Same Sex Marriage

Should Same-Sex Marriages be
Legalized?
In a Nutshell
Yes No
1. Denying them is a violation of 1. Most religions consider
religious freedom (civil and religious homosexuality a sin.
marriages are two separate 2. It would weaken the definition and
institutions). respect for the institution of marriage.
2. Marriage benefits (such as joint 3. It would further weaken the
ownership, medical decision-making traditional family values essential to
capacity) should be available to all our society.
couples. 4. It could provide a slippery slope in
3. Homosexuality is an accepted the legality of marriage (e.g. having
lifestyle nowadays with most multiple wives or marrying an object
evidence proving biological could be next).
causation.
4. Denying these marriages is a form of 5. The gay lifestyle is not something to
minority discrimination. be encouraged, as a lot of research
5. It doesn't hurt society or anyone in shows it leads to a much lower life
particular. expectancy, psychological disorders,
6. The only thing that should matter in and other problems.
marriage is love.
7. The number of child adoptions
should increase since gay couples
cannot pro-create (although some
might see an increase in gay
adoptions as an argument against
same-sex marriages).
8. It encourages people to have strong
family values and give up high-risk
sexual lifestyles.
9. The same financial benefits that

apply to man-woman marriages
apply to same-sex marriages.
Overview/Background
Traditionally in this country, marriage has been defined as a religious & legal
commitment between a man and woman, as well as the ultimate expression of love.
Homosexual relationships are increasingly gaining acceptance in this country; however,
these couples have not been permitted to marry. Some states have considered a new form
of commitment called a "civil union", which essentially is marriage without using the
word "marriage". Many politicians have said they are against gay marriage but think it
should be left up to the states to decide. However, the "full faith and credit" clause of the
Constitution says that if one state makes a law, other states must recognize it. Thus, if one
state allows a gay marriage and that couple moves to another state, the other state must
recognize that marriage. This in effect allows one state to make same-sex marriage legal
in the entire country. Many politicians are calling for amendments to their state
constitution or the U.S. Constitution. Many areas of the country such as San Francisco
have performed marriage ceremonies in defiance of the law. Lost in all the legal battles
and political maneuvering is the basic question "Should we allow gay couples to legally
marry?"
Yes
1. Denying them is a violation of religious freedom (civil and religious
marriages are two separate institutions). The main reason for denying marriage
to gay couples is that all major religions consider homosexuality a sin; however,
the First Amendment of the Constitution clearly states that a person's religious
views or lack thereof must be protected. Marriage by the state is a secular activity;
the government cannot start making laws just because a religion says they should.
What's next, should we make taking the Lord's name in vain a criminal activity
because Christians consider it a breaking of a commandment?
2. Marriage benefits (such as joint ownership, medical decision-making

capacity) should be available to all couples. Marriage is more than a legal
status. It affects many things in society such as tax filing status, joint ownership of
property, insurance benefits, and agency law. It affects critical medical decisions.
For example, if one member of a gay couple that has been together for 20 years
gets critically ill, visitation may not even be allowed since the other isn't
considered a "spouse or immediate family member". Also, critical medical
decisions must often be made when one person is incapacitated; e.g. should a
certain surgery be done or not? It is completely unfair to deny these privileges to
people because their relationship doesn't fit the state's definition of one.
3. Homosexuality is an accepted lifestyle nowadays with most evidence proving

biological causation. For too long homosexuality has been considered a form of
"deviant sexual behavior". Those making these accusations should examine the
history books and the psychological research. Throughout our history going all
the way back to ancient Greece, homosexual relationships have existed. The term
"lesbian" comes from a Greek island called "Lesbos" where many such couples
lived. An overwhelming amount of research has been done showing that
homosexuality has a biological causation; not a genetic one, but a biological one.
The easiest way to think of it is as a hormonal switch that gets thrown one way or
the other. And if you think about it, it makes logical sense. Consider many gays
and lesbians you've seen. Not always, but many times, secondary sexual
characteristics resemble the opposite sex. In other words, homosexual males often
have softer voices. Lesbians may have strong cheekbones and a more masculine
body shape. It's all affected by those hormone switches. And why would someone
choose to be gay. Do people analyze the situation..."Let's see, I can be
discriminated against, ridiculed by friends and co-workers, rejected by my family,
told I'm going to hell by the church, subjected to beatings by gay
bashers...hmmm, sign me up!" Now, there will be odd cases where people
experiment with different types of sex, but you can't just teach people to be gay or
not gay for a lifetime.
4. Denying these marriages is a form of minority discrimination. America was

founded on the concept that the majority should rule, but the rights of minorities
should be protected. It is the main reason we have a Bill of Rights as well as anti-
slavery and equal protection amendments. Denying marriage to a homosexual
couple is no different than denying marriage to Hispanic or black couples.
5. It doesn't hurt society or anyone in particular. A marriage is a relationship

between two people. How does it hurt society or people not involved in the
marriage? It is a personal commitment that really is no one else's business.
Society shouldn't be dictating what two people can or can't do when no one else is
hurt in the process. If the church or certain groups disapprove, that's their right,
but it isn't their right to stop it.
6. The only thing that should matter in marriage is love. The number one reason
that heterosexuals marry is not to establish legal status, allow joint filing of taxes,
or protect each other in medical decision-making. They marry because it is the
ultimate expression of a person's love for another. Marriage is a commitment that
says "I love you so much that I want to live the rest of my life with you. I want to
share the ups and downs, forsake all others, and be together until death do us
part." Should it matter that the couple doesn't fit into what society is used to?
Some people talk about living wills and other legal contracts that can give
homosexuals essentially the same rights as a married couple. If that is the case,
why don't all heterosexual couples use these legal maneuvers instead of marriage?
Just maybe there's something more to it.
7. The number of child adoptions should increase since gay couples cannot pro-
create (although some might see an increase in gay adoptions as an argument
against same-sex marriages). Like any heterosexual couple relationship, a same-
sex marriage may fuel the desire for a family. Since gay couples cannot have kids
naturally, this will likely increase the desire to adopt. Since there are so many kids
around the country in need of adoption, this is a good thing. However, others
believe a child reared in a same-sex marriage do not develop ideally. Evidence at
this point is inconclusive since same-sex adoptions have yet to become
widespread.
8. It encourages people to have strong family values and give up high-risk

sexual lifestyles. One of the main arguments against gay marriage is that it would
further erode family values; however, the opposite is true. The problems related to
sexuality in our society such as STD's stem from carefree, frivolous lifestyles; in
other words, having frequent, unprotected sex with many partners. Marriage
encourages people to settle down and to give up that type of lifestyle. Married
people commit themselves to one partner and work to build a life together. Isn't
that the type of behavior we want to encourage?
9. The same financial benefits that apply to man-woman marriages apply to

same-sex marriages. In today's economic environment, it often takes two
incomes to live. A married couple shares rent, utilities, and other bills, which are
often difficult for one person to take on alone. This is especially truly if a
dependent person is involved such as a child. In addition, a married couple can
often financially support each other when times get tough, such as when one of
the two is out of work. The other can continue to pay the bills until the
unemployed person gets back on his/her feet. Owning a house is often impossible
without another person to share the financial burden, and owning a home is not
only part of the American dream, it promotes stability and community pride.
No
1. Most religions consider homosexuality a sin. Virtually every religion in the
world, including the major ones in this country, consider homosexuality
unacceptable. It is offensive and a swipe to the religious freedom of the majority
to have to recognize a relationship they consider sinful. The legal system in the
United States evolved out of the laws contained in the Bible. We shouldn't go
even farther to tear down those laws.
2. It would weaken the definition and respect for the institution of marriage.
The 50 percent divorce rate has already weakened the definition of marriage. We
shouldn't be taking further steps to define what marriage is. A law allowing gay
marriage would increase the number of joke or non-serious marriages, such as a
couple of friends who want to save on taxes. Marriage is the most sacred
institution in this country, and every society considers it the joining of a man and
a woman. It makes biological sense since only a man and woman can pro-create.
3. It would further weaken the traditional family values essential to our society.
The building blocks of our society and the thing that makes it strong is the
traditional family of man, woman, and children. It is what has sustained us
through two world wars, a great depression, and numerous other challenges over
the centuries. While friends & lovers come and go, your family is always there.
The main reason our culture and values have started to crumble is the weakening
of families. Introducing another form of "family" would only make the situation
worse.
4. It could provide a slippery slope in the legality of marriage (e.g. having

multiple wives or marrying an object could be next). Gay rights activists claim
that these marriages should be allowed because it doesn't hurt anyone, but it could
start a chain reaction that destroys the whole idea of marriage. If someone wants
to marry his dog, why shouldn't he be able to? What if someone wants to marry
their brother or parent? What if someone wants to marry their blow-up doll or
have 10 wives? Unless we develop some firm definition of what a marriage is, the
options are endless. If these options sound absurd, remember that all it takes is a
few activist judges to use the statute to open the door. It doesn't matter if 95
percent of the population disagrees with the policy, one judge can interpret the
case the way he or she wants and use the doctrine of stare decisis to impose a law
on everyone. Do you remember how two judges in California recently declared
the Pledge of Allegiance unconstitutional? If the decision hadn't been overturned,
it would have prevented millions of children from being able to say the pledge
every morning, despite the fact that 95+ percent of Americans disagreed with the
decision.
5. The gay lifestyle is not something to be encouraged, as a lot of research shows

it leads to a much lower life expectancy, psychological disorders, and other
problems. Studies show that homosexuals, for a variety of reasons, have life
expectancies of approximately 20 years less than the general population. Just like
a lifestyle of smoking, drinking, etc., unhealthy lifestyles should be discouraged.

Same Sex Marriage

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Same Sex Marriage

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Same Sex Marriage

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Should Same-Sex Marriages be

9. The same financial benefits that

2. Marriage benefits (such as joint ownership, medical decision-making

3. Homosexuality is an accepted lifestyle nowadays with most evidence proving

4. Denying these marriages is a form of minority discrimination. America was

5. It doesn't hurt society or anyone in particular. A marriage is a relationship

8. It encourages people to have strong family values and give up high-risk

9. The same financial benefits that apply to man-woman marriages apply to

4. It could provide a slippery slope in the legality of marriage (e.g. having

5. The gay lifestyle is not something to be encouraged, as a lot of research shows

You might also like