Index 2015 PDF
Index 2015 PDF
Index 2015 PDF
2015 Index of
Economic Freedom
Promoting Economic Opportunity and Prosperity
Anthony B. Kim is Senior Policy Analyst in the Center for Trade and Economics.
James M. Roberts is Research Fellow for Economic Freedom and Growth in the
Center for Trade and Economics.
Bryan Riley is Jay Van Andel Senior Analyst in Trade Policy in the Center for Trade
and Economics.
Ryan Olson is Research Associate in the Center for Trade and Economics.
Antonio Nucifora, PhD, is the former Lead Economist for Tunisia at the
World Bank.
Bob Rijkers, PhD, is an economist in the Research Department at the World Bank.
Nicolas D. Loris is the Herbert and Joyce Morgan Fellow and Senior Analyst in the
Thomas A. Roe Institute for Economic Policy Studies of the Institute for Economic
Freedom and Opportunity.
2015 Index of
Economic Freedom
Ambassador Terry Miller
Anthony B. Kim
Preface. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ix
Jim DeMint
Acknowledgments. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . xi
Ambassador Terry Miller and Anthony B. Kim
Executive Highlights. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Chapter 4: Cronyism, Corruption, and the Arab Spring: The Case of Tunisia. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
Antonio Nucifora, PhD, Erik Churchill, and Bob Rijkers, PhD
Appendix. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 467
Index of Economic Freedom Scores, 1995–2015. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 468
Methodology. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 475
Major Works Cited.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 489
v
Foreword
I
n his famous 1980 book and TV series Free to men in the Hong Kong government. Support-
Choose, the incomparable Milton Friedman ers of democracy were harassed, notably media
held forth with the backdrop of Hong Kong baron Jimmy Lai, a chief funder of the democ-
harbor on the miracle of the then-British colony. racy movement whose home was raided by Hong
He called it “the modern exemplar of free mar- Kong’s anti-corruption agency that previously
kets and limited government.” had a reputation for incorruptibility. That raid
He was surely right, as I learned when I lived and others looked to be motivated by politics.
in Hong Kong in 1979 and again through much of This matters for economic as much as for
the 1980s. The pile of rocks had prospered under political freedom because the rule of law is essen-
the “positive non-interventionism” of its wise tial to property rights and a free society. Liberty
British rulers, and it has continued to do so since has prospered in Hong Kong in part because con-
it became a Special Administrative Region under tracts have been protected by the British legal
light Chinese control in 1997. With that happy tradition. If the law in the future can be bent to
legacy, Hong Kong has also remained at the top political ends, then individual workers and busi-
of the annual Index of Economic Freedom. ness investors will eventually get the message
The question raised this year is how long its that they too are vulnerable to threats, harass-
premier status will last. Singapore, another city- ment, and perhaps expropriation if they get on
state dependent largely on human capital, has the wrong side of the Chinese Communist Party.
been inching closer to Hong Kong and now is Some will argue that economic freedom can
essentially tied. exist without political freedom, and perhaps
More ominously, doubts have increased this that is true for a time. But eventually, the need
year about Hong Kong’s rule of law as protests for political control compromises the rule of law
broke out over Beijing’s control of future elec- and the freedom to make economic choices.
tions in the territory. Pro-democracy students This is what could now be happening in Hong
took to the streets, gaining global headlines Kong, and it is why the city’s democracy protes-
but little movement from Beijing or its yes- tors deserve the world’s support. They are fight-
vii
ing to protect their way of life as much as they America, my home, is having its own struggles.
are for the right to elect a chief executive. This is Its precipitous decline in the Index in the wake
why we at The Wall Street Journal have devoted of the financial panic of 2008 and the rise of
so much coverage to Hong Kong’s democratic the Obama Administration seems to have been
uprising. In 2014, Hong Kong has been on free- arrested. The election of a Republican Congress
dom’s front lines. in November 2014 gives some new hope for a
Hong Kong’s struggle is also a reminder that revival, but that will require the rise of a new
economic liberty is not guaranteed, and the generation of leaders willing to relearn the old
wealth of nations can rise and fall with surpris- lessons about freedom and prosperity that Mil-
ing rapidity. The “Executive Highlights” in this ton Friedman taught us through the example of
year’s Index contrast some of the gainers and Hong Kong. So here we go, back to the barricades.
losers in what is the eternal battle by men and
women to determine their own fate. It is heart- Paul A. Gigot
ening to see progress in parts of Africa, long Editorial Page Editor
ignored as hopeless in the West, but dispiriting The Wall Street Journal
to see setbacks in Europe, original home of the November 2014
Enlightenment and capitalism.
A
s I write this in November 2014, people of enemies both external and internal. False
around the world are celebrating the 25th starts toward economic freedom have been seen
anniversary of the fall of the Berlin Wall. in places like China, where a burst of economic
This Index was inspired in many ways by the reform 30 years ago lifted millions out of poverty
heroic events that took place in Europe a quarter but where economic momentum is flagging as
of a century ago, and it was only shortly thereaf- reform has stalled. The collapse of countries like
ter that we began, in connection with The Wall Zimbabwe and Venezuela, where dictatorial rule
Street Journal, to record the march of freedom has destroyed lives and prospects for the future,
around the world. is a vivid reminder that freedoms hard won may
The unraveling of the Soviet Union and the be easily lost. In my own country, the United
liberation of Eastern Europe represent a great States, economic freedom has not advanced in
triumph for freedom and economic advance- recent years. We are performing far below poten-
ment. People who once lived in fear and poverty tial as a result. In the Middle East, a burst of revo-
have experienced a rebirth of productivity and lutionary fervor is driving change toward ends as
dramatic economic modernization. Countries yet unknown.
that once lagged badly have emerged from the Perhaps the most critical lesson for these
shadows of repression to join as equals in free- tumultuous times is that the proven superior-
dom those who in the past they could view only ity of the free-market system and the value of
dimly through an iron curtain. economic liberty must be steadfastly reiterated,
The lesson is clear: The human spirit is the particularly in times of trouble. The data we
real wellspring of economic prosperity. That present in the Index of Economic Freedom are a
spirit is at its most inspired when it is unleashed good foundation for that discussion.
from the chains in which it has been bound. In addition to its country analysis and rank-
Still, as events in countries like Georgia, ings, the 2015 Index contains three informative
Ukraine, and Russia show, the fight for freedom chapters that explore topics of particular rel-
requires perpetual vigilance against the inroads evance to today’s policy debates.
ix
• In Chapter 3, Steve Moore, Chief Economist at Like its predecessors, the 2015 Index pro-
The Heritage Foundation, and his co-author, vides ample evidence that dynamic economic
Joel Griffith, undertake comparative analysis gains can be achieved by advancing freedom.
of selected countries in various regions, high- Countries that are gaining freedom enjoy higher
lighting ways in which the rule of law, efficient economic growth, greater gains in employment,
regulatory structures, open markets, and a higher incomes, better health, cleaner environ-
commitment to lower taxes promote great- ments, and a host of other benefits. Those that
er prosperity. are not are, on average, lagging behind and, in the
• In Chapter 4, the Index takes a closer look at worst cases, remain stuck in stagnation and pov-
the causes and prospects for the Arab Spring. erty. Such failures are inexcusable. Most impor-
Presenting a detailed case study on Tunisia, tant, they are preventable.
three World Bank economists analyze the We cannot, of course, know what the future
harm inflicted by cronyism and underscore will bring as the Index of Economic Freedom
the urgent need for inclusive policies that pro- advances into its third decade. Nonetheless, it
vide opportunities for all Tunisians to ensure is encouraging to know that economic freedom
a successful economic and political transition. is still on the march. As the Index has shown in
• In Chapter 5, Nick Loris, a researcher focus- case after case, nations that find the political will
ing on energy, environmental, and regulatory and wisdom to advance economic freedom will
issues as the Herbert and Joyce Morgan Fel- be best positioned to see their citizens prosper
low at The Heritage Foundation, assesses the in the years ahead.
critical linkages between economic freedom,
energy, and development. Jim DeMint, President
The Heritage Foundation
November 2014
T
he Index of Economic Freedom is a product ies Center; Luke Coffey and Daniel Kochis of the
of intense collaboration with people and Margaret Thatcher Center for Freedom; and
organizations around the world. While it is Charlotte Florance, James Phillips, and Ana
impossible to mention all of those who have con- Quintana of the Douglas and Sarah Allison Cen-
tributed to our success, we wish to express our ter for Foreign and National Security Policy.
gratitude to the myriad individuals serving with The Index of Economic Freedom is a substan-
various international organizations, research tial publication that is brought to print each year
institutions, U.S. government agencies, foreign by an incredibly talented team of editors and
embassies, and other organizations who provide production specialists. We wish to express our
the data used in the Index. Assistance from them deepest appreciation to Senior Editor Richard
is vital and greatly appreciated. Odermatt, who is responsible for final review
The Heritage Foundation’s Center for Trade of the completed text, and Senior Copy Editor
and Economics (CTE) leads the Index produc- William T. Poole, who bears the primary respon-
tion effort. The CTE team of James Roberts, sibility for perfecting the language we employ,
Bryan Riley, and Ryan Olson shared with us as well as Therese Pennefather, Deputy Director
the responsibility for grading the 10 compo- of Research Editing, and Senior Data Graphics
nents of economic freedom. CTE interns Fan Editor John Fleming. Creative Director Melissa
Mo, Tori Whiting, Ashley Wright, Bridget Mudd, Bluey and Jay Simon, Publication Production
Elizabeth Allen, Andy Marguiles, Preston Turner, Specialist, were responsible for the design and
and Charlotte Howson contributed substan- layout of the book.
tial research. The availability of the entire Index and its
Various Heritage Foundation foreign policy database online at www.heritage.org/index has
experts who provided country backgrounds greatly expanded the publication’s reach and
informed by their regional and country expertise accessibility over the past years. The transposi-
include Lisa Curtis, Bruce Klingner, Bill Wilson, tion to the Web each year would not be possible
and Director Walter Lohman of the Asian Stud- without the expertise of Director of Marketing
xi
Technology Tim McGovern and his team, includ- Denton, and Matt Streit; and Chief of Staff Bret
ing Roger Spurzem, Maria Sousa, Isabel Isidro, Bernhardt is sincerely appreciated.
Jeph Christoff, Joe Perez, Catherine Dugyon, We also wish to acknowledge our enduring
and former Heritage staffer Jim Lawruk. debt to Chairman Thomas A. Saunders III and
Jack Spencer, Vice President for the Institute the Heritage Board of Trustees, and particularly
for Economic Freedom and Opportunity, and Dr. to Ambassador J. William Middendorf II, who
James Carafano, Vice President for the Kathryn originally encouraged us to undertake such a
and Shelby Cullom Davis Institute for National study of global economic freedom. We remain
Security and Foreign Policy, provide substantial deeply indebted to Dr. Edwin J. Feulner,
help and advice in connection with many aspects Founder and former President of The Heritage
of Index production and marketing. We are also Foundation, and Heritage Distinguished Fellow
grateful for the contributions to our work over Dr. Kim R. Holmes, who was a founding editor of
the past year of Derrick Morgan, former Vice the Index. Without their vision and insight, this
President for the Institute for Economic Free- project could never have become a reality and
dom and Opportunity. achieved such success over the past 21 years.
Senator Jim DeMint, President of The Very special thanks also go to Paul Gigot
Heritage Foundation, and Phil Truluck, Executive and Mary Anastasia O’Grady at The Wall Street
Vice President of The Heritage Foundation, have Journal, whose partnership and support we
been enthusiastic supporters and great sources truly cherish.
of encouragement in producing this annual pub-
lication. The ongoing support from Group Vice Ambassador Terry Miller
Presidents David Addington, Ed Corrigan, John Anthony B. Kim
Fogarty, and Geoff Lysaught; Vice Presidents November 2014
Becky Norton Dunlop, John Von Kannon, Wesley
T
he results of the 2015 Index of Economic Free- that recorded in the aftermath of the financial
dom confirm that the significant rebound in crisis and recession, thus regaining all of the
world economic freedom reported in the ground that had been lost.
2014 Index was no fluke. While the growth in • On a worldwide basis, the increase in eco-
economic freedom has slowed over the past year, nomic freedom was driven by improvements
the global average economic freedom score has in trade freedom, monetary freedom, and free-
nonetheless reached its highest level ever. dom from corruption, for which global ratings
This 21st edition of the Index analyzes eco- have advanced by close to one point or more
nomic policy developments in 186 countries and on average.
territories since the second half of 2013. Econo- • Average scores for most other economic free-
mies in six regions have been graded and ranked doms, including business freedom, property
on 10 aspects of economic freedom that evaluate rights, labor freedom, and financial freedom,
the rule of law, the intrusiveness and size of gov- registered small declines. More troubling
ernment, regulatory efficiency, and the open- were declines in the Index measures related
ness of markets. to assessing government size. With a score
drop of 1.0 point, the control of government
HIGHLIGHTS FROM THE 2015 INDEX spending recorded the biggest deterioration,
• Despite the continuing challenges that con- reflecting a continuation of countercycli-
front the world economy, the global average cal or interventionist stimulus policies in
economic freedom score has improved over some countries.
the past year by one-tenth of a point, reach- • 101 countries, the majority of which are less
ing a record 60.4 (on a 0-to-100 scale) in the developed or emerging economies, showed
2015 Index. Although the rate of advancement advances in economic freedom over the past
has slowed in comparison to last year’s near year; 37 countries, including Taiwan, Lithu-
record 0.7-point increase, the world average ania, Georgia, Colombia, Israel, Cabo Verde,
has now reached a level a full point higher than Montenegro, and Côte d’Ivoire, achieved their
1
highest economic freedom scores ever in the spiral in U.S. economic freedom over the pre-
2015 Index. vious seven years has come to a halt. In the
• While five countries (Singapore, Finland, 2015 Index, the U.S. has recorded modest score
Mexico, Madagascar, and Suriname) recorded gains in six of the 10 economic freedoms and
no score change, declines in economic free- an overall score increase of seven-tenths of
dom were registered in 72 countries in the a point. On the other hand, the U.S. score for
2015 Index; 11 countries, including Venezuela, business freedom has plunged below 90, the
Equatorial Guinea, Argentina, Bolivia, Algeria, lowest level since 2006.
Greece, and El Salvador, recorded their lowest
economic freedom scores ever. Countries with higher levels of economic
• Sub-Saharan Africa is home to six of the 10 big- freedom continue to outperform others in
gest score improvements. São Tomé and Prín- reducing poverty, achieving greater prosperity,
cipe, Democratic Republic of Congo, Togo, and ensuring broader progress in many dimen-
Senegal, Burundi, and Zimbabwe all recorded sions of social and human development.
score gains of two points or more. Five coun-
tries in Europe (Slovenia, Ukraine, Armenia, • The intensity of poverty in countries whose
Greece, and Turkey) were among those regis- economies are considered mostly free or mod-
tering the worst score declines. erately free is only about one-fourth the level
• Average levels of economic freedom advanced found in countries that are rated less free.
in half of the six Index regions. Sub-Saharan • Despite varying degrees of economic freedom
Africa (led by São Tomé and Príncipe and across the regions around the globe, the posi-
Democratic Republic of Congo) and the tive relationship between economic freedom
Asia–Pacific region (led by Maldives and the and prosperity is unequivocally consistent
Philippines) each showed an average score within the regions: Per capita incomes are
improvement of 0.3 point, and Middle East/ much higher in countries that are economi-
North Africa countries (led by Israel and cally free.
Morocco) gained 0.1 point on average. While • Not surprisingly, overall human development
average economic freedom for the South and also thrives in an environment that is eco-
Central America/Caribbean region stayed the nomically free. Economic freedom is about
same as last year, Europe and North America more than a business environment in which
registered slight declines of 0.1 point and 0.2 entrepreneurship and prosperity can flour-
point, respectively. ish. Higher economic freedom induces greater
• Three northern European economies (Esto- overall human development in such key areas
nia, Lithuania, and Latvia—the so-called Baltic as life expectancy, literacy, education, and the
Tigers) are on the move toward greater eco- standard of living.
nomic freedom. Overcoming severe recessions • There is a robust relationship between
following the global financial turmoil, these improving economic freedom and achieving
countries have maintained their openness higher per capita economic growth. Wheth-
to global markets and competition, further er long-term (20 years), medium-term (10
reformed their economies, and shrunk the years), or short-term (five years), the relation-
size of their governments. Each has advanced ship between changes in economic freedom
economic freedom and moved up in the global and changes in economic growth is consis-
rankings every year since 2012. tently positive. As economies gain economic
• The United States continues to be only the freedom and thus achieve dynamic growth,
12th-freest economy, seemingly stuck in the individuals and companies are empowered
ranks of the “mostly free,” the second-tier to build businesses, create jobs, and gener-
economic freedom category into which the ate greater innovation for their communities
U.S. dropped in 2010. However, the downward and societies.
Executive Highlights 3
2015 Index of Economic Freedom World Rankings
Government Spending
Investment Freedom
Monetary Freedom
Change from 2014
Financial Freedom
Business Freedom
Property Rights
Labor Freedom
Fiscal Freedom
Trade Freedom
Overall Score
World Rank
Country
1 Hong Kong 89.6 -0.5 90 75.0 93.2 89.7 100.0 95.9 81.8 90.0 90 90
2 Singapore 89.4 0.0 90 86.0 91.2 93.8 96.9 96.9 83.7 90.0 85 80
3 New Zealand 82.1 0.9 95 91.0 70.4 43.0 95.5 91.4 87.6 86.8 80 80
4 Australia 81.4 -0.6 90 81.0 63.7 61.8 94.1 81.6 85.3 86.4 80 90
5 Switzerland 80.5 -1.1 90 85.0 70.3 65.1 78.1 75.3 86.3 90.0 85 80
6 Canada 79.1 -1.1 90 81.0 79.9 48.3 89.0 76.1 77.9 88.4 80 80
7 Chile 78.5 -0.2 90 71.0 76.5 83.3 69.3 67.0 85.6 82.0 90 70
8 Estonia 76.8 0.9 90 68.0 80.6 53.2 81.5 58.7 77.6 88.0 90 80
9 Ireland 76.6 0.4 85 72.0 73.6 45.6 82.1 76.2 83.9 88.0 90 70
10 Mauritius 76.4 -0.1 65 52.0 91.9 87.4 78.0 68.2 77.6 88.4 85 70
11 Denmark 76.3 0.2 95 91.0 39.6 1.8 97.4 92.1 87.6 88.0 90 80
12 United States 76.2 0.7 80 73.0 66.2 51.8 88.8 98.5 76.6 87.0 70 70
13 United Kingdom 75.8 0.9 90 76.0 62.9 30.3 91.1 75.6 74.4 88.0 90 80
14 Taiwan 75.1 1.2 70 61.0 80.4 87.1 92.4 55.2 83.3 86.4 75 60
15 Lithuania 74.7 1.7 60 57.0 92.9 61.3 84.9 62.0 81.2 88.0 80 80
16 Germany 73.8 0.4 90 78.0 60.8 40.1 88.2 51.2 81.5 88.0 90 70
17 The Netherlands 73.7 -0.5 90 83.0 51.8 23.8 84.3 66.3 79.8 88.0 90 80
18 Bahrain 73.4 -1.7 60 48.0 99.9 73.1 72.5 83.1 74.2 78.6 65 80
19 Finland 73.4 0.0 90 89.0 66.4 3.6 92.6 54.8 79.9 88.0 90 80
20 Japan 73.3 0.9 80 74.0 68.7 47.1 84.1 90.2 86.7 82.6 70 50
21 Luxembourg 73.2 -1.0 90 80.0 62.3 42.2 71.3 42.1 80.7 88.0 95 80
22 Georgia 73.0 0.4 40 49.0 87.2 73.8 88.6 79.9 82.7 88.6 80 60
23 Sweden 72.7 -0.4 90 89.0 43.0 19.2 87.9 54.0 85.5 88.0 90 80
24 Czech Republic 72.5 0.3 75 48.0 81.5 40.6 68.2 82.9 81.2 88.0 80 80
25 United Arab Emirates 72.4 1.0 55 69.0 99.5 85.8 74.7 83.8 83.8 82.4 40 50
26 Iceland 72.0 -0.4 90 78.0 72.0 32.6 90.5 62.2 77.0 88.0 70 60
27 Norway 71.8 0.9 90 86.0 52.1 43.8 92.1 48.2 81.7 89.4 75 60
28 Colombia 71.7 1.0 50 36.0 80.3 76.0 81.5 81.7 80.1 81.2 80 70
29 South Korea 71.5 0.3 75 55.0 72.5 67.9 89.7 51.1 81.6 72.6 70 80
30 Austria 71.2 -1.2 90 69.0 50.1 19.8 78.0 76.7 80.3 88.0 90 70
31 Malaysia 70.8 1.2 55 50.0 84.4 74.0 93.5 75.7 80.8 80.0 55 60
32 Qatar 70.8 -0.4 70 68.0 99.7 71.9 70.5 71.2 79.7 81.8 45 50
33 Israel 70.5 2.1 75 61.0 61.9 47.8 72.4 67.1 81.6 88.6 80 70
34 Macau 70.3 -1.0 60 49.7 71.8 91.8 60.0 50.0 74.9 90.0 85 70
35 Saint Lucia 70.2 -0.5 70 71.0 77.7 65.8 75.6 79.8 85.5 72.0 65 40
36 Botswana 69.8 -2.2 70 64.0 79.5 61.9 66.8 70.0 73.9 72.2 70 70
Government Spending
Investment Freedom
Monetary Freedom
Change from 2014
Financial Freedom
Business Freedom
Property Rights
Labor Freedom
Fiscal Freedom
Trade Freedom
Overall Score
World Rank
Country
37 Latvia 69.7 1.0 50 53.0 84.4 59.2 82.1 61.5 83.8 88.0 85 50
38 Jordan 69.3 0.1 60 45.0 93.7 70.7 59.1 74.4 80.6 79.6 70 60
39 Brunei 68.9 -0.1 35 60.0 87.0 63.6 68.3 96.9 76.6 81.8 70 50
40 Belgium 68.8 -1.1 80 75.0 43.6 10.2 90.7 63.7 81.7 88.0 85 70
41 The Bahamas 68.7 -1.1 70 71.0 97.8 83.2 68.9 75.3 78.8 52.2 30 60
42 Poland 68.6 1.6 60 60.0 82.1 47.1 67.3 60.4 81.3 88.0 70 70
43 Uruguay 68.6 -0.7 70 73.0 77.1 65.1 72.6 64.3 71.6 81.8 80 30
Saint Vincent
44 68.0 1.0 70 62.0 73.3 75.3 70.8 78.2 82.3 68.4 60 40
and the Grenadines
45 Cyprus 67.9 0.3 70 63.0 79.5 36.7 79.5 59.6 82.7 88.0 70 50
46 Barbados 67.9 -0.4 80 75.0 73.8 42.1 71.6 69.2 78.2 63.8 65 60
47 Peru 67.7 0.3 40 38.0 78.6 88.5 67.7 63.4 83.9 87.0 70 60
48 Jamaica 67.7 1.0 40 38.0 81.5 73.2 85.9 76.5 71.4 75.0 85 50
49 Spain 67.6 0.4 70 59.0 53.1 39.8 77.5 52.6 81.3 88.0 85 70
50 Slovak Republic 67.2 0.8 50 47.0 80.8 55.1 69.6 56.5 75.5 88.0 80 70
51 Costa Rica 67.2 0.3 50 53.0 80.0 89.9 64.5 54.6 75.8 83.8 70 50
52 Armenia 67.1 -1.8 20 36.0 84.4 82.8 82.7 64.3 70.6 85.4 75 70
53 Macedonia 67.1 -1.5 35 44.0 91.4 65.6 79.2 70.7 79.0 86.2 60 60
54 Hungary 66.8 -0.2 55 54.0 78.7 25.9 74.5 67.7 79.2 88.0 75 70
55 Bulgaria 66.8 1.1 30 41.0 91.0 64.5 68.5 76.6 83.2 88.0 65 60
56 Oman 66.7 -0.7 55 47.0 98.5 44.2 68.4 76.1 76.2 76.8 65 60
57 Romania 66.6 1.1 40 43.0 86.9 62.3 69.8 68.6 77.3 88.0 80 50
58 Malta 66.5 0.1 75 56.0 63.1 44.4 61.0 55.6 81.8 88.0 80 60
59 Mexico 66.4 -0.4 50 34.0 77.8 78.0 71.5 59.9 77.6 85.6 70 60
60 Cabo Verde 66.4 0.3 75 58.0 78.3 67.9 61.8 42.1 81.0 69.6 70 60
61 Dominica 66.1 0.9 60 58.0 73.6 61.5 71.6 68.7 89.5 72.8 75 30
62 El Salvador 65.7 -0.5 35 38.0 79.4 85.5 53.3 53.3 82.5 85.2 75 70
63 Albania 65.7 -1.2 30 31.0 87.2 76.1 70.6 52.9 80.8 87.8 70 70
64 Portugal 65.3 1.8 70 62.0 61.1 28.8 87.5 42.9 82.8 88.0 70 60
65 Rwanda 64.8 0.1 30 53.0 80.2 79.2 59.5 84.5 76.0 80.8 65 40
66 Montenegro 64.7 1.1 40 44.0 92.6 36.7 77.1 77.5 79.7 84.8 65 50
67 Trinidad and Tobago 64.1 1.4 50 38.0 79.0 69.3 65.3 76.6 74.3 78.6 60 50
68 Panama 64.1 0.7 30 35.0 84.5 78.8 71.5 41.5 76.4 78.4 75 70
69 Kazakhstan 63.3 -0.4 25 26.0 93.2 85.0 73.7 87.0 74.6 79.0 40 50
70 Turkey 63.2 -1.7 45 50.0 76.1 57.6 61.0 50.2 72.4 84.6 75 60
71 Ghana 63.0 -1.2 50 46.0 84.6 70.8 62.5 56.9 69.2 64.8 65 60
Executive Highlights 5
2015 Index of Economic Freedom World Rankings
Government Spending
Investment Freedom
Monetary Freedom
Change from 2014
Financial Freedom
Business Freedom
Property Rights
Labor Freedom
Fiscal Freedom
Trade Freedom
Overall Score
World Rank
Country
72 South Africa 62.6 0.1 50 42.0 69.5 68.2 73.0 61.6 74.9 76.6 50 60
73 France 62.5 -1.0 80 71.0 47.5 2.5 80.2 43.5 77.5 83.0 70 70
74 Kuwait 62.5 0.2 45 43.0 97.7 61.1 58.6 64.2 74.0 76.2 55 50
75 Thailand 62.4 -0.9 40 35.0 81.5 81.4 72.5 63.5 69.9 75.4 45 60
76 The Philippines 62.2 2.1 30 36.0 79.1 89.3 55.3 58.2 78.8 75.4 60 60
77 Saudi Arabia 62.1 -0.1 40 46.0 99.7 61.9 65.8 72.7 68.4 76.4 40 50
78 Samoa 61.9 0.8 60 38.0 80.2 46.5 73.6 78.4 81.2 75.8 55 30
79 Madagascar 61.7 0.0 45 28.0 90.9 94.7 62.3 45.1 79.2 71.8 50 50
80 Italy 61.7 0.8 55 43.0 54.2 23.2 71.9 55.4 81.2 88.0 85 60
81 Croatia 61.5 1.1 40 48.0 74.9 46.5 55.8 42.8 80.0 87.2 80 60
82 Kyrgyz Republic 61.3 0.2 20 24.0 93.6 53.2 73.7 85.0 73.8 80.2 60 50
83 Paraguay 61.1 -0.9 30 24.0 96.0 81.9 58.4 26.3 78.3 81.4 75 60
84 Vanuatu 61.1 1.6 40 33.5 97.2 83.8 51.5 46.4 82.9 75.4 60 40
85 Azerbaijan 61.0 -0.3 20 28.0 88.1 59.7 74.5 79.1 79.8 76.0 55 50
86 Dominican Republic 61.0 -0.3 30 29.0 84.1 87.1 53.5 57.5 76.0 77.8 75 40
87 Guatemala 60.4 -0.8 20 29.0 79.6 94.1 54.7 50.6 76.8 84.6 65 50
88 Slovenia 60.3 -2.4 60 57.0 58.1 0.0 81.2 57.1 81.3 88.0 70 50
89 Morocco 60.1 1.8 40 37.0 70.9 61.0 68.8 33.4 81.9 78.2 70 60
90 Serbia 60.0 0.6 45 42.0 82.4 27.1 57.8 70.4 72.2 78.2 75 50
91 Swaziland 59.9 -1.3 40 39.0 76.4 68.6 60.5 69.3 73.9 76.0 55 40
92 Uganda 59.7 -0.2 25 26.0 73.3 89.0 43.3 87.5 76.3 76.6 60 40
93 Namibia 59.6 0.2 30 48.0 66.7 56.0 64.3 90.9 74.3 71.2 55 40
94 Lebanon 59.3 -0.1 20 28.0 91.3 70.6 54.7 60.7 72.0 75.8 60 60
95 Tonga 59.3 1.1 20 28.6 87.2 79.0 74.1 92.1 73.5 78.4 40 20
96 Mongolia 59.2 0.3 30 38.0 83.9 35.6 68.2 82.7 69.2 74.8 50 60
97 Bosnia and Herzegovina 59.0 0.6 20 42.0 82.9 27.3 53.5 63.4 84.0 87.2 70 60
98 Fiji 59.0 0.3 25 22.3 81.3 74.6 63.2 75.2 78.3 70.2 50 50
99 Benin 58.8 1.7 30 36.0 68.3 86.7 55.2 53.2 79.9 58.4 70 50
100 Zambia 58.7 -1.7 30 38.0 71.9 78.0 68.2 46.0 73.2 76.8 55 50
101 Sri Lanka 58.6 -1.4 35 37.0 85.0 88.4 72.5 58.7 68.2 71.6 30 40
102 Burkina Faso 58.6 -0.3 25 38.0 82.4 79.8 49.6 57.8 80.0 68.2 65 40
103 Côte d'Ivoire 58.5 0.8 35 27.0 77.7 82.4 65.4 46.0 75.0 71.4 55 50
104 Gabon 58.3 0.5 40 34.0 77.5 74.6 57.9 64.3 78.4 61.0 55 40
105 Indonesia 58.1 -0.4 30 32.0 83.3 88.3 49.3 48.7 74.9 74.8 40 60
106 Senegal 57.8 2.4 40 41.0 71.3 74.6 54.6 39.5 83.0 74.0 60 40
107 Tunisia 57.7 0.4 40 41.0 74.3 70.8 81.2 69.1 74.8 61.2 35 30
Government Spending
Investment Freedom
Monetary Freedom
Change from 2014
Financial Freedom
Business Freedom
Property Rights
Labor Freedom
Fiscal Freedom
Trade Freedom
Overall Score
World Rank
Country
108 Nicaragua 57.6 -0.8 10 28.0 78.4 76.6 58.0 56.7 67.8 85.4 65 50
109 Tanzania 57.5 -0.3 30 33.0 79.9 79.3 45.0 61.4 69.7 67.0 60 50
110 Cambodia 57.5 0.1 25 20.0 90.5 87.5 29.2 62.2 78.7 72.2 60 50
111 Moldova 57.5 0.2 40 35.0 85.1 51.8 66.8 40.6 76.1 79.8 50 50
112 Djibouti 57.5 1.6 25 36.0 81.2 57.1 55.4 66.6 78.9 54.8 70 50
113 The Gambia 57.5 -2.0 25 28.0 75.4 73.4 55.7 66.7 70.8 65.0 65 50
114 Seychelles 57.5 1.3 50 54.0 79.8 59.4 67.7 63.9 76.0 44.0 50 30
115 Bhutan 57.4 0.7 60 63.0 82.6 60.1 61.9 81.1 66.0 49.4 20 30
116 Honduras 57.4 0.3 30 26.0 84.9 78.7 53.2 28.0 75.4 77.6 60 60
117 Belize 56.8 0.1 30 6.7 82.4 78.3 59.1 61.8 79.3 70.4 50 50
118 Brazil 56.6 -0.3 50 42.0 68.4 50.9 53.6 52.1 69.4 69.6 50 60
119 Mali 56.4 0.9 25 28.0 69.6 89.2 47.2 50.7 81.1 73.2 60 40
120 Nigeria 55.6 1.3 30 25.0 85.2 76.1 48.3 77.7 70.4 63.8 40 40
121 Pakistan 55.6 0.4 30 28.0 77.7 86.1 65.6 42.1 71.2 65.6 50 40
122 Kenya 55.6 -1.5 30 27.0 78.0 72.1 47.9 63.8 72.8 64.0 50 50
123 Guyana 55.5 -0.2 25 27.0 68.7 70.8 63.8 74.5 78.4 72.0 45 30
124 Egypt 55.2 2.3 20 32.0 85.8 68.0 65.4 53.6 67.4 70.0 50 40
125 Mozambique 54.8 -0.2 30 30.0 75.2 66.5 60.9 37.9 82.0 75.4 40 50
126 Malawi 54.8 -0.6 40 37.0 78.5 49.0 49.1 63.1 53.8 72.2 55 50
127 Niger 54.6 -0.5 30 34.0 76.6 83.6 39.2 40.9 81.3 65.6 55 40
128 India 54.6 -1.1 55 36.0 79.4 78.3 43.3 48.7 65.3 64.6 35 40
129 Suriname 54.2 0.0 35 36.0 69.3 73.8 42.2 81.9 77.2 66.2 30 30
130 Greece 54.0 -1.7 40 40.0 64.2 0.0 73.3 51.6 77.8 83.0 60 50
131 Bangladesh 53.9 -0.2 20 27.0 72.7 92.0 62.2 63.7 67.7 59.0 45 30
132 Burundi 53.7 2.3 20 21.0 73.5 61.3 61.4 68.1 69.8 72.2 60 30
133 Yemen 53.7 -1.8 30 18.0 91.5 59.9 54.0 57.1 68.5 77.6 50 30
134 Maldives 53.4 2.4 25 21.9 95.5 50.6 85.8 73.4 74.1 47.8 30 30
135 Mauritania 53.3 0.1 25 30.0 80.2 59.8 50.5 52.1 76.6 69.0 50 40
136 São Tomé and Príncipe 53.3 4.5 25 42.0 87.8 41.4 65.1 45.8 70.7 75.2 50 30
137 Papua New Guinea 53.1 -0.8 20 25.0 66.9 68.7 53.5 74.5 72.7 85.0 35 30
138 Togo 53.0 3.1 30 29.0 69.7 78.1 51.9 43.4 80.4 67.8 50 30
139 China 52.7 0.2 20 40.0 69.7 81.5 52.1 63.0 74.2 71.8 25 30
140 Tajikistan 52.7 0.7 20 22.0 92.1 81.9 65.4 46.4 69.6 74.6 25 30
141 Liberia 52.7 0.3 25 38.0 83.0 69.9 60.1 43.9 72.7 74.4 40 20
142 Comoros 52.1 0.7 30 28.0 64.5 78.8 47.3 52.0 77.9 73.0 40 30
143 Russia 52.1 0.2 20 28.0 86.1 57.8 76.3 58.9 63.9 75.0 25 30
Executive Highlights 7
2015 Index of Economic Freedom World Rankings
Government Spending
Investment Freedom
Monetary Freedom
Change from 2014
Financial Freedom
Business Freedom
Property Rights
Labor Freedom
Fiscal Freedom
Trade Freedom
Overall Score
World Rank
Country
144 Guinea 52.1 -1.4 15 24.0 68.1 79.5 51.6 74.4 66.7 61.2 40 40
145 Guinea-Bissau 52.0 0.7 20 19.0 89.1 88.0 39.6 61.7 77.5 65.4 30 30
146 Cameroon 51.9 -0.7 25 25.0 71.7 87.8 41.6 47.8 75.6 59.6 35 50
147 Sierra Leone 51.7 1.2 10 30.0 80.8 87.5 53.4 41.6 68.5 70.2 55 20
148 Vietnam 51.7 0.9 15 31.0 79.1 77.1 61.5 62.9 66.8 78.6 15 30
149 Ethiopia 51.5 1.5 30 33.0 77.4 91.4 55.9 56.4 66.1 64.4 20 20
150 Laos 51.4 0.2 15 26.0 86.2 86.8 59.5 57.1 74.5 58.6 30 20
151 Haiti 51.3 2.4 10 19.0 80.3 76.2 43.1 63.7 73.5 77.6 40 30
152 Nepal 51.3 1.2 30 31.0 85.6 88.9 65.7 44.3 70.5 61.8 5 30
153 Belarus 49.8 -0.3 20 29.0 86.4 54.7 72.0 80.1 44.5 81.0 20 10
154 Micronesia 49.6 -0.2 30 30.0 93.2 0.0 51.0 79.1 76.9 81.0 25 30
155 Lesotho 49.6 0.1 35 49.0 68.5 0.0 54.7 63.9 75.2 64.6 45 40
156 Ecuador 49.2 1.2 15 35.0 79.1 51.0 51.4 51.3 68.2 71.4 30 40
157 Algeria 48.9 -1.9 30 36.0 80.0 38.7 66.6 50.5 71.2 60.8 25 30
158 Angola 47.9 0.2 15 23.0 84.5 50.1 47.4 43.2 65.4 70.2 40 40
159 Solomon Islands 47.0 0.8 30 25.0 61.1 25.7 67.7 68.6 74.3 73.0 15 30
160 Uzbekistan 47.0 0.5 15 17.0 90.2 67.3 73.1 64.2 63.5 69.8 0 10
161 Burma 46.9 0.4 10 21.0 86.9 77.9 28.7 79.3 66.1 74.2 15 10
162 Ukraine 46.9 -2.4 20 25.0 78.7 28.0 59.3 48.2 78.6 85.8 15 30
163 Bolivia 46.8 -1.6 10 34.0 86.8 60.9 53.7 25.5 69.7 77.6 10 40
164 Kiribati 46.4 0.1 30 29.2 73.0 0.0 56.8 83.9 80.6 55.4 25 30
165 Chad 45.9 1.4 20 19.0 46.2 83.6 27.1 47.7 75.6 55.2 45 40
166 Central African Republic 45.9 -0.8 15 25.0 65.0 92.0 27.2 37.5 69.6 52.4 45 30
167 Timor-Leste 45.5 2.3 20 30.0 64.7 0.0 59.8 72.0 68.7 79.6 40 20
168 Congo, Dem. Rep. 45.0 4.4 10 22.0 72.9 85.7 42.8 38.4 75.1 63.0 20 20
169 Argentina 44.1 -0.5 15 34.0 66.8 41.2 52.8 43.3 59.6 68.8 30 30
170 Congo, Republic of 42.7 -1.0 10 22.0 67.4 60.7 36.8 36.0 71.6 62.4 30 30
171 Iran 41.8 1.5 10 25.0 81.2 93.0 57.0 51.3 48.7 41.4 0 10
172 Turkmenistan 41.4 -0.8 5 17.0 94.0 93.5 30.0 20.0 64.2 80.0 0 10
173 Equatorial Guinea 40.4 -4.0 10 19.0 75.4 31.4 37.5 33.5 78.3 53.8 35 30
174 Eritrea 38.9 0.4 10 20.0 57.0 71.8 18.2 65.5 57.8 69.2 0 20
175 Zimbabwe 37.6 2.1 10 21.0 66.6 74.2 37.1 23.7 75.4 58.4 0 10
176 Venezuela 34.3 -2.0 5 20.0 75.0 52.0 41.6 24.2 42.8 62.8 0 20
177 Cuba 29.6 0.9 10 46.0 61.8 0.0 20.0 20.0 64.8 63.8 0 10
178 North Korea 1.3 0.3 5 8.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0
N/A Afghanistan N/A N/A N/A 8.0 91.7 81.2 61.4 67.5 72.6 N/A 55 N/A
Government Spending
Investment Freedom
Monetary Freedom
Change from 2014
Financial Freedom
Business Freedom
Property Rights
Labor Freedom
Fiscal Freedom
Trade Freedom
Overall Score
World Rank
Country
N/A Iraq N/A N/A N/A 16.0 N/A 43.8 57.7 74.4 73.6 N/A N/A N/A
N/A Kosovo N/A N/A 30 33.0 N/A 73.9 66.8 72.1 74.9 N/A 65 N/A
N/A Libya N/A N/A 10 15.0 95.0 37.5 46.8 66.7 71.4 80.0 5 N/A
N/A Liechtenstein N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 90.0 85 80
N/A Somalia N/A N/A N/A 8.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A Sudan N/A N/A N/A 11.0 86.4 94.5 49.0 43.8 52.8 55.6 15 N/A
N/A Syria N/A N/A 10 17.0 N/A N/A 57.3 49.1 N/A N/A 0 20
Executive Highlights 9
Chapter 1
[A] society that puts freedom first will, as a individual merit. Government decision-making
happy by-product, end up with both great- is characterized by openness and transparency,
er freedom and greater equality. Though which illuminates the shadows where dis-
a by-product of freedom, greater equality crimination might flourish and promotes equal
is not an accident. A free society releases opportunity for all.
the energies and abilities of people to pur- In an economically free society, the power of
sue their own objectives. It prevents some economic decision-making is widely dispersed,
people from arbitrarily suppressing others. and the allocation of resources for production
and consumption is on the basis of open compe-
—Milton and Rose Friedman1
tition so that every individual or firm gets a fair
chance to succeed.
I
n an economically free society, each person These three fundamental principles of
controls the fruits of his or her own labor economic freedom—empowerment of the
and initiative. Individuals are empowered— individual, non-discrimination, and open compe-
indeed, entitled—to pursue their dreams by tition—underpin every measurement and policy
means of their own free choice. idea presented in the Index of Economic Freedom.
In an economically free society, individu-
als succeed or fail based on their individual ECONOMIC FREEDOM:
effort and ability. The institutions of a free and THE ROLE OF GOVERNMENT
open market society do not discriminate either As Friedrich Hayek once observed, “To be
against or in favor of individuals based on their controlled in our economic pursuits means to be
race, ethnic background, gender, class, family controlled in everything.”2 Hayek’s keen insights
connections, or any other factor unrelated to into economic freedom are based on the moral
11
truth that each person is, as a matter of natural and enjoy the fruits of their labor. For example,
right, a free and responsible being with inalien- citizens are taxed to provide revenue for public
able dignity and fundamental liberties that safety, the protection of property, and the com-
righteous and effective political systems should mon defense. Other goods—what economists call
regard as unassailable. Governments that are “public goods”—may be supplied more efficiently
just, according to the U.S. Declaration of Inde- by government than through private means.
pendence, are instituted precisely to secure Some public goods, such as the maintenance of
these rights. a police force to protect property rights, a mon-
Any discussion of economic freedom thus has etary authority to maintain a sound currency, and
at its heart reflection on the critical relationship an impartial judiciary to enforce contracts among
between individuals and the government. In parties, are themselves vital ingredients of an eco-
general, state action or government control that nomically free society. When government action
interferes with individual autonomy limits eco- rises beyond the minimal necessary level, how-
nomic freedom. ever, it leads inevitably and quickly to the loss of
However, the goal of economic freedom is freedom—and the first freedom affected is often
not simply an absence of government coercion economic freedom.3
or constraint, but the creation and maintenance Throughout history, governments have
of a mutual sense of liberty for all. As individuals imposed a wide array of constraints on econom-
enjoy the blessings of economic freedom, they ic activity. Such constraints, though sometimes
in turn have a responsibility to respect the eco- imposed in the name of equality or some other
nomic rights and freedoms of others within the noble societal purpose, are in reality imposed
rule of law. Governments are instituted to ensure most often for the benefit of societal elites or spe-
basic protections against the ravages of nature cial interests, and they come with a high cost to
or the predations of one citizen against another. society as a whole. By substituting political judg-
Positive economic rights such as property and ments for those of the marketplace, government
contracts are given societal as well as individ- diverts entrepreneurial resources and energy
ual defense against the destructive tendencies from productive activities to rent-seeking, the
of others. quest for economically unearned benefits. The
A comprehensive view of economic freedom result is lower productivity, economic stagna-
should encompass all liberties and rights of pro- tion, and declining prosperity.
duction, distribution, or consumption of goods Government provision of goods and services
and services. The highest forms of economic beyond those that are clearly considered pub-
freedom should provide an absolute right of lic goods also imposes a separate constraint on
property ownership; full freedom of movement economic activity, crowding out private-sector
for labor, capital, and goods; and an absolute activity and usurping resources that otherwise
absence of coercion or constraint of economic might have been available for private investment
activity beyond that which is necessary for the or consumption. Constraining economic choice
protection and maintenance of liberty itself. An distorts and diminishes the production, distri-
economically free society encourages the han- bution, and consumption of goods and services
dling of economic decisions in a decentralized (including, of course, labor services). The wealth
fashion. Individuals are free to work, produce, of a nation inevitably declines as a result.
consume, and invest in any way they choose
under the even-handed application of laws, with MEASURING ECONOMIC FREEDOM
their economic freedoms at once both protected The Index of Economic Freedom takes a broad
and respected by the state. and comprehensive view of economic freedom,
Some government action is necessary for measuring country performance in 10 separate
the citizens of a nation to defend themselves, areas. Some of the aspects of economic freedom
promote the peaceful evolution of civil society, that are evaluated are concerned with a coun-
Chapter 1 13
but it also does so when it incurs public debt that and private investment incentives. Even worse,
ultimately must be paid off through taxation. a government’s insulation from market dis-
The marginal tax rate confronting an indi- cipline often leads to bureaucracy, lower pro-
vidual is, in effect, the government’s cut of the ductivity, inefficiency, and mounting public
profit from that individual’s next unit of work or debt that imposes an even greater burden on
engagement in a new entrepreneurial venture; future generations.
whatever remains after the tax is the individu- As many economies have experienced in
al’s actual reward for the effort. Therefore, the recent years, high levels of public debt accumu-
higher the government’s cut, the lower the indi- lated through irresponsible government spend-
vidual’s reward—and the lower the incentive to ing undermine economic freedom and prevent
undertake the work at all. Higher tax rates inter- dynamic entrepreneurial growth.
fere with the ability of individuals and firms to
pursue their goals in the marketplace and there- Regulatory Efficiency
by reduce overall private-sector activity. Business Freedom. Business freedom is
While individual and corporate income tax about an individual’s right to establish and run
rates are important to economic freedom, they an enterprise without undue interference from
are not a comprehensive measure of the tax bur- the state. Burdensome and redundant regula-
den. Governments impose many other indirect tions are the most common barriers to the free
taxes, including payroll, sales, and excise taxes, conduct of entrepreneurial activity.
as well as tariffs and the value-added tax (VAT). By increasing the costs of production, regula-
In the Index of Economic Freedom, the burden of tions can make it difficult for entrepreneurs to
these taxes is captured by measuring the overall succeed in the marketplace. Although many reg-
tax burden from all forms of taxation as a per- ulations hinder business productivity and profit-
centage of total GDP. ability, the most inhibiting to entrepreneurship
Government Spending. The cost of exces- are those that are associated with licensing
sive government is a central issue in economic new businesses.
freedom, both in terms of generating revenue In some countries, as well as many states in
(see fiscal freedom) and in terms of spending. the United States, the procedure for obtaining
Government spending comes in many forms. a business license can be as simple as mailing in
Some government spending—for example, a registration form with a minimal fee. In Hong
to provide infrastructure, fund research, or Kong, for example, obtaining a business license
improve human capital—may be considered requires filling out a single form, and the process
investments. Government also spends on can be completed in a few hours. In other econo-
public goods, the benefits of which accrue mies, such as India and parts of South America,
broadly to society in ways that markets cannot the process of obtaining a business license can
price appropriately. take much longer, involving endless trips to gov-
All government spending that must eventu- ernment offices and repeated encounters with
ally be financed by higher taxation, however, officious and sometimes corrupt bureaucrats.
entails an opportunity cost. This cost is the value Once a business is open, government regu-
of the private consumption or investment that lation may interfere with the normal decision-
would have occurred had the resources involved making or price-setting process. Interestingly,
been left in the private sector. two countries with the same set of regulations
Excessive government spending runs a great can impose different regulatory burdens. If one
risk of crowding out private economic activ- country applies its regulations evenly and trans-
ity. Even if an economy achieves faster growth parently, this can lower the regulatory burden by
through more government spending, such eco- facilitating long-term business planning. If the
nomic expansion tends to be only temporary, other applies regulations inconsistently, it raises
distorting the market allocation of resources the regulatory burden by creating an unpredict-
Chapter 1 15
companies that take the entrepreneurial risk in es that offer alternative means for raising capital
expectation of greater return, but also to society or diversifying risk. As with the banking system,
as a whole. An effective investment framework the useful role for government in regulating
will be characterized by transparency and equi- these institutions lies in ensuring transparency
ty, supporting all types of firms rather than just and integrity and promoting disclosure of assets,
large or strategically important companies, and liabilities, and risks.
will encourage rather than discourage innova- Banking and financial regulation by the state
tion and competition. that goes beyond the assurance of transparency
Restrictions on the movement of capital, both and honesty in financial markets can impede
domestic and international, undermine the effi- efficiency, increase the costs of financing entre-
cient allocation of resources and reduce pro- preneurial activity, and limit competition. If the
ductivity, distorting economic decision-making. government intervenes in the stock market, for
Restrictions on cross-border investment can instance, it contravenes the choices of millions
limit both inflows and outflows of capital, there- of individuals by interfering with the pricing of
by shrinking markets and reducing opportuni- capital—the most critical function of a market
ties for growth. economy. Equity markets measure on a con-
In an environment in which individuals and tinual basis the expected profits and losses in
companies are free to choose where and how to publicly held companies. This measurement is
invest, capital will flow to its best use: to the sec- essential in allocating capital resources to their
tors and activities where it is most needed and highest-valued uses and thereby satisfying con-
the returns are greatest. State action to redirect sumers’ most urgent requirements.
the flow of capital and limit choice is an imposi-
tion on the freedom of both the investor and the ECONOMIC FREEDOM: AN END IN
person seeking capital. The more restrictions ITSELF, A MEANS FOR PROGRESS
a country imposes on investment, the lower its As a vital element of human dignity, auton-
level of entrepreneurial activity. omy, and personal empowerment, economic
Financial Freedom. An accessible and effi- freedom is valuable as an end itself. But just as
ciently functioning formal financial system important is the fact that economic freedom is
ensures the availability of diversified savings, the key to achieving the broad-based economic
credit, payment, and investment services to dynamism that ensures lasting inclusive growth
individuals. By expanding financing opportuni- and increased prosperity for society as a whole.
ties and promoting entrepreneurship, an open As Hayek foresaw decades ago, “the guiding prin-
banking environment encourages competition ciple in any attempt to create a world of free men
in order to provide the most efficient financial must be this: a policy of freedom for the individ-
intermediation between households and firms ual is the only truly progressive policy.”4
as well as between investors and entrepreneurs. As editions of this Index have documented
Through a process driven by supply and over the past two decades, the link between
demand, markets provide real-time information economic freedom and long-term development
on prices and immediate discipline for those who is clear and strong. Countries that allow their
have made bad decisions. This process depends citizens more economic freedom reach higher
on transparency in the market and the integrity incomes and better standards of life. People in
of the information being made available. A pru- economically free societies live longer. They
dent and effective regulatory system, through have better health. They are able to be better
disclosure requirements and independent audit- stewards of the environment, and they push for-
ing, ensures both. ward the frontiers of human achievement in sci-
Increasingly, the central role played by banks ence and technology through greater innovation.
is being complemented by other financial servic-
Chapter 1 17
Chapter 2
S
ince its inception in 1995, the Index of Eco- linkages are straightforward: Higher taxes, for
nomic Freedom has chronicled hundreds example, reduce investment and hurt job growth.
of examples of government policy changes Others, such as the impact on economic growth
that have enhanced economic freedom, thereby from the promotion of property rights or the
promoting human progress and greater pros- maintenance of a stable monetary system, are
perity. As the Index has catalogued, nations with more intricate, multidimensional, and nonlinear.
higher degrees of economic freedom prosper Even in these cases, however, the evidence is
because they capitalize more fully on the ability strong that adherence to the principles of eco-
of the free-market system not only to generate, nomic freedom is an unmatched strategy for
but also to reinforce dynamic growth through promoting solutions to human problems and
efficient resource allocation, value creation, advancing overall well-being. No alternative sys-
and innovation. Policies that promote freedom, tems—and many have been tried—come close to
whether through improvements in the rule of the record of free-market capitalism in promot-
law, the promotion of competition and openness, ing growth and improving the human condition.
or suitable restraints on the size and economic
reach of government, turn out in practice to offer ECONOMIC FREEDOM:
and advance practical solutions to a wide range ADVANCING OPPORTUNITY
of economic and social challenges that face the Today’s successful economies are not neces-
world’s societies. sarily geographically large or richly blessed with
The findings of the 2015 Index once again natural resources. Many economies have man-
demonstrate the strongly positive linkages aged to expand opportunities for their citizens by
between economic freedom and various dimen- enhancing their economic dynamism. In general,
sions of human development. Many of the the overarching objective of economic policies
19
Economic Freedom Promotes Entrepreneurial Dynamism
Rank— 1
Entrepreneurship
and Opportunity
20
Correlation: 0.80
R2 = 0.64
40
60
80
ine
100
ndL
Tre
Each circle
120 represents a nation
in the Index of
Economic Freedom
140
140 120 100 80 60 40 20 1
Rank—Index of Economic Freedom
Sources: Terry Miller and Anthony B. Kim, 2015 Index of Economic Freedom (Washington, DC: The Heritage Foundation
and Dow Jones & Company, Inc., 2015), http://www.heritage.org/index, and Legatum Institute Foundation, “Legatum
Prosperity Index: Entrepreneurship and Opportunity,” http://www.prosperity.com/#!/entrpreneurship-opportunity
(accessed November 20, 2014).
Chart 1 heritage.org
must be to create an environment that provides the free-market system is not on the verge of
the most opportunity for the widest range of breakdown. In fact, as the negative impact of
activities that can lead to increased prosperity. regulatory and spending mistakes has become
The Index results have shown that sustain- apparent, a greater number of people around
ing such economic dynamism is achievable only the world seem to be realizing that the economic
when governments adopt economic policies that damage inflicted by the heavy hand of govern-
empower individuals and firms with more choic- ment—subpar growth, deteriorating entrepre-
es, encouraging greater entrepreneurship. neurial environments, and lower employment
It is noteworthy that despite recent policy growth—is not inevitable, but rather the result
missteps by many countries in responding to the of bad policy choices.
global economic slowdown, which amounted to Even as the free market has been under chal-
a political assault on capitalism in some places, lenge in countries such as Venezuela, Bolivia,
Each circle
represents a nation
$120,000 in the Index of
Economic Freedom
$100,000
e
d Lin
R2 = 0.42
Tren
$80,000
$60,000
$40,000
$20,000
$0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
$39,840
$40,000
$30,000
$20,000 $18,509
$10,000 $7,955
$6,157
$0
Free Mostly Free Moderately Mostly Repressed
Free Unfree
Category in the Index of Economic Freedom
Sources: Terry Miller and Anthony B. Kim, 2015 Index of Economic Freedom (Washington, DC: The Heritage Foundation
and Dow Jones & Company, Inc., 2015), http://www.heritage.org/index; and International Monetary Fund, World
Economic Outlook Databases, http://www.imf.org/external/ns/cs.aspx?id=28 (accessed November 19, 2014).
Chart 2 heritage.org
Chapter 2 21
As Economic Freedom Rises, the Global Economy Expands and Poverty Falls
60 $51.1
$50 40%
59.4 34.1%
59
$40 30%
$39.8
58
58.1
$30 20%
57 20.6%
56 $20 10%
1995 2000 2010 2015 2005 2000 2010 2012 1990 2000 2010
Sources: Terry Miller and Anthony B. Kim, 2015 Index of Economic Freedom (Washington, DC: The Heritage Foundation and
Dow Jones & Company, Inc., 2015), http://www.heritage.org/index; The World Bank, World Development Indicators
Online, http://databank.worldbank.org/data/views/variableSelection/selectvariables.aspx?source=world-development-
indicators (accessed November 20, 2014); and The World Bank, PovcalNet, http://iresearch.worldbank.org/PovcalNet/
index.htm?1 (accessed November 20, 2014). Some figures have been interpolated.
Chart 3 heritage.org
Russia, and even the United States, many other try’s entrepreneurial environment, its promo-
governments around the world have acknowl- tion of innovative activity, and the evenness
edged its superiority. Decades of evidence, some of opportunity.”
presented in the pages of this Index, are hard for Given such a strong relationship, it should
even the most ideological governments to ignore. be apparent that a government’s most effective
Not only does the free-market system remain via- stimulus activity will not be to increase its own
ble, but many of its core features, such as private spending or increase layers of regulation, both
property rights, openness to trade and invest- of which reduce economic freedom. The best
ment, and fiscal discipline, have entrenched results are likely to be achieved instead through
themselves as the policy standard, any deviation policy reforms that improve the incentives that
from which requires strong justification. drive entrepreneurial activity, creating more
opportunities for greater economic dynamism.
ECONOMIC FREEDOM: Equally notable are the fundamental benefits
PROMOTING PROSPERITY that stem from the strong positive relationship
In many respects, economic freedom is between economic freedom and levels of per
merely shorthand for an openness to entrepre- capita income. For countries achieving scores
neurial activity that increases opportunity for in the Index that reflect even moderate levels of
individuals to succeed in their endeavors. Chart economic freedom (60 or above), the relation-
1 shows the close correspondence between eco- ship between economic freedom and per capita
nomic freedom and entrepreneurial oppor- GDP is highly significant.
tunity as measured by the Entrepreneurship As indicated in Chart 2, countries moving up
and Opportunity sub-index of the Legatum the economic freedom scale show increasingly
Prosperity Index, which “measures a coun- high levels of average income. Economies rated
3.5% 3.5%
2.0%
3.0% 3.0%
2.5% 2.5%
1.5%
2.0% 2.0%
1.0%
1.5% 1.5%
1.0% 1.0%
0.5%
0.5% 0.5%
0% 0% 0%
1st 2nd 3rd 4th 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 1st 2nd 3rd 4th
Sources: Terry Miller and Anthony B. Kim, 2015 Index of Economic Freedom (Washington, DC: The Heritage Foundation and
Dow Jones & Company, Inc., 2015), http://www.heritage.org/index, and The World Bank, World Development Indicators
Online, http://databank.worldbank.org/data/views/variableSelection/selectvariables.aspx?source=world-development-
indicators (accessed November 20, 2014). Changes in economic freedom score have been calculated as the annual
compound growth rate.
Chart 4 heritage.org
“free” or “mostly free” in the 2015 Index enjoy The free-market system that is rooted in
incomes that are over twice the average levels in the principles of economic freedom has fueled
all other countries and more than five times high- unprecedented economic growth around the
er than the incomes of “repressed” economies. world. As Chart 3 illustrates, as the global econ-
omy has moved toward greater economic free-
ECONOMIC FREEDOM: dom over the past two decades, real world GDP
ANTIDOTE TO POVERTY has increased by about 70 percent, and the global
By a great many measures, the past two decades poverty rate has been cut in half, lifting hundreds
during which the Index has been charting the of millions of people out of poverty.
advance of economic freedom have been the most Greater economic freedom has had a posi-
prosperous in the history of humankind. Those tive impact not just on the number of people in
countries that have adopted some version of free- poverty, but also on the intensity of the poverty
market capitalism, with economies supported by still experienced by some. Poverty intensity as
efficient regulations and open to the free flow of measured by the United Nations Development
goods, services, and capital, have participated in Programme’s Multidimensional Poverty Index,
an era of globalization and economic integration which assesses the nature and intensity of depri-
in which solutions to many of the world’s devel- vation at the individual level in education, health
opment problems have taken hold and generated outcomes, and standard of living, is much lower
real improvements in living standards. on average in countries with higher levels of eco-
Chapter 2 23
Economic Freedom and al per capita economic growth rates of countries
Poverty Intensity that have grown economic freedom the most are
at least 50 percent higher than those of countries
Poverty Intensity where freedom has stagnated or slowed.
0.25
0.22 ECONOMIC FREEDOM:
0.20 SOCIETAL DEVELOPMENT
AND DEMOCRATIC PROGRESS
0.15
Growing economic freedom is unequivo-
cally about more than financial success. Achiev-
0.10
ing greater overall prosperity that goes beyond
0.06
0.05 materialistic and monetary dimensions of well-
being is equally important. The societal benefits
0 of economic freedom extend far beyond higher
Mostly Free and Mostly Unfree incomes or reductions in poverty. Countries
Moderately Free and Repressed
countries countries with higher levels of economic freedom enjoy
higher levels of overall human development as
Sources: Terry Miller and Anthony B. Kim, 2015 Index of measured by the United Nations Human Devel-
Economic Freedom (Washington, DC: The Heritage
Foundation and Dow Jones & Company, Inc., 2015), opment Index, which measures life expectancy,
http://www.heritage.org/index, and U.N. Human literacy, education, and the standard of living in
Development Programme, “Human Development
Report 2014,” 2014, http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/ countries worldwide. As Chart 6 shows, govern-
human-development-report-2014 (accessed ments that choose policies that increase eco-
November 20, 2014).
nomic freedom are placing their societies on the
Chart 5 heritage.org pathway to more education opportunities, bet-
ter health care, and higher standards of living for
their citizens.
nomic freedom. Chart 5 shows that the intensity In some countries, government policies
of poverty in countries whose economies are and actions concerning the environment have
considered mostly free or moderately free is only become more intrusive and economically dis-
about one-fourth the level in countries that are tortionary. Many governments have pushed
rated less free. programs to tax carbon emissions and increase
The key driver of poverty reduction is dynam- taxes on gasoline, organized non-transparent
ic and resilient economic growth that creates and sometimes corrupt exchanges for the buy-
jobs. Not surprisingly, one of the most important ing and selling of carbon emissions, and provided
goals of economic policy in almost every country subsidies for “clean” energy to politically favored
in the world has thus been to increase the rate of firms. Such policies impose a huge direct cost on
economic growth. society, and they also retard economic growth—
As Chart 4 demonstrates, there is a robust rela- and all for uncertain environmental benefits.
tionship between improving economic freedom Interestingly, the same free-market princi-
and achieving higher per capita economic growth. ples that have proven to be the key to economic
Whether long-term (20 years), medium-term (10 success have also proven to deliver environmen-
years), or short-term (five years), the relationship tal success. Around the world, economic freedom
between changes in economic freedom and chang- has been shown to increase countries’ capacity
es in economic growth is consistently positive. for innovation and thus to improve overall envi-
Undeniably, countries moving toward greater ronmental performance.
economic freedom tend to achieve higher rates of The positive link between economic free-
per capita GDP growth over time. Whether in the dom and higher levels of innovation ensures
short term or over the long run, the average annu- greater economic dynamism in coping with
Chapter 2 25
Economic Freedom, Innovation, and the Environment
Innovation 70
Capacity
Each circle
represents a nation
60 in the Index of
Economic Freedom
50
Correlation: 0.74
R2: 0.55
40
30
20
e
Lin
rend
T
10
0
20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
60 55.9
43.2
40.2
40
20
0
Free Mostly Free Moderately Mostly Repressed
Free Unfree
Category in the Index of Economic Freedom
Sources: Terry Miller and Anthony B. Kim, 2015 Index of Economic Freedom (Washington, DC: The Heritage Foundation
and Dow Jones & Company, Inc., 2015), http://www.heritage.org/index; and Cornell University, INSEAD, and World
Intellectual Property Organization, The Global Innovation Index 2013: The Local Dynamics of Innovation (Geneva: World
Intellectual Property Organization, 2013), http://www.globalinnovationindex.org/content.aspx?page=gii-full-report-2013
(accessed November 20, 2014); and Yale University, “2014 Environmental Performance Index,” http://epi.yale.edu/epi
(accessed November 20, 2014).
Chart 7 heritage.org
e
Each circle
Lin
represents a nation
nd
in the Index of
Tre
10 Economic Freedom
R2 = 0.43
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Sources: Terry Miller and Anthony B. Kim, 2015 Index of Economic Freedom (Washington, DC: The Heritage Foundation and
Dow Jones & Company, Inc., 2015), http://www.heritage.org/index, and The Economist Intelligence Unit, “Democracy Index
2013,” http://www.eiu.com/public/topical_report.aspx?campaignid=Democracy0814 (accessed November 19, 2014).
Chart 8 heritage.org
directly related to preserving and enhancing ronments that are most conducive to social
dynamic upward mobility. progress.2 Countries that improve their com-
Also notable is that although some naysay- petitiveness and open their societies to new
ers claim that economic and social progress has ideas, products, and innovations have largely
been limited in recent years as incomes in some achieved the high levels of social progress
countries have become more unequal as a result that their citizens demand. It is not massive
of economic freedom, the evidence does not sup- redistributions of wealth or government dic-
port this contention. Instead, societies based on tates on income levels that produce the most
economic freedom are the ones that have dem- positive social outcomes. Instead, mobility
onstrated the strongest social progress. and progress require lower barriers to entry,
As shown in Chart 9, countries that largely freedom to engage with the world, and less
embrace economic freedom provide the envi- government intrusion.
Chapter 2 27
Economic Freedom and Social Progress
Each circle
represents a nation
in the Index of
Economic Freedom
80
Correlation: 0.71
R2 = 0.49
60
40
ine
ndL
Tre
20
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Overall Score in the Index of Economic Freedom
Sources: Terry Miller and Anthony B. Kim, 2015 Index of Economic Freedom (Washington, DC: The Heritage Foundation and
Dow Jones & Company, Inc., 2015), http://www.heritage.org/index, and Social Progress Imperative, “Social Progress Index
2014,” April 2014, http://www.socialprogressimperative.org/data/spi (accessed November 19, 2014).
Chart 9 heritage.org
Chapter 2 29
ENDNOTES
1. Milton Friedman and Rose D. Friedman, Free
to Choose: A Personal Statement (New York:
Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1979).
2. The Social Progress Index defines social
progress as the capacity of a society to meet
the basic human needs of its citizens, establish
the building blocks that allow citizens and
communities to enhance and sustain the quality
of their lives, and create the conditions for all
individuals to reach their full potential.
F
or 21 years, the Index of Economic Free- over “tax cuts for the rich,” much of the world has
dom has provided an indispensable road taken note of the impressive and sustained rates
map for countries that aspire to greater of economic growth that typically follow such cuts,
economic dynamism and prosperity. The rules and tax rates have come down worldwide.
are not complicated. As the Index has revealed, One of the taxes that have perhaps the larg-
lasting prosperity is a result of a persistent com- est impact on a nation’s ability to compete in
mitment to low tax rates, a stable currency, lim- global markets is the corporate tax. The reason,
ited government, strong private property rights, of course, is that tax’s large impact on the flow of
openness to global trade and financial flows, investment. In this age of information and tech-
and sensible regulation. Together, these factors nology, borders do not matter much anymore for
empower the individual and induce dynamic businesses. The world has become one massive
entrepreneurial activity. shopping market for capital. Nations are in a
The supply-side economics model, which contest to climb past each other in a race up the
focuses on ways to increase the production of ladder of economic growth.
goods and services rather than on maintaining The impact of non-competitive corporate
high levels of demand, was popularized in the tax rates can be debilitating. For example, the
United States by President Ronald Reagan more U.S.’s effective statutory rate is now a full 50
than 30 years ago. It is now a primary operating percent higher than the average of its inter-
principle of countries around the world. A key part national competitors. Businesses are adapting
of the supply-side model is careful attention to the by relocating overseas or through structural
potentially stifling nature of taxes, and tax cuts are changes such as corporate inversion, in which
often the preferred policy prescription for eco- companies legally reincorporate in a foreign
nomic woes. Despite occasional howls of protest country that has lower tax rates.
31
Corporate Tax Rate: U.S. vs. Average of Developed Countries
35%
25%
20%
15%
10%
5%
0%
1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2014
Source: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, OECD Tax Database, Corporate and Capital Income
Taxes, http://www.oecd.org/tax/tax-policy/tax-database.htm (accessed November 17, 2014).
Chart 1 heritage.org
The Index of Economic Freedom has shown markets are vital to achieving greater prosper-
that commitment to lower taxation is one of the ity. Over the lifetime of the Index, some politi-
key components of a country’s effort to create a cians have evidently been listening and taking
virtuous cycle of entrepreneurship, growth, and action. Others have not. The resulting dispari-
lasting prosperity for its citizens. A recent study ties of living standards among countries are not
by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation just happenstance.
and Development examines why some countries This essay provides three types of compari-
are becoming more prosperous than others and sons:
concludes that “corporate taxes are found to be
most harmful for growth, followed by personal • We look at some dramatic differences between
income taxes, and then consumption taxes.” 1 outcomes in neighboring countries that have
The OECD study finds, not surprisingly, that pursued vastly different economic policies;
investment rates fall when corporate tax rates • We compare the economic results since the
rise and that the most profitable and most rap- collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991 between a
idly expanding companies tend to be those that leading free market–embracing Baltic country
are the most sensitive to corporate tax rates. and a less liberty-minded nation; and
High corporate tax rates are also self-defeating • We explain that the interrelation between
because they produce little if any revenue. economic policy and outcomes is evidenced
But taxes are not all that matters. The rule by the “laboratories of democracy” in the 50
of law, efficient regulatory structures, and open United States.
Chapter 3 33
The decades-long respect for property rights The recent $100 billion national debt default,
has incentivized investing and fostered trust in a wave of nationalizations, and strict capital
financial institutions. With the Socialists cur- controls are deterring foreign investment, but
rently back in control, all of this could be undone, Argentina’s bureaucrats seem not to mind. Minis-
but Chile has forged a remarkable record under ter of Economy and Production Roberto Lavagna
both the left and the right in advancing and pro- boasted that “Argentina isn’t interested in luring
tecting hard-won freedoms, both political and speculative investors…. It generates bubbles that
economic. With Chile well on its way to becom- when they are reverted can produce a negative
ing the first developed economy in Latin Ameri- impact, especially for the poorest people.”18
ca, one can only hope that such political wisdom Economic results clearly show the repercus-
continues to prevail. sions of these policies. Consider R.R. Donnelly
Argentina. Contrast Chile’s remarkable suc- & Sons, a Chicago company that just shuttered
cess with the situation in Argentina, once Latin the doors of its factory in Argentina. This print-
America’s richest country. Argentina now ranks ing plant employed up to 400 people for more
169th out of 178 countries included in the Index than two decades. Yet, according to the compa-
and 27th out of 29 countries in the South and ny, “rising labor costs, inflation, materials price
Central America/Caribbean region. Continuing increases, devaluation, inability to pay debts
to be mired in a climate of economic repression, as they become due, and other issues” forced
Argentina has recorded its lowest economic free- the closure.19
dom score ever in the 2015 Index. Despite a population more than twice as
The erosion of freedom is creating havoc. large as Chile’s, Argentina has barely attracted
Cristina Fernández de Kirchner’s government even a third the level of Chile’s net foreign direct
in Buenos Aires “bullies and nationalises busi- investment. Inflation in Argentina has run at
nesses, and pressures the central bank to use more than three times that of Chile. Both taxes
international reserves for debt payments.”15 and government spending as a fraction of the
For example, on April 16, 2012, Kirchner economy are nearly twice the level of Chile’s. In
introduced a bill, overwhelmingly approved by 2012, Argentina’s 1.9 percent GDP growth greatly
both houses of Congress, that partially rena- underperformed Chile’s 5.5 percent boom.20
tionalized YPF, the nation’s largest energy firm.16 In fact, after years of Kirchner’s steel grip,
This followed the discovery by the company just Argentina’s economy is now smaller than Brazil’s,
months before of nearly 1 billion barrels of oil in Mexico’s, and Colombia’s.21 This is quite a fall
one of its fields.17 No wonder that the country is from grace for the Keynesian experiment consid-
on track to remain dependent on foreign suppli- ering that just 20 years ago, Argentina’s economy
ers for energy even though the nation possesses was nearly five times that of Colombia’s.22
the world’s third largest deposits of shale gas, This plunge in economic standing worsened
and no wonder that investors are hesitant to risk as the government officially devalued the peso
capital in such an environment. early in 2014. In combination with the flood-
Furthermore, in Argentina, politicians— ing of the markets with newly created currency,
regional governors—have sway over the opera- future investment is chased away, and prices
tions of private businesses. The authority leap higher.
wielded by elected officials to set prices, man-
date production, and engage in other corporate CHINA VS. HONG KONG
governance is in many ways similar to expropria- AND TAIWAN
tion. Value is destroyed and profits diminished, China. China ranks a dismal 139th worldwide
although title of the wrangled entity remains in in economic freedom and 30th out of 42 coun-
private hands. We have seen this before in Argen- ties in the Asia–Pacific region. Some have touted
tina during the socialist Peronist years, and the China’s model of state-guided capitalism as one
middle class suffered. to be followed.
Chapter 3 35
GDP per Capita—Hong Kong, Taiwan, and China
$30,000
$20,000
$0
1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2013
Chart 2 heritage.org
predicted more human misery after decades of spending is low; regulations on small businesses
unchecked population growth than one finds in are light; education is largely private; capital
the poorest province of India or village of Africa. moves freely in and out, unhindered.
Yet the contrary is true: Hong Kong’s per capita For many decades after it adopted a flat tax in
GDP exploded by more than $45,000 from 1980 1947, Hong Kong enjoyed the benefits of a com-
to 2013. The mainland’s GDP grew under $300 petitively low tax rate with no tax on dividends
yearly during that same period, to around $9,800 or capital gains or money earned outside of the
in 2013. In terms of GDP per capita adjusted for island. Hong Kong has also embraced free trade,
purchasing power parity, the average Hong Kong which explains why it has evolved into a capital-
resident had a standard of living more than five ist paradise brimming with entrepreneurial spir-
times higher than the average mainlander. it. The tax code is about 200 pages, compared to
By meeting the demands of individual con- over 70,000 pages for the U.S. tax code.29
sumers and companies across the globe rather Over several decades, Hong Kong has evolved
than the dictates of state bureaucrats, Hong into one of the richest places on Earth despite
Kong has attained prosperity. Skeptics say, “Well, its tiny land mass and no natural resources. The
that’s only because Westerners—Brits and Amer- only mystery is why it took nearly half a century
icans—invested so much there.” Which begs the for the rest of the world to start copying the Hong
question: Why did they invest there? Hong Kong Kong model.
is the most economically free country on the Taiwan. In the wake of the Chinese Com-
planet. It has long had a 15 percent flat individual munist revolution, the remnants of the previous
income tax; it is a free trade mecca; government Chinese government were confined to the island
Chapter 3 37
years, the government engaged in monetary mis- Israel has welcomed foreign investment into
chief, printing such copious amounts of curren- these start-ups, embraced foreign expertise in
cy that inflation hit 79,600,000,000 percent in governmental development, and sought foreign
November 2008 with an average daily inflation capital for its burgeoning energy sector.
rate of 98 percent a day. This fiscal malpractice, Established with a socialist bent, Israel has
combined with lack of property rights, deters been deregulating industry and allowing priva-
domestic and foreign investment. tization and competition to grow in areas once
Under the guise of racial equality and concern dominated by state monopoly. Israel now has a
for the poor, the government has seized swaths of booming technology sector with start-ups such
land belonging to white farmers. For those who as Consumer Physics and Reduxio, which raised
pursue entrepreneurship, opening a business $4 million and $12 million, respectively, in the
takes three months, during which you will need past year. As home to between 4,000 and 5,000
to go through nine different procedures and start-ups, Israel is second only to Silicon Valley
spend on average 140 percent of average gross in technology innovation.43
per capita income. Protectionism is rampant, Perhaps Israel best exemplifies what the late
and foreign investment in numerous industries Julian Simon taught: “The ultimate resource is
is severely restricted.40 people—skilled, spirited, and hopeful people
Unemployment in Zimbabwe is estimated to who will exert their wills and imaginations for
be as high as 95 percent, with per capita GDP at their own benefit as well as in a spirit of faith and
only $600 per person. These alarming statistics, social concern. Inevitably they will benefit not
combined with the lack of foreign investment only themselves but the rest of us as well.”44
and economic growth, make Zimbabwe an eco- Despite the constant threat of war with hos-
nomic nightmare.41 Ironically, the neighboring tile neighbors, terrorist activity, and diplomatic
country of Botswana, with almost identical geo- hurdles, Israel continues to advance. The abil-
graphic, demographic, and natural resources, ity of smaller political groups to obtain propor-
is flourishing. tional representation in the Israeli parliament
If Zimbabweans ever wish to lift themselves provides a robustness to Israel’s democracy; the
from poverty, all they need do is look next door necessity to build coalitions has allowed eco-
to Botswana. nomic reform to move forward. The entire world
is better off as a result.
ISRAEL VS. LEBANON Lebanon. Although Israel and Lebanon
Israel. Israel re-emerged as an independent share similar climate, geography, and cuisine,
nation in 1948. Since then, it has become known these two neighbors are far different in matters
as the “start-up nation.” Israel ranks 33rd for of economics. Lebanon ranks 94th globally and
economic freedom globally and 4th in the Mid- 10th in the region for economic freedom. In fact,
dle East/North Africa region. Registering the the situation has deteriorated in recent years,
10th largest score increase in the 2015 Index, and Lebanon’s economy is now classified as
Israel has achieved its highest score ever. “mostly unfree.” This has come about as a result
This tiny country in the Middle East has of a turbulent political situation influenced by
absorbed millions of impoverished immigrants radical ideology that is geared toward state con-
from Eastern Europe, the Middle East, and Afri- trol and socialism.
ca, yet its economy has boomed. Immigrants who Recent years’ decline in economic freedom
fled often-repressive nations have transformed has weakened an already fragile structural and
the desert into a start-up nation. Business incu- institutional environment. Entrepreneurs are
bators dot the landscape, and technological out- suffocated by restrictive business and labor
put is among the highest in the world. In fact, the regulations that inhibit business formation
number of Israeli companies trading on the Nas- and the development of a dynamic private sec-
daq totals 40 with more IPOs to come in 2015.42 tor. Prevalent corruption has undermined the
Chapter 3 39
Change in Real GDP per Capita—Estonia and Ukraine
Cumulative 200%
Change in
GDP per
Capita 159.8% Estonia
Since 1993 150%
100%
50%
14.8% Ukraine
0%
–50%
1994 1995 2000 2005 2010 2013
Source: World Bank, “GDP per Capita (Constant 2005 US$),” http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.KD/
countries/EE-UA?display=graph (accessed November 20, 2014).
Chart 3 heritage.org
Chapter 3 41
Interstate competition for jobs, people, and Few had predicted the rapid change with
capital is a positive force that helps to discipline
which Eastern Europe would embrace freedom
politicians to do the right thing. Yet many politi-
or the notable extent to which many develop-
cians and pundits pretend that taxes, labor laws,ing countries in other parts of the world would
indebtedness, and heavy regulation do not affect pursue free-market reforms that advance eco-
economic growth. nomic freedom. We have seen hundreds of mil-
Growth is not a zero sum game: More jobs, lions of people advance rapidly from poverty and
higher incomes, and expanded opportunity ben- subsistence living to modern comforts. Experi-
efit all residents without regard to their incomeences of individual nations have acted as labora-
or status. And as states get richer, they are able to
tories to evaluate performance under a myriad of
provide higher-quality public services—and will policy conditions.
need fewer services—for things like welfare and Over the past 21 years, the Index of Economic
crime prevention. Freedom has gathered ample evidence to track
What would happen if every country were to the performance of countries implementing to
adopt the pro-growth policies embraced by such varying degrees the precepts of economic free-
states as Texas, Florida, and North Dakota? The dom and the resulting levels of their economic
entire globe would benefit from rising living success. The comparisons presented in this
standards and expanded opportunity. Billions of chapter highlight the opportunity for prosper-
those who are now mired in poverty would ben- ity that is inherent in giving people the freedom
efit the most. to choose.
Much has been accomplished, and much
CONCLUSION remains to be done. In charting the freedom path
Twenty-one years ago, when the first edition to economic growth, the challenge of advancing
of the Index of Economic Freedom was published, economic freedom is the challenge of pursuing
the supply-side idea of the Laffer Curve—that sustained prosperity. Those countries that have
high tax rates reduce growth and can even been brave enough to accept the challenge have
reduce revenues—was still highly controversial reaped great rewards and, in doing so, have set a
and disregarded among the political class and powerful example for others to follow.
even trained economists. Today, however, more
nations around the globe are embracing the idea.
Chapter 3 43
24. State-owned Assets Supervision and 37. Ibid.
Administration Commission of the State Council 38. Nake M. Kamrany and Jennifer Gray, “Botswana:
(SASAC), People’s Republic of China, Website, An African Model for Progress and Prosperity,”
http://www.sasac.gov.cn/n2963340/n2971121/ The World Post, http://www.huffingtonpost.
n4956567/4956583.html com/nake-m-kamrany/botswana-economic-
(accessed November 17, 2014). growth_b_2069226.html
25. “Fixing China Inc,” The Economist, (accessed November 17, 2014).
August 30, 2014, http://www.economist.com/ 39. Transparency International, Corruption
news/china/21614240-reform-state-companies- Perceptions Index 2013,
back-agenda-fixing-china-inc http://www.transparency.org/cpi2013/results
(accessed November 17, 2014). (accessed November 17, 2014).
26. “China Focus: China Pledges Further Reforms 40. World Bank Group, “Ease of Doing Business in
for State-dominated Sectors,” Xinhua, Zimbabwe,” Doing Business 2015,
October 24, 2012, http://news.xinhuanet.com/ http://www.doingbusiness.org/data/
english/indepth/2012-10/24/c_131928023.htm exploreeconomies/zimbabwe/
(accessed November 17, 2014). (accessed November 17, 2014).
27. “China’s Major SOEs Report Assets Growth,” 41. U.S. Central Intelligence Agency, “Zimbabwe,”
Shanghai Daily, July 27, 2014, The World Factbook, last updated June 20, 2014,
http://www.shanghaidaily.com/business/ https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-
Chinas-major-SOEs-report-assets-growth/ world-factbook/geos/zi.html
shdaily.shtml (accessed November 17, 2014). (accessed November 17, 2014).
28. Justin Yifu Lin, “Rural Reforms and Agricultural 42. Ari Rabinovitch, “Nasdaq Expects Increase in
Productivity Growth in China,” UCLA Working IPOs from Israeli Firms,” Reuters, May 11, 2014,
Paper No. 576, December 1989, http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/05/11/
http://www.econ.ucla.edu/workingpapers/ us-nasdaq-israel-idUSBREA4A04320140511
wp576.pdf (accessed November 17, 2014). (accessed November 17, 2014).
29. Institute for Research on the Economics of 43. Julie Bort, “The 20 Hottest Startups from Israel
Taxation, “The Tax System of Hong Kong,” Policy in 2014,” Business Insider, June 15, 2014,
Bulletin No. 95, December 28, 2010, http://www.businessinsider.com/20-hottest-
http://iret.org/pub/BLTN-95.PDF startups-from-israel-2014-6?op=1
(accessed November 17, 2014). (accessed November 17, 2014).
30. U.S. Department of State, Bureau of Economic 44. Julian Simon, The Ultimate Resource 2
and Business Affairs, “2012 Investment Climate (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press,
Statement—Taiwan,” June, 2012, 1998), p. xxxviii.
http://www.state.gov/e/eb/rls/othr/ 45. Stephen Moore, “The World Discovers the Laffer
ics/2012/191245.htm Curve,” Chapter 4 in Terry Miller and Kim
(accessed November 17, 2014). R. Holmes, 2009 Index of Economic Freedom
31. Taiwan Bureau of Foreign Trade, National (Washington: The Heritage Foundation and Dow
Statistics Database, http://ebas1.ebas.gov.tw/ Jones & Company, Inc., 2009), p. 38,
pxweb/Dialog/statfile1L.asp http://thf_media.s3.amazonaws.com/index/
(accessed November 17, 2014). pdf/2009/Index2009_Chapter4.pdf.
32. Ibid. 46. World Bank, “Data: Indicators,”
33. Ibid. http://data.worldbank.org/indicator
34. KPMG, “Corporate Tax Rates Table,” (accessed November 17, 2014).
http://www.kpmg.com/global/en/services/tax/ 47. L. S. Tallinn, “Estonia’s Technology Cluster;
tax-tools-and-resources/pages/corporate-tax- Not Only Skype,” The Economist, July 11, 2013,
rates-table.aspx (accessed November 17, 2014). http://www.economist.com/blogs/
35. Taiwan Bureau of Foreign Trade, National schumpeter/2013/07/estonias-technology-
Statistics Database. cluster (accessed November 17, 2014).
36. U.S. Department of State, Bureau of Economic 48. Paul Krugman, “Estonian Rhapsody,” The New
and Business Affairs, “2014 Investment Climate York Times, June 6, 2012, http://krugman.blogs.
Statement—Botswana,” June 2014, nytimes.com/2012/06/06/estonian-rhapsdoy/?_
http://www.state.gov/e/eb/rls/othr/ r=0 (accessed November 17, 2014).
ics/2014/226918.htm 49. World Bank, “Data,” http://data.worldbank.org/
(accessed November 17, 2014). (accessed November 17, 2014).
Chapter 3 45
Chapter 4
Cronyism, Corruption,
and the Arab Spring:
The Case of Tunisia
Antonio Nucifora, PhD, Erik Churchill, and Bob Rijkers, PhD 1
Editor’s Note: Since 2011, the countries of the Middle East and North Africa have experienced a period
of economic and political turmoil—the Arab Spring—that holds both great promise and great risk. Such
a widespread uprising against autocratic rule will have many diverse causes. What began as a protest
by a street vendor against, in part, excessive economic regulation in Tunisia has become a wide-ranging
movement challenging entrenched political, economic, cultural, and religious interests across an entire
region. An empirical study presented in the 2012 Index by Dr. Nahid Anaraki used the techniques of
econometric analysis to demonstrate that the motivation for violence in the region is likely to be less
about conflict between Islam and Western values and more about revenge against corrupt regimes. This
chapter deepens that analysis, looking specifically at the role that cronyism and corruption played in
the Tunisian uprising while identifying ongoing problems that must still be addressed if Tunisia is to
achieve the full flowering of economic freedom and broad-based development that benefits everyone, not
just a politically connected elite.
T
he Tunisian Revolution took the world by Nevertheless, deep-rooted deficiencies of the
surprise in January 2011 and unleashed socioeconomic system have not yet been tack-
expectations of a transition toward liberal led. This system, characterized by privileges and
Western-style democracy in the Arab World. Much cronyism at the expense of competition and per-
progress has been made in Tunisia over the past formance, is at the root of the Arab Spring and
three years on the political front. A new constitu- still needs to change if the future of the Tunisian
tion was adopted with a large consensus in January transition is to be secured.2
2014, and the first democratic parliamentary and Tunisia’s economy was one of the best-per-
presidential elections under the new constitution forming in the region before 2011. Rapid pov-
were held in October–November 2014. erty reduction was accompanied by significant
47
Economic Significance of Cronyism and Regulation
Connected Firms in 2010
Ben Ali Firms 21.3% Prevalance of Regulatory
Share of Total Restrictions Across Sectors
■ Sectors with Ben Ali Firms
■ Sectors without Ben Ali Firms
42.9%
39.3%
3.2%
0.8%
24.3%
100%
75.1%
58%
50% Ben Ali Firms
Sectors without Had Higher
Restrictions Profits
0%
Sectors Subject Sectors Subject Sectors Subject
Ben Ali Firms
to FDI to Entry to Entry and FDI
Had Lower
–50% Restriction Restrictions Restrictions
Profits
–50.6%
–100%
Source: Bob Rijkers, Caroline Freund, and Antonio Nucifora, “All in the Family: State
Capture in Tunisia,” World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 6810, March 2014. Chart 3 heritage.org
and his extended family (a total of 114 people) construction (nine); financial services (eight);
in the aftermath of the 2011 revolution and to the food industry (seven); hotels and restaurants
compare their performance to that of all other (seven); media activities (five).
firms in Tunisia.8 Specifically, our analysis found that confis-
Firms confiscated from President Ben cated firms are more likely to operate in sectors
Ali’s extended family were important from an subject to entry regulation. Approximately 40
aggregate economic point of view. Although percent of Ben Ali firms were in sectors subject
they account for less than 1 percent of all jobs, to authorizations and restrictions on foreign
they pocketed a striking 21.3 percent of all net direct investment (FDI).9 By comparison, autho-
private-sector profits in Tunisia, equivalent to rization requirements apply to only 24 percent of
US$233 million in 2010, corresponding to over all sectors in which Ben Ali firms are not present,
0.5 percent of GDP. (See Chart 1.) Considering while FDI restrictions apply to approximately 14
that we identify only firms with direct links to percent of sectors that are free of Ben Ali firms.10
the Ben Ali family as opposed to all firms with (See Chart 2.) Thus, regulatory restrictions and
cultivated connections, this number is probably connected firms go hand-in-hand.
best interpreted as a lower bound on the impor- The superior performance of Ben Ali firms
tance of political connections. is especially marked in densely regulated sec-
How could connected firms make so much tors (at the five-digit sector level). Restrictions
money? The firms confiscated from President on entry into these sectors were associated with
Ben Ali’s family were concentrated in sectors greater market share and greater profits for the
where profit margins are quite high and close firms owned by Ben Ali’s extended family, who
relations with government counterparts is an had privileged access. Ben Ali firms are especial-
important determinant of profitability, notably ly more profitable than their peers in sectors that
in the real estate and enterprise services sectors are subject to authorization and FDI restrictions;
(59 firms); personnel services (20); transport these regulations thus appear disproportionate-
(16); wholesale trade (15); automobile trade (11); ly to assist the profitability of Ben Ali firms. In
Chapter 4 49
sectors that are not subject to these restrictions, Prevalence of New Regulations by
Ben Ali firms make significantly less profit than Presence of Ben Ali Firms
their competitors, which countermands the idea
that Ben Ali family members were innately bet- Change in New Regulations at
ter entrepreneurs. (See Chart 3.) the 5-Digit Level, 1994–2010
Legislative changes introducing new entry
■ Sectors with Ben Ali Firms
restrictions were plausibly due to manipulation ■ Sectors without Ben Ali Firms
by the Ben Ali clan.11 First, the prevalence of FDI
2.00%
restrictions and authorization requirements
was significantly higher in sectors in which Ben
1.55%
Ali firms were present when the Investment
Incentives Code was approved in December
1993. Second, over time, new restrictions were
introduced at a higher frequency in sectors in 0.75%
which Ben Ali firms had set up shop. 12 Sectors 0.38%
in which Ben Ali firms are active are two times
more likely to be subjected to new authorization
requirements than sectors in which they are not Authorization FDI
and five times more likely to be subjected to new Required Restriction
FDI restrictions.13 (See Chart 4.) In sum, if exist- Source: Bob Rijkers, Caroline Freund, and Antonio
Nucifora, “All in the Family: State Capture in Tunisia,”
ing regulations did not suffice to secure lucrative World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 6810,
business deals, Ben Ali would use executive pow- March 2014.
ers to change the legislation in his favor. Chart 4 heritage.org
Tunisia’s investment policies thus did not
serve only their purported objectives of creat-
ing jobs and stimulating investment. Instead, administration, custom duties, and public pro-
regulations often served the personal interests curement) and the (ab)use of public assets and
of those in power at the expense of providing fair public enterprises (including public banks). 15
opportunities to the vast majority of Tunisian All of these practices undermine competition by
entrepreneurs who lacked political connections. favoring better-connected firms and those who
Is Tunisia an isolated case? Unfortunately practice corruption.
not: Our findings are consistent with a large The inefficiencies and distortions resulting
body of literature showing that countries with from this system of rents extraction obstruct
more extensive business entry regulations tend the development of a dynamic economic envi-
to grow more slowly and to have higher levels of ronment—which is at the root of the economic
corruption.14 Across the globe, corruption and stagnation of Tunisia.16 Few new firms are cre-
burdensome business regulation go hand-in- ated, and productive firms do not grow, as they
hand. (See Chart 5.) face unfair competition by crony firms.17 The
In sum, our results substantiate that state emergence and expansion of innovative dynam-
interventions and barriers to competition cre- ic firms is hampered by the expensive and low-
ated ample opportunities for rents extraction by quality goods and services they need to pay to
cronies, severely hampering the performance crony firms. As a result, Tunisian entrepreneurs
of the private sector in Tunisia. While we have are competitive only in labor-intensive low-
focused on authorizations and restrictions on skill tasks, investment has been lacking, and
FDI, several other policy instruments were unemployment has been rampant. Most of the
also used to gain unfair competitive advantage jobs created were in low-value-added activities
and extract rents, notably through the discre- and mostly in the informal sector, offering low
tionary enforcement of regulations (e.g., in tax wages and no job security. Such jobs certainly do
Rank— 180
Corruption
Perceptions
Index 160
140
120
ine
ndL
100 Tre
Tunisia
80
60
40
Each circle
20 represents a
country
1
1 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
Sources: World Bank, “Doing Business: Economy Rankings,” http://www.doingbusiness.org/rankings (accessed November
17, 2014), and Transparency International, “Corruption Perceptions Index 2013,” http://www.transparency.org/cpi2013
(accessed November 17, 2014).
Chart 5 heritage.org
not meet the aspirations of the growing number they have been captured in practice for rents
of graduates. extraction and privileges by those who are close
Tunisia’s rents-prone economic system is to those in power. The resulting inequality was a
not only inefficient, but also highly inequitable. fundamental cause of the revolution and, since
That such a small group of 114 entrepreneurs the economic model has not yet been changed,
could appropriate such a large share of Tuni- remains a latent source of instability in the Tuni-
sia’s wealth creation illustrates how corruption sian transition.
has been synonymous with social exclusion.
Inequality of opportunity characterizes Tunisia LESSONS FROM THE EXPERIENCE OF
today, as the current institutional infrastruc- OTHER DEMOCRATIC TRANSITIONS
ture creates an “insider-outsider” culture. Even Successful transitions are often associated
if the interventionist policies were introduced with rapid reforms, though historically, a coun-
originally to foster the country’s development, try that undertakes a democratic transition has
Chapter 4 51
only a 30 percent probability of succeeding.18 MOVING FROM A CLOSED
A democracy is more likely to be established SOCIOECONOMIC SYSTEM TO ONE
when per capita GDP is high and increasing;19 THAT IS OPEN TO ALL CITIZENS
income distribution is equal (low Gini coeffi- How can Tunisia move from a closed socioeco-
cient or low ratio of incomes of top-to-bottom nomic system to an open one? Since the Ben Ali
quintile); populations are small; urbanization is regime limited access to political and economic
advanced; people are educated; gender equality functions in order to generate rents, we can turn
in primary education is high; natural resources to the limited access order (LAO) framework for
are limited; there is no ethnic division; the tran- guidance.23 The framework is premised on the
sition is not conducted by a military regime; idea that power is tied to organizations and not
democratic states are present in the region (the to the individual and that rents-sharing is the
“contagion effect”);20 the time to election is mini- process by which a dominant coalition reaches
mal; the regime is not a presidential regime or an equilibrium that allows economic activities to
not dominated completely and permanently continue to generate rents.
by one political force; and the country has a Tunisia during the Ben Ali era could be char-
parliamentary system. acterized as a basic LAO with strong elements of
There is some consensus that rapid demo- predation. Few players were part of the domi-
cratic transition occurs primarily when several nant elite, which comprised the “ruling” fam-
fundamentals are in place: per capita GDP is ily, the security forces, the administration, the
high,21 the middle class is large, urbanization is media, civil society organizations, and business
advanced, the percentage of people receiving firms that allied with the political elite (or at
primary school educations is high, gender equal- least stayed out of politics). All other groups were
ity in primary education is high, a military force marginalized or actively suppressed. In such a
is present before the transition, there is a pre- setting, the LAO framework offers guidance on
vious attempt at democratization, democratic how organizations in societies arrive at elite bar-
states are present in the region, and natural gains—formal or informal agreements—to divide
resources are limited. Further, although there is the available opportunities for rents extraction
no empirical evidence from historical data, some and profit making in the economy.
scholars have noted that a democratic transition, The LAO framework predicts that countries
especially in middle-income capitalist countries, will not transition easily from limited access
might occur following years of declining growth orders, in which rent-seeking dominates, to an
and/or increasing inflation,22 as was the case for open access order, which characterizes most lib-
Latin American countries during the period of eral democracies. By limiting access to economic
hyperinflation in the 1980s and the Asian finan- activity and resources, the LAO creates rents
cial crisis in 1997. that help to maintain the equilibrium. Thus,
Unlike many other Arab Spring countries, there will be strong incentives for rent-seeking
which have seen their transitions fail, Tunisia to continue, albeit with some changes in the cast
has many of these fundamentals. Some of these, of organizations in the dominant coalition. In
such as high rates of urbanization and a large other words, even if countries hold fair elections,
middle class, Tunisia possessed before its upris- they will not soon become open democracies, but
ings. Others are the outcomes of choices Tuni- they may mature in the range of institutions and
sia has made since the revolution, such as the organizations that are allowed to participate in
decision to opt for a parliamentary rather than broader decision making.
presidential system. Together, they imply that Of course, advancing the principles of eco-
the country has a high likelihood of successfully nomic freedom—empowerment of the individual,
completing its democratic transition despite the non-discrimination, and open competition—can
risk of backsliding that is inherent in virtually all weaken the rent-creation system that holds the
democratic transitions. LAO together. These changes, whether in the
Chapter 4 53
mental steps rather than giant leaps. Historical- tem, which privileges its elites and is at the root
ly, incremental steps that have led to increased of the revolution, to a more open system for the
openness have included greater predictability in benefit of all Tunisians.
the elite bargain. Notably, experience has shown This requires changing the policy infra-
the importance of building institutions that structure inherited from the Ben Ali era, which
can underpin predictable resolution of conflict perpetuates social exclusion and invites cor-
between elites (i.e., to enforce the rule of law for ruption. The system of laws and regulations
elites). As these elite-oriented rule-of-law insti- that allowed the family to capture such a large
tutions become stronger over time, they provide share of the country’s wealth remains largely in
a platform to move from privileges for the elite to place, maintaining the opportunities for firms
a level playing field for all citizens. to earn rents through cronyism and corruption.
In Tunisia, several new institutions, in the These regulations perpetuate social exclusion, as
form of the new, relatively liberal constitution or unconnected Tunisians have very limited eco-
various laws such as those governing freedom of nomic opportunities.
association or access to information, may form Without such changes, there is a risk that
the basis for greater competition among a wider instead of reforming the policy infrastructure,
cross-section of society. Granting citizens access Tunisia’s elites will collaborate just enough to
to information will enable independent analysis share the spoils, albeit with a slightly differ-
of the beneficiaries of existing policies, which ent group of vested interests. In lieu of reforms
will also increase the pressure for policy changes. that would level the playing field, the economic
Nevertheless, the LAO framework emphasizes system would remain closed in favor of a small,
that trying to go straight from revolution to an though slightly expanded, minority of elites.
open access order has often led to disruption and Under this scenario, markets would remain
more fragility.26 closed off from competition, regulatory policy
What is yet more difficult to measure, given would remain subject to discretion, and decision
the extent of elite capture that continues to pre- making would be opaque.
vail, is whether incremental progress is taking Opening the economic system will require
place in the aggregate. While certain institution- political determination, since fierce resistance
al reforms appear objectively to be steps forward, can be expected from those who are at risk of
these have been counterbalanced by economic losing rents and privileges. Moving too rapidly
decision making that has remained exclusive will likely create tension and instability, which
and unequal. Even the task of creating a work- could undermine the process. Moving too tim-
able limited access order will not be easy—as we idly, however, will fuel the frustration expressed
see in many other post–Arab Spring countries. by the marginalized groups in society.
Empowering strong independent governance
THE WAY FORWARD: OPENING institutions that enforce the rule of law on elites
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY and vested interest groups will accelerate the
TO ALL TUNISIANS change process. Enforcing citizens’ right of
Tunisia has made enormous progress in its access to information, as well as transparency
democratic transition, and historical experience and accountability in the government, is also
from other countries suggests that it has the key critical in order to arrive at a stable democracy,
ingredients required to succeed. The challenge is both in Tunisia and everywhere else.
to move from a fairly closed socioeconomic sys-
Chapter 4 55
Trabelsi, the brother of the president’s second 18. Caroline Freund and Mélise Jaud, “Democratic
wife, followed on the heels of Decree No. 2007- Transitions: Successful, Gradual, and Failed,”
2311 stipulating the need for government World Bank, Office of the Chief Economist,
authorization for firms producing cement. Middle East and North Africa Region,
13. Rijkers, Freund, and Nucifora, All in the Family: September 2012.
State Capture in Tunisia. Each year 1.6 percent of 19. Adam Przeworski and Fernando Limongi also
all sectors in which Ben Ali firms are active are note that a democracy is unlikely not to last
subjected to new authorization requirements, when per capita GDP is above $6,000. Adam
whereas only 0.8 percent of sectors in which Przeworski and Fernando Fernando Limongi,
Ben Ali firms are not present are subjected “Modernization: Theories and Facts,” World
to new authorization requirements. For FDI Politics, Vol. 49, No. 2 (January 1997), pp. 155–183.
restrictions, the difference is even larger with 20. Abraham Lowenthal, Exporting Democracy:
2 percent of sectors in which Ben Ali firms are Themes and Issues (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins
active being subjected to new FDI restrictions University Press, 1991).
each year, compared to 0.4 percent of sectors 21. Seymour Martin Lipset, “Some Social Requisites
without Ben Ali firms. of Democracy: Economic Development and
14. Simeon Djankov, Rafael La Porta, Florencio Political Legitimacy,” American Political Science
Lopez-De-Silanes, and Andrei Shleifer, “The Review, Vol. 53, Issue 1 (March 1959), pp. 69–105.
Regulation of Entry,” The Quarterly Journal of 22. Stephan Haggard and Robert R. Kaufman, “The
Economics, Vol. 117, Issue 1 (February 2002), Political Economy of Democratic Transitions,”
pp. 1–37. Comparative Politics, Vol. 29, No. 3 (April 1997),
15. The 2011 report of the Tunisian Anticorruption pp. 263–283.
Commission highlighted that the areas that 23. Douglass C. North, John Joseph Wallis, Steven
had been the most at risk during the Ben Ali B. Webb, and Barry R. Weingast, Limited
regime were real estate, agricultural land, state- Access Orders in the Developing World: A New
owned enterprises, public procurement and Approach to the Problems of Development, World
concessions awards, large public investments Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 4359,
projects, privatization, information technology, September 2007.
financial and banking sectors, customs and
24. Ibid.
taxation, and justice. The Organisation for
Economic Co-operation and Development 25. In the fall of 2013, a severe political impasse
(OECD) carried out an assessment of corruption was resolved when the governing coalition and
risks in Tunisia and found similar problems. The the opposition engaged in a National Dialogue
results of a parallel qualitative survey that we process that was brokered by key civil society
carried out in Tunisia in 2012 broadly confirm organizations. The dialogue focused on the
this diagnosis. See Hamouda Chekir and Claude constitutional and electoral timetables, as well
Menard, “Barriers to Private Firms Dynamism as on the opposition’s proposition to replace the
in Tunisia: A Qualitative Approach,” Internal government with a nonpartisan, technocratic
Mimeo, World Bank, October 2012. government to oversee the final year of the
transition until new elections would be held.
16. Rijkers, Freund, and Nucifora, All in the Family:
State Capture in Tunisia. 26. North, Wallis, Webb, and Weingast, Limited
Access Orders in the Developing World.
17. Bob Rijkers, Hassen Arrouri, Caroline Freund,
and Antonio Nucifora, Which Firms Create the
Most Jobs in Developing Countries? Evidence
from Tunisia, World Bank Policy Research
Working Paper No. 7068, October 2014.
A
ccess
to dependable energy is an essential conventional energy supplies or renewables, the
requirement
for development, underpin- world’s energy needs will be met best through
ning our ability to produce goods and ser- free markets.
vices more efficiently, communicate more easily, Governments of all stripes regulate the ener-
and trade with other parts of the world. More- gy sector with measures ranging from outright
over, energy markets are becoming increas- state ownership or the direct government man-
ingly more international, and the energy sector agement of prices or supply to the more general
evolves dynamically as technological, economic, maintenance of a system of laws and property
and political environments change. rights. The energy sector is uniquely prone to
It is common these days to talk about an ener- government intervention because of energy’s
gy revolution, by which many politicians and unique connection to an economy.
commentators mean a government-planned and While the exact relationship between ener-
government-subsidized switch from conven- gy consumption and gross domestic product
tional fuels to renewable forms of energy. But all (GDP) can vary, it is clear that energy is a key
forms of renewable energy continue to account ingredient in a nation’s economic growth.2 Con-
for a very small percentage of world energy pro- sequently, many governments have sought to
duction. The real revolution, unforeseen and control energy supply, manipulate demand, and
unplanned by any government but nonethe- limit competition through feed-in tariffs, pref-
less bringing energy and opportunity to billions erential tax treatment, renewable energy quotas,
around the world, is a market-driven technologi- regulatory structures, trade barriers, targeted
cal revolution in exploration and exploitation stimulus investments, and other such market
that has seen investment in energy supply more manipulations that artificially increase access
than double since 2000.1 Whether it is through to and perhaps lower the price of politically pre-
57
ferred energy or, conversely, decrease access and real one).” Young villagers carried signs demand-
increase price of other energy sources. ing the “real source of energy” and “not the fake
Both experience and data show that policies solar powered” one.5
designed to engineer energy markets through In fact, the environmental concerns that
state interference hamper economic growth drive such projects, while admirable in theo-
rather than stimulate it. Conversely, both expe- ry, are sadly misdirected when they hold back
rience and data show that whether a country is development. Arguably, advances in traditional
rich in natural resources or deprived of them, energy production and use are the single most
policies that sustain the four pillars of economic important factor in achieving the societal wealth
freedom—rule of law, limited government, regu- that enables advances in health, pollution con-
latory efficiency, and open markets—are more trol, and higher standards of living.
successful not only in stimulating economic Improved Efficiency and Environment.
growth and innovation, but also in using energy As economies develop and become richer, they
more efficiently. also tend to be more capable of adopting great-
er energy efficiency through innovation. Both
ECONOMIC FREEDOM small and large innovations that improve energy
AND ACCESS TO ENERGY efficiency add up to big savings for businesses as
There are 1.3 billion people around the world well as families, and the accumulation of these
without access to reliable electricity. More innovations and efficiency improvements can
than 2.5 billion people use biomass for cook- dramatically enhance a country’s energy use per
ing, meaning that they cook their food and heat dollar of GDP.
their homes with animal waste, leaves, wood, and As shown in Chart 1, economically freer coun-
charcoal.3 Without access to reliable, affordable tries tend to consume energy more efficiently.
energy—something the developed world has Granted, there are unfree countries that have
enjoyed for a century or more—these people both extremely low electrification and high rates
have little chance to improve their lives. of energy efficiency, but on average, free and
Economic and technological realities make mostly free countries use energy more efficiently
conventional coal, nuclear, oil, hydroelectric, than do mostly unfree and repressed economies.
and natural gas the most affordable and reliable Economically freer countries also enjoy
energy-dense sources of power. For example, cleaner environments and greater environmen-
Tanzania is hoping to switch increasingly from tal sustainability. Freer economies have access to
environmentally destructive charcoal to natu- more products and technologies that make our
ral gas, and it recently built infrastructure to lives healthier and the environment cleaner. For
deliver offshore natural gas to the homes of Dar instance, the availability of simple products like
es Salaam.4 While renewable sources like solar soaps, cleaners, and detergents makes our homes
and wind may one day play a larger role, they dramatically cleaner and healthier. The devel-
cannot be relied on for the far-reaching or basel- opment of sanitation systems and availability of
oad power that fuels economies and reaches the garbage collection greatly reduce many types of
average citizen. diseases and reduce toxins in the air and water.
Regrettably, too many special interests are As a country grows economically, it increases the
pursuing political and environmental agen- financial ability of its citizens and businesses to
das that interfere with the effort to meet basic care for the environment and reduce pollutants
energy needs in developing countries. When emitted from industrial growth.
Greenpeace India installed a solar micro-grid One measure of different countries’ environ-
in Dharnai, an Indian village surviving without mental status is the Yale Center for Environmen-
electricity since 1981, the villagers had one mes- tal Law and Policy’s Environmental Performance
sage for them: “Hamen nakli nahin, asli bijli cha- Index (EPI), a joint project of the Yale Center
hiye (We do not want artificial energy, give us the for Environmental Law and Policy (YCELP) at
10,000
8,500
7,797
5,000
0
Free Mostly Free Moderately Mostly Unfree Repressed
Free
Category in the Index of Economic Freedom
Sources: Terry Miller and Anthony B. Kim, 2015 Index of Economic Freedom (Washington, DC: The Heritage Foundation and
Dow Jones & Company, Inc., 2015), http://www.heritage.org/index, and U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information
Administration, International Energy Statistics, http://www.eia.gov/cfapps/ipdbproject/iedindex3.cfm?
tid=92&pid=46&aid=2&cid=regions&syid=2011&eyid=2011&unit=BTUPUSDM (accessed October 6, 2014).
Chart 1 heritage.org
Yale University and the Center for International freedom achieve the best results in protecting
Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN) at the environment.
Columbia University. The EPI ranks countries The principles driving economic freedom and
based on a number of environmental indicators their importance to environmental improve-
including agriculture, health impacts, air quality, ments are unmistakable. Private property rights
biodiversity, climate, water and sanitation, and incentivize owners to take care of their belong-
other measures.6 It provides comprehensive ings rather than abuse the land and water. As
analysis and important measurements of 178 the economist’s adage notes, “Nobody washes a
countries’ environmental performance.7 rental car.”
As it turns out, there is a highly positive cor- A sound rule of law ensures that pollut-
relation between a country’s environmental ers cannot violate the rights of others without
performance as measured by the EPI and its accounting for externalities or providing just
economic freedom. (See Chart 2). The EPI is not compensation for any damage inflicted. Free
without its faults; for example, the index places trade promotes competition and creates oppor-
unwarranted and subjective weight on carbon tunities for businesses to adopt newer and
emissions and climate change relative to more more innovative technologies. When countries
basic environmental measures. But even with increase their economic prosperity by advanc-
the index’s bias toward government command- ing economic freedom, their capacity to increase
and-control environmental regulation, it is overall well-being and protect the environment
striking that countries with greater economic also increases.
Chapter 5 59
As Economic Freedom Rises, So Does Environmental Performance
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
e
Lin
rend
T
20 Each circle
represents a nation
in the Index of
10 Economic Freedom
0
20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Sources: Terry Miller and Anthony B. Kim, 2015 Index of Economic Freedom (Washington, DC: The Heritage Foundation and
Dow Jones & Company, Inc., 2015), http://www.heritage.org/index, and Yale University, Environmental Performance Index,
http://www.epi.yale.edu/downloads (accessed October 6, 2014).
Chart 2 heritage.org
Chapter 5 61
Many times, however, those obstacles can be owned Pemex, kept in place since 1938, and
traced to burdensome government regulations. allowing private companies to compete in the
The marked decline in the U.S. nuclear industry, energy sector. As a direct result, the U.S. Energy
even in the midst of significant international Information Administration now projects that
growth, is a clear case in point. Private business- Mexico’s oil production will stop its 10-year
es have the knowledge and expertise to respond decline, level off, and eventually begin grow-
to market signals and succeed or fail by taking ing again.21 An open, resource-rich Mexico is
risks with their own resources. Government an extremely attractive new market for foreign
intervention, no matter the form, interferes with investors, and reform of the power market will
that process. upgrade the country’s energy infrastructure
Open Markets. Opening markets to domes- and provide both increased energy supplies and
tic private investment and foreign investment more economic opportunity.
is crucial to developing energy resources and Mexico is far from the only country imple-
increasing economic growth. The countries menting market-oriented reforms. India has
where private actors own the mineral rights signed civil commercial nuclear agreements
and reap the rewards from risk-taking typically with the United States and Australia, under
have more efficient, economically competitive which nuclear technologies can be traded freely
outcomes than do countries where the pro- and safely to bring electricity to energy-starved
ceeds from energy production funnel back to Indians. South African President Jacob Zuma is
the government or to corrupt special interests calling for more competitive pricing and encour-
allied with the government. Opening markets aging foreign investment through increased
to encourage foreign investment will not auto- private-sector participation.22 The United States’
matically eliminate the political corruption that Anadarko, Italy’s ENI, and India’s Jindal Steel and
is prevalent within the governments of many Power are investing directly in Mozambique’s
countries, but access to foreign capital will result wealth of coal and natural gas, and the doubling
in more competition, expanded energy supplies, of foreign direct investment has sparked steady
more jobs, and higher standards of living for economic growth for the country.23
more people. Open markets can also foster the explora-
While many countries are already enjoy- tion and development of new and more efficient
ing the economic benefits that flow from open energy technologies. Innovation and increased
energy markets, others are recognizing the need access to energy spurred by competition have
for change. Underinvestment and serious inef- the ultimate effect of reducing energy costs.
ficiencies in Mexico’s government-run energy As energy becomes more affordable, both the
sector, for example, have led to wasteful, out-of- expense of operating businesses and the cost of
date infrastructure and the underdevelopment products decrease, benefiting consumers.
of energy supplies. Unlike its North American
neighbors, Mexico has largely been detached THE EROSION OF ECONOMIC
from the energy boom in oil and natural gas cre- LIBERTY AND HARMFUL
ated by new technology. From 2000 to 2012, the ENERGY POLICIES
world’s major oil-producing countries increased Many of the problems associated with
their proven reserves; during the same period, accessing, producing, and consuming energy in
Mexico’s proven reserves fell 50 percent.20 countries around the world are a direct result
In recent years, however, Mexico has adopted of government intervention and policies that
a series of reforms that should open up invest- undermine economic liberty. Even in the freest
ment for oil and gas production, refineries, economies, the energy sector is uniquely prone
power plants, and pipelines and enable it to to government intervention. Governments have
upgrade existing energy infrastructure. Chang- sought to control energy supply, manipulate
es include ending the monopoly held by state- demand, and limit competition. However, both
Chapter 5 63
from motor vehicles and both new and existing tic energy production, the United States should
power plants. be in a position to gain significant economic
Carbon dioxide (CO2) and other greenhouse benefits by exporting energy. Rather than treat-
gas (GHG) emissions do not have direct adverse ing energy like other goods traded freely around
health impacts. In fact, CO2 is critical to enhanc- the world, however, America bans exports of
ing plant growth and improving ecosystems, pro- crude oil and places needless restrictions on the
viding a number of agricultural and broad human exporting of other energy sources and technolo-
health benefits. Countries around the world are gies.36 It even hampers imports, as shown by its
implementing schemes to reduce CO2 because, failure to approve construction of the Keystone
it is claimed, its contribution to global warming XL pipeline that would facilitate imports of
negatively affects human health and the environ- crude oil from Canada.
ment. While a near-universal consensus exists In other cases, governments have resorted
among climatologists that man-made emissions to restrictions on energy trade in pursuit of
have some warming effect, a large community strategic or tactical advantages. The govern-
of scientists have serious reservations about ment of Venezuela, for example, has subsi-
the rate of warming, the magnitude of climate dized oil exports to Cuba, other nations of the
change induced by GHG emissions, and the abil- Caribbean and Central America, and even the
ity of climate models to predict conditions sev- United States in pursuit of political support
eral centuries into the future. for its foreign policy goals. Russia, by contrast,
More important, no matter what one believes has restricted or threatened to restrict the flow
regarding climate change, one thing is clear: of natural gas to European countries to mute
Collectively, the proposed carbon-emissions their objections to its expansionist policies in
reduction policies will cost billions of dollars in Ukraine and Georgia.
higher taxes33 and trillions of dollars in lost eco- The most famous case of the attempted use
nomic opportunity while likely having little if of energy export controls for strategic advan-
any noticeable impact on global temperatures.34 tage is probably the 1973 Arab oil embargo
When energy prices are artificially increased, enforced by the Organization of Petroleum
higher costs reverberate throughout the global Exporting Countries (OPEC) against the
economy as affected industries pass these costs United States and others who were supporting
onto consumers. Simply put, consumers are con- Israel in the so-called Yom Kippur War. The
strained to consume less as producers are forced result was a quadrupling of oil prices and a
to raise prices. This results in lower incomes, global recession. The link between government
fewer jobs, and lost economic output. actions that reduce the availability of energy
Recognizing the high costs that a carbon tax and economic growth could not have been
was imposing on its citizens and businesses to demonstrated more vividly.
achieve insignificant climate benefits, Australia
abolished the tax in July 2014.35 No doubt other ENERGY: AN ESSENTIAL BUILDING
countries are watching the Australian about- BLOCK FOR AN IMPROVED
face with significant interest. STANDARD OF LIVING
Carbon regulations and taxes are merely one Energy is a key building block for economic
example of how governments impose stringent opportunity. Energy policies rooted in the prin-
regulations on the energy industry that achieve ciples of economic freedom lead to increased
little in the way of meaningful environmental production, improved access, and greater pros-
benefit. Many governments impose controls on perity, while governments that deviate from
exploration, exploitation, and trade in oil and those principles are likely to doom their citizens
natural gas. to lives of energy scarcity, thereby curtailing eco-
Restrictions on Trade. With a wealth of nomic growth, environmental progress, health,
natural resources and a recent surge in domes- and longevity.
Chapter 5 65
ENDNOTES
1. International Energy Agency, World Energy 11. William J. Garvelink, “Land Tenure, Property
Investment Outlook, 2014, Rights, and Rural Economic Development in
http://www.iea.org/publications/ Africa,” Center for Strategic and International
freepublications/publication/weio2014.pdf. Studies Critical Questions, February 17, 2012,
2. See, for example, Ross McKitrick and Elmira http://csis.org/publication/land-tenure-
Aliakbari, Energy Abundance and Economic property-rights-and-rural-economic-
Growth: International and Canadian Evidence, development-africa.
Fraser Institute, May 2014, 12. Daron Acemoglu, Simon Johnson, and James A.
http://www.fraserinstitute.org/uploadedFiles/ Robinson, “An African Success Story: Botswana,”
fraser-ca/Content/research-news/research/ July 11, 2011, http://www.colby.edu/economics/
publications/energy-abundance-and-economic- faculty/jmlong/ec479/ajr.pdf, and Global
growth.pdf. Property Guide, “Property Rights Index—Cape
3. International Energy Agency, “World Energy Verde Compared to Continent,”
Outlook,” Energy Access Database, http://www.globalpropertyguide.com/Africa/
http://www.worldenergyoutlook.org/resources/ Cape-Verde/property-rights-index.
energydevelopment/energyaccessdatabase/. 13. David Victor, David R. Hults, and Mark C.
4. Deutsche Welle, “Tanzanian Natural Gas Comes Thurber, eds., Oil and Governance: State-Owned
Ashore,” August 19, 2014, Enterprises and the World Energy Supply,
http://www.dw.de/tanzanian-natural-gas- (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press,
comes-ashore/a-17862556. 2014), http://www.cambridge.org/us/academic/
5. Giridhar Jha, “Bihar Village Clamours for Real subjects/politics-international-relations/
Electricity,” India Today, August 6, 2014, political-economy/oil-and-governance-state-
http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/bihar-village- owned-enterprises-and-world-energy-supply.
dharnai-nitish-kumar-clamours-for-real- 14. Cesar J. Alvarez and Stephanie Hanson,
electricity/1/375733.html. “Venezuela’s Oil-based Economy,” Council
6. Yale Center for Environmental Law and Policy on Foreign Relations Backgrounder, updated
and Center for International Earth Science February 9, 2009, www.cfr.org/world/
Information Network at Columbia University, venezuelas-oil-based-economy/p12089.
2014 Environmental Performance Index, “Our 15. Jim Jelter, “Why Oil Prices Dipped on Chavez’s
Methods,” http://epi.yale.edu/our-methods. Death,” The Wall Street Journal, MarketWatch,
7. Ibid. March 5, 2013, http://blogs.marketwatch.com/
thetell/2013/03/05/why-oil-prices-dipped-on-
8. Marc Humphries, “U.S. Crude Oil and
chavezs-death/.
Natural Gas Production in Federal and Non-
Federal Areas,” Congressional Research 16. Fabiola Moura, “Energy Losses Expose Petrobras
Service Report for Congress, March 7, 2013, Fuel Distortion: Corporate Brazil,” Bloomberg,
http://energycommerce.house.gov/sites/ November 23, 2012, http://www.bloomberg.
republicans.energycommerce.house.gov/ com/news/2012-11-23/energy-losses-expose-
files/20130228CRSreport.pdf. petrobras-fuel-distortion-corporate-brazil.html.
9. Doug Black, “A Canadian Energy Strategy 17. Christian Gómez, Jr., “Brazil’s Energy Agenda:
Framework Summary,” in A Canadian Energy The Way Forward,” Americas Society/Council
Strategy Framework: A Guide to Building of the Americas Energy Action Group Working
Canada’s Future as a Global Energy Leader, Paper, September 2013,
Energy Policy Institute of Canada, August 2012, http://www.as-coa.org/sites/default/files/
http://www.canadasenergy.ca/wp-content/ Brazils%20Energy%20Agenda.pdf.
uploads/2012/08/Final-Document-Aug-1.pdf. 18. U.S. Energy Information Administration,
10. Carl Bauer, “Market Approaches to Water “Country Analysis Brief: Iran,” last updated
Allocation: Lessons from Latin America,” July 22, 2014, http://www.eia.gov/countries/
Journal of Contemporary Water Research & analysisbriefs/Iran/iran.pdf.
Education, Issue 144 (March 2010), pp. 44–49, 19. KPMG, “Oil and Gas in Africa: Africa’s Reserves,
http://www.ucowr.org/issue-144/market- Potential and Prospects,” 2013,
approaches-to-water-allocation-lessons-from- http://www.kpmg.com/Africa/en/
latin-america. IssuesAndInsights/Articles-Publications/
Documents/Oil%20and%20Gas%20in%20
Africa.pdf.
Chapter 5 67
Chapter 6
T
he 2015 Index of Economic Freedom assess- That represents a 2.8-point overall improve-
es economic policy developments in 186 ment from the inception of the Index in 1995.
economies in six regions around the world. (See Chart 1.)
The Index grades and ranks economies based Of the 178 economies graded in the 2015 Index,
on their performance in 10 key policy areas only five have sustained very high freedom scores
affecting overall economic freedom, which are of 80 or more, putting them in the ranks of the
grouped into categories that evaluate the rule economically “free.” The next 30 countries have
of law, respect for the principle of limited gov-been rated as “mostly free” economies recording
ernment, regulatory efficiency, and the domes- scores between 70 and 80. With scores of 60 to 70,
tic and international openness of markets. The 55 countries have earned scores that place them
2015 Index, the 21st annual edition, evaluates in the “moderately free” category. Thus, a total of
economic conditions and policy developments 90 economies, or about 50 percent of all nations
between July 1, 2013, and June 30, 2014. and territories graded in the 2015 Index, provide
institutional environments in which individu-
GLOBAL PROGRESS als and private enterprises benefit from at least
IN ECONOMIC FREEDOM a moderate degree of economic freedom in the
The 2015 Index judges the world economy as pursuit of greater prosperity and success.
a whole to be “moderately free.” Average eco- On the opposite side of the spectrum, nearly
nomic freedom has increased for the third year half of the remaining countries graded in the
in a row. Although the pace of advancement has Index—88 economies—have registered economic
slowed sharply in comparison to last year’s 0.7- freedom scores below 60. Of those, 62 economies
point improvement, economic freedom has still are considered “mostly unfree” (scores of 50–60),
advanced by 0.1 point to 60.4 in the 2015 Index. and 26 are clearly “repressed” (below 50).
69
Global Economic Freedom
58
57.6
57
57.1
56
1995 2000 2005 2010 2015
Source: Terry Miller and Anthony B. Kim, 2015 Index of Economic Freedom (Washington, DC: The Heritage Foundation
and Dow Jones & Company, Inc., 2015), http://www.heritage.org/index.
Chart 1 heritage.org
Despite the global progress recorded over the by close to one point or more on average. Aver-
21-year history of the Index, the number of people age scores for most other economic freedoms,
living without economic freedom remains disturb- including business freedom, property rights,
ingly high: 4.5 billion, or about 65 percent of the labor freedom, investment freedom, and finan-
world’s population. More than half of these people cial freedom, have registered small declines.
live in just two countries, China and India, where The loss of economic freedom was most
advancement toward greater economic freedom pronounced in the area of respect for limited
has been both limited and uneven. In the two most government. A score drop of 1.0 point in the cat-
populous economies, structural reforms in a few egory measuring control of government spend-
key sectors have sometimes boosted growth, but ing reflects the continuation of countercyclical or
the governments have failed to institutionalize interventionist stimulus policies in some countries,
open environments that promote broad-based though there is scant evidence that such policies
and sustained improvements in the economic are boosting growth or restoring employment.
well-being of the population as a whole.
As shown in “The Ten Economic Freedoms: A GAINS AND LOSSES
Global Look” on the next page, on a worldwide In the 2015 Index, 101 countries, the majority
basis, this year’s increase in economic freedom of which are less developed or emerging econo-
has been driven by improvements in trade free- mies, showed advances in economic freedom
dom, monetary freedom, and freedom from cor- over the past year. Remarkably, 37 countries,
ruption, for which global ratings have advanced including Taiwan, Lithuania, Georgia, Colom-
The world average score for property rights has declined since last year, with 28 countries’
scores deteriorating. In many countries, the judiciary has become more vulnerable to political
interference. Despite some improvement, the average score for freedom from corruption still
lags behind scores for other components of economic freedom. Populations in some countries
have engaged in demonstrations calling for greater transparency and accountability.
The average top individual income tax rate for all countries is about 28 percent, and the average
top corporate tax rate is 24.1 percent. The average overall tax burden corresponds to around
23 percent of gross domestic product. The average level of government spending is equal to
34.7 percent of GDP. The average level of gross public debt for countries covered in the Index is
equivalent to slightly over 50 percent of GDP.
Many countries continue to implement regulatory reforms, although developed countries have
generally lagged behind developing countries. Globally, starting a business takes seven proce-
dures and 22 days, while licensing requirements consume over five months on average. For
the world as a whole, burdensome labor codes stifle job growth. Monetary freedom registered
a continued improvement as a result of generally low inflationary pressures.
The average trade freedom score continues to improve. The average investment freedom score
remains essentially unchanged. Many countries’ investment policies remain geared toward
sectoral investment promotion rather than general market openness. Despite some progress,
the global financial system remains under continuing strain and uncertainty. Overall, global
financial freedom has recorded a slight decline since last year.
Chapter 6 71
Economic Freedom: Regional Variations (Regional Average)
Regional North Middle East / South and Central Sub-Saharan
Ranking America North Africa America / Caribbean Asia-Pacific Europe Africa
(73.9) (61.6) (59.7) (58.8) (67) (54.9)
1 Canada Bahrain Chile Hong Kong Switzerland Mauritius
2 United States United Arab Emirates Colombia Singapore Estonia Botswana
3 Mexico Qatar Saint Lucia New Zealand Ireland Cabo Verde
4 Israel Bahamas, The Australia Denmark Rwanda
5 Jordan Uruguay Taiwan United Kingdom Ghana
Saint Vincent
6 Oman Japan Lithuania South Africa
and the Grenadines
7 Kuwait Barbados South Korea Germany Madagascar
8 Saudi Arabia Peru Malaysia Netherlands Swaziland
9 Morocco Jamaica Macau Finland Uganda
10 Lebanon Costa Rica Brunei Luxembourg Namibia
11 Tunisia Dominica Kazakhstan Georgia Benin
12 Egypt El Salvador Thailand Sweden Zambia
13 Yemen Trinidad and Tobago Philippines, The Czech Republic Burkina Faso
14 Algeria Panama Samoa Iceland Côte d'Ivoire
15 Iran Paraguay Kyrgyz Republic Norway Gabon
16 Dominican Republic Vanuatu Austria Senegal
17 Guatemala Azerbaijan Latvia Tanzania
18 Nicaragua Tonga Belgium Djibouti
19 Honduras Mongolia Poland Gambia, The
20 Belize Fiji Cyprus Seychelles
21 Brazil Sri Lanka Spain Mali
22 Guyana Indonesia Slovak Republic Nigeria
23 Suriname Cambodia Armenia Kenya
24 Haiti Bhutan Macedonia Mozambique
25 Ecuador Pakistan Hungary Malawi
26 Bolivia India Bulgaria Niger
27 Argentina Bangladesh Romania Burundi
28 Venezuela Maldives Malta Mauritania
São Tomé
29 Cuba Papua New Guinea Albania
and Príncipe
30 China Portugal Togo
31 Tajikistan Montenegro Liberia
32 Vietnam Turkey Comoros
33 Laos France Guinea
34 Nepal Italy Guinea-Bissau
35 Micronesia Croatia Cameroon
36 Solomon Islands Slovenia Sierra Leone
37 Uzbekistan Serbia Ethiopia
Bosnia and
38 Burma Lesotho
Herzegovina
39 Kiribati Moldova Angola
40 Timor-Leste Greece Chad
Economic Freedom Scores Central African
41 Turkmenistan Russia
Republic
80–100 Free
42 North Korea Belarus Congo, Dem. Rep.
70–79.9 Mostly Free
43 Ukraine Congo, Republic of
60–69.9 Moderately Free
44 Equatorial Guinea
50–59.9 Mostly Unfree
45 Eritrea
0–49.9 Repressed
46 Zimbabwe
Source: Terry Miller and Anthony B. Kim, 2015 Index of Economic Freedom (Washington, DC: The Heritage Foundation
and Dow Jones & Company, Inc., 2015), http://www.heritage.org/index.
Chart 2 heritage.org
bia, Israel, Cabo Verde, Montenegro, and Côte Fourteen countries, including Angola, Poland,
d’Ivoire, achieved their highest economic free- South Korea, Taiwan, and the United Arab Emir-
dom scores ever in the 2015 Index. ates, have achieved uninterrupted growth in eco-
While four countries (Singapore, Finland, nomic freedom over the past five years. Seven of
Madagascar, and Suriname) recorded no score the 14, all developing countries, have recorded
change, declines in economic freedom have notable cumulative score gains of over five
occurred in 73 countries. Eleven countries, includ- points: Zimbabwe, Burma, Comoros, Seychelles,
ing Venezuela, Equatorial Guinea, Argentina, Liberia, the Philippines, and Guinea–Bissau.
Bolivia, Algeria, Greece, and El Salvador, recorded Competition for the top spot in the Index
their lowest economic freedom scores ever. rankings has intensified. The 2015 Index has
Sub-Saharan Africa is home to six of the 10 recorded a number of noticeable realignments
most improved countries. São Tomé and Prínci- and achievements within the top 20 global eco-
pe, Democratic Republic of Congo, Togo, Senegal, nomic freedom rankings.
Burundi, and Zimbabwe all recorded score gains
of two points or more. On the other hand, Europe • Hong Kong has maintained its status as the
has the most countries (Slovenia, Ukraine, Arme- world’s freest economy, a distinction that it
nia, and Greece) recording serious declines, fol- has achieved for 21 consecutive years. How-
lowed by Sub-Saharan Africa (Equatorial Guinea, ever, the gap between that territory and Sin-
Botswana, and the Gambia) and Middle East/ gapore, the second-freest economy, has almost
North Africa (Algeria and Yemen). vanished. Hong Kong’s economic freedom
Score improvements in eight countries, all score declined by 0.5 point, with an erosion of
of which are developing or emerging econo- the rule of law reflecting an increased level of
mies, were significant enough to merit upgrades perceived corruption.
in their economic freedom status in the Index. • Along with Hong Kong and Singapore, New
Notably, Israel and Malaysia have joined the Zealand, Australia, and Switzerland are the
ranks of the “mostly free,” in Israel’s case for the only economies considered “free” with eco-
first time ever and in Malaysia’s case regaining a nomic freedom scores above 80 on the 0-to-
level of economic freedom it had not experienced 100 Index grading scale. New Zealand moved
since 1996. Three developing countries (Moroc- up two slots and reclaimed third place in the
co, Serbia, and Vanuatu) have advanced into the rankings as a result of committed efforts to
ranks of the “moderately free.” Three others cut government spending. Canada remains
(Haiti, São Tomé and Príncipe, and Togo) have the world’s sixth-freest economy for the fifth
escaped the status of economically “repressed.” year in a row.
Chapter 6 73
Per-Capita Income by Region
GDP per Capita
(Purchasing Power Parity)
$60,000
$53,106 ■ Five Most Free Nations
$50,841 ■ Five Least Free Nations
50,000
$39,097
40,000
30,000 $27,452
20,000
$15,607
$10,655 $11,228
10,000 $8,658 $8,371
$5,841
0
Middle East and Asia-Pacific Europe Americas Sub-Saharan
North Africa Africa
Sources: Terry Miller and Anthony B. Kim, 2015 Index of Economic Freedom (Washington, DC: The Heritage Foundation
and Dow Jones & Company, Inc., 2015), http://www.heritage.org/index; and International Monetary Fund, World
Economic Outlook Databases, http://www.imf.org/external/ns/cs.aspx?id=28 (accessed November 19, 2014).
Chart 3 heritage.org
Source: Terry Miller and Anthony B. Kim, 2015 Index of Economic Freedom (Washington, DC: The Heritage Foundation and
Dow Jones & Company, Inc., 2015), http://www.heritage.org/index.
Table 1 heritage.org
economic freedom scores among the regions: co. Average economic freedom scores in the
73.9 and 67, respectively. Despite the ongoing South and Central America/Caribbean region,
economic and political turmoil in a number of the Asia–Pacific region, and Sub-Saharan Africa
countries in the Middle East and North Africa, continue to be below 60.
the region as a whole still achieved an average Despite varying degrees of economic free-
economic freedom score slightly above 60 due dom across the regions, the fundamental
to high ratings of economic freedom in Bahrain, relationship between economic freedom and
the United Arab Emirates, and Qatar, reinforced prosperity is readily apparent worldwide. Chart
by improved scores in Egypt, Israel, and Moroc- 3 shows that, no matter the region, per capita
Government Spending
Investment Freedom
Monetary Freedom
Change from 2014
Financial Freedom
Business Freedom
Property Rights
Labor Freedom
Fiscal Freedom
Trade Freedom
Regional Rank
Overall Score
World Rank
Country
6 1 Canada 79.1 -1.1 90 81.0 79.9 48.3 89.0 76.1 77.9 88.4 80 80
12 2 United States 76.2 0.7 80 73.0 66.2 51.8 88.8 98.5 76.6 87.0 70 70
59 3 Mexico 66.4 -0.4 50 34.0 77.8 78.0 71.5 59.9 77.6 85.6 70 60
Table 2 heritage.org
Chapter 6 75
North America
United
States
Canada
Source: Terry Miller and Anthony B. Kim, 2015 Index of Economic Freedom (Washington, DC: The Heritage
Foundation and Dow Jones & Company, Inc., 2015), http://www.heritage.org/index.
Map 1 heritage.org
income levels are consistently higher in coun- There is no single answer to the particular
tries that are economically freer. challenges of development that we face. One
The diversity of the world’s peoples and cul- thing, however, is sure: Governments that
tures implies that there will be many paths to respect and promote economic freedom provide
economic development and prosperity. The the best environment for experimentation, inno-
whole idea of economic freedom is to empow- vation, and progress, and it is through these that
er people with more opportunity to choose humankind grows in prosperity and well-being.
for themselves how to pursue and fulfill their
dreams, subject only to the basic rule of law and NORTH AMERICA
honest competition from others. The patterns of The North America region has two “mostly
economic freedom across the six Index regions free” economies (Canada and the U.S.) and one
are, not surprisingly, unique. They reflect the “moderately free” economy (Mexico). Canada has
culture and history of each nation and the indi- led the region in economic freedom since 2010.
viduals that inhabit them, not to mention cir- Overall, average economic freedom in the
cumstances of geography or endowments of region has registered a slight decline (0.2 point)
natural resources. since last year, with a small improvement in the
Government Spending
Investment Freedom
Monetary Freedom
Change from 2014
Financial Freedom
Business Freedom
Property Rights
Labor Freedom
Fiscal Freedom
Trade Freedom
Regional Rank
Overall Score
World Rank
Country
5 1 Switzerland 80.5 -1.1 90 85.0 70.3 65.1 78.1 75.3 86.3 90.0 85 80
8 2 Estonia 76.8 0.9 90 68.0 80.6 53.2 81.5 58.7 77.6 88.0 90 80
9 3 Ireland 76.6 0.4 85 72.0 73.6 45.6 82.1 76.2 83.9 88.0 90 70
11 4 Denmark 76.3 0.2 95 91.0 39.6 1.8 97.4 92.1 87.6 88.0 90 80
13 5 United Kingdom 75.8 0.9 90 76.0 62.9 30.3 91.1 75.6 74.4 88.0 90 80
15 6 Lithuania 74.7 1.7 60 57.0 92.9 61.3 84.9 62.0 81.2 88.0 80 80
16 7 Germany 73.8 0.4 90 78.0 60.8 40.1 88.2 51.2 81.5 88.0 90 70
17 8 The Netherlands 73.7 -0.5 90 83.0 51.8 23.8 84.3 66.3 79.8 88.0 90 80
19 9 Finland 73.4 0.0 90 89.0 66.4 3.6 92.6 54.8 79.9 88.0 90 80
21 10 Luxembourg 73.2 -1.0 90 80.0 62.3 42.2 71.3 42.1 80.7 88.0 95 80
22 11 Georgia 73.0 0.4 40 49.0 87.2 73.8 88.6 79.9 82.7 88.6 80 60
23 12 Sweden 72.7 -0.4 90 89.0 43.0 19.2 87.9 54.0 85.5 88.0 90 80
24 13 Czech Republic 72.5 0.3 75 48.0 81.5 40.6 68.2 82.9 81.2 88.0 80 80
26 14 Iceland 72.0 -0.4 90 78.0 72.0 32.6 90.5 62.2 77.0 88.0 70 60
27 15 Norway 71.8 0.9 90 86.0 52.1 43.8 92.1 48.2 81.7 89.4 75 60
30 16 Austria 71.2 -1.2 90 69.0 50.1 19.8 78.0 76.7 80.3 88.0 90 70
37 17 Latvia 69.7 1.0 50 53.0 84.4 59.2 82.1 61.5 83.8 88.0 85 50
40 18 Belgium 68.8 -1.1 80 75.0 43.6 10.2 90.7 63.7 81.7 88.0 85 70
42 19 Poland 68.6 1.6 60 60.0 82.1 47.1 67.3 60.4 81.3 88.0 70 70
45 20 Cyprus 67.9 0.3 70 63.0 79.5 36.7 79.5 59.6 82.7 88.0 70 50
49 21 Spain 67.6 0.4 70 59.0 53.1 39.8 77.5 52.6 81.3 88.0 85 70
50 22 Slovak Republic 67.2 0.8 50 47.0 80.8 55.1 69.6 56.5 75.5 88.0 80 70
United States outweighed by declines in Canada dom in the region. In 1995, when the first edition
and Mexico. The downward spiral in U.S. eco- of the Index measured these freedoms, the score
nomic freedom over the previous seven years has differences between the United States and Mexi-
come to a halt. In the 2015 Index, the U.S. recorded co were over 10 points. Over the past two decades,
modest score gains in six of the 10 economic free- the trade and investment freedom margins have
doms; however, its score for business freedom has narrowed to less than three points.
plunged below 90, the lowest level since 2006.
The North American Free Trade Agreement EUROPE
remains the linchpin of massive trade and invest- The Europe region includes 43 countries graded
ment flows in the North America region. This by the Index, the most of any region. Switzerland
increasing integration is reflected in converging continues to be the only “free” economy in the
scores for trade freedom and investment free- region, with a score of 80.5. Nine of the world’s 20
Chapter 6 77
Economic Freedom in European Countries (continued)
Government Spending
Investment Freedom
Monetary Freedom
Change from 2014
Financial Freedom
Business Freedom
Property Rights
Labor Freedom
Fiscal Freedom
Trade Freedom
Regional Rank
Overall Score
World Rank
Country
52 23 Armenia 67.1 -1.8 20 36.0 84.4 82.8 82.7 64.3 70.6 85.4 75 70
53 24 Macedonia 67.1 -1.5 35 44.0 91.4 65.6 79.2 70.7 79.0 86.2 60 60
54 25 Hungary 66.8 -0.2 55 54.0 78.7 25.9 74.5 67.7 79.2 88.0 75 70
55 26 Bulgaria 66.8 1.1 30 41.0 91.0 64.5 68.5 76.6 83.2 88.0 65 60
57 27 Romania 66.6 1.1 40 43.0 86.9 62.3 69.8 68.6 77.3 88.0 80 50
58 28 Malta 66.5 0.1 75 56.0 63.1 44.4 61.0 55.6 81.8 88.0 80 60
63 29 Albania 65.7 -1.2 30 31.0 87.2 76.1 70.6 52.9 80.8 87.8 70 70
64 30 Portugal 65.3 1.8 70 62.0 61.1 28.8 87.5 42.9 82.8 88.0 70 60
66 31 Montenegro 64.7 1.1 40 44.0 92.6 36.7 77.1 77.5 79.7 84.8 65 50
70 32 Turkey 63.2 -1.7 45 50.0 76.1 57.6 61.0 50.2 72.4 84.6 75 60
73 33 France 62.5 -1.0 80 71.0 47.5 2.5 80.2 43.5 77.5 83.0 70 70
80 34 Italy 61.7 0.8 55 43.0 54.2 23.2 71.9 55.4 81.2 88.0 85 60
81 35 Croatia 61.5 1.1 40 48.0 74.9 46.5 55.8 42.8 80.0 87.2 80 60
88 36 Slovenia 60.3 -2.4 60 57.0 58.1 0.0 81.2 57.1 81.3 88.0 70 50
90 37 Serbia 60.0 0.6 45 42.0 82.4 27.1 57.8 70.4 72.2 78.2 75 50
97 38 Bosnia and Herzegovina 59.0 0.6 20 42.0 82.9 27.3 53.5 63.4 84.0 87.2 70 60
111 39 Moldova 57.5 0.2 40 35.0 85.1 51.8 66.8 40.6 76.1 79.8 50 50
130 40 Greece 54.0 -1.7 40 40.0 64.2 0.0 73.3 51.6 77.8 83.0 60 50
143 41 Russia 52.1 0.2 20 28.0 86.1 57.8 76.3 58.9 63.9 75.0 25 30
153 42 Belarus 49.8 -0.3 20 29.0 86.4 54.7 72.0 80.1 44.5 81.0 20 10
162 43 Ukraine 46.9 -2.4 20 25.0 78.7 28.0 59.3 48.2 78.6 85.8 15 30
N/A N/A Kosovo N/A N/A 30 33.0 N/A 73.9 66.8 72.1 74.9 N/A 65 N/A
N/A N/A Liechtenstein N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 90.0 85 80
Table 3 heritage.org
freest countries are in Europe, and the vast major- problems in public finance management result-
ity of the region’s countries are considered at least ing from years of expansion of the public sector.
“moderately free.” Europe has three “mostly unfree” The result has been stagnant economic growth,
economies (Moldova, Greece, and Russia) and two which has exacerbated the burden of fiscal deficits
“repressed” economies (Ukraine and Belarus). and mounting debt. In many countries of the region,
Taken as a whole, the Europe region still struggles decisive policy action is needed to cut spending.
with a variety of policy barriers to dynamic eco- Where such actions have been taken, progress is
nomic expansion, such as overly protective and apparent. Three Baltic economies (Estonia, Lithu-
costly labor regulations, higher tax burdens, various ania, and Latvia) are on the move toward greater
market distortionary subsidies, and continuing economic freedom. Overcoming severe recessions
Estonia
Iceland
Latvia Russia
Denmark
Netherlands Lithuania
Belgium
Belarus
United
Kingdom Poland
Economic Freedom Scores
Germany
80–100 Free Ireland
Czech Ukraine
70–79.9 Mostly Free Luxembourg Republic
60–69.9 Moderately Free Slovakia Moldova
50–59.9 Mostly Unfree Austria
Liechtenstein Hungary
0–49.9 Repressed Switzerland
Sea of
Chapter 6
Not Ranked Croatia Romania
Italy Azov
France Caspian
Serbia Sea
Black
Bulgaria Sea
Georgia
Spain
Slovenia Greece Turkey
Malta
Portugal Cyprus Armenia
Bosnia & Herzegovina Macedonia
Montenegro Kosovo
Albania
Source: Terry Miller and Anthony B. Kim, 2015 Index of Economic Freedom (Washington, DC: The Heritage
Foundation and Dow Jones & Company, Inc., 2015), http://www.heritage.org/index.
Map 2 heritage.org
79
South and Central America/Caribbean
The Bahamas
Cuba
Haiti
Dominican Republic
Belize
Honduras Jamaica Dominica
Guatemala St. Lucia
St. Vincent & The Grenadines
El Salvador Barbados
Trinidad & Tobago
Nicaragua
Costa Rica Venezuela Guyana
Panama Suriname
Colombia
Ecuador
Brazil
Peru
Bolivia
Economic Freedom Scores
80–100 Free
70–79.9 Mostly Free
Paraguay
60–69.9 Moderately Free
50–59.9 Mostly Unfree
0–49.9 Repressed
Not Ranked
Chile Argentina
Uruguay
Source: Terry Miller and Anthony B. Kim, 2015 Index of Economic Freedom (Washington, DC: The Heritage
Foundation and Dow Jones & Company, Inc., 2015), http://www.heritage.org/index.
Map 3 heritage.org
Government Spending
Investment Freedom
Monetary Freedom
Change from 2014
Financial Freedom
Business Freedom
Property Rights
Labor Freedom
Fiscal Freedom
Trade Freedom
Regional Rank
Overall Score
World Rank
Country
7 1 Chile 78.5 -0.2 90 71.0 76.5 83.3 69.3 67.0 85.6 82.0 90 70
28 2 Colombia 71.7 1.0 50 36.0 80.3 76.0 81.5 81.7 80.1 81.2 80 70
35 3 Saint Lucia 70.2 -0.5 70 71.0 77.7 65.8 75.6 79.8 85.5 72.0 65 40
41 4 The Bahamas 68.7 -1.1 70 71.0 97.8 83.2 68.9 75.3 78.8 52.2 30 60
43 5 Uruguay 68.6 -0.7 70 73.0 77.1 65.1 72.6 64.3 71.6 81.8 80 30
Saint Vincent
44 6 68.0 1.0 70 62.0 73.3 75.3 70.8 78.2 82.3 68.4 60 40
and the Grenadines
46 7 Barbados 67.9 -0.4 80 75.0 73.8 42.1 71.6 69.2 78.2 63.8 65 60
47 8 Peru 67.7 0.3 40 38.0 78.6 88.5 67.7 63.4 83.9 87.0 70 60
48 9 Jamaica 67.7 1.0 40 38.0 81.5 73.2 85.9 76.5 71.4 75.0 85 50
51 10 Costa Rica 67.2 0.3 50 53.0 80.0 89.9 64.5 54.6 75.8 83.8 70 50
61 11 Dominica 66.1 0.9 60 58.0 73.6 61.5 71.6 68.7 89.5 72.8 75 30
62 12 El Salvador 65.7 -0.5 35 38.0 79.4 85.5 53.3 53.3 82.5 85.2 75 70
67 13 Trinidad and Tobago 64.1 1.4 50 38.0 79.0 69.3 65.3 76.6 74.3 78.6 60 50
68 14 Panama 64.1 0.7 30 35.0 84.5 78.8 71.5 41.5 76.4 78.4 75 70
Chapter 6 81
Economic Freedom in South and
Central America / Caribbean Countries (continued)
Government Spending
Investment Freedom
Monetary Freedom
Change from 2014
Financial Freedom
Business Freedom
Property Rights
Labor Freedom
Fiscal Freedom
Trade Freedom
Regional Rank
Overall Score
World Rank
Country
83 15 Paraguay 61.1 -0.9 30 24.0 96.0 81.9 58.4 26.3 78.3 81.4 75 60
86 16 Dominican Republic 61.0 -0.3 30 29.0 84.1 87.1 53.5 57.5 76.0 77.8 75 40
87 17 Guatemala 60.4 -0.8 20 29.0 79.6 94.1 54.7 50.6 76.8 84.6 65 50
108 18 Nicaragua 57.6 -0.8 10 28.0 78.4 76.6 58.0 56.7 67.8 85.4 65 50
116 19 Honduras 57.4 0.3 30 26.0 84.9 78.7 53.2 28.0 75.4 77.6 60 60
117 20 Belize 56.8 0.1 30 6.7 82.4 78.3 59.1 61.8 79.3 70.4 50 50
118 21 Brazil 56.6 -0.3 50 42.0 68.4 50.9 53.6 52.1 69.4 69.6 50 60
123 22 Guyana 55.5 -0.2 25 27.0 68.7 70.8 63.8 74.5 78.4 72.0 45 30
129 23 Suriname 54.2 0.0 35 36.0 69.3 73.8 42.2 81.9 77.2 66.2 30 30
151 24 Haiti 51.3 2.4 10 19.0 80.3 76.2 43.1 63.7 73.5 77.6 40 30
156 25 Ecuador 49.2 1.2 15 35.0 79.1 51.0 51.4 51.3 68.2 71.4 30 40
163 26 Bolivia 46.8 -1.6 10 34.0 86.8 60.9 53.7 25.5 69.7 77.6 10 40
169 27 Argentina 44.1 -0.5 15 34.0 66.8 41.2 52.8 43.3 59.6 68.8 30 30
176 28 Venezuela 34.3 -2.0 5 20.0 75.0 52.0 41.6 24.2 42.8 62.8 0 20
177 29 Cuba 29.6 0.9 10 46.0 61.8 0.0 20.0 20.0 64.8 63.8 0 10
Table 4 heritage.org
Caspian
Sea
Algeria
Kuwait
Libya
Egypt
Bahrain
Qatar
Saudi Arabia
Chapter 6
United
Oman Arab
Emirates
Yemen
Economic Freedom Scores
80–100 Free
70–79.9 Mostly Free
60–69.9 Moderately Free
50–59.9 Mostly Unfree
0–49.9 Repressed
Not Ranked
Source: Terry Miller and Anthony B. Kim, 2015 Index of Economic Freedom (Washington, DC: The Heritage Foundation and Dow Jones & Company, Inc., 2015),
http://www.heritage.org/index.
Map 4 heritage.org
83
Economic Freedom in Middle East/North African Countries
Government Spending
Investment Freedom
Monetary Freedom
Change from 2014
Financial Freedom
Business Freedom
Property Rights
Labor Freedom
Fiscal Freedom
Trade Freedom
Regional Rank
Overall Score
World Rank
Country
18 1 Bahrain 73.4 -1.7 60 48.0 99.9 73.1 72.5 83.1 74.2 78.6 65 80
25 2 United Arab Emirates 72.4 1.0 55 69.0 99.5 85.8 74.7 83.8 83.8 82.4 40 50
32 3 Qatar 70.8 -0.4 70 68.0 99.7 71.9 70.5 71.2 79.7 81.8 45 50
33 4 Israel 70.5 2.1 75 61.0 61.9 47.8 72.4 67.1 81.6 88.6 80 70
38 5 Jordan 69.3 0.1 60 45.0 93.7 70.7 59.1 74.4 80.6 79.6 70 60
56 6 Oman 66.7 -0.7 55 47.0 98.5 44.2 68.4 76.1 76.2 76.8 65 60
74 7 Kuwait 62.5 0.2 45 43.0 97.7 61.1 58.6 64.2 74.0 76.2 55 50
77 8 Saudi Arabia 62.1 -0.1 40 46.0 99.7 61.9 65.8 72.7 68.4 76.4 40 50
89 9 Morocco 60.1 1.8 40 37.0 70.9 61.0 68.8 33.4 81.9 78.2 70 60
94 10 Lebanon 59.3 -0.1 20 28.0 91.3 70.6 54.7 60.7 72.0 75.8 60 60
107 11 Tunisia 57.7 0.4 40 41.0 74.3 70.8 81.2 69.1 74.8 61.2 35 30
124 12 Egypt 55.2 2.3 20 32.0 85.8 68.0 65.4 53.6 67.4 70.0 50 40
133 13 Yemen 53.7 -1.8 30 18.0 91.5 59.9 54.0 57.1 68.5 77.6 50 30
157 14 Algeria 48.9 -1.9 30 36.0 80.0 38.7 66.6 50.5 71.2 60.8 25 30
171 15 Iran 41.8 1.5 10 25.0 81.2 93.0 57.0 51.3 48.7 41.4 0 10
N/A N/A Iraq N/A N/A N/A 16.0 N/A 43.8 57.7 74.4 73.6 N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A Libya N/A N/A 10 15.0 95.0 37.5 46.8 66.7 71.4 80.0 5 N/A
N/A N/A Syria N/A N/A 10 17.0 N/A N/A 57.3 49.1 N/A N/A 0 20
Table 5 heritage.org
change for the better. Of the Arab Spring econo- whose average unemployment rate is close to
mies, Tunisia and Egypt have shown the most 25 percent.
encouraging results over the past year. However, Undoubtedly, mounting economic problems
Yemen and Bahrain continue to be on downward will not be solved simply by holding elections or
paths in terms of economic freedom, and grading allowing greater expressions of dissent. Exist-
of economic freedom for Iraq, Libya, and Syria ing policies and practices continue to restrict
remains suspended because of ongoing violence economic freedom. Over the past year, business
and unrest. freedom, the lack of which contributed to ignit-
Structural and institutional problems ing Arab Spring protests, has declined in 11 of the
abound throughout the region, and private- 18 countries in the region. Equally troublesome
sector growth continues to lag far behind levels is that costly subsidies on energy and food, which
needed to provide adequate jobs for growing place a considerable burden on budgets and
populations. Taken as a whole, the Middle East/ stand in the way of sound sustainable economic
North Africa region’s lack of job opportunities development, are still on the rise as many gov-
continues to be a serious problem, particu- ernments in the region continue to rely on lavish
larly for younger members of the labor force subsides to quell social and political unrest.
Kazakhstan
Mongolia
Caspian
Sea Australia Tonga
North
Korea
Azerbaijan
Nepal Bhutan China
Turkmenistan
South Japan
Afghanistan Korea New Zealand
Chapter 6
Philippines Micronesia
Burma
Vietnam
Thailand
Maldives Malaysia Brunei
Sri Lanka
Economic Freedom Scores
Kiribati
80–100 Free
70–79.9 Mostly Free
60–69.9 Moderately Free
50–59.9 Mostly Unfree
Singapore Indonesia Timor-Leste Papua Solomon 0–49.9 Repressed
New Guinea Islands
Not Ranked
Source: Terry Miller and Anthony B. Kim, 2015 Index of Economic Freedom (Washington, DC: The Heritage Foundation
and Dow Jones & Company, Inc., 2015), http://www.heritage.org/index. Map 5 heritage.org
85
Economic Freedom in Asia–Pacific Countries
Government Spending
Investment Freedom
Monetary Freedom
Change from 2014
Financial Freedom
Business Freedom
Property Rights
Labor Freedom
Fiscal Freedom
Trade Freedom
Regional Rank
Overall Score
World Rank
Country
1 1 Hong Kong 89.6 -0.5 90 75.0 93.2 89.7 100.0 95.9 81.8 90.0 90 90
2 2 Singapore 89.4 0.0 90 86.0 91.2 93.8 96.9 96.9 83.7 90.0 85 80
3 3 New Zealand 82.1 0.9 95 91.0 70.4 43.0 95.5 91.4 87.6 86.8 80 80
4 4 Australia 81.4 -0.6 90 81.0 63.7 61.8 94.1 81.6 85.3 86.4 80 90
14 5 Taiwan 75.1 1.2 70 61.0 80.4 87.1 92.4 55.2 83.3 86.4 75 60
20 6 Japan 73.3 0.9 80 74.0 68.7 47.1 84.1 90.2 86.7 82.6 70 50
29 7 South Korea 71.5 0.3 75 55.0 72.5 67.9 89.7 51.1 81.6 72.6 70 80
31 8 Malaysia 70.8 1.2 55 50.0 84.4 74.0 93.5 75.7 80.8 80.0 55 60
34 9 Macau 70.3 -1.0 60 49.7 71.8 91.8 60.0 50.0 74.9 90.0 85 70
39 10 Brunei 68.9 -0.1 35 60.0 87.0 63.6 68.3 96.9 76.6 81.8 70 50
69 11 Kazakhstan 63.3 -0.4 25 26.0 93.2 85.0 73.7 87.0 74.6 79.0 40 50
75 12 Thailand 62.4 -0.9 40 35.0 81.5 81.4 72.5 63.5 69.9 75.4 45 60
76 13 The Philippines 62.2 2.1 30 36.0 79.1 89.3 55.3 58.2 78.8 75.4 60 60
78 14 Samoa 61.9 0.8 60 38.0 80.2 46.5 73.6 78.4 81.2 75.8 55 30
82 15 Kyrgyz Republic 61.3 0.2 20 24.0 93.6 53.2 73.7 85.0 73.8 80.2 60 50
84 16 Vanuatu 61.1 1.6 40 33.5 97.2 83.8 51.5 46.4 82.9 75.4 60 40
85 17 Azerbaijan 61.0 -0.3 20 28.0 88.1 59.7 74.5 79.1 79.8 76.0 55 50
95 18 Tonga 59.3 1.1 20 28.6 87.2 79.0 74.1 92.1 73.5 78.4 40 20
96 19 Mongolia 59.2 0.3 30 38.0 83.9 35.6 68.2 82.7 69.2 74.8 50 60
98 20 Fiji 59.0 0.3 25 22.3 81.3 74.6 63.2 75.2 78.3 70.2 50 50
101 21 Sri Lanka 58.6 -1.4 35 37.0 85.0 88.4 72.5 58.7 68.2 71.6 30 40
105 22 Indonesia 58.1 -0.4 30 32.0 83.3 88.3 49.3 48.7 74.9 74.8 40 60
Government Spending
Investment Freedom
Monetary Freedom
Change from 2014
Financial Freedom
Business Freedom
Property Rights
Labor Freedom
Fiscal Freedom
Trade Freedom
Regional Rank
Overall Score
World Rank
Country
110 23 Cambodia 57.5 0.1 25 20.0 90.5 87.5 29.2 62.2 78.7 72.2 60 50
115 24 Bhutan 57.4 0.7 60 63.0 82.6 60.1 61.9 81.1 66.0 49.4 20 30
121 25 Pakistan 55.6 0.4 30 28.0 77.7 86.1 65.6 42.1 71.2 65.6 50 40
128 26 India 54.6 -1.1 55 36.0 79.4 78.3 43.3 48.7 65.3 64.6 35 40
131 27 Bangladesh 53.9 -0.2 20 27.0 72.7 92.0 62.2 63.7 67.7 59.0 45 30
134 28 Maldives 53.4 2.4 25 21.9 95.5 50.6 85.8 73.4 74.1 47.8 30 30
137 29 Papua New Guinea 53.1 -0.8 20 25.0 66.9 68.7 53.5 74.5 72.7 85.0 35 30
139 30 China 52.7 0.2 20 40.0 69.7 81.5 52.1 63.0 74.2 71.8 25 30
140 31 Tajikistan 52.7 0.7 20 22.0 92.1 81.9 65.4 46.4 69.6 74.6 25 30
148 32 Vietnam 51.7 0.9 15 31.0 79.1 77.1 61.5 62.9 66.8 78.6 15 30
150 33 Laos 51.4 0.2 15 26.0 86.2 86.8 59.5 57.1 74.5 58.6 30 20
152 34 Nepal 51.3 1.2 30 31.0 85.6 88.9 65.7 44.3 70.5 61.8 5 30
154 35 Micronesia 49.6 -0.2 30 30.0 93.2 0.0 51.0 79.1 76.9 81.0 25 30
159 36 Solomon Islands 47.0 0.8 30 25.0 61.1 25.7 67.7 68.6 74.3 73.0 15 30
160 37 Uzbekistan 47.0 0.5 15 17.0 90.2 67.3 73.1 64.2 63.5 69.8 0 10
161 38 Burma 46.9 0.4 10 21.0 86.9 77.9 28.7 79.3 66.1 74.2 15 10
164 39 Kiribati 46.4 0.1 30 29.2 73.0 0.0 56.8 83.9 80.6 55.4 25 30
167 40 Timor-Leste 45.5 2.3 20 30.0 64.7 0.0 59.8 72.0 68.7 79.6 40 20
172 41 Turkmenistan 41.4 -0.8 5 17.0 94.0 93.5 30.0 20.0 64.2 80.0 0 10
178 42 North Korea 1.3 0.3 5 8.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0
N/A N/A Afghanistan N/A N/A N/A 8.0 91.7 81.2 61.4 67.5 72.6 N/A 55 N/A
Table 6 heritage.org
fying economic development, trade agreements pines, and Burma) have achieved five consecutive
have proliferated in the Asia–Pacific region over years of advancing economic freedom.
the past decade. There are now some 40 completed On the other hand, Hong Kong’s economic
intraregional trade agreements and over 100 agree- freedom score has tumbled to the territory’s
ments with countries outside the region. second lowest rating since 2007. Although Hong
In the 2015 Index, the Asia–Pacific region has Kong continues strongly to maintain the fea-
recorded some notable changes in economic free- tures of an economically free society, the city’s
dom. The scores of 27 countries have improved, waning institutional uniqueness has placed it
and those of 14 have worsened. Of those that have at a critical crossroads. The current failure to
improved, seven countries, including Taiwan, deliver promised meaningful electoral reform
Vietnam, and Laos, have achieved their highest has galvanized greater pro-democracy senti-
economic freedom score ever in the 2015 Index. ments in Hong Kong and undermined trust and
Four countries (Taiwan, South Korea, the Philip- confidence in the government.
Chapter 6 87
Sub-Saharan Africa
The Gambia
Senegal
Mauritania
Mali Niger Eritrea
Chad Sudan
Burkina Djibouti
Guinea Faso
Nigeria Somalia
Cote Ghana Ethiopia
South
Guinea- d'Ivoire Central African
Sudan
Bissau Republic
Cameroon
Sierra Benin
Leone Liberia Togo Uganda
Kenya
Sao Tome Gabon Democratic
Cabo Verde & Principe Rwanda
Republic of
Congo Burundi
Equatorial Guinea Comoros
Tanzania
Republic of Congo Seychelles
Angola
Note: Western Sahara is not depicted Zambia
because its economy is not in the Index of
Economic Freedom. Malawi
Zimbabwe
Namibia Mozambique
Economic Freedom Scores Botswana
80–100 Free
70–79.9 Mostly Free
60–69.9 Moderately Free Swaziland Madagascar
50–59.9 Mostly Unfree South Lesotho
0–49.9 Repressed Africa
Mauritius
Not Ranked
Source: Terry Miller and Anthony B. Kim, 2015 Index of Economic Freedom (Washington, DC: The Heritage
Foundation and Dow Jones & Company, Inc., 2015), http://www.heritage.org/index.
Map 6 heritage.org
Government Spending
Investment Freedom
Monetary Freedom
Change from 2014
Financial Freedom
Business Freedom
Property Rights
Labor Freedom
Fiscal Freedom
Trade Freedom
Regional Rank
Overall Score
World Rank
Country
10 1 Mauritius 76.4 -0.1 65 52.0 91.9 87.4 78.0 68.2 77.6 88.4 85 70
36 2 Botswana 69.8 -2.2 70 64.0 79.5 61.9 66.8 70.0 73.9 72.2 70 70
60 3 Cabo Verde 66.4 0.3 75 58.0 78.3 67.9 61.8 42.1 81.0 69.6 70 60
65 4 Rwanda 64.8 0.1 30 53.0 80.2 79.2 59.5 84.5 76.0 80.8 65 40
71 5 Ghana 63.0 -1.2 50 46.0 84.6 70.8 62.5 56.9 69.2 64.8 65 60
72 6 South Africa 62.6 0.1 50 42.0 69.5 68.2 73.0 61.6 74.9 76.6 50 60
79 7 Madagascar 61.7 0.0 45 28.0 90.9 94.7 62.3 45.1 79.2 71.8 50 50
91 8 Swaziland 59.9 -1.3 40 39.0 76.4 68.6 60.5 69.3 73.9 76.0 55 40
92 9 Uganda 59.7 -0.2 25 26.0 73.3 89.0 43.3 87.5 76.3 76.6 60 40
93 10 Namibia 59.6 0.2 30 48.0 66.7 56.0 64.3 90.9 74.3 71.2 55 40
99 11 Benin 58.8 1.7 30 36.0 68.3 86.7 55.2 53.2 79.9 58.4 70 50
100 12 Zambia 58.7 -1.7 30 38.0 71.9 78.0 68.2 46.0 73.2 76.8 55 50
102 13 Burkina Faso 58.6 -0.3 25 38.0 82.4 79.8 49.6 57.8 80.0 68.2 65 40
103 14 Côte d'Ivoire 58.5 0.8 35 27.0 77.7 82.4 65.4 46.0 75.0 71.4 55 50
104 15 Gabon 58.3 0.5 40 34.0 77.5 74.6 57.9 64.3 78.4 61.0 55 40
106 16 Senegal 57.8 2.4 40 41.0 71.3 74.6 54.6 39.5 83.0 74.0 60 40
109 17 Tanzania 57.5 -0.3 30 33.0 79.9 79.3 45.0 61.4 69.7 67.0 60 50
112 18 Djibouti 57.5 1.6 25 36.0 81.2 57.1 55.4 66.6 78.9 54.8 70 50
113 19 The Gambia 57.5 -2.0 25 28.0 75.4 73.4 55.7 66.7 70.8 65.0 65 50
114 20 Seychelles 57.5 1.3 50 54.0 79.8 59.4 67.7 63.9 76.0 44.0 50 30
119 21 Mali 56.4 0.9 25 28.0 69.6 89.2 47.2 50.7 81.1 73.2 60 40
120 22 Nigeria 55.6 1.3 30 25.0 85.2 76.1 48.3 77.7 70.4 63.8 40 40
122 23 Kenya 55.6 -1.5 30 27.0 78.0 72.1 47.9 63.8 72.8 64.0 50 50
125 24 Mozambique 54.8 -0.2 30 30.0 75.2 66.5 60.9 37.9 82.0 75.4 40 50
126 25 Malawi 54.8 -0.6 40 37.0 78.5 49.0 49.1 63.1 53.8 72.2 55 50
region. Most impressively, six of the top 10 larg- from the ranks of the economically “repressed.”
est score improvements in the 2015 Index have Also encouraging is that six countries in the
occurred in countries in this region. São Tomé region, including Angola, Comoros, Guinea–
and Príncipe, Democratic Republic of Congo, Bissau, and Seychelles, have registered sus-
Togo, Senegal, Burundi, and Zimbabwe have tained growth in economic freedom throughout
all recorded score gains of two points or more. the past five years.
Liberia and Sierra Leone, two post-conflict Many countries in the region have substantial
countries currently confronting challenges of growth momentum. The positive economic results
containing Ebola, have continued to move up achieved through advancing economic freedom
Chapter 6 89
Economic Freedom in Sub-Saharan Africa Countries (continued)
Government Spending
Investment Freedom
Monetary Freedom
Change from 2014
Financial Freedom
Business Freedom
Property Rights
Labor Freedom
Fiscal Freedom
Trade Freedom
Regional Rank
Overall Score
World Rank
Country
127 26 Niger 54.6 -0.5 30 34.0 76.6 83.6 39.2 40.9 81.3 65.6 55 40
132 27 Burundi 53.7 2.3 20 21.0 73.5 61.3 61.4 68.1 69.8 72.2 60 30
135 28 Mauritania 53.3 0.1 25 30.0 80.2 59.8 50.5 52.1 76.6 69.0 50 40
136 29 São Tomé and Príncipe 53.3 4.5 25 42.0 87.8 41.4 65.1 45.8 70.7 75.2 50 30
138 30 Togo 53.0 3.1 30 29.0 69.7 78.1 51.9 43.4 80.4 67.8 50 30
141 31 Liberia 52.7 0.3 25 38.0 83.0 69.9 60.1 43.9 72.7 74.4 40 20
142 32 Comoros 52.1 0.7 30 28.0 64.5 78.8 47.3 52.0 77.9 73.0 40 30
144 33 Guinea 52.1 -1.4 15 24.0 68.1 79.5 51.6 74.4 66.7 61.2 40 40
145 34 Guinea-Bissau 52.0 0.7 20 19.0 89.1 88.0 39.6 61.7 77.5 65.4 30 30
146 35 Cameroon 51.9 -0.7 25 25.0 71.7 87.8 41.6 47.8 75.6 59.6 35 50
147 36 Sierra Leone 51.7 1.2 10 30.0 80.8 87.5 53.4 41.6 68.5 70.2 55 20
149 37 Ethiopia 51.5 1.5 30 33.0 77.4 91.4 55.9 56.4 66.1 64.4 20 20
155 38 Lesotho 49.6 0.1 35 49.0 68.5 0.0 54.7 63.9 75.2 64.6 45 40
158 39 Angola 47.9 0.2 15 23.0 84.5 50.1 47.4 43.2 65.4 70.2 40 40
165 40 Chad 45.9 1.4 20 19.0 46.2 83.6 27.1 47.7 75.6 55.2 45 40
166 41 Central African Republic 45.9 -0.8 15 25.0 65.0 92.0 27.2 37.5 69.6 52.4 45 30
168 42 Congo, Dem. Rep. 45.0 4.4 10 22.0 72.9 85.7 42.8 38.4 75.1 63.0 20 20
170 43 Congo, Republic of 42.7 -1.0 10 22.0 67.4 60.7 36.8 36.0 71.6 62.4 30 30
173 44 Equatorial Guinea 40.4 -4.0 10 19.0 75.4 31.4 37.5 33.5 78.3 53.8 35 30
174 45 Eritrea 38.9 0.4 10 20.0 57.0 71.8 18.2 65.5 57.8 69.2 0 20
175 46 Zimbabwe 37.6 2.1 10 21.0 66.6 74.2 37.1 23.7 75.4 58.4 0 10
N/A N/A Somalia N/A N/A N/A 8.0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
N/A N/A Sudan N/A N/A N/A 11.0 86.4 94.5 49.0 43.8 52.8 55.6 15 N/A
Table 7 heritage.org
have created valuable impetus for additional with exports often concentrated in sectors with
institutional reforms that are needed to ensure little scope for sustained productivity increases.
long-term economic development. However, the More critically, uneven economic playing fields,
region as a whole continues to underperform in exacerbated by the weak rule of law, continue to
following through on policy changes that will help leave those who lack connections with only lim-
the emergence of a more dynamic private sector. ited prospects for a brighter future. It remains to
Despite sustained high growth over the past be seen whether the region’s political leaders have
decade, structural transformation remains the political will to undertake the fundamental
patchy in many African countries. Limited diver- economic reforms that are needed to translate
sification has resulted in less broad-based growth, narratives of “Africa Rising” into reality.
The Countries
T
his chapter reports data on economic free- averaged (using equal weights) to compute the
dom for each of the countries included in country’s final economic freedom score. In addi-
the 2015 Index of Economic Freedom, the tion to the scores, the country pages include in
21st annual edition. Of the 186 countries includ- each case a brief introduction describing the
ed in the 2015 Index, 178 are fully scored and economic strengths and weaknesses and the
ranked. Because of insufficient data, Afghani- political and economic background influencing
stan, Iraq, Kosovo, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, a country’s performance, as well as a statistical
and Liechtenstein are covered without numeri- profile documenting the country’s main eco-
cal grading. nomic indicators.
For analytical understanding and presen- To assure objectivity and reliability within
tational clarity, the 10 economic freedoms are each of the 10 components on which the coun-
grouped into four broad categories of econom- tries are graded, every effort has been made to
ic freedom: use the same data source consistently for all
countries; when data are unavailable from the
• Rule of law (property rights, freedom primary source, secondary sources are used.
from corruption); (For details, see Appendix, “Methodology.”)
• Government size (fiscal freedom, govern-
ment spending); DEFINING THE “QUICK FACTS”
• Regulatory efficiency (business freedom, Each country page includes “Quick Facts”
labor freedom, monetary freedom); and with nine different categories of information.
• Market openness (trade freedom, invest- Unless otherwise indicated, the data in each
ment freedom, financial freedom). country’s profile are for 2013 (the year for which
the most recent data are widely available) and in
Ranked countries are given a score ranging current 2013 U.S. dollars (also the most recent
from 0 to 100 on each of the 10 components of available). The few cases in which no reliable
economic freedom, and these scores are then statistical data were available are indicated by
91
“n/a.” Definitions and sources for each category Unemployment rate: A measure of the por-
of information are as follows. tion of the workforce that is not employed but
Population: 2013 data from World Bank, is actively seeking work. Data are from Interna-
World Development Indicators Online 2014. For tional Labour Organization, Global Employment
some countries, other sources include the coun- Trends 2014.
try’s statistical agency and/or central bank. Inflation: The annual percent change in con-
GDP: Gross domestic product—total produc- sumer prices as measured for 2013 (or the most
tion of goods and services—adjusted to reflect recent available year). The primary source for
purchasing power parity (PPP). The primary 2013 data is International Monetary Fund, World
source for GDP data is World Bank, World Devel- Economic Outlook Database, 2014. Secondary
opment Indicators Online 2014. The major sec- sources are Economist Intelligence Unit, Data
ondary source is International Monetary Fund, Tool; Asian Development Bank, Asian Develop-
World Economic Outlook Database, 2014. Other ment Outlook 2014; and a country’s statistical
sources include a country’s statistical agency agency and/or central bank.
and/or central bank. Foreign direct investment (FDI) inward
GDP growth rate: The annual percentage flow: The total annual inward flow of FDI in cur-
growth rate of real GDP derived from constant rent 2013 U.S. dollars, reported in millions. FDI
national currency units. Annual percent changes flows are defined as investments that acquire a
are year-on-year. The primary source is Inter- lasting management interest (10 percent or more
national Monetary Fund, World Economic Out- of voting stock) in a local enterprise by an investor
look Database, 2014. Secondary sources include operating in another country. Such investment is
World Bank, World Development Indicators the sum of equity capital, reinvestment of earn-
Online 2014; Economist Intelligence Unit, Data ings, other long-term capital, and short-term
Tool; Asian Development Bank, Asian Develop- capital as shown in the balance of payments and
ment Outlook 2014; and a country’s statistical both short-term and long-term international
agency and/or central bank. loans. Data are from United Nations Conference
GDP five-year compound annual growth: on Trade and Development, World Investment
The compound average growth rate measured Report 2014.
over a specified period of time. The compound Public debt: Gross government debt as a per-
annual growth rate is measured using data from centage of GDP, which indicates the cumulative
2008 to 2013, based on real GDP expressed in total of all government borrowings less repay-
constant national currency units. It is calcu- ments that are denominated in a country’s cur-
lated by taking the nth root of the total percent- rency. Public debt is different from external debt,
age growth rate, where n is the number of years which reflects the foreign currency liabilities of
in the period being considered. The primary both the private and public sectors and must be
source is International Monetary Fund, World financed out of foreign exchange earnings. The
Economic Outlook Database, 2014. Secondary primary sources for 2013 data are International
sources are World Bank, World Development Monetary Fund, World Economic Outlook Data-
Indicators Online 2014, and Asian Development base, 2014; International Monetary Fund, Arti-
Bank, Asian Development Outlook 2014. cle IV Staff Reports, 2011–2014; and a country’s
GDP per capita: Gross domestic product statistical agency. The data source for U.S. pub-
(adjusted for PPP) divided by total population. lic debt is United States Office of Management
The sources for these data are World Bank, World and Budget. Concerning the U.S. data, gross debt
Development Indicators Online 2014; Interna- includes both publicly held debt (bonds and
tional Monetary Fund, World Economic Outlook Treasury bills held by foreigners, corporations,
Database, 2014; U.S. Central Intelligence Agency, individual citizens, investment vehicles, etc.)
The World Factbook 2014; and a country’s statis- and intragovernmental debt such as Social Secu-
tical agency and/or central bank. rity trust funds.
Chapter 7 93
AFGHANISTAN
Economic Freedom Score
50
25 75
Least Most
free 0 100 free
World Rank: Not Ranked Regional Rank: Not Ranked This economy is not graded
A fghanistan’s
economic freedom could not be fully assessed
in the 2015 Index of Economic Freedom because of a lack
of sufficient comparable data. This assessment is based on
Freedom Trend
the limited information available from government and
international sources. Afghanistan will receive an economic
freedom score and ranking in future editions as more data
become available.
While undergoing substantial political, economic, and
Not graded this year
social transformation over the past decade, Afghanistan has
achieved rapid yet volatile economic growth. The construc-
tion and agricultural sectors have been the key contributors to
economic expansion, which has averaged around 10 percent
over the past five years. There have been noticeable improve-
ments in such areas as health, education, and microfinance,
but dependence on high levels of foreign aid continues.
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
The economy still lacks the overall institutional capacity to
enhance productivity and promote self-sustaining growth.
Although some progress has been made in developing the pri-
Country Comparisons
vate sector, it remains small and informal, and there is little
impetus for more vibrant entrepreneurial activity. Political Country n/a
uncertainty and security challenges undermine the rule of law
World
and continue to be formidable. Average 60.4
Property Rights n/a Fiscal Freedom n/a Business Freedom n/a Trade Freedom n/a
Freedom from n/a Government n/a Labor Freedom n/a Investment Freedom n/a
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom n/a Financial Freedom n/a
Property Rights –20.0 Fiscal Freedom +5.5 Business Freedom +0.6 Trade Freedom +28.8
Freedom from +21.0 Government +41.8 Labor Freedom +3.9 Investment Freedom 0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +58.7 Financial Freedom +20.0
world averages. 50
Property Rights –20.0 Fiscal Freedom +31.2 Business Freedom –3.4 Trade Freedom +6.6
Freedom from –14.0 Government –30.8 Labor Freedom –5.4 Investment Freedom –25.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +12.0 Financial Freedom –20.0
Property Rights –15.0 Fiscal Freedom +22.9 Business Freedom +7.4 Trade Freedom +45.2
Freedom from –7.0 Government +50.1 Labor Freedom –1.7 Investment Freedom +10.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +65.4 Financial Freedom +10.0
Property Rights –55.0 Fiscal Freedom –13.9 Business Freedom –32.2 Trade Freedom +10.4
Freedom from –16.0 Government –45.4 Labor Freedom –0.6 Investment Freedom –40.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom –1.5 Financial Freedom –20.0
Property Rights –30.0 Fiscal Freedom +8.6 Business Freedom +27.7 Trade Freedom +16.4
Freedom from –14.0 Government +82.8 Labor Freedom +2.2 Investment Freedom +45.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +70.6 Financial Freedom +20.0
Property Rights 0 Fiscal Freedom +4.1 Business Freedom +24.1 Trade Freedom +9.4
Freedom from +11.0 Government +7.9 Labor Freedom –4.2 Investment Freedom +10.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom –1.4 Financial Freedom 0
Property Rights 0 Fiscal Freedom +3.8 Business Freedom +8.0 Trade Freedom +7.0
Freedom from –21.0 Government +10.2 Labor Freedom +3.1 Investment Freedom +20.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom –2.6 Financial Freedom –20.0
Property Rights –10.0 Fiscal Freedom +41.8 Business Freedom +34.5 Trade Freedom +21.0
Freedom from +18.0 Government +10.9 Labor Freedom +14.3 Investment Freedom +45.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +79.8 Financial Freedom +20.0
Thasheeconomy
Bahamas’ economic freedom score is 68.7, making its
the 41st freest in the 2015 Index. Its overall score
decreased by 1.1 points, with notable declines in finan-
Freedom Trend
72
cial freedom and labor freedom offsetting improvements in
freedom from corruption and monetary freedom. The Baha- 71
mas’ overall score continues to be higher than the regional
and world averages, and its economy is the 4th freest out of 70
29 countries in the South and Central America/Caribbe-
an region.
69
Over the past half-decade, economic freedom in the Bahamas
has improved by 0.7 point despite score declines in the past 68
two years. Gains in economic freedom have been led by strong
improvements in freedom from corruption and trade free-
67
dom, which have advanced by 16 and 10 points, respectively.
More modest improvements have occurred in monetary and 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
fiscal freedoms.
Despite some improvement, corruption remains a problem, Country Comparisons
and regulatory inefficiency continues to hold back the eco-
nomic dynamism that should result from the competitive Country 68.7
financial sector and a tax regime with no personal or corpo-
rate income tax. Ultimately, it is the government’s ability to World
Average 60.4
promote more broad-based reforms that will determine the
prospects for a long-term and diversified economic expansion. Regional
59.7
Average
BACKGROUND: In 2012, Prime Minister Perry Christie and
his Progressive Liberal Party won a five-year term. The Baha- Free
Economies 84.6
mian economy centers on tourism, international banking,
0 20 40 60 80 100
investment management, and financial services, with tour-
ism accounting for more than 60 percent of GDP. While acces-
sion to the World Trade Organization would be a positive
step, politicians and the private sector are locked in a dispute Quick Facts
about how to replace the revenues that would be lost. Due to Population: 0.4 million
its geographic location just 50 miles off the coast of Florida, GDP (PPP): $11.4 billion
the country is a major transshipment point for illegal drugs, 1.9% growth in 2013
particularly shipments to the U.S. and Europe, and is used for 5-year compound annual growth 0.4%
smuggling illegal migrants into the U.S. $32,036 per capita
Unemployment: 13.6%
Inflation (CPI): 0.3%
FDI Inflow: $1.1 billion
Public Debt: 56.3% of GDP
How Do We Measure Economic Freedom?
See page 475 for an explanation of the methodology 2013 data unless otherwise noted.
or visit the Index Web site at heritage.org/index. Data compiled as of September 2014.
113
THE BAHAMAS (continued)
THE TEN ECONOMIC FREEDOMS
1–Year
Score Country World Average Rank Change
Property Rights –20.0 Fiscal Freedom +0.1 Business Freedom –31.1 Trade Freedom +33.2
Freedom from +1.0 Government –3.7 Labor Freedom –4.7 Investment Freedom 0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom –3.8 Financial Freedom –10.0
Property Rights 0 Fiscal Freedom +0.5 Business Freedom –27.5 Trade Freedom +0.2
Freedom from –22.0 Government +1.4 Labor Freedom +43.1 Investment Freedom +15.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom –12.5 Financial Freedom +10.0
Property Rights –10.0 Fiscal Freedom +28.7 Business Freedom +22.2 Trade Freedom +59.0
Freedom from +17.0 Government +0.5 Labor Freedom –0.4 Investment Freedom –5.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom –5.2 Financial Freedom 0
Bworse
arbados’s economic freedom score is 67.9, making its econ-
omy the 46th freest in the 2015 Index. Its score is 0.4 point
than last year due to declines in half of the 10 economic
Freedom Trend
71
freedoms including the control of public spending, labor free-
dom, and freedom from corruption. Barbados is ranked 7th 70
out of 29 countries in the South and Central America/Carib-
bean region, and its overall score remains well above the glob- 69
al and regional averages.
Barbados is one of the Caribbean region’s most prosper- 68
ous economies, and offshore finance and tourism have been
important sources of economic growth. With relatively strong 67
foundations of economic freedom supported by a high degree
of transparency and an efficient judiciary, the economy has
66
focused on attracting international companies and long-
term investment. 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Property Rights +30.0 Fiscal Freedom +13.0 Business Freedom +1.6 Trade Freedom +14.8
Freedom from +45.0 Government –29.4 Labor Freedom –10.8 Investment Freedom –5.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom –10.8 Financial Freedom –10.0
Property Rights –30.0 Fiscal Freedom +44.4 Business Freedom +2.0 Trade Freedom +21.0
Freedom from +19.0 Government +23.2 Labor Freedom +8.1 Investment Freedom –30.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +44.5 Financial Freedom –40.0
Bdecreased
elgium’s economic freedom score is 68.8, making its econ-
omy the 40th freest in the 2015 Index. Its overall score has
by 1.1 points from last year, with declines in labor
Freedom Trend
72
freedom, the management of public spending, and fiscal
freedom outweighing improvements in monetary freedom, 71
business freedom, and freedom from corruption. Belgium is
ranked 18th among the 43 countries in the Europe region, and 70
its overall score is above the regional and global averages.
Over the past five years, Belgium’s economic freedom score 69
has slipped by 1.4 points, moving the country further away
from the rank of “mostly free” that it last achieved in 2011. 68
Long-term declines in four of the 10 economic freedoms,
including the management of public spending, business free-
67
dom, labor freedom, and monetary freedom, have caused this
deterioration. In particular, Belgium’s government spending 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
score has declined by nearly 15 points.
Policy responses during and after the eurozone financial cri- Country Comparisons
sis have exacerbated long-term structural weaknesses. A rigid
labor market and high taxation have undermined any broad- Country 68.8
based recovery, and government spending has increased sub-
stantially, pushing public debt close to the size of the economy. World
Average 60.4
Labor market reforms and fiscal prudence must be at the top
of the policy agenda in order to secure broad-based economic Regional
67.0
freedom and growth. Average
Property Rights –10.0 Fiscal Freedom +9.7 Business Freedom +20.7 Trade Freedom +10.2
Freedom from –15.0 Government +2.9 Labor Freedom –4.3 Investment Freedom +15.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom –3.3 Financial Freedom 0
Property Rights –40.0 Fiscal Freedom +19.2 Business Freedom –10.9 Trade Freedom +28.4
Freedom from –43.3 Government +13.6 Labor Freedom –21.5 Investment Freedom –20.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom –7.2 Financial Freedom 0
Property Rights –20.0 Fiscal Freedom –3.8 Business Freedom –14.8 Trade Freedom +58.4
Freedom from –14.0 Government –3.8 Labor Freedom +0.6 Investment Freedom +20.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +22.0 Financial Freedom 0
Bincreased
hutan’s economic freedom score is 57.4, making its
economy the 115th freest in the 2015 Index. Its score has
0.7 point from last year, with improvements in free-
Freedom Trend
59
dom from corruption, the management of government spend-
ing, and business freedom partially offset by declines in labor 58
freedom and fiscal freedom. Bhutan is ranked 24th out of 42
countries in the Asia–Pacific region, and its overall score is
57
below the global and regional averages.
Over the past five years, Bhutan has charted a V-shaped trend 56
in economic freedom. Bolstered by improvements in freedom
from corruption and business freedom, it has bounced back
55
from its lowest economic freedom score ever in 2013. None-
theless, Bhutan continues to be in the ranks of the “mostly
unfree,” with scores on many of the 10 economic freedoms 54
remaining below the world averages. 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Property Rights 0 Fiscal Freedom –1.0 Business Freedom +0.2 Trade Freedom +7.4
Freedom from +13.0 Government +1.8 Labor Freedom –4.7 Investment Freedom –10.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom –9.9 Financial Freedom 0
Property Rights –40.0 Fiscal Freedom –4.2 Business Freedom –1.3 Trade Freedom +12.2
Freedom from +24.0 Government +0.2 Labor Freedom –22.2 Investment Freedom –60.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom –9.8 Financial Freedom +10.0
Property Rights +10.0 Fiscal Freedom +4.1 Business Freedom +13.5 Trade Freedom +17.8
Freedom from +32.0 Government +10.6 Labor Freedom +8.6 Investment Freedom +40.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +84.0 Financial Freedom +50.0
Property Rights 0 Fiscal Freedom +25.8 Business Freedom –3.2 Trade Freedom +26.0
Freedom from +14.0 Government +6.8 Labor Freedom +3.4 Investment Freedom +20.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +8.0 Financial Freedom +20.0
Bworse
razil’s economic freedom score is 56.6, making its econo-
my the 118th freest in the 2015 Index. Its score is 0.3 point
than last year, reflecting declines in half of the 10 eco-
Freedom Trend
59
nomic freedoms including investment freedom, the manage-
ment of government spending, and monetary freedom. Brazil
is ranked 21st out of 29 countries in the South and Central 58
America/Caribbean region, and its overall score is below the
world average.
57
Over the past five years, Brazil’s economic freedom has
advanced by less than 0.5 point. Improvements in financial
freedom and freedom from corruption have been largely 56
offset by deteriorations in the area of regulatory efficiency,
including business freedom and labor freedom.
55
The negative economic impact of stagnant economic freedom 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
has largely been masked by strong growth driven by high com-
modity prices over the past decade, but a deteriorating inter-
national environment and diminished growth expectations Country Comparisons
have brought these structural issues to the forefront. More
broad-based and consistent reforms will be needed to guar- Country 56.6
antee long-term economic development.
World
BACKGROUND: Preparations for the 2014 World Cup and Average 60.4
2016 Rio Olympic games have tested President Dilma Rous-
seff ’s government. Public discontent was reflected in the Regional
Average 59.7
unexpectedly strong showing by Socialist Party candidate
Marina Silva, but Rousseff was re-elected to a second term Free
84.6
in October 2014. Brazil is spending heavily to host marquee Economies
sporting events, but Brazilians resent the fact that they are 0 20 40 60 80 100
left to contend with poor public services, antiquated and
insufficient infrastructure, high taxes, inflation, corruption,
and sluggish economic growth. Brazil’s “Bolsa Família,” a Quick Facts
conditional cash transfer program for the poor, has helped Population: 198.3 million
the government to win support in some sectors. Brazil is the GDP (PPP): $2.4 trillion
world’s seventh-largest economy, and its population of almost 2.3% growth in 2013
200 million is heavily concentrated on the Atlantic coast. The 5-year compound annual growth 2.6%
middle class is growing, and millions have been lifted out of $12,221 per capita
poverty, but government intervention in the economy con- Unemployment: 6.6%
tinues to cause the misallocation of capital and limit mobility, Inflation (CPI): 6.2%
fueling a sense of injustice. FDI Inflow: $64.0 billion
Public Debt: 66.3% of GDP
How Do We Measure Economic Freedom?
See page 475 for an explanation of the methodology 2013 data unless otherwise noted.
or visit the Index Web site at heritage.org/index. Data compiled as of September 2014.
137
BRAZIL (continued)
THE TEN ECONOMIC FREEDOMS
1–Year
Score Country World Average Rank Change
Property Rights 0 Fiscal Freedom –8.3 Business Freedom –1.4 Trade Freedom +13.2
Freedom from –8.0 Government –23.5 Labor Freedom –12.5 Investment Freedom 0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +69.4 Financial Freedom +10.0
Bis essentially
runei’s economic freedom score is 68.9, making its econ-
omy the 39th freest in the 2015 Index. Its overall score
the same as last year’s, with improvements
Freedom Trend
71
in freedom from corruption, monetary freedom, and labor
freedom counterbalanced by declines in property rights, fis-
70
cal freedom, and the management of public spending. Bru-
nei is ranked 10th out of 42 countries in the Asia–Pacific
region, and its overall score is higher than the regional and
69
world averages.
Brunei was graded in the Index for the first time in 2014 and
continues to perform competitively in most aspects of eco- 68
nomic freedom. Relatively high market openness facilitates
integration into the global economy, particularly in the oil
67
and natural gas sectors. Macroeconomic stability has been a
staple of development, which has been supported by a well- 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
developed legal system, secure property rights, and a commit-
ment to investment. Country Comparisons
Improving access to private-sector financing remains critical
if the government wishes to diversify away from the oil and Country 68.9
gas industry. The small financial sector, largely insulated from
the global financial crisis, has seen a boom in Islamic finance World
Average 60.4
in recent years. Streamlined investment rules and regulations
would improve openness and encourage economic growth. Regional
58.8
Average
BACKGROUND: The Sultan of Brunei is prime minister, min-
ister of defense, and minister of finance. He is advised by Free
Economies 84.6
several councils, including a Legislative Council and Privy
0 20 40 60 80 100
Council, which he appoints. Imposition of a new Sharia Penal
Code, which includes harsh penalties (including death) for
a variety of offenses, in 2014 generated widespread interna-
tional criticism. The oil and gas industry, which accounts for Quick Facts
over half of GDP and 90 percent of government revenues, Population: 0.4 million
funds a sizable welfare state, and most of the population GDP (PPP): $21.7 billion
works directly for the government. Brunei has extremely low –1.2% growth in 2013
manufacturing capacity and imports most of its manufactured 5-year compound annual growth 0.8%
goods and food. The government is seeking integration into $53,431 per capita
the global economy as a member of the Trans-Pacific Partner- Unemployment: 3.7%
ship negotiations. Inflation (CPI): 0.4%
FDI Inflow: $895.0 million
Public Debt: 2.5% of GDP
How Do We Measure Economic Freedom?
See page 475 for an explanation of the methodology 2013 data unless otherwise noted.
or visit the Index Web site at heritage.org/index. Data compiled as of September 2014.
139
BRUNEI (continued)
THE TEN ECONOMIC FREEDOMS
1–Year
Score Country World Average Rank Change
Property Rights –5.0 Fiscal Freedom –3.2 Business Freedom +0.1 Trade Freedom 0
Freedom from +6.7 Government –2.5 Labor Freedom +0.4 Investment Freedom 0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +2.4 Financial Freedom 0
B1.1 points
ulgaria’s economic freedom score is 66.8, making its econ-
omy the 55th freest in the 2015 Index. Its overall score is
better than last year due to improvements in invest-
Freedom Trend
68
ment freedom, freedom from corruption, and monetary free-
dom that outweigh declines in business freedom and labor 67
freedom. Bulgaria is ranked 26th out of 43 countries in the
Europe region, and its overall score is above the world aver-
66
age but below the regional average.
Over the past five years, economic freedom in Bulgaria has 65
advanced by nearly 2.0 points, led by a more open invest-
ment environment, improvements in the fiscal outlook,
64
diminished perceptions of corruption, and low inflation.
Gains were recorded in six of the 10 factors, led by invest-
ment and monetary freedom, which advanced 10 points and 63
7.7 points, respectively. 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Property Rights –20.0 Fiscal Freedom +45.0 Business Freedom +13.5 Trade Freedom +15.6
Freedom from +11.0 Government +14.0 Labor Freedom –3.7 Investment Freedom –5.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +56.9 Financial Freedom +10.0
Property Rights –5.0 Fiscal Freedom +15.7 Business Freedom +9.6 Trade Freedom +13.2
Freedom from +28.0 Government –4.5 Labor Freedom +14.0 Investment Freedom –5.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +20.9 Financial Freedom +10.0
Bbetter
urma’s economic freedom score is 46.9, making its econo-
my the 161st freest in the 2015 Index. Its score is 0.4 point
than last year due to improvements in five of the 10
Freedom Trend
51
economic freedoms, including freedom from corruption,
48
labor freedom, and monetary freedom, that outweigh a sub-
stantial decline in the control of government spending. Burma
45
is ranked 38th out of 42 countries in the Asia–Pacific region,
and its overall score is much lower than the regional average.
42
Over the past five years, economic freedom in Burma has
advanced by about 9.0 points, the second-best improvement 39
among graded countries. From a low base, Burma has made
considerable strides in liberalizing its economy and opening 36
Property Rights –20.0 Fiscal Freedom +5.1 Business Freedom –11.3 Trade Freedom +24.2
Freedom from +11.0 Government –3.4 Labor Freedom +59.3 Investment Freedom –15.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +12.8 Financial Freedom –20.0
Property Rights –10.0 Fiscal Freedom +29.9 Business Freedom +6.4 Trade Freedom +2.0
Freedom from +11.0 Government –20.2 Labor Freedom +14.4 Investment Freedom +30.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +11.2 Financial Freedom 0
regional averages.
65
Over the past five years, economic freedom in Cabo Verde
has advanced by close to 2.0 points, reflecting broad-based 64
improvements in six of the 10 economic freedoms, including
investment freedom, fiscal freedom, and the protection of 63
property rights. In the 2015 Index, Cabo Verde has recorded
its highest economic freedom score ever, progressing further 62
into the ranks of the “moderately free.” 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Cabo Verde’s average tariff rate is 10.2 percent, and non-tariff barriers are relatively low for
the region. Domestic and foreign investors are generally treated equally under the law. Banks
dominate the small financial sector. They remain well-capitalized, and the number of nonper-
forming loans is decreasing. Small and medium-sized companies have access to credit that is
allocated on market terms, but capital markets are not fully developed.
Property Rights +5.0 Fiscal Freedom +14.0 Business Freedom +6.8 Trade Freedom +24.6
Freedom from +28.0 Government +37.0 Labor Freedom –14.8 Investment Freedom 0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +8.7 Financial Freedom +50.0
Cessentially
ambodia’s economic freedom score is 57.5, making its econ-
omy the 110th freest in the 2015 Index. Its overall score is
unchanged from last year, with improvements in
Freedom Trend
60
labor freedom and freedom from corruption largely offset by
declines in business freedom and property rights. Cambodia
is ranked 23rd out of 42 countries in the Asia–Pacific region, 59
and its overall score is lower than the regional average.
Over the past five years, economic freedom in Cambodia has 58
stagnated, with potential gains from a liberalized labor market
and a small opening to international markets undermined by
a weakening business environment, looser fiscal policy, and a 57
decline in property rights.
Little progress has been made in tackling corruption, which is 56
by far the most serious threat to advancing economic freedom 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
in Cambodia. The government must do more to strengthen
the institutional environment underpinning the rule of law,
including improving the judiciary and reinforcing property Country Comparisons
rights. These issues, along with a poor business environment
and government interference in the economy, continue to Country 57.5
undermine the dynamic investment flows enjoyed by region-
al neighbors. World
60.4
Average
BACKGROUND: Between 1975 and 1979, Pol Pot’s Khmer
Rouge regime killed an estimated 3 million Cambodians. The Regional
Average 58.8
Khmer Rouge Tribunal, established under an agreement with
the United Nations to prosecute senior officials involved in Free
84.6
the atrocities, has been slow to deliver justice. Though it is Economies
nominally a democracy, Cambodia has been ruled by former 0 20 40 60 80 100
Khmer Rouge member and Vietnamese puppet Prime Min-
ister Hun Sen since 1993. The 2013 election nearly unseated
Hun Sen and remains hotly contested by the opposition party. Quick Facts
In 2012, Cambodia took its turn chairing the Association of Population: 15.4 million
Southeast Asian Nations, drawing increased international GDP (PPP): $39.7 billion
attention to and criticism of its undemocratic policies and 7.0% growth in 2013
close ties to China. Cambodia’s economy depends heavily on 5-year compound annual growth 5.5%
tourism and apparel assembly. $2,576 per capita
Unemployment: 0.3%
Inflation (CPI): 3.0%
FDI Inflow: $1.4 billion
Public Debt: 28.1% of GDP
How Do We Measure Economic Freedom?
See page 475 for an explanation of the methodology 2013 data unless otherwise noted.
or visit the Index Web site at heritage.org/index. Data compiled as of September 2014.
151
CAMBODIA (continued)
THE TEN ECONOMIC FREEDOMS
1–Year
Score Country World Average Rank Change
Property Rights –5.0 Fiscal Freedom –1.2 Business Freedom –25.8 Trade Freedom +57.2
Freedom from –10.0 Government –4.3 Labor Freedom +18.3 Investment Freedom +10.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +16.6 Financial Freedom 0
Property Rights –25.0 Fiscal Freedom +20.6 Business Freedom –13.4 Trade Freedom +34.6
Freedom from +15.0 Government –2.0 Labor Freedom –4.2 Investment Freedom –15.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom –5.3 Financial Freedom 0
C1.1 points
anada’s economic freedom score is 79.1, making its econ-
omy the 6th freest in the 2015 Index. Its overall score is
lower than last year, with modest improvements in
Freedom Trend
82
monetary freedom and the control of government spending
outweighed by declines in labor freedom and freedom from
81
corruption. Canada continues to be the freest economy in the
North America region.
Over the past five years, Canada’s economic freedom score has 80
declined by 1.7 points, highlighting a trend that has pushed
the country into the “mostly free” category for the first time
since 2007. Score declines have been spread over five of the 10 79
economic freedoms, with an increase in the level of perceived
corruption contributing the most to the moderate slide in
78
Canada’s score.
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Nonetheless, Canada remains one of the world’s most stable
business climates and an attractive investment destination.
With the world’s second-best property rights regime buttress- Country Comparisons
ing openness to global commerce, Canada has a solid founda-
tion of economic freedom. The financial sector is competitive, Country 79.1
and its efficiency is supported by prudent lending practices
and sound oversight. World
Average 60.4
BACKGROUND: Prime Minister Stephen Harper and his Con- Regional
servative Party have governed since 2011 with a strong parlia- Average 74.0
mentary majority of 166 out of 308 seats. With 103 seats, the
social democratic New Democratic Party has become the lead- Free
Economies 84.6
ing opposition party for the first time. The next election must
0 20 40 60 80 100
be held no later than October 19, 2015, when 30 new seats will
be added to the House of Commons to increase representa-
tion of provinces with growing populations. Canada’s diversity
and geographic size are reflected in a democratic system that Quick Facts
provides substantial autonomy to its 13 provinces and terri- Population: 35.1 million
tories. The 20 percent of Canadians for whom French is the GDP (PPP): $1.5 trillion
native language are heavily concentrated in Quebec. Canada is 2.0% growth in 2013
a major exporter of oil, minerals, automobiles, manufactured 5-year compound annual growth 1.4%
goods, and forest products, and its economy is closely linked $43,472 per capita
to the U.S. economy. Unemployment: 7.1%
Inflation (CPI): 1.0%
FDI Inflow: $62.3 billion
Public Debt: 89.1% of GDP
How Do We Measure Economic Freedom?
See page 475 for an explanation of the methodology 2013 data unless otherwise noted.
or visit the Index Web site at heritage.org/index. Data compiled as of September 2014.
155
CANADA (continued)
THE TEN ECONOMIC FREEDOMS
1–Year
Score Country World Average Rank Change
Property Rights 0 Fiscal Freedom +15.7 Business Freedom +4.0 Trade Freedom +13.2
Freedom from –9.0 Government +33.5 Labor Freedom –6.1 Investment Freedom +30.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom –8.0 Financial Freedom +10.0
52
modest gains in the rule of law undermined by declines in six
other areas. The CAR is ranked 41st out of 46 countries in the 50
Sub-Saharan Africa region, and its overall score is lower than
the regional average. 48
Over the past five years, economic freedom in the CAR has
46
declined by 3.4 points, with score decreases in the past two
years wiping out steady improvements earlier in the decade.
44
Score declines in eight of the 10 economic freedoms indicate
deteriorations across such key policy areas as market open- 42
ness and regulatory efficiency. In the 2015 Index, the CAR has
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
registered its lowest economic freedom score ever.
The Central African Republic’s overall entrepreneurial envi-
ronment remains severely constrained, burdened by over-
Country Comparisons
regulation that pushes many entrepreneurs into the informal
sector. Poor access to credit and high financing costs further Country 45.9
suppress the development of a vibrant private sector. Since
World
2013, state institutions have collapsed, and the economy has Average 60.4
contracted sharply.
Regional
BACKGROUND: In 2013, Seleka rebels ousted President Fran- Average 54.9
çois Bozizé and seized power under the leadership of Michel
Free
Djotodia. Widespread atrocities carried out by the Seleka mili- Economies 84.6
tia spurred the emergence of the “anti-balaka” militia, com-
0 20 40 60 80 100
prised of Christians opposed to Seleka rule. France sent forces
to the former French colony in December 2013, and a U.N.
peacekeeping force was deployed in September 2014. Djoto- Quick Facts
dia stepped down early in 2014 after failing to stop sectarian
Population: 4.6 million
violence and was replaced by interim President Catherine
GDP (PPP): $2.5 billion
Samba-Panza. General elections are scheduled for early 2015.
–36.0% growth in 2013
The CAR is one of the world’s least-developed countries. More
5-year compound annual growth –6.3%
than half of the population lives in rural areas and depends on
$542 per capita
subsistence agriculture. The CAR has abundant timber, dia-
Unemployment: 8.8%
monds gold, uranium, and prospects for oil exploration.
Inflation (CPI): 6.6%
FDI Inflow: $0.8 million
Public Debt: 50.8% of GDP
How Do We Measure Economic Freedom?
See page 475 for an explanation of the methodology 2013 data unless otherwise noted.
or visit the Index Web site at heritage.org/index. Data compiled as of September 2014.
157
CENTRAL AFRICAN REPUBLIC (continued)
THE TEN ECONOMIC FREEDOMS
1–Year
Score Country World Average Rank Change
Property Rights –35.0 Fiscal Freedom –0.3 Business Freedom –27.8 Trade Freedom +4.2
Freedom from –5.0 Government +4.0 Labor Freedom –12.2 Investment Freedom –25.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom –12.4 Financial Freedom –20.0
Cpoints
had’s economic freedom score is 45.9, making its economy
the 165th freest in the 2015 Index. Its overall score is 1.4
better than last year, reflecting improvements in five of
Freedom Trend
47
the 10 economic freedoms, particularly in policy areas relat-
ed to regulatory efficiency such as monetary freedom, labor
freedom, and business freedom. Chad is ranked 40th out of 46
46 countries in the Sub-Saharan Africa region, and its overall
score is lower than the regional average.
45
Over the past five years, Chad’s economic freedom has
advanced by 0.6 points, but with a trend that has seen it
bounce between yearly score gains and losses. Score improve- 44
ments have been modest and evenly spread among four of the
10 economic freedoms: freedom from corruption, business
freedom, labor freedom, and monetary freedom. Price stabil- 43
ity has improved the most. 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Property Rights –10.0 Fiscal Freedom 0 Business Freedom –27.9 Trade Freedom +1.8
Freedom from +9.0 Government –5.5 Labor Freedom +4.4 Investment Freedom +15.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +13.2 Financial Freedom +10.0
Property Rights 0 Fiscal Freedom –2.9 Business Freedom –15.7 Trade Freedom +19.0
Freedom from +21.0 Government –3.7 Labor Freedom –10.3 Investment Freedom +20.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +19.4 Financial Freedom +20.0
Property Rights –10.0 Fiscal Freedom –0.9 Business Freedom –2.9 Trade Freedom +51.8
Freedom from +10.0 Government –12.2 Labor Freedom –2.0 Investment Freedom –25.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +5.8 Financial Freedom –20.0
Property Rights 0 Fiscal Freedom –0.2 Business Freedom –3.5 Trade Freedom +16.2
Freedom from +26.0 Government –10.0 Labor Freedom +18.9 Investment Freedom +10.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +16.4 Financial Freedom 0
Comoros has been graded only since 2009. It moved out of the
ranks of the “repressed” last year and registered its highest Country Comparisons
score ever in the 2015 Index. Institutionalizing and improv-
ing on gains made in the past half-decade will be essential. Country 52.1
Comoros continues to lag far behind on rule of law, and
corruption remains pervasive. Despite opening to foreign World
Average 60.4
investment, the repressive domestic regulatory environment
hinders entrepreneurial dynamism. The government must Regional
54.9
also do more to promote competition, as financial and invest- Average
ment regimes remain among the world’s least free. Free
Economies 84.6
BACKGROUND: The three-island Union of the Comoros has
0 20 40 60 80 100
endured more than 20 coups since independence in 1975.
Under a 2001 constitution granting each island increased
autonomy, the presidency rotates among the three islands
every four years. The transfer of power to President Ikililou Quick Facts
Dhoinine in 2011 was peaceful. Although Comoros is a leading Population: 0.7 million
producer of ylang-ylang, cloves, and vanilla, its narrow export GDP (PPP): $0.9 billion
base leaves it vulnerable to external shocks. It also has poor 3.5% growth in 2013
transportation links. Comoros remains heavily dependent on 5-year compound annual growth 2.5%
foreign aid and remittances. In 2012, the International Mon- $1,287 per capita
etary Fund and the World Bank provided $176 million in debt Unemployment: 7.9%
relief to Comoros. Inflation (CPI): 2.3%
FDI Inflow: $13.9 million
Public Debt: 19.0% of GDP
How Do We Measure Economic Freedom?
See page 475 for an explanation of the methodology 2013 data unless otherwise noted.
or visit the Index Web site at heritage.org/index. Data compiled as of September 2014.
167
COMOROS (continued)
THE TEN ECONOMIC FREEDOMS
1–Year
Score Country World Average Rank Change
Property Rights 0 Fiscal Freedom –0.1 Business Freedom +0.8 Trade Freedom +45.8
Freedom from +2.0 Government –9.3 Labor Freedom +20.2 Investment Freedom +20.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom –1.0 Financial Freedom +10.0
Over the past five years, the DRC’s economic freedom has 40
advanced by 4.3 points, with especially strong gains in the past
two years. Monetary freedom has improved by over 28 points, 38
but advancement has been broad-based, with gains in six of
the 10 factors. The DRC has registered its highest economic 36
freedom score ever in the 2015 Index. 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Property Rights –40.0 Fiscal Freedom +22.0 Business Freedom –12.2 Trade Freedom +14.0
Freedom from +12.0 Government –11.5 Labor Freedom +3.9 Investment Freedom –10.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +75.1 Financial Freedom –10.0
Toverall
he Republic of Congo’s economic freedom score is 42.7,
making its economy the 170th freest in the 2015 Index. Its
score is 1.0 point worse than last year, with improve-
Freedom Trend
45
ments in investment freedom, trade freedom, business free-
dom, and freedom from corruption counterbalanced by
44
declines in the control of government spending and labor
freedom. Congo is ranked 43rd out of 46 countries in the Sub-
Saharan Africa region, and its overall score is much lower than
43
the global and regional averages.
Large sections of the population remain trapped in poverty.
Government remains involved in leading economic sectors, 42
and institutional constraints force many small entrepreneurs
to operate informally. Lack of an effective independent judi-
41
ciary, corruption, and an oppressive regulatory environment
hamper the development of a dynamic private sector. 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Property Rights –20.0 Fiscal Freedom +17.8 Business Freedom –18.2 Trade Freedom +10.0
Freedom from +12.0 Government +5.9 Labor Freedom –7.9 Investment Freedom 0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +20.7 Financial Freedom 0
The small increase in Costa Rica’s overall score this year has
reversed a multi-year decline. Over the past five years, Costa Country Comparisons
Rica’s economic freedom has declined in four of the 10 factors,
including property rights, fiscal freedom, labor freedom, and Country 67.2
trade freedom. Changes in the corporate income tax regime to
help pay for security services have undermined fiscal freedom. World
60.4
Average
BACKGROUND: Luis Guillermo Solís of the Partido Acción
Ciudadana was elected president in 2014, ousting the incum- Regional
Average 59.7
bent Partido Liberación Nacional amid concerns over cor-
ruption. The peaceful transfer of power highlighted the long Free
84.6
history of democratic stability that has contributed to one of Economies
Latin America’s highest levels of foreign direct investment per 0 20 40 60 80 100
capita. Nevertheless, many people live in poverty and work in
the underground economy. Fiscal and structural reforms to
liberalize the economy are long overdue. While Costa Rica Quick Facts
remains safer than many of its neighbors, crime rates are Population: 4.8 million
rising. There is an ongoing border dispute with Nicaragua. GDP (PPP): $61.6 billion
Costa Rica has benefited from foreign investments in elec- 3.5% growth in 2013
tronics and health care, and the Central America–Dominican 5-year compound annual growth 3.4%
Republic–United States Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA– $12,942 per capita
DR) has opened insurance and telecommunications to pri- Unemployment: 7.7%
vate investors. Inflation (CPI): 5.2%
FDI Inflow: $2.7 billion
Public Debt: 37.0% of GDP
How Do We Measure Economic Freedom?
See page 475 for an explanation of the methodology 2013 data unless otherwise noted.
or visit the Index Web site at heritage.org/index. Data compiled as of September 2014.
173
COSTA RICA (continued)
THE TEN ECONOMIC FREEDOMS
1–Year
Score Country World Average Rank Change
Property Rights 0 Fiscal Freedom –2.6 Business Freedom –5.5 Trade Freedom +5.8
Freedom from +3.0 Government –0.9 Labor Freedom –6.5 Investment Freedom 0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +4.9 Financial Freedom 0
Property Rights –15.0 Fiscal Freedom +25.5 Business Freedom –4.6 Trade Freedom +58.8
Freedom from –3.0 Government –3.7 Labor Freedom –13.9 Investment Freedom +5.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom –4.7 Financial Freedom 0
Cpoints
roatia’s economic freedom score is 61.5, making its econo-
my the 81st freest in the 2015 Index. Its overall score is 1.1
better than last year, reflecting improvements in five
Freedom Trend
63
of the 10 economic freedoms including freedom from corrup-
tion, fiscal freedom, and labor freedom. Croatia has registered
62
its highest score ever in the 2015 Index, but it continues to lag
behind many other emerging economies in the region, and its
overall score remains below the regional average.
61
Despite its accession to the European Union in 2013, Croatia
still suffers some of the difficulties facing other transitional
economies. An independent judiciary has not been fully estab- 60
lished, and there are delays and backlogs in adjudicating cases.
High levels of corruption persist in business, education, and
59
basic government services. Land registry offices need further
reform to guarantee clearly defined property rights. 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Property Rights –10.0 Fiscal Freedom –2.5 Business Freedom +0.8 Trade Freedom +18.2
Freedom from +18.0 Government –4.0 Labor Freedom –1.5 Investment Freedom +30.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +80.0 Financial Freedom +10.0
Chigher
uba’s economic freedom score is 29.6, making its economy
one of the world’s least free. Its overall score is 0.9 point
than last year, with a slight deterioration in monetary
Freedom Trend
31
freedom outweighed by improvements in three of the 10 eco-
nomic freedoms, including trade freedom, fiscal freedom, 30
and freedom from corruption. Cuba is ranked least free of
29 countries in the South and Central America/Caribbean 29
region, and its overall score is significantly lower than the
regional average.
28
In recent years, the government has made measured conces-
sions to encourage more entrepreneurship and private-sector 27
growth. Communist Party–endorsed reforms to cut govern-
ment payrolls and expand approved professions have not
26
been broad enough to ensure any meaningful advancement in
overall economic freedom. The state continues to interfere in 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
most economic activity. Price controls are pervasive, and the
two-tiered exchange rate regime continues to distort prices. Country Comparisons
Despite membership in the World Trade Organization, the
economy remains relatively cut off from the international Country 29.6
marketplace. Only state enterprises are allowed to engage in
international trade and investment. The state uses an oppres- World
Average 60.4
sive regulatory environment to suppress entrepreneurial
activity and controls most means of production. Shallow Regional
59.7
credit markets impede access to credit for business activities. Average
Property Rights 0 Fiscal Freedom +14.2 Business Freedom –20.0 Trade Freedom +3.8
Freedom from +36.0 Government 0 Labor Freedom 0 Investment Freedom –10.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +1.9 Financial Freedom 0
Property Rights +20.0 Fiscal Freedom +7.6 Business Freedom –5.5 Trade Freedom +19.6
Freedom from +13.0 Government –31.2 Labor Freedom –10.4 Investment Freedom 0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +6.7 Financial Freedom –20.0
Tall score
he Czech Republic’s economic freedom score is 72.5, mak-
ing its economy the 24th freest in the 2015 Index. Its over-
is 0.3 point better than last year, with declines in the
Freedom Trend
74
management of public spending, business freedom, and labor
73
freedom outweighed by improvements in the area of the rule
of law as measured by property rights and freedom from cor-
72
ruption. The Czech Republic is ranked 13th out of 43 coun-
tries in the Europe region, and its overall score is higher than
71
the regional and global averages.
Over the past five years, the Czech Republic’s transition to a 70
market economy has been facilitated by a strong commitment
to economic freedom. Since 2011, its economic freedom score 69
Property Rights +5.0 Fiscal Freedom +34.8 Business Freedom –31.8 Trade Freedom +12.0
Freedom from –2.0 Government +2.4 Labor Freedom +25.2 Investment Freedom +10.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +12.0 Financial Freedom –10.0
Property Rights +5.0 Fiscal Freedom +8.1 Business Freedom +12.4 Trade Freedom +10.2
Freedom from +1.0 Government +1.8 Labor Freedom –7.8 Investment Freedom +20.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom –3.8 Financial Freedom +10.0
Property Rights –25.0 Fiscal Freedom –2.9 Business Freedom +0.4 Trade Freedom +3.8
Freedom from +6.0 Government +12.6 Labor Freedom +6.9 Investment Freedom +20.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +3.4 Financial Freedom 0
Property Rights 0 Fiscal Freedom +6.2 Business Freedom –4.8 Trade Freedom –1.4
Freedom from +2.0 Government +9.3 Labor Freedom –1.3 Investment Freedom +15.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +9.7 Financial Freedom 0
Toverall
he Dominican Republic’s economic freedom score is 61.0,
making its economy the 86th freest in the 2015 Index. Its
score is 0.3 point lower than last year due to consid-
Freedom Trend
63
by 20 points.
Once an agricultural economy, the Dominican Republic now Country Comparisons
boasts a robust tourism and services sector. Liberalization of
the investment regime has facilitated growth surrounding Country 61.0
free trade zones along the coast. However, entrepreneurship
World
and private-sector development remain constrained by ineffi- Average 60.4
cient government services and weak rule of law. Corruption is
still pervasive in the economy, exacerbated by drug trafficking Regional
59.7
in recent years. Institutionalizing free-market principles will Average
be vital for securing long-term growth. Free
Economies 84.6
BACKGROUND: Danilo Medina of the center-left Dominican
0 20 40 60 80 100
Liberation Party (PLD) won the presidency in August 2012,
succeeding three-term President Leonel Fernández, also of
the PLD. Haitian immigration is a hot political issue. A 2013
Supreme Court ruling that limited the rights of Haitians who Quick Facts
are unlawfully present in the country and their Dominican- Population: 10.4 million
born children was partially undone by a Medina-sponsored GDP (PPP): $103.2 billion
law in 2014. The Dominican Republic is the second-largest 4.1% growth in 2013
economy in the Caribbean. The traditional agricultural econ- 5-year compound annual growth 4.7%
omy has shifted in recent years toward greater reliance on $9,911 per capita
tourism and manufacturing. Remittances from the United Unemployment: 15.0%
States account for about 10 percent of GDP. Drug and human Inflation (CPI): 4.8%
trafficking undermine the rule of law. FDI Inflow: $2.0 billion
Public Debt: 33.8% of GDP
How Do We Measure Economic Freedom?
See page 475 for an explanation of the methodology 2013 data unless otherwise noted.
or visit the Index Web site at heritage.org/index. Data compiled as of September 2014.
191
DOMINICAN REPUBLIC (continued)
THE TEN ECONOMIC FREEDOMS
1–Year
Score Country World Average Rank Change
Property Rights 0 Fiscal Freedom –0.2 Business Freedom –1.5 Trade Freedom +46.8
Freedom from –1.0 Government –8.2 Labor Freedom +0.6 Investment Freedom +25.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom –0.2 Financial Freedom –10.0
Property Rights –35.0 Fiscal Freedom –2.7 Business Freedom –3.6 Trade Freedom +10.4
Freedom from +25.0 Government –43.9 Labor Freedom +11.5 Investment Freedom –40.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +21.9 Financial Freedom –10.0
Epoints
gypt’s economic freedom score is 55.2, making its economy
the 124th freest in the 2015 Index. Its overall score is 2.3
higher than last year due to improvements in six of the
Freedom Trend
62
10 economic freedoms, including labor freedom, monetary
freedom, and investment freedom, that outweigh declines in 60
trade freedom and the control of government spending. Egypt
is ranked 12th out of 15 countries in the Middle East/North 58
Africa region, and its overall score is below the world average.
56
Over the past five years, Egypt’s economic freedom score has
declined by nearly 4.0 points, pushed down by double-digit 54
losses in property rights, investment freedom, and finan-
cial freedom. However, this decline has come to a halt in the 52
2015 Index.
50
Further action to restore and improve economic freedom is 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
essential to counter economic stagnation and poverty. Long-
established weaknesses in the institutional framework that
include price controls and government subsidies of gasoline Country Comparisons
have greatly burdened the budget and forced the government
to seek a bailout from both the IMF and other Arab states. The Country 55.2
rule of law is ineffective and arbitrary, and judicial procedures
are long and costly. World
60.4
Average
BACKGROUND: The army ousted President Hosni Mubarak
in February 2011, and the Supreme Council of the Armed Regional
Average 61.6
Forces assumed power pending election of a new civilian gov-
ernment. The parliament was dissolved in June 2012 after Free
84.6
one-third of its members were found to have won their seats Economies
illegitimately. Mohamed Morsi of the Muslim Brotherhood’s 0 20 40 60 80 100
Freedom and Justice Party was elected president in June 2012
and granted himself sweeping new powers in November. His
increasingly authoritarian rule triggered huge demonstra- Quick Facts
tions and a July 2013 army coup. Field Marshal Abdel Fat- Population: 84.2 million
tah el-Sisi was elected president in May 2014. Three years of GDP (PPP): $553.6 billion
political instability have hurt tourism and foreign investment, 2.1% growth in 2013
both of which are important sources of foreign exchange. 5-year compound annual growth 3.2%
There have been limited market reforms, but food, energy, $6,579 per capita
and other key commodities remain heavily subsidized. Unemployment: 12.7%
Inflation (CPI): 6.9%
FDI Inflow: $5.6 billion
Public Debt: 89.2% of GDP
How Do We Measure Economic Freedom?
See page 475 for an explanation of the methodology 2013 data unless otherwise noted.
or visit the Index Web site at heritage.org/index. Data compiled as of September 2014.
195
EGYPT (continued)
THE TEN ECONOMIC FREEDOMS
1–Year
Score Country World Average Rank Change
Property Rights –10.0 Fiscal Freedom +39.8 Business Freedom +10.4 Trade Freedom +45.0
Freedom from +2.0 Government +14.3 Labor Freedom –6.1 Investment Freedom 0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom –4.6 Financial Freedom –10.0
Escoreleconomy
Salvador’s economic freedom score is 65.7, making its
the 62nd freest in the 2015 Index. Its overall
is 0.5 point lower than last year, with declines in labor
Freedom Trend
70
freedom, business freedom, and property rights outweigh-
ing improvements in trade freedom, investment freedom, 69
and freedom from corruption. El Salvador is ranked 12th out
of 29 countries in the South and Central America/Caribbean 68
region, and its overall score remains above the world average.
67
Over the past five years, economic freedom in El Salvador has
declined by over 3.0 points, and the country has recorded its 66
lowest score ever in the 2015 Index. Declines in half of the 10
economic freedoms include especially serious deteriorations 65
in fiscal freedom and regulatory efficiency.
64
El Salvador’s deteriorating economic freedom undermines 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
an already weak institutional environment. Rampant vio-
lent crime further incapacitates a legal environment that is
already subject to lingering corruption and obstructionism. Country Comparisons
However, relatively open trading and investment environ-
ments have fueled growth and offset other weaknesses. Country 65.7
Property Rights –15.0 Fiscal Freedom –4.4 Business Freedom –16.7 Trade Freedom +20.2
Freedom from –12.0 Government –8.1 Labor Freedom –14.8 Investment Freedom +5.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +13.1 Financial Freedom 0
Eoverall
quatorial Guinea’s economic freedom score is 40.4, mak-
ing its economy the 173rd freest in the 2015 Index. Its
score has dropped by 4.0 points, the biggest decline in
Freedom Trend
50
this year’s Index. Equatorial Guinea is ranked 44th out of 46
countries in the Sub-Saharan Africa region, and its score is far 48
below the regional and world averages.
46
Economic freedom in Equatorial Guinea has declined by over
7 points over the past half-decade, and the country has regis- 44
tered its lowest score ever in the 2015 Index. Led by a 49-point
deterioration in its score for government spending, it has 42
dropped even further into the “repressed” category. Scores
for financial freedom and property rights have plummeted by 40
over 10 points.
38
Abundant oil reserves have generated high economic growth, 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
but most Equatorial Guineans remain trapped in poverty.
A corrupt government and the small group of presidential
cronies and other elites have captured billions of dollars in Country Comparisons
petroleum rents. The government continues to influence for-
eign investment decisions, subsidize key industries, control Country 40.4
the flow of capital, and generally maintain its pervasive pres-
ence in the economy. The judiciary is one of the weakest in World
60.4
the world and is directly influenced by the president’s office. Average
Property Rights 0 Fiscal Freedom –13.9 Business Freedom –17.5 Trade Freedom –0.6
Freedom from +9.0 Government –50.0 Labor Freedom –13.9 Investment Freedom +5.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +12.3 Financial Freedom +20.0
Over the past five years, scores have declined in the areas of
corruption, taxation, and labor policy, further burdening an Country Comparisons
already weak institutional framework. An oppressive central
government controls investment and the financial sector and Country 38.9
distorts prices. Corruption is endemic. The judiciary is highly
politicized and fails to check government expropriations of World
60.4
private property. Average
Property Rights 0 Fiscal Freedom –29.4 Business Freedom –0.1 Trade Freedom 0
Freedom from –8.0 Government +61.9 Labor Freedom –8.4 Investment Freedom –10.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom –1.2 Financial Freedom 0
Property Rights +20.0 Fiscal Freedom –1.4 Business Freedom –3.5 Trade Freedom +11.0
Freedom from +18.0 Government –10.1 Labor Freedom +11.3 Investment Freedom 0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +77.6 Financial Freedom +10.0
Epoints
thiopia’s economic freedom score is 51.5, making its econo-
my the 149th freest in the 2015 Index. Its overall score is 1.5
higher than last year, reflecting considerable improve-
Freedom Trend
53
ments in monetary freedom, freedom from corruption, and
labor freedom. Ethiopia is ranked 37th out of 46 countries in 52
the Sub-Saharan Africa region, and its overall score continues
to be below the regional average. 51
With a large domestic market and promising economic pros-
pects, Ethiopia has the potential to become a regional eco- 50
nomic powerhouse, but persistent state intervention in the
relatively closed economy has suppressed the growth of eco- 49
nomic freedom over the past five years. Since 2011, Ethiopia’s
economic freedom has expanded by a modest 1.0 point.
48
Overall, the institutional basis of economic freedom in Ethio- 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
pia is still weak. A nominally independent judiciary continues
to follow government policy advice, and corruption remains
endemic. The government has made significant investments Country Comparisons
in major development projects, including the Grand Renais-
sance Dam, but restricts foreign investment in major indus- Country 51.5
tries and keeps important sectors of the economy closed to
global trade and investment. World
Average 60.4
BACKGROUND: Prime Minister Hailemariam Desalegn’s Regional
Ethiopian People’s Revolutionary Democratic Front and Average 54.9
allied parties hold all but two seats in parliament. Elections
are scheduled for 2015. Desalegn served a one-year term as the Free
Economies 84.6
elected chairman of the African Union. In May 2014, Ethiopia,
0 20 40 60 80 100
Kenya, Burundi, and Rwanda agreed to send troops to South
Sudan to prevent renewed fighting between government
troops and rebel forces. After years of unilateral intervention
to secure border buffer zones in Somalia, Ethiopia joined the Quick Facts
African Union’s peacekeeping mission there in 2014. Border Population: 88.9 million
tensions continue between Ethiopia and Eritrea. Ethiopia GDP (PPP): $121.4 billion
has had 10 years of steady economic growth, but not enough 9.7% growth in 2013
to reduce poverty. Its per capita income remains among 5-year compound annual growth 10.1%
the world’s lowest. Ethiopia is a leading coffee producer. Its $1,366 per capita
economy is largely based on agriculture and is vulnerable to Unemployment: 5.7%
droughts and external shocks. Inflation (CPI): 8.0%
FDI Inflow: $953.0 million
Public Debt: 22.2% of GDP
How Do We Measure Economic Freedom?
See page 475 for an explanation of the methodology 2013 data unless otherwise noted.
or visit the Index Web site at heritage.org/index. Data compiled as of September 2014.
205
ETHIOPIA (continued)
THE TEN ECONOMIC FREEDOMS
1–Year
Score Country World Average Rank Change
Property Rights 0 Fiscal Freedom +36.4 Business Freedom +0.9 Trade Freedom +37.4
Freedom from +3.0 Government +2.9 Labor Freedom –5.2 Investment Freedom +10.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom –5.9 Financial Freedom –10.0
Property Rights –25.0 Fiscal Freedom +24.2 Business Freedom +8.2 Trade Freedom +17.6
Freedom from –7.7 Government +2.1 Labor Freedom –8.4 Investment Freedom 0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +2.8 Financial Freedom 0
Property Rights 0 Fiscal Freedom +8.0 Business Freedom +37.6 Trade Freedom +10.2
Freedom from –1.0 Government +3.6 Labor Freedom +4.9 Investment Freedom +20.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom –2.4 Financial Freedom +30.0
Fdecreased
rance’s economic freedom score is 62.5, making its econo-
my the 73rd freest in the 2015 Index. Its overall score has
by 1.0 point, with particularly large declines in
Freedom Trend
66
labor freedom and the management of government spend-
ing. France is ranked 33rd out of 43 countries in the Europe 65
region, and its overall score is higher than the world average
but below the regional average. 64
Over the past five years, France’s economic freedom has
waned as the size and reach of government have expanded. A 63
stagnating domestic economic environment has led to persis-
tently high unemployment, particularly among young people, 62
and structural deficiencies have suppressed dynamic private-
sector expansion. Since 2011, economic freedom in France has
61
declined by over 2.0 points, falling in five of the 10 economic
freedoms including the control of government spending, fiscal 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
freedom, and labor freedom.
However, with such institutional strengths as strong protec- Country Comparisons
tion of property rights and a relatively efficient legal frame-
work, the French economy is diversified and modern. The Country 62.5
entrepreneurial environment is generally facilitated by a
sophisticated and relatively resilient financial sector. The World
Average 60.4
government has pursued reform measures to increase the
economy’s competitiveness and flexibility, but progress has Regional
67.0
been slow and patchy. Average
Property Rights +10.0 Fiscal Freedom –13.3 Business Freedom –4.8 Trade Freedom +5.2
Freedom from –19.0 Government –13.2 Labor Freedom –10.8 Investment Freedom +20.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom –3.0 Financial Freedom +20.0
Property Rights –10.0 Fiscal Freedom +28.1 Business Freedom –12.1 Trade Freedom +37.4
Freedom from –16.0 Government –1.4 Labor Freedom +4.1 Investment Freedom –15.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom –0.5 Financial Freedom –10.0
Tscoreheeconomy
Gambia’s economic freedom score is 57.5, making its
the 113th freest in the 2015 Index. Its overall
is 2.0 points worse than last year, with especially notable
Freedom Trend
61
declines in the management of government spending, prop-
erty rights, freedom from corruption, and fiscal freedom. The 60
Gambia is ranked 19th out of 46 countries in the Sub-Saharan
Africa region, and its overall score is below the world average. 59
With few natural resources and high rates of poverty, The
Gambia has been behind many developing countries in imple- 58
menting policies that advance economic freedom. Over the
past five years, improvements to open the economy to greater 57
trade and investment have been offset by declines in six of the
10 economic freedoms including the control of government
56
spending and property rights. The Gambia’s overall score
decline is the fifth-largest in the 2015 Index. 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Property Rights –45.0 Fiscal Freedom +2.9 Business Freedom +0.7 Trade Freedom +7.0
Freedom from +18.0 Government –7.4 Labor Freedom –8.4 Investment Freedom +35.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +0.9 Financial Freedom +20.0
Property Rights +10.0 Fiscal Freedom –4.8 Business Freedom +33.6 Trade Freedom +19.6
Freedom from +39.0 Government +12.5 Labor Freedom +13.1 Investment Freedom +30.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +82.7 Financial Freedom +30.0
Property Rights 0 Fiscal Freedom +27.6 Business Freedom +3.2 Trade Freedom +10.2
Freedom from –12.0 Government +9.5 Labor Freedom +2.5 Investment Freedom +20.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom –0.1 Financial Freedom 0
Property Rights 0 Fiscal Freedom +18.3 Business Freedom +7.5 Trade Freedom +33.6
Freedom from –24.0 Government –11.0 Labor Freedom +6.7 Investment Freedom +35.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +3.0 Financial Freedom +10.0
al averages.
58
Since 2011, Greece’s economic freedom has declined by 6.3
points, with scores falling in seven of the 10 measured catego- 56
ries. Once ranked in the “moderately free” category, Greece is
now considered “mostly unfree.” With the 10th largest score 54
decline in the 2015 Index, Greece has recorded its lowest eco-
nomic freedom score ever this year. 52
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Large continued declines in the management of government
spending bode ill for a government still reeling from a sov-
ereign debt crisis and multiple international bailouts. The Country Comparisons
rule of law remains problematic, with property rights weakly
enforced, tax evasion on the rise, and corruption pervasive. Country 54.0
Despite efforts to create a more business-friendly regulato-
ry environment, the labor market remains rigid and slow to World
60.4
adjust to market realities. Average
Property Rights –30.0 Fiscal Freedom +1.7 Business Freedom +3.3 Trade Freedom +5.2
Freedom from –10.0 Government –55.3 Labor Freedom –4.5 Investment Freedom –10.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +12.5 Financial Freedom +20.0
Property Rights –30.0 Fiscal Freedom –7.2 Business Freedom –0.3 Trade Freedom +32.2
Freedom from –21.0 Government –2.5 Labor Freedom –10.0 Investment Freedom +15.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +9.9 Financial Freedom 0
Property Rights –35.0 Fiscal Freedom –3.2 Business Freedom –18.4 Trade Freedom +10.2
Freedom from +14.0 Government –6.9 Labor Freedom +3.9 Investment Freedom –10.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom –9.2 Financial Freedom –30.0
Property Rights +10.0 Fiscal Freedom +23.6 Business Freedom –0.4 Trade Freedom +36.0
Freedom from +9.0 Government +22.1 Labor Freedom +10.1 Investment Freedom 0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +36.9 Financial Freedom +20.0
Property Rights –25.0 Fiscal Freedom +12.9 Business Freedom +8.8 Trade Freedom +6.0
Freedom from +17.0 Government +40.5 Labor Freedom +12.0 Investment Freedom –5.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +14.4 Financial Freedom 0
in the 2015 Index, but its economy is still reeling from the 49
destruction of the 2010 earthquake. Despite some progress,
institutional and economic foundations remain fragile, with 48
economic freedom declining by close to 1.0 point over the past
47
five years.
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Of particular concern is the poor regard for rule of law. Cor-
ruption is rampant, and the judicial system is ineffective and
inefficient. Smuggling remains a huge problem and is exacer- Country Comparisons
bated by poor trade freedom. Entrepreneurs find Haiti one of
the world’s most difficult places to do business, as the regu- Country 51.3
latory environment for both business and labor is outdated
and inefficient. World
Average 60.4
BACKGROUND: President Michel Martelly took office in 2011 Regional
promising a fresh start for Haiti, but his policies have had lit- Average 59.7
tle effect on the daily economic struggle that most Haitians
face. Inflation and corruption remain popular grievances, Free
Economies 84.6
weakening his political capital. Relations with the Dominican
0 20 40 60 80 100
Republic have been strained since Santo Domingo revoked
the citizenship of thousands of Dominican-born people of
Haitian descent. The United Nations Stabilization Mission
in Haiti, established in 2004 to ensure security, extended its Quick Facts
mandate until October 2014 but reduced the number of U.N. Population: 10.3 million
peacekeeping troops in the country. Haiti is still recover- GDP (PPP): $13.6 billion
ing from a 2010 earthquake, and reconstruction is far from 4.3% growth in 2013
complete. More than 90 percent of the government’s budget 5-year compound annual growth 2.0%
comes from an agreement with Petrocaribe, a Venezuela-led $1,315 per capita
oil alliance. Extreme poverty, weak government institutions, Unemployment: 7.1%
and violent crime are still major problems. Inflation (CPI): 6.8%
FDI Inflow: $190.0 million
Public Debt: 21.3% of GDP
How Do We Measure Economic Freedom?
See page 475 for an explanation of the methodology 2013 data unless otherwise noted.
or visit the Index Web site at heritage.org/index. Data compiled as of September 2014.
233
HAITI (continued)
THE TEN ECONOMIC FREEDOMS
1–Year
Score Country World Average Rank Change
Property Rights 0 Fiscal Freedom +1.7 Business Freedom +3.1 Trade Freedom –2.4
Freedom from +9.0 Government –19.3 Labor Freedom +1.8 Investment Freedom +30.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +20.7 Financial Freedom +20.0
Property Rights –20.0 Fiscal Freedom +19.4 Business Freedom –1.8 Trade Freedom +16.6
Freedom from –4.0 Government –4.7 Labor Freedom –16.7 Investment Freedom +10.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +7.6 Financial Freedom +10.0
Property Rights –15.0 Fiscal Freedom +31.9 Business Freedom –10.5 Trade Freedom +27.0
Freedom from +4.0 Government +25.9 Labor Freedom –0.5 Investment Freedom +5.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +15.0 Financial Freedom +20.0
Idecreased
celand’s economic freedom score is 72.0, making its econ-
omy the 26th freest in the 2015 Index. Its overall score has
by 0.4 point since last year, with combined declines
Freedom Trend
74
in freedom from corruption, fiscal freedom, business free- 73
dom, and the management of public spending outweighing
improvements in labor freedom and monetary freedom. Ice- 72
land is ranked 14th out of 43 countries in the Europe region,
and its overall score remains well above the world and region- 71
al averages. 70
Property Rights 0 Fiscal Freedom +10.4 Business Freedom +20.5 Trade Freedom +7.2
Freedom from –12.0 Government –8.0 Labor Freedom –2.4 Investment Freedom 0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom –4.3 Financial Freedom +10.0
Ipoints
ndia’s economic freedom score is 54.6, making its economy
the 128th freest in the 2015 Index. Its score is down by 1.1
from last year, with modest improvements in busi-
Freedom Trend
57
ness freedom, property rights, and freedom from corruption
offset by declines in labor freedom and trade freedom. India
is ranked 26th out of 41 countries in the Asia–Pacific region, 56
and its overall score continues to be below the regional and
world averages.
55
India’s level of economic freedom is unchanged over five years.
The state’s presence in the economy remains extensive through
state-owned enterprises and wasteful subsidy programs that 54
cause chronically high budget deficits. In the absence of a well-
functioning legal and regulatory framework, a weak rule of law
exacerbated by corruption in many areas of economic activity 53
undermines the emergence of a more vibrant private sector. 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
India remains a “mostly unfree” economy.
The reform-minded Modi administration has undertak- Country Comparisons
en some necessary structural adjustments with a focus on
reforming the inefficient and bloated government sector, bet- Country 54.6
ter managing public finance, and improving the business and
investment environments. The first budget presented in July World
60.4
2014, however, was short on detail about plans to restructure Average
wasteful subsidy programs and reignite economic growth. Regional
Average 58.8
BACKGROUND: India is a relatively stable democracy. It is
80 percent Hindu but is still home to one of the world’s larg- Free
84.6
est Muslim populations. The Bharatiya Janata Party, led by Economies
Narendra Modi, won a sweeping victory in the 2014 national 0 20 40 60 80 100
elections, held over a five-week period. The previous Congress
Party–led government was unseated amid corruption scan-
dals and a faltering economy. After decade-low GDP growth Quick Facts
in 2013, Prime Minister Modi has promised to implement eco- Population: 1.24 billion
nomic reform in order to attract private-sector investment. GDP (PPP): $5.1 trillion
Corruption, poor infrastructure, and fiscal deficits are major 4.4% growth in 2013
obstacles to economic growth. India is a significant force in 5-year compound annual growth 6.9%
world trade, but its economy continues to operate far below $4,077 per capita
its potential. Unemployment: 3.7%
Inflation (CPI): 9.5%
FDI Inflow: $28.2 billion
Public Debt: 66.7% of GDP
How Do We Measure Economic Freedom?
See page 475 for an explanation of the methodology 2013 data unless otherwise noted.
or visit the Index Web site at heritage.org/index. Data compiled as of September 2014.
243
INDIA (continued)
THE TEN ECONOMIC FREEDOMS
1–Year
Score Country World Average Rank Change
Property Rights +5.0 Fiscal Freedom +32.6 Business Freedom –11.7 Trade Freedom +64.6
Freedom from +26.0 Government –14.1 Labor Freedom –13.0 Investment Freedom –15.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom –6.4 Financial Freedom +10.0
Ideteriorated
ndonesia’s economic freedom score is 58.1, making its
economy the 105th freest in the 2015 Index. Its score has
by 0.4 point since last year, reflecting declines
Freedom Trend
60
in business freedom, the control of government spending,
and monetary freedom that counterbalance improvements 59
in freedom from corruption and labor freedom. Indonesia is
ranked 22nd out of 41 countries in the Asia–Pacific region,
58
and its overall score is below the world and regional averages.
Steady growth in economic freedom over the past five years 57
has tapered off more recently. However, since 2011, economic
freedom in Indonesia has advanced by over 2.0 points, reflect-
56
ing a more sustained commitment to opening up the financial
sectors and improving the investment regime. Other changes
have led to score advances in six of the 10 economic freedoms, 55
reflecting relatively broad-based policy improvements. 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Property Rights –20.0 Fiscal Freedom +10.2 Business Freedom –5.7 Trade Freedom +29.8
Freedom from +22.0 Government –1.4 Labor Freedom –0.4 Investment Freedom –10.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +4.0 Financial Freedom +10.0
Property Rights 0 Fiscal Freedom +39.7 Business Freedom +2.0 Trade Freedom –3.6
Freedom from +15.0 Government +0.9 Labor Freedom –25.1 Investment Freedom –10.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom –2.6 Financial Freedom 0
Icountry.
raq remains unranked in the 2015 Index because of the lack
of sufficiently reliable data on economic freedom within the
The Iraqi economy has slowly recovered from the
Freedom Trend
hostilities that began in 2003, but much of this progress has
been patchy or even reversed. The country faces worsening
political and security challenges. Iraq was last graded in the
2002 Index, when it received an overall score of 15.6.
A higher degree of political instability and violence has
Not graded this year
plagued Iraq over the past year and undermined its recon-
struction. Endowed with abundant oil wealth, the govern-
ment has failed to address problems in economic freedom
that hold back private-sector development and improvements
in productivity.
Inefficient business regulations undermine the entrepreneur-
ial environment, preventing the diversification of the econo- 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
my away from oil production. Monetary and fiscal policies are
poorly enforced, and the government has trouble maintain-
ing proper bookkeeping or budgetary functions. Corruption
Country Comparisons
is endemic and undermines the development of a dynamic
private sector. Sectarian favoritism in government bureau- Country n/a
cracies leads to arbitrary economic policies that favor par-
World
ticular groups. Average 60.4
Property Rights n/a Fiscal Freedom n/a Business Freedom n/a Trade Freedom n/a
Freedom from n/a Government n/a Labor Freedom n/a Investment Freedom n/a
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom n/a Financial Freedom n/a
Ipoint
reland’s economic freedom score is 76.6, making its econ-
omy the 9th freest in the 2015 Index. Its score is up by 0.4
from last year, with a notable combined improvement
Freedom Trend
80
in the management of government spending and monetary
freedom outweighing declines in half of the 10 economic free- 79
doms including property rights, labor freedom, and freedom
from corruption. The Irish economy is ranked third out of 43 78
countries in the Europe region, and its score is far above the
77
world and regional averages.
Two years of gains in economic freedom have not totally 76
reversed losses earlier in the past half-decade. During that
period, Ireland’s economic freedom has declined by over 2.0 75
points, with ratings for freedom from corruption and business
freedom recording the largest declines. 74
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
This erosion of economic freedom has undermined com-
petitiveness and hindered economic recovery in a difficult
external environment. Nonetheless, by adhering to its com- Country Comparisons
mitment to policies that sustain open markets and reducing
the costs of a bloated public sector to restore fiscal soundness, Country 76.6
Ireland has been able to reemerge as one of the world’s 10 fre-
est economies. World
60.4
Average
BACKGROUND: Prime Minister Enda Kenny’s Fine Gael
government was elected in February 2011. Ireland’s modern, Regional
Average 67.0
highly industrialized economy performed extraordinarily well
throughout the 1990s and most of the next decade, encour- Free
84.6
aged by free-market policies that attracted investment capi- Economies
tal. However, a speculative housing bubble burst in 2008 and 0 20 40 60 80 100
generated a financial crisis. A 2010 National Recovery Plan
was implemented after the government nationalized several
banks, and Ireland accepted a $90 billion European Union– Quick Facts
International Monetary Fund rescue package. The policy Population: 4.8 million
agenda aims to get the economy back on a solid footing by GDP (PPP): $188.9 billion
2015. In February 2013, Ireland reached agreement with the –0.3% growth in 2013
European Central Bank to restructure loans and ease the debt 5-year compound annual growth –1.1%
burden incurred when the Anglo Irish Bank was nationalized $39,547 per capita
in 2009. Ireland’s economy was expected to grow in 2014, but Unemployment: 13.6%
the ratio of public debt to GDP remains very high. Inflation (CPI): 0.5%
FDI Inflow: $35.5 billion
Public Debt: 122.8% of GDP
How Do We Measure Economic Freedom?
See page 475 for an explanation of the methodology 2013 data unless otherwise noted.
or visit the Index Web site at heritage.org/index. Data compiled as of September 2014.
251
IRELAND (continued)
THE TEN ECONOMIC FREEDOMS
1–Year
Score Country World Average Rank Change
Property Rights –5.0 Fiscal Freedom +24.5 Business Freedom –2.9 Trade Freedom +10.2
Freedom from +22.0 Government +6.9 Labor Freedom –2.0 Investment Freedom +20.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom –2.2 Financial Freedom 0
Ipoints
srael’s economic freedom score is 70.5, making its econo-
my the 33rd freest in the 2015 Index. Its overall score is 2.1
better than last year, with improvements in six of the
Freedom Trend
72
10 economic freedoms, including the management of gov- 71
ernment spending, trade freedom, labor freedom, and fiscal
freedom. Registering the 10th largest score increase in the 70
2015 Index, Israel has achieved its highest score ever. Israel
is ranked 4th out of 15 countries in the Middle East/North 69
Africa region, and its overall score is above the world and 68
regional averages.
67
Broad, sustained improvements in property rights and the
regulatory sectors over the past five years have propelled Isra- 66
el into the ranks of the “mostly free” for the first time. Since
65
2011, economic freedom has advanced by 2.0 points, with
scores advancing broadly in six of the 10 categories measured. 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Improvements in property rights and the regulatory environ-
ment have been the backbone of this advance. Country Comparisons
A democratic and free-market bastion in the Middle East,
Israel has entrenched the principles of economic freedom Country 70.5
during its development. A small, open economy, Israel relies
on its competitive regulatory environment and well-estab- World
Average 60.4
lished rule of law to attract international investment. While
government spending is sizeable, the government has not Regional
61.6
interfered heavily with industrial activity. Average
Property Rights +5.0 Fiscal Freedom +17.1 Business Freedom –12.6 Trade Freedom +8.2
Freedom from +31.0 Government +17.8 Labor Freedom +2.9 Investment Freedom –10.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +8.4 Financial Freedom +20.0
Iincreased
taly’s economic freedom score is 61.7, making its econo-
my the 80th freest in the 2015 Index. Its overall score has
by 0.8 point since last year, with improvements in
Freedom Trend
63
five of the 10 economic freedoms, including property rights,
62
freedom from corruption, labor freedom, and monetary free-
dom, outweighing declines in business freedom, management
61
of government spending, and fiscal freedom. Italy is ranked
34th out of 43 countries in the Europe region, and its score is
60
above the world average but below the regional average.
Despite the eurozone’s challenging economic environment, 59
economic freedom in Italy has advanced by 1.4 points since
2011, maintaining the country’s “moderately free” rating. 58
Property Rights –15.0 Fiscal Freedom +10.6 Business Freedom –13.1 Trade Freedom +10.2
Freedom from –27.0 Government +19.6 Labor Freedom –19.1 Investment Freedom +15.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +0.1 Financial Freedom +10.0
Property Rights –10.0 Fiscal Freedom +4.0 Business Freedom +15.9 Trade Freedom +10.0
Freedom from –12.0 Government –3.3 Labor Freedom +8.1 Investment Freedom +15.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +20.5 Financial Freedom –20.0
Property Rights –10.0 Fiscal Freedom +15.1 Business Freedom –0.9 Trade Freedom +0.6
Freedom from –16.0 Government –20.6 Labor Freedom +6.9 Investment Freedom +20.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom –0.3 Financial Freedom –20.0
Junchanged
ordan’s economic freedom score is 69.3, making its econo-
my the 38th freest in the 2015 Index. Its score is essentially
from last year, with a change of 0.1 point reflect-
Freedom Trend
72
ing improvements in the management of government spend-
ing and labor freedom that are largely counterbalanced by 71
declines in business freedom, monetary freedom, and free-
dom from corruption. Jordan is ranked 5th out of 15 countries 70
in the Middle East/North Africa region, and its overall score
continues to be well above the world and regional averages.
69
Steady improvement in economic freedom in the early half of
the past decade has tapered off in recent years. Over the past 68
five years, Jordan’s economic freedom has advanced by just
0.4 point, primarily due to a deteriorating regulatory envi-
67
ronment and an increased level of perceived corruption that
offset gains in the control of government spending and prop- 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
erty rights.
Despite challenges, economic freedom in Jordan continues Country Comparisons
its gradual advance, and the economy has moved closer to
the “mostly free” category. Jordan is relatively open to global Country 69.3
investment and trade. Property rights are generally respected,
but improvements are needed to combat corruption and rein- World
Average 60.4
force the judiciary’s independence.
Regional
BACKGROUND: Jordan is a constitutional monarchy with Average 61.6
relatively few natural resources. Foreign loans, international
aid, and remittances from expatriate workers support the Free
Economies 84.6
economy. In 2011, King Abdullah responded to “Arab Spring”
0 20 40 60 80 100
demonstrations by dismissing his cabinet and ceding greater
authority to the judiciary and parliament. The government
also implemented two economic relief packages and a supple-
mentary budget to subsidize the middle class and the poor. Quick Facts
In 2000, Jordan joined the World Trade Organization and Population: 6.5 million
signed a free trade agreement with the United States; in 2001, GDP (PPP): $40.0 billion
it signed an association agreement with the European Union. 3.3% growth in 2013
Jordan negotiated a $2.1 billion standby arrangement with the 5-year compound annual growth 3.2%
International Monetary Fund in 2012 to finance its budget- $6,115 per capita
ary and balance-of-payments deficits. The presence of more Unemployment: 12.6%
than 600,000 Syrian refugees causes serious administrative Inflation (CPI): 5.5%
and resource problems. FDI Inflow: $1.8 billion
Public Debt: 87.7% of GDP
How Do We Measure Economic Freedom?
See page 475 for an explanation of the methodology 2013 data unless otherwise noted.
or visit the Index Web site at heritage.org/index. Data compiled as of September 2014.
261
JORDAN (continued)
THE TEN ECONOMIC FREEDOMS
1–Year
Score Country World Average Rank Change
Property Rights –10.0 Fiscal Freedom +47.1 Business Freedom –10.9 Trade Freedom +20.4
Freedom from +15.0 Government +0.1 Labor Freedom +0.5 Investment Freedom 0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +3.1 Financial Freedom –10.0
Property Rights –5.0 Fiscal Freedom +19.9 Business Freedom +18.7 Trade Freedom +18.0
Freedom from +16.0 Government –0.7 Labor Freedom +4.4 Investment Freedom +10.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +74.6 Financial Freedom +20.0
Property Rights –20.0 Fiscal Freedom +10.0 Business Freedom –7.1 Trade Freedom +10.4
Freedom from –23.0 Government +9.1 Labor Freedom +4.4 Investment Freedom 0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +22.4 Financial Freedom 0
Property Rights 0 Fiscal Freedom +30.8 Business Freedom –5.7 Trade Freedom +0.4
Freedom from –3.8 Government 0 Labor Freedom –1.7 Investment Freedom –5.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom –8.1 Financial Freedom 0
NORTH KOREA
free 0 100 free
46.4
Economic Freedom Score
Freedom Trend
50
25 75
Least
free 0
48
Most
100 free
World Rank:178 Regional Rank: 42 1.3
47
N orth Korea remains a closed society. Timely collection of
data is extremely difficult, and reported economic statis-
tics must be considered highly speculative. Nevertheless, it is
Freedom Trend
4
possible to determine that North Korea scores some minimal 46
points only in property rights and freedom from corruption,
3
and its overall score is only 1.3 points, hardly measurable on
the Index scale. North Korea continues to be the world’s least 45
free economy.
2
North Korea is an unreformed dictatorial state. Little is
known about the economic policy intentions of Kim Jong-un, 44
the hermit kingdom’s third-generation “supreme leader,” but 1
his time in power has been marked by inconsistencies.
Calling for North Korea to become an “economic giant,” Kim 43
0
has attempted to attract more foreign direct investment with 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
such measures as designating new economic development 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
zones. There have been few takers. Additionally, a new Min-
istry of External Economic Affairs was formed in June 2014. Country Comparisons
The regime firmly upholds the development of its military
and nuclear strength as key priorities, severely undercutting Country Comparisons
Country 1.3
any chance of economic reform and development.
World
60.4
BACKGROUND: Western-educated North Korean dictator Average
Country 46.4
Kim Jong-un rules a totalitarian state unchanged since his Regional
father died in 2011. Kim rejects any alterations in the status Average 58.8
quo, warning of the dangers of outside contagion to the sta- World
bility of the country. He has maintained Pyongyang’s aggres- Free
Average 60.4 84.6
Economies
sive rhetoric and provocative behavior toward its neighbors
0 20 40 60 80 100
and the international community. North Korea continues to
Regional
conduct nuclear and missile tests in violation of U.N. Security
Average 58.8
Council resolutions. It has threatened nuclear attacks on the
United States and its allies, and it continues to augment and Quick Facts
refine its nuclear and missile-delivery capabilities. Typically, Free
Population: 24.7 million
Pyongyang escalates and then lowers tensions in attempts to Economies
GDP (PPP): $40.0 billion (2011) 84.6
win diplomatic and economic benefits. The Obama Admin- 0.8% growth in 2011
istration, South Korea, and Japan have refused to resume 0 20 annual
5-year compound 40 60 80n/a100
growth
negotiations on denuclearizing the Korean Peninsula without $1,800 per capita (2011)
tangible signs of change in North Korean policy. Unemployment: n/a
Inflation (CPI): n/a
FDI Inflow: n/a
Public Debt: n/a
How Do We Measure Economic Freedom?
See page 475 for an explanation of the methodology 2013 data unless otherwise noted.
or visit the Index Web site at heritage.org/index. Data compiled as of September 2014.
269
NORTH KOREA (continued)
THE TEN ECONOMIC FREEDOMS
1–Year
Score Country World Average Rank Change
Property Rights –5.0 Fiscal Freedom 0 Business Freedom –40.0 Trade Freedom 0
Freedom from –2.0 Government 0 Labor Freedom 0 Investment Freedom –10.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom 0 Financial Freedom –10.0
Property Rights –15.0 Fiscal Freedom +9.2 Business Freedom +19.7 Trade Freedom +3.4
Freedom from –15.0 Government –17.7 Labor Freedom –5.5 Investment Freedom +20.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +1.5 Financial Freedom +10.0
Property Rights n/a Fiscal Freedom n/a Business Freedom n/a Trade Freedom n/a
Freedom from n/a Government n/a Labor Freedom n/a Investment Freedom n/a
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom n/a Financial Freedom n/a
Property Rights –45.0 Fiscal Freedom –2.2 Business Freedom –26.4 Trade Freedom –0.8
Freedom from –27.0 Government +50.2 Labor Freedom –16.0 Investment Freedom +25.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom –7.7 Financial Freedom 0
Tscorehemaking
Kyrgyz Republic’s economic freedom score is 61.3,
its economy the 82nd freest in the 2015 Index. Its
has increased by 0.2 point since last year, with improve-
Freedom Trend
63
ments in trade freedom, freedom from corruption, and labor
freedom outweighing declines in the control of government 62
spending, fiscal freedom, and business freedom. The Kyr-
gyz Republic is ranked 15th out of 42 countries in the Asia– 61
Pacific region, and its overall score is above the regional and
world averages.
60
Over the past two years, the Kyrgyz Republic has re-estab-
lished the positive growth in economic freedom it had 59
achieved prior to 2010. Solid gains have been made in opening
the economy to trade and investment, but the control of gov-
58
ernment spending continues to deteriorate.
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Compared to transitioning economies in Eastern Europe, the
Kyrgyz Republic lags behind in key indicators of economic
freedom. Trade freedom has only recently surpassed the Country Comparisons
global average, and the rule of law remains weak. Corruption,
particularly surrounding the president’s family and office, has Country 61.3
been well documented. Courts remain largely unreformed,
and property rights are weak. World
Average 60.4
BACKGROUND: The Kyrgyz Republic is one of Central Asia’s Regional
poorest and least stable countries and is sharply divided along Average 58.8
ethnic lines. Former Prime Minister Almazbek Atambayev,
elected president in 2011 with Moscow’s support, has used Free
Economies 84.6
questionable legal maneuvers to persecute opponents. Weak
0 20 40 60 80 100
governance has encouraged extremist threats, organized
crime, and corruption. The government has accumulated high
levels of external debt and is heavily dependent on foreign
aid. The economy depends heavily on gold exports and remit- Quick Facts
tances from Kyrgyzstani migrant workers, primarily in Rus- Population: 5.6 million
sia. Cotton, tobacco, wool, and meat are the main agricultural GDP (PPP): $14.7 billion
products, but only tobacco and cotton are exported in any 10.5% growth in 2013
quantity. There has been strong foreign investment, particu- 5-year compound annual growth 3.5%
larly from Russia. In May 2014, Atambayev signed a road map $2,611 per capita
for membership in the Russia-dominated Eurasian Economic Unemployment: 7.9%
Union, saying that his country has little choice but to join. Inflation (CPI): 6.6%
FDI Inflow: $757.6 million
Public Debt: 47.7% of GDP
How Do We Measure Economic Freedom?
See page 475 for an explanation of the methodology 2013 data unless otherwise noted.
or visit the Index Web site at heritage.org/index. Data compiled as of September 2014.
277
KYRGYZ REPUBLIC (continued)
THE TEN ECONOMIC FREEDOMS
1–Year
Score Country World Average Rank Change
Property Rights –10.0 Fiscal Freedom +21.3 Business Freedom +18.7 Trade Freedom +15.2
Freedom from –6.0 Government –19.4 Labor Freedom +20.2 Investment Freedom +10.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +32.7 Financial Freedom 0
Property Rights +5.0 Fiscal Freedom +53.9 Business Freedom +19.5 Trade Freedom –22.4
Freedom from +16.0 Government –3.4 Labor Freedom –4.2 Investment Freedom +20.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +11.7 Financial Freedom +10.0
Latvia’s top individual income tax rate is 24 percent, and its top corporate tax rate is 15 percent.
Other taxes include a value-added tax and a tax on capital gains. The overall tax burden equals
27.6 percent of gross domestic product. Public expenditures correspond to 36.9 percent of total
domestic production, and public debt equals 32 percent of gross domestic output.
Property Rights 0 Fiscal Freedom +6.4 Business Freedom +12.1 Trade Freedom +33.0
Freedom from +3.0 Government +8.4 Labor Freedom –2.0 Investment Freedom +35.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +42.7 Financial Freedom 0
Lunchanged
ebanon’s economic freedom score is 59.3, making its econo-
my the 94th freest in the 2015 Index. Its score is essentially
from last year, with a loss of 0.1 point reflecting
Freedom Trend
62
declines in the control of government spending, monetary
freedom, and business freedom that offset improvements in
61
freedom from corruption, labor freedom, and fiscal freedom.
Lebanon is ranked 10th out of 15 countries in the Middle
East/North Africa region, and its overall score is below the
60
world average.
Political instability and diminishing confidence in the domes-
tic economy reflect the slow degradation of Lebanon’s eco- 59
nomic freedom over the past five years. A decline of 0.8 point
since 2011 reflects deteriorations in four of the 10 economic
58
freedoms, including property rights, monetary freedom, and
trade freedom. 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Property Rights –30.0 Fiscal Freedom –6.7 Business Freedom –15.3 Trade Freedom +0.8
Freedom from +18.0 Government –9.3 Labor Freedom +1.5 Investment Freedom +10.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +5.6 Financial Freedom –10.0
Property Rights –15.0 Fiscal Freedom +9.4 Business Freedom –0.3 Trade Freedom +19.6
Freedom from +19.0 Government –38.7 Labor Freedom –8.0 Investment Freedom –5.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +9.9 Financial Freedom +10.0
Lhigher
iberia’s economic freedom score is 52.7, making its econo-
my the 141st freest in the 2015 Index. Its score is 0.3 point
than last year, reflecting improvements in freedom
Freedom Trend
56
from corruption and trade freedom that offset declines in six
of the 10 economic freedoms, including property rights, labor 54
freedom, and business freedom. Liberia is ranked 31st out of
46 countries in the Sub-Saharan Africa region, and its overall 52
Property Rights 0 Fiscal Freedom +9.2 Business Freedom +19.9 Trade Freedom +20.6
Freedom from +17.0 Government –27.3 Labor Freedom –5.9 Investment Freedom +10.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +2.6 Financial Freedom 0
Property Rights n/a Fiscal Freedom n/a Business Freedom n/a Trade Freedom n/a
Freedom from n/a Government n/a Labor Freedom n/a Investment Freedom n/a
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom n/a Financial Freedom n/a
Property Rights n/a Fiscal Freedom n/a Business Freedom n/a Trade Freedom n/a
Freedom from n/a Government n/a Labor Freedom n/a Investment Freedom n/a
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom n/a Financial Freedom n/a
Property Rights +10.0 Fiscal Freedom +16.3 Business Freedom +14.9 Trade Freedom +23.0
Freedom from +27.0 Government –1.1 Labor Freedom +6.2 Investment Freedom +30.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +68.3 Financial Freedom +50.0
Property Rights 0 Fiscal Freedom +15.7 Business Freedom –13.7 Trade Freedom +9.0
Freedom from –10.0 Government +5.1 Labor Freedom –9.3 Investment Freedom +25.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom –4.0 Financial Freedom +10.0
Property Rights +5.0 Fiscal Freedom +10.4 Business Freedom +24.2 Trade Freedom +23.2
Freedom from +11.0 Government +2.3 Labor Freedom +14.5 Investment Freedom +10.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +1.8 Financial Freedom –10.0
Property Rights +15.0 Fiscal Freedom +16.2 Business Freedom –7.7 Trade Freedom +34.2
Freedom from +18.0 Government +6.8 Labor Freedom –3.8 Investment Freedom 0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +5.2 Financial Freedom +20.0
Property Rights –10.0 Fiscal Freedom +9.2 Business Freedom –5.9 Trade Freedom +8.2
Freedom from +7.0 Government –15.1 Labor Freedom +5.2 Investment Freedom +5.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom –6.4 Financial Freedom 0
Property Rights –15.0 Fiscal Freedom +10.3 Business Freedom +8.5 Trade Freedom +13.0
Freedom from –20.0 Government –4.3 Labor Freedom +3.7 Investment Freedom –15.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom –1.7 Financial Freedom +10.0
Tincreased
he Maldives’ economic freedom score is 53.4, making its
economy the 134th freest in the 2015 Index. Its score has
by 2.4 points, reflecting improvements in six of the
Freedom Trend
56
10 economic freedoms, including the control of government
spending, investment freedom, property rights, and mone- 54
tary freedom. The country has recorded its highest economic
freedom score ever in this year’s Index. Ranked 28th out of 42
52
countries in the Asia–Pacific region, its overall score remains
below the world and regional averages.
50
The Maldives is heavily dependent on fishing and tourism
and has yet to achieve the benefits of diversification that
48
follow from higher levels of economic freedom. A 5.0-point
advance in its economic freedom score over the past five
years has enabled the country to move out of the “repressed” 46
category, but this advance has been led in large measure by 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
a nearly 50-point improvement in government spending,
meaning that improvements have been concentrated and not
broad-based.
Country Comparisons
Weaknesses in the rule of law and protectionist measures Country 53.4
that keep the domestic economy relatively closed continue
to hold back economic development in the Maldives. Tariffs World
60.4
are over 20 percent. Political unrest and a strict investment Average
regime deter potential foreign investors. The island econo- Regional
my’s political situation undermines the judiciary and has led Average 58.8
to increased perceptions of corruption. A more broad-based
Free
commitment to institutional and structural reforms is neces- Economies 84.6
sary to allow the progress made in advancing economic free-
0 20 40 60 80 100
dom in recent years to bear fruit.
BACKGROUND: The military forced President Mohammed
Nasheed to step down in February 2012 after several weeks of Quick Facts
anti-government street protests instigated by former dictator Population: 0.3 million
Maumoon Abdul Gayoom. In November 2013, Gayoom’s half- GDP (PPP): $3.1 billion
brother Abdulla Yameen was elected, putting an end to nearly 3.7% growth in 2013
two years of political turmoil. Tourism is the centerpiece of 5-year compound annual growth 2.8%
the economy, contributing 28 percent of GDP and over 90 per- $9,173 per capita
cent of government tax revenue. Unemployment: 11.7%
Inflation (CPI): 4.0%
FDI Inflow: $325.3 million
Public Debt: 80.7% of GDP
How Do We Measure Economic Freedom?
See page 475 for an explanation of the methodology 2013 data unless otherwise noted.
or visit the Index Web site at heritage.org/index. Data compiled as of September 2014.
307
MALDIVES (continued)
THE TEN ECONOMIC FREEDOMS
1–Year
Score Country World Average Rank Change
Property Rights –5.0 Fiscal Freedom –0.3 Business Freedom +2.6 Trade Freedom +3.8
Freedom from –11.1 Government +50.6 Labor Freedom –16.7 Investment Freedom 0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom –2.4 Financial Freedom 0
Property Rights –5.0 Fiscal Freedom +20.7 Business Freedom –7.8 Trade Freedom +8.2
Freedom from +18.0 Government +8.6 Labor Freedom –12.6 Investment Freedom –10.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom –1.0 Financial Freedom +10.0
Property Rights +25.0 Fiscal Freedom –5.1 Business Freedom –9.0 Trade Freedom +24.4
Freedom from +46.0 Government –7.4 Labor Freedom –4.4 Investment Freedom +10.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +8.4 Financial Freedom +10.0
Property Rights –5.0 Fiscal Freedom +30.4 Business Freedom –4.5 Trade Freedom +14.0
Freedom from 0 Government –20.5 Labor Freedom +5.1 Investment Freedom +20.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +7.0 Financial Freedom +30.0
Property Rights –5.0 Fiscal Freedom +15.9 Business Freedom –7.0 Trade Freedom +31.4
Freedom from +2.0 Government +2.3 Labor Freedom –8.2 Investment Freedom +35.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +4.0 Financial Freedom 0
Property Rights –20.0 Fiscal Freedom +5.4 Business Freedom +16.5 Trade Freedom +19.4
Freedom from –16.0 Government –8.8 Labor Freedom –1.5 Investment Freedom 0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +9.8 Financial Freedom +30.0
Property Rights 0 Fiscal Freedom –4.2 Business Freedom –8.8 Trade Freedom 0
Freedom from 0 Government 0 Labor Freedom –3.2 Investment Freedom –5.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +0.2 Financial Freedom 0
Property Rights –10.0 Fiscal Freedom +47.8 Business Freedom –3.2 Trade Freedom +62.2
Freedom from +25.0 Government –20.3 Labor Freedom –24.2 Investment Freedom +20.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +76.1 Financial Freedom +40.0
Property Rights –40.0 Fiscal Freedom +36.3 Business Freedom –1.8 Trade Freedom +19.8
Freedom from –12.0 Government +18.3 Labor Freedom +12.3 Investment Freedom –20.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +69.2 Financial Freedom +10.0
Property Rights 0 Fiscal Freedom +3.5 Business Freedom +8.4 Trade Freedom +4.6
Freedom from +11.0 Government –8.6 Labor Freedom +20.3 Investment Freedom +25.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +0.8 Financial Freedom 0
Property Rights –30.0 Fiscal Freedom +13.4 Business Freedom –1.2 Trade Freedom +28.4
Freedom from –13.0 Government –11.8 Labor Freedom –8.7 Investment Freedom 0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +6.9 Financial Freedom +10.0
Saharan Africa region, and its overall score is just below the
56
regional average.
Relative peace after years of civil war and the discovery of 55
promising natural gas reserves have propelled Mozambique’s
economic growth in recent years, but improvements in eco- 54
nomic freedom have not followed. Over the past five years,
economic freedom in Mozambique has declined by 2.0 points, 53
with losses in a majority of the 10 factors. Particularly worry- 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
ing is a large score decline in the management of government
spending. Continued fiscal intransigence could undermine
the productive use of commodity windfalls.
Country Comparisons
This downward trend undermines an already weak economic Country 54.8
foundation. The judiciary remains ineffective and vulnerable
to political influence, and corruption remains pervasive in the World
60.4
public sector. Much of the population is stuck in subsistence Average
agriculture due to burdensome business regulations that Regional
inhibit entrepreneurship, and the rigid labor market exacer- Average 54.9
bates unemployment and underemployment.
Free
Economies 84.6
BACKGROUND: The Frelimo party, currently headed by
President Armando Guebuza, has been in power since inde- 0 20 40 60 80 100
pendence from Portugal in 1975. Following independence,
there was a 16-year civil war between Frelimo and the rebel
movement Renamo that ended with the Rome Peace Accords Quick Facts
in 1992. In October 2013, after several clashes with Freli- Population: 25.9 million
mo, Renamo announced that it was pulling out of the peace GDP (PPP): $28.2 billion
accord. Both parties reached a peace deal in September 2014 7.1% growth in 2013
ahead of the country’s national elections in October. Despite 5-year compound annual growth 7.0%
political instability, Mozambique has emerged as one of the $1,090 per capita
world’s fastest-growing economies and is expected to become Unemployment: 8.5%
one of the world’s largest exporters of coal and gas. Inflation (CPI): 4.2%
FDI Inflow: $5.9 billion
Public Debt: 43.3% of GDP
How Do We Measure Economic Freedom?
See page 475 for an explanation of the methodology 2013 data unless otherwise noted.
or visit the Index Web site at heritage.org/index. Data compiled as of September 2014.
329
MOZAMBIQUE (continued)
THE TEN ECONOMIC FREEDOMS
1–Year
Score Country World Average Rank Change
Property Rights 0 Fiscal Freedom +14.8 Business Freedom +5.9 Trade Freedom +0.4
Freedom from +20.0 Government –8.3 Labor Freedom +2.7 Investment Freedom +10.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +38.1 Financial Freedom +20.0
Property Rights –40.0 Fiscal Freedom –1.0 Business Freedom +9.3 Trade Freedom +35.0
Freedom from –2.0 Government –4.5 Labor Freedom +4.3 Investment Freedom –15.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom –0.6 Financial Freedom –30.0
Property Rights 0 Fiscal Freedom –0.8 Business Freedom +10.7 Trade Freedom +8.6
Freedom from +21.0 Government –2.4 Labor Freedom –3.2 Investment Freedom –25.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +3.5 Financial Freedom 0
Tdecreased
he Netherlands’ economic freedom score is 73.7, making
its economy the 17th freest in the 2015 Index. Its score has
by 0.5 point since last year, reflecting declines in
Freedom Trend
76
four of the 10 economic freedoms, including business freedom
and freedom from corruption, that outweigh a significant gain
in labor freedom. The Netherlands is ranked 8th out of 43 75
countries in the Europe region.
The Netherlands has a long history of openness to global com- 74
merce and economic freedom. Its port of Rotterdam is among
the busiest in the world and serves as a primary entry point
for goods to Europe. However, over the past five years, the 73
country’s traditional commitment to the free market has been
under stress. Since 2011, economic freedom has declined by
1.0 point, largely as a result of excessive government spending 72
and increased perceptions of corruption. 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Property Rights 0 Fiscal Freedom +18.0 Business Freedom –0.7 Trade Freedom +10.2
Freedom from –7.0 Government +17.2 Labor Freedom +4.8 Investment Freedom +20.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom –4.6 Financial Freedom –10.0
Property Rights +5.0 Fiscal Freedom +5.3 Business Freedom +10.5 Trade Freedom +8.2
Freedom from +1.0 Government –5.6 Labor Freedom +0.3 Investment Freedom +10.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +1.6 Financial Freedom –10.0
Property Rights –20.0 Fiscal Freedom +0.1 Business Freedom +3.0 Trade Freedom +31.0
Freedom from +18.0 Government +1.5 Labor Freedom –16.2 Investment Freedom +15.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +67.8 Financial Freedom +20.0
Property Rights 0 Fiscal Freedom +30.5 Business Freedom –15.8 Trade Freedom +0.6
Freedom from +24.0 Government –8.4 Labor Freedom –3.3 Investment Freedom +25.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +26.8 Financial Freedom +10.0
Property Rights –20.0 Fiscal Freedom +9.8 Business Freedom –6.7 Trade Freedom +18.8
Freedom from –25.0 Government +76.1 Labor Freedom +4.5 Investment Freedom –10.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +20.2 Financial Freedom –10.0
Property Rights 0 Fiscal Freedom –6.8 Business Freedom +22.1 Trade Freedom +20.4
Freedom from –4.0 Government +34.9 Labor Freedom –1.1 Investment Freedom +5.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom 0 Financial Freedom +10.0
Property Rights –15.0 Fiscal Freedom +23.5 Business Freedom –16.6 Trade Freedom +3.8
Freedom from –23.0 Government –8.5 Labor Freedom +2.3 Investment Freedom +15.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom –9.5 Financial Freedom –10.0
Pincreased
akistan’s economic freedom score is 55.6, making its
economy the 121st freest in the 2015 Index. Its score has
by 0.4 point since last year, reflecting improvements
Freedom Trend
57
in investment freedom and freedom from corruption that are
largely counterbalanced by deteriorations in labor freedom
and business freedom. Pakistan is ranked 25th out of 42 coun- 56
tries in the Asia–Pacific region, and its overall score is below
the world and regional averages.
55
Pakistan’s economic freedom has advanced modestly in
recent years. Since 2011, economic freedom in Pakistan has
increased by 0.5 point, led by advances in investment free- 54
dom, monetary freedom, and freedom from corruption. How-
ever, gains have been outnumbered by losses among the 10
economic freedoms. 53
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Large sections of the population live in poverty and sur-
vive through subsistence agriculture. Inefficient regulatory
agencies inhibit business formation. Access to bank credit Country Comparisons
also undermines entrepreneurship, and the financial sec-
tor’s seclusion from the outside world has slowed innovation Country 55.6
and growth.
World
BACKGROUND: Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif took office in Average 60.4
June 2013 and has had to contend with terrorism, sectarian
violence, and a well-organized insurgency along the border Regional
Average 58.8
with Afghanistan. The army stepped up its military operations
in North Waziristan in June 2014 following a major attack on Free
84.6
the Karachi airport that killed nearly 36 people. Sustained Economies
street demonstrations in August and September 2014 led by 0 20 40 60 80 100
Tehreek-e-Insaf party chief Imran Khan and religious leader
Tahir ul-Qadri have weakened Sharif and increased civil–mili-
tary tensions. Pakistan has privatized some state-run indus- Quick Facts
tries, but the economy is still heavily regulated, and poor Population: 182.6 million
security discourages foreign investment. GDP (PPP): $575.0 billion
3.6% growth in 2013
5-year compound annual growth 2.9%
$3,149 per capita
Unemployment: 5.2%
Inflation (CPI): 7.4%
FDI Inflow: $1.3 billion
Public Debt: 63.1% of GDP
How Do We Measure Economic Freedom?
See page 475 for an explanation of the methodology 2013 data unless otherwise noted.
or visit the Index Web site at heritage.org/index. Data compiled as of September 2014.
349
PAKISTAN (continued)
THE TEN ECONOMIC FREEDOMS
1–Year
Score Country World Average Rank Change
Property Rights –40.0 Fiscal Freedom +18.6 Business Freedom +10.6 Trade Freedom +33.2
Freedom from +18.0 Government +4.0 Labor Freedom –17.5 Investment Freedom –20.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +1.3 Financial Freedom –30.0
Pincreased
anama’s economic freedom score is 64.1, making its
economy the 68th freest in the 2015 Index. Its score has
by 0.7 point since last year, with improvements in
Freedom Trend
67
six of the 10 economic freedoms, led by trade freedom and
66
labor freedom, outweighing a decline in business freedom.
Panama is ranked 14th out of 29 countries in the South and
65
Central America/Caribbean region, and its overall score is
above the world average.
64
Panama’s economic freedom has stagnated over the past five
years. Large declines in property rights and the management 63
of government spending have undercut a substantial increase
in investment freedom, and Panama has dropped from 59th to 62
Property Rights –20.0 Fiscal Freedom +7.0 Business Freedom +1.5 Trade Freedom +14.0
Freedom from –15.0 Government –5.2 Labor Freedom –3.7 Investment Freedom +5.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom –12.3 Financial Freedom –20.0
Property Rights –30.0 Fiscal Freedom –14.6 Business Freedom –16.5 Trade Freedom +39.2
Freedom from –25.0 Government –0.6 Labor Freedom –6.6 Investment Freedom –15.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom –8.5 Financial Freedom 0
Pdecreased
araguay’s economic freedom score is 61.1, making its
economy the 83rd freest in the 2015 Index. Its score has
by 0.9 point since last year, with improvements in
Freedom Trend
64
freedom from corruption, business freedom, and trade free-
dom counterbalanced by declines in the management of gov-
63
ernment spending, monetary freedom, and labor freedom.
Paraguay is ranked 15th out of 29 countries in the South and
Central America/Caribbean region. As a “moderately free”
62
economy, its overall score is above the world average.
Over the past five years, Paraguay’s economic freedom has
fallen by 1.2 points with declines in five of the 10 economic 61
freedoms, including the control of public finance and business
freedom. The government has pursued a series of structural
60
reforms to enhance the entrepreneurial environment, but
inefficient business and labor regulations force much of the 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
population into the informal sector.
Economic freedom in Paraguay remains particularly chal- Country Comparisons
lenged by the weak rule of law. Political instability has under-
mined efforts to combat corruption and improve governance. Country 61.1
The previous president’s promises to address corruption have
been undermined by his constitutional removal from power. World
Average 60.4
Soya remains a vital export, facilitated by a commitment to
open trade and investment policies. Regional
59.7
Average
BACKGROUND: President Horacio Cartes of the tradition-
ally dominant Colorado Party was elected in 2013, succeed- Free
Economies 84.6
ing Federico Franco, who served temporarily following the
0 20 40 60 80 100
impeachment of left-leaning Fernando Lugo in 2012. Para-
guay was suspended from the MERCOSUR regional trade
bloc after Lugo’s impeachment. In 2013, Cartes made a deal
in which Paraguay voted to approve Venezuela as a new mem- Quick Facts
ber in exchange for readmission. Paraguay had also been sus- Population: 6.8 million
pended from summits of the South American Union but was GDP (PPP): $46.4 billion
welcomed back that same year. After a recession in 2012, the 13.0% growth in 2013
economy rebounded strongly in 2013. Corruption is pervasive, 5-year compound annual growth 4.8%
and government attempts to reduce smuggling and scrutinize $6,823 per capita
suspected terrorist groups in the tri-border area with Brazil Unemployment: 5.2%
and Argentina have met with little success. Inflation (CPI): 2.7%
FDI Inflow: $382.4 million
Public Debt: 15.2% of GDP
How Do We Measure Economic Freedom?
See page 475 for an explanation of the methodology 2013 data unless otherwise noted.
or visit the Index Web site at heritage.org/index. Data compiled as of September 2014.
355
PARAGUAY (continued)
THE TEN ECONOMIC FREEDOMS
1–Year
Score Country World Average Rank Change
Property Rights –20.0 Fiscal Freedom +5.9 Business Freedom –11.6 Trade Freedom +23.0
Freedom from +14.0 Government –9.6 Labor Freedom –1.8 Investment Freedom –15.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +15.2 Financial Freedom –10.0
Property Rights –10.0 Fiscal Freedom –2.5 Business Freedom +12.7 Trade Freedom +36.0
Freedom from +28.0 Government –1.0 Labor Freedom +17.5 Investment Freedom 0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +48.0 Financial Freedom –10.0
Tincreased
he Philippines’ economic freedom score is 62.2, making
its economy the 76th freest in the 2015 Index. Its score has
by 2.1 points since last year, with notable improve-
Freedom Trend
66
ments in financial freedom, freedom from corruption, and
labor freedom outweighing declines in business freedom and 64
the management of public spending. The Philippines ranks
13th out of 42 countries in the Asia–Pacific region, and its 62
Property Rights –20.0 Fiscal Freedom +5.9 Business Freedom +0.3 Trade Freedom +33.4
Freedom from +26.0 Government +0.9 Labor Freedom +4.8 Investment Freedom +10.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +2.1 Financial Freedom +10.0
Pbetter
oland’s economic freedom score is 68.6, making its econo-
my the 42nd freest in the 2015 Index. Its score is 1.6 points
than last year, driven by improvements in half of the
Freedom Trend
70
10 economic freedoms, especially freedom from corruption,
69
fiscal freedom, the management of government spending,
and monetary freedom. Poland is ranked 19th out of 43 coun- 68
tries in the Europe region, and its overall score is above the
world average. 67
Property Rights +10.0 Fiscal Freedom +31.1 Business Freedom –2.7 Trade Freedom +31.0
Freedom from +10.0 Government +37.5 Labor Freedom +0.4 Investment Freedom 0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +32.6 Financial Freedom +20.0
Pimproved
ortugal’s economic freedom score is 65.3, making its
economy the 64th freest in the 2015 Index. Its score has
by 1.8 points since last year, with improvements
Freedom Trend
67
in seven of the 10 economic freedoms led by labor freedom,
monetary freedom, and business freedom. Portugal is ranked 66
30th out of 43 countries in the Europe region, and its overall
score is above the world average.
65
A difficult external environment and a domestic banking cri-
sis have not prevented Portugal from advancing its economic 64
freedom. Over the past five years, it has gained 1.3 points and
moved up five spots in the rankings. Improvements in five of
63
the 10 factors have been led by a notable easing of business
and labor regulations.
62
Portugal still lags behind other European countries in many 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
areas. Government spending accounts for over half of the
domestic economy, and bailouts of financial firms have
severely strained government finances. Rigid labor regula- Country Comparisons
tions prevent the market from adjusting efficiently to changes
in labor demand. The rule of law is generally respected, but Country 65.3
budgeting problems have led to backlogs in the court system.
World
BACKGROUND: Portugal joined the European Union in Average 60.4
1986 and the eurozone in 2002. A sovereign debt crisis in
2011 threatened to sink the economy. Pedro Passos Coelho’s Regional
Average 67.0
center-right Social Democrats defeated Prime Minister Jose
Socrates’s Socialist Party in the 2011 general elections. In May Free
84.6
2011, Portugal accepted a €78 billion European Union–Inter- Economies
national Monetary Fund bailout plan that included demands 0 20 40 60 80 100
for structural reforms that would reduce public debt and
increase incentives for private investment. In 2014, the coun-
try’s highest court blocked the government from making the Quick Facts
public spending cuts required to receive the last installment Population: 10.6 million
of the bailout. The economy is based primarily on services GDP (PPP): $244.8 billion
and industrial production. Some state enterprises have been –1.4% growth in 2013
privatized. Overall unemployment decreased from 2013 to the 5-year compound annual growth –1.4%
first quarter of 2014 but remains well above pre-crisis levels. $23,068 per capita
Unemployment: 16.9%
Inflation (CPI): 0.4%
FDI Inflow: $3.1 billion
Public Debt: 128.8% of GDP
How Do We Measure Economic Freedom?
See page 475 for an explanation of the methodology 2013 data unless otherwise noted.
or visit the Index Web site at heritage.org/index. Data compiled as of September 2014.
363
PORTUGAL (continued)
THE TEN ECONOMIC FREEDOMS
1–Year
Score Country World Average Rank Change
Property Rights 0 Fiscal Freedom +0.6 Business Freedom +17.5 Trade Freedom +10.2
Freedom from –8.0 Government –7.2 Labor Freedom +1.7 Investment Freedom +20.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +5.1 Financial Freedom +10.0
Property Rights +20.0 Fiscal Freedom +12.2 Business Freedom +15.5 Trade Freedom +6.8
Freedom from –22.0 Government +24.1 Labor Freedom +11.2 Investment Freedom –5.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +7.0 Financial Freedom +20.0
Property Rights +10.0 Fiscal Freedom +47.5 Business Freedom +14.8 Trade Freedom +9.0
Freedom from +33.0 Government +10.1 Labor Freedom +13.1 Investment Freedom +10.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +77.3 Financial Freedom 0
Property Rights –30.0 Fiscal Freedom +10.6 Business Freedom –8.7 Trade Freedom +23.0
Freedom from +18.0 Government –9.3 Labor Freedom –2.9 Investment Freedom –45.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +63.9 Financial Freedom –20.0
Property Rights +20.0 Fiscal Freedom +12.3 Business Freedom +19.5 Trade Freedom +46.8
Freedom from +43.0 Government –13.0 Labor Freedom +26.5 Investment Freedom +35.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +25.2 Financial Freedom +30.0
Sdecreased
aint Lucia’s economic freedom score is 70.2, making its
economy the 35th freest in the 2015 Index. Its score has
by 0.5 point since last year, reflecting considerable
Freedom Trend
73
declines in business freedom and labor freedom that outweigh
modest improvements in five other economic freedoms. Saint
72
Lucia is ranked 3rd out of 29 countries in the South and Cen-
tral America/Caribbean region, and its overall score is above
the world average.
71
Saint Lucia’s successful tourism industry depends in part
on the country’s commitment to economic freedom and a
competitive business environment. Over the past five years, 70
advances in five of the 10 economic freedoms, including a
particularly large advance in investment freedom, have been
69
more than offset by sizeable declines in the control of govern-
ment spending, business freedom, and labor freedom. If this 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
downward trend is not reversed, Saint Lucia could fall into the
“moderately free” category. Country Comparisons
There is plenty of room for policy improvements. With high
tariffs, Saint Lucia remains relatively closed to international Country 70.2
trade, and new laws require some approval for investments.
Financial freedom is far less than some other Caribbean World
Average 60.4
islands provide.
Regional
BACKGROUND: In late 2011, former Prime Minister Kenny Average 59.7
D. Anthony and his Saint Lucia Labour Party defeated Prime
Minister Stephenson King’s more business-friendly United Free
Economies 84.6
Workers Party. Saint Lucia is a member of the Community of
0 20 40 60 80 100
Latin American and Caribbean States (CELAC) and the Carib-
bean Community (CARICOM) and home to the Organization
of Eastern Caribbean States. The economy depends primar-
ily on tourism (65 percent of GDP), banana production, and a Quick Facts
diversified light manufacturing sector. An educated workforce Population: 0.2 million
and reliable infrastructure and port facilities attract foreign GDP (PPP): $2.1 billion
investment in tourism, petroleum storage, and transship- –1.5% growth in 2013
ment. A decline in tourism that began during the recession in 5-year compound annual growth –0.4%
2009, fluctuations in banana prices, and reduced European $12,730 per capita
Union banana trade preferences have forced greater eco- Unemployment: n/a
nomic diversification in cocoa, mangos, and avocados. Violent Inflation (CPI): 1.5%
crime threatens the tourism industry. FDI Inflow: $87.9 million
Public Debt: 79.8% of GDP
How Do We Measure Economic Freedom?
See page 475 for an explanation of the methodology 2013 data unless otherwise noted.
or visit the Index Web site at heritage.org/index. Data compiled as of September 2014.
373
SAINT LUCIA (continued)
THE TEN ECONOMIC FREEDOMS
1–Year
Score Country World Average Rank Change
Property Rights 0 Fiscal Freedom +3.7 Business Freedom –12.1 Trade Freedom 0
Freedom from +3.0 Government –2.7 Labor Freedom –3.0 Investment Freedom +25.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +0.4 Financial Freedom 0
Property Rights 0 Fiscal Freedom +8.6 Business Freedom –7.4 Trade Freedom –5.2
Freedom from +1.0 Government +14.4 Labor Freedom –0.3 Investment Freedom +20.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +6.7 Financial Freedom 0
Property Rights +10.0 Fiscal Freedom +15.7 Business Freedom +3.6 Trade Freedom +75.8
Freedom from –32.0 Government +44.3 Labor Freedom –1.8 Investment Freedom +5.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +9.2 Financial Freedom –20.0
Property Rights –5.0 Fiscal Freedom +12.8 Business Freedom +20.0 Trade Freedom +15.2
Freedom from +15.0 Government +19.4 Labor Freedom –2.2 Investment Freedom +10.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +9.3 Financial Freedom 0
Sessentially
audi Arabia’s economic freedom score is 62.1, making its
economy the 77th freest in the 2015 Index. Its score is
unchanged since last year, with improvements in
Freedom Trend
70
trade freedom and freedom from corruption offset by declines
in labor freedom, business freedom, and the management of 68
public spending. Saudi Arabia is ranked 8th out of 15 countries
in the Middle East/North Africa region, and its overall score 66
Property Rights –50.0 Fiscal Freedom +0.3 Business Freedom –19.2 Trade Freedom +17.4
Freedom from –24.0 Government +15.6 Labor Freedom –12.5 Investment Freedom +10.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom –16.5 Financial Freedom 0
Sincreased
enegal’s economic freedom score is 57.8, making its
economy the 106th freest in the 2015 Index. Its score has
by 2.4 points since last year, driven by improve-
Freedom Trend
59
ments in half of the 10 economic freedoms, including freedom
from corruption, business freedom, and fiscal freedom, that 58
outweigh declines in labor freedom and the management of
government spending. Senegal is ranked 16th out of 46 coun-
57
tries in the Sub-Saharan Africa region, and its score is below
the world average.
56
After four years of little progress, economic freedom in Sen-
egal has advanced by 2.1 points since 2011, and the country has
55
recorded the fourth highest score improvement of any coun-
try graded in the 2015 Index.
54
However, the Senegalese economy remains “mostly unfree.” 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Senegal’s economic freedom remains suppressed by weak rule
of law and a poor regulatory environment. The judiciary lacks
the resources to prevent corruption and move cases efficient- Country Comparisons
ly. Registering a business is expensive, and the rigid labor code
confines many to informal employment. Country 57.8
Property Rights –30.0 Fiscal Freedom +10.6 Business Freedom –0.4 Trade Freedom +29.0
Freedom from –9.0 Government –12.4 Labor Freedom –4.2 Investment Freedom +10.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +27.2 Financial Freedom –10.0
Property Rights +5.0 Fiscal Freedom –3.5 Business Freedom +1.8 Trade Freedom +0.2
Freedom from +8.0 Government –19.2 Labor Freedom +0.4 Investment Freedom +35.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +6.4 Financial Freedom 0
Sincreased
eychelles’ economic freedom score is 57.5, making its
economy the 114th freest in the 2015 Index. Its score has
by 1.3 points since last year, with declines in labor
Freedom Trend
60
freedom and the management of government spending out-
weighed by considerable improvements in trade freedom and 58
freedom from corruption that have enabled the island econ-
omy to achieve its highest economic freedom score ever. Sey- 56
Property Rights 0 Fiscal Freedom +6.0 Business Freedom +2.2 Trade Freedom +15.6
Freedom from +9.0 Government +59.4 Labor Freedom +6.8 Investment Freedom 0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom –2.1 Financial Freedom 0
Sincreased
ierra Leone’s economic freedom score is 51.7, making its
economy the 147th freest in the 2015 Index. Its score has
by 1.2 points since last year, with improvements in
Freedom Trend
53
labor freedom, freedom from corruption, and the control of
52
government spending outweighing deteriorations in property
rights and business freedom. Sierra Leone is ranked 36th out
51
of 46 countries in the Sub-Saharan Africa region, and its over-
all score is below the world average.
50
Advances in the past two years have lifted Sierra Leone out
of the “repressed” category for the first time since 1996. Over 49
the past five years, economic freedom in Sierra Leone has
advanced by 2.1 points, led by improvements in half of the 48
Property Rights –40.0 Fiscal Freedom +29.1 Business Freedom –16.6 Trade Freedom +25.2
Freedom from +20.0 Government –4.0 Labor Freedom +9.1 Investment Freedom +5.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +18.6 Financial Freedom –10.0
Sunchanged
ingapore’s economic freedom score is 89.4, making its
economy the 2nd freest in the 2015 Index. Its score is
from last year, with gains in the management of
Freedom Trend
91
government spending, monetary freedom, and labor freedom
offset by a slightly lower score for freedom from corruption. 90
Only 0.2 point behind Hong Kong, Singapore ranks 2nd out of
42 countries in the Asia–Pacific region. 89
Already benefiting from one of the world’s highest levels of
economic freedom, Singapore has reinforced its commitment 88
to continued reform. Over the past five years, the small city
economy has advanced its economic freedom by 2.1 points, 87
the largest score increase among the 10 freest economies. Sus-
tained efforts to build a world-class financial center and fur-
86
ther open its market to global commerce have led to advances
in four of the 10 economic freedoms, including financial free- 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
dom and investment freedom.
A highly educated and motivated workforce has added to the Country Comparisons
economy’s dynamism and resilience, reinforcing Singapore’s
innovative capacity. Singaporean society has a low tolerance Country 89.4
for corruption, and the effective rule of law strongly under-
girds all aspects of economic development. More work to World
Average 60.4
reduce the state’s involvement in key sectors will be necessary
to realize continued advances in economic freedom. Regional
58.8
Average
BACKGROUND: Singapore is a nominally democratic state
that has been ruled by the People’s Action Party (PAP) since Free
Economies 84.6
independence in 1965. The PAP won 81 out of 87 seats in the
0 20 40 60 80 100
legislature in the May 2011 elections, although its percentage
of the vote ( just over 60 percent) was the lowest in history.
The opposition won another seat in 2013 during a special
election. Certain civil liberties, such as freedom of assembly Quick Facts
and freedom of speech, remain restricted, but the PAP has Population: 5.4 million
embraced economic liberalization and international trade. GDP (PPP): $348.7 billion
Singapore is one of the world’s most prosperous nations. Its 4.1% growth in 2013
economy is dominated by services, but the country is also a 5-year compound annual growth 5.2%
major manufacturer of electronics and chemicals. $64,584 per capita
Unemployment: 3.1%
Inflation (CPI): 2.4%
FDI Inflow: $63.8 billion
Public Debt: 103.8% of GDP
How Do We Measure Economic Freedom?
See page 475 for an explanation of the methodology 2013 data unless otherwise noted.
or visit the Index Web site at heritage.org/index. Data compiled as of September 2014.
391
SINGAPORE (continued)
THE TEN ECONOMIC FREEDOMS
1–Year
Score Country World Average Rank Change
Property Rights 0 Fiscal Freedom +10.4 Business Freedom –3.1 Trade Freedom +7.0
Freedom from –4.0 Government +5.7 Labor Freedom –1.3 Investment Freedom –5.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom –1.5 Financial Freedom +10.0
Sincreased
lovakia’s economic freedom score is 67.2, making its
economy the 50th freest in the 2015 Index. Its score has
by 0.8 point from last year, with improvements in
Freedom Trend
71
freedom from corruption, business freedom, and labor free-
70
dom outweighing declines in monetary freedom and the man-
agement of government spending. Slovakia is ranked 22nd out
69
of 43 countries in the Europe region, and its overall score is
higher than the world average.
68
Economic freedom has not fared as well in Slovakia as it has in
other Eastern European countries in recent years. In fact, over 67
the past five years, economic freedom in Slovakia has declined
by 2.3 points. Score declines have been concentrated largely in 66
Property Rights –20.0 Fiscal Freedom +23.1 Business Freedom –15.4 Trade Freedom +13.0
Freedom from –3.0 Government +32.8 Labor Freedom –19.2 Investment Freedom +10.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +12.2 Financial Freedom +20.0
Sdecreased
lovenia’s economic freedom score is 60.3, making its
economy the 88th freest in the 2015 Index. Its score has
by 2.4 points since last year, reflecting a combined
Freedom Trend
66
decline in the management of public spending, business free- 65
dom, and freedom from corruption that dwarfs improvements
in labor freedom and monetary freedom. Slovenia is ranked 64
36th out of 43 countries in the Europe region, and its overall
score is just below the world average. 63
Property Rights +30.0 Fiscal Freedom –11.2 Business Freedom +11.2 Trade Freedom +29.0
Freedom from +27.0 Government –34.6 Labor Freedom +16.8 Investment Freedom +40.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +20.8 Financial Freedom –20.0
Property Rights 0 Fiscal Freedom –7.8 Business Freedom +0.5 Trade Freedom +6.6
Freedom from –3.0 Government +25.7 Labor Freedom –7.7 Investment Freedom –5.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +0.8 Financial Freedom 0
Sinstability.
omalia’s economic freedom remains unrated due to a
severe lack of reliable data caused by ongoing political
The last time Somalia was fully graded and ranked
Freedom Trend
was in the 2000 Index when it received a score of only 27.8.
Violence and political unrest have prevented Somalia from
developing a coherent and coordinated domestic marketplace.
The central government controls only part of the country, and
formal economic activity is largely relegated to urban areas
Not graded this year
like Mogadishu. Progress toward economic normalization
is continuing as the government takes back more land from
the rebels.
Lack of central authority makes the rule of law inconsistent
and fragmented, with different militias, authorities, and tribes
applying varying legal frameworks. Traditional customs,
like Sharia law, have become more entrenched. Corruption 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
remains high, and a lack of transparency and formal book-
keeping means that government revenues are easily embez-
zled. Establishment of government control and security will
Country Comparisons
be vital for fostering broad-based economic freedom based on
consistent rules and regulations. Country n/a
Property Rights n/a Fiscal Freedom n/a Business Freedom n/a Trade Freedom n/a
Freedom from n/a Government n/a Labor Freedom n/a Investment Freedom n/a
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom n/a Financial Freedom n/a
Sessentially
outh Africa’s economic freedom score is 62.6, making its
economy the 72nd freest in the 2015 Index. Its score is
unchanged from last year, with a 0.1-point gain
Freedom Trend
64
reflecting improvements in labor freedom, fiscal freedom,
trade freedom, and freedom from corruption that are largely
63
offset by declines in investment freedom, business freedom,
and the management of government spending. South Africa
is ranked 6th out of 46 countries in the Sub-Saharan Africa
62
region, and its overall score is higher than the world and
regional averages.
South Africa’s large domestic market and natural resource 61
base make it a promising candidate for economic freedom–led
growth. However, recent labor unrest and falling commodity
60
prices have undermined growth and tarnished the economy’s
investment reputation. 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Property Rights 0 Fiscal Freedom +8.4 Business Freedom –12.0 Trade Freedom +33.6
Freedom from –8.0 Government +4.9 Labor Freedom +2.9 Investment Freedom –20.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +1.1 Financial Freedom +10.0
Property Rights 0 Fiscal Freedom +7.9 Business Freedom +7.5 Trade Freedom +10.2
Freedom from +9.0 Government +3.0 Labor Freedom +3.8 Investment Freedom +15.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +5.5 Financial Freedom 0
Sdecreased
ri Lanka’s economic freedom score is 58.6, making its
economy the 101st freest in the 2015 Index. Its score has
by 1.4 points since last year, with modest gains in
Freedom Trend
62
freedom from corruption and the management of government
61
spending outweighed by declines in half of the 10 economic
freedoms, including investment freedom, property rights, and
60
trade freedom. Sri Lanka is ranked 21st out of 42 countries in
the Asia–Pacific region, and its score is just below the world
59
and regional averages.
The return to relative political stability has precipitated a rise 58
in Sri Lanka’s economic freedom. Over the past five years,
economic freedom on the island has advanced by 1.5 points, 57
Property Rights –15.0 Fiscal Freedom +20.7 Business Freedom +2.5 Trade Freedom +17.4
Freedom from +7.0 Government +10.1 Labor Freedom –8.9 Investment Freedom –20.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom –10.2 Financial Freedom –30.0
Swhich
udan’s economic freedom remains unrated due to the lack
of reliable data. Those facets of economic freedom for
data are available have been individually scored. The
Freedom Trend
last time Sudan was fully graded and ranked was in the 2000
Index, when it received a score of 47.2.
Civil war, political conflict, and unrest have undermined the
development of a stable society ready for sustained economic
growth. Although the petroleum sector provides some eco-
Not graded this year
nomic stability and foreign exchange earnings, other parts of
the economy are underdeveloped and face serious structural
and institutional headwinds. Continued conflict with reb-
els and South Sudan promotes uncertainty and undermines
investor confidence.
Further diversification of the economy is undermined by
poor governance and inefficient regulations. A large informal 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
economy remains trapped by business regulations that inhibit
registration and a rigid labor market that discourages formal
hiring. High tariffs discourage imports and protect domestic
Country Comparisons
industry, while investment remains largely reserved for the
hydrocarbon sector. Country n/a
Property Rights n/a Fiscal Freedom n/a Business Freedom n/a Trade Freedom n/a
Freedom from n/a Government n/a Labor Freedom n/a Investment Freedom n/a
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom n/a Financial Freedom n/a
Sremains
uriname’s economic freedom score is 54.2, making its
economy the 129th freest in the 2015 Index. Its score
the same as last year, with improvements in half of
Freedom Trend
56
the 10 economic freedoms, including monetary freedom and
freedom from corruption, offset by declines in property rights 55
and the management of government spending. Suriname
is ranked 23rd out of 29 countries in the South and Central 54
America/Caribbean region, and its overall score is lower than
the regional average.
53
Over the past five years, Suriname’s overall economic freedom
score has risen by 1.1 points, with advances in half of the 10 52
economic freedoms. Large gains in investment freedom have
been offset by declines in the control of government spending
51
and property rights.
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Despite an export-oriented economy focused on commod-
ity and mineral trade, Suriname has yet to benefit fully
from global trade and investment. High tariff rates protect Country Comparisons
domestic businesses from competition, and regulatory inef-
ficiency often impedes overseas investment. The rule of law Country 54.2
is undermined by a growing domestic drug trade that encour-
ages corruption. World
Average 60.4
BACKGROUND: In 2010, former dictator and convicted narco- Regional
trafficker Desire “Dési” Bouterse of the National Democratic Average 59.7
Party was re-elected president for a five year term. Bouterse
first took power in 1980 when he led the “Sergeants Coup” Free
Economies 84.6
that overthrew the civilian government and installed a mili-
0 20 40 60 80 100
tary regime that ruled until 1987. In 2012, Suriname’s legisla-
ture gave him amnesty for the 1982 murders of 15 prominent
young Surinamese men who had criticized the military dicta-
torship. In 2013, Bouterse’s son Dino was arrested in Panama Quick Facts
and extradited to New York, where he pleaded guilty in 2014 Population: 0.5 million
to charges of drug-trafficking and providing material support GDP (PPP): $7.2 billion
to a terrorist organization. Suriname remains one of South 4.7% growth in 2013
America’s poorest and least-developed countries. The econ- 5-year compound annual growth 4.4%
omy is dominated by exports of natural resources, especially $13,116 per capita
alumina, oil, and gold, which are subject to boom-and-bust Unemployment: 12.4%
price fluctuations. Inflation (CPI): 1.9%
FDI Inflow: $112.8 million
Public Debt: 29.2% of GDP
How Do We Measure Economic Freedom?
See page 475 for an explanation of the methodology 2013 data unless otherwise noted.
or visit the Index Web site at heritage.org/index. Data compiled as of September 2014.
409
SURINAME (continued)
THE TEN ECONOMIC FREEDOMS
1–Year
Score Country World Average Rank Change
Property Rights –15.0 Fiscal Freedom +19.8 Business Freedom –27.8 Trade Freedom +41.2
Freedom from +26.0 Government +28.0 Labor Freedom –3.9 Investment Freedom –20.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +77.2 Financial Freedom 0
Property Rights –30.0 Fiscal Freedom +12.9 Business Freedom –9.5 Trade Freedom +18.0
Freedom from –11.0 Government –0.7 Labor Freedom +0.1 Investment Freedom –15.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +4.6 Financial Freedom –10.0
Sdecreased
weden’s economic freedom score is 72.7, making its
economy the 23rd freest in the 2015 Index. Its score has
by 0.4 point since last year, with improvements in
Freedom Trend
75
four of the 10 economic freedoms outweighed by deteriora-
tions in freedom from corruption, business freedom, and the 74
management of government spending. Sweden is ranked 12th
out of 43 countries in the Europe region, and its overall score 73
is above the world and regional averages.
Despite its well-established welfare state and large govern- 72
ment budget, Sweden has made marginal changes to improve
its economic freedom and competitiveness. Over the past five 71
years, economic freedom in Sweden has advanced by 0.8 point
with gains in five of the 10 economic freedoms, including fiscal
70
freedom, the management of government spending, monetary
freedom, trade freedom, and investment freedom. 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Property Rights +20.0 Fiscal Freedom –1.0 Business Freedom +17.9 Trade Freedom +11.0
Freedom from –1.0 Government +19.2 Labor Freedom –11.2 Investment Freedom +20.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +4.0 Financial Freedom +30.0
Sdecreased
witzerland’s economic freedom score is 80.5, making its
economy the 5th freest in the 2015 Index. Its score has
by 1.1 points since last year, with modest improve-
Freedom Trend
83
ments in business freedom, fiscal freedom, and monetary
freedom overwhelmed by a large decline in labor freedom and
82
smaller declines in freedom from corruption and the manage-
ment of government spending. Switzerland is ranked 1st out
of 43 countries in the Europe region.
81
Switzerland has enjoyed economically “free” status since
2010. With an economy that benefits from sound fundamen-
tals that include monetary stability, low public debt, and a 80
vibrant employment market, the Swiss economy has weath-
ered the global economic uncertainty well.
79
Switzerland continues to be a regional leader in economic 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
freedom. Efficient and transparent regulations underpin an
efficient business environment and support diversified eco-
nomic growth. Openness to global trade and investment is Country Comparisons
firmly institutionalized, buttressed by a dynamic financial
sector and a well-functioning independent judiciary. Switzer- Country 80.5
land has a strong tradition of reliable protection of property
rights, and the legal system is transparent and evenly applied. World
Average 60.4
Effective anti-corruption measures are in force.
Regional
BACKGROUND: Switzerland’s federal system of government Average 67.0
disperses power widely, and executive authority is exercised
collectively by the seven-member Federal Council. Switzer- Free
Economies 84.6
land has a long tradition of openness to the world but jeal-
0 20 40 60 80 100
ously guards its independence and neutrality. It did not join
the United Nations until 2002, and two referenda on mem-
bership in the European Union have failed by wide margins.
Membership in the European Economic Area was rejected by Quick Facts
referendum in 1992. Switzerland is one of the world’s richest Population: 8.0 million
and most investment-friendly countries. It has a well-devel- GDP (PPP): $371.6 billion
oped financial services industry. In addition to banking, the 2.0% growth in 2013
economy relies heavily on precision manufacturing, metals, 5-year compound annual growth 1.2%
pharmaceuticals, chemicals, and electronics. $46,430 per capita
Unemployment: 4.4%
Inflation (CPI): –0.2%
FDI Inflow: –$5.3 billion
Public Debt: 49.4% of GDP
How Do We Measure Economic Freedom?
See page 475 for an explanation of the methodology 2013 data unless otherwise noted.
or visit the Index Web site at heritage.org/index. Data compiled as of September 2014.
415
SWITZERLAND (continued)
THE TEN ECONOMIC FREEDOMS
1–Year
Score Country World Average Rank Change
Property Rights +20.0 Fiscal Freedom –7.7 Business Freedom +8.1 Trade Freedom +12.0
Freedom from –5.0 Government +11.7 Labor Freedom –1.9 Investment Freedom –5.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom –5.3 Financial Freedom +10.0
Property Rights n/a Fiscal Freedom n/a Business Freedom n/a Trade Freedom n/a
Freedom from n/a Government n/a Labor Freedom n/a Investment Freedom n/a
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom n/a Financial Freedom n/a
Tpoints
aiwan’s economic freedom score is 75.1, making its econo-
my the 14th freest in the 2015 Index. Its score is up by 1.2
from last year, with improvements in seven of the 10
Freedom Trend
78
economic freedoms led by investment freedom, the control of
government spending, and labor freedom. Taiwan is ranked 76
5th out of 42 economies in the Asia–Pacific region, and its
overall score is well above the world average.
74
Prudent macroeconomic policy within a stable legal and
monetary environment has been the key to rising levels of 72
economic freedom over the past five years. Commitment to
structural reforms and openness to global commerce have
70
enabled Taiwan to advance far into the “mostly free” category.
Recording uninterrupted years of growth in economic free-
dom since 2009, Taiwan has achieved its highest score ever in 68
the 2015 Index. 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Property Rights –20.0 Fiscal Freedom +6.3 Business Freedom +7.4 Trade Freedom +11.2
Freedom from –29.0 Government +17.2 Labor Freedom +9.1 Investment Freedom +25.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom –0.1 Financial Freedom +10.0
Tby 0.7
ajikistan’s economic freedom score is 52.7, making its
economy the 140th freest in the 2015 Index. Its score is up
point since last year, with improvements in six of the
Freedom Trend
55
10 economic freedoms, including business freedom, the con-
trol of government spending, and freedom from corruption,
54
offsetting a large decline in financial freedom. Tajikistan is
ranked 31st out of 42 countries in the Asia–Pacific region, and
its overall score is lower than the world average.
53
Tajikistan’s relatively stable overall level of economic freedom
in recent years masks large score declines in financial free-
dom and labor freedom that offset more modest gains in other 52
areas. Over the past five years, economic freedom in Tajikistan
has declined by 0.8 point, with losses in four of the 10 econom-
51
ic freedoms.
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
A five-year civil war destroyed much of Tajikistan’s economic
infrastructure and institutions. The rule of law is extremely
weak, and the president’s family dominates key positions in Country Comparisons
government and business. Poverty is rampant, and inefficient
business regulations inhibit individuals from lifting them- Country 52.7
selves from poverty. The trade environment limits investment
and the transfer of productive technologies. World
Average 60.4
BACKGROUND: The 1992–1997 civil war between an Islamist/ Regional
democratic coalition and the ruling Communists severely Average 58.8
damaged an already weak economy and caused a sharp decline
in industrial and agricultural production. Emomali Rahmon, Free
Economies 84.6
president since 1994 and re-elected to another seven-year
0 20 40 60 80 100
term in November 2013 in an election that was neither free
nor fair, controls all three branches of government. Corrup-
tion, Islamic terrorism, and narco-trafficking are endemic.
Most Tajiks survive by working in the underground economy. Quick Facts
Relations with neighboring Uzbekistan are strained. Govern- Population: 8.1 million
ment abuses of human rights are widespread. Tajikistan is GDP (PPP): $19.1 billion
heavily dependent on revenues from aluminum and cotton 7.4% growth in 2013
exports. The illegal drug trade and remittances from migrant 5-year compound annual growth 6.5%
workers, primarily in Russia, account for over 45 percent of $2,354 per capita
GDP. Tajikistan became a member of the World Trade Orga- Unemployment: 10.8%
nization in 2013. Inflation (CPI): 5.0%
FDI Inflow: $107.8 million
Public Debt: 29.2% of GDP
How Do We Measure Economic Freedom?
See page 475 for an explanation of the methodology 2013 data unless otherwise noted.
or visit the Index Web site at heritage.org/index. Data compiled as of September 2014.
421
TAJIKISTAN (continued)
THE TEN ECONOMIC FREEDOMS
1–Year
Score Country World Average Rank Change
Property Rights –10.0 Fiscal Freedom +34.6 Business Freedom +10.4 Trade Freedom +6.2
Freedom from +12.0 Government –7.4 Labor Freedom –13.9 Investment Freedom –5.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +69.6 Financial Freedom 0
Tdecreased
anzania’s economic freedom score is 57.5, making its
economy the 109th freest in the 2015 Index. Its score has
by 0.3 point since last year due to declines in trade
Freedom Trend
60
freedom and business freedom that outweigh improvements
in half of the 10 economic freedoms, including freedom from
corruption and monetary freedom. Tanzania is ranked 17th 59
out of 46 countries in the Sub-Saharan Africa region, and its
overall score is lower than the world average.
58
Productive economic growth in recent years has helped to
promote prosperity, but widespread poverty still plagues an
economy that lacks fundamental aspects of economic free- 57
dom. A greater commitment to structural and institutional
reforms is needed to create an efficient entrepreneurial envi-
ronment and open markets. 56
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Tanzania lacks an effective rule of law. Corruption remains
pervasive and has been especially noticeable in energy and
mining, which have experienced rapid growth in recent years. Country Comparisons
Business and labor regulations remain stringent and prohibi-
tively difficult for new job-creating activities. Entrepreneurs Country 57.5
find it hard to register businesses legally, and the formal labor
market’s barriers to entry inhibit full employment. Efforts to World
60.4
open the economy have experienced some success, but gov- Average
ernment bureaucracy still delays some investment. Regional
Average 54.9
BACKGROUND: President Jakaya Kikwete was elected in
December 2005 and re-elected in October 2010. Kikwete’s Free
84.6
Chama Cha Mapinduzi party has been in power since the Economies
emergence of multi-party politics in 1961. The adoption of 0 20 40 60 80 100
a limited number of market-based policies has stimulated
moderate growth, but property rights are still uncertain, and
corruption is endemic. Tanzania also has a high HIV/AIDS Quick Facts
rate and poor infrastructure. Foreign investments have led Population: 46.3 million
to improvements in efficiency. A 50-year border dispute with GDP (PPP): $79.4 billion
Malawi recently resurfaced when Malawi gave a British firm 7.0% growth in 2013
exploration rights for oil in Lake Malawi. Tanzania hosts more 5-year compound annual growth 6.7%
than half a million refugees, mainly from the Democratic $1,715 per capita
Republic of Congo and Burundi, and is a transit point for both Unemployment: 3.5%
human and drug trafficking. Inflation (CPI): 7.9%
FDI Inflow: $1.9 billion
Public Debt: 41.0% of GDP
How Do We Measure Economic Freedom?
See page 475 for an explanation of the methodology 2013 data unless otherwise noted.
or visit the Index Web site at heritage.org/index. Data compiled as of September 2014.
423
TANZANIA (continued)
THE TEN ECONOMIC FREEDOMS
1–Year
Score Country World Average Rank Change
Property Rights –20.0 Fiscal Freedom +2.1 Business Freedom –10.0 Trade Freedom +13.2
Freedom from +3.0 Government –11.3 Labor Freedom +13.5 Investment Freedom +10.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +11.2 Financial Freedom 0
Tdecreased
hailand’s economic freedom score is 62.4, making its
economy the 75th freest in the 2015 Index. Its score has
by 0.9 point since last year, with deteriorations in
Freedom Trend
66
financial freedom, property rights, and the control of govern-
ment spending outweighing small improvements in six of the 65
10 economic freedoms, including labor freedom, fiscal free-
dom, and freedom from corruption. Thailand is ranked 12th 64
out of 42 countries in the Asia–Pacific region, and its overall
score is higher than the world and regional averages.
63
Thailand’s economic freedom score has declined for three
years in a row. Since 2011, economic freedom in Thailand 62
has fallen by 2.3 points. Score declines in a majority of the 10
economic freedoms have been led by double-digit declines in
61
investment freedom and labor freedom and a nearly double-
digit drop in the control of government spending. 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Property Rights –50.0 Fiscal Freedom +6.9 Business Freedom +2.5 Trade Freedom +9.0
Freedom from –35.0 Government –11.4 Labor Freedom –13.3 Investment Freedom –5.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom –7.8 Financial Freedom +10.0
Tincreased
imor-Leste’s economic freedom score is 45.5, making its
economy the 167th freest in the 2015 Index. Its score has
by 2.3 points from last year, with improvements
Freedom Trend
47
in trade freedom, business freedom, and freedom from cor-
46
ruption that more than offset declines in labor freedom and
investment freedom. Timor-Leste is ranked 40th out of 42
45
countries in the Asia–Pacific region, and its overall score is
well below the world and regional averages.
44
Timor-Leste remains one of the world’s least economically
free countries. Its economic freedom has increased by 2.7 43
points over the past five years, but improvements have come
from such a low base that economic activity remains sup- 42
Property Rights 0 Fiscal Freedom 0 Business Freedom +12.8 Trade Freedom +6.6
Freedom from +4.0 Government –84.0 Labor Freedom +6.0 Investment Freedom +10.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom –5.4 Financial Freedom 0
Tpoints
ogo’s economic freedom score is 53.0, making its economy
the 138th freest in the 2015 Index. Its score is up by 3.1
from last year, reflecting improvements in six of the
Freedom Trend
54
10 economic freedoms, including investment freedom, busi- 53
ness freedom, freedom from corruption, and trade freedom.
Togo is ranked 30th out of 46 countries in the Sub-Saharan 52
Africa region, and its overall score is well below the world and
regional averages. 51
Togo from the “repressed” category for the first time, and it 49
has recorded its highest score ever in the 2015 Index. Over
the past five years, economic freedom in Togo has advanced 48
by 3.9 points, with relatively broad-based improvements led
47
by gains of 25 points in investment freedom and 15 points in
business freedom. 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Togo has one of West Africa’s largest natural harbors, but its
institutional framework is not fully consistent with the freer Country Comparisons
standards expected in the international marketplace. The rule
of law remains weakly enforced, and corruption is prevalent. Country 53.0
Rigid and inefficient business regulations encourage the use
of graft to expedite bureaucratic delays. World
Average 60.4
BACKGROUND: The military appointed Faure Gnassingbé Regional
to the presidency in 2005 following the death of his father. Average 54.9
Faced with sanctions by the Economic Community of West
African States and the African Union, he stepped down two Free
Economies 84.6
months later and called for an election, which he won despite
0 20 40 60 80 100
electoral irregularities. Gnassingbé was re-elected in 2010,
and his Union of Forces for Change won a majority of seats
in flawed parliamentary elections in 2013. Togo is the world’s
fourth-largest producer of phosphate. Cocoa, coffee, and cot- Quick Facts
ton generate about 40 percent of export earnings. With West Population: 6.8 million
Africa’s only deep-water port, its secure territorial waters GDP (PPP): $7.4 billion
have become a relatively safe zone for international shippers 5.6% growth in 2013
amid the regional surge in maritime piracy. Togo remains 5-year compound annual growth 4.8%
dependent on foreign assistance and continues to work on $1,084 per capita
International Monetary Fund–designed reforms. Unemployment: 8.5%
Inflation (CPI): 2.0%
FDI Inflow: $84.2 million
Public Debt: 43.3% of GDP
How Do We Measure Economic Freedom?
See page 475 for an explanation of the methodology 2013 data unless otherwise noted.
or visit the Index Web site at heritage.org/index. Data compiled as of September 2014.
429
TOGO (continued)
THE TEN ECONOMIC FREEDOMS
1–Year
Score Country World Average Rank Change
Property Rights 0 Fiscal Freedom –7.7 Business Freedom +11.9 Trade Freedom +4.8
Freedom from +19.0 Government –8.5 Labor Freedom –3.5 Investment Freedom +20.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +13.5 Financial Freedom 0
Property Rights 0 Fiscal Freedom +4.7 Business Freedom –4.9 Trade Freedom +22.4
Freedom from +11.6 Government +21.0 Labor Freedom –7.3 Investment Freedom 0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +4.6 Financial Freedom 0
67
ment of government spending, business freedom, and free-
dom from corruption outweighing a loss in fiscal freedom. 66
Trinidad and Tobago is ranked 13th out of 29 countries in the
South and Central America/Caribbean region, and its score is 65
above the world average.
64
Trinidad and Tobago has become one of the most prosper-
63
ous countries in the Caribbean Basin. Endowed with hydro-
carbon reserves, the island group has been struggling against 62
slow growth and an uptick in violence in recent years. Despite
this year’s gain, economic freedom in Trinidad and Tobago 61
has declined since 2001 by 2.4 points, largely reflecting fall- 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
ing scores in financial freedom, government spending, and
fiscal freedom.
Country Comparisons
Drug-related violence undermines the rule of law, and cor-
ruption has infiltrated the police force and increases the Country 64.1
daily cost of living. The regulatory environment remains
relatively inefficient. The economy is fairly open to trade and World
60.4
Average
investment. The financial system is undergoing moderniza-
tion in response to the recent financial upheaval and govern- Regional
59.7
ment bailouts. Average
Property Rights –40.0 Fiscal Freedom +14.5 Business Freedom –4.7 Trade Freedom +43.6
Freedom from –12.0 Government –8.2 Labor Freedom –2.4 Investment Freedom –30.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom –1.6 Financial Freedom –20.0
Thigher
unisia’s economic freedom score is 57.7, making its econo-
my the 107th freest in the 2015 Index. Its score is 0.4 point
than last year, with improvements in the control of
Freedom Trend
60
government spending, freedom from corruption, and busi-
ness freedom largely offset by declines in labor freedom and
monetary freedom. Tunisia is ranked 11th out of 15 countries 59
in the Middle East/North Africa region.
Tunisia’s transition to a more open and inclusive economy 58
has been hurt by political instability and indecisiveness in
implementing critical reforms. Over the past five years, eco-
nomic freedom in Tunisia has declined by 0.8 point, with 57
deteriorations in four of the 10 economic freedoms, includ-
ing property rights, the control of government spending, and
monetary freedom. 56
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Inconsistent rule of law and regulatory inefficiency weaken
Tunisia’s fragile economic framework. Years of corruption
under the Ben Ali regime instilled a culture of nepotism and Country Comparisons
cronyism that prevented much-needed market liberalization.
Following through on structural and institutional reforms will Country 57.7
be critical to the success of Tunisia’s ongoing transition to a
functioning market economy. World
60.4
Average
BACKGROUND: Tunisia, birthplace of the Arab Spring, oust-
ed President Zine al-Abidine Ben Ali in January 2011. Short- Regional
Average 61.6
ly thereafter, the formerly banned Islamist Ennahda Party
won the largest number of seats in the National Constituent Free
84.6
Assembly. The Ennahda government stepped aside in 2014 Economies
following the ratification of a new constitution in January, 0 20 40 60 80 100
and an interim technocratic government was installed, led
by Interim Prime Minister Mehdi Jomaa. The Nidaa Tounes
party headed by Béji Caïd Essebsi won the most seats in par- Quick Facts
liamentary elections in late 2014. Tunisia’s diverse economy is Population: 10.9 million
based on manufacturing, tourism, agriculture, and mining. An GDP (PPP): $108.4 billion
association agreement with the European Union has helped 2.7% growth in 2013
to create jobs and modernize the economy, but the EU eco- 5-year compound annual growth 2.1%
nomic slowdown has depressed demand for Tunisian-made $9,932 per capita
goods. Salafi Islamist violence has undermined foreign invest- Unemployment: 17.5%
ment and tourism. Political stability is also threatened by high Inflation (CPI): 6.1%
formal-sector unemployment. FDI Inflow: $1.1 billion
Public Debt: 44.4% of GDP
How Do We Measure Economic Freedom?
See page 475 for an explanation of the methodology 2013 data unless otherwise noted.
or visit the Index Web site at heritage.org/index. Data compiled as of September 2014.
435
TUNISIA (continued)
THE TEN ECONOMIC FREEDOMS
1–Year
Score Country World Average Rank Change
Property Rights –10.0 Fiscal Freedom +4.6 Business Freedom –3.8 Trade Freedom +15.8
Freedom from –9.0 Government +1.7 Labor Freedom +6.4 Investment Freedom –35.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom –6.3 Financial Freedom –20.0
Tdecreased
urkey’s economic freedom score is 63.2, making its
economy the 70th freest in the 2015 Index. Its score has
by 1.7 points since last year, with declines in five of
Freedom Trend
66
the 10 economic freedoms, including labor freedom, business
freedom, the control of government spending, and property 65
rights, outweighing improvements in freedom from corrup-
tion and investment freedom. Turkey is ranked 32nd out of 43 64
countries in the Europe region, and its overall score is higher
than the world average.
63
Turkey’s economic freedom score has declined by 1.0 point
since 2011. A 26-point decline in the management of gov- 62
ernment spending has offset a double-digit gain in financial
freedom. Scores for five other economic freedoms, including
61
business freedom and property rights, have also dropped.
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Turkey’s commitment to economic freedom is vital given
its position as an important emerging market. Its economic
freedom rests on relatively stable but fragile foundations. The Country Comparisons
judiciary is subject to government influence, and corruption
charges have reached high-level officials close to the govern- Country 63.2
ment. While the economy is open and boasts a burgeoning
manufacturing sector, regulatory inefficiencies and a rigid World
Average 60.4
labor market hinder business formation and full employment,
undermining more vibrant private-sector growth. Regional
67.0
Average
BACKGROUND: Turkey is a constitutionally secular repub-
lic, but Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s Justice and Free
Economies 84.6
Development Party is pushing an Islamist agenda and erod-
0 20 40 60 80 100
ing Turkey’s Euro–Atlantic connections. Large-scale protests
resulting from unpopular government decisions continued
sporadically in 2014. Economic modernization is progressing
despite clashes with the media and the slow pace of judicial Quick Facts
reform. Turkey has been a member of NATO since 1952. The Population: 76.5 million
European Union granted Turkey candidate status in 1999, GDP (PPP): $1.2 trillion
but there is strong opposition from France, Germany, and 4.3% growth in 2013
Austria. Turkey’s dispute with Cyprus has also delayed nego- 5-year compound annual growth 3.8%
tiations. Turkey’s economy has been growing steadily for the $15,353 per capita
past decade and weathered the 2008 global financial crisis Unemployment: 9.9%
relatively well. Principal exports include foodstuffs, textiles, Inflation (CPI): 7.5%
clothing, iron, and steel. FDI Inflow: $12.9 billion
Public Debt: 35.8% of GDP
How Do We Measure Economic Freedom?
See page 475 for an explanation of the methodology 2013 data unless otherwise noted.
or visit the Index Web site at heritage.org/index. Data compiled as of September 2014.
437
TURKEY (continued)
THE TEN ECONOMIC FREEDOMS
1–Year
Score Country World Average Rank Change
Property Rights –25.0 Fiscal Freedom +31.6 Business Freedom –24.0 Trade Freedom +9.8
Freedom from +40.0 Government –5.7 Labor Freedom +9.5 Investment Freedom +5.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +34.2 Financial Freedom –10.0
Tdeclined
urkmenistan’s economic freedom score is 41.4, making its
economy the 172nd freest in the 2015 Index. Its score has
by 0.8 point since last year, with improvements in
Freedom Trend
45
freedom from corruption, trade freedom, and the control of
government spending outweighed by a combined decline in 44
labor freedom, monetary freedom, and fiscal freedom. Turk-
menistan is ranked 41st out of 42 countries in the Asia–Pacif- 43
ic region, and its overall score is significantly lower than the
world and regional averages.
42
Turkmenistan is one of the world’s most closed and most cen-
tralized countries. Apart from natural gas exports, it engages 41
little with the outside world, and a large proportion of its soci-
ety lives in poverty. Since 2011, economic freedom in Turkmen-
40
istan has declined by 2.2 points, reflecting a further worsening
of already strict labor rules and increasing inflation. 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Property Rights –25.0 Fiscal Freedom +37.8 Business Freedom –25.0 Trade Freedom +40.0
Freedom from +7.0 Government +9.4 Labor Freedom –10.0 Investment Freedom –30.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +64.2 Financial Freedom 0
Uganda has mostly recovered from its past civil and political
unrest, but moderate reforms have not been enough to put Country Comparisons
the economy on the path to sustainable growth. The executive
exerts serious influence on the judiciary, and foreign aid has Country 59.7
been frozen in recent years due to corruption allegations. The
business environment impedes the formation of new busi- World
Average 60.4
nesses, and most of the largely impoverished and agricultural
population works in the informal sector. Regional
54.9
Average
BACKGROUND: President Yoweri Museveni, who seized
power in a military coup in 1986, was elected to a fourth term Free
Economies 84.6
in 2011. Museveni has been accused of aiding rebels in the
0 20 40 60 80 100
Democratic Republic of Congo. Limited market reforms have
produced more than a decade of relatively strong economic
growth. Uganda has substantial natural resources, includ-
ing copper, gold, and newly discovered oil. Infrastructure Quick Facts
projects in the transport and energy sectors have increased Population: 36.8 million
domestic demand and stimulated growth. Instability in South GDP (PPP): $54.6 billion
Sudan, Uganda’s main export partner, threatens to desta- 6.0% growth in 2013
bilize the economy. Uganda continues to play an important 5-year compound annual growth 5.1%
role in peacekeeping operations in Somalia and in the fight $1,484 per capita
against terrorism. Unemployment: 3.8%
Inflation (CPI): 5.4%
FDI Inflow: $1.1 billion
Public Debt: 33.9% of GDP
How Do We Measure Economic Freedom?
See page 475 for an explanation of the methodology 2013 data unless otherwise noted.
or visit the Index Web site at heritage.org/index. Data compiled as of September 2014.
441
UGANDA (continued)
THE TEN ECONOMIC FREEDOMS
1–Year
Score Country World Average Rank Change
Property Rights –25.0 Fiscal Freedom –8.2 Business Freedom –26.7 Trade Freedom +18.8
Freedom from –4.0 Government –0.6 Labor Freedom –0.4 Investment Freedom –10.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +9.2 Financial Freedom –10.0
Property Rights –10.0 Fiscal Freedom +16.9 Business Freedom +4.3 Trade Freedom +30.8
Freedom from +15.0 Government –19.1 Labor Freedom –7.6 Investment Freedom –35.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +78.6 Financial Freedom –20.0
TIts hemaking
United Arab Emirates’ economic freedom score is 72.4,
its economy the 25th freest in the 2015 Index.
score has increased by 1.0 point since last year, driven by
Freedom Trend
76
improvements in investment freedom, the management of
government spending, and freedom from corruption that out- 74
weigh a small combined decline in monetary freedom, trade
freedom, and fiscal freedom. The UAE is ranked 2nd out of 72
Property Rights –35.0 Fiscal Freedom –0.4 Business Freedom –10.3 Trade Freedom +5.4
Freedom from –21.0 Government +38.7 Labor Freedom +9.5 Investment Freedom +10.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +8.6 Financial Freedom 0
Tscorehemaking
United Kingdom’s economic freedom score is 75.8,
its economy the 13th freest in the 2015 Index. Its
has increased by 0.9 point since last year, reflecting
Freedom Trend
77
improvements in half of the 10 economic freedoms, including
fiscal freedom and labor freedom, that outweigh declines in
business freedom and freedom from corruption. The U.K. is 76
ranked 5th out of 43 countries in the Europe region, and its
overall score is above the world and regional averages.
75
Over the past five years, economic freedom in the U.K. has
advanced by 1.3 points. Led by a sizeable improvement stem-
ming from corporate tax rate cuts in recent years, score 74
improvements have occurred in four of the 10 economic free-
doms, including fiscal freedom and property rights.
73
Historically a champion of economic freedom in Europe, 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
the United Kingdom has developed its economy based on a
strong rule of law, an open trading environment, and one of
the world’s most advanced financial sectors. A relatively lib- Country Comparisons
eral labor market by European standards complements one
of the world’s most efficient business environments. Large Country 75.8
government spending, which still takes up nearly half of the
domestic economy, has consumed resources that could have World
60.4
enabled additional private-sector growth. Average
Property Rights 0 Fiscal Freedom +1.6 Business Freedom –8.9 Trade Freedom +10.2
Freedom from –14.0 Government –7.0 Labor Freedom –3.4 Investment Freedom +20.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom –10.6 Financial Freedom –10.0
Tis 0.7heingpoint
United States’ economic freedom score is 76.2, mak-
its economy the 12th freest in the 2015 Index. Its score
higher than last year, with modest gains in six of
Freedom Trend
79
the 10 economic freedoms, including control of government
spending, outweighing a slight decline in business freedom. 78
Property Rights –10.0 Fiscal Freedom +1.4 Business Freedom +3.8 Trade Freedom +8.6
Freedom from –17.0 Government –6.0 Labor Freedom +3.1 Investment Freedom 0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom –7.2 Financial Freedom 0
Property Rights +20.0 Fiscal Freedom –7.5 Business Freedom +2.6 Trade Freedom +18.8
Freedom from +23.0 Government –14.5 Labor Freedom –11.6 Investment Freedom +10.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +26.4 Financial Freedom –20.0
Property Rights –15.0 Fiscal Freedom +32.8 Business Freedom +33.1 Trade Freedom +19.8
Freedom from +7.0 Government +10.8 Labor Freedom –2.9 Investment Freedom –30.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +63.5 Financial Freedom 0
Property Rights 0 Fiscal Freedom +1.9 Business Freedom –17.5 Trade Freedom +12.4
Freedom from +2.5 Government –0.2 Labor Freedom –6.2 Investment Freedom +30.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +4.2 Financial Freedom 0
Property Rights –45.0 Fiscal Freedom –5.0 Business Freedom –43.4 Trade Freedom –2.2
Freedom from +10.0 Government –24.1 Labor Freedom –8.1 Investment Freedom –50.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom –9.2 Financial Freedom –50.0
Property Rights +5.0 Fiscal Freedom +10.3 Business Freedom +21.5 Trade Freedom +34.0
Freedom from +21.0 Government –10.0 Labor Freedom –1.2 Investment Freedom –15.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +11.6 Financial Freedom 0
Property Rights 0 Fiscal Freedom +13.3 Business Freedom –16.0 Trade Freedom +32.6
Freedom from +8.0 Government –13.5 Labor Freedom –19.7 Investment Freedom –20.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +26.7 Financial Freedom 0
Property Rights –20.0 Fiscal Freedom –0.5 Business Freedom +13.2 Trade Freedom +15.6
Freedom from +8.0 Government +3.2 Labor Freedom –6.6 Investment Freedom –15.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +61.0 Financial Freedom –20.0
Zincreased
imbabwe’s economic freedom score is 37.6, making its
economy the 175th freest in the 2015 Index. Its score has
by 2.1 points from last year, driven by a particu-
Freedom Trend
44
larly large gain in the control of government spending and
40
improvements in six other economic freedoms including
trade freedom and fiscal freedom. Nonetheless, Zimbabwe 36
is ranked last out of 46 countries in Sub-Saharan Africa, and
its overall score remains far below the world and region- 32
al averages.
28
After near economic collapse in the late 2000s, Zimbabwe has
24
experienced five consecutive years of improvements in eco-
nomic freedom. Over the past five years, economic freedom in 20
Zimbabwe has improved by 15.5 points, the largest improve-
ment of any nation. The biggest score gains have been in 16
monetary freedom and the control of government spending. 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
A move to dollarize the economy has brought the hyperinfla-
tion of 2008 and 2009 under control.
Country Comparisons
Nevertheless, Zimbabwe remains one of the world’s least free
economies. President Robert Mugabe’s government is corrupt Country 37.6
and inefficient. The labor market is one of the most restricted
in the world, and business licensing forces most workers to World
60.4
seek employment in the informal sector. The violent seizure Average
of land has underscored poor government land reform poli- Regional
cies and upset investor confidence in a once-vibrant agricul- Average 54.9
tural sector.
Free
Economies 84.6
BACKGROUND: When it became independent in 1965, Zim-
babwe had a diversified economy, well-developed infrastruc- 0 20 40 60 80 100
ture, and an advanced financial sector. It is now one of Africa’s
poorest countries. In July 2013, President Robert Mugabe of
the Zimbabwe African National Union–Patriotic Front was Quick Facts
re-elected to his seventh five-year term, and his party won Population: 13.1 million
three-quarters of the seats in parliament in a peaceful but GDP (PPP): $10.3 billion
flawed election. In March 2013, voters approved a new consti- 3.0% growth in 2013
tution that would roll back presidential power. After decades 5-year compound annual growth 8.9%
of corruption and mismanagement, Zimbabwe now faces a $788 per capita
cash crisis and declining support from China. In 2014, poor Unemployment: 5.5%
harvests left 2.2 million people in need of food assistance. Inflation (CPI): 1.6%
FDI Inflow: $400.0 million
Public Debt: 54.7% of GDP
How Do We Measure Economic Freedom?
See page 475 for an explanation of the methodology 2013 data unless otherwise noted.
or visit the Index Web site at heritage.org/index. Data compiled as of September 2014.
465
ZIMBABWE (continued)
THE TEN ECONOMIC FREEDOMS
1–Year
Score Country World Average Rank Change
Property Rights –40.0 Fiscal Freedom +16.5 Business Freedom –17.9 Trade Freedom +6.6
Freedom from –9.0 Government +8.9 Labor Freedom –19.1 Investment Freedom –30.0
Corruption Spending Monetary Freedom +20.7 Financial Freedom –40.0
467
Index of Economic Freedom Scores, 1995–2015
Country 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Afghanistan - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Albania 49.7 53.8 54.8 53.9 53.4 53.6 56.6 56.8 56.8 58.5 57.8 60.3 61.4 62.4 63.7 66.0 64.0 65.1 65.2 66.9 65.7
Algeria 55.7 54.5 54.9 55.8 57.2 56.8 57.3 61.0 57.7 58.1 53.2 55.7 55.4 56.2 56.6 56.9 52.4 51.0 49.6 50.8 48.9
Angola 27.4 24.4 24.2 24.9 23.7 24.3 - - - - - 43.5 44.7 46.9 47.0 48.4 46.2 46.7 47.3 47.7 47.9
Argentina 68.0 74.7 73.3 70.9 70.6 70.0 68.6 65.7 56.3 53.9 51.7 53.4 54.0 54.2 52.3 51.2 51.7 48.0 46.7 44.6 44.1
Armenia - 42.2 46.7 49.6 56.4 63.0 66.4 68.0 67.3 70.3 69.8 70.6 68.6 69.9 69.9 69.2 69.7 68.8 69.4 68.9 67.1
Australia 74.1 74.0 75.5 75.6 76.4 77.1 77.4 77.3 77.4 77.9 79.0 79.9 81.1 82.2 82.6 82.6 82.5 83.1 82.6 82.0 81.4
Austria 70.0 68.9 65.2 65.4 64.0 68.4 68.1 67.4 67.6 67.6 68.8 71.1 71.6 71.4 71.2 71.6 71.9 70.3 71.8 72.4 71.2
Azerbaijan - 30.0 34.0 43.1 47.4 49.8 50.3 53.3 54.1 53.4 54.4 53.2 54.6 55.3 58.0 58.8 59.7 58.9 59.7 61.3 61.0
The Bahamas 71.8 74.0 74.5 74.5 74.7 73.9 74.8 74.4 73.5 72.1 72.6 72.3 72.0 71.1 70.3 67.3 68.0 68.0 70.1 69.8 68.7
Bahrain 76.2 76.4 76.1 75.6 75.2 75.7 75.9 75.6 76.3 75.1 71.2 71.6 71.2 72.2 74.8 76.3 77.7 75.2 75.5 75.1 73.4
Bangladesh 40.9 51.1 49.9 52.0 50.0 48.9 51.2 51.9 49.3 50.0 47.5 52.9 46.7 44.2 47.5 51.1 53.0 53.2 52.6 54.1 53.9
Barbados - 62.3 64.5 67.9 66.7 69.5 71.5 73.6 71.3 69.4 70.1 71.9 70.0 71.3 71.5 68.3 68.5 69.0 69.3 68.3 67.9
Belarus 40.4 38.7 39.8 38.0 35.4 41.3 38.0 39.0 39.7 43.1 46.7 47.5 47.0 45.3 45.0 48.7 47.9 49.0 48.0 50.1 49.8
Belgium - 66.0 64.6 64.7 62.9 63.5 63.8 67.6 68.1 68.7 69.0 71.8 72.5 71.7 72.1 70.1 70.2 69.0 69.2 69.9 68.8
Belize 62.9 61.6 64.3 59.1 60.7 63.3 65.9 65.6 63.5 62.8 64.5 64.7 63.3 63.0 63.0 61.5 63.8 61.9 57.3 56.7 56.8
Benin - 54.5 61.3 61.7 60.6 61.5 60.1 57.3 54.9 54.6 52.3 54.0 55.1 55.2 55.4 55.4 56.0 55.7 57.6 57.1 58.8
Appendix
Croatia - 48.0 46.7 51.7 53.1 53.6 50.7 51.1 53.3 53.1 51.9 53.6 53.4 54.1 55.1 59.2 61.1 60.9 61.3 60.4 61.5
Cuba 27.8 27.8 27.8 28.2 29.7 31.3 31.6 32.4 35.1 34.4 35.5 29.3 28.6 27.5 27.9 26.7 27.7 28.3 28.5 28.7 29.6
Cyprus - 67.7 67.9 68.2 67.8 67.2 71.0 73.0 73.3 74.1 71.9 71.8 71.7 71.3 70.8 70.9 73.3 71.8 69.0 67.6 67.9
Czech Republic 67.8 68.1 68.8 68.4 69.7 68.6 70.2 66.5 67.5 67.0 64.6 66.4 67.4 68.1 69.4 69.8 70.4 69.9 70.9 72.2 72.5
Denmark - 67.3 67.5 67.5 68.1 68.3 68.3 71.1 73.2 72.4 75.3 75.4 77.0 79.2 79.6 77.9 78.6 76.2 76.1 76.1 76.3
Djibouti - - 54.5 55.9 57.1 55.1 58.3 57.8 55.7 55.6 55.2 53.2 52.4 51.2 51.3 51.0 54.5 53.9 53.9 55.9 57.5
Dominica - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 62.6 63.2 63.3 61.6 63.9 65.2 66.1
Dominican
55.8 58.1 53.5 58.1 58.1 59.0 59.1 58.6 57.8 54.6 55.1 56.3 56.8 57.7 59.2 60.3 60.0 60.2 59.7 61.3 61.0
Republic
Ecuador 57.7 60.1 61.0 62.8 62.9 59.8 55.1 53.1 54.1 54.4 52.9 54.6 55.3 55.2 52.5 49.3 47.1 48.3 46.9 48.0 49.2
Egypt 45.7 52.0 54.5 55.8 58.0 51.7 51.5 54.1 55.3 55.5 55.8 53.2 54.4 58.5 58.0 59.0 59.1 57.9 54.8 52.9 55.2
El Salvador 69.1 70.1 70.5 70.2 75.1 76.3 73.0 73.0 71.5 71.2 71.5 69.6 68.9 68.5 69.8 69.9 68.8 68.7 66.7 66.2 65.7
Equatorial
- - - - 45.1 45.6 47.9 46.4 53.1 53.3 53.3 51.5 53.2 51.6 51.3 48.6 47.5 42.8 42.3 44.4 40.4
Guinea
469
Index of Economic Freedom Scores, 1995–2015
Country 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Eritrea - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 38.5 35.3 36.7 36.2 36.3 38.5 38.9
Estonia 65.2 65.4 69.1 72.5 73.8 69.9 76.1 77.6 77.7 77.4 75.2 74.9 78.0 77.9 76.4 74.7 75.2 73.2 75.3 75.9 76.8
Ethiopia 42.6 45.9 48.1 49.2 46.7 50.2 48.9 49.8 48.8 54.5 51.1 50.9 53.6 52.5 53.0 51.2 50.5 52.0 49.4 50.0 51.5
Fiji 54.7 57.4 58.0 58.2 58.4 57.8 53.7 53.9 54.7 58.0 58.2 58.4 60.8 61.8 61.0 60.3 60.4 57.3 57.2 58.7 59.0
Finland - 63.7 65.2 63.5 63.9 64.3 69.7 73.6 73.7 73.4 71.0 72.9 74.0 74.6 74.5 73.8 74.0 72.3 74.0 73.4 73.4
France 64.4 63.7 59.1 58.9 59.1 57.4 58.0 58.0 59.2 60.9 60.5 61.1 62.1 64.7 63.3 64.2 64.6 63.2 64.1 63.5 62.5
Gabon 57.5 55.7 58.8 59.2 60.5 58.2 55.0 58.0 58.7 57.1 54.8 56.1 54.8 54.2 55.0 55.4 56.7 56.4 57.8 57.8 58.3
The Gambia - - 52.9 53.4 52.1 52.7 56.6 57.7 56.3 55.3 56.5 57.3 57.7 56.9 55.8 55.1 57.4 58.8 58.8 59.5 57.5
Georgia - 44.1 46.5 47.9 52.5 54.3 58.3 56.7 58.6 58.9 57.1 64.5 69.3 69.2 69.8 70.4 70.4 69.4 72.2 72.6 73.0
Germany 69.8 69.1 67.5 64.3 65.6 65.7 69.5 70.4 69.7 69.5 68.1 70.8 70.8 70.6 70.5 71.1 71.8 71.0 72.8 73.4 73.8
Ghana 55.6 57.7 56.7 57.0 57.9 58.1 58.0 57.2 58.2 59.1 56.5 55.6 57.6 57.0 58.1 60.2 59.4 60.7 61.3 64.2 63.0
Greece 61.2 60.5 59.6 60.6 61.0 61.0 63.4 59.1 58.8 59.1 59.0 60.1 58.7 60.6 60.8 62.7 60.3 55.4 55.4 55.7 54.0
Guatemala 62.0 63.7 65.7 65.8 66.2 64.3 65.1 62.3 62.3 59.6 59.5 59.1 60.5 59.8 59.4 61.0 61.9 60.9 60.0 61.2 60.4
Guinea 59.4 58.5 52.9 61.0 59.4 58.2 58.4 52.9 54.6 56.1 57.4 52.8 54.5 52.8 51.0 51.8 51.7 50.8 51.2 53.5 52.1
Guinea-Bissau - - - - 33.5 34.7 42.5 42.3 43.1 42.6 46.0 46.5 46.1 44.4 45.4 43.6 46.5 50.1 51.1 51.3 52.0
Guyana 45.7 50.1 53.2 52.7 53.3 52.4 53.3 54.3 50.3 53.0 56.5 56.6 53.7 48.8 48.4 48.4 49.4 51.3 53.8 55.7 55.5
Haiti 43.0 41.0 45.8 45.7 45.9 45.7 47.1 47.9 50.6 51.2 48.4 49.2 51.4 49.0 50.5 50.8 52.1 50.7 48.1 48.9 51.3
Appendix
Liberia - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 48.1 46.2 46.5 48.6 49.3 52.4 52.7
Libya - 31.7 28.9 32.0 32.3 34.7 34.0 35.4 34.6 31.5 32.8 33.2 37.0 38.7 43.5 40.2 38.6 35.9 - - -
Liechtenstein - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - n/a n/a N/A - - -
Lithuania - 49.7 57.3 59.4 61.5 61.9 65.5 66.1 69.7 72.4 70.5 71.8 71.5 70.9 70.0 70.3 71.3 71.5 72.1 73.0 74.7
Luxembourg - 72.5 72.8 72.7 72.4 76.4 80.1 79.4 79.9 78.9 76.3 75.3 74.6 74.7 75.2 75.4 76.2 74.5 74.2 74.2 73.2
Macau - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 72.0 72.5 73.1 71.8 71.7 71.3 70.3
Macedonia - - - - - - - 58.0 60.1 56.8 56.1 59.2 60.6 61.1 61.2 65.7 66.0 68.5 68.2 68.6 67.1
Madagascar 51.6 52.2 53.8 51.8 52.8 54.4 53.9 56.8 62.8 60.9 63.1 61.0 61.1 62.4 62.2 63.2 61.2 62.4 62.0 61.7 61.7
Malawi 54.7 56.2 53.4 54.1 54.0 57.4 56.2 56.9 53.2 53.6 53.6 55.4 52.9 52.7 53.7 54.1 55.8 56.4 55.3 55.4 54.8
Malaysia 71.9 69.9 66.8 68.2 68.9 66.0 60.2 60.1 61.1 59.9 61.9 61.6 63.8 63.9 64.6 64.8 66.3 66.4 66.1 69.6 70.8
Maldives - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 51.3 49.0 48.3 49.2 49.0 51.0 53.4
Mali 52.4 57.0 56.4 57.3 58.4 60.3 60.1 61.1 58.6 56.6 57.3 54.1 54.7 55.6 55.6 55.6 56.3 55.8 56.4 55.5 56.4
Malta 56.3 55.8 57.9 61.2 59.3 58.3 62.9 62.2 61.1 63.3 68.9 67.3 66.1 66.0 66.1 67.2 65.7 67.0 67.5 66.4 66.5
471
Index of Economic Freedom Scores, 1995–2015
Country 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Mauritania - 45.5 47.0 43.7 42.8 46.0 48.5 52.5 59.0 61.8 59.4 55.7 53.6 55.2 53.9 52.0 52.1 53.0 52.3 53.2 53.3
Mauritius - - - - 68.5 67.2 66.4 67.7 64.4 64.3 67.2 67.4 69.4 72.6 74.3 76.3 76.2 77.0 76.9 76.5 76.4
Mexico 63.1 61.2 57.1 57.9 58.5 59.3 60.6 63.0 65.3 66.0 65.2 64.7 66.0 66.2 65.8 68.3 67.8 65.3 67.0 66.8 66.4
Micronesia - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 51.7 50.6 50.3 50.7 50.1 49.8 49.6
Moldova 33.0 52.5 48.9 53.5 56.1 59.6 54.9 57.4 60.0 57.1 57.4 58.0 58.7 57.9 54.9 53.7 55.7 54.4 55.5 57.3 57.5
Mongolia 47.8 47.4 52.9 57.3 58.6 58.5 56.0 56.7 57.7 56.5 59.7 62.4 60.3 63.6 62.8 60.0 59.5 61.5 61.7 58.9 59.2
Montenegro - - - - - - - 46.6 43.5 - - - - - 58.2 63.6 62.5 62.5 62.6 63.6 64.7
Morocco 62.8 64.3 64.7 61.1 63.8 63.2 63.9 59.0 57.8 56.7 52.2 51.5 56.4 55.6 57.7 59.2 59.6 60.2 59.6 58.3 60.1
Mozambique 45.5 48.4 44.0 43.0 48.9 52.2 59.2 57.7 58.6 57.2 54.6 51.9 54.7 55.4 55.7 56.0 56.8 57.1 55.0 55.0 54.8
Namibia - - 61.6 66.1 66.1 66.7 64.8 65.1 67.3 62.4 61.4 60.7 63.5 61.4 62.4 62.2 62.7 61.9 60.3 59.4 59.6
Nepal - 50.3 53.6 53.5 53.1 51.3 51.6 52.3 51.5 51.2 51.4 53.7 54.4 54.1 53.2 52.7 50.1 50.2 50.4 50.1 51.3
The Netherlands - 69.7 70.4 69.2 70.2 70.4 73.0 75.1 74.6 74.5 72.9 75.4 75.5 77.4 77.0 75.0 74.7 73.3 73.5 74.2 73.7
New Zealand - 78.1 79.0 79.2 81.7 80.9 81.1 80.7 81.1 81.5 82.3 82.0 81.4 80.7 82.0 82.1 82.3 82.1 81.4 81.2 82.1
Nicaragua 42.5 54.1 53.3 53.8 54.0 56.9 58.0 61.1 62.6 61.4 62.5 63.8 62.7 60.8 59.8 58.3 58.8 57.9 56.6 58.4 57.6
Niger - 45.8 46.6 47.5 48.6 45.9 48.9 48.2 54.2 54.6 54.1 52.5 53.2 52.9 53.8 52.9 54.3 54.3 53.9 55.1 54.6
Nigeria 47.3 47.4 52.8 52.3 55.7 53.1 49.6 50.9 49.5 49.2 48.4 48.7 55.6 55.1 55.1 56.8 56.7 56.3 55.1 54.3 55.6
Norway - 65.4 65.1 68.0 68.6 70.1 67.1 67.4 67.2 66.2 64.5 67.9 67.9 68.6 70.2 69.4 70.3 68.8 70.5 70.9 71.8
Appendix
Slovak
60.4 57.6 55.5 57.5 54.2 53.8 58.5 59.8 59.0 64.6 66.8 69.8 69.6 70.0 69.4 69.7 69.5 67.0 68.7 66.4 67.2
Republic
Slovenia - 50.4 55.6 60.7 61.3 58.3 61.8 57.8 57.7 59.2 59.6 61.9 59.6 60.2 62.9 64.7 64.6 62.9 61.7 62.7 60.3
Solomon
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - 46.0 42.9 45.9 46.2 45.0 46.2 47.0
Islands
Somalia - 25.6 25.6 27.8 27.8 27.8 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
South Africa 60.7 62.5 63.2 64.3 63.3 63.7 63.8 64.0 67.1 66.3 62.9 63.7 63.5 63.4 63.8 62.8 62.7 62.7 61.8 62.5 62.6
Spain 62.8 59.6 59.6 62.6 65.1 65.9 68.1 68.8 68.8 68.9 67.0 68.2 69.2 69.1 70.1 69.6 70.2 69.1 68.0 67.2 67.6
Sri Lanka 60.6 62.5 65.5 64.6 64.0 63.2 66.0 64.0 62.5 61.6 61.0 58.7 59.4 58.4 56.0 54.6 57.1 58.3 60.7 60.0 58.6
Sudan 39.4 39.2 39.9 38.3 39.6 47.2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Suriname - 36.7 35.9 39.9 40.1 45.8 44.3 48.0 46.9 47.9 51.9 55.1 54.8 54.3 54.1 52.5 53.1 52.6 52.0 54.2 54.2
Swaziland 63.3 58.6 59.4 62.0 62.1 62.6 63.6 60.9 59.6 58.6 59.4 61.4 60.1 58.4 59.1 57.4 59.1 57.2 57.2 61.2 59.9
Sweden 61.4 61.8 63.3 64.0 64.2 65.1 66.6 70.8 70.0 70.1 69.8 70.9 69.3 70.8 70.5 72.4 71.9 71.7 72.9 73.1 72.7
Switzerland - 76.8 78.6 79.0 79.1 76.8 76.0 79.3 79.0 79.5 79.3 78.9 78.0 79.5 79.4 81.1 81.9 81.1 81.0 81.6 80.5
473
Index of Economic Freedom Scores, 1995–2015
Country 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Syria - 42.3 43.0 42.2 39.0 37.2 36.6 36.3 41.3 40.6 46.3 51.2 48.3 47.2 51.3 49.4 51.3 51.2 - - -
Taiwan 74.2 74.1 70.0 70.4 71.5 72.5 72.8 71.3 71.7 69.6 71.3 69.7 69.4 70.3 69.5 70.4 70.8 71.9 72.7 73.9 75.1
Tajikistan - - - 41.1 41.2 44.8 46.8 47.3 46.5 48.7 50.4 52.6 53.6 54.4 54.6 53.0 53.5 53.4 53.4 52.0 52.7
Tanzania 57.3 57.5 59.3 59.6 60.0 56.0 54.9 58.3 56.9 60.1 56.3 58.5 56.8 56.5 58.3 58.3 57.0 57.0 57.9 57.8 57.5
Thailand 71.3 71.0 66.1 67.3 66.9 66.6 68.9 69.1 65.8 63.7 62.5 63.3 63.5 62.3 63.0 64.1 64.7 64.9 64.1 63.3 62.4
Timor-Leste - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 50.5 45.8 42.8 43.3 43.7 43.2 45.5
Togo - - - - 48.2 46.4 45.3 45.2 46.8 47.0 48.2 47.3 49.7 48.9 48.7 47.1 49.1 48.3 48.8 49.9 53.0
Tonga - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 54.1 53.4 55.8 57.0 56.0 58.2 59.3
Trinidad and
- 69.2 71.3 72.0 72.4 74.5 71.8 70.1 68.8 71.3 71.5 70.4 70.6 69.5 68.0 65.7 66.5 64.4 62.3 62.7 64.1
Tobago
Tunisia 63.4 63.9 63.8 63.9 61.1 61.3 60.8 60.2 58.1 58.4 55.4 57.5 60.3 60.1 58.0 58.9 58.5 58.6 57.0 57.3 57.7
Turkey 58.4 56.7 60.8 60.9 59.2 63.4 60.6 54.2 51.9 52.8 50.6 57.0 57.4 59.9 61.6 63.8 64.2 62.5 62.9 64.9 63.2
Turkmenistan - - - 35.0 36.1 37.6 41.8 43.2 51.3 50.7 47.6 43.8 43.0 43.4 44.2 42.5 43.6 43.8 42.6 42.2 41.4
Uganda 62.9 66.2 66.6 64.7 64.8 58.2 60.4 61.0 60.1 64.1 62.9 63.9 63.1 63.8 63.5 62.2 61.7 61.9 61.1 59.9 59.7
Ukraine 39.9 40.6 43.5 40.4 43.7 47.8 48.5 48.2 51.1 53.7 55.8 54.4 51.5 51.0 48.8 46.4 45.8 46.1 46.3 49.3 46.9
United Arab
- 71.6 71.9 72.2 71.5 74.2 74.9 73.6 73.4 67.2 65.2 62.2 62.6 62.6 64.7 67.3 67.8 69.3 71.1 71.4 72.4
Emirates
The Index of Economic Freedom focuses on four key aspects of the economic environment over
which governments typically exercise policy control:
• Rule of law,
• Government size,
• Regulatory efficiency, and
• Market openness.
In assessing conditions in these four categories, the Index measures 10 specific components of
economic freedom, each of which is graded on a scale from 0 to 100. Scores on these 10 components
of economic freedom, which are calculated from a number of sub-variables, are equally weighted and
averaged to produce an overall economic freedom score for each economy.
The following sections provide detailed descriptions of the formulas and methodology used to
compute the scores for each of the 10 components of economic freedom.
RULE OF LAW
Property Rights
The property rights component is a qualitative assessment of the extent to which a country’s legal
framework allows individuals to freely accumulate private property, secured by clear laws that are
enforced effectively by the government. It measures the degree to which a country’s laws protect
private property rights and the extent to which those laws are respected. It also assesses the likeli-
hood that private property will be expropriated by the state and analyzes the independence of the
judiciary, the existence of corruption within the judiciary, and the ability of individuals and busi-
nesses to enforce contracts.
The more effective the legal protection of property, the higher a country’s score. Similarly, the
greater the chances of government expropriation of property or the less independent the judiciary,
the lower a country’s score.
475
Each country’s property rights score is assessed according to the following criteria:
• 100—Private property is guaranteed by the government. The court system enforces contracts
efficiently and quickly. The justice system punishes those who unlawfully confiscate private
property. There is no corruption or expropriation.
• 90—Private property is guaranteed by the government. The court system enforces contracts
efficiently. The justice system punishes those who unlawfully confiscate private property. Cor-
ruption is nearly nonexistent, and expropriation is highly unlikely.
• 80—Private property is guaranteed by the government. The court system enforces contracts
efficiently but with some delays. Corruption is minimal, and expropriation is highly unlikely.
• 70—Private property is guaranteed by the government. The court system is subject to delays
and lax in enforcing contracts. Corruption is possible but rare, and expropriation is unlikely.
• 60—Enforcement of property rights is lax and subject to delays. Corruption is possible but rare,
and the judiciary may be influenced by other branches of government. Expropriation is unlikely.
• 50—The court system is inefficient and subject to delays. Corruption may be present, and the
judiciary may be influenced by other branches of government. Expropriation is possible but rare.
• 40—The court system is highly inefficient, and delays are so long that they deter resort to the
court system. Corruption is present, and the judiciary is influenced by other branches of gov-
ernment. Expropriation is possible.
• 30—Property ownership is weakly protected. The court system is highly inefficient. Corruption
is extensive, and the judiciary is strongly influenced by other branches of government. Expro-
priation is possible.
• 20—Private property is weakly protected. The court system is so inefficient and corrupt that
outside settlement and arbitration is the norm. Property rights are difficult to enforce. Judicial
corruption is extensive. Expropriation is common.
• 10—Private property is rarely protected, and almost all property belongs to the state. The coun-
try is in such chaos (for example, because of ongoing war) that protection of property is almost
impossible to enforce. The judiciary is so corrupt that property is not protected effectively.
Expropriation is common.
• 0—Private property is outlawed, and all property belongs to the state. People do not have the
right to sue others and do not have access to the courts. Corruption is endemic.
An intermediate score such as 75 or 45 may be assigned to countries whose property rights fall
between two adjacent categories.
Sources. Unless otherwise noted, the Index relies on the following sources for information on
property rights, in order of priority: Economist Intelligence Unit, ViewsWire; Freedom House, Free-
dom in the World, 2011–2014; U.S. Department of Commerce, Country Commercial Guide, 2011–2014;
U.S. Department of State, Investment Climate Statements, 2011–2014; U.S. Department of State, Coun-
try Reports on Human Rights Practices, 2010–2013; and various news and magazine articles.
GOVERNMENT SIZE
Fiscal Freedom
The fiscal freedom component is a composite measure of the burden of taxes that reflects both
marginal tax rates and the overall level of taxation, including direct and indirect taxes imposed by all
levels of government, as a percentage of GDP. The component score is derived from three quantita-
tive sub-factors:
Each of these numerical variables is weighted equally as one-third of the component score. This
equal weighting allows a country to achieve a score as high as 67 based on two of the factors even if it
receives a score of 0 on the third.
Fiscal freedom scores are calculated with a quadratic cost function to reflect the diminishing rev-
enue returns from very high rates of taxation. The data for each sub-factor are converted to a 100-
point scale using the following equation:
Appendix 477
Country Report, “Article IV Consultation,” 2011–2014; Asian Development Bank, Key Indicators for
Asia and the Pacific, 2011–2014; United Nations Economic Commission for Latin America, Economic
Survey of Latin America and the Caribbean, 2011–2014; and individual contacts from government
agencies and multinational organizations such as the IMF and the World Bank.
Government Spending
The government spending component captures the burden imposed by government expendi-
tures, which includes consumption by the state and all transfer payments related to various entitle-
ment programs.
No attempt has been made to identify an optimal level of government spending. The ideal level
will vary from country to country, depending on factors that range from culture to geography to level
of economic development. However, government spending becomes an unavoidable burden at some
point as government grows in scope and size, resulting in both misallocation of resources and loss
of economic efficiency. Volumes of research have shown that excessive government spending that
causes chronic budget deficits and the accumulation of public debt is one of the most serious drags
on economic dynamism.
The Index methodology treats zero government spending as the benchmark. As a result, under-
developed countries, particularly those with little government capacity, may receive artificially high
scores. However, such governments, which can provide few if any public goods, are likely to receive
low scores on some of the other components of economic freedom (such as property rights, financial
freedom, and investment freedom) that measure aspects of government effectiveness.
Government spending has a major impact on economic freedom, but it is just one of many impor-
tant components. The scale for scoring government spending is non-linear, which means that gov-
ernment spending that is close to zero is lightly penalized, while levels of government spending that
exceed 30 percent of GDP lead to much worse scores in a quadratic fashion (for example, doubling
spending yields four times less freedom). Only extraordinarily large levels of government spending—
for example, over 58 percent of GDP—receive a score of zero.
The equation used for computing a country’s government spending score is:
Each of these sub-factors is converted to a scale of 0 to 100, after which the average of the con-
verted values is computed. The result represents the country’s business freedom score in compari-
son to those of other countries. Even if a country requires the highest number of procedures for
starting a business, which yields a score of zero in that factor, it could still receive a score as high
as 90 based on scores in the other nine factors. Canada, for instance, receives scores of 100 in nine
of these 10 factors, but the 14 licensing procedures required by the government equate to a score
of 64.5 for that factor.
Each sub-factor is converted to a scale of 0 to 100 using the following equation:
Labor Freedom
The labor freedom component is a quantitative measure that considers various aspects of the legal
and regulatory framework of a country’s labor market, including regulations concerning minimum
wages, laws inhibiting layoffs, severance requirements, and measurable regulatory restraints on hir-
ing and hours worked.
Appendix 479
Six quantitative sub-factors are equally weighted, with each counted as one-sixth of the labor
freedom component:5
Based on data collected in connection with the World Bank’s Doing Business report, these sub-
factors specifically examine labor regulations that affect “the hiring and redundancy of workers and
the rigidity of working hours.”6
In constructing the labor freedom score, each of the six sub-factors is converted to a scale of 0 to
100 based on the following equation:
Monetary Freedom
Monetary freedom combines a measure of price stability with an assessment of price controls.
Both inflation and price controls distort market activity. Price stability without microeconomic
intervention is the ideal state for the free market.
The score for the monetary freedom component is based on two sub-factors:
• The weighted average inflation rate for the most recent three years and
• Price controls.
The weighted average inflation rate for the most recent three years serves as the primary input
into an equation that generates the base score for monetary freedom. The extent of price controls is
then assessed as a penalty deduction of up to 20 points from the base score. The two equations used
to convert inflation rates into the final monetary freedom score are:
Weighted Avg. Inflationi = θ1 Inflationit + θ2Inflationit–1 + θ3 Inflationit–2
Monetary Freedomi = 100 – α √Weighted Avg. Inflationi – PC penaltyi
OPEN MARKETS
Trade Freedom
Trade freedom is a composite measure of the extent of tariff and non-tariff barriers that affect
imports and exports of goods and services. The trade freedom score is based on two inputs:
Different imports entering a country can, and often do, face different tariffs. The weighted aver-
age tariff uses weights for each tariff based on the share of imports for each good. Weighted average
tariffs are a purely quantitative measure and account for the calculation of the base trade freedom
score using the following equation:
• 20—NTBs are used extensively across many goods and services and/or act to impede a signifi-
cant amount of international trade.
• 15—NTBs are widespread across many goods and services and/or act to impede a majority of
potential international trade.
• 10—NTBs are used to protect certain goods and services and impede some international trade.
• 5—NTBs are uncommon, protecting few goods and services, and/or have very limited impact
on international trade.
• 0—NTBs are not used to limit international trade.
Appendix 481
We determine the extent of NTBs in a country’s trade policy regime using both qualitative and
quantitative information. Restrictive rules that hinder trade vary widely, and their overlapping and
shifting nature makes their complexity difficult to gauge. The categories of NTBs considered in our
penalty include:
As an example, Brazil received a trade freedom score of 69.6. By itself, Brazil’s weighted average
tariff of 7.7 percent would have yielded a score of 84.6, but the existence of NTBs in Brazil reduced
its score by 15 points.
Gathering tariff statistics to make a consistent cross-country comparison is a challenging task.
Unlike data on inflation, for instance, some countries do not report their weighted average tariff rate
or simple average tariff rate every year.
To preserve consistency in grading the trade freedom component, the Index uses the most recent-
ly reported weighted average tariff rate for a country from our primary source. If another reliable
source reports more updated information on the country’s tariff rate, this fact is noted, and the grad-
ing of this component may be reviewed if there is strong evidence that the most recently reported
weighted average tariff rate is outdated.
The World Bank publishes the most comprehensive and consistent information on weighted
average applied tariff rates. When the weighted average applied tariff rate is not available, the
Index uses the country’s average applied tariff rate; and when the country’s average applied tariff
rate is not available, the weighted average or the simple average of most favored nation (MFN)
tariff rates is used.8 In the very few cases where data on duties and customs revenues are not avail-
able, data on international trade taxes or an estimated effective tariff rate are used instead. In all
cases, an effort is made to clarify the type of data used in the corresponding write-up for the trade
freedom component.
Sources. Unless otherwise noted, the Index relies on the following sources to determine scores
for trade policy, in order of priority: World Bank, World Development Indicators 2014; World Trade
Organization, Trade Policy Review, 1995–2014; Office of the U.S. Trade Representative, 2014 National
Trade Estimate Report on Foreign Trade Barriers; World Bank, Doing Business 2013 and Doing Business
2014; U.S. Department of Commerce, Country Commercial Guide, 2009–2014; Economist Intelligence
Unit, Country Commerce, 2014; World Economic Forum, The Global Enabling Trade Report 2014; and
official government publications of each country.
Investment Freedom
In an economically free country, there would be no constraints on the flow of investment capital.
Individuals and firms would be allowed to move their resources into and out of specific activities,
Investment restrictions:
Appendix 483
Capital controls
• No repatriation of profits; all transactions require
government approval 25 points deducted
• Inward and outward capital movements require
approval and face some restrictions 15 points deducted
• Most transfers approved with some restrictions 5 points deducted
Up to an additional 20 points may be deducted for security problems, a lack of basic investment
infrastructure, or other government policies that indirectly burden the investment process and limit
investment freedom.
Sources. Unless otherwise noted, the Index relies on the following sources for data on capital
flows and foreign investment, in order of priority: official government publications of each country;
U.S. Department of State, Investment Climate Statements 2014; Economist Intelligence Unit, Country
Commerce, 2011–2014; Office of the U.S. Trade Representative, 2014 National Trade Estimate Report
on Foreign Trade Barriers; World Bank, Investing Across Borders, 2012; Organisation for Economic
Co-operation and Development, Services Trade Restrictiveness Index; and U.S. Department of Com-
merce, Country Commercial Guide, 2011–2014.
Financial Freedom
Financial freedom is an indicator of banking efficiency as well as a measure of independence from
government control and interference in the financial sector. State ownership of banks and other
financial institutions such as insurers and capital markets reduces competition and generally lowers
the level of access to credit.
In an ideal banking and financing environment where a minimum level of government interfer-
ence exists, independent central bank supervision and regulation of financial institutions are limited
to enforcing contractual obligations and preventing fraud. Credit is allocated on market terms, and
the government does not own financial institutions. Financial institutions provide various types
of financial services to individuals and companies. Banks are free to extend credit, accept deposits,
and conduct operations in foreign currencies. Foreign financial institutions operate freely and are
treated the same as domestic institutions.
The Index scores an economy’s financial freedom by looking at five broad areas:
These five areas are considered to assess an economy’s overall level of financial freedom that
ensures easy and effective access to financing opportunities for people and businesses in the econo-
my. An overall score on a scale of 0 to 100 is given to an economy’s financial freedom through deduc-
tions from the ideal score of 100.
Sources. Unless otherwise noted, the Index relies on the following sources for data on banking
and finance, in order of priority: Economist Intelligence Unit, Country Commerce and Financial Ser-
vices, 2011–2014; International Monetary Fund, Staff Country Report, “Selected Issues,” and Staff
Country Report, “Article IV Consultation,” 2010–2014; Organisation for Economic Co-operation and
Development, Economic Survey; official government publications of each country; U.S. Department
of Commerce, Country Commercial Guide, 2011–2014; Office of the U.S. Trade Representative, 2014
National Trade Estimate Report on Foreign Trade Barriers; U.S. Department of State, Investment Cli-
mate Statements, 2011–2014; World Bank, World Development Indicators 2014; and various news and
magazine articles on banking and finance.
Appendix 485
Equal Weight. In the Index of Economic Freedom, the 10 components of economic freedom
are equally weighted so that the overall score will not be biased toward any one component or
policy direction. It is clear that the 10 economic freedoms interact, but the exact mechanisms of
this interaction are not clearly definable: Is a minimum threshold for each one essential? Is it pos-
sible for one to maximize if others are minimized? Are they dependent or exclusive, complements
or supplements?
These are valid questions, but they are beyond the scope of our fundamental mission. The purpose
of the Index is to reflect the economic and entrepreneurial environment in every country studied in
as balanced a way as possible. The Index has never been designed specifically to explain economic
growth or any other dependent variable; that is ably done by researchers elsewhere. The raw data for
each component are provided so that others can study, weight, and integrate as they see fit.
Using the Most Currently Available Information. Analyzing economic freedom annually
enables the Index to include the most recent information as it becomes available country by country.
A data cutoff date is used so that all countries are treated fairly. As described above, the period of
study for the current year’s Index considers all information as of the last day of June of the previous
year (in this case, June 30, 2014). Any new legislative changes or policy actions effective after that
date have no positive or negative impact on scores or rankings.9
Appendix 487
Major Works Cited
The 2015 Index of Economic Freedom relies on data from multiple internationally recognized
sources to present a representation of economic freedom in each country that is as comprehensive,
impartial, and accurate as possible. The following sources provided the primary information for ana-
lyzing and scoring the 10 components of economic freedom. In addition, the authors and analysts
used supporting documentation and information from various government agencies and sites on
the Internet, news reports and journal articles, and official responses to inquiries. All statistical and
other information received from government sources was verified with independent, credible third-
party sources.
489
European Commission, Eurostat, European Statistics; available at
http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/statistics/themes.
International Monetary Fund, Article IV Consultation Staff Reports, various countries, Wash-
ington, D.C., 2010–2014; available at http://www.imf.org/external/ns/cs.aspx?id=51.
, Country Information; available at http://www.imf.org/external/country/index.htm.
, Selected Issues and Statistical Appendix, various countries, Washington, D.C., 2010–2014.
, World Economic Outlook Database, April 2014; available at
http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2014/01/weodata/index.aspx.
Low Tax Network, various countries; available at http://www.lowtax.net.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, OECD Economic Outlook, No. 94
(May 2014); available at http://www.keepeek.com/Digital-Asset-Management/oecd/economics/
oecd-economic-outlook-volume-2014-issue-1_eco_outlook-v2014-1-en#page1.
, OECD Factbook 2014; available at http://www.oecd.org/publications/factbook/.
, OECD Statistics Portal; available at http://stats.oecd.org/source/.
, OECD Web site; available at www.oecd.org/home.
PricewaterhouseCoopers, Worldwide Tax Summaries; available with registration at
http://www.pwc.com/gx/en/tax/corporate-tax/worldwide-tax-summaries/taxsummaries.jhtml.
Transparency International, The Corruption Perceptions Index, Berlin, Germany, 2000–2013;
available at http://www.transparency.org/cpi2013/.
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, World Investment Report 2014: Invest-
ing in the SDGs: An Action Plan; available at
http://unctad.org/en/pages/PublicationWebflyer.aspx?publicationid=937.
United States Central Intelligence Agency, The World Factbook 2014; available at
https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/index.html.
United States Department of Commerce, Country Commercial Guides, Washington, D.C.,
2010–2014; available at http://www.buyusainfo.net/adsearch.cfm?search_type=int&loadnav=no.
United States Department of State, Country Reports on Human Rights Practices for 2013,
released by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor, February 2014; available at
http://www.state.gov/j/drl/rls/hrrpt/humanrightsreport/index.htm#wrapper.
, Investment Climate Statements: 2010–2014, released by the Bureau of Economic and Busi-
ness Affairs; available at http://www.state.gov/e/eb/rls/othr/ics/.
United States Trade Representative, Office of the, 2014 National Trade Estimate Report on For-
eign Trade Barriers, Washington, D.C., 2014; available at
http://www.ustr.gov/about-us/press-office/reports-and-publications/2014-NTE-Report.
World Bank, World Bank World Development Indicators Online, Washington, D.C., 2014; avail-
able at http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/world-development-indicators.
, Country Briefs and Trade-at-a-Glance (TAAG) Tables, Washington, D.C., available at
http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/TOPICS/TRADE/0,,contentMDK:22421950~pa
gePK:148956~piPK:216618~theSitePK:239071,00.html.
, Doing Business, 2005–2015; available at www.doingbusiness.org.
World Trade Organization, Trade Policy Reviews, 1996–2014; available at
http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/tpr_e/tpr_e.htm.
491
Fundación Libertad Centro de Investigaciones
Mitre 170 Sobre la Libre Empresa, A.C.
2000 Rosario Sta Fe Rep. Arg. Camelia 329 Col. Florida C.P.
Teléfono: ++54 341 4105000 01030 México D.F.
Email: Teléfono: +++56.62.42.50
[email protected] Teléfono: +++ 56.62.45.00
Página Web: Email: [email protected]
http://www.libertad.org.ar Página Web:
http://www.cisle.org.mx/
Fundación Libertad y
Desarrollo Centro de Investigación y
Pedro de Villagra 2265, Estudios Legales (CITEL)
Vitacura Coronel Portillo No 521
Teléfono: ++ (56-2) 377-4800 San Isidro, Lima 27
Email: [email protected] Teléfono: ++511-222-3286
Página Web: Email: [email protected]
http://www.lyd.com Página Web: www.citel.org
The Wall Street Journal is the world’s leading business publication with more than two
million subscribers and is the largest U.S. newspaper by total paid circulation. The Wall
Street Journal franchise, with a global audience of nearly 3.6 million, comprises The Wall
Street Journal, The Wall Street Journal Asia, and The Wall Street Journal Europe. The Wall
Street Journal Online at WSJ.com is the leading provider of business and financial news and
analysis on the Web with more than one million subscribers and 36 million visitors per month
worldwide. WSJ.com is the flagship site of The Wall Street Journal Digital Network, which also
includes MarketWatch.com, Barrons.com, AllThingsD.com, and SmartMoney.com. The Journal
holds 35 Pulitzer Prizes for outstanding journalism, and, in 2014, was ranked No. 1 in BtoB’s
Media Power 50 for the 15th consecutive year.
Global Economic Freedom
59.6 59.6
59.4
59
58
57.6
57
57.1
56
1995 2000 2005 2010 2015
Source: Terry Miller and Anthony B. Kim, 2015 Index of Economic Freedom (Washington, DC: The Heritage Foundation
and Dow Jones & Company, Inc., 2015), http://www.heritage.org/index.
Chart 1 heritage.org
Visit Heritage.org/Index.
USD $24.95
ISBN 978-0-89195-287-9
52495
9 780891 952879