Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 22 views

    Attorneys For Defendant Attorney General Edmund G. Brown JR

    Uploaded by

    Equality Case Files
    The Attorney General of California filed a statement of nonopposition to the motion to intervene of the City and County of San Francisco in the case of Perry v. Schwarzenegger. The Attorney General, representing the defendant, does not oppose San Francisco's motion to intervene as a plaintiff in the lawsuit challenging California's ban on same-sex marriage. The statement was filed on July 29, 2009 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Attorneys For Defendant Attorney General Edmund G. Brown JR

    Uploaded by

    Equality Case Files
    22 views2 pages
    The Attorney General of California filed a statement of nonopposition to the motion to intervene of the City and County of San Francisco in the case of Perry v. Schwarzenegger. The Attorney General, representing the defendant, does not oppose San Francisco's motion to intervene as a plaintiff in the lawsuit challenging California's ban on same-sex marriage. The statement was filed on July 29, 2009 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.

    Original Description:

    Doc #121

    Original Title

    3:09-cv-02292 #121

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The Attorney General of California filed a statement of nonopposition to the motion to intervene of the City and County of San Francisco in the case of Perry v. Schwarzenegger. The Attorney General, representing the defendant, does not oppose San Francisco's motion to intervene as a plaintiff in the lawsuit challenging California's ban on same-sex marriage. The statement was filed on July 29, 2009 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    22 views2 pages

    Attorneys For Defendant Attorney General Edmund G. Brown JR

    Uploaded by

    Equality Case Files
    The Attorney General of California filed a statement of nonopposition to the motion to intervene of the City and County of San Francisco in the case of Perry v. Schwarzenegger. The Attorney General, representing the defendant, does not oppose San Francisco's motion to intervene as a plaintiff in the lawsuit challenging California's ban on same-sex marriage. The statement was filed on July 29, 2009 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 2

    Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document121 Filed07/29/09 Page1 of 2

    1 EDMUND G. BROWN JR.


    Attorney General of California
    2 JONATHAN K. RENNER
    Senior Assistant Attorney General
    3 GORDON BURNS
    Deputy Solicitor General
    4 TAMAR PACHTER
    Deputy Attorney General
    5 State Bar No. 146083
    455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 11000
    6 San Francisco, CA 94102-7004
    Telephone: (415) 703-5970
    7 Fax: (415) 703-1234
    E-mail: [email protected]
    8 Attorneys for Defendant
    Attorney General Edmund G. Brown Jr.
    9

    10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

    11 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

    12

    13
    KRISTIN M. PERRY, et al., Civil Case No. 09-2292 VRW
    14
    Plaintiffs, ATTORNEY GENERAL’S STATEMENT
    15 OF NONOPPOSITION TO MOTION TO
    v. INTERVENE OF THE CITY AND
    16 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
    17 ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, et al., (Local Rule 7-3(b))
    18 Defendants. Date: August 19, 2009
    Time: 10 a.m.
    19 Courtroom: No. 6, 17th Floor
    Judge: Hon. Vaughn R. Walker, C.J.
    20 Trial Date: None
    Action Filed: May 22, 2009
    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28
    1
    Attorney General’s Nonopposition to CCSF Motion to Intervene (Civil Case No. 09-2292 VRW)
    Case3:09-cv-02292-VRW Document121 Filed07/29/09 Page2 of 2

    1 Attorney General Edmund G. Brown Jr. does not oppose the Motion to Intervene of
    2 proposed plaintiff intervenor the City and County of San Francisco.
    3

    4 Dated: July 29, 2009 Respectfully submitted,


    5 EDMUND G. BROWN JR.
    Attorney General of California
    6 JONATHAN K. RENNER
    Senior Assistant Attorney General
    7 GORDON BURNS
    Deputy Solicitor General
    8

    10 /s/ Tamar Pachter


    TAMAR PACHTER
    11 Deputy Attorney General
    Attorneys for Defendant
    12 Attorney General Edmund G. Brown Jr.
    13 SA2009310603
    Document in ProLaw
    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28
    2
    Attorney General’s Nonopposition to CCSF Motion to Intervene (Civil Case No. 09-2292 VRW)

    You might also like