CFD Simulation of Multiphase Flow in A Sieve Tray of A Distillation Column
CFD Simulation of Multiphase Flow in A Sieve Tray of A Distillation Column
CFD Simulation of Multiphase Flow in A Sieve Tray of A Distillation Column
ABSTRACT
Many studies on distillation columns are based on macroscopic models of mass and energy conservation.
In this work, we investigate the complex hydrodynamics of sieve trays in pilot plant distillation columns,
based on a distributed control system with heating action at intermediate points, by means of electrical
resistance heaters arranged on the surface of sieve trays (Marangoni and Machado, 2007; Werle, 2007),
using computational fluid dynamics. The main objective was to evaluate the influence of the electrical
resistance heaters on the hydrodynamics of the sieve trays. A three-dimensional mathematical
homogeneous biphasic model was implemented in the commercial code of computational fluid dynamics
(CFD), CFX 11 (AEA Technology) for numerical experimentation studies. The results show the influence of
electrical resistance heaters placed on the sieve trays on the flow patterns, although the hydrodynamics is
not affected as a whole. Consequently, this helped to provide enhanced mixing and homogenization in the
region with active bubbles, and thus the use of electrical resistance heaters could be applied in a
distributed control system approach.
KEYWORDS
distillation columns; fluid dynamics model; CFX
1
To whom all correspondence should be addressed.
Address: Federal University of Santa Catarina- Department of Chemical Engineering - Laboratory of Control of Processes -
Technological Center - University Campus - Trindade. P.O. Box 476. ZIP Code:. Florianpolis - SC. Brazil
CEP: 88040-970 | Telephone / fax number: +55 48 3721 9554 | E-mail: [email protected]
93
BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM AND GAS | v. 3 n. 3 | p. 093-102 | 2009 | ISSN 1982-0593
94
BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM AND GAS | v. 3 n. 3 | p. 093-102 | 2009 | ISSN 1982-0593
loads and weir heights when the valves are fully 2.2 Momentum Equation
open. The objectives were: to propose the
development, implementation and application of a Equation 3 expresses the overall momentum
microscopic model for momentum conservation equation.
subjected to the turbulent flow of the vapor phase;
to represent the fluid dynamics of the vapor-liquid
flow in a perforated plate distillation pilot plant, (fkk vk ) + (fkk vk vk ) = fk Pk +
t (3)
with validation through correlation with the
experimental data provided in Bennett et al. [
+ fk k (v k + v kT ) + Mg.l + fkk g ]
(1983); and, finally, to examine the influence of
electrical resistance heaters placed on the tray where k and g represent the molecular viscosity
surfaces to control the distributed heating of a for the kth phase and the gravity vector,
distillation pilot plant on the fluid flow dynamics. respectively. P k is the pressure field, having the
same value for the gas end and the liquid phase.
M g,l represents the momentum transfer between
the gas and the liquid phases, and the additional
2. MATHEMATICAL MODEL momentum flux due to the velocity fluctuation
(turbulence) was incorporated into the diffusion
The model considers the gas and liquid flows in term.
a Eulerian-Eulerian framework, where the phases
are treated with transport equations. The To solve Equations 1-3, an additional equation
equations used were: mass continuity and relating the interphase momentum transfer (M g,l )
momentum equations. To solve these, it was and additional momentum fluxes is required, and
necessary to add and use the equation of this is provided by Equation 4.
momentum flux (Liu et al., 2000). It was considered
3 fgl
that the fluctuations (turbulence) reflect the Mg,l = CD v g v l (v g v l ) (4)
formation and dispersion of small swarms of 4 dg
bubbles, and that the Reynolds stresses can be
linearly related to the mean velocity gradients where dg is the bubble diameter and CD is the drag
(eddy viscosity hypothesis), as in the case of the coefficient.
relationship between the stress and strain tensors
in laminar Newtonian flow. The standard k-
turbulence model for multiphase flow was 2.3 Turbulence Equations
assumed (Nikou and Ehsani, 2008).
When applying the time average procedure in
the Navier Stokes equations, an extra term appears
2.1 Mass Continuity Equations due to the turbulent fluctuation of the velocities,
which needs to be represented by a constitutive
Equation 1 expresses the overall mass equation. This term is known as the Reynolds flux.
continuity equation. We consider that the fluctuations (turbulence)
reflects the formation and dispersion of small
swarms of bubbles, and that the Reynolds stresses
(fkk ) + (fkk vk ) = 0 (1)
t can be linearly related to the mean velocity
gradients (eddy viscosity hypothesis) as in the
where f k , k and v k represent the volume fraction, relationship between the stress and strain tensors
macroscopic density and velocity vector for the k in laminar Newtonian flow, and thus an effective
phase, respectively. The gas and liquid volume viscosity can be assumed (Equation 5), and the
fractions, f g and f l , are related through the Reynolds fluxes of a scalar are linearly related to
summation constraint indicated by Equation 2: the mean scalar gradient.
95
BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM AND GAS | v. 3 n. 3 | p. 093-102 | 2009 | ISSN 1982-0593
The standard k- model is related to the In Figure 1 two perforated sieve trays of a
turbulent kinetic energy and its dissipation rate as distillation column are illustrated, which were
follows: studied in the CFD simulations.
(b)
(a)
Figure 1. Top views of modules showing the characteristics of the plate (a) without and (b) with electrical resistor.
96
BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM AND GAS | v. 3 n. 3 | p. 093-102 | 2009 | ISSN 1982-0593
Figure 2. 3-D multiphase physical domain (a) without and (b) with electrical resistance.
difference scheme was used for the time Figures 3a and 3c show the distribution profiles
integration. of the volumetric fraction of water in the XY plane
and XZ plane, respectively, at three different
Air, at ambient pressure, and water were used heights (1.5, 9.0 and 16.5 cm), without the
as the gas and liquid phases, respectively. At the presence of the electrical resistance on the surface
beginning of the simulation, the conditions of the trays. Figures 3b and 3d show the behavior
consisted of liquid up to the weir height, and air up of velocity vectors for air (in the XY plane) and
to the weir height, at a homogeneous temperature liquid (in the XZ plane 1.5 cm above the surface),
equal to T 0 . The velocity fields and the turbulent respectively.
properties, also considered as initial conditions for
each simulation, are shown in the next section. The It can be observed in Figure 3a that the retained
time increment used in the simulations is 0.001 s. liquid layer (hold-up) represented by the dark blue
During the simulation the volume fraction of the color (volume fraction of liquid equal to one)
liquid phase in the gasliquid dispersion in the undergoes a small increase, with the mixing of both
system is monitored and quasi-steady state is phases and foam formation because of the high gas
assumed to prevail if the value of the hold-up flow.
remains constant for sufficiently long period of
time in order to determine the time-averaged The rising of the liquid is more pronounced in
values of the various parameters. Typically, steady the region near the wall of the exit from the lower
state is achieved in about 12 s from the start of the tray, since air inlet through the holes is a control
simulations. Simulations were performed in a condition with constant velocity and normal
cluster with ten Pentium-4 computers with boundary, which forces the evolution of some
processors running at 200 MHz. A typical preferential routes, such as those observed,
simulation took around 7 days to simulate 20 s of causing part of the air to rise through the tube of
tray hydrodynamics. the liquid drop.
97
BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM AND GAS | v. 3 n. 3 | p. 093-102 | 2009 | ISSN 1982-0593
(a) Volume Fraction of liquid phase in the XY plane (b) Velocity vector of gaseous phase in the XY plane
Water Volume Fraction Water Superficial Velocity
(c) Volume Fraction of liquid phase in the XZ plane at (d) Velocity vector of liquid phase in the XZ plane at a
three different heights height of 1.5 cm above the surface of the plate
Figure 3. Distribution of the liquid volumetric fraction and velocity vectors for multiphase flow
without the electrical resistance.
Figure 3c confirms the distribution of the liquid The presence of some circulation regions near
volume fraction at three different levels in the XZ the walls of the plate and also at the proximities of
plane. It can be observed that the liquid phase the liquid fall tube can be noted. This distillation
distribution at 1.5 cm above the tray represents a tray behavior presents some operational and
less homogeneous mixture of liquid and vapor efficiency problems, but it should be noted that
phases, with a region of greater concentration of this study is focused on the hydrodynamics of the
air close to the hold-up fall barrier and near the plate in order to study these phenomena in
wall of the liquid fall represented by the color particular.
green. This probably occurred due to the initial
condition at the boundary imposed on the gas To demonstrate the volume fraction distribution
entrance flow, which is constant and normal. of the liquid in the active bubbling region (-0.5 to
0.5 in X[m]), three lines were drawn on it (one in
The distribution of the liquid volume fraction at the center of the plate and two 5 cm away to the
1.5 cm above the top plate shows greater right and to the left of the central line) for both the
homogeneity of the mixture, due to the behavior of lower tray and the top tray.
the vapor flow being closer to reality, that is, in the
holes of the top plate no air entry condition was It can be observed in Figure 4 that the
imposed because the air that passes through the distribution of the liquid volume fraction in the
liquid retained in the lower tray is the same as that lower tray has a large variation in the bubbling
which enters the holes of the top tray. The region, with points of minimum fluid concentration
behavior of the velocity vector of the liquid phase closer to the wall than in the case of the hold-up
at 1.5 cm from the surface of the plate can be (close to 0.05 m). This is an undesirable factor in
observed in Figure 3d. terms of tray operation since there will be
concentration and temperature gradients on the
98
BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM AND GAS | v. 3 n. 3 | p. 093-102 | 2009 | ISSN 1982-0593
0.025
99
BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM AND GAS | v. 3 n. 3 | p. 093-102 | 2009 | ISSN 1982-0593
(a)
(a)Volume
VolumeFraction
Fractionofofliquid
liquidphase
phaseininthe
theXY
XYplane
plane (b)(b)
Volume Fraction
Volume of gaseous
Fraction of gaseousphase in the
phase XYplane
in XY planeininthe
the
ininthe
thepresence
presenceofofelectrical
electricalresistance
resistance presence
presenceofofelectrical
electricalresistance
resistance
(c)Volume
Volumefraction
fractionofofliquid
liquidphase
phaseininthe
theXZ
XZplane
planeatatthree
three (d)
(d)Vector
Vectorvelocity
velocityofofliquid
liquidphase
phaseininthe
theXZ
XZplane
planeatataa
(c)
differentheights
heightsininthe
thepresence
presenceofofelectrical
electricalresistance
resistance height
heightofof1.5
1.5cm
cmabove
abovethe thesurface
surfaceofofthe
theplate
plateininthe
the
different
presence
presenceofofelectrical
electricalresistance
resistance
Figure 7. Distribution of the liquid volumetric fraction and velocity vectors for multiphase flow
in the presence of electrical resistance.
and left of the center line) for both the lower and fraction on the plate. From the separation process
upper plates. point of view, this is beneficial because it minimizes
the possible concentration and temperature
In Figure 7, the distribution of the liquid volume gradients in this region.
fraction in the lower plate shows only a small
region within which there is a considerable
variation in the volume fraction of the liquid phase
in the bubbling region next to the wall (hold-up,
close to 0.05 m). On the top plate the mixture
between the phases was considerably more
homogeneous and thus satisfactory in terms of
proper operation of a perforated plate distillation.
100
BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM AND GAS | v. 3 n. 3 | p. 093-102 | 2009 | ISSN 1982-0593
101
BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM AND GAS | v. 3 n. 3 | p. 093-102 | 2009 | ISSN 1982-0593
VAN DOORMAL, J.; RAITHBY, G.D. Enhancement of incompressible flows. Number. Heat Transfer,
the SIMPLE method for predicting v.7, p. 147163, 1984.
102