Icicle Lawsuit

Case 2:21-cv-01715-TSZ Document 1 Filed 12/31/21 Page 1 of 3
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7. WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
8. AT SEATTLE
9. ICICLE SEAFOODS, INC., and W.K. CASE NO.: 2:21-cv-1715

WEBSTER (OVERSEAS), LIMITED
10. COMPLAINT
Plaintiffs,
11.
12. v.
13. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY,
14. Defendant.
15.
16. Plaintiffs ICICLE SEAFOODS, INC. and W.K. WEBSTER (OVERSEAS), LIMITED
17. for their Complaint against the above-named defendant, allege upon information and belief:`
18. I. JURISDICTION AND VENUE
19. 1.1 This claim involves the interstate transportation of goods by rail, subject to the
20. Carmack Amendment, including 49 U.S. C. Sections 11706 and 14706, which provides Federal
21. Jurisdiction.
22. 1.2 Venue is proper because the transportation by rail commenced in Bellingham,
23. Washington, within the jurisdiction of this court. In addition, defendant does business in this
24. state and may be personally served within this district.
25.
26.
COMPLAINT – 1 LAW OFFICES OF

NICOLL BLACK & FEIG
A PROFESSIONAL LIMITED LIABILIT Y COMPANY
1325 FO URT H A VEN UE, SUITE 1650
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98101
206-838-7555
1. II. PARTIES
2. 2.1 Plaintiff Icicle Seafoods, Inc. (hereinafter “Icicle”) is an Alaska corporation in
3. good standing that does business in the State of Washington with a principal address within this
4. district, in Seattle.
5. 2.2 Plaintiff WK Webster (Overseas), Limited. (hereinafter “Webster”) is a business
6. entity organized under the laws of the United Kingdom and registered in the State of New York
7. as a Foreign Business Corporation.
8. 2.3 Defendant BNSF Railway Company (hereinafter “BNSF”) is a railroad
9. company, believed to be incorporated in one of the states of the United States, that does
10. business within the state of Washington.
11. III. RELEVANT FACTS
12. 3.1 Plaintiff Icicle contracted with defendant BNSF, directly or indirectly, to
13. transport a shipment of frozen fish (pollock) from Bellingham, Washington to Taunton,
14. Massachusetts. The shipment was to be shipped frozen, in a refrigerated container.
15. 3.2 On or about November 10, 2020, BNSF, through its employees, representatives,
16. agents, affiliates and/or subcontractors, including carriers, took possession of the shipment of
17. frozen fish in BNSF Container #793928. The Shipment was delivered to BNSF, through its
18. employees, representatives, agents, affiliates and/or subcontractors, in good order and
19. condition, for transport to Taunton, Massachusetts.
20. 3.3 Notwithstanding the importance of maintaining the frozen fish in a frozen state,
21. BNSF failed to provide proper refrigeration as required during the transport and, as a result, the
22. product was not in good order and condition by the time it arrived at destination on or about
23. December 9, 2020. The product showed evidence of temperature abuse, and smelled. The
24. refrigeration was not operating at the time of the delivery of the formerly frozen fish at
25. destination in Taunton, Massachusetts.
26.

NICOLL BLACK & FEIG
206-838-7555
1. 3.4 BNSF required that plaintiff Icicle execute an assignment to allow its designated
2. claims handling agent, Webster, to process the claim for damages. As a result of this
3. assignment, Webster is designated as a plaintiff in this action, even though its rights are simply
4. derivative of those of Icicle.
5. 3.5 BNSF breached its contract with Icicle by failing to deliver the Shipment to
6. Massachusetts in the same good order and condition in which it was received at the point of
7. origin, and specifically for failing to keep the product properly refrigerated during the transport.
8. 3.6 As a direct and proximate result of the loss of the breach of contract by BNSF,
9. and its failure to provide refrigeration as required, plaintiffs suffered damages in the total
10. amount of $247,335.65, calculated as follows: $228,690 for the invoice value of the fish;
11. $3,400.65 for labor to handle the thawed and rotting fish at destination; $14,696.00 for disposal
12. costs; and recovery of the freight paid to defendant in the amount of $549.00 for transportation
13. “services” that transformed valuable frozen fish into garbage.
14. IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
15. WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs pray for judgment against defendant as follows:
16. 1. For damages in the amount of $247,335.65, or an amount proven at trial.
17. 2. For prejudgment and post-judgment interest in the full amount allowed by law,
18. commencing as of the date of the termination of the transportation, December 9, 2020;
19. 3. For attorneys’ fees, costs and expenses of suit as allowable by law; and,
20. 4. For such other and further relief as the Court may deem just and proper.
21. DATED this 31st day of December, 2021.

22. NICOLL BLACK & FEIG, PLLC
23.
24. By: /s/ Rodney Q. Fonda

Rodney Q. Fonda, WSBA #6594
25. Atttorneys for Plaintiff Icicle Seafoods,
Inc.
26.

NICOLL BLACK & FEIG
206-838-7555

Icicle Lawsuit

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Icicle Lawsuit

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Icicle Lawsuit

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Case 2:21-cv-01715-TSZ Document 1 Filed 12/31/21 Page 1 of 3

9. ICICLE SEAFOODS, INC., and W.K. CASE NO.: 2:21-cv-1715

13. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY,

COMPLAINT – 1 LAW OFFICES OF

2. 2.1 Plaintiff Icicle Seafoods, Inc. (hereinafter “Icicle”) is an Alaska corporation in

5. 2.2 Plaintiff WK Webster (Overseas), Limited. (hereinafter “Webster”) is a business

7. as a Foreign Business Corporation.

8. 2.3 Defendant BNSF Railway Company (hereinafter “BNSF”) is a railroad

10. business within the state of Washington.

11. III. RELEVANT FACTS

14. Massachusetts. The shipment was to be shipped frozen, in a refrigerated container.

19. condition, for transport to Taunton, Massachusetts.

25. destination in Taunton, Massachusetts.

COMPLAINT – 2 LAW OFFICES OF

4. derivative of those of Icicle.

13. “services” that transformed valuable frozen fish into garbage.

14. IV. PRAYER FOR RELIEF

15. WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs pray for judgment against defendant as follows:

16. 1. For damages in the amount of $247,335.65, or an amount proven at trial.

21. DATED this 31st day of December, 2021.

24. By: /s/ Rodney Q. Fonda

COMPLAINT – 3 LAW OFFICES OF

You might also like