Detailed marking rubric for the ENGD2061 PLC Assignment 1
1. An introduction briefly describing the overall process of
ladder programming development and the concepts used in the specific tasks. (5 Marks)
Presented materials Awarded Marks
No introduction is given, or the student has simply 0-1 copied the presented materials from the coursework assignment sheet. The introduction is weak and does not cover any of the 2-3 aspects of ladder programming. Good introduction that shows an understanding of the 4-5 requested tasks and general concepts of ladder programming.
2. Task: Airlock Control System
a. Identification of inputs, outputs, and other needed devices (5 Marks)
Presented materials Awarded Marks
Not presented or incorrectly identified devices. 0-1 All devices are identified. No operational logic is 2-3 provided. Minor mistakes only. All devices are correctly identified. Their operation 4-5 logic is provided as well.
b. A truth table and a corresponding Boolean expression describing the system
logic (10 Marks)
Presented materials Awarded Marks
No truth table is presented or the truth table is 0-3 unreadable or the truth table is illogical.
The presented truth table is either missing some of the 4-7
steps or does not reflect accurately the logic of the requested task assignment. An attempt to derive Boolean expressions is presented. Only minor mistakes.
The truth table is correctly constructed and reflects 8-10
all steps from start to end. All the conditions and processes are correctly presented. The correct Boolean expressions were derived and simplified. Detailed marking rubric for the ENGD2061 PLC Assignment 1
c. A ladder program with a brief description of its operation (10 Marks)
Presented materials Awarded Marks
The provided ladder is either illogically constructed 0-3 or the whole program was not fully presented to demonstrate the flow of the lines/tasks that satisfy the requirements of the assignment. The ladder program is ill-structured but still may end 4-7 with the expected outcome. Description is provided but may miss some key points. The ladder program does not well correspond to truth table equations. The provided ladder program is logical, and the 8-10 presentation is clear enough to see this logic. A good description of each step is provided. The ladder program corresponds well to truth table equations.
d. Demonstration (5 marks)
Program performance Awarded Marks
No demonstration. 0 Irrelevant or failed. 1 Major flaws were found. 2-3 Minor flaws were found. 4 Demonstration works according to specifications. 5
3. Task: Counting Parts on a Conveyor
a. Identification of inputs, outputs, and other needed devices. (5 Marks)
Presented materials Awarded Marks
Not presented or incorrectly identified devices. 0-1
All devices are identified. No operational logic is 2-3
provided. Minor mistakes only. All devices are correctly identified. Their operation 4-5 logic is provided as well. Detailed marking rubric for the ENGD2061 PLC Assignment 1
b. A flowchart illustrating system operation (10 Marks)
Presented materials Awarded Marks
No flowchart diagram is presented, the diagrams are 0-3 unreadable, or the diagrams are illogical. The presented diagram is either missing some of the 4-7 steps or does not reflect accurately the logic of the requested task assignment in terms of the sequence of the events. Only minor mistakes in using the correct flowchart blocks. The flowchart diagram accurately shows the 8-10 consecutive steps from start to end.
c. A ladder program with a brief description of its operation (10 Marks)
Presented materials Awarded Marks
The provided ladder is either illogically constructed 0-3 or the whole program was not fully presented to demonstrate the flow of the lines/tasks that satisfy the requirements of the assignment. The ladder program is ill-structured but still may end 4-7 with the expected outcome. Description is provided but may miss some key points. The ladder program does not well correspond to truth table equations. The provided ladder program is logical, and the 8-10 presentation is clear enough to see this logic. A good description of each step is provided. The ladder program corresponds well to truth table equations.
d. Demonstration (5 marks)
Program performance Awarded Marks
No demonstration. 0 Irrelevant or failed. 1 Major flaws were found. 2-3 Minor flaws were found. 4 Demonstration works according to specifications. 5 Detailed marking rubric for the ENGD2061 PLC Assignment 1
4. Task: Time Delay in a Ladder Program
a. Identification of inputs, outputs, and other needed devices (5 Marks)
Presented materials Awarded Marks
Not presented or incorrectly identified devices. 0-1 All devices are identified. No operational logic is 2-3 provided. Minor mistakes only. All devices are correctly identified. Their operation 4-5 logic is provided as well.
b. A GRAFCET diagram illustrating system operation (10 Marks)
Presented materials Awarded Marks
No GRAFCET diagram is presented, the diagrams are 0-3 unreadable, or the diagrams are illogical. The presented diagram is either missing some of the 4-7 steps or does not reflect accurately the logic of the requested task assignment in terms of the sequence of the events. Only minor mistakes in using the correct GRAFCET syntax. The GRAFCET diagram accurately shows the 8-10 consecutive steps from start to end. All the conditions and processes are correctly presented. The correct GRAFCET syntax was used.
c. A ladder program with a brief description of its operation (10 Marks)
Presented materials Awarded Marks
The provided ladder is either illogically constructed 0-3 or the whole program was not fully presented to demonstrate the flow of the lines/tasks that satisfy the requirements of the assignment. The ladder program is ill-structured but still may end 4-7 with the expected outcome. Description is provided but may miss some key points. The ladder program does not well correspond with the diagram. The provided ladder program is logical, and the 8-10 presentation is clear enough to see this logic. A good description of each step is provided. The ladder program corresponds well with the diagram. Detailed marking rubric for the ENGD2061 PLC Assignment 1
d. Demonstration (5 marks)
Program performance Awarded Marks
No demonstration. 0 Irrelevant or failed. 1 Major flaws were found. 2-3 Minor flaws were found. 4 Demonstration works according to specifications. 5
5. Overall conclusions from all the tasks (5 Marks)
Program performance Awarded Marks
Not presented or poor or irrelevant summary. 0-1 Weak summary including all tasks and ladder 2-3 programming concepts used. Some key points missing. Good summary including all tasks and ladder 5-4 programming concepts used.