Congestive Heart Failure: Diagnosis, Pathophysiology, Therapy, and Implications For Respiratory Care
Congestive Heart Failure: Diagnosis, Pathophysiology, Therapy, and Implications For Respiratory Care
Congestive Heart Failure: Diagnosis, Pathophysiology, Therapy, and Implications For Respiratory Care
Introduction
Pathophysiology of Congestive Heart Failure
Evaluation of the Patient With Congestive Heart Failure
Therapy for Congestive Heart Failure
Pulmonary Complications of Congestive Heart Failure
Exacerbations of Heart Failure: Use of CPAP and NPPV
Summary
Congestive heart failure (CHF) is a common clinical disorder that results in pulmonary vascular
congestion and reduced cardiac output. CHF should be considered in the differential diagnosis of
any adult patient who presents with dyspnea and/or respiratory failure. The diagnosis of heart
failure is often determined by a careful history and physical examination and characteristic chest-
radiograph findings. The measurement of serum brain natriuretic peptide and echocardiography
have substantially improved the accuracy of diagnosis. Therapy for CHF is directed at restoring
normal cardiopulmonary physiology and reducing the hyperadrenergic state. The cornerstone of
treatment is a combination of an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor and slow titration of a
blocker. Patients with CHF are prone to pulmonary complications, including obstructive sleep
apnea, pulmonary edema, and pleural effusions. Continuous positive airway pressure and nonin-
vasive positive-pressure ventilation benefit patients in CHF exacerbations. Key words: heart failure,
diastolic dysfunction, systolic dysfunction, obstructive sleep apnea, Cheyne-Stokes respiration, respira-
tory failure, noninvasive ventilation. [Respir Care 2006;51(4):403– 412. © 2006 Daedalus Enterprises]
ing for patients with CHF accounts for 2–3% of the federal
health-care budget. The estimated direct and indirect cost
of CHF in the United States in 2005 was $27.9 billion.1
There are 2 mechanisms of reduced cardiac output and
heart failure: systolic dysfunction and diastolic dysfunc-
tion. The most common causes of systolic dysfunction
(defined by a left-ventricular ejection fraction of 50%)
are ischemic heart disease, idiopathic dilated cardiomyop-
athy, hypertension, and valvular heart disease. Diastolic
dysfunction (defined as dysfunction of left-ventricular fill-
ing with preserved systolic function) may occur in up to
40 –50% of patients with heart failure, it is more prevalent
in women, and it increases in frequency with each decade Fig. 1. Determinants of cardiac output.
of life. Diastolic dysfunction can occur in many of the
same conditions that lead to systolic dysfunction. The most standing the pathophysiologic consequences of heart fail-
common causes are hypertension, ischemic heart disease, ure and the potential treatments. Furthermore, an appreci-
hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, and restrictive cardiomyop- ation of cardiopulmonary interactions is important in our
athy. Many patients who have symptoms suggestive of understanding of heart failure. In the simplest terms, the
heart failure (shortness of breath, peripheral edema, par- heart can be viewed as a dynamic pump. It is not only
oxysmal nocturnal dyspnea) but also have preserved left- dependent on its inherent properties, but also on what is
ventricular function may not have diastolic dysfunction; pumped in and what it must pump against. The preload
instead, their symptoms are caused by other etiologies, characterizes the volume that the pump is given to send
such as lung disease, obesity, or occult coronary isch- forward, the contractility characterizes the pump, and the
emia.3 This article will review the pathophysiology, diag- afterload determines what the heart must work against.
nosis, and treatment of CHF, with specific discussion of The preload is often expressed as the end-diastolic pres-
the pulmonary manifestations and their treatment, includ- sure/volume of the left ventricle and is clinically assessed
ing noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation (NPPV) strat- by measuring the right atrial pressure. However, the pre-
egies. load is not only dependent on intravascular volume; it is
also influenced by any restriction to ventricular filling.
Pathophysiology of Congestive Heart Failure Since the heart resides in the thoracic cavity, an increased
positive pleural pressure (as seen with dynamic hyperin-
The syndrome of CHF arises as a consequence of an flation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma)
abnormality in cardiac structure, function, rhythm, or con- can reduce right-atrial pressure (which equals central ve-
duction. In developed countries, ventricular dysfunction nous pressure minus pleural pressure) and thus reduce ven-
accounts for the majority of cases and results mainly from tricular filling. The cardiac pump is a muscle and will
myocardial infarction (systolic dysfunction), hypertension respond to the volume it is given with a determined output.
(diastolic and systolic dysfunction), or in many cases both. If volume increases, so will the amount pumped out in a
Degenerative valve disease, idiopathic cardiomyopathy, normal physiologic state, to a determined plateau; this
and alcoholic cardiomyopathy are also major causes of relationship is described by the Frank-Starling law (Figs. 2
heart failure. Heart failure often occurs in elderly patients and 3).5
who have multiple comorbid conditions (eg, angina, hy- A concept that is often poorly understood is the diastolic
pertension, diabetes, and chronic lung disease). Some com- function of the heart. Diastolic function is determined by
mon comorbidities such as renal dysfunction are multifac- 2 factors: the elasticity or distensibility of the left ventri-
torial (decreased perfusion or volume depletion from cle, which is a passive phenomenon, and the process of
overdiuresis), whereas others (eg, anemia, depression, dis- myocardial relaxation, which is an active process that re-
orders of breathing, and cachexia) are poorly understood.4 quires metabolic energy.6 Relaxation of the myocardium
CHF indicates not only an inability of the heart to main- occurs in early diastole, and the “untwisting” of the left
tain adequate oxygen delivery; it is also a systemic re- ventricle is an active process that produces a suction effect
sponse attempting to compensate for the inadequacy. The that augments left-ventricular filling. Loss of normal left-
determinants of cardiac output include heart rate and stroke ventricular distensibility or relaxation by either structural
volume (Fig. 1). The stroke volume is further determined changes (eg, left-ventricular hypertrophy) or functional
by the preload (the volume that enters the left ventricle), changes (eg, ischemia) impairs ventricular filling (preload).
contractility, and afterload (the impedance of the flow from The exercise intolerance seen with diastolic dysfunction
the left ventricle). These variables are important in under- largely results from the impairment of ventricular filling,
Table 1. Modified Framingham Criteria for the Diagnosis of Table 2. New York Heart Association Classification of Congestive
Chronic Heart Failure* Heart Failure*
drive leads to a fall below the apneic threshold, which tion improves physiologic variables in both groups, but no
creates a cessation of breathing, a rise in CO2, and repe- trials in OSA have shown a mortality benefit, and its use
tition of the cycle. in CSR/CSA has not been proven beneficial.55
Nocturnal oxygen therapy is effective in patients who Patients with chronic CHF have decreased lung volume,
have CSR/CSA and CHF. Hanly et al, in a one-night study, decreased compliance, increased airway-closing pressure,
discovered that nocturnal oxygen improved oxygenation increased work of breathing, and greater oxygen consump-
and sleep architecture and decreased sleep-disordered tion.57 These pathological effects lead to the progression
breathing.49 Javaheri et al found that nasally administered and worsening of an already stressed system. Diffusion
oxygen, titrated up from 2 L/min to 4 L/min (based on capacity is also altered by CHF, but the extent of the
desaturation below 90%) decreased the incidence of CSA.50 change in diffusion capacity depends on the timing of the
Nocturnal oxygen decreases the incidence of sympathetic disease. Acute CHF usually presents with an increased
stimulation, which is a major determinant of poor prog- diffusion capacity secondary to intra-alveolar red blood
nosis in CHF.51,52 Multiple mechanisms have been hy- cells, which increase the uptake of carbon monoxide. In
pothesized to explain the effect of oxygen on CSR/CSA. contrast, patients with chronic CHF present with decreased
Administration of oxygen increases PCO2 by decreasing diffusion capacity and a restrictive lung defect, which is
tidal volume and is hypothesized to increase ventilation- probably from chronic interstitial edema and the resulting
perfusion mismatch.53,54 This rise in CO2 allows a wider interstitial fibrosis.58 Furthermore, this change in pulmo-
variation between the daytime CO2 and apneic threshold, nary mechanics is not reversed in patients who undergo
which decreases sleep-disordered breathing. cardiac transplantation.59 Pulmonary rehabilitation im-
As with OSA, the use of CPAP for CSR/CSA has mul- proves quality of life and exercise capacity in patients with
tiple physiologic effects. The majority of clinical trials chronic heart failure.
have been limited to small groups of patients and short
duration, and with varied results. However, a recent large Exacerbations of Heart Failure:
randomized controlled trial (the CANPAP trial), which Use of CPAP and NPPV
included 258 patients followed over a mean of 2 years,
provided the first long-term-follow-up data. The patients Acute pulmonary edema with respiratory distress is a
were predominantly older, white, and male, and had isch- common presentation to the hospital. The RT often be-
emic cardiomyopathy and an average ejection fraction of comes involved in NPPV, to prevent the need for intuba-
24%. Two thirds of the patients were in NYHA class II, tion. The rationale for using CPAP and NPPV in acute
and the rest were in NYHA class III or IV. Consistent with pulmonary edema is that positive pressure may limit the
previous trials, early analysis showed an improvement in decrease in functional residual capacity, improve respira-
the occurrence of central apnea, increases in mean oxygen tory mechanics and oxygenation, and decrease left-ven-
saturation, improved ejection fraction, and suppression of tricular preload and afterload. Theoretically, NPPV could
plasma catecholamine levels. However, the primary out- improve hypercarbia, with a greater decrease in work of
comes (death and cardiac transplantation) did not differ breathing.60 The patients who will most benefit from NPPV
between the 2 groups with the use of CPAP. Furthermore, are probably those presenting to the emergency room and
no difference was observed in morbidity measured by qual- who have a narrow time-window for intervention. The
ity-of-life assessment and hospitalization.55 These out- skill of the RT is critical in improving synchrony between
comes may reflect the difficulty in changing outcomes for the patient and the NPPV device.
patients who have a poor prognosis with CHF at this stage. Pang et al performed the first meta-analysis concerning
Only one prior study reported a mortality benefit with the the use of positive-pressure airway support. They found a
use of CPAP, and greater use of blockers in the treat- lower rate of intubation and a trend toward lower mortality
ment group may have accounted for the difference.56 By with CPAP.61 Later studies, however, failed to show a
decreasing sympathetic surge, CPAP may have provided a clear mortality benefit.62– 64 One of the early randomized
nonpharmacologic benefit that vanished with the increased controlled trials, by Mehta et al, raised the concern that
use of blockade in the CANPAP trial. It remains spec- NPPV might increase the rate of myocardial infarction,
ulative whether patients who have CSR/CSA and are in- compared to CPAP.65 However, the randomization of pa-
tolerant of blockers should be treated with CPAP. tients differed with the NPPV patients, such that there was
Sleep-disordered breathing occurs in approximately half a difference in the number of patients with chest pain
of patients who have chronic CHF, and the physiologic (71% vs 31%), and several patients in the NPPV group had
consequences are detrimental to the struggling cardiovas- evidence of evolving myocardial infarct at the time of
cular system. The respiratory therapist (RT) becomes in- randomization. NPPV (at 15/5 cm H2O) more rapidly im-
volved in providing means of support for patients who proved dyspnea, arterial blood gases, and vital signs than
have both OSA and CSR/CSA. Positive-pressure ventila- did CPAP (at 10 cm H2O).
22. Konstam MA. Progress in heart failure management? Lessons from effects of continuous positive airway pressure. Lancet 1991;
the real world. Circulation 2000;102(10):1076–1078. 338(8781):1480–1484.
23. The SOLVD Investigators. Effect of enalapril on mortality and the 40. Roux F, D’Ambrosio C, Mohsenin V. Sleep-related breathing dis-
development of heart failure in asymptomatic patients with reduced orders and cardiovascular disease. Am J Med 2000;108(5):396–402.
left ventricular ejection fractions. N Engl J Med 1992;327(10):685– 41. Bradley TD, Floras JS. Sleep apnea and heart failure: Part II: central
691. Erratum in: N Engl J Med 1992;327(24):1768. sleep apnea. Circulation 2003;107(13):1822–1826.
24. Abraham WT, Fisher WG, Smith AL, Delurgio DB, Leon AR, Loh 42. Sin DD, Fitzgerald F, Parker JD, Newton G, Floras JS, Bradley TD.
E, et al; MIRACLE Study Group; Multicenter InSync Randomized Risk factors for central and obstructive sleep apnea in 450 men and
Clinical Evaluation. Cardiac resynchronization in chronic heart fail- women with congestive heart failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med
ure. N Engl J Med 2002;346(24):1845–1853. 1999;160(4):1101–1106.
25. Bardy GH, Lee KL, Mark DB, Poole JE, Packer DL, Boineau R, et 43. Ho KK, Pinsky JL, Kannel WB, Levy D. The epidemiology of heart
al; Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure Trial (SCD-HeFT) Inves- failure: the Framingham Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993;22(4 Suppl
tigators. Amiodarone or an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator for A):6A–13A.
congestive heart failure. N Engl J Med 2005;352(3):225–237. Erra- 44. Johns MW. Daytime sleepiness, snoring, and obstructive sleep ap-
tum in: N Engl J Med 2005;352(20):2146. nea. The Epworth Sleepiness Scale. Chest 1993;103(1):30–36.
26. Grady KL, Dracup K, Kennedy G, Moser DK, Piano M, Stevenson 45. Mansfield DR, Gollogly NC, Kaye DM, Richardson M, Bergin P,
LW, Young JB. Team management of patients with heart failure: a Naughton MT. Controlled trial of continuous positive airway pres-
statement for healthcare professionals from The Cardiovascular Nurs- sure in obstructive sleep apnea and heart failure. Am J Respir Crit
ing Council of the American Heart Association. Circulation 2000; Care Med 2004;169(3):361–366.
102(19):2443–2456. 46. Leung RS, Tkacova R, Bradley TD. Obstructive sleep apnoea (let-
27. Blackshear JL, Kaplan J, Thompson RC, Safford RE, Atkinson EJ. ter). Lancet 1999;354(9185):1212–1213.
Nocturnal dyspnea and atrial fibrillation predict Cheyne-Stokes res- 47. Kohnlein T, Welte T, Tan LB, Elliott MW. Central sleep apnoea
pirations in patients with congestive heart failure. Arch Intern Med syndrome in patients with chronic heart disease: a critical review of
1995;155(12):1297–1302.
the current literature. Thorax 2002;57(6):547–554.
28. Javaheri S, Parker TJ, Liming JD, Corbett WS, Nishiyama H, Wexler
48. Javaheri S. A mechanism of central sleep apnea in patients with heart
L, Roselle GA. Sleep apnea in 81 ambulatory male patients with
failure. N Engl J Med 1999;341(13):949–954.
stable heart failure: types and their prevalences, consequences, and
49. Hanly PJ, Millar TW, Steljes DG, Baert R, Frais MA, Kryger MH.
presentations. Circulation 1998;97(21):2154–2159.
The effect of oxygen on respiration and sleep in patients with con-
29. Hanly PJ, Zuberi-Khokhar NS. Increased mortality associated with
gestive heart-failure. Ann Intern Med 1989;111(10):777–782.
Cheyne-Stokes respiration in patients with congestive heart failure.
50. Javaheri S, Ahmed M, Parker TJ, Brown CR. Effects of nasal O2 on
Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1996;153(1):272–276.
sleep-related disordered breathing in ambulatory patients with stable
30. Young T, Palta M, Dempsey J, Skatrud J, Weber S, Badr S. The
heart failure. Sleep 1999;22(8):1101–1106.
occurrence of sleep-disordered breathing among middle-aged adults.
51. Andreas S, Bingeli C, Mohacsi P, Luscher TF, Noll G. Nasal oxygen
N Engl J Med 1993;328(17):1230–1235.
31. The Report of an American Academy of Sleep Medicine Task Force. and muscle sympathetic nerve activity in heart failure. Chest 2003;
Sleep-related breathing disorders in adults: recommendation for syn- 123(2):366–371.
drome definition and measurement techniques in clinical research. 52. Cohn JN, Levine TB, Olivari MT, Garberg V, Lura D, Francis GS,
Sleep 1999;22(5):667–689. et al. Plasma norepinephrine as a guide to prognosis in patients with
32. Virolainen J, Ventila M, Turto H, Kupari M. Influence of negative chronic congestive heart failure. N Engl J Med 1984;311(13):819–
intrathoracic pressure on right atrial and systemic venous dynamics. 823.
Eur Heart J 1995;16(9):1293–1299. 53. Andreas S, Plock EH, Heindl S, Scholz KH. Nasal oxygen effects on
33. Buda AJ, Pinsky MR, Ingels NB Jr, Daughters GT 2nd, Stinson EB, arterial carbon dioxide pressure and heart rate in chronic heart fail-
Alderman EL. Effect of intrathoracic pressure on left ventricular ure. Am J Cardiol 1999;83(5):795–798.
performance. N Engl J Med 1979;301(9):453–459. 54. Javaheri S. Pembrey’s dream: the time has come for a long-term trial
34. Berman EJ, DiBenedetto RJ, Causey DE, Mims T, Conneff M, Good- of nocturnal supplemental nasal oxygen to treat central sleep apnea
man LS, Rollings RC. Right ventricular hypertrophy detected by in congestive heart failure. Chest 2003;123(2):322–325.
echocardiography in patients with newly diagnosed obstructive sleep 55. Bradley TD, Logan AG, Kimoff RJ, Series F, Morrison D, Ferguson
apnea. Chest 1991;100(2):347–350. K, et al; CANPAP Investigators. Continuous positive airway pres-
35. Somers VK, Dyken ME, Clary MP, Abboud FM. Sympathetic neural sure for central sleep apnea and heart failure. N Engl J Med 2005;
mechanisms in obstructive sleep apnea. J Clin Invest 1995;96(4): 353(19):2025–2033.
1897–1904. 56. Sin DD, Logan AG, Fitzgerald FS, Liu PP, Bradley TD. Effects of
36. Takasaki Y, Orr D, Popkin J, Rutherford R, Liu P, Bradley TD. continuous positive airway pressure on cardiovascular outcomes in
Effect of nasal continuous positive airway pressure on sleep apnea in heart failure patients with and without Cheyne-Stokes respiration.
congestive heart failure. Am Rev Respir Dis 1989;140(6):1578–1584. Circulation 2000;102(1):61–66.
37. Granton JT, Naughton MT, Benard DC, Liu PP, Goldstein RS, Brad- 57. Lenique F, Habis M, Lofaso F, Dubois-Rande JL, Harf A, Brochard
ley TD. CPAP improves inspiratory muscle strength in patients with L. Ventilatory and hemodynamic effects of continuous positive air-
heart failure and central sleep apnea. Am J Respir Crit Care Med way pressure in left heart failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997;
1996;153(1):277–282. 155(2):500–505.
38. Kaneko Y, Floras JS, Usui K, Plante J, Tkacova R, Kubo T, et al. 58. Wright RS, Levine MS, Bellamy PE, Simmons MS, Batra P, Steven-
Cardiovascular effects of continuous positive airway pressure in pa- son LW, et al. Ventilatory and diffusion abnormalities in potential
tients with heart failure and obstructive sleep apnea. N Engl J Med heart transplant recipients. Chest 1990;98(4):816–820.
2003;348(13):1233–1241. 59. Mettauer B, Lampert E, Charloux A, Zhao QM, Epailly E, Oswald
39. Malone S, Liu PP, Holloway R, Rutherford R, Xie A, Bradley TD. M, et al. Lung membrane diffusing capacity, heart failure, and heart
Obstructive sleep apnoea in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy: transplantation. Am J Cardiol 1999;83(1):62–67.
60. Liesching T, Kwok H, Hill NS. Acute applications of noninvasive 64. Takeda S, Takano T, Ogawa R. The effect of nasal continuous pos-
positive pressure ventilation. Chest 2003;124(2):699–713. itive airway pressure on plasma endothelin-1 concentrations in pa-
61. Pang D, Keenan SP, Cook DJ, Sibbald WJ. The effect of positive tients with severe cardiogenic pulmonary edema. Anesth Analg 1997;
pressure airway support on mortality and the need for intubation in 84(5):1091–1096.
cardiogenic pulmonary edema: a systematic review. Chest 1998; 65. Mehta S, Jay GD, Woolard RH, Hipona RA, Connolly EM, Cimini
114(4):1185–1192.
DM, et al. Randomized, prospective trial of bilevel versus continu-
62. Masip J, Betbese AJ, Paez J, Vecilla F, Canizares R, Padro J, et al.
ous positive airway pressure in acute pulmonary edema. Crit Care
Non-invasive pressure support ventilation versus conventional oxy-
Med 1997;25(4):620–628.
gen therapy in acute cardiogenic pulmonary oedema: a randomised
trial. Lancet 2000;356(9248):2126–2132. 66. Nava S, Carbone G, DiBattista N, Bellone A, Baiardi P, Cosentini
63. Philip-Joet FF, Paganelli FF, Dutau HL, Saadjian AY. Hemody- R,et al. Noninvasive ventilation in cardiogenic pulmonary edema: a
namic effects of bilevel nasal positive airway pressure ventilation in multicenter randomized trial.Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003;
patients with heart failure. Respiration 1999;66(2):136–143. 168(12):1432–1437.