Introduction of Floor Vibration For Steel Structures: Background
Introduction of Floor Vibration For Steel Structures: Background
Introduction of Floor Vibration For Steel Structures: Background
Background
The first criteria in designing floor for service ability starts nearly 180
years ago. Tredgold (1828) wrote that girders over long spans
should be made “deep” to avoid the inconvenience of not being able
to move on the floor without shaking everything in the room.
Traditionally, soldiers "break step" when marching across bridges to
avoid large, potentially dangerous, resonant vibration.
The example of the millennium bridge.
A traditional stiffness criterion limits floor deflection due to live load
= span/360. This limitation has limited success in controlling floor
vibration.
Resonance has been ignored in the design of floors and footbridges
until recently.
Dynamic amplification.
Rhythmic activities, such as aerobics and high-impact dancing, can cause serious
floor vibration problems due to resonance.
Types of Dynamic Loading
(a) Harmonic
load (Machine)
(b) Periodic
load (Dancing)
(c) Transient
load (Walking)
(d) Impulsive
load (Jumping)
Dynamic Resonance
Factors affecting
the dynamic
amplification:
damping, ω and
ωn
Peak Acceleration for Human
Comfort for Vibrations
Acceptance criteria for peak
floor acceleration with
frequency ranges from 4 Hz to
8 Hz.
Office (0.005 g).
Gym (0.05 g) ~ 10 times office
acceptance.
Shopping mall (0.015 g) ~ 3
times office acceptance.
Acceptance criteria for peak
floor acceleration increases
outside the
frequency range from 4 Hz to
8 Hz.
(Eq. 2.2)
(Table 4.1)
(Eqs. 4.2, 4.3a, b, 4.4)
(Eq. 4.1)
Natural Frequency of Floor System
Combined mode
damping ratio
acceleration limit
5.7 kips per in.