EngineersGuide Handbook ALI 9.600 092017 en

An Engineer‘s Guide
Making Maintenance Matter
Optimizing plant availability using

• Laser shaft alignment
• Vibration analysis
• Dynamic balancing
• Wear debris analysis
An Engineer‘s Guide
to shaft alignment, vibration analysis, dynamic
balancing and wear debris analysis
Document no.: ALI 9.600.G

Edition: 12
Issued: 09.2017
LEGAL NOTICES
Copyright
This publication and the products described herein are protected by copyright.
The authors reserve all rights. This publication must not be copied, reproduced
translated or made available to third parties in any other form - in part or in
full - without prior approval.
Exclusion of liability
Care has been taken by the authors in the preparation of this publication. It
is not intended as a comprehensive guide to alignment, analysis or balancing
of process machinery, nor is it a substitute for seeking professional advice or
reference to the manufacturers of the machinery. No liability whatsoever can
be accepted by PRUFTECHNIK AG or its subsidiaries for actions taken based
on information contained in this publication. PRUFTECHNIK AG and/or its
subsidiaries assume no responsibility directly or indirectly for any claims from
third parties resulting from use or application of information contained in this
handbook.
Trademark
The trademarks and registered trademarks referenced in these instructions are
generally marked as such and are the property of their owners. The absence of
a marking does not however mean that names are not protected.
© PRUFTECHNIK AG; All rights reserved
Printed in Germany
5
Contents
Contents
Introduction...................................................................................................... 8
SHAFT ALIGNMENT.............................................................9
What is shaft alignment?................................................................................. 10
Expressing alignment...........................................................................13
Alignment parameters..................................................................................... 13
How precise should alignment be?.....................................................21

Alignment tolerances for flexible couplings...................................................... 21
Troubleshooting....................................................................................25
Coupling strain and shaft deflection................................................................ 25
Causes of machine breakdown........................................................................ 27
The accumulated benefits of precision shaft alignment.................................... 29
Symptoms of misalignment............................................................................. 29
Alignment methods and practice........................................................31

Alignment methods – eyesight........................................................................ 37
Alignment methods – dial indicators................................................................ 39
Alignment methods – Laser shaft alignment.................................................... 51
Case studies.................................................................................................... 58
PRUFTECHNIK laser alignment systems............................................................ 66
Thermal expansion of machines..........................................................67

PRUFTECHNIK alignment monitoring systems.................................................. 70
Alignment of pulleys and sheaves.....................................................71

Pulley alignment.............................................................................................. 74
PRUFTECHNIK belt pulley alignment system..................................................... 78
Engineer’s Guide | 09.2017

6
Contents
VIBRATION ANALYSIS.......................................................83
Condition Monitoring...................................................................................... 84
Vibration analysis.................................................................................89
Basic parameters............................................................................................. 89
Transducers............................................................................................97
Mounting location........................................................................................... 97
Transducer design............................................................................................ 98
Fault detection ...................................................................................102

Basic theory of enveloping............................................................................. 109
A common sense approach................................................................113

FFT analysis.........................................................................................115
Rolling element bearings...................................................................122
Shock pulse evaluation.................................................................................. 128
Gear and gearbox faults....................................................................133

Looseness fault analysis....................................................................136
Belts and pulleys.................................................................................139
Fans......................................................................................................141
Electric motors....................................................................................143
Other electromechanical faults...................................................................... 145
Bent rotor or shaft..............................................................................148

Phase....................................................................................................149
PRUFTECHNIK data collectors and vibration analyzers.................................... 152

7
Contents
DYNAMIC BALANCING...................................................153
Balancing standards....................................................................................... 154
Correction methods............................................................................158
Single-plane balancing................................................................................... 160
Two-plane stroboscope method (devised by A Wahrheit)............................... 169
Trial weight calculation.................................................................................. 173
Balancing safety............................................................................................ 174
PRUFTECHNIK balancing instruments............................................................. 175
WEAR DEBRIS ANALYSIS................................................177
An overview........................................................................................178
Review of WDA methods............................................................................... 179
Assessing the results from WDA analysis........................................................ 182
Sampling procedure and location.................................................................. 183
PRUFTECHNIK WDA system........................................................................... 185
RESOURCES.....................................................................189
About PRUFTECHNIK...........................................................................190
Further Reading..................................................................................191

8
Introduction
Introduction
The purpose of producing this handbook is to provide basic information
and guidelines for the implementation of good shaft alignment, vibration
analysis and dynamic balancing practice for standard rotating machines
systems.
Laser alignment, dynamic balancing and condition monitoring are essential
components of a viable maintenance strategy for rotating machines. In iso-
lation, each strategy helps to reduce unexpected machine failure. But taken
together, they form the hub of a proactive maintenance strategy that will
not only identify incipient problems, but also extend machine operating life
considerably.
In each section of this handbook, we have used one or two examples of
the available methods for measuring the required parameters. We do not
suggest that the methods illustrated are the only ones available. For any-
one wishing to pursue further, the subjects covered here, a bibliography of
some of the available literature is to be found at the end of this handbook.
PRUFTECHNIK are specialists in the alignment and monitoring of rotating
machines. We have accumulated substantial practical knowledge of these
subjects over the 40 years of our existence. In so doing we have produced
many handbooks covering individual subjects and systems. This handbook
is a distillation of this accumulated knowledge. Each section has a brief
overview of the latest PRUFTECHNIK systems that address the specific ap-
plications concerned.
We hope that this information is presented in a clear readable form, and
will provide readers new to the subject, a platform to successfully apply
profitable maintenance practice on their plant.

Section 1
Shaft Alignment
10
What is shaft alignment?

Shaft alignment is the process whereby two or more machines (typically a
motor and pump) are positioned such that at the point of power transfer
from one shaft to another, the axes of rotation of both shafts should be
collinear when the machine is running under normal conditions.
As with all standard definitions there are exceptions. Some coupling types,
for example gear couplings or cardan shafts, require a defined misalign-
ment to ensure correct lubrication when operating. Note the following
important points in the above definition:
At the point of power transfer:
All shafts have some form of catenary due to their own weight, hence not
straight. Therefore the location where the alignment of the two shafts can
be compared is only at the point of power transfer from one shaft to the
next.
The axes of rotation:

Do not confuse “shaft alignment” with “coupling alignment”. The cou-
pling surfaces should not be used to measure alignment condition since
they do not represent the rotation axis of the shafts. To save manufacturing
costs coupling surfaces are often only rough machined or in some cases not
machined at all.
The accuracy of the fit of the coupling on the shaft is unknown:

Rotating only one shaft and using dial gauges to measure the opposing
coupling surface does not determine the axis of rotation of both shafts.

11
Under normal operating conditions:

The alignment condition can change when the machine is running. This
can be for a number of reasons including thermal growth, piping strain,
machine torque, foundation movement and bearing play. Since shaft
alignment is usually measured with the machines cold, the alignment con-
dition as measured is not necessarily the zero alignment condition of the
machines.
Alignment condition should be measured whilst turning the shafts in the
normal direction of rotation. Most pumps, fans and motors etc. have ar-
rows on the end casing showing direction of rotation.
Machinery catenary:
The amount of shaft deflection in a machine depends upon several fac-
tors such as the stiffness of the shafts, the amount of weight between
overhanging supports, the bearing design and the distance between the
supports.
The natural bending of shafts under their own weight
For the vast majority of close coupled rotating machines this catenary bow
is negligible, and therefore for practical purposes can be ignored. On long
drive machine trains, e.g. turbine generators in power generation plants or
machines with long spacer shafts e.g. cooling tower fans or gas turbines,
the catenary curve must be taken into consideration.
Machinery catenary

12
In a steam turbine for example the shafts are usually aligned to each other
better than 1/100th mm, but the mid point of the center shaft could be as
much as 30 mm lower than the two end shafts.
Operation above critical speed?

When a very long, flexible shaft begins to rotate, the bow of the shaft tries
to straighten out, but will never become a perfectly straight line. It is im-
portant to understand that the axis of rotation of a shaft could very possibly
run on a curved axis of rotation. In situations where two or more pieces of
machinery are coupled together with one or more of the shafts rotating
around a catenary shaped axis of rotation, it is important to align the shafts
so that they maintain the curved center-line of rotation.
Drive shaft operation below critical speed:

Align machine couplings to spacer couplings
Drive shaft operation above critical speed:

Align machine couplings to one another ignoring spacer.

13
Expressing alignment
Alignment parameters
Since shaft alignment needs to be measured and subsequently corrected,
a method of quantifying and describing alignment condition is necessary.
Traditionally alignment has been described in terms of dial indicator

readings at the coupling face or position values at the machine feet. The
measured values from both of these methods are dependent upon the
dimensions of the machines. Since there are many different methods for
mounting dial indicators (e.g. reverse indicator, rim and face, double rim)
the comparison of measurements and the application of tolerances can be
problematic. Additionally, rim indicator readings show twice the true offset,
and sign reversals must be observed depending on whether the indicator
measures an internal or external, left or right coupling face or rim.
A more modern and easily understandable approach is to describe machine

alignment condition in terms of angularity and offset in the horizontal
(plan view) and vertical (side view). Using this method, four values can then
be used to express alignment condition as shown in the following diagram.

14
Vertical offset Vertical angularity
Horizontal offset Horizontal angularity
Angularity, gap and offset

Angularity describes the angle between two rotating axes.
Angularity can be expressed directly as an angle in degrees or mrads, or in

terms of a slope in mm/m or thous/inch. This latter method is useful since
the angularity multiplied by the coupling diameter gives an equivalent gap
difference at the coupling rim.
Thus the angle is more popularly expressed in terms of GAP per diameter.
The gap itself is not meaningful, it must be divided by the diameter to have
meaning. The diameter is correctly referred to as a “working diameter”,
but is often called a coupling diameter. The working diameter can be any
convenient value. It is the relationship between gap and diameter that is
important.

15
Gap
Working diameter t
Angle t
Relationship of angle, gap and working diameter.
A 6 inch (152.4 mm) coupling open at the top by 0.005 inches (0.127 mm)
gives an angle between shafts axes of 0.83 mrads.
For a 10 inch working diameter this corresponds to a gap of 0.0083 inches.
For a 100 mm working diameter this corresponds to a gap of 0.083 mm.
Note: 1 mrad = 1 thousandths of an inch per inch
1 mrad = 1mm per meter
same angle – different gap
same gap – different angle

16
Offset describes the distance between rotation axes at a given point.

Offset is sometimes incorrectly referred to as parallel offset or rim misalign-
ment. Shaft rotation axes are however rarely parallel, and the coupling or
shaft rim has an unknown relationship to the shaft rotation axes.
+ 0.08 mm
+ 0.003"
- 0.09 mm
- 0.004" + 0.15 mm
+ 0.006"
As shown above, for the same alignment condition, the offset value varies
depending upon the location where the distance between two shaft ro-
tation axes is measured. In the absence of any other instruction, offset is
measured in mm or thousandths of an inch at the coupling center. This defi-
nition refers to short flexible couplings. For spacer couplings, offset should
be measured at the power transmission planes of the coupling.

17
Short flexible couplings

For ease of understanding, we define short flexible couplings when the ax-
ial length of the flexible element or the axial length between the flexible el-
ement is equal or smaller than the coupling diameter. Machines with short
flexible couplings running at medium to high speed require very accurate
alignment to avoid undue loading of the shafts, bearings, and seals.
Since the alignment condition is virtually always a combination of angu-
larity and offset, and the machine has to be corrected in both vertical and
horizontal planes, four values are required to fully describe the alignment
condition.
• Vertical angularity (or gap per diameter)
• Vertical offset
• Horizontal angularity (or gap per diameter)
• Horizontal offset.
Unless otherwise specified, the offset refers to the distance between shaft
rotation axes at the coupling center.
The sketch below shows the notation and sign convention.
Gap
Offset
Angle
+ Offset + Angle / Gap
- Gap/Offset - Angle / Gap

18
Spacer shafts
Spacer shafts are usually installed when significant alignment changes are
anticipated during operation of the machine, for example due to thermal
growth. Through the length of the spacer shaft, the angular change at the
spacer shaft end remains small even when larger machine positional chang-
es occur. The alignment precision for machines fitted with spacer shafts
that have flexible elements at each end is not as critical as for machines
that have short flexible couplings installed. Four values are required to fully
describe the alignment condition.
• Vertical angle a
• Vertical angle b
• Horizontal angle a
• Horizontal angle b
Angles are measured between the spacer shaft rotation axis and the respec-
tive machine rotation axes.
The sketch below shows notation and sign convention
Angle a
Angle b
+a
-b
-a -b
+b +a
+b
-a

19
Offset B – offset A
As an alternative to the 2 angles a and b the alignment can be specified in
terms of offsets.
• Vertical offset B
• Vertical offset A
• Horizontal offset B
• Horizontal offset A
The offsets are measured between the machine shaft rotation axes at the
location of the spacer shafts ends. This is similar to reverse indicator align-
ment.
The sketch shows the notation and sign convention.
Offset B
Offset A
+ Offset B + Offset A + Offset A
- Offset B
+ Offset B
- Offset B - Offset A
- Offset A

20
Relationships
By studying the diagram below a clearer understanding of the relationship
between the various offsets and angles will be obtained.
t=a+b
Offset B = b x L Offset A = -(a x L)
a b
spacer length L

21
How precise should alignment be?

Alignment tolerances for flexible couplings
The suggested tolerances shown on the following pages are general values
based upon over 20 years of shaft alignment experience at PRUFTECHNIK
and should not be exceeded. They should be used only if no other tol-
erances are prescribed by existing in-house standards or by the machine
manufacturer.
Consider all values to be the maximum allowable deviation from the align-
ment target, be it zero or some desired value to compensate for thermal
growth. In most cases a quick glance at the table will tell whether coupling
misalignment is allowable or not.
As an example, a machine with a short flexible coupling running at 1500
rpm has coupling offsets of -0.04 mm vertically and +0.02 mm horizontally.
Both these values fall within the “excellent” limit of 0.06 mm.
Angularity is usually measured in terms of gap difference. For a given
amount of angularity, the larger the diameter the wider the gap at the cou-
pling rim. The following table lists values for coupling diameters of 100 mm
or 10 inches. For other coupling diameters multiply the value from the table
by the appropriate factor. For example, a machine running at 1500 rpm has
a coupling diameter of 75 mm. At this diameter the maximum allowable
gap would be; 0.07 mm x 75/100 = 0.0525 mm.
For spacer shafts the table gives the maximum allowable offset for either
100 mm or 1 inch of spacer shaft length. For example, a machine running
at 6000 rpm with 300 mm of spacer shaft length would allow a maximum
offset of; 0.03 mm x 300/100 = 0.09 mm at either coupling at the ends of
the spacer shaft.
Rigid couplings have no tolerance for misalignment, they should be aligned
as accurately as possible.

22
Suggested alignment tolerance table

rpm Tolerance – [mm] Tolerance – [mils]
Softfoot any 0.06 2.0
Acceptable Excellent Acceptable Excellent
OK OK
Short flexible couplings
600 9.0 5.0
750 0.19 0.09
900 6.0 3.0
Offset
1200 4.0 2.5
1500 0.09 0.06
1800 3.0 2.0
3000 0.06 0.03
3600 1.5 1.0
6000 0.03 0.02
7200 1.0 0.5
600 15.0 10.0
750 0.13 0.09
Angularity
(gap difference at coupling 900 10.0 7.0
edge per 100 mm diameter
or per 10“ diameter) 1200 8.0 5.0
1500 0.07 0.05
1800 5.0 3.0
3000 0.04 0.03
3600 3.0 2.0
6000 0.03 0.02
7200 2.0 1.0

23
Suggested alignment tolerance table

rpm Tolerance – [mm] Tolerance – [mils]
Acceptable Excellent Acceptable Excellent
Spacer shafts
and membrane couplings
OK OK
600 3.0 1.8
750 0.25 0.15
Offset 900 2.0 1.2
(per 100 mm or per 1“
spacer length) 1200 1.5 0.9
1500 0.12 0.07
1800 1.0 0.6
3000 0.07 0.04
3600 0.5 0.3
6000 0.03 0.02
7200 0.3 0.2
Tolerance – [mrad] Tolerance – [mrad]

600 3.0 1.8
750 2.5 1.5
Angularity 900 2.0 1.2

(mrad) 1200 1.5 0.9
1500 1.2 0.7
1800 1.0 0.6
3000 0.7 0.4
3600 0.5 0.3
6000 0.3 0.2
7200 0.3 0.2

24
Note
For industrial equipment the amount of misalignment that can be tolerated
is a function of many variables including rpm, power rating, coupling type,
spacer length, design of coupled equipment and expectations of the user
with respect to service life. Since it is not practical to consider all these vari-
ables in a reasonably useful alignment specification, some simplification of
tolerances is necessary.
Tolerances based on rpm and coupling spacer length were first published in
the 1970s. Many of the tolerances were based primarily on experience with
lubricated gear type couplings. Experience has shown however that these
tolerances are equally applicable to the vast majority of non-lubricated cou-
pling systems that employ flexible elements in their design.
In the previous table “acceptable” limits are calculated from the sliding ve-
locity of lubricated steel on steel, using a value of 12 mm/sec for allowable
sliding velocity. Since these values also coincide with those derived from
elastomer shear rates they can be applied to short flexible couplings with
flexible elements.
“Excellent” values are based on observation made on a wide variety of
machines to determine critical misalignment for vibration. Compliance with
these tolerances does not however guarantee vibration free operation.

25
Troubleshooting
Troubleshooting
Coupling strain and shaft deflection
New readings do not agree with moves just made?
When performing an alignment whether using dial indicators or laser op-
tical systems, sometimes the readings following an alignment adjustment
does not agree with the corrections made. One possibility is that coupling
strain is bending the shaft, the machine mounts or the foundation. This
has frequently been noticed particularly on pump sets which have a front
“steady” mount as shown in the following sketch.
In this application the flexible coupling element is radially quite rigid and
can influence the alignment measurement. In this situation we advise
splitting the coupling element to free the measured alignment from such
external forces.
If not accommodated the net effect of influences such as noted above is
that the new alignment is not only wrong but quite often has been made in
the opposite direction to the required alignment correction.
In extreme cases coupling strain imposed by the newly aligned machines
can bend shafts during operation. In most cases this bending will be mini-
mal but sufficient to effect the measured axes of shaft rotation.

26
Troubleshooting
The following sketches illustrate the potential problem
This is the alignment condition with shafts uncoupled
This is the measured alignment with the shafts coupled.

Projected centrelines of rotation are shown
The moves are made as measured.

There is less strain on the coupling now and the shafts will be properly aligned at the next
attempt

27
Troubleshooting
Causes of machine breakdown

Couplings can take misalignment?
An often quoted comment is “...why bother to align the machine when it is
fitted with a flexible coupling designed to take misalignment?”
Experience and coupling manufacturers maximum misalignment recom-
mendations would suggest otherwise. Anecdotal evidence suggests that as
much as 50% of machine breakdowns can be directly attributed to incor-
rect shaft alignment.
It is true that flexible couplings are designed to take misalignment, typically

up to 10 mm or more radial offset of the shafts. But the load imposed on
shafts, and thus the bearings and seals increase dramatically due to the
reaction forces created within the coupling when misaligned. For example
a 445 mm vulcan coupling designed for a maximum of 6 mm radial offset
at 600 rpm produces a reaction force of 1.2 kN per mm of radial offset.
Anti-friction bearings
Bearings are precision manufactured components designed to operate with
clean lubrication and constant but restricted operating temperatures. Com-
ponents manufactured within 0.005 mm accuracy are:
• Not able to withstand operating for long periods at elevated tempera-
tures caused by misalignment.
• Not able to withstand contamination caused by mechanical seal failure
which has allowed ingress of dirt, grit, metallic elements or other ob-
jects.

28
Troubleshooting
• Not manufactured to operate for long periods with misalignment im-

posing axial shock loads on the carefully machined and honed compo-
nents.
In addition to the damage imposed on the bearings through the misalign-

ment itself, when mechanical seals fail, bearings have to be removed from
the shaft assembly, sometimes re-fitted or in most cases replaced. Removal
and re-fitting in itself can cause bearing damage. Most pump manufactur-
ers and repairers recommend that when repairing damaged pumps, bear-
ings should always be replaced irrespective of apparent condition, since it
is easy to miss minor damage to the bearing that will progressively worsen
after re-fitting.
Mechanical seals
Seal wear increases due to shaft loading when shafts are misaligned. Pump
seals are a high cost item often costing up to a third of the total pump cost.
Poor installation and excessive shaft misalignment will substantially reduce
seal life. Manufacturers have addressed the problem of poor installation
practice by the introduction of cartridge type seals which can be installed
with little or no site assembly. Seals however have precision ground and
honed components with finished accuracy of 2 microns (0.002 mm). They
do not tolerate operation in a poorly aligned condition, face rubbing, ele-
vated temperatures, and ingress of contaminants quickly damage expensive
components. Seal failure is often catastrophic, giving little or no pre warn-
ing. The resultant plant downtime, seal replacement costs, pump repair
costs and bearing replacements makes seal failure due to misalignment an
expensive and unnecessary problem.
Machine vibration
Machine vibration increases with misalignment. High vibration leads to
fatigue of machine components and consequently to premature machine
failure.

29
Troubleshooting
The accumulated benefits of precision shaft alignment

The benefits that accrue from adopting good shaft alignment practice be-
gin with improved machine operating life thus ensuring plant availability
when production requires it. Accurately aligned machinery will achieve the
following results.
• Improve plant operating life and reliability
• Reduce costs of consumed spare parts such as seals and bearings
• Reduce maintenance labor costs
• Improve production plant availability
• Reduce production loss caused by plant failure
• Reduce the need for standby plant
• Improve plant operating safety
• Reduce costs of power consumption on the plant
• “Push” plant operation limits in times of production need
• Obtain better plant insurance rates through better operating practice
and results
Symptoms of misalignment
It is not always easy to detect misalignment on machinery that is running.
The radial forces that are transmitted from shaft to shaft are difficult to
measure externally. Using vibration analysis or infrared thermography it is
possible to identify primary symptoms of misalignment such as high vibra-
tion readings in radial and axial directions or abnormal temperature gradi-
ents in machine casings. Without such instrumentation it is also possible to
identify secondary machine problems which can indicate inaccurate shaft
alignment.
• Loose or broken foundation bolts
• Loose shim packs or dowel pins
• Excessive oil leakage at bearing seals
• Loose or broken coupling bolts
• Some flexible coupling designs run hot when misaligned. If the coupling
has elastomeric elements look for rubber powder inside the coupling
shroud
• Similar pieces of equipment are vibrating less or have longer operating
life

30
Troubleshooting
• Unusually high rate of coupling failures or wear.

• Excessive amount of grease or oil inside coupling guards.
• Shafts are breaking or cracking at or close to the inboard bearings or
coupling hubs.
Good shaft alignment practice should be a key strategy in the maintenance

of rotating machines. A machine properly aligned will be a reliable asset to
the plant. It will be there when it is needed and will require less scheduled
(and unscheduled) maintenance. In a later section we will review some spe-
cific case studies that will show how shaft alignment will deliver substantial
cost benefits to operating plants. The next section of this handbook how-
ever will review the various methods of shaft alignment that can be used to
deliver good installed machinery alignment.

31
Alignment methods and practice

There are a number of different methods whereby acceptable rotating
machine alignment can be achieved. These range from an inexpensive
straight edge to the more sophisticated and inevitably more expensive laser
systems. We can condense these methods into three basic categories,
• Eyesight – straightedge and feeler gauges
• Dial indicators – mechanical displacement gauges
• Laser optic alignment systems.
Within each category there are a number of variations and options. It is not
the intention here to evaluate all of these options. We will concentrate on
the most widely used methods in each category.
Preparation is important
The first preparatory step toward successful alignment is to ensure that the
machine to be aligned may be moved as required; this includes vertical mo-
bility upwards (using proper lifting equipment, of course) and downwards,
should the machine require lowering, as is frequently the case. This can be
achieved by inserting 2 to 4 mm (0.08” – 0.16”) of shims beneath the feet
of both machines on initial installation. We recommend shimming both
machines initially so that changes in the foundation condition may later be
compensated, if need be.
Horizontal positioning of machines is best performed using jack bolts or a
simple ‘machine puller’ tool or hydraulic equipment, all of which allow fine
control of movement in a slow, gentle and continuous manner. Methods
such as hammers make exact positioning more difficult and can damage
machines (e.g. by causing chatter marks on bearings).The resulting vibra-
tion could displace the alignment system during the Live Move function and
therefore lead to less accurate monitoring of correction positioning.

32
Machine installation guidelines

The installation of machinery such as a pump, gearbox, compressor or oth-
er plant machinery require some general rules to be followed.
• The driven unit is normally installed first, and the prime mover or motor
is then aligned to the shaft of the driven unit.
• If the driven unit is driven through a gearbox, then the gearbox should
be aligned to the driven unit and the driver aligned to the gear box.
• Basic checks should be carried out to determine the accuracy of the ma-
chine couplings, i.e. check for “run-out” (concentricity and squareness
to the shaft centerlines) of coupling halves using a dial indicator, if pos-
sible. Out of “true” coupling halves can cause out of balance problems.
• Preparation of the machinery baseplate and machine mounting surfac-
es, feet, pedestals and similar foundation is of paramount importance.
Otherwise, successful alignment may not be easily achieved.
• Clean, dress up and file any burrs from mounting faces and securing
bolt holes.
• Have quality shims available to align precisely and effectively.
• Before assembling the shaft alignment system/ instrumentation to the
machines, take a few minutes to look at the coupling/shaft alignment.
Remember, your eyes are your first measuring system.
• Check that the pump/motor set is sitting square to the baseplate (soft
foot check), and correct as required – see following pages.
• Keep shims to a minimum – if possible use no more than a maximum of
3 shims under machinery feet/mounts.
• Correct alignment as required to ensure that, when the machinery is
running, the machinery shafts are centered in their bearings and are
aligned to manufacturers tolerances.
• Always check manufacturers alignment figures prior to commencing
work. Temperature growth may require specific “cold” alignment off-
sets.
• Ensure that any pipework attached to machines is correctly supported
but free to move with thermal expansion.

33
Measurement and correction of soft foot.

An essential component of any successful alignment procedure is the
determination and correction of soft foot. Just as a wobbly chair or table
is an annoyance, a wobbly machine mount causes alignment frustration.
The machine stands differently each time an alignment is attempted, and
each set of checking measurements indicate that the machine is still mis-
aligned. Additionally when the machine is bolted down strain is placed
upon the machine casing and bearing housings. Essentially there are two
types of soft foot as illustrated in the sketch below.
Parallel soft foot Angular soft foot
Parallel soft foot indicates that the baseplate and machine foot are par-
allel to each other allowing correction by simply adding shims of the cor-
rect thickness. Angular soft foot is caused by the machine feet forming
an angle with one another. This situation is more complex to diagnose
and to correct. One solution is to use tapered shims to fill the angular
space between the baseplate and the foot. A more drastic but long term
solution is to remove the machine and grind the machine feet flat.

34
Soft foot measurement

One of the following techniques may be used to determine soft foot prior
to commencing alignment:
• Using a dial indicator mounted on a magnetic foot; position the indica-
tor above one of the machine feet, zero the indicator and then loosen
off the machine foot. Record any change in the indicator reading. Tight-
en the machine foot down. Repeat this for all machine feet.
• Using a set of feeler gauges; loosen one machine foot at a time, mea-
sure the gap that appears below the loosened machine foot and record
this. Tighten the machine foot and move to the next foot.
• Using a laser alignment system; loosen one machine foot at a time. The
alignment system records the amount of foot lift at each foot. Tighten
the machine foot before proceeding to the next foot.
Having determined the amount of soft foot present as indicated below, it
is possible to make adjustments to the machine according to the soft foot
condition diagnosed.
4 76
A B
D C
80 0
This example shows classic soft foot problems with a rock across feet B and
D. It is tempting to shim both feet to eliminate the rock but this would be a
mistake. The best solution would be to shim only one foot 80/100 mm and
to recheck all four feet.
Many additional soft foot problems may be found including bent feet strain
imposed by pipe work or “squishy” foot cause by too many shims under
the machine feet. Some examples are shown in the following sketches.

35
0 0
A B
D 55 60 C
0 0
4 24
Soft foot example: bent foot - step shim at foot C and recheck all feet
0 0
A B
D 36 40 C
44 40
28 24
Soft foot example: pipe strain – relieve external forces
0 0
A B
D 0 0 C
0 0
4 24
Soft foot example: squishy foot – re shim all feet with max 3 shims and recheck

36
When eliminating soft foot follow these steps.

• Check all four machine feet. Any foot showing over 0.08 mm is to be
corrected as appropriate.
• Examine the largest soft foot (or two largest if having the same value)
with feeler gauges to determine the type of soft foot. It never hurts to
examine the other feet as well, but concentrate on finding and fixing
the largest problem first.
• Correct the condition diagnosed by shimming only one foot if any.
• If all feet are within tolerance commence the alignment.

37
Alignment methods – eyesight

The straightedge
This method of shaft alignment was common practice in many plants,
provided a flexible coupling was used. It was considered good enough to
eyeball the alignment and bolt the machine down. The system is certainly
cheap and equipment is readily available.
The corrective values for the machine feet were usually estimated accord-
ing to the experience of the engineer carrying out the alignment. Most
often corrections at machine feet need to be repeated on a trial and error
basis before the “eyeball” alignment condition was completed. Even then
there is no certainty that the completed alignment was correct. Since the
resolution of the human eye is limited to 0.1mm, alignment accuracy is
correspondingly limited. Additionally without having carried out extensive
checks on the fitting accuracy of the coupling on the shaft, no direct cor-
relation between the completed alignment and the actual alignment of the
machine shafts can be made.
At best this alignment method can be described as coupling alignment not
shaft alignment as defined earlier.
The feeler gauge

Although classified here as an “eyesight” method of shaft alignment the
feeler gauge method under certain circumstances and for some machines
can be perfectly acceptable. In the installation and alignment of turbine
sets where the coupling half is an integral part of the rotor shaft and has
no flexible elements, it is possible for a skilled turbine engineer to align the
two coupling halves very accurately. (As noted in the section on alignment

38
tolerances, no allowance for offset or gap is permissible on these “solid”

type of couplings).
Using the feeler gauge or a vernier caliper the engineer accurately measures
any gap between the coupling halves. Jacking oil is then used to rotate the
shafts together through 180 degrees and the “gap” is then checked again
(with the jacking oil off). This procedure is then carried out for the horizon-
tal alignment measurements.
Readings are usually graphically plotted to establish alignment condition

and any necessary corrections that are required. In some cases engineers
will rotate one shaft through 180 degrees and take additional readings.
These readings are then averaged to eliminate any possible shaft machining
errors. The averaged readings form the basis for the alignment graph.
On machines that employ flexible elements in the coupling design, the
use of feeler gauges is beset with the same limitations as the straightedge
method and can only be described as coupling alignment.

39
Alignment methods – dial indicators

The use of dial indicators for the vast majority of shaft alignment tasks
where a flexible coupling element is used represents a substantial step for-
ward in accurate shaft alignment methods.
There are a number of dial setups that can be used to effect the alignment
of machines, this section will review some of these. There are a number of
factors that the engineer should take into account before embarking on a
dial indicator alignment task.
Indicator bracket sag

This should always be measured before actual alignment read-
ings are taken – no matter how solid the bracket appears (see
section on measuring sag).
Internal friction / hysteresis

Sometimes the gauge has to be tapped in order for the indica-
tor needle to settle on its final value.
1/100 mm resolution
Up to 0.005 mm rounding error may occur with each reading.
This may be compounded several times in a full set of readings.
40 10
15
35
Reading errors
Simple errors occur when dials are read under difficult condi-
tions and severe time constraints.

40
Play in mechanical linkage

Slight amounts of play may go unnoticed but will produce large
reading errors.
Tilted dial indicators

The gauge may not be mounted perpendicular to the measure-
ment surface so that part of the displacement reading is lost.
Axial shaft play

This will affect face readings taken to measure angularity unless
two axial gauges are used.

41
Rim and face method – by trial and error

The interpretation of shaft alignment readings using dial indicators, taking
factors such as bracket sag into consideration requires an elementary un-
derstanding of maths and geometry. In some cases these skills are limited
and a rough trial and error procedure is used where bracket sag and shaft
float are ignored. Additionally only one shaft is rotated during the measure-
ment adding errors to the alignment caused by coupling run-out and shaft
bending.
The above sketch illustrates the scenario. Rim and face indicators clock the
fixed machine coupling. Indicators are zeroed at 12 o’clock and the shaft
of machine to be moved is rotated through a half turn to the 6 o’clock
position. The foot nearest the coupling is raised (or lowered) by an amount
equal to half the rim indicator reading. Shims are repeatedly placed under
the foot furthest from the coupling until the face indicator readings do not
change as the shaft is rotated.
Similarly the indicators are zeroed at the 3 o’clock position and rotated to
the 9 o’clock position for the horizontal correction.
It is usually easy to spot when this procedure is used as there are often a
number of thin shims under the rear feet of the machine. Usually this trial
and error procedure results in significant misalignment errors at the cou-
pling transmission planes. Where possible, this method should be discour-
aged in favor of other dial or laser methods of alignment.

42
Rim and face method – by calculation

The measuring device for this type of alignment is a dial indicator. The dial
hand indicates or points to increments marked on the dial face. As the foot
is pushed into the body, the dial hand rotates clockwise. The number of
indicator marks that the hand moves is equal to the distance that the foot
was pushed into the body. When the foot travels out from the body the dial
hand similarly indicates the travel distance. The dial count is positive when
the foot travels in and negative traveling out.
sL
sR
Rim and face alignment takes its name from the positions of the indicator
feet during measurements. A traditional indicator setup is shown above.
Once mounted, the two shafts are rotated together and the dials are read
at 12:00, 3:00, 6:00 and 9:00 o’clock positions.
Formulas for calculating alignment corrections

For such setups, the MTBM alignment at the plane of the indicator foot is
as follows:
• VO = (R6 - R0 - RS) / 2
• VA = (F6 - F0 - FS) / dia
• HO = (R9 - R3) / 2
• HA = (F9 - F3) / dia
Where:
VO / VA = Vertical Offset / Angularity
HO / HA = Horizontal Offset / Angularity

43
R0 = Rim reading at 12:00 o’clock position

F0 = Face reading at 12:00 o’clock position
dia = Diameter of the circle travelled by face indicator foot
RS = Sag of rim indicator
FS = Sag of face indicator*
s = Span from measurement plane (rim indicator foot) to machine foot
(front or back) – this value can be positive or negative
Clockwise is determined looking along shaft from MTBM towards STAT.

• Shim = (VA) (s) - VO
• Shim = (F6 - F0 + FS)(s) / dia - (R0 - R6 + RS) / 2
• Move = (HA)(s) - HO
• Move = (F9 - F3)(s) / dia - (R3 - R9) / 2
If the dial indicators are set to zero at 12:00 and then read at 6:00, the shim
calculation becomes:
• Shim = (F6 - FS)(s) / dia - (R6 - RS) / 2
Positive result means add shims. Negative result means remove shims
If the dial indicators are set to zero at 3:00 and then read at 9:00 the Move
calculation becomes:
• Move = (F9)(s) / dia - R9 / 2
Positive means move toward 3:00. Negative means move toward 9:00
The Shim and Move calculations must each be done twice; once for the
front feet, and once for the back feet.

44
Alignment methods – Dial indicators
Indicator reading validity rule.

The sum of the 3 and 9 o’clock readings should equal the sum of the 12
and 6 o’clock readings. This applies to both radial and face readings.
Sag
A major source of error in the above procedure is the sag of the spanner
bar. This error can affect the shim amounts to such an extent that the ma-
chine will be grossly misaligned. To compensate for this sag, measure it and
then add the sag reading (it can be positive or negative) to the 6:00 o’clock
readings (see the previous formulas).

45
Reverse indicator method – by calculation

The reverse indicator method of alignment is the most advanced dial indi-
cator alignment method. It is recommended by the American Petroleum
Institute (API 686) as the preferred dial indicator alignment method
D
C sL
sR
Reverse indicator alignment takes its name from the positions of the indi-
cators opposing one another on the opposite coupling halves. A traditional
indicator setup is shown above.
Once mounted, the two shafts are rotated together and the dials are read
at 12:00, 3:00, 6:00 and 9:00 o’clock positions.
Formulas for calculating reverse indicator alignment

For such setups the misalignment at the coupling center is as follows:
• VO = (S6-S0-SS)/2 - (S6-S0-SS +M6-M0-MS)C/2D
• VA = (S6-S0-SS +M6-M0-MS)/2D
• HO = (S9-S3)/2 - (S9-S3+M9-M3)C/2D
• HA = (S9-S3+M9-M3)/2D
Where:
VO / VA = Vertical Offset / Angularity
HO / HA = Horizontal Offset / Angularity
S0 = Left rim reading at 12 o’clock

46
M0 = Right rim reading at 12 o’clock

D = Distance between left and right indicators
C = Distance between left indicator and coupling centre
SS = sag of left rim indicator (*)
MS = sag of right rim indicator (*)
sL = Distance from the coupling center to front feet of right machine
sR = Distance from the coupling center to back feet of right machine.
(*) these values can be positive or negative
The corrections at the right machine feet can be calculated as follows

• Shim front feet = (VA * sL) - VO
• Shim back feet = (VA * sR) - VO
Positive result means add shim, negative result means remove shim.
• Move front feet = (HA * sL) - HO
• Moe back feet = (HA * sR) - HO
Positive result means move towards 3 o’clock, negative means move to-
ward 9 o’clock.
If the dial indicators are set to zero at 12 o’clock and then read at 6 o’clock
the shim calculation are as follows:
• Shim front feet = (S6 - SS + M6 - MS) (C+sL)/2D - (S6 - SS) / 2
• Shim back feet = (S6 - SS + M6 - MS) (C+sR)/2D - (S6 - SS) / 2
Positive result means add shim, negative result means remove shim.
If the dial indicators are set to zero at 3 o’clock and then read at 9 o’clock
the move calculations are as follows:
• Move front feet = (S9 + M9) (C+ sL)/2D - S9/2
• Move back feet = (S9+M9) (C + sR)/2D - S9/2
Positive result means move towards 3 o’clock, negative means move to-
ward 9 o’clock.
For sag calculations see following section.

47
Reverse indicator method – by graph

The calculations shown in the previous section can be daunting for many
engineers and unlike with rim and face measurement, trial and error cor-
rections are not possible. To avoid mathematical computation, a graphical
solution can be used to resolve the alignment condition and the necessary
shim and move corrections.
100 150 500
The sketch above shows a typical reverse indicator configuration with the
right machine as the machine to be moved (MTBM). Both indicators are
zeroed when the indicators are in the 12 o’clock position. The direction of
view is from the MTBM to the stationary machine.
The shaft is rotated through 180 degrees in the direction of normal shaft
rotation. Dial values are read and noted; as an example assume the follow-
ing readings were taken.
0 0
12 12
9 3 9 3
6 6
0.60 -1.50
All values shown in mm

48
The indicator bracket sag was -0.10 mm. The total indicator readings (T.I.R.)
after correction for bracket sag are thus:
0 0
12 12
9 3 9 3
6 6
0.60 -1.50
0.70 -1.40
T.I.R. values must be divided by 2 to determine the true shaft offset values
in the planes of the dial indicators.
Offset S = +0.70 / 2 = +0.35 mm
Offset M = -1.40 / 2 = -0.70 mm.
These offsets are then plotted on the graph as follows.

29,60 mm
12,25 mm
0,70 mm
0,35 mm
Note sign reversall

Foot corrections
50 mm
50 mm

49
Both indicators are then zeroed with the indicators at the 3 o’clock posi-
tion. The shaft is rotated through 180 degrees in the direction of normal
rotation. The readings are noted. On returning the shafts to the 3 o’clock
position the indicator readings should return to zero.
Assume the following readings were taken:
12 12
0.50 9 3 0 -0.90 9 3 0
6 6
Sag correction values are not applicable to horizontal readings.
T.I.R. values must be divided by 2 to determine the true shaft offset values
in the planes of the dial indicators.
Offset S = +0.50 / 2 = +0.25 mm
Offset M = -0.90 / 2 = -0.45 mm
These offsets are then plotted on the graph as follows
17,50 mm
0,45 mm
7,50 mm
0,25 mm
Note sign reversall

Foot corrections
50 mm
50 mm

50
Vertical and horizontal shim corrections are shown on each graph. The
corrections assume that the alignment should be 0.0/0.0 in vertical and
horizontal planes. Any manufacturers figures or computed figures for ther-
mal expansion should be accommodated in these shimming corrections or
in the original dial indicator readings.
Indicator bracket sag measurement

To measure sag, mount the entire measurement fixture (brackets, bars and
indicators) onto a piece of straight pipe. Adjust the fixture until the brackets
are the same distance apart, as they will be, when they are mounted on the
actual machinery. Likewise position the indicators as near as possible to the
way they will be set on the machinery. With the indicators held at the 12
o’clock position, zero the dials. Rotate the pipe until the indicators are at
6:00 o’clock. Read and record the dial indicators (the rim indicator will be
a negative value, the face indicator may be positive or negative but should
be close to zero).

51
Alignment methods – Laser shaft alignment

Shaft alignment by laser became popular in the mid 1980s when
PRUFTECHNIK introduced OPTALIGN the world’s first commercially available
computer-aided laser shaft alignment system. Despite its then relatively
high price, the system quickly gained a market popularity with engineers
and companies across a wide spectrum of process industries world wide.
OPTALIGN offered many significant advantages in effecting quick and ac-
curate alignment of coupled rotating machines. Since the introduction of
the first system, developments in laser and microprocessor technology has
allowed a new generation of laser systems to be developed which offer the
user simple-to-understand, menu led, systems that can be used for virtually
any shaft alignment task irrespective of complexity or size.
As we have seen in the previous sections that there are a number of import-
ant considerations to be taken into account when using mechanical meth-
ods of shaft alignment. Additionally, calculations of alignment corrections
can be complicated and error prone. None of these considerations apply to
the laser method of shaft alignment. Access to precision shaft alignment
and the benefits that this brings (see following section) are readily available
when laser shaft alignment is used on plant.
A summary of the advantages offered by laser systems are shown here:
• Precision alignment with no manual input of data and no graphical or
numeric calculations to perform
• Graphic display of alignment results at the power transmission planes of
the coupling, and shim and adjustment corrections at the machine feet
• No mechanical fixtures - no bracket sag
• No need to disassemble the coupling to effect an alignment
• No need to take readings at predetermined locations such as 12;00,
3;00, 6;00 and 9;00 o’clock positions; results can be obtained with less
than 90 degrees of shaft rotation
• Data storage and print out of results for report generation of alignment
condition
• Certified calibrated accuracy of the laser system to comply with ISO
9000 requirements
• Universal bracket systems which cover all types of alignment applica-
tions; no need for special “Christmas tree” brackets for long spacer
shaft measurement

52
• Menu driven operator system allows use by a wide range of engineering

skills and disciplines
• Live dynamic display of vertical and horizontal corrections during align-
ment corrections
• Inbuilt go/no go alignment standards for analysis of alignment accuracy
Having identified some of the benefits and advantages that can be ob-
tained by using a laser alignment system to carry out shaft alignment, it is
important to establish the functionality of the alignment system that will
suit the users requirements. There are a number of systems available and a
number of manufacturers who offer laser alignment systems.
As a minimum the system you choose should have the following capabili-
ties:
• Certified calibration to a traceable standard: There is no point
purchasing a system for accurate shaft alignment that cannot have its
measurement accuracy certified.
• High accuracy and repeatability: Poor accuracy simply results in
wrong correction values. High repeatability means that fewer mea-
surements are required to acquire sufficient data to calculate accurate
results.
• Rugged, water, shock and dust proof: A rugged enclosure means
outdoor use in wet conditions is not a problem. Rugged instruments
with a guaranteed seal of approval like the IP standards (65 and 67) let
you continue working even in adverse conditions.
• Measurement resume capability: Resume allows you to easily re-start
an alignment in progress after an interruption, or at the start of a new
day, the user won’t have to input dimensions or targets again. Even
measurement results are saved. Data will never be lost.
• Measurement extend capability: The ability to extend the dynamic
range of the laser detector system ensures that no matter the misalign-
ment being measured, the laser system will cope with the alignment
task. Static detector systems will not allow measurement of gross mis-
alignment on long or intermediate spacer shafts whatever the stated
size of the detector plane (see later notes).
• Interchangeable static feet: The ability to vary static feet allows the
engineer maximum flexibility and the ability to deal with bolt bound feet

53
on the MTBM without the need for re-measuring or complex calcula-

tions; all possible alternatives of machine move can be shown.
• Assortment of brackets: A wide range of brackets means that mea-
suring equipment can be fitted even to the most awkward of machines
with speed and ease.
• Tolerances (TolCheck): Built in verification of alignment tolerances
save time and effort. No time is wasted on unnecessary machine moves.
Automatic tolerance check shows when excellent or acceptable align-
ment has been reached.
• Report generation directly from the box: Direct reporting means
faster reporting to any printer with the serial number, date and time,
and operator name printed on the report, allowing full compliance with
ISO 9000 traceability requirements for example.

54
Laser systems basic operating principles

Essentially there are two types of laser systems: one that uses a single beam
projected onto either a detector or on to a reflector that returns the beam
to the laser detector; the other type of system uses two lasers each with
inbuilt detectors. The former single laser system is a patented system used
exclusively by PRUFTECHNIK, the two laser systems are employed by all
other system suppliers.
The single laser system as shown above has a number of advantages that
have been incorporated to improve system versatility and usability.
Measurement extend capability – only one laser datum means that it is
possible to dynamically extend the detector range of the system to incorpo-
rate gross misalignment – see later explanation.
Split alignment capability – one laser allows alignment of machines
that have no spacer or coupling in place, each machine can be rotated
independently. This is particularly useful when large spacer couplings or
fluid couplings are used, when aligning large machines such as turbines, or
when one or both machines cannot easily be rotated.
Single cable technology – only one (or no) cable is required. This is par-
ticularly useful on long spacer shafts such as cooling tower drives where
long cables can influence alignment measurements by becoming entangled
during measurement.
Only one laser to adjust – on long spacer shafts or large machines, set up
is much easier with only one fixed datum position to adjust.

55
Measurement extend capability explained

Why would it be useful to be able to extend the range of the detector plane
on a shaft alignment system; surely it would be better to have a larger de-
tector area? Well, yes, theoretically it would be useful to have a static detec-
tor plane of 500 mm. But the system would be unusable simply because of
size and weight. An ideal compromise is to dynamically extend the detector
plane if it is required. This keeps the system to a minimum size and weight
and therefore maximizes the system’s use in difficult to access areas.
Taking as an example a cooling tower drive with a spacer shaft coupling of
3000 mm. The offset between the driver and driven shafts can be substan-
tial even with only a small angular offset between the shafts.
2000 mm
1000 mm
500 mm
100 mm
26.18 mm
Versatz
3000 mm
This above sketch illustrates the limitations imposed by long spacer cou-
pling lengths.
Taking as a simple example a coupling setup with an angular misalignment
between the couplings of 0.5 degrees would mean that over a simple
short coupling length of 100 mm an offset of 0.87 mm between coupling
centerlines would occur. This offset could be comfortably measured by any
laser system.
If the distance between coupling faces increases to 500 mm the centerline
offset becomes 4.36 mm, a value out side the range of most static laser
detector systems. Now increase the distance to 1000 mm. The offset be-
comes 8.72 mm. As the coupling spacer gets longer so does the offset until
at 3000 mm a massive 26.18 mm offset occurs. This with only a 0.5 degree
angle between the shaft centerlines.

56
This large offset can only be measured by an extendable detector range

since a static detector area of approximately 60 mm is required to accom-
modate this offset. The reason for such a large detector can be explained
as follows:
The working area of the detector is less than the physical detector surface.
For example, if the detector area is 20 x 20 mm, and the laser beam is 4.0
mm diameter then the maximum useful measurement range is 16 mm as
shown below.
Real measurement range

Detector size L
Beam diameter D
To be able to measure an offset a system detector range has to be twice the

offset. As with a dial gauge, the laser sensor measures twice the physical
offset of the two shafts as shown below.
Physical offset
4
3
2
1
1
2
Detector displacement 3
4
To measure a physical offset of 2.0 mm we need a detector measurement

range of 4.0 mm.

57
A measurement extend capability you may say is all very well if you measure
cooling tower drives or other long spacers but when the maximum spacer
measurement is less than 1 meter, why is this ability to extend the detector
range important? An example of the benefit of this ability to extend the
detector range is illustrated here with a real application. A motor / fan drive
was measured, as shown below:
The coupling spacer length was 800 mm.

Measured offset and gap per 100 mm spacer shaft length:
Vertical = 0.00 offset 0.72 mm gap
Horizontal = 0.00 offset 1.05 mm gap
To facilitate this measurement it is necessary that the detectors are able to

measure an offset of 8.40 mm. This requires a detector range of 20.8 mm.
This is derived from the following formula:
Measured offset x 2 + beam diameter,
(8.4 mm x 2) + 4 mm = 20.8mm.
Depending on the specific requirements encountered in day-to-day align-

ment tasks, the ability to extend the system detector range could be the sin-
gle most influencing factor in choosing a measurement system. Regardless
of laser alignment system chosen, the operating plant will gain substantial
benefits as illustrated in the following case studies.

58
Laser shaft alignment – Case studies
Case studies
Laser shaft alignment cuts energy costs
A project to determine the extent to which shaft misalignment influenced
the power consumption of the plant was set up as a graduate student proj-
ect at a major UK chemical processing plant. The study was conducted over
a six-week period in a controlled environment that accurately reflected the
normal operating conditions across the plant.
A 7.5 kW pump rig on a redundant plant was used for the investigation.
Before the project commenced the pump and motor were removed to the
workshop where new bearings were fitted, and both units were rebalanced
to eliminate any external factor that could distort the project results. Plates
and jacking bolts were attached to the motor base plate to allow fine ad-
justments in alignment condition. The pump set was installed to circulate
water through a closed loop of piping with the motor running at 3000 rpm
(+/- 1% due to variations in load condition). The pump and motor were
initially installed with the alignment recorded as 0.00 gap and offset in the
vertical and horizontal directions. The system was run in this condition for
a number of days with current drawn being measured at the distribution
board every few hours. During the course of the trial period, the alignment
of the machines was adjusted and at each misalignment interval run for a
set period with current drawn measured at regular intervals.
Across the site the two principle types of coupling installed were “pin” and
“tyre” couplings. In order to obtain a reasonable picture of potential sav-
ings that could be made on the plant both types of coupling were installed
with the same amount of misalignment/current measured on each coupling
type.
The results of the study are shown in the following graphs. Offset mis-
alignment affected power consumption more than angularity; angular
misalignment affected power drawn by “pin” type couplings more than
“tyre” couplings. The components of misalignment are additive irrespective
of whether the misalignment was vertical or horizontal.

59
Effects on power consumption
Pin coupling at 3000 rpm

7 Offset %
6 0.03 mm 0.0
5 0.25 mm 0.7
% increase
4
0.53 mm 1.0
0.73 mm 1.3
3
0.99 mm 2.0
2
1.24 mm 5.2
1 1.24 mm 6.6
0
0
0
0.25
.004
0.53 0.74
.008 .012
0.99 1.24
.016 .020
1.52
.025
Offset in mm
Tyre coupling at 3000 rpm

9
8
Offset %
7
0,03 mm 0,0
0.25 mm 0.7
% increase
6
5 0.53 mm 1.0
4 0.74 mm 1.3
3 0.99 mm 2.8
2 1.24 mm 8.5
1
0
0 0.25
0 0,01 0.53 0.74
0,02 0,03 0.99
0,04 1.24
0,05
Offset in mm
Pin coupling at 3000 rpm

8 Gap %
7 0.004 mm 0.3
6 0.008 mm 3.1
0.010 mm 3.3
% increase
5
0.011 mm 5.7
4
0.016 mm 7.8
3
2
0 0,002 0,004
0 0.02 0.04 0,006 0,008 0,01
0.06 0.08 0.10 0,012 0,014
0.12 0.14 0,016
0.16
Gap in 0.01 mm / cm diameter of coupling

60
Tyre coupling at 3000 rpm

5
4,5
4
Gap %
3,5
0.008 mm 0.3
% increase
3
2,5
0.016 mm 1.2
2
0.024 mm 3.2
1,5 0.032 mm 4.8
1
0,5
0
0 0,005 0,01 0,015 0,02 0,025 0,03 0,035
0 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35
Gap in 0.01 mm / cm diameter of coupling
The conclusion from the project was a site wide recommendation to align
machines to within an offset tolerance of 0.15 mm and an angularity toler-
ance of 0.05 mm per 100 mm of coupling diameter.
To estimate the potential cost savings that could accrue from this new site
standard a random sample of machines were measured to estimate the
extent of misalignment that existed on the plant. The pie chart below illus-
trates the findings of this survey.
Shaft offsets in
1/100 mm
31% 18% 0–5
6 – 10
11 – 20
11%
21 – 50
51 – 100
7% > 100
Acceptable
alignment
23% 10%
Shaft offsets in 1/100 mm at the coupling center for a sample of 100 machines operating at
3000 rpm.
Only 7% of machines measured were within the recommended site align-

ment standard.

61
Using the pie chart a representative median offset of 0.35 mm was esti-
mated as a reasonable figure for calculating the potential power saving on
the plant. Given that the power consumption for the rotating equipment
on the plant was in the range of 30 Megawatts, the following estimate of
power saving that could be achieved was:
Assuming electricity rates of 0.10 Euro per kWh and a conservative % pow-
er reduction of 0.75%:
30,000 kW * 0.75% * 0.10 Euro / kWh = 22.5 Euro per hour or

197,100 Euro per year.

62
Laser shaft alignment improves pump reliability

Substantial plant operating improvements were achieved following the
introduction of a comprehensive pump alignment and monitoring program
at a major acetate chemical plant in Derbyshire.
The production process requires materials to be mechanically moved around
the plant from process stage to process stage. Some 260 pumps are used
on this plant. It is therefore vital that both duty and stand-by plant is reliable
and available. Maintenance was very much a firefighting exercise. The plant
engineer at the time persuaded management of the need to take a more
pro-active view of pump performance maintenance and monitoring. Using
PRUFTECHNIK laser alignment systems and condition monitoring equip-
ment a coordinated plan to improve plant performance was introduced.
In the preceding years there had been an estimated 120 pumps repaired
per year at an annual cost of some £98,000. The calculated mean time
between failure (MTBF) of these pumps was 10 months.
By applying a combination of laser alignment of newly refurbished ma-
chines and alignment of installed machines when time permitted plus
routine plant condition monitoring together with a comprehensive review
of installed components such as seals, bearings and gaskets, the plant be-
gan to see significant savings on maintenance of the all important pump
systems.
The program, now well established, has returned substantial dividends.
Plant reliability has improved to more than 46 months MTBF and routine
pump repairs have been drastically reduced.
Calculated savings are now in excess of £80,000 per annum, and since the
beginning of the program is in the order of £450,000.

63
A comprehensive plan of action was used by engineers to achieve these

extraordinary savings on the plant. The key factors include:
• Engineers and managers commitment to the program

• Patience
• Laser alignment
• Condition monitoring
• Training
• Root cause analysis
• Careful mechanical seal selection
• Careful bearing selection
• Partnerships with suppliers
• Improved piping design and installation
• Considered pump selection
• Advanced lubrication systems selection

64
Laser shaft alignment improves bearing and seal life

A study was conducted by Infraspection Institute in the USA to evaluate
the affect of misalignment on key machine elements such as bearings, seals
and couplings.
In a series of tests, misalignment was introduced into a pump – motor set.
At each new misalignment interval thermographic pictures were taken to
identify the degree of temperature rise on key components.
The tests were conducted across a wide variety of flexible coupling types.
Without exception all couplings, bearings and machine housings (and
therefore seals) showed significant temperature rise. The graphics below
show the affect of misalignment on components when the machine set
was aligned to +/- 0.05 mm and when the misalignment was increased to
+0.5 mm.
Aligned to 0.05 mm Misaligned to 0.5 mm
Not only was the flexible element of the coupling shown to heat up, but
the machines themselves also develop elevated temperatures particularly
around the bearing housings. Neither bearings nor seals are designed to
operate at the elevated temperatures (caused by misalignment) for pro-
longed periods of time. An inevitable result of their operating in these con-
ditions is premature failure and reduction in machine operating life.

65
Laser shaft alignment reduces vibration alarms

A major UK petroleum refinery adopted laser shaft alignment as a standard
policy for all coupled rotating machinery. OPTALIGN® and later the RO-
TALIGN® from PRUFTECHNIK were the preferred systems. They also mon-
itored the incidents of vibration alarms and how, if at all, the use of laser
shaft alignment would help reduce this. Alarms were broken down into
problems caused by “misalignment” and “other” problems such as bearing
damage, unbalance and mechanical looseness.
The graph provided by the company shows clearly that a substantial re-
duction in alarm violations was achieved, with those of alignment related
problems all but eliminated altogether.
Vibration alarms per year

700
600
500
400 Misalignment
300
Other (bear-
ing damage,
200 imblance)
100
0
1987
year 1 1991
year 6 1995
year 13

66
PRUFTECHNIK laser alignment systems
PRUFTECHNIK laser alignment systems

ROTALIGN® touch is a truly versatile laser shaft alignment system, de-
signed with simplicity of operation as its first principle. The system has
many innovative features including:
• Tablet-like capacitive touchscreen with 3D display
• Extremely durable with strengthened glass screen and tough housing
• High measurement quality with intelliSWEEP
• Live Move with acoustic assistant
• Voice recognition for hands-free operation
• Inbuilt mobile connectivity: RFID, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth and integrated cam-
era
• Free cloud space and alignment software
• Live Trend to monitor continuously relative machine positional changes
• Vibration Spot Check to measure overall values
• intelliPASS and intelliPOINT measurement modes for uncoupled shafts

67
Thermal expansion of machines

In most cases in this handbook, we have considered only the cold align-
ment conditions of rotating machines. However, for larger machine sets
and for equipment that operates at elevated temperatures on one compo-
nent of the machine sets it is necessary to consider the effects of expansion
(or contraction) on the alignment condition of the machines. There is little
point in accurately aligning a machine set at cold if this alignment condition
will change at the normal operating condition of the machine set.
There are a number of ways of establishing the final alignment or operating

alignment condition.
• Manufacturers of machines should be able to provide thermal offset
information
• Imperial calculation based on coefficient of thermal expansion for spe-
cific materials per unit length of center line height per degree of thermal
change (see following page)
• On line measurement of cold to hot alignment condition using contact
or non contact alignment measurement instruments
Estimating or calculating the effective alignment position change is by no
means a simple operation. On complex machine systems such as compres-
sors where there are a number of machine elements, each with varying
temperature gradients, simple thermal growth calculations become very
complex. In these cases on-line measurement of the machine components
is usually necessary.

68
In these cases laser systems such as PRUFTECHNIKs PERMALIGN® system is

an ideal tool. Systems such as PERMALIGN® must be designed for long term
operation in difficult conditions. Often, the very act of mounting the equip-
ment onto a turbine or compressor operating in excess of 300 degrees C
will mean that the measurement system needs to be cooled to avoid dam-
age or inaccurate thermal growth readings.
Thermal expansion is not however the only cause of machine position
change. Many elements can impinge on the accuracy of the final result;
examples included:
• Thermal expansion of bearing supports
• Changes in radial or axial forces
• Changes in oil film thickness on bearings
• Changes in foundation or base plate supports
• Changes in piping forces
Thermal growth calculations

If the direction and extent of growth are known, the machines may be
purposely misaligned such that they grow into place, resulting in good
alignment condition during normal operation.
PRUFTECHNIKs laser alignment systems contain a special function designed
especially to incorporate such alignment target values. The most readily
available target specifications for cold alignment are generally obtainable
from machine manufacturers. Where this information is not available, the
following calculations will assist in establishing thermal growth.
dL = L * a * dT
where
dL = thermal expansion
L = height centerline to base of machine
a = coefficient of thermal expansion of material
dT = change in temp from ambient

69
Example:
• A pump with liquid at 150 ºC
• Base to center height 700 mm
• Ambient temp 10 ºC
• a (cast iron) = 0.0000059
dL = L * a * dT
dL = 700 mm * 0.0000059 * (150-10)
= 700 mm * 0.0000059 * 140 = 0.578 mm
Some advanced laser alignment systems such as ROTALIGN Ultra perform

these calculations for you.

70
PRUFTECHNIK alignment monitoring systems
PRUFTECHNIK alignment monitoring systems

PERMALIGN® is the ideal system for permanent or temporary monitoring
of machinery positional changes. It measures and monitors continuously,
and in real time, the alignment changes of rotating machinery during op-
eration. It may be used for permanent monitoring or for just the necessary
time to determine the positional changes from cold to hot or vice versa.
All four alignment parameters – vertical offset, horizontal offset, vertical
angularity and horizontal angularity are monitored simultaneously using
two monitors.
• Laser-based positional change monitoring system with graphical display
• Impact of temperature changes minimized through cooling of measure-
ment components
• Impact of vibrations minimized by adjusting sampling time
• Monitors multi-element machine trains
• Live Monitoring software application for monitoring analysis (ALIGN-
MENT CENTER)
• Intrinsically safe option available

71
Alignment of pulleys and sheaves

The use of flexible belt drives represents a significant percentage of all
industrial power transmission applications, particularly when the speed of
the driver and driven shafts are different or where shafts have to be widely
separated. There are obviously a number of design factors that preclude the
use of flexible belts. But where appropriate, such drives offer an efficient
and economic design solution with some useful advantages over other
means of power transmission. The advantages include:
• Overall economy
• Cleanliness
• No need for lubrication
• Low maintenance costs
• Easy installation
• Damping of shock loads
• The ability to be used for variable speed power transmission between
widely spaced shafts
The power that is transmitted by a belt during operation works on the rim
of a pulley, therefore the belt on a pulley drive system must be tight enough
to prevent ‘slip’ during operation. The forces that work during operation
are not uniform around the entire belt length. There is always a tight side
tension and a slack side tension. The difference between these pulls is often
referred to by manufacturers of belts systems as the effective or net pull.
This effective pull is applied at the rim of the pulley and is the force that
produces work.
The design of pulley systems and the selection of correct belt design and
application is by no means simple. The number and variety of belt types
is a testament to this. Manufacturers of belts and pulleys do not produce
a wide range of different types and styles just to be different from their
competitors. Vee belts, flat belts, wedge belts and synchronous belts all
have their specific design applications and application criteria. Within each
design section there are numerous different configurations, cross sections
and operating criteria.
It is not the brief of this section to consider either belt design or selection.
Listed in the bibliography at the end of this book are a number of useful
guides to belt selection and design.

72
It is however useful to note the following basic design criteria.

• The maximum center distance of pulleys should be around 15 times that
of the pitch of the smallest pulley, and should not exceed 20 times the
pitch of this pulley. Distances greater than this require tight control of
belt tension because a small amount of stretch will cause a large drop in
belt tension, creating slip and power transmission inefficiency.
During operation a flexible belt experiences three types of tension as it

rotates around a pulley.
• Working tension (tight side – slack side)
• Bending tension
• Centrifugal tension
Belts are designed to withstand these working operation states (provided

that pre-selection of the belt meets the operating criteria). The design life
of the belt will be met and usually exceeded provided that no other forces
other than the above act upon the belt during its operating life. Forces
such as misalignment and loose or overtightened belt tension are killers of
flexible belt drives. Useful operating life can be reduced by as much 80% by
poor pulley alignment. In addition to belt wear, pulleys, bearings and seals
are also damaged by inattention to basic installation requirements.
Belt tension
The required tension of newly installed belts is virtually always specified
by the belt manufacturers. This specification should always be followed
meticulously. If there is no specification then a guide to belt tension can be
applied as follows:
Tension load =
Distance (cm) between the axes of the driver and driven shafts x 1.0 mm

73
= =
max deflection = 1 mm per 100 mm

of total pulley center distance
After tensioning and alignment re-start the machine. After a running pe-
riod of 48 hours the tension on the new belts should be re-checked and
re-tightened to correct any mid span deflection that exceeds the tension
specification.
It is advisable to use a custom designed belt tension testing device for ac-
curate and repeatable measurement of belt tension. Periodic checking of
each belt drive will quickly identify any drives that need tightening (or loos-
ening) before incipient damage to the belts and other components cause
premature failure.

74
Pulley alignment
By far the most common and damaging installation error that occurs on
belt drives is that of misalignment of the driving and driven pulleys. This is
not usually due to carelessness on the part of the installer. It is more often
due to a lack of suitable tools with which to carry out the required align-
ment. For many years, at best, a tight wire or straight edge were the only
available tools with which to do the job.
Both methods rely entirely on the installers eyesight to ensure that the align-
ment is correct. Neither method has any measurements documented. Both
rely upon the installer adjusting the driven pulley until the faces or grooves
of the driven pulley touch the surface of the straight edge or tight wire. The
driven pulley is then rotated half a turn and then rechecked and adjusted.
The measurement is then repeated until the pulleys appear to be in line. No
angularity or inaccurate mounting of the reference line is measurable. The
system is purely an estimate of the alignment of the two pulleys.
Types of pulley misalignment

There are three basic parameters that describe pulley misalignment. These
are vertical angularity, horizontal angularity and axial offset. These
conditions usually occur in any or all combinations of alignment condition.
Vertical angularity Axial offset Horizontal angularity

75
Pulley run-out
In addition to correct alignment of the pulleys, the run-out errors of the
pulley should also be measured and corrected. The two types of run-out -
rim (radial) and face (axial) should be corrected until they meet tolerance
before final alignment of the pulleys takes place. If this is not corrected the
effect could be that the belts slacken off at one position and then snap into
tension at the opposite position. This continuous snapping action if not
corrected quickly wears out belts and bearings.
The tolerance for radial or rim run-out on high speed pulleys (1500 rpm and
higher) should not exceed 0.12 mm ( 0.005 inches) total indicator reading
(T.I.R.) on average, and may be increased up to 0.24 mm (0.01 inches) on
slower pulley drives.
The tolerance for axial or face run-out should not exceed 0.05 mm per 100
mm (0.0005 per inch) of pulley diameter for high speed pulleys, and may
be increased up to 0.1 mm per 100 mm (0.001 per inch) of pulley diameter
for slower pulley drives.
Check that the offset from the pulley mounting face to the groove is the
same for both pulleys.
The pulley or machine manufacturers tighter tolerance recommendations

should be followed where possible. Start by checking for radial run-out.
If unsatisfactory, check for shaft run-out. If excessive run-out is present on
the shaft it may be bent and must be replaced before radial run-out on the
pulley is checked again. If no shaft run-out is detected replace the pulley
instead. If the pulley is mounted on a tapered shaft bushing, inspect and
clean the bushing both inside and out to ensure proper seating.
Now check for face (axial) run-out and if necessary correct it by reposition-
ing the pulley on its shaft. When run-out is in tolerance proceed to install
new belts.

76
Drive belt fitting

• Clean pulleys of all foreign matter with a stiff brush, not a wire brush, as
this can damage the surface of the groove walls.
• Use the “go-no-go” profile gauges that can be obtained from the belt
manufacturer to ensure the pulley condition is acceptable for the fitting
of new belts.
• Replace any pulleys with worn, chipped or cracked groove surfaces.
• Install new belts on the pulleys so that the slack sides of all belts are on
the same side at either top or bottom of the drive.
DO NOT UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES install belts by prying them onto
pulleys by any forcible method. Belts should be fitted by hand pressure only.
• De-tension the motor to allow this fitting to be effected without undue
pressure.
• In the case of multiple belt drives when replacing belts, even where only
one belt appears worn, all belts should be replaced together.
• Only belts from the same manufacturer should be combined together,
preferably a factory matched set.
After replacing belts it is worth examining the replaced belts for noticeable
defects such as cracking or glazing. The condition of the belt is a good indi-
cation of the type of installation problems. Uneven wear or cracking on belt
sides are a good indication of misalignment. Glazing on the contact surface
of the belts indicate slipping and therefore poor belt tension.
Checking soft foot

Having mounted the belts and positioned the driver and driven units in
their approximately correct position, a check on the soft foot condition of
the movable machine (usually the driver) is useful. Undetected soft foot can
lead to distortion of the machine frame when bolted down, causing dam-
age to bearings, seals and higher than acceptable vibration on bearings.
To check for soft foot use feeler gauges under each machine foot in turn
or a dial indicator mounted on a magnetic base. Loosen each foot in turn;
measure any rise in the loosened foot and record it. Tighten the foot down
and proceed to the next foot.
Having established the type of soft foot (if any) shim as necessary and re-
check each foot. As a guide, no reading of soft foot should be larger than
0.05 mm (0.002 inches).

77
Alignment tolerances
Having completed the soft foot check the drive is ready for alignment
Whichever system is employed for this, be it tight wire, straight edge or
laser system ( a brief description of this type of alignment will follow), the
alignment should be as accurate as possible.
The nominal recommended tolerance for belt drives is 0.5 degrees. Most
major belt and pulley manufacturers specify this value. Better tolerances
can be achieved if the alignment procedure is carefully followed. The table
below converts the tolerance from degrees into offsets in mm per 100 mm
and in thousandths of an inch per inch.
Tolerances conversion table

Angle of offset Offset Offset
misalignment mm / 100 mm thous / inch
0.1° 0.18 0.00175
0.2° 0.35 0.00349
0.3° 0.52 0.00524
0.4° 0.70 0.00698
0.5° 0.87 0.00873
0.6° 1.05 0.01047
0.7° 1.22 0.01222
0.8° 1.40 0.01396
0.9° 1.57 0.01571
1.0° 1.74 0.01745
Note: Values between 0.1° and 0.5° fall within recommended tolerances.

78
PRUFTECHNIK belt pulley alignment system

PULLALIGN® is tailor-made for the job as it is easy to use and only requires
a single operator. Due to its versatile design and strong magnets, the units
mount onto virtually any pulley face or ring gear.
Vertical Angularity Axial Offset Horizontal Angularity
• Displays offset and angular misalignment

• More accurate and efficient than wires and straightedge
• Setup is quick and requires no training
• Prolongs belt and pulley life
• Reduces vibration and belt noise
• Reduces downtime, manpower needed and energy costs

79
PULLALIGN® comprises two compact measurement units, a laser and a re-

flector system both with magnetic mounts to enable mounting onto pulley
faces. Each unit is marked with a series of graduation lines to enable fine
adjustment of the movable machine in order to correct vertical and horizon-
tal angular misalignment and axial offset.
LASER
REFLECTOR
The laser sender transmits a laser line onto the reflector mounted on the
opposite pulley (the laser sender should be mounted on the stationary
machine). Depending on alignment condition the laser line will be shown
clearly on the reflector and also will be transmitted back to the laser sender.
The reflector indicates any vertical angularity that is present and simultane-
ously shows the amount of axial offset. The laser sender shows the horizon-
tal angular condition of the drive.
The diagrams on the following page show typical displays of misalignment
condition.

80
Laser line on the reflector unit
Observed vertical angularity Observed axial offset
Laser line on the laser unit
Observed horizontal angularity

81
Correction procedure
• Correct vertical angularity by shimming the movable machine – this can
often be achieved by shimming (or removing shims) from the rear feet
of the movable machine only. The corrections can be viewed on the re-
flector during adjustment.
• Correct horizontal angularity by adjusting the movable machine laterally.
This can be viewed on the laser sender during adjustment.
• Correct offset by adjusting the movable machine axially, this correction
can be observed on the reflector unit whilst adjustment is in progress.
By following the three steps described above the alignment of the pulleys
should be quickly effected. When you are satisfied that the alignment is
correct, it is then necessary to properly tension the belts in accordance
with the manufacturers tolerances. Leave the PULLALIGN® system in place
during tensioning of the belt, this will give a clear indication of any changes
to the alignment condition of the drive. If adjusting tension has changed
the alignment condition make adjustments as required by following steps
described earlier.
Laser line on the reflector and laser units following alignment correction

Section 2
Vibration Analysis
84
Condition Monitoring
Most people involved in plant maintenance have heard of Condition Mon-
itoring (CM). By definition CM means to periodically view machine oper-
ating condition and when necessary respond to any changes in machine
condition. CM can be carried out by a number of “maintenance functions”;
visual inspection, wear debris analysis, thermographic analysis and vibration
analysis are the most popular methods. In this handbook we are concerned
with the use of vibration analysis to measure, monitor and analyze machine
condition.
Later we will look at vibration measurement techniques and explain some
of the basic parameters and terminology that is used for machine condition
measurement. First, it is useful to briefly look at the benefits that a CM
regime can bring to an operating plant.
In 1988 the DTI reported that companies who have implemented a CM
program on their plant on average spend 25% less on maintenance of the
plant than companies who have no CM program (DTI Boardroom report on
maintenance in British Industry 1988).
Given that a moderately sized UK plant will spend £250,000 annually on
plant maintenance a saving of £62,000 plus additional savings on produc-
tion, power and ancillary activities represents a very good return on the
investment in a CM program.
If the returns on an investment on a CM program are so good why doesn’t
every plant have a system in operation? Most often the answer to this lies
in a lack of understanding of what is required for CM on the plant, and on
a fear that the cost of implementing a system and running it will be more
than the return on cost that the system will realize.
Condition monitoring essentially means that the machines on plant get a
“regular health check.” This is usually taken in the form of periodic vibra-
tion measurements. These measurements are compared to a standard or
“known” operating condition. In the case of vibration this standard is usu-
ally an ISO norm or in some cases an on plant standard or manufacturers
recommendations. By making a comparison between current condition and
“ standard or known” condition an evaluation can be made as to whether
the machine operating condition has changed. Depending on the extent
of change the machine condition can be further investigated or monitored

85
more frequently to detect further changes. The key tool in this CM concept
is to trend collected data and respond to changes in the trend. The objec-
tive is to intervene before the machine fails catastrophically.
The “Nuts and Bolts” of a CM system

Having identified the basic principle of a CM regime, what are the costs
of getting a program up and running? The answer is, not much. A system
can cost as little as a few hundred pounds for a simple portable “point
and shoot” product that is touched onto the machine and gives a reading
of vibration severity, usually RMS vibration. This reading can be manually
recorded on a chart. Readings are then compared over time to identify a
change in measured operating condition.
VIBSCANNER – a typical low cost portable CM system
A development of this is to collect machine condition data and input this

into a PC program to automatically establish and trend machine condition
data. Further developments allow analysis of machine condition via algo-
rithmic calculations (FFT analysis) to determine specific machine condition
defects. From portable systems you can progress to on-line monitoring sys-
tems which provide round the clock measurement and alarming of machine
condition.
As system complexity and analysis capabilities expand so does system cost.
Normally the criticality of machines to the operation of the plant will de-

86
termine the level of monitoring system required on the plant. It does not
follow, however, that a company who spends £20,000 on a CM system
gets a 20 times better system than a company who spends £1,000, or will
get 20 times better CM results.
Take the CM route that is most comfortable. Match the system to the plant
and to the skills available. Don’t go for the most expensive system option
just because a salesman says it is the best, it may be, but, it may not be
appropriate to the plant.
If the plant has many process critical machines on-line monitoring may
need to be considered. If the process plant is small, start simple; routine vi-
sual inspection and simple overall vibration readings will suffice. If in doubt,
irrespective of plant size, start simple. Provided the system implemented is
capable of expansion and can grow as CM requirements grow, you need
not worry about more complex analysis capabilities.
Trend the data collected – most systems (even the most expensive) trend
the data and only analyze when a problem occurs. If necessary outsource
the analytical expertise required.
Implementing a CM program
First and foremost, implementing a CM regime means that you have to
know your plant. A basic understanding of the way the machines behave
and the way they should behave is essential. This doesn’t mean extensive
initial investment in sensors, expert analysis or highly skilled personnel. In-
formation from ISO standards, machine suppliers and past plant operating
experience will often provide the information required to initially establish
how the plant should behave. How the plant actually behaves can be es-
tablished by a combination of techniques including vibration measurement,
thermography, oil analysis and operator experience of the plant.
One of the keys to running an effective CM regime is the investment that
the plant management is prepared to make in ensuring operators are skilled
in using the systems they employ, and that on going training is available to
maintain operator skills.
Implementing and maintaining a CM regime doesn’t have to be a full time
job; but is does require commitment and regular monitoring routines via
some form of data acquisition, storage and regular review.

87
Returns on CM investment
The most effective prevention of machine breakdown is a combination of
regular data acquisition, trending analysis, root cause analysis, and machine
operator awareness. Attention to changes in operating condition, a leaking
seal, an increase in overall vibration, a change in machine operating tem-
perature or even an increase in operating noise will notify an alert operator
or engineer of a potential problem. It doesn’t mean you shut the plant.
What it should mean is that you investigate further, eliminate variable pro-
cess changes and then increase frequency of monitoring of the machine
to establish the rate of change in operating condition. A rapid rise requires
intervention quickly before plant failure, a slow rise means that you can
plan a convenient future time for intervention. This is one of the principle
benefits of implementing CM on your plant.
• It allows your engineers to plan plant shutdown, order spares, and get
the right personnel available to carry out the shutdown work.
Everyone who has been involved in maintenance or production using pro-

cess plant will have experienced a “sudden” plant failure. A bearing on a
pump for example seizes; the catastrophic result is a mechanical seal is de-
stroyed; product spills; a shaft or coupling is destroyed. If you can reduce or
eliminate these “sudden” failures and intervene before catastrophic failure,
only the failing component (in this case the bearing) has to be replaced.
• CM will help prevent ancillary plant damage thus the cost of replace-
ment parts will be lower, and time to effect repair will be less – plant will
restart quicker.
• Labor costs can be reduced by focusing the work force on problem areas.
• A proven CM routine should enable you to negotiate better plant insur-
ance rates.
• You can “push” process machines harder to gain extra production if
needed whilst monitoring plant condition.
• You can reduce or eliminate routine machine shutdown.
• You can build production reserves prior to a forecast machine shutdown
in order to eliminate production losses.
The common denominator of all these benefits is cash. Improved process
plant availability, and reduced maintenance costs effectively mean a more
profitable production plant.

88
Having reviewed the options available and the CM strategies that you can
adopt, you should sit back and ask what you really want out of a plant im-
provement scheme. You may just want a quiet life, or to improve machine
reliability or you may want to improve plant-operating profitability. What
you want will dictate what you are prepared to spend and commit to CM.
Whatever the reasons for the investment, CM will repay you long after the
cost of equipment has been capitalized and written off in your accounts.

89
Vibration analysis
Vibration analysis
Vibration data has high information content
Vibration measurements contain a lot of useful information that will help
determine the health of the machine for example:
• It provides information for safe machine operation.
• It can detect that the condition of a machine has changed.
• It can be used to diagnose the cause of change.
• It can be used to classify the condition of a machine.
Vibration measurement is normally a non intrusive measurement procedure
and it can be carried out with the machine running in its normal operating
condition.
Basic parameters
Vibration is an effect caused by machine condition. Vibration is simply the
oscillation about a reference point (i.e. a shaft vibrates relative to the casing
of a piece of machinery and a bearing vibrates relative to a bearing hous-
ing.) Vibration exists when a system responds to some internal or external
excitation and can be broken down into 3 basic types.
The amplitude of vibration depends on the magnitude of the excitation
force, the mass and stiffness of the system and its damping. Vibration oc-
curs because we are not able either to build a perfect piece of machinery or
to install it perfectly. If we could build a perfect piece of machinery, the cen-
ter of mass of the rotating element would be located exactly at its center of
gravity. When the center of mass and center of gravity do not coincide the
rotor has a heavy spot and some degree of unbalance. This unbalance pro-
duces a vibration proportional to the amount of weight of the heavy spot.
Additional sources of vibration are machine tolerances, machine structure,
bearing design, loading and lubrication, machine mounting and rolling and
rubbing between moving parts.
The analysis of vibration requires an understanding of the terminology used
to describe the components of vibration.

90
Vibration analysis – Basic parameters
Free body vibration
PM PM
Meshing and passing vibration
PM
PM
Gear mesh vibration Blade pass vibration
Frictional vibration

91
Frequency
Frequency is the cyclic movement in a given unit of time. The units of fre-
quency are:
• rpm = revolutions or cycles per minute.
• Hertz (Hz) = revolutions or cycle per second.
These are related by the formula: F = frequency in hertz = rpm/60.
Amplitude
Amplitude is the magnitude of dynamic motion of vibration. It is typically
expressed in any of the following terms:
• RMS (Root Mean Square); Zero to Peak; Peak to Peak.
The sketch below illustrates the relationship of these three units of mea-
surement associated with amplitude.
Amplitude, whether expressed in displacement, velocity or acceleration is

generally an indicator of severity. Since industrial standards of vibration se-
verity will be expressed in one of these terms, it is necessary to have a clear
understanding of their relationship. Care must be exercised to note the
“type” of amplitude measurement when comparing machinery vibration
to industry standards.
Fundamental Frequency
Fundamental frequency is the primary rotating speed of the machine or
shaft being monitored and usually referred to as the running speed of the
machine.

92
You will also see the fundamental frequency referred to as 1 x rpm, or

as Hz; using as an example an 1800 rpm motor this would be 30 Hz (1 x
1800/60). The fundamental frequency is important because many machin-
ery faults such as misalignment or unbalance occur at some multiple of
the fundamental frequency. For example misalignment at 1 x fundamental
frequency.
Harmonics
These are the vibration signals having frequencies that are exact multiples
of the fundamental frequency (i.e. 1 x F, 2 x F, 3 x F etc.).
F = 1/T
Time
1xF 2xF 3xF Frequency
Displacement (D)
Displacement is the actual physical movement of a vibrating surface. Dis-
placement is usually expressed in mils (thousands of an inch) or microns.
When measuring displacement, we are interested in the Peak to Peak
displacement which is the total distance from the upper limits to the lower
limits of travel.
Velocity (V)
Velocity is the speed at which displacement occurs. We define velocity as
the rate of change in the relative position. Velocity is usually measured in
mm/sec RMS, or inches/sec RMS.
Acceleration (A)
Acceleration is the rate of change of velocity. This we can simply define as
the change of velocity in a period of time or change in rate of velocity. Ac-
celeration is usually measured in m/s² or in g’s of gravitational force.

93
Vibration frequency spectrum

Machinery vibration consists of various frequency components as illustrated
below. The amplitude of each frequency components provides an indica-
tion of the condition of a particular rotating element within the machine.
Schwingungsamplitude
Frequenz
The advantage of frequency spectrum analysis is the ability to normalize

each vibration component so that the complex machine spectrum can
be divided into discrete components. This ability simplifies the analysis of
mechanical degradation within the machine. The following chart illustrates
typical signal forms for various machine components.

94

95
Relationship between displacement, velocity, amplitude, frequency

Variation in the values of velocity and acceleration with frequency is ex-
tremely important, for it forms the basis for vibration severity criteria,
provides guidelines for selecting the variable which will be most represen-
tative for a particular purpose, and explains how failures can occur without
warning if the wrong variable is monitored. This variation is best illustrated
by plotting displacement and acceleration versus frequency at a constant
velocity amplitude of 7 mm/s as shown below.

96
Note that velocity appears to be a valid indicator of condition across the

entire range of frequencies. This is the main reason why vibration is used as
the prime indication of mechanical condition.
The relationship between displacement, velocity and acceleration also pro-
vides the best indication of which parameter should be measured to assess
condition. The diagram clearly shows that when examining the low fre-
quencies around or below the running speed of most machinery, displace-
ment or velocity measurements are likely to produce the best quality signal.
On the other hand, phenomena such as bearings resonance’s at 5 – 10KHz
and above, are best measured in terms of acceleration.
FFT (Fast Fourier Transform)

FFT is predominantly the most used tool in analysis of spectral data with
respect to vibration analysis of machine components. Fourier transform is a
mathematical operation which decomposes a time domain function into its
frequency domain components.

97
Transducers
Transducers
Mounting location
The position and the manner in which data is collected is very important to
a successful vibration monitoring program. In order to properly diagnose
a fault, data must be collected in the right plane and must be repeatable.
Some faults show the high amplitude in the radial direction and some in
the axial direction.
Measure location should usually be on exposed parts of the machine that
are normally accessible and that reflect the vibration of the bearing hous-
ing. Vertical and horizontal mounting directions are the most usual trans-
ducer locations for horizontally mounted machines, any angular position is
acceptable provided that the location reasonably represents the dynamic
forces present in the machine. For vertically mounted machines the location
giving the maximum vibration reading should be used as a future monitor-
ing reference point
The data collection points should be clearly marked to ensure that data is
collected at the same point every time. (Frequently, measurement studs are
permanently fixed to the machine ensuring reproducibility of measurement
location). When analyzing a machine for changes, the analysis can be inac-
curate if data is not collected at the same point each time.

98
Transducers
Measurements should be carried out when the rotor and main bearings
have reached their normal steady state operating temperature, speed, load,
voltage and pressure. Where machine speeds vary measurements should
be taken at all conditions at which the machine operates for a prolonged
period.
Transducer design
There are a variety of instruments (transducers) that will convert actual me-
chanical movement (vibration) into electrical energy.
The industrial accelerometer

Accelerometers are the most widely used transducer in routine vibration
monitoring programs. A typical accelerometer contains a piezoelectric
crystal element which is pre-loaded by a mass of some type and the entire
assembly is enclosed in a rugged protective housing. The piezoelectric crys-
tal produces an electrical output when it is physically stressed by either a
pressure or tension effect as shown below.
The variable vibration force exerted by the mass on the crystal produces an
electrical output proportional to acceleration. Accelerometers have a broad
frequency range, typically from 2 Hz to 10 KHz. The accelerometer is also
easily mounted using either a stud, a magnet, an adhesive or by hand-hold-
ing it onto the machinery surface. Accelerometers also have good tempera-
ture and environmental responses and are usually of a rugged construction.

99
Transducers
Accelerometer frequency response

Each accelerometer has a usable frequency range and response curve typ-
ically as shown below. If the data to be collected is outside the frequency
range shown on the response curve, an accelerometer having the correct
response should be chosen. As a general rule, the smaller the accelerome-
ter, the higher the usable frequency range.
Typical accelerometer response for threaded or bonded transducers
Accelerometer mounting
The mounting of an accelerometer plays a significant role in its frequency
response. Shown below are four different types of mounting methods for
transducers, all of which are used in vibration analysis programs.

100
Transducers
The screw or stud mounted unit with the proper accelerometer has a fre-
quency response of around 20 KHz. The epoxy mount (glue mount) has
approximately the same response. The permanent magnet mount has a
frequency response of approximately 5 KHz, while the hand held unit is
typically around 1.5KHz. The more rigid the transducer contact with the
machine the better the frequency response and hence the better the reli-
ability of the vibration reading.
Signal processing
The raw data collected by the transducers must be enhanced to provide
useful information. For vibration data this raw data must be “conditioned”
to prevent errors. Typically such conditioning includes:
• Filtering to remove unwanted or spurious signals
• Amplifying to enhance the resolution of low energy signals
• Data averaging to remove spurious data
• Conversion to frequency domain (FFT)
To assist with these filtering techniques many analyzers provide a number
of “window” functions which, depending on the type selected, will assist
with analysis of data.
Rectangular window
This provides for higher inaccuracy in the amplitude domain but with a
greater accuracy in the frequency domain. A practical use for this window
is for transient process e.g. bump tests to identify natural component fre-
quencies.

101
Transducers
Flat top window

This has the highest accuracy for the amplitude domain but higher inaccu-
racy for the frequency resolution domain.
Hanning window
This is the standard window for most vibration analysis, it has the best ac-
curacy for the frequency resolution domain, but with higher inaccuracy in
the amplitude domain.

102
Fault detection
Fault detection
As has been discussed, the main objective of a vibration monitoring pro-
gram is the detection of incipient machine failures. The methodologies
associated with fault prediction usually involve comparing current vibration
information with a vibration description of that machine or a similar ma-
chine in satisfactory operating condition. This comparison is made by two
methods:
• Comparison to industrial standards – ISO 10816-3-7
• Comparison to a previously measured reading
ISO 10816-3-7
The ISO 10816-3-7 is the current standard for the evaluation of “standard”
rotating machine operating condition. Issued in 2009 it covers “large and
medium size industrial machines with nominal power rating above 15 kW
and nominal speeds between 120 rpm and 15000 rpm”. In addition pumps
are added as a specific category for consideration. This range covers most
rotating machines and can therefore be used as a good guide for in-situ
operating condition. The chart below illustrates the standard and allows a
quick comparison of actual against standard operating condition.
Variations will inevitably occur when comparing these standards to actual

machine operating condition. Machines should not however be con-
demned because of variations in readings without first considering other
potential reasons for the difference in readings.

103
Fault detection
The chart on the previous page shows 4 zones of vibration severity ranging
from good to unacceptable.
• Zone A – the vibration of newly commissioned machines would normal-
ly fall into this zone.
• Zone B – machines with vibration within this zone are normally consid-
ered acceptable.
• Zone C – machines with vibration in this zone are normally considered
unsatisfactory for long term continuous operation. Machine may be op-
erated for a limited period in this condition until a suitable opportunity
arises for remedial operation. (It is advised to increase the frequency of
vibration monitoring during this operating period.)
• Zone D – vibrations within this zone are normally considered to be of
sufficient severity to cause damage to the machine.
The use of these zones and the numerical values ascribed to them are
not intended as an acceptance standard for machine manufacturers and
customers but the values do help to establish alarm and warning criteria
for a routine condition monitoring program. If machines are found to be
operating at vibration levels consistently above the nominal values shown
in the standard, investigation as to the cause should always be carried out.
Comparison to previous readings

This method is the most widely used method of identifying changes in
machine operating condition. Most commonly referred to as trending,
comparison quickly shows the machine operator or manager if the machine
condition has changed, and by how much, and in what period of time.
Trended graphical measurement values combined with ISO alarm limits give
clear visual warnings of machine condition change and with some software
packages, can be used to predict likely run to failure intervals in order to
schedule remedial repair. (Graphic predictions of machine trends should
always be considered as a guide to likely failure and not as a definitive mea-
surement of machine failure intervals.)

104
Fault detection
Fault mode analysis

There is a great deal of literature on diagnostic techniques employed for
various types of equipment. Although we will not discuss specific diagnos-
tic methods in this handbook, you will find that a great deal of information
must be readily available to execute an effective vibration monitoring pro-
gram. Once the vibration monitoring program flags a machine as potentially
having a mechanical problem, the following questions must be answered.
• How severe is the problem?
• What is the problem?
• When must the machine be taken out of service for repair?
Machinery diagnostics using vibration analysis provides information that
addresses these questions.
The machinery diagnostics technique viewed here is based on a technique

known as “fault mode” analysis. This technique utilizes the fact that spe-
cific mechanical events, such as unbalance, misalignment, looseness, bear-
ing defects, aerodynamic and hydraulic problems, and gearbox problems
usually generate vibration frequencies in specific patterns. The frequency,
amplitude and pattern of the peaks in a vibration spectrum can be a telling
indication of the type of problem being experienced by the machine. The
principles of “fault mode” analysis include:
• Measurement of mechanical faults such as unbalance and misalignment
generate mechanical vibration in a well defined frequency pattern.
• Comparing the vibration levels and vibration spectra on similar types of
machines will help establish the severity and cause of a vibration prob-
lem.
The following chart summarizes specific machinery faults and their vibra-
tion patterns.

Possible cause Dominant frequency Direction Comment
Radial for dynamic im- Vibration amplitude proportional to imbalance &
Imbalance 1x rotational frequency
balance; possible axial rpm – causes severe vibration to occur
Severe axial vibration 2nd harmonic, best realigned
Misalignment 2x rotational frequency Radial & axial
using a laser alignment system.
Use bearing enveloping diagnosis or shock pulse
Bearing defect High frequency vibration Radial & axial loaded
to determine damage severity
Typically at one or more nat-
Natural resonant frequency of foundation or ma-
Machine foundations ural frequency (transient vi- Radial
chine base plate
bration)
Additionally recommend strobe to combine ma-
Rotational frequency and
Belt vibrations Radial chine rpm and belt speed to check for belt slip-
multiples thereof
page
Number of vanes or blades x Vibration frequency represented by the number of
Blade pass vibration Radial
the fundamental frequency blades x the shaft rpm
Line frequency, 50 Hz (UK) Side bands may also occur at multiples of the ro-
Electrical 60 HZ (USA) and multiples Radial & axial tational frequency. Vibration stops when power is
thereof turned off
Gear frequency equal to the Sidebands occur from modulation of the gear
Gear mesh defect number of teeth x the rpm of Radial & axial teeth meshing vibration at the rpm e.g. the output
the gear shaft speeds of the gearbox
A components natural frequency coincides with
Resonance Natural component frequency Radial & axial
an excitable frequency

Fault detection
105
106
Fault detection
Imbalance
Vibration caused by imbalance occurs at a frequency equal to 1 rpm of
the imbalanced part, and the amplitude of vibration is proportional to the
amount of imbalance present.
Normally, the largest amplitude will be measured in the radial (vertical or
horizontal) directions.
Misalignment
Generally, misalignment can exist between shafts that are connected with
a coupling, gearbox or other intermediate drives. Three types of misalign-
ment are:
• Angular – where the center line of the two shafts meet at an angle
• Offset – where the shaft center lines are displaced from one another
• A combination of angular and offset misalignment
A bent shaft looks very much like angular displacement, so its vibration
characteristics are included with misalignment.
Misalignment, even with flexible couplings, have two forces, axial and ra-
dial, which result in axial and radial vibration. The significant characteristics
of vibration due to misalignment or a bent shaft is that it will be in both
the radial and axial directions. For this reason when axial vibration is greater
than one half of the highest radial measurement (horizontal or vertical),
then misalignment or a bent shaft should be suspected.
All misalignment conditions will produce vibration at the fundamental (1 x
rpm) frequency components since they create an imbalanced condition in
the machine. Misalignment will sometimes produce vibration at the second
harmonic (2 x rpm).
Loosness
Mechanical looseness can be caused by loose rotating components or loose
machine foundations.
Mechanical looseness causes vibration at a frequency of twice the rotating
speed (2 x rpm) and higher orders of the loose machine part. In most cases,
vibration at the fundamental (1 x rpm) frequency will also be produced.

107
Fault detection
Bearing problems
One of the results of damage to rolling element bearings is that the natural
frequencies of the bearing components are excited by the bearing defect.
The resonant vibration or “ringing” occurs at frequencies between 2 KHz
and 60 KHz.
This vibration is most effectively measured at a level of acceleration in units
of g’s Peak. Vibration is measured by the machinery monitoring system as a
HFE (High Frequency Energy) measurement and gives an effective indication
of the condition of rolling element bearings. Based on field experience, the
shock pulse technique works well on motors and other quiet equipment.
Care must be taken when using the technique on pumps and gearboxes,
where flow, cavitation, and tooth meshing can produce impulses which
interfere with and mask the impacts produced by bearing defects.
Rotational frequencies related to the motion of the rolling elements, cage
and races are also produced by mechanical degradation of the bearing.
These frequencies are dependent on bearing geometry and shaft speed
and can be found typically, in the 3 – 10 x rpm range and because of these
reasons the “enveloping” method is the most widely adopted method of
viewing specific bearing defects. This method of bearing condition evalua-
tion and that of shock pulse analysis of bearing condition are reviewed in
the following pages.
Aerodynamic and hydraulic problems

Normally associated with blade or vane machinery such as pumps or com-
pressors, aerodynamic and hydraulic vibration is created by an unstable or
unbalanced condition within the machine.
In most cases this will produce a vibration at the fundamental frequency (1
x rpm) of the machine and blade pass/vane frequency components.

108
Fault detection
Gearbox problems
Gear defects or faulty gears produce low amplitude, high frequency vibra-
tion. The vibration is predominantly at gear mesh frequency. Gear mesh
frequency is calculated as follows:
Gear mesh frequency (GMF) =
Speed of output gear x
Number of teeth in output gear
Example:
52 tooth gear running at 90 rpm (90/60 = 1.5 Hz).
GMF = 52 x 1.5 = 78 Hz.
Most gear problems exhibit vibration at the gear mesh frequency, and may
be summarized as follows:
• Imbalance – predominant at the 1 x rpm of the gear.
• Misalignment – predominant at the 1 x rpm and 2 X rpm; may excite
GMF.
• Pitch line run out – predominant at GMF with 1 x rpm sidebands.
• Faulty gear teeth – predominant at GMF with sidebands at 1 x rpm of
faulty gear.

109
Fault detection
Basic theory of enveloping

When a bearing defect exists in a rolling element bearing the vibration sig-
nature will show high frequency vibration generated each time a damaged
roller or damaged race make contact. These repetition rates are known as
the natural bearing defect frequencies. In any rolling element bearing ar-
rangement there are four types of element defect frequency.
• Ball Pass Frequency Outer Race – BPFO
• Ball Pass Frequency Inner Race – BPFI
• Ball Spin Frequency – BSF (Rolling element defect)
• Fundamental Train Frequency – FTF (Cage defect)
1 = Outer ring defect

4 2 = Inner ring defect
3 = Rolling element defect
3
4 = Cage defect
a = contact angle
Dw = Rolling element diameter
Dpw = Bearing pitch diameter
Z = Number of rolling elements
n = Shaft speed in rpm

110
Fault detection
Formula for calculating bearing defect frequencies:
• BPFO = Z * n / (60 * 2) * (1 - (Dw / Dpw *cos (a)).

• BPFI = Z * n / (60 * 2) * (1 + (Dw / Dpw *cos (a)).
• BSF = (Dpw * n) / (Dw * 60 * 2) * (1- [Dw / Dpw* cos (a)]²)
• FTF = n / (60 * 2) * (1 - (Dw / Dpw *cos (a)).
Example: Pass frequencies.

Bearing type SKF 6211, operating speed 2998 rpm
Dimensions Defect frequencies
Dpw = 77.50 mm BPFO = n / 60 * 4.0781 = 204 Hz

Dw = 14.29 mm BPFI = n / 60 * 5.922 = 294 Hz
Z = 10 BSF = n / 60 * 5.239 = 264 Hz
a=0 FTF = n / 60 * 0.4079 = 20 Hz
Enveloping is essentially a 2-stage process; the first stage is a band pass fil-
tering of the time waveform. The filtering process results in a series of spiky
peaks when enveloping is applied to extract the repetition rate relating to
the bearing defect and its harmonics as shown in the following frequency
spectra. Since healthy rolling element bearings may exhibit vibration at the
natural frequency of the bearing components, it is very important to mea-
sure accurately the severity of bearing deterioration.

111
Fault detection
Ring damage
Envelope
Time waveform
Ta
Envelope
Damage frequency fa = 1/ Ta
To measure the severity of a defect in an enveloped spectra the following

must be undertaken:
• Measure the amplitude of the specific component in dB (decibels) above
the carpet value shown in the spectra.
• The spectra above identifies the carpet and peak values.
• Experience tells us that when a bearing starts to deteriorate a peak to
carpet difference of around 10 dB can be seen. This does not mean that
bearing breakdown is imminent. As deterioration continues to show a
difference of around 15 dB between peak and carpet levels, the bearing
should be monitored more closely and preparation made at some point
to strip down the machine for repair.

112
Fault detection
• When the defect amplitude is 20 dB or greater immediate action should

be initiated to repair and or replace the bearing.
• The carpet level of the bearing should not be used as a stand alone
method of monitoring bearing condition but should be used in conjunc-
tion with another trending technique such as shock pulse measurement.
The above diagram shows the steps involved in obtaining an envelope

spectra for a bearing.

113
A common sense approach

Most vibration problems respond well to a logical, systematic approach. A
list of suitable steps towards firstly defining and secondly solving problems
is given below:
Raw data
• Where is the vibration level highest on the machine and in which direc-
tion?
• Is the vibration present in associated machinery and pipework or is it at
highest levels on the bearing houses?
• Do changes to the process and lubricating the bearings radically change
the vibration response?
• Does the trend show a roughly exponential growth with time?
• How does the machine feel and sound in comparison with similar ma-
chines elsewhere?
Diagnostics
• Is this a new machine or one which has recently been worked on? If so,
what could have been assembled wrongly and does this tie up with the
raw data?
• Which frequencies are dominant on the spectrum? Do these occur at
gear meshing frequencies or low order multiples of shaft speed?
• On rolling element bearings and gearboxes, how does the enveloped
spectrum appear?
• How quickly is the machine deteriorating and hence how soon does it
need to be repaired? (This includes consideration of capital worth of
equipment, downtime and maintenance costs.)
• Vibration is usually highest at the point of maximum damage unless a
resonant condition exists.
• Vibration is usually the response of a machine to a fault so the only way
to stop the vibration is to find the source not the response.
• It is always necessary to build up several items of evidence before diag-
nosing a fault. The weapons available are HFE, spectra, envelopes, tem-
perature and sound. For each fault the interaction and evidence from
these will be different.
• Vibration is a physical phenomenon and as such can be defined by phys-
ical means.

114
Solutions
• Where a fault has occurred on previously sound equipment it should
be clear from the steps suggested above where the likely problem lies.
Having defined the problem, the best course of action should be clear.
• If the fault is on new or recently serviced equipment it may be unclear
where the problem lies. Is something resonant? Is there a defect in the
installation? Is there a basic design error? The solution to a problem of
this type should be achieved in a logical manner. Try one solution at a
time (starting with the most likely) taking new sets of data at each step.
The best solution will gradually emerge.
• Try to explain all the responses in relation to the damage found once the
problem is solved.

115
FFT analysis
FFT analysis
As the name of this short overview suggests the focus of the rest of the
section concerns the measurement and subsequent analysis of vibration
measurements taken using an FFT analyzer. In effect what we will be doing
with this FFT analyzer is taking a time signal analysis and applying a calcula-
tion to convert the measured signal into a series of peaks on a standardized
graph. Each peak represents an amplitude of vibration and a frequency.
Using these two parameters it is possible to see in a relatively simple way
the magnitude of vibration and to identify the root cause of the highest
vibration signatures.
Frequency analysis
Time waveform Machine vibration spectrum
Different factors such as misalignment, unbalance, mechanical looseness

can be identified because each factor exhibits its highest vibration ampli-
tude at a different frequency. As an example, misalignment usually exhibits
its highest amplitude of vibration at 2 x rotational frequency whereas un-
balance exhibits its highest vibration amplitude at 1 x rotational frequency.
As we will see later however nothing in the world of vibration analysis is as
straightforward as this simple example. However, the principle stands we
convert a complex (to understand) time signal analysis into a more under-
standable FFT vibration plot.
Not only do different factors, such as imbalance or misalignment, exhibit
different frequencies of vibration amplitude, so do different components
such as bearing or gears. As a general rule (for this initial examination of
FFT analysis), machine components have higher frequency vibration char-
acteristics than does the gross mechanical defects such as misalignment,
imbalance, looseness or other complete machine operating parameters.

116
FFT analysis
The following two graphs where a time signal for a machine operating in
an unbalanced condition is converted to an FFT graph clearly shows the
unbalance in an understandable form as a defined frequency – in this case
in cycles per minute (cpm) or rotations per minute (rpm) of the machine. An
explanation of this important frequency conversion follows.
Time waveform of an unbalanced machine at 1000 rpm.
Converted FFT spectrum of the above time waveform.
In the previous time waveform graph the horizontal scale is time in millisec-
onds and the vertical scale is velocity in mm per second. In the spectrum,
the horizontal scale is in cycles per minute (cpm) whilst the vertical scale is
again velocity in mm/sec.

117
FFT analysis
A note about horizontal scaling in FFT graphs will help at this point. There
are two conventions that are equally valid in scaling on an FFT graph. Either
cycles / rotations per minute (cpm / rpm) or Hertz (Hz) are used. Cpm / rpm
is simply a term for the rotating speed of the machine, whilst Hz is the fre-
quency of the machine, simply put it is the cpm / rpm divided by 60.
The spectrum clearly shows a large vibration “spike” at 1000 cpm, which
is the fundamental frequency of the machine running at 1000 rpm. This
“spike” is described as being at 1x the fundamental frequency of the ma-
chine, smaller “spikes” are present at 2x, 3x, 4x and 5x the fundamental
frequency. If the horizontal scale had been in Hz the “spikes” would have
been in the same position but the scale would have shown the first “spike”
at 16.6 Hz (1000/60).
The above is a good example of the ability of an FFT conversion to illustrate
specific machine problems in a simplified format. Similarly for another com-
mon machine fault (misalignment), the conversion to FFT works just as well
(as below).
Time waveform of a misaligned machine set at 1000 rpm.

118
FFT analysis
Converted FFT spectrum of the previous time waveform.
It is perfectly possible to produce a basic reference chart for common ma-

chine faults which will help the person new to FFT analysis with diagnosis of
machine faults, but at this point it is more helpful for future understanding
of the subject that we continue with an explanation of the basics.
For example why does unbalance exhibit its highest frequency at the funda-
mental frequency? In fact, the explanation is pretty simple: When an out of
balance rotor is spinning, the out of balance force is thrown towards the vi-
bration sensor at its greatest velocity once every revolution of the machine.
Some commonly encountered types of unbalance

Static unbalance: Also referred to as forced unbalance, this occurs when
a heavy spot is located at the mid point between the bearings. This form
of unbalance is most common in rotors that have a short length compared
to its diameter.

119
FFT analysis
Couple unbalance: Where unbalance forces are 180 degrees out of phase
on the same shaft, the 1x frequency spike is always present and dominates
the FFT spectrum. Correction requires balance weights to be in at least 2
planes.
Dynamic unbalance: Sometimes referred to as quasi-static unbalance, this

is the most commonly encountered form of imbalance. It occurs, when the
rotational axis of the shaft and the weight distribution of the rotor do not
intersect. This is effectively a combination of static and couple unbalance.
Overhung unbalance: This exhibits radial and axial vibrations – always at

1x frequency, radial signals are the result of influence from shaft bending
effects caused by the unbalance load. Axial readings may vary and appear
unsteady during the measurement.

120
FFT analysis
Misalignment
Misalignment alongside unbalance is perhaps one of the most commonly
found causes of high vibration in coupled rotating machines such as pumps
and other standard machine trains. Unlike unbalance it does not offer a
clear frequency spike at one single frequency. Instead misalignment can be
identified by having its highest frequency amplitudes at 1x and 2x cpm and
with smaller harmonic frequency spikes at 3x cpm up to and including 7x
cpm.
The commonly encountered parameters of misalignment

Parallel offset: This exhibits high radial vibration, 180 degrees out of
phase with 1x, 2x, 3x and 4x radial vibration prominent with 2x being the
dominant vibration amplitude. Vertical and horizontal parallel offset exhibit
the same frequency pattern.
Angular misalignment: This exhibits high axial vibration, 180 degrees

phase change across the coupling, 1x, 2x, 3x axial vibration with 1x and 2x
dominant (either can be the dominant amplitude). Vertical and horizontal
angularity exhibit the same frequency pattern.

121
FFT analysis
General misalignment: This is the most commonly encountered misalign-

ment, it is a combination of parallel and angular misalignment. Axial and
radial measurements both show the major frequency components with 1x
and 2x the dominant frequencies with harmonics showing up to 7x cpm.

122
Rolling element bearings

Of all components in a rotating machine probably the most common com-
ponent associated with vibration analysis is that of the rolling element bear-
ing. The basic construction of the bearing comprising four components;
namely an outer race, a ball or roller cage, balls or rollers and an inner
race, means that its fault diagnosis is considerably more complex than that
of many components. Each component has a distinct fault signature on the
FFT spectrum. In order to identify the signature faults emanating from the
bearing, it is necessary to indulge in a series of mathematical equations to
establish the fundamental frequencies of each component as follows.
Inner Race Ball Pass Frequency:

• BPFI = Z * n / (60 * 2) * (1 + (Dw / Dpw *cos (a))
Outer Race Ball Pass Frequency:
• BPFO = Z * n / (60 * 2) * (1 - (Dw / Dpw *cos (a)).
Ball Spin Frequency:
• BSF = (Dpw * n) / (Dw * 60 * 2) * (1- [Dw / Dpw* cos (a)]²)
Fundamental Train Frequency:
• FTF = n / (60 * 2) * (1 - (Dw / Dpw *cos (a))
where
a = contact angle
Dw = Rolling element diameter
Dpw = Bearing pitch diameter
Z = Number of rolling elements
n = Shaft speed in r.p.m.
The number of balls and dimensions of the bearing can be obtained from
the manufacturers catalogue of the bearing. Additionally, advanced FFT
analyzers, such as the VIBXPERT II, have built into the support software the
fundamental frequencies of the bearings. This is obtained by simply typing
into the software the manufacturers bearing model number. Needless to
say, this saves considerable time in setting up and analyzing bearing condi-
tion. There is no shortcut, however this information is required in order to
properly diagnose bearing condition using FFT spectra.

123
Cage fault components in velocity spectrum

To separate the rolling elements is the chief function of the bearing cage,
permitting safe operation at a variety of operating speeds. The cage reduc-
es rolling element sliding, contact and wear. Cages facilitate uniform load
distribution by the elements in the bearing but carry no load. Cage faults
can appear in the velocity spectrum in different forms based upon the bear-
ing fault condition.
Fundamental frequency of cage alone
Fundamental train frequency and harmonics
Another bearing fault frequency plus sidebands thereof

124
Roller / Ball fault components in velocity spectrum

The function of a ball bearing is to connect two machine members that
move relative to one another in such a manner that the frictional resistance
to motion is minimal. In most applications one of the members is a rotating
shaft and the other a fixed housing. Separating these are the balls or rollers
which are in effect the load carrying component of the bearing. Defects or
damage to these rolling elements are shown in the FFT spectra.
Dominant ball spin frequency and harmonics (2x BSF).
Dominant ball spin harmonics (2x BSF).
Ball spin frequency with fundamental train frequency sidebands.

125
Inner and outer race fault components in velocity spectrum

The inner and outer races of bearings are of course two separate bearing
components. Each race is a ring with a groove where the balls rest. The
groove is usually shaped, so the ball is a slightly loose fit in the groove.
Thus, the ball contacts each race at a single point. However, a load on a
small point would cause extremely high contact pressure. In practice, the
ball deforms (flattens) slightly where it contacts each race, and the race
also dents slightly where each ball presses on it. Depending on load, fitting,
ingress of wear debris particles and lubrication, the inner or outer races can
become permanently damaged. This damage shows up in the FFT spectra
adjacent to the fundamental component frequencies calculated earlier.
Outer race damage spectrum with harmonics.
Inner race damage spectrum with sidebands.

126
Bearing fault progress stages

The foregoing examples of bearing component failure are an example of
the type of spectra that you can expect to find on a damaged bearing.
It is more probable however that when analyzing a bearing there will be
progressive damage occurring which progresses over time to a position
where intervention is necessary. As discussed earlier, progressive damage is
highlighted in a trend graph of the measurements. It is helpful, however,
to be able during this trending to identify cause of damage and implement
corrective action in order to extend the life of the bearing. At stages in the
trend graph it is therefore useful to view the bearing FFT spectra. Four typ-
ical failure stages are illustrated in the following examples.
Early trend increase spectrum.
Continued trend increase spectrum: intervention stage.

127
Quickly increasing trend damage: intervention recommended.
Rapidly increasing trend: failure imminent.
It more or less goes without saying, that you should try and intervene be-
fore you arrive at a stage 4 spectra. Of course it is not always possible to
shut down production critical equipment. In such circumstances you should
rely on the rate of increase and the amplitude of the trend graph as well
as the measured spectra. BUT always be aware that catastrophic bearing
failure usually does not begin and end with just the bearing failure. Bent
shafts, coupling damage and a whole range of additional major component
failures could result, in failure to intervene when an obviously damaged
bearing has been identified.

128
Shock pulse evaluation

There is one non-FFT method widely used to assess the operating condi-
tion of anti-friction bearings. It is one of the most successful and popular
techniques available and deserves mention in this FFT section, if only for
the fact that it is a valuable first line of analysis for small bearings, where
overall condition is used as the defining criteria for stopping a machine and
changing bearings. It is that of shock pulse evaluation.
Shock pulses are a special type of vibration which must be clearly distin-
guished from ordinary machine vibrations. The actual shock pulse is the
pressure wave generated at the moment when one metallic object strikes
another. The bulk of the impact momentum, however, acts to deform the
target object, which then oscillates at its natural frequency. This vibration
ultimately dissipates, primarily as heat, due to internal friction (material
damping).
Shock pulse Deformation wave
Shock pulses occur during bearing operation when a rolling element passes
over an irregularity in the surface of the bearing race. Of course, there is
no such thing as a perfectly smooth surface in real life. Even new bearings
emit a signal of weak shock pulses in rapid succession. This ‘carpet level’
rises when the lubrication film between rolling elements and their races
becomes depleted.
A defect (pit or crack) on the surface of a rolling element or bearing race
produces a strong shock pulse with up to 1000 times the intensity of the
carpet level. These irregular peaks (the ‘maximum value’), which stand out
clearly from the background level, are ideal indicators of bearing damage.

129
Shock pulses propagate within a much higher frequency range than that
of ordinary machine vibration, and their energy content is much weaker.
Therefore, the accelerometer used for shock pulse measurement has a
resonance frequency (approx. 36 kHz) that lies precisely within this range.
Shock pulse diagrams for good and damaged bearings

dBN
60
Poor
40
Reduced
20
Good
Carpet level = bearing noise
dBN
60
Poor
40
Reduced
20
Good
0
Time
Signal peaks above carpet level. Signal strength is shown in decibels
(logarithmic scale) for clarity. 60 dB represents a change of 1000x.
This means, that in this high frequency range of particular interest for bear-
ing condition evaluation, the transducer is especially sensitive to the shock
pulse signal – even when far more energetic machine vibration occurs at
lower frequencies (for example, due to unbalance or shaft misalignment) or
from adjacent machines. And since high frequency signals tend to dissipate
rapidly, very little interference is encountered from adjacent bearings.
0.1 Hz 1 Hz 1 kHz 10 kHz

130
Evaluating bearing condition

Just as with other condition evaluation methods, the shock pulse technique
reaches its conclusions via certain defined parameters. These are influenced
by factors such as bearing size, rpm, signal damping and lubrication. Shock
pulse readings generally should be compared with ‘signature’ readings,
taken when condition is known to be good, or normalized to take these
factors into account.
Over the years reliable normalization methods have been developed based
upon extensive measurements, to calculate the effect of bearing size and
rpm on shock pulse readings of new, perfect bearings. The normalized
signal level (dBn) calculated for an actual bearing allows its condition to be
rated directly as ‘good’, ‘reduced’ or ‘poor’.
0
dBi
-2
-1
-1
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
-5
0
5
0
1000
560
320
180
100
56
32
18
10
3,2
5,6
10
18
32
56
100
160
320
560
1000
1800
3200
5600
10000
18000
32000
56000
Normalization graph plots bearing diameter over machine speed
Two normalized parameters are used to determine bearing condition.

• The carpet value indicates deteriorating or poor operating condition
(e.g. caused by insufficient lubrication, shaft misalignment or improper
installation).
Damaged bearing elements, in contrast, generate individual shock pulses
of greater intensity.
• The resulting maximum value is a direct indication of bearing operat-
ing condition.

131
Specific types of damage can be recognized not only from the absolute sig-
nal amplitude, but also from the difference to the carpet level and the pat-
tern of pulses. Comparison with typical shock pulse diagrams often shows
clearly where the problem lies (e.g. ‘lubricant contamination’).
dBN
60
Poor
40
Reduced
20
Maximum value
Carpet value Good
0
Time
Shock pulse comparison chart
The above diagram shows a typical shock pulse graph where bearing con-
dition over time has changed. The upper line of the graph is the normalized
overall dBn measurement of bearing condition and the lower line is the
carpet level measurement dBc. As can be seen, normalized and carpet levels
trend much the same in a good-operating-condition bearing. A developing
problem is indicated when the level trends begin to separate, for example
by an increase in the dBn (upper) trend. An increase in the dBc (carpet)
level indicates a potential lubricating film breakdown which can often be
resolved by lubrication.
The dBc trend provides important information regarding lubrication, mount-
ing and loading condition of the bearing. It is related directly to the fluid
film thickness at the rolling component interface.
The dBn trend gives information on irregularities in the bearing surface
which give rise to single shock pulses at random intervals. These high val-
ues give a good indication of damage already done to the bearing and the
overall condition.

132
Lubrication
Typical shock pulse trend graph
If after lubrication, the dBc falls below alarm levels and stays there, it is a
good indication that intervention in the form of lubrication has brought the
bearing operation back within acceptable operating limits. An increase in
dBn over dBc trends indicates a more fundamental problem unlikely to be
improved by lubrication.

133
Gear and gearbox faults

Gearboxes and more specifically gear meshing and wear problems occupy
a significant section in the analysis of rotating machinery. Complex gear-
box design, planetary gear systems and the fault analysis thereof can be a
daunting task for the condition monitoring engineer no matter what level
of training or experience. It is not the plan of this publication to delve too
deeply into the analysis of gears and the complex fault analysis that can
be required. Instead we will look at a typical spectrum of a gear system in
a good condition and at three common and relatively easy to detect prob-
lems:
• Excessive gear tooth wear
• Excessive loading on gear teeth
• Mechanical misalignment between gears
The following four spectra graphs illustrate the basic FFT spectra you would
expect to see given these problems.
Expected spectrum of a gear in a good condition
This spectrum is showing 1x and 2x frequencies of the gear plus 1x the

frequency of the pinion and the Gear Mesh frequency (GMF) with 1x side-
bands. There are no gear natural frequencies showing and all peaks are of
low amplitude.

134
Spectrum of a gear assembly with worn teeth
The above spectrum shows tooth wear which excites the gear natural fre-
quency with 1x sidebands of the bad gear. Gear Natural Frequency (GNF)
sidebands may also increase in amplitude. Other frequency components are
similar to what you would see in a good gear spectrum.
Spectrum of a gear assembly with excessive loading
High loading of gear teeth will show an increase in the Gear Mesh Frequen-
cy amplitude (GMF) and very little change in sideband amplitude.

135
Spectrum of a gear assembly with excessive misalignment
In this example, gear misalignment excite 2nd harmonic of the Gear Mesh
Frequency (GMF) and even 3rd harmonic in some cases. The frequencies 1x
and 2x are lower compared to 2x GMF.

136
Looseness fault analysis

Looseness of components, poor structural integrity, cracked or broken
holding down bolts and poor foundation condition can cause untold prob-
lems for the engineer analyzing FFT data. It is often difficult to establish
from a spectra since it often manifests itself as another common fault such
as unbalance or even misalignment. The users EYES are often the key to
unlocking looseness FFT diagnosis. Always look for any obvious problems
such as a broken foot. This makes the diagnosis much easier. Below are
three typical looseness spectra.
PM
radial
PM
Structural looseness
Structural looseness is caused by a weakness of machine components, typ-

ically machine soft foot, baseplate or foundation distortion, or even poor
baseplate design creating flexing of the baseplate. This manifests itself as
a strong 1x component measured in the radial direction and is therefore
frequently misdiagnosed as a form of static unbalance.

137
2x
PM
1x
0.5x radial
PM 3x
Amplitude
Frequency
Mechanical looseness caused by loose holding down bolts
This type of looseness is often easily identified by observation, loose bolts

or cracked or broken machine feet, identified by 0.5x 1x, 2x, and 3x cpm,
measured in the radial direction.
Looseness caused by poor fit components
Component fit looseness can be caused by poor fitting of bearings or

excessive clearance of fan impellers on the shaft. There may be a phase
change from one measurement to another, generating numerous harmon-
ics 1x, 2x, 3x; and 0.5x, 1.5x, 2.5x may also be present in the spectra.

138
Journal bearing wear will also show up as a form of mechanical looseness.
Plain bearing Shaft
High pressure Oil film

contact area
Journal bearing wear
Vibration readings to establish journal bearing wear can be taken from the
shaft or the bearing housing. The FFT spectrum generated is very similar
to component looseness with 1x component plus many harmonics in the
radial vibration spectrum. In very severe cases, peaks may also show at 0.5x,
1.5x etc. The most definitive way to establish actual journal wear is via oil
analysis and wear particle debris analysis.
Journal bearing wear is frequently caused by oil whirl which occurs when
a lubrication wedge cannot form in the high pressure contact areas of the
assembly but instead whirls around the bearing. This leads to direct metal
to metal contact between shaft and bearing which quickly wears out the
bearing.
Sub-synchronous components between 0.4x and 0.48x appears in the
spectrum with an unstable amplitude.
Journal bearing oil whirl

139
Belts and pulleys
Belts and pulleys

During operation a flexible belt experiences three types of tension as it
rotates around a pulley.
• Working tension (tight side – slack side)
• Bending tension
• Centrifugal tension
Belts are designed to withstand these working operation states, provided
that pre-selection of the belt meets the operating criteria. The design life
of the belt will be met and usually exceeded provided that no other forces
other than the above act upon the belt during its operating life.
Forces, such as misalignment and loose or over tight belt tension, are killers
of flexible belt drives. Poor pulley alignment can reduce useful operating
life by as much 80%. Furthermore, not paying adequate attention to basic
installation requirements leads not only to belt wear but may also damage
pulleys, bearings and seals. FFT analysis can identify many of the “belt drive
killers”. The following example provide an insight into what you should
look for when analyzing belt drive spectra.
Ø2
Ø1 ω 1
ω2
w1* F1 = w2* F2 Ø1ω1= Ø2ω2

fB = p * w1* F1 / lB , where
3.1416 ω φ
fΒ = 1 1
fB: Belt frequency l

lB: Belt length
Worn, loose or mismatched belts

140
Belts and pulleys
Twisted Offset Angular
Misaligned belts
Eccentric sheave
Belt resonance
Belt resonance occurs when the belt natural frequency approaches or co-
incides with the drive or driven frequency. To correct this, change the belt
tension to change the belt natural frequency.

141
Fans
Fans
Most fans we encounter in standard process applications are either ax-
ial-flow propeller type or centrifugal. Such fans are prone to an uneven
build up of debris on the blades, particularly when handling particle laden
air in applications such as car manufacturing paint shops. Particle build up
leads to fan unbalance. FFT analysis will quickly show up such operational
problems. Fans are also frequently belt driven which also gives rise to typical
belt drive FFT characteristics as described in the previous pages.
If however during the course of analysis, unbalance and misalignment can
be eliminated from elevated FFT readings on a fan, then the likelihood is
that there is some form of mechanical damage that the fan has suffered.
This could vary from an extreme problem such as a missing blade to a
cracked or chipped blade tip. FFT investigation of this problem requires
that the analyst knows the blade pass frequency (fBP) of the fan. It is not a
complicated calculation, it is simply the number of blades multiplied by the
rpm of the fan itself.
PM
PM fBP
radial
PM
PM
fBP = Bn * N
Bn = Number of blades or vanes
N = Rotor speed in rpm

142
Fans
Example calculation of a fan with 9 blades and 3 support struts on the

intake housing:
3 struts on intake x=3
9 blades Bn = 9
Rotor speed N = 600 rpm
fBP * x = N * Bn * x = 600 * 9 * 3
Characteristic frequency = 16,200 cpm
Aerodynamic and hydraulic forces

This is a problem that can affect both fan and pumps assemblies and is as-
sociated with fluid and air movement through the structure. The problems
can be classified as either cavitation or turbulence. As can be seen in the
following examples, both offer distinct FFT spectra.
PM PM
1X
1X BPF
Random
Turbulence FFT spectrum Cavitation FFT spectrum

143
Electric motors
Electric motors
Probably the most common equipment in any process plant is the electric
motor. Almost everything is driven by them, and therefore, as a distinct
item of equipment, we should consider the electromechanical faults that
can arise from their operation. Of course, since they are invariably coupled
to another component (fan, pump, etc.), they are subject to the same basic
component faults such as unbalance, misalignment, looseness, bearing
problems etc,(covered earlier in this section). However, electric motors are
rather complex and suffer from electromechanical problems which are dis-
tinctly unique to themselves.
Essentially motors consist of a stator (laminated steel sections wound by
copper wire or bars) and a rotor (again a laminated steel section wound by
copper wire or bars). The rotor is supported on bearings and is separated
from the stator by an air gap of a given dimension. Two main types of mo-
tors are synchronous and induction motors. They differ in that the synchro-
nous motor has a permanently magnetized rotor which is rotated by the
stator “dragging” it round by magnetic attraction. The induction motor is
different in that the rotor is not a permanent magnet but an electromagnet.
This is determined by the design of the rotor with rotor bars embedded into
the laminations. The rotor bars are connected to each other at each end
with a continuous copper ring. The induction motor works by magnetic
repulsion rather than attraction as with the synchronous motor. Both how-
ever experience similar electromagnetic faults in operation.
If you suspect a motor has electromagnetic problems a first useful step is to
disconnect it from the driven component and carry out an FFT analysis with
the motor running alone. Electric motor problems can be roughly classified
as below.
• Stator eccentricity
• Rotor eccentricity
• Rotor problems
• Loose connections

144
Electric motors
Stator eccentricity
Caused by loose iron (laminations), shorted stator laminations, and soft
foot.
High 1x fn and 2x fn signals; 2x fl ( twice line frequency) without sidebands.
Radial measurements predominant. High resolution settings should be used
for measurement.
fn 2 x fn
2 x fl
Rotor eccentricity
Caused by rotor offset, misalignment and poor base; fp, 1x, 2x and 2fl
signals; 1x and 2fl with sidebands at fp (pole pass frequency). Radial mea-
surements predominant. High resolution settings should be used for mea-
surement.
fp fn 2x fn
2x fl

145
Electric motors
Key parameters
Twice line frequency vibration: 2*fl
Bar meshing frequency fbar = fn * nbar
Synchronous frequency: fsyn = 2*fl / p,
Slip frequency: fslip = fsyn - fn
Pole pass frequency: fp = p * fslip
where
fn : rotational frequency
nbar : number of rotor bars
p: number of poles
Other electromechanical faults

Uneven heating of the rotor due to unbalanced bar currents will cause
the rotor to warp (bow). This causes unbalance with the characteristic FFT
signature. It can be identified because the symptoms disappear when the
motor is cold.
fn
Rotor bow

146
Electric motors
fn 2fn fbar 2fbar
Loose rotor bars: fbar and 2fbar with 2fl sidebands;

2fbar can be higher; 1x and 2x can be present
fn 2fn 3fn 4fn
Cracked rotor bars: 1x and harmonics with sidebands at fp;

high resolution spectrum required; possible beating signal

147
Electric motors
fn 2fn 2fl
Loose connections: 2fl excessive signal;

electrical phase problems; correction must be immediate

148
Bent rotor or shaft
Bent rotor or shaft

Bent shaft at center
Bent shafts generates high radial and axial loads. Axial vibration shows up
at 1x, 2x and 3x components. 1x is dominant if the bend is near the shaft
center; and a 180 degree phase shift in the axial direction. Phase measure-
ments are essential in this diagnosis.
Bent shaft at one end
Bent shafts generates high radial and axial loads. Axial vibration shows up
at 1x, 2x and 3x components. 2x is dominant if the bend is near the shaft
center; and 180 degree phase shift in the axial direction. Phase measure-
ments are essential in this diagnosis.

149
Phase
Phase
Phase measurements are a very useful tool for diagnosis of a number of
common rotating machine conditions, such as misalignment, unbalance
or bent shafts. It is therefore necessary to have an understanding of the
measurement technique and what in fact you are measuring. Phase is a
measure of the time difference between two sine waves.
For clarity of explanation, we use in the following examples a vibration
transducer to sense the imbalance force and a light sensitive tachometer
(“tacho”) and a reflective strip attached to the shaft to sense shaft position.
The phase angle is the angle in degrees that the shaft travels from the start
of data collection to the position when the vibration transducer measures
the maximum positive force of imbalance.
Shaft at start
The tacho senses the reflective strip and starts the data collection. At this
point phase = 0.

150
Phase
Shat rotated through 90 degrees
The imbalance force has rotated through 90 degrees. At this point the im-
balance force produces the highest positive reading at the transducer. As
the imbalance is traveling towards the transducer, its force is considered to
be in a positive direction.
Imbalance travels a further 90 degrees
The force experienced by the transducer is zero.

151
Phase
The imbalance is now opposite the transducer. At this point the force
produced is at its highest negative reading from the transducer. Force is
considered to be in the negative direction.
The imbalance force has completed its 360 rotation and the force experi-
enced by the transducer is again zero.

152
Phase
In the preceding examples the mounting angle between the transducer and
tacho for simplicity is shown as 90 degrees. This is not an absolute neces-
sity. They can be mounted in the same plane or indeed 180 degrees apart.
The key is the use of the tacho and transducer together to initialize and
measure the phase shift of the machine. The examples also use a simple
static unbalance to explain the principle of phase measurement.
Phase is a key component of FFT diagnosis. Without carrying out phase
measurements, it is often impossible to accurately distinguish between
faults such as imbalance, misalignment, bent shafts or other low frequency
problems, which manifest themselves in 1x, 2x or 3x of the machine fun-
damental frequency.
PRUFTECHNIK data collectors and vibration analyzers

The vibration analysis functions and methods described in the previous pag-
es can all be performed by the PRUFTECHNIK VIBXPERT® II system. Essen-
tially VIBXPERT II is a modular system which can be configured to perform a
number of vibration related tasks including the following:
• Route-based data collection
• Dual channel FFT analysis
• Time waveform analysis
• Dynamic Balancing

Section 3
Dynamic balancing
154
Balancing standards
Balancing standards
In accordance with ISO standard 1940 – 1973 (E)
“Balancing is the process of attempting to improve the mass distribution
of a body so that it rotates in its bearings without unbalanced centrifuge
forces”.
Our focus in this handbook is to look at balancing standards for simple
rotating machines with rigid rotors. And how, by using calculation and por-
table balancing systems, such as the PRUFTECHNIK VIBXPERT II Balancer,
these balancing standards can be achieved.
As with shaft alignment, balancing of rotating machines will contribute
significantly to improving machine reliability and hence improve production
profitability.
Unlike with shaft alignment, where if necessary, it is possible to align a
machine set to a zero alignment condition, it is not possible to balance
machines to a zero unbalance state. Even after balancing, machines will
continue to have some residual imbalance. Using modern systems it is
possible to reduce machine unbalance to very low levels. It is however not
economic to pursue very low unbalance levels on most standard machines.
To what extent unbalance should be reduced, and where the economic
compromise between pursuing lower unbalance levels and accepting what
has been achieved, is a subjective issue. ISO standards can however be used
as a good guide to acceptable unbalance conditions.
Standards use machine operating speed and rotor mass to establish guide
levels which can be applied. Balance quality is classified in a range from G
0.4 to G 4000. For most standard rotating machines, such as fans, pumps
and motors, the range we should be concerned with is from G 6.3 to G1.
Depending on individual plant operation and commissioning standards,
some plants will specify a balancing standard within this range. The ISO
standard does not intend that balance standards are used to determine
acceptance test for specific rotor types. They are more designed as in indi-
cation of unbalance acceptability based on experience and historical evalu-
ation of machine operation.

155
Balancing standards
In general, the larger the rotor mass the greater the permissible unbalance.
Permissible unbalance U is related to rotor mass m to give the specific per-
missible unbalance of the rotor as per the ´given formula.
e = U/m
General classification for standard machines according to ISO 1940

Balance quality
Examples of balancing bodies or machines
grade G
Crank gear rigidly assembled four-stroke engines and elastically

630
mounted ships diesel engines
250 Crank gear rigidly mounted, high-speed 4-cylinder diesel engines
Crank gear rigidly mounted, high-speed diesel motors with six and
100
more cylinders
Automobile wheels, rims, wheel sets, drive shaft crank gear elasti-
40 cally mounted, high-speed four-stroke engines with six and more
cylinders
Crank gear components of automobile, truck and locomotive en-
16 gines, crank gear of six and more cylinder engines with special re-
quirements´´
Fans, flywheels, centrifugal pumps, machine construction and ma-

6.3
chine tool construction parts
Impellers of jet power plants, gas and steam turbines, turbo blowers
2.5
and generators
1 Tape recorder and phono drives, grinding machine drives
0.4 Precision grinding machine anchorages, shafts and disks, gyroscopes

156
Balancing standards
Practical experience shows that for rotors of the same type the permissible
specific unbalance varies as the speed of the rotor changes. This produces
a chart of permissible unbalance against rotor speed:
Source: ISO 1940-1973 (E)

157
Balancing standards
Using the balance grades as shown in the guide table an estimate of the
acceptability of the unbalanced condition of a rotor can be established.
ISO 1940-1973 (E) suggests a variation as follows can be used to when
measuring and assessing the balance quality of a rotor compared to the
standard table:
Balance quality grades Permissible deviation

G 2.5 - G16 ± 15%
G1 ± 30%
G 0.4 ± 50%
The graph on the previous page is a simplified version of the ISO standard
graph. In bold are the most commonly used balance grades for standard
machine types. For standard motors, pumps and fans, the most commonly
used balance grades are in the range between 2.5 and 6.3. In exceptional
cases grade 1.0 can be used. This however is an exacting standard for such
applications.
Before embarking on corrective action for unbalance, it is essential to elimi-
nate any extraneous causes of vibration such as looseness, rubs or misalign-
ment. Analysis as described in the previous section will help establish the
primary source of vibration. This should be attended to first.

158
Correction methods
Correction methods
By far the major method of correcting rotor unbalance is by use of a specifi-
cally designed balancing machine or portable balancing system, such as the
PRUFTECHNIK VIBXPERT II Balancer.
The use of static balancing machines and the types available is not a subject
covered in this handbook. Here we are focused on in-situ balancing as ad-
dressed by most portable systems. It is useful however to look at a method
of determining unbalance in-situ without the aid of a dedicated balancing
system. This will help to establish basic balancing requirements and will
most likely underline the usefulness of investing in a balancing system that
eliminates the rather complex calculations that are necessary.
In-situ balancing should be performed under normal operating conditions,
and at normal speed. Should this be precluded by unbalance having be-
come excessive already, so that normal operation would be too dangerous,
pre-balancing must first be performed at reduced speed to lower vibration
severity, followed by final balancing at normal speed.
The locations on the rotor at which trial weights and balance weights are
fixed in the balancing planes must be freely accessible. Dismantling of
major components in between trial runs may alter external influences in
such a manner that the measurements of the individual runs are no longer
comparable.
An appropriate measuring point, identical with all runs, should be identified
at the location where the vibration measurement instrument indicates the
highest vibration value.
With all procedures, vibration severity can be measured in the form of vibra-
tion severity veff, displacement amplitude s, or acceleration amplitude, â.
For the purpose of simplicity, the following discussion is based on veff only,
further abbreviated to v.
Just as with car wheels, balancing is performed in the main by adding bal-
ance weights, less frequently by removing weight. Hence it is a matter of
determining the location where the balance weight must be added, and
how heavy it must be.

159
Correction methods
There are several procedures for determining location and amount of

the balance weight. But depending on the geometry of the rotor to be
balanced, there are basically two methods for correcting rotor unbalance
which we shall consider here.
Single-plane balancing for mechanical assemblies having, essentially, one

rotor whose thickness is smaller than its radius, e.g. the majority of fans,
belt pulleys or half-couplings. With this method, the mass center plane is
called balancing plane.
Two-plane balancing is designed accordingly for use with machines hav-

ing two or more rotors, or having one rotor whose width exceeds its radius.
With this method, the two balancing planes are the left and the right
side, or the front and the rear side, respectively.

160
Correction methods: Single-plane balancing
Single-plane balancing
To be able to define the position of the balance weight, the rotor is grad-
uated anticlockwise in degrees, from 0º to 360º. The graduation can be
applied to the front face or to the side of the rotor, depending on where the
balance weight is to be added later on. In the event of a cover permitting
access to the rotor in one particular place only, a 0º mark is applied first,
and from this mark the other angles can be measured by conversion of
radius and circumference.
There are several procedures again for both single-plane and two-plane
balancing. Set out below are two procedures for single-plane balancing. For
ease of understanding each one is explained on the basis of an example.
Single-plane three-point balancing

The first procedure is the single-plane three-point. The only accessories
required are a trial weight and a pair of compasses.
As can be implied from the name, three test points, T1, T2, T3, for attach-
ment of a trial weight are marked out on the rotor, at 0º, 120º and 240º.

161
A convenient size of the trial weight can be determined by means of the

following formula:
MT = G * s / r
MT: Trial weight
G: Weight of the vibrating parts
s: Displacement amplitude of vibration
r: Distance between the trial weight and the rotational axis
It is of course sufficient for the trial weight to be only approximately this

size. 1.5 times or half the calculated weight also is permissible.
As a first step, a trial run is made without a trial weight, to record the vibra-
tion severity VO. Assume the result is
VO = 8.0 mm/s.
Care must be taken to ensure that VO is measured at the rotational fre-
quency.
Then the trial weight MT is fixed to the points T1, T2, T3 in turn, and each
time a trial run of the machine and a measurement of vibration severity, V,
is performed. Assume the measuring results are
V1 = 6.4 mm/s
V2 = 13.0 mm/s
V3 = 7.6 mm/s
The trial weight in this example is MT = 22.5 g.
The measurement can best be evaluated on an prepared sheet showing a
basic outline graduated in degrees as shown on the following page.

162
A suitable scale is selected for the purpose: 1 cm corresponds to 2 mm/s.

A circle is drawn with M as its center and VO as its radius. In our example,
this would mean: r = 4.0 cm. The points of intersection of this circle with
the three legs 1, 2 and 3 are the points K1, K2 and K3.
The next step is to draw circles around these points: with a radius of V1 (i.e.
3.2cm) around K1; with a radius of V2 (i.e. 6.5 cm) around K2; and with a
radius of V3 (i.e. 3.8 cm) around K3. It does not matter if these circles do
not fit on the paper in their entirety. The crucial point is the common inter-
section of all three circles, the point S.

163
The angle WA represented by the leg M to S gives the angle at which the
balance weight MA must be fixed to the rotor; in this case,
WA = 307º.
The length of the segment M to S is measured and denoted by VT. In the

example,
VT = 5.0 mm/s.
As a general rule, the balance weight is fitted at the same distance r from
the center as the trial weight. The balance weight MA is therefore calculat-
ed according to the formula
MA = V0·MT/VT = 8 x 22.5 / 5
The result obtained in our example is:

Correction weight MA = 36 g, located at 307 degrees from 0
If the balance weight is to be fixed at a shorter or greater distance R than

from the axis, the balance weight must be calculated as follows:
MA(1) = r / R x MA
In most cases the measurements will not intersect at one point as shown in
our example; intersection S has been somewhat idealized. Most instances
will resolve a small triangle (detail a) or in exceptional circumstances there
may not even result a complete triangle (detail b). In these cases a mean
value should be selected from the hatched portion of the intersect area.

164
Should the triangle or the hatched area for once be very large, vibration is
not attributable to unbalance but to other defects. In that case, another
vibration analysis must be carried out, preferably backed by shock pulse
measurement.
Single-plane stroboscope method

The second procedure considered here for single-plane balancing is the
single-plane stroboscope method. The additional instrument required
is a stroboscope which can be synchronized with the machines rotational
frequency via a vibration analyzer. This method is more expensive than
the previous method. But it has the advantage that just two trial runs are
required instead of four, and that evaluation can be made both graphically
and by calculation.
For balancing, the rotor is again graduated anticlockwise in degrees, from
0º to 360º. During measuring, this graduation is viewed by the light of the
synchronized stroboscope so that the machine appears to be stationary.
The first run is made without a trial weight. The parameters to be recorded
are the vibration severity VO and – with the aid of the stroboscope – the
angle WO of the occurring vibration SO. Care must be taken to ensure that
VO is measured selectively for the rotational frequency.
For measurement of angles, a reference mark is fixed, e.g. at the top, which
is then used for both trial runs and where the angle is read off.

165
In the second trial run, a trial weight MT is attached at 0º, at a distance r

from the rotational axis. Then the vibration ST is recorded, with its vibration
severity VT and its phase angle WT, just as in the first trial run. Both, the
measuring point for the vibration pick-up and the reference mark for mea-
surement of angles, must remain unchanged in the process.
The following recorded values are assumed as an example:
SO: VO = 9 mm/s; WO = 110º
ST: VT = 15.6 mm/s; WT = 40º
Trial weight MT = 20 g
Correction by graphical method

The first step is to plot SO and ST to a suitable scale in a circle graduated
in degrees, the final points being O and T. The arrow from T to O is then
shifted parallel to the center. Its length is measured and is denoted by N,
its angle is WN.

166
The amount of balance weight MA is calculated as follows:

MA = SO·MT/N
Its angular location is

WA = WO – WN
The result is
WA = 280º, MA = 12 g.
Correction by calculation
For an evaluation by calculation, complex numbers must be used. Unbal-
ance and vibration may be considered complex numbers in polar co-ordi-
nates, and equally the balance weight.
Conversion of these complex numbers into Cartesian co-ordinates will yield
the expressions below.
The given quantities are: VO, WO, VT, WT, MT.
VO = 9 mm/s; WO = 110º;
VT = 15.6 mm/s; WT = 40º;
MT = 20 g
Stage 1: conversion of SO and ST into Cartesian co-ordinates.

SOX = VO·cos (WO) SOX = 9 mm/s·cos (110º) = -3.08 mm/s
SOY = VO·sin (WO) SOY = 9 mm/s·sin (110º) = 8.46 mm/s
STX = VT·cos (WT) STX = 15.6 mm/s·cos (40º) = 11.95 mm/s
STY = VT·sin (WT) STY = 15.6 mm/s·sin (40º) = 10.03 mm/s
Stage 2: calculation of SO – ST
NX = SOX – STX NX = -15.03 mm/s
NY = SOY – STY NY = -1.57 mm/s
N2 = (NX)2 + (NY)2 N2 = 228.4 mm/s
Stage 3: calculation of the balance weight

AX = (SOX·NX + SOY·NY)·(MT/N²) AX = 2.89 g
AY = (SOY·NX - SOX·NY)·(MT/N²) AY = -11.56 g

167
Stage 4: conversion of the balance weight into polar co-ordinates

MA = (AX)²+ (AY)² MA = 11.9 g
WA = √[tan-1(AY/AX)] WA = -76º
With respect to WA, allowance must be made for the fact that a calculator
will indicate the principle value of tan-1(AY/AX), and also that when AX = 0,
WA is not defined at all. It is therefore advisable either to perform an extra
graphical evaluation (doubling as a further check) to definitely identify the
angular location, or to plot the balance weight in Cartesian co-ordinates.
The exact value of WA is then obtained by adding or subtracting appropri-
ate multiples of 180º.
This is the case in our example where the result of both the graphical eval-
uation and the plotting of the Cartesian co-ordinates is about 285º. 360º
must thus be added to the previously calculated value to obtain the exact
value of WA = 284º.

168
Just as with the single-plane three-point method, the calculated balance

weight MA must be attached at the same distance r from the center as the
trial weight. In case another spacing is preferred, the balance weight must
again be converted according to the principal of the lever.
With the single-plane stroboscope method, calculation is as follows:

If U is the unbalance, the first measurement yields
(i) SO = a·U
with a complex parameter a.
In the second measurement, the trial weight T is added to the unbalance U

so that the result of the measurement is
(ii) ST = a·(U+T)
From (i), a = SO/U, and inserting this into (ii) yields

ST = SO·(U+T)/U
Resolving to U yields
U = (SO·T)/(ST-SO)
The balance weight A must be opposite to U:

A = (SO·T)/(SO-ST)

169
Correction methods: Two-plane balancing
Two-plane stroboscope method (devised by A Wahrheit)

If the rotor assembly concerned has either two rotors or one rotor whose
width exceeds its diameter, two-plane balancing methods must be used.
We will review one two-plane balancing method and will show calculations
to obtain balance correction weights and location.
The two ends of the rotor represent the two balancing planes E1 and E2.
This method is similar to the single-plane stroboscope method, especially

in that identical equipment is required, i.e. a frequency-selective vibration
measuring instrument and a stroboscope. A graduation in degrees is again
applied to both balancing planes, the positions being identical on both
planes.
A total of three trial runs must be made; the first one without a trial weight
and the other two with a trial weight added. The trial weight is always at-
tached at 0º, first in the balancing plane E1 and then in the balancing plane
E2. With all three trial runs, either balancing plane is measured in respect of
vibration severity and, with the aid of the stroboscope, phase angle.
Twelve recorded values are thus obtained, and the 13th value is the trial
weight.

170
Without trial weight:

E1: V10 = 14.7 mm/s W10 = 56º
E2: V20 = 12.0 mm/s W20 = 75º
With trial weight at E1:

E1: V11 = 27.3 mm/s W11 = 33º
E2: V21 = 14.1 mm/s W21 = 55º
With trial weight at E2:

E1: V12 = 18.5 mm/s W12 = 45º
E2: V22 = 23.9 mm/s W22 = 44º
Trial weight: MT = 60 g
On the basis of the 13 values recorded, a calculation is then made to deter-

mine the angles in both balancing planes at which the balance weights are
to be fixed, and also the value of those weights. Four values are thus ob-
tained: MA1; WA1 and MA2; WA2. The calculating procedure is as follows
(refer to the chart on the next page):
Step I
The measuring results are entered in the top portion of the evaluation
sheet.
Step II
Columns I and II are completed as specified. The highest result of operation
I is underlined, the other results of 1 are then divided by this value, mul-
tiplied by 10 and entered in column VX on the right. The angles resulting
from operation II are moved directly to the column WX. Should an angle
exceed 360º, however, 360º must be subtracted until the result is in the
range from 0º to 360º.
The points A to F are plotted with amount and angle into the circle. The ra-
dius of the circle corresponds to 10. The amounts and angles of K (center of
AB), L (center of CD) and S (center of gravity of the triangle KLM, M center
of E F) are read off and entered in the respective spaces.

171

172
Step III
Determines two auxiliary quantities, Z1 and Z2, which are eventually used
to calculate the sizes and angular locations of the balance weights. The
principals of the two-plane stroboscope method are as follows:
As with the single-plane stroboscope method, the unbalances in the bal-
ancing planes E1 (U1) and E2 (U2) as well as the trial unbalance T are de-
fined as complex numbers.
Vibration severity levels without trial weight are as follows:
S10 = a·U1 + b·U2 S10 = (V10; W10)
S20 = c·U1 + d·U2 S20 = (V20; W20)
Where a, b, c and d are complex parameters, b and c represents the effects
of the unbalances on the other balancing plane.
Since the equations contain six unknown quantities (a, b, c, d, U1, U2), four
more equations are needed. They are obtained from the two trial runs with
trial weight.
S11 = a·(U1 + T) + b·U2 S11 = (V11; W11)
S21 = c·(U1 + T) + d·U2 S21 = (V21; W21)
S12 = a·U1 + b·(U2 + T) S12 = VG12; W12)
S22 = c·U1 + d·(U2 + T) S22 = (V22; W22)
These give the following solutions:

U1 = {[(S10 x S22) - (S20 x S12)] / [S20x(S12 - S11) + S21x(S10 - S12) + S22x(S11 - S10)]} x T
U2 = {[(S11 x S22) - (S10 x S21)] / [S20x(S12 - S11) + S21x(S10 - S12) + S22x(S11 - S10)]} x T
With regard to the balance weights M1 = -U1 and M2 = -U2.
It is obvious from the preceding pages, that calculating unbalance correc-

tions even on simple rotors in both one and two planes involves a series of
complex graphical and/or mathematical calculations. The balancing meth-
ods reviewed are based on the assumption of ideal linear conditions, which
is rarely encountered in reality. Corrections may therefore require a second
and in extreme cases a third balancing procedure to achieve the balance
quality required.

173
Trial weight calculation
There is however a more straightforward method of in-situ dynamic balanc-

ing which substantially reduces the time required to achieve an acceptable
balance quality and all but eliminates the complex calculations of the pre-
vious methods.
Dedicated balancing systems, such as VIBXPERT® II Balancer, performs
balancing in one or two planes. It graphically describes balance weight
corrections and locations or allows the operator to select suitable mount-
ing locations, e.g. on the blades of a fan, and automatically compensates
weight requirements to accommodate this.
The time saved and the improved accuracy from such systems makes the
initial investment well worthwhile
Trial weight calculation

Most suitable trial weights are small screw clamps that are easy to install
and to remove at any location desired. Screws or bolts can be used as well,
provided the respective locations are fitted with the tapped holes required.
Additionally, an exactly weighed quantity of a special putty can also serve
as a trial weight.
It goes without saying that the trial weights must be weighed, and secured
to the rotor carefully. If balancing work needs to be done fairly frequently, a
set of trial weights could be prepared and kept in readiness.
Instruments, such as VIBXPERT® II Balancer, described in the next pages
will calculate the trial weight to be used and will identify the location.
If however the unbalance is to be calculated or resolved graphically it is
necessary to accurately calculate the amount of trial weight to be used as
follows.
A convenient size of the trial weight can be determined by means of the
formula below, where MT is the trial weight, G the weight of the rotor, s
the displacement amplitude of the vibration, and r the distance of the trial
weight from the center.
MT = G • s / r
If a bolt is to be fitted as a balance weight, the respective tapped hole must

be deducted from the weight of the bolt.

174
Balancing safety
Balancing safety
When performing in-situ balancing on rotating machines, it is essential that
operators are aware of the in plant and local HSE safety requirements for
working on the machines. And must be mindful of the implications and
safety requirements when mounting balance weights to machines. Guide
lines supplied below should be the minimum precautions taken.
• Isolate machines to avoid accidental switching on when work is being
carried out.
• When assembling measurement components ensure that no fixtures or
cables or other objects project within the vicinity of rotating machine
parts.
• Follow manufacturers directions when attaching balance weights.
• Always operate within the maximum permissible rpm of the rotor.
• Always pay particular attention to the calculation of the trial mass to
be used for the initial balance run. Oversize trial masses can have grave
consequences for machines and operator alike.
• During trial and balancing runs ensure no operators are within the radial
vicinity of the machine.
• Close all access guards and doors to the rotor before switching on the
machine.
• Do not exceed the permitted number of machine start ups for any given
time.
• Before balancing begins determine the cause of unbalance and where
possible remove any material which may be caked on to the rotor. Weld
any cracks in impeller blades or replace the impeller if this is not possi-
ble.

175
PRUFTECHNIK balancing instruments
PRUFTECHNIK balancing instruments

The principle of operation of VIBXPERT® II Balancer is similar to that of
resolving balance by graphical or calculation method. Each method requires
the following:
• A preliminary machine measurement to establish current unbalance
condition
• Either one or two trial measurements with trial weights, depending on
number of planes to balance; one plane requires one trial run.
• A trim run to correct rotor unbalance; it may in some cases be necessary
to carry out two trim runs to achieve final balance condition.
The fundamental difference between VIBXPERT® II Balancer and manual
balance methods is that the instrument carries out all necessary calculations
and reports corrective action to be taken. Different machine type config-
urations can be initially selected to establish either single or two plane
balancing requirements.

Section 4
Wear Debris
Analysis
178
Wear debris analysis
An overview
Wear debris analysis (WDA), like previously discussed methods of mainte-
nance actions which are designed to improve machine operating life, is just
one section of a comprehensive maintenance regime. On its own it will not
prove to be an all encompassing solution for improving plant operating
performance. WDA however does provide in some instances a very good
early warning system for incipient machine failure.
As its name suggests the concept of WDA is that it is used to measure
debris in machine lubrication systems. A lack of debris is usually a good
indication that little or no component wear or breakdown is taking place.
Conversely a significant amount of debris is a good indication that some-
thing is taking place within the machine system that should not be happen-
ing. The type and size of debris will further indicate the source and extent
of the component failure.
Of course all components wear over time and there will hardly ever be a
situation where no debris is found in a lubrication sample. What is import-
ant is the size and increase of debris encountered. WDA data trending is
therefore used extensively to measure over time the ongoing condition
of a machine component, such as a bearing. It is of course perfectly pos-
sible to obtain a reasonable indication of a component condition by one
“snapshot” sample analysis. A significant amount of debris will indicate
progressive and often terminal component wear requiring almost immedi-
ate intervention before machine failure. Little or no debris will indicate the
component is in OK condition.
Actually it’s not quite that simple. Debris found in lubrication samples
needs to be analyzed, so that the particle size and content can be used as
a guide to the source of the debris and component wear. WDA was initially
heavily used in the mining industry, where airborne particles of coal dust
were often ingested into machinery contaminating lubrication mediums for
bearings, gears and other “sliding” components. WDA was a very good
early indicator of the level of contamination and the extent to which these
abrasive airborne particles were damaging the sliding components of the
machines. In many cases WDA was the first line indicator of possible ma-
chine component failure.

179
Wear debris analysis methods
Care should however be taken, as what you see is not always what you
get. The accuracy of readings and analysis depends entirely upon the qual-
ity of the sample taken. Samples taken a long distance from the target
component can be contaminated “down the line” as can samples taken in
“unclean” containers or with already contaminated sampling systems. As
a consequence, data can be corrupted and meaningless before the analysis
takes place. Care has to be taken when considering sample location and
sampling instruments and methods.
Review of WDA methods

Generally there are two types of WDA methods that are employed in in-
dustrial applications: off-line analysis and on-line (or in-line) analysis.
These methods represent distinctly different approaches to the application
of WDA. On-line analysis, as its name suggests, is incorporated into the
system process. It yields more immediate results than the more commonly
adopted off-line method, but on-line analysis relies heavily upon particle
count measured against particle size. Detailed analysis of the debris content
is generally not possible in on-line analysis.
On-line analysis
Within On-line analysis methods there are a number of different system
options designed to catch or measure specific wear debris particles.
• Filter blockage – where flow passes through a filter with a known pore
size, changes in flow characteristics indicate an increase in particle size
causing an in line blockage of the filter.
• Magnetic attraction – a magnet is used to attract debris particles into
a trap, further on-line measurement is then performed to assess particle
volume.
• Optical – detectors are positioned within a light source focused within
the flow line. These detect particle size either by diffraction of the light
source or by using a photo diode to detect a drop in the light intensity
measured.
• Film ware – fluid is projected at a surface coated with a thin conductive
layer, as debris wears the film surface away the resistance across the film
increases. This indicates developing debris levels and consequent wear
problems.

180
• Ultrasonics – an ultrasonic beam is focused into the fluid, an echo sig-

nal is measured as it hits debris. The echo changes (increases) as more
debris is encountered.
Within each sub group there are a number of different techniques and a
differing number of advantages for each system used. Depending upon
the specific requirements of the particle analysis required, the engineer will
have to establish the type of on-line system required. If for example only
ferrous debris is to be analyzed, then a magnetic on-line system should
be used. If however none ferrous components such as white metal or
phosphor bronze bearing debris is to be measured, a device to sense these
materials is essential. Likewise, if all debris is to be measured, then a simple
filter blockage system can be employed to deliver the required debris data.
All on-line systems however suffer from the universal problem (with the
exception of the filter block system) in that they are analysis specific. They
focus on targeted types of debris analysis rather than the broad spectrum
analysis possible with off-line WDA.
In one area however, on-line analysis does offer a distinct advantage over
off-line analysis in that it makes possible WDA in machines and systems
that would not normally be accessible to humans without considerable ef-
fort or potential danger. Applications such as wind turbine gearboxes and
marine thruster gearboxes are typical machine systems which cannot easily
be measured for wear debris without on-line analysis.
Off-line analysis
This method is more universally used in general industrial applications and it
does offer the analyzer much greater scope for evaluation of a wide variety
of debris. As noted earlier however, considerable care has to be taken in
obtaining the debris sample and storing it for later analysis.
Off-line analysis can more or less be sub-divided into three types of anal-
ysis methods. Patch analysis, ferrography and particle concentration.
Within each, there are a number of methods of sample analysis possible
and scope for greater or lesser degrees of detailed analysis.
Patch analysis is probably the most common method of off-line analysis of

debris. A sample of the extracted lubricant is passed through a filter mem-
brane, debris is deposited on the filter for examination. The advantage of

181
this method is that all debris types are deposited on the filter allowing for a
comprehensive analysis of debris if required. This can be achieved in a num-
ber of ways ranging from the very rough to the highly detailed as follows:
• Rough analysis: Color analysis – A comparison is made between the
filter with the debris deposit and a new clean filter. Generally this anal-
ysis is used to establish grade of contamination ranging in three or four
standard conditions of good, acceptable, and warning.
• Rough / intermediate analysis: Standard comparisons – This uses a
standard set of filters made in accordance to ISO 4406 level of debris
concentration or cleanliness. A comparison is made between the debris
filter and the ISO filters again to establish good, acceptable or warning
levels of debris concentration. This type of system is often found in the
many portable WDA analysis kits available.
• Intermediate analysis: Particle counting – Usually carried out on a fil-
ter membrane with a grid etched on to the surface. The total quantity of
debris particles are counted in any one grid area, the total particle count
then being multiplied by the number of grids. This system is classed here
as intermediate simply because the size and distribution of debris can be
further checked using a microscope.
• Intermediate / advanced analysis: Using visual inspection – A de-
tailed observation of debris particles is carried out. This allows analysis
of shape, size, type and concentration of debris contamination. Micro-
scope examination, different types of lighting and operator experience
will determine accurately the level and general composition of contami-
nation of the off-line sample.
• Advanced analysis: Using a scanning electron microscope – This pro-
vides access to highly detailed evaluation, analysis and reporting of de-
bris sample concentrations including the specific elements of the debris
in each analysis sample.
Particle concentration – This method can be carried out using either

visual or by magnetic methods of particle analysis. Usually the sample is
transferred into an optically clear glass vessel. The sample contents are then
placed on a shaker to uniformly distribute the debris throughout the sam-
ple. The debris is then evaluated either by an optical device or by magnetic
induction to view particle size, type and distribution. Obviously when using
magnetic induction only ferrous particles can be observed in the sample.

182
Wear debris analysis results
This analysis method is usually used in conjunction with more detailed lab-
oratory analysis of particle content.
Ferrography – As its name suggests, this analysis method concentrates on

ferrous and other magnetic particles. It is extremely useful in establishing
the content of ferrous particles in a sample, but virtually useless in estab-
lishing other non magnetic particles such as phosphor bronze or white
metal. The resulting slide taken using this method will allow identification
of ferrous wear particles. When the slide is heated, ferrous particles can be
compared to a standard wear particle color chart to establish actual debris
particle content of the sample.
Assessing the results from WDA analysis

As with all methods of condition based maintenance, a level of on plant
experience is necessary to accurately establish whether intervention is nec-
essary on a particular item of equipment. If for example using a rough or
intermediate analysis of a WDA sample, the color of the slide is significantly
different from the control sample or slide then its pretty well a “no brainer”
that at the very minimum, further and more detailed analysis should take
place. This then becomes a two stage WDA analysis strategy. A second
WDA sample should be taken and sent to a laboratory for detailed analysis.
Depending on the report content action can then be taken to prevent dam-
age to machine components.
Rough or intermediate analysis then becomes an important link in the WDA
maintenance strategy. Whereas the maintenance manager may have pre-
viously dismissed this technique as not good enough for the plant, it does
provide an easily obtained and readily available source of plant operating
condition evaluation. Its added advantage is that it requires very little train-
ing of the operative to compare samples with pre-established reference
slides. It is in this area that the many portable oil analysis laboratories pro-
vide a good introduction product to WDA.
When the exercise of WDA is extended to a detailed analysis of a debris
sample the usual route is to send the extracted sample to a specific lab-
oratory. Analysis will be comprehensive and should be accompanied by
a detailed report of the sample including an overall spectrograph of the
sample together with a description and analysis of each element found in

183
Sampling procedure and location
the sample. This should include a list of the proportions of each element in
the sample.
Where laboratory analysis is a routine procedure carried out, there should
also be a trend graph of samples over time available. Depending upon
the laboratory, and the price you are prepared to pay for analysis, it is also
possible to have an indication of the source of any significant increase of
a particular debris element and thus any component that may be showing
signs of advanced wear. Without a trend graph for example, the laboratory
analysis of a sample is no more than a snap shot of the present lubrication
condition of the machine. It gives no indication of any change in operating
state and is therefore of only limited use or can identify machines only in an
advanced state of component failure.
It is of course very important that each sample sent for analysis is accurately
labeled with location, machine, date and time of the obtained sample. As
noted previously it is also important that the sample is taken from the same
location each time in order for the analysis to have any serious validity.

It stands, saying again, location and repeatability are all important with
WDA sampling. The best possible arrangement is to have the sampling
point installed as a integral part of the machine system, located in a pres-
surized part of the system. This will provide a guaranteed repeatable sample
process and hence reliable results from WDA.
Where this is not possible, the sample has to be obtained from a location
that is repeatedly accessible such as an oil reservoir or sump. It has to be
accepted that the results may be compromised by other contaminants but
as with all condition monitoring something is better than nothing.
Where it is possible to retrofit a sampling point, is ideal, and there are many
options available. Each manufacturers sample point will provide a secure
drip free, clean and easily attachable probe location. All manufacturers will
also supply sample probes to fit their systems.
If the operator has to rely on sampling from a non fixed point, then it is
necessary to use an extraction syringe attached to a sample bottle. This
will enable the operator to suck the sample into the bottle. Before taking

184
a sample in this way, it is necessary to ensure that the sample tube is thor-
oughly flushed with clean (same) lubricating fluid as is to be extracted. Care
must be taken to ensure that the sample tube is suspended in the fluid and
not sitting in the lower settled debris in the bottom of the reservoir.
It is not good practice to simply dip the sample bottle into the reservoir to
obtain a fluid sample. This potentially introduces a number of additional
contaminants that may corrupt the fluid sample being taken.
The forgoing information should be read as a guide only to the possibilities

of introducing a WDA system to your plant. The bibliography at the end of
this book lists further essential reading that will assist the introduction of a
successful WDA regime.
PRUFTECHNIK have introduced an on-line WDA system designed to give

early warning of bearing and gearbox damage in critical equipment such as
wind turbine and marine thruster gearboxes. The following notes describe
the system and its operating principal.

185
WEARSCANNER
PRUFTECHNIK WDA system

WEARSCANNER® monitors particle distribution in lubricating oil. The sys-
tem detects metal particles in the circulating lubricating oil, records them in
real-time and classifies them by size in accordance with ISO 16232.
When the particle count in a particular size class exceeds a defined thresh-
old, the system indicates an alarm via the switching signal. The internal
ring buffer can accommodate one year of data when values are stored at
two minute intervals. They can be read out at any time for trend analysis
or when thresholds are exceeded. If the system is integrated in a data
network, it transfers measurement data to the system control via Modbus.
When the WEARSCANNER® is used in combination with the VIBROWEB®
XP Online Condition Monitoring System, the data is transferred to the
Monitoring Center by e-mail.
The particle count is influenced by the oil temperature, flow rate, air and
water content, and darkening (especially when using optical methods). The
patented WEARSCANNER® method, based on the eddy current principle, is
not influenced by these restricting parameters.

186
How WEARSCANNER® works
• Each peak represents a particle that flows through the sensor tube.
• The amplitude indicates the size of the particle.
• The peaks are counted in set time intervals – and the number of peaks
per time interval is transmitted via ModBus TCP.
• The size categories – three classes in this case – are configured for each
particular situation.
• The time resolution and scan rate can be selected.
• The sensitivity can be adapted by adjusting the gain, power and filter to
the machine application.
The eddy current measuring principle

An excitation coil that generates an alternating magnetic field induces
eddy currents in the oil. A receiver coil detects the resulting eddy current
density.
Electrically conductive, i.e. ferritic and non-ferritic contaminants in the oil
change the current flow between the excitation and the receiver coils. In or-
der to detect even minuscule particles at high flow velocities WEARSCAN-
NER® utilizes the fast reacting differential coils method with two receiver
windings connected in opposition.

187
WEARSCANNER®
Particle size distribution in oil

As a general rule, the greater the particle size, the greater the damage.

Section 5
Resources
190
About PRUFTECHNIK
About PRUFTECHNIK
PRUFTECHNIK is an international company involved in the design, man-
ufacture and sale of measurement and diagnostic systems used for laser
alignment, condition monitoring, and nondestructive testing.
Originally founded in 1972 in Munich by Dieter Busch, the company first
acted as a marketing company for a range of metal detector systems and
bearing testing equipment. As the company became established, a new
range of its own designed eddy current testing systems was developed, fol-
lowed over the next few years by the world’s first laser shaft alignment sys-
tem OPTALIGN. This was later followed by vibration analysis and dynamic
balancing systems; all designed with the unique PRUFTECHNIK approach to
simplicity of operation and application.
PRUFTECHNIK head office is still located in Germany, but has established
subsidiaries in the UK, Belgium, Netherlands, France, Singapore, Italy,
Spain, Canada, U.S.A., Turkey, Japan, Russia, China, Poland, India, Brazil
and Dubai. In addition to this, PRUFTECHNIK has a network of more than
70 sales partners throughout the world.
For PRUFTECHNIK being close to customers is the essential ingredient to its
past and future success. Many of the current products are the result of long
established working relationships with its customers. Being close to the
market is more than a slogan.
In addition to the unrivaled range of products, PRUFTECHNIK has an inter-
national training, service and support organization that provides product
training, consultation services, and specialized services in areas such as
turbine alignment, installation, commissioning and planning of condition
monitoring systems.
PRUFTECHNIK holds more than 200 world wide patents together with 100
registered trademarks for its innovative range of products.

191
Further reading
Further Reading
Shaft Alignment
• Shaft Alignment Handbook, 2nd edition, John Piotrowski, ISBN 0-8247-
9666-7
• Maintenance Fundamentals, Keith Mobley, ISBN 0-7506-7151-3
• Introduction to machinery analysis, John Mitchell 1993, ISBN 0-87814-
401-3
• Infrared Thermography and Laser alignment technologies, 1994, Infra-
spection Institute, Frank Pray and Bruce Bortnem
• Drives and Seals, M J Neal, ISBN 0 7506 0981 8
Vibration Analysis
• The Vibration monitoring Handbook, Coxmoor publishing, ISBN 1
90189 200 X
• International conference on condition monitoring, Coxmoor publishing,
ISBN 1 90189 214 X
• Management guide to condition monitoring in manufacture, Institute of
Production engineers, ISBN 0 85510 037 0
• Vibration Spectrum analysis, Steve Goodman, 2nd Edition, ISBN 08311
30881
Balancing
• Dynamic balancing of rotating machinery, JB Wilcox, ISBN 0273429590
• Machinery Vibration Balancing, Victor Wowk, ISBN 00707 1938 1
• Balancing accuracy of rigid rotors No 8, Dott.Ing Luigi Buzzi, booklet, III
edition 1989, translated by P F Kercher
Wear Debris Analysis

• Wear Debris Analysis, Brian Roylance, Trevor Hunt, ISBN 1 90189 202 6
• A Handbook of Oil Analysis, Augustus H Gill

192
Further reading
ISO standards
• Mechanical vibration – Evaluation of machine vibration by measure-
ments on non-rotating parts: ISO 10816 - 3
• Field balancing equipment – Description and evaluation ISO 2371
• Balancing quality of rotating rigid bodies ISO 1940.-1973
• Cleanliness of components of fluid circuits ISO 16232-1:2007
including:
• Method of extraction of contaminants by ultrasonic techniques
• Particle mass determination by gravimetric analysis
• Method of extraction of contaminants by ultrasonic techniques
• Particle sizing and counting by microscopic analysis
• Particle sizing and counting by automatic light extinction particle
counter

PRUFTECHNIK
85737 Ismaning, Germany
[email protected]
www.pruftechnik.com
Productive maintenance technology

EngineersGuide Handbook ALI 9.600 092017 en

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

EngineersGuide Handbook ALI 9.600 092017 en

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

EngineersGuide Handbook ALI 9.600 092017 en

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

An Engineer‘s Guide

Making Maintenance Matter

Optimizing plant availability using

Document no.: ALI 9.600.G

© PRUFTECHNIK AG; All rights reserved

What is shaft alignment?................................................................................. 10

How precise should alignment be?.....................................................21

Alignment methods and practice........................................................31

Thermal expansion of machines..........................................................67

Alignment of pulleys and sheaves.....................................................71

Engineer’s Guide | 09.2017

Fault detection ...................................................................................102

A common sense approach................................................................113

Gear and gearbox faults....................................................................133

Bent rotor or shaft..............................................................................148

Engineer’s Guide | 09.2017

Balancing standards....................................................................................... 154

WEAR DEBRIS ANALYSIS................................................177

Engineer’s Guide | 09.2017

Engineer’s Guide | 09.2017

What is shaft alignment?

The axes of rotation:

The accuracy of the fit of the coupling on the shaft is unknown:

Engineer’s Guide | 09.2017

Under normal operating conditions:

The natural bending of shafts under their own weight

Engineer’s Guide | 09.2017

Operation above critical speed?

Drive shaft operation below critical speed:

Drive shaft operation above critical speed:

Engineer’s Guide | 09.2017

Traditionally alignment has been described in terms of dial indicator

A more modern and easily understandable approach is to describe machine

Engineer’s Guide | 09.2017

Vertical offset Vertical angularity

Horizontal offset Horizontal angularity

Angularity, gap and offset

Angularity can be expressed directly as an angle in degrees or mrads, or in

Engineer’s Guide | 09.2017

Relationship of angle, gap and working diameter.

same angle – different gap

same gap – different angle

Engineer’s Guide | 09.2017

Offset describes the distance between rotation axes at a given point.

Engineer’s Guide | 09.2017

Short flexible couplings

+ Offset + Angle / Gap

- Gap/Offset - Angle / Gap

Engineer’s Guide | 09.2017

Engineer’s Guide | 09.2017

+ Offset B + Offset A + Offset A

Engineer’s Guide | 09.2017

Engineer’s Guide | 09.2017

How precise should alignment be?

Engineer’s Guide | 09.2017

Suggested alignment tolerance table

Engineer’s Guide | 09.2017

Suggested alignment tolerance table

Tolerance – [mrad] Tolerance – [mrad]