Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 17 views

    Clinton Perry v. Western Tidewater Regional Jail Jack Dewan, Superintendent, 37 F.3d 1495, 4th Cir. (1994)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a lawsuit filed by Clinton Perry against the Western Tidewater Regional Jail and its superintendent under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The district court denied relief to Perry. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal was without merit. The Fourth Circuit relied on the reasoning of the district court in its June 10, 1994 decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    Clinton Perry v. Western Tidewater Regional Jail Jack Dewan, Superintendent, 37 F.3d 1495, 4th Cir. (1994)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    17 views2 pages
    The document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a lawsuit filed by Clinton Perry against the Western Tidewater Regional Jail and its superintendent under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The district court denied relief to Perry. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal was without merit. The Fourth Circuit relied on the reasoning of the district court in its June 10, 1994 decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1994-10-13 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 37 F.3d 1495 Docket: 94-6700

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a lawsuit filed by Clinton Perry against the Western Tidewater Regional Jail and its superintendent under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The district court denied relief to Perry. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal was without merit. The Fourth Circuit relied on the reasoning of the district court in its June 10, 1994 decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    17 views2 pages

    Clinton Perry v. Western Tidewater Regional Jail Jack Dewan, Superintendent, 37 F.3d 1495, 4th Cir. (1994)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a lawsuit filed by Clinton Perry against the Western Tidewater Regional Jail and its superintendent under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The district court denied relief to Perry. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal was without merit. The Fourth Circuit relied on the reasoning of the district court in its June 10, 1994 decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    37 F.

    3d 1495
    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished
    dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law
    of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the
    Fourth Circuit.

    Clinton PERRY, Plaintiff Appellant,


    v.
    WESTERN TIDEWATER REGIONAL JAIL; Jack Dewan,
    Superintendent, Defendants Appellees.
    No. 94-6700.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted Aug. 25, 1994
    Decided Oct. 13, 1994.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
    Virginia, at Norfolk. Richard B. Kellam, Senior District Judge. (CA-93588-2)
    Clinton Perry, appellant pro se.
    Kevin Lawson Keller, Willcox & Savage, Norfolk, VA., for appellee.
    E.D.Va.
    AFFIRMED.
    Before RUSSELL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
    Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's
    opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on
    the reasoning of the district court. Perry v. Western Tidewater Regional Jail,
    No. CA-93-588-2 (E.D. Va. June 10, 1994). We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
    materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like