Filtration Focus Fixes Faults: Fluid Power in Action
Filtration Focus Fixes Faults: Fluid Power in Action
Filtration Focus Fixes Faults: Fluid Power in Action
I
n 1996 and 97, I and other engineers and tech-
nicians at Nissan Motors of Japan performed
field tests in an attempt to analyze and rectify
oil contamination problems in our assembly
plant that manufactures our Maxima and Blue
Bird models. Final results of the year-long study
showed that installing off-line filtration systems
reduced hydraulic equipment breakdowns by
86.7% and failure of servovalves by 92.4%. We
were so impressed with the results that we now
specify this type of filtration system on all new
hydraulic machinery equipped with servovalves.
Following is a condensed version of a report
summarizing our work and what we learned.
Laying the groundwork The 1998 Maxima GXE, shown, and other models are manufactured at Nissan’s Kanagawa Plant,
Because hydraulic fluid contamination can which has begun widespread use of off-line filtration in conjunction with in-line filtration to re-
come from many different sources, we first set duce hydraulic failures overall, and especially those related to servovalve operation.
out to identify all potential sources of contami-
nation from within our plant before actually be- A recent study machine shop; and weld spatter and fiber scrap
ginning the tests. The standard interval for oil in the assembly shop.
sampling and analysis was every four months for by Nissan Contaminants produced within the hy-
critical equipment, every six months for less- Motors of Japan draulic system — Friction from sliding motions
critical equipment, and annually for general-pur- inherent to hydraulic components eventually
pose equipment. Among the characteristics ana- attributed 85% generates wear particles that get carried through
lyzed in these routine tests were oil color, kinetic of hydraulic a hydraulic system. We found that abraded iron
viscosity, total acid numbers, and water and par- particles and packing material debris became
ticulate contamination. These analyses enabled equipment wedged between sliding surfaces, further aggra-
us to narrow down the sources of contamination failures to vating the abrasive wear. Eventually, the
into five categories: abraded surfaces caused internal leakage in the
Contamination from the workplace envi- contamination. affected components, which degraded perfor-
ronment — We found sources of contamination Better filtration mance and caused operational malfunctions.
surrounding hydraulic equipment to include Water from oil cooler cracks — We found
dirty air, metal particles from nearby machinery,
slashed these that water-cooled heat exchangers in some of
extraneous oil, weld spatter, and sanding by- failures by equipment sometimes developed cracks in the
products. We found hydraulic fluid to be con- nearly 90%. thin walls separating the water from the hydraulic
taminated with sand and iron powder in our oil. This allowed water to enter the hydraulic sys-
forging shop; water, oil, chips, and dust in our tem, which eventually led to emulsified fluid.
Emulsified fluid often caused pump cavitation
Seijiro Hanawa is a senior engineer, Equipment and rust on internal surfaces of components.
Check Engineering Group, Engineering Experi- Contaminants resulting from fluid decom-
mentation Div., Third Engineering Dept., Nis- position — Hydraulic oil is composed of hydro-
san Motor Co., Ltd., Kanagawa, Japan. The off- carbon compounds combined with small
line filtration systems described in this article amounts of oxygen. When heated or continuously
are manufactured by Triple R Corp. For more exposed to light, the fluid becomes more suscep-
information on these systems, Circle 398 on a tible to oxidation, which can lead to sludge for-
reader service card. mation. We found that a gel-like sludge formed at
High-performance
≤210 9 6 5.0 0.05 ≤25
hydraulic motor
Electrohydraulic
≤140 6 5 3.0 0.03 ≤25
servovalve