BSDH Domiciliary Guidelines August 2009
BSDH Domiciliary Guidelines August 2009
BSDH Domiciliary Guidelines August 2009
for
Disability and Oral
Health
Registered Charity No 1044867
1
Contents
Page no.
Introduction and Purpose 3
Summary 23
References 24 – 25
Appendices 26 – 39
1. Multidisciplinary team for older people 26
2. Domiciliary referral form 27
3. Eligibility criteria for domiciliary oral healthcare 28
4. Environmental risk assessment – guidance notes 29 – 30
5. Decision making process flowchart 31
6. Domiciliary care pathway 32
7. Assessment of capacity check-list 33 – 34
8. Domiciliary equipment details 35 – 37
9. Organisation of domiciliary kit into sub-kits 38 – 39
10. ROCS Project Sheffield - example of good practice 40
2
Introduction
The final report of the NHS Next Stage Review ‘High Quality Care for All’ 1 sets out the
strategic direction for driving improvements in the quality of care across the health service.
High quality oral healthcare should be available to all people regardless of their age or
circumstances. People with long term and/or progressive medical conditions; mental
illness or dementia, causing disorientation and confusion in unfamiliar environments; and
increasing frailty are not always able to travel to a dental surgery. For some people,
access to oral healthcare services is achievable only through the provision of domiciliary
oral healthcare.2
This document draws on, and should be read alongside, the following documents:
¾ The Department of Health and British Association for the Study of Community
Dentistry document ‘Delivering better oral health: An evidence-based toolkit for
prevention’ 3
¾ The Department of Health world class commissioning document ‘Primary care and
Community Services: Improving dental access, quality and oral health’ 5.
The DDA (1995) 7 states that service providers must be fair and flexible in taking
action to remove any barriers that exclude disabled people. The Act requires that,
where a person is unable to access a service because of disability, the service
provider makes it available via reasonable alternative means. In the case of a person
being unable to access dental services provided in a conventional dental surgery
setting, a reasonable alternative means of access to dental care would be for the
dental practitioner to provide domiciliary care. However, it must be cautioned that
domiciliary dental care provision is not a panacea and the GDC (1999) recommends
that dental treatment provided on a domiciliary basis should be appropriate within that
setting, taking into account the nature of the dental problem, the facilities available and
the welfare of the patient 8. Surgery-based care remains the best option for irreversible
treatment procedures, but where this is not reasonable or possible patients should not
be unduly disadvantaged by having to receive domiciliary oral healthcare. Ideally, they
should have equitable oral health outcomes in terms of self esteem, appearance,
4
social interaction, function and comfort. This requires careful assessment and
treatment planning which takes account of all associated factors, including the skills
required to manage delivery of care in a sometimes compromised situation 6. The
ability of carers to facilitate delivery of the preventive aspect of the oral healthcare plan
must also be taken account of.
2. The Need
As more people retain their natural teeth into old age, this presents challenges to the
dental profession in providing care to medically compromised, multiply disabled and
older people who may require a wide range of interventions in a heavily restored
dentition, at a time in their lives when they are less able to cope with treatment. It is
projected that the number of people with NO natural teeth will decline from 40-45 % of
people over 65 years in 2005 to only 20% (1 in 5 people) in 2025. It is also expected
that 40-50% of over 65 year olds will be dentate with 21 or more natural teeth ( a
functional dentition) by 2025 2. Additionally, as dentate older people become disabled
they are more likely to use dental services more regularly than edentate older people.
Therefore, the demand for care will increase for DOHC, as will the requirement for the
skills and equipment to provide a more comprehensive service than the provision of
dentures.
Functionally dependent older adults are often best served by bringing dental services
to them12. People over the age of 90 have shown a preference for home visits, as it
enables them to use their limited energy in receiving care rather than travelling for
care13. Younger people with disabilities and/or additional needs may also be confined
to home and, if so, will also require domiciliary oral healthcare.
There is evidence that people in residential care (such as those, people with a
learning disability or mental health problem , people who are physically or medically
compromised older people 14 and people in secure units 15 are more likely to have
poor oral health and inadequate or restricted access to dental services 14. Whilst
people confined to home perceive a high dental care need, difficulties in getting to a
dentist, paying for dental care, and poor oral health have been cited as barriers to
obtaining dental care by American researchers 16,17.
5
A recent study demonstrated that a domiciliary denture service improved oral health
related quality of life of older people confined to home 18. Despite the increase in older
people keeping more teeth for longer, currently investment in DOHCS would help to
meet the oral healthcare needs of around 50% of all people aged 85 years and over
until 2018 2.
The document ‘Meeting the Challenges of Oral Health for Older People: A Strategic
Review’ concluded that there is a need for Primary Care Trusts to invest in domiciliary
denture care services 2.
3. Availability
Domiciliary care should not be considered as the last resort. It should be offered
amongst the routine options for dental care for people who are mostly confined to
home or for whom leaving or travelling from home can cause unwarranted upheaval
and distress. However, access to, and availability of dental domiciliary services for
disabled older people is relatively low.
Analysis of health service records reveals that less than 40% of dentists in general
dental practice provide home visits and this figure is falling 19. Some of these dentists
restrict their domiciliary practice to prosthodontics, and a proportion of these restrict it
further to complete dentures only. A study of availability of domiciliary dentistry
indicated that only 21% of dentists who were willing to do domiciliary work would
undertake restorative treatment 19. The salaried primary care dental service (SPCDS)
acts as a safety-net for people who are unable to obtain care within the general dental
services. Even so, only a minority of community dentists provide domiciliary care.
6
1. Commissioning
Commissioning domiciliary oral healthcare services should be set in the context and
current agenda of equality, diversity and human rights in both health and social care
and reducing healthcare inequalities through personalisation, consultation and
partnership working. Thus, it is fitting that ‘Our Vision for Primary and Community
Care’ 21 draws together the main conclusions of ‘The Next Stage Review’ for
community-based NHS services, including primary dental care and sets out an agenda
based on the following four key areas:
¾ Shaping services around people’s needs and views
¾ Promoting healthy lives and tackling health inequalities
¾ Continuing improving quality
¾ Ensuring change is led locally
The 2009 -10 Operating Framework22 clarifies the priority for PCTs to develop NHS
dental services to meet the local needs for access, quality of care and oral health in
order to provide services to anyone who seeks help in accessing them. The key
elements for a successful dental commissioning strategy that will enable this to be
delivered include:
¾ Assessing local needs
¾ Mapping current services
¾ Developing a strategic commissioning plan
¾ Delivering improvements through:
⎯ transparent use of performance information
⎯ supporting quality improvement
⎯ information for patients and public
⎯ assuring minimum standards
⎯ promoting patient choice
⎯ developing the market, and
7
⎯ commissioning new and or additional capacity
¾ Improving premises and estates, including domiciliary equipment
¾ Top-level (eg Board) ownership, and
¾ A systematic approach to monitoring for performances. 5
PCTs are also required to prepare an annual operating plan, setting out how it will
implement its strategy in the coming year. Both the strategic and operating plans
should address how the PCT will improve its primary care services and, where there is
a need, this should include domiciliary oral healthcare services.
The annual cycle of this WCC assurance process holds PCTs to account. At the same
time, PCTs need to be able to provide clear assurance that the services being
accessed provide safe and effective care and good patient experience, in line with the
objectives of High Quality Care for All.1 The distinctive features of commissioning
primary dental care are set out in ‘Primary care and Community Services: Improving
dental access, quality and oral health ’5.
8
3. Mapping the baseline
In order to make improvements to primary care services, including domiciliary oral
healthcare, a baseline needs to be established. There are three key stages to mapping
the baseline:
1. Assessing needs
2. Mapping existing services, and
3. Identifying what needs to change.
Stage 1 Assessing local needs – this is usually done through a Joint strategic Needs
Assessment (JSNA) which entails having a clear understanding of the diversity of the
local population (including associated patterns of oral health and service demand);
specific communities with unmet or comparatively greater health needs (such as older
people in residential care or confined to home); and how these needs compare with
similar populations elsewhere, through benchmarking 5. Obtaining patient feedback
and assessing levels of patient satisfaction are essential to the commissioning
process.
Assessing oral health needs and assessing demand for dental services are also
essential elements of the process. ‘Valuing People’s Oral Health – best practice
guidance for improving oral health in disabled children and adults’ 4 contains useful
information on needs assessment. Assessing demand for dental services is not
straightforward. The current access indicator, of the number of people using services
within a two year period, is not an accurate proxy for levels of unmet need or demand.
It is suggested that the simplest way of gauging unmet demand is to set up a well-
publicised dental access helpline for both people seeking urgent care and those
seeking a regular NHS dentist, monitor the nature of the requested needs and the
ability to offer services to meet them 5.
Dental services for people who require domiciliary care and for people with disabilities
will need to be considered in each of the above parameters. In order to identify
required service need accurately, an assessment of complexity of treatment is
essential so that the appropriate workforce can be commissioned in a co-ordinated
way. For example how much of the need can be met by the primary care dental team
(including hygienists), how much requires a dentist with a special interest and how
much requires specialist input. The DOH publication, National guidelines for the
appointment of dentists with a special interest (DwSI) in special care dentistry23
10
provides guidance to PCT’s on the appointment of dentists with a special interest in
special care dentistry including the competency framework for the scope of treatment
that can be undertaken.
Specialist oral healthcare provision for older people with disability, dementia or
complex medical conditions falls within the remit of Special Care Dentistry. Quality
assurance criteria for a specialist in Special Care Dentistry are set out in ‘The
Commissioning Tool for special Care Dentistry’ 6. They are set out alongside those of
a generalist dental practitioner and the dentist with a specialist interest in Special Care
Dentistry in order to facilitate PCTs ability to identify what level of care is required to
meet the identified need in their area.
All this needs to be done with the backdrop of the NHS 2009 constitution 10 in mind,
and in particular that:
¾ The NHS provides a comprehensive service, available to all - irrespective
of gender, race, disability, age, sexual orientation, religion or belief. It has a
duty to each and every individual that it serves and must respect their human
rights. At the same time, it has a wider social duty to promote equality
through the services it provides and to pay particular attention to groups or
sections of society where improvements in health and life expectancy are not
keeping pace with the rest of the population. And
11
¾ Patients have the right to expect their local NHS to assess the health
requirements of the local community and to commission and put in place the
services to meet those needs as considered necessary.
5. Making it happen
‘Primary care and Community Services: Improving dental access, quality and oral
health’ sets out commissioning levers under nine broad headings, which if used
intelligently can deliver rapid improvement and the reader is referred to that document
for further information on each of them 5. It also provides a useful list of the relevant
regulations from which the legislative framework related to PCTs powers to manage
contracts is drawn.
This view of WCC fits well with the four aims of the commissioning strategy set out in
‘The Commissioning Tool for Special Care Dentistry’ 6 which are:
1. A patient centred service, which aims to provide and maintain the optimum oral
health for the individual or group
2. Integrated front line delivery which is organised around the needs of the
vulnerable adult rather than professional boundaries
3. Integrated processes which lead to effective joint working
4. Joint planning and commissioning
Use of these two guidance documents 5, 6 in combination will lead to the provision of a
robust strategy and operational plan to meet the needs of people requiring domiciliary
oral healthcare services.
12
• Establish a system which will identify individuals in the community who have an oral
healthcare need and for whom domiciliary provision is the only reasonable option.
• Provide an oral healthcare service to address patients’ needs, taking into account
their personal circumstances and their wishes, consistent with the most appropriate
use of resources.
• Deliver high quality oral healthcare in a person- centred way that respects the
dignity of the individual receiving it.
c. Urgent referrals can be difficult to fit into an already scheduled working day and
both eligibility for a visit and the degree of urgency will need to be assessed (see
Appendix 3). There may be a case for agreeing some objective criteria for inclusion
on a referral form which would allow for an appraisal to be made by a clinician at the
stage of allocating priority for follow-up (see Appendix 2).
d. Care homes should have access to information on local dental services including
advice on referrals and information on domiciliary care 14.
e. New patients should all have a domiciliary visit risk assessment carried out (see
Appendix 4) and the decision on whether to carry out dental treatment through a
DOHC service reached following a risk-benefit analysis. Provision of dental care as
13
a domiciliary procedure is an expensive aspect of service provision. In addition to
time spent seeing the patient, there is often considerable time spent in travelling to
and from the clinic base, and in preparing (and clearing up afterwards), a suitable
working area in the patient’s home environment. Furthermore, there are also travel
costs to consider, which can be significant in rural areas owing to the sometimes
long distances involved. In any consideration of the costs of providing domiciliary
care versus surgery-based care, it is necessary to bear in mind that there are
‘hidden’ costs in bringing patients to the surgery and these may include the cost of
providing an escort and specialist or ambulance transport, which, whilst they do not
necessarily impact on the SPCDS budget, nonetheless, represent a cost to the
public purse. Appendix 5 provides an example of good practice from Oldham PCT
CDS, to help with decision-making regarding the appropriate provision of DOHC.
Occasionally, patients referred for DOHCS do not qualify either for domiciliary or
SPCDS care. In these cases, it will be necessary to ensure that the referrer is made
aware that the request is not appropriate and has not been accepted. Responsibility
for arranging dental care remains with the referrer, who should be given guidance on
the most appropriate route locally.
14
4. Mix and Match care
Mix and match care is the term used to describe when domiciliary and surgery-based
care are mixed and matched according to the need to develop rapport and trust
between the patient and the dental team, or according to the complexity of the dental
procedures that need to be undertaken. For example, profoundly anxious patients may
feel able to attend the surgery once rapport built with the dental team, through a
domiciliary visit, has helped to reduce their fear; or a disabled patient taking
anticoagulants attends the surgery for extraction of a tooth because of the risk of
postoperative bleeding, whilst dentures can be safely constructed on a domiciliary
basis.
It has been suggested that a great deal of the procedure and process of domiciliary
visiting is similar to camping. Time is spent preparing and packing equipment and kit
15
required. This is then taken to the visit and time is spent unpacking and setting up for
the necessary treatment. Afterwards, everything needs to be dismantled ready to pack
away again.
The dentist can become a central figure in the social network of a person confined to
home, and the established rapport can lead to the individual feeling supported by the
healthcare provider which can have a positive impact on the immediate and long-term
well being of the patient 24.
a. For emergency visits, telephone ahead to clarify the dental problem and the need
for a visit.
b. For non-emergency visits the following ‘Telephone Tick List’ is helpful. The
acronym ‘CAMPING’ can again be used as an aide memoire:
C check full address and helpful directions
A appointment to be sent in writing if possible
M medical history and consent - note need to liaise with relevant people
P parking facilities
I information about who will be present, eg carer, relative, neighbour
N name of dentist visiting, provided for security
G gain access to any special instructions or requirements, eg need to
collect key from neighbour, dog barks but does not bite, etc...
16
d. Health and safety Issues
An important part of organising a DOHC service is to consider the following health
and safety issues:
¾ Risk assessment (see Appendix 4)
¾ Staff protection
¾ Chaperoning
¾ Employer’s liability
¾ Personal protection
¾ Manual handling skills.
¾ Insurance for vehicles and equipment
7. Procedures
a. The initial visit
The following procedures help the initial visit to go well:
¾ Telephone the patient at the beginning of the day to confirm the timetable
¾ Try to be punctual. If a delay is anticipated, then a telephone call to
apologise, explain and reassure will usually be appreciated. Carers may
have made special arrangements to be available for a particular time
¾ Every member of the dental team should carry official identification, and
all staff should be introduced on arrival by name and status
¾ Establish at the outset the relationship of any carer(s) to the patient
¾ The clinician (dentist, therapist or hygienist) must be chaperoned at every
visit by another member of the team in the interests of personal and
patient safety
¾ Confirm the patient’s personal details
¾ Consult with the carer regarding the patient’s capacity to give a reliable
history and valid consent; and check who, if anyone, is the patient’s
Court Appointed Deputy
¾ Check the reason for, and source of the internal referral as an update on
past medical history /past dental history is often necessary. Importantly,
before doing so, establish that confidentiality is not being compromised
by the presence of a person such as a home help or support worker
when this is done.
17
b. Adhesive dentistry
With the advent of adhesive dentistry, the restorative options available to the
increasing numbers of people who are dentate receiving domiciliary care have
improved. Consideration should be given to the use of the Atraumatic Restorative
Techniques (ART) and Carisolv 25.
c. Infection control
Within the domiciliary environment, infection control procedures, including the
establishment of a clean work area should be maintained as far as is reasonably
practicable and in accordance with professional and local Trust guidance. All clinical
waste including sharps must be disposed of according to local rules. The
procedures detailed in local SPCDS policies for control of infection will apply to
domiciliary procedures in the same way as for clinic-based procedures.
e. Confidentiality
All patients have the right to expect that information they give to health workers will
be treated in confidence and used only in the context of their healthcare provision.
Care must be taken that where other people are present (such as, relatives or
significant others) no breach of patient confidentiality is allowed to occur either in
the collection or imparting of information, unless the patient has given consent for
disclosure.
18
f. Consent
The law in relation to consent clearly places the duty on the practitioner who
proposes to carry out treatment to ensure that a valid consent is obtained. This is no
less the case with domiciliary oral healthcare provision. Consent must be informed
and where a client is considered not to have the capacity to consent, the procedure
set out in the Mental Capacity Act (MCA) 2005 9 or Adults with Incapacity Act,
Scotland 26must be followed. For more information see the section on the MCA on
pages 20 - 22 and Appendix 7.
8. Training
Providing effective domiciliary oral healthcare requires skills that extend well beyond
clinical dentistry 2. Training in the understanding, planning and delivery of all aspects
of domiciliary services should be provided to all members of the dental team who are
likely to be involved. This should be planned and organised according to local
requirements and based on relevant professional guidance.
Understanding of, and proficiency in, risk management needs to be an integral part of
any such training. In the GDC’s guidance ‘Maintaining Standards’ attention is drawn to
the possibility that a medical emergency could occur at any time in premises where
dental treatment takes place. The nature of the patients being treated in a domiciliary
setting means that there is likely to be a greater chance of encountering a medical
emergency. It is, therefore, imperative that the dentist ensures that all members of the
dental team are properly trained, have available the necessary resources and are
prepared to deal with an emergency including a collapsed patient. Training should
include preparing for medical emergencies, including the use of emergency drugs, and
practice of resuscitation routines in a simulated emergency.
It is essential that all premises where dental treatment takes place, including
domiciliary settings, have available and in working order:
¾ Portable suction apparatus to clear the oro-pharynx
¾ Oral airways to maintain the natural airway
¾ Equipment with appropriate attachments to provide intermittent positive
pressure ventilation of the lungs
¾ A portable source of oxygen, and
¾ Emergency drugs 8
19
In order to comply with this guidance, the domiciliary dental team will need to take this
equipment with them. The carriage of oxygen requires that the car owner informs their
insurance company, secures the oxygen in the car to stop it rolling around and carries
an oxygen safety data sheet and TREM (Transport Emergency) card. A mobile phone
is also necessary to ensure that emergency services can be phoned, if required.
Local policies and procedures will apply to many of the above considerations. Staff
providing domiciliary care should be aware of, trained in, and operate in compliance
with the local rules of their employing authority.
The portable domiciliary kit should always be complete and ready to go. This requires
a designated member of the dental team to have responsibility for keeping it this way
(see the section on Equipment on page 16).
The MCA clarifies the terms ‘mental capacity’ and ‘lack of mental capacity’. There
is an assumption that people have the capacity to make decisions for themselves
unless proved otherwise. An assessment regarding capacity may be supported by the
use of a tick box check list within the patient’s dental records (see Appendix 7).
The new law states that a person is unable to make a particular decision if they cannot
do one or more of the following:
¾ Understand information given to them
¾ Retain that information long enough to be able to make the decision
20
¾ Weigh up the information available to make the decision
¾ Communicate their decision - this could be done by talking, using sign
language or even simple muscle movements such as blinking an eye or
squeezing a hand.
Healthcare workers are able to diagnose conditions and carry out treatment for
patients who do not have capacity as long as they have complied with the MCA, and
are acting in the individual’s ‘best interests’. The MCA indicates that the individual’s
past values, attitudes and behaviour should be taken into account when providing a
healthcare service for people who do not have the capacity to consent (see Advance
Decisions in the MCA 2005). For example, where an individual has attended the
dentist regularly throughout their life, and they have retained their natural teeth into old
age and/or there is evidence of advanced restorative treatment, the implication is that
they value their teeth. Were they to have the capacity to consent it is likely that they
would choose restoration of a tooth rather than extraction. Thus a treatment plan
including prevention and restorative care is likely to reflect their values, attitudes and
past dental history.
A new criminal offence of ‘ill- treatment’ or ‘wilful neglect’ of people who lack capacity
came into force in April 2007. Within the law, ”helping with personal hygiene” (which
includes toothbrushing) will attract protection from liability as long as the individual has
complied with the MCA by assessing a person’s capacity and acted in their best
interests. The following check list may be used to determine what is in the ‘best
interests’ of a person lacking capacity:
¾ Involve the person who lacks capacity
¾ Consult with others involved with the care of the person
¾ Do not make assumptions based solely on a person’s age, appearance,
condition or behaviour
¾ Be aware of the persons past and present wishes and feelings
¾ Give consideration to whether the person is likely to regain capacity to
make the decision in the future.
¾ The individual must be supported to make a decision as far as possible
even if it is what others may feel is an unwise decision.
¾ The decision should always be recorded in writing.
21
Appendix 7 provides a check list that can be used to document the process followed to
assess capacity.
The Mental Capacity Act takes account of the role of ‘Advance Directives’. These
include:
1. Advance decisions - people 18 years of age and over can make advance
decisions, while still capable, to refuse ‘specified medical treatment’ for a time in the
future when they might lack the capacity to consent or refuse
2. Lasting power of attorney (LPA) - LPA allows adults aged 18 and over, who have
capacity, to appoint attorneys to make decisions about their personal welfare,
including healthcare and medical treatment decisions, and their property and affairs.
This is something that people may well do in the early stages of dementia when
they can still make decisions. It is likely that their LPA will be a family member
3. Court Appointed Deputy (CAD) - this is someone who can act for and make
decisions on behalf of an individual whose condition makes it likely that they will
lack capacity to make decisions in the future. The CAD must follow the Act’s
statutory principles, act in the person’s best interests, and only make decisions
authorised by the Court. CADs are more likely to be used for people with learning
disability. Again, it is likely that family members will be appointed.
11. Equipment
There is an increasing selection of domiciliary equipment available. What you need
should be assessed on the basis of:
¾ Frequency of use
¾ Types of treatment likely to be carried out
¾ Facilities already available
¾ Ease of adequate decontamination
22
¾ Weight of equipment and ease of transporting it
¾ Any other relevant features associated with the service you provide, and
¾ Cost
Appendix 8 lists some items of equipment with approximate prices, current at the time
of publication of these guidelines.
Organisation of the domiciliary kit into sub-kits is a useful way of ensuring everything
required is in place, ensuring that the kit is kept clean and ready for use, and of taking
only those sub-kits necessary into the patient’s home. Appendix 9 outlines the way a
domiciliary kit might be organised into sub-kits.
Summary
These guidelines are intended to provide advice and support for all those involved with the
commissioning and provision of DOHCS.
There is an increasing need to deliver oral healthcare to patients with complex additional
needs. As well as contributing to deteriorating oral health, physical and mental impairment
may present problems as regards the delivery of, and access to, oral healthcare. The
availability of DOHCS will need to be maintained and improved to meet the needs of this
growing population. This requires adequate training and more opportunities to gain
experience to develop the necessary knowledge and skills as well as appropriate
remuneration to reflect the additional time and skills required for DOHC. At the same time
it is important, that domiciliary oral healthcare provision is targeted through world class
local commissioning of appropriate services.
23
References
1. Lord Darzi. ‘High Quality Care for All: NHS Next Stage Review’, 2008.
http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistcs/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndG
uidance/DH_085825
2. Meeting the Challenges of Oral Health for Older People: A Strategic Review.
Commissioned by DOH. Gerodontology 2005; 22: Supplement 1.
3. Department of Health and British Association for the Study of Community Dentistry
‘Delivering better oral health: An evidence-based toolkit for prevention’, 2007.
http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistcs/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndG
uidance/DH_078742
4. Department of Health. Valuing People’s Oral Health: A good practice guide for
improving the oral health of disabled children and adults. 2007:
www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidan
ce/DH_080918
5. The Department of Health world class commissioning document ‘Primary care and
Community Services: Improving dental access, quality and oral health’,
2009.http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistcs/Publications/PublicationsPolicy
AndGuid ance/DH_093831
6. British Society for Disability and Oral Health. Commissioning tool for Special Care
Dentistry. 2006.http://www.bsdh.org.uk/guidelines.html
10. The NHS Constitution: securing the NHS today for generations to come, 2009.
http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndG
uidance/DH_093419
11. All Wales Special Interest Group. Special Oral Health Care Guidelines for the Delivery
of a Domiciliary Oral Health Care Service. J Disabil Oral Health 2006; 7:166-172
12. Helgeson MJ, Smith BJ, Johnsen M, Ebert C.Dental Considerations for Frail Elderly.
Spec Care Dentist. 2002; 22(3):40S-55S
13. Lester V, Ashley F P, Gibbons D E. Reported dental attendance and perceived barriers
to care in frail and functionally dependent older adults. Br Dent J 1998:184: 285-289.
24
14. Fiske J, Griffiths J, Jamieson R, et al. BSDH Guidelines for oral healthcare for long-
stay patients and residents. http://www.bsdh.org.uk/guidelines.html
15. Heidari E, Dickinson C, Wilson R, Fiske J.Oral health of remand prisoners in HMP
Brixton, London.Br Dent J. 2007; 202(2):E1.
16. Steifel DJ, Lubin JH, Truelove EL. A survey of perceived oral health needs of
homebound patients. J Public Health Dent 1979;39:7-15.
17. Strayer MS. Perceived barriers to oral health care among the homebound. Spec Care
Dentist 1995;15:113-18.
18. Pearson NK, Gibson BJ, Davis DM, Gelbier S and Robinson PG. The effect of a
domiciliary denture service on oral health related quality of life: a randomised controlled
trial. Br Dent J 2007;203:E3.
19. Longhurst RH. Availability of domiciliary dental care for the elderly. Prim Dent Care
2002; 9:147-50.
20. Oral Healthcare for Older People - 2020 Vision – A BDA Key Issue Policy Paper. BDA,
London May 2003.
21. Department of Health ‘NHS Next Stage Review: Our vision for primary and community
care’,2008.http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistcs/Publications/PublicationsP
olicyAndGuidance/DH 093831
22. Department of Health. ‘The NHS in England: The operating framework for 2009/10’,
2008.http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicy
AndGuidance/DH_091445
23. Department of Health . National Guidelines for the appointment of dentists with a
special interest in Special Care Dentistry..
http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndG
uidance/DH_096466
24. Moore PE, The portable alternative. Selecting the right equipment for the non-
traditional practice setting. Spec Care Dentist 1989; 9:152-54.
25. Fiske J, Dickinson C, Boyle C, Rafique S, Burke M. Special Care Dentistry. Chapter 11
–21. Patient management through non-invasive treatment. Quintessentials of Dental
Practice – 42. London: Quintessence Publishing Co. Ltd. 2007.
27. Griffith R. Making decisions for incapable adults: the Scottish law. Br J Community
Nurs. 2006 Jul;11(7):308-3.
25
Appendix 1 Multidisciplinary Team for Older People
Day
Community General
Voluntary Centre
Nursing Medical
Organisation
Team Practitioner
Dietician
Health Facilitator Hospice
Care Team
Dental Team Patient Social
Speech and Service Pharmacist
Language
Therapist Carer/Family/Friends
Physiotherapist
Hospital
Specialist Occupational
Residential Therapist
Home
MacMillan Team
Adapted from Clinical guidelines and integrated care pathways for the oral healthcare of people with learning
disabilities BSDH RCS 2001
26
Appendix 2 Domiciliary Referral Form
DOMICILIARY REFERRAL FORM
Date___________________________
Tel. No.______________________
Urgent Non-urgent
Mobility problems____________________________________________________________________
Physical Disability___________________________________________________________________
Mental Disability_____________________________________________________________________
Sensory Disability____________________________________________________________________
Communication difficulties_____________________________________________________________
Any other relevant
information__________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________
27
Appendix 3 Eligibility Criteria for Domiciliary Oral Healthcare
If the patient has a hospital appointment, how does he/she get there?
Ambulance Taxi Car Other
When was the last time the patient was able to leave the house?
______________________________________________________________
Mobility
Walks unaided Needs assistance Wheelchair user Confined to home
Additional Comments:
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________
28
Appendix 4 Guidance notes for an Environmental Risk Assessment for
DOHC
Address ___________________________________________________
___________________________________
___________________________________________________
Tel no ___________________________________
Number of persons living in premises
Can the patient understand and
communicate at an acceptable level?
Examples of hazards
External access Difficulty in reaching premises due to location
eg access gained via back streets or alleyways
items stored on entrance steps or corridors
steep stairs, poorly laid paths
lift frequently out of action
External lighting Unsafe parking due to lack of / or inadequate street lighting
Dimly lit stair wells
Internal lighting Poorly lit households, Insufficient light to carry out procedure
Slips, trips and falls Any items that have Slippery kitchen / bathroom floors
a potential to cause slips, trips or falls Flooring stained with bodily matter (environmental hazard)
Broken furniture
Lack of space due to furniture / other clutter
29
Other hazards e.g. animals Pets within treatment area
30
Appendix 5 Decision Making Process for Domiciliary Dental Treatment
Request for homee visie
Confined to Bed
Yes O2 therapy
PEG fed
No
Wheelchair User
Yes
Can use private car or taxi
No
Outings Made
For social reasons Yes
– hair, shops
No
Assess at home
No conservation, extractions
Yes
Transport
arrange minibus, ring & ride,
ambulance?
No
Domiciliary
waiting list
Prosthetics Clinic
Scaling Domiciliary appointment
Urgent cons – limit
pain not controlled by treatment plan
painkillers, swellings, extractions – 31
bleeding simple only
Appendix 6 Care Pathway for Domiciliary Oral Healthcare
Assess eligibility
Referral received from Does not meet criteria
according to Criteria for
member of multidisciplinary No appointment required
Domiciliary Oral car
team or self referral – see Letter back to referrer
Healthcare – see
Appendix 1 & 2
Appendix 3
………………………………………. …………………………………………..
Does the patient have a condition/impairment which may affect their capacity to consent to dental
treatment? Yes No Don’t know
If yes, record reason for impaired capacity (e.g. Learning disability, dementia, brain injury, stroke etc)
……………………………………………………………………………………………….
Assessment of capacity
Can the patient understand the information given to them about their treatment?
Yes No Don’t know
Can the patient retain that information long enough to be able to make the decision?
Yes No Don’t know
Can the patient weigh up the information available to make the decision?
Yes No Don’t know
Or can the patient communicate their decision (whether by talking, sign language or any other means)?
Yes No Don’t know
33
Was consultation with other professionals required to assess capacity?
Yes No
If yes, record name & status …………………………………………………..
What methods have been used to involve the person who lacks capacity in making the decision?
………………………………………………………………………………………………..
……………………………………………………………………………………………….
Has the patient’s past or present wishes, feelings and beliefs been taken into consideration?
Yes No Don’t know
Names and relationship to patient who can act in service user’s best interest contacted?
………………………………………………………………………………………………..
………………………………………………………………………………………………..
Does the patient have an appointed Lasting Power of Attorney or Court of Protection appointed deputy?
Yes No Don’t know
If the patient does not have any personal or legal advocates, do you need to involve the Independent
Mental Capacity Advocate (IMCA)? Yes No Don’t know
If yes, provide
Name of IMCA …………………………………. Date consulted ……………………..
Outcome of consultation
………………………………………………………………………………………………….
………………………………………………………………………………………………….
………………………………………………………………………………………………….
………………………………………………………………………………………………….
34
Appendix 8 Domiciliary Equipment Details
Dentalman £1,298
Dentrovac £4,434
Lightpen Daray £5
Voroscope MXL
LED Portable light with
rechargable battery pack Nuview £640
35
Orascoptic Evident £1000
Heat source
Safe Air Healthco £290
Carrying boxes
Stanley B&Q £20
Other equipment
Coaguchek
-portable INR machine Roche £700
www.lysta.dk
www.dentalman.biz
www.dentsply.com
www.silvertree.co.im (Accutrim)
www.daray.co.uk
www.coaguchek.com
36
www.quayledental.co.uk
Info @ DNTLworks.com– Portable equipment from USA- contact www.kabdental.com for UK source
www.Vorascopes.co.uk
www.orascoptic com
www.screwfix.com/prods/66107
37
Appendix 9 Organisation of a Domiciliary Kit into Sub-kits
This list is an aide memoire, and is not prescriptive. Other items may be included according to
individual need and preference.
General Kit
This is likely to include:
Portable light
Portable suction
Examination instruments for initial assessment visits, eg mirror and probe
Finger Guard
Infection control items and equipment:
Gloves
Masks/Face visors
Protective clothing for dentist and nurse, e.g. plastic aprons
Sharps disposal
Alcohol gel
Plastic over-sheaths/cling film
Disinfection wipes
Waste bags
Paper towels, rolls, tissues
Dirty instrument-carrying receptacle
Protective spectacles for patient
Laerdal resuscitation pocket mask
Emergency equipment/ drugs kit / oxygen
Administrative Items
The following items are useful:
Prosthetics Kit
This requires all the items that you would usually use for removable prosthetics
38
Waxes Gauze
Pressure relief paste Cotton wool rolls
Bite registration material Vaseline
Wax knife Denture fixative
Bite gauge Dividers
Paint scraper/ occlusal rim trimmer Indelible pencil
Denture pots Denture marking kits
Scalpel Tissue conditioner
Impression disinfection
Conservation kit
Materials
Periodontal kit
Hand scalers
Portable ultrasonic scaler
Toothbrushes, toothpastes and therapeutic agents, e.g. Corsodyl, Tooth Mousse
Surgical kit
39
Appendix 10 ROCS project Sheffield- example of good practice
The Residential Oral Care in Sheffield (ROCS) domiciliary project was instigated in 2000 as a
result of discussions between one of the dental advisors in Sheffield and SDO gerodontology
regarding the ad-hoc dental care arrangements available for older people in care homes in the
city. Its aim was to provide a more coordinated approach to improve access to dental services
for this often neglected group. Neither the CDS, nor GDS were able to provide the service to
the 100 plus homes alone, and it was clear that collaborative working should be the way
ahead.
A small group of interested General Dental Practitioners, the consultant in Dental Public Health
(DPH)and the local Salaried Dental Service applied to the Modernisation Agency for funding
under the Options for Change initiative and were successful. ROCS was launched in February
2004 and has evolved to now cover 50% of the care homes in the city, adapting since then to
the many changes in the dental contract. An annual screening is offered to all residents and
treatment provided if appropriate, either on a domiciliary basis, at the surgery or referred on to
the salaried service for the more complex cases.
The ROCS process is relatively simple and consists of the following stages:
1. Contact is made by the GDP with the home to be covered and an appointment
arranged with the care-home manager.
2. A meeting is convened to explain the details of the dental package. The ROCS
charter is explained - what the home can expect from the dentist & vice versa. The
residents are all offered a screening & appropriate information, and payment status
is collated by the home
3. At the screening visit(s), data is collected and forwarded to DPH consultant for use.
in needs-assessment exercises
4. Information is recorded in the patient care plans
5. Treatment visits are planned and provided, with referral to the Salaried Dental
Service if appropriate
6. Input from the Oral Health Promotion department on regular basis
7. Meeting with care-home manager to report on recommendations
The ROCS process has been well received and appreciated by those taking part as the
following quote illustrates:
A newly appointed Care Home Manager, following a screening visit: “In the 20 years I have
been working in Care Homes, you are the first dentist that has talked to us and explained
things to us, about the residents’ dental care. Dentists previously have visited, seen the
resident and dashed off again.”
ROCS is now funded on a sessional payment basis. A good working relationship with the PCT
commissioners is essential to the continued success of the project. The ROCS group meet
regularly as a team and continue to evolve through peer review and audit.
40