Managing An Outbreak of Postoperative Endophthalmitis PDF
Managing An Outbreak of Postoperative Endophthalmitis PDF
Managing An Outbreak of Postoperative Endophthalmitis PDF
July 2016
For permission to reproduce and of the content contained herein please contact [email protected]
Contents
Section page
1. Introduction 3
2. Sources of causative microorganisms 3
3. Routine prophylaxis against endophthalmitis 4
Operating theatre general measures 4
Preoperative 4
During procedure 4
Preventive measures 5
4. Treatment of cases 5
5. Active monitoring of incidence and investigation of isolated cases 5
6. How many cases comprise an outbreak? 6
7. What should raise particular concerns? 6
8. Actions once suspicions have been raised 7
9. Notification and involvement of others, raising awareness, detecting cases 7
10. Immediate actions to improve prophylaxis/prevent further cases 8
11. Investigation 8
12. Summary 9
13. Flow chart - Coping with a cluster of postoperative endophthalmitis 10
14. References 11
15. Authors 12
2016/PROF/336 2
1. Introduction
The aim of this document is to provide advice on the identification and management of an
outbreak of post ophthalmic procedure (post-op) endophthalmitis. The guidance will
concentrate particularly on cataract surgery, but the principles and much of the detail are
applicable to other intraocular procedures including intravitreal injections. As much is
possible is based on published evidence but, in the absence of published high quality
evidence for many aspects, expert consensus has been used to make recommendations.
Acute endophthalmitis is a severe intraocular inflammation presumed to be due to entry of
microbes into the eye during the perioperative period. It is identified usually in the first two
weeks after surgery and presents as a red painful eye with severe anterior uveitis, often with
fibrin and hypopyon, and vitritis. It is not always culture positive. It is one of the most serious
postoperative complications of intraocular procedures and, despite treatment, often results
in a very poor visual outcome. The incidence in the developed world is low, approximately
0.1-0.08%, with an incidence in the UK (as determined by BOSU in 20045) of 0.14% after
cataract surgery and approximately 0.02-0.06% after intravitreal injections.
Many units may face a possible or actual cluster of cases (“outbreak”) of post-op
endophthalmitis at some point and a logical method of investigating and tackling this is key
to reducing harm to patients and minimising operational disruption to the ophthalmology
service.
A summary sheet and check list is included at the end
Most cases of sporadic isolated postoperative endophthalmitis arise from the patient’s own
commensal bacteria (Staphylococci and Streptococci) and are mainly (60-80%) gram positive
cocci. However, clusters of cases have a greater likelihood of arising from some particular
source of contamination and have a much greater chance of being gram negative bacteria
(Coliforms or Pseudomonas) or fungal with potentially worse outcomes.
Sources of contamination in outbreaks include:
Contaminated intraprocedural solutions both extraocular (e.g. povidone iodine,
saline) and intraocular (e.g. irrigating fluid, intracameral drugs including
antibiotics, anti-VEGF, dyes and viscoelastic). This is the commonest source in
clusters.
Contaminated phaco machines including tubing and phaco probes
Inadequate ventilation systems providing poor air change rate per hour in the
operating environment
Defective sterilisation procedures
Miscellaneous e.g. defective, contaminated or dirty instruments
Some have more than one source
In approximately 20% there is no obvious or identifiable source
2016/PROF/336 3
3. Routine prophylaxis against endophthalmitis
The low incidence of endophthalmitis makes it difficult to obtain robust evidence of the
efficacy of preventative measures in reducing its occurrence. Although this is not a full
guideline on how to avoid endophthalmitis, and detailed guidance and assessment of the
evidence exists within The Royal College of Ophthalmologists’ cataract guidelines and
elsewhere, there are a number of areas where there is general consensus on what is good
ophthalmic theatre practice or likely to offer a benefit:
Preoperative
Avoidance of intraocular procedures in patients with significant active non-ocular
infections
Treatment of patients with blepharitis, significant lid malpositions (e.g. entropion
with lashes abrading ocular surface), infective conjunctivitis and nasolacrimal
infections prior to procedure.
During procedure
Skin preparation with povidone iodine or chlorhexidine if allergic to povidone
iodine.
Povidone iodine solution 5% instilled into the conjunctival sac prior to
commencement.
Good draping technique to isolate the lid margins and lashes from the surgical
field.
Ensuring all equipment, intraocular lenses, viscoelastics, drugs and solutions are
from a reliable source.
Rejection of instruments which are damaged, faulty or show signs of poor
cleaning such as debris or deposits. Do not clear blocked instrument lumens e.g.
of an irrigation-aspiration cannula during the procedure as sterility may then be
uncertain.
Excellent surgical wound construction and good wound closure.
Avoidance of serious intraoperative complications especially posterior capsular
rupture and vitreous loss and avoidance of overly prolonged surgery.
Prophylactic antibiotics in accordance with the RCOphth (or equivalent) surgery
and procedure guidelines where indicated. It is not currently mandated by the
College to use intracameral antibiotics in cataract surgery as long as
2016/PROF/336 4
endopthalmitis rates are satisfactory but it is worth noting that some authors
believe it to be superior to other methods of delivery, such as topical and
subconjunctival.
Any other procedure which, after the preparation of this guide, is shown with
good statistical support to be effective and safe.
Preventive measures
Suggested by some authors, but for which there is little consensus or evidence, include:
Non-touch technique as far as possible, avoiding contaminating the functional
end of instruments.
Rejection of lens implants which have inadvertently contacted the lid margins.
Wear facemasks in theatre, especially scrub nurses and surgeons.
Preoperative topical broad spectrum antibiotics.
Injecting lens implants rather than folding them with forceps, in order to reduce
the possibility of contact with the lid margin.
Single use/disposable instruments.
Single use medications.
Postoperative antibiotic drops (regimens vary but usually one-two weeks).
4. Treatment of cases
1. This is a condition where time is of the essence. It is crucial that cases are
diagnosed early and treated as an emergency. If there is enough clinical
suspicion of endohthalmitis, treatment should not be delayed waiting for
microbiological confirmation or the effects of a trial of steroids.
2016/PROF/336 5
For cases of endophthalmitis which have arisen at another unit, the ophthalmic clinical lead
and the operating consultant of the source unit must be informed about the case by the
receiving/treating unit so that they can incident report and investigate. In the unfortunate
event that the source unit does not seem to reply/act/engage, whether NHS or independent,
the commissioner should be notified directly.
Ophthalmology audit or clinical governance meetings should include a regular complications
and morbidity slot which should consider any cases of endophthalmitis and examine any
predisposing factors or areas for action, learning or improvement.
Electronic patient records can facilitate continuous audit and surveillance, and identify even
a small rise in endophthalmitis cases or other complications which might not otherwise be
evident.
Either via electronic patient records, incident reporting or both, incidence should be
regularly monitored. Departments should have a system for identifying and acting upon any
rise in incidence or cluster of cases.
Report to the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, and to the
manufacturers, any problems with drugs or devices.
This is a difficult question to answer as random clusters mimicking an outbreak may occur
from time to time. With such a low background incidence, even one or two extra events
during a short time frame can raise concerns but may turn out not to be significant and may
be followed by an unusually long period with no cases so that the frequency over a longer
time frame may be within acceptable limits.
It is important to consider the possibility that more than one case in a short time frame may
have arisen from a preventable and recurring cause.
2016/PROF/336 6
Some have used statistical methods or charts to ensure a sensible balance
between complacency and overkill. There are a number of methods (see
references). It is wise to involve the local microbiologist in determining the best
local method for this and even wiser to have done so proactively before any
suspected cluster rather than reactively after concerns have been raised.
The degree of action will of course depend on both the rate of occurrence, any suspicious
factors and whether the problem persists. Operational factors have to be taken into
consideration but the first duty is to minimise patient harm.
Keep detailed records of all action taken and minute any meetings.
Decision as to whether or not there is an outbreak (see above) based on frequency, possible
statistical analyses and identification of common factors in the cases.
Alert colleagues: make them aware of the cases so far, ask if there are other
cases not yet reported, advise a high degree of suspicion and to report any
further cases.
Ensure incident reports are completed for any cases.
Alert the lead clinician, clinical director and the medical director.
If receiving multiple cases from another provider, their clinical lead and medical
director must be notified and take action. If their response is deemed
inadequate, contact their commissioner.
Involve the hospital consultant microbiologist and hospital infection team at an
early stage.
Involve the risk team and consider notifying commissioners.
With risk team notify MHRA and manufacturers if devices or drugs are clearly
implicated.
Consider establishing a multidisciplinary team to manage and investigate
(ophthalmologists, nurses, theatre staff, managers, risk, microbiology, infection
control).
Verify that patients are fully aware of postoperative danger symptoms.
Consider resuming day two or day three follow-up if this is not normally
undertaken.
Ask neighbouring units if they also have noticed an increased incidence of
endophthalmitis.
2016/PROF/336 7
10. Immediate actions to improve prophylaxis/prevent further
cases
11. Investigation
2016/PROF/336 8
6. Review theatre practices: independent observation of practices such as door
closures, staff movements, facemasks, drugs and instrument prep and use, solution
and drug handling etc.
8. Assess that all equipment and disposables are functional and used according to
manufacturer’s instructions, are in date and appropriately serviced. Confirm single
use where instruments are so designated.
12. Summary
Units should have robust protocols for endophthalmitis prevention, and methods to monitor
the incidence. It is important to identify a significant rise in incidence and analyse and learn
from sporadic cases. The discovery or suspicion of an outbreak of endophthalmitis should
prompt a rapid, systematic and open investigation to attempt identification and remedy of
any possible cause. Patient safety is paramount and may involve temporary cessation of
intraocular procedures.
2016/PROF/336 9
13. Flow chart - Coping with a cluster of postoperative
endophthalmitis
• Review cases check all aspects for risks and common factors
• Check theatre environment, cleanliness, airflow/ventilation system
• Microbiological sampling equipment, theatre, drugs, solutions
• Review and obey theatre discipline and correct operating practices
• Ensure equipment/devices up to date, used properly, maintained well
• Check instrument cleaning and sterilisation procedures
• Keep detailed records of investigations and actions
Investigation • Eliminate specific cause if found
• Revise and improve prophylactic measures
• Introduce intracameral antibiotics
• Consider external review from other unit or College
2016/PROF/336 10
14. References
2016/PROF/336 11
19. An investigation into postoperative endophthalmitis and lessons learned.
Mandal K, Hildreth A, Farrow M, Allen D. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30:1960-5.
20. Post-operative endophthalmitis: the application of hazard analysis critical
control points (HACCP) to an infection control problem.
21. Baird DR, Henry M, Liddell KG, Mitchell CM and Sneddon JG. Journal of Hospital
Infection, 2001; 49:14-22.
22. A model for the management of an atypical endophthalmitis outbreak.
Anderson OA, Lee V, Shafi S, Keegan D, Vafidis G. Eye 2005 19:972-80.
23. A cluster of acute-onset postoperative endophthalmitis over a 1-month period:
investigation of an outbreak caused by uncommon species, Akçakaya A, Sargin F,
Hasbi Erbil H, Yazıcı S, Yaylalı SA et al. Br J Ophthalmol 2011;95:481-484.
24. Endophthalmitis outbreaks following cataract surgery: Causative organisms,
etiologies, and visual acuity outcomes. Pathengay A, Flynn HW, Isom RF, Miller
D. J Cataract Refract Surg 2012; 38:1278–1282.
25. Endophthalmitis occurring after cataract surgery.; Jabbarvand M, Hashemain H,
Khodaparat M, et al Ophthalmology 2016;123:295–301.
26. Effectiveness and Safety of an Intracameral Injection of Cefuroxime for the
Prevention of Endophthalmitis After Cataract Surgery With or Without
Perioperative Capsular Rupture. Papinaud DV, Gillies MC, Domerq C et al. JAMA
Ophthalmol. 2016 May 2. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.1351. [Epub ahead
of print]
27. Endophthalmitis after cataract surgery: a nationwide prospective study
evaluating incidence in relation to incision type and location. Lundstrom M,
Wejde G, Stenevi U, Thorburn W, Montan P. Ophthalmology 2007;114:866-870.
28. Efficacy of intracameraland subconjunctival cefuroxime in preventing
endophthalmitis after cataract surgery. Yu-Wai-Man P, Morgan SJ, Hildreth AJ,
Steel DH, Allen D. J Refractive Surgery 2008; 34:447- 451.
29. ESCRS Guidelines for Prevention and Treatment of Endophthalmitis
30. Following Cataract Surgery: Data, Dilemmas and Conclusions 2013. Bary P,
Cordoves L, Gardner S. www.escrs.org.
15. Authors
The Royal College of Ophthalmologists’ Quality and Safety group, Chair Mrs Melanie
Hingorani FRCOphth
July 2016
2016/PROF/336 12