Rourkela Institute of Management Studies
Rourkela Institute of Management Studies
Rourkela Institute of Management Studies
Focuses on testing theories and hypotheses Focuses on exploring ideas and formulating
a theory or hypothesis
Key terms are: testing, measurement, Key terms are: understanding, context,
objectivity, replicability complexity, subjectivity
Example:
Qualitative: Depth interviews with 20 women aged 35–50. Ask questions about their
memories of buying/wear blue jeans. Ask them to leaf through magazines and find pictures
of what they’d like to look when they wear their favourite brand of blue jeans. Tell a story
about a woman who goes shopping for blue jeans — what are her negative and positive
experiences? Tell a story about a woman who wears their most preferred brand and their
least preferred brand. Etc.
Conduct thematic analyses to identify the dimensions of meaning women associate with blue
jeans in general and with specific brands. The objective is to create a “movie” that leads to
rich insights about the category: Understand the “deep meanings” of these garments/brands
and how wearers relate to them, and how their self-concepts are influenced when they wear
them.
Quantitative: Identify a generalizable sample of women aged 35–50 who have bought a pair
of blue jeans in the last month. Ask them (perhaps via an online instrument) to respond to a
series of scales about different brands of blue jeans, e.g. ratings on various product
attributes (functional and non-functional) including durability, sophisticated, attractive fit.
Include a battery of items about the purchase experience,
e.g. did you purchase your most recent pair in a store (which one), online, etc. what led you
to purchase this pair.
Creating models (such as personas and representative workflows) that are used
during the design phase
Obtaining an objective understanding of technical development constraints and
opportunities
Articulating business goals that may affect features and product deployment
strategies
Understanding user needs.
A design research phase consists of three main activities: stakeholder interviews, domain
research, and user interviews. Some combination of all three makes for a successful phase.
The length of each activity depends on the complexity of the product. More is always better,
but effective design research can be gathered in a relatively short amount of time. Typically,
one to three weeks is sufficient for most business and domain products, while complex
enterprise systems with multiple interfaces require a longer research period.
Sampling error is the difference between a sample and the entire population. Thanks to
sampling error, it’s entirely possible that while our sample mean is 330.6, the population
mean could still be 260. Or, to put it another way, if we repeated the experiment, it’s possible
that the second sample mean could be close to 260. A hypothesis test helps assess the
likelihood of this possibility!
(2) the decision milker’s attitude about the importance of Type I and Type II errors. In this
chapter we will (1) use the generally applicable hypotheses forms in which Ho contains an
equality sign, as in =, s, or2: If Ho contains the strict equality sign =, Ha will contain the not-
equal sign :F; if Ho has the weak inequality sign -s, Ha will have the strict inequality sign >;
and if Ho contains 2:, Ha will contain <. Examples are
Also, we will (2) formulate the hypotheses so that to the decision maker, rejecting a true Ho
is the worst error that can be made, and set a low value a as the chance of making that
worst error. The value of a will be associated with the = sign in Ho. For example,
suppose we have a = 0.05 and
EXAMPLE:
Suppose the sponsor of the Nifty Tricks television program states that the program should
be canceled if there is convincing evidence (obtained from a random sample of the TV
audience) that the program’s share of the viewing audience is less than 2; percent. The
sponsor also states (1) that the worst error would be to cancel the program if its audience
share is 25 percent or more and (2) the chance of making the worst error is to be only 5
percent. A sample of 1250 TV viewers will be interviewed, and the sample proportion fj of
viewers who watch Nifty Tricks will be used to decide whether or not the program is
canceled. Now suppose there are 260 Nifty Tricks viewers in the sample. Then the sample
proportion of viewers is
fj = 1250 = 0.208
Shouldthesponsorcanceltheprogram?
How to identify Ho
SOLUTION First we identify Ho and Ha. The easiest way to do this is to take the sponsor’s
strict inequality statement “less than 25 percent” as H,
That makes Ha: P < 0.25; so we have Ho: P 2: 0.25. Or, take the sponsor’s “25 percent or
more” statement (which means 2:0.25, and contains three quality) as Ho: P 2: 0.25; then, as
before, the alternative hypothesis is Ha: p < 0.25. But note also that Ho: P 2: 0.25 and a =
0.05 are the translation of the sponsor’s statement that the chance of canceling the program
if the
show has 25 percent or more of the audience (the worst error) is to be 5 percent.So we have
Next we want a rule, called a decision rule, for the sponsor to use to determine whether to
accept or to reject Ho. If Ho is accepted, the sponsor will continue the program. If Ho is
rejected, the sponsor will accept Ha: P < 0.25 and cancel the program. The sponsor would
not, of course, reject Ho if the .sample proportion p of viewers is 0,25 or more, because such
such values of p support Ho: P ~ 0,25, But a p value less than 0.25 raises doubt about
the truth of Ho: and if p is much smaller than 0.25, the sponsor, should reject Ho.We want to
associate a = 0.05 with the equality part of Ho, P = 0.25. To do so, we need the sampling
distribution of p, and that is easily determined it is a normal distribution that has.
4) CASE STUDY
Natural settings
Religious places
Wildlife
Tourists are classified according to their needs and their reasons for travelling into
four broad categories----
b) Travel and tourism play an important role in india’s economy compared with
other nations. India ranks 14 th in the world in terms of it’s tourism sectors contribution
to GDP
Retail shops
Transportation services
Entertainment venues
Attractions
Higher prices
Anyone who’s been to popular tourist’s destination knows that they are going to
spend a lot of money not only due to the volume of purchases but because tourists
destinations tend to jack up the prices of everything; food, hotels, drinks etc.
Touts
Indians are known for their generosity, humbleness, culture and tradition. They treat
guest as god but all fine fingers are not alike. There are some frauds as well. There
are many frauds
4) Suggestions by the tourists to the KSTDC to attract more customers are listed as
follows—
By investing in creating tourist’s spots.
Planning urabanisation , construction near monument of historic importance
must be restricted
Involving locals of a region to act as tourist’s guide, set up small business
Protecting rights of foreigners especially females
Promotion through TV advertisement, advertisement thorough tourism
department of every state.
Attracting tourists throughout the year and not just in few months of year.
Preserving art and culture of a region so that specialty of regions is not
vanished.
Provide fast internet connection and food availability of all kind a few famous
tourists spots.
Glorifying local culture and tradition. ex: folk dance, local music etc.