266845.

qxp:00

2/28/08

1:21 PM

Page 24

By Victor Aparicio, Carlos Balanza,

and Eduardo Zambrana

olivias Carrasco gas plant of Empresa

Petrolera CHACO has seen growth
over the years. However, the need to
update its distributed control system (DCS)
was looming.
The company decided an update was
imminent, and that move would be a
great way to improve system and process
efficiency, eliminate obsolescence, and
reduce operation and maintenance costs.
The best solution to meet these goals was
to have all facilities under a new DCS
system, optimizing control links.
The Carrasco plants control system
includes a DCS installed 11 years ago. All
the plants control signals and monitoring
are collected in five cabinets and then
sent to a central processor. The system
has gateways for SCADA communications

266845.qxp:00

2/28/08

1:21 PM

Page 25

PROCESS AUTOMATION

THIS
FOR FAST FORWARD
FASTIS
FORWARD
G
G
G
G
G
G
G

This
boxgrowth
can become
or wider
as
Facility
leads taller
to imminent
upgrade
needed
for the
layout balance.
at Bolivian
petroleum
plant.
The
ruledisbox
should
align to column
Strategy
to link
all facilities
under one
guides
DCS system.
The
head divided
is the same
the arc.
Upgrade
into color
threeas
phases
for
costhead
efficiency.
The
and arc color should work off
of the color of the artwork.

Gas plant converts DCS in phases

for better efficiency
with the Amine Plants PLC and the RTU
of the wells in the Bulo Bulo field (five
total). The instruments connect to the
field modules through 4-20 mA point-topoint connections.

Existing problems
The old system had old technology,
which required high maintenance costs.
It was difficult to obtain spare parts. The
hardware and software were saturated,
and we could add no more instruments
and I/O modules to the system. It was
impossible to work with modern instrumentation, such as, Hart, Foundation
Fieldbus, Profibus, and Ethernet.
The system was centralized. The whole
control system was under a control
processor, so when it broke down, the
whole plant shut down, with the consequent losses in production and time. The
systems software was old, and we could
not upgrade without totally changing to
a superior version and without losing
licenses. It was impossible to obtain
reports and historical data on Excel
spread sheets.
While we wanted to improve the system
and process efficiency, eliminate obsolescence, and reduce operation and
maintenance costs, it was not possible to

replace and update the whole control

system for production and budgeting
reasons. So we decided to partially substitute the present structure and gradually
substitute all the components of the system
as budget, time, and production allowed.
In order to do this, we divided the project
into three phases:
Phase 1: The DCS system migration
began in the year 2005 with the installation
of a new DCS system, which was connected
from separators, measurement, gas reinjection system, LPG cargo station, and
the SCADA system. The new system would
be interconnected with the old system
through OLE for process control (OPC).
Phase 2: The new DCS system was to
consolidate through connecting the system
to electric energy generation, glycol
dehydration, the separators control, and
total replacement of the old DCS system
in the cryogenic process of the plant.
Phase 3: The implementation process
of a new DCS system will end up with the
optimization of all the control links of
the plant.

Modernizing the DCS

The hope was adding all new facilities to
the control system would achieve
automation of 100% of the plant. The

addition would also allow us to reduce

operational and maintenance costs,
improve the quality of the final product
(natural gas processing), and extend the
benefits of the modernization through
the use of more recent versions of software and hardware. Where possible, we
could also adopt industry standards to
ensure greater system availability and
operation, as well as increasing its life
cycle. We also wanted the system to be
open for new additions of software with
the external world (object linking
embedding [OLE], OPC, and open database connectivity [ODBC]).
Because we were making a partial
conversion of the obsolete DCS system,
we needed to segment the plant into its
various areas of automation so we could
move selected areas and functions to the
new DCS system. We have identified
these areas of automation as automated
(cryogenic, dehydration and fractioning,
Bulo Bulo field, Amine plant, separation,
and compression) and not automated
(generators, Kanata field [8 wells], LGP
loading, analytical instrumentation, reinjection, and glycol dehydration). All
areas have necessary instrumentation
and are operating with local control
loops and monitoring.

266845.qxp:00

2/28/08

1:21 PM

Page 26

PROCESS AUTOMATION

Proposed solution
Update the old DCS to a new technology.
Increase speed, field modules, software
capacity, and security.
Make it possible to manage modern
instrumentation.
Dont lose connection with old
instruments.
Update obsolete equipment.
Open systems.
The new DCS system is distributed in
different areas, in DCS cabinets connected
to the control room by means of Ethernet
optic fiber. We added two PCs to the control
room for graphic information because it
has corresponding software for configuring
the applications of the new DCS system.
The old system is in charge of three DCS
cabinets in which we have added what we

call the old plant, or the cryogenic

part for which the old DCS system
was originally designed. We took
special care to follow the appropriate norms and standards of the
industry for this case, such as IEC
and ISA standards.

OPC
Systems proplus
host

Work station
oper-01
Room 1

LPG
Plant 01

HMI training, communication

Communications between the
two systems occur through OPC.
The new system has the capacity
to monitor the old system and
present graph screens of the
whole plant on its human
machine interface (HMI). We
used design standards from the
old DCS system when designing
the new one because operators

Bulo Bulo
field
Kanata
field

Amine
plant

Controller CP40B

MCP 300
MCP 100 MCP 200

Diagram of the partial replacement of the old DCS

system; the dotted lines show the new DCS system,
with three process controllers, which allow us to
control the different areas added to the system.

Integrating SCADA reduces engineering, maintenance costs

By Xu Jie

hejiang Natural Gas Co. is engaged in substantial pipeline

construction of its West Gas Eastwards Pipeline, which will
include the installation of a new system featuring an industrial server. The new system will enable Zhejiang Natural Gas Co.
to meet users needs by helping them visualize its plant processes,
analyze the resulting information, and use that information to
optimize the plant as a whole.

Goal: Centralize monitoring, control

The main goal in the new construction is to centralize the monitoring of station equipment, processes, and pipelines. A new SCADA
system offers plant staff increased system access. With the ability
to visualize production processes, they can make real-time adjustments and analyze the resulting data, using an industrial real-time
plant historian. The staff also benefits from independent PLC
access. Easy maintenance and centralized control simplifies system
growth and optimizes ongoing pipeline construction. In addition,
the platform architecture is expected to generate great engineering and maintenance cost savings.
An integrated solution
System integrator HollySys helped implement the new control
system, which includes an industrial application server, visualization
software, a server historian, and reporting and analysis clients. The
software monitors and controls the operation of the entire
pipeline system and monitors the plants equipment processes
(including pressure, temperature, flow transmitters, motor-driven
valves, modulating valves and special equipment) via the Modbus
protocol. The system also performs gas-flow and supply calculations. Personnel can thus decipher the plants complex operations
contracts and how they affect downstream and upstream costs.
Furthermore, they can evaluate gas quality based on process and
capacity calculations and create statistical models based on the
server historians database structure.

Simple, secure application replication

The application server, built on an industrial automation and
information software architecture, centralizes the companys
pipeline system using simple drag-and drop methods to create
application objects that model equipment, such as pumps or valves,
connectivity devices, or an entire plant. Operators can replicate
objects multiple times and include operational attributes such as
performance history, I/O characteristics, and other requirements
when replicated. The application server security model provides
security at the data-element level, which is valuable for protecting
the system.
The industrial application server enables efficient system
deployment across the companys control system, which
stretches across a wide area, but uses identical equipment per
each control station. A portal software facilitates secure access
to statistical reports, alarm information, and data stored within the server historian.
So far, plant personnel appreciate the application servers
plant model, which helps them organize each station in a
consistent manner using application templates. Because the
new architecture is built on a Microsoft.NET framework, the
plants programmers can use .NET scripts to easily add more
functionality to the system at a low cost.
The expansion of its natural gas pipeline has given the
company new business opportunities. To build on this success,
plant staff can now visualize their plant processes, analyze the
resulting real-time plant information, and use it to optimize the
plant as a whole. Even more importantly, the new architecture
is expected to save the company time and money by providing
highly distributed applications for the entire pipeline.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Xu Jie is an engineer in automation systems at Zhejiang Gas

Development Ltd., in Zhejiang, China ([email protected]).

266845.qxp:00

2/28/08

1:21 PM

Page 27

PROCESS AUTOMATION

were familiar with the graphics, and we

believed there was no advantage for
introducing different standards. The
OPC system provides the possibility of
getting plant reports and historic variables
on Excel spread sheets.
The operators were trained in the
handling of the system, alarms, screens,
setpoints, and changes. We prepared
maintenance personnel, such as DCS
and instrumentation engineers, with
training in the configuration of the system,
control loops, and equipment calibration.
We made sure the supplier provided
technical support in planning, implementing, maintaining availability of
spare parts, and advice for personnel in
all the projects stages. This way, we can
maintain the system with new versions
of software and firmware available on
the market.

Implementing phases
To implement the first phase, we
planned the work jointly with operations
and supplier. We tested instruments and
the database in supplier office and
installed the cabinets one day before the
migration. Maintenance prepared a
report of signals and power supply
(100VAC and 24VDC) before the migration.
The day of the migration, operations
planned the work in such a way they
only passed to local control (in field) the
affected areas of the old DCS, allowing
the work without plant shutdown, and
completing in the shortest time period
(approximately six hours).
All connections followed the appropriate
standards for Zone 2, Division 1. The
control room was air-conditioned to
allow more comfort and facilitate the
operators job. While developing this
phase, we did not have any unforeseen
plant shutdowns, and the whole implementation process occurred without any
great inconvenience.

Second, third phases

The objective of Phase 2 is to completely replace the old DCS system, for which
we will have the following control
processors:
Room II: Control processor in charge
of the generating and compression
areas
Plant II: Control processor in charge
of the fractioning and turbo-expansion areas
Plant III: Control processor in charge
of the dehydration and hot environment areas
Phase 2 is underway, and the database
for the old DCS system is transferring to
the new one. For this phase, where we
will replace the entire old system, we
have programmed a plant shutdown,
allowing us to safely carry out the main
work. The objective of Phase 3 is to
optimize the control loops and the production parameters so we can fulfill the
proposed objectives. The hardware and
software substitution of control systems
should be carefully planned, following
the ISA Certified Automation Professional
(CAP), model for an automation project,
and limiting the projects scope to any
needed operational improvements, as this
is linked to budget and time. We should
responsibly select a supplier, bearing in
mind local technical support, such as
maintenance and supply infrastructure.
With joint work between maintenance and operational personnel, it is
vital to remember their needs and thus
ensure the project has a high life cycle.
It is also important to develop an operator
training course before or during the
projects implementation, thus getting
the operator to participate in the project.
We should also take special care when
selecting the hardware and software,
since this must permit its easy integration
with future phases and technologies.
The OPCs structure allowed us to open

the control system to other systems,

enabling us to interconnect the different
control systems of other fields Empresa
Petrolera CHACO owns or operates.

Project update
Today, the DCS implementation has
achieved 100% automation of the plants
gas treatment. We wrote new startup and
shutdown sequences, and we are now
adding new instrumentation to the new
DCS system (SCADA). We put new
automation areas into the system as well.
As a third phase of the project, we are
changing instruments with 4-20 mA or
proprietary protocol to HART-type instruments. Our objective is to have the whole
plant instrumentation (transmitters and
control valves) changed to the HART protocol. At the same time, we are managing
instrumentation, with inspection, calibration, qualification, and preventive maintenance plans, throughout the entire plant.
We hope to finish this phase during the
first trimester of 2008. As a fourth phase,
we plan to install a safety instrumented
system (SIS) throughout the plant.
ABOUT THE AUTHORS

Victor Aparicio is a DCS Engineer at

Chaco S.A. in Santa Cruz, Bolivia ([email protected]). Carlos Balanza is superintendent of maintenance (balanzc@
chaco.com.bo). Eduardo Zambrana is in
instrumentation at the plant.
View the online version at www.isa.org/intech/20071002.

RESOURCES

Water System Unplugs

http://www.isa.org/intech/060009
The Perfect Storm Platform

http://www.isa.org/intech/20061002
Manufacturing Interoperability
Guideline Working Group

www.isa.org/link/MIGworking

Reprinted with permission from InTech, October 2007.

2007 ISA Services, Inc. All Rights Reserved. FosteReprints 866-879-9144

ER-00071-Oct07