49

A Study on Scholarly Activities in the Last

Period of the Vikramala Monastery:
Quotations in Ratnarakitas Padmin

Kenichi KURANISHI

Introductory Remarks
In the history of Buddhism, there were several institutions, i.e., monasteries, such as the Nland and the Vikramala. However, it is said that Indian
Buddhism had been slowly declining around the 10th century onwards.1 In
the beginning of the 12th century, the movement of unifying Buddhist theories2 had been attempted by Abhaykaragupta,3 one of the most eminent
monks in the history of the Vikramala monastery, and by his contemporaries, who all had to face an impending crisis of the fall of Buddhism. At
that time, even though being in their declination, there were still quite a
huge number of Buddhist monks living and studying at the Vikramala and
other monasteries. It also appears that the monks of these monasteries had
already been in cooperation with one another, as in the case of modern institutions and universities.4
This paper is a revised and abridged version of KURANISHI 2013 and KURANISHI 2015
published in Japanese.
1
One of the reasons for the decline of Indian Buddhism was the rise of Islam in northern India.
2
The purpose of this movement is to compete against the other religions like Hinduism and Islam.
3
This kind of attempt can be found in most of his works, e.g., Vajrval, Nipannayogval and so forth.
4
For instance, DUTT 1961: 352353 reports, An interesting feature of these establishments under the Plas is the existence of a system of co-ordination among them.
Evidently, all of them were under State supervision. It is said by Lama Trantha
that the head of Vikramala had control over Nlanda. It seems from the evidence
*

50

The Padmin by Ratnarakita (ca. 11501250), one of the popular monks

in the last period of Indian Buddhism, is the largest commentary on the
Savarodayatantra, which is classified in the Yogintantra. The aim of this
short paper is to present and analyze some quotations in the Padmin, which
will help us get a glimpse of scholarly activities in the last period of Indian
Buddhism.5
1. Ratnarakita and his Padmin
1.1 On Ratnarakita
Ratnarakita was one of the most popular scholar monks at the Vikramala
monastery in the last period of Indian Buddhism. According to Trantha,6
he was most likely ordained in the Mahsghika school. Sometimes he is
compared with his contemporary colleague, kyarbhadra. Although
both of them are equally knowledgeable, kyarbhadra had stronger
knowledge of the Prama, while Ratnarakita had a mastery of the Mantranaya (i.e. Vajrayna). They evacuated to Nepal before their monastery
was invaded by the Muslim army in 1203. Trantha also relates that Ratnarakita prophesied this tragic incident two years in advance. After having
moved to Nepal, he energetically taught many Nepalese and Tibetan disciples. Although his biography is still far from clear, his floruit could be
placed in ca. 11501250, since Ratnarakita had already been one of the
popular monks in the Vikramala around 1200, i.e., the time of the end of
this monastery, and also he taught Chag lo ts ba (Dharmasvmin) in 1226
in Kathmandu, Nepal.7 After moving to Nepal, Ratnarakita seems to have
been based there. Although it is said that he visited Tibet to teach, it is likely that he came back to Nepal and died there, since there is no record of his
death in Tibet.
We can easily notice that Ratnarakita was much influenced by Abhaykaragupta, who was active at the Vikramala monastery around 1100.8 In
that the dierent seats of Buddhist learning that functioned in eastern India under the
Plas were regarded together as forming a network, an interlinked group of institutions.
5
The situation in the last period of Indian Buddhism can be found not only in the Tibetan historical account, e.g. , the Chos byung (SCHIEFNER 1963: 191(12)-195(10))
written by Tranatha, but also in the Muslim chronicle, the Tabaqati Nasiri (RAVERTY
1970: 551552) written by Minhaj al Siraj Juzjani (1193-?).
6
SCHIEFNER 1963: 192(48).
7
Cf. ROERICH 1959: iv-v; 6; 54, NAKAYAMA 1994: 239240.
8
See, e.g., BHNEMANN 1992 on the floruit of Abhaykaragupta.

A Study on Scholarly Activities in the Last Period of the Vikramala Monastery

51

fact, many passages from Abhaykaraguptas works9 are incorporated into

the Padmins sections on abhieka, pratih and homa.
Moreover, Ratnarakita engaged in translating Abhaykaraguptas and
his own works on the Mantranaya into Tibetan.10 Taking this into consideration, it appears that Ratnarakita was well known as the best informant for
Abhaykaraguptas teachings at that time.
1.2 On the Padmin
The Padmin is the most important commentary of the Savarodayatantra,
since it is the only one that is available in Sanskrit, the original language of
the text. This text seems to give sucient evidence to illustrate part of
scholarly activities in the time of Ratnarakita, not only because he comments on the mlatantra word by word, but also because he devotes much
space to the arguments of several important Buddhist topics such as the
acquisition of Buddha state, the ecacy of meditation and so forth. In these
discussions, he displays a wide range of knowledge, using a good deal of
quotations from the Mantranaya and the Pramitnaya sources for his arguments. According to Trantha, Ratnarakita seems to have composed the
Padmin while staying in Tibet, probably in order to teach not only the
doctrine of the Savarodayatantra but also the basics of Buddhism in general to Tibetan monks.
Little attention has so far been given to the Padmin in spite of its significance. In recent years, however, some articles dealing mainly with the Padmin have been published. Among them, TANEMURA/KANO/KURANISHI 2014
introduces a number of research materials available for editing the Padmin.
2. Quotations in the Padmin
Although Ratnarakita was a scholar monk, well known as an expert in the
Mantranaya, his largest and most important work, the Padmin, quotes extensively from both the Mantranaya and the Pramitnaya sources.11 Thus,
The sections on abhieka and pratih of the Padmin follow the Vajrval. The section on homa follows the Jyotirmajar.
10
See SHIZUKA 2012 on the list of Ratnarakitas works.
11
Regarding several key topics, Ratnarakita mentions the dierences and similarities
between the Mantranaya and the Pramitnaya. For instance, he tries to clarify that
the Pramitnaya also has the conception of great bliss (mahsukha), one of the important doctrines of Mantranaya, by means of the several quotations from the Mantranaya and the Pramitnaya in the thirteenth chapter: mahsukhamayatvam api
9

52

from his discussions of topics such as the Buddha state (Buddhatva) in

chapter one and the ecacy of the meditative practice of the sequence of
generation (Utpattikramabhvan) in chapter thirteen, we can acquire valuable information about the trends of scholarly activities in his times.
Due to space limitations, the present paper will deal only with some important quotations that suggest interesting and significant contexts related
to the other sources used by Ratnarakita.
Explanatory notes:
The following four manuscripts12 are currently available:
T=Takaoka CA17, complete, paper, 49 fols., Nepal savat 732
B=Baroda No. 78, complete, paper, 92 fols., Vikrama (?) savat 1983
N=NAK 5/203=NGMPP B113/8, complete, paper, 230 pages, Nepal
savat 1044
R Ra=Tucci Collection 3. 7. 16, ch113, incomplete, paper, 35 fols.
Rb=Tucci Collection 3. 7. 26, ch1833, incomplete, paper, 41 fols.
Since B, N, and R are basically apographs of T, I mainly consult T in
this paper.
Editorial apparatus are shown after each text, if necessary.
e.g., caturati-]N; caturti-TBRa.
Sandhis are basically standardized.
The names of each text and its author are underlined.
2.1 Pramitnaya
(1) Anantamukhanirhradhra
na cint cintayec cintym acinty naiva cintayet |
cintycinty na cintayet tata prpsyati dhrim || (Padmin Ch.13;
T23r910)
cintayec]em.; cintaye TBNRa. cintycintyn na cintayet]em. Mtyuvacanopadea (4.77: SCHNEIDER 2010: 188); cintaye na vicintaye TBNRa. dhrim]var. Mtyuvacanopadea (ibid.) nyatm
(Trs.) One should not consider any thought to be conceivable, [and]
one should never consider [it] to be unperceivable. One should not
consider [it] to be [at once] perceivable and unperceivable. He will
then reach the essence (dhrim13).
(23v1) pramitnaye pratipditam. According to its context, Ratnarakita, in short,
contends that the conception of great bliss is the important stage of the bhvan
taught in both the Mantranaya and the Pramitnaya.
12
See TANEMURA/KANO/KURANISHI 2014 on the manuscripts of the Padmin and the other research materials.

A Study on Scholarly Activities in the Last Period of the Vikramala Monastery

53

(2) Avikalpapraveadhra14
prantam acala reha vaavarti samsamam |
avikalpasukha tasmd bodhisattvo dhigacchati || (Padmin Ch.13;
T23v1)
(Trs.) Therefore, a Bodhisattva obtains a non-conceptualized bliss,
which is calm, immovable, most splendid, powerful, equal and unequal.
Although both (1) and (2) are entitled as Dhras, they could be classified as the Pramitnaya texts, considering their contents. In fact,
they are often quoted as Mahynic texts in several literatures.15 The
Anantamukhanirhradhra has nine Chinese translations, and the
oldest one was translated by Zh Qin () about the 3rd century. The
Avikalpapraveadhra was translated into Chinese by Dnapla (
)16 and has a commentary written by Kamalala.17
(3) Catuataka by ryadeva (Ch.12 v. 18)18
bjabhtn anarthasya dtv trthakarn bahn |
na bhavet kasya kruya karmakmeu jantuu ||19 (Padmin Ch.4;
T10v3)
The Mtyuvacanopadea 4. 77(SCHNEIDER 2010: 188) has nyatm instead of
dhrim, probably due to fitting itself to the context.
14
MATSUDA 1996: 99. This is also called the Nirvikalpapraveadhra. For instance,
Sthiramatis Triikvijaptibhya (ad v. 23) mentions this title.
15
The iksamuccaya quotes a dierent verse of this text, while The Mtyuvacanopadea written by Vgvarakrti (4. 77) quotes the very verse. This verse, with
some variants, seems to have been quite popular not only in the Pramitnaya but
also in the Mantranaya.
16
Taisho654:(F-shu-r-w-fn-bi-f-mn-jng)
17
Toh4000(123a3145b5), Ota5510(146b6174b1): ryvikalpapraveadhrak.
18
This verse is also quoted in the Madhyamaklakravtti written by ntarakita.
(ICHIGO 1985: 330)
19
The Sanskrit manuscript of the Padmin has na bhavet kasyacit kruya karmakmeu jantuu, which is hypermetrical. If we trust that this reading fits to Ratnarakitas intention, it might mean that no Bodhisattva shows compassion for nonBuddhists. If we emend kasyacit to kasya as this paper shows, Ratnarakita might
have intended that a Bodhisattva is compassionate for everybody, even for nonBuddhists. In addition, the Catuataka (Tib.) and all the texts quoting this verse
except for the Sanskrit manuscripts of the Padmin, to my best knowledge, have
dharmakmeu (chos dod pa) instead of karmakmeu. The variant, dharmakmeu,
which means those who are longing for dharma, namely Buddhists, is contrast to
non-Buddhists (trthakarn in the pda B). We are not sure which variant is the
Catuatakas original reading. These variants could be caused by a transcriptional
error because of the similarity of the scripts dha and ka, or by a deliberate change
because of dierent implications.
13

54

kasya]em.; kasyacit TBNRa. karmakmeu]var. dharmakmeu

Tib., Sadmnynusri (Ms: 8r88v1), Catuataka (Tib.),
Madhyamaklakravtti (Tib.).
(Trs.) Having seen many non-Buddhists who are unfortunate seeds,
who would not be compassionate for those who are longing for karma?
The Catuataka is one of the most important Madhyamaka texts written by the well-known ryadeva. No original Sanskrit text of this
verse is extant, although there are its tentative restorations from the
Tibetan translation.20

(4) Pramavrttika by Dharmakrti (Ch.3 v. 285)21

tasmd bhtam abhta v yad yad evtibhvyate |
bhvanbalanipattau tat sphukalpadhphalam || (Padmin Ch.13;
T22r3)
tibhvyate]var. Pramavrttika bhibhvyate
balanipattau]var. Pramavrttika parinipattau.
(Trs.) Therefore, [being] real or unreal, whatever is intensively meditated upon results in a clear and non-conceptual cognition when the
power of cultivation is accomplished.
This is a well-known verse on the theory of Yogic perception.22 The
quotation has two variants: the current edition of the Pramavrttika23
has abhibhvyate and bhvanparinipattau instead of atibhvyate and
bhvanbalanipattau respectively. It is plausible that these variants were
merely caused by transcriptional errors. In any case, however, these variants seem to have been preferred in several texts.24 It is more than interesting that the texts which employ the above-mentioned variants are almost always categorized in the Mantranaya in this period. Therefore, it
seems reasonable to suppose that these variants had been intentionally
adopted in Ratnarakita's times, due to fitting itself to the Mantranaya
doctrine, which puts emphasis on the practice of meditation.

Cf. BHATTACHARYA 1931: 157, VAIDYA 1923: 100.

Cf. MIYASAKA 1972: 80. This verse is also identical with the Pramavinicaya (1. 31,
STEINKELLNER 2007: 28).
22
This verse is referred to in both Buddhist and aiva texts. Cf. ISAACSON and SFERRA
2014: 267 n. 70.
23
With regard to these variants, see ISAACSON and SFERRA 2014: 267 n. 70 as well.
24
Cf. rdharas Sahajlokapajik (Tucci sscr 7: 7r1: see KURANISHI forthcoming),
Mahsukhavajras Padmvat (NGMPP B31/7: 16v45), Rmaplas Sekanirdeapajik (ISAACSON and SFERRA 2014: 169).
20
21

A Study on Scholarly Activities in the Last Period of the Vikramala Monastery

55

2.2 Mantranaya
(1) tmasdhanvatra by Jnapda
samantabhadram tmna bhvayann eva bodhibhk |25 (Padmin
Ch.1: T3r78)
(Trs.) If one only meditates himself as the Samantabhadra, [he can]
attain enlightenment.
Although the available Tibetan translation of the tmasdhanvatra
is written in prose, what this quotation makes clear at once is that the
original text should have been composed in verse.26
(2) Pratibhsavajrodaya by Anonymous
sukhadnaphala puya tannirodhd vthaiva tat |
puyena labhyate saukhya saukhyt puyam avpyate |
bodhicittaprastatvt tat puya gaganopamam | (Padmin Ch.13:
T23v4)
tat (pda B) ]em.; tata TBNRa.
(Trs.) A merit has the result of giving bliss. It (the bliss) [becomes]
fruitless by shutting it (the merit) o. The bliss is obtained by the
merit. The merit is obtained through the bliss. The merit is equal to the
sky because it is produced from the Bodhicitta.
Neither Tibetan nor Chinese canons contain this text. Although the
Sarvavajrodaya of nandagarbha has a similar name, it is completely
dierent from the text in question. Regarding the title of Pratibhsavajrodaya (So sor snang bai rdo rje byung ba or So sor snang bai rdo rje
char ba), it is possibly related to the Sarvatathgatatattvasagraha, just
like the Sarvavajrodaya, since both names have vajrodaya, which is the
important concept of the Sarvatathgatatattvasagraha. To the best of my
knowledge, the other texts which quote this mysterious Pratibhsavajrodaya with the text title are Abhaykaraguptas mnyamajar (once, 6
pdas) and Jinadattas *Guhyasamjatantrapajik (nine times, 57 pdas).
The quotations in the Padmin and the mnyamajar are not entirely
the same, but both are quoted in the *Guhyasamjatantrapajik. One
possibility is to assume that both Abhaykaragupta and Ratnarakita just
borrowed and reused the Pratibhsavajrodayas verses quoted in the
*Guhyasamjatantrapajik, since Jinadatta was most likely active about
25
26

Ratnarakita quotes the pda CD only.

This verse is also quoted in the *Guhyasamjatantrapajik (Toh1847: 147r56)
written by Jinadatta. Its Tibetan translation shows that the original is composed in
verse.

56

the 11th century and his *Guhyasamjatantrapajik seems to have been

famous for quoting a variety of texts.27
(3) Bodhicittavivaraa by Ngrjuna (ryapda)
anutpdeti nyeti nirtmeti ca dharmatm |
yo bhvayati mandtm na t bhvayati hy asau || (Padmin Ch.13;
T22r1)
t]em.; tn TBNRa.
(Trs.) He whose nature is dull and who meditates on the dharmat as
non-production, empty and selfless never [truly] meditates on it (dharmat).
Ratnarakita quotes this verse with the name of ryapda, who is most
likely equal to rya-Ngrjuna, the founder of rya school of the
Guhyasamjatantra. Then, Ratnarakita would have considered the
Bodhicittavivaraa a tantric text. This verse is quoted in several texts,28
but all the texts available to us have nyatm instead of dharmatm in
pda B. Ratnarakita might have changed the expression intentionally,
considering the context of the Padmin.29
(4) Vajraekharamahyogatantra
(1.2.23623730)
catvra pudgal loke vidhne pi na siddhyati31 |
ki cpy abhiyujyante kalpakoiatair api || Hypometrical32
anutpditacitta ca arddho naiva siddhyati |
vicikitsdhraaka caiva33 japta na kariyati || Hypermetrical34
For more details, see KURANISHI 2011a and KURANISHI 2011b.
Abhaykaraguptas Munimatlakra (Toh3903: 160r6161r4) quotes this verse and
some verses through the context. The Amtakanikodyotanibandha (LAL 1994: 150,
177) written by Vibhticandra, who is a contemporary of Ratnarakita, also quotes
this verse. Cf. ISAACSON 1999: 58 n. 15.
29
The topic of this section is as follows: dharmatmtra ckracakram apsya
taastha na sambhavati yat kevala bhvanya syt | kevala tadbhvan tattvrthabhvan naiva | (T21v11)
30
KITAMURA et al. 2012: 71. (Japanese translation from the Tibetan translation)
31
The word siddhyati, which is ungrammatical, should be kept here (metri causa).
32
The possible emendation could be ki cpi abhiyujyante. However, it might be unfavorable to divide between the two pdas.
33
The classical sandhi is not applied here. Since CD pdas are hypermetrical and there
are several possible emendations, the reading of the manuscript is kept. See also n.
34.
34
Although there are several possible emendations to make it metrical, we cannot rule
out that this hypermetrical reading is the original. One of possible emendations could
27
28

A Study on Scholarly Activities in the Last Period of the Vikramala Monastery

57

(Padmin Ch.13; T23v56)

(Trs.) [These] four kinds of people35 in the world will not get accomplishment even if they perform rituals. Moreover, they would never
make them ready [to get accomplishment] even if they perform for a
billion kalpas.
One who does not produce a [Bodhi]citta and one who is impious will
never get accomplishment, and one who remains skeptical will not do
[Buddha's] order.
(2.1.29629736)
aham eva svaya vajr vajrasattvo smy aha svayam |
aha vajro mahrj aha vajr mahbala |
aha yogvaro rj vajrapir aha dham | (Padmin Ch.17; T26v3)
(Trs.) I myself am the Vajra-holder. I myself am the Vajrasattva. I am
the great king Vajra. I am the mighty Vajra-holder. I am the king, the
lord of yogins. I am completely the Vajrapi.
The latter is quoted in the Padmin Ch.17, which illustrates how to draw
maalas. This quotation could also have been reused by Ratnarakita,
since this chapter is virtually reproduced from the corresponding part of
the Vajrval. Moreover, several sentences of the other chapters of Padmin, especially related to abhieka, pratih, and homa, are found in the
Vajrval too. Such a style of writing reminds us that Ratnarakita translated Abhaykaraguptas work, such as the Vajrval, into Tibetan.
3. Closing Remarks
Needless to say, a work itself is to be seen as part of the authors scholarly
activities and as a reflection of his in-depth knowledge. Above all, quoting
from authorities like Stras (/Tantras) and works of previous scholars could
have been one of the most eective ways for showing his education and for
endorsing the logic of his arguments. Ratnarakita shows his scholarship
be as follows: vicikitsdhraaka caivjapta na kariyati (kariyati should sound
like having three syllables).
35
KITAMURA et al. 2012: 71 suggests that the four kinds of people are mentioned in the
second verse: (1) one does not produce a Bodhicitta, (2) an impious one, (3) a skeptical one, (4) one does not do Buddhas order. KITAMURA et al. translates the verses
from the Tibetan. However, it is dicult to read like that in Sanskrit. Although it is
dicult to say what is the four kinds of people, it is plausible that the four can be
pthagjanas, rvakas, pratyekabuddhas, bodhisattvas newly entered to the [Mah-]
yna (navaynasaprasthita), mentioned in the Ratnagotravibhga (Ch. 1 v. 153,
JOHNSTON 1950: 74).
36
KITAMURA et al. 2012: 193.

58

thoroughly in his Padmin, even though this work is merely the commentary of a single Tantra. The quotations in the Padmin dealt with in the
present paper could possibly intimate part of scholarly activities of both
Ratnarakita and his contemporaries.
Acknowledgements
I am grateful to Prof. Taiken KYUMA, Prof. Ryugen TANEMURA, Prof. Kazuo
KANO, and Ms. Junglan BANG, who gave me a lot of suggestions on this
article. This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Numbers
22320014, 25370059, 26284008.
Bibliography
BHATTACHARYA, Vidhushekhara.
1931 The Catuataka of ryadeva, Sanskrit and Tibetan Texts with copious extracts from the commentary of Candrakrti, Calcutta.
BHNEMANN, Gudrun
1992 Some Remarks on the Date of Abhaykaragupta and the Chronology of His Works, Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenlndischen Gesellschaft, Band 142-Heft 1, 120127.
DUTT, Sukumar
1961 Buddhist Monks and Monasteries of India: Their History and their
Contribution to Indian Culture, London.
ICHIGO, Masamichi
1985 Madhyamaklakra of ntarakita with his own commentary or
vtti and with the subcommentary or pajik of Kamalala, Buneido.
ISAACSON, Harunaga
1999 Citations from the Ratnval and Bodhicittavivaraa in the Abhayapaddhati, Studien zur Indologie und Iranistik, Band 22, 122134.
ISAACSON, Harunaga & SFERRA, Francesco
2014 The Sekanirdea of Maitreyantha (Advayavajra) with the Sekanirdeapajik of Rmapla, Critical Edition of the Sanskrit and Tibetan
Texts with English Translation and Reproductions of the MSS, Manuscripta Buddhica 2, Asien-Afrika-Institut Univeritt Hamburg & Universit
Degli studi di Napoli LOrientale, Napoli.
JOHNSTON, Edward
1950 Ratnagotravibhga Mahynottaratantrastra, Patna.
KITAMURA, Taido. et al. ()
2012Zenyaku Kongch-daihimitsu-yuga-tantra (
; The Japanese translation of the Vajraekharatantra)

A Study on Scholarly Activities in the Last Period of the Vikramala Monastery

59

.
KURANISHI, Kenichi ()
2011aJijitsu to KyokIndo-Kouki-Mikky no Aru Seijinden wo megutte(;Truth and
FictionThe Hagiography of rdhara)Seichi

to Seijin no Tzai
Kigen wa ikani katarareruka
)183202.
2011b Notes on the Classification of Buddhist TantrasThe View of Jinadatta and rdhara,39111.
2013Indo-Bukky-Shenki ni okeru Daijybuttenjyuy no ichirei
Kenmitsu rysh no Gakus Ratnarakita no chosaku wo chsintosite
(
;Mahyna Texts accepted by Vajrayna in its
phase)
35(209) - (224).
2015Indo-Mikky-Gakus no Gakujyutsukatsud ni kansuru ichi-ksatsuRatnarakita cho Padmin shoin no Bunken no keik to bunseki ni
motoduite(
; A Study on Scholarly Activities in Vajrayna LiteratureRegarding Quotations in Ratnarakita's Padmin)
471528.
Forthcoming Fragment of the SahajlokapajikA Critical Edition of
the IASWR Manuscript, Tantric Studies vol. 2, Universitt Hamburg.
LAL, Banarsi
1994 ryamajurnmasagti with Amtakaikippa by Bhiku
Ravirjna and Amtakaikodyotanibandha of Vibhticandra, Bibliotheca Indo-Tibetica 30, Sarnath.
MATSUDA, Kazunobu ()
1996Nirvikalpapraveadhra Sanskrit Text and Japanese Translation
3, 89113.
MIYASAKA, Yusho ()
19711972 Pramavrttika-krik (Sanskrit and Tibetan), Acta Indologica vol. 2, Naritasan.
MORI, Masahide ()
2009 Vajrval of Abhaykaragupta Edition of Sanskrit and Tibetan Versions, 2 vols, Tring UK.
NAKAYAMA, Shorei ()
1994Indo-Bukky Shen no koro (;Around the
Last years of Indian BuddhismA Japanese Translation, Chapter I & II
of the Biography of Chag lo tsa ba chos rje dpal (1) )

17.

60

RAVERTY, Henry G.
1970 (rep.) abaqt-i-Nir A General History of the Muhammadan Dynasties of Asia, including Hindustan; from A. H. 194 (810 A. D.) to A. H.
658 (1260 A. D.) and the irruption of the Infidel Mughal into Islam, 2
vols., Munishiram Manoharlal.
RINPOCHE, Samdhong and DWIVEDI, Vrajvallabh
1993 Abhisamayamajar of ubhkaragupta, CIHTS, Sarnath.
ROERICH, George
1959 Biography of Dharmasvmin (Chag lo tsa-ba Chos-rjes dpal) A
Tibetan Monk Pilgrim, K. P. Jayaswal Research Institute, Patna.
SAKURAI, Munenobu ()
1998:Cakrasavarbhisamaya no Gentenkenkybonbunktei text
(Cakrasavarbhisamaya; A Critical
Study on Lypda's Cakrasavarbhisamaya)
47
(1) - (32).
SCHIEFNER, Anton
1963 (rep.) Tranthae de Doctrinae Buddhicae in India Propagatione,
Suzuki Research Foundation.
SCHNEIDER, Johannes
2010 Vgvarakrtis Mtyuvacanopadea, eine buddhstische Lehrschrift
zur Abwehr des Todes, Verlag der sterreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.
SHIZUKA, Haruki ()
2012Ratnarakita no Gaacakra giki wayaku kenky (
;A Study on Ratnarakita and A Japanese Translation of his Gaacakravidhicintmai)

25150 (21) -116 (55).
STEINKELLNER, Ernst
2007 Dharmakrtis Pramavinicaya Chapter 1 and 2, China Tibetology
Publishing house (Austrian Academy of Sciences Press), Beijing-Vienna.
TANEMURA, Ryugen ()
2010Savarodayatantra dai 21 sh Carynirdeapaala ni kansuru
ichiksatsuPadmin dai 21 sh ktei tekisuto narabini ch (Savarodayatantra21CarynirdeapaalaPadmin
21 ;Some Remarks on the Carynirdeapaala of
the Savarodayatantrawith a Critical Edition of and notes on the
Padmin, Chapter 21)
41.
2014Ratnarakita cho Padmin dai 22 shPratih sekushon no Sanskrit go ktei tekisuto (Ratnarakita Padmin 22Pratih
)
2597
126.

A Study on Scholarly Activities in the Last Period of the Vikramala Monastery

61

TANEMURA, Ryugen & KANO, Kazuo & KURANISHI, Kenichi (

)
2014Ratnarakita cho PadmnKenky shiry Gaikan (RatnarakitaPadmin; Toward a critical edition of Ratnarakitas PadminA Survey of the textual materials)

36(163) - (176).
TSUDA, Shinichi ()
1974 The Savarodaya-tantra Selected Chapters, Hokuseido Press.
VAIDYA, Parasurama L.
1923 tudes sur ryadeva et son Catuataka, chapitres VIII-XVI, Librairie Orientaliste Paul Geuthner, Paris.

ISSN 0564-0202

Relationship between Tantric and Non-Tantric Doctrines

in Late Indian Buddhism
Editor-in-Chief: Norihisa Baba
Foreword ................................................................................................ Norihisa Baba1
Preface ................................................................................................... Taiken Kyuma3
%I<MHDOM<JIOC@/>QK>DLQO>SF?ED> ................................................... Kazuo Kano7
.OP?TJI.>CJG<MGT>ODQDOD@NDIOC@'<NO+@MDJ?JAOC@1DFM<H<G<(JI<NO@MT
,PJO<ODJINDI-<OI<M<FDO<N->AJFK ........................................... Kenichi Kuranishi49
K<F<M<MEI<N>ODQDOD@N<OOC@1DFM<H<G<(JI<NO@MT
DI-@G<ODJIRDOCOC@+G<TI<NOT ..................................................... &<D@(ochizuki63
C<QT<FMODN.P=>JHH@IO<MTJIOC@-O>AMLAAVLQ>K><N<JSJBM<KCT
.JH@+M@GDHDI<MT-@H<MFN<I?<.TIJKNDN ...................................... Toru Tomabechi81
*IOC@$?@IODOT<I?POC@IOD>DOTJAOC@0>OS>AE>OJ>@>OVLM>AB?EFP>J>V>Q>KQO>
/<IOMD>.>MDKOPM@NNJ>D<O@?RDOCOC@1DFM<H<G</M<?DODJI ..... JMED2angchuk95
.JH@-@H<MFNJIOC@JI>@KOJAOC@4JBDIDIOC@?E>V>M>AAE>QF
JA=C<TF<M<BPKO< ................................................................................... (@D4ang107

96

ORIENTAL CULTURE
No. 96

March

2016

Published by

Institute for Advanced Studies on Asia

The University of Tokyo
S

2016 3 31

7 3 1

1130033

1130033

3 3 11

033818 6450 FAX
033818 0554
URL http://www.nar unia.co.jp/

List of Authors
Editor-in-Chief :Norihisa

Baba

Norihisa Baba

Institute for Advanced Studies on Asia,

University of Tokyo

Taiken Kyuma

Mie University

Kazuo Kano

Koyasan University

Kenichi Kuranishi

Institute for Comprehensive Studies of Buddhism,

Taisho University

Kaie Mochizuki

Minobusan University

Toru Tomabechi

International Institute for Digital Humanities

Dorji Wangchuk

Universitt Hamburg

Mei Yang

Universitt Hamburg