Iasbaba Block 1 Set 1 Polity

IASbabas ILP 2017 VALUE ADD: SET 1 BLOCK 1: POLITY MODULE
ILP 2017 is not a TEST SERIES but an Integrated Prelims Cum Mains Programme. This document is the
read for Test 1 covering daily plan from Aug 25 to 30 only.
Page 1
INDIAN CONSTITUTION AT WORK

NCERT CLASS XI
Important Points to Note
This Value Add is not only important for Prelims but Mains and Essay too.
Go through it very carefully to understand How to use basic understanding/knowledge

to enrich your content.
We are sure of the following changes in you (after you go through this)
How to make Notes?
How to develop the understanding for integrated preparation of Prelims, Mains

& Interview?
This book mainly deals with:
Various aspects of the working of our Constitution

Various institutions (Election, Judiciary, President, Prime Minister) of the government
and their relationship with each other
Understanding the entire structure of the government
Various principles that bind the institutions of government
Coverage: Specific to NCERT

No coverage of Laxmikant: It will be covered during the specified chapters (if required)
Page 2
CONSTITUTION: WHY AND HOW?

Objectives:
What is a Constitution?
What a Constitution does (functions) to the society?
Hallmarks of a successful Constitution
What was the way in which the Constitution of India was made?
About Constituent Assembly
What is a Constitution?
Each society consists of some set of rules or ideals that make it what it is and differentiate it
from other kinds of societies. In large societies these rules are formulated through consensus
and in modern countries this consensus is usually available in written form.
On similar lines, a Constitution is a body or a document which consists of certain fundamental
rules and principles that all persons in a country can agree upon as the basis of the way in
which they want the country to be governed.
Who can decide which rules are the best to suite for a society?
The constitution specifies the basic allocation of power in a society.

It decides who gets to decide what the laws will be.
In the Indian Constitution, it is specified that in most instances, Parliament gets to
decide laws and policies, and that Parliament itself be organized in a particular manner.
Purpose and functions of a Constitution:
Lays out certain ideals that form the basis of the kind of country that we as citizens
aspire to live in.
Defines the nature of a countrys political system; plays a crucial role in laying out
certain important guidelines that govern decision-making within these societies.
Provides a set of basic rules that allow for minimal coordination amongst members of a
society.
Page 3
Provides safeguards against the leaders who might misuse their authoritysets some
limits on what a government can impose on its citizens. These limits are fundamental in
the sense that government may never trespass them. (Ex - Aseem Trivedi, Shreya Singal
Case, Section 66A of IT Act)
Protects minorities from tyranny of the majority (i.e. from inter-community and intracommunity domination) Ex - Apartheid Movement in South Africa
Constitution saves us from ourselves (This may sound strange but what is meant by this
is that we might at times feel strongly about an issue that might go against our larger
interests and the Constitution helps us guard against this.)
It helps to protect us against certain decisions that we might take that could have an
adverse effect on the larger principles that the country believes in. Therefore, the
constitution sets authoritative constraints upon what one may or may not do. (Ex - Cow
slaughter, Ghar Wapsi issue)
Enables the government to fulfill the aspirations of a society and create conditions for a
just society.
Constitution expresses the fundamental identity of a people.
In many Countries Constitutions remain defunct. Why?

Because they are crafted by military leaders or leaders who are not popular. (Ex. Junta
rule of Myanmar, Nepals Constitution)
Crafted by leaders who do not have the ability to carry the people with them.
Why the Constitution of countries like India, South Africa and the United States are the most
successful?
The Constitutions were created in the aftermath of popular national movements and
were crafted by popular leaders who had ability to take forward the citizens with them
and were highly credible drawing upon a long history of the nationalist movement
that had a remarkable ability to take along different sections of society together.
(Ex - Nehru, B.R.Ambedkar etc.)
The Constitution drew enormous legitimacy from the fact that it was drawn up by
people who enjoyed immense public credibility, who had the capacity to negotiate and
command the respect of a wide cross-section of society, and who were able to convince
the people that the constitution was not an instrument for the aggrandizement of their
personal power.
Page 4
In some countries (not India) Constitution was framed on the basis of a full-fledged
referendum, where all the people vote on the desirability of a constitution.
Therefore, the authority of people who enact the Constitution helps determine in part its
prospects for success.
Hallmark of a successful constitution/an effective constitution is one which
Gives everyone in society some reason to go along with its provisions.
Does not allow permanent majorities to oppress minority groups within society.
Does not systematically privilege some members at the expense of others or that
systematically entrenched the power of small groups in society.
Does not stifle the identity of any group.
Has to convince people that it provides the framework for pursuing basic justice.
Preserves the freedom and equality of all its members.
Fragments power in society intelligently so that no single group can subvert the
constitution
Ensures that no single institution acquires monopoly of power
Provides for balanced institutional design - i.e., intelligent system of checks and balances
Strikes the right balance between certain values, norms and procedures as
authoritative, and at the same time allow enough flexibility in its operations to adapt to
changing needs and circumstances
Is not too rigid or too flexible
Such Constitution can ensure that it will survive as a document respected by people.
How was the Indian Constitution made?

Constitution was made by the Constituent Assembly which had been elected for
undivided India.
First sitting on 9 December 1946 and re-assembled as Constituent Assembly for divided
India on 14 August 1947
Much before the Constituent Assembly finally came into being, the demand for such a
constituent assembly was first echoed by Dr. Rajendra Prasad (in 1946)
(Rajendra Prasad quoted Mahatma Gandhi that "swaraj would mean wishes of the
people as expressed through their freely chosen representatives")
Page 5
However, the idea of constituent assembly to frame a constitution for India was first
mooted by M. N. Roy in 1934
Members were elected by indirect election by the members of the Provisional
Legislative Assemblies that had been established in 1935
The Constituent Assembly was composed roughly along the lines suggested by the plan
proposed by the committee of the British cabinet, known as the Cabinet Mission.
Cabinet Mission Plan:

According to this plan
Each Province and each Princely State or group of States were allotted seats
proportional to their respective population roughly in the ratio of 1:10,00,000.
The seats in each Province were distributed among the three main communities,
Muslims, Sikhs and General, in proportion to their respective populations.
Members of each community in the Provisional Legislative Assembly elected their own
representatives by the method of proportional representation with single transferable
vote.
The method of selection in the case of representatives of Princely States was to be
determined by consultation.
What is a Constituent Assembly?

A constituent assembly is a body of representatives which is composed for drafting a
constitution.
In our times, we have recently seen how Nepals constituent assembly has drafted its
constitution recently. We note that drafting the constitution is the only function of a
constituent assembly.
Once the constitution is ready and adopted; the assembly is dissolved.
Further, since members of constituent assembly are representatives (elected or
unelected); its a form of representative democracy.
Page 6
About Objective Resolutions:
Moved by Nehru in 1946; Defined the aims of the Constituent Assembly.

This resolution encapsulated the aspirations and values behind the Constitution.
Based on this resolution, our Constitution gave institutional expression to these
fundamental commitments: equality, liberty, democracy, sovereignty and a
cosmopolitan identity.
Page 7
Constitution of India: Drawn From Various Sources
The Constitution of India has borrowed most of its provisions from the constitutions of
various other countries as well as from the Government of India Act of 1935.
Dr B R Ambedkar proudly acclaimed that the Constitution of India has been framed after
ransacking all the known Constitutions of the World.
Page 8
RIGHTS IN THE INDIAN CONSTITUTION

Constitution sets limits on the powers of the government and ensures a democratic system in
which all persons enjoy certain rights through Fundamental Rights.
This chapter deals with:
various Fundamental Rights

how these rights are protected
Judiciarys role in protecting these rights
difference between FRs and DPSPs
BILL OF RIGHTS
A list of rights mentioned and protected by the constitution is called the "bill of rights"
A democracy must ensure that individuals have certain rights and that the government
will always recognize these rights.
Bill of rights prohibits government from acting against the rights of the individuals and
ensures a remedy in case there is violation of these rights.
FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS IN THE INDIAN CONSTITUTION
Motilal Nehru committee had demanded a bill of rights as far back as in 1928.
The Constitution listed the rights that would be specially protected and called them
fundamental rights.
These rights are so important that the Constitution has separately listed them and made
special provisions for their protection.
The Constitution itself ensures that they are not violated by the government.
Page 9
Ordinary Rights and Fundamental Rights:
Ordinary legal rights are protected and enforced by ordinary law; Fundamental Rights
are protected and guaranteed by the Constitution of the country.
Ordinary rights may be changed by the legislature by ordinary process of law making,
but a fundamental right may only be changed by amending the Constitution itself.
Judiciary has the powers and responsibility to protect the fundamental rights from
violations by actions of the government. Executive as well as legislative actions can be
declared illegal by the judiciary if these violate the Fundamental rights or restrict them
in an unreasonable manner.
Fundamental Rights at a glance:
Page 10
Page 11
Overview of Rights:
The Constitution clarifies that the government can implement special schemes and
measures for improving the conditions of certain sections of society: children, women,
and the socially and educationally backward classes.
In fact Article 16(4) of the constitution explicitly clarifies that a policy like reservation
will not be seen as a violation of right to equality. If you see the spirit of the
Constitution, this is required for the fulfillment of the right to equality of opportunity.
Right to freedom of speech and expression is subject to restrictions such as public order,
peace and morality etc.
Freedom to assemble too is to be exercised peacefully and without arms.
The government may impose restrictions in certain areas declaring the assembly of five
or more persons as unlawful.
Preventive detention:
Ordinarily, a person would be arrested after he or she has reportedly committed some
offence (exceptions exists)
But sometimes a person can be arrested simply out of an apprehension that he or she is
likely to engage in unlawful activity and imprisoned for some time. This is known as
preventive detention.
It means that if the government feels that a person can be a threat to law and order or
to the peace and security of the nation, it can detain or arrest that person. This
preventive detention can be extended only for three months.
Rights of accused
To ensure a fair trial in courts, the Constitution has provided three rights:
1. No person would be punished for the same offence more than once;
2. No law shall declare any action as illegal from a backdate; and
3. No person shall be asked to give evidence against himself or herself
Page 12
Freedom of faith and worship
Feedom of religion also includes the freedom of conscience

It means that a person may choose any religion or may choose not to follow any
religion.
Freedom of religion includes the freedom to profess, follow and propagate any religion.
Certain Limitations:
The government can impose restrictions on the practice of freedom of religion in order to
protect public order, morality and health
It is not an unlimited right
The government can interfere in religious matters for rooting out certain social evils.
The Constitution does not allow forcible conversions.
It only gives us the right to spread information about our religion and thus attract others
to it.
Recent State of Affairs
Sport of Jallikattu:
A part of Tamil tradition and culture-sport that has its roots in feudalism and has, killed
humans and bulls in equal measure.
SC: Ruled that not only did jallikattu inflict unnecessary pain and suffering on the
animal and thereby violate the PCA Act, but the whole sport in the form in which it
exists today has nothing to do with the traditional bull-taming of yore. The court
exhaustively cites international rights jurisprudence to stress the need to correct
anthropocentric views and the fact that animals too have the right to live dignified lives.
Temple entry of women-Gender Justice in Religious institutions
Case: Restriction of entry for women who have entered their menstrual cycle (i.e age group 1050 years old) by Sabarimala temple board and subsequently by Shani temple in Maharashtra
SC: held that while personal law is exempt from the application of the Constitution, mere
custom is not
Violates:
Article 14, (Right to equality)
Article 15 (by inflicting gender based discrimination)
Article 17 (Prohibiting individuals from entering temples)
Page 13
Article 21 (Right to life and dignity)
Justice Kurian: The onus of causing disturbance is on women. If you are true celibate, why
blame women for disturbing you? This is a classical blaming-the-victim game
If I, a woman, have faith. If I want to worship. I must have access to see Him... that part is
protected by the Constitution irrespective of sex, gender, caste or biological phenomena
CULTURAL AND EDUCATIONAL RIGHTS
All minorities, religious or linguistic, can set up their own educational institutions. By
doing so, they can preserve and develop their own culture.
The government will not, while granting aid to educational institutions, discriminate
against any educational institution on the basis that it is under the management of
minority community.
RIGHT TO CONSTITUTIONAL REMEDIES

Dr. Ambedkar considered the right to constitutional remedies as heart and soul of the
constitution.
Why Dr. Ambedkar considered the right to constitutional remedies as heart and soul of the
constitution?
Because this right gives a citizen the right to approach a High Court or the Supreme
Court to get any of the fundamental rights restored in case of their violation.
The Supreme Court and the High Courts can issue orders and give directives to the
government for the enforcement of rights.
What are the writs issued by the court?
The courts can issue various special orders known as writs.
Habeas corpus: Means the court orders that the arrested person should be presented
before it. It can also order to set free an arrested person if the manner or grounds of
arrest are not lawful or satisfactory.
Mandamus: Issued when the court finds that a particular office holder is not doing legal
duty and thereby is infringing on the right of an individual.
Page 14
Prohibition: Issued by a higher court (High Court or Supreme Court) when a lower court
has considered a case going beyond its jurisdiction.
Quo Warranto: If the court finds that a person is holding office but is not entitled to
hold that office, it issues the writ of quo-warranto and restricts that person from acting
as an office holder.
Certiorari: Under this writ, the court orders a lower court or another authority to
transfer a matter pending before it to the higher authority or court.
National Human Right Commission (NHRC):

NHRCs functions include:
Inquiry at its own initiative or on a petition presented to it by a victim into complaint of
violation of human rights;
Visit to jails to study the condition of the inmates;
Undertaking and promoting research in the field of human rights.
The Commission does not have the power of prosecution; it can merely make
recommendations to the government or recommend to the courts to initiate proceedings
based on the inquiry that it conducts.
Page 15
DIRECTIVE PRINCIPLES OF STATE POLICY

The chapter on Directive Principles lists mainly three things:
1. The goals and objectives that we as a society should adopt
2. Certain rights that individuals should enjoy apart from the Fundamental Rights
3. Certain policies that the government should adopt
Relation between Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles of State Policy:
Fundamental Rights restrain the government from doing certain things while Directive
Principles exhort the government to do certain things.
Fundamental Rights mainly protect the rights of individuals while Directive Principles
ensure the well-being of the entire society.
Right to Property
In the Constitution, originally, there was a fundamental right to acquire, possess and
maintain property. But the Constitution made it clear that property could be taken
away by the government for public welfare.
In 1973, the Supreme Court gave a decision that the right to property was not part of
the basic structure of the Constitution and therefore, Parliament had power to abridge
this right by an amendment.
In 1978, the 44th amendment to the Constitution removed the right to property from
the list of Fundamental Rights and converted it into a simple legal right under article
300A.
Page 16
ELECTION AND REPRESENTATION

Objectives:
Study the constitutional provisions regarding elections and representation

Chosen method of election by our Constitution
o Different methods of election
o Characteristics of the system of election adopted
Implications of the constitutional provisions regarding impartial machinery for
conducting elections
Suggestions for amending the related constitutional provisions/Electoral Reforms
Elections (Most visible symbol of the democratic process)

Dynamics of Representation:
All citizens cannot take direct part in making every decision and therefore,
representatives are elected by the people. (Method followed-Elections)
Rule by the people usually means rule by peoples representatives
Constitution lays down some basic rules about elections
o Eligibility of the Voter
o Eligibility of the Contester
o Supervision of Elections
o Method of Election
o Counting of Votes
Can elections take place in non-democratic countries?

Yes; to present themselves as democratic (In Qatar)
Page 17
Rules of the Election Game

A. First past the Post System/Plurality System
Step 1: The entire country is divided into constituencies
Step 2: Each constituency elects one representative
Step 3: The candidate who secures the highest number of votes in that constituency is declared
elected.
Winner: Whoever has more votes than all other candidates is declared elected the winning
candidate need not secure a majority of the votes.
India
Extremely simple to understand: No specialised knowledge required about politics and
elections
Presentation of a clear choice:
Voters have to simply endorse a candidate or a party while voting . The FPTP system
offers voters a choice not simply between parties but specific candidates.
In other electoral systems, especially PR systems, voters are often asked to choose a
party and the representatives are elected on the basis of party lists.
As a result, there is no one representative who represents and is responsible for one
locality.
In constituency based system like the FPTP, the voters know who their own
representative is and can hold him or her accountable.
Stable Government in power: Gives the largest party or coalition some extra bonus seats, more
than their share of votes would allow. Thus this system makes it possible for parliamentary
government to function smoothly and effectively by facilitating the formation of a stable
government.
Coming together of Unity: Encourages voters from different social groups to come together to
win an election in a locality.
Discourages caste/religion based voting
Page 18
Rise of Coalition: A two-party system ensures even two major competitors coming together for
power and power is often shared by these two parties alternately. However, one must note
that post-independence there existed a one party dominance and several smaller parties.
B. Proportional Representation
Step 1: Counting of Votes
Step 2: Each party is allotted the share of seats in the parliament in proportion to its share of
votes
Step 3: Each party fills its quota of seats by picking those many of its nominees from a
preference list that has been declared before the elections
Note:
Voters exercise their preference for a party and not a candidate

A party gets the same proportion of seats as its proportion of votes
Variations
Entire country is treated as one constituency and seats are allocated to each party
according to its share of votes in the national election
The country is divided into several multi-member constituencies
India Election of President, Vice President, and for the election to the Rajya Sabha and Vidhan
Parishads
Rajya Sabha Elections (PR)
Every State has a specific quota of seats in the Rajya Sabha.

The members are elected by the respective State legislative assemblies
Legislature of Israel: Knesset Proportional Representation
Page 19
Reservation of Constituencies
System: In this system, all voters in a constituency are eligible to vote but the candidates must
belong to only a particular community or social section for which the seat is reserved.
Constitution:
Lok Sabha + State Legislative Assemblies for the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes
Provision was made initially for a period of 10 years and as a result of successive
constitutional amendments, has been extended up to 2010
Decides which constituency is to be reserved: Delimitation Commission
Appointed by the President of India
Works in collaboration with the Election Commission of India
Page 20
Purpose: Drawing up the boundaries of constituencies all over the country
Steps Involved:
1. A quota of constituencies to be reserved in each State is fixed depending on the

proportion of SC or ST in that State.
2. After drawing the boundaries, the Delimitation Commission looks at the composition of
population in each constituency. Those constituencies that have the highest proportion
of Scheduled Tribe population are reserved for ST.
3. In the case of Scheduled Castes, the Delimitation Commission looks at two things:
It picks constituencies that have higher proportion of Scheduled Caste population but it
also spreads these constituencies in different regions of the State. This is done because
the Scheduled Caste population is generally spread evenly throughout the country.
These reserved constituencies can be rotated each time the Delimitation exercise is
undertaken.
Does the Constitution make similar reservation for other disadvantaged groups: No
Women Empowerment: Time to deliver on Womens Reservation Bill
Why
In India, the candidate who secures the highest votes in a particular constituency is
declared elected smaller social groups disadvantaged
History of caste based discrimination: the dominant social groups and castes can win
everywhere and the oppressed social groups may continue to remain unrepresented.
Need to provide a way to ensure fair and just representation to the oppressed social
groups
Also Read Reservation: Boon or bane?
Page 21
Characteristics of Elections
Free & Fair elections: Impartial and transparent election system; must allow the aspirations of
the voter to find legitimate expression through the electoral results
Universal franchise:
All adult citizens of the country must be eligible to vote in the elections consistent
with the principle of equality and non-discrimination
Age: Till 1989, an adult Indian meant an Indian citizen above the age of 21. An
amendment to the Constitution in 1989, reduced the eligibility age to 18.
Right to contest: All citizens have the right to stand for election and become the representative
of the people (Age & legal qualifications applied in some casese.g. A person who has
undergone imprisonment for two or more years for some offence is disqualified from
contesting elections)
Independent Election Commission (EC): Article 324 of the Indian Constitution provides for an
independent Election Commission
Article 324: (1) The superintendence, direction and control of the preparation of the
electoral rolls for, and the conduct of, all elections to Parliament and to the Legislature
of every State and of elections to the offices of President and Vice- President held under
this Constitution shall be vested in the EC
Chief Electoral Officer in every state: To assist the Election Commission of India
Note: The election of local body elections is conducted by the State Election Commissioners
who work independently of the Election Commission of India
Details
Composition- can either be a single member or a multi-member bodyensures greater

power and greater accountability
Presiding Officer: Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) presides over the Election
Commission
Powers: The CEC and the two Election Commissioners have equal powers to take all
decisions relating to elections as a collective body
Page 22
Appointment: Appointed by the President of India on the advice of the Council of

Ministers
Tenure: Constitution ensures the security of the tenure of the CEC and Election
Commissioners are appointed for a six year term or continue till the age of 65,
whichever is earlier
Removal:
CEC can be removed before the expiry of the term, by the President if
both Houses of Parliament make such a recommendation with a special
majority. This is done to ensure that a ruling party cannot remove a CEC
who refuses to favour it in elections.
The Election Commissioners can be removed by the President of India.
Functions of the EC
Supervises the preparation of up-to-date voters list ensures that the voters list is free
of errors
Determines the timing of elections and prepares the election schedule election
schedule includes
o Notification of elections,
o Date from which nominations can be filed,
o Last date for filing nominations,
o Last date of scrutiny,
o Last date of withdrawal,
o Date of polling
o Date of counting
o Declaration of results
To ensure a free and fair poll
Can postpone or cancel the election in the entire country or a specific State or
constituency on the grounds that the atmosphere is vitiated and therefore, a free and
fair election may not be possible.
Implements a model code of conduct for parties and candidates
Can order a re-poll in a specific constituency
Can also order a recount of votes when it feels that the counting process has not been
fully fair and just
Accords recognition to political parties and allots symbols to each of them
Page 23
Administrative Machinery: Conducts the elections with the help of the existing administrative
machinery
Once the election process has begun, the commission has control over the
administration as far as election related work is concerned.
During the election process, the administrative officers of the State and central
governments are assigned election related duty and in this respect, the Election
Commission has full control over them.
The EC can transfer the officers, or stop their transfers; it can take action against them
for failing to act in a non-partisan manner
Electoral Reforms: Will be done in detail when we cover the same chapter in the notes
pertaining to Lakshmikant
Page 24
EXECUTIVE
This chapter deals with:
Distinction between the parliamentary and the presidential executive;
Understanding the constitutional position of the President of India;
Knowing the composition and functioning of the Council of Ministers and the
importance of the Prime Minister; and
Understanding the importance and functioning of the administrative machinery.
WHAT IS AN EXECUTIVE?
The organ of government that primarily looks after the function of implementation and
administration is called the executive.
Principal functions of the Executive:
Executive is the branch of government responsible for the implementation of laws and
policies adopted by the legislature and are often involved in framing of policy.
Some countries have Presidents (US, India), while others have Chancellors (Germany).
The executive branch is not just about presidents, prime ministers and ministers-it also
extends to the administrative machinery (civil servants).
While the heads of government and their ministers, saddled with the overall
responsibility of government policy, are together known as the political executive, those
responsible for day to day administration are called the permanent executive.
Page 25
WHAT ARE THE DIFFERENT TYPES OF EXECUTIVE?
Page 26
In a Presidential system:
The president is the Head of state as well as head of government.
Office of president is very powerful, both in theory and practice.
Example - United States, Brazil and most nations in Latin America.
Semi-Presidential Executive:
Under the system of Executive Presidency, people directly elect the President.
It may happen that both the President and the Prime Minister belong to the same
political party or to different political parties.
France, Russia, Sri Lanka
Parliamentary System:
The prime minister is the head of government.
Most parliamentary systems have a President or a Monarch who is the nominal Head of
state.
In such a system, the role of president or monarch is primarily ceremonial and prime
minister along with the cabinet wields effective power.
Germany, Italy, Japan, United Kingdom as well as Portugal.
PARLIAMENTARY EXECUTIVE IN INDIA

India already had some experience of running the parliamentary system under the Acts
of 1919 and 1935.
This experience had shown that in the parliamentary system, the executive can be
effectively controlled by the representatives of the people.
Why India adopted Parliamentary Form?
Indian Constitution wanted to ensure that the government would be sensitive to public
expectations and would be responsible and accountable.
The presidential executive puts much emphasis on the president as the chief executive
and as source of all executive power. There is always the danger of personality cult in
presidential executive.
Executive will be answerable to, and controlled by the legislature or peoples
representatives.
Page 27
What is Parliamentary Form of System?

President who is the formal Head of the state of India and the Prime Minister and the
Council of Ministers, which run the government at the national level.
At the State level, the executive comprises the Governor and the Chief Minister and
Council of Ministers.
Power and position of President

Article 52: There shall be a President of India.
Article 53: Executive power of the Union The executive power of the Union shall be vested in
the President and shall be exercised by him either directly or through officers subordinate to
him in accordance with this Constitution.
Article 74 (1): There shall be a Council of Ministers with the Prime Minister at the head to aid
and advise the President who shall in the exercise of his functions, act in accordance with such
advice.
Discretionary Powers of the President:
Constitutionally, the President has a right to be informed all the important matters and
deliberations of the Council of Ministers.
The Prime Minister is obliged to furnish all the information that the President may call
for.
The President often writes to the Prime Minister and expresses his views on matters
confronting the country.
Three Situations where the President can exercise the power using his/her own discretion:
He/she can send back the advice given by the Council of Ministers and ask the Council
to reconsider the decision. In doing this, the President acts on his/her own discretion.
He/she has veto power by which he can withhold or refuse to give assent to Bills
(other than Money Bill) passed by the Parliament.
When after an election, no leader has a clear majority in the Lok Sabha, the President
has to decide whom to appoint as the Prime Minister. In such a situation, the President
Page 28
has to use his own discretion in judging who really may have the support of the majority
or who can actually form and run the government.
Can President just keep the bill pending with him?
Every bill passed by the Parliament goes to the President for his assent before it
becomes a law.
The President can send the bill back to the Parliament asking it to reconsider the bill.
This veto power is limited because, if the Parliament passes the same bill again and
sends it back to the President, then, the President has to give assent to that bill.
However, there is no mention in the Constitution about the time limit within which
the President must send the bill back for reconsideration.
This means that the President can just keep the bill pending with him without any time
limit. This gives the President an informal power to use the veto in a very effective
manner. This is sometimes referred to as pocket veto.
The Vice President of India:

Article 63: The Vice-President of India There shall be a Vice-President of India.
Elected for: 5 years
Election method: Similar to that of the President; the only difference is that members of State
legislatures are not part of the Electoral College.
Functions:
Acts as the ex- officio Chairman of the Rajya Sabha and takes over the office of the
President when there is a vacancy by reasons of death, resignation, removal by
impeachment or otherwise.
Acts as the President only until a new President is elected.
Removal of Vice-President: May be removed from his office by a resolution of the Rajya Sabha
passed by a majority and agreed to by the Lok Sabha.
Page 29
PRIME MINISTER AND COUNCIL OF MINISTERS

Article 74: Council of Ministers to aid and advise President There shall be a Council of
Ministers with the Prime Minister at the head to aid and advise the President who shall, in the
exercise of his functions, act in accordance with such advice.
Article 75(1): The Prime Minister shall be appointed by the President and the other Ministers
shall be appointed by the President on the advice of the Prime Minister. The Prime Minister
becomes the most important functionary of the government in our country.
Prime Minister
In the parliamentary form of executive, it is essential that the Prime Minister has the
support of the majority in the Lok Sabha. This support by the majority also makes the
Prime Minister very powerful.
He/she decides who will be the ministers in the Council of Ministers.
He/she allocates ranks and portfolios to the ministers.
Depending upon the seniority and political importance, the ministers are given the ranks
of cabinet minister, minister of State or deputy minister.
All ministers have to be MP:
The Prime Minister and all the ministers have to be members of the Parliament.
If someone becomes a minister or Prime Minister without being an MP, such a person
has to get elected to the Parliament within six months.
Size of the Council of Ministers: An amendment was made in 2003 (91 CAA), that the Council
of Ministers shall not exceed 15 percent of total number of members of the House of People
(or Assembly, in the case of the States).
st
Collective responsibility and dissolution of the Council of Ministers:

Most important feature of parliamentary executive is that the executive is routinely under the
control and supervision of the legislature.
Council of Ministers is collectively responsible to the Lok Sabha. This provision means
that a Ministry which loses confidence of the Lok Sabha is obliged to resign.
The principle indicates that the ministry is an executive committee of the Parliament
and it collectively governs on behalf of the Parliament.
Page 30
Collective responsibility is based on the principle of the solidarity of the cabinet. It

implies that a vote of no confidence even against a single minister leads to the
resignation of the entire Council of Ministers.
It also indicates that if a minister does not agree with a policy or decision of the cabinet,
he or she must either accept the decision or resign. It is binding on all ministers to
pursue or agree to a policy for which there is collective responsibility.
The death or resignation of the Prime Minister automatically brings about the
dissolution of the Council of Ministers but the demise, dismissal or resignation of a
minister only creates a ministerial vacancy.
Role of the Prime Minister:

The Prime Minister acts as a link between the Council of Ministers on the one hand and
the President as well as the Parliament on the other.
The Prime Minister is involved in all crucial decisions of the government and decides on
the policies of the government.
Thus, the power wielded by the Prime Minister flows from various sources:
Control over the Council of Ministers,
Leadership of the Lok Sabha,
Command over the bureaucratic machine,
Access to media,
Projection of personalities during elections,
Projection as national leader during international summitry as well as foreign visits
At the State level:
Similar parliamentary executive exists, though with some variations.
The most important variation is that there is a Governor of the State appointed by the
President (on the advice of the Central Government).
Though the Chief Minister, like the Prime Minister is the leader of the majority party in
the Assembly, the Governor has more discretionary powers.
However, the main principles of parliamentary system operate at the State level too.
Page 31
PERMANENT EXECUTIVE: BUREAUCRACY

Who implements the decisions of the ministers?
The Executive organ of the government includes the Prime Minister, the ministers and a
large organization called the bureaucracy or the administrative machinery.
Trained and skilled officers who work as permanent employees of the government are
assigned the task of assisting the ministers in formulating policies and implementing
these policies.
In a democracy:
The elected representatives and the ministers are in charge of government and the
administration is under their control and supervision.
The legislature also exercises control over the administration.
The administrative officers cannot act in violation of the policies adopted by the
legislature.
It is the responsibility of the ministers to retain political control over the administration.
The Indian bureaucracy:
It consists of the All-India services, State services, employees of the local governments,
and technical and managerial staff running public sector undertakings.
The Union Public Service Commission has been entrusted with the task of conducting
the process of recruitment of the civil servants for the government of India.
Similar public service commissions are provided for the States also.
Members of the Public Service Commissions are appointed for a fixed term.
Their removal or suspension is subject to a thorough enquiry made by a judge of the
Supreme Court.
The bureaucracy is an instrument through which welfare policies of the government
must reach the people.
Concerns:
Most often, bureaucracy is so powerful that people are afraid of approaching a
government officer.
Most of the people believe that bureaucracy is insensitive to the demands and
expectations of the ordinary citizen.
Page 32
Too much political interference turns the bureaucracy into an instrument in the hands
of the politician.
Though the Constitution has created independent machinery for recruitment, many
people think that there is no provision for protecting the civil servants from political
interference in the performance of their duties.
Enough provisions are not there to ensure the accountability of the bureaucracy to the
citizen.
There is an expectation that measures like the Right to Information may make the
bureaucracy a little more responsive and accountable.
Read: Need for more Public Officials
LEGISLATURE
Objectives
Importance of the legislature
Functions and powers of the Parliament of India
Law making procedure
How the Parliament controls the executive
How the Parliament regulates itself
WHY DO WE NEED A PARLIAMENT?

Legislature is not merely a law making body and lawmaking is but one of the functions
of the legislature centre of all democratic political process.
It is packed with action, walkouts, protests, demonstration, unanimity, concern and cooperation.
Helps people in holding the representatives accountablethe very basis of
representative democracy
Page 33
Therefore, Parliament is recognized as one of the most democratic and open forum of
debate the most representative of all organs of government; vested with the power
to choose and dismiss the government.
WHY DO WE NEED TWO HOUSES OF PARLIAMENT?

The term Parliament refers to the national legislature & the legislature of the States is
described as State legislature.
Parliament in India has two houses; when there are two houses of the legislature, it is called a
bicameral legislature.
Council of States or the Rajya Sabha
House of the People or the Lok Sabha.
The Constitution has given the States the option of establishing either a unicameral or
bicameral legislature. At present (2015) only Seven States have a bicameral legislature.
States having a bicameral legislature:
1. Andhra Pradesh
2. Telegana
3. Bihar
4. Jammu and Kashmir
5. Karnataka
6. Maharashtra
7. Uttar Pradesh
Advantages of Bicameral Legislature:
Countries with large size and much diversity usually prefer to have two houses of the
national legislature to give representation to all sections in the society and to give
representation to all geographical regions or parts of the country.
A bicameral legislature makes it possible to have every decision reconsidered. Every
decision taken by one house goes to the other house for its decision.
This means that every bill and policy would be discussed twice. This ensures a double
check on every matter.
Page 34
Even if one house takes a decision in haste, that decision will come for discussion in the
other house and reconsideration will be possible.
RAJYA SABHA:
Represents the States of India
An indirectly elected body.
Residents of the State elect members to State Legislative Assembly.
The elected members of State Legislative Assembly in turn elect the members of Rajya
Sabha.
Principles of representation:
Equal representation to all the parts of the country irrespective of their size or
population called as symmetrical representation.
Parts of the country may be given representation according to their population means
that regions or parts having larger population would have more representatives in the
second chamber than regions having less population.
States with larger population get more representatives than what States with smaller
population get.
Members of Rajya Sabha:
Members are elected for a term of six years.
Can get re-elected.
All members of the Rajya Sabha do not complete their terms at the same time.
Every two years, one third members of the Rajya Sabha complete their term and
elections are held for those one third seats only.
The Rajya Sabha is never fully dissolved and hence, called the permanent House of the
Parliament.
Rajya Sabha also has twelve nominated members. The President nominates these
members.
Read: Revisiting the role of Rajya Sabha
Page 35
LOK SABHA
The Lok Sabha and the State Legislative Assemblies are directly elected by the people.
For the purpose of election, the entire country (State, in case of State Legislative
Assembly) is divided into territorial constituencies of roughly equal population.
One representative is elected from each constituency through universal adult suffrage
where the value of vote of every individual would be equal to another.
At present there are 543 constituencies.
Functions of the Parliament:
Apart from law making, the Parliament is engaged in many other functions.
Legislative functions:
The Parliament enacts legislations for the country. (chief law-making body)
The Parliament often merely approves legislations.
The actual task of drafting the bill is performed by the bureaucracy under the
supervision of the minister concerned.
The substance and even the timing of the bill are decided by the Cabinet. No major bill is
introduced in the Parliament without the approval of the Cabinet.
Members other than ministers can also introduce bills but these have no chance of
being passed without the support of the government.
Control of Executive and ensuring its accountability: Parliament ensures that the executive
does not overstep its authority and remains responsible to the people who have elected them.
Financial Function:
In a democracy, legislature controls taxation and the way in which money is used by the
government.
If the Government of India proposes to introduce any new tax, it has to get the approval
of the Lok Sabha.
The financial powers of the Parliament involve grant of resources to the government to
implement its programmes.
The government has to give an account to the legislature about the money it has spent
and resources that it wishes to raise
Page 36
The legislature also ensures that the government does not misspend or overspend. This
is done through the budget and annual financial statements.
Representation: Parliament represents the divergent views of members from different

regional, social, economic, religious groups of different parts of the country.
Debating Function:
The Parliament is the highest forum of debate in the country; no limitation on its power
of discussion.
Members are free to speak on any matter without fear. This makes it possible for the
Parliament to analyze any or every issue that faces the nation.
These discussions constitute the heart of democratic decision making.
Constituent Function:
The Parliament has the power of discussing and enacting changes to the Constitution.
The constituent powers of both the houses are similar.
All constitutional amendments have to be approved by a special majority of both
Houses.
Electoral functions: The Parliament also performs some electoral functions elects the
President and Vice President of India.
Judicial functions: The judicial functions of the Parliament include considering the proposals for
removal of President, Vice-President and Judges of High Courts and Supreme Court.
Page 37
Powers of the Lok Sabha and Powers of the Rajya Sabha
Special Powers of Rajya Sabha
The Rajya Sabha is an institutional mechanism to provide representation to the States.

Its purpose is to protect the powers of the States. Therefore, any matter that affects the
States must be referred to it for its consent and approval.
Thus, if the Union Parliament wishes to remove a matter from the State list (over which
only the State Legislature can make law) to either the Union List or Concurrent List in
the interest of the nation, the approval of the Rajya Sabha is necessary. This provision
adds to the strength of the Rajya Sabha.
However, experience shows that the members of the Rajya Sabha represent their
parties more than they represent their States.
Page 38
HOW DOES THE PARLIAMENT MAKE LAWS?
A bill is a draft of the proposed law. There can be different types of bills.
When a non-minister proposes a bill, it is called private members Bill.
A bill proposed by a minister is described as Government Bill.
Page 39
LEGISLATIVE PROCEDURE IN PARLIAMENT

The legislative procedure is identical in both the Houses of Parliament. Every bill has to pass
through the same stages in each House. A bill is a proposal for legislation and it becomes an act
or law when duly enacted.
Bills introduced in the Parliament are of two kinds: Public bills and Private bills (also known as
government bills and private members bills respectively). Though both are governed by the
same general procedure and pass through the same stages in the House, they differ in various
respects as shown in Table below:
Page 40
The bills introduced in the Parliament can also be classified into four categories:
Ordinary bills, which are concerned with any matter other than financial subjects.
Money bills, which are concerned with the financial matters like taxation, public
expenditure, etc.
Financial bills, which are also concerned with financial matters (but are different from
money bills).
Constitution amendment bills, which are concerned with the amendment of the
provisions of the Constitution.
The Constitution has laid down separate procedures for the enactment of all the four types of
bills.
Page 41
Ordinary Bills
Every ordinary bill has to pass through the following five stages in the Parliament before it finds
a place on the Statute Book:
1.
First Reading
2.
Second Reading
Stage of General Discussion, Committee Stage, Consideration Stage
3.
Third Reading
4.
Bill in the Second House
In the second House also, the bill passes through all the three stages, that is, first reading,
second reading and third reading. There are four alternatives before this House:
a.
It may pass the bill as sent by the first house (i.e., without amendments);
b.
It may pass the bill with amendments and return it to the first House for
reconsideration;
c.
It may reject the bill altogether; and
d.
It may not take any action and thus keep the bills pending.
If the second House passes the bill without any amendments or the first House accepts
the amendments suggested by the second House, the bill is deemed to have been
passed by both the Houses and the same is sent to the president for his assent.
On the other hand, if the first House rejects the amendments suggested by the second
House or the second House rejects the bill altogether or the second House does not take
any action for six months; a deadlock is deemed to have taken place.
To resolve such a deadlock, the president can summon a joint sitting of the two Houses.
If the majority of members present and voting in the joint sitting approves the bill, the
bill is deemed to have been passed by both the Houses.
5.
Assent of the President

Every bill after being passed by both Houses of Parliament either singly or at a joint sitting,
is presented to the president for his assent. There are three alternatives before the
president:
a.
He may give his assent to the bill; or
b.
He may withhold his assent to the bill; or
c.
He may return the bill for reconsideration of the Houses.
Page 42
If the president gives his assent to the bill, the bill becomes an act and is placed on the
Statute Book. If the President withholds his assent to the bill, it ends and does not
become an act.
If the President returns the bill for reconsideration and if it is passed by both the Houses
again with or without amendments and presented to the President for his assent, the
president must give his assent to the bill. Thus, the President enjoys only a
suspensive veto.
Money Bills
Article 110 of the Constitution deals with the definition of money bills. It states that a bill is
deemed to be a money bill if it contains only provisions dealing with all or any of the following
matters:
1. The imposition, abolition, remission, alteration or regulation of any tax;
2. The regulation of the borrowing of money by the Union government;
3. The custody of the Consolidated Fund of India or the contingency fund of India, the
payment of moneys into or the withdrawal of money from any such fund;
4. The appropriation of money out of the Consolidated Fund of India;
5. Declaration of any expenditure charged on the Consolidated Fund of India or increasing
the amount of any such expenditure;
6. The receipt of money on account of the Consolidated Fund of India or the public
account of India or the custody or issue of such money, or the audit of the accounts of
the Union or of a state; or
7. Any matter incidental to any of the matters specified above.
However, a bill is not to be deemed to be a money bill by reason only that it provides for:
1. The imposition of fines or other pecuniary penalties, or
2. The demand or payment of fees for licenses or fees for services rendered; or
3. The imposition, abolition, remission, alteration or regulation of any tax by any local
authority or body for local purposes.
If any question arises whether a bill is a money bill or not, the decision of the Speaker
of the Lok Sabha is final. His decision in this regard cannot be questioned in any court of
law or in the either House of Parliament or even the president.
When a money bill is transmitted to the Rajya Sabha for recommendation and
presented to the president for assent, the Speaker endorses it as a money bill.
Page 43
A money bill can only be introduced in the Lok Sabha and that too on the
recommendation of the president. Every such bill is considered to be a government bill
and can be introduced only by a minister.
The Rajya Sabha has restricted powers with regard to a money bill. It cannot reject or
amend a money bill. It can only make the recommendations. It must return the bill to
the Lok Sabha within 14 days, wither with or without recommendations. The Lok Sabha
can either accept or reject all or any of the recommendations of the Rajya Sabha.
If the Rajya Sabha does not return the bill to the Lok Sabha within 14 days, the bill is
deemed to have been passed by both the Houses in the form originally passed by the
Lok Sabha. Thus, the Lok Sabha has more powers than Rajya Sabha with regard to a
money bill.
On the other hand, both the Houses have equal powers with regard to an ordinary bill.
Finally, when a money bill is presented to the president, he may either give his assent to
the bill or withhold his assent to the bill but cannot return the bill for reconsideration of
the Houses. Normally, the president gives his assent to a money bill as it is introduced in
the Parliament with his prior permission.
Financial Bills
Financial bills are those bills that deal with fiscal matters, that is, revenue or expenditure.
However, the Constitution uses the term financial bill in a technical sense.
Financial bills are of three kinds:
1. Money billsArticle 110
2. Financial bills (I)Article 117 (1)
3. Financial bills (II)Article 117 (3)
Money bills are simply a species of financial bills. Hence, all money bills are financial bills
but all financial bills are not money bills.
Only those financial bills are money bills which contain exclusively those matters which
are mentioned in Article 110 of the Constitution.
These are also certified by the Speaker of Lok Sabha as money bills. The financial bills (I)
and (II), on the other hand, have been dealt with in Article 117 of the Constitution.
Page 44
Financial Bills (I)

Contains not only any or all the matters mentioned in Article 110, but also other matters
of general legislation.
A bill that contains a borrowing clause, but does not exclusively deal with borrowing. In
two respects, a financial bill (I) is similar to a money bill
(a) Both of them can be introduced only in the Lok Sabha and not in the Rajya
Sabha, and (b) Both of them can be introduced only on the recommendation of
the president.
In all other respects, a financial bill (I) is governed by the same legislative procedure
applicable to an ordinary bill.
Page 45
Hence, it can be either rejected or amended by the Rajya Sabha (except that an
amendment other than for reduction or abolition of a tax cannot be moved in either
House without the recommendation of the president).
In case of a disagreement between the two Houses over such a bill, the president can
summon a joint sitting of the two Houses to resolve the deadlock.
Financial Bills (II)
A financial bill (II) contains provisions involving expenditure from the Consolidated Fund
of India, but does not include any of the matters mentioned in Article 110.
It is treated as an ordinary bill and in all respect, it is governed by the same legislative
procedure which is applicable to an ordinary bill. The only special feature of this bill is
that it cannot be passed by either House of Parliament unless the President has
recommended to that House the consideration of the bill.
Financial bill (II) can be introduced in either House of Parliament and recommendation
of the President is not necessary for its introduction. It can be either rejected or
amended by either House of Parliament. In case of a disagreement between the two
Houses over such a bill, the President can summon a joint sitting of the two Houses to
resolve the deadlock.
Joint Sitting of Two Houses
Joint sitting is an extra-ordinary machinery provided by the Constitution to resolve a

deadlock between the two Houses over the passage of a bill.
A deadlock is deemed to have taken place under any one of the following three
situations after a bill has been passed by one House and transmitted to the other House:
1. if the bill is rejected by the other House;
2. if the Houses have finally disagreed as to the amendments to be made in the bill; or
3. if more than six months have elapsed from the date of the receipt of the bill by the
other House without the bill being passed by it.
In the above three situations, the president can summon both the Houses to meet in a
joint sitting for the purpose of deliberating and voting on the bill. It must be noted here
that the provision of joint sitting is applicable to ordinary bills or financial bills only
and not to money bills or Constitutional amendment bills.
In the case of a money bill, the Lok Sabha has overriding powers, while a Constitutional
amendment bill must be passed by each House separately.
Page 46
In reckoning the period of six months, no account can be taken of any period during
which the other House (to which the bill has been sent) is prorogued or adjourned for
more than four consecutive days.
If the bill (under dispute) has already lapsed due to the dissolution of the Lok Sabha, no
joint sitting can be summoned.
But, the joint sitting can be held if the Lok Sabha is dissolved after the President has
notified his intention to summon such a sitting (as the bill does not lapse in this case).
After the President notifies his intention to summon a joint sitting of the two Houses,
none of the Houses can proceed further with the bill.
The Speaker of Lok Sabha presides over a joint sitting of the two Houses and the Deputy
Speaker, in his absence.
If the Deputy Speaker is also absent from a joint sitting, the Deputy Chairman of Rajya
Sabha presides.
If he is also absent, such other person as may be determined by the members present at
the joint sitting, presides over the meeting. It is clear that the Chairman of Rajya Sabha
does not preside over a joint sitting as he is not a member of either House of
Parliament.
The Constitution has specified that at a joint sitting, new amendments to the bill cannot be
proposed except in two cases:
Those amendments that have caused final disagreement between the Houses; and
Those amendments that might have become necessary due to the delay in the passage
of the bill.
Instruments of Parliamentary Control

The legislature in parliamentary system ensures executive accountability at various stages:
policy making, implementation of law or policy and during and post- implementation stage. The
legislature does this through the use of a variety of devices:
1. Deliberation and discussion
2. Approval or Refusal of laws
3. Financial control
4. No confidence motion
Page 47
1.
Deliberation and discussion:

During the law-making process, members of the legislature get an opportunity to
deliberate on the policy direction of the executive and the ways in which policies are
implemented.
Apart from deliberating on bills, control may also be exercised during the general
discussions in the House.
Question Hour, which is held every day during the sessions of Parliament, where
Ministers have to respond to searching questions raised by the members;
Zero Hour where members are free to raise any matter that they think is
important (though the ministers are not bound to reply),
Half-an hour discussion on matters of public importance, adjournment motion
etc. are some instruments of exercising control.
Perhaps the question hour is the most effective method of keeping vigil on the
executive and the administrative agencies of the government.
Members of Parliament have shown great interest in question hour and maximum
attendance is recorded during this time.
Most of the questions aim at eliciting information from the government on issues of
public interest such as, price rise, availability of food grains, atrocities on weaker
sections of the society, riots, black-marketing etc. This gives the members an
opportunity to criticize the government, and represent the problems of their
constituencies.
The discussions during the question hour are so heated that it is not uncommon to see
members raise their voice, walk to the well of the house or walk out in protest to make
their point. This results in considerable loss of legislative time.
At the same time, we must remember that many of these actions are political
techniques to gain concessions from government and in the process force executive
accountability.
2. Approval and ratification of laws:

Parliamentary control is also exercised through its power of ratification. A bill can
become a law only with the approval of the Parliament.
A government that has the support of a disciplined majority may not find it difficult to
get the approval of the Legislature. Such approvals however, cannot be taken for
granted.
Page 48
They are the products of intense bargaining and negotiations amongst the members of
ruling party or coalition of parties and even government and opposition.
If the government has majority in Lok Sabha but not in the Rajya Sabha, as has happened during
the Janata Party rule in 1977 and N.D.A rule in 2000, the government will be forced to make
substantial concessions to gain the approval of both the Houses. Many bills, such as the Lok Pal
Bill have failed enactment, Prevention of Terrorism bill (2002) was rejected by the Rajya Sabha.
3. Financial control:
As mentioned earlier, financial resources to implement the programmes of the
government are granted through the budget.
Preparation and presentation of budget for the approval of the legislature is
constitutional obligation of the government. This obligation allows the legislature to
exercise control over the purse strings of the government.
The legislature may refuse to grant resources to the government. This seldom happens
because the government ordinarily enjoys support of the majority in the parliamentary
system.
Nevertheless, before granting money the Lok Sabha can discuss the reasons for which
the government requires money. It can enquire into cases of misuse of funds on the
basis of the report of the Comptroller and Auditor General and Public Accounts
committees.
But the legislative control is not only aimed at financial propriety. The legislature is
concerned about the policies of the government that are reflected in the budget.
Through financial control, the legislature controls the policy of the government.
4. No Confidence Motion:
The most powerful weapon that enables the Parliament to ensure executive accountability is
the no-confidence motion. As long as the government has the support of its party or coalition
of parties that have a majority in the Lok Sabha, the power of the House to dismiss the
government is fictional rather than real.
However, after 1989, several governments have been forced to resign due to lack of confidence
of the house. Each of these governments lost the confidence of the Lok Sabha because they
failed to retain the support of their coalition partners. Thus, the Parliament can effectively
control the executive and ensure a more responsive government.
Page 49
It is however important for this purpose, that there is adequate time at the disposal of the
House, the members are interested in discussion and participate effectively and there is
willingness to compromise amongst the government and the opposition. In the last two
decades, there has been a gradual decline in sessions of the Lok Sabha and State Legislative
Assemblies and time spent on debates. Moreover, the Houses of the Parliament have been
plagued by absence of quorum, boycott of sessions by members of opposition which deprive
the house the power to control the executive through discussion.
HOW DOES THE PARLIAMENT REGULATE ITSELF?

It is through debates that the parliament performs all its vital functions.
Such discussions must be meaningful and orderly so that the functions of the Parliament
are carried out smoothly and its dignity is intact.
The presiding officer of the legislature is the final authority in matters of regulating the
business of the legislature Speaker in case of Lok Sabha and Chairman i.e. VicePresident in case of Rajya Sabha.
Anti-Defection Law:
Most of the members of the legislatures are elected on the ticket of some political party. What
would happen if they decide to leave the party after getting elected? For many years after
independence, this issue was unresolved.
Finally there was an agreement among the parties that a legislator who is elected on one
partys ticket must be restricted from defecting to another party.
An amendment to the Constitution was made (52nd Amendment Act) in 1985. This is
known as anti-defection amendment.
It has also been subsequently modified by the 91st amendment.
The presiding officer of the House is the authority who takes final decisions on all such
cases.
Defection: If a member remains absent in the House when asked by the party leadership to
remain present or votes against the instructions of the party or voluntarily leaves the
membership of the party, it is deemed as defection.
The Tenth Schedule of the Indian Constitution validates the Anti-Defection Law, mentioning
conditions for disqualification of MPs.
Page 50
Intention:
To curb political defections and rein in the issue of horse-trading
To bring stability in the structures of political parties and strengthen parliamentary
practice by banning floor-crossing
Promote party discipline
Anti-democratic fallouts brought into notice:
Muzzled Free Expression: since the law makes it mandatory on the parliamentarian to
vote along party lines or face eviction
Curtailed the parliamentarians discretion to vote, effectively suppressing intra-party
debate
Dissent Not Allowed: presence of party whips has been stifling dissent and gradually
decreased the quality of the debates on various policy issues.
Issue of Accountability: moratorium on allowing MPs to change parties reduces the
accountability of the government to the Parliament and the People.
Read: Anti-Defection Law- Liberate the Legislator
Page 51
JUDICIARY
Objectives:
To understand
Meaning of independence of judiciary

Role of Indian Judiciary in protecting our rights
Role of the Judiciary in interpreting the Constitution
Relationship between the Judiciary and the Parliament of India
Need of an Independent Judiciary

Owing to the important role it has been envisaged with
To be able to settle all the arising disputes by an independent body in accordance with
the principle of rule of law
To protect rule of law and ensure supremacy of law
Safeguard rights of the individual
Ensures that democracy does not give way to individual or group dictatorship
Independence of Judiciary:
Counter the ineffectiveness, if any other organs of the government like the executive
and legislature must not restrain the functioning of the judiciary in such a way that it is
unable to do justice
No interference other organs of the government should not interfere or dictate the
decision of the judiciary
Freedom judges must be able to perform their functions without fear or favour
Independence of the judiciary does not imply arbitrariness or absence of accountability. It is a

part of the democratic political structure and therefore, is accountable to
The Constitution,
The democratic traditions
The people of the country
Page 52
Enabling Independence of Judiciary
No involvement of the legislature in the process of appointment of judges

Qualifications specifiedno criteria of the kind of political opinion a person holds
Security of Tenure:
Provided with a fixed tenure; hold office till they reach the age of
retirement
Removal: Only in exceptional cases difficult procedure
Not financially dependent on either the executive or legislature; salaries and allowances
of the judges are not subjected to the approval of the legislature
The actions and decisions of the judges are immune from personal criticisms.
Power to penalise those who are found guilty of contempt of court
Parliament cannot discuss the conduct of the judges except when the proceeding to
remove a judge is being carried out
Appointment of Judges
Chief Justice of India (CJI): No hard & fast rule but the senior-most judge (not compulsorily)
Other Judges of the Supreme Court and the High Court: Appointed by the President after
consulting the CJI
Principle of collegiality in making recommendations for appointments: the Supreme Court has
suggested that the Chief Justice should recommend names of persons to be appointed in
consultation with four senior-most judges of the Court
Current Situation: Judicial Appointments
CJI: charged the centre of attempting to bring the judiciary to a grinding halt by not appointing
High Court judges
Union Finance Minister: Judiciary creating problems in working of executive
After the SC judgment in NJAC act, the government approached the SC to send them the
prospective names of candidates and it will process it and will not create any hurdle till
the MoP is finalised. Now, the government is sitting on names of appointments, it is
blocking the recommendation of transfers.
Page 53
Veto power wanted by government is the main contention between executive and
judiciary. MoP is also not finalised because of other reasons like Secretariat that
government wants to be set up by SC, a committee to screen all candidates and dispute
over who will have authority to man the committee.
Previous judgements had allowed the Chief Ministers to have a say in judicial
appointments, though there were no such mention in constitution. The present
government wants to continue with it, but now SC is not in favour of it.
Removal of Judges
Can be removed only on the ground of proven misbehaviour or incapacity

A motion containing the charges against the judge must be approved by special majority
in both Houses of the Parliament
Unless there is a general consensus among Members of the Parliament, a judge cannot be
removed
Note:
Executive Crucial role in making appointments
Legislature Powers of removal
Page 54
Single Integrated Judicial System
Page 55
Types of Jurisdictions
Page 56
Original Jurisdiction
Cases:
Can be directly considered by the Supreme Court without going to the lower courts
Cases involving federal relations SC becomes an umpire in all disputes regarding
federal matters (legal disputes between the Union and the States, or between States)
Called original jurisdiction: The Supreme Court alone has the power to deal with such cases.
High Courts or the lower courts: Do not have any say
Supreme Court
Settles disputes
Interprets the powers of Union and State government as laid down in the Constitution
Writ Jurisdiction
Any individual, whose fundamental right has been violated, can directly move the
Supreme Court for remedy and the Supreme Court can give special orders in the form of
writs.
The High Courts can also issue writs, but the persons whose rights are violated have the
choice of either approaching the High Court or approaching the Supreme Court directly.
Purpose of writs: Court is empowered to give orders to the executive to act or not to act in a
particular way
Appellate Jurisdiction
Highest court of appeal: Supreme Court
A person can appeal to the Supreme Court against the decisions of the High Court
Instances when an appeal can be made:
High Court certifies that the case is fit for appeal involving a serious matter of
interpretation of law or Constitution
In criminal cases, if the lower court has sentenced a person to death then an appeal can
be made to the High Court or Supreme Court.
Page 57
SC: Holds the powers to decide whether to admit appeals even when appeal is not allowed by
the High Court
Appellate jurisdiction
Supreme Court will reconsider the case and the legal issues involved in it. If the Court
thinks that the law or the Constitution has a different meaning from what the lower
courts understood, then the Supreme Court will change the ruling and along with that
also give new interpretation of the provision involved.
High Courts have appellate jurisdiction over the decisions given by courts below them
Advisory Jurisdiction
The President of India can refer any matter that is of public importance or that which involves
interpretation of Constitution to Supreme Court for advice.
Supreme Court is not bound to give advice on such matters

The President is not bound to accept such an advice.
Utility of the advisory powers of the Supreme Court
Allows the government to seek legal opinion on a matter of importance before taking
action on it thus preventing unnecessary litigations later
In the light of the advice of the Supreme Court, the government can make suitable
changes in its action or legislations.
Judicial Activism
Chief instrument: Public Interest Litigation (PIL) or Social Action Litigation (SAL)
Normal course of law: An individual can approach the courts only if he/she has been personally
aggrieveda person whose rights have been violated, or who is involved in a dispute
1979:
Court decided to hear a case where the case was filed not by the aggrieved persons but
by others on their behalf; involving a consideration of an issue of public interest
SC: Took up the case about rights of prisonersopened the gates for large number of
cases where public spirited citizens and voluntary organisations sought judicial
Page 58
intervention for protection of existing rights, betterment of life conditions of the poor,
protection of the environment, and many other issues in the interest of the public
Began considering many cases merely on the basis of newspaper reports and postal
complaints received by the court
Impact on the political system:

Positives
Democratised the judicial system by giving not just to individuals but also groups access
to the courts
Forced executive accountability
Made an attempt to make the electoral system much more free and fair
Asked candidates contesting elections to file affidavits indicating their assets and
income along with educational qualifications so that the people could elect their
representatives based on accurate knowledge.
Negatives of Pro-active Judiciary
Has overburdened the courts

Has blurred the line of distinction between the executive and legislature on the one
hand and the judiciary on the other involvement of court in resolving questions which
belong to the executive is leading to the creation of strains on the democratic principle
of balance of powers.
Judicial activism should not lead to the dilution of separation of powers which is the
Constitutional scheme. Each organ of our democracy must function within its own sphere and
must not take over what is assigned to the others, Mr. Pranab Mukherjee (President of India)
Page 59
Supreme Court remedies the violation of rights

1. Can restore fundamental rights by issuing writs of Habeas Corpus; mandamus etc.
Article 32: SC
Article 226: HC
2. Supreme Court can declare the concerned law as unconstitutional and therefore nonoperational (Article 13)
Supreme Court
Protector of fundamental rights of the citizen

Interpreter of Constitution
Establishes the process of Judicial Review
o Power of the Supreme Court (or High Courts) to examine the constitutionality of any
law if the Court arrives at the conclusion that the law is inconsistent with the
provisions of the Constitution, such a law is declared as unconstitutional and
inapplicable
o The term judicial review is nowhere mentioned in the Constitution However, the
fact that India has a written constitution and the Supreme Court can strike down a
law that goes against fundamental rights, implicitly gives the Supreme Court the
power of judicial review
o Power to review legislations on the ground that they violate fundamental rights or
on the ground that they violate the federal distribution of powers.
o Extends to the laws passed by State legislatures
o Powers of the President and Governor were brought under the purview of the
courts
Page 60
How Judiciary exhibits its power to interpret the Constitution

1973: Kesavananda Bharati case
1. The Court ruled that there is a basic structure of the Constitution and nobodynot even
the Parliament (through amendment)can violate the basic structure
2. Right to property (the disputed issue) was not part of basic structure and therefore
could be suitably abridged
3. Court reserved to itself the right to decide whether various matters are part of the basic
structure of the Constitution
*Rule of Law: all individuals rich and poor, men or women, forward or backward castes
are subjected to the same law
Page 61
FEDERALISM
Objectives:
What is Federalism?
Federal provisions in the Indian Constitution
Issues involved in the relations between the centre and the States
Special provisions for certain States having a distinct composition and historical features
India emerged as an independent nation-state in 1947 after a painful partition and has
remained united over six decades of its independent existence
Contributing factors to this achievement:
Adopting a federal constitution

Nature of the federal system
Practice of federalism
What is Federalism
An institutional mechanism to accommodate two sets of politiesone at the regional

level and the other at the national level
Two sets of identities and loyaltiespeople belong to the region as well as the nation
Details of this dual system of government are generally spelt out in a written
constitution, which is considered to be supreme and which is also the source of the
power of both sets of government (List of Subjects: Union, State, Concurrent &
Residuary)
Independent judiciary to settle disputes between the centre and the State legal
matters about the division of power
Page 62
In India
Principle: Government would be based on the principles of unity and cooperation between the
centre and the States and separate powers to the States (while recognising diversity, the
Constitution emphasised unity)
Article 1:
(1) India, that is Bharat, shall be a Union of States.
(2) The States and the territories thereof shall be as specified in the First Schedule
Term Federation: Not mentioned in the Constitution
Division of Powers
For the entire nation: Union government (Central government)

One for each unit or State: State government
Status & Power: Mentioned & specified + clearly identified area of activity
Dispute: about which powers come under the control of the union and which under the
States, this can be resolved by the Judiciary on the basis of the constitutional provisions.
The Constitution clearly demarcates subjects, which are under the exclusive domain of
the Union and those under the States.
Economic and financial powers are centralised in the hands of the central government
by the Constitution
Page 63
Page 64
Strong Central Government

India: A country of continental dimensions with immense diversities and social problems
Need to create a strong centre:
To stem disintegration and bring about social and political change

The socio-economic problems of the country needed to be handled by a strong central
government in cooperation with the States
Provisions that create a strong central government:

Existence of a State including its territorial integrity is in the hands of Parliament
The Parliament is empowered to form a new State by separation of territory from any
State or by uniting two or more States.
Can also alter the boundary of any State or even its name.
Powerful emergency provisions
Can turn our federal polity into a highly centralised system once emergency is declared
During an emergency, power becomes lawfully centralised.
Parliament also assumes the power to make laws on subjects within the jurisdiction of
the States.
Central government has very effective financial powers and responsibilities
Items generating revenue are under the control of the central government. Thus, the
central government has many revenue sources and the States are mostly dependent on
the grants and financial assistance from the centre.
Usage of its discretion to give grants and loans to Statesthis distribution of economic
resources is considered lopsided and has led to charges of discrimination against States
ruled by an opposition party.
Page 65
Governor
Can recommend dismissal of the State government and the dissolution of the Assembly
Has the power to reserve a bill passed by the State legislature, for the assent of the
Presidentgives the central government an opportunity to delay the State legislation
and also to examine such bills and veto them completely.
Move ratified by the Rajya Sabha
Allows central government to legislate on matters from the State list

Executive powers of the centre are superior to the executive powers of the States
Article 257 (1): The executive power of every State shall be so exercised as not to
impede or prejudice the exercise of the executive power of the Union, and the executive
power of the Union shall extend to the giving of such directions to a State as may appear
to the Government of India to be necessary for that purpose.
Integrated administrative system
The all-India services are common to the entire territory of India and officers chosen for
these services serve in the administration of the States. Thus, an IAS officer who
becomes the collector or an IPS officer who serves as the Commissioner of Police, are
under the control of the central government.
States cannot take disciplinary action nor can they remove these officers from service.
Articles 33 and 34
Authorises the Parliament to protect persons in the service of the union or a state in
respect of any action taken by them during martial law to maintain or restore order.
The Armed Forces Special Powers Act has been made on the basis of these provisions.
This Act has created tensions between the people and the armed forces on many
occasions
Irom Sharmila and AFSPA Debate
Manipur in ILPS turmoil
AFSPA and Supreme Courts recent orders calling to account
TLP1 & TLP2
Page 66
Conflicts: Between Centre & State

Point of Contention: the Constitution recognises the separate identity of the regions and yet
gives more powers to the centre
1 Phase of Federalism A peaceful one
st
In the 1950s and early 1960s the foundation of our federalism was laid under Jawaharlal
Nehru a period of Congress dominance over the centre as well as the States
Except on the issue of formation of new States, the relations between the centre and
the States remained quite normal during this period.
The States were hopeful that they would be making progress with the help of the
grants-in-aid from the centre.
In the middle of the 1960s Decline of Congress dominance

A large number of States opposition parties came to power resulted in demands for greater
powers and greater autonomy to the States
Since the 1990s End of Congress dominance entered an era of coalition politics
In both Centre & States

Resulted in a greater say for the States, a respect for diversity and the beginning of a
more mature federalism
Demand for Autonomy ranges from
Division of powers should be changed in favour of the States and more powers and
important powers be assigned to the States
States should have independent sources of revenue and greater control over the
resources (financial autonomy)
States resent the control of the centre over the administrative machinery
Cultural and linguistic issue: the opposition to the domination of Hindi (in Tamil Nadu)
or demand for advancing the Punjabi language and culture
Page 67
Role of Governors and Presidents Rule

Governor: Not an elected office holder; is appointed by the central government and therefore,
actions of the Governor are often viewed as interference by the Central government in the
functioning of the State government.
Especially when: Two different parties are in power at the centre and the State
The Sarkaria Commission: To examine the issues relating to centre-State relations
Appointments of Governors should be strictly non-partisan
Article 356:
Provides for Presidents rule in any State

When: a situation has arisen in which the Government of the State cannot be carried
on in accordance with the provisions of this Constitution. It results in the takeover of
the State government by the Union government.
Conditions: The Presidents proclamation has to be ratified by Parliament. Presidents
rule can be extended till three years.
Article 356Arunachal Pradesh: Is Presidents rule being misused?
Harking back to an interventionist era Article 356
Article 356: When Centre targets state
The Governor has the power to recommend the dismissal of the State government and
suspension or dissolution of State assembly many conflicts; in some cases, State governments
were dismissed even when they had a majority in the legislature or without testing their
majority
Page 68
Demands for New States

With a pan-Indian national unity; the national movement also generated distinct unity around a
common language, region and cultureStates would be created on the basis of common
cultural and linguistic identity.
1954: States Reorganisation Commission was set up and it recommended the creation
of linguistic States, at least for the major linguistic groups
1956: Reorganisation of some States took place. This saw the beginning of the creation
of linguistic States and the process is still continuing. Gujarat and Maharashtra were
created in
1960: Punjab and Haryana were separated from each other in 1966
1990s: Some of the larger States were further divided both to meet the demands for a
separate State as well as to meet the need for greater administrative efficiency.
Inter-state Conflicts
Disputes: Have political implications and therefore they can best be resolved only through
negotiations and mutual understanding.
Border dispute: States have certain claims over territories belonging to neighbouring
States. Though language is the basis of defining boundaries of the States, often border
areas would have populations speaking more than one language. So, it is not easy to
resolve this dispute merely on the basis of linguistic majority.
Sharing of rivers: Rivers are a major resource and therefore, disputes over river waters
test the patience and cooperative spirit of the States
Read: Indian federalism needs the Inter-State Council)
Page 69
The curious case of Differential Treatment to some selected States

Due to: their peculiar social and historical circumstances
States: NE States + Himachal Pradesh + Andhra Pradesh + Goa + Gujarat + Maharashtra + Sikkim
+ J&K
NE States: a sizeable indigenous tribal population with a distinct history and culture, which
they wish to retain (Art 371)
Jammu and Kashmir (Art. 370)
Concurrence of the State is required for making any laws in matters mentioned in the
Union and Concurrent lists.
Central government has only limited powers and other powers listed in the Union List
and Concurrent List can be used only with the consent of the State government
Has a separate constitution and a flag
The union government cannot impose a financial emergency in the State
The Directive Principles do not apply in J&K
Amendments to the Indian Constitution (under Art. 368) can only apply in concurrence
with the government of J&K.
Limitation:
There is a constitutional provision that allows the President, with the concurrence of the
State government, to specify which parts of the Union List shall apply to the State.
The Parliaments power to make laws on subjects in the Union List is fully accepted.
No emergency due to internal disturbances can be declared in J&K without the
concurrence of the State
Read:
How the Kashmir valley is changing?
Unfinished Business of Partition: Article 370
Page 70
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
Objectives:
Importance of local government bodies;

The provisions made by the 73rd and 74th amendments; and
Functions and responsibilities of the local government bodies
Local government:
Government at the village and district level

Government closest to the common people; that involve the day-to-day life and
problems of ordinary citizens
Of the belief that local knowledge and local interest are essential ingredients for
democratic decision making, and are necessary for efficient and people-friendly
administration
Convenient for the people to approach the local government for solving their problems
both quickly and with minimum cost
Strong and vibrant local governments ensure both active participation and purposeful
accountability
1993: Constitutional status was accorded to local government institutions
Tracing the existence of local government in India

Post 1882: Lord Rippon, the Viceroy of India at that time, took the initiative in creating these
the local boards.
Government of India Act 1919: Village panchayats were established in a number of provinces
and the trend continued after the Government of India Act of 1935.
Mahatma Gandhi: Had strongly pleaded for decentralisation of economic and political power as
strengthening village panchayats was a means of effective decentralisation (DPSP)
Idea of Independence: National movement was concerned about the enormous concentration
of powers in the hands of the Governor General sitting at Delhi. Therefore, for our leaders,
Page 71
independence meant an assurance that there will be decentralisation of decision making,

executive and administrative powers.
Constitution: Handed over to the State Govt. + DPSP (non-justiciable and advisory in its nature)
Do you think panchayats received adequate importance in the Constitution?
Partition: The turmoil resulted in a strong unitary inclination in the Constitution

Dr. B.R. Ambedkar: The faction and caste-ridden nature of rural society would defeat
the noble purpose of local government at the rural level
Local Government in present times

Local governments got a fillip after the 73rd and 74 Constitution Amendment Acts
th
Community Development Programme in 1952: To promote peoples participation in local

development in a range of activities
A three-tier Panchayati Raj system of local government was recommended for the rural
areas
Some States (like Gujarat, Maharashtra) adopted the system of elected local bodies
around 1960 and some were either not capable to go ahead with it or some did not
deem it to be necessary.
Post 1987: A thorough review of the functioning of local government institutions was initiated
1989: P. K. Thungon Committee
Recommended constitutional recognition for the local government bodies

A constitutional amendment to provide for periodic elections to local government
institutions
Enlistment of appropriate functions to them, along with funds
Page 72
73rd and 74th Constitutional Amendments

73rd Amendment: About rural local governments (which are also known as Panchayati Raj
Institutions or PRIs)
Levels
Base: Gram Panchayat; covers a village or group of villages
Intermediary level: Mandal (also referred to as Block or Taluka); need not be
constituted in smaller States
Apex level: Zilla Panchayat covering the entire rural area of the District
Mandatory creation of the Gram Sabha:

comprise of all the adult members registered as voters in the Panchayat area
Role and functions: decided by State legislation
Elected directly by the people

Term of each Panchayat body is five years
If the State government dissolves the Panchayat before the end of its five year term,
fresh elections must be held within six months of such dissolution
Reservations
Women: One third of the positions in all panchayat institutions (Gen + SC + ST +
OBC)
Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes: for at all the three levels, in proportion
to their population.
Backward castes (OBCs): if necessary
Positions: apply also to the positions of Chairpersons or Adhyakshas at all the
three levels.
Transfer of Subjects
Twenty-nine subjects, which were earlier in the State list of subjects, are
identified and listed in the Eleventh Schedule of the Constitution. These subjects
are to be transferred to the Panchayati Raj institutions
Subjects: linked to development and welfare functions at the local level
Page 73
Actual transfer of these functions depends upon the State legislation. Each State
decides how many of these twenty-nine subjects would be transferred to the
local bodies.
State Election Commissioners: responsible for conducting elections to the Panchayati

Raj institutions
State Finance Commission: To review the distribution of revenues between the State
and local governments on the one hand and between rural and urban local governments
on the other
74th amendment: Made the provisions relating to urban local government (Nagarpalikas)
The Census of India defines an urban area as having:
(i) a minimum population of 5000;
(ii) at least 75 per cent of male working population engaged in non-agricultural occupations
(iii) a density of population of at least 400 persons per sq. km
2001 census: Nearly 28% of Indias population lives in urban areas.
All the provisions of the 73rd amendment relating to direct elections, reservations,
transfer of subjects, State Election Commission and State Finance Commission are
incorporated in the 74th amendment also and thus apply to Nagarpalikas.
The Constitution mandated the transfer of a list of functions from the State government
to the urban local bodies Eleventh Schedule of the Constitution
Earlier: Local government was a State subjectStates are free to make their own laws on this
subject
Post amendment of the Constitution: States had to change their laws about local bodies in
order to bring these in conformity with the amended Constitution and were given one years
time for making necessary changes in their respective State laws in the light of these
amendments
Read:
Empowerment of the Gram Sabhas
For creating Vibrant Cities: Decentralise and Empower City Governments
Page 74
Backing demos and kratiaPower of the people

Towards directly elected and empowered mayors
CONSTITUTION AS A LIVING DOCUMENT

Objectives:
How Indian Constitution can be amended according to the needs of the time;
Why even after many amendments, the Constitution has remained intact and its basic
premises have not changed;
Role of the judiciary in protecting the Constitution and also in interpreting the
Constitution;
The Constitution is a document that keeps evolving and responding to changing
situations.
ARE CONSTITUTIONS STATIC?
The Soviet Union had four constitutions in its life of 74 years. In 1991, the rule of the
Communist Party of Soviet Union came to an end and soon the Soviet federation
disintegrated. After this political upheaval, the newly formed Russian federation
adopted a new constitution in 1993.
The Constitution of India was adopted on 26 November 1949. Its implementation
formally started from 26 January 1950. More than fifty-five years after that, the same
constitution continues to function as the framework within which the government of
our country operates.
Lot of questions will come in our mind For instance:
1.
Is our Constitution so good that it needs no change?
2.
Were our Constitution makers so far-sighted and wise that they had foreseen all the
changes that would take place in the future?
Page 75
The answer to the above questions is

Yes, we have inherited a very robust Constitution
The basic framework of the Constitution is very much suited to our country.
The Constitution makers were very farsighted and provided for many solutions for
future situations.
3. We know that our constitution provides the solution for many problems but can it
provide for all eventualities?
4. Then how does the same Constitution continue to serve the country?
The answer to this question is:
Our Constitution accepts the necessity of modifications according to changing needs of
the society.
In the actual working of the Constitution, there has been enough flexibility of
interpretations. Both political practice and judicial rulings have shown maturity and
flexibility in implementing the Constitution.
The above factors have made our Constitution a living document rather than a closed
and static rulebook.
Challenging Issue of Constitution & Solutions:
The provisions of the constitution would naturally reflect efforts to tackle the problems
that the society is facing at the time of making of the constitution and it must be a
document that provides the framework of the government for the future as well
The constitution has to be able to respond to the challenges that may arise in the
future; will always have something that is contemporary and something that has a more
durable importance
A constitution is not a frozen and unalterable document and is a framework for the
democratic governance of the society.
Page 76
Thus the Indian Constitution is a combination of both the approaches mentioned above:
That the constitution is a sacred document and that it is an instrument that may require
changes from time to time or we can say that;
Our Constitution is not a static document, it is not the final word about everything; it is
not unalterable.
HOW TO AMEND THE CONSTITUTION?

Article 368 deals with the amending power of the parliament i.e. Parliament may in exercise of
its constituent power amend by way of addition, variation or repeal any provision of this
Constitution in accordance with the procedure laid down in this article.
Balancing approach of our Constitution:
The Constitution must be amended if so required. But it must be protected from unnecessary
and frequent changes. In other words, the Constitution is to be flexible and at the same time
rigid.
Flexible means open to changes and rigid means resistant to changes; can be very easily
changed or modified is often called flexible.
In the case of constitutions, which are very difficult to amend, they are described as
rigid.
The Indian Constitution combines both these characteristics.
What happens if there are faults or mistake in our Constitution?
Whenever such mistakes would come to light, the Constitution needs to be easily amended and
should be able to get rid of these mistakes. Then there were some provisions in the
Constitution that were of temporary nature and it was decided that these could be altered later
on once the new Parliament was elected. But at the same time, the Constitution was framed by
considering a federal polity and therefore, the rights and powers of the States could not be
changed without the consent of the States.
Page 77
Note that all amendments to the Constitution are initiated only in the Parliament.
Besides the special majority in the Parliament no outside agency like a constitution
commission or a separate body is required for amending the Constitution.
An amendment bill, like all other bills, goes to the President for his assent, but in this
case, the President has no powers to send it back for reconsideration.
These details show how rigid and complicated the amending process could have been.
Only elected representatives of the people are empowered to consider and take final
decisions on the question of amendments.
Thus, sovereignty of elected representatives (parliamentary sovereignty) is the basis of
the amendment procedure.
Special Majority:
Amendment to the Constitution requires two different kinds of special majorities:
In the first place, those voting in favor of the amendment bill should constitute at least
half of the total strength of that House.
Secondly, the supporters of the amendment bill must also constitute two-thirds of those
who actually take part in voting.
Both Houses of the Parliament must pass the amendment bill separately in this same
manner (there is no provision for a joint session). For every amendment bill, this special
majority is required.
The basic principle behind the amending procedure is that it should be based on broad
support among the political parties and parliamentarians.
Page 78
Ratification by States:
For some articles of the Constitution, special majority is not sufficient.
When an amendment aims to modify an article related to distribution of powers

between the States and the central government, or articles related to representation, it is
necessary that the States must be consulted and that they give their consent.
The Constitution has ensured this by providing that legislatures of half the States have
to pass the amendment bill before the amendment comes into effect.
Apart from the provisions related to federal structure, provisions about fundamental
rights are also protected in this way.
The Constitution of India can be amended through large-scale consensus and limited
participation of the States.
WHY HAVE THERE BEEN SO MANY AMENDMENTS?
There is always a criticism about the number of amendments. It is said that there have been far
too many amendments to the Constitution of India. On the face of it, the fact that ninety-three
amendments took place in fifty-five years does seem to be somewhat odd. Amendments are
not only due to political considerations.
Barring the first decade after the commencement of the Constitution, every decade has
witnessed a steady stream of amendments. This means that irrespective of the nature of
politics and the party in power, amendments were required to be made from time to time.
Was this because of the inadequacies of the original Constitution? Is the Constitution too
flexible?
The anti-defection amendment (52nd amendment), this period saw a series of amendments in
spite of the political turbulence.
Apart from the anti-defection amendments (52nd and 91st) these amendments include
the amendment bringing down the minimum age for voting from 21 to 18 years, the
73rd and the 74th amendments, etc.
In this same period, there were some amendments clarifying and expanding the scope
of reservations in jobs and admissions.
After 1992-93, an overall consensus emerged in the country about these measures and
therefore, amendments regarding these measures were passed without much difficulty
(77th, 81st, and 82nd amendments).
Page 79
Controversial Amendments
In particular, the 38th, 39th and 42nd amendments have been the most controversial
amendments so far.
These three amendments were made in the background of internal emergency declared
in the country from June 1975.
They sought to make basic changes in many crucial parts of the Constitution.
42nd Amendment: An Overview
An attempt to override the ruling of the Supreme Court given in the Kesavananda case.
Even the duration of the Lok Sabha was extended from five to six years.
They were included in the Constitution by this amendment act and also ended up
putting restrictions on the review powers of the Judiciary.
This amendment made changes to the Preamble, to the seventh schedule of the
Constitution and to 53 articles of the Constitution.
BASIC STRUCTURE AND EVOLUTION OF THE CONSTITUTION

Most famous case: Kesavananda Bharati
It has set specific limits to the Parliaments power to amend the Constitution.
It says that no amendment can violate the basic structure of the Constitution;
It allows the Parliament to amend any and all parts of the Constitution (within this
limitation); and
It places the Judiciary as the final authority in deciding if an amendment violates basic
structure and what constitutes the basic structure.
The theory of basic structure There is no mention of this theory in the Constitution.
It has emerged from judicial interpretation.
The Judiciary and its interpretation have practically amended the Constitution without a
formal amendment.
Page 80
Examples of how judicial interpretation changed our understanding of the Constitution:

Reservations in jobs and educational institutions cannot exceed fifty per cent of the
total seats.
Reservations for other backward classes, the Supreme Court introduced the idea of
creamy layer and ruled that persons belonging to this category were not entitled to
benefits under reservations
The Judiciary has contributed to an informal amendment by interpreting various
provisions concerning right to education, right to life and liberty and the right to form
and manage minority educational institutions.
Parliamentary Democracy:
In a parliamentary democracy, the Parliament represents the people and therefore, it is
expected to have an upper hand over both Executive and Judiciary. At the same time, there is
the text of the Constitution and it has given powers to other organs of the government.
Therefore, the supremacy of the Parliament has to operate within this framework.
Democracy is not only about votes and peoples representation; also about the principle of rule
of law, about developing institutions and working through these institutions.
Page 81
THE PHILOSOPHY OF THE CONSTITUTION

Objectives:
Core features of the Indian Constitution
Criticisms of this Constitution
Limitations of the Constitution
Constitution: A document based on a certain moral vision

Individual freedom
Emergence of Constitution: product of continuous intellectual and political activity of well over
a century
Freedom of expression
Freedom from arbitrary arrest
Freedom of conscience
Social Justice
Liberalism exhibited by the Indian Constitution Provision for reservations for Scheduled
Castes and Scheduled Tribes in the Constitution (mere granting of the right to equality was not
enough to overcome age-old injustices suffered by these groups or to give real meaning to their
right to vote. Special constitutional measures were required to advance their interests)
Indian liberalism has two streams
Rammohan Roy: emphasised on individual rights, particularly the rights of women
K.C. Sen, Justice Ranade and Swami Vivekananda: introduced the spirit of social justice
within orthodox Hinduism. For Vivekananda, such a reordering of Hindu society could
not have been possible without liberal principles
Respect for diversity and minority rights

Encourages equal respect between communities difficult to foster in the country
Tend to have hierarchical relationships with one another (as in the case of caste)
When these communities do see each other as equals, they also tend to become rivals
(as in the case of religious communities).
Page 82
India is a land of multiple cultural communities and is important to ensure that no one
community systematically dominates others made it mandatory for our Constitution to
recognize community based rights.
Right of religious communities to establish and run their own educational institutions
(may receive money from the government)
Secularism
Though the term secular was not initially mentioned, the Indian Constitution has always been
secular.
Rights of Religious Groups
Recognized that intercommunity equality was as necessary as equality between
individualsgrants rights to all religious communities such as the right to establish and
maintain their educational institutions.
Freedom of religion in India means the freedom of religion of both individuals and
communities
States Power of Intervention
No mutual exclusionreligiously sanctioned customs such as untouchability deprived
individuals of the most basic dignity and self-respect. Such customs were so deeply rooted and
pervasive that without active state intervention, there was no hope of their dissolution.
Therefore, state has to interfere in the affairs of religion and such intervention was not always
negative
Could also help religious communities by giving aid to educational institutions run by
them-may help or hinder religious communities depending on which mode of action
promotes values such as freedom and equality
Separation between religion and state did not mean their mutual exclusion but rather
principled distance- allowing the state to be distant from all religions so that it can
intervene or abstain from interference, depending upon which of these two would
better promote liberty, equality and social justice.
Against the background of inter-communal strife, the Constitution thus, upholds its
commitment to group rights (the right to the expression of cultural particularity).
Page 83
Universal franchise
Indian nationalism has always conceived of a political order based on the will of every single
member of society. The idea of universal franchise lay securely within the heart of nationalism.
Right to take part in the affairs of the country and be admitted to public office
Motilal Nehru Report (1928) reaffirms this conception of citizenship, reiterating that
every person of either sex who has attained the age of twenty-one is entitled to vote for
the House of Representatives or Parliament.
Thus universal franchise was always considered as the most important and legitimate
instrument by which the will of the nation was to be properly expressed.
Federalism
Concept of asymmetric federalism
Accession of Jammu and Kashmir to the Indian union was based on a commitment to
safeguard its autonomy under Article 370 of the Constitution. This is the only State that
is governed by its own constitution.
Under Article 371A, the privilege of special status was also accorded to the NorthEastern State of Nagaland. This Article not only confers validity on preexisting laws
within Nagaland, but also protects local identity through restrictions on immigration.
Democratic and linguistic federalism of India has managed to combine claims to unity with
claims to cultural recognition. A fairly robust political arena exists that allows for the play of
multiple identities that complement one another.
National identity
Constitution constantly reinforces a common national identity
Reason behind the rejection of the Separate electorates: Not because they fostered
difference between religious communities as such or because they endangered a simple
notion of national unity but because they endangered a healthy national life.
Sought to evolve true fraternityto evolve one community
Procedural Achievements of the Constitution
Indian Constitution reflects a faith in political deliberation: even when groups and
interests were not adequately represented in the Constituent Assembly, the debates in
the Assembly amply show that the makers of the Constitution wanted to be as inclusive
in their approach as possible indicates the willingness of people to modify their
Page 84
existing preferences, or to justify outcomes by reference not to self-interest but to

reasons and a willingness to recognize creative value in difference and disagreement
Reflects a spirit of compromise and accommodation (positive note)
Decisions on the most important issues must be arrived at consensually rather than by
majority vote
Criticisms of the Indian Constitution

1.
Unwieldy: details, practices and statements are included in one single document and
this has made that document very vast
2.
Unrepresentative: Members of the Constituent Assembly were chosen by a restricted
franchise, not by universal suffrage but if we are to look closely a vast range of issues and
opinions were mentioned, members raised matters not only based on their individual social
concerns but based on the perceived interests and concerns of various social sections as
well.
3.
Is alien to our conditions: It is true that the Indian Constitution is modern and partly
western yet, it was never a blind borrowing but an innovative borrowing (selective
adaptation).
Many Indians have not only adopted modern ways of thinking, but have made these
their own (Rammohan Roy)
Emergence of a hybrid culture due to creative adaptation with the character of a
different, alternative modernity
Page 85
Limitations of Constitution
Has a centralized idea of national unity

Appears to have glossed over some important issues of gender justice, particularly
within the family
It is not clear why in a poor developing country, certain basic socio-economic rights
were relegated to the section on Directive Principles rather than made an integral
feature of our fundamental rights
Best Wishes
IASbaba
Copyright by IASbaba
All rights are reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or
transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise,
without prior permission of IASbaba.
Page 86

Iasbaba Block 1 Set 1 Polity

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Iasbaba Block 1 Set 1 Polity

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Iasbaba Block 1 Set 1 Polity

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

IASbabas ILP 2017 VALUE ADD: SET 1 BLOCK 1: POLITY MODULE

IASbabas ILP 2017 VALUE ADD: SET 1 BLOCK 1: POLITY MODULE

INDIAN CONSTITUTION AT WORK

Important Points to Note

Go through it very carefully to understand How to use basic understanding/knowledge

How to make Notes?

How to develop the understanding for integrated preparation of Prelims, Mains

This book mainly deals with:

Various aspects of the working of our Constitution

Coverage: Specific to NCERT

IASbabas ILP 2017 VALUE ADD: SET 1 BLOCK 1: POLITY MODULE

CONSTITUTION: WHY AND HOW?

The constitution specifies the basic allocation of power in a society.

Purpose and functions of a Constitution:

IASbabas ILP 2017 VALUE ADD: SET 1 BLOCK 1: POLITY MODULE

In many Countries Constitutions remain defunct. Why?

IASbabas ILP 2017 VALUE ADD: SET 1 BLOCK 1: POLITY MODULE

How was the Indian Constitution made?

IASbabas ILP 2017 VALUE ADD: SET 1 BLOCK 1: POLITY MODULE

Cabinet Mission Plan:

What is a Constituent Assembly?

IASbabas ILP 2017 VALUE ADD: SET 1 BLOCK 1: POLITY MODULE

About Objective Resolutions:

Moved by Nehru in 1946; Defined the aims of the Constituent Assembly.

IASbabas ILP 2017 VALUE ADD: SET 1 BLOCK 1: POLITY MODULE

Constitution of India: Drawn From Various Sources

IASbabas ILP 2017 VALUE ADD: SET 1 BLOCK 1: POLITY MODULE

RIGHTS IN THE INDIAN CONSTITUTION

various Fundamental Rights

FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS IN THE INDIAN CONSTITUTION

IASbabas ILP 2017 VALUE ADD: SET 1 BLOCK 1: POLITY MODULE

Ordinary Rights and Fundamental Rights:

Fundamental Rights at a glance:

IASbabas ILP 2017 VALUE ADD: SET 1 BLOCK 1: POLITY MODULE

IASbabas ILP 2017 VALUE ADD: SET 1 BLOCK 1: POLITY MODULE

IASbabas ILP 2017 VALUE ADD: SET 1 BLOCK 1: POLITY MODULE

Freedom of faith and worship

Feedom of religion also includes the freedom of conscience

IASbabas ILP 2017 VALUE ADD: SET 1 BLOCK 1: POLITY MODULE

Article 21 (Right to life and dignity)

CULTURAL AND EDUCATIONAL RIGHTS

RIGHT TO CONSTITUTIONAL REMEDIES

IASbabas ILP 2017 VALUE ADD: SET 1 BLOCK 1: POLITY MODULE

National Human Right Commission (NHRC):

IASbabas ILP 2017 VALUE ADD: SET 1 BLOCK 1: POLITY MODULE

DIRECTIVE PRINCIPLES OF STATE POLICY

IASbabas ILP 2017 VALUE ADD: SET 1 BLOCK 1: POLITY MODULE

ELECTION AND REPRESENTATION

Study the constitutional provisions regarding elections and representation

Elections (Most visible symbol of the democratic process)

Can elections take place in non-democratic countries?

IASbabas ILP 2017 VALUE ADD: SET 1 BLOCK 1: POLITY MODULE

Rules of the Election Game

IASbabas ILP 2017 VALUE ADD: SET 1 BLOCK 1: POLITY MODULE

Voters exercise their preference for a party and not a candidate

Every State has a specific quota of seats in the Rajya Sabha.

Legislature of Israel: Knesset Proportional Representation

IASbabas ILP 2017 VALUE ADD: SET 1 BLOCK 1: POLITY MODULE

Decides which constituency is to be reserved: Delimitation Commission

Appointed by the President of India