The document discusses Jose Rizal's alleged retraction of his writings and conversion to Catholicism before his execution. There are two accounts from Jesuit priests claiming Rizal recanted, but two scholars doubt the veracity of the retraction. Rafael Palma argues the retraction was a "pious fraud" to bolster the Church's prestige, while the Jesuits used Rizal's conversion for political motives regardless of his true convictions. Austin Coates believes Rizal doubted any fraud and the archbishop was likely behind coercing the retraction.
The document discusses Jose Rizal's alleged retraction of his writings and conversion to Catholicism before his execution. There are two accounts from Jesuit priests claiming Rizal recanted, but two scholars doubt the veracity of the retraction. Rafael Palma argues the retraction was a "pious fraud" to bolster the Church's prestige, while the Jesuits used Rizal's conversion for political motives regardless of his true convictions. Austin Coates believes Rizal doubted any fraud and the archbishop was likely behind coercing the retraction.
The document discusses Jose Rizal's alleged retraction of his writings and conversion to Catholicism before his execution. There are two accounts from Jesuit priests claiming Rizal recanted, but two scholars doubt the veracity of the retraction. Rafael Palma argues the retraction was a "pious fraud" to bolster the Church's prestige, while the Jesuits used Rizal's conversion for political motives regardless of his true convictions. Austin Coates believes Rizal doubted any fraud and the archbishop was likely behind coercing the retraction.
The document discusses Jose Rizal's alleged retraction of his writings and conversion to Catholicism before his execution. There are two accounts from Jesuit priests claiming Rizal recanted, but two scholars doubt the veracity of the retraction. Rafael Palma argues the retraction was a "pious fraud" to bolster the Church's prestige, while the Jesuits used Rizal's conversion for political motives regardless of his true convictions. Austin Coates believes Rizal doubted any fraud and the archbishop was likely behind coercing the retraction.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1
The Rizal Retraction securing the retraction document from
the Archbishop of Manila Bernardino
Historical context Nozaleda, and writing another shorter Dr. Jose Rizal was arrested, tried, and retraction document as well which was sentenced to death by a Spanish court- the one Rizal allegedly copied. martial after being implicated as a Rafael Palma’s Critical Analysis leader of the Philippine Revolution. “Rizal’s conversion was a pious fraud to At the Luneta on December 30, 1896, make the people believe that the accounts exist that Rizal allegedly extraordinary man broke down and retracted his Masonic ideals and his succumbed before the Church which he writings and reconverted to Catholicism had fought. The Archbishop was following several hours of persuasion by interested in his conversion for political Jesuit priests. motives, and the Jesuits lent themselves as his instrument. The example of Rizal The following primary sources are of two kinds: would have great resonance in the the first two are the official accounts as whole country and it was necessary to witnessed by the Jesuits who were bolster the drooping prestige of religion instrumental in the alleged retraction of Rizal. with his abjuration. What if Rizal was a The other two are critical analyses by two man of valor and convictions and his Rizalist scholars who doubted the story of conversion would be unbelievable? So retraction. much the better. The interest of religion Fr. Vicente Balaguer’s Statement was above him. His aureole of glory had to be done away with if necessary. Fr. Vicente Balaguer was one of the What did it matter? He was only an Jesuit priests who visited Rizal during indio.” his last hours in Fort Santiago and claimed that he managed to persuade Austin Coates’ Critical Analysis Rizal to denounce Masonry and return • “Rizal believed that there was a strong to the Catholic fold. In an affidavit likelihood of fraud, and that the prime executed in 1917 when he had returned mover in this world would be the friar to Spain, Balaguer also claimed that he archbishop.” was the one who solemnized the marriage of Josephine Bracken and Rizal • “Balaguer had the intelligence to hours before the hero’s execution. perceive that everything depended on the speed and audacity with which he Fr. Pio Pi’s statement declared his success.” Fr. Pio Pi was the Jesuit Superior in the • “Balaguer had in fact damaged the Philippines during the time when Rizal Church’s case. Worse than this, he had was executed. In 1917, he issued the unwittingly revealed his own fraud. In affidavit recounting his involvement in his account he made no mention of the the alleged retraction of Rizal. Unlike Fr. Ultimo Adios.” Balaguer, he was involved only in