Partial Replacement of Cement With GGBS in Concrete
Partial Replacement of Cement With GGBS in Concrete
Partial Replacement of Cement With GGBS in Concrete
ISSN: 2454-132X
Impact factor: 4.295
(Volume3, Issue5)
Available online at www.ijariit.com
Partial Replacement of Cement with GGBS in Concrete
Chalamcharla Venu Gopal Suresh .A V. Gokul Nath
Student Student Assistant Professor
Saveetha School of Engineering, Saveetha Saveetha School of Engineering, Saveetha School of Engineering, Saveetha
University, Chennai Saveetha University, Chennai University, Chennai
[email protected] [email protected] [email protected]
Abstract: In this present construction era concrete is the most used construction material in the world. Concrete is consumed
widely that it is second most consumed material after the water in terms of per-capita consumption. As the pollution is increasing
and the environmental sustainability is affected, researchers are seeking for other materials to reduce the consumption of
cement. GGBS is one of these supplementary materials used to replace with cement to reduce the consumption of the cement.
INTRODUCTION
The blast furnace slag is a by-product of the iron manufacturing industry. Iron ore, coke, and limestone are fed into the furnace and
the resulting molten slag floats above the molten iron at a temperature of about 1500 oC to 1600oC. The molten slag has a composition
of about 30% to 40% SiO2 and about 40% CaO, which is close to the chemical composition of Portland cement.
Advantages
Durable concrete structures can be made with the combination of GGBS and ordinary Portland cement.
Portland Blast furnace cement (PBFC) and high-slag blast-furnace cement (HSBFC) are produced from the GGBS.
LITERATURE REVIEW
Er. Kimmi Garg, Er. Kshipra Kapoor studied and experimented, it is proved that GGBS can be used as an alternative material
for cement, reducing cement consumption and reducing the cost of construction. Use of industrial waste products saves the
environment and conserves natural resources.
Vinayak Awasare, Prof. M. V. Nagendra made a study work to analyse strength properties of partially replaced GGBS
concrete. The flexural strengths achieved are 3.01Mpa, 3.45Mpa, 3.58Mpa, 3.44Mpa and 3.12Mpa at 0%, 20%, 30%, 40%, and
50% for GGBS concrete respectively for M20 grade concrete of OPC cement and crushed sand. This report shows that tensile
strength also gives good performance for 20%, 30 % and 40% replacement which is more than normal plain concrete.
Yasutaka SAGAWA, Daisuke Yamamoto and Yoshikazu HENZAN in a study concluded that the specimens which include
normal-strength concrete and high-strength concrete by changing W/B from 65% to 35% were examined. The effectiveness of
GGBS on chloride ion diffusion coefficient was investigated by migration test. Moreover, the application of GGBS which has
the surface area of 6000 cm2/g for bridge superstructures was presented.
D. Suresh and K. Nagaraju in a review concluded that the movement of moisture of GGBS mixes, probably due to the dense
and strong microstructure of the interfacial aggregate/binder transition zone is probably responsible for the high resistance of
GGBS mix to attack in aggressive environments such as silage pits. GGBS is a good replacement for cement in some cases and
serves effectively but it can’t replace cement completely. But even though it replaces partially it gives very good results and a
greener approach to construction and sustainable development which we are engineers are keen about today.
METHODOLOGY
Materials Used
Cement
Fine Aggregate
Coarse Aggregate
GGBS
Water
Cement
Ordinary Portland cement (OPC) of 53 grade was used in which the composition and properties are in compliance with the Indian
standard organization.
2 SiO2 19-23
3 Al2O 2.5-6
4 Fe2O3 0-6
5 SO3 1.5-4.5
Fine Aggregate
The aggregate which passes through 4.75 mm IS sieve and retain on 75 microns IS sieve are known as fine aggregates. Fine
aggregate is basically sands won from the land or the marine environment. Fine aggregates generally consist of natural sand or
crushed stone with most particles passing through a 9.5mm sieve. As with coarse aggregates, these can be from Primary, Secondary
or Recycled sources.
Property Result
Coarse Aggregate
The aggregates which pass through 75mm IS sieve and retain on 4.75mm IS sieve are known as coarse aggregates.
Coarse Aggregate
Physical Properties of Coarse Aggregate
Property Result
GGBS
AI2O3 5% 10%
MgO 2% 8%
Water
Water plays an important role in concrete production (mix) in that it starts the reaction between the cement, pozzolanic and the
aggregates. It helps in the hydration of the mix. In this research, the water used was distilled water.
Water
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE
Mixing of Concrete
Mixing of concrete was carried out by machine. Machine mixing is not only efficient but also economical. Before the materials
are loaded in to drum about 25 percent of the total quantity of water required for mixing is poured into the mixer drum and to
prevent any sticking of cement on the bodies or at the bottom of the drum.
Mixing of Concrete
Moulds
The concrete is cast into cube molds of size 150mm×150mm.
Mould
Curing of specimen
After casting the molded specimens are stored in the laboratory at a room temperature for 24 hours. After this period the specimens
are removed from the molds and immediately submerged in clean, fresh water of curing water tank. The specimens are cured for 28
days in present investigation work.
Curing
Slump Value
Mix
(mm)
Normal Concrete 61
20 % GGBS 63
40 % GGBS 57
20 % GGBS 0.93
40 % GGBS 0.91
Compression-Testing Machine
The above Table 5.1 gives the compressive strength of the concrete when the cement is replaced with GGBS at the proportions of
0%, 20%, 40% with cement after the curing period of 7 Days and 28 Days.
50
40 39.25
36.4
30 30.8 0% GGBS
24.74
20 20.07 20 % GGBS
17.94
10 40% GGBS
0
7 Days 28 Days
50
39.25
40 36.4
30.8
30 24.74 0% GGBS
17.94 20.07 20% GGBS
20
40% GGBS
10
0
7 Days 28 Days
CONCLUSIONS
1. Durability and service life are improved by preparing High-Performance Concrete.
2. With the addition of 40% of GGBS as a replacement of Cement for an M25 grade of concrete, there is an increase in the
strength compared to the normal concrete.
3. As GGBS is partially replaced with the cement, the consumption of the cement is reduced and also the cost of construction
is reduced.
4. Thus the workability is improved by the partial replacement of the GGBS with cement.
REFERENCE
[1] Santosh Kumar Karri, G. V. Rama Rao, P. Markandeya Raju "Strength and Durability Studies on GGBS Concrete", SSRG
International Journal of Civil Engineering (SSRG - IJCE), V2 (10), 34-41 October 2015. ISSN: 2348 – 8352.
www.internationaljournalssrg.org/IJCE/index.html. Published by: Seventh Sense Research Group.
[2] Mojtaba Valinejad Shoubi, Azin Shakiba Borough, and Omidreza Amirsoleimani. (2013). . . "Assessment of the Roles of
Various Cement Replacements in Achieving Sustainable and High-Performance Concrete". International Journal of
Advances in Engineering and Technology, 6 (1): 68-77.
[3] Martin O. Connell, Ciaran McNally, and Mark G. Richardson. (2012). "Performance of Concrete Incorporating GGBS in
Aggressive Wastewater Environments. Construction and Building Materials", 27 (1), 368-374.
[4] "European Journal of Scientific Research ISSN 1450-216X Vol.88 No-1" October 2012, pp.155163@Euro journals
Publishing, Inc. 2012 http://www.europeanjournalof scientific research.com.
[5] Aveline Darquennes, Stephanie Staquet, and Bernard Espion. (2011). "Behaviour of Slag Cement Concrete under Restraint
Conditions". European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering, 15 (5), 787-798.
[6] Elsayed, A.A. (2011). "Influence of Silica Fume, Fly Ash, Super Pozz and High Slag Cement on Water Permeability and
Strength of Concrete". Jordan Journal of Civil Engineering, 5 (2), 245-257.
[7] Reginald B. Kogbara, and Abir Al-Tabbaa. (2011). "Mechanical and Leaching Behaviour of Slag-Cement and Lime-
activated Slag Stabilized/Solidified Contaminated Soil". The science of the Total Environment, 409 (11), 2325-2335.
[8] Peter W.C. Leung, and Wong, H.D. (2010). "Final Report on Durability and Strength Development of Ground Granulated
Blast Furnace Slag Concrete". Geotechnical Engineering Office, Civil Engineering and Development Department, the
Government of Hong Kong.
[9] Pazhani .K., Jeyaraj .R ―"Study on durability of high-performance concrete with industrial wastes ATI - Applied
Technologies & Innovations” Volume 2 | Issue 2 | August 2010 |pp. 19-28
[10] Ashish Kumar dash et al ―"Effect of pozzolanas on fiber Reinforced concrete" 2010
[11] Venu Malagavelli et. al. ―"High-performance concrete with GGBS and robot sand" International Journal of Engineering
Science and technology vol. 2(10), 2010, 5107-5113.
[12] Hanifi Binici, Huseyin Zengin et al. ―Resistance to sodium sulphate attack of plain and blended cement containing
corncob ash and ground granulated blast furnace slag Scientific Research and Essay" Vol.4 (2), pp. 098-106, February
2009.
[13] M. Shariq, J. Prasad et al ―"Strength development of cement mortar and concrete incorporating GGBFS Asian journal of
civil engineering (building and housing) " vol. 9, no. 1 (2008)Pages 61-74.