Book Preview Ready Reckoner 3NEWLAWS
Book Preview Ready Reckoner 3NEWLAWS
Book Preview Ready Reckoner 3NEWLAWS
ev
Pr
k
oo
eB
pl
m
Sa
Published by
Samarth Agrawal Books LLP
7R/5, Kailashpuri Colony, Tashkant Marg
Civil Lines, Prayagraj-211001
E-mail : [email protected]
Website : www.samarthagrawalbooks.com
iew
ISBN : 978-81-965961-2-5
ev
Compiled & Edited by :
Shreya Bhargava & Samarth Agrawal
Former Judges (U.P. Judicial Service) Pr
k
oo
Disclaimer
Due care has been taken while compiling, editing and printing this book to avoid any error or omissions. Neither the author nor the
eB
publisher of the book holds any responsibility for any mistake that may have inadvertently crept in. They also take no responsibility
for any loss or damage caused to any person on account of any action taken on the basis of the book. The publisher shall not be liable
for any direct, consequential or incidental damage arising out of use of this book. Any mistake or discrepancy noted may be brought
pl
contact the concerned department or official publication. Kindly contact the concerned department for official papers. In case of
any binding mistake, misprints or missing pages the publisher's entire liability is limited to replacement of the book within one week
Sa
of purchase by similar edition/reprint of the book upon production of original invoice of purchase.
All disputes are subject to the courts of Prayagraj jurisdiction only.
iew
Changes Introduced in Various Provisions
ev
Pr
k
List of New & Omitted Provisions
oo
eB
pl
We are delighted to present this comprehensive ready reckoner tailored specifically for aspirants of
judicial service, law students, and legal professionals who seek basic understanding of three new criminal
laws i.e. Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Bharatiya
Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023. As authors deeply committed to facilitating your legal journey, we have me-
ticulously crafted this book with the utmost consideration for your learning experience.
The focal point of this book lies in its concise study material, carefully curated to provide you with
a clear and comprehensive grasp of the intricacies of the three new criminal laws. To enhance your reading
experience and facilitate efficient learning, we have implemented a unique approach to highlight key aspects.
iew
Newly introduced provisions have been distinctly marked with an asterisk (*) throughout the text,
drawing your attention to the legal changes. Moreover, changes in old provisions have been thoughtfully
ev
emphasized by rendering the text in bold, ensuring that you can easily identify and comprehend the evolving
landscape of criminal laws.
Pr
Recognizing the importance of clarity, we have mentioned “Changes Introduced” in the respec-
tive chapters separately. This deliberate structuring aims to simplify complex legal concepts, allowing for a
k
seamless understanding of the modified provisions. It is our sincere belief that this approach will prove
oo
instrumental in aiding your preparation for judicial services and legal examinations.
eB
In addition to these strategic features, we have incorporated comparative charts to facilitate quick
reference. These charts serve as invaluable tools, offering a visual representation of the provision and aiding
in the comprehension of nuances within the legal framework.
pl
m
As you embark on this journey through the pages of this book, our earnest hope is that it serves as
a guiding light in your pursuit of legal knowledge. May it empower you with the insights and understanding
Sa
PRELIMINARY .........11
DEFINITIONS .........12
POWERS OF SUPERIOR OFFICER OF POLICE AND AID TO THE MAGISTRATE AND .........29
iew
THE POLICE
ev
ARREST .........30
Pr
PROCESSES TO COMPEL, PRODUCTION OF THINGS .........49
k
RECIPROCAL ARRANGEMENTS FOR ASSISTANCE IN CERTAIN MATTERS AND .........53
oo
iew
APPEALS ..........164
ev
REFERENCE AND REVISION ..........170
TRANSFER OF CRIMINAL CASES Pr
EXECUTION, SUSPENSION, REMISSION AND COMMUTATION OF SENTENCES
..........171
..........173
k
oo
2023
PRELIMINARY ..........246
PUNISHMENT ..........254
iew
OFFENCES AFFECTING THE HUMAN BODY ..........293
ev
OFFENCES AGAINST THE PUBLIC TRANQUILLITY ..........315
Pr
FALSE EVIDENCE AND OFFENCES AGAINST PUBLIC JUSTICE ..........320
SANHITA, 2023
PRELIMINARY .........410
iew
FACTS WHICH NEED NOT BE PROVED .........446
ev
ORAL EVIDENCE .........448
Pr
EXCLUSION OF ORAL EVIDENCE BY DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE .........465
k
BURDEN OF PROOF .........467
oo
ESTOPPEL .........473
eB
WITNESSES .........475
iew
ev
Pr
BHARATIYA NAGARIK
k
SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023
oo
eB
pl
m
Sa
iew
ev
Pr
k
oo
eB
pl
m
Sa
PRELIMINARY
[Chapter I, Sections 1-5]
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) is intended to consolidate and amend the law relating
to Criminal Procedure.
Supreme Court in Shivjee Singh v. Nagendra Tiwari,AIR 2010 SC 2261 held that provisions of the
code are to be interpreted in light of recognized principles of construction that procedural laws are
meant for doing substantial justice.
Supreme Court in Sangram Singh v. Election Tribunal, Koth, AIR 1955 SC 425, held that rules of
procedure are designed to facilitate justice and further its ends. Too technical interpretation should be
iew
avoided.
ev
Name: According to Section 1(1) of BNSS this Act may be called the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha
Sanhita, 2023.
Pr
Commencement: The Sanhita got the Presidential assent on 25.12.2023 and it shall come into force on
k
oo
01.07.2024.
Territorial extent: According to Section 1(2) of BNSS the provisions of the Sanhita contained in
eB
The concerned State Government has been empowered to apply any or all of the provisions of the
Sa
DEFINITIONS
[Section 2]
iew
Section 2(1)(j) : High Court
Section 2(1)(k) : Inquiry
ev
Section 2(1)(l) : Investigation
Section 2(1)(m) :
Section 2(1)(n) :
Judicial Proceeding
Local Jurisdiction
Pr
k
Section 2(1)(o) : Non-cognizable Offence & Non-cognizable Case
oo
‘Audio-video electronic means’ shall include use of any communication device for the purposes of
video conferencing, recording of processes of identification, search and seizure or evidence, transmis-
sion of electronic communication and for such other purposes and by such other means as the State
Government may, by rules provide. It is a newly introduced definition.
‘Bail’ means release of a person accused of or suspected of commission of an offence from the
custody of law upon certain conditions imposed by an officer or Court on execution by such person
of a bond or a bail bond.
Bailable
For the purpose of bail,
Offences may be classified as
Non-bailable
‘Bailable offence’ means an offence which is shown as bailable in the First Schedule or which is made
bailable by any other law for the time being in force. A ‘Non-bailable’ offence means any other
iew
offence.
Whether the offence is bailable or not is provided in the column 5 of First Schedule. First Schedule
ev
lays down the classification of offences given under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.
Pr
According to the First Schedule the offences under laws other than BNS which are punishable with
imprisonment of 3 years or more are considered to be ‘non-bailable’, while offences punishable with
less than 3 years of imprisonment are considered to be ‘bailable’.
k
oo
The provisions relating to bail are laid down in Chapter XXXV of the Sanhita.
“Charge” includes any head of charge when the charge contains more heads than one.
A ‘charge’ can be defined as a precise formulation of the specific accusation made against a person. It
is framed when a prima facie case is disclosed about commission of certain offence or offences.
Object of framing of charge: The object of framing a charge is to give notice of the essentials facts
which the prosecution proposes to establish against the accused in order to prove the case against him,
so that the accused may not be prejudiced in his defence.
It is the foundation of the accusation in a criminal trial. It separates the inquiry stage from the trial.
The provision relating to charge are laid down in Chapter XVIII [Sections 234-247] of the Sanhita.
According to Section 2(1)(g) a ‘Cognizable offence’ means an offence for which & ‘Cognizable Case’
means a case in which a police officer may, in accordance with the first schedule or under any other law
for the time being in force, arrest without warrant.
According to Section 2(1)(o) “non-cognizable offence’ means an offence for which and a ‘non-
cognizable case’ means a case in which, a police officer has no authority to arrest without a warrant.
According to Section 175(1) of BNSS any officer in charge of police station may without the order
of magistrate investigate any cognizable case. This section makes it expressly clear that a cognizable case
can be investigated by the police officer without the order of the magistrate. Whereas Section 174(2)
of BNSS states that police officer shall not investigate a non-cognizable case without the order of a
iew
magistrate having power to try such a case or commit the case for trial.
On the point of arrest in cognizable and non-cognizable cases reference may be made to Section 35(1)
of BNSS. It says that any police officer may without the order of magistrate and without warrant,
ev
arrest any person. Whereas Section 35(2) lays down that no person concerned in a non-cognizable case
Pr
shall be arrested without warrant or order from the court [Section 39 being exception].
If a case relates to two or more offences of which at least one is a cognizable one, the case shall be
k
deemed to be a cognizable case, notwithstanding that the other offences are non-cognizable [Section
oo
174(4)]. Thus, it can be said that if there are more than one offence then even if one of the offences is
eB
The classification of offences into cognizable and non-cognizable is shown in column 4 of the First
Schedule of the Sanhita.
‘Complaint means any allegation made orally or in writing to a magistrate with a view to his taking
action under this Sanhita, that some person whether known or unknown has committed an offence but
does not include a police report.
Explanation : A report made by a police officer in a case which discloses, after investigation the
commission of a non-cognizable offence shall be deemed to be a complaint, and the police officer by
whom such report is made shall be deemed to be the complainant.
iew
It must not be a ‘police report’.
A complaint may be made oral or in writing, no particular format is required.
ev
A complainant need not be a person aggrieved except in cases falling under Section 215-222 of the
Sanhita. Any person having knowledge of the commission of any offence can file a complaint.
Pr
Some Special & Local Acts (Cattle Trespass Act, Prevention of food Adulteration Act, Employees
Provident Fund Act etc.) provides that complaint should be made only by some particular persons.
k
Deemed complaint :
oo
The general provision is that the complaint does not include police report. However, according to the
eB
explanation of Section 2(1)(h) of the Sanhita if after investigation it is disclosed that the offence is a
non-cognizable then the report of the police officer will be deemed to be a complaint.
Electronic communication means the communication of any written, verbal, pictorial information or
video content transmitted or transferred (whether from one person to another or from one device to
Sa
another or from a person to a device or from a device to a person) by means of an electronic device
including a telephone, mobile phone, or other wireless telecommunication device, or a computer, or
audio-video player or camera or any other electronic device or electronic form as may be specified by
notification, by the Central Government.
Inquiry means every inquiry, other than a trial conducted under this Sanhita by a Magistrate or Court.
Purpose: The basic purpose of inquiry is to ascertain truth or falsity of facts in order to proceed
further under the Sanhita.
Inquiry is conducted by the magistrate and inquiry and trial does not overlap. Where trial begins, inquiry
stops.
Proceedings under Section 126, 127, 128, 129, 144, 152, 163, 164, 166, 167, 225, 379 of the Sanhita
have been held to be inquiries.
Investigation includes all proceedings under the Sanhita for the collection of evidence conducted by the
police officer or any person, other than the magistrate, authorized by him.
Purpose: The basic purpose of investigation is the collection of evidence.
Investigation is conducted by police officer. It must be noted here that investigation is not conducted by
the magistrate, however, in certain circumstances magistrate may authorize any person other than police
officer to conduct an investigation.
Explanation to Section 2(1)(l) provides thatthe provisions of the special Act shall prevail, where any
of the provisions of a special Act are inconsistent with the provisions of this Sanhita.
iew
Trial
ev
The term ‘trial’ has not been defined in the Sanhita. There can be no universal meaning of the term
‘trial’. It can be defined as proceeding to determine guilt or innocence of the accused.
Pr
Trial always ends in either acquittal or conviction. The purpose of trial is to find out whether the
accused is guilty or not.
k
Supreme Court in Harchand Singh v. State of Haryana, (1974) SCR (1) 583 held that trial can be
oo
defined as a proceeding to determine guilt or innocence of the accused. Trial ends in either acquittal or
conviction.
eB
“Judicial Proceedings” includes any proceeding in the course of which evidence is or may be legally
m
taken on oath.
Sa
An “offence” means :
(a) any act or omission made punishable by any law for the time being in force and,
(b) any act in respect of which a complaint may be made under Section 20 of the Cattle Tresspass Act,
1871.
It means a report forwarded by a Police-officer to a Magistrate under Section 193(3) of the Sanhita.
If it discloses the commission of offence, it is known as ‘chargesheet’ or ‘challan’. If it does not disclose
the commission of offence, it is known as ‘final report’ or ‘closure report’.
Warrant case: Warrant case means a case relating to an offence punishable with death, imprisonment
for life or imprisonment for a term exceeding two years.
Summons case : It means a case relating to an offence which is not a warrant case.
The classification is useful for determination of type of trial procedure. The procedure in trial of
summons case is different from that of warrant case. The classification is based on the seriousness of
the offence.
Victims means a person who has suffered any loss or injury caused by reason of the act or omission for
which the accused person has been charged. The expression “victim” also includes his or her guardian
iew
or legal heir.
Section 2(2) of the Sanhita provides that the meaning of the words & expressions used in this Sanhita
ev
and not defined but defined in the Information & Technology Act, 2000 and Bharatiya NyayaSanhita,
2023 are applicable to this Sanhita. Pr
In Jagjeet Singh and Ors. v. Ashish Mishra @ Monu and Anr, (2022) 9 SCC 321 Supreme Court
k
held that victim has a legally vested right to be heard at every step post the occurrence of an offence
oo
including the stage of hearing of bail application of accused. Such a ‘victim’ has unbridled participatory
rights from the stage of investigation till the culmination of the proceedings in an appeal or revision.
eB
CHANGES INTRODUCED
pl
In Section 2(1) of BNSS, 2023 certain new terms have been added in definition clause such as–
Audio video electronic means [Section 2(1)(a)]
m
According to Section 4 of the Sanhita, generally BNSS is applicable in respect of investigation, inquiry
or trial of offences punishable under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS).
General Rule
Investigation in accordance
Offences under
Section 4(2) Inquiry with BNSS
any other law
iew
Trial Exception
Subject to any other
ev
enactment regulating
manner, place of
Pr investigation, inquiry,
k
trial etc.
oo
Section 4(2) further lays down that offences under any other law shall also be investigated, inquired
eB
and tried according to the procedure in the Sanhita. But if there is any enactment which regulates the
manner, place of investigation, inquiry or trial of the offences the procedure prescribed in that enact-
pl
Section 5 lays down that in absence of any specific provision in the Sanhita, the provisions of any
special or local law, special jurisdiction or power conferred or special form of procedure shall not be
Sa
affected.
Thus, a conjoint reading of both sections clearly provides that for offences punishable under BNS
procedure prescribed in BNSS shall be applicable but if there is any special or local law, special proce-
dure or power conferred by any other law, such law, procedure or power shall be applicable.
Supreme Court in Extra-Judicial Execution Victim Famlies Assn. v. Union of India, (2016) 14
SCC 536 held that other enactments which prescribe the procedure would not be affected by the CrPC
(now BNSS) if such statute specifically provides for the applicable procedure which derogates from the
Code.
The BNSS does not apply to contempt of court proceedings as contempt of court is not an offence
within Section 4(2).
Section 6 provides for the classes of criminal courts. According to Section 6 following shall be the
classes of criminal courts –
High Court (and other courts under other laws)
Courts constituted under any law
Courts of Session
Classes of Criminal Courts
Judicial Magistrates of first class
Judicial Magistrates of second class
iew
Executive Magistrates
ev
CHANGES INTRODUCED Pr
Concept of ‘Metropolitan Area’ and ‘Metropolitan Magistrates’, which were earlier provided in
CrPC, has now been abolished in BNSS, 2023.
k
oo
Territorial Divisions
Section 7 provides that every State shall be a sessions division or shall consist of sessions divisions.
eB
Every sessions divisions shall, for the purpose of this Sanhita, be a district or consist of district.
pl
Power of alteration: State Government with consultation of High Court may alter the limits or
number of divisions and districts.
m
Sa
Section 8 deals with the power of State Government to establish Court of Session & the power of
High court to appoint Judges.
Sessions Judges & Additional Sessions Judges are appointed by High Court under Section 8(2).
Place of sitting:Section 8(6) lays down that the Court of Sessions shall ordinarily hold its sitting at
such place or places as the High Court may specify. In certain circumstances the court may also hold its
sitting in any other place in sessions division with the consent of prosecution and the accused.
Section 8(7) provides that Sessions Judge may make rules as to the distribution of business among
such Additional Sessions Judge.
Section 9 provides for establishment of Court of Judicial Magistrate of first class or of second class
in every district by the State Government after consultation with High Court. The Magistrates of such
courts shall be appointed by High Court.
It further provides that the High Court may confer the powers of Judicial Magistrate first class or of
second class to any member of judicial service functioning as Judge in a Civil Court. [Section 9(3)]
Section 10 provides that in every district the High Court shall appoint a Judicial Magistrate of first class
to be the Chief Judicial Magistrate. The High Court may also appoint Judicial Magistrate to be Addi-
tional Chief Judicial Magistrate.
Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate shall have all or any of the powers of Chief Judicial Magistrate.
iew
[Section 10(2)]
The High Court may also designate any Judicial Magistrate of first class to be Sub-divisional Judicial
ev
Magistrates. [Section 10(3)]
Pr
Section 11 provides for the appointment of Special Judicial Magistrate by the High Court on request
of the Central or State Government in respect to particular case or particular classes of cases.
k
oo
Qualification: Any person who hold or has held any post under the government may be appointed as
Special Judicial Magistrate if he possesses such qualification or experience in relation to legal affairs as
eB
Section 12 lays down that subject to the control of High Court, the Chief Judicial Magistrate may,
Sa
from time to time, define the local limits of the areas within which the Magistrates appointed under
Section 9 or Section 11 may exercise powers.
Section 13 provides that every Chief Judicial Magistrate shall be subordinate to the Sessions Judge.
Every other Judicial Magistrate shall, subject to the general control of the Sessions Judge, be subordi-
nate to the Chief Judicial Magistrate.
Executive Magistrates
Sections 14-17 provide for provisions of appointment, jurisdiction and subordination of Executive
Magistrates.
Section 14 provides that in every district the State Government may appoint as many persons as it
thinks fit to be Executive Magistrates and shall appoint one of them to be District Magistrate.
Section 15 provides that the State Government may appoint Executive Magistrates or any police
officer not below the rank of Superintendent of Police or equivalent, to be known as Special
Executive Magistrates and confer on such Special Executive Magistrates such of the powers as are
conferrable under this Sanhita on Executive Magistrates, as it may deem fit.
CHANGES INTRODUCED
Section 15 of BNSS, 2023 corresponds to Section 21 of CrPC. Earlier, in CrPC, only Execu-
tive Magistrates could be appointed as Special Executive Magistrates but now in BNSS, apart
from Executive Magistrate, any police officer not below the rank of Superintendent of
Police and equivalent, can also be appointed as Special Executive Magistrates.
iew
Prosecutor Court Qualification Appointing Other Details
Authority
ev
1. Public High Court Advocate in State Government Appointment to be made after
Prosecutor practice for or Central consultation with High Court.
[Section 18(1)] seven years
or more
Pr
Government
k
2. Public High Court Advocate Central Appointment to be made
oo
for
NCT of Delhi
m
[Proviso to
Sa
Section 18(1)]
3. Additional High Court Advocate in State Government Appointment to be made after
Public practice for or Central consultation with High Court.
Prosecutor seven years Government
[Section 18(1)] or more
4. Public Sessions Advocate in State Government The advocate must be on the
Prosecutor for Court practice for or Central panel prepared by the
District seven years Government District Magistrate in Consul-
[Section 18(3)] or more tation with the Session Judge.
In case of appointment by a State
in which regular cadre of prose-
iew
cadre.
6. Special Public Any Court Advocate in State Government Appointment is to be made for
ev
Prosecutor/s practice for 10 or Central the purposes of any case or class
[Section 18(8)] years or more Government of cases.
7. Assistant
Public
Courts of
Magistrates
Any person
other than a
Pr
State Government
or Central
For the purpose of any particular
Assistant Public Prosecutor is not
k
Prosecutor/s police officer Government available, the District Magistrate
oo
Section 19(3) provides that where no Assistant Public Prosecutor is available for the purposes of any
particular case, the District Magistrate may appoint any other person to be the Assistant Public Prosecu-
tor in charge of that case after giving notice of fourteen days to the State Government.
CHANGES INTRODUCED
Section 18 of BNSS, 2023 corresponds to Section 24 of CrPC. A new Proviso has been
added to Section 18(1) which provides that the appointment of Public Prosecutor and Assis-
tant Public Prosecutor for National Capital of Delhi shall be made by the Central Government
after consultation with the High Court of Delhi.
Explanation (b) to Section 18(6) of BNSS, 2023 now include Special Public Prosecutor also
in the definition of term ‘Public Prosecutor’.
Section 19 of BNSS, 2023 corresponds to Section 25 of CrPC. Section 19(3) of BNSS, 2023
now provides that if no Assistant Public Prosecutor is available, the District Magistrate may
appoint any other person to be the Assistant Public Prosecutor in charge of the particular case,
only after giving fourteen days’ notice to the State Government.
iew
Qualification:
1. For Director and Deputy Director - Advocate in practice for not less than 15 years or is or has
ev
been a Sessions Judge.
2. For Assistant Director – Advocate in practice for not less than seven years or has been a
Magistrate of the first class. [Section 20(2)] Pr
Directorate of Prosecution shall be headed by the Director of Prosecution and shall function under the
k
administrative control of the Head of Home Department in the State. [Section 20(3)]
oo
In Jayaben v. Tejas Kanubhai Zala, (2022) 3 SCC 230 Supreme Court observed that the post of
Director of Prosecution is a very important post in so far as the administration of justice in criminal
eB
matters is concerned. It is the duty of the Director of Prosecution to take prompt decision. Given that
crimes are treated as a wrong against the society as a whole, the role of the Director of Prosecution in
pl
2. Deputy Director of Prosecution-to examine and scrutinise police report and monitor the
cases in which offences are punishable for seven years or more, but less than ten years, for
ensuring their expeditious disposal. [Section 20(8)]
3. Assistant Director of Prosecution - to monitor cases in which offences are punishable for
less than seven years. [Section 20(9)]
However, the Director, Deputy Director or Assistant Director of Prosecution shall have
the power to deal with and be responsible for all proceedings under this Sanhita. [Section
20(10)]
Provisions of this section shall not apply to the Advocate General for the State while performing the
functions of a public prosecutor. [Section 20(12)]
CHANGES INTRODUCED
iew
Section 20 of BNSS, 2023 corresponds to Section 25A of CrPC.
Earlier Section 25A of CrPC provided only for the establishment of Directorate of Prosecu-
tion but now Section 20 of BNSS, 2023 states specifically that Directorate of Prosecution shall
ev
be established both in the State and in every district.
Pr
Section 20(1)(b) of BNSS, 2023 now provides for establishment of Directorate of Prosecu-
tion in every district consisting of as many Deputy Directors and Assistant Directors of Pros-
k
ecution, as State Government thinks fit. New post of Assistant Director of Prosecution has
oo
been created.
Eligibility criteria provided in Section 25A(2) of CrPC for appointment of Director and
eB
Deputy Director of Prosecution has been changedin Section 20(2)(a) of BNSS, 2023. Now,
any person who has been in practice as an advocate for not less than 15 years can be appointed
pl
as Director and Deputy Director of Prosecution. Earlier, in CrPC, it was ten years. Also, the
m
requirement of concurrence of Chief Justice of High Court in their appointment has been
removed.
Sa
Section 20(1)(b) of BNSS, 2023 provides for the eligibility criteria of Assistant Director of
Prosecution. It provides that a person shall be eligible for the appointment of said post if he
has been in practice as an advocate for not less than seven years or has been a Magis-
trate of the first class.
Section 20(4) of BNSS, 2023 now also provides that every Assistant Director of Prosecu-
tion shall be subordinate to Director and Deputy Director of Prosecution.
Section 20(6) of BNSS, 2023 now provides that every Public Prosecutor, or Additional and
Special Public Prosecutor conducting cases in District Court shall be subordinate to Deputy
Director as well as Assistant Director of Prosecution. Earlier in CrPC, they were subordi-
nate to Deputy Director only.
Section 25A(7) of CrPC did not clearly specified the functions of Director and Deputy Direc-
tor of Prosecution. Section 20(7), (8), (9) & (10) of BNSS, 2023 now clearly specifies the
role of Director, Deputy Director and Assistant Director of Prosecution.(Discussed above)
Supreme Court
High Court
Sessions Court
iew
Chief Judicial Magistrate
ev
or Additional Chief Judicial
Magistrate
Pr
Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate
k
oo
India
Sa
States
Session Divisions
Districts
Sub-divisions
POWER OF COURTS
[Chapter III, Sections 21-29]
Trial Courts
Section 21 lays down courts by which offences are triable. It lays down that subject to other provisions
of this Sanhita, any offence under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita may be tried by:-
(i) High Court
(ii) Court of Session
(iii) Any Court by which such offence is shown in the First Schedule to be triable
It also provides that any offence under Section 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70 or 71 of Bharatiya NyayaSanhita
shall be tried as far as practicable by a Court presided over by a women.
iew
Section 21(b) provides for offences other than those mentioned in Bharatiya NyayaSanhita. It pro-
vides that such offences will be tried by the Court mentioned in that law or if no court is mentioned
then they may be tried by-
ev
(i) High Court
Pr
(ii) Any other Court by which offence is shown in the First Schedule to be triable
Section 520 provides that if an offence is tried by High Court otherwise than under Section 447 it shall
k
observe the procedure adopted by Court of Sessions.
oo
Supreme Court in Kaushik Chaterjee v. State of Haryana, (2020) 10 SCC 92 held that in case of
trial of offence under special law, the offences shall be tried by the court specifically mentioned in the
eB
special law. If the special law is silent about the court, then such offence can be tried either by the High
Court or by any other court by which such offence is shown in the First Schedule of CrPC (now BNSS).
pl
CHANGES INTRODUCED
m
Courts of Metropolitan Magistrate and Assistant Sessions Judge has been abolished.
Sa
iew
CHANGES INTRODUCED
Section 23 of BNSS, 2023 corresponds to Section 29 of CrPC. The amount of fine that can
ev
be imposed by Judicial Magistrate First Class and Second Class has been increased.
Pr
Section 23(3) of BNSS, 2023 now provides that Judicial Magistrate of First Class can now
impose fine up to Rs. 50000. Earlier, in CrPC, it was Rs. 10000.
k
Section 23(4) of BNSS, 2023 now provides that Judicial Magistrate of Second Class can
oo
now impose fine up to Rs. 10000. Earlier, in CrPC, it was Rs. 5000.
New punishment in form of Community Service has been introduced. Explanation to
eB
Section 24 provides that the Court of Magistrate may award such term of imprisonment in default of
m
payment of fine as is authorized by law. This section only confers the power to the Court to impose
Sa
It is often seen that the accused is punished for the more offences than one. In such circumstances
Section 25 provides that the Court shall, considering the gravity of offences, order such punish-
ments to run concurrently or consecutively.
Section 25(2) provides that in the case of consecutive sentences, it shall not be necessary for the Court
by reason only of the aggregate punishment for the several offences being in excess of the punishment
which it is competent to inflict on conviction of a single offence, to send the offender for trial before
a higher Court.
Supreme Court in Sharad Hiru Kolambe v. State of Maharashtra, (2018) 18 SCC 718 held that
default sentence must be in excess to or in addition to the substantive sentence. Concurrent running of
default sentence inter se or with substantive sentence is not permissible.
In Gagan Kumar v. State of Punjab (2019), Supreme Court held that it is a mandatory legal require-
iew
ment to specify whether sentences awarded to an accused convicted for two or more offences, would
run concurrently or consecutively.
If the court awards consecutive sentences, then Proviso to Section 25(2) provides two limitations-
ev
(i) Person shall not be sentenced to imprisonment for a period longer than 20 years.
Pr
(ii) The aggregate punishment shall not exceed twice the amount of punishment which the court is
competent to inflict for a single offence.
k
In Sunil Kumar v. State of U.P., (2021) 5 SCC 560 Supreme Court held thatit is beyond shadow of
oo
doubt that Section 31(1) of the CrPC (now Section 25(1) of BNSS) vests complete discretion with the
court to order sentences for two or more offences at one trial to run concurrently having regard to
eB
nature of offences and surrounding factors. There cannot be any straightjacket approach in manner of
exercise of such discretion.
pl
In Malkeet Singh Gill v. State of Chhattisgarh, (2022) 8 SCC 204 Supreme Court held that the
Trial Court as well as Appellate Court has full discretion to order the sentences to run concurrently in
m
case of conviction for two or more offences in consonance with the provisions of Section 31 of
Sa
iew
2(1)(h) “complaint” 2(d) “complaint”
2(1)(i) “electronic communication” (New) - -
ev
2(1)(j) “High Court” 2(e) “High Court”
2(1)(k) “inquiry” 2(g) “inquiry”
2(1)(l)
2(1)(m)
“investigation”
“judicial proceeding”
Pr 2(h)
2(i)
“investigation”
“judicial proceeding”
k
2(1)(n) “local jurisdiction” 2(j) “local jurisdiction”
oo
iew
18 Public Prosecutors 24 Public Prosecutors
19 Assistant Public Prosecutors 25 Assistant Public Prosecutors
20 Directorate of Prosecution 25A Directorate of Prosecution
ev
21 Courts by which offences are triable 26 Courts by which offences are triable
22 Sentences which High Courts and 28 Sentences which High Courts and
23
Sessions Judges may pass
Sentence which Magistrates may pass
Pr 29
Sessions Judges may pass
Sentence which Magistrates may pass
k
24 Sentence of imprisonment of default of 30 Sentence of imprisonment of default of
fine fine
oo
31 Public when to assist Magistrates and 37 Public when to assist Magistrates and
police police
32 Aid to person, other than police officer, 38 Aid to person, other than police officer,
executing warrant executing warrant
33 Public to give information of certain 39 Public to give information of certain
offences offences
34 Duty of officers employed in connection 40 Duty of officers employed in connection
with affairs of a village to make certain with affairs of a village to make certain
report report
35(1)/(2) When police may arrest without warrant 41 When police may arrest without warrant
35(3) to (6) When police may arrest without warrant 41A Notice of appearance before police
– notice of appearance officer
35(7) When police may arrest without - -
warrant (New) – prior permission
iew
42 Protection of members of Armed Forces 45 Protection of members of Armed Forces
from arrest from arrest
43 Arrest how made 46 Arrest how made
ev
44 Search of place entered by person sought 47 Search of place entered by person sought
to be arrested to be arrested
45 Pursuit of
jurisdictions
offenders into other
Pr 48 Pursuit of
jurisdictions
offenders into other
k
46 No unnecessary restraint 49 No unnecessary restraint
oo
iew
effected as before provided effected as before provided
68 Service on Government servant 66 Service on Government servant
ev
69 Service of summons outside local limits 67 Service of summons outside local limits
70 Proof of service in such cases and when 68 Proof of service in such cases and when
71
serving officer not present
Proof of service in such cases and when
Pr 69
serving officer not present
Proof of service in such cases and when
serving officer not present serving officer not present
k
72 Forms of warrant of arrest and duration 70 Forms of warrant of arrest and duration
oo
75 Warrants may be directed to any person 73 Warrants may be directed to any person
76 Warrant directed to police officer 74 Warrant directed to police officer
77 Notification of substance of warrant 75 Notification of substance of warrant
pl
80 Warrant forwarded for execution outside 78 Warrant forwarded for execution outside
jurisdiction jurisdiction
81 Warrant directed to police officer for 79 Warrant directed to police officer for
execution outside jurisdiction execution outside jurisdiction
82 Procedure on arrest of person against 80 Procedure on arrest of person against
whom warrant issued whom warrant issued
83 Procedure by Magistrate before whom 81 Procedure by Magistrate before whom
such person arrested is brought such person arrested is brought
84 Proclamation for person absconding 82 Proclamation for person absconding
85 Attachment of property of person 83 Attachment of property of person
absconding absconding
86 Identification and attachment of - -
property of proclaimed person (New)
87 Claims and objections to attachment 84 Claims and objections to attachment
iew
applicable to summons and warrants of applicable to summons and warrants of
arrest arrest
94 Summons to produce document or other 91 Summons to produce document or other
ev
thing thing
95 Procedure as to letters 92 Procedure as to letters
96
97
When search-warrant may be issued
Search of place suspected to contain
Pr 93
94
When search-warrant may be issued
Search of place suspected to contain
stolen property, forged documents, etc. stolen property, forged documents, etc.
k
98 Power to declare certain publications 95 Power to declare certain publications
oo
forfeited and to issue search-warrants for forfeited and to issue search-warrants for
same same
eB
99 Application to High Court to set aside 96 Application to High Court to set aside
declaration of forfeiture declaration of forfeiture
100 Search for persons wrongfully confined 97 Search for persons wrongfully confined
pl
103 Persons in charge of closed place to 100 Persons in charge of closed place to
allow search allow search
104 Disposal of things found in search 101 Disposal of things found in search
beyond jurisdiction beyond jurisdiction
105 Recording of search and seizure - -
through audio-video electronic
means (New)
106 Power of police officer to seize certain 102 Power of police officer to seize certain
property property
107 Attachment, forfeiture or restoration - -
of property (New)
108 Magistrate may direct search in his 103 Magistrate may direct search in his
presence presence
109 Power to impound document, etc., 104 Power to impound document, etc.,
produced produced
iew
2(g) “inquiry” 2(1)(k) “inquiry”
2(h) “investigation” 2(1)( l) “investigation”
ev
2(i) “judicial proceeding” 2(1)(m) “judicial proceeding”
2(j) “local jurisdiction” 2(1)(n) “local jurisdiction”
2(k)
2(l)
“metropolitan area”
“non-cognizable offence”
Pr -
2(1)(o) “non-cognizable offence”
-
2(o) “officer in charge of a police station” 2(1)(r) “officer in charge of a police station”
2(p) “place” 2(1)(s) “place”
eB
2(q) “pleader” - -
2(r) “police report” 2(1)(t) “police report”
pl
iew
Magistrate
18 Special Metropolitan Magistrates - -
19 Subordination of Metropolitan - -
ev
Magistrates
20 Executive Magistrates 14 Executive Magistrates
21 Special Executive Magistrates
Pr 15 Special Executive Magistrates
22 Local jurisdiction of Executive 16 Local jurisdiction of Executive
k
Magistrates Magistrates
oo
28 Sentences which High Courts and 22 Sentences which High Courts and
Sessions Judges may pass Sessions Judges may pass
Sa
29 Sentences which Magistrates may pass 23 Sentences which Magistrates may pass
30 Sentences of imprisonment in default of 24 Sentences of imprisonment in default of
fine fine
31 Sentence in cases of conviction of 25 Sentence in cases of conviction of
several offence at one trial several offence at one trial
32 Mode of conferring powers 26 Mode of conferring powers
33 Powers of officers appointed 27 Powers of officers appointed
34 Withdrawal of powers 28 Withdrawal of powers
35 Powers of judges and Magistrates 29 Powers of judges and Magistrates
exercisable by their successors in office exercisable by their successors in office
36 Power of superior officers of police 30 Power of superior officers of police
37 Public when to assist Magistrates and 31 Public when to assist Magistrates and
police police
38 Aid to person, other than police officer, 32 Aid to person, other than police officer,
executing warrant executing warrant
220 Samarth Agrawal Books LLP
Comparative Table of Sections of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 & Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023
iew
41D Right of arrested person to meet an 38 Right of arrested person to meet an
advocate of his choice during advocate of his choice during
interrogation interrogation
ev
42 Arrest on refusal to give name and 39 Arrest on refusal to give name and
residence residence
43 Arrest by private person and precedure
on such arrest
Pr 40 Arrest by private person and precedure
on such arrest
k
44 Arrest by Magistrate 41 Arrest by Magistrate
oo
47 Search of place entered by person sought 44 Search of place entered by person sought
to be arrested to be arrested
pl
ground of arrest and of right to bail ground of arrest and of right to bail
50A Obligation of person making arrest to 48 Obligation of person making arrest to
inform about the arrest, etc., to a inform about the arrest, etc., to a
nominated person nominated person
51 Search of arrested person 49 Search of arrested person
52 Power to seize offensive weapons 50 Power to seize offensive weapons
53 Examination of accused by medical 51 Examination of accused by medical
practitioner at the request of police practitioner at the request of police
officer officer
53A Examination of person accused of rape 52 Examination of person accused of rape
by medical practitioner by medical practitioner
54 Examination of arrested person by 53 Examination of arrested person by
medical officer medical officer
54A Identification of person arrested 54 Identification of person arrested
iew
60A Arrest to be made strictly according to 62 Arrest to be made strictly according to
the Code the Code
61 Form of summons 63 Form of summons
ev
62 Summons how served 64 Summons how served
63 Service of summons on corporate bodies
and societies
Pr 65 Service of summons on corporate bodies
and societies
64 Service when persons summoned cannot 66 Service when persons summoned cannot
k
be found be found
oo
70 Form of warrant of arrest and duration 72 Form of warrant of arrest and duration
Sa
iew
to, summons to, summons
88 Power to take bond for appearance 91 Power to take bond for appearance
89 Arrest on breach of bond for appearance 92 Arrest on breach of bond for appearance
ev
90 Provisions of this chapter generally 93 Provisions of this chapter generally
applicable to summonses and warrants applicable to summonses and warrants
91
of arrest
Summons to produce document or other
Pr 94
of arrest
Summons to produce document or other
k
thing thing
oo
forfeited and to issue search warrants for forfeited and to issue search warrants for
the same the same
m
96 Application to High Court to set aside 99 Application to High Court to set aside
declaration of forfeiture declaration of forfeiture
Sa
97 Search for persons wrongfully confined 100 Search for persons wrongfully confined
98 Power to compel restoration of abducted 101 Power to compel restoration of abducted
females females
99 Direction, etc., of search warrants 102 Direction, etc., of search warrants
100 Persons in charge of closed place to 103 Persons in charge of closed place to
allow search allow search
101 Disposal of things found in search 104 Disposal of things found in search
beyond jurisdiction beyond jurisdiction
102 Power of police officer to seize certain 106 Power of police officer to seize certain
property property
103 Magistrate may direct search in his 108 Magistrate may direct search in his
presence presence
104 Power to impound document, etc., 109 Power to impound document, etc.,
produced produced
iew
172 Person bound to conform to lawful directions of police
336 Evidence of public servants, experts, police officers in certain cases
356 Inquiry, trial or judgment in absentia of proclaimed offender
ev
398 Witness protection scheme
472 Mercy petition in death sentence cases
530 Pr
Trial and proceedings to be held in electronic mode
k
oo
eB
pl
m
Sa
iew
27 Jurisdiction in the case of juveniles
144A Power to prohibit carrying arms in procession or mass drill or mass training with arms
153 Inspection of weights and measures
ev
355 Metropolitan Magistrate’s judgment
404 Statement by Metropolitan Magistrate of grounds of his decision to be considered by High Court
Pr
k
oo
eB
pl
m
Sa
iew
ev
Pr
BHARATIYA NYAYA
k
SANHITA, 2023
oo
eB
pl
m
Sa
iew
ev
Pr
k
oo
eB
pl
m
Sa
DEFINITIONS OF CRIME
Bentham: Offences are whatever the legislature has prohibited for good behavior or for bad reasons.
Blackstone: A crime is an act committed or omitted in violation of a public law forbidding or
commanding it.
Stephen: A crime is a violation of a right, considered in reference to an evil tendency of such violations
as regards the community at large.
Austin: A wrong which is pursued by the sovereign or his subordinates is a crime.
Kenny: Crime is a wrong whose sanction is punitive and is in no way remissible by any private person,
but is remissible by Crown alone if remissible at all.
Miller: Crime is commission or omission of an act which the law forbids or commands under pain of
a punishment to be imposed by the State by a proceeding in its own name.
iew
P.H. Winfield: A wrong the sanction of which involves punishment.
In T.K. Gopal v. State of Karnataka, Supreme Court held that crime is an act that subjects the doer
ev
to legal punishment.
A human being or a person
Pr
Injury to another person Elements of crime Evil intent (mens rea)
k
oo
Actus non facit reum nisi mens sit rea: It means that the act itself does not make a man guilty
Sa
MENS REA
The general rule applicable in criminal law is actus non facit reum nisi mens sit rea. Unless the statute either
clearly or by necessary implication rules out mens rea as an element of crime the court should not hold a
man guilty unless he has guilty mind.
In Sherras v. De Rutzen the court held that in every statute mens rea is to be implied unless the contrary
is shown.
In R. v. Prince Henry Prince was prosecuted for abducting a girl below the age of 16 years under the
belief that she was above 18 years of age.
The court drew a distinction between acts that were themselves innocent but were made punishable by
statute (malum prohibitum) and acts that were intrinsically wrong (malum in se)
In cases of malum prohibitum it could be held that there can be no conviction in absence of mens rea. But
in cases of malum in se person can be convicted even in absence of mens rea unless the statute has made
it otherwise.
In Queen v. Tolson it was held by the court that as a general rule there must be a guilty mind before
there can be a crime but a statute may make an act criminal whether there has been any intention to
break the law or not.
iew
In State of Maharashtra v. M.H. George, AIR 1956 SC 722, Supreme Court considered the appli-
cation of the principle of mens rea in statutory offences. The court held that unless the statute either
clearly or by necessary implication rules out mens rea as a constituent part of the crime the accused
ev
should not be held guilty of an offence unless he has a guilty mind.
to the general principle of mens rea:-
Pr
Exceptions to general principle of mens rea: Common law has following recognized exceptions
k
(1) Public nuisance
oo
PRELIMINARY
[Chapter I, Sections 1-3]
pl
m
Section 1 of the Sanhita deals with the title and extent of the Sanhita.
Section 1(3) provides that every person shall be liable to punishment under this Sanhita and not other-
wise for every act or omission contrary to the provisions, of which he shall be guilty within India.
Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 shall come into force from 1st July, 2024 except provisions of Section
106(2). It received assent of President on 25th December, 2023.
Extra-territorial operation of the Code
Section 1(4) and 1(5) deal with extra-territorial operation of the Code.
Section 1(4) provides that any person liable, by any Indian law, to be tried for an offence committed
beyond India shall be dealt with according to the provisions of this Sanhita for any act committed
beyond India in the same manner as if such act had been committed within India.
It simply provides that an act constituting an offence in India shall also be an offence when committed
outside India.
If an Indian does an act in a foreign country which is not an offence in that country but is an offence in
India, he may be prosecuted in India.
Section 1(5) provides for extension of Sanhita to extra-territorial offences. It provides that the provi-
sions of this Code apply also to any offence committed by—
(1) Any citizen of India in any place without and beyond India;
(2) Any person on any ship or aircraft registered in India wherever it may be.
(3) Any person in any place without and beyond India committing offence targeting a computer
resource located in India.
For example, ‘A’ who is a citizen of India, commits a murder in any place without and beyond India. He
iew
can be tried and convicted of murder in any place in India in which he may be found.
In Jitender Panchal v. Narcotics Control Bureau, (2009) 3 SCC 57, Supreme Court held that if the
ev
accused has faced the trial in a foreign country for an offence he may be tried in India for an offence
separate and distinct from the previous one charged in a foreign country. Subsequent trial shall not be
hit by prohibition of double jeopardy. Pr
Section 1(6) provides that nothing in this Sanhita shall affect the provisions of any Act for punishing
k
mutiny and desertion of officers, soldiers, sailors or airmen in the service of the Government of India
oo
Definitions [Sections 2]
eB
Important Definitions
pl
Child [Section 2(3)]*: Child means any person below the age of eighteen years.
m
Counterfeit [Section 2(4)]: A person is said to ‘counterfeit’ who causes one thing to resemble another
thing, intending by means of that resemblance to practice deception, or knowing it to be likely that
Sa
Dishonestly [Section 2(7)]: Dishonestly means anything with the intention of causing wrongful gain
to one person or wrongful loss to another person.
In Pyarelal Bhargava v. State of Rajasthan, AIR 1963 SC 1094, Supreme Court held that a
person is said to act dishonestly even if he temporarily dispossess another of his property.
Document [Section 2(8)]: Document means any matter expressed or described upon any substance
by means of letters, figures or marks, or by more than one of those means, and includes electronic
and digital record, intended to be used, or which may be used, as evidence of that matter.
Explanation 1 provides that it is immaterial by what means or upon what substance the letters,
figures or marks are formed, or whether the evidence is intended for, or may be used in a Court
or not.
Explanation 2 provides that whatever is expressed by means of letters, figures or marks as
explained by mercantile or other usage, shall be deemed to be expressed by such letters, figures or
iew
marks within the meaning of this section, although the same may not be actually expressed.
Fraudulently [Section 2(9)]: Fraudulently means doing anything with the intent to defraud but not
otherwise.
ev
Gender [Section 2(10)]: The pronoun ‘he’ and its derivates are used for any person, whether male,
female or transgender.
Pr
Explanation states that the term ‘transgender’ shall have the meaning assigned to it in
k
Section 2(k) of the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019.
oo
Good faith [Section 2(11)]: Nothing is said to be done or believed in “good faith” which
is done or believed without due care and attention.
eB
Harbour [Section 2(13)]: Harbour includes supplying a person with shelter, food, drink, money,
clothes, arms, ammunition or means of conveyance, or the assisting a person by any
pl
means, whether of the same kind as those enumerated in this clause or not, to evade
apprehension.
m
Injury [Section 2(14)]: Injury means any harm whatever illegally caused to any person, in body,
Sa
Month and Year [Section 2(20)]: The word ‘month’ or ‘year’ is to be reckoned according to the
Gregorian calender.
Movable property [Section 2(21)]: Movable property includes property of every description, except
land and things attached to the earth or permanently fastened to anything which is attached to the earth.
Offence [Section 2(24)]: Offence means anything made punishable by this Sanhita, except in the
Chapters and Sections mentioned in Section 2(24)(a) and 2(24)(b).
Section 2(24)(a) provides that in Chapter III and in the following Sections, namely, sub-sections
(2), (3), (4) and (5) of Section 8, Sections 9, 49, 50, 52, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 119, 120, 123,
sub-sections (7) and (8) of Section 127, 222, 230, 231, 240, 248, 250, 251, 259, 260, 261, 262, 263,
sub-sections (6) and (7) of Section 308 and sub section (2) of Section 330, the word “offence”
means a thing punishable under this Sanhita, or under any special law or local law; and
iew
Section 2(24)(b) provides that in sub-section (1) of section 189, sections 211, 212, 238, 239, 249,
253 and sub-section (1) of section 329, the word “offence” shall have the same meaning when the
ev
act punishable under the special law or local law is punishable under such law with imprisonment
for a term of six months or more, whether with or without fine.
Pr
Public servant [Section 2(28)]: “public servant” means a person falling under any of the descrip-
tions, namely:—
k
oo
officer, to investigate or report on any matter of law or fact, or to make, authenticate, or keep any
m
document, or to take charge or dispose of any property, or to execute any judicial process, or to
Sa
administer any oath, or to interpret, or to preserve order in the Court, and every person specially
authorised by a Court to perform any of such duties;
(d) every assessor or member of a panchayat assisting a Court or public servant;
(e) every arbitrator or other person to whom any cause or matter has been referred for decision or
report by any Court, or by any other competent public authority;
(f) every person who holds any office by virtue of which he is empowered to place or keep any
person in confinement;
(g) every officer of the Government whose duty it is, as such officer, to prevent offences, to give
information of offences, to bring offenders to justice, or to protect the public health, safety or
convenience;
(h) every officer whose duty it is, as such officer, to take, receive, keep or expend any property on
behalf of the Government, or to make any survey, assessment or contract on behalf of the
Government, or to execute any revenue-process, or to investigate, or to report, on any matter
affecting the pecuniary interests of the Government, or to make, authenticate or keep any docu-
ment relating to the pecuniary interests of the Government, or to prevent the infraction of any law
for the protection of the pecuniary interests of the Government;
(i) every officer whose duty it is, as such officer, to take, receive, keep or expend any property, to
make any survey or assessment or to levy any rate or tax for any secular common purpose of any
village, town or district, or to make, authenticate or keep any document for the ascertaining of the
rights of the people of any village, town or district;
(j) every person who holds any office by virtue of which he is empowered to prepare, publish,
iew
maintain or revise an electoral roll or to conduct an election or part of an election;
(k) every person—
ev
(i) in the service or pay of the Government or remunerated by fees or commission for the perfor-
mance of any public duty by the Government;
Pr
(ii) in the service or pay of a local authority as defined in clause (31) of Section 3 of the General
Clauses Act, 1897, a corporation established by or under a Central or State Act or a Government
k
oo
(a) persons falling under any of the descriptions made in this clause are public servants, whether
appointed by the Government or not;
pl
(b) every person who is in actual possession of the situation of a public servant, whatever legal defect
m
(c) “election” means an election for the purpose of selecting members of any legislative, municipal or
other public authority, of whatever character, the method of selection to which is by, or under any
law for the time being in force.
Municipal Commissioner
A member of Executive Committee or servant of registered society.
Employee of a National bank
Chief Minister of a State and Ministers [M. Karunanidhi v. Union of India, AIR 1979 SC].
Chairman of Film Censor Board
iew
Reason to believe [Section 2(29)]: A person is said to have “reason to believe” a thing,
ev
if he has sufficient cause to believe that thing but not otherwise.
Valuable security [Section 2(31)]: Valuable security means a document which is, or purports to be, a
Pr
document whereby any legal right is created, extended, transferred, restricted, extinguished or released,
k
or whereby any person acknowledges that he lies under legal liability, or has not a certain legal right.
oo
Voluntarily [Section 2(33)]: A person is said to cause an effect “voluntarily” when he causes it by
means whereby he intended to cause it, or by means which, at the time of employing those means, he
eB
Wrongful gain [Section 2(36)]: Wrongful gain means any gain by unlawful means of property to
pl
Wrongful loss [Section 2(37)]: Wrongful loss means any loss by unlawful means of property to
Sa
Gaining wrongfully and losing wrongfully [Section 2(38)]: A person is said to gain wrongfully
when such person retains wrongfully, as well as when such person acquires wrongfully. A person is said
to lose wrongfully when such person is wrongfully kept out of any property, as well as when such
person is wrongfully deprived of property.
Words and expressions used but not defined in this Sanhita [Section 2(39)]
Section 2(39) provides that words and expressions used but not defined in this Sanhita but defined in
the Information Technology Act, 2000 and the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023
shall have the meanings respectively assigned to them in that Act and Sanhita.
CHANGES INTRODUCED
A new definition of ‘Child’ is introduced in Section 2(3) of BNS. It means person below the
age of 18 years.
Section 2(5) of BNS, 2023 corresponds to Section 20 of IPC. Illustration below Section 20
IPC has been omitted from Section 2(5) of BNS, 2023.
Section 2(8) corresponds to Section 29 of IPC. The definition of document now includes
‘electronics and digital record’.
Section 2(10) of BNS, 2023 corresponds to Section 8 of IPC. Now, definition of ‘gender’
expressly refers to ‘transgender’.
Section 2(20) of BNS, 2023 corresponds to Section 49 of IPC. Earlier, year or month was to
be as per British calendar. Now, Section 2(20) requires it to be reckoned as per Gregorian
calendar.
iew
Section 2(21) of BNS, 2023 corresponds to Section 22 of IPC. Definition has omitted the
word ‘are intended to include corporeal’ before the word ‘property’. Now, movable property
ev
includes property of every description other than immovable property whether that property is
corporeal or incorporeal.
Pr
Section 2(28) of BNS, 2023 corresponds to Section 21 of IPC. The term ‘Local authority’ is
defined by referring to Section 31(3) of General Clauses Act, 1897 and Section 2(45) of the
k
Companies Act, 2013. References to juryman has been omitted from the definition in Section
oo
Section 3(1) provides throughout this Sanhita every definition of an offence, every penal provision,
pl
and every illustration of every such definition or penal provision, shall be understood
subject to the exceptions contained in the Chapter entitled “General Exceptions”, though
m
those exceptions are not repeated in such definition, penal provision, or illustration.
Sa
Section 3(2) provides that every expression which is explained in any Part of this Sanhita, is used in
every Part of this Sanhita in conformity with the explanation.
Section 3(3) provides that when property is in the possession of a person’s spouse, clerk or servant, on
account of that person, it is in that person’s possession within the meaning of this Sanhita.
Section 3(4) provides that in every Part of this Sanhita, except where a contrary intention appears
from the context, words which refer to acts done extend also to illegal omissions.
Principle of Joint Liability
Section 3(5) provides that when a criminal act is done by several persons in furtherance of the com-
mon intention of all, each of such persons is liable for that act in the same manner as if it were done by
him alone.
Common intention: In Mahboob Shah v. Emperor, (Indus River case) the court held that common
intention implies a pre-arranged plan, prior meeting of minds or prior consultation between all persons
iew
constituting the group.
In Barendra Kumar Ghosh v. Emperor, (Post Office case) the court held that even if a person who does
ev
not do anything but if he has common intention he will be liable. The court said ‘they also serve who
only stand and wait’.
Pr
In Mahboob Shah v. Emperor, the court laid down the following principles:-
k
(1) Essence of liability under Section 3(5) is found in ‘common intention’
oo
(2) To invoke Section 3(5) it must be shown that act was done in furtherance of common intention;
eB
(3) Common intention implies pre-arranged plan and it must be proved that criminal act was done in
concert pursuant to pre-arranged plan;
pl
(4) For intention to be common it must be known to all members and must also be shared by them.
In Rishidev Pandey v. State of U. P., Supreme Court held that common intention can develop on the
m
Section 3(5) provides a rule of evidence and does not create any offence.
In Shree Kantia v. State of Bombay Supreme Court, held that physical presence and active participa-
tion in crime is necessary. But in J. N. Desai v. State of Bombay Supreme Court observed that the
physical presence and active participation is not necessary in all cases.
In Pandurang v. State of Hyderabad, Supreme Court differentiated between similar intention and
common intention. The court held that several persons can simultaneously attack a man and each can
have the same intention, namely, the intention to kill, and each can individually inflict a separate fatal
blow and yet none would have the common intention required by the specific section because there
was no prior meeting of minds to form a pre-arranged plan.
Section 3(6) provides that whenever an act, which is criminal only by reason of its being done with a
criminal knowledge or intention, is done by several persons, each of such persons who joins in the
act with such knowledge or intention is liable for the act in the same manner as if the act were
done by him alone with that knowledge or intention.
Section 3(7) provides that wherever the causing of a certain effect, or an attempt to cause that effect,
by an act or by an omission, is an offence, it is to be understood that the causing of that effect partly by
an act and partly by an omission is the same offence.
For example, ‘A’ intentionally causes ‘Z’s’ death by illegally omitting to give Z food and partly by beating
Z. A has committed murder.
Section 3(8) provides that when an offence is committed by means of several acts, whoever intention-
ally co-operates in the commission of that offence by doing any one of those acts, either singly or
jointly with any other person, commits that offence.
iew
For example,
ev
‘A’ and ‘B’ agree to murder ‘Z’ by severally and at different times giving him small doses of poison.
‘A’ and ‘B’ administer the poison according to the agreement with intent to murder ‘Z’. ‘Z’ dies
Pr
from the effects of the several doses of poison so administered to him. Here ‘A’ and ‘B’ intention-
ally co-operate in the commission of murder and as each of them does an act by which the death
k
is caused, they are both guilty of the offence though their acts are separate.
oo
‘A’ and ‘B’ are joint jailors, and as such, have the charge of ‘Z’, a prisoner, alternatively for six hours
at a time. ‘A’ and ‘B’, intending to cause Z’s death, knowingly co-operate in causing that effect by
eB
illegally omitting, each during the time of his attendance, to furnish ‘Z’ with food supplied to them
for that purpose. ‘Z’ dies of hunger. Both ‘A’ and ‘B’ are guilty of the murder of ‘Z’.
pl
Section 3(9) makes the liability of the offenders according to their own acts when a crime has been
m
committed. This section provides for different punishment for different offences, whether such per-
sons are actuated by one intention or the other.
Sa
For example, ‘A’ attacks ‘Z’ under such circumstances of grave provocation that his killing of ‘Z’ would
be only culpable homicide not amounting to murder. ‘B’, having ill-will towards ‘Z’ and intending to kill
him, and not having been subject to the provocation, assists ‘A’ in killing ‘Z’. Here though ‘A’ and ‘B’ are
both engaged in causing Z’s death, ‘B’ is guilty of murder, and ‘A’ is guilty only for culpable homicide.
PUNISHMENT
[Chapter II, Sections 4-13]
Punishment can be defined as suffering inflicted upon the offender by the court when he is adjudged
guilty under the law. The amount of punishment will vary according to the facts and circumstances of
the case.
Theories of Punishment
Following theories were advocated to explain the purpose of punishment:-
iew
for life which is of Property Service
two kinds
ev
Rigorous, that Simple
which is with hard
labour
Pr
k
oo
Death sentence
eB
Section 393(3) of Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 provides that the Court has to give the
special reasons in awarding the death penalty.
In Bachan Singh v. State of Punjab, AIR 1980 SC, the Supreme Court held that death sentence
should not be passed except in ‘rarest of the rare case’.
In Gopal Vinayak Godse v. State, AIR 1961 SC 600, it was observed by the Supreme Court that life
imprisonment means an imprisonment that continues till the life of the convict and is nothing less.
In Md. Munna v. Union of India and others, (2005) 7 SCC 417, Supreme Court has held that
imprisonment for life means rigorous imprisonment for life.
iew
Commutation of sentence of death and imprisonment for life [Section 5]
Section 5 provides that the appropriate Government may, without the consent of the offender, com-
ev
mute any punishment under this Sanhita to any other punishment in accordance with Section 474 of
the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
Pr
Fractions of punishment [Section 6]
k
oo
Section 6 provides that in calculating fractions of terms of punishment, imprisonment for life shall be
reckoned as equivalent to imprisonment for twenty years, unless otherwise provided.
eB
Section 7 provides that in every case in which an offender is punishable with imprisonment which may
be of either description, it shall be competent to the Court which sentences such offender to direct in
m
the sentence that such imprisonment shall be wholly rigorous, or that such imprisonment shall be wholly
Sa
simple, or that any part of such imprisonment shall be rigorous and the rest simple. Therefore, the
court can sentence the offender to any of the following descriptions of sentences:-
Wholly rigorous; or
Wholly simple; or
Fine [Section 8]
Section 8(1) provides that where no sum is expressed to which a fine may extend, the amount of fine
to which the offender is liable is unlimited, but shall not be excessive.
iew
Section 8(3) provides that the term for which the Court directs the offender to be imprisoned in
default of payment of a fine shall not exceed one-fourth of the term of imprisonment which is the
maximum fixed for the offence, if the offence be punishable with imprisonment as well as fine.
ev
Section 8(4) provides that the imprisonment which the Court imposes in default of payment of a fine
may be of any description to which the offender might have been sentenced for the offence.
Pr
Imprisonment for non-payment of fine, when offence punishable with fine only
k
[Section 8(5)]
oo
Section 8(5) provides that if the offence be punishable with fine or community service:-
The imprisonment which the Court imposes in default of payment of the fine or in default of
eB
For any term not exceeding two months when the amount of the fine shall not exceed five
thousand rupees; and
Sa
For any term not exceeding four months when the amount shall not exceed ten thousand
rupees; and
For any term not exceeding one year in any other case.
Section 8(6)(a) provides that the imprisonment which is imposed in default of payment of a fine shall
terminate whenever that fine is either paid or levied by process of law.
Section 8(6)(b) provides for termination of imprisonment on payment of proportional part of fine.
Section 8(7) provides that the fine, or any part thereof which remains unpaid, may be levied at any
time within six years after the passing of the sentence, and if, under the sentence, the offender be liable
to imprisonment for a longer period than six years, then at any time previous to the expiration of that
period; and the death of the offender does not discharge from the liability any property which would,
after his death, be legally liable for his debts.
iew
For example, ‘A’ gives ‘Z’ fifty strokes with a stick. Here ‘A’ may have committed the offence of voluntar-
ily causing hurt to ‘Z’ by the whole beating, and also by each of the blows which make up the whole
beating. If ‘A’ were liable to punishment for every blow, he might be imprisoned for fifty years, one for
ev
each blow. But he is liable only to one punishment for the whole beating.
Pr
Section 10* provides that in all cases in which judgment is given that a person is guilty of one or several
offences specified in the judgment, but that it is doubtful of which of these offences he is guilty, the
k
offender shall be punished for the offence for which the lowest punishment is provided if the same
oo
Section 11 provides that if person is convicted of an offence for which under this Sanhita the Court
has power to sentence him to rigorous imprisonment, the Court may, by its sentence, order that the
pl
offender shall be kept in solitary confinement for any portion or portions of the imprisonment to
m
which he is sentenced.
Such solitary confinement shall not exceed three months in the whole, according to the following scale:-
Sa
A time not exceeding one month if the term of imprisonment shall not exceed six months;
A time not exceeding two months if the term of imprisonment shall exceed six months and shall
not exceed one year;
A time not exceeding three months if the term of imprisonment shall exceed one year.
Section 12 provides that in executing a sentence of solitary confinement, such confinement shall in no
case exceed fourteen days at a time.
The intervals between the periods of solitary confinement shall not be less than 14 days periods.
When the imprisonment awarded shall exceed three months, the solitary confinement shall not exceed
seven days in any one month of the whole imprisonment awarded, with intervals between the periods
of solitary confinement of not less duration than such periods.
Enhanced punishment for certain offences after previous conviction [Sections 13]
Section 13 provides that whoever, having been convicted by a Court in India, of an offence punish-
able under Chapter X or Chapter XVII of this Sanhita with imprisonment of either description for a
term of three years or upwards, shall be guilty of any offence punishable under either of those Chapters
with like imprisonment for the like term, shall be subject for every such subsequent offence to impris-
onment for life, or to imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years.
CHANGES INTRODUCED
Section 53 of IPC provided for five types of punishments. Corresponding Section 4 of BNS,
2023 introduced a sixth type of punishment i.e. Community Service.
Punishment of community service will help to reduce the burden in jails. In following offences
the punishment of community service is given:-
iew
Public servant unlawfully engaging in trade [Section 202]
Non-appearance in response to proclamation under Section 84 of BNSS, 2023 [Section 209]
ev
Attempt to suicide to compel or restrain exercise of lawful power [Section 226]
Pr
In certain case of theft [Section 303(2) Proviso]
Misconduct in public by drunken person [Section 355]
k
oo
BNSS, 2023. It means the work which the court may order a convict to perform as a form of
punishment that benefits the community, for which he shall not be entitled to any remuneration.
pl
Section 6 of BNS, 2023 corresponds to Section 57 of IPC. The words ‘unless otherwise
m
provided’ has been added in Section 6 of BNS, 2023 which was not present in Section 57 of
IPC.
Sa
Since, the concept of community service as a form of punishment has been introduced in BNS,
2023, imprisonment in default of community service has also been added in Section 8(4) and
Section 8(5) of BNS, 2023. It was not present in IPC.
Under Section 8(5) of BNS, 2023 the limits for default in payment of fine or community
service has been changed to the following scales:-
Imprisonment not exceeding 2 months- Fine not exceeding Rs 5000/- or community service.
Imprisonment not exceeding 4 months- Fine not exceeding Rs 10000/- or community ser-
vice
In any other case- Imprisonment not exceeding 1 year.
GENERAL EXCEPTIONS
[Chapter III, Section 14-44]
General exception contained in [Chapter III, Sections 14-44] extinguish the criminal liability. These
are rules of evidence carrying conclusive or rebuttable presumptions. They deal with circumstances
which extinguish mens rea.
This chapter applies to the offences not only defined in Indian Penal Code but also the offences defined
by any local or special law.
As a general rule the burden to prove the guilt of the accused is on the prosecution. However, in cases
of General Exception this rule is reversed.
Section 108 of Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 provides that if an accused person claims the
benefit of exceptions, the burden of proving his plea that his case falls under the general exception lies
iew
upon the accused.
In K. M. Nanawati v. State of Maharashtra, AIR 1962 SC 605 Supreme Court observed that if an
ev
accused pleads exceptions contained in Indian Penal Code (now Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023) then there
Pr
is a presumption against him and the burden to rebut that presumption is on him.
In T.N. Lakshmaiah v. State of Karnataka, (2002) 1 SCC 219, Supreme Court held that the ac-
k
cused has to prove that his case falls within the general exceptions. The standard of proof is not the
oo
same as expected from the prosecution. It is sufficient that the accused makes his case in any of the
general exceptions by standard of preponderance of probabilities.
eB
Excusable [Sections 14, 17, 18, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24]
pl
Categories of exceptions
m
Justifiable [Sections 15, 16, 19, 25, 26, 27, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34-44]
Sa
Act done by a person bound, or by mistake of fact believing himself bound by law [Section 14]
Section 14 provides that nothing is an offence which is done by a person who is, or who by reason of
a mistake of fact and not by reason of a mistake of law in good faith believes himself to be, bound by
law to do it.
Ignorance of fact must be ignorance in respect material fact i.e. fact which is essential to constitute
offence. Ignorance of fact negatives the evil intent necessary to constitute the offence.
Maxim ignorantia facti excusat, ignorantia juris non excusat provides that ignorance of fact is excused but
ignorance of law is not excused. Everyone is bound to know the law of the land and hence mistake orr
ignorance of law is not excused. It is also applicable to a foreigner.
Act done by a person justified, or by mistake of fact believing himself justified by law [Section 17]
Section 17 provides that nothing is an offence which is done by any person who is justified by law, or
iew
who by reason of a mistake of fact and not by reason of a mistake of law in good faith, believes
himself to be justified by law, in doing it.
ev
Government official and servants are protected by this section when they carry out act of the State.
Person is justified by law
Essential ingredients
Pr
In good faith he believes to be justified by law
k
Such belief is by reason of mistake of fact and not by mistake of law
oo
For example, ‘A’ sees ‘Z’ commit what appears to ‘A’ to be a murder. ‘A’, in the exercise, to the best of his
judgment, exerted in good faith, of the power which the law gives to all persons of apprehending
eB
murderers in the act, seizes ‘Z’, in order to bring ‘Z’ before the proper authorities. A has committed no
offence, it may turn out that ‘Z’ was acting in self-defence.
pl
Sections 14 and 17 are based on the maxim ‘ignorantia facit excusat, ignorantia juris non excusat’, which
m
Section 15 provides that nothing is an offence which is done by a Judge when acting judicially in the
exercise of any power which is, or which in good faith he believes to be, given to him by law.
Section 16 provides that nothing which is done in pursuance of, or which is warranted by the judgment
or order of, a Court of Justice; if done whilst such judgment or order remains in force, is an offence,
notwithstanding the Court may have had no jurisdiction to pass such judgment or order, provided the
person doing the act in good faith believes that the Court had such jurisdiction.
iew
‘A’ cannot plea the defence of Section 80 because his work is not done with proper care and
caution.
Happening must be unintentional and unexpected.
ev
According to Stephen an effect is accidental when the act by which it is caused is not done with the
Pr
intention of causing it. When a consequence is caused by an accident, it is not possible to impute any evil
intention.
k
When the act is done due to want of proper care and caution then the same cannot be termed as an
oo
accident.
eB
Two car drivers after getting drunk began race with each other and drove over an old man. Both were
charged with contributing to death of deceased by their negligence and improper conduct. [R. v.
Swindall and Osborne]
pl
Section 19 provides that nothing is an offence merely by reason of its being done
iew
application - Extension of Code to offences
extra territorial offences
1(6) Short title, commencement and 5 Certain laws not to be affected by this
ev
application - Certain laws not to be Act
affected by this Act
2(1) "act" Pr 33
32
"Act"/"Omission"
Words referring to acts include illegal
omissions
k
oo
iew
2(36) "wrongful gain" 23, Para 1 "Wrongful gain"
2(37) "wrongful loss" 23, Para 2 "Wrongful loss"
ev
2(38) "gaining wrongfully" and 23, Para 3 "Gaining wrongfully", "losing
"losing wrongfully" wrongfully"
2(39)
3(1)
Words and expressions not defined
General explanations
Pr 29A
6
"Electronic record"
Definitions in the Code to be
understood subject to exceptions
k
3(2) General explanations - Sense of 7 Sense of expression once explained
oo
common intention
3(6) General explanations - When such an 35 When such an act is criminal by reason
Sa
act is criminal by reason of its being of its being done with a criminal
done with a criminal knowledge or knowledge or intention
intention
3(7) General explanations - Effect caused 36 Effect caused partly by act and partly by
partly by act and partly by omission omission
3(8) General explanations - Cooperation by 37 Cooperation by doing one of several
doing one of several acts constituting acts constituting an offence
an offence
3(9) General explanations - Persons 38 Persons concerned in criminal act may
concerned in criminal act may be guilty be guilty of different offences
of different offences
4 Punishment 53 Punishment
5 Commutation of sentence – of sentence 54 Commutation of sentence of death
of death and imprisonment for life 55 Commutation of sentence of
imprisonment for life
iew
imprisonment for non-payment of fine, and fine awardable
when imprisonment and fine awardable
8(4) Amount of fine, liability in default of 66 Description of imprisonment for non-
ev
payment of fine, etc. - description of payment of fine
imprisonment for non-payment of fine
8(5) Amount of fine, liability in default of
payment of fine, etc. - imprisonment
Pr 67 Imprisonment for non-payment of fine
when offence punishable with fine only
for non-payment of fine when offence
k
punishable with fine only
oo
iew
23 Act of a person incapable of judgment 85 Act of a person incapable of judgment
by reason of intoxication caused against by reason of intoxication caused against
his will his will
ev
24 Offence requiring a particular intent or 86 Offence requiring a particular intent or
knowledge committed by one who is knowledge committed by one who is
25
intoxicated
Act not intended and not known to be
Pr 87
intoxicated
Act not intended and not known to be
k
likely to cause death or grievous hurt, likely to cause death or grievous hurt,
done by consent done by consent
oo
26 Act not intended to cause death, done 88 Act not intended to cause death, done
by consent in good faith for person's by consent in good faith for person's
eB
benefit benefit
27 Act done in good faith for benefit of 89 Act done in good faith for benefit of
child or person of unsound mind, by, or child or insane person, by or by consent
pl
or misconception or misconception
Sa
29 Exclusion of acts which are s offences 91 Exclusion of acts which are offences
independently of harm caused independently of harm caused
30 Act done in good faith for benefit of a 92 Act done in good faith for benefit of a
person without consent person without consent
31 Communication made in good faith 93 Communication made in good faith
32 Act to which a person is compelled by 94 Act to which a person is compelled by
threats threats
33 Act causing slight harm 95 Act causing slight harm
34 Things done in private defence 96 Things done in private defence
35 Right of private defence of body and of 97 Right of private defence of the body
property and of property
36 Right of private defence against act of a 98 Right of private defence against act of a
person of unsound mind, etc. person of unsound mind, etc.
37 Acts against which there is no right of 99 Acts against which there is no right of
private defence private defence
iew
44 Right of private defence against deadly 106 Right of private defence against deadly
assault when there is risk of harm to assault when there is risk of harm to
innocent person innocent person
ev
45 Abetment of a thing 107 Abetment of a thing
46 Abettor 108 Abettor
47 Abetment in India of offences outside
India
Pr 108A Abetment in India of offences outside
India
48 Abetment outside India for offence - -
k
in India (New)
oo
no express provision is made for its and where no express provision is made
punishment for its punishment
50 Punishment of abetment if person 110 Punishment of abetment if person
pl
abetted does act with different intention abetted does act with a different
from that of abettor intention from that of abettor
m
51 Liability of abettor when one act 111 Liability of abettor when one act
abetted and different act done abetted and different act done
Sa
iew
offences application - Extension of Sanhita to
extra territorial offences
5 Certain laws not to be affected by this 1(6) Short title, commencement and
ev
Act application - Certain laws not to be
affected by this Act
6 Definitions in the Code to
understood subject to exceptions
be Pr 3(1) General explanations
iew
33 "Act"/ "Omission" 2(1) "act"
2(25) "omission"
ev
34 Acts done by several persons in 3(5) General explanations - Acts done by
furtherance of common intention several persons in furtherance of
intention
36 Effect caused partly by act and partly by 3(7) General explanations - Effect caused
eB
an offence
38 Persons concerned in criminal act may 3(9) General explanations - Persons
m
iew
but not for life [Omitted earlier]
57 Fractions of terms of punishment 6 Fractions of terms of punishment
58 Offenders sentenced to transportation - -
ev
how dealt with until transported
[Omitted earlier]
59 Transportation instead of imprisonment
[Omitted earlier]
Pr - -
60 Sentence may be (in certain cases of 7 Sentence may be (in certain cases of
k
imprisonment) wholly or partly rigorous imprisonment) wholly or partly rigorous
oo
or simple or simple
61 Sentence of forfeiture of property - -
eB
[Omitted earlier]
62 Forfeiture of property, in respect of - -
offenders punishable with death,
pl
transportation or imprisonment
[Omitted earlier]
m
iew
72 Punishment of person guilty of one of 10 Punishment of person guilty of one of
several offences, the judgment stating several offences, judgment stating that
that it is doubtful of which it is doubtful of which
ev
73 Solitary confinement 11 Solitary confinement
74 Limit of solitary confinement 12 Limit of solitary confinement
75 Enhanced punishment for certain
offences under Chapter XII or Chapter
Pr 13 Enhanced punishment for certain
offences after previous conviction
k
XVII after previous conviction
oo
77 Act of Judge when acting judicially 15 Act of Judge when acting judicially
78 Act done pursuant to the judgment or 16 Act done pursuant to judgment or
order of Court order of Court
pl
iew
person without consent person without consent
93 Communication made in good faith 31 Communication made in good faith
ev
94 Act to which a person is compelled by 32 Act to which a person is compelled by
threats threats
95
96
Act causing slight harm
Things done in private defence
Pr 33
34
Act causing slight harm
Things done in private defence
97 Right of private defence of the body 35 Right of private defence of body and of
k
and of property property
oo
98 Right of private defence against the act 36 Right of private defence against act of a
of a person of unsound mind, etc. person of unsound mind, etc.
eB
99 Act against which there is no right to 37 Acts against which there is no right of
private defence private defence
100 When the right of private defence of the 38 When right of private defence of body
pl
iew
disability or in persistent vegetative state
117(4) Voluntarily causing grievous hurt – causes grievous hurt on the ground of a person’s race, caste
or community, sex etc.
ev
152 Acts endangering sovereignty, unity and integrity of India
195(2) Assaulting or obstructing public servant when suppressing etc.
197(1)(d)
Pr
Imputations, assertions prejudicial to national integration – makes or publishes false or
misleading information, jeopardizing the sovereignty, unity and integrity or security of India
k
226 Attempt to commit suicide to compel or restrain exercise lawful power
oo
304 Snatching
324(3) Mischief – causes loss or damage to property of government or local authority
341(3)/(4)
eB
Making or possessing counterfeit seal, etc., with intent to commit forgery punishable under
Section 338
358 Repeal and savings
pl
m
Sa
PROVISIONS OF INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860 OMITTED IN BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023
iew
264 Fraudulent use of false instrument for weighing
265 Fraudulent use of false weight or measure
266
ev
Being in possession of false weight or measure
267 Making or selling false weight or measure
309
310
Attempt to commit suicide
Thug
Pr
311 Punishment
k
377 Unnatural offences
oo
497 Adultery
pl
m
Sa
iew
ev
Pr
BHARATIYA SAKSHYA
k
ADHINIYAM, 2023
oo
eB
pl
m
Sa
iew
ev
Pr
k
oo
eB
pl
m
Sa
The Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 has been divided into Four Parts, Twelve Chapters and 170
Sections.
Part II
iew
Statements by persons who cannot be called as witnesses
[Sections 26-27]
ev
Statements made under special circumstances [Sections 28-32]
Pr
How much of a statement is to be proved [Section 33]
Part III Chapter 3 Facts which need not be proved [Section 51-53]
Part I
PRELIMINARY
[Chapter I, Sections 1-4]
Extent
Section 1 of Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniym, 2023 omits the provision on territorial extent.
CHANGES INTRODUCED
Section 1 of Indian Evidence Act provided the provision of territorial extend. It laid down that
the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 extended to whole of India.
One of the primary reasons for omission of the provision related to territorial extent is that it
iew
might have affected the admissibility of digitally generated evidence outside India.
ev
Section 1(2) of BSA applies to all judicial proceedings in or before any Court, including court-
Pr
martials, but not to affidavits presented to any court or officer, not to the proceedings before an
arbitrator.
k
BSA does not apply to –
oo
CHANGES INTRODUCED
Sa
Section 1 of IEA provided that the said Act did not apply to court-martials convened under
Army Act, the Navy (Discipline) Act and the Air Force Act.
Section 1(2) of the BSA omitted the words ‘convened under the Army Act, the Navy
Discipline Act or the Indian Navy (Discipline) Act or the Air Force Act’.
Judicial inquiry: An inquiry is judicial if the object is to determine a jural relation between the parties.
Judicial proceedings: A judicial proceeding is one in the course of which evidence is or may be legally
taken on oath. [Section 2(i) of Code of Civil Procedure]
The Act does not apply to affidavits because deponent’s assertion of facts on the basis of his personal
knowledge does not constitute ‘evidence’.
Arbitrators have to follow the principles of natural justice but they are not bound by law of evidence.
Object:
The Preamble of the Adhiniyam states that it is to consolidate and to provide for general rules and
principles of evidence for fair trial.
CHANGES INTRODUCED
The Preamble of the Indian Evidence Act stated that the Act was to consolidate, define and
amend the law of evidence
Law of evidence is a lex fori which governs the courts. [Bain v. White Raven and Furness Junction]
The law of evidence does not affect substantive rights of the parties but only lays down the law for
facilitating the course of justice.
Definitions [Section 2]
Scheme : The Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 is divided into 170 Sections and 12 Chapters.
iew
Court
ev
The term ‘Court’ is defined in Section 2(1)(a). The word ‘Court’ includes all Judges and Magistrates
and all persons, except arbitrators, legally authorized to take evidence.
Fact Pr
The term ‘Fact’ is defined in Section 2(1)(f). It means and includes:-
k
Any thing, state of things, relation of things, capable of being perceived by the senses;
oo
For example
There are certain objects arranged in a certain order in a certain place, is a fact.
pl
a particular word in a particular sense, or was at a specified time conscious of a particular sensation,
is a fact.
That a man has a certain reputation is a fact.
Facts
Capable of being perceived by the senses Any mental condition of which any
(Any thing, state of thing or relation of things) person is conscious
Facts in issue
The term ‘Facts in issue’ is defined in Section 2(1)(g). It means and includes-
(i) Any fact from which either by itself or in connection with other facts, the existence, non-existence,
nature, or extent of any right, liability or disability is asserted or denied in any suit or proceedings,
necessarily follows.
(ii) Any fact asserted or denied in answer to an issue of fact recorded under Civil Procedure Code.
Issues of fact are recorded under Order XIV Rule 1 of Code of Civil Procedure. As per Order XIV
Rule 1(1) – ‘Issues arise when a material proposition of fact or law is affirmed by one party and denied
by the other.’
A fact in issue is called the ‘principal fact’ or factum probandum.
Every fact that a plaintiff must prove in order to get a decision in his favour or which the defendant
proves to defeat the plaintiff ’s claim is a fact in issue.
iew
All facts which are essential for determining right, duty, and disability or liability in question and asserted
by one party and denied by the other are called facts in issue.
ev
Relevant Fact
Pr
The term ‘Relevant’ is defined in Section 2(1)(k). It lays down that a fact is said to be relevant to
another when the one is connected with the other in any of the ways referred to in the provisions of this
k
Act relating relevancy of facts.
oo
A fact in order to be a relevant fact must be connected with the fact in issue or with any other relevant
fact in any of the ways referred to in Sections 4-50.
eB
The section only indicates when one fact becomes relevant to another. Normally, relevant facts are
those facts which are required for proof or disproof of a fact in issue.
pl
Fact which are not themselves in issue but which may affect the probability of the existence of facts in
issue and can be used as the foundation of inferences respecting them are known as relevant fact.
m
Relevant facts are also known as evidentiary facts or factum probans as they have a certain degree of
Sa
probative force.
Document
The term ‘Document’ is defined in Section 2(1)(d). It means any matter expressed or described upon
any substance by means of letters, figures or marks or by any other means or by more than one of
those means, intended to be used, or which may be used for the purpose of recording that matter and
includes electronic and digital records.
For example
Writing is a document
A map or a plan is a document
An inscription on a metal plate or stone is a document
A caricature is a document.
Words printed, lithographed or photographed are documents.
An electronic record on emails, server logs, documents on computers, laptop or smartphone,
messages, website, locational evidence and voice mail messages stored on digital devices are docu-
ments.
Public Documents [Section 74(1)]
Types of Document
Private Documents [Section 74(2)]
Evidence
iew
Court permits or requires to be made before it by witnesses in relation to matters
of fact under inquiry and such statements are called oral evidence;
ev
Documentary Evidence : All documents including electronic or digital records produced for
the inspection of the Court, such documents are called documentary evidence.
Pr
The above definition does not define the term evidence in real sense. It only states what evidence
includes.
k
Evidence means anything which establishes the ‘principal fact’ or the ‘issue in question’ before the court.
oo
Supreme Court in Pushpadevi M. Jatia v. M.L. Wadhawan, AIR 1987 SC 1748 held that evidence
eB
obtained through undesirable means can also be taken into consideration provided it is relevant.
Supreme Court in Ronny v. State of Maharashtra, (1998) 3 SCC 625 held that evidence obtained in
pl
investigation of other crimes can also constitute good evidence in any other case provided it is relevant.
Discovery of a fact with the help of tracker dog is scientific evidence. [Abdul Razak v. State]
m
Appreciation of evidence: It is the duty of the court to ascertain which part of evidence represents
Sa
the truth and which part represents the falsity. In Mahendran v. State of Tamil Nadu, (2019) 5 SCC
67 Supreme Court held that maxim falsus in uno falsus in omnibus is not app;icable in India. This maxim
means false in one thing is false in all others.
Proved – Section 2(1)(j) defines the term ‘proved’. A fact is said to be proved, when after consider-
ing the matters before it, the court either believes it to exist, or considers its existence so probable that
a prudent man ought to act upon the supposition that it exists.
Disproved – Section 2(1)(c) defines the term ‘disproved’. A fact is said to be disproved, when after
considering the matters before it, the court either believes that it does not exist, or considers its non-
existence so probable that a prudent man ought to act upon the supposition that it does not exist.
Not proved – Section 2(1)(i) defines the term ‘not proved’. A fact is said not to be proved when it
is neither proved nor disproved.
In Kuna v. State of Odisha, (2018) 1 SCC 296 Supreme Court held that the expression ‘proved’,
‘disproved’ and ‘not proved’ lays down the standard of proof, namely, about the existence or non—
existence of circumstances from a point of view of a prudent man.
May presume, Shall presume and Conclusive proof
The term presumption is not defined in the Adhiniyam. It means that an inference is drawn from a
proved fact. Section 2(1)(h) defines ‘May presume’, Section 2(1)(l) defines ‘Shall presume’ and
Section 2(1)(b) defines the term ‘Conclusive proof ’.
May presume [Section 2(1)(h)]: Whenever it is provided by this Adhiniyam that court ‘may pre-
sume’ a fact, it may either regard such fact as proved, unless or until it is disproved, or may call for
proof of it.
iew
This kind of presumption is called as ‘presumptio hominis’. It is a presumption of fact.
Such kind of presumption is provided under Sections 88, 89, 90, 92, 93 and 119 of the Bharatiya
ev
Sakshya Adhiniyam..
Shall Presume [Section 2(1)(l)] - Whenever it is directed by this Act that the Court shall presume a
Pr
fact, it shall regard such fact as proved, unless and until it is disproved.
It is rebuttable presumption of law and court is bound to draw it unless it is disproved by evidence to
k
oo
contrary.
Such kind of presumption is provided under Sections 78-87, 91 and 108 of the Bharatiya Sakshya
eB
Adhiniyam.
Conclusive Proof [Section 2(1)(c)]- When one fact is declared by this Act to be conclusive proof of
another, the court shall, on proof of one fact, regard the other as proved, and shall not allow evidence
pl
These are irrebutable presumption of law and cannot be rebutted by evidence to contrary.
Sa
Such kind of presumption is provided under Sections 35, 116 of the Bharatiya Sakhsya Adhiniyam.
CHANGES INTRODUCED
The new definition of document specifically includes ‘digital records’ within the definition of
thee term ‘document’
Section 2(1)(d) of BSA, 2023 introduces sixth illustration which clarifies that an electronic
record on emails, server logs, documents on computers, laptop or smartphone, messages, website,
locational evidence and voice mail messages stored on digital devices are documents.
Under the new provision in order to qualify as ‘document’ or ‘documentary evidence’, it is not
necessary that the matter must be expressed or described upon any substance by means of
letters, figures or marks only. Any matter ‘otherwise recorded’ upon any substance ‘by any other
means’ will also qualify as ‘document’ or ‘documentary evidence’.
Section 2(1)(e) of BSA, 2023 provides new definition of the term ‘evidence’. Under this
definition statements given electronically are to be treated as oral evidence. This also correspond
to Section 530 of Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 which provides for the examination
of complainant and witness in electronic mode by use of electronic communication or by
audio-video electronic means.
Section 3 provides that the evidence may be given in any suit or proceeding of the existence or non-
iew
existence of every fact in issue and of such other facts as are hereinafter declared to be relevant, and of
no others.
ev
Explanation - This section shall not enable any person to give evidence of a fact which he is disentitled
to prove by any provision of the law for the time being in force relating to Civil Procedure.
Pr
For example, ‘A’ is tried for murder of ‘B’ by beating him with a club with the intention of causing death.
k
Following facts are relevant at A’s trial:-
oo
This section deals with facts of which evidence can be given i.e. of facts in issue and relevant facts.
m
Relevant facts are those facts which in the eyes of law are so connected with the facts in issue that they
render their existence probable or improbable. [Sections 4-50]
Sa
All facts, which are logically relevant, may not be legally relevant.
One fact is said to be legally relevant to another when the one is connected with the other in any of the
ways refered to in Sections 4-50 the Adhiniyam.
Whatever is legally relevant is logically relevant but not vice-vesa. For example, confession made to a
police officer may appear to be logically relevant but it is legally irrelevant.
It is to be noted that question of relevancy is a question of law which has to be decided by the judge
and it can be raised at any stage of the proceeding.
According to Phipson, relevancy denotes connection of two events as cause and effect. Relevant
means that which is logical probative. Admissibility on the other hand is not based on logic but
on law and strict rules.
In Ram Bihari Yadav v. State of Bihar, (1994) 4 SSC 517 the Supreme Court held that terms
‘relevancy’ and ‘admissibility’ are not co-extensive on interchangeable terms. Their legal incidents
are different. All admissible evidence are usually relevant, but all relevant evidence are not admis-
sible.
For example, the communication made by spouse during marriage, the communication be-
tween an advocate and his client, though relevant is not admissible.
Relevancy is the genus of which admissibility is a species.
iew
Admissibility [Section 141]
When evidence related to a certain relevant fact is sought to be introduced in court, the Adhiniyam
ev
under Section 141 empowers a judge to decide as to the admissibility of evidence.
Evidence illegally obtained is admissible - If the evidence is relevant the court is not concerned by
Pr
the method by which it was obtained or with the question whether that method was tortious but
excusable.
k
oo
Section 4 provides that facts which, though not in issue, are so connected with a fact in issue or a
eB
relevant fact so as to form part of the same transaction, are relevant, whether they occured at the
same time and place or at different time and places.
pl
For example,
m
‘A’ is accused of murder of ‘B’ by beating him. Whatever was said or done by ‘A’ or ‘B’ or by by-
standers at the beating, or so shortly before or after it so as to form part of transaction, is relevant
Sa
fact.
‘A’ is accused of waging war against the Government of India by taking part in an armed insurrec-
tion in which property is destroyed and troops are attacked, and goals are broken open. The
occurrence of these facts are relevant, as forming part of the general transaction, though ‘A’ may
not have been present at all of them.
Under Section 4 facts which are so closely connected with the fact in issue or relevant so as to form
part of the same transaction are relevant.
Same transaction: In order that different acts may constitute the same transaction they must be con-
nected by proximity of time, unity or proximity of place, continuity of action and community of
purpose or design. They may occur at same time and place or at different time and places.
In Basanti v. State of Himachal Pradesh, (1987) 3 SSC 227 the Court held that when shortly after
murder, the person suspected of murder described the absence of the deceased by saying that he had
left the village, the court held that statement as part of the same transaction and thus relevant.
In G. Vijayvardhan Rao v. State of Andhra Pradesh, AIR 1996 SC 2971 Supreme Court held that
for a statement to be part of transaction, it must be spontaneous and must be contemporaneous with
the fact. If the statement is made after the act is over and its maker has had time for reflection then it is
not relevant.
Res Gestae
According to Taylor, Res Gestae is a fact, transaction or an event in continuity with the main
transaction. It will include everything which can be considered to be fairly connected with the
main event.
There has to be a continuity of the transaction and in order to be Res Gestae there has to be an
iew
automatic and spontaneous connection between fact under question and fact in issue.
Section 4 is direct manifestation of the doctrine of Res Gestae, while elements of it can also be
ev
found in Sections 5, 6, 7 and 12 of the Adhiniyam.
In R.M. Malkani v. State of Maharashtra, (1973) 1 SCC 471 the Supreme Court held that
Pr
contemporaneous tape record of a relevant conversation is a relevant fact.
In R. v. Foster, the witnesses had seen only speeding vehicle and not the accident. The injured
k
person explained him the nature of accident. He was allowed to give evidence of what the
oo
In Gentela Rao v. State of Andhra Pradesh, (1996) 6 SCC 241 Supreme Court held that the
rule of res gestae is an exception to the general rule that hearsay evidence is not admissible.
pl
Facts which are the occasion, cause or effect of facts in issue [Section 5]
m
facts.
Facts which constitute the state of things under which they happened.
Facts which afforded an opportunity for their occurence or transaction.
For example,
The question is whether ‘A’ robbed ‘B’. The facts that, shortly before the robbery, ‘B’ went to a fair
with money in his possession, and that he showed it, or mentioned the fact that he had it, to third
persons are relevant.
The question is whether ‘A’ murdered ‘B’. Marks on the ground, produced by a struggle at or near
the place where the murder was committed, are relevant facts.
Occasion - Evidence can always be given of the set of circumstances which constituted the
occasion for happening of the principal fact. [see Illustration (a)]
Cause - Why a particular act was done. It helps the court to connect a person with the act.
Effects - Every act leaves behind certain effects which not only record the happening of the act,
but also throw light upon the nature of the act. [see Illustration (b)]
Opportunity - No act can be done without the accused having an opportunity to do it. The
circumstances which provide an opportunity for the happening of a fact in issue is relevant [see
Illustration (c)]
State of things - The facts which constitute the background in which the principal facts hap-
pened. For example - state of relation between parties, health of the deceased etc.
iew
Section 6
ev
Conduct Motive Preparation
Previous Subsequent
Pr
Section 6 makes the following facts are relevant –
k
oo
Motive - Any fact which shows or constitutes a motive for any fact in issue is a relevant fact.
Preparation - Any fact which shows or constitutes preparation for any fact in issue is a relevant
eB
fact.
Conduct - Conduct (previous or subsequent) of any party or his agent or an accused is relevant, if
pl
ments accompany and explain acts other than statements; but this explanation is not to effect the
Sa
In Prem Singh v. State of NCT of Delhi, AIR 2023 SC 193 Supreme Court held that motive when
proved supplies additional link in the chain of circumstantial evidence but, the absence of motive
cannot, by itself be a ground to reject the prosecution case, although absence of motive in a case based
on circumstantial evidence is a factor that weighs in favour of accused.
Illustration for motive
‘A’ is tried for murder of ‘B’. The facts that ‘A’ murdered ‘C’, that ‘B’ knew that ‘A’ had murdered
‘C’, and that ‘B’ had tried to extort money from ‘A’ by threatening to make his knowledge public,
are relevant.
Preparation
Preparation connotes the means and measures necessary for commission of any offence. Preparation is
the instance of previous conduct of a party which influences the facts in issue or is influenced by the
iew
facts in issue.
Illustrations for preparation
ev
‘A’ is tried for murder of ‘B’ by poison. The fact that, before the death of ‘B’, ‘A’ procured poison
Pr
similar to that which was administered to ‘B’ is relevant.
The question is, whether a certain document is the Will of ‘A’. The facts that, not long before the
k
date of the alleged Will, ‘A’ made inquiry into matters to which the provisions of the alleged Will
oo
relate, that he consulted vakils in reference to making the Will, and that he caused drafts or other
Wills to be prepared of which he did not approve, are relevant.
eB
Conduct
pl
iew
‘A’ sues ‘B’ for a libel imputing disgraceful conduct to ‘A’. ‘B’ affirms that the matter alleged to be
libelous is true. The position and relation of parties at the time when libel was published may be
ev
relevant facts as introductory to the facts in issue.
Pr
Identification parade is relevant under Section 7. It must be noted that Supreme Court in Surendra
Narain v. State of U.P., AIR 1998 SC 3031 held that holding identification parade is not
k
oo
compulsory even when the accused demands it. Prosecution is not bound to do so.
If the adequate precautions are observed, the evidence with regard to the test identification
eB
It is used to test and strengthen trustworthiness of the witness. Identification of the accused at
m
the test identification parade or in a court is not sine qua non for conviction.
Sa
Supreme Court in Ram Lochan v. State of West Bengal, AIR 1963 SC 1074 Superimposed
photograph of the deceased over the skeleton of human body was admissible to prove that
skeleton was that of the deceased.
In Pammi v. Govt. of M.P., (1998) 6 SCC 609 failure to hold TIP is not fatal to the prosecu-
tion case where the accused persons were previously known to the witness.
In Chunthuram v. State of Chhattisgarh, (2020) 10 SCC 733 Supreme Court held that test
identification evidence is not substantive evidence. It can only be used for the purpose of cor-
roboration. When identifications are held in police presence, resultant communications tanta-
mount to statements made by identifiers to a police officer in course of investigation and they
fall within the ambit of Section 162 Cr.P.C. (now Section 181 of Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita,
2023)
In Mukesh Singh v. State (NCT of Delhi), AIR 2023 SC 4097 Supreme Court held that it is
well settled that the substantive evidence is the evidence of identification in court and the test
identification parade provides corroboration to the identification of the witness in court, if
required. However, what eight must be attached to the evidence of identification in court, which
is not preceded by a test identification parade is a matter for the courts of fact to examine.
Section 8 provides that where there is a reasonable ground to believe that two or more persons have
conspired together to commit an offence or an actionable wrong, anything said, done or written by any
one of such persons in reference to their common intention, after the time when such intention was first
entertained by any one of them, is a relevant fact as against each of the persons believed to so conspir-
ing, as well as for the purpose of proving the existence of a conspiracy as for the purpose of showing
that any such person was a party to it.
iew
Conditions of relevancy under Section 8 : Following are the conditions of relevancy under Section
8:-
ev
1. There must be a reasonable ground to believe that two or more persons have entered into a
conspiracy.
Pr
2. The impugned act must have been done after the time when the intention to conspire was first
entertained by any of them.
k
3. The act must have been done in reference to their common intention.
oo
In Kehar Singh v. Delhi Administration, AIR 1980 SC 1883 Supreme Court held that only prima facie
case of conspiracy has to be made out to bring Section 10 (now Section 8 of Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam,
m
If prima facie evidence of existence of a conspiracy is given and accepted, the evidence of acts and
statements made by anyone of the conspirators in furtherance of the common object is admissible
against all.
Supreme Court in Sardul Singh v. State of Bombay, AIR 1957 SC 747 held that the principle
underlying evidence under Section 10 (now Section 8 of Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023) is the ‘theory
of agency’.
In Mirza Akbar v. Emperor, AIR 1940 PC 176, court held that the term ‘common intention’ used in
Section 10 (now Section 8 of Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023) signifies a common intention existing at
the time when the thing was said, done or written by one of them. Any statement, narrative or confes-
sion made after the common intention or conspiracy was no longer operating is not admissible under
Section 10. (now Section 8 of Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023)
iew
2(1)(h) "may presume" 4, para 1 "May presume"
2(1)(i) "not proved" 3, para 9 "Not proved"
ev
2(1)(j) "proved" 3, para 7 "Proved"
2(1)(k) "relevant" 3, para 3 "Relevant"
2(1)(l)
2(2)
"shall presume"
Words and Expressions (New)
Pr
4, para 2
-
"Shall presume"
-
3 Evidence may be given of facts in issue 5 Evidence may be given of facts in issue
k
and relevant facts and relevant facts
oo
4 Relevancy of facts forming part of same 6 Relevancy of facts forming part of same
transaction transaction
eB
5 Facts which are the occasion, cause or 7 Facts when are the occasion, cause or
effect of facts in issue or relevant facts effect of facts in issue
6 Motive, preparation and previous or 8 Motive, preparation and previous or
pl
iew
Proviso I to Confession made after removal of 28 Confession made after removal of
22 impression caused by inducement, threat impression caused by inducement, threat
or promise, relevant or promise, relevant
ev
Proviso II Confession otherwise relevant not to 29 Confession otherwise relevant not to
to 22 become irrelevant because of promise of become irrelevant because of promise of
23(1)
secrecy etc.
Confession to police officer
Pr 25
secrecy etc.
Confession to police officer not to be
proved
k
23(2) Confession by accused while in custody 26 Confession by accused while in custody
oo
of police not to be proved against him of police not to be proved against him
Proviso to How much of information received from 27 How much of information received from
eB
jointly under trial for same offence jointly under trial for same offence.
25 Admissions not conclusive proof, but 31 Admissions not conclusive proof, but
m
iew
37 Judgments etc., other than those 43 Judgments etc., other than those
mentioned in Sections 34, 35 and 36 mentioned in Sections 40 to 42 when
when relevant relevant
ev
38 Fraud or collusion in obtaining 44 Fraud or collusion in obtaining
judgment, or incompetency of Court, judgment, or incompetency of Court,
may be proved may be proved
39(1) Opinions of experts
Pr 45 Opinions of experts
39(2) Opinion of Examiner of electronic 45A Opinion of Examiner of electronic
k
Evidence Evidence
oo
40 Facts bearing upon opinions of experts 46 Facts bearing upon opinions of experts
41(1) Opinion as to handwriting and signature, 47 Opinion as to handwriting, when
when relevant relevant
eB
41(2) Opinion as to electronic signature when 47A Opinion as to electronic signature when
relevant relevant
pl
43 Opinion as to usages, tenets, etc., when 49 Opinions as to usages, tenets, etc., when
relevant relevant
Sa
iew
64 Rules as to notice to produce 66 Rules as to notice to produce
65 Proof of signature and handwriting of 67 Proof of signature and hand-writing of
person alleged to have signed or written person alleged to have signed or written
ev
document produced document produced
66 Proof as to electronic signature 67A Proof as to electronic signature
67 Proof of execution of document required
by law to be attested
Pr 68 Proof of execution of document required
by law to be attested
68 Proof where no attesting witness found 69 Proof where no attesting witness found
k
69 Admission of execution by party to 70 Admission of execution by party to
oo
execution execution
71 Proof of document not required law to 72 Proof of document not required by law
be attested to be attested
pl
iew
90 Presumption as to electronic messages 88A Presumption as to electronic messages
91 Presumption as to due execution, etc., of 89 Presumption as to due execution, etc., of
documents not produced documents, not produced
ev
92 Presumptin as to documents thirty years 90 Presumption as to documents thirty
old years old
93 Presumption as to electronic records five
years old
Pr 90A Presumption as to electronic records five
years old
k
94 Evidence of terms of contracts, grants 91 Evidence of terms of contracts, grants
and other dispositions of property and other dispositions of properly
oo
which can apply to one only of several which can apply to one only of several
persons persons
100 Evidence as to application of language to 97 Evidence as to application of language to
one of two sets of facts, to neither of one of two sets of facts, to neither of
which the whole correctly applies which the whole correctly applies
101 Evidence as to meaning of illegible 98 Evidence as to meaning of illegible
characters, etc. characters, etc.
102 Who may give evidence of agreement 99 Who may give evidence of agreement
varying terms of document varying terms of document
103 Saving of provisions of Indian 100 Saving of provisions of Indian
Succession Act relating to wills Succession Act relating to wills
104 Burden of proof 101 Burden of proof
105 On whom burden of proof lies 102 On whom burden of proof lies
106 Burden of proof as to particular fact 103 Burden of proof as to particular fact
107 Burden of proving fact to be proved to 104 Burden of proving fact to be proved to
make evidence admissible make evidence admissible
Samarth Agrawal Books LLP 499
COMPARATIVE TABLE OF SECTIONS OF
INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT, 1872 & BHARATIYA SAKSHYA ADHINIYAM, 2023
iew
3, para 7 "Proved" 2(1)(j) "proved"
3, para 8 "Disproved" 2(1)(c) "disproved"
3, para 9 "Not proved" 2(1)(i) "not proved"
ev
3, para 10 "India" - -
4, para 1 "may presume" 2(1)(h) "may presume"
4, para 2
4, para 3
"Shall presume"
"Conclusive proof"
Pr2(1)(l)
2(1)(l)
"Shall presume"
"Conclusive proof"
5 Evidence may be given of facts in 3 Evidence may be given of facts in
k
issue and relevant facts issue and relevant facts
oo
7 Facts which are the occasion, cause 5 Fact which are the occasion, cause or
or effect of facts in issue effect of facts in issue or relevant
facts
8 Motive, preparation and previous or 6 Motive, preparation and previous or
pl
facts
10 Things said or done by conspirator in 8 Things said or done by conspirator in
reference to common design reference to common design
11 When facts not otherwise relevant 9 When facts not otherwise relevant
become relevant become relevant
12 In suits for damages, fact tending to 10 Facts tending to enable Court to
enable Court to determine amount determine amount are relevant in
are relevant suits for damages
13 Facts relevant when right or custom 11 Facts relevant when right or custom
is in question is in question
14 Facts showing existence of state of 12 Facts showing existence of state of
mind, or of body or bodily feeling mind, or of body or bodily feeling
15 Facts bearing on question whether 13 Fact bearing on question whether act
act was accidental or intentional was accidental or intentional
16 Existence of course of business when 14 Existence of course of business when
relevant relevant
iew
of documents are relevant of documents are relevant
22A When oral admissions as to contents - -
of electronic records are relevant
ev
23 Admissions in civil cases, when 21 Admissions in civil cases when
relevant relevant
24 Confession caused by inducement, 22 Confession caused by inducement,
threat or promise, when irrelevant in
criminal proceeding
Pr threat, coercion or promise, when
irrelevant in criminal proceeding
k
25 Confession to police officer not to be 23(1) Confession to police officer
proved
oo
iew
ev
PROVISIONS OF INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT OMITTED IN BHARATIYA SAKSHYA
ADHINIYAM, 2023
3, Para 10 "India"
22A When oral admissions as to contents of electronic records are relevant
82 Presumption as to document admissible in England without proof of seal or signature
eB
166
m
Sa