Wfjo6211 Poe
Wfjo6211 Poe
Wfjo6211 Poe
By submitting this assignment, you acknowledge that you have read and understood all the rules
as per the terms in the registration contract, in particular the assignment and assessment rules in
The IIE Assessment Strategy and Policy (IIE009), the intellectual integrity and plagiarism rules in
the Intellectual Integrity Policy (IIE023), as well as any rules and regulations published in the
student portal.
INSTRUCTIONS:
1. No material may be copied from original sources, even if referenced correctly, unless it is a
direct quote indicated with quotation marks. No more than 10% of the assignment may
consist of direct quotes.
2. Any PoE with a similarity index of more than 25% will be scrutinised for plagiarism. Please
ensure that you submit your assignment through SafeAssign. Please make sure you attach
a similarity report to your POE if you are required to submit a hard‐copy of your PoE.
3. Make a copy of your assignment before handing it in.
4. Assignments must be typed unless otherwise specified.
5. Begin each section on a new page.
6. Follow all instructions on the PoE cover sheet.
7. This is an individual assignment.
Referencing Rubric
Providing evidence based on valid and referenced academic sources Markers are required to provide feedback to students by indicating
is a fundamental educational principle and the cornerstone of high‐ (circling/underlining) the information that best describes the
quality academic work. Hence, The IIE considers it essential to student’s work.
develop the referencing skills of our students in our commitment to
achieve high academic standards. Part of achieving these high Minor technical referencing errors: 5% deduction from the
standards is referencing in a way that is consistent, technically overall percentage – the student’s work contains five or more
correct, and congruent. This is not plagiarism, which is handled errors listed in the minor errors column in the table below.
differently.
Major technical referencing errors: 10% deduction from the
Poor quality formatting in your referencing will result in a penalty of overall percentage – the student’s work contains five or more
a maximum of ten percent being deducted from the percentage errors listed in the major errors column in the table below.
awarded, according to the following guidelines. Please note,
however, that evidence of plagiarism in the form of copied or If both minor and major errors are indicated, then 10% only (and
uncited work (not referenced), absent reference lists, or not 5% or 15%) is deducted from the overall percentage. The
exceptionally poor referencing, may result in action being taken in examples provided below are not exhaustive but are provided to
accordance with The IIE’s Intellectual Integrity Policy (0023). illustrate the error
Required: Minor errors in technical correctness of Major errors in technical correctness of referencing
Technically correct referencing referencing style style
style Deduct 5% from percentage awarded Deduct 10% from percentage awarded
Consistency Minor inconsistencies. Major inconsistencies.
The referencing style is generally Poor and inconsistent referencing style used in‐
The same referencing format consistent, but there are one or two text and/or in the bibliography/ reference list.
has been used for all in‐text changes in the format of in‐text Multiple formats for the same type of referencing
references and in the referencing and/or in the bibliography. have been used.
bibliography/reference list. For example, page numbers for direct For example, the format for direct quotes (in‐text)
quotes (in‐text) have been provided for and/or book chapters (bibliography/ reference
one source, but not in another instance. list) is different across multiple instances.
Two book chapters (bibliography) have
been referenced in the bibliography in
two different formats.
Technical correctness Generally, technically correct with some Technically incorrect.
minor errors. The referencing format is incorrect.
Referencing format is technically The correct referencing format has been Concepts and ideas are typically referenced, but a
correct throughout the consistently used, but there are one or reference is missing from small sections of the
submission. two errors. work.
Concepts and ideas are typically Position of the references: references are only
Position of the reference: a referenced, but a reference is missing given at the beginning or end of large sections of
reference is directly associated from one small section of the work. work.
with every concept or idea. Position of the references: references For example, incorrect author information is
are only given at the beginning or end of provided, no year of publication is provided,
For example, quotation marks, every paragraph. quotation marks and/or page numbers for direct
page numbers, years, etc. are For example, the student has incorrectly quotes missing, page numbers are provided for
applied correctly, sources in presented direct quotes (in‐text) and/or paraphrased material, the incorrect punctuation is
the bibliography/reference list book chapters (bibliography/reference used (in‐text); the bibliography/reference list is
are correctly presented. list). not in alphabetical order, the incorrect format for
a book chapter/journal article is used, information
is missing e.g. no place of publication had been
provided (bibliography); repeated sources on the
reference list.
Congruence between in‐text Generally, congruence between the in‐ A lack of congruence between the in‐text
referencing and bibliography/ text referencing and the bibliography/ referencing and the bibliography.
reference list reference list with one or two errors. No relationship/several incongruencies between
There is largely a match between the the in‐text referencing and the
All sources are accurately sources presented in‐text and the bibliography/reference list.
reflected and are all accurately bibliography. For example, sources are included in‐text, but not
included in the bibliography/ For example, a source appears in the in the bibliography and vice versa, a link, rather
reference list. text, but not in the bibliography/ than the actual reference is provided in the
reference list or vice versa. bibliography.
In summary: the recording of In summary, at least 80% of the sources In summary, at least 60% of the sources are
references is accurate and are correctly reflected and included in a incorrectly reflected and/or not included in
complete. reference list. reference list.
Overall Feedback about the consistency, technical correctness and congruence between in‐text referencing and bibliography:
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Background:
This PoE is made up of questions/parts which require you to apply theoretical and practical
knowledge of Magazine and feature writing.
Instructions:
Magazines have been an integral part of the journalism industry for many decades. Magazines
offer a different perspective to other traditional forms of media. It is critical to understand the
magazine industry from past to present to be able to be involved and be a part of this industry in
an effective manner.
There are three questions in this part. Answer Question 1 OR Question 2 and Question 3.
OR
Scenario:
You got the opportunity to shadow at a well‐known magazine in your area over the holidays. This
means that you get to be with different reporters from time to time. You observed something
strange from some of them. For starters, one promised that they would not reveal a source in a
story, and they did. Another journalist told you she didn’t like a certain musician. Shortly after that,
a story started trending on social media. The journalist went on and published one side of the story
without verifying. It did some damage to the musician’s reputation. The magazine had to
apologise later. One of the worst instances was when another senior journalist made racist and
homophobic remarks about a certain model at a fashion show. This experience got you thinking
about why you learnt about ethics back in varsity.
Write an essay discussion in which you explain the importance of ethics for magazine journalists.
Explain how magazines identify their brand and writing to fit that particular brand.
Describe what a target audience is and why it so critical to know your target audience.
Examine how to research for a magazine feature.
Explain the various tools available for magazine research.
Explain how to conduct interviews for a magazine feature.
Identify guidelines to conducting Interviews.
Conduct interviews to use in a written magazine feature.
Identify how to develop a story idea or topic for a magazine feature.
Outline how to put content together in preparation to produce a magazine feature.
A magazine journalist should be familiar with the magazine that they are working for and the
target audience of the magazine before a feature can be contemplated. A lot of preparation is
needed for a feature before it can be written. This includes researching, interviewing and the
overall planning to ensure the idea behind the feature is in line with the brand and that it is well
written.
For this part, you will work on the preparation process for two features (Feature 1 and Feature
2) that you will be required to write in Part 3. After submission, your lecturer will provide you
with feedback that will assist in your next Part.
Q.1.3 Discuss the idea you have for your Feature article 1. (10)
Q.1.4 Discuss how you will conduct research for this feature.
(15)
Various tools used for magazine research.
Explain how you will develop the story idea.
Outline how you will put content together in preparation to produce the
feature.
Q.1.5 Provide a list of three sources you plan to interview for Feature 1. (3)
Q.1.6 List four questions you would ask each source on Q.1.5 for your feature. (12)
Q.2.3 Discuss the idea you have for your Feature article 2. (10)
Q.2.4 Discuss how you will conduct research for this feature.
Your discussion should include:
Various tools used for magazine research.
(15)
Explain how you will develop the story idea.
Outline how you will put content together in preparation to produce the
feature.
Q.2.5 Provide a list of three sources you plan to interview for Feature 2. (3)
Q.2.6 List four questions you would ask each source on Q.2.5 for your feature. (12)
Reflect on the research process it took for you to conduct research for Feature 2. Write a
discussion in which you explain the influence of social media on the magazine industry.
For this question, you need to write Feature 1 that you conducted research on for Part 2.
For this question, you need to write Feature 2 that you conducted research on for Part 2.
Please note: Tear off this section and attach it to your work when you submit it/ If this is an online submission, then this information needs to be included
in the online submission.
STUDENT NAME:
STUDENT NUMBER:
Does not meet required Approaches to meet required Meets the required Exceeds the required standard
standard standard standard
0‐2 marks 3‐4 marks 5‐7 marks 8‐10 marks
Answer is not written in Essay structure is Essay structure is Answer is in the form of a
the form of an essay. inadequate. adequate. well‐structured essay with
Essay Structure,
There is no introduction or Either the introduction Both an introduction an appropriate introduction
Grammar, and
conclusion. or conclusion is omitted and conclusion are and conclusion.
Spelling,
Answer has many spelling or inappropriate. present. Grammar and spelling are
Paraphrasing
and grammar errors. Answer has an Answer has few, minor correct throughout the
Little to no effort has been unacceptable number of spelling, and grammar answer.
demonstrated in this area. spelling and grammar errors. Answer has been well
errors although these do paraphrased.
not negatively affect the Word count has been met.
OR
Little to no effort has Answer has not been Any minor errors that
been demonstrated in adequately paraphrased. appear do not
this area. Word count has not been negatively affect the
Errors negatively affect met. readability of the
the readability of the answer.
answer. Answer has been
No attempt has been adequately
made at paraphrasing. paraphrased.
Word count has Word count has been
exceeded. met.
Please note: Tear off this section and attach it to your work when you submit it/ If this is an online submission, then this information needs to be included
in the online submission.
STUDENT NAME:
STUDENT NUMBER:
Description of target audience does not Description makes sense. Description shows student knows the
make sense. target audience well.
Does not meet required standard Meets the required standard Exceeds the required standard
0 – 4 marks 5 – 7 marks 8 ‐ 10 marks
Little or no discussion on the student’s Student adequately discussed their Student exceptionally discussed their idea.
idea for the feature. feature idea.
Feature idea is good and befitting for
Q.1.3
Student’s feature idea is not clear. Feature idea makes sense. student’s chosen magazine.
Idea shows that student does not Idea shows that student understands basic Idea shows student understands basic
understand basic concepts of magazine concepts of magazine and feature writing. concepts of magazine and feature writing
and feature writing. well.
Q.1.4 Does not meet required standard Meets the required standard Exceeds the required standard
Questions provided are inappropriate or Questions are adequately linked to each Student asked questions which
do not apply to the student’s chosen source but some of them do not make demonstrate that they understand what
feature. sense. they need from each source.
LECTURER
FEEDBACK
Description of target audience does not Description makes sense. Description shows student knows the target
make sense. audience well.
Does not meet required standard Meets the required standard Exceeds the required standard
0 – 4 marks 5 – 7 marks 8 ‐ 10 marks
Little or no discussion on the student’s idea Student adequately discussed their feature Student exceptionally discussed their idea.
for the feature. idea.
Feature idea is good and befitting for
Q.2.3
Student’s feature idea is not clear. Feature idea makes sense. student’s chosen magazine.
Idea shows that student does not Idea shows that student understands basic Idea shows student understands basic
understand basic concepts of magazine and concepts of magazine and feature writing. concepts of magazine and feature writing
feature writing. well.
Does not meet required standard Meets the required standard Exceeds the required standard
0 – 7 marks 8 – 12 marks 13 ‐ 15 marks
Little or no discussion on how student will Student presented an exceptional
Discussion outlines adequate steps students
conduct research for the feature. discussion on how they will conduct
will follow to conduct research for the
research
Q.2.4 feature.
Discussion makes little or no sense and it
shows student does not understand the Discussion outline on how the feature will
Discussion outline on how student will put
research process. be put together shows student understands
content together makes sense.
theory well.
Little or no mention or various tools used Student explained how they will develop Various tools that student will use for
for magazine research. the story idea. research are explained in detail.
Discussion shows student understands how Student showed evidence of how they will
to do research for the feature by explaining develop the story idea.
which research tools they will use.
Does not meet required standard Partially meets the required standard Meets the required standard
0 – 1 mark 2 marks 3 marks
No source has been mentioned.
Q.2.5
OR Only two sources have been mentioned. All three sources have been mentioned.
LECTURER
FEEDBACK
Please note: Tear off this section and attach it to your work when you submit it/ If this is an online submission, then this information needs to be included
in the online submission.
STUDENT NAME:
STUDENT NUMBER:
Does not meet required standard Meets the required standard Exceeds the required standard
0 – 4 marks 5 – 7 marks 8 – 10 marks
Examples provided are incorrect or Examples are taken directly from prescribed Examples provided by the student are
inappropriate. material/lecturer material/Learn, but the original.
student has attempted to adapt the examples
OR in some way. Two detailed examples are provided and
Examples there are no gaps.
Less than two examples are provided. Two examples are provided.
Examples provided also demonstrate that
Student made little attempt or did Student made an adequate attempt to apply the student understands the theory.
not apply research process on research process on Feature 2.
Feature 2. Student exceptionally applied research
process on Feature 2.
module and is lacking interest and principles of the module and has interest and principles of the module and has
readability. readability. outstanding interest and readability
present.
Does not meet required standard Meets the required standard Exceeds the required standard
0 – 1 mark 2 ‐ 3 marks 4 – 5 marks
The student’s headline does not speak The student has presented an average The student has presented a strong
Headline to the actual content of the stories headline which could be a lot stronger but headline which links well to the content
and/or does not follow the theoretical does link to the content of the stories. of the stories and makes you want to read
guidelines as outlined in the module the stories.
resulting in ineffective headlines.
Does not meet required standard Meets the required standard Exceeds the required standard
Grammar, 0 – 4 marks 5 – 7 marks 8 – 10 marks
editing and There are many grammatical errors There are grammatical errors and mistakes in There are little mistakes. Feature shows
spelling that affect the readability of the the feature. These, however, do not affect that the content presented has been
feature. readability. edited.
Does not meet required standard Meets the required standard Exceeds the required standard
0 – 1 mark 2 ‐ 3 marks 4 – 5 marks
The student’s headline does not speak to the The student has presented an average The student has presented a strong
Headline actual content of the stories and/or does not headline which could be a lot stronger but headline which links well to the
follow the theoretical guidelines as outlined does link to the content of the stories. content of the stories and makes you
in the module resulting in ineffective want to read the stories.
headlines.
Does not meet required standard Meets the required standard Exceeds the required standard
Grammar, 0 – 4 marks 5 – 7 marks 8 – 10 marks
editing and There are many grammatical errors that There are grammatical errors and mistakes There are little mistakes. Feature
spelling affect the readability of the feature. in the feature. These, however, do not shows that the content presented has
affect readability. been edited.