Set 1 2 3 Possible Questions Uring The Oral Defense
Set 1 2 3 Possible Questions Uring The Oral Defense
Set 1 2 3 Possible Questions Uring The Oral Defense
Question 1: In few sentences, are you able to tell us what your study is all about?
The question is simple right? Many professors will tell you that the majority students get
choked on an issue like this. Anyways the question is straightforward , but a touch technical.
To answer this question, you would like to understand every detail of your scientific research
from chapters one to the top.
The question needs a solution in sort of a summary of the whole study, therefore, to ace this
particular question you would like to understand every detail in your abstract. If you wrote
an honest abstract, this question are going to be a cross over for you.
To answer this question, you’ll plan to elaborate on the matter investigated within the study.
Your zeal to solve this problem becomes your motivation. Do not state financial reasons or
the necessity to graduate as a motivation as you’ll easily explode point.
Do not discourse limitations in your methods or data analysis techniques as this might imply
that your study could also be biased or not well researched. Use simple limitations like
difficulties encountered in combining lectures and project rather than limiting your study.
For example, if I researched on the challenges of private tax collection in Nigeria, an honest
area for further study are going to be in other sorts of taxation such as VAT, Company tax
etc.
Question 12: How can your research study be put into practice?
Easy for the pc scientist and engineering students, but a touch tough for management and
social sciences since most management/social science projects are more of abstract in nature.
However, you ought to try your best to be realistic here. Relate your study to current trends
in your environment, office, economy, government, schools, church etc. Use of relevant
examples and illustrations will score you good point here.
Question 13: How would you summarize your study to a practitioner during a few
sentence?
Your ability to convey technical information from the study will score you good points here.
Question 14: What would you modify if you were to conduct the study again?
Hmmm. Be careful! don’t be too jovial. there’s a loophole here! a bit like your limitations,
this question are often asked to spot your week points.
In simple terms, what data collection method did you use for the study? Here you state if
questionnaires were distributed or data was gotten from secondary sources. For more
information on measurement instruments.
Here you’ll got to convince your panel members that you simply know what you’re talking
about. you would like to elucidate your independent and dependent variable(s) to convince
them that you simply are on point. Your variables are present in your project topic. you
would like to spot these variables and know their definitions also to ace your defense.
Very simple question. It should take about 0.015 seconds to answer this question if you’re
fully prepared.
Question 18: What does one decide to do together with your scientific research after
Graduation?
Here you’re at liberty to mention your mind. If you plan to publish it, this is often the
simplest opportunity to discourse and interact with the committee members-maybe a
professor there can help.
Question 19: What source of knowledge was employed for the study?
At now you’ve got to state the source(s) you bought data from. generally , you’ve got to state
whether data was gotten from primary or secondary source or both. you’ll further convince
the committee members by discoursing on literature reviewed for the study-both theoretical
and empirical.
Question 20: What theories or theoretical framework is your study based on?
This is a really technical question but interesting. Before you step into the defense room, you
ought to know a minimum of two relevant theories that relate to your study. for instance , the
“impact of motivation on employee productivity” are going to be supported Maslow’s
Theory and other theories of motivation. If you can’t find relevant theories to copy your
study, consult your supervisor for help.
Question 21: How would you relate your findings to existing theories on the study?
To ace this question, one will need to read extensively. you ought to know existing theories
on the topic matter also as empirical studies too. Your ability to link your findings to
previous research studies (Whether they agree or not) will go an extended way in validating
your study. you’ll score good points here trust me.
Question 22: What recommendations does one have for future research?
Your problem solving skill is put to check here. you ought to be ready to identify areas
which will need more research.
This one may be a cheap or should I say bonus question? Here you quickly state the
delimitation of the study in short .
Question 24: What question(s) does one have for the committee?
Not a possible question in our Nigerian context, but I even have defended a seminar project
where this question was asked and that i was shocked to my marrows. this is often a chance
to interact together with your committee members and ask some constructive questions.
don’t ask silly or too difficult questions because the goal should be to form the committee
members feel because the “boss”. it’ll also go an extended way in showing that you simply
are an excellent individual.
This is praising time! Use this chance to thank your committee members for his or her time
and questions. Tell them what proportion you’ve got learnt from them and the way you plan
to correct errors (if any) identified in your work. this will go an extended way in impressing
your internal and external supervisors.
Set 2
Common project defense questions and answers
1. Why did you choose this topic?
This might be the first question you will be asked, and you need to have a good response.
You should talk about the motivations for the study. Talk about the research problem you
wanted to address which made you embark on the study.
3. What is the scope of the study
Here you briefly state the specific aspects of your project topic that was covered.
4. What is the significance of the study?
To answer this question, you will need to state how your research work will help other
researchers, educators, organizations(like the case study used), practitioners and
policymakers.
9. Why do you think your research is reliable?
To answer this question, simply tell your audience/panel of assessors that the threats to
research reliability (which are participants error, participant bias, research error, and
researcher bias) did not occur during the research. Or you can simply say that you made
sure the threats were reduced to the barest minimum.
13. Which programming language did you use to write your program? (for computer
science students)
State the programming language and database used in the development of your
software/program. If you did not design the program yourself or you were assisted by a
friend or colleague, find out from the person which programming language was used. You
might also ask the person to give you a crash course on the programming language.
14. Show us how your software works (for computer science students)
Make sure you are familiar with how the software works. Also, be sure that there are no
errors in the software. Go ahead and show the panel of assessors how the software
functions. You can also show them some records which you entered previously.
19. If you could change something regarding your study, what would it be?
The answer to this question can be gotten from the limitations of your study. You can give
answers such as:
1. Given the constraints (like the short time frame for the research or lack of sufficient
funds) I was working with, this was what I was able to do but if I could do more, this is
what I would have done.
2. In doing this I learned a problem with this kind of data collection. Next time, I will do it
this way.
20. What questions do you have for us
You can ask them if there any revisions they want you to make in your report. Ask them
to summarize the major revisions, so you can take some notes.
21. Do you have any closing comments
Thank the panel of assessors and let them know that the revisions/corrections that were
given (such as rewriting the conclusion, tables/graphs that are not in the right format,
something you said during the defense and they want you to include it in the report or
some other issues they noticed you did not capture) would be implemented and shown to
your supervisor.
SET 3
The following are some of the most defense questions that you may be asked; the answers,
of course, are personal to you and your research:
Can you summarize your thesis in just a few sentences? (or even in a single
sentence)
What motivated you to undertake this research?
Who are the main researchers in this area?
What are the main ongoing debates or issues?
Why is your research in this area important?
Who will be interested in your research?
What do you recommend based on your findings?
What are the implications of what you have found to society in general?
What are the most important papers related to your own research and how is yours
different?
What other developments have been made in your field recently?
Why did you select the research methodology that you used?
In hindsight should you have used a different methodology? (Beware they may be
looking for you to dig a hole for yourself to invalidate your conclusions and
analysis.)
Would you have discovered anything else if you had used a different approach?
What are the ethical implications of your work and how should they be dealt with?
How do you know that what you have found is right?
What is the weakest part of your work?
What would you suggest as future research and why?
If you could start over what would you have done differently? (Again don’t dig a
hole to fall into.)
What advice would you give to yourself if you could go back to the start of your
research?
In a project defense you are expected to:
Present yourself as a scholar in the discipline and an authority on your
subject.
Cogently and clearly explain your work.
Have a conversation with the panel of assessors.
Defend any idea that might be disagreed upon. (That is why it is called a
project defense).
View
The following are some of the most defense questions that you may be asked; the answers, of course, are personal
to you and your research:
Can you summarize your thesis in just a few sentences? (or even in a single sentence)
What motivated you to undertake this research?
Who are the main researchers in this area?
What are the main ongoing debates or issues?
Why is your research in this area important?
Who will be interested in your research?
What do you recommend based on your findings?
What are the implications of what you have found to society in general?
What are the most important papers related to your own research and how is yours different?
What other developments have been made in your field recently?
Why did you select the research methodology that you used?
In hindsight should you have used a different methodology? (Beware they may be looking for you to dig a
hole for yourself to invalidate your conclusions and analysis.)
Would you have discovered anything else if you had used a different approach?
What are the ethical implications of your work and how should they be dealt with?
How do you know that what you have found is right?
What is the weakest part of your work?
What would you suggest as future research and why?
If you could start over what would you have done differently? (Again don’t dig a hole to fall into.)
What advice would you give to yourself if you could go back to the start of your research?
Do you intend to publish any of your research? If so, where?