3 GeologyMiningOperation PDF
3 GeologyMiningOperation PDF
3 GeologyMiningOperation PDF
1. Introduction species of palm trees. However, much of the area has been
deforested, and is currently used for agricultural purposes.
Location and Access
The Paragominas bauxite complex is located 220km south of
Belém, Northern Brazil, and 70km southwest of Paragominas,
the closest town (about 3°21’ S, 48°05’ W). Site access is from
Belém, via the BR-010 Belém–Brasília highway, and also from
the town of Paragominas. CVRD stated that local access roads
are due to be asphalt-sealed prior to production start-up. Belém
is the capital of the Pará State, with excellent aerial and river-
borne communication (Figure 1).
The climate is hot and humid. The average temperatures range The Miltônia 3 (M3) and Miltônia 5 (M5) gibbsitic bauxite
from 20°C to 33°C and the natural humidity averages 90%. There deposits have formed by deep tropical weathering of the Ipixuna
are no well-defined seasons, only very wet and less wet periods, Formation. The bauxite layer forms a nearly continuous tabular
locally known as “inverno” (or winters, December to May) and body, less than 5 m thick, but extending 20km north–south, and
“verão” (or summers, June to November). Annual precipitation as much as 8km east–west, beneath the plateau surface.
reaches 2,200 mm, with monthly averages of 180 mm. The geological profile found in drill holes, pits and trenches
The original vegetation is the equatorial latifoliated forest, with indicates that differences in composition, mineralogy, and texture
transitions to a tropical forest, dominated by low and medium have arisen from differences in the original sedimentary protolith,
size plants, and locally with very high trees, among them the as well as from the position within the weathering profile.
cedar (Cedera odera), “ipê roxo” (Tabebuia barbata), “angelim” The main factors in the bauxite formation were as follows:
(Hymenolobium petraeum), and “maçaranduba” (Manikalra
luberi). Other common species include the “cipós” and various • geologic factors: geologic stability over a long period,
Minerals within the deposit display either ‘detrital’ or ‘secondary’ Only samples from the bauxite section were submitted to the
character. Minerals that are ‘detrital’ were originally deposited laboratory, although one or two samples from the overlying and
as part of the host water-borne sediment (e.g., quartz and underlying material were also included. The crude sample and
anastase); those that are ‘secondary’ are weathering products of the +20 mesh fraction were assayed in the lab. The assay suite
kaolinite and feldspar. includes ICP determinations for Total Al2O3, Total SiO2, Fe2O3
and TiO2; and Loss on Ignition (LOI). In addition, a Parr sodium
2. Exploration hydroxide bomb was used to measure Available Al2O3 (by titration
with ZnSO4) and Reactive SiO2 (by ICP).
Drilling
Drilling at the Paragominas bauxite district started in July 2002. Quality Assurance and Quality Control
The drilling was made using triple-barrel air-flush drills. Core People from CVRD had detailed written procedures for every
drilling at the Miltônia 3 was initiated on a 1,600 m x 1,600 m operation, from drilling and sampling to sample preparation
grid, and progressed to a 200 m x 200 m centered grid (a 200 and assaying, including recommendations to minimize errors. A
m square with a central hole). In some areas, the grid was even quality control procedure was implemented during the Miltônia 3
more detailed, 100 m x 100 m and 25 m x 25 m. The Miltônia and Miltônia 5 exploration programs. The program included the
5 grid went from 800 m x 800 m to 200 m x 200 m with center following control operations and control samples:
holes. Table I lists the drilling meterages per plateau.
• mass control after crushing (5%)
Core Logging • sieve tests after pulverization (5%)
Drill core in the PVC pipe was transported to a logging facility, • coarse duplicates (5%): conducted after splitting the original
where the entire hole was laid out and logged. Measures of core sample, before the granulometric separation (sent blind to
recoveries were made by inserting a measuring tape in each end the laboratory)
of the PVC pipe and then were compared to the recovered length • pulp duplicates (5%): conducted after pulverization (blind to
of the drilled length. the laboratory)
• check samples (5%): submitted for external analysis to a
The PVC pipe was then cut longitudinally with a saw; the core secondary laboratory.
was placed into the underlying tray with a minimum amount of
disruption, and was then photographed with a digital camera 3. Resource Estimation
(one picture per drill hole). Geological Model
Logging intervals were measured to the nearest centimeter. The The geological modeling was prepared using two different
logs were general, mainly describing the rock type and color. The general mining software packages. Two methodologies were
distinction between ore and waste units was quite clear in the used for building Miltônia 3 and Miltônia 5 models where eight
drill core. lithological units were interpreted and modeled.
Table I. Drill Hole Meterages by Deposit For Miltônia 3, a Gridded Seam Model was used. The methodology
Deposit Year No.Holes Meterage (m) Grid
consists of defining the lithological contact points in the drill hole
Miltônia 3 9 131 1,600 m x 1,600 m database, then interpolation of the seam thickness, and finally
43 567 800 m x 800 m corrections of the surfaces that auto intersect. Surfaces were
2002- 741 10,223 400 m x 400 m
2005 1,087 14,724 200 m x 200 m
created and then a block model was defined.
580 8,466 200 m x 200 m Centered
28 457 100 m x 100 m For Miltônia 5, a traditional method of vertical section
128 2,159 25 m x 25 m interpretation was used. Sections north–south and east–west
Subtotal 2,616 36,727 -
were interpreted where drill holes exist. A manual interpretation
Miltônia 5 91 1,174 800 m x 800 m
2004- 561 7,638 400 m x 400 m of the lithological units was done, by “snapping” the line point to
2005 735 10,695 200 m x 200 m an existing drill hole intersection, thereby building a straight line
112 1,252 200 m x 200 m Centered
between two drill hole points. This contact line is then smoothed
Subtotal 1,499 20,759 -
using a GMP command tool that will create intermediate points
The following lithology types were logged: CAP, capeamento along the string segments and interpolate a curve, or smoothed
(overburden); BN, bauxita nodular (nodular bauxite); BC, bauxita line in between the existing points, honoring the contact
cristalizada (crystallized bauxite); LF, laterita ferruginosa information. The strings, north–south and east–west, are then
(ferruginous laterite); BM, bauxita maciça (massive bauxite), BA, used for building three-dimensional surfaces. Where lenses of
bauxita amorfa (amorphous bauxite), ARV, argila variegada material occur in between the seams, a three-dimensional solid
(mottled clays), with mixed or transition zones, like BNC, BCM modeling technique was put in place.
and BCBA. These attributes were hand-entered by a technician
into the in-house database management system. Models were extrapolated laterally up to 400 m from the last
existing drill hole, just to impose a limit for the block model.
The main factors for estimating the productivity are: the operator
skills (0.5-1.0), type of material (0.6-1.2), Slot Dozing (1.2),
side by side dozing (1.15-1.25), job efficiency (.67-.83). The
grade factor has a big influence on the productivity and can be
calculated from Figure 7.
7. Production Schedule
A simple way to calculate this productivity is to use the supplier
manual. After selecting the appropriate blade according to the
material (mainly clay), the next step is to estimate the dozing
production by the following formula:
References
1. Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy, and Petroleum, “CIM Standards on Mineral Resources and Reserves, Definitions and Guidelines: CIM
Standing Committee on Reserve Definitions”, (December 2005).
2. Caterpillar, “Caterpillar Performance Handbook”, (34 Ed. Caterpillar Inc., Peoria, Illinois, U.S.A. 1999), 1282.
3. Chiles, J.P., and Delfiner, P., Geostatistics; (New York, Wiley Press, 1999), 695.
4. Companhia Vale do Rio Doce. “Avaliação Geoestatística de Recursos – Projeto Bauxita Paragominas Depósitos Miltônia 3 e Miltônia 5”, (February
2006).
5. JORC, “Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources, and Ore Reserves (the JORC Code): The Joint Ore Reserves
Committee of The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy,” (Australian Institute of Geoscientists and Minerals Council of Australia”, December
2004).
6. Kotschoubey B., Truckenbrodt W. & Hieronymus B. 1997. Bauxite deposits of Paragominas. In: A. Carvalho, B. Boulangé, A.J. Melfi & Y. Lucas (eds.)
Brazilian Bauxites. USP/FAPESP/ORSTOM, São Paulo, p. 75-106.
7. Kotschoubey, B., Calaf, J.M.C., Lobato, A.C.C., Leite, A.S., Azevedo, C.H.D. Caracterização e Gênese dos Depósitos de Bauxita da Província Bauxitífera
de Paragominas, Nordeste da bacia do Grajaú, Nordeste do Pará/Oeste do Maranhão. In: Queiroz, E.T., Mrini, O.J., Ramos, B.W.(Org.).Caracterização
de depósitos minerais em distritos mineiros da Amazônia. Ouro Preto: DNPM/CT-MINERAL/FINEP/ADIMB, 2006, v. p. 688-782.
8. MRDI, “Update to the Reserves Audited in 2000 for the F-3 and 20-F Filing of 31 December 2000 Reserves with the SEC”, (Unpublished Internal Report
to Companhia Vale do Rio Doce, June 2001).
9. Pincock, Allen, and Holt, “Audit of Reserves”; (Unpublished Internal Report to Companhia Vale do Rio Doce, May 2005).
10. SANTOS, Jr. A. E. & ROSSETTI. D.F. 2002. Influência estuarina na Formação Ipixuna, porção média do rio Capim, Sub-bacia de Cametá. In: Simp.
Cretáceo do Brasil, 6, Boletim, p. 1-5.
11. Sinclair, A.J., “Evaluation of errors in paired analytical data by a linear model,” Exploration and Mining Geology, (7) (1) (1999), 167–173.