CONTRACEPTIVE PERFORMANCE

REPORT 2017-2018

PAKISTAN BUREAU OF STATISTICS

M i n i s t r y o f P l a n n i n g , D e v e l o p im e n t & R e f o r m , I s l a m a b a d
www.pbs.gov.pk
ii
 Table of Contents
Preface ............................................................................................................................................................. vii
Genesis of Report.............................................................................................................................................. ix
Acronyms .......................................................................................................................................................... xi
Executive Summary......................................................................................................................................... xiii
Report Organization ......................................................................................................................................... xv
SECTION- I: INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 1
Rationale for the Contraceptive Performance Report ................................................................................... 2
Total Fertility Rate (TFR) and Modern Contraceptive Performance Rate (mCPR) ......................................... 5
Demographic trends in Pakistan .................................................................................................................... 6
Family Planning in Pakistan............................................................................................................................ 7
FP2020 ........................................................................................................................................................... 8
Commitments of Pakistan for FP2020 ........................................................................................................... 9
Commitment 1: Raising CPR to 50% .......................................................................................................... 9
Commitment 2: Offering greater choices of contraceptive and better counseling .................................. 9
Commitment 3: Expansion of programme to all the stakeholders............................................................ 9
Commitment 4: Reduction in unmet needs............................................................................................... 9
Commitment 5: Enhancing funding of family planning programme ....................................................... 10
Initiatives Taken to Fulfill the FP2020 Commitments .................................................................................. 10
Family Planning and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) ..................................................................... 11
SECTION – II: CONCEPTS & DEFINITIONS ......................................................................................................... 12
Family Planning: ........................................................................................................................................... 12
Service Statistics:.......................................................................................................................................... 12
Couple Years of Protection (CYP): ................................................................................................................ 12
Contraceptive Prevalence Rate (CPR): ......................................................................................................... 13
Method Mix ................................................................................................................................................. 14
Family Planning Service Vendors ................................................................................................................. 14
Categories of Family Planning Data ............................................................................................................. 15
Service Delivery Mechanism ........................................................................................................................ 15
Population Welfare Departments ............................................................................................................ 15
Department of Health (HFs) ..................................................................................................................... 17

iii
 Department of Health (LHWs) ................................................................................................................. 17
NGO Sector............................................................................................................................................... 17
Data Sources ................................................................................................................................................ 18
Population Welfare Departments: ........................................................................................................... 18
Departments of Health (Health Facility & LHWs) .................................................................................... 18
NGO(s) ...................................................................................................................................................... 18
Channel of Data Reporting to PBS ............................................................................................................... 19
Methodology................................................................................................................................................ 21
SECTION III – RESULTS AND DISCUSSION ......................................................................................................... 23
Source-Wise Comparison in Terms of Couple Years of Protection.............................................................. 23
Method-Wise Comparison of Contraceptive Performance ......................................................................... 24
Contraceptive Usage by Source & Method.................................................................................................. 27
Population Welfare Departments (PWDs) ............................................................................................... 27
Department of Health (Health Facility).................................................................................................... 28
Departments of Health (LHWs) ................................................................................................................ 29
NGOs Sector ............................................................................................................................................. 30
Outlet-Wise Comparison in terms of Couple Years of Protection ............................................................... 31
Comparative Usage by Outlet & Method .................................................................................................... 33
Condoms .................................................................................................................................................. 33
Oral Pills ................................................................................................................................................... 35
Injectable.................................................................................................................................................. 36
IUDs (insertions)....................................................................................................................................... 37
Contraceptive Surgery ............................................................................................................................. 38
Implant ..................................................................................................................................................... 39
Method and Outlet-Wise Average Performance ......................................................................................... 40
Average performance per FWC by method ............................................................................................. 40
Average performance per RHS-A by method........................................................................................... 41
Average Performance per MSU by Method............................................................................................. 43
Percentage Distribution of Total CYP by Source .......................................................................................... 44
Overall Percentage Distribution of Total CYP by Various Methods/ Contribution of Each Method in
Method-Mix ................................................................................................................................................. 44
Method wise Distribution in PWDs .......................................................................................................... 45

iv
 Method wise Distribution in DOH (HF) .................................................................................................... 45
Method wise Distribution in DOH (LHW) ................................................................................................. 45
Method wise Distribution in DOH (NGOs) ............................................................................................... 45
Province-wise Family Planning and Mother & Child Health (MCH) Service Delivery for 2017-18 .............. 46
Pakistan-Estimation of Modern Contraceptive Prevalence Rate (mCPR) for 2017-18 ................................ 46
SECTION-IV: CONCLUSION & WAY FORWARD ................................................................................................. 49
STATISTICAL TABLES ......................................................................................................................................... 51
ANNEXURES ..................................................................................................................................................... 81
List of Annexures.......................................................................................................................................... 82
ANNEXURE-I: Provincial & District-Wise Comparative Analysis of Contraceptive Performance, in terms of
Couple Years of Protection (CYP) For The Year 2017-18 and 2016-17, in respect of Population Welfare
Departments, Departments of Health (HFs & LHWs) & NGO(s) (Rahnuma FPAP, MSS & GSM) ................ 83
ANNEXURE-II: Quarterly Break-up of Contraceptive Usage By Source & Methods, in Terms of Couple
Years Of Protection (CYP) for the Year 2017-18 in Respect Of Population Welfare Departments,
Department of Health (HFs & LHWs)& NGO(s)............................................................................................ 95
ANNEXURE-III: Justification For +/- 10% Change in Contraceptive Performance 2017-18 as Compared to
the Last Year in Respect of Population Welfare Departments, Departments Of Health (HFs & LHWs) and
NGO(s). ....................................................................................................................................................... 101
ANNEXURE-IV: Statement on Bottlenecks hindering the Progress & New Initiatives taken to enhance the
Progress, as supplied by the Source Agencies. .......................................................................................... 105
ANNEXURE-V: STATEMENT ON FP2020 (TARGETS VS ACHIEVEMENTS) IN RESPECT OF POPULATION
WELFARE DEPARTMENTs. .......................................................................................................................... 115
Annexure-VI: Pakistan: FP2020 Core Indicators Summary Sheet 2017 & FP2020 Core Indicators 1-9
Country Fact Sheet. .................................................................................................................................... 118
ANNEXURE-VII: Performae, developed / utilized for collection of Contraceptive Performance data from
Population Welfare Department, Department of Health (Health Facility) & Department of Health (LHW)
and NGO(s). ................................................................................................................................................ 120
ANNEXURE VIII: Updated Conversion Factors, along-with necessary details, utilized for the Computation
of Couple Years of Protection (CYP) ........................................................................................................... 128

v
 Table of Figures
Figure 1 : Report Development Process at PBS H/Q Islamabad ................................................................................ 4
Figure 2 : TFR & CPR in South Asian countries ................................................................................................... 5
Figure 3: TFR Trends........................................................................................................................................... 7
Figure 4: Percent distribution of currently married women age 15-49, by contraceptive method currently
used .................................................................................................................................................................... 8
Figure 5 : Provincial CPR Goals by FP2020 ....................................................................................................... 10
Figure 6: Method Mix ...................................................................................................................................... 14
Figure 7 : Family Planning Service Vendors ..................................................................................................... 14
Figure 8: Data received in PBS ......................................................................................................................... 19
Figure 9: Data Flow Channel in Population Welfare Departments (PWDs) .................................................... 19
Figure 10: Data reporting by Department of Health (Health Facilities) .......................................................... 20
Figure 11: Data reporting by Department of Health (LHWs) ........................................................................... 21
Figure 12 : Data reporting by NGOs ................................................................................................................. 21

Statistical Tables
Table 1 CONTRACEPTIVE USAGE BY DATA SOURCE ________________________________________ ______________ 53
Table 2 CONTRACEPTIVE USAGE BY METHOD (PWDs) _____________________________________________________ 54
Table 2 CONTRACEPTIVE USAGE BY METHOD (DoH-HF) & (DoH LHWs)_______________________________________ 55
Table 2 CONTRACEPTIVE USAGE BY METHOD (NGOs) _____________________________________________________ 56
Table 3-a CONTRACEPTIVE USAGE BY SOURCE & METHOD (CONDOMS)______________________________________57
Table 3-b CONTRACEPTIVE USAGE BY SOURCE & METHOD (ORAL PILLS)____________________________________ 58
Table 3-c CONTRACEPTIVE USAGE BY SOURCE & METHOD (INJECTABLES) _________________________________59
Table 3-d CONTRACEPTIVE USAGE BY SOURCE & METHOD (IUCDs)_________________________________________ 60
Table 3-e CONTRACEPTIVE USAGE BY SOURCE & METHOD (CONTRACEPTIVE SURGERY)______________________ 61
Table 3-f CONTRACEPTIVE USAGE BY SOURCE & METHOD (IMPLANTS) ______________________________________62
Table 4 OUTLET-WISE USAGE OF CONTRACEPTIVE _____________________________________________________63
Table 5-a CONTRACEPTIVE USAGE BY OUTLET & METHOD (CONDOMS) __________________________________ 64-65
Table 5-b CONTRACEPTIVE USAGE BY OUTLET & METHOD (ORAL PILLS) _________________________________ 66-67
Table 5-c CONTRACEPTIVE USAGE BY OUTLET & METHOD (INJECTABLES) ________________________________ 68-69
Table 5-d CONTRACEPTIVE USAGE BY OUTLET & METHOD (IUCDs)_______________________________________70-71
Table 5-e CONTRACEPTIVE USAGE BY OUTLET & METHOD (CONTRACEPTIVE SURGERY)__________________ 72-73
Table 5-f CONTRACEPTIVE USAGE BY OUTLET & METHOD (IMPLANTS) ____________________________________74-75
Table 6 AVERAGE PERFORMANCE OF MAJOR SERVICE DELIVERY UNITS OF PWDs _________________________ 76
Table 7 PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF TOTAL CYP (2017-18) BY SOURCE ________________________________ 77
Table 8-a PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF TOTAL CYP (2017-18) BY METHOD _______________________________ 78
Table 8- b PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF TOTAL CYP (2017-18) BY SOURCE AND METHOD _________________ 79
Table-9 FAMILY PLANNING AND MOTHER & CHILD (MCH) SERVICES________________________________________80
Table-10 COMPARISON OF ESTIMATED MODERN CONTRACEPTIVE PREVELANCE RATE (mCPR) FOR 2017-18 & 2016-
17___________________________________________________________________________________________________81

vi
 Preface
Pakistan Bureau of Statistics (PBS) is prime official agency of Pakistan, responsible for
collection, compilation and timely dissemination of reliable statistical information to policy makers, planners and
researchers. This organization publishes a variety of data, collected through primary as well as secondary
sources, especially on economic and social aspects of the country.

The task of producing Contraceptive Performance Report has been assigned to PBS as a
sequel to the devolution of Ministry of Population Welfare (MoPW). Pursuantly, Population Welfare Statistics
(PWS) Section of PBS has so far released seven issues of Annual Contraceptive Performance Reports since
2010-11. In these reports, secondary data relating to Contraceptive Performance of Public Sector and Private
Sector represented by three eminent NGO(s), involved in service delivery, had been presented in the form of
different tables.

Annual Contraceptive Performance Report, 2017-18 is the 8th issue in the series. The Report is
based on secondary data comprising contribution of Provincial & Regional Population Welfare Departments;
Provincial & Regional Departments of Health (Health Facilities & Lady Health Workers) and three eminent
NGO(s) (Rahnuma Family Planning Association of Pakistan, Greenstar Social Marketing and Marie Stopes
Society) in rendering family planning services. Performance of these Agencies are reported in the form of Service
Statistics covering services data of commodities to clients, by getting respective data from concerned
departments. In this report, Contraceptive Performance gleaned from these Service Statistics, has been
complied in terms of Couple years of Protection (CYP), one of the indicators of FP2020 Core Indicators, being
reported annually for 69 FP2020 focus countries. In addition, this report presents comparison of contraceptive
performance for the year 2017-18, in terms of Couple Year of Protection (CYP), with the last year 2016-17, at
National & Provincial level, in respect of Population Welfare Departments, Departments of Health (Health
Facilities &LHWs) and for three eminent NGO(s). Moreover, annual estimates of modern Contraceptive
Prevalence Rate (mCPR), developed by using an approximation of Estimated Method User (EMU) rates through
Service Statistics have also been included in this report, to have an idea about annual trends in mCPR.

I appreciate and acknowledge the role of our worthy data suppliers & key stakeholders, both in
public and in private sector. I would also like to appreciate the untiring efforts of staff of Population Welfare
Statistics Section and staff of Data Processing Centre, Pakistan Bureau of Statistics Islamabad towards
compiling this report, in accordance to the norms of reliability and serviceability.

Considering the requirements of policy makers, planners, researchers and other data users,
efforts have been made to improve this report. It is hoped that the data users will find it useful. However, there
is always a room for improvement. Comments and suggestions, for future improvement will be highly
appreciated.
Zafar Hasan
Secretary,
M/o Planning, Development & Reform
Chief Statistician (PBS)
June, 2019
Pakistan Bureau of Statistics,
M/o Planning, Development & Reform,
Government of Pakistan, Islamabad.

vii
viii
 Genesis of Report
Contraceptive Performance Report 2017-18 owes to devoted and tireless efforts of the following staff of
Pakistan Bureau of Statistics (PBS):

Compilation of Report
Mr. Habib-Ullah Khan, Member (Census & Surveys)
Mr. Muhammad Sarwar Gondal, Member (Support Services)
Dr. Bahrawar Jan, Member (National Accounts)
Ms. Rizwana Siddique, Director
Mr. Sikandarazam, Chief Statistical Officer
Mr. Arshad Ahmad Khan, Data Processing Assistant
Mr. Mahmood-ul-Hassan, Data Processing Assistant
Mr. Noor Muhammad Farooq, Statistical Assistant
Mr. Muhammad Hanan, Statistical Assistant
Mr. Shafiq Khattak , Statistical Assistant

Data Processing
Rana Muhammad Iqbal, Director (In-charge DP Centre)
Mr. Muhammad Yasir Ashfaq, Chief System Analyst
Mr. Ghulam Kibria, Data Processing Assistant

Typing and Graphic

Mr. Noor Muhammad Farooq, Statistical Assistant
Mr. Muhammad Hanan, Statistical Assistant
Mr. Shafiq Khattak, Statistical Assistant

ix
x
 Acronyms
AJK Azad Jammu & Kashmir
BHU Basic Health Unit
CPR Contraceptive Prevalence Rate
COC Pills Combined Oral Contraceptive Pills
CBFPWs Community Based Family Planning Workers
CS Contraceptive Surgery
CYP Couple Years of Protection
DGHS Director General Health Services
DHIS District Health Information System
DHO District Health Office
DHQ District Headquarters
FATA Federally Administered Tribal Area
FHMUs Family Health Mobile Units
FLCF Fore Level Control Function
FP Family Planning
FPAP Family Planning Association of Pakistan
FPIH Family Planning Initiative for Health
FWCs Family Welfare Centers
GB Gilgit – Baltistan
GSM Greenstar Social Marketing
HF Health Facility
H&H Hakeem & Homeopaths
ICT Islamabad Capital Territory
IEC Information Education & Communication
IRC Institutional Reimbursement Cost
IUDs Intrauterine Devices
LARCs Long Acting Reversible Contraceptive
LHW Lady Health Workers
LMO Lady Medical Officer
MCH Mother & Child Health
MM Male Mobilizers
MMR Maternal Mortality Rate
MCH Mother & Child Health
MNCH Maternal, Newborn and Child Health
MoPW Ministry of Population Welfare
MSS Marie Stopes Society
MSUs Mobile Service Units
M&P Muller & Phipps
MWRA Married Women of Reproductive Age

xi
NGOs Non- Governmental Organizations
NSV Non Scalpel Vasectomy
PBS Pakistan Bureau of Statistics
PC-1 Planning Commission (Form – 1)
PDHS Pakistan Demographic & Health Survey
PDS Pakistan Demographic Survey
PGR Population Growth Rate
PIU Project Implementation Unit
PLDs Provincial Line Departments
PMA Performance Monitoring & Accountability
PMO Program Management Offices
PNC Pakistan Nursing Council
PPHI People Primary Healthcare Initiative
POP PILLS Progestogen Only Pills or Mini Pills
PSDP Public Sector Development Programme
PPWDs Provincial Population Welfare Departments
PWSS Population Welfare Statistics Section
RHS Reproductive Health Services
RMPs Registered Medical Practitioners
RTIs Regional Training Institutes
SNE Summary of New Expenditure
TBAs Traditional Birth Attendants
TFR Total Fertility Rate
THQs Tehsil Headquarters
VBFPWs Village Based Family Planning Workers
WHO World Health Organization

xii
 Executive Summary
Comparison of contraceptive performance during 2017–18 with 2016–17 is summarized as
under:
I) Contraceptive Performance in Terms of Couple Years of Protection (CYP)
Overall Contraceptive Performance in terms of Couple Years of Protection (CYP) for the year
2017-18 as compared to 2016-17, has been computed as -2.7%, based on Family Planning Service Statistics
data collected from Population Welfare Departments, Departments of Health (including performance of both
Health Facilities & Lady Health Workers (LHWs) and from three eminent NGO(s) namely Rahnuma Family
Planning Association of Pakistan (Rahnuma FPAP), Marie Stopes Society (MSS) and Greenstar Social
Marketing (GSM), working throughout the country. Source-wise break-up is given in subsequent sub-headings:

(A) Population Welfare Departments (PWDs)

a) Overall Contraceptive Performance of PWDs for the year 2017-18 in terms of Couple Years of
Protection (CYP) has increased by 15.6% in comparison with the last year 2016-17.
b) Province and region wise profile of CYP indicates an increase in Punjab (32.9%) and Gilgit Baltistan
(13.1%) whereas decrease has been noticed in Sindh (2.0%), Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (14.0%),
Balochistan (6.6%), Islamabad (7.4%), AJK (11.2%) and FATA (9.6%).
c) Method-wise comparison of 2017-18 with 2016-17 of PWDs, in terms of CYP, increase has been
observed in all methods i.e. Condoms (15.2%), Oral Pills (18.9%), Injectables (15.1%), IUCDs
(17.5%), Sterilization/Contraceptive Surgery (7.6%) and Implants (30.0%).
d) Outlet-wise contribution in terms of CYP during the year 2017-18 compared with year 2016-17, has
shown an increase of 15.3% in Family Welfare Centers (FWCs), 9.0% in Reproductive Health
Services-A (RHS-A) Centers, 92.9% in Mobile Service Units (MSUs), 68.3% in Hakeems &
Homeopaths (H&H), 1.2% in Reproductive Health Services-B (RHS-B) Centers, 450.1% 1 in
Community based Family Planning Workers (CBFPWs), 8.1% in Regional Training Institutes (RTIs)
and 185.6% in OTHERS (franchise clinics etc.). The performance has decreased by 24.4% in
Provincial Line Departments (PLDs), 8.5% in Male Mobilizers (MM), 20.5% in Family Planning
Initiative for Health (F.P.I.H) Program, and 1.1% in Registered Medical Practitioners (RMPs).

(B) Departments of Health (DoH)

i. Health Facilities (HFs)
a) Overall Contraceptive Performance of Departments of Health (Health Facilities) for the year 2017-
18 in terms of Couple Years of Protection (CYP) has increased by 1.5% in comparison with the last
year 2017-18.
b) Provincial/regional profile of Departments of Health (HFs) in terms of CYP has shown an increase
in Sindh (53.7%), Islamabad (61.0%), AJK (57.0%), FATA (23.2%), Gilgit Baltistan (141.4%) whereas

1
A new initiative as there was low numbers during previous year.

xiii
 decrease has been witnessed in Punjab (7.1%), Khyber Pakhtunkhawa (24.0%) and Balochistan
(7.8%).
c) Method-wise comparison of DoH (HFs) for 2017-18 with 2016-17, in terms of CYP, has depicted
increase in Condoms (1.2%), Oral Pills (0.7%), Implants (66.4%) and IUCDs (4.9%) whereas
decrease has been observed in Injectables (26.4%) and Sterilization/Contraceptive Surgery (2.0%).

ii. Lady Health Workers (LHWs)

a) Overall Contraceptive Performance of Departments of Health (LHWs) for the year 2017-18 in terms
of Couple Years of Protection (CYP) has decreased by 18.5% in comparison with the last year
2016-17.
b) Provincial/regional profile of DoH (LHWs) in terms of CYP indicates an increase in Sindh (2.9%),
Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (1.6%), Islamabad (141.3%) and Gilgit Baltistan (37.3%) whereas decrease
has been witnessed in Punjab (35.4%), Balochistan (27.6%), AJK (2.4%) and FATA (100%).
c) Method-wise comparison of 2017-18 with 2016-17 of DoH (LHWs), in terms of CYP, a decrease
has been observed in all three methods, that is Condoms (15.4%), Oral Pills (25.3%) and Injectables
(16.4%)

(C) NGO Sector

During 2017-18, decrease has been observed in the performance of all three eminent NGO(s)
Marie Stopes Society (MSS) of Pakistan; Greenstar Social Marketing (GSM) and Rahnuma Family Planning
Association of Pakistan (R-FPAP) involved in FP Services delivery. Performance of Marie Stopes Society (MSS)
of Pakistan, has decreased by 22.4% during 2017-18 as compared to its performance during 2016-17 while
decrease in performance of other two NGO(s) namely Greenstar Social Marketing (GSM) and Rahnuma Family
Planning Association of Pakistan (R-FPAP) have also decreased and remained at 12.0% and 6.3% respectively.

II) Modern Contraceptive Prevalence Rate (mCPR) by Estimated Modern Method User
(EMU) rates
Annual estimates of modern Contraceptive Prevalence Rate (mCPR), by using an
approximation of Estimated Modern Method Use (EMU) rates, computed through services statistics, during the
year 2017-18 is 41.0%, whereas 39.3% during 2016-17. Overall mCPR of all stakeholders during 2017-18 when
compared with 2016-17, has shown an increase of 4.3%. However, departmental impact in modern Contraceptive
Prevalence Rate (mCPR), during the year 2017-18 has been estimated as 15.6% for Population Welfare
Departments (PWDs); 11.9% for Departments of Health (HF & LHWs) and for NGO sector represented by three
eminent NGOs (Rahnama FPAP, MSS, GSM), share is 13.7%. In the Provincial setup, estimate of mCPR in
Punjab during 2017-18 was 44.5%, while that of Sindh, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Balochistan is 35.5%, 45.5%
and 12.3% respectively. However, estimate of mCPR of Federal district Islamabad is 72.4% and respective
estimate of mCPR of AJK, FATA and Gilgit-Baltistan (GB) are 29.8%, 7.1% & 48.9% respectively.

xiv
 Report Organization
Annual Contraceptive Performance Report, 2017-18 has been organized in the following key sections:

Section – I: contains introductory and background information. It begins with discussion on issues of rapidly
growing population at global and regional levels, following a comprehensive description on the rationale of
Contraceptive Performance Report. Subsequently, a comparison of two interconnected FP indicators, i.e. Total
Fertility Rate (TFR) and Modern Contraceptive Prevalence Rate (mCPR) in South Asian region and Pakistan
has been discussed, at length. The next segment under the section –I, outlines the demographic trends in
Pakistan; followed by the description on the history of family planning in Pakistan and details about international
commitments of Pakistan with respect to global Family Planning movement (FP2020). The last segment of this
section highlights the initiatives taken by Pakistan to fulfill aforesaid commitments and concluded with
deliberation on relationship between SDG(s) and Family Planning.

Section – II: delineates the details regarding Concepts and definitions used in the report including Method Mix,
& Family Planning Service Vendors in Pakistan, Service Delivery Mechanism, Data Sources, Channel of Data
Flow and Methodology utilized for the compilation of Contraceptive Performance being gleaned from the Service
Statistics.

Section – III: comprises key findings regarding the Contraceptive Performance of Provincial & Regional
Population Welfare Departments, Provincial & Regional Departments of Health (Health Facilities & Lady Health
Workers) & of three eminent NGO(s) i.e. Rahnuma FPAP, Marie Stopes Society of Pakistan (MSS) and
Greenstar Social Marketing (GSM). This contraceptive performance has been compiled in terms of two FP
performance Indicators that are (a) Couple Years of Protection (CYP) and (b) Estimate of Modern Contraceptive
Prevalence Rate (mCPR)

Section –IV: Conclusion & Way Forward

xv
xvi
 SECTION- I: INTRODUCTION
Over population is an issue of grave concern for developing and underdeveloped countries because it
undermines the state’s efforts to alleviate the living standards of citizens by putting pressure on the economic
resources that consequently leads to numerous other social problems such as un-employment, load shedding,
deteriorating law & order situation and inflation etc. Beside this, rapid increase in population also resulted in
increased requirements of food, water, energy, and land thus adding to existing menace of poverty in developing
world.

Since the world is experiencing a huge population explosion during present century, the need for fertility control
extended beyond the family to societal levels. At the level of family, Family Planning allows individuals and
couples to anticipate and attain their desired number of children and the spacing & timing of their births. Now,
Family Planning efforts need to be undertaken at societal level, as a means of limiting the population growth to
a level within their socio-economic capabilities.

At the state level, population is the centre for the progress & development hence, Family planning can
accelerate the achievement of all Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) designed to end poverty, protect the
planet, and ensure prosperity for all by 2030. Currently 214 million women of reproductive age in developing
countries who want to avoid pregnancy are not using a modern contraceptive method 2. There are multiple
reasons behind the low usage of modern contraceptives including limited choice of methods; limited access to
contraception particularly among young people, poorer segments of populations, or unmarried people; fear or
experience of side-effects; cultural or religious opposition; poor quality of available services; users and providers
bias and gender-based barriers. Impact of these factors can be reduced by empowering women through
effective family planning and liberty to use the modern contraceptive measures to avoid unwanted pregnancies.

Ability to decide freely the number, spacing and timing of one’s children is a basic human right, as endorsed at
the International Conference on Population and Development in 1994. Empowering women to choose the
number, timing and the space of their pregnancies is not only a matter of human right but also related to many
other issues vital to sustainable development including health, education and women’s status in the society.

2
World Health Organization WHO
http://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/family-planning-contraception

1
Therefore, comprehensive family planning policy at state level is fundamental to the health and survival of
women and children.

Rationale for the Contraceptive Performance Report

Pakistan has gone through devolution of its services related public sectors including population welfare
programme and health sector to the provinces with the 18th amendment in its Constitution which became
effective from June 28, 2011.

In pursuance to 18th Constitutional Amendment Act 2010, the functions of Collection, Maintenance and Analysis
of Population Statistics, handled earlier by the defunct Ministry of Population Welfare (MoPW) have been
relocated to Pakistan Bureau of Statistics (PBS). To implement the decision of the Government of Pakistan,
Pakistan Bureau of Statistics has established a new section entitled as “Population Welfare Statistics (PWS)
Section” with the following objectives:

 To collect, compile and disseminate contraceptive performance data on monthly, quarterly and yearly
basis at provincial and national level;
 To maintain data base on contraceptive service statistics;
 To carry out periodic analysis of contraceptive performance statistics and;
 To develop liaison on the subject, with national & international statistical agencies.

For the compliance of the above mentioned objectives and in view of importance and key role of family planning
in the development of the country, an effort has been made to compile contraceptive performance data at
national level for measuring the capacity and performance of the government and non-government departments
in the field. Contraceptive Performance Report is one of the significant publications of the Pakistan Bureau of
Statistics (PBS) being published annually by one of the eminent section of PBS – Population Welfare Statistics
(PWS) Section.

Current Annual Contraceptive Performance Report is eighth in the series, being published by PBS since
2010-11. The Contraceptive performance report mainly aims at:

 To assess the province/sector-wise, method-wise and outlet-wise contraceptive performance in terms

of Couple Year of Protection (CYP).
 To provide basis for estimating annual contraceptives requirement and distribution in the country.

2
  To estimate trends in Modern Contraceptive Prevalence Rate (mCPR) by using an approximation of
Estimated Modern Use (EMU) rates to have an idea about the birth control strategy of the country.

In order to achieve the above mentioned objectives of Annual Contraceptive Performance Report , PBS has
been collecting secondary data relating to FP service statistics on monthly/quarterly basis from three main
source agencies which are:

a. Provincial & Regional Population Welfare Departments including Population Welfare Directorates of AJK, GB & defunct
FATA and District Population Welfare Office ICT, Islamabad
b. Provincial & Regional Departments of Health covering FP Service Statistics of both Health Facilities and LHWs,
c. In private sector, FP Service Statistics is being collected from three eminent NGOs involved in service delivery namely
Rahnuma Family Planning Association of Pakistan (Rahnuma FPAP), Marie Stopes Society of Pakistan (MSS), and
Green Star Social Marketing of Contraceptives (GSM).

It is worthy to mention here that upon taking over assignment during 2010-11, Contraceptive Performance report
was developed on the pattern followed by the defunct Ministry of Population Welfare containing FP Service
Statistics only from Provincial & Regional Population Welfare Departments and from three NGOs. However,
from the years 2015-16 & onwards, scope of the report has been extended by incorporating the service statistics
from Provincial & Regional Departments of Health highlighting the contribution of both Health Facilities (HF) and
Lady Health Workers (LHW) in FP Service delivery. Performae utilized for collection of data from the source
departments, are at Annexure-VII. Moreover, data on new programmes / initiatives have also been included in
this report, on time to time basis in addition to routine activities being reported upon by the provinces. Meticulous
process is adopted, for the compilation of Contraceptive Performance report by PBS, which is illustrated in the
flow chart given on the following page:

3
 Data Collection
from source agencies (PWDs, DoH (HF & LHWs) & NGOs)

Editing and Coding

at PWS Section at PBS H/Q, Islamabad

Data entry
at Data Processing(DP) Center at PBS H/Q, Islamabad

Checking of Error listing

Data Entered at DP Centre, sent back to PWS Section for Error Checking

Rectifications of Errors
Error identified and referred back to DP Center for Correction

Data Finalization and Compilation of Tables

(At DP Centre of PBS)

Vetting of Data by Source Agencies

and Getting Justification for Significant Changes(+/- 10%) w.r.t. Previous Year Performance

Analysis of Data and Compilation of Annual Contraceptive Performance Report at PWS Section

Holding Technical Committee Meeting of National and International Stakeholders

Finalization of the Report in the light of Decisions of Technical Committee

Getting Approval of Report by Head of Department, for Uploading on Website of PBS & Printing
of Report

Printing / Publication of Annual Contraceptive Performance report

Figure 1 : Report Development Process at PBS H/Q Islamabad

4
Total Fertility Rate (TFR) and Modern Contraceptive Performance Rate (mCPR)

Contraceptives use play a significant role in controlling fertility, particularly in reaching the replacement level of
fertility. Thus there exists a strong inverse relationship between TFR and mCPR, i.e. increasing the use of
contraceptives, causes decrease in the fertility rate. Let’s try to explore this relationship in South Asian Countries.

Population in South Asian is a matter of concern because top ten populous countries around the world are in
South Asia namely India 2nd, Pakistan 6th and Bangladesh is at 8th position with over 160 million progress. Rapid
population growth is one of the major challenges for these countries which is leading towards the issues like
increased population density, high dependency ratio and strong demand for employment — and these factors
are exerting great pressure on socioeconomic development.

South Asian region is considered most densely populated region of the world constituting the over one-fifth of
the world’s population. Although the countries of South Asia have made some progress in increasing access to
modern family planning methods and reducing total fertility rates, the region still accounts for the second highest
burden of maternal deaths. Again Poor, marginalized and uneducated households do not have access to the
reproductive health services they need, including family planning.

Thus to conclude, it is stated that highest fertility rate and low contraceptive prevalence rates are main

TFR & CPR IN SOUTH ASIAN COUNTRIES

65.6
65.4

62.3

61.7
53.9

53.5

52.6
51.3

47.8

42.8

35.4

34.7
26.1

27

22.5
19.8
5.3
3.6
2.3

2.3

2.3

2.2
2.1

2.1

Bhutan Bangladesh Sirilanka India Nepal Pakistan Maldives Afghanistan

TFR 2.1 2.3 2.1 2.3 2.3 3.6 2.2 5.3
CPR 65.6 62.3 61.7 53.5 52.6 35.4 34.7 22.5
mCPR 65.4 53.9 51.3 47.8 42.8 26.1 27 19.8

Figure 2 : TFR & CPR in South Asian countries

 World Contraceptive Use by Marital Status and Age 2018, United Nations, Department of Economic and
Social Affairs, Population Division, Fertility and Family Planning Section
 World Population Data, 2017 World Population Data Sheet

contributing factors in the exponential population growth in the south Asian countries. Though most of South

5
Asian Countries have put in their efforts to control TFR through increasing awareness among masses regarding
the use of modern contraceptive methods, but still fertility rates in South Asian countries are significantly higher
than replacement level, as illustrated in Figure 2 below:

In most countries of South Asia, fertility remained high during the 1950s and 1960s. It started to decline
significantly during the late 1960s. Currently, fertility rate at global level is less than 2.5 children per women3;
still the most of the countries particularly Afghanistan and Pakistan in South Asia are lagging behind to equate
themselves with global average (See Figure 2), despite the fact that Pakistan was the first country to launch the
family welfare programme, its Contraceptive Prevalence Rate (CPR) is lowest amongst the region after
Maldives and Afghanistan as depicted in the Figure 2.

Demographic trends in Pakistan

Since establishment, Pakistan population grew significantly, on average, at the rate of 3 percent per year from
1951 until the middle of the 1980’s decade4. However in the subsequent years, population growth rate gradually
declined to 2.69% as per demographic statistics of 1998 census5 whereas the total population was recorded
about 132 Million. In the subsequent decades although growth rate declined as compared to previous years but
still it is higher as compared to other countries in the region i.e. India and Bangladesh. According to 6th population
census, 2017 which was conducted after a gap of eighteen years, indicates that population has surged to a
staggering number of 207.8 million, as per provisional results of Population & Housing Census, 2017,showing
an increase of 75 million people in eighteen years that is computed as almost seven times increase since
1951.This implies that the country has witnessed 57% increase in the population at an annual growth rate of
2.4% which is among the highest population growth countries in the world. It can be further inferred from these
statistics that every year, 3.7 million people are being added in Pakistan’s population. At this pace and if the
population growth remains unchecked, it will outpace Indonesia by 2030 as the country with the largest
population. Arguably, this rapid rise in population poses the biggest threat to the state’s plans to achieve self-
sufficiency in different human development indicators. Unchecked population growth in Pakistan is among one
of the serious challenges, which the country faces today

3
Max Roser (2018) - "Fertility Rate". Published online at OurWorldInData.org. Retrieved from:
https://ourworldindata.org/fertility-rate
4
World population review
http://worldpopulationreview.com/countries/pakistan-population/
5
Population Census 1998, Pakistan Bureau of Statistics.
http://www.pbs.gov.pk/sites/default/files//tables/DEMOGRAPHIC%20INDICATORS%20-%201998%20CENSUS.pdf

6
Major causes of this continuing surge are high fertility rate, public ignorance about modern contraceptive
measures, religious taboos particularly in rural areas, son preferences, need of more earning hands, early
marriages, avoiding family planning measures and people beliefs about family planning considering it contrary
to Islamic teaching. In Pakistan on average couples have 1 unwanted child. 6 Low usage of contraceptives
supply-side factors (including poor’s access to FP services, lack of counseling and technical knowledge of
unmotivated providers, and insufficient of availability of affordable modern methods) are the major obstacles to
the uptake of modern contraceptives, rather than the more frequently cited demand-side factors (including
husband disapproval and religious opposition)7.

Family Planning in Pakistan

Although Pakistan has initiated its family planning TFR Trends
programme in 1950s with the help of World Bank, however
6 5.4
it could not achieve the intended results so far. During the
5
year 1965, an ambitious Family Planning Scheme became 4.1
3.8 3.6
4
part of the “Third Five Year Plan” that was considered as
model for other Islamic countries but it also remained 3

ineffective, despite its placement on high policy agenda 2

and an unquestioned commitment posed by government, 1

mainly due to over-reliance on the IUD and design defects. 0
For the next couple of decades, family planning has 1990-91 2006-07 2012-13 2017-18
PDHS PDHS PDHS PDHS
remained on low priority. During the 1980s, the Sixth and
Figure 3: TFR Trends
Seventh Five Year Plans outlined a new Multi-Sectoral
Strategy in which a new Population Welfare program was designed to utilize public and private clinics to increase
the availability, commercial marketing of contraceptives started to stimulate public demand and mobile service
units were established.

The year 1990 was denoted as “turning point” for family planning in Pakistan by the experts & researchers and
reported strong and consistent evidences for the rapid decline in fertility and population growth from the late
1980s through 2000. Total fertility rate declined from 6.5 in 1979-80 to 5.4 in1990-91 and to 4.1 in 2006-07, and

6
Fact sheet 2018 prepared by population council
7
Batool Zaidi and Sabahat Hussain, “Reasons for Low Modern Contraceptive Use – Insights from Pakistan and
Neighboring countries”, Population council, January 2015

7
contraceptive use rose from 6% in 1969 to 11.8% in 1990-91 to 29.6% in 2006-078. Overall, the era of 1990-
2006 witnessed a decline in Fertility rate. According to findings of series of four Pakistan Demographic & Health
Survey (PDHS), launched during the period 1990-91 till 2017-18, there has been a steady decline in fertility
rates over time, from 5.4 births per woman as reported in the 1990-91 PDHS to 3.6 births per woman in the
2017-18 PDHS—a drop of about two births per woman in almost three decades. Figure 4, depicts trends in TFR
since 1990s, as per PDHS reports.

Moreover in the following figure, percent distribution of married women of reproductive age (15-49), currently
using family planning method is given. Overall, 34% of currently married women use a method of family planning,
with 25% using a modern method and 9% using a traditional method.
Percent distribution of currently married women age 15-49, by contraceptive method currently
used, according to background characteristics, Pakistan DHS 2017-18

CPR mCPR
45.7
38.3 39
34.7
30.9 30.9 27.6 30.2
27.2 24.4 23.2 19.8 21.8 19.1
14 13.7

Punjab Sindh KP Balochistan ICT FATA AJK Gilgit

Islamabad Baltistan

Figure 4: Percent distribution of currently married women age 15-49, by contraceptive method currently used
FP2020
In the meantime, FP2020 a global initiative is undertaken, that support and focus on rights of individuals
particularly of women and girls to decide, freely and for themselves, whether, when, and how many children to
have. This global movement is an outcome of 2012 London Summit on Family Planning (FP) launched with an
aim to improve the FP services to women and girls in the poorest countries. To date, more than 169 partners—
including focus country governments, donor governments, foundations, civil society organizations, multilateral
institutions, and private sector partners—have joined FP2020 with formal commitments to support, expand and
fund rights-based family planning. Pakistan is also signatory of this FP2020 global agenda. 9

8
Changes In contraceptive use and the method mix In Pakistan 1990-91 to 2006-07, Greenstar Research
DepartmentWorking Paper No. 3, 2009.
https://www.greenstar.org.pk/assets/publications/pub4.pdf
9
https://www.familyplanning2020.org

8
Commitments of Pakistan for FP2020
FP 2020 is global partnership that encourages community level progress of family planning goals by prioritizing
it in 69 focused countries including 36 commitments-making countries. Pakistan is one of these commitment-
making countries which are working to expand access to family commodities and services. FP2020 has created
a unique platform and architecture, for global family planning community to fulfill these commitments.

Following the 18th constitutional amendment and devolution of responsibility for FP financing, policy making and
program implementation, this commitment package by Pakistan represents the revitalized focus and ownership
of the federation and the provinces/regions of Pakistan, to the pledges made in the 2012 Summit, and to
additional commitments made jointly by the provinces for adding direction and transparency to achieving FP2020
Goals.

Commitment 1: Raising CPR to 50%

Raise the CPR to 50 percent by 2020, by ensuring the optimal involvement of the public and private health
sectors in family planning, and move towards universal coverage of reproductive health services meeting the
SDG target 3.7 by 2030.

Commitment 2: Offering greater choices of contraceptive and better counseling

Offer greater contraceptive choices through an improved method mix, by better counseling and expanding the
use of long acting reversible methods, availing all possible opportunities in the health system (especially
antenatal and post-delivery consultations) and training 33 percent of all LHVs, FWWs and community based
workers (LHWs and CMWs) to provide a wider range of contraceptive products.

Commitment 3: Expansion of programme to all the stakeholders

Expand the program focus by providing services and information to men and gatekeepers so as to reduce unmet
need among those women who cite husbands/social/religious opposition as reasons for non-use.

Commitment 4: Reduction in unmet needs

Focus on addressing the information and FP service needs of nearly 100,000 married adolescent girls aged 15-
19 thereby reducing their unmet need and meeting the reproductive health informational gaps of unmarried
youth by providing life skills based education.

9
Commitment 5: Enhancing funding of family planning programme
Provincial Ministers of Finance assure an increase in financing, moving towards the 2020 goal of $2.50 per
capita that includes both private and public funding for family planning, (especially new initiatives) with support
from the Federal government. Provincial commitments to meet FP 2020 (CPR Goals by 2020) are given in the
Figure 5 below:

National = 50%

Punjab = 55%

Sindh = 45%

KP= 42%

Baluchistan =
32%

Figure 5 : Provincial CPR Goals by FP2020

Initiatives Taken to Fulfill the FP2020 Commitments

When Pakistan committed to FP2020 at the 2012 London Summit, it had just embarked on a massive overhaul
of its federal system. The Ministry of Health had been abolished and responsibility for health policies, financing,
and programming devolved to the four provinces— all part of the shift from a centralized state to a system with
significant provincial autonomy.

Now, the devolution process has matured and stabilized, thanks in large part to positive political will and
outstanding cooperation across ministries and provinces. The original FP2020 commitment has been
transformed into provincial goals and each province has taken ownership of its FP2020 strategy. The Federal
Ministry of Health has been reconstituted as a coordinating body, fostering alignment and synergy across the
provinces. At the 2017 Family Planning Summit, Pakistan presented its renewed FP2020 pledge as a package
commitment from the federal government and the four provinces. High-level delegations from each province
attended the Summit, and the provincial chief ministers pledged to personally monitor progress on their FP2020
goals.

10
Family Planning and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
Though population is a center of all the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) comprising a framework of 17
goals and 169 targets across social, economic and environmental areas of sustainable development. However,
SDGs making specific references to family planning particularly Goal 3 on Health and Goal 5 on Gender Equality
and Women’s Empowerment with specified target of 3.7 and 5.6 ensuring universal access to sexual and
Reproductive Health, are reproduced below, for specified and ready reference: Though, number of initiatives
are being taken, however, increasing the political priority of family planning, can help in view of the current status
of Pakistan as FP2020 focus country.

Goals Targets
Goal 3 Ensure healthy lives and 3.1 By 2030, reduce the global maternal mortality ratio to less
promote well-being for all at all ages than 70 per 100,000 live births.
3.7 By 2030, ensure universal access to sexual and
reproductive health-care services, including for family
planning, information and education, and the integration of
reproductive health into national strategies and programs
3.8 Achieve universal health coverage, including financial risk
protection, access to quality essential health-care services and
access to safe, effective, quality and affordable essential
medicines and vaccines for all
Goal 5 Achieve gender equality and 5.6 Ensure universal access to sexual and reproductive health
empower all women and girls and reproductive rights as agreed in accordance with the
Programme of Action of the international Conference on
Population and Development and the Beijing Platform for
Action and the outcome documents of their review
conferences.

Specifying only these SDG goals here, does not mean that only these goals are directly related to family
planning. Accomplishment of most of the SDGs goals are linked to effective family planning as it will be
impossible to end poverty and hunger (goals 1 and 2), ensure quality education for all (goal 4), promote
sustained economic growth (goal 8) without ensuring that every women has access to quality, rights-based
family planning services.
In view of the above, accelerated & vigorous efforts are direly needed to have a check on rapidly increasing
population through effective and fool proof implementation of population welfare programme of related issues
by creating awareness among masses.

11
 SECTION – II: CONCEPTS & DEFINITIONS
Family Planning:
Family Planning encompasses the services, policies, information, attitudes, practices and commodities including
contraceptives that give couples, the ability to avoid unintended pregnancy and to choose whether and / or when
to have a child.

Service Statistics:
Service Statistics refer to the volume of contraceptive commodities sold or distributed free of charge, to the
clients during a particular period of time.

Couple Years of Protection (CYP):

“Couple Years of Protection (CYP)” is one of several commonly used indicators to assess family planning efforts.
It is an indirect estimator of birth control. It is also one of core indicator of FP2020; being reported annually for
69 FP2020 focused countries including Pakistan.

CYP is defined as the estimated protection provided by family planning services during one year period, based
upon the volume of all contraceptives sold or distributed free of charge to clients during that period.

CYP is calculated by multiplying the quantity of each method distributed to clients/ service statistics by a
conversion factor, which yields an estimate of the duration of contraceptive protection provided per unit of that
method. The CYP for each method is then summed for all methods to obtain a total CYP figure.

The CYP conversion factors are based on how a method is used, failure rates, wastage, and how many units of
the method are typically needed to provide one year of contraceptive protection for a couple. The calculation
takes into account that some methods, like condoms and oral contraceptives, for example, may be used
incorrectly and then discarded, or that IUDs and implants may be removed before their life span is realized.

The term “CYP” reflects distribution and is a way to estimate coverage and not actual use or impact. The CYP
calculation provides an immediate indication of the volume of program activity. CYP can also allow programs to
compare the contraceptive coverage provided by different family planning methods.

12
The following are updated conversion factors, being used internationally to calculate CYP:

CONVERSION FACTORS* FOR COUPLE YEARS OF PROTECTION (CYP)

Condom 120 Units = 1 CYP
Oral Pills(COC&POP) 15 Cycles = 1 CYP
Emergency Contraceptive Pills (ECP) 20 Doses = 1 CYP
IUCDs 380-A /Cu-T(10-Years) 1 Insertion = 4.6 CYP
IUCDs Multiload (05-Years) 1 Insertion = 3.3 CYP
Inject-able DMPA (03-Months) 4 Doses = 1 CYP
Inject-able Net-En (02-Months) 6 Doses = 1 CYP
Inject-able Femiject (1-Month) 13 Doses = 1 CYP
Contraceptive Surgery /Sterilization 1 Case = 10 CYP
Implant (e.g. 3-Years) 1 Implant = 2.5 CYP
Implant (e.g.4-Years) 1 Implant = 3.2 CYP
Implant (e.g.5-Years) 1 Implant = 3.8 CYP
Source: These factors are adopted from USAID website. Link: http://www.usaid.gov
*For details Annexure-VIII is referred.

Contraceptive Prevalence Rate (CPR):

The CPR is the percentage of women who are practicing, or whose sexual partners are practicing, any form of
contraception. It is usually measured for married women of reproductive age i.e., 15-49 years. Modern
Contraceptive Prevalence Rate (mCPR) for this report, has been estimated by using an approximation of
Estimated Modern Use (EMU) rates for each method, calculated on the basis of consumption of contraceptive
by converting number of units sold into users with the help of the formulae given in the following table:

CONVERSION FORMULAE FOR ESTIMATING NUMBER OF USERS

100 Units of Condoms 1 User
13 Cycles of Oral Pills 1 User
1 Insertion of Iud 1 User
5 Vials of Injectables 1 User
1 Contraceptive Surgery (CS) /Sterilization Case 1 User

Thereafter, number of users is divided by number of Married Women of Reproductive Age (MWRA), symbolically
represented as under:

Estimated mCPR (%) = (Estimated Number of Users / MWRA) x 100

13
Method Mix
Following method mix of modern contraception has been followed for reporting contraceptive performance in
this report.

Oral Pills

Injectables IUDs

Method
Mix

Sterilization Condoms

Implants

Figure 6: Method Mix

Family Planning Service Vendors

Major family planning service vendors in public and private sectors of Pakistan:

Family Planning Service Vendors

Popultion
Department Self
Welfare NGOs
of Health Procurement
Departments

Department of Department of
Health (Health Health (Lady Health
Facility) Workers)

Figure 7 : Family Planning Service Vendors

14
Categories of Family Planning Data
Following are three categories of family planning data that are utilized for estimating coverage/distribution:

i. Number of contraceptive commodities distributed to clients by method;

ii. Number of client family planning service visit, by method and
iii. Number of current contraceptive users.

Some methodological details regarding these different types of family planning data, is as under:

Commodities distributed to clients: Under this category, we use data on commodities distributed to clients
from service delivery points-that is, counted when products or services are provided to clients-as opposed to
further back in the supply chain such as when products are distributed to warehouses or to the service delivery
points.
Service visits: By service units, we mean the number of times clients interacted with a provider for contraceptive
services. For short acting contraceptive methods, the same client may be counted multiple times because the
client comes multiple times for resupply (e.g., an Injectable client has 4 service visits because she receives 4
injections over the course of a year).Here, conversion of service visits data to an estimate of the number of
contraceptive users in given year must take this into account.
Current users: Under current user category, all persons are considered who are currently using contraception,
regardless of when the method was received. This is not directly comparable with the number of clients served
in a year because it includes people still using long acting or permanent method received in previous years (e.g.
a woman who had an IUD inserted in 2013 may still be an IUD user in 2016).
In this report, we are only using / compiling data relating to commodities distributed to clients.

Service Delivery Mechanism

Population Welfare Departments
Family Welfare Centre (FWC):
The FWC is the cornerstone of Pakistan’s Population Welfare Programme. These centers constitute the
most extensive institutional network in the country for promoting and delivering family planning services
in both urban and rural areas. FWC operates in a rented building in any BHU, RHC where two separate
rooms are available. As a static facility, it serves a population of about 7000; while operating through its
satellites clinics and outreach facility, a FWC covers a population of about 12000.

15
Reproductive Health Services (RHS) Centers:
The Reproductive Health Service Centers are major clinical component of Pakistan’s Population
Welfare Programme. They provide services through RHS-A Centers and RHS-B Centers. The RHS-A
centers are hospital-based service outlets in teaching Hospitals, major Hospital of big cities all DHQ and
related THQ Hospitals. They provide contraceptive surgery facilities for women and men with safe and
effective backup medical support along with full range of contraceptives i.e., IUCD, Injectables,
Condoms, Oral Pills, Implant. RHS-B centers are well-established hospitals and clinics with fully-
equipped operating facilities (operation theatre facilities, beds for admission post-operative care,
sterilization and emergency resuscitation equipment, etc.) and trained work force.

Mobile Service Units (MSUs):

The MSUs are the flagship of the Population Welfare Programme. These provide a package of quality
Family Planning/Reproductive Health (FP/RH) services to the people of those remote villages and
hamlets where no other health facility exists. The MSUs operate from specially-designed vehicles which
carry with-in them all the facilities of a mini clinic ensuring complete privacy for simple gynecological
procedures.

Social Mobilizers / Male Mobilizers:

Population Welfare Programme introduced village based Family Planning workers projects to enlighten
male towards responsible parenthood and family healthy during the 9 th year plan. During the 10 th Plan
period, the cadre was named as male mobilizers. However, it has been observed the male mobilizers
were experiencing difficulty in approaching house hold. It has therefore been decided to supplement
these activists with female social mobilizers during the plan period (2009-14). The cadre of male
mobilizers has been renamed and observed in the cadre of social mobilizer (Male). Now, both cadre
names (Male Mobilizers / Social Mobilizer) are being used interchangeably.

Regional Training Institutes (RTIs):

The RTIs provide skill-based training in FP/RH for all categories of health care providers i.e. Doctors,
medical students, nurses, student nurses, lady health visitors and other paramedics. The RTIs also
undertake activities focused on raising the awareness level of hakims, homeopaths, community health
workers, teachers and college students.

16
Department of Health (HFs)
In the public sector, health services are provided through a tiered referral system of health care facilities with
increasing levels of complexity and coverage from primary to secondary and tertiary health facilities. Primary
care facilities include Basic Health Unit (BHUs), Rural Health Centres (RHC), Mother and Child Health (MCH)
Centres and TB Centres. Tehsil and District Headquarter Hospitals provide increasingly specialized secondary
health care, while Teaching Hospitals form the tertiary level tier.
Department of Health (LHWs)
LHW(s) play key role in creating awareness and bringing about changes in attitude regarding basic issues of
health and family planning. One LHW is responsible for approximately 1000 people, or 150 homes, and visits 5
to 7 houses daily. The scope of work and responsibility of LHW includes over 20 tasks, ranging from health
education in terms of antenatal care and referral, immunization services and support to community mobilization,
provision of family Planning and basic curative care.
NGO Sector
PBS is collecting contraceptive performance data from the following three eminent NGOs, involved in service
delivery relating to family planning reproductive health services in the country. Their service delivery mechanism
is deliberated below:

Rahnuma Family Planning Association of Pakistan (FPAP):

Rahnuma - Family Planning Association of Pakistan (FPAP) works through various programs to increase access
to quality and affordable health care aimed at women and young girls in the civil society of Pakistan. FPAP is
committed to promoting Family Planning and Sexual & Reproductive Health as a basic human right and providing
sustainable and quality sexual & reproductive health and family planning services to men, women and youth in
partnership with government, NGOs and civil society by improving the quality of life of the poor and marginalized.
At present Rahnuma FPAP is located in five Regional Offices (Sindh, KPK, Islamabad/AJK/ Gilgit-Baltistan,
Punjab and Balochistan) and Fourteen Program Management Offices (PMOs) having extensive service delivery
network.

Marie Stopes Society of Pakistan (MSS):

Marie Stopes Society is a social enterprise that provides comprehensive reproductive health services for people
throughout Pakistan. Their aim is to increase access to reproductive health information and services that
empower women, men, young people and families to lead healthier lives.

17
MSS is providing family planning services through its Behtar Zindagi Centres (BZCs), Suraj Social Franchise
(SF) Centres, Maternal and Child Health (MCH) Centres, Field-based Health Educators (FHEs), Reproductive
Health Private Providers (RHPPs) and Outreach Services/Sites.
Registered under the Societies Act of Pakistan, MSS opened its first clinic in Karachi in 1992. Today, MSS is
operating a network of 68 service delivery centers, and one mother and child health center, providing services
in 68 districts across four provinces of the country.

Greenstar Social Marketing of Pakistan (GSM):

Greenstar is also one of the eminent private sector providers of reproductive health services. Greenstar Social
Marketing (GSM) was established in 1991 as a social enterprise, to improve the sexual and reproductive health
of people in the country by increasing choices and access to quality modern family planning methods and
contraceptives.
Greenstar is contributing in the improvement of the quality of life among low-income people throughout Pakistan
by increasing access to and use of health products, services and information through private sector franchise
clinics.
Distribution network of over 7,000 franchised clinics & 70,000 retail outlets. GSM is responsible for provision of
approximately 53% of all contraceptives, distributed by the private sector, in Pakistan.

Data Sources
Contraceptive Performance Report is prepared on the basis of Family Planning (commodities to clients) data
received from following sources:
Population Welfare Departments:
 Provincial Population Welfare Departments (PPWDs);
 Population Welfare Departments AJK, GB and FATA;
 District Population Welfare Office, (ICT), Islamabad
 Regional Training Institutes (RTIs).
Departments of Health (Health Facility & LHWs)
 Provincial Directorate of Health;
 District Health Office Islamabad;
 Director General Health Office AJK;
 Directorate of Health Services FATA
 Directorate of Health Services GB.
NGO(s)
 Rahnuma Family Planning Association of Pakistan (Rahnuma FPAP) ;
 Marie Stopes Society of Pakistan (MSS)
 Greenstar Social Marketing (GSM).

18
Channel of Data Reporting to PBS
Pakistan Bureau of Statistics collects family planning service statistics from public sector data sources/agencies
including Provincial & Regional Population Welfare Departments, Departments of Health (Health facility &
LHWs) and from three eminent NGOs namely Rahnuma FPAP, Marie stopes and Greenstar Social Marketing.
Following figure illustrates the flow of data from data source agencies to PBS

Pakistan Bureau Of
Statistics

Provincial & Regional

NGOs Provincial & Regional Population Departments of Health
Welfare Departments including including AJK, GB ,FATA
(AJK, GB, FATA)

Rahnuma FPAP MSS GSM Health Facilties LHWs

Figure 8: Data received in PBS

A. Data Flow Channel in Population Welfare Departments (PWDs)

The District Population Welfare Office is the main operational tier of Population Welfare Program. It is
responsible for actual implementation of population welfare activities in the field. For the purpose, it collects
Contraceptive Performance Reports of all the reporting units (FWCs, RHS-A, MSUs etc.). After
consolidating, these reports are transmitted to the provincial Population Welfare Department. The provincial
Population Welfare Departments forward these reports to Pakistan Bureau of Statistics. Besides the

Pakistan Bureau Of
Statistics

Provincial Regional
Population Welfare
Departments

District Population Welfare

offices

Social
FWCs RHS (A&B) MSUs PLDs & HH RMPs RTIS
Mobilisers
Figure 9: Data Flow Channel in Population Welfare Departments (PWDs)

19
Provincial Population Welfare Departments, Population Welfare Directorate(s) of FATA, AJK & GB, and
three eminent NGOs namely Rahnuma FPAP; Marie Stopes Society and Greenstar (GSM) also provide
Contraceptive Performance data to PBS as shown in Fig (9).

Further, flow of data from Provincial Departments of Health regarding contribution of Health Facilities (HFs)
and Lady Health Workers (LHWs) has also been described separately through Fig (10) & Fig (11)

B. Data Flow Channel in Departments of Health (Health Facilities)

PBS collects data from focal person at provincial cell of District Health Information System (DHIS),
responsible for maintenance/updating of DHIS, that in turn collects data from health facility, through the
following channel.

Primary Health M/o of National Health

Care Services Services, Regulation
Level and Coordination

DHIS CELL AT
DHO OFFICE

DHIS CELL AT
DHQ OFFICE Pakistan Bureau
PROVINCIAL of Statistics
DHIS CELL

Provincial Health
Secondary Departments (Secretariat
Health Care Directorate)
Services Level

Figure 10: Data reporting by Department of Health (Health Facilities)

20
 C. Data Flow Channel in Departments of Health (LHWs)
Further, Data on short term methods such as Condoms, Oral Pills and Injectables, being used by LHWs for
family planning, is collected by PBS from Provincial Office responsible for collection/compilation of services
data of LHWs, on the basis of their monthly reporting as shown in the Figure 10

Provincial DGHS
Field Staff Distrcit Office
HF (LHS) Office (Data Development
(LHW) (ADCO)
Analyst) Partners PBS

Figure 11: Data reporting by Department of Health (LHWs)

D. Data Reporting by NGOs

PBS collects service statistics data from private sector also. In this regard, data/ service statistics are
collected from three eminent NGOs involved in service delivery of family planning namely Rahnuma-Family
Planning Association of Pakistan(Rahnuma-FPAP), Marie Stopes Society(MSS) and Greenstar Social
Marketing(GSM).

Pakistan
Bureau Of
Statistics

Rahnuma-
MSS GSM
FPAP

Figure 12 : Data reporting by NGOs

Methodology
Pakistan Bureau of Statistics collects contraceptive performance data/ FP Service Statistics on monthly basis
by post, through e-mail and by fax from the Provincial Population Welfare Departments (PWDs); Population
Welfare Directorates AJK, GB & FATA and District Population Welfare Office, Islamabad. For Departments of

21
Health (Health Facilities & LHWs data), Provincial Departments of Health (DoHs), Directorates of Health AJK,
GB, FATA and District Health Office, Islamabad are approached. Further to reflect the contribution of private
sector, Contraceptive data from three eminent NGOs, are collected on monthly/quarterly basis. These service
statistics in respect of modern contraceptive methods are collected, on the prescribed format CLR-11 & CLR-
15. These Performa(s) have been attached in Annexure-VII of the report for reference. After careful editing and
coding, data is entered in the data base at Data Processing Centre of PBS and thereafter tabulated / classified
according to approved tabulation plan. The data is entered on monthly basis and consolidated after three months
to compile the Quarterly Contraceptive Performance. At the end of financial year, Annual Contraceptive
Performance Report is compiled. From these service statistics, the indicator, Couple Years of Protection (CYP)
is computed on quarterly and annual basis by utilizing internationally recommended conversion factors, as
mentioned in Annexure-VIII of this report. Moreover, mCPR is also estimated on annual basis by using an
approximation of Estimating Modern Use (EMU) rates. The comparative analysis has been presented, in the
form of different tables at national and provincial level, by calculating the percentage changes in the
contraceptive performance in respect of afore mentioned different departments for the current financial year
(2017-18), in comparison with previous year (2016-17).

22
SECTION III – RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Source-Wise Comparison in Terms of Couple Years of Protection
Overall Contraceptive Performance in terms of Couple Years of Protection (CYP) for the year 2017-18
as compared to 2016-17, has been computed as -2.7%, based on Family Planning Service Statistics data
collected from Population Welfare Departments, Departments of Health (including performance of both Health
Facilities & Lady Health Workers (LHWs) and from data of three eminent NGO(s) namely Rahnuma Family
Planning Association of Pakistan (Rahnuma-FPAP), Marie Stopes Society (MSS) and Greenstar Social
Marketing (GSM), working throughout the country.

Source wise comparison of performance in terms of CYP, of contraceptive service delivery of 2017-18
over 2016-17 shows that, overall PWDs performed better as compared to other sources followed by the
performance of DoH (HF) with increase of 15.6% and 1.5% respectively whereas performance of DoH (LHW)

Percentage Change in CYP by Source during 2017-18 over 2016-17

15.6

1.5

PWDs DOH (HF) DOH (LHW) NGOs

-13.6

-18.5

Graph 1: Percentage Change in CYP by Source during 2017-18 over 2016-17

remained low at 18.5%. NGOs performance have also decreased by 13.6%. Source wise Illustration is given in
following graph 1 while for detailed data, Table 1, at the end of report is referred.

23
Region &Province wise comparison of contraceptive performances in terms of CYP of Population Welfare
Departments, Department of Health (LHW & HF) and NGOs for the 2017-18 over 2016-17, is given in Table 1
while graphical illustration is given below in graph 2 :

Region /Province wise comparison of contraceptive performances in term of CYP

200.0
150.0
100.0
50.0
0.0
-50.0
-100.0
-150.0
Punab Sindh KPK Balochistan Islamabad AJK FATA GB
PWDs 32.9 -2.0 -14.0 -6.6 -7.4 -11.2 -9.6 13.1
DOH (HF) -7.1 53.7 -24.0 -7.8 61.0 57.0 23.2 141.4
DOH (LHW) -35.4 2.9 1.6 -27.6 141.3 -2.4 -100.0 37.3
NGO- Maristopes -30.1 22.5 -70.0 -32.2
NGO-FPAP 3.8 -27.5 25.1 24.9 -38.7 -15.3 7.1
NGO-GSM -10.6 5.9 -29.6 2.6 -51.7 -70.9 -56.9 122.8

Graph 2: Region /Province wise Comparison of Contraceptive Performance in terms of CYP

Method-Wise Comparison of Contraceptive Performance

Contraceptive usage by method and department during the year 2017-18 in absolute numbers as well as in
terms of CYP is given in Table-2 at the end of report. Quarterly Break-up of Contraceptive Usage by Source &
Methods, in terms of Couple Years of Protection (CYP) for the year 2017-18, in respect of Population Welfare
Departments, Department of Health (HFs & LHWs) and NGO(s) (Rahnuma FPAP, Marie Stopes Society (MSS)
and Greenstar Social Marketing (GSM) is at Annexure-II. Main findings with respect to each source are
explained as under:

Population Welfare Department (PWDs)

In absolute terms, the Contraceptive Performance of Program and Non-Program service outlets reported sale
of 79.820 million units of Condoms; 3.574 million cycles of Oral Pills as a whole including 3.377 million cycles of
Oral Pills (CoC), 16,136 cycles of Oral Pills (PoP), 0.181 million doses of Emergency Contraceptive Pills (EC);
For Injectables, sale/distribution figure reported during 2017-18 was 1.532 million vials of Injectables (3-months)
& 58 vials of Injectables (2-months). For IUCD, overall 0.768 million insertions of Intrauterine Contraceptive
Devices (IUCDs) has been reported that includes 0.767 million insertions of IUCDs (10-years), 265 insertions of
IUCDs (05-years). Apart from these, total 105,413 cases of Sterilization/ Contraceptive Surgery have been

24
reported which include 1884 Male Contraceptive Surgery cases & 103,529 Female Contraceptive Surgery
cases. Similarly for Implants, total of 46,818 implants have
Percentage Change in Sale (in Terms of CYP) of
been reported partitioned by 11,327 Implants (3-years) and Contraceptive Method-Mix during 2017-18
Over 2016-17 (PWDs)
35,491 Implants (5-years). Details regarding each method of 30
contraceptives is reflected in Table-2, at the end of the report.
18.9 17.5
15.2 15.1
Method-wise comparison of 2017-18 with 2016-17, in terms of 7.6

CYP, indicates an increase in all methods i.e. Condoms

(15.2%), Oral Pills (18.9%), Injectables (15.1%), IUCDs
(17.5%), Contraceptive Surgery (7.6%) and Implants
(30%).Details are given in Table-2 and graphical presentation
is given in the graph 3. Graph 3: Percentage Change in Sale (in terms of CYP)
of Contraceptive Method-Mix During 2017-18 Over
2016-17 (PWDs)
Department of Health (Health Facilities)

The Contraceptive Performance of DoH (HF) service delivery reported a sale of 8.014 million units of Condoms;
1.676 million cycles of Oral Pills which included 1.544 million cycles of CoC-Oral Pills & 0.132 million cycles of
PoP-Oral Pills; 1 million vials of both types of Injectables which include .0914 million vials of Injectables (3-
months) & 0.091 million vials of Injectables (2-months). Regarding IUCD, 0.310 million insertions of Intrauterine
Contraceptive Devices (IUCDs) has been reported in total that are only for 10-year IUCDs. Apart from these,
total 54,610 cases of Sterilization/ Contraceptive Surgery
Percentage Change in Sale (in Terms of CYP)
including 2687 Male Contraceptive Surgery cases & 51923 of Contraceptive Method-Mix during 2017-18
Over 2016-17[DoH (HFs)]
Female Contraceptive Surgery cases have been performed.
66.4
Similarly for Implants, total of 69,155 implants have been
reported that are only for 3-years implants. Detail of each
method of contraceptive is reflected in Table-2.
1.2 0.7 4.9
-2
The Method-wise comparison of 2017-18 with 2016-17, in terms
of CYP, an increase has been noticed in Condoms (1.2%), Oral
-26.4
Pills (0.7%), IUCDs (4.9%),and Implants (66.4%) whereas
decrease has been observed in Injectables (26.4%) ,
Graph 4: Percentage Change in Sale (in Terms of CYP)
Contraceptive Surgery (2%). Details are given in Table-2 and of Contraceptive Method-Mix during 2017-18 Over
2016-17(DoH (HFs)
graphical presentation is given in the graph 4.

25
Departments of Health (LHWs)
In absolute terms, the Contraceptive Performance of DoH Percentage Change in Sale (in Terms of CYP) of
Contraceptive Method-Mix during 2017-18
(LHWs) service delivery reported a sale of 70.250 million units Over 2016-17 [DoH (LHWs)]

of Condoms; 8.293 million cycles of Oral Pills on the whole Condoms Oral Pills Injectibles
including 8.280 million cycles of Oral Pills (CoC) & 13420
doses of Emergency Contraceptive Pills (EC); For Injectables,
sale of 4.405 million vials (3 months) has been reported. The
-15.4 -16.4
details of each method of contraceptive are reflected in Table-
2 at the end of report.
-25.3

Method-wise comparison of 2017-18 with 2016-17, in terms

Graph 5: Percentage Change in Sale (in terms of CYP) of
of CYP, decrease has been noticed in Condoms (15.4%), Oral Contraceptive Method-Mix during 2017-18 over 2016-17
DoH (LHWs)
Pills (25.3%) and Injectables (16.4%). The details are given
in Table-2 at the end of report and graphical presentation is given in the graph 5.

NGO Sector
In absolute terms, the Contraceptive Performance of NGOs service outlets reported sale of 112.722 million
units of Condoms; 3.306 million cycles of Oral Pills which include 1.043 million cycles of Oral Pills (CoC) & 2.262
million doses of Emergency Contraceptive Pills (EC);for Injectables, sale of 1.228 million vials has been reported
including 0.879 million vials of Injectables (3-months), 0.244 Percentage Change in Sale (in Terms of CYP) of
Contraceptive Method-Mix during 2017-18 Over
million vials of Injectables (2-months) & 0.105 million vials of 2016-17 (NGOs)

Injectables (1-month); 0.751 million insertions of Intrauterine 124

Contraceptive Devices (IUCDs) as a whole that includes

0.652 million insertions of IUCDs (10-years), 0.099 million
insertions of IUCDs (05-years). Apart from these, total
13,663 cases of Sterilization/ Contraceptive Surgery including -14
-0.9 -1.7 -3.2 -18.7
294 Male Contraceptive Surgery cases & 13,369 Female
Contraceptive Surgery cases. Similarly for Implants, total of
17,179 implants have been reported including 156 Implant (3-
Graph 6: Percentage Change in Sale (in Terms of CYP)
years) &17,023 Implant (5-years). Detail of each method of of Contraceptive Method-Mix during 2017-18 Over
2016-17 (NGOs)
contraceptives is reflected in Table-2 at the end of report.

26
Method-wise comparison of 2017-18 with 2016-17, in terms of CYP, an increase has been observed in implant
(124%) while a decrease has been noticed in Condoms (0.9%), Oral Pills (1.7%), Injectables (3.2%), IUCDs
(18.7%) and Contraceptive Surgery (14%). Details are given in Table-2 at the end of report and graphical
presentation is given in the graph 6.

Contraceptive Usage by Source & Method

Method & Source-wise Comparison of Contraceptive Performance of 2017-18 over 2016-17 of all methods in
absolute term is depicted in Table (3-a to3-f). Details are as under:

Population Welfare Departments (PWDs)

For Condoms, method-wise performance of 2017-18 compared with the last year (2016-17), has reflected an
increase in Punjab (39.5%), Baluchistan (19.9%), FATA (18.9%) and GB (1.6%). However, decrease in Sindh
(15.7%), Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (14.4%), Islamabad (1.6%) and AJK (14.3%) has been noticed (Table 3-a).

In case of Oral Pills, an increase has been witnessed in Punjab (32.3%), Sindh (13%) Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
(2.2%), Baluchistan (13.7%), Gilgit-Baltistan (8.2%) while decrease has been shown in Islamabad (9%), AJK
(18.2%) and FATA (16.1%) (Table 3-b).

In case of Injectables, an increase has been observed in Punjab (39.6%), Sindh (14.2%), Islamabad (1%),
Gilgit-Baltistan (15.1%) and FATA (7.4%) while decrease has been depicted in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (9.5%),
Balochistan (0.9%), and AJK (1.6%) (Table 3-c).

For IUCDs, an increase has been observed in Punjab (38.1%), and Gilgit-Baltistan (13.7%), while decrease has
been depicted in Sindh (11%), Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (17.2%), Balochistan (15.2%) Islamabad (7.6 %), AJK
(11.8%) and FATA (14.2 %) (Table 3-d).

If we look into the figure of Contraceptives Surgery cases, an increase has been noticed in Punjab (13%) and
KPK (3.7%), while a decrease has been recorded in Sindh (1.3%), Balochistan (24.2%), Islamabad (15.8%) and
AJK (25.4%) (Table 3-e).

For Implants, an increase has been noticed in Punjab (9.7%), Sindh (15.7%), Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (146.2%)
and AJK (400%) while decrease has been observed in Islamabad (6.2%) (Table 3-f).

27
Following graph 7 depicts the province / region wise percentage change in contraceptive usage by methods for
the Year 2017-18 over 2016-17 for PWDs

Percentage change in Contraceptive usage by source (PWDs) and method for the Year 2017-18 over 2016-17

450.0
400.0
350.0
300.0
Percentage

250.0
200.0
150.0
100.0
50.0
0.0
-50.0
Punjab Sindh KPK Balochistan Islamabad AJK FATA GB
Condoms 39.5 -15.7 -14.4 19.9 -1.6 -14.3 18.9 1.6
Oral Pills 32.3 13.0 2.2 13.7 -9.0 -18.2 16.1 8.2
Injectables 39.6 14.2 -9.5 -0.9 1.0 -1.6 7.4 15.1
IUCDs 38.1 -11.0 -17.2 -15.2 -7.6 -11.8 -14.2 13.7
Sterilization 13.0 -1.3 3.7 -24.2 -15.8 -25.4 0.0 0.0
Implants 9.7 15.7 146.2 0.0 -6.2 400.0 0.0 0.0

Graph 7: Percentage change in Contraceptive usage by source (PWDs) and method for the Year 2017-18 over 2016-17
Department of Health (Health Facility)
For Condoms, method-wise performance of 2017-18 compared with the last year (2016-17), has reflected an
increase in Punjab (13.9%), Sindh (13.2%), Baluchistan (11.4%), Islamabad (12.6%) and FATA (28%).
However, decrease in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (45.2%), AJK (28.8%) and Gilgit-Baltistan (36.8%) has been noticed
(Table 3-a).

In case of Oral Pills, an increase has been witnessed in Punjab (27.7%), Sindh (49.6%), FATA (11.9%), and
Gilgit-Baltistan (40.8%), however, decrease in KPK (63.8%), Baluchistan (25.4%), Islamabad (6.3%) and AJK
(41%) has been observed (Table 3-b).

In case of Injectables, an increase has been observed in Sindh (53.9%), Baluchistan (24%), FATA (15.4%) and
Gilgit-Baltistan (47.9%). However decrease in Punjab (3.6%), Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (74.5%), Islamabad
(25.2%), and AJK (35.7%) has been noted (Table 3-c).

For IUCDs, an increase has been observed in Sindh (45.4%), KPK (52.7%), Islamabad (396.4%), AJK (743.8%),
FATA (19%) and Gilgit-Baltistan (118.7%). However, decrease in Punjab (7.9%), and Balochistan (18.3%) has
been depicted (Table 3-d).

28
If we look into the figure of Contraceptives Surgery cases an increase has been observed in Sindh (3.1%), FATA
(75.6%) and Gilgit-Baltistan (393.9%). However, decrease has been recorded in Punjab (12.6%), Baluchistan
(4.1%) and Islamabad (100%) (Table 3-e).

For Implants, an increase has been noticed in DoH (HFs) Punjab (3.7%), Sindh (117.1%) and Khyber
Pakhtunkhwa (153.3%) while decrease has been observed in DoH (HFs) Baluchistan (64%) and Gilgit-Baltistan
(100%) (Table 3-f).

Graph 8 is the graphical illustration of the above scenario.

PERCENTAGE CHANGE IN CONTRACEPTIVE USAGE BY SOURCE (DOH-HF) AND METHOD FOR

THE YEAR 2017-18 OVER 2016-17
800.0
700.0
600.0
Percentage

500.0
400.0
300.0
200.0
100.0
0.0
-100.0
-200.0
Punjab Sindh KPK Balochistan Islamabad AJK FATA GB
Condoms 13.9 13.2 -45.2 11.4 12.6 -28.8 28.0 -36.8
Oral Pills 27.7 49.6 -63.8 -25.4 -6.3 -41.0 11.9 40.8
Injectables -3.6 53.9 -74.5 24.0 -25.2 -35.7 15.4 47.9
IUCDs -7.9 45.4 52.7 -18.3 396.4 743.8 19.0 118.7
Sterilization -12.6 3.1 0.0 -4.1 -100.0 0.0 75.6 393.9
Implants 3.7 117.1 153.3 -64.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -100.0

Graph 8: Percentage change in Contraceptive usage by source (DOH-HF) and method for the Year 2017-18 over 2016-17
Departments of Health (LHWs)
For Condoms, method-wise performance of 2017-18 compared with the last year (2016-17), has reflected an
increase in Sindh (51.6%), Baluchistan (38.7%) and Islamabad (205.3%), whereas decrease in Punjab (26.6%),
KPK (12.5%), AJK (5.2%), FATA (100%) and Gilgit-Baltistan (62.3%) has been noticed (Table 3-a).

In case of Oral Pills, an increase has been witnessed in Sindh (6.4%), Islamabad (50.5%), AJK (4.7%) and
Gilgit- Baltistan (110.7%) however, decreases in Punjab (44%), Baluchistan (12.9%), and FATA (100%) has
been observed (Table 3-b).

29
In case of Injectables, an increase has been observed in KPK (2.7%) and in Islamabad (5.7%) whereas decrease
in Punjab (37.1%), Sindh (12.2%) and Baluchistan (40.7%) AJK (4.9%), FATA (100%) and Gilgit- Baltistan
(13.8%) have been noted (Table 3-c).

The situation has been graphically represented as graph 9 above.

PERCENTAGE CHANGE IN CONTRACEPTIVE USAGE BY SOURCE (DOH -LHWS) AND

METHOD FOR THE YEAR 2017-18 OVER 2016-17

Punjab Sindh KPK Balochistan Islamabad AJK FATA GB

205.3

110.7
51.6

50.5
38.7

6.4

5.7
4.7

2.7
1.8

CONDOMS ORAL PILLS INJECTABLES

-13.8
-26.6

-12.5

-37.1
-5.2

-40.7
-44.0

-12.2
-12.9

-4.9
-62.3
-100.0

-100.0

-100.0
Graph 9: Percentage change in Contraceptive usage by source (DOH-LHWs) and method for the Year 2017-18 over 2016-17

NGOs Sector
For Condoms, method-wise performance of 2017-18 compared with the last year(2016-17), has reflected an
increase in Rahnuma FPAP (19.4%),however, decrease in Marie Stopes Society (MSS) (61.7%) and Greenstar
(GSM) (0.5%),has been noticed (Table 3-a).

In case of Oral Pills, an increase has been witnessed in Rahnuma FPAP (34.2%), whereas decrease in Marie
Stopes Society (MSS) (42.7%) and Greenstar (GSM) (1.8%) has been observed (Table 3-b).

For Injectables, an increase has been observed in Rahnuma FPAP (35.2%) whereas decrease in Marie Stopes
Society (MSS) (38.2%) and Greenstar (GSM) (19.7%), has been depicted (Table 3-c).

In case of IUCDs, a decrease has been observed in Rahnuma FPAP (9.5%), Marie Stopes Society (MSS)
(23.7%) Greenstar (GSM) (30.7%) and has been noticed (Table 3-d).

If we look into the figure of Contraceptives Surgery cases, an increase has been recorded in Rahnuma FPAP
(6.4%) and Marie Stopes Society (MSS) (12.7%), whereas decrease has been depicted in Greenstar (GSM)
(93.3%) (Table 3-e).

30
For Implants, an increase has been observed in Rahnuma FPAP (25.7%) and Greenstar (GSM) (879.2%)
whereas a decrease has been noted in Marie Stopes Society (MSS) (17.6%) (Table 3-f).Graphical illustration is
given in Graph 10 below.

PERCENTAGE CHANGE IN CONTRACEPTIVE USAGE BY SOURCE (DOH-LHWS) AND METHOD FOR THE
YEAR 2017-18 OVER 2016-17
1000.0

800.0

600.0

400.0

200.0

0.0

-200.0
Condoms Oral Pills Injectables IUCDs Sterilization Implants
Rahnuma FPAP 19.4 34.2 35.2 -9.5 6.4 25.7
Marie Stopes (MSS) -61.7 -42.7 -38.2 -23.7 12.7 -17.6
Greenstar (GSM) -0.5 -1.8 -19.7 -30.7 -93.3 879.2

Graph 10: Percentage change in Contraceptive usage by source (DOH-LHWs) and method for the Year 2017-18 over 2016-17

Outlet-Wise Comparison in terms of Couple Years of Protection

(A) Population Welfare Departments (PWDs)

The contribution of services outlets in terms of CYP during the year 2017-18 compared with year 2016-17, has
shown an increase of 15.3% in Family Welfare Centers (FWCs), 9.0% in Reproductive Health Services-A(RHS-
A), 1.2% in Reproductive Health Services-B (RHS-B), 92.9% in Mobile Service Units (MSUs), 68.3% in Hakeems
and Homeopaths (H&H), 8.1% in Regional Training Institutes and 450.1% in CBFPWs. The performance has
decreased by 24.4% in Provincial Line Departments (PLDs), 1.1% in RMPs,8.5% in Male Mobilizers (MM),),

31
100% in village based F.P. Workers, 22.7% in counters , 100% in TBAs and 20.5% in F.P.I.H Programme. The
details are given in Table-4 and graphical presentation (graph 11) is given as above:

Main Service Delivery Outlets of PWDs Expressed as Percentage Change in CYP For
2017-18 Over 2016-17
450.1

92.9 68.3
15.3 9 -8.5 8.1 -100 -22.7 -100 -20.5
1.2 -24.4 -1.1

Graph 11: Main Service Delivery Outlets of PWDs expressed as Percentage Change in CYP for 2017-18 Over 2016-17

(B) Departments of Health (HF) & (LHWs)

The contribution of services outlets in terms of CYP during the year 2017-18 compared with year 2016-17, has
shown an increase of 1.5% in DoH (HFs) and a decrease of 18.5% in DoH (LHWs).The details are given in
Table-4 at the end of report
(C) NGO Sector

Overall NGO Sector performance has decreased by 13.6% during the year 2017-18 compared with last year
2016-17 .The contribution of NGOs services delivery in terms of CYP during the year 2017-18 compared with
year 2016-17, has depicted decrease of 22.4 % in Marie Stopes Society, 6.3% in Rahnuma FPAP and 12.0%
in Greenstar. The details are given in Table-4 and graph(12), in this regard, is given below.

0
Rahnuma Mariestopes GSM
-5
-10 -6.3

-15 -12

-20
-25 -22.4

Graph 12: Contribution of NGOs in services delivery in terms of CYP during the year 2017-18 compared with year 2016-17

32
Comparative Usage by Outlet & Method
Overall Outlet & Method-wise Comparison of Performance of Contraceptives Delivery Services of 2017-18 over
2016-17 in absolute terms shows that, overall PWDs performed better in each of the methods, as compare to
other outlets, followed by the DOH-HF(Except the performance in Injectable). Similarly, with respect to the
methods implant shows a better performance while comparing it with other methods. DOH (LHWs) performed
least as compared to other in every method followed by the NGOs (Except the performance in Implants). Details
are given in the graph 13 below.

Source & Method-wise Comparison of Performance of Contraceptives Delivery Services

of 2017-18 over 2016-17
140.00%
120.00%
100.00%
80.00%
60.00%
40.00%
20.00%
0.00%
-20.00%
-40.00%
Contraceptiv
Condom Oral Pills Injectables IUD-Insertion Implant
e Surgery
PWDs 15.20% 18.80% 15.10% 17.50% 7.60% 15.60%
DOH-HF 1.20% 0.70% -25.60% 4.90% -2.00% 66.40%
DOH-LHW -15.40% -25.30% -16.40% 0% 0.00% 0.00%
NGOs -0.90% -1.70% -6.20% -20.30% -14.00% 116.90%

Graph 13: Source & Method –wise Comparison of Performance of Contraceptive Services Delivery of 2017-18 over 2016-17

Table 5 (a-f) annexed in the report demonstrates Outlet & Method-wise Comparison of Performance of
Contraceptives Delivery Services of 2017-18 over 2016-17 in detail. The following section of the report narrates
the outlet and method-wise performance in respect of each department.

Condoms
Population Welfare Departments (PWDs) performances with respect to Condoms
For Condoms, the performance of 2017-18 when compared with the 2016-17, an increase has been observed
in FWCs (14.8%), RHS-A (17.9%), RHS-B (180.7%), MSUs (63%), PLDs (93.5%), RMPs (7.2%), Hakeem &
Homeopaths (H&H) (65%), RTIs (32.4 %), CBFPWs (467%), F.P.I.H Programme {Only in Islamabad (38.2 %)},
Gilgit-Baltistan (1.6%), FATA (18.9%), whereas decrease has been recorded in Male Mobilizer (MM) (11%),
VBFPW (100%), TBAs (100%), Counters (20.5%) and AJK (14.3%). For details Table (5-a) is referred.

33
DOH (HF) performances with respect to Condoms
For Condoms, the performance of 2017-18 when compared with the 2016-17, an increase has been observed
in Punjab (13.9%), Sindh (13.2%), Balochistan (11.4%), Islamabad (12.6%) and FATA (28.8%) whereas a
decrease has been observed in KPK (45.2%), AJK (28.8%) and Gilgit-Baltistan (36.8%). For details Table (5-a)
is referred.

DOH (LHW) performances with respect to Condoms

For Condoms, the performance of 2017-18 when compared with the 2016-17, an increase has been observed
in Sindh (51.6%), Balochistan (38.7%), Islamabad (205.3%) and whereas a decrease has been observed in
Punjab (26.6%), KPK (12.5%), AJK (5.2%), FATA (100%) and Gilgit-Baltistan (62.3%). For details Table (5-a)
is referred.

NGOs performances with respect to Condoms

FPAP
For Condoms, the performance of 2017-18 when compared with the 2016-17, an increase has been
observed in Punjab (21.1%), Sindh (33.1%), KPK (16.4%), Balochistan (38.4%), AJK (6.8%) and Gilgit-
Baltistan (21%) whereas a decrease has been observed in Islamabad (11.5%). For details Table (5-a) is
referred.

GREENSTAR (GSM)
For Condoms, the performance of 2017-18 when compared with the 2016-17, an increase has been
observed in Punjab (9.7%), Sindh (18.6%) and Gilgit-Baltistan (221.6%), whereas a decrease has been
observed in KPK (43.2%) Balochistan (15.4%), Islamabad (68.4%) AJK (67.9%) and FATA (39.4%). For
details Table (5-a) is referred.

MARIE STOPES
For Condoms, the performance of 2017-18 when compared with the 2016-17, a decrease has been
observed in Punjab (63.7%) and Sindh (25.8%), KPK (91.5%) and Balochistan (2.70%). For details Table
(5-a) is referred.

34
Oral Pills
PWDs performances with respect to Oral Pills
For Oral Pills, the performance of 2017-18 when compared with the 2016-17, an increase has been shown in
FWCs (16%), RHS-A (19.5%),RHS-B (117.8%), MSUs (73.5%), PLDs (75%), RMP’s (8%), Hakeem &
Homeopaths(H&H) (58.1%), Male/Social Mobilizers (MM) (0.3%), CBFPWs (404.4%), RTIs (13.2%), Gilgit-
Baltistan (8.2%) and Others (129%) whereas decrease has been recorded in VBFPW (100%), Counters (3.8%),
TBA’s (100%), FPIH Programme (22.2%), AJK (18.2%) and FATA (16.1%). Facility-wise data can be seen in
Table (5-b).

Department of Health (Health Facility) performances with respect to Oral Pills

For Oral Pills, the performance of 2017-18 when compared with the 2016-17, an increase has been shown in
Punjab (27.7%), Sindh (49.6%), FATA (11.9%) and Gilgit-Baltistan (40.8%) whereas decrease has been
observed in KPK (63.8%), Balochistan (25.4%), Islamabad (6.3%) and AJK (41%). Facility-wise data can be
seen in Table (5-b).

Department of Health (LHWs) performances with respect to Oral Pills

For Oral Pills, the performance of 2017-18 when compared with the 2016-17, an increase has been shown in
Sindh (6.4%), KPK (1.8%), Islamabad (50.5%), AJK (4.7%) and Gilgit-Baltistan (110.7%) whereas decrease has
been observed in Punjab (44%), Balochistan (12.9%), and FATA (100%). Facility-wise data can be seen in
Table (5-b).

NGO’s performances with respect to Oral Pills

RAHNUMA (FPAP)
For Oral Pills, the performance of 2017-18 when compared with the 2016-17, an increase has been shown
in Punjab (47.6%), Sindh (27.7%), KPK (73.7%), Balochistan (14.6%), AJK (4.3%) and Gilgit-Baltistan
(10.6%). Whereas decrease has been observed in Islamabad (11.2%) only. Facility-wise data can be seen
in Table (5-b).

GREENSTAR SOCIAL MARKETING (GSM)

For Oral Pills, the performance of 2017-18 when compared with the 2016-17, an increase has been shown
in Punjab (1.1%), Balochistan (48.1%), Islamabad (7.8%), FATA (61.9%) and Gilgit-Baltistan (93.5%).
Whereas decrease has been observed in Sindh (10.4%), KPK (11%), and AJK (5.8%). Facility-wise data
can be seen in Table (5-b).

35
 MARIE STOPES SOCIETY (MSS)
For Oral Pills, the performance of 2017-18 when compared with the 2016-17, an increase has been shown
in Balochistan (2.1%), only. Whereas decrease has been observed in Punjab (53.9%), Sindh (1%) and KPK
(77.8%).Facility-wise data can be seen in Table (5-b).

Injectable

Population Welfare Departments (PWDs) performances with respect to Injectables

For Injectables, the performance of 2017-18 when compared with the 2016-17, an increase has been noted in
FWCs (14.6%), RHS-A (8.2%), RHS-B (26.3%), MSUs (50.5%), RMPs (3.9%), RTIs (13.5%) , FATA (7.4%),
Gilgit-Baltistan (15.1%) and Others (28.7%), whereas decrease has been recorded in PLDs (31.3%), VBFPWs
(100%), Counters (27.9%), TBAs (100%) , FPIH Programme (-36.8%), and AJK (1.6%). Product-wise data can
be seen in Table (5-c)

Department of Health (Health Facilities) performances with respect to Injectables

(Health Facility)
For Injectable, the performance of 2017-18 when compared with the 2016-17, an increase has been
shown in Sindh (53.9%), Balochistan (24%), FATA (15.4%) and Gilgit-Baltistan (47.9%) whereas
decrease has been observed in Punjab (3.6%), KPK (74.5%), Islamabad (25.2%), AJK (35.7%). Facility-
wise data can be seen in Table (5-c).

DOH (LHW)
For Injectable, the performance of 2017-18 when compared with the 2016-17, an increase has been
shown in KPK (2.7%) and Islamabad (5.7%). Whereas decrease has been observed in Punjab (37.1%),
Sindh (12.2%), Balochistan (40.7%), AJK (4.9%), FATA (100%) Gilgit-Baltistan (13.8%) Facility-wise
data can be seen in Table (5-c).

NGO’s performances with respect to Injectables

RAHNUMA FPAP
For Injectable, the performance of 2017-18 when compared with the 2016-17, an increase has been
shown in Punjab (29.3%), Sindh (1.5%), KPK (55.5%), Balochistan (10.3%), Islamabad (149.8 %), AJK
(13.1%) and Gilgit-Baltistan (1.5%). Facility-wise data can be seen in Table (5-c).

36
 GREENSTAR SOCIAL MARKETING (GSM)
For Injectable, the performance of 2017-18 when compared with the 2016-17, an increase has been
shown in KPK (7.7%), Islamabad (15.7%), AJK (10.3%) and Gilgit-Baltistan (150.5%). Whereas
decrease has been observed in Punjab (22.2%), Sindh (31%), Balochistan (10.9%), and FATA (34.9%).
Facility-wise data can be seen in Table (5-c).

MARIE STOPES SOCIETY (MSS)

For Injectable, the performance of 2017-18 when compared with the 2016-17, an increase has been
shown in Sindh (17.8%), only. Whereas decrease has been observed in Punjab (47.5%), KPK (76.5%)
and Balochistan (31.1%).Facility-wise data can be seen in Table (5-c).

IUDs (insertions)
Population Welfare Departments (PWDs) performances with respect to IUDs (insertions)
For IUCDs, the performance of 2017-18 when compared with the 2016-17, an increase has been noted in FWCs
(15.3%), RHS-A (3.9%), RHS-B (8.8%), MSUs (102%), RTIs (6.4%), Gilgit-Baltistan (13.7%) and Others
(236.2%), whereas decrease has been recorded in PLDs (41.1%), RMPs (4.4%), VBFPWs (100%), Counters
(25.4%), FPIH Programme (23.2%) AJK, (11.8%) and FATA (14.2%). Product-wise data can be seen in Table
(5-d).

Department of Health (Health Facilities) performances with respect to IUDs (insertions)

For IUDs (insertions), the performance of 2017-18 when compared with the 2016-17, an increase has been
shown in Sindh (45.4%), KPK (52.7%), Islamabad (396.4%), AJK (743.8%), FATA (19%) and Gilgit-Baltistan
(118.7%) whereas decrease has been observed in Punjab (7.9%) and Balochistan (18.3%). Facility-wise data
can be seen in Table (5-d).

NGO’s performances with respect to IUDs (insertions)

RAHNUMA FPAP
For IUDs (insertions), the performance of 2017-18 when compared with the 2016-17, an increase has been
shown in Punjab (1.9%), KPK (21.2%), Balochistan (24.9%), and Gilgit-Baltistan (8.5%). Whereas decrease
has been observed in Sindh (29.9%), Islamabad (44.7 %) and AJK (17.0%). Facility-wise data can be seen
in Table (5-d).

37
 GREENSTAR SOCIAL MARKETING (GSM)
For IUDs (insertions), the performance of 2017-18 when compared with the 2016-17, an increase has been
shown in Gilgit-Baltistan (69.9%), only. Whereas decrease has been observed in Punjab (30.5%), Sindh
(24.2%), KPK (31%), Balochistan (12%), Islamabad (24.7%), FATA (96.2%) and AJK (86.1%). Facility-wise
data can be seen in Table (5-d).

MARIE STOPES SOCIETY (MSS)

For IUDs (insertions), the performance of 2017-18 when compared with the 2016-17, an increase has been
shown in Sindh (19.3%), only. Whereas decrease has been observed in Punjab (29.9%), KPK (69.2%) and
Balochistan (18.9%).Facility-wise data can be seen in Table (5-d).

Contraceptive Surgery
Population Welfare Departments (PWDs) performances with respect to Contraceptive
Surgery
When we look into the figure of Contraceptive Surgery cases, the performance of 2017-18 when compared
with the 2016-17,an increase has been noted in RHS-A (7.9%), whereas decrease has been witnessed in RHS-
B (1.8%) and AJK (25.4%). Product-wise data can be seen in Table (5-e).

DOH- HF performances with respect to Contraceptive Surgery

For Contraceptive Surgery, the performance of 2017-18 when compared with the 2016-17, an increase has
been shown in Sindh (3.1%), FATA (75.6%) and Gilgit-Baltistan (393.9%) whereas decrease has been observed
in Punjab (12.6 %), Balochistan (4.1%) and Islamabad (100%). Facility-wise data can be seen in Table (5-e).

NGO’s performances with respect to Contraceptive Surgery

RAHNUMA FPAP
For Contraceptive Surgery, the performance of 2017-18 when compared with the 2016-17, an
increase has been shown in Punjab (10.5%), KPK (30.2%) and Balochistan (21.6%), whereas decrease
has been observed in Sindh (9.9%), Islamabad (38.5 %), and GB (15.4%). Facility-wise data can be
seen in Table (5-e).

GREENSTAR SOCIAL MARKETING (GSM)

For Contraceptive Surgery, the performance of 2017-18 when compared with the 2016-17 a decrease
has been observed in all i.e. Punjab (91.5%), Sindh (98.4%), KPK (94.2%), and Islamabad (81.9%).
Facility-wise data can be seen in Table (5-e).

38
 MARIE STOPES SOCIETY (MSS)
For Contraceptive Surgery, the performance of 2017-18 when compared with the 2016-17, an
increase has been shown in Sindh (72.7%), only. Whereas decrease has been observed in Punjab
(7.9%), KPK (93%) and Balochistan (48.3%).Facility-wise data can be seen in Table (5-e).

Implant
Population Welfare Departments (PWDs) performances with respect to Implant
For Implants, the performance of 2016-17 when compared with the 2015-16, increase has been observed in
FWCs (447%), RHS-A (11.5%), MSUs (119.5%), Counters (5400%), and AJK (400%). Product-wise data can
be seen in Table (5-f).

DOH- HF performances with respect to Implant

For Implant, the performance of 2017-18 when compared with the 2016-17, an increase has been shown in
Punjab (3.7 %), Sindh (117.1%), and KPK (153.3%) whereas decrease has been observed in Balochistan (64%)
and Gilgit-Baltistan (100%). Facility-wise data can be seen in Table (5-f).

NGO’s performances with respect to Implants

RAHNUMA FPAP
For Implant, the performance of 2017-18 when compared with the 2016-17, an increase has been
shown in Punjab (200.8%), Balochistan (273.5%), Islamabad (4.9%) and AJK (12.4%), whereas
decrease has been observed in KPK (4.6%), Sindh (7.8%) and GB (47.5%). Facility-wise data can be
seen in Table (5-f).

GREENSTAR SOCIAL MARKETING (GSM)

For Implant, the performance of 2017-18 when compared with the 2016-17 an increase has been
observed in Sindh (4382.2%) and Islamabad (596.2%) whereas a decrease has been noted in Punjab
(53.9%) and KPK (44.6%). Facility-wise data can be seen in Table (5-f).

MARIE STOPES SOCIETY (MSS)

For Implant, the performance of 2017-18 when compared with the 2016-17, an increase has been
shown in Balochistan (78.1%), only. Whereas decrease has been observed in Punjab (49.9%), Sindh
(7.5%) and KPK (54.7%).Facility-wise data can be seen in Table (5-f).

39
Method and Outlet-Wise Average Performance
Method and Outlet-wise Average performance for the Federal and Provincial setup during the financial year
2017-18 is given in Table-6. The details are as under:
Average performance per FWC by method
Among provinces, the highest average performance obtained for Condoms is 23,004 units per FWC sold in
Punjab, followed by 14967 units in KPK and 12355 units in Sindh and 8295 units in Balochistan, whereas 21826
units in Islamabad average per FWC has been reported.

The maximum numbers i.e. 1037 cycles of Oral Pills (COC & POP) per FWC were dispensed by Khyber
Pakhtunkhwa and the lowest 462 cycles were reported by FWCs of Sindh, whereas in Islamabad 934 cycles
per FWC.

For Emergency Contraceptive Pills (ECP) Punjab is reported as the highest with 64 doses and Balochistan
reported as the lowest with 13 doses on average per outlet, while in Islamabad the same was reported as 20
doses.

By looking at the figure for Injectables, it is observed that the maximum number has been reported for Khyber
Pakhtunkhwa as 541 vials per FWC while the minimum number i.e. 139 vials per FWC have been observed in
Balochistan whereas in Islamabad 394 vials per FWCs.

The highest insertions of IUCDs i.e. 313 per FWC have been reported in Punjab and the lowest figure reported
is 44 for FWC of Sindh whereas in Islamabad 263 insertions of IUCD per FWCs.

40
By looking at the figure for Implant, it is observed that the FWCs of Sindh and KPK are providing services of
Jadelle. Maximum number has been reported for Sindh as 1 Jadelle per FWC while the minimum number i.e.
0.1 per FWC have been observed in KPK. The graphical presentation (graph-13) in respect of all methods is

Condoms Oral Pills

23004 OP (COC & POP) EC

21826

14967 1037
12355 934
824
8295 547
462

64 45 20 13 20

Punjab Sindh KPK Balochistan Islamabad Punjab Sindh KPK Balochistan Islamabad

Injectibles IUDs
541 313
263
395 394 230
314

139 69
30

Punjab Sindh KPK Balochistan Islamabad Punjab Sindh KPK Balochistan Islamabad

given above:
Graph 13: Average performance per FWC by method

Average performance per RHS-A by method

Among provinces, the highest average performance for Condoms per RHS-A is 29224 units in Punjab followed
by, 14761 units in KPK, 11571 units in Balochistan and 10729 units in Sindh whereas 43,443 units sold in
Islamabad .

The Reproductive Health Services-A (RHS-A) Centers of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa were able to dispense maximum
number 902 cycles of Oral Pills (POP & COC) as compared to the lowest 696 cycles of Oral Pills by RHS-A of
Sindh, whereas in Islamabad 1377 cycles of Oral Pills per RHA-A center.

41
Whereas Oral Pills (ECP) Punjab is reported as the highest with 93 doses and Balochistan reported as the
lowest with 28 doses on average per outlet, while in Islamabad the same was reported as 33 doses.:

The highest Injectables i.e. 734 vials per RHA-Center were reported by Khyber Pakhtunkhwa in comparison to
the lowest 445 vials per outlet reported by RHS-A Center of Sindh, whereas in Islamabad 651 vials per RHS-A
Center.

The highest insertions of IUDs i.e. 418 were reported by Punjab in comparison to the lowest 81 insertions carried
out by RHS-A Centers in Sindh, whereas in Islamabad 579 insertions of IUDs per RHS-A Center.

The highest Contraceptive Surgery Cases per RHS-A Center were performed by Punjab (689) and the lowest
(119) in Balochistan whereas in Islamabad 284 cases per RHS-A Center. The graphical presentation of Oral
Pills method dispensed per FWC is presented in graph 14:

Condoms Oral Pills (COC & POP)

43443 COC POP

29224
1221 1204
14761 11571 692 891 851
10729
0 4 11 23 173

Punjab Sindh KPK Balochistan Islamabad Punjab Sindh KPK Balochistan Islamabad

Oral Pills (Emergency Pills) Injectables

93
734 651
61 56 548
445 515
28 33

Punjab Sindh KPK Balochistan Islamabad Punjab Sindh KPK Balochistan Islamabad

CS (Male & Female) IUDs

689
579
393 418
284 294
187
125 119 81

Punjab Sindh KPK Balochistan Islamabad Punjab Sindh KPK Balochistan Islamabad

Graph: 14 Average achievement per RHS-A by methods for the year 2017-18

42
Average Performance per MSU by Method
Among provinces, The highest reported average performance for Condoms per MSU is 43319 units in
Punjab followed by 10405 units in Sindh,9380 units in KPK and 6918 units in Balochistan whereas in Islamabad
28350 units.

The MSUs of Punjab were able to dispense maximum number 1921 cycles of Oral Pills (POP & COC) as
compared to the lowest 383 cycles of Oral Pills by MSU of Sindh, whereas in Islamabad 1140 cycles of Oral
Pills per MSU.

Whereas in term of Oral Pills (Emergency Contraceptive) Punjab is reported as the highest with 189 doses and
Balochistan reported as the lowest with 15 doses on average per outlet, while in Islamabad the same was
reported as 17 doses.

The highest Injectables i.e. 965 vials per MSUs were reported by Punjab in comparison to the lowest 261 vials
per outlet reported by MSU of Balochistan, whereas in Islamabad 367 vials per MSU.

The highest insertions of IUDs i.e. 910 were reported by Punjab in comparison to the lowest 39 insertions carried
out by MSU in Sindh, whereas in Islamabad 196 insertions of IUDs per MSU. The graphical presentation of Oral
Pills method dispensed per MSU is presented in graph 15:
43319 Condoms OPs (POP & COC)
28350
COC POP
1919
10405 9380 6918 1056
383 602 434
2 0 3 14 84
Punjab Sindh KPK Balochistan Islamabad Punjab Sindh KPK Balochistan Islamabad

Oral Pills (Emergency Pills) Injectables

189
965
492 367
49 275 261
19 15 17

Punjab Sindh KPK Balochistan Islamabad Punjab Sindh KPK Balochistan Islamabad

IUDs
910

215 196
39 82

Punjab Sindh KPK Balochistan Islamabad

Graph: 15 Average Performances per MSU by Method

43
Percentage Distribution of Total CYP by Source
The percentage distribution of total CYP by data source during the year 2017-18 reflected 38.3% in
PWDs, 16.3% in DoH (HFs), 14.2% in DOH (LHWs) and 31.2% in NGOs. The details are given in Table-7 and
graphical presentation is as under:

percentage distribution of total CYP by data source

NGOs PWDs
31.2% 38.3%

DOH-LHWs
14.2% DOH-HF
16.3%

Graph: 16 percentage distribution of total CYP by data source

Overall Percentage Distribution of Total CYP by Various Methods/ Contribution of Each

Method in Method-Mix
Overall the method-wise percentage contribution in terms of total CYP during the year 2017-18 has been
calculated for Condom 14.3%, Oral Pills 6.9%, Injectables 12.7%, IUCDs 52.6%, Contraceptive Surgery 11%
and Implants 2.5%. The details are given in Table-8a and graphical presentation in graph 17:

Sterilization/CS Implants Condom

11% 2% 14%
Oral Pills
7%

Injectables
13%

IUCDs
53%

Graph: 17 Overall Percentage Distribution of Total CYP by Various Methods/ Contribution of Each Method in Method-Mix

44
Source and method wise percentage contribution in term of total CYP during the year 2017-18 is given in Table
8b and details are as under.

Method wise Distribution in PWDs

The method-wise percentage contribution in terms of total CYP during the year 2017-18 has been calculated for
Condom 4.2%, Oral Pills 1.5%, Injectables 2.4%, IUCDs 22.4%, Contraceptive Surgery 6.7% and Implants 1.0%.
The details are given in Table-8:

Method wise Distribution in DOH (HF)

The method-wise percentage contribution in terms of total CYP during the year 2017-18 has been calculated for
Condom 0.4%, Oral Pills 0.7%, Injectables 1.5%, IUCDs 9.1%, Contraceptive Surgery 3.5% and Implants 1.1%.
The details are given in Table-8:

Method wise Distribution in DOH (LHW)

The method-wise percentage contribution in terms of total CYP during the year 2017-18 has been calculated for
Condom 3.7%, Oral Pills 3.5% and Injectables 7.0%. The details are given in Table-8

Method wise Distribution in DOH (NGOs)

The method-wise percentage contribution in terms of total CYP during the year 2017-18 has been calculated for
Condom 6.0%, Oral Pills 1.2%, Injectables 1.7%, IUCDs 21.1%, Contraceptive Surgery 0.9% and Implants 0.4%.
The details are given in Table-8 and graphical presentation is as under:

Percentage Distribution of Total CYP by Various Methods/ Contribution

25 22.4 21.1
20
15
9.1
10 6.7 7 6
4.2 3.5 3.7 3.5
5 1.5 2.4 1 1.5 1.1 1.2 1.7 0.9 0.4
0.4 0.7
0
Injectibles

Injectibles

Injectibles

Injectibles
CS

CS

CS
IUDs

IUDs

IUDs
Condoms

Condoms

Condoms

Condoms
Oral Pills

Oral Pills

Oral Pills

Oral Pills
Norplants

Norplants

Norplants

PWDs (38.3%) DOH-HF (16.3%) DOH-LHW NGOs (31.2%)

(14.2%)

Graph: 18 Percentage Distribution of Total CYP by Various Methods/ Contribution:

45
Province-wise Family Planning and Mother & Child Health (MCH) Service Delivery for
2017-18
The data indicates that during the year (2017-18) 3,785,129 clients availed Family Planning Services of various
contraceptive methods at Family Welfare Centers (FWCs)/ Reproductive Health Service-A (RHS-A) Centers
and other outlets. These service delivery outlets also provided the services to 343,415 clients for Pre-natal Care
and 230,633 clients for Post-natal Care. Apart from these, FWCs/RHS-A Centers and others outlets had
provided treatment to 2,029,728 clients (Children + Adults) for General Ailments. The details are given in
Table-09.

Pakistan-Estimation of Modern Contraceptive Prevalence Rate (mCPR) for 2017-18

Estimates of the modern contraceptive prevalence rate (mCPR), a population-level indicator, that are derived
directly from family planning service statistics lack sufficient accuracy to serve stand-alone substitutes for survey
based estimates. However, data on service statistics of Contraceptive commodities distributed to clients have
been utilized, for estimating number of contraceptive users, as per formulae given in table on page 27 of this
report. The estimated number of users was then divided by estimated number of Married Women of
Reproductive Age (MWRA) during that year covered by the service statistics data. Estimates and projection of
the number of MWRA have been taken as 16% of the population as per Provisional Results of Census 2017 for
estimating MWRA of 2017-18. These MWRA estimates were used as denominators in the calculations as shown
in the formula below:

Formula for Estimate of mCPR (%) = (Estimated Number of Users / MWRA) x 100

This yielded approximations of annual mCPR estimates, referred to as Estimated Modern Use (EMU)
rates. EMU rates constitute an approximation of the actual mCPR.

The Contraceptive Prevalence Rate, on the basis of modern methods, has been calculated in respect
of PWDs; DOH (HFs &LHWs) and NGO(s) for the year 2017-18 and 2016-17 followed by comparative analysis
of two years (Table-10 is referred)The details are given below:

46
(A) Population Welfare Departments

The Contraceptive Prevalence Rate of Population Welfare Departments (PWDs), on the basis
of modern methods, during the year 2017-18 is 15.6%. In Provincial setup, the mCPR by PWDs in Punjab is
18.2%,Sindh 10.0%,Khyber Pakhtunkhwa18.7% and Balochistan 5.3%,whereas in Federal district Islamabad
share in mCPR is 31.5%, AJK 5.8%, FATA 4.8% and in GB 4.8%. The Modern Contraceptive Prevalence Rate
of Population Welfare Departments (PWDs) during the year 2017-18 compared with the previous year, an
increase of 10% has been noted, while in provincial/regional set-up, an increase has been observed in Punjab
(17.6%), Balochistan (22.0%), Islamabad (0.8%), AJK (2.1%) and in FATA (6.6%) and GB (12.6%), whereas
decrease has been noticed in Sindh (1.8%) and KPK (2.1%).The details are given in Table-10.

(B) Departments of Health (HF & LHWs)

The Contraceptive Prevalence Rate of Departments of Health (HF & LHWs), on the basis of
modern methods (mCPR), during the year 2017-18 is 11.9%. In Provincial setup, the mCPR by DoH (HF &
LHWs) in Punjab is 12.9%, Sindh10.1%, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa 14.7% and Balochistan 2.0%, whereas in
Federal district Islamabad is 1.6%, AJK 6.0%, FATA 1.8% and in GB 32.5%.The Contraceptive Prevalence Rate
of DoH (HF & LHWs) during the year 2017-18 compared with the previous year decreased by 7%, whereas in
provincial/regional set-up an increase has been observed in Sindh (15.8%),Islamabad (90.3%) and in GB
(82.7%), whereas decrease has been observed in Punjab (13.4%), KPK (10.4%) Balochistan (6.7%), AJK (6.9)
and FATA (2.8%).The details are given in Table-10.

(C) Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs) Sector

Rahnuma FPAP
The Modern Contraceptive Prevalence Rate (mCPR) of Rahnuma FPAP during 2017-18, is
3.2% with provincial contribution Punjab (2.4%), Sindh (2.3%), Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (4.1%) and Balochistan
(1.2%). Comparison of mCPR during 2017-18 over 2016-17 in respect of Rahnuma FPAP has noted overall
increase of 35.3% (Table-10).
Marie Stopes Society (MSS)
The Modern Contraceptive Prevalence Rate (mCPR) of MSS during 2017-18, is 4.3% with
provincial contribution Punjab (4.2%), Sindh (6.6%), Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (3.1%) and Balochistan (1.5%).

47
Comparison of mCPR during 2017-18 over 2016-17 in respect of MSS has shown overall increase of 8.7%
(Table-10).
Greenstar Social Marketing (GSM)
The Modern Contraceptive Prevalence Rate (mCPR) of GSM during 2017-18, is 6.2% with
provincial contribution Punjab (6.9%), Sindh (6.5%), Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (5.0%) and Balochistan (2.3%).
Comparison of mCPR during 2017-18 over 2016-17 in respect of GSM has observed overall increase of 1.2%
(Table-10).
Overall mCPR of all Stakeholders
The overall Contraceptive Prevalence Rate, on the basis of modern methods, during the year
2017-18 is 41.0%. In the Provincial setup, the mCPR in Punjab is 44.5%, Sindh 35.5%, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
45.5%, Balochistan 12.3%, Federal district Islamabad 72.4 %, AJK 29.8%, FATA 7.1% and Gilgit-Baltistan (GB)
48.9%.The details are given in Table-10.
Overall Contraceptive Prevalence Rate (mCPR) in respect of all stakeholders during 2017-18
when compared with 2016-17, has shown an increase of 4.3%. In provincial/regional comparison of two years,
increase has been observed in Punjab (5.0%), Sindh (9.7%), Balochistan (11.7%), AJK (8.6%) and GB in
(57.3%), while decrease has been noticed in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (4.5%), Islamabad (4.7%) and FATA (0.2%).
The details are given in Table-10.
Percentage share of PWDs, DOH (HF & LHWs) and NGOs in Total mCPR during 2017-18

Percentage share of PWDs, DOH (HF & LHWs) and NGOs in Total mCPR during 2017-18

33% 38%

PWDs
DOH-(HFs & LHWs)
NGOs
29%

48
 SECTION-IV: CONCLUSION & WAY FORWARD
Conclusion:
In Annual Contraceptive Performance Report, progress of Family Planning (FP) services in the
country, is generally measured by services statistics. These service statistics are related to modern
Contraceptive methods/services provided to clients at service delivery points through six modern methods
including three Non-clinical Methods (Condoms, Oral Pills & Injectables) and three Clinical Methods (IUDs,
Sterilization/Contraceptive Surgery & Implants) In the Public Sector, Population Welfare Departments (PWDs)
and Department of Health (DoH) are two major Family Planning Service Vendors. The Contraceptive
Performance, gleaned from service statistics of these departments have been reported here, in terms of Couple
Years of Protection (CYP), one of the major indicator of Family Planning Services / efforts, in a country. Here
performance of Department of Health has been bifurcated by the contribution of Health Facility (HF) and
contribution of Lady Health Workers (LHWs) in Family Planning Service delivery. Further, comparison of
Contraceptive Performance during 2017-18 in respect of these departments has also been made with the
previous year 2016-17 at national & provincial level. It has been observed that this year Contraceptive
Performance of PWDs and DoH (HF), in terms of CYP, has increased by 15.6% & 1.5% respectively, as
compared to the previous year while Contraceptive Performance of DoH (LHWs) has decreased by 18.5%,
when compared with previous year.
In case of Private Service Providers, performance of three eminent NGO(s) Rahnuma FPAP,
Marie Stopes Society (MSS) & Greenstar Social Marketing (GSM) has been included in the report. Overall
performance of NGOs sector is decreased by 13.6% during this year (2017-18) as compared to last year (2016-
17).
Another indicator of Family Planning, Contraceptive Prevalence Rate, on the basis of modern
methods (mCPR), has also been estimated using an approximation of Estimated Modern Use (EMU) rates for
each method. For the year 2017-18, this estimates of mCPR is computed as 41%. As such, estimate of mCPR
during 2017-18 has increased by 4.3% as compared to the last year (2016-17) estimate of 39.3%.

Way Forward:

Upon the devolution of M/o Population Welfare, as per notification No.4-17/2010-Min-I dated
2nd December, 2010, issued by Cabinet Division, the function of “Collection, Maintenance and Analysis of
Demographic and Population Statistics” under the M/o Population Welfare was relocated to Pakistan Bureau of
State. The Contraceptive Performance Report, earlier prepared by the defunct M/o Population Welfare is now
being compiled by PBS from secondary data in respect of Family Planning service delivery, collected from
Provincial & Regional Population Welfare Departments, Departments of Health regarding contribution of Health
Facilities and Lady Health Workers, and from three eminent NGO(s). For the release of this report at national
level, PBS, is responsible for compilation, tabulation and measuring performance in terms of contraceptive
commodities supplied to clients. However, following are some issues that need to be addressed for improving
Contraceptive Performance data reporting.

49
 I. Contraceptive Prevalence Rate (CPR): According to PDHS 2017-18, the CPR by any method is 34.2%
& by any modern method is 25% while in PDHS 2012-13, CPR by any method was 35.4% and by
modern methods was 26.1%. In contrary, the mCPR, estimated by PBS using an approximation of
Estimated Method Use (EMU) rates for each method, for the year 2017-18, is computed as 41%. As
such, estimate of mCPR during 2017-18 has increased by 4.3% as compared to the 2016-17 estimate
of 39.3%. This estimated CPR by modern methods is computed by PBS by using Service Statistics
supplied by source departments [PWDs, DoH (HF & LHWs) and NGOs] shows an upward trend. This
situation needs to be scrutinized in detail as reporting of Service Statistics by respective source
departments seem to be on the higher side than actual consumption.
II. High Share of IUDs in CYP: It has been observed from supplied data that contribution of IUDs during
2016-17 in CYP is very high (over 50%). This means strong Monitoring & Evaluation mechanism is
needed to ascertain that no over reporting is being done. Moreover, data on dis-continuation rate of
IUD(s), also need to be taken into account by the source departments.
III. Need for on-spot Checking of Data Quality: PBS has no mechanism for on-spot checking of data
quality except asking justification for +/- 10% change in current year performance as compared to
previous year performance and getting the data vetted by the source agencies. It is proposed that PBS,
as a third party, may carry out random on-spot checking for ensuring data quality, at least once in a
quarter.
IV. Delay in Supply of Health Data: In general, data on contraceptive performance is not being supplied
on time by Health Departments in respect of both Health Facilities and Lady Health Workers (HFs and
LHWs). To resolve this problem, Director General (Health) Technical Wing, M/o National Health Services
Regulation & Coordination, may be requested to collect the respective data and ensure timely supply of
accurate and consolidated contraceptive performance data of Provincial/Regional Departments of
Health (Health Facilities and Lady Health Workers), for compilation of this report.
V. Lack of Coordination: There is a lack of coordination between Provincial Population Welfare
Departments & Departments of Health (Health Facilities and Lady Health Workers) and NGO(s) working
in provinces. Though, Sindh and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa have taken some positive steps and started
coordination meetings but these are not being organized regularly. In this connection, it is proposed that
all Provincial Population Welfare Departments (PWDs), may take the lead in strengthening the
coordination among the departments / organizations working in the field at provincial level and also take
steps for improvements in collection & compilation of contraceptive performance data at provincial level,
by inviting representative from PBS, in the regular Provincial Coordination Committee meeting. It is also
requested to kindly transmit the consolidated data/Service Statistics to PBS for its compilation, at
national level, by declaring Population Welfare Departments, as a hub/focal point.
VI. Uniform Standard for Data Reporting: Uniform standards for data reporting is the key to evaluate the
performance of source agencies. Though efforts are underway, to collect data on a uniform format from
all stakeholders but still it is not being followed completely. In this connection, PBS has developed a
standard format and shared with the stakeholders in different forums/meetings. The stakeholders are
advised to send contraceptive performance data on uniform format.

50
STATISTICAL TABLES

51
52
Table 1 CONTRACEPTIVE USAGE BY DATA SOURCE
COUPLE YEARS OF PROTECTION (CYP) %AGE CHANGE
SOURCE
2017-18
2017-18 2016-17
Vs
2016-17
PWDs 6,031,013 5,218,044 15.6
PUNJAB 4,046,850 3,046,060 32.9
SINDH 766,974 782,600 -2.0
K.P.K 913,018 1,062,017 -14.0
BALOCHISTAN 99,209 106,235 -6.6
ISLAMABAD 98,816 106,724 -7.4
AJK 44,749 50,415 -11.2
FATA 43,724 48,364 -9.6
GB 17,674 15,628 13.1

DOH(HF) 2,567,288 2,529,135 1.5

PUNJAB 1,725,460 1,858,141 -7.1
SINDH 358,735 233,417 53.7
K.P.K 232,492 305,899 -24.0
BALOCHISTAN 27,690 30,040 -7.8
ISLAMABAD 4,237 2,632 61.0
AJK 5,884 3,747 57.0
FATA 17,943 14,561 23.2
GB 194,846 80,699 141.4

DOH(LHW) 2,239,297 2,748,172 -18.5

PUNJAB 971,230 1,503,945 -35.4
SINDH 568,477 552,348 2.9
K.P.K 621,308 611,472 1.6
BALOCHISTAN 17,030 23,518 -27.6
ISLAMABAD 2,683 1,112 141.3
AJK 34,018 34,850 -2.4
FATA 0 3,044 -100.0
GB 24,550 17,882 37.3

NGOs 4,918,107 5,689,727 -13.6

RAHNUMA (FPAP) 1,626,401 1,736,041 -6.3
MARIE STOPES 1,394,029 1,797,273 -22.4
GREENSTAR (GSM) 1,897,677 2,156,414 -12.0

Pakistan 15,755,706 16,185,079 -2.7

53
TABLE 2 CONTRACEPTIVE USAGE BY METHOD (PWDS)
OVERALL PERFORMANCE
METHOD
2017-18 2016-17
%
Change

PWDs
CONDOMS (Units) 79,820,255 69298325
CYP 665,169 577486 15.2

ORAL PILL (Cycles) 3,574,562 3009997

CYP 235,289 197906 18.9
OP-COC 3,377,510 2730446
CYP 225,167 182030 23.7
OP-EC 180,916 165655
CYP 9,046 8283 9.2
OP-POP 16,136 113896
CYP 1,076 7593 -85.8

INJECTABLE (Vials) 1,531,999 1330812

CYP 382,995 332648 15.1
INJ-DMPA 1,531,941 1330152
CYP 382,985 332538 15.2
INJ-NetEn 58 660
CYP 10 110 -91.2

IUCD (Insertions) 767,520 653482

CYP 3,530,248 3004366 17.5
IUD-CuT 767,255 652212
CYP 3,529,373 3000175 17.6
IUD-Multiload 265 1270
CYP 875 4191 -79.1

Sterilization/CS (Cases) 105,413 98011

CYP 1,054,130 980110 7.6
C.S (Cases) 0 0
CYP 0 0 0.0
CS(Female) 103,529 95737
CYP 1,035,290 957370 8.1
CS(Male) 1,884 2274
CYP 18,840 22740 -17.2

NORPLANT (Insertions) 46,818 40505

CYP 163,183 125528 30.0
Implanon 11,327 21839
CYP 28,318 54598 -48.1
Jadelle 35,491 18666
CYP 134,866 70931 90.1

54
Table-2 CONTRACEPTIVE USAGE BY METHOD (DOH-HF) & (DoH- LHWs)
DOH(HF)
CONDOMS (Units) 8,014,330 7922949
CYP 66,786 66025 1.2

ORAL PILL (Cycles) 1,676,477 1665397

CYP 111,765 111026 0.7
OP-COC 1,544,935 1535786
CYP 102,996 102386 0.6
OP-POP 131,542 129611
CYP 8,769 8641 1.5

INJECTABLE (Vials) 1,005,296 1352002

CYP 243,713 331232 -26.4
INJ-DMPA 913,963 1270777
CYP 228,491 317694 -28.1
INJ-NetEn 91,333 81225
CYP 15,222 13537 12.4

IUCD (Insertions) 310,008 295612

CYP 1,426,037 1359815 4.9
IUD-CuT 310,008 295612
CYP 1,426,037 1359815 4.9

Sterilization/CS (Cases) 54,610 55711

CYP 546,100 557110 -2.0
CS(Female) 51,923 52518
CYP 519,230 525180 -1.1
CS(Male) 2,687 3193
CYP 26,870 31930 -15.8

NORPLANT (Insertions) 69,155 41571

CYP 172,888 103928 66.4
Implanon 69,155 41571
CYP 172,888 103928 66.4

DOH(LHW) 82,947,992 99,388,751

CONDOMS (Units) 70,249,847 83026673
CYP 585,415 691889 -15.4

ORAL PILL (Cycles) 8,293,191 11095137

CYP 552,656 739547 -25.3
OP-COC 8,279,767 11087437
CYP 551,984 739162 -25.3
OP-EC 13,420 7700
CYP 671 385 74.3
OP-POP 4 0
CYP 0 0 0.0

INJECTABLE (Vials) 4,404,954 5266941

CYP 1,101,226 1316735 -16.4
INJ-DMPA 4,404,802 5266941
CYP 1,101,201 1316735 -16.4
INJ-NetEn 152 0
CYP 25 0 0.0

55
Table-2 CONTRACEPTIVE USAGE BY METHOD (NGOs)
NGOs
CONDOMS (Units) 112,722,449 113690918
CYP 939,354 947424 -0.9

ORAL PILL (Cycles) 3,305,746 3363423

CYP 182,682 185921 -1.7
OP-COC 1,043,697 1065021
CYP 69,580 71001 -2.0
OP-EC 2,262,049 2298402
CYP 113,102 114920 -1.6

INJECTABLE (Vials) 1,228,025 1308926

CYP 268,485 277320 -3.2
INJ-DMPA 878,778 839884
CYP 219,695 209971 4.6
INJ-FEMIJECT 104,940 120622
CYP 8,072 9279 -13.0
INJ-NetEn 244,307 348420
CYP 40,718 58070 -29.9

IUCD (Insertions) 751,015 942369

CYP 3,325,879 4091084 -18.7
IUD-CuT 651,946 754820
CYP 2,998,952 3472172 -13.6
IUD-Multiload 99,069 187549
CYP 326,928 618912 -47.2

Sterilization/CS (Cases) 13,663 15893

CYP 136,630 158930 -14.0
CS(Female) 13,369 15499
CYP 133,690 154990 -13.7
CS(Male) 294 394
CYP 2,940 3940 -25.4

NORPLANT (Insertions) 17,179 7922

CYP 65,077 29048 124.0
Implanon 156 167
CYP 390 418 -6.6
Jadelle 17,023 6358
CYP 64,687 24160 167.7
Sino-Implant 0 1397
CYP 0 4470 -100.0

Pakistan
CYP 15,755,706 16,185,079 -2.65

56
Table 3a CONTRACEPTIVE USAGE BY SOURCE & METHOD (CONDOMS)
CONDOM (Units)

SOURCE 2017-18 2016-17 %

Change
PWDs 79,820,255 69,298,325 15.2
PUNJAB 51,323,018 36,783,705 39.5
SINDH 13,633,050 16,171,650 -15.7
K.P.K 10,588,418 12,362,847 -14.4
BALOCHISTAN 2,043,267 1,703,465 19.9
ISLAMABAD 1,195,580 1,214,832 -1.6
AJK 497,856 580,827 -14.3
FATA 346,814 291,773 18.9
GB 192,252 189,226 1.6
DOH(HF) 8,014,330 7,922,949 1.2
PUNJAB 5,822,142 5,111,429 13.9
SINDH 998,667 882,141 13.2
K.P.K 821,895 1,498,459 -45.2
BALOCHISTAN 96,665 86,795 11.4
ISLAMABAD 29,113 25,857 12.6
AJK 87,067 122,212 -28.8
FATA 68,779 53,739 28.0
GB 90,002 142,317 -36.8
DOH(LHW) 70,249,847 83,026,673 -15.4
PUNJAB 48,343,785 65,891,848 -26.6
SINDH 15,898,642 10,485,482 51.6
K.P.K 3,998,065 4,571,159 -12.5
BALOCHISTAN 185,746 133,871 38.7
ISLAMABAD 260,682 85,399 205.3
AJK 1,438,135 1,516,416 -5.2
FATA 0 11,220 -100.0
GB 124,792 331,278 -62.3
NGOs 112,722,449 113,690,918 -0.9
RAHNUMA (FPAP) 1,304,597 1,092,805 19.4
MARIE STOPES 368,884 964,162 -61.7
GREENSTAR (GSM) 111,048,968 111,633,951 -0.5
Pakistan 270,806,881 273,938,865 -1.1

57
Table 3b CONTRACEPTIVE USAGE BY SOURCE & METHOD (ORAL PILLS)
ORAL PILLS (CYCLES)
TOTAL ORAL PILLS
OP-COC (03-Months) OP-POP (02-Months) OP-EC
SOURCE
2017-18 2016-17 % 2017-18 2016-17 % 2017-18 2016-17 % 2017-18 2016-17 %
Change Change Chang Change
e
PWDs 3,377,510 2,730,446 39.6 16,136 113,896 -97.4 180,916 165,655 -7.7 3,574,562 3,009,997 18.8

PUNJAB 1,869,364 1,339,346 39.6 962 36,746 -97.4 114,873 124,438 -7.7 1,985,199 1,500,530 32.3

SINDH 519,878 453,769 14.6 1,716 20,405 -91.6 46,913 28,878 62.5 568,507 503,052 13.0

K.P.K 729,405 693,983 5.1 2,763 29,605 -90.7 15,051 7,459 101.8 747,219 731,047 2.2

BALOCHISTAN 132,979 105,610 25.9 1,168 10,604 -89.0 3,083 4,497 -31.4 137,230 120,711 13.7

ISLAMABAD 37,338 39,880 -6.4 4,128 6,367 -35.2 963 375 156.8 42,429 46,622 -9.0

AJK 26,899 33,457 -19.6 3,596 3,833 -6.2 33 8 312.5 30,528 37,298 -18.2

FATA 45,272 53,943 -16.1 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 45,272 53,943 -16.1

GB 16,375 10,458 56.6 1,803 6,336 -71.5 0 0 0.0 18,178 16,794 8.2
DOH(HF) 1,544,935 1,535,786 33.7 131,542 129,611 -25.3 0 0 0.0 1,676,477 1,665,397 0.7

PUNJAB 855,269 639,884 33.7 54,181 72,485 -25.3 0 0 0.0 909,450 712,369 27.7

SINDH 229,972 146,182 57.3 19,083 20,261 -5.8 0 0 0.0 249,055 166,443 49.6

K.P.K 145,686 493,439 -70.5 40,627 20,563 97.6 0 0 0.0 186,313 514,002 -63.8

BALOCHISTAN 29,754 44,788 -33.6 12,993 12,542 3.6 0 0 0.0 42,747 57,330 -25.4

ISLAMABAD 1,880 2,006 -6.3 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 1,880 2,006 -6.3

AJK 6,326 10,715 -41.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 6,326 10,715 -41.0

FATA 12,482 11,561 8.0 4,655 3,760 23.8 0 0 0.0 17,137 15,321 11.9

GB 263,566 187,211 40.8 3 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 263,569 187,211 40.8

DOH(LHW) 8,279,767 11,087,437 -44.0 4 0 0.0 13,420 7,700 0.0 8,293,191 11,095,137 -25.3

PUNJAB 3,926,850 7,012,344 -44.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 3,926,850 7,012,344 -44.0

SINDH 2,374,782 2,231,255 6.4 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 2,374,782 2,231,255 6.4

K.P.K 1,466,549 1,441,245 1.8 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 1,466,549 1,441,245 1.8

BALOCHISTAN 103,394 118,719 -12.9 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 103,394 118,719 -12.9

ISLAMABAD 4,409 2,930 50.5 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 4,409 2,930 50.5

AJK 148,081 141,372 4.7 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 148,081 141,372 4.7

FATA 0 19,540 -100.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 19,540 -100.0

GB 255,702 120,032 113.0 4 0 0.0 13,420 7,700 74.3 269,126 127,732 110.7
NGOs 1,043,697 1,065,021 20.5 0 0 0.0 2,262,049 2,298,402 0.0 3,305,746 3,363,423 -1.7

RAHNUMA (FPAP) 201,484 167,239 20.5 0 0 0.0 22,909 0 0.0 224,393 167,239 34.2
MARIE STOPES 82,196 133,949 -38.6 0 0 0.0 0 9,490 -100.0 82,196 143,439 -42.7

GREENSTAR (GSM) 760,017 763,833 -0.5 0 0 0.0 2,239,140 2,288,912 -2.2 2,999,157 3,052,745 -1.8
Pakistan 14,245,909 16,418,690 -13.2 147,682 243,507 -39.4 2,456,385 2,471,757 -0.6 16,849,976 19,133,954 -11.9

58
Table 3c CONTRACEPTIVE USAGE BY SOURCE & METHOD (INJECTABLES)
INJECTABLES (VIALS)

TOTAL INJECTABLES
SOURCE NetEn (02-Months) DMPA (03 Months) FEMIJECT (01-Month)

2017-18 2016-17 % 2017-18 2016-17 % 2017-18 2016-17 % 2017-18 2016-17 %

Chang Chang Chang Change
PWDs 58 660 -91.2 1,531,941 1,330,152 15.2 0 0 0.0 1,531,999 1,330,812 15.1
PUNJAB 0 0 0.0 694,031 497,140 39.6 0 0 0.0 694,031 497,140 39.6
SINDH 0 132 -100.0 325,046 284,381 14.3 0 0 0.0 325,046 284,513 14.2
K.P.K 0 0 0.0 383,348 423,405 -9.5 0 0 0.0 383,348 423,405 -9.5
BALOCHISTAN 0 364 -100.0 37,307 37,287 0.1 0 0 0.0 37,307 37,651 -0.9
ISLAMABAD 0 0 0.0 20,960 20,761 1.0 0 0 0.0 20,960 20,761 1.0
AJK 0 64 -100.0 23,983 24,305 -1.3 0 0 0.0 23,983 24,369 -1.6
FATA 0 0 0.0 29,823 27,774 7.4 0 0 0.0 29,823 27,774 7.4
GB 58 100 -42.0 17,443 15,099 15.5 0 0 0.0 17,501 15,199 15.1
DOH(HF) 91,333 81,225 12.4 913,963 1,270,777 -28.1 0 0 0.0 1,005,296 1,352,002 -25.6
PUNJAB 56,444 58,123 -2.9 448,636 465,622 -3.6 0 0 0.0 505,080 523,745 -3.6
SINDH 7,715 8,459 -8.8 249,762 158,862 57.2 0 0 0.0 257,477 167,321 53.9
K.P.K 15,534 5,289 193.7 133,105 578,205 -77.0 0 0 0.0 148,639 583,494 -74.5
BALOCHISTAN 6,781 5,455 24.3 33,840 27,302 23.9 0 0 0.0 40,621 32,757 24.0
ISLAMABAD 0 0 0.0 2,690 3,596 -25.2 0 0 0.0 2,690 3,596 -25.2
AJK 0 0 0.0 4,043 6,290 -35.7 0 0 0.0 4,043 6,290 -35.7
FATA 1,051 2,770 -62.1 15,704 11,748 33.7 0 0 0.0 16,755 14,518 15.4
GB 3,808 1,129 237.3 26,183 19,152 36.7 0 0 0.0 29,991 20,281 47.9
DOH(LHW) 152 0 0.0 4,404,802 5,266,941 -16.4 0 0 0.0 4,404,954 5,266,941 -16.4
PUNJAB 0 0 0.0 1,226,301 1,949,425 -37.1 0 0 0.0 1,226,301 1,949,425 -37.1
SINDH 0 0 0.0 1,110,679 1,264,876 -12.2 0 0 0.0 1,110,679 1,264,876 -12.2
K.P.K 0 0 0.0 1,960,884 1,909,186 2.7 0 0 0.0 1,960,884 1,909,186 2.7
BALOCHISTAN 0 0 0.0 34,358 57,953 -40.7 0 0 0.0 34,358 57,953 -40.7
ISLAMABAD 0 0 0.0 867 820 5.7 0 0 0.0 867 820 5.7
AJK 0 0 0.0 48,646 51,155 -4.9 0 0 0.0 48,646 51,155 -4.9
FATA 0 0 0.0 0 6,590 -100.0 0 0 0.0 0 6,590 -100.0
GB 152 0 0.0 23,067 26,936 -14.4 0 0 0.0 23,219 26,936 -13.8
NGOs 244,307 348,420 -29.9 878,778 839,884 4.6 104,940 120,622 -13.0 1,228,025 1,308,926 -6.2
RAHNUMA (FPAP) 1,347 9,084 -85.2 471,911 340,882 38.4 0 0 0.0 473,258 349,966 35.2
MARIE STOPES 0 944 -100.0 50,734 81,128 -37.5 0 0 0.0 50,734 82,072 -38.2
GREENSTAR (GSM) 242,960 338,392 -28.2 356,133 417,874 -14.8 104,940 120,622 -13.0 704,033 876,888 -19.7
Pakistan 335,850 430,305 -22.0 7,729,484 8,707,754 -11.2 104,940 120,622 -13.0 8,170,274 9,258,681 -11.8

59
Table 3d CONTRACEPTIVE USAGE BY SOURCE & METHOD (IUCDs)

IUCDs (INSERTIONS)
TOTAL IUCDs
SOURCE 10 - Years 05 - Years
2017-18 2016-17 % 2017-18 2016-17 % 2017-18 2016-17 %
Chan Chang Chan
PWDs 767,255 652,212 38.1 265 1,270 -100.0 767,520 653,482 38.1
PUNJAB 551,406 399,275 38.1 0 86 -100.0 551,406 399,361 38.1
SINDH 35,812 39,831 -10.1 15 423 -96.5 35,827 40,254 -11.0
K.P.K 137,504 165,968 -17.2 37 48 -22.9 137,541 166,016 -17.2
BALOCHISTAN 11,896 13,869 -14.2 189 378 -50.0 12,085 14,247 -15.2
ISLAMABAD 15,175 16,398 -7.5 0 19 -100.0 15,175 16,417 -7.6
AJK 6,596 7,251 -9.0 4 231 -98.3 6,600 7,482 -11.8
FATA 6,600 7,694 -14.2 0 0 0.0 6,600 7,694 -14.2
GB 2,266 1,926 17.7 20 85 -76.5 2,286 2,011 13.7
DOH(HF) 310,008 295,612 -7.9 0 0 0.0 310,008 295,612 -7.9
PUNJAB 221,291 240,183 -7.9 0 0 0.0 221,291 240,183 -7.9
SINDH 22,456 15,440 45.4 0 0 0.0 22,456 15,440 45.4
K.P.K 36,545 23,926 52.7 0 0 0.0 36,545 23,926 52.7
BALOCHISTAN 2,619 3,205 -18.3 0 0 0.0 2,619 3,205 -18.3
ISLAMABAD 695 140 396.4 0 0 0.0 695 140 396.4
AJK 810 96 743.8 0 0 0.0 810 96 743.8
FATA 2,402 2,018 19.0 0 0 0.0 2,402 2,018 19.0
GB 23,190 10,604 118.7 0 0 0.0 23,190 10,604 118.7
DOH(LHW) 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
PUNJAB 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
SINDH 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
K.P.K 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
BALOCHISTAN 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
ISLAMABAD 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
AJK 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
FATA 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
GB 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
NGOs 651,946 754,820 -9.5 99,069 187,549 0.0 751,015 942,369 -9.5
RAHNUMA (FPAP) 310,936 343,755 -9.5 0 0 0.0 310,936 343,755 -9.5
MARIE STOPES 275,679 360,496 -23.5 0 818 -100.0 275,679 361,314 -23.7
GREENSTAR (GSM) 65,331 50,569 29.2 99,069 186,731 -46.9 164,400 237,300 -30.7
Pakistan 1,729,209 1,702,644 1.6 99,334 188,819 -47.4 1,828,543 1,891,463 -3.3

60
Table 3e CONTRACEPTIVE USAGE BY SOURCE &METHOD (STERLIZATION/CONTRACEPTIVE SURGERY)

CONTRACEPTIVE SURGERY (CASES)

TOTAL CS (CASES)
SOURCE CS-MALE CS-FEMALE

2017-18 2016-17 % 2017-18 2016-17 % 2017-18 2016-17 %

Change Chang Change

PWDs 1,884 2,274 -17.2 103,529 95,737 8.1 105,413 98,011 7.6
PUNJAB 1,538 1,854 -17.0 68,891 60,456 14.0 70,429 62,310 13.0
SINDH 324 403 -19.6 28,771 29,063 -1.0 29,095 29,466 -1.3
K.P.K 19 11 72.7 3,951 3,816 3.5 3,970 3,827 3.7
BALOCHISTAN 0 0 0.0 731 964 -24.2 731 964 -24.2
ISLAMABAD 0 4 -100.0 974 1,153 -15.5 974 1,157 -15.8
AJK 3 2 50.0 211 285 -26.0 214 287 -25.4
FATA 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
GB 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
DOH(HF) 2,687 3,193 -15.8 51,923 52,518 -1.1 54,610 55,711 -2.0
PUNJAB 2,497 2,739 -8.8 40,459 46,418 -12.8 42,956 49,157 -12.6
SINDH 24 180 -86.7 5,081 4,771 6.5 5,105 4,951 3.1
K.P.K 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
BALOCHISTAN 16 14 14.3 194 205 -5.4 210 219 -4.1
ISLAMABAD 0 0 0.0 0 74 -100.0 0 74 -100.0
AJK 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
FATA 12 0 0.0 60 41 46.3 72 41 75.6
GB 138 260 -46.9 6,129 1,009 507.4 6,267 1,269 393.9
DOH(LHW) 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
PUNJAB 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
SINDH 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
K.P.K 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
BALOCHISTAN 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
ISLAMABAD 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
AJK 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
FATA 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
GB 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
NGOs 294 394 -25.4 13,369 15,499 -13.7 13,663 15,893 -14.0
RAHNUMA (FPAP) 226 333 -32.1 4,459 4,070 9.6 4,685 4,403 6.4
MARIE STOPES 68 61 11.5 8,659 7,680 12.7 8,727 7,741 12.7
GREENSTAR (GSM) 0 0 0.0 251 3,749 -93.3 251 3,749 -93.3
Pakistan 4,865 5,861 -17.0 168,821 163,754 3.1 173,686 169,615 2.4

61
Table 3f CONTRACEPTIVE USAGE BY SOURCE & METHOD (IMPLANTs)
IMPLANT (INSERTIONS)
TOTAL IMPLANT
SOURCE IMPLANON (03-Yrs) IMPLANT (04-Yrs) JADELLE (05-Yrs)
2017-18 2016-17 % 2017-18 2016-17 % 2017-18 2016-17 % 2017-18 2016-17 %
Chan Chang Chang Change
PWDs 11,327 21,839 -48.1 0 0 0.0 35,491 18,666 90.1 46,818 40,505 15.6
PUNJAB 9,632 16,987 -43.3 0 0 0.0 13,258 3,886 241.2 22,890 20,873 9.7
SINDH 1,399 4,383 -68.1 0 0 0.0 19,935 14,060 41.8 21,334 18,443 15.7
K.P.K 83 196 -57.7 0 0 0.0 1,798 568 216.5 1,881 764 146.2
BALOCHISTAN 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 290 0 0.0 290 0 0.0
ISLAMABAD 183 267 -31.5 0 0 0.0 210 152 38.2 393 419 -6.2
AJK 30 6 400.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 30 6 400.0
FATA 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
GB 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
DOH(HF) 69,155 41,571 66.4 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 69,155 41,571 66.4

PUNJAB 18,899 18,220 3.7 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 18,899 18,220 3.7

SINDH 46,294 21,324 117.1 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 46,294 21,324 117.1
K.P.K 3,700 1,461 153.3 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 3,700 1,461 153.3
BALOCHISTAN 119 331 -64.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 119 331 -64.0
ISLAMABAD 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
AJK 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
FATA 143 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 143 0 0.0
GB 0 235 -100.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 235 -100.0
DOH(LHW) 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0

PUNJAB 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0

SINDH 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
K.P.K 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
BALOCHISTAN 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
ISLAMABAD 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
AJK 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
FATA 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
GB 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
NGOs 156 167 -6.6 0 1,397 -100.0 17,023 6,358 167.7 17,179 7,922 116.9

RAHNUMA (FPAP) 0 0 0.0 0 1,171 -100.0 1,472 0 0.0 1,472 1,171 25.7
MARIE STOPES 156 167 -6.6 0 226 -100.0 4,476 5,227 -14.4 4,632 5,620 -17.6
GREENSTAR (GSM) 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 11,075 1,131 879.2 11,075 1,131 879.2
Pakistan 80,638 63,577 26.8 0 1,397 -100.0 52,514 25,024 109.9 133,152 89,998 47.9

62
Table 4 OUTLET-WISE USAGE OF CONTRACEPTIVE
COUPLE YEARS OF PROTECTION (CYP) %AGE CHANGE

OUTLETS
2017-18 2016-17 %
Change
PWDs 6,031,013 5,218,044 15.6
FWC 3,785,152 3,281,613 15.3
RHS-A 1,524,285 1,398,004 9.0
RHS-B 32,547 32,162 1.2
MSU 284,406 147,444 92.9
PLD 5,776 7,635 -24.4
RMPs 58,870 59,531 -1.1
HAKEEM & HOMEOPATH 6,887 4,093 68.3
MM 106,473 116,322 -8.5
RTIs 12,813 11,850 8.1
VILLAGE BASE F.P.WORKERS 0 232 -100.0
CBFPWs 29,670 5,394 450.1
COUNTRES 11,331 14,659 -22.7
TBAs 0 52 -100.0
F.P.I.H PROGRAMME 1,438 1,809 -20.5
OTHERS 65,219 22,837 185.6
AJK 44,749 50,415 -11.2
GB 17,674 15,628 13.1
FATA 43,724 48,364 -9.6
DOH(HF) 2,567,288 2,529,135 1.5
PUNJAB 1,725,460 1,858,141 -7.1
SINDH 358,735 233,417 53.7
KPK 232,492 305,899 -24.0
BALOCHISTAN 27,690 30,040 -7.8
AJK 5,884 3,747 57.0
GB 194,846 80,699 141.4
FATA 17,943 14,561 23.2
Others 4,237 2,632 61.0
DOH(LHW) 2,239,297 2,748,172 -18.5
PUNJAB 971,230 1,503,945 -35.4
SINDH 568,477 552,348 2.9
KPK 621,308 611,472 1.6
BALOCHISTAN 17,030 23,518 -27.6
AJK 34,018 34,850 -2.4
GB 24,550 17,882 37.3
FATA 0 3,044 -100.0
Others 2,683 1,112 141.3
NGOs 4,918,107 5,689,727 -13.6
MARIE STOPES 1,394,029 1,797,273 -22.4
RAHNUMA FPAP 1,626,401 1,736,041 -6.3
GSM 1,897,677 2,156,414 -12.0
Pakistan 15,755,706 16,185,079 -2.65

63
Table 5a CONTRACEPTIVE USAGE BY OUTLET & METHOD (CONDOMs)
CONDOM
( Un it s)
OUTLET
2017- 18 2016- 17 %
Ch an g e
PW Ds 79,820,255 69,298,325 15.2
FW C 55,871,752 48,680,679 14.8
PUNJAB 34,352,755 24,920,077 37.9
SINDH 10,263,209 11,202,152 - 8.4
K.P.K 9,317,192 10,747,679 - 13.3
BALOCHIST AN 1,327,171 1,170,788 13.4
ISLAMABAD 611,425 639,983 - 4.5
RHS - A 4,300,186 3,646,819 17.9
PUNJAB 2,893,211 2,072,829 39.6
SINDH 793,910 865,198 - 8.2
K.P.K 413,311 535,556 - 22.8
BALOCHIST AN 69,424 58,396 18.9
ISLAMABAD 130,330 114,840 13.5
RHS - B 66,489 23,684 180.7
PUNJAB 0 0 0.0
SINDH 38,959 0 0.0
K.P.K 12,430 12,684 - 2.0
BALOCHIST AN 1,300 900 44.4
ISLAMABAD 13,800 10,100 36.6
MS U 3,019,250 1,851,774 63.0
PUNJAB 1,646,106 309,596 431.7
SINDH 749,173 826,012 - 9.3
K.P.K 318,914 454,009 - 29.8
BALOCHIST AN 276,707 228,457 21.1
ISLAMABAD 28,350 33,700 - 15.9
PL D 137,555 71,071 93.5
PUNJAB 100,456 32,905 205.3
SINDH 0 0 0.0
K.P.K 633 701 - 9.7
BALOCHIST AN 36,466 37,465 - 2.7
RMP 1,240,394 1,157,080 7.2
PUNJAB 453,143 425,811 6.4
SINDH 239,936 193,256 24.2
K.P.K 270,164 305,820 - 11.7
BALOCHIST AN 135,243 97,777 38.3
ISLAMABAD 141,908 134,416 5.6
H&H 580,087 351,633 65.0
PUNJAB 229,980 102,003 125.5
SINDH 221,026 101,362 118.1
K.P.K 125,597 144,636 - 13.2
BALOCHIST AN 3,484 3,632 - 4.1
MM 10,183,501 11,440,179 - 11.0
PUNJAB 8,733,447 8,379,130 4.2
SINDH 1,032,221 2,719,816 - 62.0
BALOCHIST AN 186,606 100,400 85.9
ISLAMABAD 231,227 240,833 - 4.0
RTI s 140,436 106,047 32.4
PUNJAB 59,730 43,088 38.6
SINDH 55,951 41,117 36.1
K.P.K 17,889 16,192 10.5
BALOCHIST AN 6,866 5,650 21.5
ISLAMABAD 0 0 0.0
VI L L AGE BAS E F .P.W ORKERS 0 4,676 - 100.0
K.P.K 0 4,676 - 100.0
CBF PW s 2,608,862 460,091 467.0
PUNJAB 2,608,862 460,091 467.0
BALOCHIST AN 0 0 0.0
COUNTRES 133,828 168,404 - 20.5
SINDH 0 0 0.0
K.P.K 112,288 139,744 - 19.6
ISLAMABAD 21,540 28,660 - 24.8
TBAs 0 1,150 - 100.0
K.P.K 0 1,150 - 100.0
F .P.I .H PROGRAMME 17,000 12,300 38.2
ISLAMABAD 17,000 12,300 38.2
OTHERS 483,993 260,912 85.5
PUNJAB 245,328 38,175 542.6
SINDH 238,665 222,737 7.2
PW D AJK,F ATA,GB 1,036,922 1,061,826 - 2.3
AJK 497,856 580,827 - 14.3
F AT A 346,814 291,773 18.9
GB 192,252 189,226 1.6

Continued …..

64
Table 5a CONTRACEPTIVE USAGE BY OUTLET &METHOD (CONDOMs)
DOH(HF) 8,014,330 7,922,949 1.2
PUNJAB 5,822,142 5,111,429 13.9
SINDH 998,667 882,141 13.2
K.P.K 821,895 1,498,459 -45.2
BALOCHISTAN 96,665 86,795 11.4
ISLAMABAD 29,113 25,857 12.6
AJK 87,067 122,212 -28.8
FATA 68,779 53,739 28.0
GB 90,002 142,317 -36.8
DOH(LHW) 70,249,847 83,026,673 -15.4
PUNJAB 48,343,785 65,891,848 -26.6
SINDH 15,898,642 10,485,482 51.6
K.P.K 3,998,065 4,571,159 -12.5
BALOCHISTAN 185,746 133,871 38.7
ISLAMABAD 260,682 85,399 205.3
AJK 1,438,135 1,516,416 -5.2
FATA 0 11,220 -100.0
GB 124,792 331,278 -62.3
NGOs 112,722,449 113,690,918 -0.9
MARI E S TOPES 368,884 964,162 -61.7
PUNJAB 222,476 613,017 -63.7
SINDH 121,360 163,619 -25.8
K.P.K 15,151 177,358 -91.5
BALOCHISTAN 9,897 10,168 -2.7
NGO (FPAP) 1,304,597 1,092,805 19.4
PUNJAB 436,463 360,316 21.1
SINDH 149,415 112,296 33.1
K.P.K 285,913 245,580 16.4
BALOCHISTAN 207,988 150,235 38.4
ISLAMABAD 85,976 97,103 -11.5
AJK 114,191 106,894 6.8
GB 24,651 20,381 21.0
GS M 111,048,968 111,633,951 -0.5
PUNJAB 68,717,705 62,631,561 9.7
SINDH 29,809,515 25,127,085 18.6
K.P.K 8,946,339 15,761,337 -43.2
BALOCHISTAN 1,393,061 1,646,367 -15.4
ISLAMABAD 1,591,428 5,040,414 -68.4
AJK 342,877 1,067,634 -67.9
FATA 210,846 347,985 -39.4
GB 37,197 11,568 221.6
Pakistan 270,806,881 273,938,865 -1.1

65
Table 5b CONTRACEPTIVE USAGE BY OUTLET &METHOD (ORAL PILLs)
ORAL PILL
OP-COC OP-POP OP-EC
(Cycles)
OUTLET
2017-18 2016-17 % 2017-18 2016-17 % 2017-18 2016-17 % 2017-18 2016-17 %
Chang Chang Change Change
PWDs 3,377,510 2,730,446 23.7 16,136 113,896 -85.8 180,916 165,655 9.2 3,574,562 3,009,997 18.8
FWC 2,353,030 1,936,629 21.5 7,929 84,767 -90.6 150,499 144,582 4.1 2,511,458 2,165,978 16.0
PUNJAB 1,217,264 920,560 32.2 878 33,055 -97.3 96,793 110,098 -12.1 1,314,935 1,063,713 23.6
SINDH 384,185 317,051 21.2 1,143 13,872 -91.8 38,573 24,368 58.3 423,901 355,291 19.3
K.P.K 641,336 605,479 5.9 2,340 26,218 -91.1 12,491 6,411 94.8 656,167 638,108 2.8
BALOCHISTAN 87,159 68,070 28.0 357 6,832 -94.8 2,072 3,482 -40.5 89,588 78,384 14.3
ISLAMABAD 23,086 25,469 -9.4 3,211 4,790 -33.0 570 223 155.6 26,867 30,482 -11.9
RHS-A 205,731 165,753 24.1 1,232 7,551 -83.7 15,519 12,887 20.4 222,482 186,191 19.5
PUNJAB 120,851 85,027 42.1 6 3,001 -99.8 9,193 10,106 -9.0 130,050 98,134 32.5
SINDH 51,208 43,399 18.0 270 1,816 -85.1 4,505 2,114 113.1 55,983 47,329 18.3
K.P.K 24,953 29,626 -15.8 301 1,033 -70.9 1,558 527 195.6 26,812 31,186 -14.0
BALOCHISTAN 5,108 4,526 12.9 135 827 -83.7 165 115 43.5 5,408 5,468 -1.1
ISLAMABAD 3,611 3,175 13.7 520 874 -40.5 98 25 292.0 4,229 4,074 3.8
RHS-B 5,118 2,315 121.1 0 36 -100.0 104 47 121.3 5,222 2,398 117.8
PUNJAB 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
SINDH 2,506 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 42 0 0.0 2,548 0 0.0
K.P.K 1,777 1,645 8.0 0 36 -100.0 27 22 22.7 1,804 1,703 5.9
BALOCHISTAN 195 150 30.0 0 0 0.0 0 20 -100.0 195 170 14.7
ISLAMABAD 640 520 23.1 0 0 0.0 35 5 600.0 675 525 28.6
MSU 139,371 75,557 84.5 862 5,794 -85.1 11,977 6,357 88.4 152,210 87,708 73.5
PUNJAB 72,922 14,910 389.1 66 356 -81.5 7,182 3,094 132.1 80,170 18,360 336.7
SINDH 27,567 23,554 17.0 35 1,271 -97.2 3,519 2,286 53.9 31,121 27,111 14.8
K.P.K 20,451 22,442 -8.9 108 1,570 -93.1 643 325 97.8 21,202 24,337 -12.9
BALOCHISTAN 17,375 13,644 27.3 569 2,432 -76.6 616 640 -3.8 18,560 16,716 11.0
ISLAMABAD 1,056 1,007 4.9 84 165 -49.1 17 12 41.7 1,157 1,184 -2.3
PLD 9,208 4,708 95.6 110 411 -73.2 301 378 -20.4 9,619 5,497 75.0
PUNJAB 5,619 2,495 125.2 3 23 -87.0 71 138 -48.6 5,693 2,656 114.3
SINDH 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
K.P.K 1,173 215 445.6 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 1,173 215 445.6
BALOCHISTAN 2,416 1,998 20.9 107 388 -72.4 230 240 -4.2 2,753 2,626 4.8
RMP 68,098 63,713 6.9 313 864 -63.8 1,503 135 1,013.3 69,914 64,712 8.0
PUNJAB 30,422 26,921 13.0 0 240 -100.0 1,225 70 1,650.0 31,647 27,231 16.2
SINDH 5,655 5,194 8.9 10 71 -85.9 0 0 0.0 5,665 5,265 7.6
K.P.K 21,046 17,718 18.8 0 15 -100.0 85 10 750.0 21,131 17,743 19.1
BALOCHISTAN 3,675 6,222 -40.9 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 3,675 6,222 -40.9
ISLAMABAD 7,300 7,658 -4.7 303 538 -43.7 193 55 250.9 7,796 8,251 -5.5
H&H 27,577 17,237 60.0 0 211 -100.0 15 0 0.0 27,592 17,448 58.1
PUNJAB 14,324 8,309 72.4 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 14,324 8,309 72.4
SINDH 4,487 2,822 59.0 0 71 -100.0 15 0 0.0 4,502 2,893 55.6
K.P.K 8,184 5,688 43.9 0 140 -100.0 0 0 0.0 8,184 5,828 40.4
BALOCHISTAN 582 418 39.2 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 582 418 39.2
MM 315,664 313,517 0.7 200 1,290 -84.5 0 0 0.0 315,864 314,807 0.3
PUNJAB 266,510 251,019 6.2 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 266,510 251,019 6.2
SINDH 32,940 52,406 -37.1 200 1,290 -84.5 0 0 0.0 33,140 53,696 -38.3
BALOCHISTAN 16,114 10,082 59.8 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 16,114 10,082 59.8
ISLAMABAD 100 10 900.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 100 10 900.0
RTIs 6,856 7,701 -11.0 67 537 -87.5 528 349 51.3 7,451 8,587 -13.2
PUNJAB 2,187 3,901 -43.9 9 71 -87.3 298 214 39.3 2,494 4,186 -40.4
SINDH 3,293 1,962 67.8 58 293 -80.2 205 100 105.0 3,556 2,355 51.0
K.P.K 1,021 1,338 -23.7 0 48 -100.0 25 35 -28.6 1,046 1,421 -26.4
BALOCHISTAN 355 500 -29.0 0 125 -100.0 0 0 0.0 355 625 -43.2
ISLAMABAD 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
VILLAGE BASE F.P.WORKERS 0 519 -100.0 0 12 -100.0 0 0 0.0 0 531 -100.0
K.P.K 0 519 -100.0 0 12 -100.0 0 0 0.0 0 531 -100.0
CBFPWs 118,943 22,861 420.3 0 0 0.0 0 718 -100.0 118,943 23,579 404.4
PUNJAB 118,943 22,861 420.3 0 0 0.0 0 718 -100.0 118,943 23,579 404.4
BALOCHISTAN 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
COUNTRES 10,234 10,186 0.5 24 533 -95.5 222 174 27.6 10,480 10,893 -3.8
SINDH 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
K.P.K 9,464 9,196 2.9 14 533 -97.4 222 129 72.1 9,700 9,858 -1.6
ISLAMABAD 770 990 -22.2 10 0 0.0 0 45 -100.0 780 1,035 -24.6
TBAs 0 117 -100.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 117 -100.0
K.P.K 0 117 -100.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 117 -100.0
F.P.I.H PROGRAMME 775 1,051 -26.3 0 0 0.0 50 10 400.0 825 1,061 -22.2
ISLAMABAD 775 1,051 -26.3 0 0 0.0 50 10 400.0 825 1,061 -22.2
OTHERS 28,359 10,724 164.4 0 1,721 -100.0 165 10 1,550.0 28,524 12,455 129.0
PUNJAB 20,322 3,343 507.9 0 0 0.0 111 0 0.0 20,433 3,343 511.2
SINDH 8,037 7,381 8.9 0 1,721 -100.0 54 10 440.0 8,091 9,112 -11.2
PWD AJK,FATA,GB 88,546 97,858 -9.5 5,399 10,169 -46.9 33 8 312.5 93,978 108,035 -13.0
AJK 26,899 33,457 -19.6 3,596 3,833 -6.2 33 8 312.5 30,528 37,298 -18.2
FATA 45,272 53,943 -16.1 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 45,272 53,943 -16.1
GB 16,375 10,458 56.6 1,803 6,336 -71.5 0 0 0.0 18,178 16,794 8.2

Continued …..

66
Table 5b CONTRACEPTIVE USAGE BY OUTLET &METHOD (ORAL PILLs)
DOH(HF) 1,544,935 1,535,786 0.6 131,542 129,611 1.5 0 0 0.0 1,676,477 1,665,397 0.7
PUNJAB 855,269 639,884 33.7 54,181 72,485 -25.3 0 0 0.0 909,450 712,369 27.7
SINDH 229,972 146,182 57.3 19,083 20,261 -5.8 0 0 0.0 249,055 166,443 49.6
K.P.K 145,686 493,439 -70.5 40,627 20,563 97.6 0 0 0.0 186,313 514,002 -63.8
BALOCHISTAN 29,754 44,788 -33.6 12,993 12,542 3.6 0 0 0.0 42,747 57,330 -25.4
ISLAMABAD 1,880 2,006 -6.3 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 1,880 2,006 -6.3
AJK 6,326 10,715 -41.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 6,326 10,715 -41.0
FATA 12,482 11,561 8.0 4,655 3,760 23.8 0 0 0.0 17,137 15,321 11.9
GB 263,566 187,211 40.8 3 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 263,569 187,211 40.8

DOH(LHW) 8,279,767 11,087,437 -25.3 4 0 0.0 13,420 7,700 74.3 8,293,191 11,095,137 -25.3
PUNJAB 3,926,850 7,012,344 -44.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 3,926,850 7,012,344 -44.0
SINDH 2,374,782 2,231,255 6.4 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 2,374,782 2,231,255 6.4
K.P.K 1,466,549 1,441,245 1.8 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 1,466,549 1,441,245 1.8
BALOCHISTAN 103,394 118,719 -12.9 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 103,394 118,719 -12.9
ISLAMABAD 4,409 2,930 50.5 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 4,409 2,930 50.5
AJK 148,081 141,372 4.7 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 148,081 141,372 4.7
FATA 0 19,540 -100.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 19,540 -100.0
GB 255,702 120,032 113.0 4 0 0.0 13,420 7,700 74.3 269,126 127,732 110.7

NGOs 1,043,6971,065,021 -2.0 0 0 0.0 2,262,049 2,298,402 -1.6 3,305,746 3,363,423 -1.7
MARIE STOPES 82,196 133,949 -38.6 0 0 0.0 0 9,490 -100.0 82,196 143,439 -42.7
PUNJAB 33,257 64,915 -48.8 0 0 0.0 0 7,178 -100.0 33,257 72,093 -53.9
SINDH 41,167 39,813 3.4 0 0 0.0 0 1,763 -100.0 41,167 41,576 -1.0
K.P.K 6,274 27,754 -77.4 0 0 0.0 0 549 -100.0 6,274 28,303 -77.8
BALOCHISTAN 1,498 1,467 2.1 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 1,498 1,467 2.1
NGO (FPAP) 201,484 167,239 20.5 0 0 0.0 22,909 0 0.0 224,393 167,239 34.2
PUNJAB 54,518 41,134 32.5 0 0 0.0 6,183 0 0.0 60,701 41,134 47.6
SINDH 38,920 35,447 9.8 0 0 0.0 6,336 0 0.0 45,256 35,447 27.7
K.P.K 61,360 37,450 63.8 0 0 0.0 3,707 0 0.0 65,067 37,450 73.7
BALOCHISTAN 11,242 11,084 1.4 0 0 0.0 1,457 0 0.0 12,699 11,084 14.6
ISLAMABAD 18,035 22,286 -19.1 0 0 0.0 1,750 0 0.0 19,785 22,286 -11.2
AJK 14,653 16,763 -12.6 0 0 0.0 2,832 0 0.0 17,485 16,763 4.3
GB 2,756 3,075 -10.4 0 0 0.0 644 0 0.0 3,400 3,075 10.6
GSM 760,017 763,833 -0.5 0 0 0.0 2,239,140 2,288,912 -2.2 2,999,157 3,052,745 -1.8
PUNJAB 171,897 177,528 -3.2 0 0 0.0 1,297,578 1,275,651 1.7 1,469,475 1,453,179 1.1
SINDH 319,236 377,619 -15.5 0 0 0.0 771,314 839,354 -8.1 1,090,550 1,216,973 -10.4
K.P.K 86,205 100,731 -14.4 0 0 0.0 70,819 75,689 -6.4 157,024 176,420 -11.0
BALOCHISTAN 164,874 93,975 75.4 0 0 0.0 49,256 50,562 -2.6 214,130 144,537 48.1
ISLAMABAD 5,235 5,136 1.9 0 0 0.0 42,609 39,265 8.5 47,844 44,401 7.8
AJK 4,098 4,179 -1.9 0 0 0.0 6,989 7,585 -7.9 11,087 11,764 -5.8
FATA 7,827 4,605 70.0 0 0 0.0 61 267 -77.2 7,888 4,872 61.9
GB 645 60 975.0 0 0 0.0 514 539 -4.6 1,159 599 93.5

Pakistan 14,245,909 16,418,690 -13.2 147,682 243,507 -39.4 2,456,385 2,471,757 -0.6 16,849,976 19,133,954 -11.9

67
Table 5c CONTRACEPTIVE USAGE BY OUTLET &METHOD (INJECTABLEs)

I NJECTABLES
02-Months 03-Months 01-Month (Vials)

OUTLET 2017-18 2016-17 % 2017-18 2016-17 % 2017-18 2016-17 % 2017-18 2016-17 %

Chang Chan Chan Change
e ge ge

PWDs 58 660 -91.2 1,531,941 1,330,152 15.2 0 0 0.0 1,531,999 1,330,812 15.1
FW C 0 251 -100.0 1,214,685 1,059,389 14.7 0 0 0.0 1,214,685 1,059,640 14.6
PUNJAB 0 0 0.0 581,381 435,454 33.5 0 0 0.0 581,381 435,454 33.5
SINDH 0 50 -100.0 262,054 223,327 17.3 0 0 0.0 262,054 223,377 17.3
K.P.K 0 0 0.0 337,682 367,174 -8.0 0 0 0.0 337,682 367,174 -8.0
BALOCHISTAN 0 201 -100.0 22,313 21,324 4.6 0 0 0.0 22,313 21,525 3.7
ISLAMABAD 0 0 0.0 11,255 12,110 -7.1 0 0 0.0 11,255 12,110 -7.1
RHS-A 0 114 -100.0 112,760 104,083 8.3 0 0 0.0 112,760 104,197 8.2
PUNJAB 0 0 0.0 54,204 44,810 21.0 0 0 0.0 54,204 44,810 21.0
SINDH 0 30 -100.0 32,957 30,612 7.7 0 0 0.0 32,957 30,642 7.6
K.P.K 0 0 0.0 20,556 23,623 -13.0 0 0 0.0 20,556 23,623 -13.0
BALOCHISTAN 0 84 -100.0 3,090 3,357 -8.0 0 0 0.0 3,090 3,441 -10.2
ISLAMABAD 0 0 0.0 1,953 1,681 16.2 0 0 0.0 1,953 1,681 16.2
RHS-B 0 0 0.0 1,597 1,264 26.3 0 0 0.0 1,597 1,264 26.3
PUNJAB 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
SINDH 0 0 0.0 473 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 473 0 0.0
K.P.K 0 0 0.0 604 771 -21.7 0 0 0.0 604 771 -21.7
BALOCHISTAN 0 0 0.0 45 153 -70.6 0 0 0.0 45 153 -70.6
ISLAMABAD 0 0 0.0 475 340 39.7 0 0 0.0 475 340 39.7
MSU 0 70 -100.0 84,007 55,754 50.7 0 0 0.0 84,007 55,824 50.5
PUNJAB 0 0 0.0 36,660 9,359 291.7 0 0 0.0 36,660 9,359 291.7
SINDH 0 0 0.0 19,805 16,359 21.1 0 0 0.0 19,805 16,359 21.1
K.P.K 0 0 0.0 16,719 20,076 -16.7 0 0 0.0 16,719 20,076 -16.7
BALOCHISTAN 0 70 -100.0 10,456 9,572 9.2 0 0 0.0 10,456 9,642 8.4
ISLAMABAD 0 0 0.0 367 388 -5.4 0 0 0.0 367 388 -5.4
PLD 0 9 -100.0 1,566 2,272 -31.1 0 0 0.0 1,566 2,281 -31.3
PUNJAB 0 0 0.0 503 583 -13.7 0 0 0.0 503 583 -13.7
SINDH 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
K.P.K 0 0 0.0 0 10 -100.0 0 0 0.0 0 10 -100.0
BALOCHISTAN 0 9 -100.0 1,063 1,679 -36.7 0 0 0.0 1,063 1,688 -37.0
RMP 0 0 0.0 16,797 16,173 3.9 0 0 0.0 16,797 16,173 3.9
PUNJAB 0 0 0.0 6,094 3,230 88.7 0 0 0.0 6,094 3,230 88.7
SINDH 0 0 0.0 150 375 -60.0 0 0 0.0 150 375 -60.0
K.P.K 0 0 0.0 3,865 6,251 -38.2 0 0 0.0 3,865 6,251 -38.2
BALOCHISTAN 0 0 0.0 233 735 -68.3 0 0 0.0 233 735 -68.3
ISLAMABAD 0 0 0.0 6,455 5,582 15.6 0 0 0.0 6,455 5,582 15.6
H&H 0 0 0.0 400 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 400 0 0.0
PUNJAB 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
SINDH 0 0 0.0 400 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 400 0 0.0
K.P.K 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
BALOCHISTAN 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
MM 0 0 0.0 1,800 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 1,800 0 0.0
PUNJAB 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
SINDH 0 0 0.0 1,800 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 1,800 0 0.0
BALOCHISTAN 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
ISLAMABAD 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
RTI s 0 52 -100.0 5,131 4,469 14.8 0 0 0.0 5,131 4,521 13.5
PUNJAB 0 0 0.0 2,013 1,655 21.6 0 0 0.0 2,013 1,655 21.6
SINDH 0 52 -100.0 2,247 1,507 49.1 0 0 0.0 2,247 1,559 44.1
K.P.K 0 0 0.0 764 840 -9.0 0 0 0.0 764 840 -9.0
BALOCHISTAN 0 0 0.0 107 467 -77.1 0 0 0.0 107 467 -77.1
ISLAMABAD 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
VI LLAGE BASE F.P.W ORKERS
0 0 0.0 0 114 -100.0 0 0 0.0 0 114 -100.0
K.P.K 0 0 0.0 0 114 -100.0 0 0 0.0 0 114 -100.0
CBFPW s 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
PUNJAB 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
BALOCHISTAN 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
COUNTRES 0 0 0.0 3,338 4,631 -27.9 0 0 0.0 3,338 4,631 -27.9
SINDH 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
K.P.K 0 0 0.0 3,158 4,406 -28.3 0 0 0.0 3,158 4,406 -28.3
ISLAMABAD 0 0 0.0 180 225 -20.0 0 0 0.0 180 225 -20.0
TBAs 0 0 0.0 0 140 -100.0 0 0 0.0 0 140 -100.0
K.P.K 0 0 0.0 0 140 -100.0 0 0 0.0 0 140 -100.0
F.P.I .H PROGRAMME 0 0 0.0 275 435 -36.8 0 0 0.0 275 435 -36.8
ISLAMABAD 0 0 0.0 275 435 -36.8 0 0 0.0 275 435 -36.8
OTHERS 0 0 0.0 18,336 14,250 28.7 0 0 0.0 18,336 14,250 28.7
PUNJAB 0 0 0.0 13,176 2,049 543.0 0 0 0.0 13,176 2,049 543.0
SINDH 0 0 0.0 5,160 12,201 -57.7 0 0 0.0 5,160 12,201 -57.7
PW D AJK,FATA,GB 58 164 -64.6 71,249 67,178 6.1 0 0 0.0 71,307 67,342 5.9
AJK 0 64 -100.0 23,983 24,305 -1.3 0 0 0.0 23,983 24,369 -1.6
FATA 0 0 0.0 29,823 27,774 7.4 0 0 0.0 29,823 27,774 7.4
GB 58 100 -42.0 17,443 15,099 15.5 0 0 0.0 17,501 15,199 15.1

Continued …..

68
Table 5c CONTRACEPTIVE USAGE BY OUTLET &METHOD (INJECTABLEs)
DOH(HF) 91,333 81,225 12.4 913,963 1,270,777 -28.1 0 0 0.0 1,005,296 1,352,002 -25.6
PUNJAB 56,444 58,123 -2.9 448,636 465,622 -3.6 0 0 0.0 505,080 523,745 -3.6
SINDH 7,715 8,459 -8.8 249,762 158,862 57.2 0 0 0.0 257,477 167,321 53.9
K.P.K 15,534 5,289 193.7 133,105 578,205 -77.0 0 0 0.0 148,639 583,494 -74.5
BALOCHISTAN 6,781 5,455 24.3 33,840 27,302 23.9 0 0 0.0 40,621 32,757 24.0
ISLAMABAD 0 0 0.0 2,690 3,596 -25.2 0 0 0.0 2,690 3,596 -25.2
AJK 0 0 0.0 4,043 6,290 -35.7 0 0 0.0 4,043 6,290 -35.7
FATA 1,051 2,770 -62.1 15,704 11,748 33.7 0 0 0.0 16,755 14,518 15.4
GB 3,808 1,129 237.3 26,183 19,152 36.7 0 0 0.0 29,991 20,281 47.9

DOH(LHW) 152 0 0.0 4,404,802 5,266,941 -16.4 0 0 0.0 4,404,954 5,266,941 -16.4
PUNJAB 0 0 0.0 1,226,301 1,949,425 -37.1 0 0 0.0 1,226,301 1,949,425 -37.1
SINDH 0 0 0.0 1,110,679 1,264,876 -12.2 0 0 0.0 1,110,679 1,264,876 -12.2
K.P.K 0 0 0.0 1,960,884 1,909,186 2.7 0 0 0.0 1,960,884 1,909,186 2.7
BALOCHISTAN 0 0 0.0 34,358 57,953 -40.7 0 0 0.0 34,358 57,953 -40.7
ISLAMABAD 0 0 0.0 867 820 5.7 0 0 0.0 867 820 5.7
AJK 0 0 0.0 48,646 51,155 -4.9 0 0 0.0 48,646 51,155 -4.9
FATA 0 0 0.0 0 6,590 -100.0 0 0 0.0 0 6,590 -100.0
GB 152 0 0.0 23,067 26,936 -14.4 0 0 0.0 23,219 26,936 -13.8

NGOs 244,307 348,420 -29.9 878,778 839,884 4.6 104,940 120,622 -13.0 1,228,025 1,308,926 -6.2
MARIE STOPES 0 944 -100.0 50,734 81,128 -37.5 0 0 0.0 50,734 82,072 -38.2
PUNJAB 0 445 -100.0 24,050 45,350 -47.0 0 0 0.0 24,050 45,795 -47.5
SINDH 0 482 -100.0 22,355 18,502 20.8 0 0 0.0 22,355 18,984 17.8
K.P.K 0 17 -100.0 3,917 16,678 -76.5 0 0 0.0 3,917 16,695 -76.5
BALOCHISTAN 0 0 0.0 412 598 -31.1 0 0 0.0 412 598 -31.1
NGO (FPAP) 1,347 9,084 -85.2 471,911 340,882 38.4 0 0 0.0 473,258 349,966 35.2
PUNJAB 829 1,286 -35.5 140,297 107,859 30.1 0 0 0.0 141,126 109,145 29.3
SINDH 111 4,624 -97.6 62,947 57,488 9.5 0 0 0.0 63,058 62,112 1.5
K.P.K 332 165 101.2 156,879 100,917 55.5 0 0 0.0 157,211 101,082 55.5
BALOCHISTAN 16 43 -62.8 16,307 14,759 10.5 0 0 0.0 16,323 14,802 10.3
ISLAMABAD 0 2,515 -100.0 47,327 16,432 188.0 0 0 0.0 47,327 18,947 149.8
AJK 14 9 55.6 35,897 31,744 13.1 0 0 0.0 35,911 31,753 13.1
GB 45 442 -89.8 12,257 11,683 4.9 0 0 0.0 12,302 12,125 1.5
GSM 242,960 338,392 -28.2 356,133 417,874 -14.8 104,940 120,622 -13.0 704,033 876,888 -19.7
PUNJAB 78,522 105,515 -25.6 166,242 214,893 -22.6 52,802 62,192 -15.1 297,566 382,600 -22.2
SINDH 81,432 137,926 -41.0 86,538 115,757 -25.2 36,224 42,422 -14.6 204,194 296,105 -31.0
K.P.K 57,017 66,181 -13.8 66,650 47,964 39.0 8,691 8,797 -1.2 132,358 122,942 7.7
BALOCHISTAN 23,365 26,006 -10.2 21,027 24,922 -15.6 5,865 5,465 7.3 50,257 56,393 -10.9
ISLAMABAD 1,040 1,122 -7.3 4,900 3,789 29.3 852 958 -11.1 6,792 5,869 15.7
AJK 960 1,265 -24.1 7,490 6,089 23.0 451 719 -37.3 8,901 8,073 10.3
FATA 622 377 65.0 2,259 4,044 -44.1 42 69 -39.1 2,923 4,490 -34.9
GB 2 0 0.0 1,027 416 146.9 13 0 0.0 1,042 416 150.5

Pakistan 335,850 430,305 -22.0 7,729,484 8,707,754 -11.2 104,940 120,622 -13.0 8,170,274 9,258,681 -11.76

69
Table 5d CONTRACEPTIVE USAGE BY OUTLET & METHOD (IUDs)
I UD-10 Years I UD-05 Years I UD
(I nsertions)
OUTLET
2017-18 2016-17 % 2017-18 2016-17 % 2017-18 2016-17 %
Change Chang Change
e
PWDs 767,255 652,212 17.6 265 1,270 -79.1 767,520 653,482 17.5
FW C 619,047 536,319 15.4 75 433 -82.7 619,122 536,752 15.3
PUNJAB 459,382 349,613 31.4 0 59 -100.0 459,382 349,672 31.4
SINDH 25,209 27,696 -9.0 14 131 -89.3 25,223 27,827 -9.4
K.P.K 119,740 143,339 -16.5 37 48 -22.9 119,777 143,387 -16.5
BALOCHISTAN 7,181 7,586 -5.3 24 176 -86.4 7,205 7,762 -7.2
ISLAMABAD 7,535 8,085 -6.8 0 19 -100.0 7,535 8,104 -7.0
RHS -A 58,481 56,004 4.4 1 304 -99.7 58,482 56,308 3.9
PUNJAB 41,397 34,820 18.9 0 27 -100.0 41,397 34,847 18.8
SINDH 5,985 6,906 -13.3 1 277 -99.6 5,986 7,183 -16.7
K.P.K 8,240 10,238 -19.5 0 0 0.0 8,240 10,238 -19.5
BALOCHISTAN 1,122 1,843 -39.1 0 0 0.0 1,122 1,843 -39.1
ISLAMABAD 1,737 2,197 -20.9 0 0 0.0 1,737 2,197 -20.9
RHS -B 695 639 8.8 0 0 0.0 695 639 8.8
PUNJAB 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
SINDH 88 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 88 0 0.0
K.P.K 197 334 -41.0 0 0 0.0 197 334 -41.0
BALOCHISTAN 25 60 -58.3 0 0 0.0 25 60 -58.3
ISLAMABAD 385 245 57.1 0 0 0.0 385 245 57.1
MS U 48,021 23,636 103.2 165 217 -24.0 48,186 23,853 102.0
PUNJAB 34,563 8,806 292.5 0 0 0.0 34,563 8,806 292.5
SINDH 2,799 2,812 -0.5 0 15 -100.0 2,799 2,827 -1.0
K.P.K 7,324 8,502 -13.9 0 0 0.0 7,324 8,502 -13.9
BALOCHISTAN 3,139 3,386 -7.3 165 202 -18.3 3,304 3,588 -7.9
ISLAMABAD 196 130 50.8 0 0 0.0 196 130 50.8
PLD 783 1,329 -41.1 0 0 0.0 783 1,329 -41.1
PUNJAB 450 459 -2.0 0 0 0.0 450 459 -2.0
SINDH 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
K.P.K 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
BALOCHISTAN 333 870 -61.7 0 0 0.0 333 870 -61.7
RMP 8,630 9,029 -4.4 0 0 0.0 8,630 9,029 -4.4
PUNJAB 3,513 2,733 28.5 0 0 0.0 3,513 2,733 28.5
SINDH 0 35 -100.0 0 0 0.0 0 35 -100.0
K.P.K 120 957 -87.5 0 0 0.0 120 957 -87.5
BALOCHISTAN 10 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 10 0 0.0
ISLAMABAD 4,987 5,304 -6.0 0 0 0.0 4,987 5,304 -6.0
H&H 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
PUNJAB 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
SINDH 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
K.P.K 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
BALOCHISTAN 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
MM 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
PUNJAB 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
SINDH 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
BALOCHISTAN 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
ISLAMABAD 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
RTI s 2,146 2,016 6.4 0 0 0.0 2,146 2,016 6.4
PUNJAB 875 950 -7.9 0 0 0.0 875 950 -7.9
SINDH 1,065 739 44.1 0 0 0.0 1,065 739 44.1
K.P.K 120 203 -40.9 0 0 0.0 120 203 -40.9
BALOCHISTAN 86 124 -30.6 0 0 0.0 86 124 -30.6
ISLAMABAD 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
VI LLAGE BAS E F.P.W ORKERS0 28 -100.0 0 0 0.0 0 28 -100.0
K.P.K 0 28 -100.0 0 0 0.0 0 28 -100.0
CBFPW s 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
PUNJAB 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
BALOCHISTAN 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
COUNTRES 1,843 2,472 -25.4 0 0 0.0 1,843 2,472 -25.4
SINDH 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
K.P.K 1,763 2,367 -25.5 0 0 0.0 1,763 2,367 -25.5
ISLAMABAD 80 105 -23.8 0 0 0.0 80 105 -23.8
TBAs 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
K.P.K 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
F.P.I .H PROGRAMME 255 332 -23.2 0 0 0.0 255 332 -23.2
ISLAMABAD 255 332 -23.2 0 0 0.0 255 332 -23.2
OTHERS 11,892 3,537 236.2 0 0 0.0 11,892 3,537 236.2
PUNJAB 11,226 1,894 492.7 0 0 0.0 11,226 1,894 492.7
SINDH 666 1,643 -59.5 0 0 0.0 666 1,643 -59.5
PW D AJK,FATA,GB 15,462 16,871 -8.4 24 316 -92.4 15,486 17,187 -9.9
AJK 6,596 7,251 -9.0 4 231 -98.3 6,600 7,482 -11.8
FATA 6,600 7,694 -14.2 0 0 0.0 6,600 7,694 -14.2
GB 2,266 1,926 17.7 20 85 -76.5 2,286 2,011 13.7

Continued …..

70
Table 5d CONTRACEPTIVE USAGE BY OUTLET & METHOD (IUDs)
DOH(HF) 310,008 295,612 4.9 0 0 0.0 310,008 295,612 4.9
PUNJAB 221,291 240,183 -7.9 0 0 0.0 221,291 240,183 -7.9
SINDH 22,456 15,440 45.4 0 0 0.0 22,456 15,440 45.4
K.P.K 36,545 23,926 52.7 0 0 0.0 36,545 23,926 52.7
BALOCHISTAN 2,619 3,205 -18.3 0 0 0.0 2,619 3,205 -18.3
ISLAMABAD 695 140 396.4 0 0 0.0 695 140 396.4
AJK 810 96 743.8 0 0 0.0 810 96 743.8
FATA 2,402 2,018 19.0 0 0 0.0 2,402 2,018 19.0
GB 23,190 10,604 118.7 0 0 0.0 23,190 10,604 118.7

DOH(LHW) 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0

PUNJAB 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
SINDH 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
K.P.K 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
BALOCHISTAN 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
ISLAMABAD 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
AJK 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
FATA 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
GB 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0

NGOs 651,946 754,820 -13.6 99,069 187,549 -47.2 751,015 942,369 -20.3
MARIE STOPES 275,679 360,496 -23.5 0 818 -100.0 275,679 361,314 -23.7
PUNJAB 154,220 219,359 -29.7 0 752 -100.0 154,220 220,111 -29.9
SINDH 103,031 86,286 19.4 0 63 -100.0 103,031 86,349 19.3
K.P.K 15,925 51,769 -69.2 0 0 0.0 15,925 51,769 -69.2
BALOCHISTAN 2,503 3,082 -18.8 0 3 -100.0 2,503 3,085 -18.9
NGO (FPAP) 310,936 343,755 -9.5 0 0 0.0 310,936 343,755 -9.5
PUNJAB 121,938 119,674 1.9 0 0 0.0 121,938 119,674 1.9
SINDH 58,624 83,636 -29.9 0 0 0.0 58,624 83,636 -29.9
K.P.K 62,300 51,400 21.2 0 0 0.0 62,300 51,400 21.2
BALOCHISTAN 5,809 4,651 24.9 0 0 0.0 5,809 4,651 24.9
ISLAMABAD 19,804 35,809 -44.7 0 0 0.0 19,804 35,809 -44.7
AJK 33,318 40,161 -17.0 0 0 0.0 33,318 40,161 -17.0
GB 9,143 8,424 8.5 0 0 0.0 9,143 8,424 8.5
GSM 65,331 50,569 29.2 99,069 186,731 -46.9 164,400 237,300 -30.7
PUNJAB 38,191 32,742 16.6 65,765 116,779 -43.7 103,956 149,521 -30.5
SINDH 7,893 4,033 95.7 14,100 24,980 -43.6 21,993 29,013 -24.2
K.P.K 17,131 11,475 49.3 15,768 36,226 -56.5 32,899 47,701 -31.0
BALOCHISTAN 879 293 200.0 1,056 1,905 -44.6 1,935 2,198 -12.0
ISLAMABAD 799 908 -12.0 1,928 2,712 -28.9 2,727 3,620 -24.7
AJK 208 905 -77.0 392 3,409 -88.5 600 4,314 -86.1
FATA 0 160 -100.0 30 620 -95.2 30 780 -96.2
GB 230 53 334.0 30 100 -70.0 260 153 69.9

Pakistan 1,729,209 1,702,644 1.6 99,334 188,819 -47.4 1,828,543 1,891,463 -3.33

71
Table 5e CONTRACEPTIVE USAGE BY OUTLET &METHOD (CONTRACEPTIVE SURGERY)
CON S URGERY
CS -MALE CS -FEMALE (Cases)
OUTLET
2017-18 2016-17 % 2017-18 2016-17 % 2017-18 2016-17 %
Change Change Change
PW Ds 1,884 2,274 -17.2 103,529 95,737 8.1 105,413 98,011 7.6
FW C 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
PUNJAB 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
SINDH 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
K.P.K 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
BALOCHISTAN 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
ISLAMABAD 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
RHS -A 1,509 1,751 -13.8 100,885 93,118 8.3 102,394 94,869 7.9
PUNJAB 1,185 1,339 -11.5 67,055 58,784 14.1 68,240 60,123 13.5
SINDH 324 403 -19.6 28,771 29,063 -1.0 29,095 29,466 -1.3
K.P.K 0 8 -100.0 3,492 3,333 4.8 3,492 3,341 4.5
BALOCHISTAN 0 0 0.0 715 929 -23.0 715 929 -23.0
ISLAMABAD 0 1 -100.0 852 1,009 -15.6 852 1,010 -15.6
RHS -B 372 521 -28.6 2,433 2,334 4.2 2,805 2,855 -1.8
PUNJAB 353 515 -31.5 1,836 1,672 9.8 2,189 2,187 0.1
SINDH 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
K.P.K 19 3 533.3 459 483 -5.0 478 486 -1.6
BALOCHISTAN 0 0 0.0 16 35 -54.3 16 35 -54.3
ISLAMABAD 0 3 -100.0 122 144 -15.3 122 147 -17.0
MS U 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
PUNJAB 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
SINDH 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
K.P.K 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
BALOCHISTAN 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
ISLAMABAD 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
PLD 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
PUNJAB 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
SINDH 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
K.P.K 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
BALOCHISTAN 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
RMP 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
PUNJAB 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
SINDH 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
K.P.K 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
BALOCHISTAN 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
ISLAMABAD 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
H&H 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
PUNJAB 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
SINDH 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
K.P.K 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
BALOCHISTAN 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
MM 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
PUNJAB 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
SINDH 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
BALOCHISTAN 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
ISLAMABAD 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
RTI s 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
PUNJAB 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
SINDH 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
K.P.K 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
BALOCHISTAN 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
ISLAMABAD 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
VI LLAGE BAS E F.P.W ORKERS
0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
K.P.K 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
CBFPW s 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
PUNJAB 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
BALOCHISTAN 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
COUNTRES 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
SINDH 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
K.P.K 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
ISLAMABAD 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
TBAs 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
K.P.K 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
F.P.I .H PROGRAMME 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
ISLAMABAD 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
OTHERS 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
PUNJAB 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
SINDH 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
PW D AJK,FATA,GB 3 2 50.0 211 285 -26.0 214 287 -25.4
AJK 3 2 50.0 211 285 -26.0 214 287 -25.4
FATA 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
GB 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0

Continued …..

72
Table 5e CONTRACEPTIVE USAGE BY OUTLET &METHOD (CONTRACEPTIVE SURGERY)
DOH(HF) 2,687 3,193 -15.8 51,923 52,518 -1.1 54,610 55,711 -2.0
PUNJAB 2,497 2,739 -8.8 40,459 46,418 -12.8 42,956 49,157 -12.6
SINDH 24 180 -86.7 5,081 4,771 6.5 5,105 4,951 3.1
K.P.K 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
BALOCHISTAN 16 14 14.3 194 205 -5.4 210 219 -4.1
ISLAMABAD 0 0 0.0 0 74 -100.0 0 74 -100.0
AJK 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
FATA 12 0 0.0 60 41 46.3 72 41 75.6
GB 138 260 -46.9 6,129 1,009 507.4 6,267 1,269 393.9

DOH(LHW) 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0

PUNJAB 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
SINDH 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
K.P.K 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
BALOCHISTAN 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
ISLAMABAD 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
AJK 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
FATA 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
GB 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0

NGOs 294 394 -25.4 13,369 15,499 -13.7 13,663 15,893 -14.0
MARIE STOPES 68 61 11.5 8,659 7,680 12.7 8,727 7,741 12.7
PUNJAB 68 61 11.5 1,391 1,523 -8.7 1,459 1,584 -7.9
SINDH 0 0 0.0 6,177 3,577 72.7 6,177 3,577 72.7
K.P.K 0 0 0.0 38 543 -93.0 38 543 -93.0
BALOCHISTAN 0 0 0.0 1,053 2,037 -48.3 1,053 2,037 -48.3
NGO (FPAP) 226 333 -32.1 4,459 4,070 9.6 4,685 4,403 6.4
PUNJAB 210 304 -30.9 1,598 1,332 20.0 1,808 1,636 10.5
SINDH 1 3 -66.7 1,087 1,205 -9.8 1,088 1,208 -9.9
K.P.K 14 1 1,300.0 1,384 1,073 29.0 1,398 1,074 30.2
BALOCHISTAN 0 0 0.0 90 74 21.6 90 74 21.6
ISLAMABAD 1 6 -83.3 176 282 -37.6 177 288 -38.5
AJK 0 0 0.0 20 0 0.0 20 0 0.0
GB 0 19 -100.0 104 104 0.0 104 123 -15.4
GSM 0 0 0.0 251 3,749 -93.3 251 3,749 -93.3
PUNJAB 0 0 0.0 189 2,236 -91.5 189 2,236 -91.5
SINDH 0 0 0.0 14 865 -98.4 14 865 -98.4
K.P.K 0 0 0.0 33 565 -94.2 33 565 -94.2
BALOCHISTAN 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
ISLAMABAD 0 0 0.0 15 83 -81.9 15 83 -81.9
AJK 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
FATA 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
GB 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0

Pakistan 4,865 5,861 -17.0 168,821 163,754 3.1 173,686 169,615 2.40

73
Table 5f CONTRACEPTIVE USAGE BY OUTLET &METHOD (IMPLANTs)
IMPLANTS
I MPLANON (03 Yr) I MPLANT (04 Yr) JADELLE (05 Yr)
(Insertions)
OUTLET
2017-18 2016-17 % 2017-18 2016-17 % 2017-18 2016-17 % 2017-18 2016-17 %
Change Chang Change Change

PWDs 11,327 21,839 -48.1 0 0 0.0 35,491 18,666 90.1 46,818 40,505 15.6
FWC 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 815 149 447.0 815 149 447.0
PUNJAB 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
SINDH 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 741 149 397.3 741 149 397.3
K.P.K 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 73 0 0.0 73 0 0.0
BALOCHISTAN 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 1 0 0.0 1 0 0.0
ISLAMABAD 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
RHS-A 11,297 21,645 -47.8 0 0 0.0 32,760 17,882 83.2 44,057 39,527 11.5
PUNJAB 9,632 16,987 -43.3 0 0 0.0 13,258 3,886 241.2 22,890 20,873 9.7
SINDH 1,399 4,195 -66.7 0 0 0.0 17,344 13,276 30.6 18,743 17,471 7.3
K.P.K 83 196 -57.7 0 0 0.0 1,671 568 194.2 1,754 764 129.6
BALOCHISTAN 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 277 0 0.0 277 0 0.0
ISLAMABAD 183 267 -31.5 0 0 0.0 210 152 38.2 393 419 -6.2
RHS-B 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
PUNJAB 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
SINDH 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
K.P.K 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
BALOCHISTAN 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
ISLAMABAD 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
MSU 0 188 -100.0 0 0 0.0 1,804 634 184.5 1,804 822 119.5
PUNJAB 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
SINDH 0 188 -100.0 0 0 0.0 1,743 634 174.9 1,743 822 112.0
K.P.K 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 49 0 0.0 49 0 0.0
BALOCHISTAN 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 12 0 0.0 12 0 0.0
ISLAMABAD 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
PLD 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
PUNJAB 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
SINDH 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
K.P.K 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
BALOCHISTAN 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
RMP 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
PUNJAB 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
SINDH 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
K.P.K 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
BALOCHISTAN 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
ISLAMABAD 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
H&H 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 30 0 0.0 30 0 0.0
PUNJAB 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
SINDH 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 30 0 0.0 30 0 0.0
K.P.K 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
BALOCHISTAN 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
MM 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 27 0 0.0 27 0 0.0
PUNJAB 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
SINDH 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 27 0 0.0 27 0 0.0
BALOCHISTAN 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
ISLAMABAD 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
RTI s 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
PUNJAB 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
SINDH 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
K.P.K 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
BALOCHISTAN 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
ISLAMABAD 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
VI LLAGE BASE F.P.W ORKERS0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
K.P.K 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
CBFPWs 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
PUNJAB 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
BALOCHISTAN 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
COUNTRES 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 55 1 5,400.0 55 1 5,400.0
SINDH 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 50 1 4,900.0 50 1 4,900.0
K.P.K 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 5 0 0.0 5 0 0.0
ISLAMABAD 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
TBAs 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
K.P.K 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
F.P.I .H PROGRAMME 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
ISLAMABAD 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
OTHERS 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
PUNJAB 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
SINDH 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
PWD AJK,FATA,GB 30 6 400.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 30 6 400.0
AJK 30 6 400.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 30 6 400.0
FATA 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
GB 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0

Continued …..

74
Table 5f CONTRACEPTIVE USAGE BY OUTLET &METHOD (IMPLANTs)
DOH(HF) 69,155 41,571 66.4 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 69,155 41,571 66.4
PUNJAB 18,899 18,220 3.7 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 18,899 18,220 3.7
SINDH 46,294 21,324 117.1 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 46,294 21,324 117.1
K.P.K 3,700 1,461 153.3 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 3,700 1,461 153.3
BALOCHISTAN 119 331 -64.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 119 331 -64.0
ISLAMABAD 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
AJK 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
FATA 143 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 143 0 0.0
GB 0 235 -100.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 235 -100.0

DOH(LHW) 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0

PUNJAB 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
SINDH 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
K.P.K 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
BALOCHISTAN 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
ISLAMABAD 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
AJK 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
FATA 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
GB 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0

NGOs 156 167 -6.6 0 1,397 -100.0 17,023 6,358 167.7 17,179 7,922 116.9
MARIE STOPES 156 167 -6.6 0 226 -100.0 4,476 5,227 -14.4 4,632 5,620 -17.6
PUNJAB 37 88 -58.0 0 170 -100.0 805 1,421 -43.3 842 1,679 -49.9
SINDH 119 79 50.6 0 38 -100.0 2,990 3,244 -7.8 3,109 3,361 -7.5
K.P.K 0 0 0.0 0 18 -100.0 120 247 -51.4 120 265 -54.7
BALOCHISTAN 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 561 315 78.1 561 315 78.1
NGO (FPAP) 0 0 0.0 0 1,171 -100.0 1,472 0 0.0 1,472 1,171 25.7
PUNJAB 0 0 0.0 0 118 -100.0 355 0 0.0 355 118 200.8
SINDH 0 0 0.0 0 437 -100.0 403 0 0.0 403 437 -7.8
K.P.K 0 0 0.0 0 174 -100.0 166 0 0.0 166 174 -4.6
BALOCHISTAN 0 0 0.0 0 49 -100.0 183 0 0.0 183 49 273.5
ISLAMABAD 0 0 0.0 0 82 -100.0 86 0 0.0 86 82 4.9
AJK 0 0 0.0 0 193 -100.0 217 0 0.0 217 193 12.4
GB 0 0 0.0 0 118 -100.0 62 0 0.0 62 118 -47.5
GSM 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 11,075 1,131 879.2 11,075 1,131 879.2
PUNJAB 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 361 783 -53.9 361 783 -53.9
SINDH 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 10,309 230 4,382.2 10,309 230 4,382.2
K.P.K 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 36 65 -44.6 36 65 -44.6
BALOCHISTAN 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
ISLAMABAD 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 369 53 596.2 369 53 596.2
AJK 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
FATA 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0
GB 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.0

Pakistan 80,638 63,577 26.8 0 1,397 -100.0 52,514 25,024 109.9 133,152 89,998 47.9

75
Table 6 AVERAGE PERFORMANCE OF MAJOR SERVICE DELIVERY OUTLETS OF PWD(s)
NON-CLINICAL METHODS
Number ORAL PILLS (Cycles) INJECTABLE (Vials)
CONDOM (Units)
OUTLET & SOURCE of OP-COC OP-POP ECP 3-Months 2-Months 1-Months
Outlets Per Per Per Per Per Per Per
2017-18 2017-18 2017-18 2017-18 2017-18 2017-18 2017-18
Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet
FWCs 3173 56,489,573 17,803 2,391,623 754 7,953 3 150,886 48 1,236,359 390 - - - -
PUNJAB 1504 34,598,083 23,004 1,237,586 823 878 1 96,904 64 594,557 395 - - - -
SINDH 850 10,501,874 12,355 392,222 461 1,143 1 38,627 45 267,214 314 - - - -
KPK 630 9,429,480 14,967 650,800 1,033 2,354 4 12,713 20 340,840 541 - - - -
BALOCHISTAN 160 1,327,171 8,295 87,159 545 357 2 2,072 13 22,313 139 - - - -
ISLAMABAD 29 632,965 21,826 23,856 823 3,221 111 570 20 11,435 394 - - - -
RHS-A CENTRES 210 4,300,186 20,477 205,731 980 1,232 6 15,519 74 112,760 537 - - - -
PUNJAB 99 2,893,211 29,224 120,851 1,221 6 0 9,193 93 54,204 548 - - - -
SINDH 74 793,910 10,729 51,208 692 270 4 4,505 61 32,957 445 - - - -
KPK 28 413,311 14,761 24,953 891 301 11 1,558 56 20,556 734 - - - -
BALOCHISTAN 6 69,424 11,571 5,108 851 135 23 165 28 3,090 515 - - - -
ISLAMABAD 3 130,330 43,443 3,611 1,204 520 173 98 33 1,953 651 - - - -
MSUs 185 3,019,250 16,320 139,371 753 862 5 11,977 65 84,007 454 - - - -
PUNJAB 38 1,646,106 43,319 72,922 1,919 66 2 7,182 189 36,660 965 - - - -
SINDH 72 749,173 10,405 27,567 383 35 0 3,519 49 19,805 275 - - - -
KPK 34 318,914 9,380 20,451 602 108 3 643 19 16,719 492 - - - -
BALOCHISTAN 40 276,707 6,918 17,375 434 569 14 616 15 10,456 261 - - - -
ISLAMABAD 1 28350 28350 1056 1056 84 84 17 17 367 367 - -

CLINICAL METHODS
Number IUCD (Insertions) STERILIZATION/ C.S (Cases) IMPLANT (Insertions)
OUTLET & SOURCE of IUDs 10-yrs IUDs 5-yrs CS MALE CS FEMALE 3-YEARS 4-YEARS 5-YEARS
Outlets Per Per Per Per Per Per Per
2017-18 2017-18 2017-18 2017-18 2017-18 2017-18 2017-18
Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet Outlet
FWCs 3173 632,782 199 75 0 - - - - - - - - 870 0
PUNJAB 1504 470,608 313 - - - - - - - - - - - -
SINDH 850 25,875 30 14 0 - - - - - - - - 791 1
KPK 630 121,503 193 37 0 - - - - - - - - 78 0
BALOCHISTAN 160 7,181 45 24 0 - - - - - - - - 1 0
ISLAMABAD 29 7,615 263 - - - - - - - - - - - -
RHS-A CENTRES 210 58,481 278 1 0 1,509 7 100,885 480 11,297 54 - - 32,760 156
PUNJAB 99 41,397 418 - - 1,185 12 67,055 677 9,632 97 - - 13,258 134
SINDH 74 5,985 81 1 0 324 4 28,771 389 1,399 19 - - 17,344 234
KPK 28 8,240 294 - - - - 3,492 125 83 3 - - 1,671 60
BALOCHISTAN 6 1,122 187 - - - - 715 119 - - - - 277 46
ISLAMABAD 3 1,737 579 - - - - 852 284 183 61 - - 210 70
MSUs 185 48,021 260 165 1 - - - - - - - - 1,804 10
PUNJAB 38 34,563 910 - - - - - - - - - - - -
SINDH 72 2,799 39 - - - - - - - - - - 1,743 24
KPK 34 7,324 215 - - - - - - - - - - 49 1
BALOCHISTAN 40 3,139 78 165 4 - - - - - - - - 12 0
ISLAMABAD 1 196 196 - - - - - - - - - - - -

76
Table 7 PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF TOTAL CYP (2017-18) BY SOURCE
CYP %
SOURCE
Change
PWDs 6,031,013 38.3
PUNJAB 4,046,850 25.7
SINDH 766,974 4.9
K.P.K 913,018 5.8
BALOCHISTAN 99,209 0.6
ISLAMABAD 98,816 0.6
AJK 44,749 0.3
FATA 43,724 0.3
GB 17,674 0.1
DOH(HF) 2,567,288 16.3
PUNJAB 1,725,460 11.0
SINDH 358,735 2.3
K.P.K 232,492 1.5
BALOCHISTAN 27,690 0.2
ISLAMABAD 4,237 0.0
AJK 5,884 0.0
FATA 17,943 0.1
GB 194,846 1.2
DOH(LHW) 2,239,297 14.2
PUNJAB 971,230 6.2
SINDH 568,477 3.6
K.P.K 621,308 3.9
BALOCHISTAN 17,030 0.1
ISLAMABAD 2,683 0.0
AJK 34,018 0.2
FATA 0 0.0
GB 24,550 0.2
NGOs 4,918,107 31.2
RAHNUMA (FPAP) 1,626,401 10.3
MARIE STOPES 1,394,029 8.8
GREENSTAR (GSM) 1,897,677 12.0
Pakistan 15,755,706 100.0

77
Table 8a OVERALL PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF TOTAL CYP (2017-18) BY METHOD
METHODS S ource CYP Percentage s hare

CONDOMS Total 2,246,724 14.3

PWDs 655,169 4.2
DOH(HF) 66,786 0.4
DOH(LHW) 585,415 3.7
NGOs 939,354 6.0
ORAL PILLS Total 1,082,391 6.9
PWDs 235,289 1.5
DOH(HF) 111,765 0.7
DOH(LHW) 552,655 3.5
NGOs 182,682 1.2
ORAL PI LLS (CoC) Total 949,727 6.0
PWDs 225,167 1.4
DOH(HF) 102,996 0.7
DOH(LHW) 551,984 3.5
NGOs 69,580 0.4
ORAL PI LLS (POP) Total 9,845 0.1
PWDs 1,076 0.0
DOH(HF) 8,769 0.1
DOH(LHW) - 0.0
NGOs - 0.0
ORAL PI LLS (EC) Total 122,819 0.8
PWDs 9,046 0.1
DOH(HF) - 0.0
DOH(LHW) 671 0.0
NGOs 113,102 0.7

INJECTABLE Total 1,996,419 12.7

PWDs 382,995 2.4
DOH(HF) 243,713 1.5
DOH(LHW) 1,101,226 7.0
NGOs 268,485 1.7
I NJECTI ON-DMPA (3 Months ) Total 1,932,372 12.3
PWDs 382,985 2.4
DOH(HF) 228,491 1.5
DOH(LHW) 1,101,201 7.0
NGOs 219,695 1.4
I NJECTI ON-NetEn (2 Months ) Total 55,975 0.4
PWDs 10 0.0
DOH(HF) 15,222 0.1
DOH(LHW) 25 0.0
NGOs 40,718 0.3
I NJECTI ON-FEMI JECT (One Month) Total 8,072 0.1
PWDs - 0.0
DOH(HF) - 0.0
DOH(LHW) - 0.0
NGOs 8,072 0.1

IUCDs Total 8,282,165 52.6

PWDs 3,530,248 22.4
DOH(HF) 1,426,037 9.1
DOH(LHW) - 0.0
NGOs 3,325,880 21.1
I UD-CuT (10 Yea r) Total 7,954,362 50.5
PWDs 3,529,373 22.4
DOH(HF) 1,426,037 9.1
DOH(LHW) - 0.0
NGOs 2,998,952 19.0
I UD-Mul ti l oa d (5 Yea r) Total 327,803 2.1
PWDs 875 0.0
DOH(HF) - 0.0
DOH(LHW) - 0.0
NGOs 326,928 2.1
Sterlization/CS Total 1,736,860 11.0
PWDs 1,054,130 6.7
DOH(HF) 546,100 3.5
DOH(LHW) - 0.0
NGOs 136,630 0.9
CS(Ma l e) Total 48,650 0.3
PWDs 18,840 0.1
DOH(HF) 26,870 0.2
DOH(LHW) - 0.0
NGOs 2,940 0.0
CS(Fema l e) Total 1,688,210 10.7
PWDs 1,035,290 6.6
DOH(HF) 519,230 3.3
DOH(LHW) - 0.0
NGOs 133,690 0.8
IMPLANT Total 401,149 2.5
PWDs 163,184 1.0
DOH(HF) 172,888 1.1
DOH(LHW) - 0.0
NGOs 65,077 0.4
I mpl a non (3 Yea rs ) Total 201,596 1.3
PWDs 28,318 0.2
DOH(HF) 172,888 1.1
DOH(LHW) - 0.0
NGOs 390 0.0
Si no-I mpl a nt (4 Yea rs ) Total - 0.0
PWDs - 0.0
DOH(HF) - 0.0
DOH(LHW) - 0.0
NGOs - 0.0
Ja del l e (5 Yea rs ) Total 199,553 1.3
PWDs 134,866 0.9
DOH(HF) - 0.0
DOH(LHW) - 0.0
NGOs 64,687 0.4

TOTAL CYP PAKISTAN 15,755,706 100

78
Table 8b OVERALL PERCENTAGE DISTRIBUTION OF TOTAL CYP (2017-18) BY SOURCE & METHOD
METHODS CYP Pe rce nta ge

PW Ds 6,031,013 38.3
CONDOMS 665,169 4.2
CONDOMS (Units) 665,169 4.2
ORAL PILL 235,289 1.5
OP-COC 225,167 1.4
OP-EC 9,046 0.1
OP-POP 1,076 0.0
IUD 3,530,248 22.4
IUD-CuT 3,529,373 22.4
IUD-Multiload 875 0.0
INJECTABLE 382,995 2.4
INJ-DMPA 382,985 2.4
INJ-NetEn 10 0.0
CS 1,054,130 6.7
CS(Female) 1,035,290 6.6
CS(Male) 18,840 0.1
IMPLANT 163,183 1.0
Implanon 28,318 0.2
Jadelle 134,866 0.9

DOH(HF) 2,567,288 16.3

CONDOMS 66,786 0.4
CONDOMS (Units) 66,786 0.4
ORAL PILL 111,765 0.7
OP-COC 102,996 0.7
OP-POP 8,769 0.1
IUD 1,426,037 9.1
IUD-CuT 1,426,037 9.1
INJECTABLE 243,713 1.5
INJ-DMPA 228,491 1.5
INJ-NetEn 15,222 0.1
CS 546,100 3.5
CS(Female) 519,230 3.3
CS(Male) 26,870 0.2
IMPLANT 172,888 1.1
Implanon 172,888 1.1

DOH(LHW ) 2,239,297 14.2

CONDOMS 585,415 3.7
CONDOMS (Units) 585,415 3.7
ORAL PILL 552,656 3.5
OP-COC 551,984 3.5
OP-EC 671 0.0
OP-POP 0 0.0
IUD 0 0.0
IUD-CuT 0 0.0
INJECTABLE 1,101,226 7.0
INJ-DMPA 1,101,201 7.0
INJ-NetEn 25 0.0

NGOs 4,918,107 31.2

CONDOMS 939,354 6.0
CONDOMS (Units) 939,354 6.0
ORAL PILL 182,682 1.2
OP-COC 69,580 0.4
OP-EC 113,102 0.7
IUD 3,325,879 21.1
IUD-CuT 2,998,952 19.0
IUD-Multiload 326,928 2.1
INJECTABLE 268,485 1.7
INJ-DMPA 219,695 1.4
INJ-FEMIJECT 8,072 0.1
INJ-NetEn 40,718 0.3
CS 136,630 0.9
CS(Female) 133,690 0.8
CS(Male) 2,940 0.0
IMPLANT 65,077 0.4
Implanon 390 0.0
Jadelle 64,687 0.4
Sino-Implant 0 0.0

Pa kista n 15,755,706 100.0

79
Table 9 FAMILY PLANNING AND MOTHER & CHILD (MCH) SERVICES, 2017-18
PROVINCE/FEDE F.P Condoms Oral Pills Injectables Cu-T Contraceptive MOTHER CARE GENERAL AILMENTS MCH ALL
RAL TERRITORY CLIENTS (10-Years) Surgery (Number of Clients) (Number of Patients) CLIENTS CLIENTS
Sum of Col 3 to 7 Pre Natal Post Natal Total Children Adult Total Col Col(2+14)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
PUNJAB 2,371,540 984,452 607,120 380,743 356,480 42,745 192,647 110,588 303,235 376,599 1,109,529 1,486,128 1,789,363 4,160,903
SINDH 684,715 275,357 209,621 153,304 23,850 22,583 86,866 72,294 159,160 51,154 34,207 85,361 244,521 929,236

K.P.K 474,507 127,746 92,751 179,632 72,440 1,938 29,382 19,320 48,702 85,440 143,045 228,485 277,187 751,694
BALOCHISTAN 87,966 34,574 27,790 18,055 7,093 454 9,981 8,169 18,150 12,448 78,595 91,043 109,193 197,159

ISLAMABAD 26,702 6,358 6,291 6,695 7,052 306 3,395 2,979 6,374 6,456 10,122 16,578 22,952 49,654
AJK 46,480 20,018 12,942 10,502 2,887 131 9,480 6,171 15,651 27,637 62,923 90,560 106,211 152,691

GB 28,899 9,529 7,697 8,632 3,041 0 1,588 2,338 3,926 2,683 3,552 6,235 10,161 39,060
FATA 64,320 45,960 13,520 0 4,840 0 10,076 8,774 18,850 8,905 16,433 25,338 44,188 108,508

Total 3,785,129 1,503,994 977,732 757,563 477,683 68,157 343,415 230,633 574,048 571,322 1,458,406 2,029,728 2,603,776 6,388,905

Table 10 COMPARISON OF ESTIMATED MODERN CONTRACEPTIVE PREVELANCE RATE (mCPR)

FOR 2017-18 AND 2016-17

COMPATIVE ANALYSIS OF CONTRACEPTIVE PREVELANCE RATE OF MODERN METHODS (mCPR),

2017-18 OVER 2016-17 BY USING ESTIMATED METHOD USE (EMU) RATES
PROVINCE/ % mCPR of DoH % % % % %
mCPR of PWDS mCPR of R-FPAP mCPR of MSS mCPR of GSM mCPR of Pakistan
REGION ( HFs & LHWs )
Change Change Change Change Change Change
2017-18 2016-17 2017-18 2016-17 2017-18 2016-17 2017-18 2016-17 2017-18 2016-17 2017-18 2016-17
PUNJAB 18.2 15.4 17.6 12.9 14.9 -13.4 2.4 1.8 32.0 4.2 3.8 9.1 6.9 6.4 7.7 44.5 42.3 5.0
SINDH 10.0 10.2 -1.8 10.1 8.7 15.8 2.3 1.7 38.8 6.6 5.8 13.5 6.5 6.1 7.3 35.5 32.4 9.7
KPK 18.7 19.1 -2.1 14.7 16.4 -10.4 4.1 2.7 49.8 3.1 3.3 -5.6 5.0 6.2 -19.0 45.5 47.7 -4.5
BALOCHISTAN 5.3 4.4 22.0 2.0 2.1 -6.7 1.2 0.9 29.8 1.5 1.4 5.6 2.3 2.2 5.3 12.3 11.0 11.7
ISLAMABAD 31.5 31.2 0.8 1.6 0.8 90.3 29.9 24.4 22.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.5 19.7 -51.7 72.4 76.0 -4.7
AJK 5.8 5.7 2.1 6.0 6.4 -6.9 16.2 12.0 34.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.8 3.4 -46.3 29.8 27.4 8.6
FATA 4.8 4.5 6.6 1.8 1.9 -2.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.8 -33.8 7.1 7.1 -0.2
GB 4.8 4.3 12.6 32.5 17.8 82.7 11.2 8.8 27.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.2 95.3 48.9 31.1 57.3
PAKISTAN 15.6 14.1 10.0 11.9 12.8 -7.0 3.2 2.3 35.3 4.3 3.9 8.7 6.2 6.1 1.2 41.0 39.3 4.3
a) Married Women of Reproductive age (MWRA) for 2017-18 is taken as 16% of total Provincial/Regional Population of Pakistan in Economic Survey, 2017-18.
b) Married Women of Reproductive age (MWRA) for 2016-17, is taken 16% of Provisional Results of Census ,2017.
c) Population of Pakistan without AJK & GB

80
ANNEXURES

81
List of Annexures
Description
Annexure-I: Provincial & District-wise Comparative Analysis of Contraceptive Performance, in
terms of Couple Year of Protection (CYP) for the year 2017-18 and 2016-17, in respect of Population
Welfare Departments, Department of Health (HFs& LHWs) and Provincial break-up of the
Contraceptive Performance by three NGO(s) (Rahnuma FPAP, Marie Stopes Society (MSS) and
Greenstar Social Marketing (GSM).

Annexure-II: Quarterly Break-up of Contraceptive Usage by Source & Methods, in terms of Couple
Year of Protection (CYP) for the year 2017-18, in respect of Population Welfare Departments,
Department of Health (HFs & LHWs) and NGO(s) (Rahnuma FPAP, Marie Stopes Society (MSS) and
Greenstar Social Marketing (GSM).

Annexure-III: Justification for + / - 10% change in contraceptive performance 2017-18 as

compared to last year in respect of Population Welfare Departments, Department of Health (HFs &
LHWs) and NGO(s).

Annexure-IV: Statement on bottlenecks hindering the progress & new initiatives taken to enhance
the progress, as supplied by the source agencies (Population Welfare Departments, Departments of
Health and NGOs).

Annexure-V: Statement on FP2020 (Targets vs Achievements) in respect of Population Welfare

Departments and NGO(s).

Annexure-VI: Pakistan: FP2020 Core Indicators Summary Sheet 2017 & FP2020 Core Indicators
1-9 Country Fact Sheet.

Annexure-VII: Performa(s) developed/utilized for collection of Population Welfare Departments,

Department of Health (HFs & LHWs and NGO(s).

Annexure-VIII: Updated conversion factors, along with necessary details, utilized for the
computation of Couple Years of Protection (CYP).

82
ANNEXURE-I: Provincial & District-Wise Comparative Analysis of Contraceptive
Performance, in terms of Couple Years of Protection (CYP) For The Year 2017-18 and
2016-17, in respect of Population Welfare Departments, Departments of Health (HFs &
LHWs) & NGO(s) (Rahnuma FPAP, MSS & GSM)
2017-18 2016-17 % change
PWDs
PUNJAB 4,046,850 3,046,060 32.9
CHINIOT 36,213 14,714 146.1
NANKANA SAHIB 31,952 13,282 140.6
RAHIM YAR KHAN 139,584 70,274 98.6
CHAKWAL 111,446 62,929 77.1
GUJRAT 102,476 58,912 73.9
RAWALPINDI 246,246 153,687 60.2
MIANWALI 72,798 45,584 59.7
KHUSHAB 111,687 72,015 55.1
D.G.KHAN 112,452 72,767 54.5
GUJRANAWALA 146,136 94,958 53.9
KASUR 125,568 82,490 52.2
SARGODHA 150,779 102,179 47.6
NAROWAL 72,706 49,961 45.5
BHAKKAR 81,986 57,037 43.7
VEHARI 70,483 50,124 40.6
BAHAWALNAGAR 143,616 105,497 36.1
ATTOCK 98,079 72,441 35.4
OKARA 111,518 82,435 35.3
LAYYAH 85,678 63,646 34.6
MUZZAFARGARH 142,471 111,530 27.7
PAKPATTAN 109,745 86,850 26.4
BAHAWALPUR 99,552 78,947 26.1
JHANG 106,253 85,559 24.2
LAHORE 259,715 213,588 21.6
JHELUM 126,703 104,426 21.3
LODHRAN 67,576 55,764 21.2
HAFIZABAD 92,003 76,949 19.6
MULTAN 97,896 82,388 18.8
MANDI BAHAUDDIN 83,633 70,892 18.0
SIALKOT 102,544 87,406 17.3
SAHIWAL 128,043 112,290 14.0
T.T.SINGH 92,813 82,060 13.1
RAJANPUR 113,457 100,489 12.9
KHANEWAL 96,634 91,972 5.1
SHEIKHPURA 74,736 73,763 1.3
FAISALABAD 201,672 206,258 -2.2
SINDH 766,974 782,600 -2.0
SUJAWAL 8,177 3,070 166.4
QAMBAR 24,960 16,949 47.3
KARACHI EAST 8,672 6,451 34.4
LARKANA 33,279 25,846 28.8
THATTA 20,718 16,148 28.3
HYDERABAD 51,322 41,589 23.4
KARACHI WEST 25,901 22,700 14.1
GHOTKI 20,373 18,483 10.2
JAMSHORO 5,501 5,012 9.7
THARPARKAR 11,360 10,414 9.1
KORANGI TOWN-KARACHI 29,949 27,900 7.3
SHIKARPUR 30,033 28,739 4.5
TANDO MUHAMMAD KHAN 20,774 19,946 4.1
KARACHI CENTRAL 35,588 35,412 0.5
SUKKUR 29,937 30,395 -1.5
MIRPURKHAS 33,120 33,876 -2.2
MALIR TOWN-KARACHI 22,256 22,796 -2.4
KASHMORE 13,777 14,283 -3.5
BADIN 31,235 32,402 -3.6
UMERKOT 13,344 14,119 -5.5
NAUSHAHRO FEROZE 35,894 38,414 -6.6
KARACHI SOUTH 77,884 86,372 -9.8
DADU 32,156 36,178 -11.1
JACOBABAD 24,162 27,374 -11.7
TANDO ALLAHYAR 15,984 19,062 -16.1
MATIARI 11,443 13,846 -17.4
KHAIRPUR 30,434 39,327 -22.6
NAWABSHAH 26,574 35,809 -25.8
SANGHAR 42,167 59,690 -29.4

83
KPK 913,018 1,062,017 -14.0
TOR GHAR 9,071 2,649 242.4
KOHISTAN 11,629 10,557 10.2
MARDAN 52,709 48,010 9.8
CHITRAL 24,667 23,098 6.8
MANSEHRA 111,098 106,623 4.2
BATAGRAM 8,629 8,331 3.6
NOWSHERA 29,409 28,424 3.5
CHARSADDA 49,686 48,270 2.9
UPPER DIR 23,481 22,871 2.7
SHANGLA 30,005 29,623 1.3
ABBOTABAD 61,013 62,578 -2.5
LAKKI MARWAT 26,720 27,669 -3.4
MALAKAND 24,405 25,928 -5.9
KOHAT 44,099 47,551 -7.3
KARAK 38,897 42,496 -8.5
DERA ISMAIL KHAN 47,650 52,106 -8.6
HARIPUR 59,258 65,546 -9.6
TANK 23,304 26,067 -10.6
PESHAWAR 60,673 87,411 -30.6
SWAT 63,518 93,305 -31.9
BANNU 32,200 48,240 -33.3
HANGU 4,832 8,422 -42.6
LOWER DIR 12,663 22,217 -43.0
SWABI 40,823 79,084 -48.4
BUNNER 22,580 44,939 -49.8
BALOCHISTAN 99,209 106,235 -6.6
CHAGHI 863 175 393.7
BARKHAN 3,243 1,880 72.5
KOHLU 1,461 939 55.5
ZIARAT 1,754 1,188 47.7
NASIRABAD 4,423 3,300 34.0
PISHIN 7,872 6,008 31.0
MUSAKHAIL 1,571 1,258 24.8
KALAT 2,579 2,084 23.8
DERA BUGHTI 1,884 1,571 19.9
PANJGOOR 2,761 2,425 13.8
KILLA ABDULLAH 3,623 3,449 5.1
ZHOB 3,880 3,837 1.1
SIBI 4,474 4,429 1.0
JAFFARABAD 4,396 4,416 -0.4
KACHHI/BOLAN 4,481 4,576 -2.1
LORALAI 5,241 5,398 -2.9
MASTUNG 3,007 3,105 -3.1
LASBELA 1,670 1,726 -3.3
KECH/TURBAT 1,415 1,514 -6.5
NOUSHKI 1,593 1,756 -9.3
KHUZDAR 3,712 4,196 -11.6
KILLA SAIFULLAH 3,633 4,201 -13.5
KHARAN 978 1,284 -23.9
QUETTA 26,903 37,962 -29.1
AWARAN 312 499 -37.5
GAWADAR 376 664 -43.4
JHALMAGSI 1,104 2,394 -53.9
WASHUK 0
HARNAI 0
SHERANI 0

84
ISLAMABAD 98,816 106,724 -7.4
ISLAMABAD 98,816 106,724 -7.4
AJK 44,749 50,415 -11.2
SUDHNOTI 4,809 2,300 109.1
MIRPUR 4,707 4,149 13.4
NEELUM 3,428 3,450 -0.6
BAGH 4,350 4,471 -2.7
POONCH 5,051 5,691 -11.3
KOTLI 5,033 6,806 -26.0
MUZAFFARABAD 13,889 18,802 -26.1
BHIMBER 3,482 4,746 -26.6
HAVELI
HATTIAN BALA/JEHLUM VALEY
GILGIT BALTISTAN 17,674 15,628 13.1
GILGIT 5,389 4,109 31.2
SAKURDU 6,820 5,499 24.0
GHIZER 3,092 3,175 -2.6
DIAMER 1,491 1,572 -5.2
GANCHE 881 1,273 -30.8
SHIGAR
NAGAR
HUNZA
KHARMANG
ASTOR
FATA 43,724 48,364 -9.6
NORTH WAZIRISTAN 2,166 1,470 47.3
BAJAUR AGENCY 8,129 7,345 10.7
SOUTH WAZIRISTAN 5,488 5,331 2.9
KHYBER AGENCY 5,227 5,467 -4.4
MOHMAND AGENCY 16,717 18,164 -8.0
ORAKZAI AGENCY 2,873 4,948 -41.9
KURRUM AGENCY 3,124 5,638 -44.6
FR TANK
FR D I KHAN
LOWER KURUM
FR LAKKI MARWAT
FR BANNU
FR KOHAT
FR PESHAWAR

85
DOH(HF)
PUNJAB 1,725,460 1,858,141 -7.1
ATTOCK 28,047 19,600 43.1
KHUSHAB 65,635 49,468 32.7
RAWALPINDI 76,255 58,587 30.2
BHAKKAR 34,178 26,450 29.2
MANDI BAHAUDDIN 35,391 29,188 21.3
SAHIWAL 52,282 43,604 19.9
T.T.SINGH 60,181 51,893 16.0
MULTAN 99,219 86,339 14.9
FAISALABAD 89,763 80,602 11.4
BAHAWALPUR 58,333 52,613 10.9
RAJANPUR 47,303 43,915 7.7
OKARA 50,043 48,609 3.0
D.G.KHAN 45,351 44,299 2.4
PAKPATTAN 20,704 20,456 1.2
LODHRAN 23,831 23,764 0.3
CHINIOT 34,553 35,464 -2.6
VEHARI 55,836 59,144 -5.6
RAHIM YAR KHAN 57,513 61,077 -5.8
SIALKOT 46,044 49,508 -7.0
SHEIKHPURA 64,281 70,041 -8.2
KASUR 49,387 54,325 -9.1
GUJRANAWALA 57,410 63,709 -9.9
JHELUM 26,956 30,231 -10.8
LAYYAH 27,079 30,998 -12.6
BAHAWALNAGAR 43,491 50,050 -13.1
NANKANA SAHIB 18,630 21,634 -13.9
GUJRAT 27,727 32,790 -15.4
MUZZAFARGARH 89,329 109,567 -18.5
HAFIZABAD 22,811 27,995 -18.5
LAHORE 94,898 118,890 -20.2
NAROWAL 15,201 19,495 -22.0
CHAKWAL 36,987 47,899 -22.8
SARGODHA 49,161 67,813 -27.5
MIANWALI 12,059 17,270 -30.2
KHANEWAL 63,751 106,195 -40.0
JHANG 45,839 104,659 -56.2
SINDH 358,735 233,417 53.7
SANGHAR 32,021 9,267 245.5
KORANGI TOWN-KARACHI 4,813 1,447 232.6
TANDO MUHAMMAD KHAN 9,390 3,201 193.3
LARKANA 17,443 6,055 188.1
MATIARI 12,034 4,463 169.6
KARACHI WEST 9,352 3,773 147.8
UMERKOT 13,133 6,220 111.2
KHAIRPUR 33,381 16,589 101.2
BADIN 14,738 7,363 100.2
GHOTKI 14,650 7,441 96.9
THARPARKAR 7,311 3,793 92.7
THATTA 4,535 2,397 89.2
QAMBAR 10,873 5,927 83.4
DADU 18,081 10,324 75.1
SUJAWAL 2,396 1,430 67.6
KARACHI EAST 7,078 4,260 66.1
SUKKUR 10,968 6,733 62.9
MIRPURKHAS 12,908 8,027 60.8
KASHMORE 8,453 5,293 59.7
KARACHI SOUTH 4,781 3,060 56.2
JAMSHORO 10,430 6,722 55.2
NAUSHAHRO FEROZE 18,075 12,383 46.0
SHIKARPUR 15,811 10,852 45.7
TANDO ALLAHYAR 8,138 5,686 43.1
JACOBABAD 21,953 16,418 33.7
HYDERABAD 6,590 5,485 20.1
NAWABSHAH 7,001 6,325 10.7
MALIR TOWN-KARACHI 20,615 19,370 6.4
KARACHI CENTRAL 1,784 33,110 -94.6

86
KPK 232,492 305,899 -24.0
KOHISTAN 107 24 341.2
TOR GHAR 296 134 120.5
NOWSHERA 39,583 22,035 79.6
TANK 5,519 3,428 61.0
KOHAT 16,086 11,800 36.3
BUNNER 6,074 5,467 11.1
CHARSADDA 28,634 28,497 0.5
HARIPUR 7,221 7,854 -8.0
HANGU 2,090 2,483 -15.8
MANSEHRA 12,548 15,731 -20.2
BATAGRAM 8,039 10,453 -23.1
UPPER DIR 4,594 6,246 -26.5
SWABI 12,226 17,581 -30.5
SWAT 24,046 34,882 -31.1
KARAK 4,092 6,158 -33.5
SHANGLA 6,307 10,046 -37.2
BANNU 6,946 11,089 -37.4
PESHAWAR 12,816 21,371 -40.0
ABBOTABAD 5,473 9,497 -42.4
DERA ISMAIL KHAN 7,020 12,996 -46.0
LOWER DIR 2,386 5,381 -55.7
LAKKI MARWAT 5,460 13,121 -58.4
MALAKAND 5,668 14,789 -61.7
CHITRAL 3,932 14,140 -72.2
MARDAN 5,329 20,695 -74.2
BALOCHISTAN 27,690 30,040 -7.8
PISHIN 1,237 60 1,964.2
KACHHI/BOLAN 116 24 376.8
PANJGOOR 732 199 267.7
BARKHAN 291 98 195.5
ZIARAT 1,585 574 176.3
CHAGHI 2,088 1,024 104.0
JAFFARABAD 3,730 2,110 76.8
ZHOB 450 323 39.4
SIBI 262 190 38.1
AWARAN 338 259 30.5
QUETTA 4,771 4,249 12.3
KILLA SAIFULLAH 217 198 9.5
MASTUNG 556 538 3.4
KILLA ABDULLAH 547 556 -1.6
KHUZDAR 1,090 1,270 -14.2
LASBELA 2,200 2,577 -14.6
NOUSHKI 245 297 -17.6
WASHUK 368 470 -21.7
LORALAI 878 1,124 -21.8
NASIRABAD 1,092 1,419 -23.0
JHALMAGSI 318 421 -24.4
KECH/TURBAT 746 1,109 -32.7
KALAT 695 1,033 -32.8
DERA BUGHTI 1,676 2,573 -34.9
GAWADAR 898 1,612 -44.3
SHERANI 62 138 -55.1
KHARAN 220 606 -63.7
MUSAKHAIL 162 791 -79.5
HARNAI 96 4,199 -97.7
KOHLU 24

87
ISLAMABAD 4,237 2,632 61.0
ISLAMABAD 4,237 2,632 61.0
AJK 5,884 3,747 57.0
HAVELI 483 118 309.2
MUZAFFARABAD 2,565 1,107 131.7
SUDHNOTI 334 316 5.7
MIRPUR 456 642 -29.0
KOTLI 23 1,470 -98.4
NEELUM 95
BAGH
POONCH
HATTIAN BALA/JEHLUM VALEY
BHIMBER 2,023
GILGIT BALTISTAN 194,846 80,699 141.4
HUNZA 58,188 4,355 1,236.3
NAGAR 23,315 2,941 692.8
GILGIT 56,028 14,874 276.7
ASTOR 682 241 183.4
SAKURDU 15,604 13,112 19.0
GANCHE 9,679 8,190 18.2
SHIGAR 31,351 32,955 -4.9
GHIZER 4,031
KHARMANG 0
DIAMER
FATA 17,943 14,561 23.2
FR D I KHAN 37 6 570.0
FR LAKKI MARWAT 7 2 364.9
SOUTH WAZIRISTAN 300 72 317.8
ORAKZAI AGENCY 847 313 170.3
FR KOHAT 915 411 122.4
FR BANNU 72 34 110.7
NORTH WAZIRISTAN 271 169 60.6
MOHMAND AGENCY 6,884 5,052 36.3
BAJAUR AGENCY 4,711 3,645 29.2
KURRUM AGENCY 1,425 1,405 1.4
KHYBER AGENCY 2,043 2,550 -19.9
FR PESHAWAR 348 899 -61.3
LOWER KURUM 84
FR TANK 2

88
DOH(LHW)
PUNJAB 971,230 1,503,945 -35.4
SARGODHA 31,311 19,875 57.5
ATTOCK 32,855 24,888 32.0
MANDI BAHAUDDIN 30,375 26,603 14.2
KHANEWAL 37,832 35,021 8.0
KHUSHAB 22,681 23,930 -5.2
VEHARI 24,385 25,926 -5.9
SAHIWAL 30,566 32,724 -6.6
BAHAWALNAGAR 30,337 32,626 -7.0
MUZZAFARGARH 45,403 50,511 -10.1
JHANG 31,559 35,952 -12.2
MIANWALI 26,062 29,764 -12.4
OKARA 31,141 35,893 -13.2
SHEIKHPURA 16,358 19,454 -15.9
JHELUM 20,419 24,677 -17.3
NAROWAL 21,660 28,034 -22.7
CHAKWAL 21,217 29,387 -27.8
RAHIM YAR KHAN 41,708 58,255 -28.4
T.T.SINGH 27,458 38,583 -28.8
HAFIZABAD 11,561 16,599 -30.3
KASUR 23,435 34,183 -31.4
GUJRAT 30,234 44,348 -31.8
RAWALPINDI 31,156 45,981 -32.2
GUJRANAWALA 40,939 60,459 -32.3
BHAKKAR 35,099 52,931 -33.7
LODHRAN 22,417 36,977 -39.4
PAKPATTAN 19,924 33,247 -40.1
RAJANPUR 21,265 37,774 -43.7
CHINIOT 10,859 19,821 -45.2
FAISALABAD 26,406 51,111 -48.3
SIALKOT 19,507 38,042 -48.7
D.G.KHAN 29,595 69,155 -57.2
MULTAN 39,291 95,984 -59.1
LAYYAH 20,192 55,988 -63.9
NANKANA SAHIB 10,938 30,626 -64.3
LAHORE 27,482 88,231 -68.9
BAHAWALPUR 27,601 120,384 -77.1
SINDH 568,477 552,348 2.9
MIRPURKHAS 22,204 13,267 67.4
SUKKUR 62,994 39,978 57.6
JACOBABAD 12,699 8,216 54.6
LARKANA 54,350 37,651 44.4
NAUSHAHRO FEROZE 52,162 37,767 38.1
KARACHI SOUTH 37,196 27,038 37.6
SUJAWAL 3,000 2,445 22.7
THARPARKAR 13,201 13,478 -2.1
SHIKARPUR 13,101 13,616 -3.8
TANDO MUHAMMAD KHAN 8,153 8,711 -6.4
TANDO ALLAHYAR 17,858 19,318 -7.6
BADIN 13,025 14,135 -7.9
KHAIRPUR 30,380 33,046 -8.1
UMERKOT 12,625 14,477 -12.8
NAWABSHAH 46,990 55,000 -14.6
THATTA 7,737 9,923 -22.0
GHOTKI 17,136 23,014 -25.5
JAMSHORO 7,843 11,589 -32.3
DADU 18,682 34,476 -45.8
MATIARI 6,582 15,184 -56.7
SANGHAR 14,841 40,632 -63.5
KARACHI CENTRAL 13,100 43,282 -69.7
KASHMORE 1,027 4,121 -75.1
QAMBAR 1,660 19,177 -91.3
HYDERABAD 12,807
MALIR TOWN-KARACHI 19,856
KARACHI EAST 3,437
KORANGI TOWN-KARACHI 26,994
KARACHI WEST 29,644

89
KPK 73,619 611,472 -88.0
TANK 2,661 5,510 -51.7
LAKKI MARWAT 5,384 17,752 -69.7
LOWER DIR 4,529 16,986 -73.3
HANGU 797 3,593 -77.8
MARDAN 12,947 70,525 -81.6
MANSEHRA 6,311 34,583 -81.8
BANNU 3,187 18,937 -83.2
DERA ISMAIL KHAN 3,840 23,077 -83.4
CHARSADDA 8,637 58,516 -85.2
CHITRAL 6,576 45,358 -85.5
SWABI 4,851 37,622 -87.1
NOWSHERA 3,243 27,228 -88.1
MALAKAND 4,999 42,136 -88.1
BATAGRAM 442 4,073 -89.2
ABBOTABAD 1,780 19,798 -91.0
HARIPUR 1,458 18,969 -92.3
KOHAT 303 8,627 -96.5
SWAT 1,460 74,489 -98.0
BUNNER 192 11,647 -98.3
UPPER DIR 22 13,699 -99.8
SHANGLA 16,402
KARAK 7,029
PESHAWAR 34,170
TOR GHAR 531
KOHISTAN 215
BALOCHISTAN 17,030 23,518 -27.6
KALAT 1,398 265 428.5
PISHIN 718 167 331.1
KHARAN 142 66 114.9
NASIRABAD 1,092 811 34.7
PANJGOOR 5,925 4,721 25.5
SIBI 480 417 15.0
NOUSHKI 505 577 -12.6
WASHUK 2,751 3,223 -14.6
ZIARAT 97 169 -42.8
KHUZDAR 1,905 4,003 -52.4
MASTUNG 231 574 -59.7
JAFFARABAD 664 1,737 -61.7
SHERANI 13 1,101 -98.8
HARNAI 0 539 -100.0
KACHHI/BOLAN 0 536 -100.0
CHAGHI 0 1,519 -100.0
KILLA ABDULLAH 0 12 -100.0
LORALAI 0 18 -100.0
KOHLU 0 78 -100.0
AWARAN 0 166 -100.0
QUETTA 0 2,616 -100.0
KILLA SAIFULLAH 0 203 -100.0
JHALMAGSI 0
ZHOB 172
KECH/TURBAT 0
BARKHAN 0
MUSAKHAIL 0
GAWADAR 922
LASBELA 4
DERA BUGHTI 10

90
ISLAMABAD 2,683 1,112 141.3
ISLAMABAD 2,683 1,112 141.3
AJK 34,018 34,850 -2.4
MIRPUR 2,665 1,878 41.9
MUZAFFARABAD 6,449 4,546 41.9
BAGH 4,381 4,370 0.3
SUDHNOTI 1,883 1,878 0.2
BHIMBER 2,984 2,985 0.0
POONCH 4,119 4,179 -1.4
KOTLI 6,173 7,230 -14.6
HATTIAN BALA/JEHLUM VALEY 2,405 2,882 -16.6
HAVELI 1,033 1,541 -33.0
NEELUM 1,927 3,362 -42.7
GILGIT BALTISTAN 24,550 17,882 37.3
DIAMER 650 117 457.1
GANCHE 5,392 3,647 47.8
HUNZA 327 333 -1.8
SAKURDU 6,954 8,079 -13.9
GILGIT 1,789 2,899 -38.3
ASTOR 438 2,322 -81.2
GHIZER 0 485 -100.0
NAGAR 1,356
KHARMANG 5,177
SHIGAR 2,466
FATA 3,044
KURRUM AGENCY 229
FR PESHAWAR 100
ORAKZAI AGENCY 474
BAJAUR AGENCY
LOWER KURUM
NORTH WAZIRISTAN
FR BANNU
FR LAKKI MARWAT
KHYBER AGENCY 2,240
FR KOHAT
SOUTH WAZIRISTAN
MOHMAND AGENCY
FR D I KHAN
FR TANK

91
NGOs
PUNJAB 2,464,035 2,889,865 -14.7
LAHORE 469,656
ATTOCK 6,078
MULTAN 108,136
JHELUM 11,524
RAHIM YAR KHAN 50,985
KHANEWAL 17,576
LAYYAH 64,697
LODHRAN 22,143
SIALKOT 34,259
BAHAWALPUR 50,702
RAWALPINDI 208,738
T.T.SINGH 40,381
NANKANA SAHIB 13,614
MIANWALI 9,793
D.G.KHAN 24,792
NAROWAL 66,962
PAKPATTAN 17,293
GUJRAT 40,122
GUJRANAWALA 110,617
CHAKWAL 125,166
BHAKKAR 5,190
BAHAWALNAGAR 70,600
VEHARI 24,672
HAFIZABAD 19,228
SHEIKHPURA 34,829
SAHIWAL 27,684
MUZZAFARGARH 141,785
MANDI BAHAUDDIN 10,786
JHANG 93,613
KASUR 77,698
KHUSHAB 14,658
CHINIOT 8,518
OKARA 24,161
FAISALABAD 334,386
SARGODHA 69,259
RAJANPUR 13,731
SINDH 1,327,116 1,313,232 1.1
BADIN 97,826
SHIKARPUR 8,090
UMERKOT 36,333
KARACHI CENTRAL 256,783
JACOBABAD 10,759
THATTA 85,805
KARACHI SOUTH 58,092
TANDO ALLAHYAR 37,399
MATIARI 43,237
NAUSHAHRO FEROZE 52,287
NAWABSHAH 41,524
THARPARKAR 27,018
HYDERABAD 121,309
SANGHAR 39,229
DADU 40,315
MIRPURKHAS 41,048
SUKKUR 17,807
SUJAWAL 21,826
KARACHI EAST 87,785
KHAIRPUR 23,804
MALIR TOWN-KARACHI 44,117
LARKANA 14,432
JAMSHORO 5,793
TANDO MUHAMMAD KHAN 41,384
KORANGI TOWN-KARACHI 23,407
KASHMORE 16,120
GHOTKI 5,693
QAMBAR 8,491
KARACHI WEST 19,403

92
KPK 664,718 873,398 -23.9
ABBOTABAD 17,851
BUNNER 3,262
LOWER DIR 3,469
BANNU 2,684
KOHAT 109,602
HARIPUR 31,932
TOR GHAR
UPPER DIR 606
TANK 2,649
CHITRAL 647
PESHAWAR 227,347
BATAGRAM 998
LAKKI MARWAT 3,711
HANGU 621
KARAK 936
MANSEHRA 14,902
SWAT 22,069
DERA ISMAIL KHAN 19,053
NOWSHERA 42,749
KOHISTAN
SHANGLA 561
SWABI 8,002
MALAKAND 3,322
MARDAN 107,455
CHARSADDA 40,292
BALOCHISTAN 101,606 105,198 -3.4
QUETTA 65,198 105,198 -38.0
AWARAN
PISHIN 832
WASHUK
ZIARAT 43
SIBI 776
NOUSHKI 760
MUSAKHAIL
KHUZDAR 844
NASIRABAD 6,875
KALAT 210
GAWADAR 329
KOHLU
KILLA ABDULLAH 1,009
CHAGHI 314
JHALMAGSI 44
LORALAI 8,168
KACHHI/BOLAN 68
ZHOB 203
SHERANI
KECH/TURBAT 4,646
PANJGOOR 97
BARKHAN
JAFFARABAD 1,189
MASTUNG 285
DERA BUGHTI
KILLA SAIFULLAH 1,244
KHARAN 282
LASBELA 8,189
HARNAI

93
ISLAMABAD 135,828 234,361 -42.0
ISLAMABAD 135,828
AJK 173,132 222,060 -22.0
BAGH 2,153
KOTLI 268
POONCH 930
HAVELI 0
SUDHNOTI 0
HATTIAN BALA/JEHLUM VALEY 206
BHIMBER 121
MIRPUR 3,309
NEELUM 1,714
MUZAFFARABAD 164,431
GILGIT BALTISTAN 48,620 44,532 9.2
GILGIT 2,288
GANCHE 5,613
SHIGAR 0
ASTOR 0
KHARMANG 0
NAGAR 0
SAKURDU 11,104
HUNZA 14,826
GHIZER 14,589
DIAMER 201
FATA 3,053 7,081 -56.9
KURRUM AGENCY 1,486
ORAKZAI AGENCY 0
MOHMAND AGENCY 0
FR TANK 0
KHYBER AGENCY 621
FR KOHAT 0
SOUTH WAZIRISTAN 316
FR PESHAWAR 0
FR BANNU 0
FR LAKKI MARWAT 0
BAJAUR AGENCY 570
NORTH WAZIRISTAN 61
FR D I KHAN 0
LOWER KURUM

94
ANNEXURE-II: Quarterly Break-up of Contraceptive Usage By Source & Methods, in
Terms of Couple Years Of Protection (CYP) for the Year 2017-18 in Respect Of Population
Welfare Departments, Department of Health (HFs & LHWs)& NGO(s)
CONDOMS (Units)

SOURCE Total Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun

2017 2017 2018 2018

PWDs 665169 159268 155343 171519 179039

PUNJAB 427692 93180 101973 116343 116195
SINDH 113609 30175 23552 30154 29729
KPK 88237 27738 20727 15842 23930
BALOCHISTAN 17027 3921 4420 4312 4374
ISLAMABAD 9963 2499 2551 2598 2315
AJK 4149 997 973 1027 1152
FATA 2890 394 766 839 892
GB 1602 363 381 406 453
DOH (HF) 66786 16129 18550 16823 15285
PUNJAB 48518 11633 12914 12730 11240
SINDH 8322 2081 2081 2081 2080
KPK 6849 1667 2739 1423 1020
BALOCHISTAN 806 143 143 260 260
ISLAMABAD 243 91 69 40 42
AJK 726 245 245 118 118
FATA 573 97 160 139 177
GB 750 171 199 32 348
DOH (LHW) 585415 149876 135003 140124 160412
PUNJAB 402865 104279 90509 94109 113968
SINDH 132489 29899 30568 35451 36571
KPK 33317 8490 8490 8169 8169
BALOCHISTAN 1548 487 395 280 387
ISLAMABAD 2172 270 303 886 714
AJK 11984 6281 4398 1124 182
GB 1040 171 340 107 422
NGOs 939354 192267 236886 258829 251372
RAHNUMA (FPAP) 10872 2073 2267 3299 3232
MARIE STOPES 3074 995 769 739 571
SOCIETY (MSS)
GREENSTAR (GSM) 925408 189198 233850 254791 247569

95
 ORAL PILL (Cycles)
Total Oral OP-COC OP-EC OP-EC OP-POP
Pills
SOURCE Sub-Total Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Sub-Total Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Sub-Total Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun
2017 2017 2018 2018 2017 2017 2018 2018 2017 2017 2018 2018

PWDs 235289 225167 51908 55053 57282 60924 9046 697 1524 3088 3737 1076 369 300 246 160
PUNJAB 130432 124624 26485 29599 33795 34746 5744 64 696 2238 2746 64 35 19 7 3
SINDH 37119 34659 8862 8959 8208 8629 2346 420 592 585 750 114 60 40 14 0
KPK 49564 48627 12423 12130 10837 13237 753 149 188 214 202 184 81 36 44 23
BALOCHISTAN 9097 8865 2004 2272 2365 2224 154 50 43 37 24 78 27 24 16 12
ISLAMABAD 2813 2489 610 665 620 595 48 13 6 14 15 275 84 94 58 39
AJK 2035 1793 427 429 463 474 2 0 0 1 1 240 58 61 63 58
FATA 3018 3018 842 733 701 742 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
GB 1212 1092 256 266 292 278 0 0 0 0 0 120 25 26 45 25
DOH (HF) 111765 102996 22076 25289 26693 28938 0 0 0 0 0 8769 2359 2611 1993 1806
PUNJAB 60630 57018 12160 13975 17112 13771 0 0 0 0 0 3612 968 956 991 697
SINDH 16604 15331 3833 3833 3833 3833 0 0 0 0 0 1272 318 318 318 318
KPK 12421 9712 2093 3502 1878 2241 0 0 0 0 0 2708 826 1111 333 439
BALOCHISTAN 2850 1984 442 442 550 549 0 0 0 0 0 866 146 146 287 287
ISLAMABAD 125 125 34 39 13 39 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
AJK 422 422 176 176 35 35 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
FATA 1142 832 212 215 163 243 0 0 0 0 0 310 101 80 64 64
GB 17571 17571 3127 3108 3109 8227 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
DOH (LHW) 552656 551984 129148 132105 138743 151989 671 0 671 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PUNJAB 261790 261790 62807 63797 64946 70240 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SINDH 158319 158319 31017 36435 45026 45840 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
KPK 97770 97770 24804 24803 24082 24082 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
BALOCHISTAN 6893 6893 1366 1210 1890 2427 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
ISLAMABAD 294 294 1 101 139 54 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
AJK 9872 9872 4125 2808 1532 1407 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
GB 17718 17047 5030 2950 1128 7939 671 0 671 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
NGOs 182682 69580 12277 13644 26874 16784 113102 25136 27247 34000 26720 0 0 0 0 0
RAHNUMA (FPAP) 14578 13432 3008 3481 3443 3499 1145 212 301 288 344 0 0 0 0 0
MARIE STOPES 5480 5480 1443 1499 1421 1117 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SOCIETY (MSS)
GREENSTAR 162625 50668 7826 8663 22010 12168 111957 24925 26946 33711 26375 0 0 0 0 0
(GSM)

96
 INJECTABLE (Vials)
Total INJ-DMPA INJ-FEMIJECT INJ-NetEn
Injectables
SOURCE Sub-Total Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Sub-Total Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Sub-Total Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun
2017 2017 2018 2018 2017 2017 2018 2018 2017 2017 2018 2018

PWDs 382995 382985 90075 95299 94725 102887 0 0 0 0 0 10 4 3 2 1

PUNJAB 173508 173508 35594 41754 46292 49868 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SINDH 81262 81262 20165 21303 19813 19980 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
KPK 95837 95837 26586 24497 20341 24414 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
BALOCHISTAN 9327 9327 2295 2460 2242 2331 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
ISLAMABAD 5240 5240 1333 1138 1336 1433 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
AJK 5996 5996 1549 1342 1490 1615 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
FATA 7456 7456 1452 1652 2146 2206 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
GB 4370 4361 1101 1154 1065 1041 0 0 0 0 0 10 4 3 2 1
DOH (HF) 243713 228491 57630 60856 56750 53256 0 0 0 0 0 15222 3558 4813 3046 3804
PUNJAB 121566 112159 29718 27969 28366 26107 0 0 0 0 0 9407 2078 3003 1766 2560
SINDH 63726 62441 15612 15612 15612 15605 0 0 0 0 0 1286 322 321 321 322
KPK 35865 33276 7503 12397 7220 6156 0 0 0 0 0 2589 372 1235 496 486
BALOCHISTAN 9590 8460 1672 1671 2560 2558 0 0 0 0 0 1130 231 231 334 334
ISLAMABAD 673 673 336 129 131 78 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
AJK 1011 1011 205 206 300 300 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
FATA 4101 3926 925 1102 969 930 0 0 0 0 0 175 87 24 46 18
GB 7180 6546 1660 1772 1592 1523 0 0 0 0 0 635 468 0 83 84
DOH (LHW) 1101226 1101201 269255 258129 281789 292028 0 0 0 0 0 25 25 0 0 0
PUNJAB 306575 306575 65154 66300 82825 92296 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SINDH 277670 277670 71654 61192 72333 72492 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
KPK 490221 490221 124033 124030 121080 121079 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
BALOCHISTAN 8590 8590 1310 1459 2569 3252 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
ISLAMABAD 217 217 217 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
AJK 12162 12162 5167 4102 1805 1087 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
GB 5792 5767 1721 1046 1177 1823 0 0 0 0 0 25 25 0 0 0
NGOs 268485 219695 53274 53028 53607 59786 8072 2401 1862 2109 1699 40718 14387 9501 12910 3921
RAHNUMA (FPAP) 118202 117978 27975 30339 27441 32223 0 0 0 0 0 224 84 48 44 49
MARIE STOPES 12684 12684 2849 3634 3108 3094 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SOCIETY (MSS)(GSM)
GREENSTAR 137599 89033 22451 19055 23059 24469 8072 2401 1862 2109 1699 40493 14303 9453 12866 3872

97
 IUDs (Insertions)
SOURCE Total IUDs IUD-CuT (10-years) IUD-Multiload (5-years)
Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun
Sub-Total 2017 2017 2018 2018 SubTotal 2017 2017 2018 2018

PWDs 3530248 3529373 773830 871718 912111 971713 875 432 195 162 86
PUNJAB 2536468 2536468 503502 624326 690267 718373 0 0 0 0 0
SINDH 164785 164735 50393 39588 38097 36657 50 50 0 0 0
KPK 632641 632518 170918 159836 131841 169924 122 122 0 0 0
BALOCHISTAN 55345 54722 13174 14246 15014 12287 624 248 195 149 33
ISLAMABAD 69805 69805 19214 15456 18469 16666 0 0 0 0 0
AJK 30355 30342 8206 6573 7641 7921 13 0 0 13 0
FATA 30360 30360 6725 8611 7779 7245 0 0 0 0 0
GB 10490 10424 1697 3082 3004 2640 66 13 0 0 53
DOH (HF) 1426037 1426037 350235 424212 343468 308122 0 0 0 0 0
PUNJAB 1017939 1017939 245097 253782 274928 244131 0 0 0 0 0
SINDH 103298 103298 25861 25861 25861 25714 0 0 0 0 0
KPK 168107 168107 38916 62795 34868 31528 0 0 0 0 0
BALOCHISTAN 12047 12047 3087 3077 2953 2930 0 0 0 0 0
ISLAMABAD 3197 3197 1909 455 290 543 0 0 0 0 0
AJK 3726 3726 566 570 1297 1293 0 0 0 0 0
FATA 11049 11049 2797 2999 3271 1983 0 0 0 0 0
GB 106674 106674 32002 74672 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
DOH (LHW) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PUNJAB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SINDH 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
KPK 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
BALOCHISTAN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
ISLAMABAD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
AJK 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
GB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
NGOs 3325879 2998952 645914 860292 748356 744390 326928 107415 99389 75778 44345
RAHNUMA (FPAP) 1430306 1430306 310601 387108 363713 368883 0 0 0 0 0
MARIE STOPES 1268123 1268123 255843 388194 304543 319544 0 0 0 0 0
SOCIETY (MSS)
GREENSTAR (GSM) 627450 300523 79470 84990 80100 55964 326928 107415 99389 75778 44345

98
 STERILIZATION/ CONTRACEPTIVE SURGERY (CS)
SOURCE CS(Female) CS(Male)

Total CS Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun

Sub-Total 2017 2017 2018 2018 Sub-Total 2017 2017 2018 2018

PWDs 1054130 1035290 247370 266230 293430 228260 18840 6490 4830 4760 2760
PUNJAB 704290 688910 171380 166830 192590 158110 15380 4880 4060 4100 2340
SINDH 290950 287710 60110 84250 85060 58290 3240 1610 660 600 370
KPK 39700 39510 9670 10540 11490 7810 190 0 110 60 20
BALOCHISTAN 7310 7310 2530 1880 1410 1490 0 0 0 0 0
ISLAMABAD 9740 9740 3110 2260 2400 1970 0 0 0 0 0
AJK 2140 2110 570 470 480 590 30 0 0 0 30
FATA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
GB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
DOH (HF) 546100 519230 158000 143050 111710 106470 26870 10130 6290 4380 6070
PUNJAB 429560 404590 108060 104920 98410 93200 24970 8530 6210 4260 5970
SINDH 51050 50810 12670 12730 12730 12680 240 70 60 60 50
KPK 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
BALOCHISTAN 2100 1940 550 500 450 440 160 40 10 60 50
ISLAMABAD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
AJK 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
FATA 720 600 140 190 120 150 120 120 0 0 0
GB 62670 61290 36580 24710 0 0 1380 1370 10 0 0
DOH (LHW) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PUNJAB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SINDH 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
KPK 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
BALOCHISTAN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
ISLAMABAD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
AJK 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
GB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
NGOs 136630 133690 26740 44270 35830 26850 2940 1000 880 420 640
RAHNUMA (FPAP) 46850 44590 9150 13620 12520 9300 2260 610 750 340 560
MARIE STOPES 87270 86590 15080 30650 23310 17550 680 390 130 80 80
SOCIETY (MSS)
GREENSTAR (GSM) 2510 2510 2510 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

99
 IMPLANTS
SOURCE Total Implants Implanon Jadelle
Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun Jul-Sep Oct-Dec Jan-Mar Apr-Jun
Sub-Total 2017 2017 2018 2018 Sub-Total 2017 2017 2018 2018

PWDs 163183 28318 12033 6788 5325 4173 134866 24685 35249 42138 32794
PUNJAB 74460 24080 10138 6263 4585 3095 50380 6445 12274 16918 14744
SINDH 79251 3498 1700 378 550 870 75753 16450 20558 22865 15880
KPK 7040 208 105 30 13 60 6832 1357 1790 1953 1733
BALOCHISTAN 1102 0 0 0 0 0 1102 133 380 296 293
ISLAMABAD 1256 458 90 100 153 115 798 300 247 106 144
AJK 75 75 0 18 25 33 0 0 0 0 0
FATA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
GB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
DOH (HF) 172888 172888 43428 45365 43753 40343 0 0 0 0 0
PUNJAB 47248 47248 11583 12098 12953 10615 0 0 0 0 0
SINDH 115735 115735 28948 28945 28948 28895 0 0 0 0 0
KPK 9250 9250 2600 4233 1683 735 0 0 0 0 0
BALOCHISTAN 298 298 58 50 98 93 0 0 0 0 0
ISLAMABAD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
AJK 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
FATA 358 358 240 40 73 5 0 0 0 0 0
GB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
DOH (LHW) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
PUNJAB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SINDH 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
KPK 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
BALOCHISTAN 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
ISLAMABAD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
AJK 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
GB 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
NGOs 65077 390 93 220 73 5 64687 4887 6867 45820 7114
RAHNUMA (FPAP) 5594 0 0 0 0 0 5594 969 1220 1094 2310
MARIE STOPES 17399 390 93 220 73 5 17009 3557 4841 5202 3409
SOCIETY (MSS)
GREENSTAR (GSM) 42085 0 0 0 0 0 42085 361 806 39524 1395

100
ANNEXURE-III: Justification For +/- 10% Change in Contraceptive Performance 2017-18
as Compared to the Last Year in Respect of Population Welfare Departments, Departments
Of Health (HFs & LHWs) and NGO(s).
%Age
Source Department Change in
CYP for Justification
2017-18 as
Compared to
2016-17
POPULATION WELFARE DEPARTMENTS (PWDs)
1 Population Welfare Department, 32.9% The significant increase of 32.9% in terms of CYP, in the contraceptive
Punjab, Lahore performance during 2017-18 as compared to 2016-17 is primarily due to
following reasons:

 Expansion of service delivery network through:

o Establishment of 600FWCs (under ADP Scheme) in addition to
existing FWCs.
o Induction of Community Based Family Planning Workers
(CBFPWs) through ADP Scheme.
o Establishment of 11FHCs (under ADP Scheme) in addition to
existing FHCs.
o Functioning of 86 MSUs.

 Zero tolerance for stock-out, contraceptive stock availability is

monitored at all service delivery outlets through Contraceptive
Logistics Management Information System. Consequently, stock-
out remained less than 1%.
 Introduction of new ADP Scheme for provision of Family Planning
services.
2 Population Welfare Department, -2% -
Sindh, Karachi.

3 Population Welfare Department, -14.0% The significant decrease of 14% in terms of CYP, in the contraceptive
KPK, Peshawar. performance during 2017-18 as compared to 2016-17 is due to following
reasons:
o The District Population Welfare Officers had received less
quantity of Contraceptive against their requisition during 2017-
18.
o Supply of IUCD was on hold due to some technical issue as
reported by inspection committee.
o Provincial procurement of Condoms were received in October
2017 before that loan quantities were provided less than
demanded. Oral Pills (POP) & (ECP) were also stock-out at CW
& S Karachi.
o Most of Women Medical Officers (WMOs) posts were lying
vacant during the reported period due to which the performance
has declined. 12 out of 31 WMOs are performing their duties at
Reproductive Health Services Centers-A.
4 Population Welfare Department, -6.6% -
Balochistan, Quetta.

5 District Population Welfare -7.4% -

Office, Islamabad.

101
 6 Department Of Population -11.2% The significant decrease of 11.2% in terms of CYP, in the contraceptive
Welfare, AJK, Muzaffarabad. performance during 2017-18 as compared to 2016-17 is due to the
following reasons:
i. Due to non-approval of PC-1, no funds were released during 2017-18
against approved PSDP, which resulted in limited field activities.

ii. Medicines which are source of attraction for clients especially female
that could not be purchased during 2017-18.

iii. Most of the positions of women Medical Officer are laying vacant at
RHSC-As and MSUs.

iv. Information Education and Communication activities to promote

family planning activities could not be conducted
7 Population Welfare Directorate, 13.1% The significant increase of 13.1% in terms of CYP, in the contraceptive
Gilgit-Baltistan, performance during 2017-18 as compared to 2016-17 is due to induction
of Women Medical Officers (WMOs).
8 Population Welfare Directorate, -9.6% -
FATA, Peshawar.

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH (HEALTH FACILITIES)

1 The Department of Health, -7.1% The significant decrease of 7.1% in terms of CYP, in the contraceptive
Punjab, Lahore performance during 2017-18 as compared to 2016-17 is due to short
supply of Family Planning Commodities.
2 Department of Health, 53.7% Justification regarding +/- 10% response has not been provided by
Sindh, Hyderabad. source agency in spite of repeated request.

3 Department of Health, -24.0% Justification regarding +/- 10% response has not been provided by
Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, source agency in spite of repeated request.
Peshawar.

4 Department of Health, -7.8% -

Balochistan, Quetta.

5 The Department of Health, 61.0% The significant increase of 61% in terms of CYP, in the contraceptive
Islamabad performance during 2017-18 as compared to 2016-17 is due to the
following factors:
o Availability of sufficient quantity of contraceptive items at health
outlets.
o Efficient staff, prevailing increased awareness level in Islamabad.
o Proper maintenance of recording and timely reporting.
6 Department of Health, Azad 57.0% Justification regarding +/- 10% response has not been provided by
Jammu & Kashmir, source agency in spite of repeated request.
Muzaffarabad
7 Department of Health, Gilgit- 141.4% Response regarding Justification of +/-10 % has not been received.
Baltistan, Gilgit

8 The Department of Health, 23.2% Response regarding Justification of +/-10 % has not been received.
FATA, Peshawar.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH (LHWs)
1 Department of Health -35.4% The IRMNCH Program could not procure contraceptives during F.Y 2017-
(LHWs), Punjab, Lahore 18, whereas in two consecutive years 2015-2016 & 2016-2017 there were
ample supplies of contraceptive available for the fieldworkers. In 2017-
18, the field staff had limited supplies for FP Service provision in the

102
 community which cause decline in annual CYP generated by LHW
Program.

2 Department of Health 2.9% -

(LHWs), Sindh, Hyderabad.
3 Department of Health 1.6% -
(LHWs), Khyber
Pakhtunkhwa, Peshawar.
4 DoH (LHWs), Balochistan, -27.6% The significant decrease of 27.6% in terms of CYP, in the contraceptive
Quetta. performance during 2017-18 as compared to 2016-17 is due to the
following:
o The number of district reported during 2017-18 was lower than the
previous year.
o Some districts (Pishin, Zhob, Khuzdar, Harnai etc.) reported zero
number of contraceptive users during this period.
5 Department of Health 141.3% The significant increase of 141.3% in terms of CYP, in the contraceptive
(LHWs), Islamabad performance during 2017-18 as compared to 2016-17 is due to the
following factors:
o Availability of sufficient quantity of contraceptive items at health
outlets.
o Efficient staff, prevailing increased awareness level in Islamabad.
o Proper maintenance of recording and timely reporting.
6 The Family Planning and -2.4%
Primary Health Care -
Program , Azad Jammu &
Kashmir, Muzaffarabad
7 The National Program for -100% No supplies received from USAID and no local purchase made for
FP & PHC FATA, Peshawar contraceptive items due to limitations of budget during 2017-18.

8 The National Program for 37.3% The significant increase of 37.3% in terms of CYP, in the contraceptive
FP & PHC, Gilgit- Baltistan, performance during 2017-18 as compared to 2016-17 is due to better
Gilgit mobilization of field staff and readily availability of contraceptives.
NGOs
1 Rahnuma Family -6.6% -
Planning Association
of Pakistan
(Rahnuma FPAP),
Lahore.
2 Marie Stopes Society -22.4% o The significant decrease of 22.4% in terms of CYP, in the
(MSS), Karachi. contraceptive performance during 2017-18 as compared to
2016-17 is due to the following key reasons:
o After completion of our Reproductive Health Franchise (RHF)
project, 1000 Pehli Kiran provided were separated from the
MMS network in July -2017 which is the main reason for
generating (-22.4%) less CYPs compare to the proceeding
years.
o Increased scrutiny and reduction in operating space for civil
society organizations like MMS and other rights-based NGOs
by law enforcement and Intelligence Agencies (LEIAs) which
started in the last week of Jan-2018 and continued through
until end of June-2018. Consequently, MMS field operations
remained restricted and non-functional in some districts.

103
3 Greenstar Social -12% Social Marketing & Social Franchising of contraceptives predominantly
Marketing (GSM), generating CYP through FP Programs sponsored by donors, donor’s
Karachi availability and continuation of programs. The significant decrease of
12% in terms of CYP, in the contraceptive performance during 2017-18
as compared to 2016-17 is due to the following reasons:

o Limited service delivery related to availability and delivery of long-

acting methods at service providers which are part of the GSM
Social Franchise Network.
o Discontinuation of two key donor funded programs pertaining to
Social Franchise Network and
o Transition period involved lasted for 6-months in the fiscal year
2017-18.

104
 ANNEXURE-IV: Statement on Bottlenecks hindering the Progress & New Initiatives
taken to enhance the Progress, as supplied by the Source Agencies.
S. # Name of Department Bottlenecks Initiatives for 2017-18 and onward
1. The Population Welfare  Warehousing of Contraceptive: Punjab is committed to provide universal access to
Department (PWD), Punjab, Before devolution warehousing of quality reproductive health care and take steps for
Lahore. contraceptive was the subject of youth development and women empowerment. For
Federal Government, However upon the purpose, Punjab aims to adopt a multi-sectoral
devolution, efforts have been approach by involving all stakeholders in public and
undertaken to construct Warehouse private sector in line with Punjab Population Policy
at provincial level but due to non- 2017 to capture the Demographic Dividend. In order
provision of land from the to achieve this vision, work on following strategic
Government of Punjab the matter is areas has been initiated.
still pending which results in
Population Welfare Department, Human resource development is Imperative for
Punjab to bear logistic charges for planned and organized execution of population
supply of contraceptives from central welfare activities. Training conducted during Fiscal
warehouse, Karachi to the districts of Year 2107-18 is given below:
Punjab.
24- Training Training of Orientation
 Weak follow-up: Weak follow-up Months of FWAS/ Training
and monitoring of clients due to less RTI Diploma Doctors FWWS/
strength of outreach workers. LHVS/
CMWS
Financial Constraints: Lahore 57 - 499 989
 Non-availability of funding through Multan 59 - 604 736
PSDP. Sahiwal 47 - 199 87
 Lack of funding from Provincial Faisalabad 50 45 600 480
Total 213 45 1902 2292
Government.
 PC-1(Amounting to Rs. 6961.831
Advocacy communication strategy:
Millions) for Population Welfare
2017-18 was a year of consolidation of the campaign
Programme, Punjab (2017-20)
started in the previous year based upon the
prepared and submitted to Federal
guidelines given in population policy 2017. The
Government through P&D for
Campaign focused on voluntary adoption of small
approval, has been returned back
family norms through public awareness campaign.
due to non-availability of funds.
Supported by community based counseling and
 Finance Department sanctioned
motivational efforts. The campaign consisted of two
9978 posts in SNE 2017-18 i.e. in
main parts i.e. print and electronic media being
position strength. 3809 posts have
managed by provincial office while outreach plan by
not been sanctioned by Finance
field offices. The outreach plan strengthens and
Department. Due to this Department
focusing on renewing the strategy of Inter Personnel
is unwillingly bound to close number
Communication (IPC) onward which was based on
service delivery outlets instead of
modern principles of behavior change and
increasing accessibility of services.
communication (BBC) strategy.
 Operational difficulties due to old
vehicles.
 Scarcity of funds for advocacy Expansion of Service Delivery Outlets:
campaign. The department attaches highest priorities to
 Absence of regional setup. enhance coverage and access to family planning
 Non-replacement of old Monitoring information and services at community level.
vehicles: To strengthen the cadre of Attending to high unmet need are focused to attain
TPWO and effecting monitoring replacement level fertility.
urgent replacement of old
monitoring vehicles is a dire need at Expansion of Family Welfare Centers:
all levels. In addition to the existing network of 1500 FWCs 600
 Only one post Deputy Director to run new FWCs have been established during the 2014-
IEC campaign/ activities at 18 in phased manner down to Union Council level in
provincial level although a full 22 district of Punjab with lowest contraceptive

105
directorate was functional before prevalence rate. However 400 FWCs caped on the
2002. direction of the P&D Department Health Sector.

Introduction to Community Based Family

Planning Workers:
In order to bridge the gap between the facility and
community 900 community based Family Planning
Workers have been inducted during 2014-18 in lowest
CPR district of Punjab however, this induction have
been capped down on the direction on P&D
Department.

Refurbishment of Clinical Services:

During financial year 2017-18 initiatives have been
taken to reactivate 20 more Mobile Service Units in 9
district of Punjab which provides total 86 functional
Mobile Service Units. 20 specialized vehicles have
been sent for refurbishment and the process for the
recruitment of WMOs has been initiated.

Franchising of Clinical Services

Partnership with private sector is an effectively proven
strategy for geographically hard to reach population
or for whom the opening timing for public service
delivery outlets may be inconvenient. Clinical
franchising is service delivery approached in which
small independent health care businesses are
organized to quality assure network. In 5 districts the
franchising of clinical services is piloted in two phases
2016-17 & 2017-18 through which in every district 5
doctors and 20 paramedics have engaged to provide
FP services.

Establishment of Adolescence Reproductive

Health Education Cell:
Through ADP scheme 2016-18 Adolescence
Reproductive Health Education Cell have been
established to address adolescent issues at the basic
level. Lectures regarding adolescent issues, life skill
base education, Health and Hygiene were delivered
to girls and boys in schools and colleges by male and
female doctors.

Costed Implementation Plan (CIP):

A well-defined Costed Implementation Plan (CIP) for
FP in a country or province would serve as a major
instrument to raise priority of family planning and in
particular for achieving FP 2020 commitments. The
CIP includes multiyear strategic approach that
defines strategies and activities, maps-out and
coordinates investments, and presents a combined
approach towards resource mobilization for achieving
FP goals. CIP has been approved and in process of
implementation to achieve target oriented results.

106
2. The Population Welfare i. Still have some gaps in integration  Functional Integration with Department of
and coordination in relevant Health: PWDs and DOH are sharing task at
Department (PWD), Sindh,
departments to bring all on one page service delivery level. DOH has notified that
Karachi in achieving FP 2020 goals. Some LHWs after training can introduce first dose of
outlets outsourced by the Health injection. Health facilities are now to providing
Department are not properly post-partum family planning.
streamlined.  Involvement of Private Sector: Private health
ii. Besides, Development partners yet sector has been engaged in Family Planning by
to streamline further for functional registering them as Reproductive Health
integration at sub district level Services B Centers to expand the FP service
iii. Facing challenges in local network and to reach out to the remote
manufactures of contraceptives population. Around 250 private health outlets
iv. International Procurement and and service providers have been registers as
Delivery of contraceptives RHS-B centers throughout Sindh including
v. Delivery of contraceptives below RMPs and NGOs. Population Welfare
district, sub district and facility/ Departments Sindh provide them free of costs
provider contraceptives under MoUs and share data with
vi. Data quality and accuracy the departments.
vii. Delays in reporting (from Health &  Task shifting to the service provider level:
development partners) Family Welfare Workers / Family Welfare
viii. Lack / delay of budget to conduct Counselors/Field Technical Officers are now
monitoring visits in fields trained in implant insertion and are providing
ix. Capacity issue of field staff services to the eligible women. Previously this
service was available only at specific Centers,
by Women Medical Officers are posted.
 Life Skill Based Education (LSBE): Life Skill
Based Education is being taught in syllabus in
Sindh.
3. The PWD, Khyber 2017-18(Approved Scheme)
Pakhtunkhwa, Peshawar  Innovative Scheme for promotion of Population
Welfare Programme for achieving SDGs,
FP2020 Goals and vision of Population Policy.
Under this scheme the following initiatives have
been taken:
 Establishment of Population Welfare Training
Institute.
 Establishment of 04 Adolescent Sexual
Reproductive Health (ASRH) Centre.
 Initiative of Joint Communication Strategy with
Health Department.
HR
 Regularization of 500 staff of various cadre from
the project mode to the current side.
 55 New posts of various cadre created during
2017-18 on regular side.
 Establishment of two new districts i.e. Kolai
Palas and Upper Kohistan.
 Merger of 7 tribal districts and bring them on
current side of Provincial budget.
Capacity Building
Training conducted by PWD KP during 2017-18 for
capacity building of its staff and the general
community.
 48 Master trainers from both PWD and DoH
trained on long Acting Reversible contraceptive

107
 (LARC) methods including Post-Partum IUCD
insertion.
 Training of Y-Peers from four districts of KPK
including Swat, Peshawar, D.I.Khan and Kohat
on communication, counseling and information
about program and its interventions. These
young people’s will act as advocate for adoption
of modern family planning in their respective
localities.
 HRBA (Human Rights Based Approach on FP):
50 services providers including WMOs, FWWs
and FTO of PWD KPK trained during 2017-18.
 Population Projection Welfare Officers,
Demographers and Woman Medical Officers on
three different software to develop their district
specific action plan to meet Provincial, National
and International commitment.
 Training on adolescence sexual and
reproductive health (ASRH) and PWD and
Health Care Professional to role out ASRH
program at district and divisional level.
4. The Population Welfare Response is still awaited Response is still awaited
Department, Balochistan,
Quetta
5. District Population Welfare  No service delivery expansion has  To increase the population coverage
Office, , Islamabad. been made. following initiatives have been taken :-
 The population coverage is o Group meetings of Social
decreasing each year. Mobilizers were held in far flung
 The proportion of contribution in areas.
maintenance of indicator is o Number of Mobile Service Unit
decreasing as compared to private Camps were increased and held
sector. in outreach areas.
 Vacant have not been filled since o Special Family Welfare Assistant
the devolution. (Male) & (Female) were directed
 On transfer of the population to visit the outreach areas of
welfare program from development union councils.
budget to current budget, 69 posts
including 57 technical posts have
been abolished by the FA’s
organization (Finance Division).
 No special storage facility for
contraceptive is available in District
stores.
 No new initiative regarding career
planning of field staff to evaluate
the morale of staff has been carried
out.
All of the above mentioned facts
are hindering the progress of
DPOW and are being addressed at
different forums for its early
resolution accordingly.
6. The Population Welfare Financial Constraints Population Welfare Department, AJ&K is committed
Directorate, AJ&K,  Due to non-approval of PC-1, no to provide universal access to quality reproductive
Muzaffarabad funds were released during 2017- health care. For the purpose PWD, AJK has
18 against approved PSDP. submitted a PC-1 (2017-20) to M/o NHS,R&C

108
 Medicines which are the source of Islamabad for approval from the competent forum. In
attraction for clients especially order to achieve the envisaged targets, following
female could not be purchased strategic areas have been initiated:
during financial year 2017-18. Enhanced coverage and access to Family
 Information, education and Planning Services at community level.
communication activities to  During the Three Year Plan (2017-20), FWCs
promote family planning could not apart from contraception will extend antenatal,
be conducted. postnatal and general health services for
mothers and infants through satellite camps.
Low strength of FMOs  MSUs will be revitalized to cater the needs of
 Many positions of FMOs are laying hard to reach and remote areas.
vacant at RHSC-As and MSUs due  RHSC-As will hold extension camps activity to
to unattractive salary package. ensure availability of Contraceptive Surgery on
a wider scale.
Service Delivery Network  Private sector hospitals will be registered as
 Service Delivery Network stands RHS-B and will be encouraged to provide FP
frozen at the level of 2008. Existing services.
strength of service delivery outlets Reforming High Risk Fertility Behaviour.
cannot cater the scattered  A Behaviour Change Communication (BCC)
population across hard to reach and Information, Education and Communication
terrain of AJ&K. (IEC) campaign will be launched that will focus
on family well-being, small family norms, birth
spacing, reproductive health, nutrition and
mobilization of resources involved in population
and development information.
 Capacity building of Human Resource.
 25 females will be pass out during 2018-19 after
completion of 24 month diploma for FWWs
 Clinical trainings for program personnel and
non-program personnel have been scheduled in
the plan period 2017-20.

 Uninterrupted availability of Quality

Contraceptives.
 At present USAID is providing contraceptives
and has given commitment for the supply up to
2019.
 An amount of Rs. 28.00 million has been
allocated in PC-1(2017-20) for purchase of
contraceptives for the year 2019-20.
 Developing Partnership for Enhancing
Coverage and Access to Services.
 Partnership will be developed with non-
governmental organizations, private sector,
community based organizations and civil society
organizations for arrangement of satellite camps
to resolve unmet need, extend coverage and
particularly to reach out to remote households.
 Provision of contraceptives through private
clinics in rural communities, urban slums and
under-served districts will be focused.
 Functional Integration of Health and
Population Welfare Departments for FP
Services.
 For functional integration the services &
resources of Health Department will be utilized

109
 during the plan period. Contraceptives and
literature containing information about Family
Planning, mother and child health will be
ensured at all health service outlets.
 Lady Health Workers (LHWs) will be utilized for
arrangement of camps for Mobile Service Units
of Population Welfare Department in far flung
areas. For this purpose each LHW will be given
Rs.1000/camp as incentive. Community
Midwives (CMWs) will be nominated as sale
points of contraceptives. For this purpose each
CMW will be given Rs.500/month.
 Involvement of Religious Scholars/ Ulemas.
 The religious scholars and ulemas can play a
great role for family planning as they were
successfully utilized to control high growth rate
in some Muslim countries. They can carry the
message to the union council level especially in
rural areas.
 During the plan period seminars focusing on
“Family Planning and Islam” have been
proposed in each district. Financial incentive @
Rs.1000/= per participant of these seminars is
also proposed.

Due to non-approval of PC-1(2017-20) activities

planned for the year 2017-18 were not performed
accordingly, which resulted in decrease of progress.

7. Population Welfare  Non-Approval of Three Year Plan New initiatives have been proposed in three Year
Directorate, Government of (2017-20), PC-1 Population Welfare Plan (2017-20) , PC-1 of Population Welfare
Gilgit-Baltistan, Gilgit. Program, Gilgit Baltistan Program, Gilgit Baltistan currently under
 Non-release of funds allocated for consideration with Ministry of Planning, Development
Population Welfare Program Gilgit and Reforms Islamabad for approval of Central
Baltistan for Financial Year 2017-18 Development Working party (CDWP). Approval is still
& 2018-19 allocated under Federal awaited to implement new initiatives envisaged
PSDP therein.
 Non Expansion in service delivery
network
 Suspension of Mobile Service Units
camps (MSUs) due to non-
availability of funds
8. Population Welfare There are certain issues related to
Directorate, Tribal Districts Population Welfare Programme Tribal
(EX-FATA) Peshawar Districts (Ex-FATA) which are retarding
progress of Population Welfare
Services. Some of the major issues are
as follows:

i. Status of Proposed PC1 2017-

20: As the Previous PC-I has
ended and a new PC-I (2017-20)
was prepared which will enhance
performance of the programme but
it is still under process for approval.

110
 A pre-CDWP was held, however,
due to merger of FATA with KPK,
the routing channel changed with
delayed its approval as per the
following detail.
ii. After pre-CDWP on 14/05/2018 the
PC-1 (2017-20) for Population
Welfare Program Tribal Districts
was amended in light of the
minutes of the Pre-CDWP and was
forwarded to Ministry National
Health Services, Regulation &
Coordination Islamabad, however,
the Ministry vide letter No.F.4-
19/2018-Dir(P&D) dated
17/09/2018 requested to submit
the PC-1 (2017-20) through
Population Welfare Department /
P&D department Khyber
Pakhtunkhwa duly approved
(recommended) by competent
authority / forum.
iii. Budgetary Issue: Since the
devolution of Ministry of Population
Welfare under 18th amendment,
Population Welfare Programme
Tribal Districts (EX-FATA) has not
received budget as per allocation
under PC-1,s. The budget being
provided is not sufficient for
establishment charges, therefore
no expansion in the service delivery
outlets or recruitment of more staff
during the last seven years. All the
services are provided through the
staff strength and service delivery
outlets structure of pre-devolution
period.
iv. Job Security of staff: It is a
universally accepted principle that
job security plays a vital role in
commitment and devotion of
employees. However,
unfortunately, the employees
working in Population Welfare
Programme Tribal Districts (EX-
FATA) are still working under
volatile service structure- being
funded from PSDP. The same
structure and nature of employees
working on provincial side (KPK)
has been transformed from
developmental to current budget
and are having a secure service
future with promotion prospects.
This directorate took submitted

111
 SNE of Population Welfare
Programme Tribal Districts (EX-
FATA) employees for shifting to
current budget to Finance Division,
Islamabad through Finance
Department Tribal Districts (EX-
FATA) Secretariat but Finance
Division replied to approach the
Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Government
to meet the requirements for the
purpose. The same has been
forwarded to KP Government for
necessary action.
v. Socio cultural constraints: Unlike
settle area, society in Tribal
Districts (EX-FATA) is more
traditional and resistant to Family
Planning. Larger families are
considered more powerful, hence,
Family Planning is unattractive for
the society. In this connection
supplementing of Family Planning
services through general medicines
is a tool to attract tribal population
to Population Welfare Service
Delivery Outlets but unfortunately
less budgetary allocation always
remains a hurdle.
vi. Participation of staff in Polio
eradication Campaign: It is worth
mentioning that the staff of
Population Welfare Programme
Tribal Districts (EX-FATA) also
actively participates in polio
eradication campaign which
hinders their services in family
planning.

9. Rahnuma- Family Planning i. Non availability of - As per new strategy, the tubal ligation clients
Association of Pakistan, commodities at some were mobilized and provided with the services at
Lahore provinces. Rahnuma FPAP own clinics.
ii. Increase in cost of - Civil Society collectively advocating with
commodities in open government for timely commodities supply.
market. - Negotiating with government for low cost
iii. Free of cost commodities commodity supply.
available in Sindh - Interaction with Sindh Government for supply of
province but some IUD and Implants.
commodities were not - Part time male doctors hired within system.
provided e.g. IUCD and
Implant.
iv. Turnover of male doctors
trained on male
vasectomy.

112
 v. RHE camps allocated
area limited by PWD in
Punjab province.
vi. Vary far flung and
challenging areas
allocated by PWD in
Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
province.
10 Marie Stopes Society (MSS),  Re-registration issues  MSS revised pricing in Nov-Dec 2017 for all
Karachi  Increased scrutiny and reduction in services in line with affordability/paying potential
operating space for civil society across each districts.
NGOs by government agencies  Conducted special days for services from
during January to June, 2018. November, 2017 where services are provided at
Consequently, MSS field subsidized rates.
operations remained non-  Revised and implement a new Subsidized
functional in some districts of Treatment Fund (STF) policy for all services
Punjab from January, 2018 to onwards under which no
woman is turned away based on her inability to
pay. Rather, she is treated and missing amount
is bridged through the STF.
 250 SF providers and 15 outreach teams are
providing services in Punjab districts through
new project “Delivering Accelerated Family
Planning in Pakistan (DAFPAK)”.

11 Greenstar Social Marketing - -

(GSM), Karachi.
12 Department of Health (HF), 1. Contraceptive Procurement: i. Expanding the HR at all levels in DoH including
KPK, Peshawar. Though recently the commodities induction of Medical officers (6000 new
have been procured jointly by PWD induction), Paramedics, Vaccinators, LHWs and
and DoH KPK but it took very long CMWs (LHWs no. increased to 15850, CMWs
time of two years because it is increased to 2185 )
international procurement and ii. Policy on involvement of CMWs/LHWs in all
need sufficient time for completion contraceptives distribution.
of the process. This lengthy iii. Capacity building of new inductees and refresher
process could hinder the of existing staff (HTSP, GBV, Counseling, LAC.)
uninterrupted contraceptive supply. iv. Uninterrupted supply of contraceptives to all
To overcome this problem pool concerned levels.
procurement of contraceptives at v. Post-Partum Family Planning Strategy.
Federal Level for all provinces is vi. Task sharing and Task Shifting in FP.
needed or vii. New Born Survival Strategy.
The PWD at provincial level must viii. Establishment of 24/7 BEmONC services at
take lead for procurement of selected 85 RHCs/Cat D across KP (providing
contraceptives for all FP outlets of FP services too).
PWD and Health at the analogy of ix. Maternal and Perinatal Death surveillance and
Sindh Govt. As Population response
Department, has one point agenda x. Mapping of RH/FP Health Facilities including
of FP/Population Control so the Health, Population, NGOs and Private Sector.
commodities security must be their xi. Regular quarterly meetings of the RH Core group
prime responsibility for ensuring (Health) and Provincial Technical Coordination
the coverage of unmet need of Committee (PTCC) (Population) to share the
population. progress, achievements, and identify the gaps in
2. Warehousing: FP Commodities service provision.
for both departments (DoH and xii. Joint CIP (Costed Implementation Plan) of PWD
PWD) are jointly procured and are and Health.
stored in the central warehouse

113
 Karachi. Both Departments xiii. Interfacing of FP reports of all stakeholders of the
maintain close cooperation with province including DoH, PWD, LHW, MNCH and
CW & S for storage needs. There is NGOs
a pressing need to create xiv. Notifying FP as part of mandatory services for
warehousing and storage Healthcare Facilities under DOH and Private
capacities at the provincial level to Sector and NGOs
seamlessly link each of the supply xv. Inclusion of RH indicators on Monitoring Dash
chain functions in a manner that board of IMU (independent Monitoring Unit)
ensures evidence based actions at xvi. MNCH Very Essential Medicine List (22
each level. Both the departments medicines included and notified) along with
fully realize the need to focus on conceptive, considering its low cost and high
developing storage capacities impact with a commitment to ensure full supplies
which are identified as the weakest round the clock across all health facilities.
link in the entire supply chain.
Department of Health (HF), i. The Health Department GB is i. All the LHWs have been given refresher
Gilgit Baltistan not procuring contraceptive training on primary health care services
commodities due to shortage of including family planning services.
fiscal space in regular budget. ii. Monitoring and supervision mechanism of
USAID was supplying the the family planning program and services
contraceptive commodities to have been improved.
Health Department GB from iii. The cost of transportation of contraceptive
their warehouse in Karachi till commodities has been proposed in the
2016 through USAID Deliver budget of upcoming Financial Year budget
Project and transport charges of National program of FP&PHC 2019-
from Karachi to various districts 2020.
of GB was also beard by iv. Contraceptive commodities such as pills
USAID. After the closure of the and condoms have been provided in 06 out
project in 2016, the Provincial of 10 districts health offices of GB.
Departments were made
responsible to bear the cost of
transportation of contraceptive
commodities. However, due to
non-availability of funds at
Health Department Gilgit-
Baltistan under the aforesaid
head, the logistic supplies
could not made available.
There is interrupted supply of
logistics from central
warehouse Karachi.
ii. The USAID also direct the
department to impose
commodity charges on client
and deposit the amount thus
collected in government
exchequer as a result the client
refused to get the services from
LHWs and CPR dropped.
iii. Harsh weather condition and
frequent road blockades and
landslides in the area hinder the
supply of the commodities.
iv. Acceptability of family planning
services due to socio cultural
and religious barriers in some
districts of GB.

114
ANNEXURE-V: STATEMENT ON FP2020 (TARGETS VS ACHIEVEMENTS) IN RESPECT
OF POPULATION WELFARE DEPARTMENTs.
S. # Name of Targets & Achievements(As Supplied by the Source Agencies)
Department
1. Population Welfare The targets for Contraceptive Prevalence Rate (CPR) committed by Punjab Province during the
Department, National Population Summit held in 2015 to raise the CPR to 55% by 2020.
Government of Year Targets (%) Achievements (%)
Punjab, Lahore. 2013-14 43.09 40.01
2014-15 44.18 41.48
2015-16 46.34 43.04
2016-17 48.51 -
2017-18 50.67 38.3
2018-19 52.84 --
2019-20 55.00 --
*Not provided by PWD, Punjab
2.
Population Welfare FP 2020 targets of PWD Sindh are as under:
Department, Year Increase per annum Additional users mCPR%
Government of 2012 up 1,638,534 24.5
Sindh, Karachi 2013 1.5% 136,504 26.0
2014 1.5% 140,459 27.5
2015 1.5% 144,595 29.0
2016 1.5% 148,640 30.5
2017 1.5% 152,685 32.0
2018 1.5% 156,731 33.5
2019 1.5% 160,776 35.0
2020 1.5% 164,821 36.5
Sub Total 2,843,835
Additional Traditional 08.0
Method
Total 44.5
It has been further intimated that year wise CPR could not be determined from reporting data, therefore
we may wait for any National or Provincial survey. However, Multi Indicators Cluster Survey (MICS
Sindh) 2014 shows CPR 29% of all methods and 24.8% of modern methods.
3. Population Welfare Year-wise targets for achieving of 42% Contraceptive Prevelance Rate (CPR) as per FP2020
Department, Commitment will be revised with the revision of Population Policy of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. However for
Government KP the year 2017-18 Khyber Pakhtunkhwa has achieved 30.9% CPR (PDHS 2017-18).
Peshawar.
4. Population Welfare FP-2020 target for the year 2020 has been fixed as 32% CPR. The current CPR of the province is 22.6
Department, % which has been estimated based on the trend of the nearest past surveys calculated with the help of
Government of Family Planning Estimating Tools (FPET).
Baluchistan, Quetta
5 District Population As per statistics available , following targets & achievement are forecasted:
Welfare Office ,
Govt. of Pakistan, Component/Indicator Baseline/Achievement Target
Islamabad Family Welfare Centres 31 42
Social Mobilizer 20 35
Contraceptive Prevalence Rate (CPR) 59.6% (PDHS, 2012-13) 60%
Total Fertility Rate (TFR) 3.00 (PDHS, 2012-13) -
Population Growth Rate 4.91 Population Census -
2017 Preliminary Results
Note:

115
 I) It has been informed by District Population Welfare Office (DPWO), Islamabad that the DPWO has no
trained technical and non-technical infrastructural set up to complete the assignment of FP2020 targets
& achievements.

II) Achievement of targets of FP2020 is subject to achievement of service delivery expansion and provision
of funds by the Finance Division.

6. Population Welfare The targets for Contraceptive Prevalence Rate (CPR) during 2018-19 and 2019-20 are as under.
Directorate,
Government of AJK, Year CPR Targets
Muzaffarabad. 2018-19 29%
2019-20 30%

7. Population Welfare
Directorate Year Total Fertility Rate (TFR) Contraceptive Prevalence Rate (CPR)
Government of Targets Achievements Targets Achievements
Gilgit Baltistan, 2016-17 3.8 4.6 38 38.1
Gilgit 2017-18 4.4 4.6 40 38

8. Population Welfare Target based on PC-1 (2017-20)

Directorate,
FATA, Peshawar Name of 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20
Contraceptive Targets Achievements Target Target Target
Condoms 291,173 291,173 349,407 862,255 1,241,647
Oral Pills (CoC) 43,155 53,943 88,244 105,893 152,485
Oral Pills (PoP) 5,394
Postin Tablets 5,394
IUDs Cu-T 380 5,770 7,694 37,790 45,348 65,302
IUDs Multiload 1,923
Net-En Injection 13,887 9,675 11,610 16,718
DMPA Injection 13,887 27,774

The targets are based on the New proposed PC-1 for the period (2017-20), which was prepared in
response to Ministry of National Health Services, Regulations& Coordination, and Islamabad letters No.
52(2)/201/Dir P&D dated 31.07.2017 is in process for approval in Planning Commission Islamabad.
Currently the program is running on the same caped budget. Therefore, no expansion and recruitment of
service providers is possible. Resultantly, there occurs some deficiency in achieving the targets.

9 Department of Year Contraceptive Prevalence Total Fertility Rate (TFR) Training on Family
Health (LHWs), Rate (CPR) Planning
Government of Targets Achievements Targets Achievements Targets Achievements
Gilgit Baltistan, 2017-18 40 39 4.4 4.7 1365 1365 LHWs
Gilgit (PDHS 2017-18) (PDHS 2017-18) LHWs have been
trained

116
 S. # Name of Targets & Achievements(As Supplied by the Source Agencies)
Department
10. Rahnuma- Family Methods Quarterly CYP Achievement (2017-18) Total (CYP)
Planning Association Jul-Spt,2017 Oct-Dec,2017 Jan-Mar,2018 Apl-Jun,2018
of Pakistan, Lahore IUCD 310601 387108 363713 368883 1430305
Inj.(Depo) 27975 30339 27441 32223 117978
Inj.(Norigest) 86 49 45 50 230
Implant 969 1220 1094 2310 5593
Condom 2073 2267 3298 3231 10869
Oral Pills 3010 3483 3445 3501 13439
EC Pills 212 301 288 344 1145
Sterilization/CS 610 750 340 560 2260
(Male)
Sterilization/CS 9150 13620 12520 9300 44590
(Female)
Total (CYP) 354686 439137 412184 420402 1626409
Overall Projected CYP Performance Indicator (PIs) & Achievement
Year Performance Indicator (PIs) Achievements Remarks
(million) (million)
2014 1.450 0.99 Annual
2015 1.645 1.06 Annual
2016 1.800 1.38 Annual
2017 1.996 1.65 Annual
2018 2.150 1.68 Annual
2019 2.250 -
2020 2.350 -
Total 13.741
Note: Achievement against PIs in any given year is subject to donor funding, socio-political situation, supply chain
management of contraceptives etc.
11.
Marie Stopes Society To assess the contribution to FP2020, MSS has measured its cumulative contribution/achievements from
(MSS), Karachi 2012 to-date. Over the last six years (2012 to 2018), MSS generated 1.2 million additional FP users and
contributed 3.5 percentage points to the national modern Contraceptive Prevalence Rate (mCPR).
12. Greenstar Social The number of users that GSM will be adding to the national framework through its services is as under:
Marketing (GSM),
Karachi Commodities/ FP Users by Methods
Products 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-2022 20202-23
Condoms 1,272,039 1454,072 1,620,022 1796,812 1,983,911
Pills 213,514 231,056 249,838 268,271 287,040
Injectables 178,992 191,181 203,498 215,665 227,558
IUDs 201,790 222,011 241,970 262,513 283,488
Total FP Users 1,866,335 2,098,320 2,315,328 2,543,261 2,781,996

117
Annexure-VI: Pakistan: FP2020 Core Indicators Summary Sheet 2017 & FP2020 Core
Indicators 1-9 Country Fact Sheet.

Contd....

118
119
ANNEXURE-VII: Performae, developed / utilized for collection of Contraceptive Performance data from Population
Welfare Department, Department of Health (Health Facility) & Department of Health (LHW) and NGO(s).

CLR-11) POPULATION WELFARE DEPARTMENT-

DISTRICT-WISE PROVINCIAL CONTRACEPTIVE STOCK AND SALE REPORT OF------(MATHOD NAME)
FOR THE MONTH OF -----------------------------------------

FIELD BREAK-UP
DISTRICT STORE FIELD TOTAL
S. Name FAMILY WELFARE CENTRE
No of (FWCs) MOBILE SERVICE UNITS (MSUs) RHS-A CENTRE / FHCs RHS-B CENTRE
. District RECEI OPENIN RECEI SO CLOSI OPENI RECEI SO CLOSI OPENI RECEI SO CLOSI OPENI RECEI SO CLOSI OPENI RECEI SO CLOSI
OPENING VED SOLD CLOSING G VED LD NG NG VED LD NG NG VED LD NG NG VED LD NG NG VED LD NG
BALANC BALA BALA BALA BALA BALA BALA BALA BALA BALA
BALANCE BALANCE E NCE NCE NCE NCE NCE NCE NCE NCE NCE

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

HAKEEMS/HOMEOPATHS PLDS RTIS RMPS TBAS OTHERS

Name OPENIN SOL CLOS OPENI RECE SO CLOS OPEN RECE SO CLOS OPEN RECE SO CLOS OPEN RECE SO CLOS OPEN RECE SO CLOS
of G RECEIVED D ING NG IVED LD ING ING IVED LD ING ING IVED LD ING ING IVED LD ING ING IVED LD ING
District
BALAN BALA BALAN BALA BALA BALA BALA BALA BALA BALA BALA BALA
CE NCE CE NCE NCE NCE NCE NCE NCE NCE NCE NCE

1 2 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50

120
CLR-15(used for District Population Welfare, Office, Islamabad)

District Contraceptive Stock Report

Distribution

1 Provincial Office
Office Copy for the Month
of -------------------- Year------
2 ----------- Name of District
Part-I
Contraceptive
District Store Condoms Oral Pills (Cycles) IUDs ( Insertions) Injectables (Vials) Surgery (Cases) Implant (Pieces)
Cu-T Multiload (5- NET- 3- 4- 5-
(Units) COC POP EC (10-yrs) yrs) DMPA EN Male Female Years Years Years
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14

1-Opening Balance
2-Received from CW&S Karachi
3-Issued to Field
4-Closing Balance
i) District Store
ii)Field
Total
5-Expired Stock
6-Untarceable Stock
Part-II
Field
Contraceptive
District Store Condoms Oral Pills (Cycles) IUDs ( Insertions) Injectables (Vials) Surgery (Cases) Implant (Pieces)
Cu-T Multiload (5- NET- 3- 4- 5-
(Units) COC POP EC (10-yrs) yrs) DMPA EN Male Female Years Years Years
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
01-Family Welfare Centre (FWC)
Opening
Received From District Store
Sold

121
Closing Balance
02. MSUs
Opening
Received From District Store
Sold
Closing Balance

02. MSUs
Opening

Received From District Store

Sold
Closing Balance
03. Male Mobilizers
Opening
Received From District Store
Sold
Closing Balance

04. RHS-As
Opening
Received From District Store
Sold
Closing Balance
05. RHS-Bs
Opening
Received From District Store
Sold
Closing Balance
06. RMPs
Opening
Received From District Store
Sold

122
Closing Balance
07. Hakeems
Opening
Received From District Store
Sold
Closing Balance
08. Homeopaths
Opening
Received From District Store
Sold
Closing Balance

09. PLDs
Opening
Received From District Store
Sold
Closing Balance

10. DDPs

Opening

Received From District Store

Sold

Closing Balance

11.TBAs

Opening

Received From District Store

Sold

Closing Balance

123
12. Counters

Opening

Received From District Store

Sold

Closing Balance

13. Field Total

Opening

Received From District Store

Sold

Closing Balance
Part-III

EDO (Health)

Contraceptive
District Store Condoms Oral Pills (Cycles) IUDs ( Insertions) Injectables (Vials) Surgery (Cases) Implant (Pieces)
Cu-T Multiload (5- NET- 3- 4- 5-
(Units) COC POP EC (10-yrs) yrs) DMPA EN Male Female Years Years Years
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14

Sold

124
 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH (HEALTH FACILITY)
DISTRICT-WISE CONTRACEPTIVE PERFORMANCE REPORT
Name of Province/Area/Region: ---------------------
Month -------------------------
S. No. Name District-wise Contraceptive Performance of Department of Health
of
District Condoms Oral Pills (Cycles) IUDs ( Insertions) Injectables Contraceptive Norplant (Pieces)
(Vials) Surgery (Cases)
(Units) COC POP EC Cu-T (10- Multiload (5- DMPA NET- Male Female 3- 4- 5-
yrs) yrs) EN Years Years Years

Note: Provincial level consolidated progress may be forwarded to PBS Headquarter as being practiced by Provincial Population Welfare Departments.

125
 DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
LADY HEALTH WORKERS PROGRAMME
DISTRICT-WISE PROVINCIAL CONTRACEPTIVE PERFORMANCE REPORT

Name of Province/Area/Region: ---------------------

Month -------------------------
No. of LHWs Oral Pills (Cycles) Injectables (Vials)
Name of
S.No. Reported Condoms (Pieces) NET-
District Posted COC POP EC DMPA
Performance EN

Note: Provincial level consolidated progress, may be forwarded to PBS Headquarter as being practiced by Provincial Population Welfare Departments.

126
 CONTRACEPTIVE PERFORMANCE BY NGOs

Name of NGOs----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------
Name of Province/Area/Region: ---------------------
Month -------------------------

District-wise Contraceptive Performance of NGOs Outlets

S. Name of Number of IUDs Injectables Contraceptive
No. District Service Condoms Oral Pills (Cycles) (Insertions) (Vials) Surgery (Cases) Implant (Sets)
Delivery Outlets (Units) COC POP EC Cu-T Multiload DMPA NET-EN Male Female 3-Years 4-Years 5-Years

Note: Provincial level consolidated progress, may be forwarded to PBS Headquarter as being practiced by Provincial Population
Welfare Departments.

127
ANNEXURE VIII: Updated Conversion Factors, along-with necessary details, utilized for the Computation of Couple
Years of Protection (CYP)

CYP conversion factors (Updated December 2011)

Method CYP Per Unit
Copper-T 380-A IUD 4.6 CYP per IUD inserted (3.3 for 5 year IUD e.g. LNG-IUS)
3 year implant (e.g. Implanon) 2.5 CYP per implant
4 year implant (e.g. Sino-Implant) 3.2 CYP per implant
5 year implant (e.g. Jadelle) 3.8 CYP per implant
Emergency Contraception 20 doses per CYP
Fertility Awareness Methods 1.5 CYP per trained adopter
Standard Days Method 1.5 CYP per trained adopter
LAM 4 active users per CYP (or .25 CYP per user)
Sterilization* Global 10
(India, Nepal, Bangladesh) 13
Oral Contraceptives 15 cycles per CYP
Condoms (Male and Female) 120 units per CYP
Vaginal Foaming Tablets 120 units per CYP
Depo Provera (DMPA) Injectable 4 doses per CYP
Noristerat (NET-En) Injectable 6 doses per CYP
Cyclofem Monthly Injectable 13 doses per CYP
Monthly Vaginal Ring/Patch 15 units per CYP
*The CYP conversion factor for sterilization varies because it depends on when the sterilization is performed in the reproductive life of the individual. For more specific data on
CYPs and sterilization, consult with national DHS and CDC reproductive health survey records which may provide a historical calculation based on a specific country’s context.
For Pakistan, 10 considered to be the most suitable, based upon the fact that two-third of the married women in Pakistan undergo sterilization after the age of 30 years as
informed through the Pakistan Demographic & Health Survey (PD&HS) {Source: USAID website (www.usaid.gov|)}

128