory Committee and shall hold his office in it by the same tenure at the same
remuneration, and upon the same terms and conditions and with the same rates and
privileges as to pension, gratuity and other matters as he would have held on such
commencement if this section had not been enacted, and shall continue to do so until his
employment under the technical advisory committee is terminated, or until his
remuneration, terms and conditions are duly altered by the Technical Advisory
Committee.

3) Notwithstanding anything contained in the Industrial Disputes Act, 147 14 of 147),
or in any other law for the time being in force, the transfer of the services of any employee
of the Tariff Advisory Committee to Technical Advisory Committee shall not entitle any
such employee to any compensation under that Act or other law, and no such claim shall be
entertained by any court, Tribunal or other authority.

4) On and from the date as may be determined by the Authority, all the assets and
liabilities of the Tariff Advisory Committee existing on that date shall be transferred to,
and vest in, the eneral Insurance Council.

5) Where the Tariff Advisory Committee has established a provident or superannuation
fund or any other fund for the benefit of its employees and constituted a trust in respect
thereof hereafter in this section referred to an existing trust), the monies standing to the
credit of any such fund, from the date as may be determined by the Authority, shall,
subject to the provisions of sub-section 6), stand transferred to, and vest in, the eneral
Insurance Council.

6) Where any employee of the Tariff Advisory Committee does not become an employee
of the Technical Advisory Committee, the monies and other assets appertaining to any fund
referred to in subsection 5) shall be apportioned between the trustees of the fund and the
eneral Insurance Council in the manner determined by the Authority, and in case of any
dispute regarding such apportionment, the decision of the Central overnment thereon
shall be final.

7) The eneral Insurance Council shall, as soon as may be after the establishment of
Technical Advisory Committee, constitute in respect of the monies and other assets which
are transferred to, and vested in it, under sub section 5), one or more trusts having, as far
as practicable, objects similar to the objects of the existing trusts.

8) Where all the monies and other assets belonging to an existing trust are transferred to,
and vested in, the eneral Insurance Council under sub-section 5), the trustees of such
trust shall be discharged from the trust except as respects things done or committed to be
done by them before such transfer.

) Unless otherwise expressly provided by or under this Act, all contracts, agreements and
other instruments of whatever nature subsisting or having effect immediately before the
date of establishment of the technical advisory committee pursuant to sub-section 1), and
to which Tariff Advisory Committee is a party or which is in favour of that Committee
shall be of as full force and effect against or in favour of the eneral Insurance Council
and may be enforced or acted upon as fully and effectually as if, instead of the Tariff
Advisory Committee, the eneral Insurance Council had been a party thereto or as if they
had been entered into or issued in favour of the eneral Insurance Council.

10) If, at the date of establishment of the Technical Advisory Committee, any suit, appeal
or other legal proceeding of whatever nature is pending by or against the Tariff Advisory
Committee, then it shall not abate, be discontinued or in any way be prejudicially affected
by reason of the transfer to the eneral Insurance Council of the assets and liabilities of
the Tariff Advisory Committee, or of anything done under this Act, but the suit, appeal or
other proceeding may be continued, prosecuted or enforced by or against the eneral
Insurance Council.

VII. For the recommended content oI Section 64U, reIerence may be made to the previous
chapter (Chapter-V).

VIII. The Iollowing may be added as section 64V:
64V. Power to remove difficulties.-If any difficulty arises in giving effect to any of the
provisions contained in any section under this Part, the Central overnment may, by
order, make such provisions or give such directions not inconsistent with the provisions of
this Act as may appear to it to be necessary or expedient for the removal of difficulty.

Provided that no such power shall be exercised after the expiry of a period of four years
from the enforcement of the provisions concerned.

IX. Part IIB oI the Act may be omitted.

CHAPTER - VII

1HER PR'ISIAS AA ASPEC1S 1HE AC1

eneral Approach
7.1 The Committee has also examined the provisions and some important aspects oI the Act,
which have not been considered by the Law Commission, besides giving its views and
suggestions on some oI the recommendations oI the Law Commission. These are dealt with in
the succeeding paragraphs.

Amendments to the Definition Clause
7.2 As the changes that may be warranted in the deIinition clause as contained in section 2 oI the
Act, as are not dealt with by the Law Commission, are already examined and provided in the
preceding Chapters, an attempt has been made herein regarding some oI the other important
deIinitions that require consideration.

7.2.1 The deIinition oI eneral Insurance Business` as stated in section 2(6B) may be
reworded as Iollows:
eneral insurance business means fire, marine or miscellaneous insurance business,
including health insurance business and agriculture insurance business, as may be
defined by way of regulations made by the Authority, whether carried on singly or in
combination with one or more of them.`

Consequently, Clauses (6A), (13A) and (13B) oI section 2, which deIine the terms Iire
insurance business`, marine insurance business` and miscellaneous insurance business` may be
omitted.

The Committee Ieels that it would be in the Iitness oI things to deIine general insurance
business` in a generic manner by empowering the IRDA to deIine the various classes oI general
insurance business by way oI Regulations, so that as and when warranted the IRDA can come
out with timely amendments to the Regulations Ior covering the new and emerging classes oI
general insurance business.
7.2.2 The deIinition oI Indian Insurance Company` as contained in section 2(7A) may be
amended as Iollows:
Indian insurance company` means any insurer, being a company limited by shares-
a) which is formed and registered under the Companies Act, 156 1 of 156) as a
public company;
b) in which the aggregate of holding of equity shares by a foreign company either by
itself or through its subsidiary companies or its nominees, do not exceed such
percent of paid up equity capital of such Indian insurance company, as may be
prescribed by the Central overnment; and
c) whose sole purpose is to carry on life insurance business or general insurance
business or re-insurance business or health insurance business.

Provided that where at the time of commencement of the Insurance Amendment) Act,
2005, an insurer, being a company, is not a public company, such insurer shall with in
one year from the date of such commencement convert itself into a public company.

Provided further that where an insurer as referred to in the first proviso fails to covert
itself into a public company with in one year as stated in that proviso, the insurer shall
cease to carry on any insurance business.

Explanation.-For the purpose of this clause, the expression foreign company` shall have
the meaning assigned to it under clause 23A) of section 2 of the Income-tax Act, 161.`

The above deIinition is recommended by the Committee, to make it patently clear that an insurer,
being a company, has necessarily to be a public company limited by shares, and not to allow a
company other than a public company to carry on any insurance business. Accordingly, by way
oI proviso, sun-set clause has been suggested Ior conversion oI private insurance companies into
public companies with in the stipulated time.

In clause (c) oI the deIinition health insurance business` is speciIically provided Ior enabling the
Iormation oI stand alone` health insurance companies.
The Committee recommends that a separate deIinition oI health insurance` may be
incorporated in the deIinition clause oI the Act, by engraIting the existing deIinition oI health
insurance` as stated in Regulation 2(I) oI the IRDA (Registration oI Indian Insurance
Companies) Regulations, 2000. Likewise a similar deIinition could be added in respect oI
agriculture insurance in the IRDA Regulations reIerred to above, which can similarly again be
carried to the Act.

The Committee deliberated at length on the pros and cons oI stipulating, in speciIic terms, the
percentage oI Ioreign participation in the paid-up equity, in clause (b) oI the deIinition oI Indian
insurance company`, as has been the case now, but reIrained Irom so speciIying (such as a
percentage not exceeding 49 per cent), leaving it to be addressed by the Central Government in
view oI the sensitivity oI the matter.

The Committee recommends that consequential amendments may be made to section 6AA oI the
Act, which reIers to 'twenty-six percent.

7.2.3 The Committee recommends that section 2(8) which deIines the term insurance company`
may be omitted, as the same is rendered redundant.

7.2.4 The Committee recommends the Iollowing consequential amendment to the deIinition oI
insurance co-operative society` as contained in section 2(8A), in the substitution oI clause (c):

c) in which no body corporate, whether incorporated or not, formed or registered
outside India, either by itself or through its subsidiaries or nominees, at any time, holds
more than such per cent of the capital of such co-operative society, as may be
prescribed by the Central overnment.

7.2.5 The Committee recommends that the deIinition oI insurer as contained in section 2(9)
may be substituted with the Iollowing:
insurer` means.-
a) the Life Insurance Corporation of India, established under the Life Insurance
Corporation Act, 16 31 of 156); or
b) an Indian insurance company; or
c) an insurance co-operative society; or
d) such other entity, as may be notified by the Central overnment.

7.2.6 The Committee recommends that the deIinition oI insurance agent as contained in
section 2(10) may be amended as Iollows:

insurance agent` means every person, appointed to act as such, as stated in section 42,
and subject to the regulations made by the Authority, who receives or agrees to receive
payment by way of commission or other remuneration in consideration of his soliciting or
procuring insurance business, including business relating to continuance, renewal or
revival of policies of insurance.

Explanation.- A micro-insurance agent, as may be defined by way of regulations made by
the Authority, is also an insurance agent and shall be governed by such regulations.

7.2.7 The Committee recommends that the deIinition oI liIe insurance business may be
amended as stated herein below. The suggested amendment is that sub-clause (c) oI clause (11)
oI section 2 oI the Act may be reworded as Iollows:
c) the granting of superannuation allowances and benefits payable out of any fund,
including managing of such funds, applicable solely to the relief and maintenance of
persons engaged or who have been engaged in any particular profession, trade or
employment or of the dependents of such persons;

Amendment of section 6A
7.3 The Committee recommends that section 6A oI the Act requires to be revamped completely,
keeping in view the aIore-suggested deIinition oI 'insurer. The Committee proposes a sleek
section, leaving the power to the IRDA to stipulate by way oI regulations the other details.
ThereIore, it is suggested that the existing section 6A may be substituted with the Iollowing:

6A. Requirements as to capital structure and voting rights and maintenance of registers of
beneficial owners of shares.- (1) Notwithstanding any thing contrary contained in any other law
Ior the time being in Iorce, no insurer shall, aIter the commencement oI the Insurance
(Amendment) Act, 2005 carry on any insurance business, unless he satisIies the conditions and
requirements, as regards the capital structure, Iace value oI shares, voting rights and other terms
and conditions as may be speciIied by way oI regulations made by the Authority.

(2) Notwithstanding any thing to the contrary contained in any other law Ior the time being in
Iorce or in the memorandum or articles oI association or bye-laws, or such other document, but
subject to other conditions oI this section, as also the regulations that may be made by the
Authority, the voting right oI every shareholder oI an Indian insurance company or an insurance
co-operative society shall in all cases be strictly proportionate to the paid up amount oI the shares
held by him.

(3) An insurer.-
(a) shall maintain, in addition to the register oI members to be maintained under any other
law Ior the time being in Iorce, a register oI shares containing such details and particulars
regarding the beneIicial owner oI each share and the changes thereoI in such manner and
within such period as may be determined by regulations made by the Authority;
(b) shall not register any transIer oI shares-
(i) unless the transIeree Iurnishes a declaration in such Iorm containing such particulars
as may be speciIied by way oI regulations made by the Authority;
(ii) where aIter the transIer, the total paid up holding oI the transIeree in the shares oI the
insurer is likely to exceed Iive per cent oI its paid-up capital or where the transIeree is a
banking company or an investment company, is likely to exceed two per cent oI such
paid up capital, unless the previous approval oI the Authority has been obtained Ior the
transIer;
(iii) where the nominal value oI the shares intended to be transIerred by an individual,
Iirm, group, constituents oI a group, or a body corporate under the same management,
jointly or severally exceeds one per cent oI the paid up equity capital oI the insurer,
unless the previous approval oI the Authority has been obtained Ior the transIer.

planati4n.-For the purposes oI this sub-clause, the Authority may by way oI
regulations determine as to what constitutes 'group and 'same management

(4) For the purpose oI giving proper eIIect to the provisions oI this section, the Authority may, in
addition to the matters as are required to be provided Ior in the regulations pursuant to the other
sub-sections, provide Ior such other matters as are considered necessary and expedient.

Deletion of sub-sections 6B and 6C and amendment of section 11

7.4 In the light oI the above suggestion Ior amending section 6A, sections 6B and 6C may be
deleted. It is also recommended that in clause (b) oI sub-section (1) oI section 11, reIerence to
receipts and payments account` be deleted.

Amendment of section 21
7.5 The Committee recommends that sub-section (2) oI section 21 may be amended in such a
way as to conIer the powers on the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) constituted under the
SEBI Act, instead oI Court. Any appeal against the order oI SAT may be made to the Supreme
Court by an aggrieved party. In addition, the sections as mentioned in clause (d) oI sub-section
(1) oI section 21 require to be Iinally veriIied and checked while Iinalizing the amendments to
the Act as a whole.

7.6 The Committee in its deliberations was oI the view that this section dealing with assignments
has withstood the test oI time, and would not seem to call Ior any amendment, except Ior the
addition one sub-section to empower the Authority to restrict or regulate certain types oI
assignments. This is called Ior to nip in the bud the potential Ior trading in liIe insurance policies
by certain agencies, and to prevent moral hazards associated with such trading in liIe insurance
policies.
7.6.1 Yet, the Law Commission had dealt extensively with the provisions in the Section and had
made recommendations on speciIic amendments that could help to cover partial transIers oI
interest and conditional assignments. The Law Commission had also considered and provided
Ior situations oI possible conIlict with policyholder or public interest when the insurer could
decline to act on the endorsement oI assignment without Iurther enquiry.

7.6.2 While taking note particularly oI the last mentioned recommendation, the Committee,
being also oI the view on the need Ior circumspection, makes its own recommendation on what
the additional provision to Section 38 could be, possibly as sub-section (9).
It is suggested that the Iollowing sub-section may be inserted as sub-section (9) to section 38:
) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in any other law for the
time being in force, the Authority may, in the interests of policyholders or of the
public prohibit, restrict or regulate certain types of assignments as may be specified
by regulations made by the Authority.

Amendment of Section 3
7.7 Like section 38, section 39 governing nominations have also withstood the test oI time. There
has been considerable jurisprudential development in regard to the rights and obligations oI
nominees. ThereIore, it is suggested that no amendment is called Ior vis-a-vis section 39.

7.7.1 The Committee has noted again the extensive treatment given by the Law Commission. It
is apprehensive though about recommendations providing Ior beneIicial interests to be acquired
by nominees who come possibly within kinship relation either blood or by marriage but might
not necessarily Iall within heir-ship.
7.8 The present system oI licensing oI agents as embodied in the Act leaves much to be desired.
Even the Malhotra Committee had taken cognizance oI this aspect, and had recommended that
insurers should appoint agents and licensing oI agents by the Controller (now the Authority)
should be discontinued.

7.9 The Committee has examined again the entire gamut oI licensing oI insurance agents, and it
is oI the considered view that the present system oI licensing oI insurance agents by the IRDA
has served no useIul purpose, and instead, it would be in the Iitness oI things to entrust this
responsibility on the insurers themselves with checks and balances, by recasting section 42 oI the
Act, and enabling the Authority to regulate this aspect by way oI detailed regulations.
Accordingly, the Committee recommends that section 42 to be recast as Iollows:

42. Appointment of insurance agents.-1) An insurer can appoint any person to act as
insurance agent for the purpose of soliciting and procuring insurance business for him
Provided that such person shall not suffer from any disqualifications mentioned in sub-
section 3) of this section.

2) No person shall act as an insurance agent for more than one life insurer and general
insurer.

3) The disqualifications above referred to shall be the following.-
a) that the person is a minor;
b) that he is found to be of unsound mind by a Court of competent jurisdiction;
c) that he has been found guilty of criminal misappropriation or criminal breach of
trust or cheating or forgery or an abetment of or attempt to commit any such
offence by a Court of competent jurisdiction

Provided that where at least five years have elapsed since the completion of the
sentence imposed on any person in respect of any such offence, the Authority shall
ordinarily declare in respect of such person that his conviction shall cease to operate
as a disqualification under this clause;
d) that in the course of any judicial proceeding relating to any policy of insurance or
the winding up of an insurer or in the course of an investigation of the affairs of an
insurer it has been found that he has been guilty of or has knowingly participated in
or connived at any fraud, dishonesty or misrepresentation against an insurer or
insured;
e) that in the case of an individual, he does not possess the requisite qualifications and
practical training for a period not exceeding twelve months, as may be specified by
the regulations made by the Authority in this behalf;
f) that in the case of a company or firm making an application under sub-section 1) or
sub-section 3), a director or a partner or one or more of its officers or other
employees so designated by it and in the case of any other person the chief executive,
by whatever name called, or one or more of his employees designated by him, do not
possess the requisite qualifications and practical training and have not passed such
an examination as required under clauses e) and g);
g) that he has not passed such examination as may be specified by the regulations
made by the Authority in this behalf;
h) that he has violated the code of conduct specified by regulations made by the
Authority.

4) If any person who acts as an insurance agent for an insurer contravening the provisions
of this section, such insurance agent is deemed to have committed fraud for the purposes of
section 44 of this Act, and the insurer may be deemed to have contravened the provision of
this Section and may be subject to the provisions of Section 105A of this Act

Amendment of section 48A.

7.10 This section prohibits liIe insurance agents Irom becoming directors oI liIe insurance
companies. However, in the context oI the existence oI corporate agents, such a stipulation
creates diIIiculties Ior corporate members holding shares in the liIe insurance companies, as co-
promoters, etc., to Iield their candidates on the boards oI liIe insurance companies. Further, the
general restriction oI agents not to become directors should be made applicable to general
insurers also. ThereIore, the section along with its marginal heading may be substituted with the
Iollowing:

48A. Insurance agents not to be directors of insures.-No insurance agent, who
solicits or procures any insurance business for an insurer, shall be eligible to be or
remain a director of that insurer
Provided that the Authority may by way of regulations modify or remove the
foregoing restriction, in the case of such of the insurance agents, and subject to
such conditions, if any, as may be specified in the regulations.

Amendment of section 50 and deletion of section 64VC.
7.11 The Committee Ieels that the proposal oI the Law Commission to amend this section in
regard to notice oI options available to the assured on the lapsing oI policies may create practical
diIIiculties to liIe insurers. The existing provision in regard to options available to the assured on
the lapsing oI a policy is quite adequate. Hence, it is suggested that no amendment is called Ior.
Once the grace time Ior payment oI premium and consequences oI lapsing oI policy on account
oI non-payment oI premium are provided in the policy conditions, that should suIIice, as per the
present provisions oI section 50. The Committee recommends that the provisions oI section
64VC oI the Act in regard to restrictions on the opening oI a new place oI business may be
deleted.

Amendment of provisions relating to penalties and suggestion for introduction of
adjudicatory mechanism

7.12 Presently, sections 102 to 105C oI the Act deal with penalties. The penal provisions as they
stand today are nebulous as regards the power oI the Authority to levy penalties even in cases
relating to statutory/technical oIIences in regard to non-compliance oI Act, orders, rules,
regulations, etc. ThereIore, it is suggested Ior speedy and timely action against deIaulting/
delinquent parties, it would be necessary to amend the present penal provisions to enIorce market
discipline and ediIying conduct by empowering the Authority to levy penalties by adapting the
SEBI pattern in this behalI, by taking a cue Irom the SEBI Act. It is also necessary to have in the
penal provisions power to award punishments by way oI Iine and/or imprisonment Ior serious
oIIences. In such matters, court`s intervention becomes imperative. ThereIore, it is suggested that
the penal provisions may be segregated into two, viz., i) penalties; and ii) Iines & imprisonment;
whereas in regard to the Iormer, the Authority may be straight away empowered to impose the
same with inbuilt checks and balances, and in regard to the latter, the court`s jurisdiction is
called Ior.

7.13 For imposition oI penalty, it is suggested that the Adjudicatory Mechanism as envisaged in
the SEBI Act may be adapted with suitable modiIications. The Authority may have a Iew
Adjudicating OIIicers at a certain level to deal with imposition oI penalty, by Iollowing the
procedure as would be laid down in the new law read with the regulations to be Iramed by the
Authority. Appeal against the order oI the Adjudicating OIIicers would lie to the Securities
Appellate Tribunal (SAT), an independent quasi judicial body constituted under the SEBI Act.
An appeal shall lie against the orders oI SAT in the Supreme Court.

7.14 It is suggested that in view oI the recommendation to conIer jurisdiction to SAT, the SEBI
Act may be amended to provide Ior a member oI SAT with insurance background who should be
on the Bench to hear matters arising out oI the appeals under the Insurance Act.

7.15 It is also suggested that the monetary penalties within the proposed domain oI Adjudication
OIIicers may also be enhanced Irom the present level. Accordingly, the present provisions oI
sections 102 to 105C require to be reworded by taking away Iines and imprisonment Irom their
purview.

7.16 In the light oI the above proposal, the provisions oI the Act in regard to power oI court to
grant relieI, cognizance oI oIIences, etc., as contained in sections 108 and 109 should be
reconsidered. Section 107 requiring previous sanction oI Advocate General Ior institution oI
proceedings should be deleted.

7.17 Section 110, dealing with appeals should be so modiIied as to conIer jurisdiction on SAT
instead oI Court.

rievance Redressal Mechanism
7.18 The Law Commission has extensively reviewed the existing grievance redressal mechanism
and it has recommended a scheme under which the disputes arising out oI insurance contracts
presently under the purview oI consumer Iora and ombudsman are settled by Grievance
Redressal Authority (GRA) to be constituted exclusively to deal with insurance disputes.
Provision has also been made Ior an appellate process under which the appeals against the orders
oI the GRA are heard and disposed oI by an Insurance Appellate Tribunal (IAT) with its
Headquarters at New Delhi and conducting business in Iour metros. The recommendations made
by the Commission cover broadly the Iollowing aspects:

(a) Grievance oI policyholders vis-a-vis the insurance companies;
(b) Redressal oI grievances oI insurers, intermediaries and insurance agents vis-a-vis the
IRDA;
(c) ModiIications in sections 102 to 105C oI Insurance Act to bring them under the purview
oI the IRDA.

7.19 The recommendations relating to grievances oI policyholders against the decisions oI the
insurance companies Ilow Irom the assumption that the existing systems oI adjudication oI
disputes through the consumer Iora and the institution oI ombudsman have not Iully addressed
the problem oI early resolution oI disputes. Hence, the suggestion to create GRA and an
Appellate Body to deal with insurance disputes. The proposal oI Law Commission to create a
parallel judicial hierarchy to address this issue has the Iollowing shortcomings:

(i) The Consumer Courts are now located at every District Headquarters and are with in the
easy reach oI the policyholders. II it is replaced by GRA which is located only in
major cities and towns, the consumers would be at a disadvantage. It is not
established in statistical terms that the Consumer Courts are so overburdened that
they cannot handle the additional burden imposed by the insured approaching them
Ior grievance redressal. The Iacility oI approaching a Iorum available at District
Headquarters would be lost iI GRAs are established at major cities only.
(ii) Appeals against the orders oI the GRA would lie to ITA with its headquarters at New
Delhi and holding court in Iour metros. As oI now, iI the insured is not satisIied with
the orders oI District Consumer Forum, he could approach the State Commission.
This Iacility would be lost in the proposed scheme.
(iii) The existing scheme oI Ombudsman has the merit oI bringing Iinality and provides relieI
to the insured as the insurer is debarred Irom appealing against the order oI
Ombudsman. Some oI the insured may preIer this route and this Iacility would be
denied to the insured.

7.20 Considering that the need Ior exclusive courts to deal with insurance claims has not been
established statistically and issues relating to access to the dispute redressal mechanism in the
proposed scheme, the Committee suggests that it may be desirable to continue and reIine the
existing system rather than replace it by a costly parallel mechanism. It is, however, desirable
that in those District Fora and State Fora where there is a large number oI cases relating to
insurance, an additional member who is well versed with insurance matters may be inducted as a
measure to hasten the process oI disposal and to provide expert Counsel to such Iora.

7.21 There is also need to continue with the system oI Ombudsman to act as an alternate
redressal mechanism. However, this institution, which was established in 1998, is still to make
an impact. This is partly due to lack oI awareness about the existence oI this system and mostly
due to the vast jurisdiction covered by the Ombudsman. There may be a case Ior creating this
post in each State Headquarters and give wide publicity about the role oI the Ombudsman.

7.22 The second issue raised by the Law Commission relates to the redressal oI grievances
arising out oI the orders passed by the Authority against insurers, intermediaries and insurance
agents. The suggestion oI the Commission that IRDA should appoint adjudicatory oIIicers to
adjudicate the violations oI the Act, Regulations and Rules by insurers, insurance agents and
intermediaries and levy penalties provided Ior in the Act needs to be implemented. As regards
provision oI appeals against the orders oI adjudicatory oIIicers, it is suggested that the SAT may
be given the authority to deal with this aspect, by inducting a member Iamiliar with the
provisions oI the Insurance Laws, instead oI the IAT as recommended by the Commission. Since
we have suggested that the existing grievance redressal should address the disputes between the
insured and the insurer, the IAT would not have adequate work iI it were to deal with appeals
arising out oI the orders oI the Adjudicating OIIicers oI the IRDA.

7.23 The Committee welcomes the suggestion oI the Law Commission to make a statutory
provision to ensure that every insurer sets up an in-house grievance redressal mechanism under
the overall supervision oI the IRDA. It may also be stipulated therein that the claimant should
Iirst approach this institution beIore taking recourse to any legal recourse Ior redressal oI
grievances.

7.24 The third issue raised by the Law Commission relates to amendments to section 102 to
105C oI the Act to enable Adjudicating OIIicers oI the IRDA to deal with and impose penalties
Ior violation oI provisions oI the Act. This would set at rest any doubt about the jurisdiction oI
criminal courts as these provisions deal with imposition oI Iines. This aspect has already been
dealt with by the Committee in para 7.13.
7.25 The Committee Ieels that the existing grievance redressal mechanism is within easy reach
oI people and implementation oI the recommendations oI the Law Commission would not only
result in additional expenditure, but also cause inconvenience to the policyholders. Hence, it is
recommended that the existing mechanism with suitable strengthening as suggested in the
preceding paras may serve the overall interests oI the insured.

Amendment of provisions relating to delegation of powers

7.26 The provisions oI section 110A oI the Act deal with delegation oI powers and duties by
Chairperson oI the Authority, but the section does not talk about delegation oI powers and
Iunctions oI the Authority. It is recommended that this section along with its marginal heading be
amended to deal with delegation oI powers and Iunctions oI both the Authority and Chairperson
as Iollows:

110A. Delegation of powers.- 1) The Authority may, by general or special order in
writing, delegate to the Chairperson or any other member or officer of the Authority
subject to such conditions, if any, as may be specified in the order such of its powers
and functions under this Act, as it may deem necessary.

2) The Authority may, by a general or special order in writing, also form committees of
the members and delegate to them the powers and functions of the Authority as it
may deem necessary.

3) The Chairperson of the Authority may by general or special order delegate any of his
powers or duties under this Act to any person subordinate to him. The exercise or
discharge of any of the powers or duties so delegated shall be subject to such
restrictions, limitations and conditions, if any, as the Chairperson of the Authority
may impose.

Amendment of Section 110 and deletion of section 110H
7.27 Consequent upon the recommendation oI the Committee to recast the provisions relating to
surveyors and loss assessors, and deletion oI section 64VC, it is recommended that in sub-section
(3) oI section 110G, reIerence to the provisions oI sections 64UM and 64VC may be omitted.
7.28 In view oI the suggestion Ior conIerring appellate jurisdiction on the SAT against the orders
oI the IRDA under the various provisions oI the Act, it is recommended that section 110H, which
provides appellate jurisdiction on the Central Government against the various order oI the IRDA
as mentioned therein, may be deleted.


7.29 The Committee recommends that section 113 oI the Act dealing with acquisition oI
surrender value by policies oI liIe insurance be recast as the current provisions oI the Section are
inadequate to meet the requirements oI the product ranges on oIIer. The suggested text Ior the
Section is as Iollows:

113. Acquisition of surrender value by policy.- 1) A policy of life insurance shall acquire
surrender value as per the norms specified by the regulations made by the Authority.

(2) Every policy oI liIe insurance shall contain the Iormula as approved by the Authority Ior
calculation oI guaranteed surrender value oI the policy.

(3) Notwithstanding any contract to the contrary, a policy oI liIe insurance under a non-linked
plan which has acquired a surrender value shall not lapse by reason oI non-payment oI Iurther
premiums but shall be kept in Iorce to the extent oI paid-up sum insured, calculated by means oI
a Iormula as approved by the Authority, and contained in the policy, and the reversionary
bonuses that have already attached to the policy:
Provided that a policy oI liIe insurance under a linked plan shall be kept in Iorce in the manner as
may be speciIied by the regulations made by the Authority.

(4) The provisions of sub-section 3) shall not apply

i) where the paid-up sum insured by a policy, inclusive of attached bonuses, is less
than the amount specified by the Authority or takes the form of annuity of
amount less than the amount specified by the Authority; or
ii) when the parties after the default has occurred in payment of the premium
agree in writing to other arrangement.

Suggestions regarding other aspects to be dealt with in the Act/Regulations
7.30 The Committee is oI the considered view that in the context oI revision oI the Act, it would
be necessary to enhance the provisions in the Act/Regulations to deal with contemporary and
emerging areas and developments in the world oI insurance. Accordingly, in the succeeding
paras suggestions in regard to some oI these areas and developments to be dealt with in the
Act/Regulations are made.
Prudential supervisory provisions
7.31 Insurance companies expose themselves to business processes, which need prudential
supervisory provisions in the Iollowing areas:
outsourcing controls over agreements and management;
risk management processes to identiIy, assess, mitigate and report risks;
documentation oI procedures and controls, oI computer systems, and reporting the
operation oI key controls;
responsibilities documentation and control oI limits and authorities delegated to subsidiary
companies, sub-committees, management and staII;
business continuity plans; and
stress / scenario testing.
The Committee recommends that there should be an enabling provision/s in the Act to empower
the IRDA to come out with regulatory norms Ior ensuring prudence in the above areas.
Helping consumers select appropriate products
7.32 Retail consumers need access to competitively priced and well-designed products. These
should have charges that are Iair and reasonable, should be understood both beIore and aIter the
point oI purchase, be appropriately and responsibly sold, and meet consumers` reasonable
expectations throughout the term oI the product. The IRDA may continue with its regulatory or
other interventions, either on its own or through the Insurance Councils, which help consumers
with Iinancial planning and select appropriate products; which may include:
web-based decision trees to Iacilitate Iinancial health check Ior consumers;
how best to include insurance products in comparative tables given that, Ior many types oI
insurance, the premium is heavily inIluenced by the consumer`s individual circumstances;
and
a process oI jargon busting` i.e. how insurers can make their literature easier to understand.
Systems control
7.33 The Committee recommends that the IRDA may consider coming out with guidelines Ior
the insurers on the Iollowing important aspects oI systems and controls:
(i) high-level controls, including the composition and role oI the governing board,
apportionment and deIinition oI management responsibilities, and the audit
committee;

(ii) responsibilities oI the risk assessment Iunction;
(iv) identiIication and mitigation oI legal risk;
(v) internal audit, including its mandate and reporting lines, audit plans and reports, and
outsourcing;
(vi) management inIormation needed to identiIy, measure and control risks in the business;
(vii) outsourcing, including issues to consider, contracts with suppliers and service level
agreements; and
(viii) risks arising Irom a Iirm`s relationship with the rest oI the group to which it belongs.

Electronic transactions
7.34 IT eIIect on insurance business organization, production, operation and compliance requires
enabling enactment oI provisions in content, authentication and audit trail oI documents. There
has to be clear cut provision Ior identiIication oI Iit and proper person` in IT environment and
recognition oI IT assets oI insurers. In dealing with e-insurance transactions, the Iollowing
aspects have to be taken care oI:

(i) Electronic Services Irom Insurers - On-line underwriting, issuing electronic policy, on-line
claim registration and processing and payment to clients;
(ii) ensuring conIidentiality, integrity and availability oI electronic transactions Encryption
and Digital Signatures ;
(iii) assurance oI insurers` IT services and/or inIrastructure quality;
(iv) assuring auditability and maintenance oI all and speciIically electronic transactions / records
Ior legal and regulatory compliance;
(v) assurance oI best practices Ior developing and implementing inIormation security;
(vi) business continuity plans and management ;
(vii) compatibility oI insurer`s application with the regulator`s application Iramework;
(viii) electronic interIace oI insurers with intermediaries;
(ix) providing compliance reports to regulators electronically.

Pronounced key objectives of IRDA
7.35 Under the Act, the IRDA should have the Iollowing Iour key objectives, which may be
maniIestly stated in the preamble:
O market conIidence: maintaining conIidence in the insurance system
O
O public awareness: promoting public understanding oI the insurance system, and thereby
enhancing the insurance spread;
O
O consumer protection: securing the appropriate degree oI protection Ior consumers; and
reduction oI insurance crimes.
O
O Recognition of 10/10 Rule in the contracts of insurance
O 7.36 There seems to be an increasing tendency to pass oII many products as insurance
products`, which do not satisIy the insurance industry`s thumb rule, viz., the 10/10 rule`.
O According to this rule, the insurer should Iace at a minimum, a 10 per cent chance oI losing
10 per cent oI the premium Ior the contract to be considered a contract oI insurance`. ThereIore,
it is recommended that the deIinition oI the term 'Contract oI Insurance may be incorporated in
the Act itselI, in the Iollowing phraseology:

Contract of insurance` means any contract effected by an insurer by which he assumes a
degree of risk of loss or assured benefit, as may be specified by regulations made by the
Authority.
O
O Consumers` pre-grievance help bench:
O 7.37 As a pre-emptive measure, the IRDA either on its own or through the Insurance
Councils may consider administration oI a mechanism as a pre-grievance help bench. Questions
as Iollows may be answered by AVRU, Kiosk or direct reply:

(How much insurance must I carry? What is the diIIerence between "cancellation" and "non-
renewal" oI a policy? My policy has been cancelled! Can the company do this? My insurer says
it won't renew my policy. What can I do? Is there a period oI time during which aIter I purchase
my liIe insurance policy I can change my mind and have my money reIunded? What happens iI I
Iorget to pay my premium by its due date? What iI I made a mistake in completing my
application Ior a liIe insurance policy? Can the insurer void my policy? II I Iorget to pay my
premium and the policy lapses is there anything I can do? II I take out a policy loan, what rate oI
interest can the insurer charge? What happens to a liIe insurance policy in the event oI suicide oI
the insured? In order to purchase liIe insurance I am told I must have an "insurable interest" in
the person to be insured. What is "insurable interest"? II there is a delay in an insurer paying the
death beneIit to the beneIiciary when a death claim is made, is the beneIiciary entitled to any
interest on the death beneIit? Why am I in the "assigned-risk" plan, why is it so expensive, and
how do I get out oI it? What discounts can I get on my car insurance? Can my insurance
company raise my premium due to an accident or traIIic violation? How do I know iI I am being
charged the right premium? My insurance company is rating me based on something that didn't
happen. Where does this inIormation come Irom and how can I correct any errors? What is a
"deductible"? Am I protected by my insurance when I drive a rental car? What happens iI an
uninsured vehicle injures me? I was involved in an accident or my car was stolen. How much is
my automobile worth? What is my "right oI recourse"? What is a pre-existing condition and can
it be excluded Irom my health coverage? My insurance company reIuses to pay my hospital
emergency room bill saying that it was not an emergency. Can they do this? How can I dispute
my TPA's decision as to the necessity oI my treatment? What is No-Fault coverage and what am
I entitled to under it? I have received a No-Fault liability award over a month ago but I have not
received payment Irom the insurer. What should I do? Where can I obtain a copy oI the new
Medicaid Fee Schedule? What is the correct method oI billing Ior an in-patient hospital stay?
What type oI coverage is included in my Insurance Policy?)
O
O Section 20 Custody and Inspection of Documents and supply of copies:
O 7.38 The Section provides Ior inspection to be allowed oI documents Iiled with the IRDA
and Ior copies being provided at a Iee. Similar provisions cover supply by an insurance
company, on request, oI copies oI statutory returns Iiled by it and oI its memorandum and
articles oI association. The Iee speciIications need to be revised.
O
O 7.39 In respect oI a similar provision in Section 51 Ior supply oI copies oI proposal Iorms
and related personal statements contained in medical reports, the Law Commission has
recommended that the Iee structure be leIt to be provided in Regulations. Similar amendments to
Section 20 could have the IRDA lay down on what Iee may be charged Ior any oI the copies to
be provided to shareholders or policyholders.
O
O Sections 32B and 32C Insurance Business in Rural Sector and Obligations in Respect of
Rural or Unorganized Sector and Backward Classes
O 7.40 The Law Commission has recommended several changes in these Sections. A related
suggestion is to replace the requirement in Regulation 3 oI IRDA (Obligations oI Insurers to
Rural or Social Sectors) Regulations, 2002 in so Iar as it relates to the social sector, spelt out in
terms oI lives to be covered by insurance, to one speciIying policies to be issued. A
representation in this connection has been that the social sector is best covered through group
insurance, at lower cost, and the obligation on minimum coverage should remain speciIied in
terms oI lives to be insured. Another argument, in so Iar as individual insurances are concerned,
has been that a requirement spelt out in terms oI policies could lead to a tendency to artiIicially
split insurances to issue additional policies Ior the same total coverage on an individual liIe. The
Committee agrees and would recommend that in so Iar as the requirement oI minimum coverage
in respect oI the social sector is concerned, it remains speciIied in terms oI lives to be insured.
O
O Sections 40, 40A, 40B, 40C and 44 Relating to Agency Commission and Ceilings on
Overall Expenses of Management, Section 41 Relating to Prohibition on Rebating and
Section 42 Relating to Licensing of Insurance Agents
O 7.41 While considering the Sections in the Act covering the appointment oI agents and the
payment oI commission to them, the Committee had wide ranging discussions on the need Ior
licensing, on relating payment oI renewal commission to continued availability oI service Irom
the agents to the policyholders and on the portability oI blocks oI policies Ior being kept
serviced. The varying practices in other jurisdictions were also considered.
O
O 7.42 However, having regard to the milieu in India and the long standing practice there has
been under the present Act provisions in regard to payment oI commission, the Committee, while
proposing an amendment to Section 42 on the appointment oI agents please see supra - Ielt that
the other provisions in the Act covering agents be leIt with just the changes as had been noted to
have been recommended by the Law Commission, including the one relating to Section 40A, on
the speciIication oI ceilings on the rates oI commission payable to agents being shiIted to
Regulations.
O
O 7.43 The Committee considered representations in this connection relating to ceilings on the
overall expenses oI management that an insurer could incur, suggesting the need Ior review oI
what were to considered expenses oI management and, in so Iar as agency commission was
concerned, a consideration oI whether under Section 40A or as to be speciIied in the
Regulations as the Law Commission had recommended or the overall ceilings on expenses oI
management (including agency commission) would suIIice Ior the containment oI expenses,
leaving in the process a degree oI Ireedom to individual insurers what commission they would
pay to their agents. Following discussion, the Committee took the view that speciIic limitations
on commission payments would need to remain and the overall ceilings on expenses oI
management or the interpretation oI what constituted such expenses, did not also call Ior any
revision or modiIication.
O
O 7.44 In regard to Section 41, on the prohibition oI rebates, the Committee did consider the
eIIectiveness oI the provision as it stood, but Ielt that it should need to stand, along with
associated rules relating to reproduction oI the prohibition in relevant insurance Iorms and
literature.
O
O Section 45 Policy not to be called in Question on round of Misstatement after two
years:
O 7.45 The Committee noted the elaborate consideration given in the Law Commission Report
and the recommendations made with regard to amendments to the provisions on the policy oI liIe
insurance being called in question on account oI any misstatements in the proposal Ior other
papers leading to the issue oI the policy. The Law Commission Report has reIer to several Court
rulings, including those oI the Supreme Court, and the Committee considered that there was a
quite well settled case law on the subject that insurers did appreciate, making any amendment oI
the present Act provisions unnecessary Ior an equitable and adequate protection oI the interest oI
policyholders or oI other beneIiciary claimants.
O
O 7.45.1 A policy oI liIe insurance obtained on Ialse premises constituted a Iraud not only on
the liIe insurance company but also on the holders oI other policies, in as much as a claim
unwarrantedly having to be settled aIIected the policyholders Iund that the insurer carried Ior its
policyholders as a whole and, additionally, could lead to the insurer having to reconsider its
underwriting and pricing norms. The requirement oI :berri2a fidei that applied in the
placement oI a policy Ior liIe insurance did not relieve an applicant oI that requirement by
allowing an extended period oI Iive years Ior the insurance company, by Iurther due enquiry, to
check on the correctness oI the inIormation Iurnished Ior grant oI the insurance. The insurer had
to take the proposer on trust beyond whatever inIormation was obtained at the time oI the
proposal and several practical issues could arise iI veriIications were leIt to be undertaken aIter
grant oI the insurance, at a cost.
O
O 7.45.2 It was represented to the Committee that the amendment proposed by the Law
Commission to make a policy oI liIe insurance totally immune Irom being called in question
beyond Iive years oI its issue or oI revival Iollowing any lapsation, would leave a liIe insurance
company vulnerable to Iraudulent insurances being taken and in any case to grant oI insurances
on inappropriate terms.
O
O 7.45.3 A second representation relating to the possible attribution oI complicity to an agent
who solicited and procured a policy oI liIe insurance, in respect oI any misrepresentation or
suppression oI material Iact contained in the proposal papers, carrying as they did a signed
declaration by the proposer with regard to the veracity oI the statements contained in the
proposal papers. The seriousness oI any misrepresentation in respect oI inIormation provided by
the proposal did not become any the less by an eIIort to ascribe possession oI correct inIormation
to the soliciting agent an issue that could come up Irom the added provision suggested by the
Law Commission oI deeming such inIormation as then being available to the company and
should not be a mitigation in holding on a breach oI warranty by the proposer himselI in regard
to the correctness oI the inIormation that was to be the basis Ior grant oI insurance.
O
O 7.45.4 The Committee, while accepting in humility the considerations that had led the Law
Commission to recommend amendments to Section 45 oI the Act, is oI the view, as earlier
remarked, that suIIicient relieI is available, with the section reading as it presently does,
supported by case law, against any inequitable eIIorts by a liIe insurance company to void a
policy on grounds oI misstatement or suppression oI material Iacts in the proposal papers leading
to the issue oI the policy.
O
O Section 118 Exemptions:
O 7.46 The Committee looked at the provisions in Section 118 oI the Act speciIying
exemptions Irom the applications oI the Act and noted that under sub-para (c) insurance
businesses iner alia carried on by the Central Government or a State Government could be
exempt Irom application oI the provisions oI the Act in entirety or to have them applied to such
extent and on such conditions or modiIications as the Central Government may by order lay
down. The exemption covers the liIe insurance schemes run by several State Governments Ior
their employees, the Postal LiIe Insurance Scheme oI the Central Government although its
extended operations now covered members oI the public, and the Army Group Insurance Fund.
Having regard to the special arrangements made and the scope oI coverage in these cases, the
Committee did not consider it necessary or desirable to suggest extending application oI that in
any selective way as the Central Government would consider.
O
O 7.46.1 The Committee noted in this connection that in the recommendation covering
amendment to Section 94A(2) oI the Act in its application to co-operative societies, which
permitted IRDA to selectively apply provisions oI the Act to such societies carrying on insurance
business, the Law Commission arguing on grounds oI making Ior a level playing Iield, had
recommended that no total exemption should be permitted and selective extension again oI
provisions oI the Act should be a matter Ior the Central Government to decide. Going on in a
sub-note as it were to this recommendation, organizations and associations carrying on insurance
business without obtaining a certiIicate oI registration Irom the IRDA (i.e. Army WelIare
Association, Postal Insurance, etc.) are suggested to be brought within the purview oI the
regulatory regime but requirements oI capital and deposits be either relaxed or suspended.
O
O 7.46.2 The Committee does not consider that the argument oI making Ior a level playing Iield
need apply, in relation to corporate players, to bring these special arrangements under the
regulatory regime. SpeciIically with respect to the Army Group Insurance Fund it has been
submitted that it is not insurance business that is being run that a welIare measure covering all
Army personnel, in war as in peace, with coverage being a service condition and the needs oI the
Army Ior conIidentiality continue to remain as valid in regard to experience under the Fund. The
Committee does agree and reiterates its view, earlier expressed, that no change need be there in
the exemptions currently covering the special insurance arrangements noted as available under
Section 118 oI the Act.
O
O Review of Insurance Rules, 13
O 7.48 A signiIicant number oI Insurance Rules, 1939 (the Rules` Ior short), has become
redundant, consequent upon the various amendments to the Act, and more particularly with the
enactment oI the IRDA Act, 1999, and conIerment oI powers on the Authority to make
regulations in regard to various matters, which were earlier conIerred upon the Central
Government. ThereIore, it is suggested that such oI the Rules that have become redundant be
weeded out.
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O

O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O

O

O
O
O
O
O
O

Particulars oI the Meetings convened by KPN Committee on Law Commission Report

Sl No. Date(S) oI Meeting Venue
1 17.03.2005 OIIice oI the Authority, Hyderabad
3 25.04.2005 OIIice oI the Authority, Jeevan Tara Bldg, New Delhi
26.04.2005
4 18.05.2005 OIIice oI the Authority,
Hyderabad
19.05.2005
5 31.05.2005 NIA, Pune
01.06.2005

O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
Appendix - 3

ICP 21 Investments

The supervisory authority requires insurers to comply with standards on investment activities.
These standards include requirements on investment policy, asset mix, valuation, diversiIication,
asset-liability matching, and risk management.

Explanatory note

21.1. Insurers must manage their investments in a sound and prudent manner. An investment
portIolio carries a range oI investment-related risks that might aIIect the coverage oI technical
provisions and the solvency margin. Insurers need to identiIy, measure, report and control the
main risks.

21.2. For insurers in many jurisdictions concentration risk arising Irom the limited availability oI
suitable domestic investment vehicles is a real problem. By contrast, international insurers`
investment strategies are potentially complex because oIten they need to manage and match
assets and liabilities in a number oI currencies and diIIerent markets. In addition, the need Ior
liquidity resulting Irom potential large-scale payments may Iurther complicate an insurer`s
investment strategy.

21.3. The supervisory authority ensures that standards are established Ior insurers in managing
their investment portIolios and inherent risks. The supervisory authority needs to have both the
authority and ability to assess these risks and their potential impact on technical provisions and
solvency. However, the detailed Iormulation oI an insurer`s investment management policy and
internal risk control methodology is the responsibility oI the board oI directors.

Essential criteria
a. Requirements regarding the management oI investments are in place, either in the law or in
supervisory rules. These requirements address, but may not be limited to, the Iollowing:

the mixture and diversiIication by type
limits or restrictions on the amount that may be held in particular types oI Iinancial
instruments, property, and receivables
the saIekeeping oI assets
the appropriate matching oI assets and liabilities
the level oI liquidity.

b. Investments are valued according to a method prescribed by or acceptable to the
supervisory authority.

c. The supervisory authority requires insurers to have in place an overall strategic investment
policy, approved and reviewed annually by the board oI directors, that addresses the
Iollowing main elements:

the risk proIile oI the insurer
the determination oI the strategic asset allocation, that is, the long-term asset mix over
the main investment categories
the establishment oI limits Ior the allocation oI assets by geographical area, markets,
sectors, counterparties and currency
the extent to which the holding oI some types oI assets is restricted or disallowed, Ior
example illiquid or volatile assets or derivatives
the conditions under which the insurer can pledge or lend assets
an overall policy on the use oI Iinancial derivatives and structured products that have
the economic eIIect oI derivatives (reIer to ICP 22)
clear accountability Ior all asset transactions and associated risks.

d. The risk management systems must cover the risks associated with investment activities
that might aIIect the coverage oI technical provisions and/or olvency margins (capital).
The main risks include:

market risk
credit risk
liquidity risk
Iailure in saIe keeping oI assets (including the risk oI inadequate custodial agreements).

e. The supervisory authority checks that insurers have in place adequate internal controls to
ensure that assets are managed in accordance with the overall investment policy, as well
as in compliance with legal, accounting, and regulatory requirements. These controls
should ensure that investment procedures are documented and properly overseen.
Normally the Iunctions responsible Ior measuring, monitoring, settling and controlling
asset transactions are separate Irom the Iront oIIice Iunctions (reIer to ICP 10).

I. The supervisory authority requires that oversight oI, and clear management accountability
Ior, an insurer`s investment policies and procedures remain ultimately with the board oI
directors, regardless oI the extent to which associated activities and Iunctions are
delegated or outsourced.

g. The supervisory authority requires that key staII involved with investment activities have
the appropriate levels oI skills, experience and integrity.

h. The supervisory authority requires that insurers have in place rigorous audit procedures
that include Iull coverage oI their investment activities to ensure the timely identiIication
oI internal control weaknesses and operating system deIiciencies. II the audit is
perIormed internally it should be independent oI the Iunction being reviewed.

i. The supervisory authority requires that insurers have in place eIIective procedures Ior
monitoring and managing their asset/liability position to ensure that their investment
activities and asset positions are appropriate to their liability and risk proIiles.

j. The supervisory authority requires that insurers have in place contingency plans to mitigate
the eIIects oI deteriorating conditions.

Advanced criteria

k. The supervisory authority requires that insurers undertake regular stress testing Ior a range
oI market scenarios and changing investment and operating conditions in order to assess
the appropriateness oI asset allocation limits (reIer to ICP 20 AC g and ICP 23 AC j).

ICP 23 CapitaI adequacy and soIvency

The supervisory authority requires insurers to comply with the prescribed solvency regime. This
regime includes capital adequacy requirements and requires suitable Iorms oI capital that enable
the insurer to absorb signiIicant unIoreseen losses.

Explanatory note

23.1. A sound solvency regime is essential to the supervision oI insurance companies and the
protection oI policyholders. Capital adequacy requirements are part oI a solvency regime. A
solvency regime should take into account not only the suIIiciency oI technical provisions to
cover all expected and some unexpected claims and expenses but also the suIIiciency oI capital
to absorb signiIicant unexpected losses - to the extent not covered by the technical provisions -
on the risks Ior which capital is explicitly required. It should also require additional capital to
absorb losses Irom risks not explicitly identiIied.

23.2. In order to protect policyholders Irom undue loss, it is necessary that a solvency regime
establishes not only minimum capital adequacy requirements, but also a solvency control level,
or series oI control levels, which act as indicators or triggers Ior early supervisory action, beIore
problems become serious threats to an insurer`s solvency. The Iorm oI the solvency control level
may be based on capital levels or other Iinancial measures related to the solvency regime oI the
jurisdiction.

23.3. Any allowance Ior reinsurance in a capital adequacy and solvency regime should consider
the eIIectiveness oI the risk transIer and make allowance Ior the likely security oI the reinsurance
counterparty.

Essential criteria

a. The solvency regime addresses in a consistent manner:

valuation oI liabilities, including technical provisions and the margins contained
therein
quality, liquidity and valuation oI assets
matching oI assets and liabilities
suitable Iorms oI capital
capital adequacy requirements.

b. Any allowance Ior risk mitigation or transIer considers both its eIIectiveness and the
security oI any counterparty.

c. Suitable Iorms oI capital are deIined.

d. Capital adequacy requirements are sensitive to the size, complexity and risks oI an
insurer`s operations, as well as the accounting requirements that apply to the insurer.

e. The minimum capital adequacy requirements should be set at a suIIiciently prudent level
to give reasonable assurance that policyholder interests will be protected.

I. Capital adequacy requirements are established at a level such that an insurer having assets
equal to the total oI liabilities and required capital will be able to absorb signiIicant
unIoreseen losses.

g. Solvency control levels are established. Where the solvency position reaches or Ialls below
one or more control levels, the supervisory authority intervenes and requires corrective
action by the insurer or imposes restrictions on the insurer. The control level is set so that
corrective action can be taken in a timely manner (reIer to ICP 14).

h. InIlation oI capital through double or multiple gearing, intra-group transactions, or other
Iinancing techniques available as a result oI the insurer`s membership in a corporate
group is addressed in the capital adequacy and solvency calculation (reIer to ICP 17).

i. The solvency regime addresses the requirements placed upon an insurer operating through
a branch.

Advanced criteria

j. The solvency regime provides Ior periodic, Iorward-looking analysis (e.g., dynamic
solvency/stress testing) oI an insurer`s ability to meet its obligations under various
conditions (reIer to ICP 20 AC g and ICP 21 AC k).

k. The supervisory authority assesses the structure oI its solvency regime against structures
oI a peer group oI jurisdictions and works towards achieving consistency.

O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O

O Appendix
4
O
O ACRONYMS used in the Report:
O
O IRDA: Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority
O
O IAIS: International Association oI Insurance Supervisors
O
O MAD: Margin Ior Adverse Deviations
O
O PAD: Provision Ior Adverse Deviations
O
O IAA: International Actuarial Association
O
O GRA: Grievance Redressal Authority

O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
Appendix 5
O
O
$uggestions Received
3/0
$I
No. $ubject Received From
1 Surveyors Consumer Education and Research Centre
2 nsurance Act, 1938 and RDA Act, 1999 FCC
3 Section 40 ( C ) Oriental nsurance Co. Ltd
4 Surveyors The nstitute of Loss Adjusters
5 Financial Service and Market Act, 2000 KC Mishra
6 nsurance Core Principles - nsurance KC Mishra
7 Surveyors Richard Tully
8 Surveyors Praveen Kothari
9 Surveyors Rajan Govind
10 Surveyors Srimu Sudarshan
11 Surveyors Chellakannu
12 Surveyors
Association of Loss Assessors & Surveyors,
Bihar
13 Surveyors S Murali
14 Surveyors S Baskaran
15 Reinsurance Munish Re
16 Surveyors Trans Car ndia
17 Grievance Redressal Mechanism RDA
18 Surveyors nstitute of Loss Adjustrers, Chennai
19 Regulation and Supervision S P Subhedar
20 Surveyors K Jaya Kumar
21 Raise in Foreign Equity Limit Sun Life Financial
22 Surveyors Mehta and Padamsey Pvt. Ltd
23 nsurance Electronic Transactions K C Mishra
24 Surveyors Anji KM
25 Surveyors Nanda Kumar R
26 Surveyors Laiju G Kodiyan
27 nsurance Law Provisions P Majmudar
28 Surveyors Philip Kuriakose
29 General American nsruance Association
30 General American nsruance Association
31 Surveyors Muhammed Rafeekh
32 Surveyors Joice John
33 Surveyors M Kavitha
34 Surveyors Shaji Suresh Kumar
35 Surveyors Thadeus Shaju
36 Surveyors Jaya Roshni
37 Surveyors Pius J
38 Surveyors Nanda Kumar R
39 Surveyors Bijuraj
40 Surveyors P Sudha
41 Surveyors T Pannerselvan
42 nsurance Act Amendment Sreenivasan, Bajaj Allianz Gen. ns.
43 Sec 40-C & 64-M & 64VB United ndia nsurance Officers' Association
44 Sec 64 UM Sub Section 5 Surveyor's Welfare Association, Gurgaon
45 Section - 64UM Sumant Sud
46
Sections 45,49,2(7A),40(2A),32B,32C,
27C Max New york Life nsurance Co Ltd
47 Sec 38 & 39 C Ramanathan
48 Sec 64 UM Sumant Sud
49 Sec 102-109 TAC
50 Rule 17E of nsurance Rules The Oriental nsurance Company Limited
51 Section 118 Army Group nsurance Fund

O
O
O

O
O

The KPN Committee

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

The KPN Committee

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

The KPN Committee

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

REPORT OF THE kPN

You might also like