Analysis of Euro 2008 XXIX AEFCA Symposium 2008
Analysis of Euro 2008 XXIX AEFCA Symposium 2008
Analysis of Euro 2008 XXIX AEFCA Symposium 2008
AEFCA-Symposium 2008
1 2 3 4 5
Purpose / Design of the Analysis Bernd Stber Analysis 1: Systems of Play / Positions Bernd Stber Analysis 2: Defensive Play Frank Wormuth Analysis 3: Attacking Play Erich Rutemller Conclusions and Implications Bernd Stber
AEFCA-Symposium 2008 2
1 2 3 4 5
Purpose / Design of the Analysis Bernd Stber Analysis 1: Systems of Play / Positions Bernd Stber Analysis 2: Defensive Play Frank Wormuth Analysis 3: Attacking Play Erich Rutemller Conclusions and Implications Bernd Stber
AEFCA-Symposium 2008 3
AEFCA-Symposium 2008
Focal Points of the Analysis This analysis focuses on elements within the game of Europes top nations.
AEFCA-Symposium 2008
DFBPlaying Philosophy
CLUB FOOTBALL
NATIONAL TEAMS
Group Switzerland
F. Wormuth, E.Rutemller, F. Engel, P. Schomann, H. Herrlich
Group Austria
Standardized Analyses
Technical Report
AEFCA-Symposium 2008 7
AEFCA-Symposium 2008
AEFCA-Symposium 2008
AEFCA-Symposium 2008
10
AEFCA-Symposium 2008
11
AEFCA-Symposium 2008
12
AEFCA-Symposium 2008
13
1 2 3 4 5
Purpose / Design of the Analysis Bernd Stber Analysis 1: Systems of Play / Positions Bernd Stber Analysis 2: Defensive Play Frank Wormuth Analysis 3: Attacking Play Erich Rutemller Conclusions and Implications Bernd Stber
AEFCA-Symposium 2008 14
4:2:3:1System
AEFCA-Symposium 2008
15
4:2:3:1System
Holland
AEFCA-Symposium 2008
16
4:2:3:1System
Germany (from quarterfinals on)
AEFCA-Symposium 2008
17
4:4:2-System
AEFCA-Symposium 2008
18
4:4:2System
Spain
AEFCA-Symposium 2008
19
4:4:2System
Germany (group stage)
AEFCA-Symposium 2008
20
4:1:4:1System
AEFCA-Symposium 2008
21
4:1:4:1 (4:1:3:2)System
Russia
AEFCA-Symposium 2008
22
AEFCA-Symposium 2008
23
Analysis Area 1: Systems of Play/Positions Summary Observation 1: Teams clearly preferred formations with four backs!
AEFCA-Symposium 2008
24
Analysis Area 1: Systems of Play/Positions Summary Observation 2: Formations with two defensive midfielders (No. 6) are widely established!
Example: Croatia
Example: Spain
AEFCA-Symposium 2008
25
Observation 3: Creating momentum through wing play with pairs on each side
Example: Netherlands
Example: Spain
AEFCA-Symposium 2008
27
Forward-type
Players like Podolski (Germany) Ronaldo (Portugal) Sneijder (Holland)
Assist-oriented/creative type
Players like Iniesta (Spain) Rakitic (Croatia)
Specialists
Players like Robben (Holland) van Persie (Holland)
AEFCA-Symposium 2008 28
Analysis Area 1: Systems of Play/Positions Summary Observation 4: Flexible duos in central attacking areas
Example: Spain
Example: Russia
AEFCA-Symposium 2008
29
AEFCA-Symposium 2008
30
Analysis Area 1: Systems of Play/Positions Summary Overall, the participating teams favored similar constellations in their formations. However, despite all similarities, they interpreted their systems of play very specifically!
AEFCA-Symposium 2008
31
Analysis Area 1: Systems of Play/Positions Summary Not systems of play, but individual quality is the most important determinant of success in international football at the highest level!
Technical perfection
Tactical flexibility
AEFCA-Symposium 2008
Quick actions
Winning mentality
32
1 2 3 4 5
Purpose / Design of the Analysis Bernd Stber Analysis 1: Systems of Play / Positions Bernd Stber Analysis 2: Defensive Play Frank Wormuth Analysis 3: Attacking Play Erich Rutemller Conclusions and Implications Bernd Stber
AEFCA-Symposium 2008 33
AEFCA-Symposium 2008
34
AEFCA-Symposium 2008
35
AEFCA-Symposium 2008
36
Analysis Area 2: Defensive Play Observation 2: Ensuring safety through falling back and playing low pressure!
AEFCA-Symposium 2008
37
AEFCA-Symposium 2008
38
AEFCA-Symposium 2008
39
AEFCA-Symposium 2008
40
Analysis Area 2: Defensive Play Observation 4: The center of defense remains closed down! Method 1: Center backs stay central!
AEFCA-Symposium 2008
41
Analysis Area 2: Defensive Play Observation 5: The center of defense remains closed down! Method 2: One purely defensive midfielder (No. 6-position)!
AEFCA-Symposium 2008
42
Analysis Area 2: Defensive Play Examples for methods 1 (CB) and 2 (No. 6)
AEFCA-Symposium 2008
43
AEFCA-Symposium 2008
44
Analysis Area 2: Defensive Play Observation 6: The center of defense remains closed down! Method 3: Two defensive midfielders in the center with different roles!
AEFCA-Symposium 2008
45
AEFCA-Symposium 2008
46
The EURO 2008 has been described as the fairest of its kind in history! WHY is that? Is it only a result of attacking play or possibly also due to the DEFENSIVE STRATEGIES applied?
AEFCA-Symposium 2008
47
1 2 3 4 5
Purpose / Design of the Analysis Bernd Stber Analysis 1: Systems of Play / Positions Bernd Stber Analysis 2: Defensive Play Frank Wormuth Analysis 3: Attacking Play Erich Rutemller Conclusions and Implications Bernd Stber
AEFCA-Symposium 2008 48
Unorganized opponent
Organized opponent
1st Phase
Quick transition
Controlled build-up
2nd Phase
2nd Ball
AEFCA-Symposium 2008
49
Unorganized opponent
Organized opponent
1st Phase
Quick transition
Controlled build-up
2nd Phase
2nd Ball
AEFCA-Symposium 2008
50
Unorganized opponent
Organized opponent
1st Phase
Quick transition
Controlled build-up
2nd Phase
2nd Ball
AEFCA-Symposium 2008
51
AEFCA-Symposium 2008
52
AEFCA-Symposium 2008
53
Unorganized opponent
Organized opponent
1st Phase
Quick transition
Controlled build-up
2nd Phase
2nd Ball
AEFCA-Symposium 2008
54
Analysis Area 3: Attacking Play Controlled build-up Characteristic: Safe build-up based on horizontal position play
Example: Spain
AEFCA-Symposium 2008
55
Analysis Area 3: Attacking Play Controlled build-up Characteristic: Variability in controlled build-up
Example: Holland
Preparation of a penetrating pass by means of a safe horizontal position play Sudden change of pace
AEFCA-Symposium 2008
57
Unorganized opponent
Organized opponent
1st Phase
Quick transition
Controlled build-up
2nd Phase
2nd Ball
AEFCA-Symposium 2008
58
Unorganized opponent
Organized opponent
1st Phase
Quick transition
Controlled build-up
2nd Phase
2nd Ball
AEFCA-Symposium 2008
59
Analysis Area 3: Attacking Play Quick counter-attacks Characteristic: Significant number of goals as a result of counter-attacks (UEFA-Statistics: 35% of all goals of EURO 2008)
Typical situations for counter-attacks:
While the ball is in play (from various zones) After restarts After quick delivery by the goalkeeper
AEFCA-Symposium 2008 60
AEFCA-Symposium 2008
61
Unorganized opponent
Organized opponent
1st Phase
Quick transition
Controlled build-up
2nd Phase
2nd Ball
AEFCA-Symposium 2008
62
AEFCA-Symposium 2008
63
Unorganized opponent
Organized opponent
1st Phase
Quick transition
Controlled build-up
2nd Phase
2nd Ball
AEFCA-Symposium 2008
64
rarely: traditional wing-play with crosses from the baseline frequently: low passes into defenders backs from positions between touchline and extended sideline of the penalty box frequently: combination play on the wing (more frequently than individual actions) frequently: driven diagonal balls to the wings to quickly change the point of attack
AEFCA-Symposium 2008
65
AEFCA-Symposium 2008
66
Analysis Area 3: Attacking Play Wing play after changing the point of attack
AEFCA-Symposium 2008
67
Unorganized opponent
Organized opponent
1st Phase
Quick transition
Controlled build-up
2nd Phase
2nd Ball
AEFCA-Symposium 2008
68
More frequently: goals from combination play, e.g. using the third man Less frequently: dribblings to beat opponents and create finishing opportunities More frequently: dribblings to maintain possession in the box and create situations for combination play Important: forwards often made diagonal runs to goal with an open position to the player in possession of the ball
AEFCA-Symposium 2008
69
AEFCA-Symposium 2008
70
AEFCA-Symposium 2008
71
Analysis Area 3: Attacking Play Summary Top-teams prove to be attacking-minded, fast, and flexible
They reveal a large repertoire of means of attack of the highest quality: - individual skill - combination play - diagonal passes - wing play - attacking through the center - changing pace and rhythm of the game!
AEFCA-Symposium 2008 73
1 2 3 4 5
Purpose / Design of the Analysis Bernd Stber Analysis 1: Systems of Play / Positions Bernd Stber Analysis 2: Defensive Play Frank Wormuth Analysis 3: Attacking Play Erich Rutemller Conclusions and Implications Bernd Stber
AEFCA-Symposium 2008 74
Highest quality in attacking play based on a perfect balance of defense and attack!
Best mixture of efficiency and attractiveness of the game Distinct changes of rhythm within long phases of possession Combination play based on quick ball-movement using one- and two-touch-play
AEFCA-Symposium 2008
75
Primary Quality Criteria in International Football at the Highest Level The determinant of success is individual class, which always has to be embedded in a perfectly functioning team!
The team-oriented and strong personality is the star
AEFCA-Symposium 2008
77
EURO 2008-Analysis
THANK YOU!
AEFCA-Symposium 2008 79