Bhandhari

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 5

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/371762348

Effect of growing substrates on performance of Lilium (Lilium longiflorum L.)


cv. Bach

Article · January 2016

CITATION READS

1 12

3 authors, including:

Ranjan Srivastava Dr Sunil Kumar


G. B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar Narendra Deva University of Agriculture and Technology
13 PUBLICATIONS 62 CITATIONS 12 PUBLICATIONS 14 CITATIONS

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

All content following this page was uploaded by Dr Sunil Kumar on 22 June 2023.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.


N
Save Nature to Survive
11(2): 1291-1293, 2016 (Supplement on Agronomy)
www.thebioscan.com

EFFECT OF GROWING SUB STRA


SUBSTRA TES ON PERFORMANCE OF
STRATES
LILIUM (LILIUM LONGIFLORUM L .) CV
L.) CV.. BACH
BACH

NARENDRA SINGH BHANDARI*, RANJAN SRIVASTAVA AND SUNIL KUMAR


Department of Horticulture, G.B. Pant University of Agriculture & Technology
Pantnagar - 263 145 (Uttarakhand), INDIA
e-mail:[email protected]

KEYWORDS ABSTRACT
Lilium To investigate the effect of growing substrates on performance of Lilium (Lilium longiflorum L.) cv. ‘Bach’ an
growing substrate experiment was conducted at Model Floriculture Center, GBPUAT, Pantnagar, India during 2014-15. Results
flowering characteristics indicated that plant height (104.90 cm), stem diameter (9.51 mm), number of flower buds (3.46), flower bud
bulbous attributes length (11.47 cm), flower bud diameter (33.50 mm), flower diameter (16.16 cm) and vase life (11.26 days) were
rooting behavior recorded maximum with T2 (100% cocopeat) treated plants. However, number of days to bud appearance
(29.53) and number of days to first flower opening (59.33) were recorded maximum with T 1 (soil) treated plants.
Received on : Among bulbous attributes bulb diameter (51.97 mm), number of bulblets (3.96), stem roots (13.60 cm) and basal
04.02.2016 roots length (24.96 cm) were found maximum in T2. Results of investigation showed that cocopeat enriched
substrate is best suitable for lilium cultivation in container system.
Accepted on :
21.05.2016

*Corresponding
author

INTRODUCTION for success of soilless culture system (Olympios, 1995).


Cocopeat has good physical properties, high total pore space,
Genus Lilium (Lilium longiflorum L.) includes herbaceous high water holding capacity, slow water and nutrient releasing
flowering plants growing from non tunicated scaly bulbs, ability, low shrinkage, low bulk density and slow
belongs to family Liliaceae. With having different shape, size, biodegradation (Evans et al., 1996) which are desirable for
colour and fragrance lilium holds 4th position among top 10 proper plant growth and development, bulb development,
cut flowers in world floriculture trade (Bahr and Compton, uptake of nutrients and water. Erwin, (1998) reported that lilium
2004). In India, liliums are popularizing among growers of forced in cocopeat and rice hulls have produced superior
Himanchal Pradesh, Jammu Kashmir, Uttarakhand and Ooty crops as compare to soil. However, in India information
because of its high profitability within a short growing periods regarding this aspect is scanty. Therefore, the primary objective
(4 months). of present investigation was to determine the performance of
In recent years, soilless culture recognized as an advance lilium in substrates culture under container system.
system for ornamental horticulture crop production and lilium
forcing (Oki and Lieth, 2004) because it has been observed MATERIALS AND METHODS
that field soil are generally unsatisfactory for the production of
plants in containers, primarily because they do not provide Present research was conducted during 2014-15 at Model
the required aeration and water retention status that are Floriculture Center, GBPUA & T Pantnagar located in Tarai
essential to maintain equilibrium between moisture content region in foothills of Himalaya at an altitude of 243.84 meter
and gaseous exchange in a limited volume of pot (Kuklal et above mean sea level. The experiment was laid out in
al., 2012). The soil cropping system traditionally used for Completely Randomized Design ensuring uniformity to all
horticultural crops production but the main problem with soil the treatments. Four treatments were T1: Garden soil, T 2:
is the loss of plants due to infection by soil born diseases Cocopeat, T3: Cocopeat + Sand (1:1) and T4: Soil + Sand
caused by Phytophtora sp. (Durner et al., 2002), nematodes (1:1). However, bulbs (vernalized) of cv. ‘Bach’ were imported
and the occurrence of soil limited factors. The properties of from VWS EXPORT IMPORT FLOWERBULBS B.V. Holland.
different substrates used as soilless growing media exhibit Ten bulbs of ‘Bach’ 14-16 cm grades were planted in plastic
direct and indirect effects on growth, productivity (Puri, 2012) containers (60x40x15 cm) containing 20 liters (on volume
and quality of plants (Kumar et al., 2014). basis) of substrates and randomized inside greenhouse during
The crop production using substrates also allows a better first week of November. The bulbs treated with 0.01% Bavistin
control of the root environment (Abad et al., 2001). Thus, solution before transplanting to check bulb and root rot.
selection of an ideal substrate is one of the most important key Cocopeat and sand procured from local supplier. During active

1291
NARENDRA SINGH BHANDARI et al.,

growth flowering attributes were recorded on mean flower might be due to the better water retention, air filled porosity,
plant height (cm), stem diameter (mm), number of flower buds, gas diffusion and nutrient availability to the roots in soilless
number of days to bud appearance, flower bud length (cm), cultivation system (Abad et al., 2001). However, minimum
flower bud diameter (mm), flower diameter (cm), number of bulb diameter (41.50 mm) and minimum number of bulblets
days to first flower opening, vase life (days). At the end of the (3.00) were recorded with T1 (soil).
growing season, five plants were uprooted and evaluated in The pooled data in Table 2 shows that minimum Stem root
terms of bulb diameter, number of bulblets, stem roots (cm) length (5.88 cm) and basal root length (7.22cm) were recorded
and basal roots length (cm). The results were statistically with T1 (soil) treated plants, this might be due to the high
evaluated through ANOVA with the help of using online compactness, bulk density and low porosity of T1 (soil) that
OPSTAT (Statistics Analytical Software) developed by leads poor root growth and development. Lipiec et al. (2003)
department of computer section, CCS, HAU Hisar. also reported that with increasing growing media compaction
result in decrease in length and number of the root and
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION increasing irregularity of root distribution system. However,
maximum stem root length (13.60 cm) and basal root length
There were significant differences in the vegetative and floral (24.96 cm) were measured with T2 (cocopeat) treated plants
attributes with respect to the different growing substrates (Table (Table 2). The findings are in accordance with the earlier
1 and figure 1). Maximum stem length (104.90 cm), stem findings of Sharma et al. (2015).
diameter (9.51 mm), number of flower buds (3.46), flower
bud length (11.47 cm), flower bud diameter (33.50 mm), flower As lilium is a short duration (3-4 month) crop, substrate
diameter (16.16 cm) and vase life (11.26 days) were observed selection is most critical factor for successful production. This
with cocopeat (T2) treated plants. The significant increase in
all these attributes might be due to better plant growth,
resulting maximum production and utilization of photo-
assimilates. These finding are in convenience with Jhon et al.,
(2005) in tulip. However, minimum number of days to flower
bud appearance (29.53) and minimum number of days to first
flower opening (59.33) were recorded maximum with soil (T1)
treated plants. The similar results were reported by Tehranifar
et al. (2011) in Lilium. Treder (2002) reported that Lilium cv.
Star Gazer grown in cocopeat flowered earlier flowering, had
better quality expressed as higher fresh and dry weight of
flowers and leaves, had longer flower buds, compared to these
grown in the control substrate.
Likewise flowering attributes, the effect of various potting media
on bulbous attributes of lilium cv. Bach shows significant
difference (Table 2). Maximum flower bulb diameter (51.97
mm) and number of bulblets (3.96) were recorded with T2
(cocopeat) treated plants that was significantly higher than T3 Figure 1: Effect of growing substrates on growth and development
(cocopeat + sand) and followed by T4 (cocopeat + sand). This of lilium plants

Table 1: Effect of growing media on flowering attributes of lilium cv. Bach

Treatment Plant Stem No. of Number No. of days Bud Bud dia Flower Vase
height diameter days to bud of flower to first flower length (mm) dia life
(cm) (mm) appearance buds per opening (cm) (cm) (Days)
plant
T1: Soil (100%) 93.13 8.49 32.00 2.40 61.53 10.34 28.55 14.40 7.46
T2: Cocopeat (100%) 104.90 9.51 29.53 3.46 59.33 11.47 33.50 16.16 11.26
T3: Cocopeat + Sand (1:1) 102.13 8.76 30.33 3.26 61.00 10.59 32.57 15.05 8.40
T4: Cocopeat + Soil (1:1) 98.80 8.62 30.40 2.60 61.40 10.47 30.11 14.89 7.60
CD at 5% 1.94 0.072 0.84 0.36 0.65 0.10 0.45 0.26 0.59

Table2: Effect of growing media on bulb and rooting behaviour of lilium cv. Bach

Bulb Dia (mm) Number of Length of Length of


bulblet per plant Stem/feeder roots (cm) basal roots (cm)
T1: Soil (100%) 41.50 3.00 5.88 7.22
T2: Cocopeat (100%) 51.97 3.96 13.60 24.96
T3: Cocopeat + Sand (1:1) 49.33 3.83 8.67 17.00
T4: Cocopeat + Soil (1:1) 45.87 3.43 8.20 15.34
CD at 5% 0.36 0.47 0.22 0.87

1292
EFFECT OF GROWING SUBSTRATES ON PERFORMANCE

studies revealed that substrate like cocopeat can be use for Kumar, A., Pandey, S. D., Rai, R. R. and Nath, V. 2014. Evaluation of
hitech lilium production in container system. alternate potting media mixtures for raising quality planting material
of litchi in polybags. The Bioscan. 9(1): 381-384.
Lipiec, J., Medvedev, V. V., Brikas. M., Dumitru, E., Lyndina, T. E.,
REFERENCES
Pousseva, S. and Fulajtar, E. 2003. Effect of soil compaction on root
Abad, M., Noguera, P. and Bures, S. 2001. National inventory of growth and crop yield in Central and Eastern Europe. International
organic wastes for use as growing media for ornamental potted plant Agrophysics. 17: 61-9.
production. Biores. Technol. 77: 197-200. Oki, L. R. and Leith, J. H. 2004. Effect of changes in substrate salinity
Bahr, L. R. and Compton, M. E. 2004. Competence for in vitro on the elongation of Rosa hybrida L.‘Kardinal’ stems. Scientia
bulblet regeneration among eight Lilium genotypes. Hort Science. Horticulturae. 101: 103-119.
39(1): 127-129. Olympios, C. M. 1995. Overview of soilless culture advantage,
Durner, E. F., Poling, E. B. and Maas, J. L. 2002. Recent advances in constraints and perspective for its use in Mediterranean countries.
strawberry plug transplant technology. Hort. Technol. 12: 545-550. Cahier Option. 31: 307-324.
Erwin, J. E. 1998. Easter lily production. Minn. Comm. Flower grow. Puri, S. 2012. Vegetative growth and fruiting induction of Lentinula
Bull. 47(5): 1-10. edodes strains on different substrates. The Bioscan. 7(1): 09-12.
Evans, M. R., Konduru, S. and Stamps, R. H. 1996. Source variation Sharma, V. K., Godara, A. K. and Kumatkar, R. B. 2015. Effect of
in physical and chemical properties of coconut coir dust. Hort science. soilless growing structures on vegetative growth and roots of strawberry
31: 965-967. cv. Sweet Charlie. The Ecoscan. 9(1&2): 89-91.
Jhon, A. Q., Khan, F. U., Bhat, R. A., Rouf, A. and Qadri, Z. A. 2005. Tehranifar, A., Selahvarzi, Y. and Alizadeh, B. 2011. Effect of different
Flowering and bulb production in Tulip as influenced by media growing media on growth and development of two Lilium (Oriental
amendment under polyhouse conditions. J. OrnamentaI Horticulturae. and Asiatic Hybrids) types in soilless conditions. Acta Horticulturae.
8(2): 143-145. 900: 139-142.
Kuklal, S. S., Debasish, S., Arnab, B. and Dubey, R. K. 2012. Water Treder, J. and Nowak, J. 2002. Zastosowanie pod³o¿y kokosowych
retention characteristics of soil bio-amendments used as growing wuprawie roœlin rabatowych, ZESZ. PROBL. POST. NAUK ROL.
media in pot culture. J. Appllied Horticulture. 14: 92-97. 485: 335-358. (In Polish with English abstract).

1293
1294

View publication stats

You might also like