Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 130 views

    Linwood Earl Chandler v. Janet M. Rinaldi, 36 F.3d 1091, 4th Cir. (1994)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from 1994. It affirms the district court's denial of relief for plaintiff Linwood Earl Chandler's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against defendant Janet M. Rinaldi. The Fourth Circuit finds the appeal has no merit based on the reasoning provided by the district court in case Chandler v. Rinaldi, No. CA-94-340-AM. The Fourth Circuit dispenses with oral arguments as the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented in the materials available to the Court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    Linwood Earl Chandler v. Janet M. Rinaldi, 36 F.3d 1091, 4th Cir. (1994)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    130 views2 pages
    The document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from 1994. It affirms the district court's denial of relief for plaintiff Linwood Earl Chandler's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against defendant Janet M. Rinaldi. The Fourth Circuit finds the appeal has no merit based on the reasoning provided by the district court in case Chandler v. Rinaldi, No. CA-94-340-AM. The Fourth Circuit dispenses with oral arguments as the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented in the materials available to the Court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1994-10-05 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 36 F.3d 1091 Docket: 94-6536

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from 1994. It affirms the district court's denial of relief for plaintiff Linwood Earl Chandler's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against defendant Janet M. Rinaldi. The Fourth Circuit finds the appeal has no merit based on the reasoning provided by the district court in case Chandler v. Rinaldi, No. CA-94-340-AM. The Fourth Circuit dispenses with oral arguments as the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented in the materials available to the Court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    130 views2 pages

    Linwood Earl Chandler v. Janet M. Rinaldi, 36 F.3d 1091, 4th Cir. (1994)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from 1994. It affirms the district court's denial of relief for plaintiff Linwood Earl Chandler's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against defendant Janet M. Rinaldi. The Fourth Circuit finds the appeal has no merit based on the reasoning provided by the district court in case Chandler v. Rinaldi, No. CA-94-340-AM. The Fourth Circuit dispenses with oral arguments as the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented in the materials available to the Court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    36 F.

    3d 1091

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Linwood Earl CHANDLER, Plaintiff Appellant,
    v.
    Janet M. RINALDI, Defendant Appellee.
    No. 94-6536.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted Aug. 25, 1994.
    Decided Oct. 5, 1994.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
    Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Chief District Judge. (CA-94340-AM).
    Linwood Earl Chandler, appellant Pro Se.
    E.D.Va.
    AFFIRMED.
    Before RUSSELL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
    Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's
    opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on
    the reasoning of the district court. Chandler v. Rinaldi, No. CA-94-340-AM
    (E.D. Va. Mar. 17, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court

    and argument would not aid the decisional process.


    2

    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like