WC2 1
WC2 1
WC2 1
WIRELESS CHANNELS
2.1 Path loss and shadowing : Free space path loss, Two-Ray model, Shadowing,
2.2 Statistical Multipath Channel Models: Time-varying channel impulse
response Narrowband fading, Wideband fading models, Delay spread and
Coherence bandwidth, Doppler spread and Coherence time, Flat fading versus
frequency selective fading, Slow fading versus fast fading, Discrete-time model
2.3 Capacity of Wireless Channels: Review of Capacity in AWGN, Capacity of
flat fading channel – Ergodic capacity, Capacity with Outage, Capacity with CSI-
R. (Derivations of capacity formulae are not required; Only expressions,
computations and significance required.)
Noise is assumed to get added to the signal and at the receiver; we have a
signal that carries both the data and the noise.
It is important that signal level at the receiver is reasonably above the noise
floor so that the detector can faithfully detect and decode the signal data.
Apart from noise, losses in the atmosphere can also distort the transmitted signal.
Some of the common losses taken into consideration during the design of
wireless link budgets include atmospheric absorption loss, scattering loss
(includes rain attenuation), reflection loss, diffraction loss and path loss.
PATH LOSS
2. Two-Ray model
The free space propagation model is used to predict received signal strength.
The path loss for the free space model when antenna gains are excluded is
given by
The Friis free space model is a valid for values of d which are in the
far-field of the transmitting antenna.
The 2-ray ground reflection model is a useful propagation model that is based
on geometric optics.
It considers both the direct path and a ground reflected propagation
path between transmitter andreceiver.
This model is accurate for predicting the large-scale signal strength over
distances of several kilometersfor mobile radio systems.
The maximum T-R separation distance is at most only a few tens of
kilometers.Earth is assumed to be flat.
The total received E-field, ETOT, is then a result of the direct line-of-
sight component, ELOS, and theground reflected component, Eg.
Figure 1.3: Two-ray ground reflection model.
The free space propagating E-field is given by
Figure 1.4: The method of images is used to find the path difference
between the line-of-sight and theground reflected paths.
Using the method of images, the path difference Δ, between the line-
of- sight and the ground reflectedpaths can be expressed as
When the T-R separation distance d is very large compared to ht+hr ,
equation (10) can be simplified using a Taylor series approximation
When d becomes large, the difference between the distances d' and d becomes
very small, and the amplitudes of ELOS and Eg are virtually identical and
differ only in phase.
Figure: Phasor diagram showing the electric field components of the line-of-sight,
ground reflected, and total received E-fields, derived from equation
SHADOWING
Log-normal Shadowing
Shadowing is the effect that the received signal power fluctuates due to
Experiments reported by Egli in 1957 showed that, for paths longer than a
few hundred meters, the received (local-mean) power fluctuates with a 'log-