Complete Action Research RYAN C SULIVAS
Complete Action Research RYAN C SULIVAS
Complete Action Research RYAN C SULIVAS
B. Hypothesis Hypothesis
Researcher Design
The pretest was given to the grade five pupils. After the
pretest had given the “Present-Engage-Build Utilization Technique”
was utilized to the grade five pupils. To see the increase in pupils’
awareness pretest and posttest were compared. The significant
difference of the pretest and posttest were computed using the
dependent t test. The data and information gathered were
systematically checked, computed, tabulated and interpreted.
Research Locale
Research Instrument
Mean
M= ∑M
N
Where:
t-Tets
Where,
x1¯x1¯ = Mean of first set of values
x2¯x2¯ = Mean of second set of values
S1 = Standard deviation of first set of values
S2 = Standard deviation of second set of values
n1 = Total number of values in first set
n2 = Total number of values in second set.
A. Books
B. Journals/Periodicals
C. Online Sources
VIII. APPENDICES
ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS
(FISHBONE TECHNIQUE)
APPENDIX B
Work Plan
RESEARCH TIME FRAME
ACTIVITIES
DECEMBER JANUARY FEBRUARY
3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4
Formulation of action
research title and
proposal
Seek permission to
the proper authorities
Checking of action
research proposal-
SCHOOL LEVEL
Revision of the
proposal
Initial assessment of
the proposal
Evaluation of the
approved proposal
Implementing and
Conducting of the
action research
*distribution of TEST
*collecting of data
*Processing and
Analyzing of data
Preparing the final
research paper to
complete
Submission and
presentation of the
result of the action
research
___________________________________________________________