IGNOU's Political Science Material Part-2: Government and Politics in India
IGNOU's Political Science Material Part-2: Government and Politics in India
IGNOU's Political Science Material Part-2: Government and Politics in India
About Us: Prepare 4 Civils, website is a part of Sukratu Innovations, a start up by IITians. The main theme of the company
is to develop new web services which will help people. Prepare 4 Civils is an online social networking platform intended for
the welfare of people who are preparing for Civil services examinations. The whole website was built on open-source
platform Wordpress.
Contact Details:
Disclaimer and Terms of Use: By following Creative Common License, for the welfare of large student body we are merging
all the pdf files provided by IGNOU’s course material website egyankosh and redistributing the files by giving proper credit
to IGNOU and the redistribution is based on the norms of Creative Common License. We are not commercially distributing
the files. People who are downloading these files should not be engaged in any sort of sales or commercial distribution of
these files. They can redistribute these copies freely by giving proper credit to the original author, IGNOU
(http://egyankosh.ac.in/) and “Prepare 4 Civils” (http://www.prep4civils.com/) by providing proper hyperlinks of the
websites. Any sort of clichés can be addressed at [email protected] and proper action will be taken.
THE CONSEQUENCES OF
COLONIALISM
Structure
Objectives
Introduction
Defining Colonialism
Consequencesof Colonialism
1.3.1 Nature and phases of the Colonial Empire
1.3.2 Impact: The First Phase-Peasantry and its Impoverishment
1.3.3 Impact: The Second Phase-De-industrialisation and its Effects
1.3.4 Impact: The Third Phase-Imperialism and Industrialisation
Let Us Sum Up
Key Words
some u s e h i Books and Articles
Answers to Check Your Progress Exercises
1.0 OBJECTIVES
To understand the challenges faced by India properly after Independence,
it is necessary to study the consequences of colonial rule. Understanding
the multiple and contradictory nature of consequences is itself an engrossing
exercise. But the making of modem India is still more fascinating. After
reading this unit, you should be able to:
understand how India came to become what it was at the time of
Independence; and
grasp political, social and economic processes which took place in India
after Independence.
1.1 INTRODUCTION
/'
The British built in India the largest colonial empire anywhere in the world.
But it was a different kind of colony from most others. Many of the colonies
especially in Latin America, with the exception of Dutch East Indies (now
called Indonesia), were built .with either slaves or indentured labour. Most
of the Indians that we find in Fiji (and many other places) today were
taken as indentured labour. The British built their colony in India with
peasants and freely recruited labour. There was a l s o e o white "settler
population" in India like for example in Kenya or Zimbabwe which took
control of land and became the edifice of colonial domination. While the
peasant and the labour were coerced, the larger landowners and social
notables were won over to the British side; sometimes after wars but
nonetheless most of them eventually came over to the British side. They
also created new groups to cooperate with them by granting them Zamindaries
or other land rights by displacing the old ones. India therefore was a colony
built on collaboration of "natives".
The British ruled India by drawing a lion's share of surplus out of the Indan
Historical Background economy through heavy exactions on peasanty in the shape of revenue
demands, indirect taxation plus some tribute; in the earliest period there was
plunder as well but this very soon stopped. How all this was done? What
were ways in which it was done? Who were the gainers and losers among
the classes and strata? What were the result for India? And finally, how
did Britain gain out of it? Answers to these will tell us a fascinating story.
A story which is our history. A history which is still alive for us.
Before we do that let us take a brief pause and be clear about what
colonialism was. Today there is imperialism and neocolonialism but colonialism
has come to an end.
What we witnessed from the 16th century onwards was the forced
incorporation by one small part of the world of the rest of the globe. A
few countries like Spain, Portugal, Holland, Britain and France established
political domination over the rest of the world. Unlike earlier when the
balance kept shifting between different powers, colonialism established an
enduring pattern of rule and domination of a few countries over the entire
world. This led over a short period of time to the economic integration
of the colonised world into the needs of the economies of conquering powers
through a process of deeply inequitable trade. Some people like Wallerstein
have called it the emergence of a "world system". Nevertheless, there arose
an interdependent world. But there is a peculiarity to this interdependence;
it was from its very inception a dependent interdependence, unequally titled
in favour of some against the rest. This is a feature of the international
system which still persists to the disadvantage of the underdeveloped world;
for example, the interdependence of say Germany on USA is not
disadvantageous to any of the two. But one cannot say the same for the
relationship of India or Brazil with USA or Germany.
One last point needs to be made before we round up the discussion or!
this point. Before the rise of colonialism the level of development of many
countries like India or China or some Arab countries was as high or higher
than that of the colonising powers. In fact the Mediterranean or the Indian
Ocean trade was controlled by the Arabs. What gave the advantage to
the European powers was a technological edge on a few counts like the
invention of the mariner's compass or the iron hull for their ships which
made it easy for them to subdue other ships on the high sea and establish
their hegemony. We must remember that the "industrial revolution" was gill
far off. India was conquered beginning with 1757, much after Latin America. The Consequences o f
Colonialism
Industrial revolution began a few decades later with the invention of steam
engine, spinning jelly, etc., only during the 1780's and onwards. It was
therefore only with the colonisation that the decline of countries like India
begins. In a few decades the west had established absolute supremacy in
most fields over the countries of what now are called the "third world".
Some writers like Andre Gunder Frank have called this as the process of
the "development of underdevelopment." '
Check Your Progress Exercise 1
Note: 9 Use the space given below for your answers.
Check your answers with the model answers given at the
end of the unit.
.................................................................................................................
'
3) How was India different from Latin America as a colony?
.................................................................................................................
The first phase itself can be divided into two periods. The first sixty years,
that is, from 1757-65 to 1813 was a pure merchantile period (in which
the merchants were the dominant class controlling long distance trade). Britain
was still to enter into the industrial revolution and therefore there was no
question of large-scale exports of manufactured goods. During this period
the East India Company enjoyed a monopoly of trade with the East including
India and China. Then begins a different, a fresh period, when in 1813
the monopoly of the Company for trade with India was abolished (and in
1834 with China too). By this time Britain had settled in as a leading The Consequences of
Colonialism
industrial nation of the world and a different type of mechanism of exploitation
was the need of the time. The Company's position was taken over by a
small number of "agency houses" which later became "managing agencies".
These controlled all extemal trade (baring a portion of trade in westem India)
and much of the wholesale internal trade especially in exportable commodities,
badly needed by the metropolitan economy. The period following 1813 can
be called one of exploitation through free trade.
1858 saw power pass directly into the hands of Crown or the British
9
parliament. The Governor general now also became the Viceroy. Though
1858 saw a legal change in the nature of political control, not much changed
in the methods of exploitation. The period 1858 to 1914-18 saw the climax
of exploitation based on free trade. But this period saw the opening up
of Indian economy thoroughly to the influence of world capitalist market and
its fill integration in the world capitalist economy. Without a change in the
mode of exploitation, the integration into world capitalist economy provided
with many different levers for the appropriation of domestic surplus. The
development of railways and transport infrastructure also saw the blending
of diverse internal economies into an integrated economic network, all of
11 which was directed towards world capitalist economy but principally towards
Britain. This went on but the second decade of the 20th century, around
I the period leading to the first world war, saw a new phase of exploitation
1
I
which continued till 1947 but with political Independence did not cease to
operate. In fact, in many, disguised forms it continues even today.
I
I
In looking at the nature of colonialism and its different phases, one thing
becomes clear. It is not the needs or requirements of the colony or home
economy which determines the policies or choices made by the colonial
powers. Much rather its is linked to the needs of the metropolitan economy
in terms of the development of capitalism there. It is the requirements of
the British capitalism that become the determining influence. So whatever ,
Historical Background happens in India, let us say in terms of "development", is simply consequential.
No favour was ever done by the colonial authorities to the Indian society.
Thus having seen the nature of colonialism and its phases it will be much
easier to understand now the detailed consequences. The remaining part of
this unit will deal with the consequences of colonialism in India.
1.3.2 Impact: The First Phase-The Peasantry and Its
Impoverishment
We have all heard how colonialism destroyed the Indian agrarian economy
which led to the impoverishment (the process by which one is made to
become poor) of peasantry. It has also been pointed out by many writers
that the British retained many of the features of Mughal land revenue system
perfected by Todar Mal. We have earlier seen in this unit that during the
18th century there was little export of manufactures fiom Britain, so the
handicrafts could not have been ruined putting pressure on the hand. So
how did this happen? In other words, how did impoverishment start? This
is an important question, a key point in all our further understanding of
the process of the making of Indian poverty.
While the British retained much of the Mughal revenue system, they made
some drastic changes of detail within its overall structure. The first, though
a minor one, was they raised the share of revenue collected enormously.
It has been estimated that the total revenue collected fiom the Bengal Diwani
in the first few years of British rule doubled whereas for the last 100 years
it had remained the same. This was a huge increase. It is important to
remember that this led to severe famines, a third of the population perished,
but it is important to note that the revenue collected continued to grow.
As an aside, it is important to remember that under the Mughals a part
of the revenue collected was reinvested to help the economy and the growth
of local product but very little came back under the British.
Let us look at the changes they made in what they retained of the Mughal
revenue system. One fundamental change they made was to make the
revenue calculable on the total land entitled to cultivate rather than the land
I actually cultivated. This was crucial; therefore, let us be clear through an
example. Under the Mughal if the peasant was entitled to cultivate, for
instance, 100 acres of land but actually cultivated only 55 acres, the revenue
collected was only for 55 acres but the British assessed and collected the
revenue for the entire 100 acres of land. Now imagine the enormous burden
it may have put on the peasanJs because barring a few nobody cultivated
the &tire land one was entitled to cultivate. In other words, the assessment
under the Mughals can be said to be based on the produce and not on
i holdings and therefore there was a flexibility in-built into the system. Sesondly,
I it hasalso been noted by many that the actual rent in full was not always
collected and considerations were given to the difficulties of the peasants.
1 Thirdly, under the Mughals the revenue was calculated in cash but more
often it was collected in kind so the peasant did not have to go for distress
sale. Finally, and very significantly, the failure to pay in time or repay other
~ -
kinds of debt did not lead to the loss of land under the Mughals. The
British forced the auction of land in case of failure to pay the revenue or
I other debts and for the first time allowed non-peasants to buy up land.
- .. . . .. . rn . . . .. ..
not alienate peasant lands. So some transfer used to take place within the The Consequences o f
Colonialism
peasantry.
It should be obvious fi-om the above that the system introduced by the British
was inflexible in relation to the vagaries of agrarian economy in conditions
like those prevailing in our tropical climate dependent on monsoon. It gave
rise to the beginning of the conversion of land into a commodity like entity,
even though land cannot become a commodity in the way cloth can be.
Nevertheless massive alienation of land became a feature of the agrarian
relations. A repercussion of this was, one, the ability of the superior holders
- or the money-lenders to confiscate the land of the peasants for realisation
of airears due to whatever reasons and, two, even the land of the superior
holders, like Zarnindars, could be taken over the moneylender for failure
to repay debt and the interest accumulated on it. The consequence was
the emergence of absentee landlords as a sizeable proportion of land owners
who then would let out land on back breaking rent or share-cropping.
1) What were the new measures introduced by the British in the area
of revenue administration?
The story was the same for a number of manufactures. For silk goods,
the British forced the weavers under its control to give up weaving and
replaced it with the production of raw silk as the sale of raw silk in Europe
was found to be more profitable. Britain also monopolised the manufacture
and sale of salt, opium (a key item in trade with China), indigo (very
important in the bleaching of cotton goods), etc. Many other manufactures
were also decimated. For example, with the loss of political power, the gun-
making industry (important in pre-colonial India) was destroked and with that
there was large-scale closure of iron foundries. I
The second very important development during this period was the beginning
of the construction of railways. Starting in 1854 the first two-truck routes
were started and then its construction was taken up in a big way. By 1914,
34,000 miles of railways were constructed linking all the major areas of
I q a . By comparison with China we can see how extensive was this
network. In China a much larger country, at the end of semi-colonial control
it had a railroad network of a mere 12,000 miles. The railways by making
the easy mobility of goods and people across India contributed enormously
to the development of trade and capital. It thus brought about the integration
_ of various local economic zones into an interacting economy. It also facilitated
the developnent of a pan-Indian market. Today the railways remain the one
physical infrastructure which plays the most significant role in the movements
of goods and people and trade and commerce and supply of inputs to the
rapidly expanding Indian industrial economy.
are more hard working, as the modem myth about the Punjab farmers seems
. to suggest, but they put more labour and capital in these regions because
of assured production. The skewed nature of this investment gave rise to
a new type of disparity among the various regions of India.
Together with railways, irrigation with the development of cash crops, and
large-scale mining gave a big push to the growth of trade both within India
,
and between India and other countries especially Britain. Therefore by 1880's
fairly sizeable Indian capitalist class was getting formed and was present in
many areas but largely concentrated in and around the port-towns. This led
in small ways to the beginning of capitalism under Indian entrepreneurs and
a slow growth of modem Industry. This was a feature of far reaching
significance for future.
Check Your Progress Exercise 3
Note: i) Use the space given below for your answers.
ii) Check your answers with the model answers given at the
end of the unit.
................................................................................................................
2) What did it do to the Indian economy?
................................................................................................................
................................................................................................................
................................................................................................................
................................................................................................................
' 3) How did de-industrialisation effect the agrarian economy?
...............................................................................................................
................................................................................................................
By the turn of the century an.. before 1914 India had developed a pretty
good industry. These industriez. were riot wide-spread but were concentrated
in certain enclave like the Jute Textiles around Calcutta, Cotton Textiles
around Bombay, etc. Other industries, viz., rice-mills, for making refined
sugar, cement and so on also started coming up. Tatas (the only Indian
allowed to do so) had also established a heavy igdustry for making steel.
This process got a big push after the h t world war. The important feature,
in this period, w& that the Indian capitalist who had accumulated large capital
through trade started establishing industries on their own. After the war,
Britain's position relatively declined within the advanced capitalist world and
it faced strong competition h m other industrial powers. The Indian capitalist
wrested large concessions from Britain to start industries and also forced
it to modifL the one-way flee-trade, with the result that Indian industrialist
got some state protection. The rise of the mass-based national movement
also helped the aspiring Indian industrialist to bargain better with Britain.
For the first time since the establishment of the British colonial control, the T h e Consequences o f
Coloninllsrn
assets of the Indian capitalist in industry grew faster than those of the British
capitalists. There was no state assistance for Indian industry but Britain was
forced to grant protective tariff to Indian industry vis-a-vis other imperialist
powers, although its own goods continued to enjoy preferential treatment.
By the time of the second world war, India had achieved a good measure
of self-sufficiency in, apart from Industries mentioned above, consumer goods
as also in crude and intermediate goods like pig-iron, steel, cement, etc.
Much of what was imported from Britain earlier was being produced within
the country itself; this pattern of industrialisation has been referred to by
the economists as "import-substitution" industrialisation.
- -
1) The new feature of the 16-18" century colonialism was that unlike
1
the earlier colonialism it saw the forced incorporation of the major
part of world by a small part of it.
2) i) Forced incorporation of the major part of the world by a small
group of countries.
ii) Exploitation of the resources of the colonies by a small number
of metropolitan countries, and ruination of the economy of the
colonies.
3) Latin America was conquered much before India. In India it was
followed by the industrial revolution, which adversely affected Indian
economy.
Check Your Progress 2
1) They raised the share of revenue. The rent was collected on the basis
of the land held by the peasant, not on the basis of the area sown.
2) It resulted in the extraction of rent from the peasants. Failure to pay
rent led to their eviction from land. The peasants became pauper.
3) It can be located in the colonial period.
Check Your Progress 3
1) In the wake of the first world war the position of Britain declined
in relation to other advanced countries. It gave an opportunity to Indian
industrialists to get concessions (protective tariff policy) h m the British
government. It helped in the growth of modem Indian industry.
2) In Jute textiles, cotton textiles, refined sugar, cement, etc.
3) Middle classes, landlords, a small group of industrialists.
4) "Import-substitution" means an economic system in which the goods
which are imported are produced in the country itself. There is no
need for import of such goods.
RESPONSES OF INDIAN SOCIETY
Structure
2.0 Objectives
2.1 Introduction
2.2 India and the Colonial Experience
2.3 The World of the Peasantry
2.4 The Tribal Response .
2.5 Middle Class, Intelligentsia and Social Reform
2.5.1 The Ideas and Vision of New Class
2.5.2 Social Reformers and Public Debate
2.6 Reform Movements
2.7 Reform or Revival?
2.8 Social or Political Reform?
2.9 The Intelligentsia, Reforms and the Colonial State
2.10 Critique of Colonialism
2.1 1 Let Us Sum Up
2.12 Some Useful Books
2.13 Answers to Check Your Progress Exercises
2.0 OBJECTIVES
This unit is about the responses of Indian society to the arrival colonialism
'
in India. After reading this unit, you will be able to understand:
The response of the peasantry to the colonial' policies;
The reaction of the tribals to it;
The reaction of the middle classes and intelligentsia to it; and
The context of the rise of the social and cultural movements during the
colonial period.
2.1 INTRODUCTION
Colonialism radically changed the face of Indian society. It also resulted in
a churning within that society. The society responded to colonialism in multiple
ways. The responses were, however, influenced by the context in which
people lived, the way they perceived the colonial rule and their vision of
a future society. In this unit we shall try and examine these various responses
in their proper historical context. This will enable us to view properly the
historical development of our society, and the manner in which this society
responded to the range of forces it encountered over the past two hundred
years or more.
\
While on the one hand, colonialism impoverished the society and used political
power to exploit it economically, it also unleashed the force of ideas to
usher in an entirely new age. The British brought with them the message
of the English (1688) and French (1789) revolutions.
P
new rulers. This created a s&er crisis for the old Zamindars, who were
now reduced to the status of revenue farmers. The new land revenue
arrangements also affected the/class of people dependant on State patronage,
such as traditional scholars, fakirs, artists, etc. The revolts of the Zamindars
and other dispossessed people formed the earliest responses to colonial power.
The peasantry was the worst victim of the new system. The peasants reacted
in the form of protest against the colonial oppression. The section provides
some examples of the peasant's response. The peasant reaction came in many
forms. Titu Mir's (1782) rebellion was one such early response to the British
rule. Titu Mir led the poor peasants near Barasat in 24 Parganas (Bengal)
against the Zamindars, both Hindus and Muslims. He instructed his followers
to follow pure and simple Islamic practices. The movement began to spread
into the adjoining districts of Nadia and Faridpur. Its popularity finally forced
the colonial authorities to kill Titu Mir and suppress his movement. In
November 1831 Titu Mir's headquarter at Narkulbaria in Barasat district
was destroyed. He and fifty of his followers were killed, and several hundreds
of his followers were arrested.
Historical Background
The more widespread Farazi movement of Haji Shariatullah (1781- 1840) in
eastern Bengal followed this. Shariatullah asked his poor peasant followers
to strictly observe the duties (far'iz, hence far'izi) enjoined by the Quran
and Sunna (Islamic law), and to maintain God's unity. He stressed that so
long as the British rule Bengal the congregational prayers on jumma and
Id should not be performed, as according to tradition they must only be
performed in a misr aljami (a town where an amir and a qazi, properly
appointed by an independent Khalifa are stationed). This was one of the
strongest indictments of British rule. Under his son Duda Mian (18 19-1862),
the impoverished and landless peasants, artisans and weavers joined the
Farazi ranks. The Farazis attacked both the landlords in the area, who
incidentally were Hindus, as well as the British Indigo factory owners. The
colonial authorities tried very hard to suppress the Farazis and to rescind
Shariatullah's indictment of British rule. It was finally in the last decades
of the nineteenth century that the movement's new leaders asked the population
to extend ioyalty to the British. The anti-British felling was so strong that
people were not allowed to seek redressal of grievances in the British courts
without permission from the Farazi leaders.
#
In 1859-60, the peasants in Nadia district of Bengal heard that the new
Lt. Governor was sympathetic to their condition. They refused to accept
the advance paid by the indigo planters coercing them to grow indigo. The
movement spread through the delta region. Indigo planters were attacked
and soon the entire system began to collapse. The active interest of the
intelligentsia in Calcutta focussed the attention of the colonial authorities too
on the oppression of the Indigo planters. As a result of this revolt, the
indigo cultivation system came to an end in the area. In the 1870s, there
were protests in Pabna (Bengal). The peasants organised themselves into
agrarian leagues here. In 1873, a large-scale movement of the peasantry
in Pabna and the adjoining areas was another strong indictment of colonial
rule.
The central Indian tribes, particularly those living in the Choota Nagpur and
Santhal Parganas area, were the worst sufferers in the new situation. When
the British began penetrating the Jangal Mahals and Chhota Nagpur after
1780, thikadars and other intermediaries also entered into the system. The
heightening of certain internal differences within the tribes in the colonial
perception precipitated these changes. The colonial system and the outsiders
began treating individuals within tribes like the Pahan (priests) or the Munda
~ (leader) or the Munda tribe, whose status was that of one amongst equals,
as landlords or political and social leaders. This attached the relatively
egalitarian structure of communities such as that of the Mundas and the
Oraons in Chhota Nagpur. The coming of the missionaries and the large
scale conversions, particularly in the last decades of the nineteenth century,
also created new inter and intra-tribal differentiation. The atrangements evolved
over centuries between the tribal differentiation. The arrangements evolved
over centuries between the tribal populqon and the neighbouring communities
were also distributed. The Ghatwals in the Jangal Mahals were traditionally
the police force of the local ruling potentates in Chhota Nagpur. The abolition
of this arrangement resulted in the famous Chuar rebellion of the Chatwals
in-the 1790s. Similarly, the reservation of forest land for colonial purposes
altered the tribals relationship with the forest and his habitat. But the most
radical change came in the shape of the large-scale intrusion of the outsiders.
The most powerful expression against the outsiders, who mostly came as
moneylenders, revenue contractors, lawyers and landlords, was the famous
Hul rising of the Santhals in Darnni-1-koh (modem day Santhal Pargana
district). In 1855 under the leadership of Sidho and Kanu, the Santhals
attacked the colonial authorities as well as outsiders whom they called dikus.
In 1832-33 the Bhumiji in the Jangal Mahals revolted against the colonial
authorities, while in the 1850s the tribal leaders called Sardars in Ranchi
district revolted against the rapid land alienation.
Assam came under British rule only in 1826, and the colonial penetration
in the Naga hills ahd in the Manipur area was relatively late. In Assam,
Vaisnavism had exerted a great influence on the local population over the
centuries. Contact with Calcutta opened the area to new influences. One
such influence was an alternative to the available mode of Hinduisation.
Kalicharan Mech of Dhubri was inspired by a Hindu sanyasi of Calcutta
and started a new faith, eschewing the expensive rituals attached to the
prevailing hinduising modes in the area. The new converts, called Brahrnas,
engaged themselves in the eradicating illiteracy of their tribes. There was
also a move towards abstinence fiom rice, beer, meat, etc.
The forces of change were too large and too rapid for the tribal people
to adjust. For inspiration, therefore, they looked back to their past. All their
revolts were characterised by a conscious invocation of a lost but golden
past. Sidho, Kanu and Birsa Munda, all of them painted a glorious picture
of their tribe in a bygone age, Satjug, vis-a-vis the tribe's present suffering
Kalijug. Birsa blamed the white fathers, the black fathers (the converted
tribals), and the colonial authorities for the miseries of his tribe, which had
lost its land and religion and had become a victim of overall degeneration.
This consciousness provided the ideological basis for solidarity behind all
these movements. Attempts to revive community memories of the pre-
Christian days by those who were disturbed by the growing divide between
the Christian and non-Christian world-views. This was combined with an
attack against the outsiders and British rule in the last decades of the 19th
century. The Khasi tribe made such an attempt.
The ongoing national movement influenced the tribal movements in the early
decades of 20th century: The Tana Bhagat movement of Gumla in Ranchi
district, and the Zeliangrong movement in the Naga hills were two such
instances. Jadonang (1905-193I), who set up the Haraka religious cult with
three basic objectives started the complex Zeliangrong or Haomei movement
in 1925. The first aimed at reformation of the tribes, particularly the Zemi,
Liangrnei and Rangmei, to enable them to face the onslaught of Christianity.
Secondly, the overthrow of the exploitative colonial laws by attacking British
rule. And third, establishment of the Naga Raj. The movement was also
aimed against the Kuki tribe, the "outsider". From 1927 onwards, influenced
by Gandhi, Jadonang began a civil disobedience movement in the area. On
13 June 1931, Jgdonang was arrested and sentenced to death, and finally
hanged on 29 August 1931. Gaidinliu a teenaged girl, took over the
leadership of the movement. In March 1932, the entire village of Bopugoanrni
in the Naga hills was burnt down by the government forces, ?n retaliation
to the attack on the Assam Rifles outpost by Gaidinliu's followers. Finally
the seventeen year old leader, called Rani Gaidinliu by'Nehru, was arrested
on 17 October 1932, and sentenced to life imprisonment. Thus, when she
was set free in 1947 on Nehru's personal insistence, she had already spent Responses of. Indian
Society
all her youth in jail. .
,'
2) What were the symbols of tribal reaction against the colonial rule?
.................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................
The reformers also realised that to defend their society against missionary
and colonial criticism and also for permanent reform, it was important that
education be imparted not only to all sections of men, but to women too.
They campaigned for a critical and scientific education system. What India
required was "not the revival of Sanskrit learning", Rammohun Roy argued,
"but promotion of a more liberal and enlightened system of instruction,
embracing Mathematics, Natural Philosophy, Chemistry and Anatomy with
other useful subjects." It was Lord Macaulay, the Law Member in the
Viceroy Council, whose decisive intervention was crucial in winning the case
for English education. Though Lord Macaulay's intention was to produce
a class of Indian in colour but British in taste, yet Rammohun Roy and
others wished to bring the fruits of new knowledge into India and infuse
Indians with these new ideas and spirit.
Check Your Progress Exercise 2
Note: 3 Use the space given below for your answers.
n Check your answers with the model answers given at the
end of the unit.
1 1) In which way the middle class/intelligentsia was different from the
peasantry and tribals?
Responses of Indian
Society
,
! .................................................................................................................
F .................................................................................................................
The new ideas soon swept the Parsi community of Bombay Presidency.
Cursetjee Nusserwanjee Cama, Nowrojee Furdonjee and Sorabjee Shapoorjee
Bengalee took the lead in this. The emphasis was on the status and education
of women. CursdJee Cama started regular schools for girls and Sir Jamshetjee
Jeejibhai opened four schools for Parsi girls, which were taken over by
the Parsi Girls Association in 1856. Furdonjee's Gujarati periodical Vidyasagar
and Bengalee's Jagatmitra and the Dyan Prakashak Mandali disseminated
new social and literary ideas. Dadabhai Naoroji's journal Rast Goftar
(185I), best reflected the-reforming trends within the community.
In Assam, attacks were directed against kulinism and the practice of sati.
Jadrum Barua prolagated widow remarriage, himself marrying a widow.
Gunaviram Barua and Hem Chandra Barua later attacked these practices
with renewed vigour. In Bibhaha Paddhati and Tin Ghaini, Hem Chandra
Barua attacked poIygamy and its associated evils, while his Bahire Rang
chang Bhitare Koa Bhaturi exposed the irreligious acts of the priestly class.
In all the attempts to reform societies, efforts were made to engage critically
with tradition. But there also existed a stream of thought, which attacked
existing traditions in toto and presented alternative traditions. In Poona, a
gardener's son Jyotiba Phule (1827-90) having personally experienced caste
oppression, presented in alternative history of the community he termed the
Bahujan Sarnaj. He saw the Brahmins as the outsiders who captured the
land of the Bahujan and reduced them to the status of untouchables and
lower castes. He criticised all traditions, including Bhakti saints like Rarndas
as legitimising these inequities. Ambedkar later developed this pow& stream
of thought. Pandita Ramabai's (1858-1922) 'The High Caste Hindu Woman'
focussed on the strong patriarchal character of ~rahrnanicalorthodoxy, and
engaged with larger question of the sanctity of tradition and perpetuation
of caste and gender inequalities. In Madras, Ramaliagnaswami represented
a very powerful rationalist line.
I Rammohun Roy and the early reformers were conscious of the colonial
I exploitation of the country. However, the positive role of the colonial rule
overwhelmed this knowledge. A section of the intelligentsia in the second
1 half of the nineteenth century realised that colonialism, morethan containing
t the seeds of societal regeneration, was fimdamentally harming Indian soceity.
"Dadabhai Naoroji (1825-1917) - the grand old man of India, Justice
Mahadev Govinda Ranade (1842- 1901), Romesh Chander Dutt (1848-
1909), G.V. Joshi (1851-1911) and others began to question the colonial
assertion of developing and modemising India. They asked if the colonial
rule made a positive contribution, how was it that Indians were becoming
poorer day by day, and famine struck villages, while manufacturing industry
and artisans were being ruined year after year. Dadabhai Naoroji propounded
the 'drain theory', explaining how large amount of resources drained from
India found their way to England. This was in the form of salaries and
pensions of civil and military officials of the colonial state, interest on the
loans taken by the Indian government, and huge profits of the British capital
employed in India. The latter meant 5% guaranteed profit on investment in
railways, and the cost of administration in England. This drain not only
deprived India of her present resources but also of the surplus for future
investment. To the contention that the railways signified the commencement
of the industrial revolution in India, Naoroji responded that the railways
merely enabled the colonial rule to penetrate the Indian interior for getting
cheap raw material for British industries and for bringing back the finished
goods of the British industry. Thus, it helped the industrial revolution in Britain
by providing all benefits to the British manufacture. This diagnosis was
propagated through public debate, "publications, etc., and helped shatter the
myth of British benevolence. Naoroji and others advocated modernisation
of India in real terms, and industrialisation with the help of Indian capital.
- -
2) What was main point in the debate about social and political issues?
.................................................................................................................
...................................................................................................i .............
.................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................
3) What do you mean by 'drain theory'?
.................................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................
Historical Background
1) The protested against the colonial rule. They attacked both the
landlords and indigo planters.
2) he; revolted against the colonial rule by invoking their traditional
symbols.
Check Your Progress Exercise 2
1) It was different 'in the sense that while the peasantry and tribals were
directly related to the land and soda1 structures, it was more entrenched
in non-land economic structures. Besides, it revolted against the British
because it was more enlightened than the peasantry and the tribals;
2) They responded to the colonial rule by invoking Indian traditions, and
calling for reforming the Indian society.
3) They generated public debate through the newspapers, magazines and
- litmhirp
Check Your Progress Exercise 3 Rpsponses of Indian
Society
3.0 OBJECTIVES
The legacy of the Indian ~ a t i o n a lMovement affected politics in India in
more ways than one. An understanding of the Indian National movement
will enable you to understand the politics of contemporary India better. After
going through this unit, you will be able to:
Understand the role of leaders with varying ideological background in the
India; qational movement;
To now the cdntribution of various classes lie the peasanw and woring class;
To establish the line between certain developments which preceded the
achievement of Independence, and contribution of politics to it; and
To analyse the unfinished task of the national movement;
National Movement
3.1 INTRODUCTION
The Indian National Movement and the Chinese revolution of 1949 were
two significant mass movements in world history, which influenced the destiny
of millions of people. The former articulated the desire for hedom of millions
of Indians, and inspired movements in colonised Asia and .Africa. The Indian
National Movement passed through several phases.
The solidarity of the Indians was shown when Bengal was partitioned in
1905, and east Bengal was amalgamated with Assam to create a new
province. It was said that Bengal was too large and unwieldy for efficient
administration. But the regular pronouncements of different officials since 1930
made it known that the real reason behind the partition was to weaken
the growing nationalist sentiments in Bengal, particularly those of the 'Bengali
babus'. The protest against the partition soon took an organised shape, and
finally the Swadeshi Movement officially commenced fkom 7 August 1905.
Boycott of foreign goods and government schools became the prime modes
of protest. National schools and Swadeshi manufacturing units were opened.
On 16 October 1905, when partition was to become operative, many people
in Bengal fasted, and at Tagore's suggestion tied Rakhi on each other's
wrist as a mar of solidarity. Processionists around the cities sang songs
written by Rabindranath Tagore and others. The Swadeshi movement spread
to other parts of the country, and provided the first spurt of nationalist
activity in Assam, Orissa and Punjab.
The new leaders demanded a more assertive Congress, which the early
nationalists saw as disastrous not only for the Congress but also for the
reform process initiated by the Congress. Their political vocabulary did not
include faith in public agitation and movements. However, this was not
because tney belonged to the educated or middle class. It was more due
to their different perception of the colonial state and their lack of understanding
of the current political mood.
within the British empire was adopted as the goal of the Congress. The
new extremist leaders tried to push the moderates out of the Congress. This
disastrous move finally led to the split in Congress at Surat in 1907, where
the extremists were pushed out of the party. The colonial state, taking
advantage of the situation, suppressed the extremist leaders with heavy hands.
Tilak was imprisoned and sent to Mandalay jail in Burma. Moderate leaders
began l~singpopular sympathy, and henceforth lived with the hope that they
were leading the country towards liberation through constitutional reforms.
The Swadeshi movement brought into the national movement new forces like
students and urban youth, and places like Assam and Orissa into the
mainstream. Bengal, Punjib and Maharashtra, however, reniained the centre
of activities. Individual acts of terrorism, displaying a high sense of patriotism
and sacrifice, by Khudiram Bose, Aurobindo and Barindra Ghose, Rashbehari
Bose and Sachin Sanyal, Ajit Singh and Madanlal Dhingra, and Damodar
Savarkar, captured the imagination of the country's youth. Khudiram Bose
and Prafulla Chaki who hurled a bomb at the Muzzafarpur Magistrate
Kingsford's carriage but unfortunately killed two innocent ladies (1908),
became household names when Khudirarn was hanged. Rashbehari Bose and
Sachin Sanyal (1912), in a state procession, threw a bomb that hurt the
Viceroy Lord Hardinge who was seated on an elephant.
Rarnnath Puri, G.D. Kumar, Taraka Nath Das and others, with the help
of Indian settled in north America, since 1905-06 had been circulating ideas
advocating free Hindustan. With the arrival of Lala Hardayal in 1911, the
Ghadar (revolution) movement centered in the west coast of USA began,
named after a newspaper. It became the focus of the anti-colonial sentiments
of the large Indian population settled there and in East Asian countries. The
Ghadar revolutionaries invited Rashbehari Bose to organise the scattered
revolutionaries and lead the revolution in India. Bose came to Punjab and
after organising people, fured the date for revolution on 21st February 1915,
later changed to 19th February 1915. But the government obtained prior
information and suppressed the Ghadar revolutionaries. Forty-five people
were hanged while hundreds were imprisoned. The revo~utionaryvision of
the Ghadar and the Ghadarites, however, left a permanent imprint on the
minds of people in bunjab and India.
3.4.2 Home Rule Movement
At the time of the First World War, the Home Rule movement led by Annie
Besant and Tilka tried to inspire the scattered nationalist forces into action.
Influenced by the Irish movement for Home rule, it demanded home rule
on the ground that Indians had now come of age. Home Rule Leagues
of Tilak (1915) and Besant (1916) enlisted volunteers and published pamphlets
in which the demands, reasons and modes of Home Rule were articulated.
By 19 17, Tilak's leagues in Kamataka, Central Provinces, Bengal and United
Provinces had 14000 volunteers, while Annie Besant's League, which
propagated ideas through New India and Commonwealth, had 7000 volunteers.
A number of future leaders of India including Jawaharlal Nehru, Shankarlal
Banker and Byornkesh Chakravarty learned their first political lessons as
volunteers of these leagues. The government was not happy with the popularity
and radicalism of the movement. Besant was arrested in 1947, raising a
storm of protest. She was released in September, and on the request of
Tilak was elected the president of Congress.
Tilak and Besant wanted to revive the Congress by involving it with the
Home Rule movement. Home Rule volunteers came in large numbers to the
Lucknow session of the Congress in 1916, where the Congress and Muslim
League met. Tilak played a crucial role in bringing the Congress-League
pact for electoraVcornrnuna1 representation. It seemed like a radical solution
at the point but proved to be a stumbling block in the development of
the national movement.
Muhammad Ali, Shaukat Ali, Abdul Kalam Azad and sections of ulama
particularly fiom Firangi Mahal, Lucknow, were at this time engaged in the
Khilafat agitation. When they approached Gandhi, they found him sympathetic
to their cause. Gandhi appealed to the Congress to side with the Khilafists
against what was a serious breach of trust by the British. At this juncture,
the government humedly passed the Rowlatt Act. The Act provided for
imprisonment of Indians without trial, and soon became the rallying ground
for the movement.
3.5.2 Protest Against the dowlett Act
Gandhi suggested formation of Satyagraha Sabhas to protest against this
draconian law. An all India hartal was planned for 30 March 1919, which
was put off till 6th April 1919. Hartal was observed in Orissa, Assam,
Madras, Bombay and Bengal. On the Baisakhi day of 13 April 1919, the
police under General Dyer opened fire on a peaceful gathering at Jallianwala
Bagh in Arnritsar, and killed an official estimate of 379 unarmed and
, defenceless people. Subsequently, marital law was clamped, and people were
I
even made to crawl of their belly before Europeans. The Jallianwala Bagh
'
incident incensed the country. Rabindranath Tagore returned the Knighthood
conferred by the British crown. Instead of questioning General Dyer, the
I
British people presented a purse to him. The Hunter commission inquiring
1 into the incident published, in the words of Gandhi, "page after page of
, white wash."
1
Historical Background
3.5.3 Non-Cooperation Movement
In November 1919, the All India Khilafat Committee met at Allahabad,
and Gandhi's proposal of a non-violent Non-Cooperation movement was
accepted. The movement soon engulfed the country. Abul Kalarn h a d ,
Maulana Akram Khan and Muniruzamman Islamabadi popularised the
movement in Bengal. Akrarn Khan's Moharnmadi propaghted the spirit of
Swadeshi and Boycott. Mohamrnad Ali's Hamdard and Comrade, and Abul
Kalam Azad's A1 Hial were powerful organs in spreading the message
of the movement. Meanwhile, Gandhiji tried to make Congress accept the
idea of a non-violent Non-Cooperation movement. He thought the Punjab
and Khilafat wrong should be made the basis for non-coohration. In
1
the special Congres session convened at Calcutta in September 1920,
,
/
Khilafat and Non-Cooperation together produced India' first p o w e m mass
upheavel. Schools, courts and foreign cloths were boycotted, and charkha
and Swadeshi cloth were adopted throughout the country. The Congress had
already announced in Nagpur that Swaraj was to be attained by peaceful
and legitimate means. There was a new enthusiasm regarding the impending
freedom, which Gandhi promised within a year. The peasants joined the
movement in Oudh, Bengal, Madras, Bombay, Bihar and Assarn. A new
leadership, largely fiom rural areas, emerged. Gandhiji's movement and
message also influenced the tribal movements in Bihar and Manipur hills.
But on 4 February 1922, a group of people in Chaurichaura in Gorakhpur,
when provoked by the police attacked the police station and burnt the
policemen alive. Gandhi suspended the movement, and despite the criticism
by most leaders he remained unmoved. He refused td sacrifice or delute
the principle of non-violence.
Check Your Progress Exercise 2
Note: 3 Use the space given below for your answers.
n) Check your answers with the model answers given at the end
of the unit.
................................................................................................................
................................................................................................................
...............................................................................................................
I
Born in 1907 and nephew of the famous revolutionary Ajit Singh, Bhagat
Singh (1907-193 1) best syrnbolised this change. He founded the Punjab
Naujawan Bharat Sabha in 1926. Bhagat Singh understood the role of the
masses for any revolution. He also realised the increasing danger of
communalism to society. In 1928 itself, he and his fiiends opposed entry
of members of any religious or communal organisation into Naujawan Sabha,
a decision taken by the Congress only in 1938. At the age of 22, while
in jail he wrote the famous tract 'Why I am in Atheist.' He could see
that the forces of change were located in Indian fields and factories.
The dilemma of a mass movement entering into electoral politics, and then
accepting office became acute during the 1937 elections won by the Congress
in many provinces. After much review and debate, the Congress decided
to form ministries in six provinces, and introduced its social and economic
programme. This created apprehensions in some quarters, such as the landlords
in United Provinces. The Muslim League too began to attack the Ministries
for its atrocities upon Muslims. Though never substantiated, these propagandist
allegations ,were used to paint the future shape of a Congress ruled Hindu
Historical Background Raj. Some of the Congress ministries, like those of Madras and Bombay,
worked to suppress the communists and other radical groups.
Check Your Progress Exercise 3
Note: 9 Use the space given below for your answers.
ni Check your answers with the model answers given at the end
of the unit.
1) What were the basic differences between Gandhi and Ambedkar?
2) What was the most important reason for the rise of communalism?
Japan joined the war in December 1941 and threatened the Indian borders.
The news of retreating British forces, leaving Indians and others to the mercy
of the Japanese, created a sense of anger and helplessness in India. Army
artrocities and war-time crises made the people restive. Gandhi understood
this growl::g unrest and, despite strong reservations of most leaders, decided
to launch a movement. On gth August at 1942. at Bombay, he gave the
call of 'Do or Die' and asked the British to 'Quit India'. Gandhiji and
other leaders were arrested that night. From the next day, people across
the country came out in the open, and a massive anti-colonial movement
began. Government property was damaged, and parallel governments were
:- ------ L1- ---- :- n - 1 : - :-
c--L-- ~ r nX K : A ---..- :- D---..I --A
Satara in Maharashtra. Jayaprakash Narayan, Ram Manohar Lohia (1910- National Movement
,
3.11 LETUSSUMUP
Independence was the conclusion of a long struggle against colonialism. The
early nationalists and extremists inculcated a high sense of patriotism among
the people. Gandhi under the aegis of the Congress brought peasantry,
labouring classes and the exploited masses into the vortex of nationalism.
The social programmes of the nationalists aimed at more than a mere political
liberation of the people. But the idea of the early nationalists that India
was a nation in the making proved to be true because partition displayed
h e lack of a strong foundation of the Indian nation. The force of nationalism
that caused the British to quit, was now to be employed to resolve social
questions of poverty, illiteracy and development, with the help of a democratic
and secular polity.
National Movement
3.12 SOME USEFUL BOOKS
Banerjee, Surendra Nath, A Nation in the Making, Calcutta, 1963
-Chandra
-
Bipan et. al. (eds.), India's Struggle for Independence, Delhi, 1989
Verma (ed.), Shiv, Selected Writings of Shaheed Bhagat Singh, New Delhi,
1986
4.0 OBJECTIVES
This unit deals with the rise of new classes which emerged during the colonial
period. After going through this Unit, you will be able to:
Understand the reasons for the rise of new classes;
Understand conditions of the old classes; and
Establish a link between these classes and the following units in rest of
the blocks.
4.1 INTRODUCTION - - - -
\ -
- --
The Indian society witnessed the emergence of many new classes after the
advent of the British rule. There emerged classes of Zarnindars, tenants,
peasant-proprietors, moneylenders, agricultural laborers, etc. in rural areas;
in the urban areas the classes of capitalists, workers, small traders, etc.,
appeared. There also emerged an educated middle class. Gradually these
classes acquired national character, which manifested in the formation of all
India organisation by them. The capitalist class formed the Federation of
Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry. The workers built All India
Trade Union Congress. The peasant-proprietors, tenants and agricultural
laborers built All India Kisan Sabha. The creation of a national economy
and state system out of almost unconnected local economies and congeries
of state by the British provided the impulse among the new classes to
organise and struggle on an all India basis. The pre-British India was marked
with the absence of an all India economy and a unified administrative system.
That is why there were no all India classes. These new classes started
struggling for the promotion of their sectional interests. The enlightened
sections of these classes started understanding the true nature of British rule,
thev could see the clash of interests of the Indian m ~ l with
e British interests
distorical Background in India. They also realised that the general prospehy of India society would
create better conditions even for promotion of their sectional interests. They
also realised this general prosperity could only come with freedom. This
realisation galvanised the progressive classes to join the united nationalist
fi-eedom struggle.
The emergence of new classes did not follow any uniform pattern everywhere
and among all the communities. The new economy causing the rise of new
classes was introduced in the areas, which came under the British control.
The conquest of India was not achieved in one stroke. It was done in
tits and bits. The part of country coming under British control early witnessed
the early rise of the new classes. Bengal was the first to usher in the two
new classes the Zamindars and the tenants because British conquest started
from Bengal and it was in Bengal where for the first time the permanent
settlement, which gave birth to the z,amindars and the tenants, was introduced.
Even the industrial enterprises which gave rise to the class of industrialists
and workers were first set up in Bengal and Bombay areas. The professional
and the educated middle class also came into being in these areas much
ahead of the other areas. It was because of the introduction of a new
administrative apparatus and the modem educational system. Gradually the
whole country came under the British control. So the economic system, the
administrative set up and the modem education system introduced by the
British enveloped the whole of country. This is how the emergence of the
,new classes became a countrywide phenomenon.
Even among the different communities the emergence of new social classes
was not uniform. Baniyas and Parsis were first to be drawn to the commerce
and banking so they blossomed into capitalist class. Similarly the Brahmins
were first to take the modem education introduced by the British. That is .
why they largely constituted th'e class of professionals and the intelligentsia.
The Muslims witnessed late emergence of the new classes because they
stayed away fiom the trade and commerce and looked at the modem system
of education with suspicion and they lived in northern India, which came
under the British subjugation at a much later stage. Bengal had a very large
Muslim population.
became for ,the market. This created opportunity for people whose role was
to import and export goods from and into India. These people came to
be known as merchants. Even in Pre-British India there existed the class
of merchants because both internal and foreign trade had existed but it was
very small in scale and volume. This class did not carry enough weight in
sodety. The accumulation of profit in hands of the trading class, a section
of zamindar and the weather among the professional classes formed the
capital for the rise of textiles, mining and other industries owned by Indians.
This led to the emergence of the native capitalist class. Thus completely
new classes appeared; one, the industhal capitalist who owned the mills,
mines and other capitalist enterprises; two, workers who worked in factories,
mines, railways and on plantations.
The new social, economic and state system introduced by the British needed
a class of Indians having acquired modem education in professional fields
like law, technologies, medicines, economics, etc. The introduction of modern
education system all over the country was done with this objective in mind.
This ever-expanding class of professionals was the creation of the new socio-
economic and administrative arrangement. This professional class was absent
in the pre-British India. These professional classes had acquired modem
knowledge in the fields of science and arts. The legal system introduced
by the British provided opportunities to those who studied law. Those who
studied medicine were absorbed in government hospitals and medical colleges.
also came under the influence of the Kisan Sabha started by N.G. Ranga
and Swami Sahajanand. In UP these were mobilised Baba Ram Chand.
These were not only critical of the British rule they were also critical of
the Indian National Congress for showing leniency towards the interest of
zamindars. Their main demands included reduction of rent, abolition of illegal
dues collected by the zamindars. The kisan sabha opposed the zamindars
and the zarnindari system.
4.4.3 Peasant-Proprietors
In south and south central India were the Ryotwari settlement was introduced,
there emerged a class of peasant proprietors. In these areas the cultivators
were recognized as the owners of their plots in return to their payment
of land revenue. The general condition of this class worsened mainly because
of excessive land tax, fragmentation of the size of holding and heavy
indebtedness. The condition of some of the peasant proprietors improved
and they joined the ranks of rich peasants but most of them fared miserably
and joined the rank of poor peasants and tenants of the absentee landlords.
Some of them even joined the class of land laborers. The peasant-proprietors
became politically conscious much ahead of the' tenants. It was because they
were in direct contact with the foreign ruler while in Zamindari areas the
Zamindars mediated between the government and the tenants. The peasant
proprietors did not have difficulty in recognizing their enemy, the British rule.
The tenants saw the ~ k i n d a r sas their enemy not the British rule. The
consciousness of the tenants was also blunted because of the Gandhian
approach of class harmony. Gandhi emphasized the need of unity between
the Zamindars and the tenants for the achievement of Swaraj. The leaders
of kisan sabha like N.G. Ranga and sahjanand pressurized the Indian national
congress to fotmulate a programme of the demands for the tenants. They
also held that the congress was aligning with Zamindars against the interest
of tenants in some areas.
Check Your Progress Exercise 1
Note: 9 Use the space given belaw for your answers.
ii) Check your answers with the model answers given at the end
of the unit.
1) Identify the factors which gave rise to the new classes.
Among the major peasant movements of the nineteenth century was the
Indigo Revolt of 1859-60. Indigo was used as a dye for the cotton clothes
manufactured by factories in England. Almost all the indigo planters were
Europeans and they forced the peasants to grow indigo on the best part
of their land Most of the magistrates were also Europeans and in case
of any dispute they used to side with the planters. The indigo revolts
enveloped all the indigo-growing districts of Bengal by 1860. The peasants
joined together to raise funds to fight court cases filed against them. The
planters succumbed to combined pressure and closed their factories. The.
role of intelligentsia in the indigo revolt was to have a lasting impact on
the nationalist intellectuals. Din Bandhu Mitra's play Nee1 Darpan became
/ famous for its vivid description of the exploitation by the planters.
Between 1870 to 1880 large part of East Bengal witnessed agrarian unrest
caused by efforts of zamindars to enhance rent beyond legal limits. This
they were doing to prevent the tenants fiom acquiring occupancy rights under
Act X of 1859. To achieve this objective they used coercive methods like
forced eviction and seizure of crops. In May 1873 an agrarian league was
formed in Pabna district to resist the demands of the zarnindars. The tenants
rehsed pawent of enhanced rent and raised funds to challenge the zamindars
in courts. Many of the disputes were settled partly due to government
pressure and partly due to zarnindar's fear of being dragged into long drawn
legal battle by the united peasantry. The 1885 Bengal tenancy act was an
attempt to address the worst aspects of the zamindari system.
of the country in the nineteenth century were the Mappila outbreak in the
Malabar region and the Kuka revolt of Punjab.
I
1
!
!
[unpaid labour] bedakhli [ejectment]. The hefty increase in the prices of
essential commodities after the war had further added to their problems.
The U.P. kisan sabha was formed in 1918 and by June 1919 it had set
up 450 branches in the province. An alternative Oudh kisan sabha was set
up in 1920, which succeeded in integrating all the grassroots lussan sabhas
of Avadh. This Avadh kisan sabha appealed to the kissans to refuse to
1
!
till bedakhli land and not to do begar. The Avadh rent act of 1921 attempted
to address to some of these demands. Towards the end of 1921 another
movement grew in some areas of Avadh under the name of Eka [unity]
movement. The main cause of discontent was that the rent in these areas
of Avadh was 50% higher than recorded rent. Severe repression by the
government brought this movement to an end. The Malabar area of Kerala,
which had witnessed disturbance even in the nineteenth century in August
1921, witnessed rebellion by Mappila [Muslim] tenants. Nambudri Brahmins
landlords exploited the Mappila tenants. This rebellion had started as an anti-
government anti-landlords affair but acquired communal colours. It was
crushed ruthlessly by the government. Another important struggle of the
peasantry broke out in 1928-29. A thirty percent increase in rent was
recommended in the Bardoli taluka of the Surat district in 1926. The
peasantry fought under, the able leadership of Sardar Pate1 the peasants fought
and forced the government to withdraw the increase in rent.
The Indian national congress shied away from raising the issues concerning
the peasants more particularly the tenants living in the zamindari areas.
According to Bipan Chandra Congress did not want to weaken Indian
nationalism,by dividing our people in political groups based on different
economic interests. In 1930 the eleven-points submitted to the British
government by Gandhi did not include the main demands of the peasants
Gke reduction of rents and redemption of agricultural indebtedness. The
Historical Background formation of the Congress ministries in a majority of the provinces raised
the expectations of the peasants. These ministries brought many legislations
aiming at debt relief, restoration of land lost during depression and security
of tenures to the tenants. These steps did not affect the conditions of
peasants belonging to lower strata. Many kisan leaders were arrested and
their meetings banned. The congress was accused of being anti-peasant. The
radical elements within the kisan sabha accused the congress of siding with
the capitalists and zamindars.
After the end of world war second when independence appeared imminent
the peasants started asserting their rights. The demand of zamindari abolition
was raised with a great sense of urgency. In Telangna the peasants organized
themselves to resist the landlord's oppression and played an important role
in the anti Nizam struggle. In 1946 the Bengal provincial Kisan Sabha led
the movement of the share croppers who wanted to pay only one third
of their crop any more to the jotedars. This movement
as Tebhaga movement.
4.4.5 Rise of Modern Indian Intelligentsia
In the early decades of the nineteenth century the number of the educated
persons were very small. The spread of modem education was largely the
work of the British government. But the Christian missionaries and a large
number of enlightened Indians had also established schools and colleges
over the country. Around the middle of the nineteenth century there emerg
a large section of intelligentsia. They assimilated western democratic culture
C
and kderstood the complex problems of the incipient Indian nationhood.
They led many social and religious reforms movements to integrate Indian
people into a modem nation. The intelligentsia was the h t to acquire national
consciousness. The people who led the nationalist movement duririg its
different phases may have believed in different ideologies but they all belonged
to the same class, the intelligentsia.
Leaders like Gopal Krishna Gokhle, Dadabhai Naoroji, M.G. Ranade and
others led the moderate phase of the nationalist movement. In the militant
phase the trio of Lala Lajpat Rai, Bal Gangadhar Tilak and B.C. Pal together
with Aurobindo Ghose were main leaders. When the freedom struggle
acquired a mass base after the non-cooperation movement of 1919 its
leadership passed into the hands of leaders such as M.K. Gandhi, Motilal
Nehru, Ballabh Bhai Patel, J.L. Nehru, S.C. Bose and intellectuals with
socialist and communist leanings. All of them were products of the modem
education system. This class was fired with a modem rational, secular,
democratic and nationalist vision they were imbued with ideas of democracy,
equality, liberty and justice. They hlly realized the negative impacts of the
British rule and could grasp the contradiction between British interest in India
and the Indian interest according to Bipan Chandra it would be wrong to
think that the nationalist movement was a product of modem education
system launched during the British rule. In fact Indian nationalism was born
out of and sustained by conflict of interests between India and Britain. The
modem education system helped to understand the nature of conflict in a
better way. This class, which included scientists, poets, historians, economists
and philosophers, had a dream of a modem, strong, prosperous and united
India. Most of the progressive social, religious and political movements were
nrngnirld hxr thorn AllAnn the Rritich n ~ l eTheir rnle xuac m i r i o l h~t-olice
they had to spread consciousness among illiterate, ignorant, superstitious Emergence of New Classes
masses.
From the beginning most of the cotton textiles industry was owned by the
Indians. The Swadeshi and Boycott movement launched by the Indian
National Congress in 1905 gave a fillip to the expansion of the Indian
industries. The period of the first world war [1914-19181 proved to be
a boon for the Indian industries. The diversion of shipping to the war needs
had made imports difficult. Therefore, to cater to the war needs many
industries were established. Between 1914 to 1947 the Indian capitalist class
grew at a faster pace and encroached upon areas of European domination.
Towards independence Indian capitalist class owned around seventy percent
of the market and eighty per cent of deposits in the organized banking sector.
The rising capitalist class had become quite powehl and conscious by 1905.
This class supported the Swadeshi and Bpycott movement launched by
the Indian National Congress because the objective of the movement suited
their class interest. After the First World War and more particularly after
1919-20 the influence of this class started increasing in the nationalist
movement and the Indian national congress. According to Bipan Chandra
it is true that the congress accepted h d s fiom the capitalist class but inspite
Historical Background . of this the congress maintained its independent position on, policy and
ideological matters. According to A.R. Desai the capitalist class was attracted
towards congress because of Gandhi's leadership, his theory of social harmony,
his opposition to the idea of class struggle and his concept of trusteeship.
The capitalist class was aware of the contradiction the interest of the colonial
government and their own independent growth. They realized that a national
government would provide better1atmosphere for their growth. The Indian
capitalists were making efforts since 1920s towards forming a national' level
organization of Indian commercial, industrial and financial interests. These
efforts culminated in the formation the Federation of Indian Chambers of
Commerce and Industry in 1927. The F.I.C.C.I. was very soon recognized
as national guardian of trade commerce and industry. It pledged its support
to the Indian freedom struggle since its inception.
During the 1930s the congress was getting increasingly radicalized under the
leadership of Nehru and the socialists. The fear of radicalization did not
push the capitalist class to align with the imperialists. The Post War Economic
Development Committee set up by the capitalists in 1942 drafted the Bombay
Plan, which attempted to accommodate socialist demands like equitable
distribution of propaty, parbl ~omlizationand land refom without capitalism
surrendering its basic features.
\
................................................................................................................
4.4.7 ~ i b eof the Working Class
The modem working class made its appearance in India in the second half
of the nineteenth century with the growth of modem industries, railways,
post and telegraph network, plantation and mining. In the deghing the Indian
worlung class was formed out of popularised peasants and ruined artisans.
~he%asants were pauperized because of high land tax, fragmentation of
holdings and growing indebtedness. The artisans were forced to join the
rank of workers because their could not compete with the cheaper
machine made goods &om England. The works 4ere li&%g in inhuman and
degrading condition without any trace of even the minimum duties performed
by the authorities towards them. S.V. Parulekar, who was the Indian delegate Emergence or N ~ WClasses
The labour movements started in an organised way only after the end of
the First World War. Before the war there were strikes and agitations mostly
sporadic, spontaneous, lacking long term objectives, devoid of class
consciousness, and based on local and immediate grievances. The worsening
economic condition of the workers due to the economic crisis that followed
the war, the socialist revolution in Russia, the Non-cooperation and Khilafat
movement in the country formed the background in which All India Trade
Union Congress [A.I.T.U.C.] was borne in 1920 mainly due to the efforts
of leaders like N.M. Joshi, Lala Lajpat Roy and Joseph Baptista. Its stated
objective was to coordinate activities of all organizations in all the provinces
of India to further the interests of Indian labour in economic, .social and
political matters. The Indian National Congress at its Gaya session in 1922
welcomed the formation of the A.I.T.U.C. and formed a committee of
prominent congressmen to assist in its works. ~ c c o r d i nto~ Bipan Chandra
early nationahsts paid relatively little attention to the question of labour despite
their wretched condition because taking up the issues of labour versus
indigenous employer would have weakened the common struggle against
imperialism. Another reason for not taking up the issues of worker was the
belief of the early nationalists .that industrialisation could solve the problems
of poverty.
In the second half of the 1920s there was a consolidation of left ideological
forces in the country. There developed a left wing leadership even with the
trade union movement. In 1928 the left wing including the communists
succeeded in acquiring dominant position inside the A.I.T.U.C. The old
leadership represented by the Joshi group became in minority. This led to
a split in A.I.T.U.C. The workers participated in large numbers in, strikes
and demonstrations all over the country under the Influence of the communists
and the radical nationalists. They also participated in Simon boycott
demonstration. The government implicated almost the entire radical leadership
in the Meerut conspiracy case.
Before the elections for the provincial government in 1937 the Congress
had promised to take steps for settling the labour disputes and securing
rights to form union and go on strike. The civil liberties had increased under
the Congress government. It reflected in the phenomenal rise in the trade
unions. There were some charges of undemocratic and pmcapitalistic legislations
like Bombay Trade Dispute Act and there were cases of banning labour
meetings and imprisonment of labour leaders. When the Second World War
started in 1939 the working class of Bombay was amongst the first in the
world to hold anti-war strike in which 90,000 workers participated. With
the Nazi attack on the Soviet Union in 1941 the communists argued that
the character of the war had changed from imperialist war to people's w'ar.
They were of the view that the working class should now support the allied
powers and dissociate themselves from the Quit India Movement of 1942.
Historical Background
Inspite of the indifference of the communists towards it, the Quit India
Movement had its impact on the workers. After the arrest of Gandhi and
other leaders there were strikes all over the country. There were strikes
between 1945-47 in support of the I.N.A. prisoners in Calcutta when their
trial began. There w&e strikes by Bombay workers in solidarity with mutiny
of the Naval Ratings in 1946.
.................................................................................................................
2) What was the attitude of the provincial governments led by the
Congress towards the working class?
Objectives
Introduction
The Meaning of Constitutional Government
The Roots of the Constituent Assembly of India
The Cabinet Mission Plan
5.4.1 A Constituent Assembly
5.4.2 The Federal Formula
5.4.3 A Three-Tier Federation
5.4.4 An Odd Procedure
5.4.5 No Way Out of a Group
The "Grouping" Controversy
Composition of the Proposed Constituent Assembly
An Interim Government
'The Constituent Assembly and Partition
Parties in the Constituent Assembly
5.9.1 Congress Dominance
5.9.2 Leadership of the Constituent Assembly
5.9.3 The Opposition in the Constituent Assembly
5.9.4 The Fence- Sitters
Work of the Constituent Assembly
Status of the Constituent Assembly
Let Us Sum Up
Some Useful Books
Answers to Check Your Progress Exercises
5.0 OBJECTIVES
The Unit deals with the processes, factors and people relating to the framing of our
constitution. After going through this unit, you will be able to eiplain:
The meaning of a constitutional government;
How and why India decided to frame its Constitution;
Which body of people framed this Constitution; and
How the Constitution was framed.
5.1 INTRODUCTION
Modern democracies are based on the theory of constitutional government. The
Indian Constitution established a republican democracy. Its authority is derived from
the people and it is the supreme law of the land.
The Cabinet Mission held that, as the Muslims were apprehensive of a unitary, Hindu-
majority state, the constitutional structure should be federal. The provinces should
have maximum autonomy and the Central government should have minimum power-
such as on foreign affairs, defence and communication. The Union could raise necessary
financial resources required for the administration of such subjects.
The Union would include not only the British Indian provinces but also the princely
states so long under the paramount power of the British Government. All the residual
powers - that is, powers not given to the Union, - would belong to the provinces
and states.
The third extra-ordinary phenomenon was a partial application of the communal veto.
No decision on a major communal issue could be taken in tlie Constituent ~ s s e m b l ~
without a majority of tlie members of the two major communities (General and
Muslim) agreeing to it. This principle, however, would not apply to the sections where
a simple majority was enough to take any decision.
The fourth extraordinary phenomenon was the formula that, once a section formed
a group constitution, no province would be free to withdraw from the group it was
in. A province could leave such a group o~ilyafter the first general election held under
the group constitution.
The Congress party feared that the groups would frame the election rules in such a
way that, after the elections, the provincial legislatures would be so constituted as to
make such withdrawal impossible. This would satisfy the Muslim League's demand
of Pakistan and would be unjust to the provinces like Assam and the North-West
Frontier Province where the Congress was dominant.
2) What was the relationship of the Muslim League with the Constituent Assembly?
In this Constituent Assembly Congress had an overwhelming majority. But the Congress
party had nominated several members from outside tlie party's fold. Many of them
were legal experts and leading legislators in the previous British Indian legislatures.
Several brilliant officials of the British Indian government, led by Sir B.N. Rau, were
drafted for the work of tlie Constituent Assembly. Experts from outside were frequently
consulted. Precedents of the foreign Constitutions were carefully studied.
There were two broad types of leadership in the Constituent Assembly: ( I ) political
and (2) technical. Because of the predominance of the Congress party the political
leadership naturally vested in its leaders. The top of this leadership consisted of Pandit
Jawaharlal Nehru, Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, Maualana Abul Kalam Azad and
Dr. Rajendra Prasad. Granville Austin calls tlie Neliru-Patel-Azad-Prasad team 'the
oligarchy.'
Below this level tliere were tlie cabinet ministers at tlie centre, provincial prime
ministers, former Congress presidents like Pattabhi Sitaramaiya and important Congress
leaders like K.M. Munshi, Thakurdas Bhargava, A.V. Thakkar and Sri Prakasa.
Outside the party's pale there were tlie legal luminaries of tlie time and statesmen of
the liberal tradition like Alladi Krishnaswami Ayyar, N. Gopalaswami Ayyangar, B.R.
Ambedkar, K.M. Panikkar, Pandit Hriday Natli Kunjru (Who was not a member of
the constituent Assembly) and, in the early days, B.L. Mitter. Of these leaders K.M.
Munshi within tlie Congress and B.R. Ambedkar from outside combined their technical
brilliance witli statesmanship as did some Congressmen like K. Santhanam and T.T.
Krislina~iiacliariwhose association witli tlie party was not long. Krishnamacliari, a
critic of some aspects of tlie Draft Constitution, was actually included in the Drafting
Committee in late 1948.
The shape of tlie opposition in the Assembly was. however, unstable. The Cabinet
Mission had divided the Indians into three communities - the General, the Muslims
and the Sikhs. The Congress party overwhelmingly dominated the 'General' section
and had come into an agreement with the Sikh Akal Panth. It also had nominated
a few nationalist Muslims like Abul Kalam ~ z a d ' a n dRafi Ahmed Kidwai.
Phil~sophyof Indian The strength of the Muslim League had been drastically reduced after partition. To
Constitution
cap it all, after Gandhiji's assassination, tlie Muslim League in India dissolved itself
and most of its membersjoined the Congress Party. Sir Mohammad Saadullah, among
them, was included in the Drafting Committee of the Constituent Assembly. Only the
Madras provincial unit of tlie Muslim League decided to retain its identity and acted
as a consistent but negligible opposition.
The only, Co~~munist member of the Constituent Assembly, Somnath Lahiri, lost his
membersh~pafter the partition of Bengal. So did B.R. Ambedkar, leader of the
Scheduled Castes Federation, who had first been elected to the Constituent Assembly
from Bengal. He was nominated by the Congress from Bombay in the vacancy
created by the resignation of the liberal Hindu Mahasabhaite, M.R. Jayakar. He later
became Chairman of the Drafting Committee.
The Congress had nominated not only two Hindu Mahasabha leaders - M.R. Jayakar
and Syama Prasad Mukherjee - but also two socialists and two Forward Bloc
members. In early 1948 in Socialists and the Forward Bloc severed their connections
with the Congress and directed its members to resign from the Assembly. The
members declined and continued in the Constituent Assembly.
.......................................................................................................................
i
i Into how many commun.itieswere Indians divided by the Cabinet Mission Plan?
2)
h
6.0 OBJECTIVES
In this Unit we shall discuss the salient features of the Indian Constitution in the
backdrop of the relevant events that preceded the coming into force of the Constitution.
After going through this unit you should be able to:
6.1 INTRODUCTION
The Constitution of India is the will of the people of the country. It sets the broad
functional parameters of governance. The Constitution was prepared after lengthy
deliberations in the Constituent Assembly, which began on 6 December 1946 and
came into force on 26 January 1950.
The precursor to the Indian Constitutio~lwas the Government of India Act of 1935, .
usually referred to as the 1935 Act. The Indian Independence Act, 1947 held that until
a new Constitution came into force, the 1935 Act would be the Constitutional Law
of India. \
The 1935 ~ cwas t the product of the Report of a Joint Select Committee that was
discussed in the British Parliament before finally receiving the assent of the Queen,
on 2 August 1935. Some of the features of the 1935 Act, with modifications though,
were later incorporated in the Constitution of India. These include a federal structure
in tlie form of a Union government and State government(s) [Centre and State(s)] Basic Feature+
and the division of powers between them [Union List, State List and Concurrent List]
bicameral Legislature-the Lower House and tlie Upper House [Lok Sabha and
Rajya Sabha at the Union level; and State Legislative Assembly and State Legislative
Council, at the State level], Federal Court [the Supreme Court].
I
Ii of India for two successive terms, and the leading light was the first Prime Minister
of Independent India, Jawaharlal Neliru. Renowned members of the Assembly
f
ilicluded T T Krislinamachari, Dr. B R Ambedkar, Alladi Krishna Swami Iyer and
i
Gopalaswami Aiyangar, Sliyama Prasad Mukherji, J B Kriplani, Vallabhai Patel and
! Pattabli i Sitaramayya.
tI
Tliere were to be 381 members in the Constituent Asse~nbly.They represented the
various political parties and belonged to tlie Congress Party, Communist Party of
India, Praja Party, Krisliak Praja Party, Scheduled Castes Federation, Non-Congress
r
Sikhs, Unionist Muslims and the Muslim League. Besides, independent Members and
representatives from the Governor's Provinces and the Princely States were also
represented in tlie Assembly. Tliere never was this full strength of the Assembly.
The provisions of the Constitution were extensively debated upon in the several
Co~nmitteesthat were formed for tlie purpose before being presented to the Assembly
for its consideration. On the basis of tlie deliberations in tlie Assembly, the Drafting
Committee, which was constituted on 29 August 1947, prepared the draft text of the
Constitution. Dr. B R Ambedkar was the chairman of the Drafting Committee. Tlie
final document, after making amendments to the draft Constitution, was signed on 26
November 1949, and two months later it came into force. We have examined the
constitution-making exercise in greater detail in Unit 5 of Block 2.
It is, indeed, creditable that the Members of the Constituent Assembly completed the
exercise of preparing a Co~istitutionwithin a period of three years and appended their
signatures to the document wliile it took many more years for other countries to have
their first Constitution. Also, it goes to tlie credit of the coilntry and is a testimony
to tlie broad vision of tlie Constitution makers that tlie Constitution of India was never
abrogated, and a new one introduced. Tlie Indian Constitution was never seriously
questioned since the time it came into force. Tlie changing requirements were attended
to through effecting amendments to the Constitution while its essential features were
retained; they occasionally came under strain, though.
The 'Preamble' to the Constitution declares that the people of the country are the
sovereigns. In other words, 'sovereignty' rests in the people and is exercised through
the institutions that have been created for that purpose. The sovereignty of the
country can not be pledged, i.e., India can not be turned into a colony or a dependency
of another country. The entire course of the Freedom Movement was on this
quintessential principle of sovereignty.
In the Preamble it is also stated that the country shall be a Republic and shall adhere
to a democratic form of government. In a Republic there is no scope for a Monarch
to reign over the people, but tlie people tliemselves rule the country through their
elected representatives.
The Constitution, thus, provides for creating new States and admitting new territories.
Once they become part of India they do not have the right to secede.
Check Your Progress Exercise 1
Note: i) Use the space given below for your answers.
ii) Try to write the answers in your own words.
I) What was the principle that formed the constitution making exercise in India.
.......................................................................................................................
.......................................................................................................................
2) Which was the state admitted into the Indian Union in 1975?
.......................................................................................................................
The Fundamental Rights are enshrined in Part 111 of the Constitution, and their
implementation is guaranteed by the Supreme Court. In other words, Fundamental
' Rights are justiceable. Indeed, some of the Fundamental Rights, it might be noted, are
applicable only to the citizens of the country and not to foreigners. Article 20, Article
- 21 and Article 22 are, however, applicable to all. At the same time, it should also be
' borne in mind that what is applicable is the 'restriction' on the Right.
Rigltt to Freedom
1 The Constitution also ensures the Right to Freedom under Articles 19 to 22. Article
19 guarantees the right to freedom of speech and expression, right to peaceful
i assembly, right to form associations, right to visit and residC in any part of the country
i
, I
and the right to profess and practice ones religion. These rights too, are subject to any
reasonable restrictions that can be imposed by the state under clauses 2 to 6 of
I
Article 19.
Article 20 guarantees that no person shall be punished on the basis of laws that are
enacted after a crime has been committed (protection from ex post facto laws),
protection from being punished more than once for the same offence (protection from
double jeopardy) and protection from standing trial against oneself (protection &om
self-incrimination). Article 2 1 ensures the protection of 'personal life and liberty'. In
other words, the state does not have the right to take away the life of a person, except
through the procedure established by law. Article 22 prohibits detention of person's
without trial. However, preventive detention of a person up to three months and, in
some cases, beyond that is permitted.
Right to Equality
Article 14, guarantees the Right to Equality before the Law and the Right to Equal
Protection of the Laws. In other words, this article ensuresthat all persons can be
tried in a court of law and every person can approach the courts for justice and that
no person shall be discriminated against in the application of laws, nor can any person
claim special privileges and favourit ism.
Article 15 guarantees protection from discrimination on the basis of 'religion, race,
caste, sex or pIace of birth', and provides for equal access and thus the Right against
Discrimination. It also, however, states clearly that the state can make special provisions
for the uplift of certain categories of people like socially and culturally backward
classes and Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes. An example in this context is
the reservation provided in educational institutions and in the public services to the
disadvantaged sections of the society. As one commentator observed, "the framers
of the Indian Constitution sought to shape an overarching Indian identity even as they
acknowledged the reality of pluralis~nby guaranteeing fundamental rights, in some
cases through specific provisions for the protection of minorities."
Philosophy o f Indian Article 16 provides for the Right to Equality of Opportunity in employment. Continuing
Constitution
with its desire to ensure equality o f all citizens, the Constitution also abolished
'~ntouchabilit~ whose
' practice is a crime under Art 17, while Article 18 abolished
Tittles.
The Directive Principles o f State Policy (DPSP) are an adaptation from the Irish
Constitution. These are broad guidelines which have to be borne in mind while
enacting laws and in implementing them. Unlike the Funda~nentalRights, the DPSP
are not justiciable. Simplistically understood the DPSP have a 'welfare' connotation.
The Constitution doe$ not provide for their guarantee and, therefore, their enforcement
can not be questioned in a court o f law.
Fundamental Rights and the DPSP "together, not individually" form the core o f the
Constitution; "the true conscience". The DPSP prescribes that tlie state shall ensures
(a) adequate means o f livelihood for all, (b) distribution o f wealth and control over it,
rather than concentration, in the common good, (c) equal pay for equal work for both
men and women (d) non-abuse o f the health o f all workers and (e) the protection of
the children o f the country from exploitation and tlieir growth in an atmosphere of
freedom and dignity.
The Fundamental Duties enshrined in the Constitution are intended to obligate all the
citizens to strive for the colnmon benefit o f all. They are expected to accord respect
to the Constitution, the National Tri-colour and the Anthem. They are called upon to
strive for upholding the unity and integrity o f the country and work for a harmonious
society setting aside all divisive tendencies. The citizens o f the country have a duty
to protect its resources both natural and material and work towards higher levels of
achievement.
There are, as all students o f Political Science know, three organs or branches 01
government, i.e., legislature, executive and judiciary. A harmonious functioning among
the three is vital for the furtherance o f a country.
Legislature
I
Executive
I n India, the legislature and the executive are drawn from one another, while the
judiciary is an independent body. The legislature comprises o f the House o f People
(Lok Sabha), Council o f States and the President o f India. A member o f the Union
Council o f Ministers has hecessarily to be a member o f either o f the lower house, the
Lok Sabha or the Upper house, the Rajya Sabha.
President
Both the houses of Parliament and tlie legislatures in the States elect the President
by means o f a 'single transferable vote'. The Office o f the President, its functions,
powers tenure, method o f election and re-election, impeachment, and the qualifications
required to hold the office are enunciated in Articles 52 to 62. All activities of tlie Basic Features
state are carried out in tlie lianie of the President as tlie executive power is vested
in tlie President (Art 52). As in the United States, in India, too, the President is tlie
Supreme Commander of tlie Armed Forces. Tlie President summolls both the houses
of Parlia~neritand addresses its joint sessions. He has the power to remit sentences
and grant reprieve. He appoints all the important functionaries of the state such as
the Prinie Minister and the Council of Ministers, Judges of tlie Supreme Court and
High Courts, the Attorney General, Governors of States, Chairpersons of Commissions
like the Election Commission of India and heads of orgal isations like tlie Comptroller
and Auditor General of India (C&AG).
i The Prime Minster is the Head of Gover~imentand presides over the meeting of the
Union Couricil of Ministers. It needs to be kept in mind tliat there is a difference
between tlie Cabinet and tlie Cou~icilof Ministers; tlie Cabinet is co~nposedof
Ministers of Cabinet rank and Ministers of State, while the Council also includes the
Deputy Ministers. Tlie Council of Ministers is collectively responsible to Parliament.
Activities of tlie Ministries are brought under scruti~iyby the opposition during the
two-hour long Question Hour at tlie beginning of each day of tlie Session in Parliament.
The Council of Ministers makes recomniendations to tlie President, in what is called
'aids and advises', in tlie affairs of the country. Important among tlie recommendations
tliat we should be aware are those relating to dissolution of the Lok Sabha, declaring
war or declaring a 'state of Emergency'.
Tlie Indian Parliament is tlie supreme law-making body of tlie country. It is a bicameral
legislature as in the United Kingdom, the United States and several other countries.
Tlie upper house is known in Hindi as the Rajya Sablia and in English as the Council
of States. It cotnprises tlie Chairman, wlio is also the Vice-President of India, the
elected members and 12 nominated members, eacli holding a term of six years, with
one-third of its membership retiring every two years.
A significant aspect and point of difference between tlie Rajya Sablia and its equivalent,
the American Senate is tliat the membership of eacli State in it is proportional to its
population, whose legislative asse~nbly~elects tlie members of the Rajya Sablia. Thus,
all States of the Indian Union do not send an equal number of representatives.
Tlie lower house of Parliament is tlie House of the People, better known as the Lok
Sabha. Its members are elected for single term of five years or less directly by all
eligible voters by rneans of 'universal adult suffrage' from territorially delimited
constituencies.
Tlie Rajya Sabha lias little power over money bills. These car1 riot be introduced in
tlie Rajya Sablia. It lias to return such bills to the Lok Sablia with its recommendations
within 14 days, and it is for the Lok Sabha to accept or reject any of its
recommendations. In case of a deadlock over a non-money bill between the Lok
Sabha and the Rajya Sablia, the President convenes a joint sitting of tlie two houses
to debate and vote on tlie bill.
A bill takes tlie form of an Act only after the President gives his assent to the same.
Tlie President is empowered to withhold assent to a bill passed by both houses of
Parliament or refer it to Parliarne~itwith liis suggestions. There have been very few
occasions when tlie President withheld liis assent, but of course, on the premise that
the bill ran in contradiction with 'public opinion'. One such instance was the Postal
Bill tliat was t~loiikrl~:
to he infringing olr tile privacy of tlie people.
t'l~ilosophy of I n d i a n Check Your Progress Exercise 2
<'onntitution
Note: i) Use the space given below for your answers.
ii) Try to write the answers in your own words.
I ) What rights do Article 20 and 21 deal with? Can these rights be restricted or
temporarily suspended?
Jurlicinry
The third and very important organ of the government is the Judiciary. The highest
court of appeal is the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court has both appellate and
original jurisdiction, as do the High Courts in the respective States.
'The Supreme Court is the custodian of the Constitution. Laws enacted by the legislature
can be declared invalid by the Supreme Court, if it is of the opinion that they are not
in conformity with tlle provisions of the Constitution. This power is known as the
power of 'judicial review'. Besides, the Supreme Court and the High Courts can also
issue writs to the government and its agencies. A well-known example is the Writ of
Habeas Corpus. By pleading for the issuance of such a writ an applicant asks the
Supreme Court to direct the concerned police authorities to present before the court
a person who is missing and is believed to be under their custody.
The President of India appoints all Judges of the Supreme Court and High Courts and
the Chief Justices. The Constitution also clearly lays down the procedure for impeaching
the Judges and Parliament alone can impeach a Judge of the Supreme Court. The
instance of initiating the inlpeachnlent of a Supreme Court Judge occurred just once,
when Justice K Ramaswamy was sought to be impeached, but the motion failed to
succeed.
The Supreme Court and Parliament have on occasion entered into a tug. This was
finally resolved with the Constit~~tion
Anlendment Act stating that the Supreme Court
has the power only to state whether an Act was in contravention of the provisions
of the Constitution or not.
An emergency can be proclaimed when the security of the country is under threat
01. is l~liderthe da11gc.r af' a t l ~ ~ efi-o~;)
; ~ t hostile countries during times of war or
external aggression or armed rebellion. (Article 352). Emergency was declared under
this provision for the first time in tlie wake of the war with China on October 26,
1962. It continued upto January 10, 1968. Another proclamation of emergency took
place on December 3, 1971, in the wake of the India-Pakistan war. During its
continuation, a third Emergency was declared was on June 25, 1975. It was revoked
in 1977. Critics argue that the third emergency was intended niore to retain Mrs.
Indira Gandhi in power than there was the actual threat. It was the darkest period
for Indian democracy as there were arbitrary detentions for a prolonged period of
time and accusations of widespread infringement of Funda~nentalRights.
i
receives a report from the Governor of a State stating that the constit~ttionalmachinery
has broken down or that the administration of the State can no longer be carried out
in accordance with the provisions laid down in the Constitution of India, an emergency
can be declared in that State. The President may do so even if he is otherwise
satisfied of a constitutional breakdown in a state. The provision allows dismissing the
State government and bringing it under President's Rule or Central Rule. Under such
a condition, the Governor of the State assumes all functions and carries out the
administration in the State, on behalf of the President, i.e. the Centre, with the aid of
his advisors appointed by the President upon the,recommendation of the Union Council
of Ministers.
There were several instances when Article 356 was brought into force in various
States. The first instance of dismissing a State government by invoking Article 356
even while it continued to elljoy tlie confidence of the State Legislature occurred in
1959, in Kerala, when the Communist goverlirnellt of the day was dismissed. It
generated a major controversy and it was argued that it was a wrong decision as the
government commanded a majority on the State Assembly. On the other hand, the
supporters of the decision held that public dissatisfaction manifest in the form of
agitation against tlie government and its policies was reason enough to conclude that
there, indeed, was a break down of law and order, and, hence, it was correct to
in1pose President's Rule.
Other instances include the dismissal of State governments en masse twice, in 1977
after the Janata Party swept the general elections and subsequently in 1979 when the
Congress Party returned to power. Other contentious occasions on which invoking the
provision was resorted are in 1984 in Andllra Pradesh and later in Karnataka when
the S R Bommai government was dismissed, and the court later subsequently held
that the decision was incorrect.
Financial emergency ciln be declared under Article 360 in conditions in which the
financial stability or credit of the country or any part of the country is threatened.
However, as provided for in the Forty Fourth Constitutional Amendment Act of 1979,
such a proclamation needs to be approved by the both the Lok Sablia and the Rajya
Sabha within two months from the date of its proclamation, or, if the Lok Sablia is
at that time dissolved, within 30 days from the date it (the new house) is reconstituted.
6.6 FEDERALISM
At the time of Independence the diversity of the country was such that the Constitution
makers thought it fit to have a strong Union government (Centre) within a federal
framework. Provisions relating to Centre-State relations are enumerated in Part XI
I'hilosophy or Indian
Constitution
o f the Constitution. The Indian Co~istitutiollprovides for gover~imentswith specified
powers in the various States, too. India's Constitution thus has both centralising and
de-centralising features.
For more than a decade and a Iialf after Independence, the Centre and the States had
almost no problems. Scholars attribute this to the existence o f Congress governments
in most o f the States in the country as well as at the Centre, the towering personality
o f the then Prime Minister, Jawaharlal Nehru, and also the leadership in the States
as well as at the Centre that was less prone to schism, but guided more by idealism.
The balance in relations tilted more in favour o f the Centre when Indira Gandhi was
the Prime Minister o f the country. This was due not only to tlie Emergency that was
imposed in 1975, but also because o f weak leaders at tlie State-level whose survival
in political power was dependent on tlie clout that they could wield at the Central
level.
By tlie 1990s, at least a few o f the States came to exercise greater leverage vis-a-
vis the Centre. A Central goverliment that lacked an absolute majority in Parliament
had to depe~idon tlie support o f its regional allies-the Dravida Munnetra Kazliagam
and the All-India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazliagam in Tamil Nadu, the Telugu
Desam in Andhra Pradesh, Shiv Sena in Maharashtra, National Conference in Jammu
and Kashmir, the Asom Gana Parishad in Assam, and the more recent splinter groups
o f tlie erstwhile Janata Party that have,established themselves in the different States.
Firinncinl Relntiorls
Another conte~~tious issue i s the sharing o f financial resources between the Centre
and the States and allccation o f Central grants to various States. While States have
since long been demanding the allocation o f larger portions, a new proposition suggested
is allocation on the 'basis o f performance'.
Governor's Rule
Yet another point of difference is the 'imposition o f Governor's Rule on a State arid
hislher role while in office, besides that o f histher abrupt removal. Governors are
generally appointed with the concurrence o f the Chief Minister o f the concerned
State, and tlie Sarkaria Commission, too, in 1988, recommended the same. The
recommendation, however, has not always been adhered to, as. The Sarkaria
Comtqission sought to herald co-operative federalism. However, most o f its
recommendations await implementation.
When a Constitution_ls amended it is expected that it would bring a change for the
better. I n other words, it would 'give more' than 'take away any'. Article 368.
together with other articles, empowers Parliament to make amendments to the
Constitution. I n fact, tlie occasion for debate, on what tlie fundamental features o f the
Constitution are, was created when certain amendments were made to the Constitution. Basic Festuh
The amendment procedure laid down in the Constitution is both rigid and soft for
different articles. While some need only a simple majority, most need a majority of
two-thirds present and voting in both the Houses of Parliament and the assent of the
President. The toughest amendment procedure prescribed requires, besides the two-
thirds present and voting and requirement, also the consent of at least half the number
of Legislatures in States in the country. And further more, it also requires the assent
of the President.
Two of the most vehemently contested aspects were one, on the authority of Parliament
to effect amendment itself to any article of the Constitution and two, on who holds
supremacy of decision over an amendment.
While the Indian Parliament held that it was the supreme authority and had, therefore
the right to amend any article in the Constitution, its critics said it was the Constitution
that is supreme and not Parliament, whose creation Parliament was as much as any
other institution. It was, in the final analysis, resolved that Parliame~itis rightfully
authorised to amind the Constitution, but only so long as it did not amend the 'basic
features of the Constitution. Besides, the Supreme Court has the power to decide
whether an amendment to the Constitution, indeed, were against the basic features
of the Constitution or not.
.......................................................................................................................
3) Can the Indian Parliament amend the basic structure of the Constitution?
7.0 OBJECTIVES
The leaders of the Indian National movement had a vision of social transformation.
The Constituent Assembly, representing various groups of the society incorporated
this vision in the Constitution of India. After going through this unit, you will be able
to understand:
7.1 INTRODUCTION
In the unit 6 we have seen the evolution of the idea of a Constituent Assembly in
India during the freedom movement and the way the leaders of India framed a
Philosophy of Indian Constitution. That Collstitutioll is not only the world's largest Constitution, it also
Constitution
reflects a great vision for the future of India as a sovereign democratic republic
where justice, liberty and equality will build a firm unity and integrity of the nation.
but als:, over all customs, traditions and faiths. Such customs and traditions, etc., are
1
valid as long as they do 11otconflict with the Constitution. In other words, no provision
of the Constitution can be challenged on the plea that it is inconsistent with the
tradition, belief and faith inherited from the past.
Further, a democratic Constitutio~lis a kind of contract among the people or, at least,
the bulk of the people. It is based on consensus - a prodi~ctof bargain among
several persons and groups. Such a contract cannot satisfy all persons fully. But it
does satisfy most of them partly. In other words, it is a kind of common minimum
programme of a majority of the people which does not harm the minority interests. 4
I Every democratic Constitution has a philosophy and a vision which can be summed
I up as growth with stability. These two concepts are inter-related. Without growth no
i stability can be ensured and without stability no growth can be achieved.
I
I Integrally connected with the concept of growth with stability is the concept of j ustice.
No unjust system can make people happy. And an unhappy people cannot work either
for stability or for growth of a country.
, -
'
In all the written democratic constitutions one finds a Preamble whichpresents a 4
I vision for the future. All such visions tend to reject the shortcomings and prejudices
of the past social and political order and promise to build a future that isjist, happy
and dignified. Democracy is essentially transformational. The vision of social I
transformation is reflected in the preamble of tkConstitution of India is given below:
In India this vision developed out of her struggle against tlie British empire and was
nourished by the liberal democratic tliinking in tlie developed world. It was first
expressed by tlie critiques of colonial rule in tlie late nineteenth century by people like
Dadabhai Naoroji, M.G. Ranade and R.C. Di~tt.End of imperialism was seen to be
tlie basic pre-condition of India's progress. In the twentieth century such critiques
grew into tlie freedom movenient.
Side by side with this broad anti-imperialist struggle grew the demands for social
justice. Jyotiba Phule enlarged tlie social reform agenda of tlie earlier nineteenth
century thinkers and activists like Rammollan Roy, lswar Chandra Vidyasagar and
Dayananda Saraswati.
Tlie Indian National Congress was born through a moderate effort to unify all sections
of Indians though, initially, it was elitist. In tlie twentieth century its anti-imperialist
content was gradually unfolded. Simultaneously, it tried to stress not only commu~ial
unity but also the need for social and economic justice in the Indian nation, Indian
nationalism was a product of all these forces.
1 II,.; the passage of tlie Government of India Act, 1935, several provincial governments
:1'1 11ed relief to the poor peasants. Tlie Congress President appointed a National
' I ;I ,!ling Committee. After World War I1 tlie Congress adopted the programme of
In tlie 1930s leftist parties and groups arose within the Congress and outside it. They
were strong advocates of socialism and land reform. Even the Krishak Proja Party
of Bengal and a section of the All-India Muslim League were supporters of socialism
and land reform.
Dr. B.R. Ambedkar shared the belief in socialism and land reform but was more
concerned with the welfare and progress of the people oppressed by the caste
system.
In short, by the time of Independence, in India the outlines of the principles of growth
with justice had become fairly visible.
.......................................................................................................................
2) What was the first comprehensive statement on the vision of social transformation?
........................................................................................................................
.......................................................................................................................
The Constituent Assembly of India was engaged in preparing a Constitution for tlie
governance of India. That Constitution, essentially, was to be a political document. In
fact, when two members of the Constituent Assembly (Syed Hasrat Moliani, a
Muslim Leaguer, and K.T. Shah, a Congressman) moved for i~icorporationof the term
'socialist' in tlie Preamble to the Indian Constitution, the Drafting Committee turned
it down on the plea that a Constitution need not enshrine a social philosophy. Dr. B.R.
Ambedkar, Chairman of tlie Drafting Committee, voiced the same opiliion on tlie floor
of the Constituent Assembly.
Tlie broad ideas of the Indian National Co~igressabout the Constitution c o ~ ~ lbe
d
summed up as :
a) a parliamelitary government;
b) a politically centralised but culturally diversified federal state; and
c) a dynamic social order.
7.7.2 Federalism
The idea of a federation sprang from tlie devolution of powers by the Government
of India Act, 1935, too. The All-Parties Conference of I928 had earlier suggested a
federal form of government to manage the religious and linguistic diversities of tlw
country. The Partition weakened the case of federalism on religious ground. But the
Co~igresswas committed to linguistic provincialism since at least 1920. The federal
idea, therefore, was not given up.
7.7.3 Welfarism
The Indian freedom movement was a mass movement and required the participation
of tlie broadest section of tlie inasses that were made up of poor, uneducated and
backward peop!e. The idea of a mass welfare, however, varied from person to person
and section to section of the political leadership. Here lay the major ideological
differences.
'.
For this purpose the Congress suggested necessary strategy which aimed:
a) to plan and co-ordinate social advance in all fields,
b) to prevent concentration of wealth and power in few hands,
c) to prevent vested interests inimical to society from growing, and
d) to have social control of the mineral resources, means of transport and principal
methods of production and distribution in land, industry and in other departments
of national activity.
According to this resolution the Congress stood for an independent sovereign republic
wherein all powers and aiithority are derived from the people. It further wanted a
Constitutioli wherein social objectives are laid down to promote freedoin, progress and
equal opportunity for all the people of India. It would enable this ancient land attain
its rightful and honoured place in the world and make its full co~itributionto the
promotion of world peace and the progress and welfare of mankind.
. Besides, a liberal democratic constitution cannot itself provide for radical social
transformation. It merely provides for a democratic political structure
Neither was it in the powers of the Constituent Assembly nor was it its intention to
XI LIP a socialist state. It was argued that a Constitution does not lay down an
econo~iiicsystem. But it could permit the creation of a certain socio-economic order.
In fact, it was realised by the leadership that the social objectives of the Constit~ltion
remained unfulfilled. Dr. Rajendra Prasad, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar and others warned
that if these objectives were not soon achieved the political structure created by the
Constituent Assembly would not be stable.
2) It was first expressed by the critique of colonial rule by people like Dadabhai
Naoroji, M,G Pa~idaeand R. C. Dutt.
3) As a result of its inlpact there develop'ed a socialist bloc within the Congress.
Objectives
Introduction
What is Citizenship?
8.2.1 Citizenship and Individualism
8.2.2 Citizenship and Multiculturalism
Citizenship and Rights in the Indian Constitution
8.3.1 Who are the Citizens of India?
8.3.2 Recognition of Community in Indian Citizenship
8.3.3 Directive Principles of State Policy
8.3.4 Rights and Franchise
8.3.5 Duties of Citizenship
Tensions in Citizenship
8.4.1 Citizenship and Gender
Pathways to Citizenship
Let Us Sum Up
Key Words
Some Useful Books
Answers to Check Your Progress Exercises
8.0 OBJECTIVES
The constitution of India is a comprehensive document giving details about the rights
and citizenship. When you finish reading this unit you should be able to understand
the legal-formal aspects of citizenship as incorporated in Part I1 of the Constitution
of India. .Reading it wifh Part 111, IV and IVA of the Constitution on Fundamental
Rights, Directive Principles and Fundamental Duties respectively, you should also be
able to comprehend the nature of citizenship as envisaged by the constitution makers.
After going through this unit you should be able to explain:
8.1 INTRODUCTION
It was, however, the French Revolution and the 'Declaration of the Rights of Man
and Citizens' that established the notion of the citizen as a 'free and autonomous
individual' entitled to take part in making decisions that all are required to obey,
combining thereby the classical notions of citizenship with individualism. With the
development of capitalist market relations and the growing influence of liberalism in
the nineteenth century, the notion of the citizens as individuals with private and
conflicti~iginterests gradually gained primacy. The ideas of citizenship as a primarily
civic activity, public spiritedness and active political participation in a community of
equals were now being seen as belonging to the past.
In much of liberal theory till most of the twentieth century, the bias in favour of the
individual citizen continued and citizenship was seen as a legal status indicating the
possession of rights which an individual citizen held equally with others. The dominant
liberal model of citizenship has, however, been criticised precisely on these grounds.
The idea that the (individual) citizen can enjoy rights independent of the community
to which he/she belongs, has been questioned. Given that modern societies are'
n~ulticultural,the specific contexts, cultural, religious, ethnic, linguistic, etc., of citizens
are being seen as determining citizenship in significant ways. In most western
societies ethn~c,religious and racial co~n~nunities have pressed for rights which would
look at their special needs and would thereby substantiate the formal equality of
citizenship. 'There is a growing effort to redefine citizenship by giving due importance
to cultural differences among individuals and strike a balance between the numerous
cultural, religious, ethnic, linguistic identities while constructing a common political
identity of the citizen of the nation. A notion of 'differentiated citizenship' has Rights and Citizenship
Part 11 of the Constitution (Articles 5 to 1 l), titled Citizenship, answers the qiiestion
'Who is a citizen of India?' at tlie time of the colnlnencement of tlie Constitution on
26 November 1949, i.e. the date on wliicli the Constitution was adopted by the
Constituent Assembly. While the Constitution came into full force only on 26 January
1950, provisions dealing with citizensliip (Articles 5 to 9), became operative on the
date of its commenceme~it. Tlie distinction between tlie Indian citizen and the non-
citizen (alien) thus becanie effective on this date. While a citizen elljoys certain rights
and performs duties wliicli distinguisli himllier from an alien, the latter lias certain
rights of 'personhood' wliicli sllie possesses irrespective of the fact that slhe i's not
a citizen. Under Articles 5 to 8 of the Constitution the following categories of persons
became the citizens of India at the date of the commencement of Constitution:
a) those domiciled and born in India;
b) tliose domiciled, not born in India but either of wliose parents was born in India;
C) those domiciled, not born in India, but ordinarily resident in India for more than
five years;
d) those resident in India, who migrated to Pakistan after 1 March 1947 and returned
later on resettlement permits;
e) those resident in Pakistan, who migrated to India before 19 July 1948 or those
who came afterwards but stayed on for more than 6 months and got registered;
f) tliose whose parents and grandparents were born in India but were residing
outside India.
Through Article 1 1 the Constitution autliorised the Parliament to make laws pertaining
to acquisition and termination of citizenship subsequent to tlie commencement of the
'~onstitution. Tlie Citizenship Act (LVII of 1955) made elaborate provisions specifying
how citizenship could be acquired by birth, descent, registration, naturalisation or
through incorporation of territory. Tlie Act was amended i l l 1986 to deal with large-
scale lnigratio~ifrom Bangladesh, Sri Lanka and some African countries. Unlike the
United States of America (U.S.A.) where citizens have dual citizenship, national
citizenship and that of the federal unit (states), Indians do not have separate citizenship
of the states. Unlike some countries which allow its citizens to hold simultaneously
the citizenship of two cou~itries'(e.~., multiple citizenship is permitted in Italy), an
Indian citizen loses herlliis citizenship if sllie acquires tlie citizenship of another
country.
Philosophy of Indian 8.3.2 Recognition of Community in India's Citizenship
Constitution
We mentioned in the previous section that the notion of citizenship as prevalent in the
nineteenth century and understood thereafter, was largely a system of rights and
obligations that defined the relationship between nation-states and their individual
members. The defining parameters of this relationship was constituted by equajity and
freedom. Equality hinted at an identity and sameness as against iniquitous systems
based on ascriptive hierarchies of race and caste. Freedom read with equality would
then imply a freedom to pursue individual aims and aspirations to the best of one's
capacities in conditions where social differences have been negated or minimised.
The citizen in liberal theory was thus the 'floating individual' shorn of all characteristics
of his / her social context. It may be pointed out, however, that these defining
principles of citizensliip were not seen as commensurate with the kind of social
relations whicli existed in non-western societies e.g., India, where religion and caste
were seen as the basis of social life. This so called 'difference' in the organisation
of tlie social structures in the West and East was sought by the colonisers as a
justification for subjecting the colonised population(s) to imperial rule. We also saw
that liberal theory in the eighties is increasingly seeking ways to accommodate itself
to multicultural societies in the West and the realisation that community membership
forms a significant determining factor of the individual member's needs and capacities.
If one reads carefully Part III of the Constitution of India enumerating the Fundamental
Rights of the citizens of India, one notices that both the individual and the community
have been made the subjects of these rights. One can say therefore, that there exists
two languages of rights in the constitution, one catering to the individual citizen and
the other to the community. By and large Articles 14 to 24 appear to give to individual
citizens the various rights of equality and freedom while Articles 25 to 30, seem to
cater to the specific needs of religious-cultural communities. A closer reading of the
Articles would, however, show that there is in fact no compartmentalisation and some
seemingly individual-catering rights are interwoven with a commitment to community
rights. If, for example, one looks at Articles 14 and IS, one sees that they assure
equality before the law for every citizen and seek to substantiate this equality by
prohibiting discriminatio~ibased on caste, religion, race etc., thus mitigating differences
provided by social contexts. The articles, however, also reserve for the state a
commitment to community-ship, in other words, allowing for certain rights in favour
of Scheduled Castes, Sclieduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes. Thus Article
15 lays down that 'The State shall not discriminate against any citizen on grounds only
of religion, race, caste, sex, place of birth or any of them' and then in clause (4)
reserves for the state the right to make 'any special provision for the advancement
of any socially and educationally backward classes of citizens or for the Scheduled
Castes and Scheduled Tribes'. Similarly Article 16 which guarantees equality of
opportunity for all citizens in matters of public employment, also provides for
compensatory discrimination in favour of certain communities. Article 17 abolishes
untouchability, a debilitating condition imposed on the Scheduled Castes. Articles 25
to 30 concern themselves with freedom of religion and minority rights assuring freedom
of conscience, the freedom to religious communities to establish and maintain religious
ilistitutions and to 'manage their ow11affairs in matters of religion', to acquire and
administer property, impart religious education, preserve their language, script, culture
etc. This cluster of rights deals explicitly with the rights of religious and cultural
communities and minority groups and also f o r m the basis of tlie rights of religious
communities to ad~niliisterthemselves in civil matters by their own 'personal laws'.
A significant factor in this cluster of rights is the scope given to the Indian state to
regulate, reform and in some cases administer these communities and institutions.
Thus, while the (individual) citizen of liberal theory persists as a subject of rights, the
Constitution gives significance to tlie tommunity as a relevant collective unit determining
the circumstances of the lives of individuals. The Indian Constitution has thus made
community membership a relevant consideration for differentiation among citizens, so
that equality among citizens could be made more substantive. It has introduced thus Rights and Citizenship
a 'differentiated-citizenship' to assure that Communities (e.g. Scheduled Castes or
Dalits) which had in the past been victims ofsocial discrimination and continue to be
disadvantaged, were able to compete on equal terms with the rest of society. Social
equality was also substantiated by assuring that while the claims of each community
to be culturally difference could be preserved, there would at the same time be an
assurance of sameness or equality among communities. The rights of the various
communities to preserve their cultural heritage was therefore recognised in the
Constitution and the state was to assure non-discrimination. Thus, social and religious
communities were given the right to be culturally different and the state was to assist
them in preserving their difference. At the same time, the notion of social equality
also required that historical disabilities were compensated and equality was made
substantive by assuring equality of opportunities. Thus caste communities were
compensated for past discriminations and segregation by including them in the body
politic as equal citizens. This equality was assured by giving them special provisions
to overcome circumstantial disabilities. A policy of reservations in public employ~nent
was therefore envisaged. (Gurpreet Mahajan, Identities and Rights, Aspects of
Liberal Democracy in India, OUP, Delhi, 1998, Chapter: Introduction: Negotiating
Differences Within Liberalism).
Article 44 of the Directive Principles enjoins the State to 'secure for all its citizens
a uniform civil code throughout the territory of India'. This article needs special
attention because it encapsulates what we earlier mentioned as the Constitution's
'simultaneous commitment' to individual and community rights. It moreover, provides
a window into the tensions which inform citizenship, and its criticism from some
quarters, especially the feminists. We shall take the article and its implications in
detail in the following section.
Apart from the provisions in these Parts, other sections of the Constitution, are also
interspersed with provisions which give substance to citizenship. Provisio~ls
Philosophy of Indian to 'elections' and 'franchise' are especially ilnportant in the context of the long history
Constitution
of deprivation of political rights under colonial rule. It is significant that the Constitution
made 'universal adult franchise' the basis of elections to the Lok Sabha and the
Legislative Assembly of States. Article 326 of the Constitution conferred voting rights
to all citizens above the age of 21 (changed to 18 by the Constitution 61st Amendment
Act of 1988, with effect from 1 April 1989). It is crucial that the Constitution did
not lay down any property and education criteria. Women, who in most western
countries were enfranchised only in the present century, were also enfranchised on
equal footing with men.
.......................................................................................................................
3) What are the "non-justiciable" rights?
I t has often been pointed out that the Preamble, Fundamental Rights and Directive
Principles embody the value o f freedom and equality, made complete and substalitive
by ideals o f economic and social justice. Criticisms coming from various quarters
point out, however, that the nature o f citizenship in tlie Indian Constitution and the
manner in which i t has unfolded over the years, have shown that the values o f
freedom and equality have been largely elusive. Studying tlie nature o f empowerment
o f citizens within the Constitution, A.R.Desai, a Marxist scholar points out the
precarious nature o f rights i n the Constitution. He e~nphasisesthat not only are rights
not resewed to the people, tliere is no preservatio~io f tlie Fundamental Riglits already
guaranteed to them. The Constitution itself permits and provides the procedure for
their amendment and over-riding by the State. Further, the Directive Principles are
not addressed to the people, which means that tlie people cannot move the courts to
instruct the government to provide conditions in which their rights could be made more
meaningful. Again, asserts Desai, while there does not appear to be any explicit
system o f accountability for the State, the people are given some 'fundamental duties'.
Desai feels that in the absence o f any similar obligations for the State, the provisions
relating to Fundamental Duties could be used to abridge the basic rights o f citizens.
Finally, the fact that certain basic rights such as tlie rights to work, shelter, education
and medical amenities are not Fundamental Rights indicates the class and gender
biases o f the Constitution-makers. Under such conditions large sections o f 'toiling'
citizens i.e. the socially and economically underprivileged, including women, are forced
to live in conditions in which their empowerment as citizens remains unrealised.
Legally too, women face numerous disabilities. The provisions o f Article 44 o f the
Directive Principles advising the State to 'secure for the citizens a uniform civil code
throughout the territory o f India' has been particularly in focus in recent years.
Various women's groilps have demanded that this directive be implemented to rectify
women's subordinate positio~iin matters pertaining to marriage, dowry, divorce,
parentage, guardianship, maintenance, inlieritance, succession etc., which are presently
determined by the 'personal laws' o f specific religious communities. While there is
a diversity o f opinio~iamong women's groups, they liave by and large, demanded a
system of gender-just laws which would help them realise tlieir potential as citizens.
Towards tlie beginning, we defined citizensliip as 'ful I' and 'equal' membersliip in a
community, i~nderstoodin tlie modern context as the nation-state. We have seen that
social I economic contexts (caste, gender, class, religion) are important factors
deterlninilig tlie extent to wliicli a persoli is able to realize this 'full' and 'equal'
membership. l'lie Constitution, as we have seen, holds out tlie promise o f assuring
this real isation for a1l sections o f people, by re~novingdebilitating circumstances or
providing enabling conditions. Tlie previous section, liowever, also shows 11sthat at
any give11moment, tlie realisation o f citizenship is mediated by class, gender, religion,
caste etc., in mutually incompatible or even a~itagonisticset o f alignments. Tlie State
itself may fail in its proniise o f providing the resources for the realisatio~io f citizenship
and alternatively, it may, through its institi~tionseven become an aggressor and violator
o f citizens' riglits. 1-his, however, does not mean that citize~isliipi s a static category.
The history o f the origins o f citizenship as a system o f equality against hierarchical
and ascriptive inequalities has shown that citizensliip lias always been a mosaic o f
struggles. People's movements have historically been conducive to the enhancement
o f citizensliip riglits. Tlie suffrage movemelits in western countries succeeded in
getting the right to vote for women. Workers movements worldwide have contributed
towards the regulation o f work hours, amelioratio~io f work conditions and welfare
measures for industrial workers. A range o f popular movements and struggles
seeking to redefine or enlarge the frontiers o f citizenship have also occurred in India.
Almost all o f them had roots in local situations but tlie issues tliey raised stranded up
with similar issi~esraised elsewhere, and agitated the minds o f a wider public. The
women's movement, tlie dalit movement, tlie environmental movement, the peasant
niove~nelitetc., not only liigliliglit tlie manner in wliicli citizensliip is eroded but also
liave i~nportantbearings on tlle definition o f the nature and substance o f citizenship
riglits. The struggles by the people o f Nar~nadavalley against tlie building o f Sardar
Sarovar Dam, for example, liigliliglits tlie claims o f the people o f the Narmada valley
to the riglit to protest against tlieir marginalisation at the hands o f the government. A t
the very basis of tlie struggle, however, is also the consistent refusal o f the people
o f tlie valley to give up tlieir identity, their history, tlieir culture and means o f livelihood,
which tliey derived fro111 generations o f living as a self-sustaining community in the
region. Tlie struggle thus aspires to check the erosion o f the rights o f people by the
develop~nentalpolicies of the State and also demands the provision o f social co~iditions
which would make tlieir riglits substantive.
Similarly, the National Commission for Women, set up in 1992, under a Parliamentary
Act (The National Commissio~ifor Wome~iAct, 1990) has, through wide ranging
investigative and recommendatory powers, concerned itself with matters relating to
women's rights under the constitution and issues of women's socio-economic conditions,
health and violence against them. Over the years the Co~nmissio~i has taken up cases
of violence, torture. and harassment of wolneli (including molestation, rape, dowry
related violence, custodial rape and death, torture and harassment witlii~ifamily, in tlie
workplace, and issues of women's legal and political riglits for investigatio~iand
redemption. Tlie National Human Riglits Com~nissionis another institution establislied
by an Act of Parliament (Tlie National Human Rights Act, 1993) to inquire into
violations of people's rights. Institutions like the National Commission for Women and
National Human Riglits Commission, when effectively used or pressurised by the
people, could contribute towards substantiating citizenship.
2) In what way do the institutions, like National Colnmissio~ifor Woman and the
National Human Rights Commission help us enhance our citizenship rights?
I Preamble (to the Constitution): A document setting out the ideals, ainis and
!
objects which tlie Constitution ri~akersintended
i to realise tliroi~glitlie co~istitutio~i.
I
I Race : A scientifically and politically co~itroversial
I
h
category, race refers to biological (genetic)
differences which supposedly distinguish one
I superiority to others.
Niraja Gopal Jayal, Denlocracy and the State, OUP, Delhi, 1999, (Chapter 4, Section
IV: Citizenship in the 1Varrnada Valley).
1) 1-he constitutional rights given to the citizens, especially the under-privileged are
not properly guarenteed.
2) They raise tlie issues relating to the rights o f wornen and other citizens through
various means including the public Interest litigation and social Action Litigation.
UNIT 9: WHAT IT MEANS TO BE A PARLIAMENTARY DEMOCRACY
Structure
9.0 Objectives
9.1 Introduction
9.2 Evolution
9.2.1 Features of Parliamentary System of Government
9.3 Parliamentary System in India
9.4 Let Us Sum Up
9.5 Some Useful Books
9.6 Answers to Check Your Progress Exercises
9.0 OBJECTIVES
2
him. Sir Robert Walpole (1721-42) was the first to be designated as the Prime
Minister. The pre-eminence of the post was consolidated by the abilities of Prime
Ministers like Pitt the elder, Pitt the Young, Disraeli and Gladstone. With the rise
of Liberal and Conservative parties following the realignment of political forces
after the 1832 Reforms on the one hand and the extension of franchise on the
other, the position of the Prime Minister got strengthened. The Prime Minister
became the leader of the nation and the head of the government.
The British parliamentary system, also known as the Westminster
government (as the Parliament is located in Westminster in London) has some
unique features. First, there is no single document referred to as the constitution.
The institutions and practices have developed through conventions. Secondly, in
the absence of a written constitution there are no special amending procedures.
The British parliament enjoys great flexibility. Often described as parliamentary
supremacy, the British parliament has an unlimited authority, recognised by the
judiciary, to make any law or to amend any law already made. No other body or
court has the right to overrule or set aside its legislation. However, very few of
the worlds legislatures, including those that have been modelled after the British
system, are free in this sense of all constitutional limitations. What are the
features of parliamentary democracies modelled after the Westminster
government? What does it mean to be a parliamentary democracy?
3
parliament.
Secondly, the executive branch of government is divided into a largely
formal head of state (the monarch) and the head of the government (the Prime
Minister) who exercises most of the executive powers and is responsible to the
parliament. The function of the head of the state is not to govern but to see that
there is a government. When a crisis occurs, either through the break down of a
coalition government or through some national emergency, the head of the state
has the responsibility to select an individual to form a government and get on with
the business of governing. The Prime Minister is the head of the government,
whose function is to make policy and suggest laws through his or her
subordinates. The Prime Minister leads the Cabinet and therefore the government.
The head of the state ‘reigns but does not rule’.
Parliamentary democracy means collegial executive. Although the Prime
Minister is the chief executive, he or she is not a singular executive. The collegial
executive is a collection of ministers (Cabinet) who must make decisions as a
group and must be in general agreement before legislation is recommended or
policies are proposed. The ministers are both individually and collectively
responsible to the parliament for their actions.
Parliamentary democracy also means a democracy based on party
responsibility. As we saw, the majority party or a coalition of parties commanding
majority in the parliament forms the government. The political parties in a
parliamentary system have a clearly defined platform and on which the position
of the party with regard to a wide variety of issues is stated. The party platform is
adhered to with as much consistency as possible. When the cabinet suggests a
piece of legislation that would fulfil a pledge made in the party platform, all
members of the majority platform must vote for that particular law. Not to do so
is to invite the wrath of the party and the subsequent failure to be nominated in
next election to run under that party’s ticket. The government in a parliamentary
system, therefore, has a built-in majority on most issues and its will generally
prevail. The minority party may debate the issues, the laws and the proposals, and
they may even succeed in causing minor changes through suggested amendments.
However, the minority can never defeat a bill initiated by the majority so long as
the rule of party responsibility holds.
Check Your Progress Exersise-1
Note: I) Use the space below for your answer.
4
ii) Check your answer with the model answer given at the end of this unit.
5
called party discipline have led to the ruin of the parliament. However, this
derision of English Parliament does not indicate Gandhi’s apathy towards the
institution of Parliament per se. He wanted the people to choose a parliament with
fullest power over finance, armed forces, courts and educational institutions. In
short, he aspired for parliamentary swaraj in accordance with the wishes and
needs of the people of India.
However, the compulsions of economic development, coupled with the
need to ensure political integration of varied elements and interests under a
corporate collectivity of “The People” our leaders set upon an agenda of building
a big modern state with elaborate structures, institutions and political processes.
In their search for a democratic government that would remain accountable to the
wishes of the people and duly represent their diverse aspirations, the builders of
our modern state chose to look to various countries and their political
experiments. The choice of a federal parliamentary system was the result of a
colonial legacy and experience. The legislative experience since the colonial rule
began in the early eighteenth century, with modifications in the method and
nature of representation in subsequent years, had a profound influence in
articulating the normative structure of our post-independent system of
governance.
In independent India, a parliamentary form of government was adopted as
the institutional device through which the democratic spirit was sought to be
realised. The institutional set up is headed by the President who is the head of the
state and the executive, functioned through the Prime Minister, who is the head of
the government, and the judiciary, by the Supreme Court, while the Parliament is
entrusted with the exercise of legislative powers. These institutions function
within the framework of parliamentary government based on the union of the
legislative and the executive wings of the government. The executive, the Council
of Ministers headed by the Prime Minister, comes from the legislature and is
collectively responsible to it. In other worlds, it is through the members of
parliament that the people of India exercise control over the executive.
The main principles of this form of democracy was the presence of a
popular check upon the government through periodic elections based on adult
franchise; granting of liberties to its citizens; and the presence of an independent
judiciary to safeguard those liberties. The government is not irremovable and is
periodically open for anybody who gets the support of the people and enters it as
6
an individual or as a member of some party. The method of election is affected
through persuasion, conversion, and change of mind, change of opinion
performed through secret ballot. Moreover, the underlying assumption of our
parliamentary democracy is the faith on liberal democratic and individualistic
principles.
The process of making this elaborate parliamentary structure functional
depends upon the political parties, which constitute the crucial elements in any
parliamentary form of government. However, the presence of political parties of
all hues and ideologies in the polity, sometimes with antagonistic and diverse
conceptions of socio-economic order, renders the functioning of our
parliamentary processes difficult. Thus, questions about the feasibility of
parliamentary democracy in a country with no stable conventions or rules to
regulate the relationship between the various offices created by the constitution
and the inability to function as a welfare state under conditions of economic
depravity are being increasingly raised. These questions are being buttressed with
proposals for alternative forms of government like the presidential system
replacing the cabinet form of government. However, we must remember that in
choosing the ‘Westminster model’ with some modifications, the framers of the
constitution were motivated by the need for a responsible government to that of a
stable government to be found in the Presidential system of government.
Though ideally any democratic executive must satisfy the conditions of
stability and responsibility, in practical circumstances a balancing of both has
been difficult. A non-parliamentary government is not dictated by its dependence
on a parliamentary majority for continuing in office. By assuring a fixed tenure, a
non-parliamentary system tends to value stability rather than responsibility. The
government’s dependence on parliamentary majority makes it incumbent upon
the parliamentary government to be responsible in its functions. In our
parliamentary democracy, the parliament plays a vital deliberative role as a forum
for national debate thereby constituting a popular check upon governmental
authority and functions. The individual members of parliament and the opposition
during question hour, amendment processes and general debates, have amply
demonstrated the deliberative importance of the parliament. Furthermore, the
restraint upon government activities and policies is maintained through the
introduction of no-confidence motions, cut motions, adjournment motions and
7
calling attentions. Thus, a popular authority of the parliament in our political
system is reinforced both through the continuous and periodic assessment of
governmental responsibility. It is continuously assessed by the members of the
parliament and periodically by the people during general elections. This is unlike
the feature in presidential systems where this assessment is only periodic and is
limited by the tenure of the executive, making the legislature literally ineffective
during normal times. Thus, any assessment of the effectiveness of our
parliamentary system must take cognisance of the wishes of the framers to value
responsibility over stability
The parliamentary structure has also been replicated at the level of the
states that respects their autonomy and the federal spirit that legitimises the unity
of the Union. Consequently, at the level of the states we have elaborate structures
that pursue the parliamentary spirit in choosing their leaders and administering
government activities. by The adoption of parliamentary system to the
requirements of large federal states means that the legislative powers of the
parliament are limited. Since the federal and the state governments have separate
law-making authority that is derived from the constitution, the Indian situation is
characterised by constitutional supremacy rather than parliamentary supremacy.
The supremacy of the constitution is further reinforced by constitutional provision
of guaranteeing fundamental rights and empowering the judiciary with the power
to act as a custodian of these rights.
In short, in our parliamentary democracy, the legitimacy to rule is vested
in the parliament, which it derives from the willing consent of the ‘people’ who
make up the electorate. It is the collective personality of the parliament that
imposes a code upon the conduct of both, individuals and political parties; the
parliament is the protector of individual liberty and the foundation of Indian laws.
An important feature of our parliamentary system, like other
parliamentary democracies, is that it clearly demarcates the position and powers
of the head of the state and the head of the government, thereby, in a sense
establishing dual executives. The head of the government is appointed from the
party or a coalition of parties that enjoys majority in parliamentary seats. This
Council of Ministers, headed by the Prime Minister is collectively responsible to
the Parliament. This principle of collective responsibility puts the idea of
accountability in the government and restricts governments from taking decisions
that it cannot justify before the Parliament. This not only indicates that the
8
hallmark of parliamentary system is a government that is collective but also
implies that executive powers are collegiate in nature helping the maintenance of
pluralism of opinions that forms the bulwark against authoritarianism. Moreover,
unlike the Westminster model, the head of the state in India is elected and
exercises his powers within the express provisions of the constitution. He is also
not merely a titular head. The constitution empowers the parliament to impeach
the President for the violation of the constitution. This implies that the President
is empowered to discharge certain functions on his own for which he is liable.
The President is also an integral part of the Parliament and is vested with powers
by the constitution that helps to check parliamentary impropriety in case of the
inability of political parties to secure parliamentary majority or its loss at any
given time. The importance of presidential authority was exhibited on numerous
instances of crisis that was confronted by the Parliament. For example in 1979,
the President rejected the request of Morarji Desai to form a government after
having resigned as Prime Minister. It was in 1979 that the President insisted that
Charan Singh, the successor to Desai seek confidence of the Parliament. The
failure of Charan Singh to gain that confidence subsequently resulted in elections.
Though these acts of the President were mired in controversies, it is asserted by
eminent jurists and writers that the President acted in a manner consistent with
parliamentary conventions. Similarly in 1987, the President used his
constitutional authority to return the Indian Post Office (amendment) bill to the
Parliament. Thus, the President of India is a potential political counterweight to
the Prime Minister, the Council of Ministers and the elected leadership.
In the Indian parliamentary system, as in other parliamentary systems, the
government governs in and through the Parliament thereby fusing the legislative
and executive branches. The Indian constitution in Article 75(5) emphasises this
peculiar fusion by maintaining that if a minister is not a member of any house
within a period of six months he shall cease to be a minister. In other words, only
a member of the Parliament, which is the legislative body, can become a minister
of the government or a member of the executive. The Council of Ministers is,
therefore, said to be the hyphen that links the legislative branch of the state to the
executive branch.
In a parliamentary system, which is sometimes referred to as the ‘Prime
Ministerial form’ or ‘Cabinet form’ of government, the Cabinet comprising of a
9
few leading ministers headed by the Prime Minister makes all important policy
decisions. The members of the Cabinet are allowed to play important political
roles in rendering policy directives but under the overall supervision and authority
of the Prime Minister. However, since the time of Lal Bahadur Shastri, the Prime
Minister’s Office or the PMO has emerged as an important alternative source to
the power of the Cabinet. The authority of the PMO was subsequently re-enforced
under Mrs. Indira Gandhi and its role enlarged in actual decision-making. This
authority of the Cabinet or the PMO has to some extent encroached upon
parliamentary prerogatives and its legislative process most notably through the
frequent passage of legislation by Ordinance issued in the name of the President.
Today the PMO is a significant centre of authority in the political structure, which
not only emphasises it authority in actual decision-making but also in monitoring
and co-ordinating policy implementation by the other ministries of the
government.
However, governance is not merely dictated by the institutional structure
that is established but is dialectic of the interaction of the institutions and the
political culture with each having an impact on the other. Immediately after
independence, the presence of a single dominant political party with very little
opposition had undercut the principle of political pluralism that formed the basis
of any parliamentary structure. In a situation where the government had majority
control in the Parliament, the legislature was reduced to little more than a ‘talking
shop’. Parliamentary processes were clouded by the charisma of Jawaharlal
Nehru who according to Ashish Nandy had himself become the opposition
criticising his ministers for lapses or extolling them to implement policies for
development. Though, during this period the authority of the Prime Minister
attained supremacy and position of primacy in the Indian political system, the
essence of parliamentary democracy and needs of a federation functioned well
with state and central politics remaining largely autonomous. During this period,
according to political scientist Paul Brass, a strong central government coexisted
with strong states in a mutually bargaining situation. Furthermore, during this
phase, the firm grip of civilian control over the military was strongly asserted and
a political executive responsible to the Parliament provided clear and effective
policy guidance.
After the death of Nehru and the power struggles within the Congress, a
party enjoying pre-eminent dominance in Indian politics, there was erosion in the
10
values associated with parliamentary democracy and the federal spirit was
undermined. The Congress party’s efforts to retain that dominant position led to
centralising tendencies within the party and even to the imposition of what may
be termed as ‘elective dictatorship’ under the government of Mrs. Indira Gandhi.
However, during this period as well the importance and need of the parliament
was demonstrably justified. The crisis and power struggle in the Congress party
resulted in a vertical split of the party in 1969 over the Congress nominee for the
Presidency of India and the election of Mrs Gandhi’s candidate, V.V.Giri, as
President. Mrs. Gandhi was expelled from the Congress party, but this expulsion
did not effect her position as the Prime Minister since she retained her support in
and among the members of the parliament. Thus, a leadership crisis in the party
having majority in the parliament did not affect the functioning of the government
effectively reflecting the importance of the parliamentary processes. This
importance of the parliamentary process was again demonstrated in 1979, when a
section of the Janata Party members in the parliament expressed dissatisfaction
with Morarji Desai, resulting in his resignation.
However, parliamentary legitimacy and sanctity suffered tremendous
challenges during the regime of Mrs Gandhi. In 1973-74, for example, food
shortages, rising prices coupled with the highly personalised and authoritarian
style of functioning by Mrs Gandhi resulted in major political demonstrations in
many parts of the country. This was precipitated by a court verdict holding Mrs
Gandhi’s 1971 election as invalid. Mrs Gandhi responded in a manner that
undermined parliamentary democracy. The fundamental principles of
parliamentary democracy like freedom of expression, enjoyment of civil liberties,
a free press and opposition were gagged through the imposition of emergency
under Article 352. Furthermore, the argument of parliamentary supremacy was
used to justify the undermining of parliamentary norms and procedures. This was
done through the passing of new electoral laws superseding the laws under which
the Allahabad High Court declared Mrs. Gandhi’s election as invalid. This act of
the Parliament had the effect of undermining the process of judicial review that
was meant to act as a bulwark against parliamentary authoritarianism. This
excessive executive power and undermining of judicial independence continued
during this period with the choice of Chief Justices and Judges committed to the
ruling political party without respect for established norms and procedures.
11
In fact, the electoral reversals suffered by the Congress party led by Mrs.
Gandhi in the 1977 general elections reflected the firm and deep roots of
parliamentary democracy in India. The ‘people’ of India have reflected enough
maturity in exercising their franchise periodically by reversing their mandate and
trust vested in a particular party. For example, Rajiv Gandhi, who led the
Congress party to a massive victory, securing nearly 80 per cent of the seats in the
Parliament in 1985, suffered a humiliating defeat in 1989.
The Indian parliamentary system saw its breakdown for a brief
interregnum in 1975, restored in 1977, survived the fall of the Janata government
in 1979 and the return to power of Mrs. Gandhi. The unprecedented majority won
by Rajiv Gandhi in 1985 was followed by the defeat of the Congress and the
installation of the V.P.Singh government in 1989 and later that of Chandrasekhar
in 1990. The 1991 general elections saw the return of the Congress government
under P.V.Narasimha Rao, which survived its term through methods that are now
being examined by the judiciary. The consequent bribery trial has thrown up
challenges for our parliamentary processes with questions as to whether acts
within the parliament are subject to judicial interpretation or not.
The fractured verdict of the 1996 general elections led initially to the
installation of a 13 days government of Atal Bihari Vajpayee, the 13 months
government of Devegowda and the installation of I.K.Gujral government in 1997.
The general elections in 1998 again resulted in a fractured verdict, leading to the
formation of the Vajpayee government that lost its majority soon, after a coalition
member withdrew support. In the event where no other political party was able to
stake claim for the formation of the government, parliament was dissolved and
general elections were notified. The 1999 general elections reflected the polarised
psyche of the electorate and the inability of any party to secure absolute majority
in the parliament. This led to the formation of the National Democratic Alliance
(NDA), a coalition of thirteen different parties under the leadership of Vajpayee
and its claim to form the government.
However, though all these instances lead to instability in governmental
functioning, it did not have any negative affect upon the transition of political
power. The instability in government functioning did not lead to instability or
assertion of radical political claims for the usurpation of parliamentary authority
by the other organs of the government or the imposition of any form
authoritarianism. This shows that the parliamentary spirit has been deeply
12
embedded in the political consciousness of all the actors in our polity thereby
enhancing the necessity and importance of our parliamentary democracy.
The Indian parliamentary structure thus matured through these trials and
tribulations, from being an institution dominated by a single party to the
emergence of a fractured polity with highly polarised political opinions and
mandate. Though, we as a parliamentary polity underwent numerous crises with
unstable and frequently changing governments, the authority and legitimacy of
our parliamentary structures have only matured in the process. Though demands
for restructuring the political structure have gained momentum due to these
unstable moments, it has been met with immense opposition. This opposition is
justified on the basis of claims that any change in the political set up might
augment the process of authoritarianism, which will not only harm the effective
functioning of political pluralism but will affect the basis of our tolerance
respecting diverse religions, ethnic, tribal or other affiliations.
13
popular rights. We saw that although parliamentary government evolved in
Britain, it has been adopted by many countries, both in the developing and
developed nations with suitable modifications. Some of the fundamental features
of parliamentary system in India are as follows:
• A government formed as a result of parliamentary elections based upon
the strength of party representation or a coalition in the parliament;
• The fundamental feature of the system is political pluralism that allows
the presence of competing political parties with diverse ideologies and
goals reflecting the interests and aspirations of a heterogeneous polity;
• Ministers or the members of the real executive (government) are drawn
from parties in the parliament that have majorities in the parliament or are
party to the coalition;
• The government is responsible and accountable to the parliament, in the
sense that it rests upon the parliament’s confidence and can be removed in
case of loss of that confidence;
• The government can recommend dissolution of the parliament and call a
general election in case no party is in a position to form the government ,
meaning that electoral terms are usually flexible within a maximum limit;
• The parliamentary executive is collective and the nature of power
diffusion is collegial;
• The posts of the head of the government and the head of the state are
separate with the President being the constitutional figurehead and the
Prime Minister, leading the Council of Ministers, the real executive.
14
A.R.Desai, State and Society in India: Essays in Dissent, Popular Prakashan,
Bombay 1975.
Andrew Heywood, Key Concepts in Politics,. Macmillan Press Ltd. Great Britain
2000.
15
Unit 10: Legislature
Structure
10.0 Objectives
10.1 Introduction
10.2 Indian legislature historical background
10.3 Union Legislature
10. 3.1.The President
10.3.2 The Parliament: Lok Sabha
10.3.3 The Parliament: Rajya Sabha
10.3. 4 Special Powers of Rajya Sabha
10.4 The Presiding Officers
10.4.1 The Speaker
10.4.2 The Chairperson of Rajya Sabha
10.5 Legislative Procedure
10.5.1 Money Bills
10.6 Parliamentary privileges
10.7 parliamentary devices to control the executive
10.7.1 Parliamentary Committees
10.8 State Legislature
10.9 Decline of Legislature
10.10 Let Us Sum Up
10.11 Some Useful Books
10.12. Answers to Check Your Progress Exercises
10.0 OBJECTIVES
This unit examines the evolution, structure and functioning of the Indian
Parliament. After going through this unit, you should be able to:
• Trace the evolution of modern legislature in India;
• Discuss the organisation and functions of the Parliament; and
• Explain parliamentary procedures
10.1 INTRODUCTION
The term legislature has been derived from the Latin word lex, which
means a distinct kind of legal rule mainly of general application. This rule is
named legislation, and the institution, which enacts it on behalf of the people, is
known as legislature. Essentially, there are two models of legislative structure: the
Parliamentary and the Presidential. In the parliamentary model, the executive is
selected by the legislature from among its own members. Therefore, the executive
is responsible to the legislature. The Presidential system is based on the theory of
separation of powers and does not permit any person to serve simultaneously in
both executive and legislature.
The Parliament of India, which is the creation of the Constitution, is the
supreme representative authority of the people. It is the highest legislative organ.
It is the national forum for the articulation of public opinion.
1
10.2 INDIAN LEGISLATURE HISTORICAL BACKGROUND
2
India States. The Government of India Act of 1915 consolidated all the previous
Acts so that the executive, legislative and judicial functions could be derived from
a single Act.
The next phase of legislative reforms emerged out of the Government of
India Act of 1919 brought further legislative reforms in the form of responsible
government in the Provinces. At the Centre, the legislature was made bicameral
and elected majority was introduced in both the Houses. However, no element of
responsible government was introduced at the Centre. The Governor General in
Council continued to be responsible as before to the British Parliament through
the Secretary of State.
The Government of India Act of 1935 came into being after several
parleys between the Indian national leaders and Britain. It contemplated a
federation consisting of British Indian Provinces and native states. It introduced
bicameral legislatures in six Provinces. It demarcated legislative power of the
Centre and the Provinces through three lists: the Central List, the Provincial List
and the Concurrent List. However, the Central Executive was not made
responsible to the legislature. The Governor General as well as the Crown could
veto bills passed by the Central Legislature. The Governor-General besides the
Ordinance-making powers had independent powers of legislation or permanent
Acts. Similar limitations existed in case of Provincial Legislatures existed as well.
The international political scene and the conditions in India and Britain
led the British government to an unequivocal acceptance of India’s claim to
freedom. The Indian Independence Act of 1947 was passed setting up two
independent dominions, India and Pakistan. The legislature of each dominion was
to have full legislative sovereignty. The powers of the legislature of the dominion
were exercisable without any limitations whatsoever by the Constituent Assembly
formed in 1946. This Constituent Assembly adopted the Constitution of India,
which received the signature of the President on 26th November 1950.
Check Your Progress Exercise-I
Note: I) Use the space below for your answer.
ii) Check your answer with the model answer given at the end of this unit.
3
…………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………
2) Division of powers between the Centre and component unit was first
introduced by ……………………………………………
Under the provision of Article 79, the Parliament of India consists of the
President and the two Houses - the Lower House or Lok Sabha (House of the
People) and the Upper House or Rajya Sabha (Council of States). While the Lok
Sabha is subject to dissolution, the Rajya Sabha is a permanent chamber which
cannot be dissolved. The office of the President also never remains vacant.
10.3.1 The President
While the American President is not a part of the Legislature (Congress),
the President of India is an integral part of the Indian Parliament. However, he
cannot sit and participate in the deliberations in any of the two Houses.
The President of India performs certain important role vis-à-vis the
Parliament. The President summons and prorogues the House from one session to
another and has the power to dissolve the Lok Sabha. No bill passed by both the
Houses can become a law without the President's assent. Further certain bills can
be introduced only after the recommendation of the President has been obtained.
The President also has the power to promulgate Ordinances when both the Houses
are not in session. These Ordinances, though temporary in nature, have the same
force and power as a law passed by Parliament. In Unit 12, we will examine the
position and powers of the President of India in detail.
10.3.2 The Lok Sabha
The Lower House or the House of the People is popularly known as Lok
Sabha. Its members are directly elected by the people. The maximum number of
members to be elected which was fixed by the Constitution at 500. It was raised
to 520 members by the Seventh Constitutional Amendment (1956) and to 545
members by the 42nd Constitutional Amendment (1976). This includes not more
than 525 members chosen by direct election from territorial constituencies in the
States and not more 20 members to represent the Union Territories. In addition,
4
the President may nominate two members of the Anglo-Indian community if he is
of the opinion that the community is not adequately represented in the Lok Sabha.
The distribution of seats among the States is based on the principle of
territorial representation which means each State is allotted seats on the basis of
its population in proportion to the total population of all the States. For election
purpose, each state is divided into territorial units called constituencies which are
more or less of the same size with regard to the population.
The election to the Lok Sabha is conducted on the basis of adult franchise;
every adult who has attained 18 years of age is eligible to vote. The candidate
who secures the largest number of votes gets elected. The Constitution provides
for an independent organisation known as the Election Commission to conduct
elections. The normal life of the Lower House is five years, though it can be
dissolved earlier by the President.
To be a member of the Lok Sabha, a person should be an Indian citizen,
must have completed 25 years of age and must possess all other qualifications
that are prescribed by a law of the Parliament. A candidate seeking election to the
Lok Sabha can contest from any parliamentary constituency from any of the
States in India.
The Constitution has laid down certain disqualifications for membership.
No person can be member of both Houses of Parliament or member both of
Parliament and of a State legislature. The candidate may contest from several
seats, but if elected from more than one, he has to vacate all expect one according
to his choice. If a person is elected both to the State legislature and the Parliament
and if he does not resign from the State legislature within the specified time
period, he will forfeit his seat in Parliament. A member should not hold any office
of profit under the Central or State government except those that are exempted by
a law of Parliament, and should not have been declared as an insolvent or of
unsound mind by a competent court. A member also gets disqualified when he
remains absent from the meetings of the House for a period of sixty days without
prior permission or when he voluntarily acquires the citizenship of another
country or is under any acknowledgement of allegiance to a foreign state.
10.3.3 The Rajya Sabha
The Rajya Sabha or Council of States consists of not more than 250
members of which 12 members are nominated by the President from amongst
persons having 'special knowledge or practical experience in literature, science,
5
art, and social service.' The remaining members are elected by the members of the
State Legislative Assemblies in accordance with the system of proportional
representation by means of single transferable vote. Thus, unlike Lok Sabha,
Rajya Sabha adopts the method of indirect election. For the purpose of this
election, each State is allotted a number of seats, mainly on the basis of their
population. The Rajya Sabha, thus reflects the federal character by representing
the States or the units of the federation. However, it does not follow the American
principle of equality of State representation in the Second Chamber. Whereas
every State of the United States sends two representatives to the Senate, in India,
the number of representatives of the States to the Rajya Sabha varies from one
(Nagaland) to 34 (Uttar Pradesh) depending upon the population of a state.
Rajya Sabha is a continuing chamber as it is a permanent body not subject
to dissolution. One third of its members retire at the end of every two years and
elections are held for the vacant positions. A member of Rajya Sabha has a six-
year term, unless he resigns or is disqualified.
10.3.4 Special Powers of Rajya Sabha:
The Rajya Sabha has hardly any control over the ministers who are
individually and jointly responsible to the Lok Sabha. Though it has every right to
seek information on all matters which are exclusively in the domain of Lok
Sabha, it has no power to pass a vote of no-confidence in the Council of
Ministers. Moreover, the Rajya Sabha has not much say in matters of money bills.
Nevertheless, the Constitution grants certain special powers to the Rajya
Sabha. As the sole representative of the States, the Rajya Sabha enjoys two
exclusive powers which are of considerable importance.
First, under Article 249, the Rajya Sabha has the power to declare that, in
the national interest, the Parliament should make laws with respect to a matter
enumerated in the State List. If by a two-thirds majority, Rajya Sabha passes a
resolution to this effect, the Union Parliament can make laws for the whole or any
part of India for a period of one year.
The second exclusive power of the Rajya Sabha is with regard to the
setting up of All-India Services. If the Rajya Sabha passes a resolution by not less
than two-thirds of the members present and voting, the parliament is empowered
to make laws providing for creation of one or more All-India Services common to
the Union and the Sates.
6
Thus, these special provisions make the Rajya Sabha an important
component of Indian Legislature rather than just being an ornamental second
chamber like the House of Lords of England. The constitution makers have
designed it not just to check any hasty legislation, but also to play the role of an
important influential advisor. Its compact composition and permanent character
provides it continuity and stability. As many of its members are "elder statesmen"
the Rajya Sabha commands respectability.
7
The Speakers conduct cannot be discusses in in the house except in a
substantive motion. His salary and allowances are charged to the Consolidated
Fund of India so that the independent character of the office is maintained.
A special feature of the Speaker's office is that even when the House is
dissolved, the Speaker does not vacate his office. He continues in office until the
new House elects another Speaker. In the absence of the Speaker, the Deputy
Speaker presides over the House.
10.4.2 Chairperson of Rajya Sabha
The Vice-President of India is the ex-officio chairperson of the Rajya
Sabha; but during any period when the Vice President acts a President or
discharges the functions of the President, he does not perform the duties as a
presiding officer of the Rajya Sabha. The Vice-President is elected by the
members of both the houses of Parliament assembled at a joint meeting, in
accordance with the system of proportional representation by means of single
transferable vote and the voting at such elections is by secret ballot. The Vice
President is not a member of either house of Parliament or of a house of
legislature of any State. He holds office for a term of five years from the date on
which he enters upon his office or until he resigns his office or is removed from
his office by a resolution passed by a majority of members of the Rajya Sabha
and agreed to by the Lok Sabha. The functions and duties of the Chairperson of
the Rajya Sabha are the same as those of the Speaker of the Lok Sabha.
Check Your Progress-2
Note: I) Use the space below for your answer.
ii) Check your answer with the model answer given at the end of this unit.
1) What are the qualifications and disqualification for a member of Indian
Parliament?
……………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………
2) The powers of the Speaker of Lok Sabha
are……………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………
8
……………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………
10.5 LEGISLATIVE PROCEDURE
9
time-consuming stage. Once the clause by clause consideration is over and every
clause is voted, the second reading of the bill comes to an end.
In the third stage the member in charge moves that "the bill be passed". At
the third reading, the progress of the bill is quick as normally only verbal or
purely formal amendments are moved and discussion is very brief. Once all the
amendments are disposed off, the bill is finally passed in the House where it was
introduced. Thereafter, it is transmitted to the other House for its consideration.
When the bill comes up for considered by the other House, it has to
undergo all the stages as in the originating House. There are three options before
the House (I) it may finally pass the bill as sent by the originating House; (II) it
may reject the bill altogether or amend it and return to the originating House; (III)
it may not take any action on the bill and if more than six months pass after the
date of receipt of the bill, this means rejection.
The originating House now considers the returned bill in the light of the
amendments. If it accepts these amendments, it sends a message to the other
House to this effect. If it does not accept these amendments, then the bill is
returned to the other House with a message to that effect. In case both the Houses
do not come to an agreement, the President convenes a joint-sitting of the two
Houses. The disputed provision is finally adopted or rejected by a simple majority
of vote of those who are present and voting.
A bill that is finally passed by both the Houses is presented with the
signature of the Speaker to the President for his assent. This is normally the last
stage. If the President gives the assent, the bill becomes an Act and is placed in
the Statute Book. If the President withholds his assent, there is an end to the bill.
The President may also return the bill for the reconsideration of the Houses with a
message requesting them to reconsider it. If, however, the Houses pass the bill
again with or without amendments and the bill is presented to the President for his
assent for the second time, the President has no power to withhold his assent.
Thus, law-making is a long, cumbersome and time-consuming process; it
becomes difficult to pass a bill within a short time. Proper drafting of the bill
saves time and skillful soliciting of opposition support makes the task easier.
10.5.1 Money Bills
Financial bill may be said to be any bill which relates to revenue and
expenditure. But the financial bill is not a money bill. Art. 110 states that no bill
is a money bill unless it is certified by the Speaker of the Lok Sabha. A money
10
bill cannot be introduced in the Rajya Sabha. Once a money bill is passed by the
Lok Sabha, it is transmitted to the Rajya Sabha. The Rajya Sabha cannot reject a
money bill. It must, within a period of fourteen days from the date of receipt of
the bill, return the bill to the Lok Sabha which may thereupon either accept or
reject all or any of the recommendations. If the Lok Sabha accepts any of the
recommendations, the money bill is deemed to have been passed by both Houses.
Even if the Lok Sabha does not accept any of the recommendations, the money
bill is deemed to have been passed by both the Houses without any amendments.
If a money bill passed by the Lok Sabha and transmitted to the Rajya Sabha for its
recommendations is not returned to it within fourteen days, it is deemed to have
been passed by both the Houses at the expiry of the said period in the original
form.
11
The rules of procedure and conduct of business in parliament provide that
unless the presiding officers otherwise direct, every sitting begins with the
Question Hour, which is available for asking and answering questions. Asking of
questions is an inherent parliamentary right of all the members, irrespective of
their party affiliations. The real object of the member in asking the question is to
point out the shortcomings of the administration, to ascertain the thinking of the
government in formulating its policy and where the policy already exists, in
making suitable modifications in that policy.
In case the answer given to a question does not satisfy the member who
raised it and if he feels the need for detailed ‘explanation in public interest’ he
may request the presiding officer for a discussion. The presiding office can allow
discussion, usually in the last half an hour of a sitting.
Members can, with the prior permission of the presiding officer, call the
attention of a Minister to any matter of public importance and request the
Minister to make a statement on the subject. The Minister may either make a
brief statement immediately or may ask for time to make the statement at a later
hour or date.
Members can take the government to task for a recent act of omission or
commission having serious consequence by resorting to adjournment motion.
This motion is intended to draw the attention of the house to a recent matter of
urgent public importance having serious consequences for the country and in
regard to which a motion or a resolution in the proper notice will be too late.
Adjournment motion is an extraordinary procedure which, if admitted, leads to
setting aside the normal business of the house for discussing a definite matter of
public importance. Adoption of an adjournment motion amounts to the censure of
the government.
Besides these devices, Parliament exercises control over the executive
through various house committees.
10.7.1 Parliamentary Committees
The accountability of the executive to the Parliament and the Parliament’s
right to oversee and scrutinise the way in which the executive functions are
accepted as axiomatic. But in practice due to some unavoidable factors, such as
the pressure on Parliament and its operational procedures, it is difficult for
parliament as a body to undertake thorough scrutiny of the multifaceted and
complex details of day to day administration and its financial transactions.
12
Parliament has solved the problem by establishing a series of committees with
necessary powers to scrutinise the working of the different departments of the
government.
Among the important Committees, which scrutinise the government's
works, particularly in the area of public finances, two committees need special
mention: Public Accounts Committee and Estimates Committee. These and other
Committees are expected to keep the executive on its toes. They ensure an
effective and comprehensive examination of all the proposed policies. Often,
Committees provides an ideal context for discussing controversial and sensitive
matters in a non-partisan manner, away the glare of publicity. They provide a
useful forum for the utilisation of experience and ability that may otherwise
remain untapped. They also constitute a valuable training ground for future
ministers and presiding officers.
13
of the Legislative Council makes its position weak, being partly elected and partly
nominated, and representing various interests. B) Its survival depends on the will
of the Assembly, as the latter has the power to abolish the Second Chamber by
passing a resolution. C) The Council of Ministers are responsible only to the
Assembly and not to the Council. D) As regard any ordinary bill originating in the
Assembly, the Council's position is very weak for it can only delay its passage for
a limited period. Hence, the second chamber of the State legislature is not a
revising body, but a mere dilatory body.
The legislative process in the State Assembly is similar to that in the
Parliament with one significant exception. The Governor can reserve any bill
passed by the State legislature for the consideration of the President. Particularly
in one case, it is obligatory on the Governor to reserve the bill, i.e., when the bill
is derogatory to the powers of the High Court. If the President directs the
Governor to return the bill for reconsideration, the Legislature must reconsider the
bill within six months and if it is passed again, the bill is presented to the
President again. But it shall not be obligatory on the President to give his assent.
Thus, it is clear that once the Governor reserves a bill for the President, its
subsequent enactment remains with the President and the Governor has no further
role in it. Since the Constitution does not put any time limit upon the President
either to declare his assent or withhold, the President can keep the bill in cold
storage for an indefinite period without revealing his intention.
14
party, the lack of party organisation, the malaise of political defections, corruption
and the decline of the morale of politician have all contributed to the erosion of
the prestige of the Parliament. A major threat to Parliament in India is posed by
the growth of diverse and divisive forces in all the political parties. Both the
ruling and opposition parties are prompted more by considerations of expediency
and political motives than ideology. The ineffectiveness of the opposition and the
lack of a strongly articulated public opinion have added to the erosion of
Parliaments position vis a vis the executive headed by the Prime Minister. In
theory, we have a parliamentary system where the executive is controlled by the
legislature, but in reality, the powers of the legislature have passed into the hands
of the executive.
Check Your Progress Exercise-3
Note: I) Use the space below for your answer.
ii) Check your answer with the model answer given at the end of this unit.
1) What is Question Hour?
……………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………
……………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………….
The Parliament of India, the supreme legislative organ in the country, has
a long historical background. While legislature in some form came into being
during the days of the East India Company, it was only when the Company rule
was replaced by that of the Crown that the powers of the Union Legislature as
well as its democratic base began to gradually grown.
15
The Parliament consists of the President, the Lok Sabha and the Rajya
Sabha. To get elected to the Parliament, one has to fulfil certain qualifications
prescribed by the Constitution and the Parliament. Members of the Parliament
have certain privileges to enable them to function better. Each house has its own
presiding officer to conduct the meetings of the House and to protect the dignity
and honour of the House.
The primary function of the Parliament is to enact laws. In addition, it
holds the Council of Ministers responsible for its policies and criticises the
policies wherever necessary. It also has the powers to amend the constitution and
to impeach the President. There are several Committees appointed from among its
members for effective functioning. Devices like the question hour, adjournment
motion, calling attention motion, etc. are available for Parliament to check the
government. Passing of the budget, an important function of the Parliament,
provides it with an opportunity to scrutinise the activities of the government.
There is a declining trend in the position of the legislature all over the
world. Delegated legislation, ascendancy of the executive over the other organs of
the government, emergence of strong party system, etc. are some of the reasons
for such a trend. Despite these trends, the Parliament still commands respect and
is able to maintain its position vis a vis the other organs of the government.
10.10 SOME USEFUL BOOKS
Basu, Durga Das, 1983, Commentary on the Constitution of India, Prentice Hall,
New Delhi.
Granville Austin 1964, India’s Constitution-Cornerstone of a Nation,
Mukherjee, Hiren, 1978, Portrait of Parliament: Reflections and Recollections,
Vikas, New Delhi.
16
1) To be a member, the person should be 25 years (for Lok Sabha) or 30 years
(for Rajya Sabha) and other qualifications prescribed by the Parliament. A
member disqualifies if absent from meetings for more than 60 days without
permission, if he holds a office of profit under Government of India, if found to
be of unsound mind, if declared insolvent or acquires citizenship of another
country or is under any acknowledgement of allegiance to a foreign state. A
member elected to the State Assembly, forfeits his membership of Parliament if
he does not resign from the State Assembly within a specified period.
2) Has wide and extensive powers-presides over the sitting of Lok Sabha,
conducts proceedings, maintains order in the house and determines the order of
business in the house- acts as spokesperson of the house-interprets and applies
rules of the house-authenticates bills- certifies money bills- etc
Check Your Progress Exercise-3
1) The first hour of the sitting of a house which is available for asking and
answering of questions.
2) It is an extraordinary procedure to call the attention of the house to a matter of
grave importance and affecting the whole country. Normal business is set aside to
discuss the motion. And adoption of this motion amounts to censure of the
government.
17
1
Unit–11: Executive
Structure
11. 0 Objectives
11.1 Introduction
11.2 President of India
11.2.1 Qualifications
11.2.2 Method of Election
11.2.3 Term of Office and Removal of the President
11.3 Powers of the President
11.3.1 Emergency Power
11.4 The Prime Minister
11.4.1 The Council of Ministers and the Cabinet
11.4.2 Collective Responsibility
11.5 The Cabinet and the Parliament
11.5.1 Sources of Prime Minister’s Power and influence
11.6 The President and the Prime Minister
11.7 Let Us Sum Up
11.8 Some Useful Books
11.9 Answers to Check Your Progress Exercises
11.0 OBJECTIVES
As in all parliamentary systems, India has both a nominal and real
executive. This unit examines the office of the President of India and the
Council of Ministers headed by the Prime Minister. After going through this
unit you should be able to:
• Describe the powers the President of India.
• Explain the procedure for the election of the President of India.
• Describe the composition and functions of the Council of Ministers
• Identify the sources of power and influence of the Prime Minister
• Discuss the position of the President and Prime Minister in the Indian
political system.
11.1 INTRODUCTION
The executive power of the government of India is vested in the
President of India, who is both the formal head of the state and the symbol of
the nation. The Constitution of India, however, bestows authority and dignity
to the office of the President without providing adequate powers to rule.
Instead, the President performs essentially a ceremonial role. The Prime
Minister exercises real executive power. While the President is the head of the
state, the Prime Minister is the head of the government. The President carries
out the actual functions of the government only with the aid and advice of the
Prime Minister. As one political scientist observed, for a President to use the
executive powers formally vested in the office would be to misuse and abuse
the trust reposed in the highest dignitary in the land. How are the incumbents
of these two important offices of the executive elected or selected? What is the
position of the President and the Prime Minister in the Indian political system?
2
states assemblies by the total number of elected members of both the houses
of the Parliament.
Voting is by single transferable vote, with electors casting first and
second preferences. A candidate who receives an absolute majority of votes
cast by the Electoral College is declared the winner. In case no candidate
secures absolute majority in the first counting, the second preference votes of
the lowest polling candidate are transferred to the other remaining candidates
until such time as one candidate crosses the threshold of 50 percent of the
votes cast.
This method of election was intended to make the Presidential election
broad based to achieve political balance between the Centre and the states.
Consequently, the President represents not only the Union but also the States.
This is in keeping with the federal character of the Indian polity.
11.2. 3 Term of Office and Removal of the President
The term of the office of the President of India is five years. His tenure
commences from the date on which he assumes office after taking an oath
administered by the Chief Justice of India. Though the constitution is silent,
the President can seek a second term. For instance, Rajendra Prasad was
elected as the President twice, though Jawaharlal Nehru, the Prime Minister
was not in favour of Rajendra Prasad’s second term. But the latter was
supported by a large number of Congress leaders
The President remains in office until his successor enters office.
However, if the President wishes to resign, he could send his resignation letter
to the Vice President. If the post of the President falls vacant, the Vice-
President takes over the charge. But the election for the post of President must
be conducted within six months from the date of occurrence of vacancy.
Articles 56 and 61 deal with the procedure for impeaching the
President of India. In this regard, the constitution lays down ‘violation of the
Constitution’ as the ground for removal. The process of impeachment can be
initiated in either house of parliament and must be passed by not less than
two-thirds of the total membership of the house in which it has been moved. If
the other house investigates the charge and two-thirds majority of that house
find him guilty, then the President stands impeached from the office from the
date of passing of the resolution. Thus, the procedure of removal of the
President is difficult and has been made so to prevent misuse of this power by
the Parliament. Till date, no President has been impeached.
11. 3 POWERS OF THE PRESIDENT
4
the same is passed by both the houses with or without modifications and
returned to the President, the latter is bound to give his assent.
When the Parliament is not in session, the President can promulgate
ordinances in public interest. These ordinances have the same force and effect
as the laws passed by the Parliament. However, they have to be placed before
the Parliament within a period of six weeks from the day of the reassembling
of Parliament. Without the Parliament’s approval, the ordinance will become
invalid.
Article 254 empower the President to remove inconsistencies between
laws passed by the Parliament and state Legislatures and the subjects included
in the Concurrent list. Another legislative function President having a bearing
on states is that the Governor of a state can reserve certain bills passed by the
state Legislatures for the consideration of the President.
The judicial powers of the President of India include the appointment
of the justices of the Supreme Court and High Courts, and the power to grant
pardon, reprieve, suspension, remission or commutation of punishment or
sentence of court. These powers of granting pardon are given to the President
for removing the extreme rigidity in the criminal laws and for protecting the
persons on humanitarian considerations. The President also has the right to
seek the advice of the Supreme Court on some important constitutional, legal
and diplomatic matters. In 1977, the President sought the advice of the
Supreme Court for creating Special Courts to try the emergency excesses.
11.3 1 Emergency Power
With the intention of safeguarding the sovereignty, independence and
integrity of Union of India, the constitution bestows the President of India
with emergency powers. The President is empowered to declare three types of
emergencies, namely, a) national emergency arising out of war, external
aggression or armed rebellion, b) emergency arising due to the break down of
the constitutional machinery in the States and c) financial emergency.
The President can make a proclamation of national emergency at any
time if he is satisfied that the security of Indian any part of the country is
threatened by war, external aggression or armed rebellion. This proclamation
must be submitted to the Parliament for its consideration and approval. It must
be accepted within one month by both the houses of Parliament by two-third
of the members present and voting. If the Parliament fails to approve the
proclamation bill, it ceases to operate. If approved, it can continue for a period
of six months. However, it can continue for any length of time if the President
6
approves the proclamation for every six months. The Parliament however, has
the power to revoke the emergency at any time by a resolution proposed by at
least one tenth of the total members of the Lok Sabha and accepted by a
simple majority of the members present and voting. National emergency under
Article 352 was proclaimed for the first time in 1962 when the Chinese
aggression took place. The second proclamation was made in 1971 during the
Bangladesh war. On 26th June 1975, for the first time, the President
proclaimed, on the advice of the Prime Minister, emergency in the name of
grave danger to internal security.
When there is a breakdown of the constitutional machinery in the state,
the President can impose emergency in that state. Article356 provides that if
the President, on receipt of a report from the Governor of a state or otherwise,
is satisfied that a situation has arisen in which the government of the state can
not be carried on in accordance with the constitutional provisions, he may
proclaim constitutional emergency in the state. He can also declare state
emergency if the state government refuses or fails to carry out certain
directives given by the central government.
The proclamation of this type of emergency, popularly called as
President Rule, can remain in force for a period of six months. By the 44th
Amendment, the Parliament can extend the duration of the state emergency for
a period of six months at one instance. Ordinarily, the total period of such
emergency cannot exceed one year unless there is a national emergency in
force. However, the total period of state emergency cannot go beyond three
years.
The President can impose financial emergency. Article 360 states that
if the President is satisfied that a situation has arisen where the financial
stability or credit of India or any part of the country is threatened, he may
declare financial emergency. Like the National emergency, such a
proclamation has to be laid before the Parliament for its approval.
On its face value one can say that the President enjoys formidable
powers. In reality however, he can exercise his powers only on the aid and
advice of the Council of Ministers, headed by the Prime Minister. In this
respect, the Presidents position is more like that of the British Monarch rather
than that of the President of the United States of America. While the President
of India may be the head of the state, the head of the government is the Prime
Minister.
Check Your Progress Exercise-1
7
efficiency and efficacy, on the basis of which alone can it continue to enjoy
the confidence of the people. Minister of State Mohan Dharia was dismissed
from the Council of Ministers in 1975 because of public dissent from the
government policy on how to handle the people’s movement launched by
Jayaprakash Narayan. Open bickering between members of the Janata
government on matters of public policy was the prelude to the collapse of the
government in 1979.
11. 5 THE CABINET AND THE PARLIAMENT
The core of the parliamentary government is the accountability of the
Prime Minister and the Cabinet to the Parliament. The Parliament does not
govern but critically examines the policies and acts of the government, and
approves or disapproves of them as the representative of the people. The very
existence and survival of the Prime Minister and the Council of Ministers
depends upon the support they receive in the Parliament. As we observed, the
Council of Ministers is collectively responsible to the Parliament. Thus, the
general feeling is that the Parliament controls the Executive. But in reality, the
Prime Minister with his majority support controls the very working of the
Parliament.
11.5 1 Sources of Prime Minister’s Power and influence
Though the constitution does not enumerate the powers and functions
of the Prime Minister, the Prime Minister in practice enjoys a wide range of
powers as a leader of the Council of Ministers and the Lok Sabha.
The Prime Minister’s prerogative of constituting, reconstituting and
reshuffling the ministry as well as chairing the meetings bestows the office
with considerable influence over the members of Parliament. It must however
be noted that the Prime Minister’s freedom to select his colleagues is
subjected to his/her own position within the party. For example, India’s first
Prime Minister, Nehru, could not ignore Sardar Patel who was very powerful
in the Congress party. He was therefore appointed as the Deputy Prime
Minster and Home Minister. Some of Patel’s followers were also made
members of the ministry. Similarly, Mrs Indira Gandhi in the early years of
office has to accommodate powerful leaders in the party in her ministry.
Emerging as an all-powerful leader after the 1971 mid-term elections, she had
complete freedom in choosing and reshuffling ministers. In coalition
governments, the Prime Ministers were did not have much choice in choosing
ministerial colleagues. In the Janata government, Morarji Desai had many
ministers whom he never knew before. In case of H.D.Deve Gowda and later
11
I.K. Gujral governments, the ministers were selected not by the Prime
Minister but by the leaders of the 14 regional parties who formed the United
Front.
The Prime Minister also derivese power and influence from the fact
that he/she is the leader of the majority party and sometimes even the leader of
the parliamentary wing of the party. As a leader of the Lok Sabha, the Prime
Minister has enormous control over parliamentary activities. The Prime
Minister advises the President on summoning and prorogation of the sessions
of Parliament. The Speaker consults the Prime Minister in finalising the
agenda of the Lok Sabha. With the Council of Ministers sponsoring majority
of the bills presented to the Parliament and with the Prime Ministers deciding
on the strategies for presenting the bills before the Parliament, the Prime
Minster’s influence over the legislature gets reinforced. Moreover, the Prime
Minister enjoys enormous legislative power in the form of recommending
Ordinances to the President for promulgation when the Parliament is not in
session. But the most important power of the Prime Minister with regard to
Parliament is to recommend dissolution of Lok Sabha. The President has to
accept the advice of the Prime Minister who is backed by the majority of the
Lok Sabha. This is the power by which the Prime Minister controls even the
opposition.
As the head of the government, the Prime Minister enjoys the power of
patronage. All the major appointments of the Central government are made by
the Prime Minister in the name of the President, which includes justices and
judges of the Supreme Court and High Court, the Attorney-General, the
Chiefs of the army, navy and air force, Governors, ambassadors and High
Commissioners, the Chief and members of the Election Commission, etc.
Further, the Prime Minister’s control over the administration, including the
intelligence agencies and other administrative wings of the government
enhances his/her influence over other members of parliament and
administration.
Apart from these structural factors, there are other factors that increase
the power and authority of the Prime Minister. To begin with, in the post-
Second World War period, the rise of executive has been a universal
phenomenon, irrespective of the political system. Moreover, the general
elections in most democratic systems have virtually become an election of the
leader, and it is being interpreted as a popular mandate. Sometimes a leader
derives strength from his/her charisma. Leaders like Jawaharlal Nehru and
12
Indira Gandhi had undisputed control over the party on account of their
charisma. This enabled them to exercise enormous power and influence over
national affairs, which were not clearly envisaged by the Constitution.. The
cumulative effect of all these factors has undoubtedly contributed to the
enhancement of the power and prestige of the office of the Prime Minister.
Check Your Progress Exercise-2
Note: Use the space below for your answer.
Check your answer with the model answer given at the end of this unit.
1) The three most important functions of a Cabinet are
…………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………
……………
2) What is collective responsibility?
…………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………
………………
3)Parliamentary system contains structural factors which contribute to the
Prime Ministers power and influence. Identify these factors.
…………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………
…………………..
11.6 THE PRESIDENT AND THE PRIME MINISTER
Article 78 enumerates the duties of the Prime Minister. The Prime
Minister is to: a) communicate to the President all decisions of the Council of
Ministers relating to the administration of the affairs of the Union and
proposals for legislation; b) furnish such information relating to the
administration of the affairs of the Union and proposals for legislation as the
President may call for and; c) if the President so requires, to submit for the
consideration of the Council of Ministers any matter on which a decision has
been taken by a Minister but which has not been considered by the Council.
These duties of the Prime Minister seem to suggest that the President is the
real executive with vast powers. But as we saw, the President can exercise his
powers only with the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers. The Prime
Minister, heading the Council of Ministers, is therefore the real executive. The
13
3) The Parliament will have the power to make laws on all subjects
including those in the state list- The Central government can issue directions
to the state government- Fundamental rights can be suspended –Normal term
of the Lok Sabha can be extend by one year, etc
12.0 OBJECTIVES
This unit deals with the structure, composition, jurisdiction and
functions of the Indian judiciary. After going through this unit, you should be
able to:
• Trace the evolution of the judicial system in India;
• Describe the composition of the courts in India;
• Explain the functions and jurisdiction of the Supreme Court, High Court
and the Subordinate Courts; and
• Explain the concept of judicial review and its importance in safeguarding
fundamental rights.
12.1 INTRODUCTION
In a political system based on constitutional government, the functions
of rule making, rule enforcement and rule interpretation are separated into the
three institutions of the legislature, the executive and the judiciary. A judiciary
that is independent of and acting as a check on the arbitrary exercise of
legislative and executive power is an essential feature of a constitutional
government. The judiciary is also the final arbiter on what that constitution
itself means. In a federal system, the judiciary also serves as a tribunal for the
final determination of disputes between the union and its constituent units.
Given the tremendous importance of the role and functions of the Supreme
Court and the High Courts, various measures have been adopted to ensure the
independence of the judiciary. Let us first trace the evolution of the modern
2
judicial system in India and then examine the various constitutional provisions
relating to its powers and functions.
12.2 EVOLUTION AND DEVELOPMENT OF JUDICIARY IN INDIA
The development of judiciary in general can be traced to the growth of
modern nation-states. This was the stage when it was assumed that power and
administration of justice was prerogative of the state.
During the ancient times, administration of justice was not considered
a function of the state as it was based on religious law or dharma. Most of the
kings courts dispensed justice according to dharma, ‘a set of eternal laws
rested upon the individual duty to be performed in four stages of life
(ashrama) and status of individual according to his status (varna)’. The king
had no true legislative power, the power to make ordinances “on his own
initiative and pleasure”. Even if a law has been enacted and royally
recognised, an individual to whom custom applies may disobey it on the
ground that it conflicts the precepts of dharma. At the village level, the
local/village/popular courts dispensed justice according to the customary laws.
However, during the medieval times, the king arrogated to himself an
important role in administering justice. He was the highest judge in the land.
With the advent of the British rule in India, judicial system on the basis
of Anglo-Saxon jurisprudence was introduced in India. The Royal Charter of
Charles II of the year 1661 gave the Governor and Council the power to
adjudicate both civil and criminal cases according to the laws of England. But
it was with the Regulating Act of 1773 that the first Supreme Court came to be
established in India. Located at Calcutta, the Supreme Court consisted of
Chief Justice and three judges (subsequently it was reduced to two judges)
appointed by the Crown and it was made a King’s court rather than a
Company’s court. The court held jurisdiction over “his majesty’s subjects”
wherever the Supreme Courts were established. Supreme Courts were
established in Madras and in Bombay later.
Judicial system during this period consisted of two systems, the
Supreme Courts in the Presidencies and the Sadr courts in the provinces.
While the former followed the English law and procedure, the latter followed
regulation laws and personal laws.
Subsequently, these two systems were merged under the High Courts
Act of 1861. This Act replaced the Supreme Courts and the native courts (Sadr
Dewani Adalat and Sadr Nizamat Adalat) in the presidency towns of Calcutta,
3
Bombay and Madras with High Courts. The highest court of appeal however
was the judicial committee of the Privy Council.
At this stage of development of the Indian legal system, we see the
beginning of a new era in the emergence of a unified court system.
The Federal Court of India was established in Delhi by the Act of
1935. This was to act as an intermediate appellant between the High Courts
and the Privy Council in regard to matters involving the interpretation of the
Indian constitution. In addition to this appellate jurisdiction, the Federal Court
had advisory as well as original jurisdiction in certain other matters. This court
continued to function until 26 January 1950, the day the independent India’s
constitution came into force.
12.3 THE SUPREME COURT
The entire judicature has been divided into three tiers. At the top there
is a Supreme Court, below it is the High Court and the lowest rank is occupied
by session’s court.
The Supreme Court is the highest court of law. The Constitution says
that the law declared by the Supreme Court shall be binding on all small
courts within the territory of India. Below the Supreme Court, are the High
Courts located in the states. Under each High Court there are District Sessions
Courts, Subordinate Courts and Courts of Minor Jurisdiction called Small
Cause Courts.
Given the importance of the judiciary in a federal system resting on
limited government, the Supreme Court was designed to make it the final
authority in the interpretation of the Constitution. While framing the judicial
provisions, the Constituent Assembly gave a great deal of attention to such
issues as the independence of the courts, the power of the Supreme Court and
the issue of judicial review.
12.3.1 Composition and Appointments
The Supreme Court consists of the Chief Justice of India and such
other number of other judges as is provided by the law. When the Supreme
Court was inaugurated, it had only eight judges. Its strength has risen to
twenty five judges. The President of India, who is the appointing authority,
makes these appointments on the advice of the Prime Minister and the Council
of Ministers.
The Constitution stipulates in Article 124 (2) that the President shall
appoint judges of the Supreme Court under his hand and seal after
consultation with such of the judges of the Supreme Court as the President
4
may deem necessary. In the case of the Chief Justice of the India, the
President shall consult such judges of the Supreme Court and of the High
Courts as he may deem necessary. In spite of this clear constitutional
provision, the appointment of the Chief Justice of India has become a matter
of political controversy. Here it may be worth recalling the issues that were
raised in 1973 when the Government of India appointed Justice SS Ray as the
Chief Justice of India superseding four other judges, against the
recommendations of the outgoing Chief Justice, SM Sikri.
To eliminate politics in the appointment of judges, high minimum
qualifications have been prescribed. For appointment to the Supreme Court, a
person should be a citizen of India, a judge of the High Court for at least five
years, or should have been an advocate of High Court for at least ten years or
a distinguished jurist in the opinion of the President of India.
12.3.2 Tenure
Once appointed, a judge holds office until he attains 65 years. A judge
of the Supreme Court may resign his office or may be removed in case of
misbehaviour or incapacity. According to the procedure laid out in the
Constitution, each house of the Parliament will have to pass a resolution
supported by two third of the members present and voting. The motion of
impeachment against a judge was table in Parliament for the first in 1991. This
involved Supreme Court Justice V Ramaswami. When an audit report
revealed several irregularities committed by the judge during his tenure as the
Chief Justice of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, a three man judicial
committee was set up with a serving and a retired Supreme Court judge and
the Chief Justice of the Bombay High Court. The Committee concluded that
there had indeed been a wilful and gross misuse of official position and
intentional and habitual extravagance at the cost of the public exchequer
which amounted to ‘misbehaviour’. Justice Ramaswami, however, maintained
that there were procedural irregularities in the notice of the motion, the
constitution of the committee and its functioning. The impeachment motion
moved in May 1993 failed with 196 out of 401 voting for it and the remaining
205 abstaining. But accepting reality, the judge subsequently resigned.
12.3.3 Salaries
A very important element that determines the independence of the
judges is the remuneration received by them. The salaries and allowances of
the judges are fixed high in order to secure their independence, efficiency and
impartiality. Besides, the salary, every judge is entitled to a rent-free official
5
accommodation. The Constitution also provided that the salaries of the judges
cannot be changed to their disadvantage, except in times of a Financial
Emergency. The administrative expenses of the Supreme Court, the salaries,
allowances, etc,. of the judges are charged on the Consolidated Fund of India.
12.3.4 Immunities
To shield judges from political controversies, the Constitution grants
them immunity from criticisms against decisions and actions made in their
official capacity. The Court is empowered to initiate contempt proceedings
against those who impute motives to the judges in the discharge of their
official duties. Even the Parliament cannot discuss the conduct of the judge
except when a resolution for his removal is before it.
Check Your Progress Excersise-1
Note: I) Use the space below for your answer.
ii) Check your answer with the model answer given at the end of this unit.
1) What are the qualifications required for appointment as a judge of the
Supreme Court?
…………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………
….
2) What is the procedure for removing a judge of the Supreme Court.?
…………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………
………………………………………………………………………………….
the interpretation of the Constitution. The appeal again depends upon whether
the High Court certifies, and if does not, the Supreme Court may grant special
leave to appeal.
Article 133 of the Constitution provides that an appeal in civil cases
lies to the Supreme Court from any judgement, order or civil proceedings of a
High Court. This appeal may be made if the case involves a substantial
question of law of general importance or if in the opinion of the High Court
the said question needs to be decided by the Supreme Court.
Article 134 provides the Supreme Court with appellate jurisdiction in
criminal matters from any judgement, final order, or sentence of a High Court.
This jurisdiction can be invoked only in three different categories of cases: a)
if the High Court on appeal reverses an order of acquittal of an accused person
and sentenced to death. b) if the High Court has withdrawn for trail before
itself any case from any court subordinate to its authority and has in such a
trial convicted the accused person and sentenced him to death, and c) if the
High Court certifies that the case is fit for appeal to the Supreme Court.
Finally, the Supreme Court has the special appellate jurisdiction. It has
the power to grant, in its discretion, special leave appeal from any judgment,
decree sentence or order in any case or matter passed or made by any court or
tribunal.
12.4.3 Advisory Jurisdiction
The Supreme Court is vested with the power to render advisory
opinions on any question of fact or law that may be referred to it by the
President. The advisory role of the Supreme Court is different from ordinary
adjudication in three senses: first, there is no litigation between two parties;
second, the advisory opinion of the Court is not binding on the government;
finally, it is not executable as a judgement of the court. The practice of
seeking advisory opinion of the Supreme Court helps the executive to arrive at
a sound decision on important issues. At the same time, it gives a soft option
to the Indian government on some politically difficult issues. A case in point is
the controversy surrounding the Babri Masjid complex in Ayodhya. The
government decided to refer aspects of the dispute to the Supreme Court for
an opinion. Since there was no legal point at issue, the referral to the Supreme
Court had had the potential for politicising the judiciary instead of resolving
what was essentially a political problem.
12.4.4 Review Jurisdiction
8
Gram Panchayat, Panchayat Adalat etc). These are, however, not considered
as courts under the purview of the criminal courts jurisdiction.
The principle function of the District Court is to hear appeals form the
subordinate courts. However, the courts can also take cognisance of original
matters under special status for instance, the Indian Succession Act, the
Guardian Act and Wards Act and Land Acquisition Act.
The Constitution ensures independence of subordinate judiciary.
Appointments to the District Courts are made by the Governor in consultation
with the High Court. A person to be eligible for appointment should be either
an advocate or a pleader of seven years standing, or an officer in the service of
the Union or the State. Appointment of persons other than the District Judges
to the judicial service of a State is made by the Governor in accordance with
the rules made by him in that behalf after consultation with the High Court
and the State Public Service Commission.
The High Court exercises control over the District Courts and the
courts subordinate to them, in matters as posting, promotions and granting of
leave to all persons belonging to the State judicial service.
12.7 JUDICIAL REVIEW
Literally the notion of judicial review means the revision of the decree
or sentence of an inferior court by a superior court. Judicial review has a more
technical significance in pubic law, particularly in countries having a written
constitution, founded on the concept of limited government. Judicial review in
this case means that Courts of law have the power of testing the validity of
legislative as well as other governmental action with reference to the
provisions of the constitution.
In England, there is no written constitution. Here the Parliament
exercises supreme authority. The courts do not have the power to review laws
passed by the sovereign parliament. However, English Courts review the
legality of executive actions. In the United States, the judiciary assumed the
power to scrutinise executive actions and examine the constitutional validity
of legislation by the doctrine of ‘due process’. By contrast, in India, the power
of the court to declare legislative enactments invalid is expressly enacted in
the constitution. Fundamental rights enumerated in the Constitution are made
justiciable and the right to constitutional remedy has itself been made a
Fundamental right.
The Supreme Court’s power of judicial review extends to
constitutional amendments as well as to other actions of the legislatures, the
12
executive and the other governmental agencies. However, judicial review has
been particularly significant and contentious in regard to constitutional
amendments. Under Article 368, constitutional amendments could be made by
the Parliament. But Article 13 provides that the state shall not make any law
which takes away or abridges fundamental rights and that any law made in
contravention with this rule shall be void. The issue is, would the amendment
of the constitution be a law made by the state? Can such a law infringing
fundamental rights be declared unconstitutional? This was a riddle before the
judiciary for about two decades after India became a republic.
In the early years, the courts held that a constitutional amendment is
not law within the meaning of Article 13 and hence, would not be held void if
it violated any fundamental right. But in 1967, in the famous Golak Nath
Case, the Supreme Court adopted a contrary position. In was held that a
constitutional amendment is law and if that amendment violated any of the
fundamental rights, it can be declared unconstitutional. All former
amendments that violated the fundamental rights to property were found to be
unconstitutional. When a law remains in force for a long time, it establishes
itself and is observed by the society. If all past amendments are declared
invalid, the number of transactions that took place in pursuance of those
amendments become unsettled. This will lead to chaos in the economic and
political system. In order to avoid this situation and for the purpose of
maintaining the transactions in fact, the past amendments were held valid. The
Supreme Court clarified that no future transactions or amendments contrary to
fundamental rights shall be valid. This technique of treating old transactions
valid and future ones invalid is called prospective over-ruling. The Court also
held that Article 368 with amendments does not contain the power to amend
the constitution, but only prescribes the procedure to amend. This
interpretation created difficulty. Even when there is a need to amend a
particular provision of the constitution, it might be impossible to do so if the
amendment had an impact on fundamental rights.
In 1970, when the Supreme Court struck down some of Mrs Indira
Gandhi’s populist measures, such as the abolition of the privy purses of the
former princes and nationalisation of banks, the Prime Minister set about to
assert the supremacy of the Parliament. She was able to give effect to her
wishes after gaining two-thirds majority in the 1971 General Elections. In
1972, the Parliament passed the 25th Constitutional Amendment act which
allowed the legislature to encroach on fundamental rights if it was said to be
13
2) What is PIL?
…………………………………………………………………………………
…………………………………………………………………………………..
12.9 LET US SUM UP
_______________________________________________________________________
UNIT 13 BUREAUCRACY IN INDIA
________________________________________________________________________
Structure
13.0 Objectives
13.1 Introduction
13.2 Meaning and Concept
13.3 Features
13.3.1 Hierarchy
13.3.2 Chain of Command
13.3.3 Adherence to Rules and Regulations
13.3.4 Impersonal/Faceless and apolitical
13.4 History
13.4.1 India’s Independence and Bureaucracy
13.5 Statutory Bodies for Recruitment and Other Related Matters
13.5.1 The Union Public Service Commission (UPSC)
13.5.2 Special Provisions for Deprived Sections
13.5.3 Controversy Over the Policy of Reservation
13.5.4 State Public Service Commissions (SPSCs)
13.6 Post-Independence Bureaucracy Up to the Commencement of Globalisation
13.6.1 1967 State Assembly Elections: A Watershed
13.6.2 Churning Within the Congress Party
13.6.3 The Idea of a Committed Bureaucracy
13.6.4 Bureaucrat-Politician-Businessmen Nexus
13.7 Indian Bureaucracy in the Era of Globalisation
13.7.1 Attitude of the Indian Bureaucracy
13.8 Some Controversies/Problems Associated with the Bureaucracy
13.8.1 Ministers Versus Civil Servants
13.8.2 Generalists Versus Specialists
13.8.3 Under-Representations of the Minorities
13.9 Let Us Sum Up
13.10 Some Useful References
13.11 Answers to Check Your Progress Exercises
13.0 OBJECTIVES
________________________________________________________________________
This unit deals with bureaucracy, particularly with reference to India. After going through
this unit you will be able to:
• Explain the meaning of bureaucracy and discuss its salient features;
• Trace the evolution of bureaucracy in India;
• Discuss the composition, nature and functioning of statutory bodies of bureaucratic
recruitment such as Union Public Service Commission (UPSC);
• Describe the nature and functioning of bureaucracy in the post-Independence India up
to the commencement of globalisation; and,
• Discuss the impact of globalisation on bureaucracy.
2
________________________________________________________________________
13.1 INTRODUCTION
______________________________________________________________________
Bureaucracy is the executive arm of the government. In traditional classical literature on
organs of government, one studied the legislature, the executive and the judiciary with
bureaucracy being subsumed under the executive (which comprises the political
establishment and the bureaucracy). Now, one finds that bureaucracy is being treated
separately and this is indicative of its growing importance. In this unit, we shall be
focussing on bureaucracy with special reference to India.
________________________________________________________________________
13.2 MEANING AND CONCEPT
________________________________________________________________________
Most of you must be familiar with the word ‘bureau’ which means office. Bureaucracy
takes off from this only. In essence, bureaucracy is an organised body of persons who
deal with office procedures, rules and regulations. Bureaucracy popularly refers to
government officials. Generally, it should be mentioned here that when one talks of the
bureaucracy, one refers to the civilian bureaucracy also known as the civil services (the
sense in which bureaucracy is treated in this unit). This point is being mentioned because
the military also has a bureaucracy and the corporate world too has one. Indeed,
bureaucracy exists in every organisation. Therefore, it is important to remain focussed on
the fact that in this lesson, when we mention bureaucracy, we have the civilian
bureaucracy (civil services) in our mind.
________________________________________________________________________
13.3 FEATURES
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Bureaucracy anywhere has certain, well-established features. Alternatively, an
organisation in bureaucratic if it has these features. Some of the better known features
are : (i) Hierarchy (ii) Chain of command (iii) Adherence to rules and regulations (iv)
Impersonal/faceless and apolitical (v) Recruitment through statutory bodies specifically
created for the purpose, etc. These features are briefly described below. We should
mention here that these features are, by and large, not mutually exclusive but run into
each other.
13.3.1 Hierarchy
Essentially, bureaucracy is hierarchical. It is based on rank. Each rank or position is
subordinate to some and superior to some other. The bottom to the top, generally, makes
3
for a pyramidal structure with the lower ranks concentrated at the bottom and the higher
ranks at the top.
13.3.2 Chain of Command
This feature is intimately linked with the one above. In any hierarchical body, there is a
chain of command flowing from the top to the bottom. Normally, the command chain is
not broken. To give an example from the Indian context, in a Department of the Central
Government in Delhi, the chain of command is as follows:
Secretary → Additional Secretary → Joint Secretary → Deputy Secretary →
Under Secretary → Section Officer → other lower ranks.
13.3.3 Adherence to Rules and Regulations
A classic feature of bureaucracies all along has been their rigid adherence to rules and
regulations. This has, in fact, led to the adjective “bureaucratic” being coined for any
person/organisation insisting too much on rules, regulations and procedures.
13.3.4 Impersonal/Faceless and Apolitical
A bureaucracy is supposed to be impersonal. This basically means that a bureaucrat is
expected to be guided by objective (as against subjective) considerations while following
rules and regulations in the course of implementing various policy measures and
directives. In other words, a bureaucrat or a civil servant or a government official-
whatever name we choose to call him by – is not supposed to be guided by his personal
whims and fancies, biases and prejudices in the discharge of his official duties.
As regards the ‘faceless’ aspect, you perhaps are aware of the fact that any civilian
bureaucracy is subordinate to the political executive. The political leadership is the face
of the administration, while the bureaucracy works behind the scenes. It of course does
not always happen but that is how it has been envisaged.
Bureaucracy, strictly, is also supposed to be apolitical. This basically implies that a
bureaucrat is not to have a political agenda of his own but rather, faithfully implement the
policies of the government of the day. It also has another and possibly more important
meaning and that is: a civil servant’s loyalty and commitment should be to the
constitution of the land and not to any political party, politician, etc.
Check Your Progress Exercise 1
Note: (I) Use the space below for your answer.
(II) Check Your answers with the model answers given at the end of this unit.
1. What do you understand by bureaucracy?
4
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Enumerate the salient features of bureaucracy and describe any two features.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
________________________________________________________________________
13.4 HISTORY
_______________________________________________________________________
Bureaucracy in some form or the other has existed from times immemorial. In ancient
India when monarchy was the predominant form of government, the various categories of
courtiers constituted the bureaucracy. Modern bureaucracy in the sense of a body of
persons being recruited through an open public competitive examination conducted by an
independent, statutory body is credited to People’s Republic of China (PRC).
In India, Lord Cornwallis is credited with creating the bureaucracy, as we know it today.
The Indian Civil Service (ICS) was the culmination of steps initiated by him. This
service as well as branches of colonial bureaucracy, to start with, had Indians only in the
lower echelons. They were, in fact, debarred from holding higher positions. From the
1850s onwards, the doors to higher ranks were opened for Indians and many of them
made their mark. One can cite names such as that of Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose,
K.P.S. Menon Senior, T. N. Kaul among others who distinguished themselves in the ICS.
Some of them, in fact, went onto play a crucial role in post-independent India as well.
It should, however, be always remembered that the ICS was essentially a colonial
creation designed to serve colonial ends. Though the Indians in the ICS were
occasionally sympathetic to the ‘natives’ (the Indian masses), by and large they followed
the line of their colonial masters. It was for this reason that the nationalist leadership
fighting for independence from British rule was highly critical of the role played by the
‘steel frame of the British Empire’ – the popular name of the ICS (also known as the
heaven born service). Jawaharlal Nehru, in particular, was its staunch critic.
The colonial bureaucracy in India largely performed what are called ‘maintenance’
functions, viz., maintaining law and order, collection of taxes/revenue, etc. The concept
of developmental administration was not much heard of then. Fundamentally, the
bureaucracy was a policing/tax collecting machinery and very far removed from being a
citizen friendly administration. The colonial bureaucracy was time and again employed
5
by the British to crush the freedom movement. This was the broad scenario at the time of
India’s independence.
13.4.1 India’s Independence and the Bureaucracy
The situation obtaining as, regards the bureaucracy in the period leading up to India’s
independence has been described above. After attaining freedom from the British rule,
the major issue at hand was the type of civilian bureaucracy the newly independent
country should have; viz. what kind of structure, method of recruitment and other related
questions. There was also the prickly and thorny issue of the fate of the Indian officers in
the erstwhile ICS. These matters were resolved the following way: despite their
criticism of the ICS, the post-independent leadership decided to let those Indian officers
continue in the civilian bureaucracy constituted after August 15, 1947 who still had
service years left. However, instead of being absorbed in the newly created Indian
Administrative Service (IAS) – the successor to the ICS – quite a few of these officers
were directly drafted into the other newly created Central Government service, viz., the
IFS (Indian Foreign Service) which was to implement India’s non-aligned foreign policy.
For instance, KPS Menon Senior and T.N. Kaul joined the foreign service and went onto
render distinguished service.
Regarding recruitment, as before it was to be through an open competitive examination
conducted by an independent, autonomous statutory body. This was to be the Union
Public Service Commission (UPSC) headquartered in Delhi, the country’s capital.
Check Your Progress Exercise 2
Note: (I) Use the space given below for your answers.
(ii) Check your answers with the model answers given at the end of this unit.
1) Discuss the nature of Indian bureaucracy during the colonial time.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
13.5 STATUTORY BODIES FOR RECRUITMENT AND OTHER RELATED
MATTERS
________________________________________________________________________
13.5.1 The Union Public Service Commission (UPSC)
The Union Public Service Commission or the UPSC to use its popular abbreviated form
is an autonomous body created by the Constitution to recruit – personnel (officer and
other ranks) for the various Central Government services. Thus, it conducts not only the
6
annual civil services examination (for the IAS, IFS, IPS Allied Services Group A and B)
but also other Central Government services such as the Indian Forest Service, the Indian
Economic Service and the Indian Engineering Service. In fact, the UPSC conducts the
recruitment of not only the civilian bureaucracy, but also of the defence services of the
country. Thus, it conducts the examinations for the National Defence Academy (NDA)
and the Indian Military Academy (IMA). The UPSC has been conducting the various
examinations since 1947. It is, in fact, not only responsible for recruitment, but also acts
as an advisory body regarding all career matters of the recruited personnel.
13.5.2 Special Provisions for Deprived Sections
It is important to note that as regards recruitment to bureaucratic positions in India, there
is provision for reservation of a certain percentage of posts for deprived sections of
society. Thus, from the onset of independence, 22.5% of post have been reserved for
Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs). In addition, since the
implementation of the Mandal Commission recommendations, an additional 27% of posts
have been reserved for the Other Backward Castes (OBCs).
Also, the various state governments have their own state-wise quotas for government
jobs. Some of the Southern Indian States – Karnataka and Tamil Nadu for instance –
have always had very high quotas for which there have been historical and socio-political
reasons.
13.5.3 Controversy over the Policy of Reservation
The policy of reservation which is based on the principle of affirmative action has been
controversial from the beginning. While it has always found favour with the sections for
whom it is meant, the others have not been too well disposed towards it. While this
section some how reconciled itself towards reservation for the Scheduled Castes and
Scheduled Tribes, it found it difficult to accept a similar treatment to the OBCs after the
announcement of the Mandal Commission recommendations. This is because it was felt
that the OBCs really do not have a history of religion-sanctioned social oppression the
way SCs and STs and especially, the SCs have. There is merit in this argument, but as of
today the recommendations have come to stay and the possibility of a change in the status
quo in extremely remote, if not impossible. In fact, since government jobs are
increasingly being reduced in the wake of globalisation, there has been now talk of
reserving jobs in the private/corporate sector for the marginalised sections of society.
This demand, though not concretised as yet, has further widened the split between those
benefited by reservation and those outside the reserved slot.
13.5.4 State Public Service Commissions (SPSCs)
7
Our point regarding the recruitment of the Indian Bureaucracy will not be complete
without a reference to the State Public Service Commissions. As the very nomenclature
indicates, a state public service commission is responsible for recruitment to government
service at the state level. In terms of organisation and functioning, State Public Service
Commissions correspond to the UPSC at the central level. However, in terms of
credibility, a wide gulf exists between the State Public Service Commissions and the
UPSC. In recent times, a lot of State Public Service Commissions have come under a
cloud for their partisan, biased and politicised functioning. It, certainly, is a fact that the
members of State Public Service Commissions are, generally, political appointees and
therefore, susceptible to extraneous pressures.
After having examined aspects like recruitment, etc., we can go to an overview of the
bureaucracy in India after independence up to the era of globalisation. The post-
globalisation era has been treated separately for obvious reasons.
Check Your progress Exercise 3
Note: (I) Use the space below for your answers.
(ii) Check your answers with the model answers given at the end of the unit.
1) Write a short note on the Union Public Service Commission (UPSC).
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2) What is the controversy regarding the policy of reservation?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
________________________________________________________________________
13.6 POST-INDEPENDENCE BUREAUCRACY UPTO THE
COMMENCEMENT OF GLOBALISATION
_____________________________________________________________________
Bureaucracy after independence set about implementing the agenda of its political
masters (as it is supposed to do). Following achievement of Independence, the Congress
headed by prime minister Jawaharlal Nehru assumed the reigns of power. The Congress
Party was broadly committed to democratic socialism, secularism and non-alignment (in
its foreign policy). The bureaucracy set about implementing this. Since the country was
a fresh, newly independent nation free after centuries of colonial rule, initially there was a
lot of enthusiasm amongst the political leadership as well as the bureaucracy regarding
nation-building. Barring some black sheep in their ranks, the bureaucrats, by and large,
8
exhibited high standards of professional and personal conduct. Of course, even then as
now, they had ‘Burra Sahib’ attitude but rarely were they accused of professional and
personal misconduct (unlike now). Though professionally, the desire to get ahead was
there, the desire for personal aggrandisement was rare.
13.6.1 1967 State Assembly Elections: A Watershed
The year 1967 to be precise marked a watershed in Indian Politics and administration.
This was the year in which the Congress Party’s hegemonic hold over India’s politics was
broken. It lost power for the first time in several assembly elections to the non-right anti-
Congress forces basically put together by the late Prime Minister Chaudhary Charan
Singh. This had a tremendous impact on national politics and on the society. It was
recognised by the political class as well as the common citizenry that the all powerful
Congress Party which had spearheaded India’s fight against colonial rule could be
defeated. It was not possible earlier. The recognition of this fact had far reaching
implication for India’s politics, society and administration. The impact of 1967 can be
felt in the times that we are passing through now.
The support base of the political forces that had dealt a massive electoral and
psychological blow to the Congress and which was largely consolidated by Charan Singh
comprised, essentially, the Other Backward Castes. These forces got a filip after the
1967 elections. Their fairly impressive representation in the bureaucracy today, an
offshoot of the Mandal Commission Recommendations, can be traced back to the
watershed elections of 1967. Indeed, the setting up of the Mandal Commission itself-
which in the last decade has affected India’s polity so decisively was a recognition of the
growing power of socio-political forces unleashed in the wake of the 1967 Vidhan Sabha
elections.
13.6.2 Churning Within the Congress Party
There was a great churning within the Congress itself. The then prime minister Indira
Gandhi who ever since assuming power in 1966 had been facing a tough time from the
old guard (the Syndicate) within the Congress found her position further weakened. To
reclaim her position as well as that of her party, she then undertook a series of steps that
were to overwhelmingly change India’s political landscape as well as the world of
civilian bureaucracy. The Congress Party split in 1969 with the Syndicate getting
marginalised. The party’s official nominee in the presidential elections N. Sanjeeva
Reddy was defeated after Mrs. Gandhi herself put her weight behind V.V. Giri. A series
of populist radical measures endearing Indira Gandhi to the Indian Left, such as the
nationalisation of banks and the abolition of privy purses of the Indian princes followed
9
which helped Mrs. Gandhi and her party to become popular once again. Later on, in
1971, her slogan of ‘Garibi Hatao’ and victory in the Indo-Pak war helped the Congress
under Mrs. Gandhi to win the Lok Sabha elections by a landslide margin. Thus, the
wheel had come full circle. However, the intervening four years led to new ideas such as
the one of a committed bureaucracy emerging.
13.6.3 The Idea of a Committed Bureaucracy
The idea most fundamentally, entailed that a bureaucrat should be hundred percent
committed to the policies and programmes of the political party in power. By extension,
this also implied full commitment to the individual politicians holding power. A
bureaucrat was not to be guided by any other consideration. This development was,
essentially, a consequence of the belief in the Congress circles that the electoral debacle
the party had suffered in 1967 was in no small measure due to the fact that the civil
bureaucracy had not faithfully delivered on the party’s programmes, thus alienating the
voters from the party. Whatever may be the merits of this argument, the idea of a
committed bureaucracy gathered momentum and eventually, became a part and parcel of
Indian public administration.
This had very far reaching and basically negative consequences. Once the idea gained
legitimacy, bureaucrats began currying favours from their political masters. Plum
postings were offered to those who did the bidding of their political bosses, while those
who insisted on following an independent line based on professional opinion were
punished. Punishment took the form of arbitrary transfers, postings to insignificant
departments and in some cases, even suspension from service. A system of rewards and
punishments got institutionalised in due course of time with civil servants being rewarded
and punished on the basis of their loyalty and commitment to politicians or parties and
not on the basis of their professional performance. As indicated above, over a period of
time, the politician-bureaucrat nexus grew into a powerful force immensely benefitting
both the parties, but spelling a blow to the concept of development and citizen friendly
administration. This was, in fact, the ‘politicization of the bureaucracy’ about which we
hear so much laments now.
13.6.4 Bureaucrat – Politician – Businessman Nexus
A parallel – though not always – development was the addition of the businessman to the
unholy combine of the politician and the civil servant. In the democratic socialist or the
Nehruvian Socialist to be more correct, framework of development that India followed
after independence, government permission or licence was required for every small and
big thing necessary for setting up a business. The discretionary power rested with the
10
bureaucrat who could grant the licence against favours granted by the concerned
businessman or alternatively, withhold the permission on the concerned party’s refusal to
please the government official. Very often, the bureaucrat and the political boss to whom
he reported shared in the spoils, as the ultimate sanctioning authority was the politician.
This was the genesis of the notorious ‘Licence-Permit-Quota Raj’ which in about 20-30
years from independence completely derailed India’s socialist pattern of development.
The planning process, the mixed economy, all got off track because of the immensely
powerful and corrupt troika of the officer-politician-businessman often contemptuously
described as the “Babu-Neta-Bania’ syndrome.
The ineffective and inefficient mixed economy brought about by the licence-permit-quota
raj coupled with the politicisation of the bureaucracy remained the contexts of India’s
civilian bureaucracy till the onset of globalisation. The globalisation era going back to
the 1990s marked another watershed in the world of Indian bureaucracy, just as the 1967
elections had done. It is to this that we turn our attention now.
11
The era of globalisation worldwide commenced about one and a half decades back;
sometime around the mid to the late 1980s. What is accepted, generally, as globalisation
today is actually the spread of the process of liberalisation of the economy on a global
scale. By liberalisation of the economy is meant freeing a national economy from
governmental control and letting it run as per the market forces. It is against this
definitional context that we have discussed the bureaucracy in this section.
In India (as indeed in many other countries), it was increasingly felt that the democratic
socialist model of development had failed to deliver the goods. Of course, it is debatable
whether there was something intrinsically wrong with the democratic socialist
framework or it had gone wrong as regards the implementation part. Whatever may be
the truth, the fact was that liberalisation of the economy entailing a slackening, if not total
elimination, of governmental regulation over the economy gained currency. This process
12
was of course actively encouraged by the US influenced bodies such as the IMF
(International Monetary Fund) and the World Bank.
Once liberalisation of the economy was accepted, changes in the bureaucracy were
inevitable. In India (as elsewhere) in the last more than ten years, there has been a
slackening of governmental rules and regulations, which certainly has been a welcome
development. We may mention here that in this unit, we are not debating the merits and
demerits of globalisation. You will read about lobalisation in unit 29. In this unit, we are
only concerned with the impact of globalisation on the bureaucracy and that too in the
Indian context.
As already mentioned, in the era of globalisation or alternatively, Economic Reforms,
there has been a doing away of the plethora of government rules and to this extent, the
developmental process has been speeded up. However, it is still not clear if it has
brought down corruption arising from the acts of commission and omission of the
Bureaucrat – Politician-Businessman combine. Even as the process of economic reforms
consequent to liberalisation has been on, there have been consistent reports of India
continuing to be amongst the most corrupt countries of the world. This naturally raises
questions about the very rationale of liberalising the economy. Be that as it may, the
process of liberalisation is currently very much on in the country.
13.7.1 Attitude of the Bureaucracy
Subsequent to the structural adjustment of the economy consequent to liberalisation, there
have been perceptible shifts in the attitude of the bureaucracy. When liberalisation first
commenced, a lot of bureaucrats were openly hostile to it as they obviously felt that in a
regime of slackening governmental control, the quantum of power wielded by them as
well as their importance would come down. This has indeed happened. The ‘redeeming’
feature in that over the years, some bureaucrats have seen the writing on the wall, and
become ‘facilitators’ rather than obstructers of development. The Indian media in the last
few years has carried quite a few lead stories on the personal initiatives of the post-90s
bureaucrats in the domain of citizen friendly administration. A lot of the comparatively
younger bureaucrats have grown up in the new, liberalising India and are, therefore, more
amenable to the new ideas of development. However, in so far as corruption is
concerned, as we have already stated above, it is difficult to say whether it has gone
down, up or remained at the pre-economic reforms level.
13
The Indian Bureaucracy has had some continuing problems/controversies associated with
it from the very beginning. It may be mentioned that these problems are to be found in
bureaucracies worldwide.
13.8. 1 Minister Versus Civil Servants
The inter-relationship between the political (ministers) and the permanent
(government officials) executive in India (as elsewhere) has been complex, to say
the least. To a great extent, this is because of the inherent nature of the
relationship between the ministers and the civil servants. In any form of
government and more so in a democracy, such as India’s, the civil servants are
subordinate to the ministers. However, this is not always the case. Where the
minister is ignorant and incompetent, the officers under him have a field day
doing exactly as they please with the minister unable to do a thing. On the other
hand, when the minister is powerful the officers are generally too willing to do the
minister’s bidding; often in contravention of all rules and regulations.
Also, as we have already pointed out, ministers and bureaucrats in India have
often enjoyed a highly mutually beneficial relationship based on a quid pro quo
basis; i.e. a relationship based on mutual exchange of favours. The net result of
all this has been a highly politicized bureaucracy and this fact, has not changed
much even in the post-globalisation era.
13.8.2 Generalists Versus Specialists
This again is a controversy that has plagued the bureaucracies the world over.
Each country has tried to find its own solution to the problem.
14
In India, the genesis of the problem can be traced back to the days of Lord
Cornwallis who is credited with laying the foundation of the civil services in
India. The Britishers needed English knowing Indians and general awareness to
man the lower ranks of the bureaucracy. No specialist knowledge was required.
This set the precedent for Indians from the pure stream of Arts and Humanities
and later on Sciences and Commerce (though not to the same extent) making it to
the civil services. Professionals and Specialists (medicos, engineers, etc.) very
rarely thought of a career in the bureaucracy. However, this has changed over the
years. As governance has become more complex, need has been felt of
‘candidates with a more specialised background. This is because civil servants
with a generalist background have increasingly been found unequal to the task.
The recruiting bodies such as the UPSC have also been encouraging aspirants
with a specialist background, viz., medicos, engineers, lawyers, chartered
accountants, etc.
The controversy is mainly centred on the fact that one school of opinion holds that
a person with a general background (especially in Humanities/Social Sciences) is
better suited for the task of civil administration as s/he can take an overall, macro
view of the tasks and the issues at hand. The other school, however, holds that in
the present globalised era with a lot of emphasis on I.T. (information technology)
and on issues of economic and commercial significance, a specialized background
is more conducive to effective and productive administration. The solution
perhaps lies in effecting a grand mix of the two approaches and in India, this has
been attempted. For instance, the department of science and technology has often
been headed by professional scientists rather than career bureaucrats, even though
one has to mention that the bureaucrats have resented this.
13.8.3 Under-representation of the Minorities
The minorities, especially, the Muslims-India’s largest minority – have often
complained of their poor representation in the country’s premier civil services
such as the IAS and the IPS. However, there is no hard core evidence to support
that this has been deliberately the case. Poor levels of education and motivation
have been a major cause. Solutions such as a separate quota for the minorities
have been suggested, but it requires a consensus amongst the political class.
15
Structure
14.0 Objectives
14.1 Introduction
14.2 Nature of a Federation
14.3 Federalism in India
14.3.1 'The Structure of the hidiati Federation
14.3.2 Territories of the States
14.3.3 Structure ot' Government
14.3.4 Division of Powers
14.4 The Union-state Relations
14.4.1 The Financial Powers of the Union and the States
14.4.2 The Finance Coni~nission
14.4.3 The Plannii~gCo~nniissionand National Development Council
14.5 The Union Territories
14.6 Let Us Sum Up
14.7 Some Usefbl Books
14.8 Answers to Check Your Progress Exercises
14.0 OBJECTIVES
This unit deals with the nature of Indian federalism. It explains the way in which
the Indian federalism is different or si~llilarto some major federations in other
countries.
After reading this unit, you will able to:
Explain the meaning of the concept of federalism;
Understand federalism in the light of polities in India;
Identify the issues which are related to federalism in India; and
Understand the relationships among different units of Indian federal system.
- - - -
14.1 INTRODUCTION
Federalism is a form of government in which the sovereign authority of political
power is divided between the various units. This form of government is also called
a "federation" or a "federal state" in the common parlance. These units are Centre,
state and panchayats or the n~unicipalities.The centre also is called union. The
component units of the union are called variously as states (in the United States of
America), Cantolls (in Switzerland), Prouinee (in Canada). Republics (in the former
Union of Soviet Socialist Republic). Literally, the word 'federal' means contractual.
A federal union is a contractual union. A federal state is a state brought into being
through a contractual union of sovereign states. The union of states by conquest
cannot be called a federal union.
In actual practice, however, not all-federal states have been born through unio~iof
sovereign states. Many of them have been products of devolution of powers by a
centralized authority of a union govemiient to the lower units. Indian federation in
one such example.
The Constitution of India is written and relatively rigid. Several provisions of the
Co~istitutio~i can be amended only with the consent of a majority of the state
legislatures. The Constitution divides power between the Union and the states. The
Supreme Court of India has original jurisdiction to decide disputes between:
a) The Union and a state or a group of states:
b) One state and another state or a group of' other states; and
c) One group of states a.nd another group of' states.
The Union and states have separate govenlments, bbth based on parlian~entary
systems. Like President at the Centre, the Institution head of government at State
level is Governor. However, although the President is elected indirectly by the
people, the Governors of the states are appointed by the President (i.e., the Union
Government). Both the President and the Governors are advised by their Councils
of Ministers.
But there is no strict division of public services in India. The Union and the state
officials administer both the Unio~iand state laws simulta~ieously.There are state
civil services. But there are also All-India Sewices whose members serve both the
Union and the state govenunent.
The Indian judiciary is, however, integrated. It is headed by the Supreme Court of
India. which is also the federal court.
In List 1, the Union List, the powers of the Union governmelit are mentio~ied;it
contains 97 subjects; in List 11, the State List, 61 subject are mentioned on w-hich
State legislatures will enact laws. In List 111, the concurrent List are ~lie~itioned
the
powers that are to be concurrently esercised by the Union and tlie state governme~its
aid 47 subjects are me~itio~ied in this. The residual powers, not mentioned in any of
these lists, belong to the Union. There are, however, three conditions attached to
this division:
I) If on a concurrent list subject tlie Union a~ida state's laws conflict, the Union
law will prevail.
2) If the Council of States, or Rajya Sabha by a majority of two-thirds of its
members, decide by a resolution that a certain subject belonging to the state list
is of national importa~icethe Parliament will be able to legislate on it.
3) When a procla~iiatio~iof emergency is in operation the Parliament may legislate
on any of the state subject. The force of sueii law will lapse six months after
the proclamation ceases to operate.
Broadly speaking, all subjects relating to defence, security, external affairs,
communication, currency, banking and insurance, inter-state river and river valleys,
inter-state trade and commerce, major industries. development and regulation of
oilfields and mines declared by Parliament necessary to be controlled by it, census
and universities and other institutions declared by Parliame~lt to be of national
importance are under the Union's control. Public order, police, prisons, local
conununication, land, agriculture, public health, local governnlent, mines not under
the Union's control, intoxicating liquor and betting and gambling are under the
state's control.
The concurrent jurisdiction of the Union and the state extend to criminal law and
criminal procedure, preventive detention, education, forests, inland shipping and
navigation, factories, boilers, electricity, newspapers, books and printing presscs,
weights and measures and price control.
i) In the first place there is a directive of the Constitution that the states should
legislate on subjects belonging to their jurisdiction and the Union can legislate
on subjects belonging to its jurisdiction. But, as we have seen, Parliament may
IegislOte on state subjects in some special cases (See 14.3.4. above).
ii) The Governors, on the other hand, have been given the power to witlll~old
assent to a bill and reserve it for the President's assent. The matter becomes
conlplicated by the fact that the Governors are appointed by the President and
hold ofice during the pleasure of the President (i.e., the Union goverru~~ent).
iii) The Parliament delegate power to legislate on any Union subject to a state
legislature. Two or more states may also delegate the power to legislate on any
of the state subjects. But this can be done only if these states request the
Rajya Sabha (the. Council of States) to pass a resolution empowering the
parliament to legislate on the matters in the state list. Even without the request
of the two or more states, the Parliament can legislate on the state issue, if two
third members present in Rajya Sabha pass resolution to this effect.
iv) The states have been directed to exercise their executive power in compliance
with the laws of the Parliament and any existing law in operation on the state.
The Union has executive power to issue directions to the state to ensure such
compliance.
v) The Union has the power to issue directives to the state to exercise their
executive power without prejudicing the executive power of the Union and the
Union can issue directions to ensure this restriction.
vi) The Union has power to protect the states from external aggression and internal
disturbance
vii) The failure of a state to give effect to any of the directives may lead to a
declaration of constitutional breakdown in a state.
These generally healthy provisions, it should be noted, have sometimes been misused
to the detriment to state autonomy.
Like the legislative and the executive powers financial powers are divided between
the Union and the states in such a detailed and complicated way that most
conuiientators on the Indian federal system have chosen to use the phrase 'financial
relations' rather than 'division of financial power'. This is mainly due to two
reasons. Politically speaking the revenues of the Union are far greater than the
revenues of the states making the states dependent on federal subsidies.
Constitutionally, on the other hand, the Indian Constitution makes a distinction between
the power to levy taxes and the power to appropriate them. There is no concurrent
jurisdiction in the matter of taxation.
Further, the division of financial powers has been subjected to four amendments: the
3rd (in 1954), the 6th (in 1956), the 46th (in 1982) and the 80th (in 2000). These
aniendnients have enhanced the Union's power to levy taxes but not necessarily to
appropriate them. There are three kinds of taxes in the Constitution, as a result:
1) Taxes and duties collected and appropriated by the states.
2) Taxes and duties collected by the Union on behalf of the states and assigned to
them.
3) Taxes and duties collected by the Union and distributed among the states
according to principles laid down by the Parliament.
Besides these taxes and duties the Union has unlin~itedpower to give grants-in-aid
to the states.
The States impose land revenue, agricrlltural income tax, succession duties and
estate duty on agricultural land, taxes on lands and buildings, taxes on mineral rights
subject to any limitations imposed by Parliament by law relating to mineral
development, excise duties on alcoholic liquors, opium, Indian hemp for non-medicinal
purpose, taxes on entry of goods for consumption and sales, taxes on consumption
and sale of electricity, sales tax on goods other than newspapers exchanged within
the State, taxes on advertisements except those on newspapers, radio or television,
taxes on goods transported by roads or inland watenvays and vehicles on road,
taxes on animals and boats, tolls, taxes on professions, trades, callings and
employments, capitation taxes, taxes in luxuries, amusements, betting and gambling
and fees in respect of any of the matters in the State List.
Federalisn~In India The net proceeds of taxes and duties that the Union levies, after being distributed
among the states as above, all loans received by the Union and all its receipts in
repayment of loans form the Consolidated Fund of India. All revenues, loans and
receipts in repayment of loans by a state govemment form the Consolidated Fund
of the State.
Such stamp duties and such duties of excise on medicinal and toilet preparations as
are mentioned in the Union list are levied by the Union government but collected
and appropriated by the states (Art. 268).
Taxes on sale and purchase of goods other than newspapers and taxes on
consignment of goods, where such sale or purchase or consignment takes place in
course of inter-State trade and commerce, shall be levied and collected by the
Union but assigned to the states according to the principles of distribution formulated
by the Parliament (Art. 269).
The other taxes and duties allowed under the Union list-tax on non-agricultural
incomes: customs including export duties, excise duty on tobacco and medicinal and
toilet preparations containing alcohol, opium and narcotic drugs, corporation tax,
taxes on capital value of non-agricultural assets of individuals and companies and
capital of companies, estate and succession duties on property other than agricultural
land, terminal taxes on goods or passengers carried by railways, sea or air, taxes on
railway fares and freights, taxes other than stamp duties on transactions in stock
exchanges and ktures market - are levied and collected by the Union. A percentase
of their proceeds will go to the Union govemment according to the order of the
President (i.e., the Union government ) after considering the recommendations of
the Finance Commission. The rest will be distributed amon3 the states ac$ording to
the prescription of the President after considering the recommendations of the
Finance Commission (Art. 270).
This leaves the Union with the power to charge fees on any matter relating to tlie
subjects in the Union list for its wholesale appropriation. Stamp duties other than
duties and fees collected by means of judicial stamps and fees imposed on the
subjects included in the Concurrent List but not including fees taken in any court
are collected concurrently. Taxes on the residual. subjects are exclusively under the
Union's jurisdiction.
At the same time, the property of the Union and the purchase and storage of water
and electricity by the Union are free from taxation of a state. The property and
income of a state is, on the other hand, free from Union taxation. Any tax iiiiposed
by a state on a Union property before tlie commencement of the Constitution would
continue to be collected by the state until the Parliament otherwise provides. Further,
Parliament, by law, may provide for imposition of tax on a trade or business carried
on by a state.
There is a special provisiori for grant in lieu of export of jute to the states of
Assani, Bihar, Orissa and West Bengal (Article 273). All other grants-in-aid are
governed by Article 275.
14.4.2 The Finance Commission
Every five years the President appoints a Finance Conunission. The Parliament by
law determines the qualification required for appointment to the Commission (Art
280). The Commission recommends to the President:
i) the distribution of the net proceeds of taxes between the Union aid the states
and the allocati~nof shares of such state proceeds among the states:
ii) the principles which should govern the grants-in-aid of the states revenues from
the Consolidated Fund of India; and
iii) the measures needed to augment the Consolidated Fund of a state to supplen~ent
the resources of the panchayats in the statcs.
Unlike the Finance Commission. the Planning Con~n~ission is not a statutory body. It*
was set up by a f o n ~ ~ aresolution
l of the Union Cabinet in March 1950. The
Platu~ingConln~issionplays an important role in the formulation of India's dconomic
policies. The Prime Minister is the chairman of the Planning Commission. Some of
the important nien~bersof the Planning Coniniission arc Union Council of Ministers,
Cabinet Secretary and other distinguislicd pcrsons. It is an extra - constitutional
agency and works as an advisory body. It is responsible for the Five Year Plans of
the country.
The plans finalised by the Planning Con~n~ission arc discussed by the National
Develop~nentCouncil (NDC). It is the highest reviewing and advisory body in thc
ficld of planning. It was constituted in 1952. The member of the NDC arc Prime
Min~ster. Chief Ministers of all states. nlembers of Planning Conunission and all
Union cabinet ministers. It is an intermediary body between the Union, state and
local govenmient. Five Year Plans become operational after the approval of the
NDC.
3) What is the rclationsliip between the Planning Comniission and the National
Developnlent Council?
14.5 THE UNION TERRITORIES
The Union territories are small and special areas directly under the administrative
control of the Union government. Many of tllc forn~erUnion territories have been
promoted to the status of states.
In 1962 Parlimlcnt created a Icgislaturc and a Council of Minister for sonic Union
territories. All of them. except Pondicherry. have by no\\ become statcs. In 1991
Delhi was given a special status as a Union capital territory \vith a large nutonom!..
2) Unlike in the federation. \\hich is result of the agreemalt bet\ccen the constituent
units. in tllc "Union of States" the constituent units of the Indian union have no
sight to secede.
Check Your Progress Exercise 2
I) Three types of taxes; collected and appropriated by the states. collected by the
Union on behalf of the states and assigned to them. and. collected b! the union
and distributed among the states according to the principles laid down b!. the
constitution.
2) To reconlnlend to the President distribution of taxes between the Union and
states, principles governing the grant-in-aid of the state revenue fro111 the
Consolidated Fund of India, and measures to augment the Consolidated Fun of
India.
3) Plans finaliscd by the. Planning Conlmission are discussed b ~ the
. National
Devclopnlent Council (NDC).
UNIT 15 SPECIAL PROVISIONS FOR NORTH-
EAST. J & K. ETC.
Structure
Objectives
Introduction
Special Provisions
15.2.1 Article 370 Regarding Ja~nmuand Kashmir
15.2.2 -
The Sixth Schedule for the North East
15.2.3 The Filth Schedule for the Scheduled Areas
Why Special Provisions'?
I 5.3.l Jammu a11d Kashmir
15.3.2 The North - East
15.3.3 The Scheduled Areas
15.3.4 Special Category Sti~teb(SCS)
Politics Relating to the Special Provisions
15.4.1 Ja~n~nu
and K>~shn~ir
15.4.2 North - East India
Let Us Sum Up
Key Words
Some Useful Books
Answers to Check Your Progress Exercises
15.0 OBJECTIVES
After going through this unit, you will be able to:
Identify the areas which are distinct from most other parts of the country;
Know the special constitutional provisions meant for these regions;
Give reasons for introduction of the special provisions; and
Understand the different perceptions of the special provisions witllin these regions.
15.1 INTRODUCTION
The Constitution of India provides for uniform rule over the whole country. 'But
certain regions of the country are governed by special provisions. These provisions
ensure the protection of cultural identities, customs and economic and political
interests of the original inhabitants of these areas. These regions include the tribal
hills of the North Eastern States, i.e., Assam, Arunachal Paradesh: Manipur: Nagaland,
Mizoram, Meghalaya and Tripura: the state of Jarnrnu and Kashmir and the regions
known as the "Scheduled Areas".
"The Scheduled Areas" are those tribal inhabited areas which are located in other
parts of the country than the North-East India. These areas are located in the
states of Andhra Pradesh, Bihar. Chhattisgarh, Gujarat, Himachal Pradesh, Madlya
Pradesh, .Iharkhand, Maharashtra, Orissa and Rajasthan. Besides these areas, some
other regions of the country also are governed by the special provisions.
Furthermore: some states have been clamouring to be accorded Special Category
States (SCS), though there are no special provisions for them in the constitution.
Placement in such category would entitle then1 to get special assistance to
development - like increase in tile grant-in-aid in comparison to the loan. While the
loans have to be repaid to the lender, the grant-in-aid has not to be re-paid. Orissa:
Bihar and the newly created state of Uttaranchal have demanded to be included in
the SCS.
k 1ndIa
.@~ilurr(krw
15.2 SPECIAL PROVISIONS
Our Constitution has the following special provisions:
According to Article 244 of the Constitution the VI Schedule lays down special
provisions for the protection of the interest and cultural identities of t4.e hill tribes of
North. The most important provision of the VI Schedule is creation of the Auto~iomous
District Councils. While tribals of some of the North - Eastern states have the
Autononious District Councils, Arunachal Pradesh, Nagaland and greater part of
Mizora~ndo not. have this. The lnner Lines Regulation exist for three states: i. e.,
Arunachal Pradcsh, Mizoram and Nagaland, aid North Cachar district of Assam.,
The modern institution df the Autonomous District Councils are elected bodies.
They are controlled by the new generation which has benefited from modern means
of education. This placed the new elite in confrontation with the traditional elite who
have considered it as an enchroachment on their position. In fact: they have been
de~nandingits abrogation. Also a section of the non- tribals have been seeking the
removal of the Autonomous District Councils. They agrue that the VI Schedule was
introduced to protect the interests of the tribals while they would be constitue~itsof
Assam. But with the formation of separate states there was no need for tlie
Autonomous District Councils. Besides, there is no clear demarcatio~iof the jurisdiction
of the ADCs, which result in overlapping of the jurisdiction of the ADCs. state
legislature and the village councils. ,This causes inconvenience to tlic people.
Spceli~lP_rovihiol~sI'UI
Since the British days a system of ln~lcrLine was drawn up under the Bellgal North-E~bst,. I & l i , Etc.
Easten1 Frontier Regulation , 1873. It prohibits the travel of outsiders into the area I
beyond the Inner Line without the govcr~uncnt's permission. Ainled primarily at
protecting the people of the covered area from the esploitation of the plainsnlen.
this also preserved the British control there and hindered the integration of the
people of the hills and plains. The lnller Line is a subject of hot controversy in
northeast India.
For the protection of the interests and cultural identity of the tribals residing in parts
of the country other than hills of the North-East, there are special provisions in the
Constitution of India. These areas are lulown as the Scheduled areas and the
provisions regarding them are enshrined in the V Schedule of our constitution.
Parlianlent has powers to change these by ordinary legislation without amending the
constitution. The main provisions are as follows:
i) The executive power of tlle states extend to the scheduled areas;
ii) The Governor of these states has to subnlit the report to the president regarding
the administration of such areas on the a~ulualbasis or \vhenevcr required to do
so;
iii) Tribes Advisory Coullcils have to be constituted to advise the govenunent on
the nlatters relating to the welfare and advancement of the Sclledules Tribes -
these matters are those which may have bcen referred to the councils by the
Governor;
iv) The Governor is authorised to direct the state govetnmcnt not to apply in the
scheduled Areas any Act of Parlianlent of or the state Legislature or apply it
subject to exceptions or n~odifications;
v) The Governor is autl~orisedto nlake regulations to prohibit or restrict transfer
,f' land by or anlong the members of Scheduled Tribes, to regulate the allot~lle~~t
' . 4 2nd thg, business of money-lending. All such regulations made by the
"
The whole state of Jammu and Kashmir enjoys special status anlong the states i11
India under Article 370 of the Constitution. This state enjoys special position because
of the special circumstances under which it was brought under the govern'mcc of
the Union of India. During the British period the state of Jammu and Kaslullir was
ruled by a hereditary king. Like many rulers Maharaja Hari Singh joined Dominion
of lndia by signing the I~cstruincntof Accession on October 26, 1947. India agreed
to accept the accession of Jammu and Kashmir on the request of Maharaja : who
had fourld it necessary following the attack of the Azad Kashmir forces in the
wake of the formation of Pakistan. Accordingly the subjects of Defence: External
Affairs and Comnlunication in respect of Jammu and Kashmir like other states
which joined lndia as per the lnstrument came under the jurisdiction of Dominion of
India. With the implementation of the Constitution in 1950, the state of Janu~luand
Kashmir was included in the Part B of the first Schedule.
Despite being a member of the Part B states, the part in which the erstwhile big
Princely states wcre placed, special provisions were devised for the govenlance of
the state of Janlrnu and b h n l i r . These provisions were different from' those meant
for other states of the part B. These were incorporated in the Article 370 of the
Constitution. According to thc provisions of this article: the state of Jammu and
Kashmir was given a separate Constituent Assembly. It consisted of the
representatives of people of the statc. The aim of the Constituent Assembly was to
\\rite the constitution of the state and demarcate the jurisdiction of Union of India
over the statc of Jammu and Kaslunir. The provisions of the Constituent Assembly
were applied as interim arrangements.
Even as in the cases of erstwhile princely states, the Government of India \\as
empowered to exercise control over all issues mentioned in the UII~OII List. in tliis
case thc Government of lndia had given public assurance that the Accession of tliis
state to the Union of lndia would be subject to the confirmatio~lbj! the people of
Jammu and Kashmir. The Government of India in turn put the condition on the
Maharaja that following the accession the Maharaja would introduce a popular
government. It meant that he would abolish the hereditary nile.The accession \\as
confinned by the people of Jarnnlu and Kashnlir through their representatives in the
Constituent Assembly of state. But it \\?as done on the condition that Jammu and
Kashnlir would be governed by different rules to be franled by the Constituent
Assembly. Thc suggestions of the Constituent Assembly of Janznlu and Kashnlir
were incorporated in Article 370 of the Constitution of India. The continuation,
amendment or the suspension of this article can not be done without support of a
majority not less than two thirds of the menlbership of legislation Assembl~~ of
Jammu and Kashmir, whi~hmans people of the state. The President of lndia
asscnted the recommendations of the Constituent Assembly by making Constitution
(Application to Jammu and Gshmir) Order, 1950, in consultation with the Govem~lent
of Jammu and Kashmir. This Order specified that the Parliament of India would be
competent to make laws relating to three areas - Defence, Foreign Affairs,
Conununication, i.e., issues agreed up011 in the Instrument of Accession. All other
issues were to be administered according to the Constitution of Jammu and Kashmir.
Again, in 1952, an, agreement was'signed between the state govenlnlent and the
Union of lndia. This agreement brought all issues mentioned in.the Union List. not
only three issues of ~efence,Foreign Affairs and Comniunication, under the
jurisdiction of the .Union Qovernment, pending the decision of the Constituent
Assembly of Jamnlu and Kashmir. In 1954, the Constituent Assembly of the Janlniu
and Kashmir ratified the Accession to lndia as well as the agreenlent between the
-. .
state governmelit and tlie U~lionof India. Tllc President in consultation with the Splsrlill P r o v i a i o ~ ~[or
s
N ~ ~ r t l ~ - E l.l&K,
~ s t . Etc.
state government made the Constitutio~l(Application to Janullu and Kaslmiir) Order,
1954. This Order iniplenie~itedthe agreement of 1952 signed between the state
govenunent and the Unio~igovemilalt and ratified tlie Constitue~itAssembly. This
Order also superceded the earlier Order of 1950.
Tlie Order of 1952 expanded the scope of jurisdiction of the centre from just three
subjects of Defence, Foreign Affairs and Coin~iiunicationmentioned in the Instrument
of Accession of Jammu and Kashniir to all subjects mentioned in the Union subjects
in tlie Constitution of India. This Order was anlendcd seven times between 1963
and 1974. The amended Order brings the entire constitutional position of the state
of Janmiu and Kashniir within the framework of the Constitution of India, escluding
the Constitution of Janimu and Kashmir which wvas made by the Constituent Assembly
of the state.
The state of Januilu and Kasllnlir is tllc only state in tllc country wwlliich lias its own
Constitution. It is also the o n l ~ state,
f \\.hich llad a Constituent Assembly: wvliicli
drafted the constitutio~iof tllc state. The Co~lstituentAssembly of Ja~lmiu and
Kashrnir: was elected by tlie people of the state. Tlle Constituent Assembly met for
the first time on October 3 I : 195 1 .
.......................................................................................................................
.......................................................................................................................
.......................................................................................................................
Tlie British India goveniment placed the hill region of Assaln in the "excluded'
category because of the expediency of their policy-orientation. Finding the cost of
adriiinistration not being compensated by the revenue returns: tlie British found it
more cxpedic~itnot spend on n~nni~ig tlie adniinistration of this region. Rather tlie
hills nfcre Icft to be govcmcd by their traditional rule, which did not cost them
an~thing.Besides, tlie people in this area had been averse to the liotion of any
outsider ruling over them. Any intrusion or its apprehension into their affairs \\as
met with oppositio~iand hostility.
In order to retain their distinctness, the British mooted a plan to bring all areas of
the North-East along with hills of Burnia under a "Crown Colony". .The plan to
create a "Crown colony" was a secrete plan and was known as the "Coupland
Plan" nanied after -Reginald Coupland. This suggestion was rejected by thc Indian
National Congress. But the need to retain the distinctness of this region was
recogiised by providing special provisions regarding their govcmance. These provisions
were included on tlie basis of the reconuiiendations of tlie North-East Frontier
(Assani). Tribal and Excluded Area Sub- Conunittee of the Advisory Conuiiittee of
tlie Constituent Assembly of India. The sub-conunittee was kno\\~~i as Bordoloi sub-
co~iimitteenanied after its chaimian Gopinath Bordoloi, a member of tlie Constituent
Assembly. and the then Prime Minister of Assam.
As you have seen in this unit earlier the "Scheduled Areas" are those tribal-
inhabited areas which are located in states other than those of North - East India.
Like the tribals of the hills of the North - East: they are also protected by the
Special Provisions as enshrined in the V Schedule of our Constitution. This Schedule
provides the safeguards to their cultural identity and economic interests.
Basu, D.D., Introdz4ction /o the Consti/u/ion of India. Printicc: Hall. New Delhi. 1985.
Bakshi, P.M, I'he C'ons/i/lrtion c!flndia (with selective conllllents by the author).
Universal Law ~ u b l i s h i hCompany,
~ Delhi, 1999.
- - - - - - - - - - -
Structure
16.0 Objectives
16.1 Introduction
16.2 Federalism and Centralisation
16.2.1 Centralisation
16.2.2 Changing Environment
16.3 Role of Governor
16.3.1 Appointment of Governor
16.3.2 Discretionary Powers of Governor
16.3.3 Reservation of Bills for Consideration of President
16.4 Use of Emergency Powers
16.4.1 Emergelicy Under Article 356
16.4.2 Contlict Over President's Rule
16.5 Financial Relations
16.5.1 Tawtion Powers
16.5.2 Issue of Gralits
16.5.3 Ecoliolnic Planning
16.6 Use of Electronic Media
16.7 Demand for Autonomy and Cooperation
16.7.1 Demand for Autonomy
16.7.2 Steps Towards Cooperation
16.7.3 Sarkaria Commission
16.7.4 Inter- Stnte Coulicil
16.8 Let Us Sum Up
16.9 Key Words
16.10 Some Usehl Books
16.11 Answers to Check Your Progress Exercises
16.0 OBJECTIVES
This unit deals with the areas of tension and cooperation that have emerged in India
due to constitutional provisions and more so working of federal system during last
more than fifty years. After studying this unit you will be able to:
16.1 INTRODUCTION
You have already read in unit 14 that though Indian Federal system was described
as one of "Cooperative Federalism", it was in fact a federation with a strong centre
and significant unitary features. It was so structured as to establish supremacy of
the union government while providing autonomy of the states in certain fields. The
,A/
scheme of Qistribution of powers in the legislative, administrative and financial fields
under the seventh scliedule of the Constitution was so effected as to make the lxnuex in C u l ~ t l i r t;IIIII
Cooper;~tiosill 111dio11
Union Government more powerful than the states. In addition the rcsiduaql powers Fcderulivn~
were also conferred on the Union govenunent. In the lialiie of eniergency provisions
even sweeping powers were given to the centre to exercise overriding legislative
and executive authority to enable it to transform the federal systeni into virtually a
/ unitary system. At the time of framing of tlie Constitiition (in the interest of national
unity and development) centralisation of powers was considered necessary. During
the working of the Constitution the central govcninicnt not only used the provisions
of the Constitution enoniiousl~~ but also kept on consolidating and increasing its
I
powers. After some time particularly fro111mid 1960s thcrc started emerging questions
about nature of Indian federalism. We are licrc discussing all these issues in the
context of their background, implications and future trends.
r
16.2 FEDERALISM AND CENTRALISATION
The political elite which inherited power after independence w7as niuch in favour of
a strong centre, strong enough not only to iniplcme~itcentre's policies but also to
maintain the national elite's position as definitely superior. Therefore, even the
centralised federation provided by tlie Constitution was considcrcd or found insufficient
b!. tlieni and the rulers at the centre ai~g~iie~itcd po\\crs further by means fair or
foul. The fact of one party in poucr both at the centre and in alniost all states
helped in this augnicntation.
16.2.1 Centralisation
The main justification provided for ccritralisatio~iat tlie Centre was that with the
experience of partition to niaintain tlie unity and integrity of tlie countql a strong
centre was necessarj. Also for a balanccd and planned dcvclopnient of ncwl!~
independent country centralised efforts were required. In practice attempts to
centralise were two: one to keep the doniillant party in po\jler in as many states as
~ossibleand. two to consolidate the central leadership's autlioritj within tlie party.
For this purpose various constitutional and extra-constitutional methods includ~ngthe
use of governors oficc and emergency provisions were used. The Centre developed
the role of a patriarch controlli~gand running tlic States through part! Chief Ministers.
At tlmes. some of the union's cstraordinary poners like imposition of President's
rule under Art. 356 nerc used to settle intra-party problems. During tlie era of one-
party doniiiiancc the Caitrc-State relations ncrc merely a reflection of relations
between the state branches of the Congrcss and its central Icadcrship. Thc federal
structure never had a cliancc to operate. nor the states to ai-joy their co~istitutio~ial
autonomy.
To begin wit11 debate on union-State relations was limited. Bj. 1972 the Coligress
party and the Union govcninlent regained their predominance. Ho\\,evcr, the situation
was not as before 1967. Now tlic process of ccntralisation bcca~licniore severe.
The Central governnlcnt adopted increasingly interventionist practices in tlle States.
Not only a niore ccntraliscd but also pcrso~laliscdprocess was set in. From 1977
omvards \\.it11 the cliangc in parties in power and conling of coalition governments
at tllc central Ic\lcl tllcre had been cmcrging nc\\! debates and processes in Union-
Statc rclations. But in general. in spite of challcngcs and nc\\: devclopmalts. U~lio~i
go\lernmalts Ilavc continued \\-it11 the idea of prcdon~inanccof centre, its right to
intcrvcnc in State's affairs and misuse of the office of go\:cnlor and PO\\-crto
inlposc President's ri~lc.TIILISthe general trend has bccn that of centre encroaching
steadily upon the state's domain. This increasing cc~ltralisatio~i and i~ltenlentionof
the ccntnral goveninlcnt has caused some nlajor tension arcas in Union-State relations.
Inlportant of tliesc are:
1) Role of Govenlor
2) I~i~position
of Prcsidalt's rule
3) Reservation of Bills for the consideration of the President
4) Sharing of Finances
5 ) Use of electronic Media
The Sarkaria Co~iunissio~i in its report lias suggested that a person to be appointed /
as Governor should satisfy tlie followiiig criteria: he should be emincnt in sollie walk
of life, he should be a person from outside the State: he should not be intinlately
connected with tlic local politics of tlic Statc and lie should be a person who lias
not taken too great a part in politics gcncrall>,.and particularly in the rccciit past.
Ho\\cver. even after tlic subniission of the report of the Sarkuia Conimission the
Goveniors continuc to be appointed fro111 tlic active politicians of the n~lingparty
and without prior consultation \\fit11tlic Chief Ministers.
Apart from the noniial fi~nct~ons. \vliich tlie Governor exercises as a co~istitutio~ial
head. he exercises certain discret~onaqrpo\vcrs. Sonie of thcni have been expressly
conferred on hini while sonic others flotv bj, neccssay -implication. As far as the
discretionary poners by implication are concerned. these are significant particularly
in tliree matters. One is \vitli regard to tlie appoint~nentof Chief Minister when
neither a single party nor a conibination of parties enierges from the election with a
clear majority. Related to tliis is also tlie question of dismissal of Chief Minister on
tlie loss of majority support or otlicnvise. The second niattcr is with regard to
making a report to President under Article 356 about liis satisfaction that a situation
has arisen in cvliich the Goveniniciit of the Statc cannot be carried on in accordance
w~ththe provisions of tlie Constitut~on.thereby recommending the iniposition of
President's rule The issue of proclamation of President's n ~ l citself has become a
matter of serious tension bct\vccn union and state goveninients. This we will discuss
separately in para 16.4 of this unit. The third po\ccr is c\ith regard to reservation of
b~llsfor tlie consideration of Prcsidcnt.
16.3.3 Reservation of Bills for Consideration of President
Article 200 of the Constitution provides that certain types of bills passed by the -
State legislature may be reserved by the Govenior for the consideration of tlie
President. The President niay either give his assent or niay direct the Governor to
send it back for reconsideration by the State legislature along with liis comnents.
But even after tlie bill has been passed by the State legislature for the second time
tlie President is not bound to give his assent.
The main purpose of this provision is that the Centre can keep watch on the
legislation in tlie national interest. But Govcniors, and through them tlie central
Govemnent have used tliis provisio~ito serve the partisan interests The opposition
n~ledStates have from time to time raised a liue and cry against the misuse of
these provisions. This has specially been so in case where the Governor has
reserved a bill against tlie advice of tlie State Ministry. presumably under tlie
direction of the Central Govcninient. In its nicmorandum to Sarkaria Commission,
tlie Bliaratiya Ja~iataPart!. alleged tliat tlic bills ha\~cbeen rcscrvcd for consideration
of the President in order to create difficulties for tlie State govenuiients. The West
Bengal govenuiient in its reply to tlic Sarkaria Coniniission's questionnaire felt that
Articles 200 and 201 cithcr should be deleted or Constitutio~~ should clarify that the
Govenior would not act in his discretion but only on the advice of the Statc Council
of Mini. ers. At tlie opposition party's conclave held at S~rinagarin 1983. the
opposition parties denlanded that lcgislatures should bc cnlpowcrcd to enact la\vs on
subjects for \~hicIithcj. constitutionallj. have responsibility without having to seek
the President's asscnt. In recent !.ears with rcgiollal parties havins gained i~nportance
and pla~ingan important part in tlic fonnation and continuation of Central Govcninlcnt
the Govcn~orsarc not using this po\ver estensively. Nevertheless tlie issue renlains
~ n of
c contention in Union-State relations.
......................................................................................................................
Ho\v far is the role of Govcnlor an area of tension bctnccn Centre and Statcs.
.......................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................................
The Sarkaria Conuiiission drawing attention to thc repeated abuse of Article 356
lias pointed out tliat during the period fonii 195 I to 1987 of tlie 75 occasions \\:lien
the President's rule was imposed, only in 26 cases was President's rule inevitable,
18 cases were typical instancc of wliolesalc misuse of Article 356 for political
purposes, extraneous to tlie one for which tlie power has been conferred by tlie
Constitution. As early as 1953, Dr. B.R. Ambcdkar said in the Rajya Sablia apropos
tlic i~npositionof President's Rule in tlic PEPSU. tliat. " tlie people got a very
lcgitiliiatc ground for suspicion that the govcnimcnt is niaintai~ii~igtheir own party in
office ill all parts of India. Tliis is a "rape of tlic constitution". How liglitl!. tliis
en~ergencjrprovision lias been taken can be seen from the situations that soon after
coniing to po\\ler in 1977. tlic Janata govcnimait dismissed Congress Govcninie~its
in nine States at one go and in 1980. Mrs. Gandhi on rcti~rningto power repeated
tlie perfoniiance in ni~icStatcs govcr~icdby tlic Ja~iataParty. During 1980s use of
Articlc 356 was niadc so frcquait tliat it alniost slio\\.cd an intolerant attitude of the
Central Govemnient to\\:ards the non- Congress (I) Statc Goveninicnts. In Punjab,
President's Rule co~itinucdfor alniost fiw years (May 1987 to February 1992) at a
stretch. Conseqi~aitlyArticle 356 has beconie tlic niost abused and criticised clause
of tlie Constitution. In spite of the safeguards provided by the 44th Aniendnient
Act, it continues to be so and has beconie a sore and serious tension area in
Caitre-State relations.
The Supreme Court of India on Marcli 11: 1994 in the Bonuiiai case, gave a
significant judgement on the application and use of Article 356. Tlic Supreme Court
i~~ianimously and full-tliroatcdl\~upheld tlic disniissal of the BJP state governnients
of Madliya Pradesli. Ra.jasthaii and Himaclinl Pradcsli in Decc~iibcr 1992 because
their anti-secular actions \\.ere inconsistait \\.it11 tlic secular Constitution. But tlic
niajority held as unconstitutionnI t l ~Ccntrc's
: use of Articlc 356 in Nagaland (1998):
Karnataka ( 1989) and Mcgliala\.a ( 1 99 1 ).
Centre gives grants-in-aid to States under Article 28 1 on its discretion for undertaking
schemes, nleeting natural calaniitics or for rcnioval of disparities etc. There is a
general feeling that tlic Centre discri~iiinatcsbct\\cai States being nllcd by different
political parties. H.A. Ghani points out that a close scrutiny of tlic Central relief to
the States affected b\. ~iatural calaniitics i~idicatcsthat no \\ell-considered norms
were followed in this regard. Tlie cc~itraltcalns pre-occupied by political considerations
have always assessed the danlagc dolie by droughts. flood. ctc. in an adhoc
perfinctory manlier.
Tlie States, therefore. havc sharply questioned the need for the Centre to wield
heavy financial clout in the sliapc of discretionary grants. There are misgivings
. about the inherent danger of their being used as a political weapon against a State
that happen to be out of favour with the centre. The States want more resources to
be earmarked for statutory devolution so that the trend of increasing allocations
through discretionary grants can be curbed.
It is generally agreed that the process of planning in India has tended to push tlie
political system to greater centralisation due to both the ce~itralco~itrolover resources
for development and the prepondcrancc of the ccntralised planning ~riachinery.R.K.
Hedge points out that the gravest and niost hanilfill consequence of the atrophy of
the State's doniain in tlie ccono~iiicfield is in regard to industries and econon~ic
planning. For esaniple the schcnie of the Constitution is perfectly clear that industries
are essentially a state subject. Only those industries are to be regulated by the
centre the control of which by the Union is declared as cspedient in the public
interest by Parliament. But without an aniend~ncntto the constitution industries have
bee11 virtually transferred into a Union subject. More that 90 per cent of the
organised industries in ternls of value put havc been brought under the domain of
tlie Union. In practice, the regulation of industrial activity by the Union govemnent
has on several occasions inhibited the setting up of new industries. Similarly, it is
alleged that in the name of national planning, the Caitre for political considerations.
has been inordinately dela~vingviable and important State projects. On the contrary,
Ccntre has bee11 super inlposing its sclicnles on the Statcs which were deemed by
State govenunents to bc irrelevant to the conditions prevailing in the State. Owing
to this and other reasolis tlic opposition conclavc held at Srinagar in October 1983
in a conselisus stateliie~itsaid that the prcsclit authority of tlic Planning Commission
F r J e r u l i x ~i ~
n ~lndia and Union Ministy of Finance who offer discretionary grants to the States must be
drastically reduccd.
With the arrival of private channels and establislunent of Prasar Bharti that provides,
some autonomy to Radio and Doordarshan the govern~ncntalcontrol and Centre's
monopoly over media has been reduccd. Also in a 'situation of coalition govcrnmcnts
in which Regional parties are playing an important role the central govenunalt can
no longer ignore them. Still the powers to legislate, control and regulate the media
rest with the Union government and complaints about use and misuse of AIR and
Doordarshan for partisan purposes remain.
Check Your Progress Exercise 3
Note: i) Use the space given below for your answers.
ii) Check your answers with model answer given at the end of the unit.
I) What arc the areas of conflict bctwvecn Union and State Govcnlnlcnts on issue
of grants'?
2) How has planning become an area of tension between Centre and State.
111 1978 the Aka11 Dal released tlic revised vcrsion of Anandpi~rSaliib resolution.
or~ginallyadopted in 1973. According to this resolution. Centre's authority should be
co~ifinedonly to Dcfencc. Foreign Relations, Coniniunications, Railways aid Currency:
Entire residuary powers sliould be vested in tlic States. In the 1980s w~thregional
parties having bcconie significant. dc~iia~id for State autonomy has been put liiore
vigorously. Regional and sollie national parties separatcl~.and collectively had attacked
the central govcninicnt for c~icroacliiligupon the po\\crs of tlic Statcs. It is suggested
tliat tlie process of cc~itralisatio~i of po\vcrs and distortio~iof the Co~istiti~tio~i are
dangerous for national integration. In gc~icralsupporters of dcccntralisatio~iof po\\crs
and autono~ii~~ of statcs argue that the prcscwatio~iof ~iatiolialilllit! and tlic process
of co~isolidatingthe forces of liational integration presuppose the acceptance of the
~iianifolddiversities prcsclit 111 the natio~iand tlic ilrgclit need for realistic and logical
attenipts to lialidle tlicsc divcrsitics at tlic local Icvcl. b\. lianicss~nglocal initiatives
and utilising local talent. Ally attempt to tackle tlicsc divcrsitics fro111a central point
of control would onlj~scntc to liciglitcn the tcnsio~isin the system.
Federalism in Indin Tlicrc arc tliosc also who feel tliat for integration and unity of India tlicrc is nccd
for a strong centre. The fact llowever is' that a strong centre and ce~itralisatio~i of
powers are two different things. Evcnts both in India and in other parts of the \\odd
llavc slio\vn tliat it is the proccss of cc~ltralisation\\711icl~
tri~gersoff tlic process of
disintegration whereas dccentralisation aims at fulfilling the liopes and aspirations of
the people in a more pu$osive and mcaninghl manncr. All over tllc \\.orld the trend
is towards dcccntralisation. In India also various studies and reports of committees
and conlnlissions lia\li: pointed towards that.
The Sarkaria Co~llmissio~l was asked to review the working of existing arrangemaits
bct\vccn tllc Union and Statcs keeping in view tlie social and cco~lo~iiicdcvclopmcnts
that have takcn place over the years as also thc sclic~ncand tlic frame-\vork of the
Constiti~tio~land the need for the unity and intcgrity of the countn*.Ilic Commission.
after talking to various state governments, political parties and otlicr interested and
concerned quartcrs finally submitted it's report on October 27. 1987.
#
'The Sarkaria Com~llissio~l favoured a strong Ccntrc as the onl!. safeguard to ~iational
integrity \ihich \\as being ,threatened severely in the liglit of rcccnt tiss~parous
tendencies in the body politics. But tlic Commissio~ldid not cqilatc strong centre
\\fit11centralisation of pojvcrs. In fact. it vic\\tcd centralisation as dangerous for tlie
1 4 4 1 1 ~ sill C'4111flict :III(I
national integration. Tlic Comm~ss~on obscncd. "Man!, a time. the actions of the
C w ~ p e r a ~ t i qi tv1~IIIII~;III
~
centre. its discretionary approacll to\vards soriic Statcs. its lack of understanding of Fcdrrali\~n
local problems. its abject i~lscnsitivcncssand tlic blatrint misuse of authorit). vis-h-vis
the States have all distanced it from the people. This in tun1 has. it is believed.
reversed the process of national integration. the divisive tendencies have been
further compounded by such a short- sighted approach.
Many observers fccl that rcco~n~iicndations of Sarkaria Commission are liniited and.
inspite of bding in favour of dcccntralisation remain biased towards Ccntrc. Yet. it is
expected that if tlic Sarkaria Conimission's rcconi~llendations arc implemented
s~ncerelymuch tension in Union-State relations can bc reduced. Ho\\cvcr. so far
~iluclihas been done in this direction except the cstablishnicnt of tlic Inter-State
Counc~l.Of Course. with regional parties having become strong and a part of
coalition govcniliicnts at the Centre. the Central govcniliicnt is not able to interfere
~iiuch in State's affair. At the salnc time tllc active role b), the President and
judiciary has also put some check on tlic Union's discrction. But there are no
constitutional or structural cliangcs as yet. The federal systc~iias a \\hole remains
under strain.
Tlic National Front fonncd before 1989 clcctions in its manifesto proniised to
undertake a compreIicnsi\~crcvie\v of Union-State rclations in consultation with all
, Chief Ministers. In pursuance of this promisc the National Front Covcrniiic~it
cstablislicd tlic Inter- Shtc Council through a presidential notification on May 25: 1990.
Tlic Council \\.as to co~isistof the Pri~iieMinister, Cliief Ministers of a11 Statcs:
Chief Ministers or Adniinistrators of Union Tcrritorics and six niinisters of cabinet
rank of the Union Govcrnmcnt. Tlic Council is licadcd b!~ tlic Prinic Minister and in
liis abscncc b!. tlic cabinet ~iiinistcrnoniinatcd by him. Tlic council prcpnrcs guidclincs
for idcntifi.ing issucs to be brought bcfore it and liicets at least thrice cvcy \.car.
Its niectings are licld in Camera. It arrives at decisio~isby colisensus which arc
final and binding. Tlic council for its effcctivc functioning. has co~istitutcda sub-
coni~nittccconsisting of sollie Union Ministers and Cliief Ministers.
.......................................................................................................................
D
I ......................................................................................................................
17.0 OBJECTIVES
The objective of the present unit is to explain to you the reasons and processes
related to the reorganisation of states in India. After going througl~this unit, you bill
be able to understand:
8 The nature of this interconnection;
Some of the issues concerning the delimitation of the boundaries of a state:
The reasons why people seek statehood; and
The way nyw states are created and state boundaries are altered in India.
17.1 INTRODUCTION
.The Constitution of lndia empowers the Union government to create new states out
of existing states or two merge one state with other. This process is called
reorganisation of the states. The basis of reorganisation could be linguistic, religious,
ethnic or administrative.
One of the major problems of state managanent today is the incongruit!* bet\vccn
the territorial limits and the cultural front~crsof 111odcrn statcs. Modem statcs arc
nlostly large states and contai~lsc\cral religious. linguistic and ethnic (tribal) groups.
In son~ecascs they arc nliscd as in the United States of America. In sonic cascs
they are conccntratcd in distinct regions as in Canada or S\\itzcrland. When tllc
religious. the linguistic or the tribal groups arc conccntratcd in particular gcograpllical
arcas. they ma!. be tbrnlcd ~ntoprovinces or statcs and granted local autonom!..
This may be called the proccss of pro\ lnciallsatio~lor rcgionalisation.
The problem bcconlcs acute in the countries for~ncrly under colonial rule. The
colonial rulers annexed territories whcncvcr and \\herever they ruled. While governing
such territories they paid little attention to the cultural or ctll~iicspccificitics of the
pcoplc under their rulc. Most of thc provinces under their rulc remained multi-
lin~wal.multi-religious and multi-tribal.
......................................................................................................................
.......................................................................................................................
What i s the niost c o l i ~ t i ~cross
o ~ ~ci~tting-cleavage'?
.......................................................................................................................
.......................................................................................................................
.......................................................................................................................
.......................................................................................................................
.......................................................................................................................
Till that timc India \\.as divided into 'Britisli India' and 'native India'. Britisli India
\\.as split into Govcnior's Pro\~inccsand Cllicf commissioncr's Pro\*inccs. Native
India was split into tn.0 t!,pcs - i ) 566 princcl!. states o f different sizes arid in
different kinds o f subordination to tllc British rulers. and ii) 'tribal areas' outsidc tlle
north \vcstcni and the north eastern borders o f British India. Though outsidc British
India tlic -tribal areas' \\.ere \/ent nlucll under the control o f the Governor-General
o f British India. tlicrc \\.ore sc\,cral back\vard districts in British Indian pro\~inccs
like Assam. Bcngal. Billar and Orissa \\.here distinct tribal groups lived. Scvcral
districts \\.ere forriicd \\.it11 nii~ltiplctribal groiIps. And. as \\.it11 the provincial
boundarics. the district boundaries also cut across several tribal groups. '
.......................................................................................................................
The Constitution o f India. in 1950. regrouped tlic provinces \\llich csistcd during the
colonial period into '-states-'. It created four kinds o f 'statcs' \\tithin the federal statc
o f India. Tlle fonncr Go\crnor's pro\!inccs \\ere declared Part A statcs. The Chief
Conimissioncr's Provinces o f AAjmcr. Coorg and Dcllii. along \\it11 sonic o f tlic
fomlcr princely statcs that had been taken over for better administration. mere
niade part C statcs. The otllcr fonllcr princely statcs and groups o f princely statcs
becanle part B statcs and tlie extre~~~el!. backuard. Andanlan and Nicobar islands
were niade a Part D statc.
Part A states \\*ere placed under Governors \vhilc Part B statcs were placed'undcr
Rajpramuksh. They \vould havc legislatures. Part A statcs \vould have Co~~ncils of
Ministers responsible to the Icgislaturcs \vhilc the Part B statcs \\:auld havc Esccutivc
Councils. Part C and Part D statcs \vould be centrally administered. As the Go\~enlors
and Raipramukhs would follo\v the advice o f their Councils o f Ministers in the Part
A and Part B states, they ivould llavc the highest amount o f ai~tonom!~.Tlic
ce~itrally-administeredstatcs \vould havc tllc least or no autono~n!..
Tlic 'Tribal Areas' the 'Excluded Areas, and the 'Partially Excluded Areas' \\.ere
all \~holl!. or mostl!. inhabited by the tribal people. But the 'Tribal Areas' were
outside British India and alnlost autonomous. Tlic 'Excli~dcdAreas' and thc 'Partiall!
Excluded Areas' \\,ere \\~ithinBritish India and very much under go\ cnlmcnt control.
Check Your Progress Exercise 3
Note:i) Use tlic space gi\:cn belo\\. for ).our ans\\er.
ii) Clicck \,our ans\\.crs ~viththe niodcl ans\\.crs given at tlic elid of this unit
1 ) Into ho\\ man!f t!.pcs of '-states" \\ere the provinces created according to
of India in 1950t?
Constit~~tion
The Statcs Rcorganisation Act. ho\\cvcr. did not nlake a drastic rcorganisation. Thc
fonilcr Part B Statc of H~.dcrabadwas joined \v~tliAndlira Stsatc to fonii a larger
Andlira Pradcsli Statc. The fornicr Part B Statc of Mysorc tunicd into a larger.
State of Karnataka \\lit11 additional territories transferred from thc Statcs of Madras
(Tamil Nadu) and Bombay. The for~ncrPart B States of Madras (Tamil Nadu) avid
Bombaj.. The foniicr Part B Statc of Travancore-Cochin was ti~rncdinto tlic Statc
of Kcrala \vith new Tcrritorics acquired froni the Statc of Madras.
You have read in sub-section 17.4.1 of this unit that tlic Constitutio~iof India. in
1950, created four t!.pcs of statcs. I n 1956. thcsc statcs \\ere reduced into t\vo
types - ( I ) Statcs and (2) U~~ion
tcrritorics. The autonom~~ of statcs \\as larger than
that of the Union territories.
Crcatio~iof ne\v statcs started shortly thereafter. In 1960 the Bombay statc \\.as
partitioned hito Maliaraslitra and (311-jarat.In 1966 Punjab. A clii~nkof tlic territory
of the foniier Punjab statc \\.as joined \\.it11 the Union tcrriton. of Hinlaclial Pradcsli
to constitute it into a State.
In the year 2000 tlircc nc\\ statcs \\ere crcatcd: Chliatt~sgarli.out of the hill area of
Madhya Pradesh. Jharkhand. out of the liill arcas of Biliar and Uttarakhand. out of
the hill areas of Uttar Pradcsh. Thcrc was a time thc hill areas of Bihar and
Madhya Pradesh \\.ere doniinatcd by people \\ho are no\\ called Scheduled Tribes.
Industrialisation and niigration lia\.c tunicd tlicni into minorities. Uttaranclial is alniost
entirely non-tribal.
All the necv states carved out of the old o~icssince 1972 can. therefore. be called
'hill states.
Paul R. Brass. i,cmg~tngc, Ijcligion trnd ILoli/ics in Indict. Nc\v Dcllii. Vikas
Publishing House. 1975.
1) India was dividcd into tn.0 typcs of provinces. i.c. "British India" and "Native
India".
I
i 2) In 1905 Bengal was partitioned on tlie religious basis.
i
18.0 OBJECTIVES
The institutions of local-self governance are indication of the existelm of the grass-
root level democracy. After reading this unit, you will be able to understand:
18.1 INTRODUCTION
The political power in India is shared by three vertical units of governance - the
central government, the state government and the local government. The local
government includes the Panchayati Raj Institutions (PRIs) in the villages and the
Mu~~icipal and Metropolitan Councils in the cities. These are known as the institutions
of local ~elf-~-l~ernance (LSG). Local self-government is democracy at the grass-
root level. The 73rd and 74th Constitutional Amendments have widened the scope
of local self-governance.
1,ornl Srll'-(;o\cr11l11t-l1t
18.2 HISTORICAL BACKGROUND O F RURAL SELF- 111atitutio11s: W U ~ ; I I ill111
1.rh;111
GOVERNMENT IN INDIA
Tlie pancIia!-ati raj. albcit in diffcrcnt for~ns.had a considcrabl! long histon going
back to the ancient period \vliai the rural con~n~~~nitics organiscd institutions to
manage tlicir o\vn affairs. The villagc ai~tononl!. \\.as considcrablc in Muglial era
and tliereforc the inipact of tlic Mugllal era on tl~clocal conlnlunitics \\?as minimal.
But tlie formal stn~cti~rc of tlic rural self- government \\'as introduced in 1882
according to Ripan's Resolution. Its nlain purposc \vas to provide tllc institutional
backing of the local l~idianclitcs to the colonial administration. Contemporary local
self-government in India can be dcc~ncdbe to nlorc a co~itinuationof tlie system
introduced under British rather than in prc-British era. Scvcral provincial Acts on
local bodies \\.ere passed and they provided framc\vork for man!. otlicr provi~icial
and central Icgislations. Tlic local self-govcni~iicntin tlic rural arcas kno\\~ias tlic
villagc pancha!.at. \\-as set up in tlic viI lagcs according to tlic rcconinicndat ions of
tlic Ro!.al Coniniission of Dcccntralisation in 1907. It ainicd to dcccntralisc tlic
po\\.er and associate the pcoplc \vi tli local adniinistration through tlic institi~tionsof
villagc pa~iclia!.ats. Unit of panclia!~at \\.as to be single village: only in case of \!cry
small villages it \\.as to be sc\~cralcontigi~oi~s \~iII;igcs. PancIia!~ats \Yere not to be
placed i~~ider the control of local boards but i~ndcrtlic dcpi~t!. co~iiniissio~icr. 1-lie
villages pancha!.ats c~!io!.cd ccrtai~iJudicial and administrative PO\\-crs.The) also
\\.ere entitled to a portion of land cases and special grants.
Tllc Rural self-govcnl~iicntBil I. 1 025. provided for a nine-nicnibcr villagc ai~tliorit!,
elected on tlic basis of restricted adult francliisc. A succcssfi~lvillagc authority \\as
to be given more polvcrs. Tlic pancha!nt could includc niorc tlimi one cadastral
\~illagc.It could be cntn~stcd\\it11 certain fi~nctionssi~clias \\atcr suppl!. nicdical
relief. and sanitation. Single nic~iibcr\!illage authority could also be put in place
\\.here no recognised fornls of villagc organisation csistcd.
Tlic Mclita Co~ii~iiittccRcport suggested that furictioris of local bodics should co\cr
tlic dc\clopmcnt o f agriculture in all its aspects - tlic improvcmcnt o f cattle arid
local industries. public licaltli. \\elfarc nark. administration ot' priman scliools and
collcctio~iand maintaiancc o f statistics and act as a11 agent o f state go\enimcnt in
cuccuting special sclicmcs o f dc\~clopmcntc~itrustcdto it.
To prcscnic tlic relative autonomy o f tlic village co~ilniu~iitics tlic hlchta Co~iiriiittcc
Rcport suggcstcd that tlic rclatio~isliip bct\\~caitlic state and tlic Pa~iclia!ati R+i
bodics 'must not be cra~iipcdb!. too ~ i i i ~ cco~itrol
li by go\~crIiiiiclitand govcrlimcnt
agencies. It must Iiavc tlic po\\.cr to ~iiakc~iiistakcsand to lcar~ib! ~ i i a k i ~~iiistakcs.
ig
but it ~ i i i ~ also \\.Iiicli \\.illliclp it to avoid riiaki~igmistakes'. Tlic
s t receive gi~ida~icc
structures that cvolvcd. lio\\.cvcr. \\.ere those \vliicli cliictl!. pcrfor~iicddc\:clopmcnt
fi~nctions.
Oiic scliool o f thought argues tliat Panclia\.at Rqi lias not onl! failed to contribute
~iiuclito n ~ r adcvclopmcnt.
l but on the contran. lias also lii~idcrcdit. Tlicsc institutions
arc pri~iiaril\.c~igagcdin po\\.cr politics and distribution o f dc\~clop~iicntal patronage.
They lia\lc also disturbed tlic \,illage Iiar~iionythrough factional contlicts. On tlic
otlicr halid. so~iicacademics fccl that tlicrc is no i~ilicrc~it problaii and rather tlic
failures o f tlic Panclia>.at Rqi arc because of the lack of tinanccs. lack o f co-
operatio11from go\,cni~iic~it dcpartmcnts. half-licartcd policies and dcfcctiic stnlcturc
crcatcd tbr tlic i~iiplc~iic~itatio~i.
Efforts to rcvitalisc tlic PRls \\ere riiadc again i n 1970s: tlic Cclitral Govcr~imcnt
Icd b!. 5; Ja:,ta Part). appointed Asliok Mclita Co~ii~iiittcc to assess tlic fi~nctioning
o f tlic PRls and rcco~li~iicndcd mcasurcs for tlicir impro\ cmcnt. Tl~ougliAsliok
Mclita Co~iianittcc likc the Bal\\ant Rai Mclita Committee Rcport b, *?vc liiorc
c~iipliasis to tlic d c l i \ l c ~~ i i c c l i a ~ i i sthan
~ i i to dcvclopmait. it niadc soiiic lie\\
suggestions. Tlicsc includcd need to allo\v tlic political parties to contest panclia!al
I,~ICIII S~~~'-(:~I\~~I.IIIIICII~
clcctions. \votncn to participate in the PRls. Tlic Asliok ,Mclita rcport drafted 43rd I ~ ~ n t i t ~ ~ t HIIPD~
i ~ b ~ ~;IIw
III :
Constitution Anicndmcnt Bill (1977) in order to incorporate its rccommcndations in \'VB:(II
tlie law. But the Ashok Mclita rcport \\as ignored aftcr the fall o f tlic Janata
Govcninic~it Ho\vcvcr. sonic statc go\crnnicnts n ~ l c dby tlic non-Congress partics
initiated niove to activate tlic PRls - Kar~iataka.West Bcngal. Andlira Pradcsli.
Tlie reconi~ncndations o f Asliok Melita Report. Iio\vcvcr. \\crc taken into
consideration by tlie Congress fro111 tlic I980 on\vards They found a place in the
73rd and 74th Constitution Anicndmcnts tliougli \\it11 some modifications.
Tlie Constit i ~ t i o ~
aiipo\\
i crs tlic statc Icgislaturcs to enact laws in ordcr to cnablc
tlic PancIia!~ats to ai.jo\. tlic po\\.crs \\-liicli arc ncccssan, for tlic dcvolution. I t can
help tlie PancIia!ats to work as institi~tionsof sclf-govcniancc. The deviation o f
powers to Parlcha!.ats i s mainly related to:
i
1I a) the preparation o f plans for ccono~iiicdcvclopnicnt and social justice; and,
b) tlic implcmcntatio~iof such sclicnics for cconomic dcvclopnicnt and social
justicc as ma!. be c~itnistcdto tlic~iiincluding tliose in rclation to tlic mattcrs
listed in the Elcvaitli Sclicdulc. l'lic Elcvcnth Schcdi~lcconsists o f 29 subjects,
relating to agriculti~rc.land rcfoniis. minor irrigation. n ~ r ainfrastructure.
l poverty
alleviation. \vomcn and cliild dc\clopmcnt. \\.elfarc o f tlic ivcakcr sections and
primary. secondan. and non-foniial education.
' Tlic Pnnclia!~ats call be autlioriscd b!. tlic la\\ cnactcd b!. tlic statc legislature to:
i ) leg: collect and appropriate such tascs. dutics tolls and Bcs collcctcd b>- tlic
statc govcninicnt: ii) ,?\all o f tascs. dutics. tolls and fccs collcctcd by the statc
govenimcnt: and iii) to get grant-in-aid from tlic Co~isolidatcdfirlids o f tlic statc.
Tlic financial rclatio~isbct\\cai tlic statc and tlic PancIia!.nts arc govcnicd b!. the
State finance Commission. Tlic statc Finance Commission is supposcd to rcvic\v the
L
financial conditions o f the Panchayats. and dctcniiinc the share o f Panclia!.ats in
I
i thc lev\,. tolls. tascs. duties and fccs.
Tlie provisions o f tlic 73rd Amcndmcnt do not apply to tlic Sclicdulcd Areas. the
! statcs o f Nagaland. Mcghala~aand Mizoram. tlic hill areas the statc o f Manipur
and tlic hill arcas of district o f Darjccling (West Bcngal). Ho\\c\cr. tlic provlslons
of tlic 73rd Anicndn~c~it \\.crc cstcndcd to the Sclicdulcd Arcas as \\ell b!. tlic
Pancha!ats ( Estcnsion o f Schcdulcd Areas) Act. 1996.
Tlic pro\,isions of the Pancha!~ats (Estcnsion o f tlic Sclicdulcd Areas) Act. I996
ha\c conic into force on 24"' Dcccnibcr 1996. Tlic Act cstc~ldsPaticliayats to tlic
tribal arcas of eight statcs o f India. namely. Andlira Pradcsh. Bihar. Gujarat. Himaclial
Pradcsh. Maliaraslitra. Madli!.a Pradcsli. Orissa and Rajasthan. I t intends to enable
tlic tribal society to assumc control over their o\vn destiny. to prcsclvc and conscr\c
tlicir traditional rights over natural rcsourccs. Tlic statc govcninicnts I\ ere required
to enact their legislations in accordance with tlic Provisions o f the Act bcforc thc
cspiry o f one year. i.c. 23rd Dcccniber 1997.
2) Wh!. was Bal\\.ant Rai Mchta Committee set up. and \\,hat \\,ere its
3) Identity tlic main features o f the 73rd Anicndnicnt Act regarding tlic
disadvantaged groups.
.......................................................................................................................
E\cn bcforc tlic continnation and implc~ncntationo f tlie 73rd Amcndnlait Act five
statc ~ovcrnmaitshad introduced tlic PRls, i.e., \\cstcnl States o f Maharastra and
Gujarat: caster11 state o f West Bcngal. soutlicr~i States o f Andlira Pradcsli and I,~IC:II ~ l - i t ' - ( : ~ ~ l - ~ ~ l ~ ~ ~ t - ~ ~
I
It11ra11
IIIIII
IIISI~IIII~IBII%:
Kamataka. I 1.11~111
Tliougli there arc slight variations in the nonicnclaturc o f tlic stn~cti~rcso f the PRls
At various levels. the 73rd Anicndnicnt provides tlic common framc\\~orkfor tlic~ii.
This scction deals \\.it11 tlic stnlctilrc o f PRls in UP as o ~ i co f the csamplcs. The
PRIs in UP consist o f tlic follo\\ing structure:
I t consists o f tlic grani sablia and mcmbcrs o f the village pancIia!ats directly
elected by tlic electorate. l~cadcdb!. the Pradhans. Tlic bod! \\.liicli consists o f all
adults o f the \.illages is kno\\-11as gram sablia (\!illage council). The la\\. c11.joins tlic
gram sablia to liold gcncral nicctings annuall!'. It can make rcco~ii~iic~idatio~is and
si~ggcstio~is to the grani pa~icIia!at 011 a far^^^^^ aspects. statcnicnt o f accoi~nto f tlic
gram panchayat on \,arious aspects related to tlic functioning o f the panclia!ats.
Tlic gralii pancIia!.at's Jurisdiction covers a11 29 sub.iccts ~iicntio~icdin tlic I 1 Sclicdulc.
Tlie pancliayats arc supposed to consist o f scvcral co~iiniittccsto help it in pcrforniing
various dutier,:TIicri <-:-;,:, tlic gram pancliayat has a \tide s\\.ccp o f f~~~ictions. if not
po\\!ers. Each gram pancIia!.at is cspcctcd to function tkrougli four co~ii~iiittccs, \iz.
Saniata Samiti (\vclfrik o f \vo~iic~i and cliildrcn and interests o f SCsISTs and
back\\~ardclassc3). .\iikas'qa~,liti (agriculture n ~ r ain
l dust^. and dcvclopmcnt sclic~iics),
Sliiksha Saniiti (education) and Lok Hita Samiti (Public licaltli. public work). Tlie
village panchayat has also a vi llagc pradlian. \\.I10 i s clcctcd indircctl! b!. tlic ~iicnibcrs
o f the village pancha!.at.
The primary fi~nctionscntn~stcdto thc zila parishads arc to supcrvisc the activities
o f gram panchayats and Kslictra Samitccs. to classif\' fairs and fcsti\lals. and to
classifi~roads as \illage roads. district roads. ctc.. for maintcnancc. l'lic zila parishads
are en~oinedto prepare an annual district dc\,clopmcnt plan incorporating those o f
tlie kslietra panclia!~ats \\hicli in turn incorporate the ones prepared bj* tlic gralii
panchayats.
Tlic pcrforniancc o f the PRls ~iccdsto be asscsscd in the colitcst o f tlic social.
cco~ioniicand political mil icu in tlic vil lagcs. Tlic PRls Iia\,c contributcd to tlic
o\.crall dc\rclop~iiaito f the \ illagc socict!. to a significant. Birt tlicir pcrformancc lias
\aricd in ditTcrcnt circunistnnccs. Nc\.crtliclcss. tlicir ~iiostsig~iiticatio~i co~itribution
113s been in raising the Ic\,cl o f political consciousness o f the people.
One o f the niain Iii~idranccsin tlic pcrfornia~icco f tlic PRls lias bee11 the lack the
\\ill on tlic part o f man! statc go\crlimcnts to dcvolvc po\\cr to tlicni. 111 statcs
otlicr tlia~iAndlira Pradcsh. rcgi~larclcction was not conducted to the \,illage
pancha!.ats. Pancha!.ats in the statcs likc Kaniataka. Wcst Bcngal. Kcrala and
Tamil Nadu havc sIio\\n bcttcr pcrfoniia~icc~ i i i ~ cbcforc
li tlic introduction o f the
73rd Amcndmcnt. Tlic TDP go\cmmcnt in Andlira Pradcsh and tlic statc gownimcnt
in Kaniataka introduced rcscnation o f scats in the PRls for SCs. STs. Backnard
classcs and \\omai in 1987 and 1985 rcspccti\~cl!.. Tlic panclia!ats haw a p l a ~ c d
pi\otal role in tlic implaiicntatio~io f lalid rcfoniis and n ~ r a dcvclopmc~it
l in Wcst
Bc~igal .
Follo\\ing the confir~nationo f tlic 73rd Constitutional Amendment b!. tlic~ii.a large
number o f statcs havc attcniptcd to dcvolvc po\\crs to tlic local bod~csin the 1990s.
M a d l i ~ aPradcsh. Rajasthall. Andhra Pradcsh and Kcrala liavc niadc special efforts
to in\lol\lc pcoplc in plannins. decision-making and iniplcmcntation o f tlic statc policies.
I n tlie era o f globalization. sigiificd b!, a collaboration bct\vccn tlic NGOs. panclia!.nts
and tlic DRDAs tlic PRls in tlicsc statcs havc contributcd to tlic dcvclop~iiaito f
\~illagcco~ii~iiunitics, i,n rural dcvclop~iic~it. education. licaltli. ctc. Bccausc o f tlic
usage o f the intcnict in tlic fi~nctio~iing village pancha!*ats in Rajastlian. Andlira
R~adcslii n d M a d l i ~ aPradcsli, tlic PRls arc involved in c-govcr~ianccalso
As nic~itionidearlier. though rcscnation for the SCs. STs. OBCs and \vonibn in tlic
PRls \\.as introduced c\.ai carlicr in sonic statcs, it has bcconic mandaton. in all
statcs follo\ving tlic passage o f 73rd Co~istitutio~ial Amcndmcnt. Tliosc statcs. \\~liicli
lia\.c been sinccrc in holding the clcction to the PRls, lia\lc cnnblcd SCs. STs.
OBCs, and \ v o ~ i ~ to a i bc participants in. and leaders o f tlic local bodies. The PRls.
lio\vc\~cr.ha1.c bccn facing serious cliallcngcs i.c. factionalis~n.castcism. corruption.
\\.liicli tli\vartcd tlicir dcmocratisation. liavc bccn tlicir bane. Wliilc bcforc tlic 73rd
Anicnd~iicntthe dominant coniniunitics in niost statcs higli-jacked tlic PRJs. in tlic
follo\\.ing period in niost cases tlic \\.omen panchayat nic~iibcrsha\c bcconrc prosics
o f the nialc nic~iibcrso f tlicir families. Transfer o f iniportant subjccts likc cduc~tion
to tlic PRls lias resulted in the ooliticisation o f the issues csuccinll\. in Wcst Bcneul.
Kcrala. Madliya Pradcsli. I t has ad\lcrscl!. a f i c t c d tlic proccss o f dcccntralisatio~i I,I,F:I .4~.11'-(:0~1.1~111111.111
I l ~ s t i t n ~ t i ~H
~ tl ~
~ \r: i ill111
~l
and govcniancc. I ~~:III
I
I Tlic urban local govcninicnt o\\cs its gclicsis to Saniucl Laing. nicnibcr o f tlic
Viccro!.'~ C o i ~ ~ i c\\.I10
il proposed that local scnjiccs slioitld be based on local
I
resources. Lord Ma!.o's Rcsolution o f 1870 introduccd the concept o f clcctcd
represc~itedin the municipalitics. Eccri as tlic local govcniriicnt in tlic n ~ r a larcas
arc cal led panclia!.ats. tlic local govcrlinic~itin to\\,ns and citics is called Municipal
Govcmment. Tlic local i~istitutio~is o f governalice in tlic citics \\ere introduccd
al~iiosttwo cc~ituricsbcforc they \\.ere introduccd in the ru ral areas.
I
Municipal bodics in Indian citics \\.ere the crcation o f tlic British. Till tlic passage o f
i c ~ i t have been existing fi\z t!,pcs o f arban govcrlimcnts
74th A ~ i i c ~ i d ~ n tlicrc -
11 Municipal Corporations. Municipal Coi~ncils.T o \ ~ nArca Committccs. Notified Arca
Committccs and Cantonnicnt Boards. Madras \\.as first to ha\lc tlic Municipal
Corporation in 1687: it \\as follo\\.cd by Bomba! and Calcutta in 1762. Lord Ma!.o's
Resolution o f 1870 cncouragcd tlic i~itroductiono f an clcctcd president in tlic
municipalitics. Tlic present for111and structure o f tlic institutions o f local go\fcrliancc
I
0n.c tlicir csistc~iccto Lord Ripo~i'sresolution on local sclf-go\~cr~i~iicnt. adopted on
, I8 ma!. 1 882. Tlicrc \\ere about 200 municipalities in tlic British India by 1 870.
Tlic nii~~iicipal bodics i~icludc- clcctcd rcprcscntati\:cs fro111 tlic clcctoral \\.ards;
~iie~iibcrso f tlic Lok Sablia and State Legislative asscniblics co\rcring wlioll! or
partly tlic niu~iicipalarea conccr~icd:the mcmbcrs o f tlic council o f states and tlic
statc Icgislativc council \\-I10 arc registered as voters \vitIiin tlic ~ i i i ~ ~ i i c i p al :
area
cliairpcrsons o f tlic co~il~iiittccs
o f tlic ~ i i i ~ ~ i i c i p
ai~tlioritics:
al and. persons Iiavi~ig
special knowlcdgc or cspcricricc in municipal administration sans right to \;otc in the
council.
Tlic scats arc rcscncd in the ~iiunicipal bodics for tlic \\-cakcr scctio~is o f the
-
socict! OBCs SCs. \\.omen. Tlic percentage o f scats rcscr\.cd for \\,omen is 3 3 .
The \lard co~ii~iiittccs
\\-liicli csist for the ~ i i i ~ ~ i i e i areas
p a l co\.cri~igniorc t l i n ~ tlircc
i
lakli population co~isisto f kbc ~iicmbcrsnominated b!. the statc go\.crlimcnt: clcctcd
mcmbcrs of tlic cou~icil\\.I10 rcprcsuits tlic \yard belonging to the \\-ard committee.
F c c l c r a ~ l i si ~
w ~111dii1
~ l l l c tcnilrc of the rili~llicipaliticsi s f i l e !,cars. 111 case tlicsc arc dissolved or
supcrccd~d.they lia\.c right to be heard. Within six r~lo~itlis o f supcrcisio~ior dissolution
of the ~lli~~licipalitics
tlic elections slloi~ldbe held. Tllc t\vclftll schcdulc o f the 74th
amendment contain I X items \\.hicIi arc:
14) Burials and burial grounds. crcnlations. crcnlation grounds and clcctl.ic
crc~ilatori
11111s
The statc govcmlllcrits cnjo!. discretion regarding the tascs. dutics. tolls and fccs
\vhich ha\-c to be levied b!. n~i~nicipal bodies. and the grant-in-aicl to be given to
them. Tllc statc govcrnlncnt is si~pposcdto appoint a tinancc commission. every
i s si~pposcdto give rccommcndations regarding
tivc !,cars. The t i ~ l a ~ l ccomrllissio~l
c
principles o f sllaring o f the statc taxes. duties. tolls and fccs bct\\.ccn the statc
go\,enlmalt. municipalities and its distribution bct\\:ccn the municipalities.
Tlic Municipal Corpohtio~lcan deal dircctl! \\it11 the statc gowrnmcnt \\licrc.?s the
Municipalities arc ans\\crablc to the District Collector and Di\,isional Comriiissioncr.
Tlic Gcncral Body o f the Municipal Corporation consists o f councilors. \tho arc
clcctcd for a tcnii of tlircc to fi1.c !.cars. The!. arc cithcr dircctl! clcctcd or I.~IC:II Sc.ll'-(;4,\ VI.IIIII(.III
l ~ ~ s t i t t ~ t i ~ Ib< ~I It~s; :I IA I I I ~
nominated coi~ncillors\\ it11 somc spccialiscd kno\\.lcdgc in municipal fi~nctio~is. l V ~ ~ I I I
Tlic Council elects. fro111alllong tlic councillors. a President \vhose tern1 ma!' be co-
tcrnlini~s\\;it11 that of tllc council. I n certain statcs Prcsidcnts arc clcctcd dircctl! by
tlic citizens. Hc cnjo!.s considcrablc authorit!* and po\vcr both in tllc dclibcrati\~cand
csccutive organs of the municipalit!,. He convenes and presides o\cr the mcctings
of the Council. gives his n~lingson all contro\~crsialmatters and cscci~tcsits decision
as its Cliicf Escci~ti\,cOftiscr. His po\\.cr depends on the support of tlic nia.jorit!..
Coniniittccs can be formed b!. the Municipal Coi~ncil.I-llc Standing Committee is
tlic ~iiostimportant of all committees. Tllc poucrs and fi~~lctions of tllc Municipal
Council Coni~nittccsarc tllc sanic as tllosc of tlic Municipal Corporation. Cantonnicnts
arc prcdominantl! militan.-occi~picdareas along \\-it11 a sizeable civil population that
nccessitatcs the 1lii11iicipalisatio11 of its administration. Tlic Caritonnicnt Board is
special fonn of i ~ r b a go\,crnmcnt.
~i constituted under dlc Ca~itonnicntsAct. 1924.
Local Bodies arc rcspo~lsiblcfor tlic cff~cicnc!. of programmes and services. raising
local resources and providing meaningfill planning and services at the local level.
Tlie fi~nctions. duties arid responsibilities of tlic municipal govcrnnicnt arc both
obligatory and discretionan.. Obligatorl\. fi~nctionsincludc supply of potable water:
constn~ctionand niaintcnancc of public strccts: lighting and cleansing of public
strects, sc\vers etc.: maintaining public hospitals: cstablisliing and niaintaining primaq.
schools: registration of birth and naming strccts and numbering Iiouscs. Discretionary
fi~nctionsmay include scci~ringor rcnlo\~i~lg dangcroi~sbuildings or places: constn~ctio~l
and niaintcnancc of pubic parks. gardens. libraries. museums. rest houscs. lcpcr
homcs. orplianagcs and rcscilc honlcs for \\.omen. ctc.: planting and maintcnancc of
roadside and otlicr trccs: housing for lo\\. inconic groups: organizing public receptions,
public csliibitions. pi~bliccntcrtain~llcnt.ctc. Co~iipi~lsoq~ Prinian. Edi~catio~l is the
rcsponsibilit!~of the local bodics in a large numbcr of states.
18.8.2 Octroi
Tas on cntq of goods Into a local area for consumption or sale tlicrcin is popularly
kno\vn as octroi. Octroi is the niost traditional tas and a niqjor source of local
revalue. It accounts for about 60 to 80 per cent of total rcvcntlc of tlic urban local
bodics wlicrc it is imposcd.
With tlic addition of ciglitcc~ifunctions in the T\\clfIh Sclicdulc after the 74th
Amaidmait. thc fi~nctionalrcsponsibilit~csof municipalities lia\lc increased. The!.
participate in the preparation of plans for local devclopmcnt and in thc iriiplc~nentation
of dc\~clopmaitpro.jccts. apart froni providing civic amcnitics. Illus the!. rcqulrc
incrcascd firiancjal allocations.
./
Check Your Progress Exercise 2
'
#
Note: i) Use the space given belo\\ for your ans\ver
ii) Cl~cck>,ourans\\.crs \\.it11 niodcl ans\vers given at tlic end of tl~cunit.
I) What is tlic coniposition of a grani pancha!.at'?
2) Identity tlic urban bodies o f local self-go\cniancc \\llicll csistcd bcforc and
I after the 74th Constitutional Anicndmcnt.
!
18.9 LET US SUM U P
1
Local Self- Goccmmcnt is o f broadly trio t!.pcs n ~ r a and
l -
urban. The n ~ r a sclf-
l
I govcninicnt i n India goes back to the ancient period but \\.as rcniodclcd b\. the
! British rulers. lndcpcndcnt India Iau~iclicdthe dri\.c f o r its dcniocratisation and
e~iipo\\cniicnt. Tlic 73rd anicndnicnt integrated it \\.it11 the co~istiti~tional s\,stc~n.
Modern i ~ r b a nL S G began \\.it11 the Britisli n ~ l c .I t is no\v elaborate and \,aricd in
structiirc according t o tllc size o f an l ~ r b i l ~illlit. i T l i c 74th A ~ i i c n d n i c n t I I ~ S
co~istiti~tio~ialiscdtlic s!.stcm o f i ~ r b a nlocal sclt'-go\cr~inncc.
C h e c k Y o u r Progress E x e r c i s e 1
I) Tliaugli tlic PancIia~.atiRqj s!.stc~ii liad csistcd c\.cn bcforc tlic Britisli pcriod.
tlic Britisli madc it ditfcrcnt fro111 earlier s\.stc~ii i n tlic scnsc that tlic\r liad
fornialiscd it.
3) I t introduced rcscwation for \\omen (33'%,). OBCs. SCs & STs and tlic general
categories to clisurc their rcprcscntation i n the P Rls.
Check Your Progress Exercise 2
I) A gralil panclia\at co~lsistsof the gram sabha and clcctcd ~ilctilbcrsof thc
\illage panchayats. It is hcadcd b\. the village pradhan. A granl pancha~athas
also an indircctl!. clcctcd up - pradlian.
2) Tllcrc csistcd five t!,pcs of municipal bodies bcforc thc introductio~iof tlic 74th
Co~lstitutio~lal
A~llc~ld~llc~~t- Mu~licipalCorporations. Municipal Councils. T o ~ n
Arca Committees. Notified Arca Co~ll~llittcc and the Cantonment Boards. Thc
74th A I ~ I C I t~ has ~ C I ~tllcnl into t hrcc - Nagar Panchrt!,ats. Municipal
~ I ~rcdilccd
Cou~icilsand Municipal Corporations.
3) Tax rcvcnuc. Octroi. Non-tas rcvcnucl Grants-in-aid and Borro\\.ings or loans
UNIT 19 NATURE OF PARTY SYSTEM IN INDIA
Structure
19.0 Objectives
19.0 OBJECTIVES
This unit deals with the nature of the party system in India. It aims at familiarising
the student of Indian politics with tlie fundamental features underlying the evolution
of the party system in the post-independence period. After studying this unit, you
should be able to:
Understand the nature of the party system in India and identify its various
characteristics;
Analyse the changing nature of tlie party system and explain the emerging patterns;
and
Discuss the socio-economic and the political factors underlying the changing
nature of party politics.
19.1 INTRODUCTION
Indian party system is unique. It does not fit in any kind of classification that is
generally used to categorise the party systems. Tt is defined by the singular nature
of Indian politics on tlie one hand and the nature of the state-society relationship on
the other. In the last two decades, there has been a substantial change both in the
nature of politics as well as in nature of relationship between the state and the society.
One of tlie very important manifestations of change is visible in the context of the
politicisation of greater ~ i i ~ ~ n of
b e rpeople, especially those belonging to the less
privileged sections of society. That explains the change in the nature of the party
system as well. The distinctive features that defined the party system of India in the
fist two decades after independence are no more to be seen at present.
In order to understand tlie present nature of the party system, it is important to trace
its I~istoryand to refer to its political logic in the context of the changing state-society
relationship.
Party System and Elccfions
i n India 19.2 NATURE OF PARTY SYSTEM - FIRST TWO
DECADES AFTER INDEPENDENCE
The common social background o f the elite resulted in the homogeneity that became
a defining feature o f tlie political centre as well as o f tlie party system. The ruling
party and the opposition, both coniing fro111 tlie same social background, shared the
social perceptions and converged on many issues. A consensus, therefore, existed
within the system around the basic values.
The Indian National Corigress was the institutional ma~iifestationo f this political
centre. Not only was it an important expression o f the nationalist movement but was
also a dynamic political organisation that formed the indigenous base for the political
system. Accommodating almost all-political groups o f political importance, it provided
a very crucial political space for political negotiations and bargaining.
1) The party system during the first two decades after independence was termed
as the Single Dominant Party system. I t was a multi-party system where the
ruling party played an overwhelmingly dominant role. Although a number o f other
mlitical parties existed and operated politically, yet the central space o f politics
was occupied by the Indian National Congress only. The dominance o f the
Congress was determ hied by its immense organisational strength as well as its
capability to capture large number o f seats both in the Union Parliament and the
state legislatures.
2) Dominance o f tlie Congress as the ruling party did not niean absence o f com-
petition. The numerous parties in opposition provided competition. Yet, such
competition did not result in effectively clialle~igingthe dominant position o f the
ruling party. Morris-Jones aptly described this phenomenon as 'dominance CQ-
existing with competition but without a trace o f alteration'. In electoral terms, it
implied that although a number o f opposition parties entered the electoral arena
but none o f them singly or in combination could secure substantial nuniber o f
seats to replace the Congress as the ruling party. These parties were fragmented
and poorly represented in the Unio~iand the state legislatures. Congress contin-
ued to return its candidates in large numbers, in fact, in proportionately large
numbers tlian the votes polled in its favour.
3) Due to their inability to provide an alternative to tlie ruling party or even to.
cliallenge its position o f dominance, the opposition parties did not play tlie tradi-
tional role o f opposition. On the contrary, their role was limited to that o f
coristaritly pressurising, criticising tlie ruling party. The parties in opposition,
therefore, operated as the parties o f pressure.
4) .One o f tlie important features o f the Congress party that helped it to sustain its
position o f do~nina~icewas its capacity to represent divergent social groups and
\
interests. As it drew its support from different sections o f society, it played the
role o f a great umbrella party. During the nationalist movement it had accom- Nature of Party System in
India
modated diverse groups into its fold and had stressed on the need for their unity
within the same organisational structure, I t had therefore assumed the character
o f a broad coalition. In the post-independence period, it continued to absorb the
dominant social elements and balance different interests that helped it to maintain'
its unchallenged position o f power. Through its accommodative and adaptive
politics, it could curb the role and relevance o f opposition.
5) Being a plural party representing diverse interests and ideologies, the Congress
had a number o f factions. O f these, some were relatively more dominant and
played important role in the decision making o f the party. Others were the
dissident factions. several of these factions of the Congress were also ideologically
closer to some o f the opposition parties. The reason for this being, that almost
each o f the party in opposition had been a part o f the Congress at one time or
the other and while choosing to form an independent party outside it, had left a
faction of similar ideological orientation within it. Therefore, there always remained
continuity between the politics o f the Congress and that o f the opposition parties.
This continuity made it possible for the opposition parties to put pressure on the
Congress and influence its decision making.
6 ) The party system, therefore, worked on the basis o f a consensual model. I t was
a politics o f broad consensus round the political values shared by all the political
actors whether operating from within the ruling groups or from the opposition.
Ideological divisions within the Congress or outside it were blurred.
Due to the unique position of dominance o f the Congress party, it was known to be
the Cental institution o f Indian politics. 'The Centrality o f Congress was reflected at
various levels:
i) At one level, it occupied the most central space o f electoral politics, thereby
monopolising it and not allowing other parties to seriously challenge its position
o f power in the centre and the states.
ii) At another level, its centrality was outlined in its occupation o f the pivotal space
between the state and society. Representing diverse interests o f society,. it re-
mained the most important formal mediating institution o f the state. It therefore,
provided the most crucial space for political negotiations and bargaining.
iii) At the third level, the,centrality o f the Congress was reflected in its ideological
standpoint. Being an un~brellaparty it had space for all kinds o f ideological
groups. Hence, it pursued a 'centrist' ideology even when it contained ideologi-
cal viewpoints o f the 'left' and 'right'.
1) What was the socio-economic background o f the political elite at the time o f
India's independence?
Party System and Elections
in India
2) What is meant by 'dorninance coexisting with competition but without a trace
of alteration'?
3) Why were the opposition parties known mainly to be the parties of pressure
before 1976?
.......................................................................................................................
5) What is meant by 'Centrality of Congress?
Change in the nature of part$ system in the decades after 1960s' according to Rajni
Kothari, was the consequence of the 'changed socio-economic and demographic
profile of the polity'. Such a change in the profile of the polity was a consequence
of the political mobilisation of the masses as well as the emergence of newpolitical
classes. The political mobilisation of the masses was a logical consequence of the
electoral politics based upon the principle of universal adult franchise. Frequently held
elections helped in increasing the political consciousness of mass of Indians, especially
those belonging to the backward and lowe castes.
f
The emergence of the new political classes was directly related to the rise of the
proprietary peasant class in rural India i n the backdrop of the land reforms. By the
beginning of the seventies, the land-owning socially dominant sections belonging mainly
to the backward castes had attained sufficient economic strength to demand a share
in political power. The entry of these castes into the competitive power politics had
far-reaching consequences for the Indian politics. Firstly, there was an increase in
the number of those aspiring for a share in power. The domination of the traditional
political elite, therefore, was serioi~slychallenged. Secondly, there was also greater N a t u r e of ''art). System i n
India
~iia~iifestation o f a variety of conflicting interests. These new entrants did not share
the political blues o f the traditional elite. They liad not only different demands and
different expectations from tlie political system but they also used a different political
language. This liad tlie effect o f posing a serious threat to tlie consensual politics o f
the traditional political elite in general and that of the Congress, in particular. Unable
to integrate and balance varied interests, the Congress was dislocated from its position
o f centrality.
Tlie changed context of politics was also tlie result o f the assertion o f the lower
castes. I n the politics o f numbers, the lower castes and Dalits were brought into
politics, initially, in tlie context o f tlie patron-client relationship. As clients ofthe locally
dominant castes, tlieir numerical strength was used in tlie interest o f their patrons.
However, as the molnenti~mto the participatory politics was created, the nature o f
lower caste politics was also changed. Tlie lower castes and Dalits started acquiring
more autonomous role in politics and tlieir tnobilisation now came to be related to tlieir
political interest. I n ternis o f party politics, this led to tlie formation o f parties
reflecting tlie support and interest o f these newly mobilised castes. Formation o f tlie
BSP, Samajwadi Party and Jariata Dal are tlie exaniples o f such political formations.
These parties clearly reflected the interest o f tlie Dalits and the Backward castes.
ii) Check your answers with the model answers given at tlie end o f this Unit.
1) What was the impact o f tlie electoral politics based on the principle o f Universal
Adult Franchise on the politics o f India?
2) Wliy was the Congress party not so successfill in integrating various interests for
1967?
3) Give some examples o f the political parties that were formed for pursuing the
particular caste interests.
Party System and Elections
i n India 19.4 PARTY SYSTEM AFTER 1967
'The nature of the Indian polity as well as the party system underwent a substantial
change after 1967. This cllange has been described in varied terms. According to
Kothari, this was the beginning of the decline of the dominant party system. While
Morris-Jones attributes this to the emergence of 'a market polity' in which the
number of opposition parties were brought 'fully into the market place, and compe-
tition that had previously occurred within the Congress, was now brought into the
iealm of inter-party conflict.' A number of new political forces and formations started
emerging-making the electoral politics more competitive. All this led gradually to the
decline of Congress.
The change in the nature of party system, initially, was much 111ore visible at the state
level where the hegemony of the Congress party was cllallel~gedthrough the forma-
tion of a number of non-Congress government. The Fourth General election led to the
beginning of the politics of coalitions. This election produced truncated majorities of
the Congress party. Hence, coalitions were formed in many states with Jana Sangh,
SSP, CPI, CPI (M), and a number of regional parties joining the government.
Meanwllile the Congress also started showing signs of its weakness at the central
level. One of the initial indicators of the weakness of the Congress was the cllanging
nature of factionalism and the sharpening of the dissidence within tlle party. Acute
factionalism ultimately led to the split of the Congress in 1969. This split, though an
internal affair of the party has far reaching consequences for the Party system of
India. One of the major consequences of the split was the decline of the consensutrl
ntotlel of Ittrlirrrt politics and of the party system. Thcold organisational structure
of Congress that was relatively more democratic and wit11 greater linkages at the
societal levels, was replaced by a more centralised organisational set-up. This new set
up was pyranlidal in nature. The decision making within the organisation was per-
sonalised and there was no space for democratic dissent. All this had the effect of
rendering the Congress orgallisationally very weak.
'The decline of the consensual model of Indian politics was not only a manifestation
of the organisational problems of the Congress party but also of the changing nat"ure
of the state-society relationship. The homogeneity that earlier cllaracterised the nature
of the elite was no more available after the mid-sixties. This was also the time when
the new classes had started becolning more assertive, specifically clain~inga share
in political power. It was the impact of sucll a changed context of elite politics that
the Congress failed to maintain its electoral dominance in a ni~lnberof states.
By tlle end of the decade of the seventies, the party system both at the central level
as well as the level of the states was marked by flux. This was due to the fragmen-
tation that was taking place in political parties. It was a process that was to continue
for quite some time. Yet, despite the flux, the con~petitivenesswas a distinct feature
of the party politics. The ~lilmberof political parties that entered the electoral arena
was also increased. All this meant that the period of the dominance of the single party
was already over. A multi-party system, instead. has evolved.
At the central level of politics, the new context of politics was reflected in the
emphasis on consolidation of the opposition parties against t l ~ eCongress. With the split
of the Congress, a 'Grand Alliance' was formed between the Congress (0), SSP,
Jana Sang11 and the Swatantra. The logic of the alliance was the unity of non-
Congress parties with a view to challenge its position of power. This logic led to the
formation of the Janata Party in 1977. This party was itself a coalition of five
erstwhile parties, the Congress (0). the Jana Sangh, Socialist Party, the Bllaratiya Lok
Dal (BLD), CFD. This new party was successful in breaking the col~tini~ity of the
I Nature of Party System in
Congress in power in the Centre for the first time, after the sixth general elections
t
I held in 1977. This had the effect of further bringing about substantial changes in the India
nature of the party system. The position of the Congress party further declined and
its organisational structure was further weakened. It was no more capable of integrating
varied social groups. Its organisational structure was fast decaying due to lack of
inter-party democracy, on the one hand, and its insensitivity towards the changing
context of civil society, on the other. Although it was still the only major institution of
political bargaining (and the only party capable of capturing power and retaining it in
i the Centre, at least for another decade), yet its position of power was very precarious.
ii) Check your answers with the model answers given at the end of unit.
1) What was the outcome of the 1967 elections at the state level?
.......................................................................................................................
2) What was the impact of Congress split on the party politics of India?
.......................................................................................................................
3) What was the major change brought out by the 1977 parliamentary elections?
It was in the period starting with the 1989 parliamentary elections that the Congress
was displaced from its position of centrality. Such displacement of Congress from the
position of the centre has various implications:
1)' Firstly, Congress has ceased to be the dominant political party. It is no more the
single major political party that dominates the political scenario. A number of
other political formations have also had their effective presence. For the last two
decades, there has been an ascendance of non-Congress political formations.
The major non-Congress formations that have been playing a crucial role in
Indian politics include the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), the Left Parties, and a
Party System and Elections number of other national and regional parties. The central political space, earlier
i n India
dominated by the Congress party, is now being shared by a number of politicai
parties.
3) The decline of Congress has not led to the emergence of an alternate national
party tliat could o ~ c u p ythe central space. In other words, tlie single party
dominant system has not bee11substituted by a two-party system. The rise of the
BJP in tlie early eighties had led some analysts to hope tliat it might work as an
alternate national party and that there miglit develop a bi-party system with a
direct competitio~iof power between the Congress and tlie BJP. Yet, it could not
be possible. While tlie Congress continued to decline from its position of strength,
the BJP could riot attain the majority on its own.
4) Failure of tlie large national parties like the Congress and the BJP to get majority
of seats in Parlia~nenthas brought liumerous smaller parties to tlie central stage
of Indian politics. The large parties have been depending upon these smaller
parties for the fonnation of governments. Instead of single party majority
governments, we have been having minority coalitions. In 1991, tlie minority
government of Congress was installed [which attained majority subsequently].
The 1996 Parliamentary elections led to the for~nationof a minority coalition of
thirteen parties of tlie United Front, supported by Congress and the Left Front.
This coalitio~iwas replaced in 1998 by another coalition led by the Bharatiya
Janata Party (BJP). The 1999 Parliamentary electio~isagain resulted in tlie
coalition government of the National Democratic Alliance (NDA) with BJP as
the largest membef of tlie coalition.
2) The kind of the p w y system that is available at present is not hegemonic but
conyetilive with sufficient scope for alternririon. However, due to the inability
of any single party to attain majority, the alternation takes place not between the
individual parties but between the groups of political parties.
The nature of alliance to begin with, was simply on the basis of exigencies of
power politics. Gradually, over the period a pattern seems to have evolved in this .
context. Rather than tlie alliances formed after the election, now there is almost
tlie accepted practice of having pre-poll alliances. Initially, alliances were amorphous
with me~iibershaving come together without ally common objectives, except the
one related to power. But of late, tliere has been some kind of effort at
drawing some conrmon ntirtintunr progrcmrme acceptable to all partners of the
alliance.
6) Acceptance of common programme among the alliance partners does not necessarily
mean that the alliance partners share cornillon ideology. Ideological cohesiveness,
in fact, does not characterize the nature of alliance. Ideological positiorl of the
parties that come forward to join an alliance, at times, is quite paradoxical. What
causes these ideologically dissimilar parties to form an alliance is the logic of
political power. Otherwise, these are non-icleological political fronts.
10) As the 'national' parties are acquiring regional character, tlte regiorral parties
rrre p/aying important role in setting tlre national agenh. What is more
important, the regional demands are being forcefully voiced in the national space
of Indian politics. Earlier, this was not possible because the regional demands
were placed i n opposition to the national demands, and therefore, were considered
as a threat to the national unity. With the entry of the regional parties at the
national level of politics, this is no more the case. The regional and the federal
issues are an important part of the political agenda at the national level of party
politics. Region or the regional assertions are no more treated as dangerous for
the nation.
1 1) This has important ilnplications for the Indian federal structure. With the shift fro111
the single-centred dominant party system to a multi-party system with lot of space
, for smaller parties located in the states, there is also a definite shift in the centre-
state relations. The emerging party system has an esserrtial conrponent of
partnersltip between the national, regional and tlre state level parties. There
is, therefore, a basis for a more egalitarian relationship between the centre and
the states. Party system itself is providing the institutional set up for the
representation of the interest of the states. Many of the regional parties that are
playing important role in party politics have been de~nandinga reorganisation of
the centre-state relationship with greater autonomy for the states. With their
ascendance, there has developed greater sensitivity towards the regional issues
and there has emerged greater consensus on federalism. Even those national
parties that have been traditionally favouring a strong centre have been forced to
accept the logic of federalism. The dependence of the BJP on Akalis, DMK,
TDP, Trinamul Congress, Samta Party and the National Conference, for instance,
has resulted in its flexible attitude towards the issues related to centre-state
relations.
The federal context of the party system makes it imperative not only to emphasise
the complexity underlying the relation between the national and the state level party
system, but also to analyse the nature of party system at the state levels. Although
some similarities can be perceived between the national and the state levels of party
politics, yet it is important to note that each of the state may be having its own
peculiarities. -
At the level of the states, therebas been, for quite some time, a keen competition for
political power. Yet, there are variations in the way this competition operates. In many
states, there is an alternation of power between at least two parties. The party
potirics, in these sates may be described as the two-party politics. I n many dlier N a t u r e of P a r t ? S?stem i n
India
states, politics'is not neatly divided between the two parties. There is a multiplicity of
parties with tlie parties bunching themselves in two groupslpoles. he party politics
of these states may be defined in terms of bi-polarity. There are other states also
having a multi-party system but which cannot be neatly classified either as two-party
system or systems of bipolarity.
I
There is, therefore, a lot of fluidity in party politics at the state level. This fluidity
operates not only in the nature of party competition but also in the way the political
parties are placed in the states. Regional parties are important political actors at the
level of the states but that does not mean that national parties do not operate at the
level of states. 'There are different patterns of competition between the regional and
the national parties. I n some of the states, regional parties are very crucial political
actors, but in otlier states, regional parties do not play that important role. There are
., some states where ~iatio~ial parties do not have significant presence. In some states,
party competition takes place mainly among the national parties while there are states
where tlie power alternates between a national and a regional party. In some of tlie
states, the national parties have acquired a regional character and compete with tlie
national or the regional parties. Tamil Nadu, West Bengal, Assam, Punjab, Kerala,
Jammu and Kashmir, are the states with a strong tradition for regional parties, while
UP, Himachal Pradesli, MP, Kar~iataka,Orissa and Rajastlian have been the states
where tlie competition has bee11taking place between tlie national parties. Regional
parties have also made strong inroads in Maliarashtra and Andlira Pradesli.
ii) Check your answers with the ~iiodelanswers given at the elid of this unit.
........................................................................................................................
i
.......................................................................................................................
2) Wliy is tlie co~iteliiporaryparty politics more representative and more plural?
i"
.......................................................................................................................
The party system in lndia has undergone major transfonnation in the last five decades.
As a legacy of the National Movement, the Party System in 1947 was characterised
by an overwhelming domihalice of the Congress party. As the central political institution
of India, the Congress completely co~itrolledthe power politics for the first two
decades after independerlce. The strength of the Coligress lay in its organisational
structure and in its ability to accommodate diverse political interests. This peculiarity
of tlie Congress was linked with the homogeneous nature of the political elite whether
belo~igi~igto the Congress or the opposition.
1 The party system changed substantially after 1967 with the change in the nature of
the socio-economic profile of Indian polity. With the politicisation of the masses as
well with the assertion of the new socio-economic groups, mainly the middle peas-
antry, the backward castes and the Dalits, the party system also changed. The
inability of the Congress to accommodate conflicting interests and tlie erosion of its
organisational structure led to its decline. By the end of the 1980s, the Congress had
lost its centrality. A multi-party system replaced the Congress System.
The contemporary party system is defined by its multiplicity. A number of national and
regional parties have filled in the vacuum created by the withdrawal of Congress from
its central position. The regional parties have become more assertive as they have
joined the national politics as the allies of the national parties. This also has strength-
ened the federal structure of India.
Kotllari Rajni, 'The "Congress System in India", in Party System and Elections
Studies, Occasional Papers of the Centre for Developing Societies, no.], Allied
Publishers, Bombay, 1967.
Manor James, 'Parties and the Party System', in Atul Kol~li,India's Democracy: An
Analysis of Changing State-Society Relations, Orient Longman, Del hi, 1988.
Pai Sudha, 'The Indian Party System Under transfonnation: Lok Sabha Elections
1998'. Asian Survey, vol.XXXVlILNo.9, Sept. 1998.
- -
N a t u r e of Party System i n
19.9 ANSWERS TO CHECK YOUR PROGRESS India
EXERCISES
20.0 OBJECTIVES
'This unit deals with the national and regional political parties in India. After going
through this unit, you will be able to:
20.1 INTRODUCTION
Political parties play cruciaT role in the functioning o f Indian democracy. Democratic
systems can not fulictioli in the absence o f political parties. They work as link
between state and people. Political parties contest elections and aim at capturing
political power. They function as a link between people and government in a repre-
sentative democracy. If a political party fails to form government, it sits in opposition.
The role o f the opposition party is to expose the weaknesses o f the ruling party in
order to strengthen tlie democratic processes.
India has a multi-party system. There are both national and regional parties. The
Election Commission recognises a party as a national'party, if it f i ~ l f i l sone o f the two.
\ conditions: (!),it secures 3.33% of votes or seats in electio~isto the le islative
assemblies, and (2) it secures 4% o f votes or seats in Lok Sabha electionLfour
states. The national parties can also be called All lndia parties. Their
1 policies, ideologies and strategies have a national focus. They have their presence in National and Regional
Partie3
most o f the parts o f the country in terms o f maintaining organisatio~lalstructures and
contesting elections. A regional party is limited to a geographical region which may
cover a state or a couple o f states. They come into being to defend and preserve
religio-cultural identity o f a region. They may also come into being on the issue o f
?
neglect*of a region which causes its economic backwardness. Regional parties are
often seen promoting regionalism -giving primacy to narrow local interest. Some
people see them as a threat to the idea o f a strong nation but at the same time there
i
are people who do not have such a negative approach towards them. They believe
the strong regional parties ensure that the region they represent gets a fair deal by
the central government. The year 1989 ushered in the phase o f multi- party system
at the centre. This has meant a definite role for regional parties in the national politics.
The period from the 1960s onwards has been significant in Indian party system
because o f the existence o f a large number o f national and regional parties. The
earlier decades were known the phase o f the one party dominance, i.e., the dominance
o f the Congress. In this unit you w i l l study some national parties - the Congress (I),
the Bharatiya Janata Party, the Communist Party of'lndia, Communist Party o f lndia
(Marxist), and the Ballujan Samaj Party. You will also study the main regional parties
- tlle National Conference, tlie DMK, the AIADMK, the Akali Dal, the Assam
Gana Parishad, the Jharkhand Party and the Telugu Desam Party.
The Congress (I)has emerged from the Indian National Congress which was born
in 1885 in Bombay. The latter had succeeded in bringing together different classes
o f Indian society in the Indian National Movement. I n the beginning Congress was
an elite organisation and under the Gandllian leadership it became a mass organisation.
The Non-Co-operation, Civil Disobedience, and the Quit lndia Movements were the
important milestones in the history o f Congress Party during the pre- l~ldepe~ldence
period. The provision o f Provincial Autonon~yunder the government o f India act 1935
provided an opportunity t o the Congress party to acquire some training in the art o f
running the administration between 1937- 1939.
After tlie Independence the Congress Party became the ruling party as the British
transferred power to this party. Between 1947- 1967 the Congress Party dominated
the Indian political scene. The outcome o f the fourth general election , which was held
in 1967, dented the Congress dominance in a, big way. The Congress party was voted
out o f power in eight states. Even at the centre it could secure only a slender majority
in the Lok Sabha. I n the year 1969 the Congress party split for the first time into a
new Congress led by lndira Gandlli and an old Congress led by S. Nijalingappa. The
new Congress led by lndira Gandhi swept the parliamentary elections o f 1971 and
assembly elections o f 1972 in most o f the states. The sixth general election in 1977
resulted in the defeat o f the Congress Party and comfortabIe majority for the Janata
Party. The defeat o f the Congress party was seen as a rejection o f lndira Gandhi's
style o f politics. After the defeat in 1977 election there was another split in the
Congress Party. There emerged two Congresses - one led by lndira Gandll\ and the
other led by Swaran Singh. This is how the congress led by lndira ~ a n b h or i the
Co~igress(Indira) or the Congress (I)was born in 1978. Generally tlie Co~igress
(I) and Congress are used synonymously. The Janata experiment at the centre failed
within two years ~nainlydue to personality clashes among the leaders and factional
fights. I n 1980 the Congress (I)retunled to power restoring Congress dominance with
two third majority in the Lok Sabl~a.After Indira Gandhi's assassi~lationin 1984, Rajiv
Party System and Elections Gandhi became the Prime Minister. I n 1985 General Election he led the party to an
i n India
unprecedented victory. The Congress Party together with its allies won four hundred
and fifteen Lok Sabha seats. The ninth general election witnessed a tough fight
between the National Front, a combination o f opposition parties and the Congress (1)
in alliancekith the AlADMK and the National Conference. The National Front
entered into seat adjustment with both the left parties and the Bharatiya Janata Party
in their areas o f influence. This ensured straight fights in most of the constituencies.
The Congress (I) emerged as the single largest party getting 197 seats. No party
could secure clear majority in the Lok Sabha. In 1991 Lok Sablla election there was
a triangular battle among the Congress (I),the Janata Dal-National Front combine
and the BJP. The Congress (I) won 232 seats. Rajiv Gandhi was killed during
electoral campaign. P.V.Narasimha Rao became the Prime Minister. [n 1996 and
1998 Lok Sabha elections the number o f seats won by the Congress (I)came down
to 140 and 14 1 respectively. In 1999 the number o f seats won by the Congress (1)
in the Lok Sablla came down to 114.
The Ideology
The Congress Party has been committed to socialism, secularism and democracy. I t
subscribed to the idea o f democratic socialism that is why economic policy o f the
Congress Party introduced state control o f the commanding heights o f the economy
like basic industries, banking and insurance. The party stood for rural and urban land
ceiling. I t was against the monopolies and was for promotion o f medium and small
industries. At Avadi session in1956 Congress proclaimed its commitment to socialistic
pattern o f society. I n 1971 election the Congress gave the slogan o f Garibi Hafao
(remove poverty). Even the 20 -point programme under emergency had a strong
socialistic component. In the 1980s Congress shifted to the right. The 1984 manifesto
did not mention socialism or the need o f curbing monopolies. The 1989 election
manifesto en~phasisedthe need to empower people through Panchayati Raj. ln1999,
the Congress election manifesto advocated the need o f a capitalist economy integrated
with world capitalist system. I t also favoured abolition o f public monopolies except in
the fields o f defence, and encouragement to the private sector. I n 1999 the election
manifesto o f the party reaffirmed its commitment to secularism and strengthening
Panchayati Raj Institutions.It also promised doubling expenditure on poverty alleviation.
I n foreign policy the party has stood for the Non- Alignment.
The party had started as an elite organisation o f the educated urban middle class. I n
the 1920s it acquired a mass base. I n spite o f a mass base the leadership o f the
Congress was in the hands o f upper caste big landowners, urban intelligentsia and
businessmen. After independence the Congress Party won three general elections
without much o f a challenge. This was because of the support it enjoyed among rural
and u!ban, educated and uneducated, upper caste and lower caste, rich and poor
almost all over the country. It was the shift o f the middle caste votes, especially from
the later half o f the 1960s onwards, away from Congress that led to its losing
elections in many states. The main support base o f Congress has been the upper
caste more particularly the ~rahmins,Scheduled Castes and the Muslims. In 1991 the
-
Co~igresswas virtually wiped out from Gangetic belt U P and Bihar. The BSP and
the Samajvadi Party in UP have snatched the Scheduled Caste and Muslim votes
from the Congress. Similarly in Bihar the Muslims and lower castes have shifted to
the RJD, while the upper caste votes in both these states have shifted to the BJP.
Organisation
The constitution o f the Congress party provides for an elaborate organisational network.
'The party president heads the organisational set up o f the party. There is a working
committee to assist the president. The A l l India Congress Committee, which is a
deliberative. body, supplements their functions. The central office of the party is National and Regional
. Parties
situated in New Delhi. The central office supervises the functions of the Pradesh
Co~lgressCommittees, District Congress Committees and Block Congress Committees.
The District Congress Committees maintain records, raise funds and recommend
candidates.
The Bharatiya Janta Party came into being in 1980 in the wake of split in the Janata
Party on the issue of the dual membership, i., e., whether those members of the
Janata Party who also were the members of Raslitriya Swayamsevak Sangh (R S S)
should silnultaneously retain their memberships of both these organisations or not. The
controversy on this issue resulted in the exit of the Bharatiya Jana Sangll constituent
or the RSS members from the Janata Party. After leaving the Janata Party, the
Bharatiya Jana Sangh constituent launched the Bllaratiya Janata Party (BJP). 'The B
J P is aptly seen as reincarnation of the Bharatiya Jana Sangh. Syama Prasad
Mukherjee founded the Bharatiya Jana Sangll in 1951. The RSS founded by Kesllav
Baliram Hedgewar in 1925 has been an organisational backbone earlier for the Bllaratiya
Jana Sangh and then the Bllaratiya Janata Party. I n 1984 the first Lok Sabha electio~l
after its birth the B J P got only two seats but in 1989 it obtained 88 seats. In 1991
election this party secured 120 seats and emerged as tlie second largest party in the
Parliament. In 1996 Lok Sabha election the BJP emerged as single largest party *
securing 162 seats. The President invited Atal Behari Vajpayee to form the government.
The government lasted for only thirteen days as it could not face the Parliament
because it did not have the majority. In1998 Lok Sabha election the BJP made
strategic alliance wiih regional parties and secured 180 seats. The BJP formed the
government but the government did not last long. There was another election in 1999.
The BJP contested this election as a partner of the National Democratic Alliance
(NDA).
The Ideology
In the beginning the BJP attempted to project a different image from the Bharatiya
Jana Sangh. Atal Behari Vajpayee, the first President of the B.IP, had linked the
emergence of the BJP with Jay Prakash Narayan's vision of a glorious India in the
first convention of the party held at Bombay. The BJP is also seen as a reincarnation
of tlie erstwhile Bllaratiya Jana Sangh, the Hindu Nationalist Party founded by Shyanla
Prasad Mukherjee in 1951. The Jana Sangll aimed at rebuilding Bharat (India) as a
modern democratic society according to religious precepts. Ideologically the BJP is
committed to five principles- nationalism and national integration, democracy, positive
secularism, Gandhian socialism and value-based politics. The BJP proclaimed to make
these policies the core of its development strategy and to build national consensus
around them. The party rejects both capitalism and socialism because they promote
concentration of economic powers either in the hands of private individuals or state
officials. In 1984 the party laid stress on the develop~nentof both agriculture arid
industry. It also empllasised reduction of taxes and introduction of employment guarantee
programme and recognition of right to work as a fundamental right. In 1996 the BJP
kept repeating its commitment to swadeshi economy but it actually appropriated the
Congress (1)'s slogari of liberalisation. In 1993 while addressing the Confederation of
Indian Industries, L.K.Advani said that if the BJP came to power the basic direction
of the economic policy would remain unchanged. The B.IP's policies as senior coalitiori
partner in the NDA government gave clear indication of its acceptance of the policies
of liberalisation. In 1999 at its Chennai meeting the BJP gave clear indication of
leaving behind the agenda of aggressive Hi~iduismand swadeshi. The BJP has accepted
the principle ofjustice to all by agreeing to reservation on caste lines. It promises 33%
reservation to women in parliament and state assemblies.
Party System and Elections The Social Base
i n India
'The BJP, like its predecessor the Bharatiya Jana Sangha, has enjoyed support base
in the Hindi belt. I t also has strong presence in Gujarat and Maharashtra. Since 1989
the party has been trying t~ penetrate into south India. BJP's traditional support base
was among upper castes, small and medium traders and shopkeepers. Among minori-
ties it gets votes largely from the Sikhs. I t i s mainly seen as a Hindu Party. From the
1990s, its base has broadened in rural and urban areas, and among the larger numbers
o f social groups.
The Organisation
At the national level the BJP has a Party President and the National Council and
party plenary or special session. At the state level the party has a Council and the
State Executive followed by Regional Committees, District Committees and Block
Committees. The BJP also has front organisations like Bharatiya Janata Yuva Morcha
and Bharatiya Janata Mahila Morcha. They function according to the guidelines o f the
National Executive.
The main communist parties which exist in lndia are: tlie Communist Party o f lndia
(CPI), tlie Communist Party o f India ( Marxist) or the CPI(M), and several Naxalite
groups. The CPI was fou~ldedin Kanpur in 1925. At the time o f Independence there
emerged two political lines within the Communist Party o f lndia about the nature o f
the Indian state, the freedom struggle and the question o f how to bring revolution in
lndia according to the tenets o f Marxism and Leninism and the future course o f
action. One line advocated by then the secretary o f the CPI, P.C. Joshi viewed the
Independence as real and thus wished that the Communist Party should support
Nehru. The other line held by B.T.Ranadive and Gautam Adhikari'held that this was
not real independence. Real independence could only be achieved under the leader-
ship o f the Communist Party o f India. So they were o f the view that tlie Party should
fight against the Congress Party. In the early 1950s a change could be noticed in
the Soviet Union's attitude towards Nehru and the Congress government. This change
was also reflected in the' attitude o f the Communist Party o f India. A draft party
programme o f the CPI called for building a broad anti-feudal and anti-imperialist front
embracing nationalist bourgeoisie led by the working class. I n 1962 with the Chinese
attack on India the two Ilines within the party came to the surface again. A group
within the CPI even refused to condemn the Chinese aggression in the name of
proletarian unity wliile the other group supported the stand o f the Gover~imento f
India. Finally in 1964 tlie CPI split into Communist Party o f lndia and Communist
Party o f lndia (Marxist). After 1964 the CPI was seen closer to tlie Communist Party
o f Soviet Union and tlie CPI(M) to the Communist Party o f China. A group within
the CPI(M) approving the path o f armed revolution broke out from the CPI(M) in
1968. They were called Naxalites because they started their experiment o f capturing
power through armed revolution from a place called Naxalbari in Bengal. The Naxalites
led by Cliaru Mazumdar formed another Communist Party known as Communist
Party o f India (Marxist-Leninist). Not all the Naxalite factions joined this party.
The CPI started participating in electio~~s from tlie very first election held in 1952.
The Communist Party o f lndia continued getting around 9% o f votes in general
election. Even after tlie division in 1964 tlie two Co~nmunistParties together co~iti~iued
to poll around tlie same percentage. The CPI(M) secured 33 and 35 seats respectively
in 1989 and 1991 elections. The CPI won 12 seats each in both these elections. I n 1996
elections the CPI(M) secured 33 seats while the CPI got onlyl3. In t k last Lok
Sablia election heM in 1999, the CPI(M) secured 32 and tlie CPI got only five. So
/'
far as the state assembly elections are concerned.the left parties have done well ill Yational and Regional
Parties
three states Kerala, West Bengal and Tripura. The CPI came to power in Kerala
after 1957 election. The left front led by the CPI-M has been ruling West Bengal for
almost twenty years.
The Ideology
The Indian communist parties believe that only the establishment o f a socialist society
according to the revolutionary principles o f Marxism and Leninism can enable the
country to overcome the problems o f backwardness, inequality, ignorance and poverty.
This goal can be achieved if the working class captures political power. They believed
that to achieve this goal lndia needed an anti- imperialist and anti -feudal democratic
revolution. I n the light o f this understanding the CPI assessed the Nehru government
and supported Indira Gandhi government even during emergency. The electoral debacle
in 1977 election made the Communist Party of lndia reassess its role in the Indian
politics and its attitude towards the Congress Party. I n the post-1977 phase the anti-
Congressism became an essential part o f CPI'S policy. I n line with its goal o f
National democracy the CPI even joined the coalition government at the centre in
1996.The CPI(M) believes in complete destruction o f the Indian state and establishment
o f People's Democracy. Establishment o f a front led by the working class could
achieve this objective. This front will also include agricultural labourers the poor
peasants and middle peasants. A t its Vijaywada Congress in 1982 the CPI(M) decided
to work for an anti- authoritarian front including even the BJP. The party has taken
note o f the danger posed by Communalism. It has emphasised the need o f an India
as a self - reliant economy, free from the clutches o f the World Bank and IMF. I n
the 17th Congress o f the CPI(M) held at Hyderabad in March 2002, the party has
called for building the People's Front as a secular democratic alternative to the N D A
at the centre. The CPI(M) has decided to co-operate with the Congress Party without
having an alliance with it. The Party has also held that minority fundamentalism is not
the correct response to majority fundamentalism.
Apart from their strongholds o f Kerala, West Bengal and Tripura the Communist
Parties have pockets o f influence in some other states like Bihar, Andhra Pradesh,UP,
Punjab, Maharaslltra and Tamil Nadu. The Communist parties get support largely
from the working class, middle classes, agricultural labour and small peasants.
The Organisation
A l l India Party Congress is the supreme party organ for the CPJ and CPI(M). I n the
case o f the Communist Party o f lndia it is convened by the National Council and in
case o f the CPI(M) it is convened by the Central Committee. The Party Congress
discusses and acts on the report o f the National Council in case o f the CPI and the
Central Committee in case o f the CPI(M). The Party Congress also decides the Party
line. Between the Party Congresses the National Council and the Central Committee
are the top most executive bodies respectively for CPI and CPI(M). To work be-
tween the two sessions o f the Central Committee, it elects a Polit Bureau from its
members. Similarly the National Couqcil of the CPI elects a Central Executive to
carry on with the work o f the National Council between its two sessions. The
~ i t i o n aCouncil
l o f the CPI and the Central Committee o f the CPI(M) also elect a
secretary each for the two communist parties.
Kanshi Ram founded the Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP) on April 14, 1984.The party
claims itself to be the party of the majority section or the Bahujan Samaj. The
Party System and Elections assumption behind this claim is that that S ~ A ~ M & ~ L ~ - L - d
i n India
Castes and minorities constitute 85% o f India's population. They constitute the majority
or the Bahujan Samaj o f India. The BSP argues that the minority high castes have
been using the votes o f the Bahujan Samaj to rule over them. Since, in democracy
the majority should rule, the BSP strives to establish the regime o f the Bahujan Samaj.
Before actually taking the form o f a party, the BSP existed in the form o f social and
cultural organisations like the BAMCEF (All India Backward and Minority Employees
Federation) and DS4 (Dalit Soshit Samaj Sangharsh Samiti). 'The BSP contested
election in 1985 when its candidate Mayawati fought a by-election from Bijnore Lok
Sabha constituency in Ugtar Pradesh. The BSP candidate came third after the Congress
and Janata Dal candidates. But the BSP candidate'sphowing was quite encouraging.
She polled 6 1,504 votas against Congress cangdate's 1.28 lakh and Janata Dal
candidate's 1.22 lakh. In the U P assembly election that year the BSP did not win
any seat but it polled fotq percent o f the popular votes. In 1989 UP assembly election
the BSP won only 13 seats but it polled 9.33% o f the popular votes: Gradually the
BSP has become$ ne o f the important players in the political life o f the country in
P
general and the politics o f states like UP, Haryana, MP, Punjab and Rajasthan in
particular. In 1996 Lok Sabha election this party secured 20% votes in UP. 8% in
M P and 3% in Rajasthan. This party won five Lok Sabha seats from UP and one
from Haryana in 1998 b k Sabha election. The BSP won 14 seats from UP in the
1999 Lok Sabha election. This party lias been widening its base by giving tickets not
only to the dalits but also to backward Muslims and even the upper castes. In the
2002 UP assembly election this tactic o f the BSP has paid rich dividends. The party
has ~ecured98 out o f 403 assembly seats.
ii) Check your answers with the model answers given at the end o f this unit.
........................................................................................................................
2) In which way the name o f J a y Prakash Narayan is associated with the BJP?
A
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
. L................................
National and Regional
20.4 REGIONAL PARTIES Parties
The faotors that give rise to regional parties may be cultural, economic and political.
Which o f these factors play more important role depends on the political circumstances.
I t may vary from case to case and time to time. lndia is a multi- lingual, multi -
religious and multi ethnic country. The cultural minorities may harbour the fear o f
being absorbed in majority culture and losing their distinct identity. A desire to maintain
this cultural distinctness has been at the roots o f the regional movements led by the
~ r a i i d Munnetra
a Kazhagam (DMK), A l l lndia Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam
(AIADMK), the Akali Dal, the Jharkhand Mukti Morcha (JMM) and the AGP. The
realisation that developme~ltalneeds o f any region have been ignored for a long time
may also give birth to regionalism and regional parties. Politically, the regional parties
may be seen as a movement against centralisation and in tune with the spirit o f a true
federation.
20.4.1 The Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) and The All India Anna
Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (AIADMK)
Under the MGR's leadership the A l A D M K followed the policies o f assuaging the
Tamil pride and populist measures o f doling out largesse to the poor. After the death
of MGR in1988 tile A I A D M K also faced splits. I n the1989 assembly elections the
D M K led by Karunanidhi became victorious. The unification o f A I A D M K splinter
groups under the leadership o f Jayalalithaa and an alliance with the Congress Party
returned it to power in 1991 assembly election. 1111996election the D M K won the
election. Jayalalithaa faced many corruption charges but in spite o f these charges, her
party became victorious in 2001 election to the state assembly.
Party System and Elections 20.4.2 The Shiromani Akali Dal
in lndia
-
The Shiromani Akali Dal (SAD) emerged in the 1920s as a movement o f the Sikhs
against the corrupt practices o f the Mahants in the Gurudwaras. I n 1925 the government
passed the Sikh Gurudwara Act. This Act gave the right o f management and control
o f Gurudwaras to Sliiromani Gurudwara Parbandhak Committee (SGPC). The Akali
Dal tried to keep a firm grip over the SGPC arguing that in Sikh tradition the Church
has not been separated from the state. The SAD projected itself as the sole spokesman
of the Sikh interest devoted to their uplifiment and fighting against injustices done to
them first by the British and then by the Indians. 'The partition and independence in
1947 provided the Sikhs with an opportunity to organise on the territorial lines; there
was also dream o f a free Punjab with Sikli majority. The SAD leadership wanted a
state where Sikh religion would be safer. In 1966 Master Tara Singh as a spokesman
of the SAD demanded the Punjabi Suba. The central government created a Sikh
majority state in November 1-966 by separating Haryana from Punjab. Among the
other issues raised by the SAD from time to time have been tlie demands for full
regional autonomy to Punjab, protection and promotion o f the interests of rich farmers,
better deal in distribution o f river waters and declaration o f Amritsar as a holy city.
The main focus o f tlie Anandpur Saheb declaration o f 1973 was more autonomy to
Punjab. This declaration demanded that the central government should have power
only over defence, foreign affairs, com~nunicationand currency; rest o f the powers
should be given to tlie states. A section o f the Akali Dal even supported tlie idea o f
- secession from the Indian Union. The Operation Blue Star and the anti-Sikh riots in
the aftermath o f Indira Gandhi's assassination wounded the Sikli psyche. The Rajiv-
Longowal Pact could not assuage the hurt feelings o f the Sikhs. The SAD split
between Badal and Tohra factions both o f them putting forward identical demands
like the transfer o f Chandigarh to Punjab and the release of the Jodhepur detenus..
The disintegration o f Akali Dal conti~iuedas United Akali Dal was born headed by
Joginder Singh, the father o f Bhindrawale. Similarly, the 1989 Lok Sabha election
was fought by Akali Dal (Man@ headed by Simaranjeet Singh Mann. This outfit
openly espoused tlie cause o f ~nilitancyand won ten out o f thirteen seats in Punjab.
I n 1997, the Akali Dal in alliance-with the B.IP won tlie assembly elections. The Akali
Dal led by Badal has lost 2002 assembly election and the Congress Party won the
election. Captain Amri~iderSingh o f tlie Congress Party has become the new Chief
Minister.
The origin o f the National Conference can be traced to the political ferment in the
state o f Jammu and Kaslimir in the1920s and1930s when a Hindu Maharaja ruled it.
An organisation in tlie name o f Anjumane-e-lslamia came up in 192 1 with the objective
o f promoting educational and social welfare o f tlie Muslims. In1931 tlie Muslim
Conference was born to articulate tlie interest o f the majority co~nmunityin the state
-the Muslims. Under the influence o f the nationalist leaders, Sheikh Abdullah opened
the doors o f Muslim Conference for non-Muslims also in 1939 and the nanie of the
party also changed to All Jammu and Kaslimir National Conference. Later it was
again renamed as the National Conference. Sheikh Mohammed Abdullah emerged as
the most powerful leader o f this party who resisted Pakistani tribal invasion and
played a key role ill Jammu Kashmir's accession to the Indian Union in 1948. The
National Conference (NC) government came to power in the same year. Among the
major successes o f the National Conference was the abolition o f big landed estate;
and inclusion in the constitution o f lndia article 370 giving Jammu and Kashrnir almost
a quasi -autonomous position within the Indian polity. I n 1965 the National Conference
and the Congress Party merged. After his release from prison in 1975, as a part o f
-. the Indira-Shcikh accord, Abdull2h revived the National Conference. 'The NC formally
i
1
!
denounced the two- nation theory, affirmed its faith .in secularisni, socialism and
democracy. I n the style o f dynastic succession before his death in 1982, he got his-
N a t i o n a l and Hegionnl
PCrties
, son Farooq elected to the Presidentship o f the National Conference. After the death
o f his father Farooq became Chief Minister. G. M. Shah the son-in-law o f the Sheikh
joined hands with the Congress Party in toppli~igFarooq's government. I n 1984
parliamentary election and 1987 assembly election Farooq led National Conference
and displayed its continued hold over the Kashmiri people. I n 1990 President's rule
was imposed in Kashmir and Farooq Abdullah's government was dismissed. The
National Conference recaptured political power in the state in 1996 after winning tlie
assembly elections.
F+ The Telugu Desam Party (TDP) was established in 1982 by the matinee idol N T
Ramarao (NTR) in Andhra Pradesli. I n 1983 asse~nblyelection it came to power in
state assembly elections. The dramatic rise o f tlie TDP was possible on account o f
the general disenchantment o f the people with the Congress due to the imposition o f
unpopular Chief Ministers in the state by the central leadership, large-scale corruption
and the charismatic leadership of N T Ramarao.. 'The rise o f the TDP i s also seen
as a political ascendance o f the Kamma caste at the cost o f tlie Reddies and
Brahmins in Andhra politics. Taking a leaf from EV Ramaswamy Naicker in Tamil
Nadu, NTR talked o f restoration o f the Telugu pride which was eroded under the
Congress rule. N. T. Ramarao felt that there was the need o f a regional party to
understand the complexities o f the problems faced by the state. He supported land
reforms, favoured ceiling on urban income, low priced rice and other populist meas-
ures. The Telugu Desam has never talked o f separation of Andhra from the Indian
Union. I n 1989 it became part o f the National Front government at the centre. It lost
assembly elections in the same year and it won only one o f the twenty two Lok Sabha
seats. I n 1994 and 1999 assembly elections the party defeated the Congress party.
I n 1995 ~handrababuNaidu the son-in-law o f NTR became the Chief Minister. The
electoral alliance with the BJP benefited the TDP in winning the 1999 assembly
election and improving its performance in terms o f Lok Sabha seats. I n the era o f
coalition politics the TDP has emerged as a major player even in national politics.
t
20.4.5 The Assam Gana Parishad
The Assam Gana Parishad (AGP) i s a product o f a vigorous student movement led
by A l l Assam Students Union (AASU) and its political wing the A l l Assam Gana
Sangram Parishad (ASGPC). The students raised the issue o f large-scale migration
to Assam by Muslim Benglis from East Pakistan, which became Bangladesh in 1971
and also by the Nepalese and Biharis. They developed the fear o f being swamped
in their own land by migrants. They were disenchanted with the central government
and the Congress party for treating the migrants as vote banks. The AASU and the
AAGSP became the syAbol o f the aspirations o f the Assamese educated middle
class. They found the possibility o f upward mobility clogged due to Bengali dominance
in the bureaucracy and the Marwari dominance in the business. /in 1985 the central
government signed an accord with AAGSP which stated that constitutional, legislative
and administrative safeguards as may be appropriate shall be provided to protect
preserve and promote the cultural, social, linguistic identity and heritage o f the Assamese
people. The Assam Gana Parishad was formed in1985. I t contested and won the
assembly election in 1986 under the leadership o f Prafuila Kumar Mohanta. The AGP
and BJP alliance won the 1996 assembly election. I n 2001 assembly electio~isthe
AGP won only 20 seats while the Congress returned to power winning 71 seats.
Party System and Elections 20.4.6 The Jharkhand Party
in India
The roots of the Jharkhad Party can be traced to the Adivasi Mahasabha founded
in 1938 for the preservation of the ethnic identity and protection and promotion of the
economic interest of the Adivasis. According to their understanding the reason of
their social and economic backwardness was firstly the British rule. They also put the
blame on the m'oneylenders and contractors for their exploitation. The government
was also to blame for its apathy towards their genuine problems. The Adivasi
Mahasabha was transformed into the Jharkhand party in 1950 with the objective of
forming a separate state for the tribals. The Party emerged as the main opposition
Party in Bihar legislative assembly in 1952, 1957 and1962 elections. The merger of
Jharkhand Party with the Congress Party in 1963 proved to be a big blow to the
$harkhand Movement. Several splinter groups and individuals attempted to reorganise
the party to figlit strongly to achieve the long cherished goal of separate state but they
could not unite them. In the post -1963 phase there emerged many parties-Jharkhand
&
Party of ~ndia,All Itrdia, arkhand Party, Hul Jharkhand Party, Jharkhand Mukti
Morcha and the Jharkhan oordination Committee. The Jharkhand Mukti Morcha
has emerged the main pa& I n 1980 general election it won most of the seats it had
contested. The JMM regrouped with the Jharkhand Party to renew the struggle for
a separate state. In the year 2000 the state of Jharkhand including the tribal areas
of Bi har, was created.
1) What are the main dema~idswhich the Shiromani Akali Dal has raised from time
to time?
2) What were the reasons for the birth of the Telugu Desam Party in Andhra
Pradesh?
..............................................................
b.........................................................
You have read about four sets of national political parties and six regional parties in
this unit. These national parties are the Congress (I), the Bharatiya Janata Party, the
Communist Parties and the Bahujan Samaj Party. The regional parties discussed in
this unit are DMK and the AIADMK, the SAD, the NC, the TDP, the AGP and the
Jharkhand Party. Committed to the principles of socialism, secularism and democracy,
the Congress (I) has a social base largely consisting of the high castes, minorities
and the Scheduled Castes. There has been a shift in its social base recently. A
successor of the Bharatiya Jana Sangh, ideologically, the BJP is committed to five
principles - nationalism. and national integration, democracy, positive secularism,
Gandhian Socialism and value based politics. The communist parties believe in the
establishment of a socialist society based on the revolutionary principles of Marxism
. and Leninism. This is possible if the working class captures political power. 'The social
bases of the communist parties mainly consist of tlie working class, middle classes
and the poor peasants and the agricultural labourers. The BSP believes in empower-
ing the majority section of the society or the Bahujan Samaj consisting of the dalits,
OBCs and the minorities.
The regional, cultural and develop~nentalfactors play more determining roles in the
programmes and mobilisation strategies of the regional parties.
Banerjee, K. ,Regional Political Parties in India, New Qelhi; B.R. Publication, 1984.
1) The social base of the Congress (I) largely consisted of the rural and urban poor,
the Scheduled Castes, the upper castes and the Muslims.
I 2) Atal Behari Vajpayee, tlie president of the BJP had linked the rise of the BJP
I
with the Jay Prakash Narayan's vision of a glorious past of India at its first
convention held in Bombay.
3) Two political lines within the CPI -one, which viewed Independence as real, and
advocated by P C Joshi wished to support the Congress, another, which held the
Independence was not real, advocated by B T Randive and Gautam Adhikari
wanted to oppose the Congress; their different understandings of the Soviet
1 Union and China provided background to the split in the CPI in 1964.
1) These are full regional autonomy to Punjab, protection and promotion of the
interests of rich farmers, better d k l in distribution of river waters and declaration
Part: System and Elections of Amritsar as a holy city. Some of the maill demands - especially more
in India
autonomy to Punjab was included in the Anandpur Saheb declaration of 1973,
This declaration demanded that the central government should have power onlg-'
over defence, foreign affairs, communication and currency; the rest of the pow--
ers should be given to the states. (A
<&#
;i.$
3) The general resentment of the people with the Congress due to imposition of theF
unpopular chief ministers by the central leadership, large scale corruption and the
charismatic leadership of N T Ramarao.
Structure
2 1.0 Objectives
2 1.1 I~ltroduction
21.2 Election System in lndia
2 1.2.1 Who is Allowed to Vote?
2 1.2.2 Who Can Contest Election?
21.3 History of Indian Elections
2 1.4 Who Conducts Elections?
2 1.5 Election Procedure
21.6 Increasing Number of Candidates
21.7 How Does the Voting Take Place?
21.8 Voter Turnout in lndia Elections
21.9 Who Forms the Government?
21.10 Elections and Social Change
21.1 1 Let Us Sum Up
21.12 Some Useful Books
21.13 Answer to Check Your Progress Exercises
21.0 OBJECTIVES
After going through this unit you will be able to understand:
'The factors which smootlien and hamper the election processes in India;
21.1 INTRODUCTION
Elections are the most significant means of realising the aspirations of the people in
a democracy. Tliese enable every adult citizen of the country to participate in the
process of the government formation. In lndia those who have attained the age of
18 are eligible to vote and elect their representatives. This was not possible before
the implementation of our Constitution. Earlier only the privileged sections of the
q c i e t y had the role in the formation of the government in our country. The grant of
&ing rights to all adult citizens belonging to all social groups - castes, sects, tribes,
religions and genders has enabled them to elect their representatives, and indirectly
participate in the process of governance. All sections of the society have participated
in the elections by contesting as the candidates or as the voters. Reservation of the
seats to various legislative bodies for the SCs, STs and following the passage of the
73rd and 74th Constitutio~ialamendments for women (33%) and OBCs in the insti-
tutions of local governance has further deepened tlie democracy in India. You have
already read in unit 10 about the strength of the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha.
Party System and Elections
i n India 21.2 ELECTION SYSTEM IN INDIA
Elections to the Lok Sabha and the Vidhan Sabha are carried out using the first-past-
the-post electoral system. The country is divided into different geographical areas,
known as the constituencies. Different political parties contest the election, though
there is no ban on independent candidates for contesting the election. During election
different political parties put up their candidates and people can cast one vote each
for a candidate of their own choice, to elect their representatives. The candidate, who
gets the maximum number of votes, wins the election and gets elected. So election
is the means by which the people elect their representatives.
While there is no maximum age prescribed for the voter, as per the original provisions
of the Indian Constitution, all Indian citizens, above the age of 21 years are entitled
to vote at the time of elections. The minimum voting age of the citizens was reduced
to 18 years by the constitution 61 st amendment act in the year 1988, by the then
Prime Minister, Rajiv Gandhi, which came into effect since 28th of march 1989.
Besides to be registered as a voter in any constituency, one should not be disqualified
under the law on grounds of non-residence, or a person of unsound mind or disqualified
on the grounds of crirne or corrupt or illegal practice.
You have already studied in unit 10 as to who is eligible to contest election for the
Lok Sabha, Vidhan Sabha, Rajya Sabha and the Vidhan Parishad. All contesting
candidates have to make a deposit of Rs. 10,000 if contesting for the Lok Sabha
election and of Rs. 5,000 if contesting for the Vidhan Sabha elections. This is considered
as the security deposit of the candidates. The security deposit for candidates belonging
to either tlie Scheduled caste or the Scheduled tribe community is Rs.5,000, if contesting
the Lok Sabha election and Rs. 2,500 for contesting the Vidhan Sabha elections. This
security deposit is returned to all those candidates who get more than one-sixth of the
total number of valid votes polled in that constituency. All other candidates lose their
security deposit.
Further, the nomination must be supported by at least one registered voter of the
constituency from which the candidate wishes to contest, in case of the candidate
being sponsored by any registered political party, and at least by ten registered voters
in case of independent candidate.
j
o f term o f the house, yet there have been elections much before the schedule. When
elections are held much before the scheduled, it is considered as the "Mid-tenn
!
Election". The Lok Sabha elections o f 1980, 199 1, 1998 and 1999 were the mid -term
I elections held much before the schedule. Though the 1971 Lok Sabha election was
b
held only four years after the 1967 Lok Sabha elections, this was not a mid-term
election. I n the history o f Illdial1 Elections, o ~ i l ytlie 1977 Lok Sablia elections was
deferred for about two years on account o f tlie proclamation o f tlie National emergency
i in the country.
Most of tlie states were created at tlie time o f independence, but tliere are states,
which liave been created even after that. As yo11 have read in unit 17 tlie most
recent addition to tlie list o f states had bee11that o f Uttaranchal, Chattisgarli and
Jliarkliand created out o f the states o f Uttar Pradesli, Madliya Pradesli and Bihar. At
present tliere are 28 states and 7 Union Territories in India.
I n some o f the states, there is the bi-camera1 house, tlie Lower house is called the
Vidhan Sabha and tlie Upper House i s called the Vidlia~iParishad. The states, which
have bi-camera1 legislature, are Biliar, Ja~nmuand Kashmir, Karnataka, Maharashtra
and Uttar Pradesh. I n all other states, the state legislative assembly constitutes o f one
single house the Vidhan Sabha. As per the constitutional provisions, the total number
o f seats in the lower house in any state assembly should not exceed 500, and at tlie
same time the house should not be less than 60 members. The states o f Sikkim,
Mizora~nand Goa are expectation to this as the number o f seats in the Vidlian Sabha
is less than 60 in all these three states.
As per tlie total number o f members in tlie upper house in tlie state assembly (Vidlian
Parishad), it should not be liiore than one third o f the total numbers o f members in
the lower house (Vidhan Sabha), but at the same time it should not be less than 40
members (Article 1 7 1). Wliile tlie nleni bers o f tlie Vidhan Sablia are directly elected
by tlie people, tlie menibers to the Vidlian Parishad are indirectly elected by an
electoral college.
The total strength o f the Vidlian Sabha varies f o r n state to state. The Uttar Pradesli
t fi
has tlie largest number o f 403 Vidha~iSabha seats in tlie assembly arid the lowest
number is that o f in the state o f Sikkim, which has the total o f 32 seats in tlie Vidhan
Sabha.
If we look into the State Assembly elections, there liave been 263 state assembly
elections held in this country till the year 2002.
ii) Check your answers with the model answers given at tlie end o f tlie unit.
........................................................................................................................
Party System and Elections 2) Wliat do you mean by 'Mid-term Election'?
in lndia
........................................................................................................................
Tlie entire election procedure takes a couple o f months to be completed. Though the
scliedule for holding tlie election is announced by the Election Co~nmissiono f India
well in advance, the actual process begins by a formal declaration by the Election
Commission o f India calling upon a co~istituencyto elect its representative. This is
what is referred as the Notification.
Tlie second stage i s that o f Filling o f the Nontinarion by those desiring to contest
elections. Earlier, ten days period was given to all tile candidates for filling o f their
nomillation papers. But with tlie co~istit~~tio~ial 40th a ~ n e ~ i d ~ iact,
i e ~ i 1961,
t tlie total
number o f days for filling o f nomi~iatio~i had bee11reduced to seven. As o f now, the
7th day from the day of notification is tlie last day for filling o f the ~iomi~iation papers.
In case the 7th day i s a haliday, the day immediately after that is considered as the
last day for f i l l i ~ i go f tlie niomi~iatiolipapers.
Elections
The tliird step is tlie Scrutirry of Nonrinations. Earlier tlie second day after tlie
nomination was fixed for scrutiny of nominations, but with tlie constitutional 47th
amendment act, 1966, the day immediately after the nomination is fixed for the
scrutiny o f the nominations.
The next step is Withdrawal of Candidates, which was earlier fixed for the tliird day
after tlie scrutiny o f tlie nominations, but later a~iiendedin tlie year 1966. At present,
tlie second day after tlie scrutiny is tlie last date for the witlidrawal o f tlie candidates.
I n case that day happens to be a lioliday tlie day immediately after that is fixed as
tlie last day for withdrawal.
Tlie next stage of election before tlie voting takes place is that o f Carrlpaig~lir~g.Tliis
is tlie time when tlie political parties put forward tlieir candidate and arguments witli
which they hope to pers~~ade people to vote for tlieir candidates and parties. Earlier
tlie campaign period lasted for tliree weeks, but since 1996, tlie time o f canipaign
period liad bee11reduced to only two week's time. As o f now, tlie official canipaig~i
lasts for two weeks from tlie date when tlie final list is put LIP by tlie Electio~i
Commission and officially ends 48 hours before tlie polling takes place. During the
carnpaig~iperiod, tlie political parties and co~itestingcandidates are expected to abide
by a model code o f conduct evolved by tlie Electio~iCommission o f India on the basis
o f a consensus among political parties. Tlie model code lays down broad gi~idelines
as to how tlie political parties and contesting candidates sliould conduct themselves
during the election campaign. I t is intended to maintain the election campaign on
healthy lines, avoid claslies and conflicts between political parties and tlieir supporters
and to ensure peace arid order during tlie canipaig~iand till tlie results are declared.
Tlie campaigning is carried out in tlie for111o f slogall shouting, distributing pamphlets
and posters, rallies and meetings in tlie constituency. During this period, tlie candidates
try to travel through their constituency, to influence as many voters as possible to vote
in liis favour.
I n the recent times, the Electiori Coniniission liad granted all tlie recognised Natio~ial
and State parties, free access to tlie state owned electronic media, tlie A l l India Radio
(AIR) and tlie Doordarslian to do tlieir campaigning. Tlie total free time is fixed by
tlie Electio~iComniission, wliicli is allotted to all tlie political parties keeping in view,
tlieir performance during tlie last electio~iin tlie state.
T l i o ~ ~ gtlie
l i Electio~iCommissio~iprovides free access for a liniited time to all tlie
recognised National and State parties for tlieir campaign, yet this does not nieali that
political parties do not spend anything on tlieir electio~icampaign. Tlie political parties
and the candidates contesting election spend large sum o f money on tlieir election
campaign, but tliere is a legal liniit 011 liow 1iiu11cha candidate call spend on liis
election campaign. For most o f tlie Lok Sablia constiti~encies,tlie legal limit for
expenditure campaign has bee11fixed for Rs. 15 Laklis though in soriie states tlie limit
is o f Rs.6 Laklis. The legal limit for campaign expenditure for tlie Vidlian Sablia
electio~iliad bee11fixed for Rs. 6 Laklis and in sollie states it has bee11fixed for Rs.3
Laklis.
Tlie final stage o f election is tlie Voting. Witli regard to polling, tlie earlier practice
liad been to have single day polling, but tlie recent practice have been for tlie phased
polling in whicli polling takes place on niore tlia~ione day witli a gap o f couple o f days
between tlie two days o f polling. Tliis facilitates tlie movement o f security forces
from one place to another, wliicll i s engaged in nia~iagingthe law and order siti~ation
during the polling.
'The average number o f candidates contesting the Lok Sablia election was only 3.8
candidates per constituency, which did not increase much till the year 1977, but went
up to as high as 25.7 candidates per constituency. It Ilas further gone down to 8.5
candidate per Lok Sablia constituency during tlie 1999 Lok Sablia elections.
18Candidates I
We, in India, have tlie syste~iio f secret ballot, wliicli implies that tlie vote o f all the
voters is kept secret. Tlie traditional pattern of voting liad bee11tlie use o f tlie ballot
papers and the ballot box, wliicli in tlie recent times are being replaced by tlie use
o f Electronic Voting Macllines (EVM).
Tliougli all the eligible voters wliose nanies appear in the electoral rolls in a particular
constituency are expected to vote during the time o f voting, practically that does not
happen and the large nu~nbero f registered voters who do not vote due to different
reasons. The percentage o f those who vote is referred to as the polling percentage
popularly called the ''Turnout o f Voters". If we look at the figures o f the last 13 Lok
Sabha elections held in our country, we would find that the voters tunlout has increased
to a great extent in tlie 80's and 90's compared to the elections held during the early
days. The lowest voters turnout o f only 45.7 per cent was recorded during the first
Lok Sabha elections held in the year 1952 and the highest turnout o f 64.1 per cent
was recorded in the year 1984 when the Lok Sabha election was held following the
assassination o f the then Prime Minister Mrs. Indira Gandhi. During the last two Lok
Sabha elections held in the year 1998 and 1999 the turnout had been fairly high as
62 and 60 per cent respectively. There is no urliform trend in the voter's turnout in
the state assembly elections. While some states do register the voter's turnout as high
as 90 per cent, we do have asse~nblyelections when the voters tur11out remains as
low as nearly 45 per cent. Generally the smaller states, and specially the North
Eastern 11 ill states had sllow~lhigher voter tur~loutcompared to other states.
Sorrrce: CSDS ( Centre for the Studics OF Developing Societies. New Delhi), Data Unit
After the polling is over all the votes are counted constituency wise. Earlier, when
only ballot paper was used, all the votes were ~nani~ally counted and the counting o f
about 5 laklls votes for one Lok Sabha co~lstitue~lcy ,used to take couple o f days, but
with the introduction o f the electronic voting ~nacllines,the counting llas become much
simpler and faster.
On counting the votes, one, who gets tlle maximum ~u.mberof vote, gets elected given
tlie system o f first past the post, which we have adopted in our country. The majority
vote is not required in order to win an election either fbr the Lok Sabha or for the
Vidhan Sabha. There are few candidates'wllo win election polling more than 50 per
cent o f the valid votes.
_ ii) Check your answers with the model answers given at the end o f tlle unit.
Tlie political party which has a simple majority, wliich implies tliat the party sliould
have won at least one seat more than half the total number o f seats in the Lok Sabha
in case o f the Centre or in tlie Vidlian Sabha in case o f tlie State forms tlie government.
Tlie results o f tlie 13 Lok Sablia elections held in our country indicates that it is the
Congress party wliicli won the majority o f seats in l ~ i d i aelectio~i
~i on Inany occasions,
but the party has never managed to get more than 50 per cent o f tlie valid votes polled
in tlie election. Tlie most spectacular victory for tlie Co~igressparty liad been in the
1984 Lok Sabha electio~iwhen the party won the highest tally o f 4.1 5 seats, but still
it could Inallage to poll only 48 per cent votes. 111 fact that liad been the best ever
perfornlance o f ally political party in tlie electoral liistory of this country.
But there lias been a niajor shift in tlie trends in India11politics especially in the 1990s.
l'liere liad been four Lok Sablia e l e c t i o y i n lndia during last decade, but no political
party managed to get tlie majority. Tlie best perfor~nanceeven during these elections
was that o f the Co~igressparty during tlie 1991 Lok Sablia elections, wlie~iit won 244
Lok Sablia seats and polled 36.6 per cent o f tlie popular votes. When no political party
gets the nlajority o f seats in tlie house, it is considered as the "Hung House". Under
such circumstances, two or more parties j o i ~ i t l yform tlie governliielit or tlie political
party, with tlie maximum number o f seats, forms tlie government and is s~~pported by
otlier smaller political parties from outside. W l i e ~two i or more parties jointly form a
government, it is coilsidered as tlie Coalitio~iGover~i~iient. YOLI will read about the
coalitio~igoveniment in unit 23. But, if a party for~iistlie gover~inienteven if it does
not have the majority and gets out side support fro111 otlier political parties, it is
considered as the Minority Government.
You w i l l study in tlie illlit 3 l that the elections- periodic elictions voters' turn out and
large scale participation o f tlie people have deepened tlie democracy in India.
Reservation o f seats for tlie SCs, the STs at all levels o f tlie legislative bodies -
national, state and tlie local, and with tlie passage o f the 73rd and 74th Constitutional
Amendments has enabled even the wolneli and tlie OBCs to get elected to tlie seats
reserved for them in tlie village panchayats and municipalities. 'These sections have
not only been elected to various legislative bodies but have become the Cliief Ministers,
~ninistersand the President of tlie cou~itryPolitical Scientist Asliutosli Varsli~ieyhas
argued tliat with tlie entry o f the groups like dalits and OBCs into tlie electoral
processes, India lias become more democratic. However, women's entry lias not
been a smooth process. In fact, in large number cases, especially in the village
panchayats, tlie women elected nlembers are the proxies o f niale members o f their
fan1iIies.
But tlie deniocratic essence o f the elections get lialnpered due to tlie social and
econo~nicinequalities. crimes and corruption. 1-hose wlio do not possess the resources,
have n o coririections w i t h the criminals, etc., f i n d i t difficult t o contest elections or
some time vote. Generally the candidates are given tickets b y the political parties on
the considerations wllether the candidates call muster the support o f n u ~ n e r i c a l l y
larger castes and c o ~ n ~ n u n i t i eand
s possesses enough resources. Even the electorates
vote o n the caste and communal lines. A large number o f elected representatives
have criniinal background or have criminal cases registered against*tIiem. The
relationship between the politicians and criminals exists i n the elections at a l l levels
- parliamentary, state legislative assemblies and councils, and panchayats and
niunicipalities. Such nexus became conspicuous, especially since tlie 1990s. This is a
reflectiotiof erosion i n the credibility o f tlie democratic values. Y o u w i l l also read i n
unit 32 that the V N Volira sub-committee also pointed out that there exists a nexus
between criminals, bureaucracy and politicians. Because o f tlie decisive role o f the
crime, caste, com~nulialisniand corruption, the real proble~nso f the people - law and
order, development- liealth, education, basic needs o f the people are relegated to tlie
secondary position. Though tliese issues are also raise b y the politicians i n every
election, i t is mainly done as a rhetoric.
1) What impact have tlie elections i n India liad o n tlie weaker sections o f tlie
society?
Elections form an integral part o f tlie denlocratic polity. I n India every adult citizen,
w h o has attained the age o f 18 has the right to participate i n tlie elections. The
elections are conducted b y the Election Co~nriiissiorio f India. From 1952 several
elections have been held i n Independent India for electing the representatives t o the
parliament, state assenlblies and councils as w e l l as tlie local bodies. Tliese have
.enabled all sections o f the society including dalits, STs, OBCs and women to elect
tlieir representatives and t o get elected as the representatives. 'I'liis is an indication
o f the positive relationship between the elections and tlie social cliange. B u t the
democratic essence o f electio~isi n India is marred b y the increasing role o f tlie crime.
money and other unfair means. O n the wliole, elections i n India have made treniendous
contribution t o the social change.
Party System and Elections
in India 21.12 SOME USEFUL BOOKS
Mitra, S. K. and Singh, V.B. (eds.), Derttocracy and Sociul Change it1 brdia: A
Cross Sectional Analysis of the Electorute, Sage Publications, New Delhi, 1999.
2) When election are held much before the schedule, it is called the 'Mid-term
Election'.
1) The election process passes through the following stages in a" order: notification,
filling o f tlie nomination, scrutiny o f ~&iiiinations. withdrawal o f candidates,
-
campaigning and voting.
I) Tlie elections in India have enabled tlie weaker sections like the SCs, STs, OBCs
and tlie women to participate in tlie democratic Decision-making by electing their
representatives, and by getting themselves also elected as the representatives. It
has deepened the democracy in India.
2) Tlie maill constraints o f tlie electoral politics in lndia are - crime, black money,
corruption, and social and economic inequalities.
UNIT 22 CASTE, CLASS AND POLITICS IN INDIA
Structure
22.0 Objectives
22.1 Introduction
22.2 What is Caste?
22.3 Main Features of Caste
22.4 Dynamic Relationship
22.5 Regional Variations
22.6 Caste and Class
22.7 Stratification within Caste
22.8 Pressure Group: Caste Association
22.9 Political Parties
22.10 Caste in Voting Behaviour
22.1 1 Let Us Sum Up
22.12 Some Useful Books
22.13 Answers to Clieck Your Progress Exercises
22.0 OBJECTIVES
Tlie purpose of this unit is to acquaint you with (a) nature and role of caste in Indian
politics and (b) in tlie process how both caste and politics undergo changes. After
going till-ough this unit, you should be able to understand:
22.1 INTRODUCTION
Theoretically speaking caste and democratic political system stand for opposite value
systems. Caste is hierarchical. Status of an individual in caste-oriented social system
is determined by birth. It has religious sanction by various holy texts, reinforced by
priests and rituals. Traditionally, upper castes enjoy certain privileges not only in
religious sphere but also in economic, education and political spheres. Customary laws
differentiate individual by birth and sex. 'That is, certain rules are harsli to women and
Shudras and soft to males and Brahmins. On the otlier hand, democratic political
system advocates freedom to an individual and equality of status. It stands for rule
of Law. No one irrespective of status is above law. Indian democratic system under
tlie Constitution stands for liberty, equality and fraternity among all citizens. It strives
to build egalitarian social order.
However, politics notwithstanding the ideals in any society does not function in vacuum.
It operates within social milieu. Therefore, it cannot be devoid of the prevailing social
forces. At societal level, politics is related to struggle for and distributio~iof political
power and resources. One of tlie importa~itfunctions of politics is to govern society.
~his'callsfor resolving conflict among various interests. It identifies needs of society
at a given point of time. Needs are prioritised: what is important and immediate to
attain and wliat can wait. I n order to meet the needs of society, nature of production
system has to be decided - whether tlie factories, farms or mines are owned privately
Party System and Elections by individual for profit or they be owned and managed by colnmunity or state or
in lndin
combinatiol~o f the both. For tliat rules are made and executed. In sliort wlio gets
what, when and how iri society is the central concerli o f politics. Though such,
decisions are taken by the state, people get involved in decision making process in
democratic system. They elect their rulers. While electing their representatives people
express tlieir material and non-material needs, expectatiolis and aspirations for today
and tomorrow. Their expectations are for themselves and also for commuliity -
immediate primordial group, caste and larger society that iliclude region, and country.
People also build pressure on decision-makers through organised oranorganised
struggles, personal colitacts and Inally otlier ways. Political leaders cannot ignore
social forces, as tliey tliemselves are part o f them. It is imperative for the decision-
makers in democratic system to seek and extend support o f the constituents for
obtaining and preserving tlieir political power.
I t however, does not lneali that politics i s just a proxy or a blueprilit o f societal forces.
I t sets goal and priorities. I t has a vision for change, a better social order than the
existing for the larger good. Politics introduces new values such as equality and
freedom; i~istitutionssucli as political parties and trade unions; gover~ilne~it policies
like abolition o f za~iii~idari
system or untouchability undermines the traditional social
order and value system. I t shifts location o f power in society from one group to
another. Moreover competitive politics like elections encourage several i~idividuals
fro111a group to aspire for political positions. 'rliey compete alnolig themseives so tlie
caste ~iie~iibersalso get divided. In tlie process caste cohesiveness gets weaken; and
new formation takes place. Thus, not only caste influences politics but the political
system also influeoces caste arid induces clia~igesin it. 'l'liere is no one way traffic.
Both influence each otlier. It is to be seen: to what extent and in which way politics
attain its objective o f social tralisfor~natio~i and to what extent it is influenced by
prevailing social forces, particularly caste?
India became a Republic in 1950. For the first time in history all adult citizens o f tlie
coulitry liave gained tlie right to vote and elect tlieir represe~itativesfor decision
making bodies from village Paricliayat to Lok Sablia. They also liave tlie right to
contest electiolis so as to become rulers. As a result, large number o f social groups
wlio were liitllerto deprived of political power begall to realise tliat they could compete
with traditio~~ally dominant power elite and also wield power so as to express their
grievances, needs, priorities and aspirations. Thus they decide their destiny. Politics
has become competitive and open. Moreover, tlie state lias u~idertakena number o f
social and eco~io~nic programs, which have developed lnolietary and contractual
relatio~isllipaffecting traditional social ties and monopoly of privileges. And, judicial
authority o f caste paucliayat lias bee11replaced b y state judicipry systeni.
Meaning o f Jati for olieself and for others is not always unifor~nand consistent
among all. It varies from purpose to purpose for which the tag is used. Jati has a
specific social ~iiealiiligidelitifyi~ig
one's place in social order in village society where
one interacts everyday with other menibers of the local community. For instance in
a village in central G~!jarat its inhabitant, say Mr. X identifies himself as Klia~itwhen
lie interacts with another villager o f lieiglibouring locality who calls'liimself a Bareeya
for inter-dining purpose. Mr. X would introduce himself as Ksliatriya when lie attends Caste. Clnss and Politics
in India
political party meeting at taluka or district place. He would call his caste as OBC
(Other Backward Caste) wlien lie visits government office to get loan or subsidy for
government sponsored program or to get scholarship for his son. Tliere is one meaning
o f Jati for matrimonial and kinship relationship, a different meaning for economic
interaction and a third meaning for political purpose. One does not necessarily have
the same meaning when one exercises vote for village pancliayat than Lok sablia
elections.
N o social system remains static. Social system changes from time to time with tlie
changing social, economic and political circumstances. This i s also true for the caste
system. At the empirical l&el the caste hierarchy lias never been static throughout
history. Theoretically, all Jatis are liierarchically placed within a prescribed social
status. Some Jatis enjoy high status and some occupy low status. Place o f tlie Jaii
in the social order in the hierarchy is determined by its ritual status based on the
observa~iceo f customs for interpersonal relationship. Some scliolars believe this value
system - acceptance o f one's station in the life is tlie result o f previous birth - lias
consensus among all Hindus including tlie Untouchables. But it is not true. 'rhough tlie
upper castes try to maintain their higher status, tlie middle and lower castes have
successfully tried to change their status. Having improved their economic condition,
a dominant section o f some o f the low castes, including the groups, which were at
one time treated as u~itoucliables,imitated customs and norms o f the upper castes
residing in their vicinity. Sociologists call this process as sanskritisation. One also
comes across instances o f some castes or even individuals who have succeeded in
improving their status even without adhering to tlie norms and rituals o f tlie upper
-
castes. Acquiring political authority facilitates not only power holder - ruler but arso
his kin and relatives to elljoy higher social status in caste hierarchy. One call cite
instances in history, which show that Shudras and ati-shudras having occupying position
o f power have acquired status o f Kshatriyas even without following tlie path o f
sanskritisation.
Party System and Electinns 'The process of sanskritisation which was prominent among the lower castes at one
i n India
point o f time, particularly in the 19th and early 20th century, has been slowed down
in the 'sixties and 'sevenhies'. Earlier many castes hesitated to be called 'backward'
despite the poor economic condition o f the members. They feared that they would not
be able to improve their social status by identifying themselves as 'backward'. But
this is no longer true now, as the State has provided certain benefits to the backward
castes. These castes have realised that they could improve their status by improving
their economic condition rather than observing rituals followed by the upper castes.
N o w there is competition among the castes to be called 'backward'. Even some o f
the Brahmin and Raiput Jatis have approached the Government to be classified as
'backward'. The Kolis o f central Gujarat followed the rituals o f the Rajputs and
struggled for three decades to be acknowledged as Kshatriyas. In the past, they used
to feel insulted if they were called Kolis. But now they have started calling themselves
as Kolis so that they could get material benefits which is the surest way to improve
social status. Social status based on the observance o f the rituals has increasingly
become redundant.
Traditionally caste members have been forbidden to accept cooked food from persons
belonging to the Jatis that they considered lower than theirs. These rules have been
weakened, particularly i n public spheres in urban areas during the last five decades.
I n their bid to gain broad support base the political elites at district and state level do
not hesitate to take food with the caste members belonging to lower strata.
Most of the Jatis are endogamous. A few follow hypergamy generally within the
caste cluster. The earlier restrictions on marriage have become flexible. Marriage
circles are expanding in sbme castes. With education and urbanisation, instances o f
inter-caste marriages among the upper and middle castes have somewhat increased
though such cases are still1 exceptions.
Caste structure in terms o f hierarchy and boundary for interaction between the social
groups is more or less neat and identifiable at the village level. But it is not so at
regional level. And to draw empirically based macro picture o f castes at the national
level is all the more difficult and hazardous. Caste structure has not developed
uniformly in all regions o f the sub-continent. Assam has developed a loose caste
structure with less rigid hierarchy than that o f Uttar Pradesh or Bihar. I t is the same
regarding observation o f caste specific rules.
The number o f castes also varies from region to region. Gujarat has a larger number
o f castes than West Bengal. Different llistorical experiences have contributed to
shaping o f the present day socio-political processes in different regions. Moreover,
there is and had been uneven economic development in the country and also within
the states. Some regions had zamindari and some had royatwari land tenure system.
Generally, Rajputs in Rajasthan or Brahmins in Tamilnadu were enjoying dominance
in the farmer and peasant castes like Marathas in Maharashtra and Patidars in
Gujarat were dominant castes. A l l castes do not have i~niformnumerical strength and
spread. Some have a larger number of memberk and some are very tiny. Some are
scattered tllroughout the region and some are heavily concentrated in a few geographical
pockets. Hence, the role and position o f caste in relation to politics varies from time
to time, area to area and'caste to caste.
Caste, Class and Politics
22I-6 CA$TE+MD CLASS in India
A number o f village studies o f different parts o f the country carried out in the post-
independent period show a certain amount o f overlap between twin hierarchies o f
caste and land. M.N. Srinivas observes, " The village community consisted o f
hierarchical groups, each with its own rights, duties and privileges. The caste at the
. top had power and privileges, which were denied to the lower castes. The lower
castes were tenants, servants, landless labourers, debtors and clients o f the higher
castes." Data from two Tamilnadu villages collected by Sivkumar and Sllivkumar in
the late 'seventies show that 59 per cent o f Mudaliyars (upper castes) and 4 per cent
o f Palli (untouchable castes) are rich peasants or landlord households. N o Mudaliyar
is engaged as an agricultural laborer, whereas 42 per cent o f Palli households earn
their livelillood as farm labourers. A study of six Rajastllan villages carried out by
K.L.Sharma in the 'seventies offers a similar pattern'. "Only 12.5 per cent o f the
lower class .households belong to upper castes, 60 per cent o f the higher cIass
households belong t o the upper castes, 24 per cent o f the upper castes belong to the
higher class, whereas among the intermediate and lower castes only 6.2 per cent and
1.3 per cent belong to high class respectively."
The Anthropological Survey o f India in its Project on "People of India" has studied
4635 communities/castes. The study confirms that the highly placed castes are marked
by "(i)a higher position in the regional socio-ritual hierarchy, (ii)better control over
land and 'other resources, and (iii)non-commercial relations with other communities
o f inferior status.... (The low castes) are placed at the bottom due to their : (i)abject
poverty caused by less possession of land and less control over economic resources
(ii)socio-ritual degradation based on the notion o f purity and pollution, and (iii)traditional
engagement in occupations which are co~lsideredritually unclean.
Aggregate data at regional and national level on caste and occupation\land llolding
give us a similar picture. Table I presents caste and occupation data collected by the
National Sample Survey (NSS) collected in 1952, analysed by K.N.Raj. The data
sllows that there is a positive relatio~lshipbetween caste and occupational status. The
small and marginal farmers.and agricultural labourers mainly belong to the low or
backward castes and ex-untouchable (scheduled) castes. There is a marginal
diversification o f occupations among the members o f low and the lowest castes in
rural areas. However, one should not ignore that a small proportion o f lower and
scheduled caste households are rich peasants who hire labour and produce marketable
surplus. According to the survey carried out by Centre for Social Studies, Surat in
Gujarat, 10 per, cent o f the lower caste and 5 per cent o f the scheduled caste
households own more than 15 acres of land. The reverse is also true. According to
the NSS data I per cent o f the upper castes and 12 per cent o f the middle castes
are agricultural labourers. Moreover it may also be noted that there are a few upper
castes in some parts o f the country wllose nlajority members do not belong to the
upper class. Rajputs (upper caste) o f Giljarat are a case in point. Their condition in
terms o f land ownership and other occupation is not significantly different than many
OBCs.
t
Party System and Elections Table 1: Occupational Distribution o f Different Caste-Groups ++
in India Among Hindu Rural Households
(Millions)
a) Farmer - a tiller who cultivates his own land, mainly with hired labour:?(b)
Cultivator - one wlio cultivates land mainly owned by him and sometimes land
taken on lease or sharecropping system, with the help of other household
members and partly with hired labour; (c) Sharecropper - one who mainly
takes up cultivatio~~ of others' land on a sliarecropping basis and cultivates
without hired labour; and (d) Agriculti~rallabourer - one wlio cultivates others'
land either for wages or for customary payment.
++ According to the NSS, " The upper castes were defined as those who, according
to custom, usek the scared thread, the middle as those from whom.the Brahmins
take water by jradition and the lower as the other castes who were not
scheduled."
But there are still several Jatis whose members liave more or less similar economic
condition. One can firid such i~ista~ices
among several Scheduled Castes and numerically
'small other backward castes. Such castes have still less than 10 per cent rate o f
literacy and all the households depend on mariual labour for their livelihood. On the
other hand there are number o f castes which are illternally stratified. There are three
types o f economic differentiation within different castes: ( I ) A caste characterised by
sharp polarisation; (2) A caste liavi~iga majority o f members from upper strata; (3)
A caste with a majority members belongi~igto poor strata. Rajputs and Thakurs o f
Rajasthan, LIP and Gujarat fall in tlie first category. A few lioi~selioldsow11 large
estates and factories and a large number are agricult~~ral labourers. Most o f tlie
households o f the several upper castes such as Bralimins, Baniyas, Kayastlias are
well off. On the other hand a large number of tlie Backward castes liave overwhelniing
majority households who are small and niargi~ialfarmers, tenants and agriculture
labourers. Economic stratification affects their cohesiveness on political issues.
Dominant stratum projects its interests as the interests o f tlie caste; and gives it
priority while bargaining witli tlie government.
........................................................................................................................
4) What is the difference between social caste and political caste?
Numerical strength o f a group is important in a democratic polity. All the Jatis do not
have equal numerical strength and spread in a geographical region - village, cluster
of villages, taluka or district. A few are very large, some are small and some are
minuscule. Some are concentrated in a villageltaluka and some are scattered in four
to five households in a village. Numerically large Jatis have an edge over others in
political bargaining with the government and political parties. Jatis confined to
endogamous character alone cannot muster a very large number at district levels and
beyond for political activities. Some o f the leaders o f such Jatis form caste associations
called Sabha or Sangam consisting o f cluster o f Jatis having similar social ranking in
a region. A few caste associations are also consist o f multi -castes having different
social ranking in traditional order. They may be called caste "federation".
It should be remembered that caste association i s not tlie same as caste pancliayat
or council. Generally the office bearers o f caste council enjoy hereditary position. This
i s not tlie case with association. Often tlie latter has written constitution specifying
power and responsibilities o f different office bearers. The former has judicial authority
dealing with ritual and social aspects related to marriage, divorce and otlier family
disputes o f tlie members. Its decisio~isare binding to all caste members. Caste
associa\ions carry out economic, educational and political programmes. All caste
mates are not members o f tlie Sabhas. 'The decisions o f the Sabha are not binding
on all caste members. It is not so with caste panchayat. In that sense caste association
is closer to voluntary organisation. Many caste associations though hold an objective
"to promote and protect tlie interests and rights o f tlie com~iiunity,"do not ~iecessarily
directly involve in electoral politics. Some caste associatio~isare active in electoral
politics at one time or another. Rudolph and Rudolph call the participation o f caste
associations in politics as "tlie democratic incarnation o f caste". Kothari calls it
"democratisation" o f castes.
\
The history o f caste associations goes back to tlie late 19th century, though their
number has increased after Independence. They are found in all states. Let us take
a few illustrations. As the Government decided in the early 1880s to debar Kulmis
as Kul~niso f Uttar pradesh from being recruited in the police service. The government
servants belo~igi~ig to Kurniis formed tlie "Sardar Kurmi Kshatriya Sabha" in 1884 to
protest against tlie decision. Another exa~iiplecan be cited o f Nadars o f Tamilnadu.
In order to enhance their economic development, tlie wealthy Slianars o f Tarnilnadu
formed the Nadar Maliajan Sangam in 1895. In Gujarat, the Rajputs after independence
!laving lost political power as rulers and ownership o f land under land reforms realized Caste. Class and Polities
i n India
a need for a larger numerical support base, as they constituted only 4 per cent o f the
population. Some o f the political aspirant Rajputs formed Gujarat Kshatriya Sablia.
The caste organisation embraced various Jatis o f Kolis who aspired Kshatriya status.
Caste pride and sentiments were i~ivokedthrough various ways aliiolig the Rajputs
and the Kolis as the Kshatriyas brethren. Caste associations make representation to
the government dema~idiligeducational facilities, la~dilpwnerslii~ and its distribution,
government jobs etc. for their caste members. Some o f them submit memoranda or
organise public ~neetingsdemanding infrastructure facilities like irrigation, electricity,
loan and subsidy for fertiliser for agriculture development.
Sucli caste associations are asserted with different leading political parties to see that
their caste members get party tickets in electioi-1s. Tliese parties i~iitiallyresisted such
pressures because o f tlie counter pressure from the dominant castes that cotitrolled
the party. 'The latter accused tlie former as castiest or comniunal. But as tlie competitio~i
among the parties intensify and as the caste association successfully mobilised tlie
members for political activities, all parties began to woo leading aspirants o f tlie caste
who could mobilise caste votes. Sucli political aspirants join different political parties.
As they are primarily interested in gaining political positions for the~nselvesrather tlian
serving social or ritual interests o f the caste, they either launcli a new associati011or
split the existing one. For them caste association is among several instruments to gain
political power. '
Some o f tlie political parties identify with certain castes for ~iolninatio~i
o f tlie party
candidates and mobilisatio~iin elections. B1ia;atiya Kranti Dal evolved an allia~iceo f
Party System and Elections four major peasant castes o f LIP in 1969 elections. The alliance was called AJGAR;
in India
that is, Ahirs, Jatsb Gugars and Rajputs. In 1977 in Gujarat tlie Coligress (I) formed
K H A M alliance o f Ksliatriyas, Hariians, Adivasis and Muslims. Lok Dal was identified
with Jats in Uttar pradesh in I977 and I980 parliamentary elections. Sa~najwadiParty
in Uttar Pradesli was identified with Backward castes in general and Yadavas in
particular in 1997 state assembly elections. BJP is generally identified with upper
castes and tlie Congress with the middle and backward castes. That reflected in their
support base in tlie eighties in Gujarat and Maliarashtra. ln tlie nineties tlie BJP has
followed the strategy of the Congress o f accommodating tlie backward caste candidates
in the elections and successfully getting support o f their caste fellows.
There are three consequences o f such interaction between caste associations and
political parties. One, caste members particularly poor and marginalised who were
hitherto remained untouclled by tlie political processes got politicised and began to
participate in electoral politics with an expectation that their interests would be served.
Second, caste members get split among various political parties weakening hold o f the
caste. Third, numerically large castes get representation in decision-making bodies
and strengtli o f tlie traditionally dominant castes get weaken. Tliis explai~istlie rise
o f middle and backward caste representations in most of tlie state assemblies. Table
2 presents caste composition o f M L A s in Gujarat Assenibly from 1957 to 1990. The
table sliows that the strength o f Bralinlins and Vanias lias declined colisiderably over
a period o f time, whereas tlie Kolis and Rajputs together as tlie Ksliatriyas increased
their strengtli by double. In Uttar Pradesli proportion o f the upper castes in the State
Assembly lias gone down fro111 42 per cent to 17 per cent between 1967 and 1995;
whereas the liienibers o f tlie OBCs have increased fro11124 per cent to 45 per cent
during tlie sanie period.
Table 2: Caste Composition of the MLAs in Cujarat Assembly from 1957 to 1995
Kshatriya I
(Rajput 13(12) 14( 10) 19(20) 2417) 32(18) 38(21) 44(25) 40(25)
and Kolis
N.A. 22 18 26 30 I 5 20
Role o f caste in elections has two dimensions. One is o f the parties and candidates
and the second is o f the voters. The former seeks support o f the voters projecting
themselves as champions o f particular social and economic interests, the latter while
exercising their vote in favour o f one party or candidate whether people vote on caste
consideration. And if so, how exclusive is it?
T l ~ o u gthere
l ~ is a trend among the caste members to vote for a particular party, there
is never a co~npleteen bloc caste voting. Some castes identify with a particular party
as their party. I t was expected that it would protect their interests. Jats in Western
UP identified Lok Dal as their party just not only because tlle leaders o f the party
were the Jats, but also the party raised the issues concerning the peasants. But'all
the Jats did not vote for the party because there were some who were traditional
supporters o f the Congress, or they perceived their interests differently than other jat
peasants which the Jats predo~nina~ltly are.. In UP 5 1 per cent o f the SC voters voted
for the BSP in the 1998 state asse~nblyelections. 18 per cent voted for the BJP. Tlle
vast majority o f the BSP SC voters belonged to poor strata and o f the BJP from the
middle class. While a~lalysingtlle election data, Pushpendra observes, " Occupationally,
the BSP's voters are mainly u~lskilledworkers, agricultural and allied workers, artisans,
and small and marginal fanners. Perso~lsengaged in business and white collar jobs
constitute only 2.6 and 1.6 per cent of tlle ESP voters (in LIP)."
I n the National Election Survey o f the 1972 carried out by Center for tlle Study o f
Developing Societies a question was asked, " What was your considerations for
voting this candidatetpartytsymbol?" For a very insignificant ~ l u ~ n boe fr respondents
(less tlla~l1 per cent) candidate's caste was the main consideration. Some o f the
respondents might have voted for personswho llappened to belong to their caste. But
it was not caste voting. They voted for tlle candidate not because hetshe was o f their
caste irrespective o f his party and ability. Tlley,voted for himther because hetshe was
the candidate o f the party to wllicll the respondent felt closer for variety o f reasons
including the feeling that the party would "protect histher" interests or the party had
done good work for tlle people like himther. Or, they were in touch with the candidate
who might have helped them or they feel that he would help them when they need.
Their primary consideration is their perception o f their interests. In a given alternative
partiestcandidates they consider as to who would serve their interests better than
others. If the candidate happens to be o f their own caste and his/her party is the party,
which they identify as theirs, they vote for himther. If they feel that the candidate
Party System and Elections belongs to that party w l ~ i c l iis either not able to serve tlieir interests or liostile or
in lndia
insignificant in electorate politics, tliey do not vote for that candidate even if he
belongs to their caste. That is tlie reason why several caste leaders lose the elections
in tlie constituency predominantly beacause o f tlieir caste members at one time or
anotlier when they change the party or their party loses popularity. Therefore there
is no one to one relatiorisliip between candidate's caste and that o f the voter's caste.
........................................................................................................................
2) Explain "democratic incarnation o f caste".
........................................................................................................................
........................................................................................................................
........................................................................................................................
........................................................................................................................
3) How does caste influence voting beliaviour?
Centre For Social Studies, Custe, Casre Conflict und Reservation, Chapters 1,2 and
8, Delhi, Ajanta Publication, 1985
Kothari, Rajni, Caste atld Poliiics it1 Itlr/ia, Hydrabad, Orient L o ~ i g n i a ~1970;
i
Rudolpli L.1. and Rudolpli S.H. The hfoclert~iiyof Tradiiion, Dellii, Longman , 196 1
Shall, Gliansliyam, Caste it1 Itlrliut1 Poliiics, Dellii, Permanent Black 2000.
2) There is a positive relationsliip between caste and land. Tlie main trend about tliis
relationship shows tliat tlie l o w or tlie backward castes and the ex-untouchables
belong to the agricultural labourers, small and marginal far~iiers,and tlie liigli and
intermediate castes belong to tlie ricli and ~ i i i d d l epeasants. However, there are
instances where the liigli castes belong to tlie poor agricultural classes, and the
l o w castes to the ricli and middle peasants.
4) Tlie social caste denotes tlie operatio11 o f tlie caste at the social level - its role
is co~ifinedto tlie social and cultural spheres. When caste becomes tlie synibol
o f ~nob,ilisationeither i n electio~iso r for ally otlier political purpose it becomes a
political caste.
1) A l l members o f a caste are ~iiernberso f the caste sabha; its leadership is hereditary;
it lias judicial authority dealing with rituals and otlier social aspects like marriage,
divorce and other disputes i n tlie falllily. N o t all ~ i i e ~ n b eor sf a caste on tlie otlier
hand are members o f the caste associations; its leadership is not hereditary: its
decisions are not binding 011a l l members o f the caste; these have economic,
educatio~ialand ~ o l i t i c a Proerammes.
l
Party System and Elections Tlie participation o f tlie caste associations in politics is ternled as "the democratic
in India
incarnation o f caste" by Rudolph and Rudolph.
The influence o f caste in tlie voting behaviour call be visible in two ways - by
allotmelit o f tickets to tlie candidates, and by casting o f the votes by tlie voters
on the caste lines. Generally voters o f a caste vote for a party or the candidate
on the consideration o f caste. But there is never a complete en block voting.
ii) The Bharatiya Krariti Dal in UP was identified with tlie AJGAR - an alliance
o f Ahirs, Jats. Gujars and Rajputs; and,
Structure
I 23.0
23.1
Objectives
Introduction
23.2 Forms of Coal itioh Politics
b 23.3 Coalition Behavioy \
b
23.4
23.5
23.6
\
boalition Governm nt: A Comparative Study
Coalition Politics in ndia (1947- 1967)
Emergence of ~ o a l i t + nGovernments in India ( 1 967- 1977)
23.7 E~nergenceof ~oalitihnGovernment at the Centre (1 977-1 979)
23.8 The Decline of Coalition Politics (1980-1989)
23.9 Coalition Governments and Coalition Politics (from 1989)
23.10 Working of the Coalition Govern~nentsin India
23.1 1 Let Us Sum Up
23.12 Some Useful Books ,
23.13 Answer to Check Your Progress Exercises
',
-23.0 OBJECTIVES
Discuss the nature and emergence of the coalition governments at the state level
after 1967 assembly elections.
The term coalition has been derived from the Latin word 'Coalitio' which is the verbal
substantive of "Coalescere'-co together, and 'alescere'-to grow up, which means to
grow or together. Coalition, thus, means an act of coalescing, or uniting into one body:
a union of parties. In the specific political sense the term coalition denotes an alliance
or temporary union of political forces for forming a single Government. As such
coalitions are direct descendants of the exigencies of a multi-party system in a
democratic regime. Coalition governments are co~nmonlycontrasted with single party
Governments, in which only one party forms government.
A coalition is a grouping of rival political actors brbught together either through the
perception of a comlnon threat, or the recognition that their goals cannot be achieved
by working separately. In general terms a coalition is regarded as parliamentary or
political grouping which is less permanent than a party or faction or an interest group.
Constitutional framework and electoral system of a country determines the forms that
coalition politics takes. 'These are three in nature: parliamentary, electoral and
governmental.
Party System and Elections Parliamentary coalitiori may occur in a situation when no single party erijoys an over
i n India
all majority. The party which is asked to forill a govern~iieritmakes an atteliipt to rule
as a m i ~ i o r i t ygovernment, relying upon an arrangemelit with other party or parties for
its survival. Tlie Ja~iataDal government led by V.P. Singli in 1989 was such a
gover~imetit.Sucli a gover~imenttilay seek support from tlie oppositio~ipolitical parties
for different items o f legislatioil or tlie government may survive merely because tlie
oppositio~iniay not like to defeat tlie gover~ilile~it either to gain political advantage or
not to be deprived o f their existing political base. The Congress government led by
Narasimha Rao in 1991 was sucli a government in its early tenure.
Electoral coalitions represent two or more than two political parties who enter into an
agreement which provides for a mutual withdrawal o f candidates in an electio~iSo that
tlie co~icer~ied parties can avoid splittirig o f votes in the co~istitue~icies where they are
strong respectively. Sucli coalitio~isare difficult to be for~iiedwhen the parties having
strong local base and organisatio~ido not wish to surrender tlieir rights to put up a
candidate. Sucli electoral coalitio~ishave become colnliioli in India in recent past in
tlie form o f f o r ~ i i a t i o o
~ if United Front and National Democratic Alliance.
A t tlie government level, there car1 be different tyl?es o f coalition. Tlie first type is
tlie ~ i a t i o ~ igovernment
al in wliicli mbst, if not all, o f the maill parties join togetlier to
meet a ~ i a t i o ~ iemergency
al arising out o f war or eco~io~iiiccrisis. Tlie ratioiiale behirid
the formation o f sucli a goverlilnelit is tliat ~iationalcrisis necessitates tlie suspension
o f party strife and requires tlie conc$ntration o f all forces in a c o ~ i i ~ i idirection.
o~i Tlie
coalition gover~imentsled by ~ s ~ u i and i l i Llyod George during tlie First World War
and by W i ~ i s t o Cliurclii
~i 1 1 during S/econd World War in U~ i i t e dKingdom were tlie
exa~iipleso f national goverliments. ,
<:orlition Politics
2) Explain the different fornis o f coalition politics.
........................................................................................................................
........................................................................................................................
........................................................................................................................
.......................................................................................................................
A study o f coalitio~ibeliaviour puts forth the following questions: Wliat are the distinct
circunistances wliicli lead to different political parties joining coalitions? Why does a
particular party prefer to enter into coalition witli otlier parties? Wliat are the
advantages a political party can expect to gain by its entering into a coalition?
A comparative study o f the coalition beliaviour drawn from tlie liistorical experiences
of coalitio~ipolitics in different countries and at different times reveal the following
trends:
First, all tlie political parties who enter into a coalition always aini to tiiaxiniise their
long term influence over decision-making process.
Third, the cotnpetitiori among the coalition partners is restricted by tlie degree to
wliicli eacli partner is willing to tolerate conipetitive demands on the part o f the allies.
Fourth, in a situation wliere the tolerance among tlie coalition partners remain o f liigli
level, co~npetitivenessis rewarded witli disproportionally liigli returns ill terms o f
political influence.
Indian politics in the period betweeti 1947 to 1967 was coalitional in nature. This was
at tlie level o f political parties or political formations. Functionalist political scientists
like Rajni Kotliari, Morris-Jones and Myron Wei~ierdeveloped a theoretical model for
this level in tlie late sixties tlirough the idea o f a one-party do~ni~iant system or
Congress system. The dominance o f Congress was reflected both in terms o f tlie
ninnber o f seats tliat it held in parliament at centre and the governments it formed
in tlie states as well as in terms o f its formidable organisational strength outside the
legislative bodies. Thus in the first three general electio~lsCongress w o ~aroundi forty
five per cent o f tlie votes atid seventy five per cent o f the seats in tlie parliament.
The Co~igressbarring brief interludes continued to rule in almost all tlie states and at
centre. The Congress system, argued Morris Jones, reflected 'dominance co-existing
witli competition but without a trace o f alter~iation'.Such a coldssal dominance o f
Co~igresso f the political system reduced other parties to marginality.
It follows tliat tlie Indian political system during this period could not be understood
in accordarice witli tlie standard textbook forniat o f government and opposition. It
was tlie big Congress versus small and frag~nentedforces o f opposition at the State
as well as tlie natio~iallevel. Congress succeSsfully defined Maurice Duverger's law-
whicli expected two party system to emerge in a plurality electoral system by
incorporating political competition and consociational arrangemelits within its boundaries
and yet holding it together through a delicate nianagenient o f factions. Creating and
sustaining such a broad coalitio~io f factio~iswas greatly helped by the colnplexities
and ambiguities o f l ~ i d i asociety
~i which did not allow polarisatio~ior the formation o f
contradictions that might have fractured such an all-embrac~ngalliance. I t was also Coalition Politirs
,
I helped, according to Myron Weiner, by traditional values and roles o f conciliation that
I
t Congress party astutely took up. I n a similar vein, R a j ~ iKothari
i has also highlighted
the colisensual politics based on pluralism, accom~nodatioliand bargaining followed by
Co~igressparty.
I
parties also. During this period the Governmelital policies came to be decided Inore
by cross party blocs rather than by inner party voting or a coliverltiolial division lilies
o f Government and Opposition.
I
I
The coalitiolial nature o f Indian politics was evident when tlie Congress leadership at
the centre often 'transferred a decisioli from tlie space within the party to the space
o f tlie political system as a whole if they were sure o f tlie support o f winning
coalition'. I t was in this manner that Congress crises were solved as Max Zins's study
o f Coligress reveals.
The 1967 elections witnessed the coalition politics in another for~n,now i~ivolvingthe
non-congress opposition parties. Opposition parties were able to defeat coligress in
the assen~blyelectiolis in six States by joiliilig into an electoral coalition. The econolilic
difficulties, the declining legiti~nacyand the fact that Coligress had never received an
absolute majority in ternis o f votes polled explains the setback to Congress.
However, the coalition technique which worked so well for Congress did exactly the
opposite in case o f the oppositio~iparties. This can be explained by the fact that the
opposition parties with divergent ideologies did benefit electorally from the widened
support base. However the same factor led to tlie crisis in governance leading to the
failure o f coalition governments.
Congress, thus was able to collie back to power in most o f the States where it had
lost power in 1967 elections. However, tlie post-1967 congress followed a new
political process which was marked by the replacement o f consensual politics by tlie
confrontationalist politics towards opposition. 'This liad to do both with tlie
'marketisation' o f polity as well as tlie over-cent~.alisatio~i
o f power in tlie party. The
Co~igressthus adopted a plebiscitary liiode o f electoral politics which led to the
institutional decline in the party. This explailis tlie inability o f the State leaders o f
' congress who were 'nominated' rather than 'elected' in holding the political equilibria
Party System and Elections i n tlie States b y creation and manipulation o f interest coalitions and factio~ialpolitics.
in' India
Destructio~io f State-level Congress organisations by an over centralised political
leadersliip led t o tlie eloiergence o f genirine conipetitiori t o tlie congress at tile State
level.
I t follows tliat Congresg was n o longer a single donii~iantparty but tlirougliout tlie
1970 and 1980's it co~itinuedto be tlie natural party o f gover~iance,tlie pole around
wliicli electoral conipetition was organised. Thereafter, the success o r the failure o f
tlie attenipts b y the oppositio~iparties to put up an electoral coalition against Congress
made a decisive difference t o tlie electoral outcome.
Tlie tliird phase i n tlie evolution o f coalition politics was niarked b y tlie defeat of tlie
Co~igressi n 1977 parlianientary as w e l l as assembly elections (in as niany as six
States). Tlie i n t r o d u c t i o ~o~f populist. bureaucratic and authoritarian mode o f politics
i n tlie party had led to tlie emergency imposed by tlie Congress government. Botli tlie
emergelicy and a liastily assellibled c o a l i t i o ~ oi f oppositio~iparties were tlie main
factors responsible for electoral debacle o f Congress both at tlie central and state
level.
Tlie c o a l i t i o ~ igovernnielit led b y Morarji Desai could not last its fill1 term as the
i party retained tlieir ideological differences - a legacy
co~lstituentfactions w i t l i i ~ tlie
o f tlieir pre-merger days. W i t h tlie twin objectives take11 during emergency being
fillfilled once tlie coalition government was fornied and a~nendnientbills were passed
- tlie a~nbitionso f its leaders saw tlie split i n the party and tlie government fell in 1979.
C h e c k Y o u r Progress Exercise 3
........................................................................................................................
/
........................................................................................................................
2) What was the nature o f tlie coalition Governments which were for~iiedin tlie
states after 1967 assembly elections?
........................................................................................................................
3) Why did not Janata coalitio~igovernment complete its full term?
The failure o f coalition experiment in the form o f failure o f Janata coalition government
to complete its full tertii gave an opportunity to Congress-recovering from a split in
1978- under the leadership o f Indira Gandlii to capture power in the 1980 elections.
Congress received a massive victory in 1984 general elections also. 'rlii~s for a
decade the coalition politics came to an end at the centre. At tlie state level, however.
the coalition politics continued. Congress, for instance, entered in to an alliance witli
National Conference in J and K and witli the DMK in 1980 and witli AIADMK ill
1984 elections in Tamil Nadu. The left parties-led coalition governments were formed
in the States o f Kerala, Tripura and West Bengal during this period.
I t was during this period that the seeds o f future coalition politics emerged. Co~igress
despite its electoral triumphs in tlie plebiscitory electioris was continuously losing its
ideological and institutional base. As sucli it was unable to respond adequately to the
demands arid aspirations o f the de~nocraticallyawakened rural social groups wlio had
been becoming increasingly aware o f tlie significance o f their electoral power. Moreover,
tlie over centralisation o f power in Co~igressled to the heightened level o f Centre-
State tensions.
The ruralisation and regionalisation o f Indian politics led to tlie emergence o f regional
parties whicli were supported by tlie numerically strong and economically powerfill
rich peasant castes. Telugu Desam in Andha Pradesli, Akali Dal in Punjab, AGP in
Assam were aniolig the regional parties which ensured a freer competition between
political parties and increased alternation o f a tendency towards personalised cotitrol
o f parties and fragmentation o f the parties into splinter groups etc. All these factors
paved tlie way for the end o f the Coligress dominance at tlie State level.
Party System and Elections What emerged in tlie States was a bipolarity as along witli tlie regional parties
in India
Congress even now retained a salience in tlie party system. It was because Congress
continued to command greater popular support that1 any otlier party at the national
level and also tliat it was the core around which the party systelii was structured.
That bipolarity at tlie state level did not, however, yield a bipolarity at tlie National
level as well as becanie evident from 1989 General elections.
In tlie run-up to tlie 1989 elections a~iotlierhastily assenhled coalition was formed in
the form o f formation o f Janata Dal wliich came into existence as a resi~lto f the
merger o f several parties like tlie Janata Party, Lok Dal (A), Lok Dal (B), Janata Dal,
subseqi~entlyfornied an electoral alliance witli tlie parties like DMK, Co~igress(S),
AGP, CPI, CPI (M) and other small regional parties. This electoral coalition came
tb be called National Front wliich entered into an agreeliie~itwitli tlie BJP on sharing
seats in tlie 1989 parliamentary elections. As the Congress and its allies did not stake
claim to forni the Government it was tlie National Front led by Janata Dal which was
invited by tlie President to form the coalition Government o f National Front led by
V.P. Singli which was sup orted froni oi~tsideby BJP and left parties who did not join
the Government.
l'
National Front niinority Goverrinient was tlie first real coalition Government at tlie
Centre as the ~anataGovernment was a coalition Government by Proxy and Charan
Sigh led coalition Government Lok Dal and Congress (S) fell before proving i t s
majority in the Lok Sabha.
However, the assenibly elections' between 1993 to 1995 decisively brduglit to an end
the one party do~ninantmulti-party systeni o f an earlier era. Co~igressno longer
remained the core aroi~ndwliich tlie party systeni was structured. These elections
marked the i~ite~isification
o f tlie process o f bipolar consolidation all over tlie Country
barring few States like Kerala and West Bellgal where coalitio~ipolitics still survived.
Thus in as many as twelve States, non-Congress Govern~nentruled by tlie end o f
1995.
Increasing tendency towards a bipolar polity at tlie State level Icd to a situatio~itliat
a two-party systeni at tlie national level beca~iieimprobable. With the effective
niarginalisation o f tlie Congress from the real arena o f co~npetitionin U.P. and Bihar
Coalition I ' o l i t i c s
- the two largest States - it was now obvious that Co~igresson its ow11 could no
longer hold its positio~iin tlie centre (both in tlie sense o f occupying and defining tlie
middle ground and being most significant) o f tlie ltidia~ipolitical system. W it11 tlie
emergence o f distinct regional party systems in tlie States sig~ialledtlie rise o f parties
like Bahujan Samaj Party, Telugu Desam Party, Asoni Gana Pgrisliad, Dravida Munnetra
Kazhagam, Akali Dal at tlie regional level, the Co~igresswas now one o f tlie Inally
parties with a position in several o f those regional systems. I t was no longer a pole
against which every political fonnation was defined. Even in those States where tliere
was a direct race between the Congress and its rival, tlie Congress was no longer
tlie natural party o f governance.
The above tendencies were confirmed in tlie par1iamentary electio~iso f 1 996. The
BJP made a strong sliowi~igin tlie Northern and Wester11States especially in Biliar
and U.P. and emerged as tlie largest party in tlie Lok Sabha. Tlie party formed a
minority Govern~neiitwliicli barely lasted two weeks before losi~igvote o f confidence
in Lok Sabha. Tlie regional parties i.e., TDP, DMK, AGP and the Tamil Manila
Congress in alliance witli Janata Dal fonned National front comprising o f the communist
parties. The resultant United Front-was able to form a coalition Gover~imentled by
H.D.Devegowda first and then by 1.K.Gujral witli tlie outside support o f the coligress
and the left parties (CPI for the first time in Parliamentary history joined tlie
Government). The UF coalition Gover~iinentcollapsed after tlie withdrawal o f support
from Congress in 1998.
B.IP taking a less011from its 1996 experience entered illto electoral coalitio~iwitli tlie
regional parties like A I A D M K in Tamil Nadu, Samata Party in Bihar, Trina~iiool
Congress in West Bengal, Akali party in Pulljab etc. Subseque~itlythese parties
(eighteen in number) for~iieda coalitio~iGover~imentwliicli lasted barely for one year
as A I A D M K withdrew its support it1 1999. l'lie 1999 parlia~iie~itary
elections,say that
the two parties Congress and BJP, had electoral allia~icewitli tlie regional parties in
such a manner that coalition G o v e r ~ i ~ n ebeca~iie
~it inevitable to emerge.
A comparative study o f tlie results o f the 1996 electio~isand the 1998 or 1999
elections reveals a rnajor difference between the two. l'lie 'hung' Parliament wliicli
emerged after 1996 elections was not just a matter o f no single party getting a
majority but rather of no party or a clear alliance o f parties being in a position to
govern. I n 1998 and 1999 elections, however, BJP and Congress have show11that
despite no party getting a majority on its own, two 'poles' have become visible-the
Congress and the BJP- within tlie regional ised multi-party system. I t is natural then
that both have been gradually accepting tlie imperatives o f coalition politics a,id
alliance building.
........................................................................................................................
........................................................................................................................
........................................................................................................................
....................................................................................................1...................
........................................................................................................................
........................................................................................................................
Party System and Elections
in India .
2) Wliat are the new trendsvisible in tlie coalitio~ipolitics after 1993- 1995 assernbly
elections?
In tlie recent past tlie coalition governments liave bee11formed on the basis o f a
comtnon agreement by tlie coalitio~ipartners to iniplenielit a Co~iilnonMinirnuni
Programme (CMP). However, tlie bickering alllong the coalition partners lias been
often obstructive to the process o f it's implementation. Moreover the very fact that
the elections in 1996 atid 1998 threw up unwieldy, unstable and short-lived coalition
Gover~i~nelits was to a great degree responsible for non-implementation o f tlie CMP.
political system i n India i n tlie first twenty-five years or so after Independence was
completely dominated by Congress both in the electoral and organisational sense.
Congress acting on its historical legacy represented a broad-based social coalition.
Tlie 'Congress system' was based on coalition in political sense also as it followed
coalition logic in its relationship with tlie opposition parties i n tlie process o f govern-
ance. The.period from the later half o f tlie 1980s onwards witnessed tlie erosion o f
the central role o f tlie Congress in niai~itainingand restructuring political consensus.
TIILIS tlie process o f political mobilisation and political recruitment heralded the iniita-
tion o f a more differentiated structure o f party competition. Rapid mobilisatio~iand
politicisatio~io f new regional and social groups resulted in to tlie growth o f a new
genre o f parties and alignments, many o f these focusing on individual leaders, wlio
were able to identity with specific castes and communities. Tlie 1990s in particular
witnessed a decisive end to tlie do~iiinantmulti-patty systeni o f tlie earlier years. I t
signified a move towards a competitive multi-party systetii both at tlie central and
state levels. Tlie General electio~isin 1989 and tlie State assembly electio~iso f 1993-
1995 confirmed this trend. Along witli an upsurge o f new social groups and identities
tlie growing regionalisation o f tlie national parties (not excluding tlie Congress and
BJP) also explai~isthe for~iiatiorio f a large number o f parties. Consequently, tliere has
I been a blurring o f lines between tlie national and state patty system. and the process
o f 'federalisation' in tlie party system. I n this coriiplex and interlocking relationship
between tlie national arid state patty systems. the change in tlie latter have been
I
ilicreasi~iglyinfluencing the former. Tlie coalitio~ipolitics and tlie coalition Govern-
ments are related to tlie ongoing process o f translbrmation fro111a single doniinant to
a region based multi-party system. TIILIS there has been an emergence o f a bipolarity
at tlie Centre supported by the regional partics - tlie Congress and tlie BJP being tlie
two 'poles' - i n an increasingly regionalised multi-party system.
Bogdanor, Veroti, The Blacknfell Eticyclopeditr of Politicd Itis f iftrtiotis, B lac kwe ll
Reference, Oxford, 1987.
2) Tliis period saw tlie formation o f tlie coalition o f tlie non-Congress Coalition
goverliments i n nine states. U ~ i l i k etlie coalition o f tlie Co~igresssystem, this type
o f coalitioti was f o r ~ i i e db y tlie parties w i t h d iverpent ideologies arid si~pport
bases.
3) The Janata coalition did not coniplete its terms because o f tlie f o l l o w i n g reasons:
ideological differences between tlie members o f tlie coalition, arid tlie a m b i t i o ~ i s
o f leaders o f constiti~entparties.
I). The ruralisation and regio~ialisationo f Indian politics gave rise t o tlie emergence
o f regional politics. '1-lie regional parties liave supported largely tlie rural rich w h o
have large nunierical strength.
2) Tliese are- elid o f tlie one party dominant multi-party system; intesification o f
bipolar consolidatio~iin most part o f tlie country; and, emergence o f distinct
regional parties.
1
STRUCTURE
24.0 Objectives
24.1 Introduction
24.2 Reforms for women in the 19th and early 20th centuries
24.2.1 Against “Sati”
24.2.2 Widow remarriage
24.2.3 Rehabilitation of the prostitutes
24.2.4 Arya Samaj
24.2.5 Prohibition of Child Marriage
24.0 OBJECTIVES
The Unit deals with the role and contribution of women in the various social and political
movements in India. After going through this unit, you will be able to know:
1
2
24.1 INTRODUCTION
It will be easier to understand the role of women in the social and political movements of
India if we divide the study into the following categories
First, we shall try to have a panoramic view of the role of women in the 19th and the 20th
centuries, i.e. in the pre and post- colonial era.
We shall next, look into these movements from two broad angles, viz, (i) “for” women
and (ii) “by” women. (i) The period of reforms and nationalist struggle can be categorised
as “for” women since all the benefits and opportunities for advancement were fought for
and gifted by social reformers who, inevitably, were men. Women had eager and sincere
participation in India’s struggle for freedom, but the leadership was in the hands of men
only. Yet, this period is extremely significant as the “beginning of freedom” for women.
(ii) In the post-independence period women concentrated on their own freedom. The
foundation for this movement had been laid in the anti-British Raj days when women had
started discovering their identity through literature and their activities as “terrorists”.
They slowly became part of the world’s women’s movement and their role in the social
and political movements in their own country started becoming more and more
prominent.
24.2 Reforms for women in the 19th and early 20th centuries
The 19th century could well be called an age for women. Their rights and the wrongs
done to them, as well as their capacities and potentials, used to be the subjects of heated
discussions in Europe and even in the colonies. By the end of the century, feminist ideas
were in the minds of the “radicals” in England, France, Germany and even Russia. In
India, the wrongs against women began to be deplored by social reformers. Such
movement of ‘for’ women, ‘by’ men originated in Bengal and Maharashtra.
The Indian bourgeois class, that was born out of Westernisation, sought to reform the
society by initiating campaigns against caste, polytheism, idolatry, animism, purda, child-
marriage, sati and the like. These, to them, were elements of ‘pre-modern’ or primitive
society. The foreign missionaries had branded these as examples of “Hindu
barbarism” thus creating enough grounds for the colonial powers to rule. Ram Mohan
Roy and Bidyasagar managed to receive the required administrative and legal support
because of this. In 1817, Pandit Mrityunjay Bidyalankar declared that sati had no
2
3
“Shastric” sanction. One year later Governor william Bentinck prohibited Sati in his
province, viz, Bengal. It took 11 years for this prohibition to get extended to other parts
of India as the Sati Prohibition Act of 1929.
In 1850s Pandit Ishwarchandra Bidyasagar, like Pandit Mrityunjay, proved from the
Shastras that the re-marriage of a widow is allowed. His was a long, difficult journey
through debats with orthodox pandits and banter from some of the pillars of then Hindu
society. The Vernacular (Bengali) press got filled with songs and satires both in support
and against. Such verses appeared in the designs of the woven cloths. They created
turmoil in society. Bidyasagar submitted a petition to the Governor General in 1855.
A Widow Remarriage Association had started in Madras in 1871, but was short lived. In
1878, Virasalingam started the Rajamundri Social Reform Association, focusing mainly
on widow re-marriage. In 1892, the Young Madras Party or the Hindu Social Reform
Association was launched. Aryan Brotherhood Conference, of which Ranade and N.M.
Joshi were members, once declared in one of its meetings, “let us no longer live in a
fool’s paradise in the fond belief that because we have managed to survive so long ..
under our present social arrangement, we will be able to survive for ever…”
Forty odd years since the Act was passed, there had been 500 widow re-marriages only,
though social reform organisations, championing the cause, had mushroomed all over
India. The majority of them were child or virgin widows. Widows from the upper caste,
who were not virgins, could not and did not- re-marry.
Other notables, who fought for reforms in anti-woman socio religious customs, were
Jyotiba Phule, Dayanand Saraswati, Karve and women like Pandita Ramabai, Sister
Nibedita and Tagore’s sister Swarnakumari Devi. Bengal had witnessed rebellious spirits
like Madhusdan Datta and Henry Derozio. They both were powerful poets also. They
had invited the wrath of the reformers even by attacking male morality. Madhusdan
organised the prostitutes and inspired them to choose the profession of acting, instead.
We must make special note of the fact that Bidyasagar, the first and the greatest
protagonist of widow re marriage felt a moral repugnance towards this scheme of
rehabilitation of the prostitutes and did not think of stopping this abhorrent practice of
polygamy. Strangely, he could not realise that the number of widows will drastically
decline and thus the problem will become much less formidable if polygamy could be
strictly stopped.
3
4
Swami Dayanand was rather revolutionary for his time. He disowned the caste system
and prescribed equal treatment to women quoting from the shastras. His Arya Samaj did
not impose any duties or obligations on women, which could not be applied to men
according to the Hindu lawgivers. In his representative book, “Satyartha Prakash”
Dayanand insisted that polygamy, child marriage and the seclusion of women did not
exist in Aryan India. He called for compulsory education for boys and girls both and that
there should be equal stress on tradition and modernity through the compulsory learning
of Sanskrit and English. He raised the age of marriage for girls and boys to 16 and 25,
respectively.
But Arya Samajis like Lala Lajpat Rai and Lal Chand opposed higher education for
women. They believed that if at all, ‘the character of girls’ education should be different,
because ‘the education we give to the girls should not unsex them’ Apart from basic
literacy, Arithmetic and some poetry, Arya Samaj religious literature, sewing,
embroidery, cooking, hygienic, drawing and music were the subjects taught. The Brahma
Samaj that started as a protest against idolatry and the backward pulling norms and rituals
of Brahminical Hindusim, was not free of this stereotype notion about girls and women.
The notion continued till the latter stages of our freedom movement. They only dissident
voice was of Subhas chandra Bose. Herin lies the justification behind dividing the ages
into “for” and “by” women. The women, at that time, had neither the awareness nor the
sensitivity to demand everything that were allowed to or given to men.
In 1860 an Act was passed fixing the age of consent at 10. Behram Malabari, himself not
a Hindu, (a Parsi) started a campaign in support of this Act towards the end of the
century. He could manage to convince a good number of lawyers, doctors, teachers and
public servants. They believed, which was echoed in the statement by the Jessore Indian
Association, that “early marriage weakens the physical strength of a nation; it stunts its
full growth and development, it affects the courage and energy of the individuals and
brings forth a race of people weak in strength” and determination. In 1891, Tilak had led
an agitation against the Act and a modern visionary like Tagore had opposed in words
and deed!
Reform movements were so strong in the Bombay-Poona cultural belt that a few had the
courage to question even Brahminism the very base of Hinduism G.H. Deshmukh, a
socio-religious reformer for example, had argued in the 1840s that the “Brahmins should
give up their foolish concepts; they must accept that all men are equal and that everybody
has a right to acquire knowledge…”. But in 1871, he succumbed to threat to outcaste
him. As a consequence, he mellowed down.
1. Why can the 19th century be called the age for women?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4
5
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. What do you know about the various attempts enforce widow re-marriage.?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
________________________________________________________________________
By the late 19th century, social reform movements were beginning to show effects;
confidence and determination started getting observed in the life and work of some
women. Novelists like Nirupama Devi and Anurupa Devi started getting referred to in
the Bengali literary circles and were even given memberships of literary clubs which
were dominated by men. Tagore’s novels and short stories are full of women characters
who excel their husbands and other male admirers. A few examples are “Gora” and
“Gharey Bairey” by Tagore, “Anandamath” and “Debi Choudhurani” by Bankimchandra
and “Pather Debi” by Sharatchandra. In Tagore’s “Char Adhyay”, a nationalist woman,
seeking identity, is criticised and crushed by male ldadership-typical of politics even
today, which has largely remained a male domain. Almost all women activist were
literary writers also; literature and writings with literary flavour were commonly used as
side weapons with most of the male freedom fighters also. Some of the noted names
among women were Nagendrakala Mustafi, Mankumari Basu and Kamini Roy. Kashibai
Kanitkar was the first woman novelist from Maharashtra. Others were Mary Bhore,
Godavaribai Samaskar, Parvatibai and Rukminibai. In South, Kamala Sathinandan, the
editor of Indian Ladies Magazine, was a writer also. Sarala Debi, Kumudini Mitra and
Madame Cama had made marks in Journalism to promote the cause of revolution.
5
6
Madame Cama had the honour of unfurling a ‘Bande Mataram’ flag at 1907 Congress of
the Socialist International at Stuttgart, and, in 1913, Kumudini Mitra, more known as a
“terrorist”, was invited to the International Women’s Suffrage Conference at Budapest,
Hungary. Sarojini Naidu waited upon the committee, headed by Montague and Lord
chelmsford to demand a series of reforms in the condition of the Indian women. Sarala
Debi made representations before the committee on behalf of Bharat Stree Mahamandal.
At the sixth National Social conference in 1892, Hardevi Roshanlals, the editor of
“Bharat Bhagini” insisted that this platform was ‘more important’ than Congress, because
the former understood that:
Anandibai Joshi was the first woman doctor. She and Kantibai were stoned when they
dared wearing shoes and carrying umbrellas on the streets. These were symbols of male
and caste authority. Was women’s position better than that of the lower castes or the
untouchables? In 1882, Tarabai Shinde’s book, Stree Purush Tulana generated heated
discussions all over. She insisted that the faults, commonly ascribed to women, such as
superstition, suspicion, treachery and insolence, could be as much found in men. She
suggested to the women that, by the strength of their firm will, they remain always well
behaved, pure as fire and unblemished internally and externally. Tarabai also suggested
that men would have to hang their heads down in shame.
Mai Bhagawati, an “upadeshika” of the Arya Samaj had the confidence to speak in a
large public gathering in Haryana. In 1881, Manorama Majumdar, educated at home by
her husband, was appointed dhama pracharika by the Barisal Brahmo Samaj. As
expected, lot of heated debate followed questioning the ‘wisdom’ of carrying the issue of
women’s equality a little too far. Regular participation in the nationalist campaigns and
organisations had generated such a spirit that a group of Brahmo women walked through
the streets of Calcutta singing and speaking against the evils of purdah. These are
indisputable instances of initiatives or movements “by”women. But Indian National
Congress and other political parties were not yet prepared to acknowledge that potential
among women. Though the women delegates were allowed to sit on the dias, they were
not allowed to speak or vote on the resolutions.
Rabindranath Tagore’s sister Swarnakumari Debi launched “Sakhi Samiti” with the aim
of training widows to learn, to teach and thus become the most powerful agents of
spreading education among women. The Samiti organised crafts fairs in order to promote
women-centric cottage industries as a means of developing self-confidence (atmashakti)
and nationalism. Congress discovered great value in this kind of “meals”, but the male
leaders could not think beyond organising a separate women’s section.
Swarnakumari Debi’s daughter, Sarala Debi, was strikingly rebellious. She wanted to
flee the ‘cage’ or ‘prison’ of home and establish her right to an independent livelihood
like men. She started a gymnasium in 1902, where women were trained in the use of
sword and ‘lathi’. She can be called the architect of militant nationalism or even
revolutionary terrorism.
6
7
Purani Agyawati, a woman member of Hissar Arya Samaj, toured almost all over Punbaj,
pleading mothers to bring up their sons not for government service but as independent
manuacturers and traders of ‘swadeshi’. She also tried to convince that strict and blind
observance of caste norms prevent the mothers from giving great sons to the nation. In
Delhi, Agyavati opened a '‘Vidhava Ashram" to organise widows not only against
oppression and for their right to education, but also to train them in militant nationalism.
She was described as “a very bold woman” by the government, which was sufficiently
alarmed by her activities.
Speaking to the Indian Social conference at Calcutta in 1906. Sarojini Naidu said,
“instruction may mean accumulation of knowledge, but education is an immeasurable,
beautiful and indispensable atmosphere in which we live and move and have our being…
How then shall a man dare to deprive a human soul of its immemorial inheritance of
liberty and life? Your fathers, in depriving your mothers of that birthrith, have robbed
you, their sons, of your just inheritance. Therefore, I charge you restore to your women
their … rights… you are, therefore, not the real nation-builders… Educate your women
and the nation will take care of itself…”
That there was a sense of great achievement among women and of new spaces opening
up for them was beautifully put by the Tamil nationalist poet Subramanya Bharati in his
poem, “The Dance of Liberation”, in 1920
Dance! Rejoice!
Those who said
It is evil for women to touch books
Are dead.
The lunatics who Said
They would lock women in their houses,
Cannot show their faces now.
A discourse on equality began to develop, in the late 1910s and 1920s, amongst women.
They used nationalists’ arguments to defend their demands for equal rights. Urmila Devi,
a militant woman, defined ‘swaraj’ as self-rule and ‘Swadhinata’ as the ‘strength and
power to rule over oneself’. Amiya Debi rightly felt that ‘Swadhinata’ cannot be given, it
has to be taken by force…. If it is left to the “well-wishing” men, then women’s adhinata
(dependence) along will get strengthened. The nationalist leaders, who were the first to
call women outside their home and household, believed in complementarity and not
sameness, which the revolutionary women demanded. The reformers and the ‘givers’
believed that women’s rights should be recognised because of women’s socially useful
7
8
role as mothers. Women demanded equal rights because, as human beings, they have the
same needs, the same desires and the same capacities as men.
Prabhavati worked for a group in U.S.A called “Freedom for India and Ireland” and
Renuka Ray was associated with the “League Against British Imperialism” in England.
Pabhavati married M.N. Roy, the pioneer of communist movement in India, and got
equally involved with the revolutionaries and the communists. She joined hands with
Muzaffar Ahmad, poet Nazrul Islam and Hemanta Kumar Sarkar to organise the
scavengers as a member of the Workers and Peasants Party.
1. Write, in brief, women’s first fight for rights during the colonial period.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. How did women define “Swaraj” and “Swadhinata” during freedom struggle?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No woman was chosen by Gandhi in his long list of 71 marchers to Dandi. Well-
recognised women, like Khurshid Naoroji and Margaret Cousins, protested strongly. But
the leader remained firm on his decision arguing that he had allocated a “greater role to
women than the mere breaking of salt laws”. But Sarojini Naidu defied and joined the
march at Dandi at the final stage and was the first woman to be arrested in that
movement. Once defiance cleared the path, and thousands of women joined the salt
satyagraha. This is generally remembered as the first time “the masses of Indian women”
got involved in the struggle for independence. Husbands now started getting proud of
8
9
their wives in the jails; but they resented if their wives had not taken prior permission. A
few notable amongst these wives were Kasturba Glandhi, Kamaladebi Chattopadhyay,
Nellie Sengupta, Basanti Debi (Roy), Durgabai Deshmukh and Aruna Asaf Ali.
Kumudini Mitra had organised a group of educated Brahmin women who liaised between
the revolutionaries in hiding. Women got increasingly involved with revolutionary
groups, popularly known, feared and revered as “terrorists”. In December, 1931, Shanti
Ghosh and Suniti Chowhhury shot a district Magistrate, Mr. Stevens, who had harassed
women more than the law, perhaps, permitted. Mina Das had atempted to shoot the
Governor of Bengal, Stanley Jackson in 1922. They had all acted on their own and the
first two were sentenced to transportation for life. Preetilata Wadedar led a raid on a club
that the Europeans frequented. The bomb killed one and injured four. Preetilatae,
clothed in male attire took cyanide to avoid arrest. A paper stating that the raid was an
“act of war” was recovered from her person. On the same day pamphlets were
distributed exhorting teachers, students and the public to join the campaign against the
British rulers and the Europeans. Sarala Debi and Sister Nibediata were also closely
related to and inspired by the Bengal terrorists.
The issue of communalism was taken up by All India women’s Conference (AIWC) in
the thirties. In 1932 both their district branches and the annual conference organised
protests against the reservation of separate seats for women in the legislatures applying
communal criteria. The Bombay branch, for example, got involved in riot relief and the
Andhra Pradesh branch started a campaign against religious prayers in the schools. The
organisation was, perhaps, the first to raise demands for uniform civil code so that
women cannot be subdued and tortured by religious dictums and caste obligations. They
demanded exactly the same law for all women of India- whatever may be their caste or
religion.
9
10
communilsim, casteism and patriarchal oppression and started getting members from all
religious groups, though the Hindu and the Dalits are many more in number.
Communalism and casteism have taken a horribly violent and ugly form ever since the
carving out of the country on communal lines; Intolerance of the lower castes and of the
religious and racial minorities has increased by leaps and bounds; mobilisation among
women in protest and self-defence has also become stronger and wider. The other modes
of oppressions, related to and born out of patriarchy and the concetration of wealth and
power in the hands of a few, have also motivated the women’s movement in India. The
number of such organisations is so large and the area of their activities is so vast that it is
simply impossible to make individual note of them within the extremely limited scope of
this lesson. The students will have to rely on their general knowledge and daily
newspaper reading.
Bhil women were the first known to have raised their voice against the alcohol menance
by breaking liquor pots in 1972. We know of so many such after that, the most sustained
and successful having been The Anti-Arrack Movement in Nellore in Andhra Pradesh.
Alcoholism is understood by women and the men who fight for women’s cause, as a
major cause behind wife-beating and family violence. Unending or increasing
impoverishment of a family is also mainly because of man’s income being wasted on this
menace. That is why all women’s bodies take up alcohol as a major issue, apart from
dowry and sexual abuse, in fact all anti-liquor movements gradually get involved in all
other problems facing women. Even the movements for environmental protection, e.g
the Chipko movement, the movement for equal land rights, e.g the Bodhgaya, and the
movement for a separate political entity, like. Uttaranchal, could not separate itself from
the age-old day to day problems that have not allowed women, from the socially and
economically backward section particularly, to see the light of freedom.
iii) Against Sexual Abuse Rape and other forms of sexual abuse are the most
common and frequent of crimes against women and yet, the most unreported.
This is the most easily available and ego-satisfying weapon in the hands of male
power not merely to overpower women, but even to overpower men from the
deprived and oppressed communities. Apart from rapes within the family or due
to personal lust or enmity, rapes are quite common occurrence in communal and
caste tensions and in police custody. The agitation against rape, for the first time,
started against police rape. The rape of Ralmmeza Bi in police custody became a
symbol. The movement is ever-increasing in area, support and anger, yet the
upward trend in the number of incidents is not getting checked. Shakti Shalini,
10
11
Sasbala Mahila Sangha, Janvadi Mahila Samiti are some of the striking names in
this field. The last named has been organisaing women in their political battles
also. The latest over-riding issue for women of all categories, of course, has been
the reservation of seats in the highest decision- making bodies of the land.
All forms of male domination, in fact, were based on women’s economic dependence.
The two primary structures of women’s oppression were thus, the sexual division of
labour and the culture and politics that rationalised it. On the other hand, Mahilal Samata
Sainik Dal, like most other women’s bodies, believed that men’s base desire for sexual
pleasure had led them to enslave women. What is fascinating about the movements
against various forms of violence and women’s movements have basically sprung as an
urge to resist and protest is how these have woven together several different kinds of
attitudes towards women: from feminist to anti –patriarchal to anti capitalist to utopian
patriarchalism. The last is held mostly by men who feel it is their duty to protest and care
for their women.
As explained by Engels, ownership of land and the means of production controls all
categories of human relationships and is, therefore, the basis of patriarchy. Even in the
age of highly advanced science and technology, food and all that a human being needs
come from Nature and environment. We also know that from the day one of human
existence, women have been the food gatherer and food provider; and therefore, women
are the worst affected as a result of environmental degradation and indiscriminate robing
of Nature. That is why, women’s movement has been most powerful with regard to their
and their family’s livelihood and the conservation of Nature. It started with women
breaking forest laws in pre-independence India. Chipko and Narmada Bachao
movements are good examples in this regard. ‘Self-employed Women’s Association
(SEWA)” is the fist known organisation in India and South Asia, which united the
women workers in the unorganised and the home-based sectors. This perhaps, is the
most successful and sustained women’s movement since it got closely tied up with
‘Mahila Kosh’ or women’s co-operative bank. It has inspired many similar movements
in Bangladesh, Nepal and elsewhere in South Asia. The Self-employed Women’s Union
of South Africa has copied the model in totality and these two, to gather, have been able
to influence ILO to enact international laws, giving recognition and protection to the
home-based workers (the majority of whom are women from the most deprived sections
of a economy). The ‘Grameen Bank’ of Bangladesh had become another widely
acknowledged model for women’s economic independence.
1. Write what you know about the activities of a few women terrorists.
11
12
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Explain why alcoholism has been taken as a major cause for violence against
women.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. What do you think is/are the basic reason/s behind violence against women?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In section 24.4 you have read, in brief about women’s independent political identity or
initiative. In this section you will be able know a few instances where such initiatives
looked more pronounced.
Women’s participation was significant in the Telengana movement for land and related
Eco-political rights. Though the leadership was with men, the movement could have died
early if not for the strong and sustained motivation from the women. It started against the
injustices for the British Raj (1941), and continued against the continuation of the
injustices even under their own government (till 1952).
Another landmrk movement for land, i.e., livelighoold, or economic rights “by” women
was the forceful acquisition of the ‘patta’ by the peasant women, who had collected from
in and around Bodh Gaya (Bihar). The men were not putting in enough efforts or
resources into the land due to drinking and other bad habits. The unexpected success
became a terrific inspiration for all united efforts by women. But, the success here was
unique and exceptional; in most other cases success was not in their fate, and Bihar
continues to be one of the top States in social injustice and oppression of women.
12
13
It will not be wrong to say that the Dalit women got first organised by a self-taught Dalit
couple, the Phules, in Maharashtra. They (Phule couples) can also be called one of the
founders of the movement for women’s rigshts in the 19th Century. At present, Janvadi
Mahila Samiti is the strongest supporter of this movement. The Dalit women felt the
need to organise themselves separately, both from their men and the other women,
mainly because of two reasons: (i) Dalit men, however oppressed themselves, do not stop
oppressing their own women; and (ii) The non-Dalit women, however sincere, fail to
comprehend the ‘double’ oppression that a Dalit women invariably suffers.
In the North Cachhar hills of Nagaland, Gudiallo, affectionately called ‘Rani’, became
famous for her role in the civil disobedience movement. She got involved at a very early
age of 13, inspired by her male cousin Jadonang, who was active in mobilising the
villagers in Manipur. In 1931-32, Gudiallo led a ‘no tax’ campaign, having taken over
the reins of leadership from her cousin brother who was hanged by the Raj. These
villagers stopped paying the compulsory levies on porterage and started refusing to work
as forced labour.
This is one of many such indigenous and spontaneour peoples’ movements which used to
be strongly discouraged and disowned by the ‘mainstream’ nationalist politics. This
trend and the attitude of deciding what is good and what is necessary for the other or
others is the foundation of patriarchy and capitalism (and, of course, imperialism), and
continues to this day even after independence. That is why the adivasis, the dalits and the
women are continuing to fight their battles even after more then half century of India
attaining freedom. At present, the war against environmental degradation is fought
mainly by the adivasis or the sons and daughters of Nature, because robbing of Nature
means robbing of their livelihood and culture. The mainstreem government of
independent India does not realise that our country is, once again, getting colonised by
the world market forces.
Section 24.3.1 has given us a brief idea about women’s contribution to their own
movement through literature during the pre-independence social reform and political
movement period. There was a bit of a lull in the first few decades after independence.
May be the women took a little time to realise that 1947 did not bring any independence
for them. Lately, with the rising strength in the women’s movement for equality, there
has been a spurt in writings, films and plays by women and on women. Powerful women
writers like Arundhuti Roy, are trudging the ‘women only’ field and taking up the cause
of humanism or universal human rights much more forcefully than men. Women are
making men realise that their good lies in women’s good and that women’s good lies in
the good of the entire humanity.
13
14
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Feminist ideas: ideas born out of the belief that women are equal to men with
regard to political, economic and social rights.
Gender: the socially established division between man and woman with the
implied belief that women are inferior to men in every aspect of
life.
Bourgeois: one with social behaviour and political views influenced by private
property interests and consumerism.
Polygamy: the custom of having more than one wife at the same time.
Suffrage: the right to vote (in political matters or for the formation of a
government).
Kumar, Radha, The History of Doing, Kali for women, New Delhi, 1993.
Sanghari, Kumkum and Vaid, Sudesh (eds.), Recasting Women: Essays in colonial
History, Kali for women, New Delhi, 1989.
Liddle, Joanna and Joshi, Rama (eds.), Daughters of Independence: Gender, Cast and
Class, Kali for Women, New D`elhi, 1986.
Gail Omvedt: Cultural Revolt in a Colonial Society
Gail Omvedt : We will smash this prison
14
15
1) It was called so because attempts to introduce the social reforms for the
improvement of the conditions of the women were made during this period. The
evils which were sought to be eliminated included tradition of sati, child marriage,
ban on the widow-remarriage, purda system, etc.
2) Pandit Ishwarchandra Bidyasagar and Pandit Matrunjay proved that the the
Shastras approved the widow-remarriage; widow-remarriage associations were
formed and the widow re-marriage ruled were made.
3) He founded the Arya Samaj which attempted to fight the caste system, tradition of
polygamy, child marriage, and for the compulsory learning of Sanskrit and
English.
1) These instances were: in 1907 Madan Cama unfurled the “Bande Matram” flag at the
Congress of Socialist International at Stuttgart; in 1913 Kumudini Mitra was invited
to the International Women’s Suffrage Conference at Budapest; Sarojini Naidu, Sarla
Debi and Hardevi Roshalal were also among the first women to raise the issues of the
women.
2) As a member of the Arya Samaj she toured almost all over Punjab pleading to the
women not to encourage their sons to join the government jobs but to become the
“swadeshis”.
3) According to them the “swaraj” and “swadhinata” meant self rule , and the “strength
and power to rule over oneself “ respectively.
1) They participated in the Indian National Movement by killing the British officers,
and by appealing to students, teachers and public to revolt against the colonial
system.
2) Alcoholism has the adverse impact on the entire family. The women revolted
against it by launching the Ant-Arrack Movements in several parts of the country,
especially Andhra Pradesh and Uttaranchal.
3) The violence against women get expressed in the form of rape, dowry death,
domestic violence, etc. The main reasons for this lie in their vulnerable social,
economic and educational conditions, and the values of the people.
1) The dalit women face dual problems of discrimination: they face the general
problems which are faced by the women belonging to all castes, and the problems
which are faced by the dalit women due to their caste status.
15
16
CERTIFICATE
entitled__________________________________________________________________
16
17
NAME :
ADDRESS :
________________________________________________________________________
17
1
_________________________________________________________________
UNIT 25 DALITS
_______________________________________________________________________________
Structure
25.0 Objectives
25.1 Introduction
25.2 Who is a dalit and what is a dalit Movement?
25.3 Dalit Movement in India
25.3.1 Dalit Movement in the Colonial Period
25.3.2 Dalit Movement in the Post – colonial Period
25.3.3 Causes of dalit Movement
25.4 Let Us Sum Up
25.5 Key Words
25.6 Some Useful Books
25.7 Answers to Check Your Progress Exercise
_________________________________________________________________
25.0 OBJECTIVES
_________________________________________________________________
After reading this unit, you will be able to:
• Understand the meaning of dalit movement in India;
• To identify the issues/problems involved in the dalit movement;
• To know various forms of dalit movement;
• To know phases through which the dalit movement has passed; and
• Analyse the role of dalits and their organisations in the electoral politics.
_________________________________________________________________
25.1 INTRODUCTION
_______________________________________________________________________________
Last few decades have seen a spate of dalit movement in various parts of the
country. This is reflected in their social, cultural and political activities at various
levels, i.e., state, local and all India. A large number of social and cultural
organisations of dalits, their political parties and leaders have emerged in various
2
parts of the country. Though in most parts of the country they are not able to
assert themselves, yet in the areas where favourable situation exists dalits are
asserting themselves. They have become a decisive force in the social and
political processes of the country. The contemporary dalit movement is taking
place along with the social and political movements of various other social groups
like women, tribals, environmentalists, workers and peasants.
_________________________________________________________________
25.2 WHO IS A DALIT AND WHAT IS A DALIT MOVEMENT?
_________________________________________________________________
Dalits are those groups of people who have faced social discrimination including
the untouchability. They largely belong to the economically disadvantaged groups
of our society. They are placed in the Scheduled Caste categories in our
constitution. The category of dalits was first used by Jyotiba Phule in the
nineteenth century. It was first popularly used by the Dalit Panther in the 1970s.
But it has come in currency quite recently – from the 1980s onwards. It has
almost replaced the category of harijans used for the dalits or Scheduled Castes.
The term Scheduled Castes was in common use till the term of dalit became more
popular from the 1980s onwards. There are special provisions for the protection
of their interests in our constitution – reservation in the public jobs, scholarships,
legislative bodies, etc. Universal adult franchise and other constitutional rights
have enabled them to participate in political activities.
Dalit movement raises issues of caste-based discrimination and economic
inequality. It is a struggle for social justice. The issues on which dalit movement
is launched are: self – respect, harassment of women, payment of wages, forced
labour or begar, disputes over land, implementation of the reservation policy,
promotion in the job, denial of democratic rights like casting of votes, disrespect
to Dr. B.R. Amebedkar/his statue, etc. Dalits protest and agitate on these issues
in various ways which include mainly informal ways, at individual basis, through
the organised ways, satyagraha and litigation, by getting these raised either in the
parliament or in the legislative assemblies. Dalit movement/agitation is also
expressed through collective action like demonstration, rallies, procession;
through signature campaign, protest literature, etc. Some times their agitation
result in the clashes between dalits, police and the those elements in the society
who are inimical to the interests of dalits.
3
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_________________________________________________________________
25.3 Dalit Movement in India
_________________________________________________________________
Dalit movement in India is taking place at various levels such as those of villages
and towns, state and all India (nation). It is taking place in those areas where
dalits are in a position to agitate, as still in many parts of the country they are not
able to raise their voice. Therefore, certain trends can be identified in the dalit
movement in the country from the regions where it has been taking place. Dalit
movement in India can be divided into two periods; pre- Independence period and
post – Independence period.
say that dalits or untouchables were also “people of God” like those of the high
castes. Ambedkar on the other hand saw the real cause untouchability in the very
nature of Hinduism and suggested that only solution to the untouchability or caste
discrimination lay in abolition of Hinduism or conversion of dalits into other
religion, preferably Buddhism. Before actually questioning the tenets of
Hinduism or advocating conversion Ambedkar had tried to eradicate
untouchability within the fold of Hindu region. Regarding this he launched the
temple entry movement. The most important incident which drastically changed
attitude Ambedkar about the Hindu religion was the Mahad Satyagrah of 1927 in
Maharastra. In this incident Ambedkar led a large number of dalits to enter into
the Chowdar water tank which was banned for the untouchables by the orthodox
Hindus. Ambedkar’s move was opposed by the orthodox Hindus, who ritually
purified the tank. The reaction of the orthodox Hindus forced Ambedkar to burn
the Manusmriti, and remark in 1935 “ I have been born a Hindu but I will not die
a Hindu“. He realised that the basic problem lay with the Hinduism and for dalits
to be liberated from the menace of untuchability, conversion was the only
panacea. This conviction of Ambedkar resulted in his conversion to Budhhism in
1956 with a large number of his supporters.
There were leaders at the provincial levels also who were involved in combating
the problems of dalits. There were also single caste movements in different parts
of India – of Nadars, Pulayas, Ezhavas in South; of Namsudra movement in West
Bengal; Adi Darm movement led by Mangoo Ram and Adi Hindu movement led
by Acchutananda among the Chamars of Punjab and Uttar Pradesh respectively,
Narayana Guru led movement among the Ezahavas in Trivancorer and Ayyakali-
led movement among the Pulayas of Kerala. These movement were committed to
self-reform in the rituals, advancement of their education, gaining access to
employment under state. Dalit movement of Pulayas traced their origin to the pre-
Aryan period and described them as the original residents of the country –
Hindus or the high castes had come later on. Mangoo Ram traced the religion of
the untouchables prior to the Hindu religion. According to him the untouchables
were the original inhabitants (Adi) of India; they had their own religion - the Adi
Dharm. The Adi Dharmis had been pushed to the subordinate positions by the
later arrivals. He tried to revive the Adi Dharm. By the mid-1930s the movement
had petered out. Sri Narayana Guru (1857-1928) developed a critique of
Hinduism in Travancore which had influence beyond his own Ezahava
5
community to Pulayas, etc. His philosophy was “one caste, one religion and one
God for man”. With the emergence of Ayyakali (1863 – 1941) Pulayas also
became effective. Pulayas were later attracted towards the Marxists and
Gandhians in Kerala. In Hyderabad princely state, P R Venkataswami attempted
to mobilise the untouchables. The main plank of his mobilisation were self-
reform, education and equality. Dalit movement in South and West during the
1920s and 1930s also focused on permission to enter the temples.
The provincial level dalit leadership also responded to the social reform
movements of North India which took place in the early decades of the twentieth
century like the Arya Samaj. But finding the leadership of these movements
belonging to the high castes, too patronising and their notion of equality too
restricted, they parted company with these movement. This was followed by their
independent course of action. It happened in UP and Punjab. Similarly in Madras
MC Raja found the Non-Brahmin Justice Party inimical to the interest of the
untouchables.
Apart from these, the dalits, especially the Chamars, of Madhya Pradesh
(Chhattisgarh) had already been under the influence of the Satnami movement
since the 18th century inspired by the legacy of the leadership of Guru Ghashi
Das. The Satnamis questioned the notion of social and ritual hierarchy in two
simultaneous ways: by rejecting the Hindu gods and goddesses, and by rejecting
the puja and purohit within the temple. The was in line with the Bhakti tradition.
With the entry of Ambedkar and his conflict with Gandhi over separate electorate
to the untouchables, catapulted Ambedkar to national level politics of the
untouchables in India. From the 1930s onwards – Amdedkar started his
movement with the issue temple entry.
A major area of difference in the earlier years of the twentieth century between
Congress and Ambedkar was regarding the issue which had be given priority
over the other in the programme of the Congress. Ambedkar believed that the
Congress should accord the social issues priority over the political issues. He felt
that political rights can not be enjoyed without establishing social equality.
Congress on the other hand believed that once political rights have been given to
the people, social equality can be established.
Dalit politics in the following period was marked by the conflict between
Ambedkar and Gandhi. The occasion when the differences between Ambedkar
and Gandhi came to the fore was Round Table Conferences of 1930-31. By then
6
having understood the futility of the temple or tank entry movement, Ambedkar
focused on the need for giving representation to dalits, as a separate and minority
community in various public bodies.
Ambedkar sought into national prominence following his differences over the
nature of electorates at the Second Round Table Conference of 1931 in London;
the conference had met to discuss the Simon Commission Report which had
suggested joint electorate and reservation for the Depressed Classes. Ambedkar
was one of the two Depressed Classes representatives invited to the Conference.
Ambedkar demanded separate electorate for the Depressed Classes. Ambedkar’s
claim was supported by another representative of the Depressed Classes from
Madras – MC Raja. But Gandhi opposed Ambedkar’s proposal for the separate
electorate for the Depressed Classes. Raja changed his position and entered into
an agreement with Munje, President of the Hindu Mahasabha to support the joint
electorate. Raja – Munje pact divided the leadership of the untouchables.
Ambedkar was supported by the Mahar leaders from Maharastra, Adi Dharm
Mandals from Punjab and one of the organs of the Bengali Namsudras. Raja’s
supporters included prominent Chambhar leaders from Maharastra. Gandhi on the
other hand set on fast unto death on September 20, 1932 against the Communal
Award of the British which advocated the separate electorate. In order to avoid
unpalatable situation which could result following fast of Gandhi, Ambedkar
relented and entered into a Pact with Gandhi known as Poona Pact. According to
it separate electorate was removed and instead reservation was introduced in the
legislative bodies for the untouchable castes. The recommendations of Poona Pact
were incorporated in the Government of India Act, 1935. As a result there was
reservation in the legislative assemblies during the election of 1937. Ambedkar’s
party Independent Labour Party contested this election. He later converted ILP
into the Scheduled Caste Federation (SCF). Later on, Raja had become supporter
of Ambedkar. After his death, the supporters of Ambedkar formed Republican
Party of India (RPI). On the other hand, Congress and Gandhi were patronising
towards the untouchables; Jagjivan Ram emerged from such patronage.
1) Discuss the dalit movements at the provincial level during the colonial period.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
especially Congress party attempted to mobilise them as its vote bank. Despite the
difficulties in availing of their right to vote in many parts of the country,
politicisation of the dalits took place to a considerable extent. Such process made
them conscious of their rights. The policies and strategies of the Congress helped
it create its social base which consisted of Dalits as major social group. The
politicisation of dalits during this phase took as a constituent of the social base of
the political parties, especially the Congress. Meanwhile, there emerged the first
generation of dalit leadership borne after independence, which included educated
middle class professional as well. This group became critical of dominant
political parties and the cultural ethos, especially the Congress and the Hindu
belief system. They started feeling that the Congress was using them as the vote
bank; the high castes were holding the leadership of this party and not allowing
dalits to get the leadership. On the cultural front they felt that the Hindu religion
does not provide them a respectable place. Therefore, in order to live respectfully
they should discard Hindu religion and convert to Buddhism. The advocates of
this opinion were influenced by the ideas of Dr. B.R. Ambedkar. They formed
Republican Party of India (RPI) based on the ideas and principles of Ambedkar.
In the late 1950s and 1960s RPI launched a cultural and political movement in UP
and Maharastra for achieving political and cultural autonomy form the dominant
formations. A large number of dalits got converted to Budhhism. The RPI
emerged one of the important political parties in the assembly and parliamentary
elections held in UP during the 1960s. But the RPI could not remain a force in UP
after the 1960s because its main leadership got co-opted into the Congress, a party
against whom it had launched movement in the preceding decade.
The Second phase (1970s – 1980s)
This phase was marked by the combination of class and caste struggles. In the
rural areas of West Bengal, Bihar and Andhra Pradesh the naxalite movement
launched a struggle against the caste and class exploitation. In the cities of
Bombay and Pune, the Dalit Panther launched the similar kind of movement.
Dalit Panther Movement
An educated group of dalits – young dalit writers and poets, in two major cities
of Maharastra set up an organisation known as Dalit Panther in 1972. Influenced
by Amedkarism, Marxism and “Negro literature”, they aimed at rejecting the
caste system, which according to them was based on the Brahmincal Hinduism.
Spreading their ideas through the media and communication network, through the
9
discussions and debate in the public space, i.e., offices, houses, tea shops, public
libraries, dalit writes and poets provided the critique of the Hindu caste system
and exploitative economic system.
The origin of the Dalit Panther can be traced to a controversy which centered
around the articles and poems written by dalit writers in a socialist magazine,
Sadhana. Raja Dhale’s writing was most controversial of these writings. The
controversy centered around two points; his comparison of a fifty rupee fine for
molesting a dalit woman with hundred rupees – fine for insulting the national
flag; another point was repetition of the points which were made earlier at the
publication ceremony of the collected poems – Golpitha, of Namdev Dhasal,
another noted dalit - Marxist writer. The Golpitah poems were also related to the
exploitation of women.
The high caste middle class felt outraged by the articles and demanded banning
of the issue of Sadhna which carried the article by Raja Dhale. Dalit youths in
reaction also organised a defence march holding a red-on-black Panther flag. In
order to give up the conventional organisational nomenclature, they gave a new
name to their organisation Dalit Panther. The activists of Dalit Panther belonged
to first generation educated youth, whose parents were poor peasants and
labourer, who had inherited the lagecy of Ambedkar movement.
Initially the movement proclaimed to have an alliance of exploited people –
dalits, backward classes, workers and peasants. Its programme centered around
the problems of women, rejection of Brahaminical principles of purity and
pollution, and fight against all kinds of political and economic exploitation. In the
tradition of Ambedakarism, they aimed at achieving the political power.This
movement grow in the wake of the failure of the Republican Movement of the
1970s which suffered because of the personality differences of its leadership.
With its main leadership having joined either the Congress or any other
formation, the RPI movement had become almost an insignificant force. But the
seeds sown by this movement resulted in the formation of Dalit Panther and its
movement. But like the RPI movement, it had to suffer from the split. Two main
leaders of the Dalit Panther Raja Dhale and Namdev Dhasal developed
differences on the ideological ground. The former an ardent Ambedkarite accused
Namdev Dhasal, a marxist of ignoring the caste problem and helping the
communists to peneterate the Dalit Panther movement. This ultimately resulted in
expulsion of Dhasal from Dalit Panther in 1974. Raja Dhale formed a separate
10
group of Dalit Panther. In 1976, the younger members of Dhale group led by
Arun Kamble and Ram Das Athavale formed a new organisation Bharatiya Dalit
Panther, in an attempt to give it an all India face. It took up the issues relating to
education system, facilities to the Buddhist converts, renaming the Marathwada
University at Aurangabad as Ambedkar University, and “nationalisation of basic
industries”. But this also could not make any dent.
The Dalit Panther could not be able to make an alliance of all exploited. It got
divided between the Ambedkarites and Marxists, particularly after the 1974 by
election to the Bombay parliamentary constituency.
Unlike the dalits of west UP or Maharastra, those of Bihar did not experience
anti-caste movement in the colonial period. While the non-dalit peasantry was
mobilised by different peasant or caste organisations in Bihar, dalits largely
remained the vote banks of political parties. Jagjivan Ram did not make any
efforts to mobilise them excepting for getting their votes. It was only since the
late 1960s that dalits of central Bihar were initiated into the political movement.
But it was not the exclusively on the caste lines; it was on the mix of caste and
class exploitation. In Bihar there seemed to one to one relationship between caste
and class to a considerable extent. The landlords formed their caste senas (private
armies) in order to protect their class interests. The dalits got organised there on
the caste and class lines. It was a backward class leader a koeri, Jagdish Mahto
who made first attempts to mobilise the dalits of Arrah district. Influenced by the
dual ideologies of Marxism and Ambedkarism, he started a paper called
“Harijanistan” (dalit land) in Arrah district. He believed in the violent methods,
including murder of the landlords in fighting the cause of the dalits. He raised the
issues of low wages to the land less workers, protection of izzat of dalit women
and social honour. He was murdered in 1971.
Dalit mobilisation in Bihar got momentum again in the 1980s following the spade
of attacks by the private army of the landlords such as “Bhoomi Sena” (of the
Kurmis), “Lorik Sena” ( of the Rajputs) on dalits. In reaction to this the labourers
formed “Lal Sena”. As the larger number of the victims of the landlords sena
included dalits, they formed the larger chunk of the supporters of the naxalism.
The naxalites attempted to unite the middle caste and the middle peasants. They
11
In Karnataka also dalits organised into the Dalit Sanghasrsh Samiti (DSS). It was
an organisation which was set up in 1973 and set up its units in most districts of
Karnataka. Like Bihar it also took up caste and class issues and attempted to build
an alliance of diverse groups of the exploited classes. It also brought dalits of
different persuasions – Marxism, socialism, Ambedkarism, etc, under the banner
of a single organisation. During 1974 and 1784 it took up the issues relating to
wages of the agricultural labourers, devdasi and reservation. It held study groups
to discuss the problems of dalits. The DSS was formed following the resignation
of a dalit leader Basavalingappa, who was asked to do so by the chief Minister
Devraj Urs. This leader referred to the literature of the high caste with Bhoosa
(cattle fodder). This outraged the students belonging to the high castes, leading to
the caste rights between the high castes and dalits. Incensed by consequences of
the remarks of the minister the chief minister had asked him to resign. The
Bhoosa controversy set a strong anti-caste tendency, which was represented a
journal Dalit Voice set up by a journalist Rajshekhar. Dalit Voice attacked
Brahmins as “Nazis” and the left movement as “ Brahmo –Communist” and
termed dalits as “born Marxists”. According to the editor of Dalit Voice the main
issue in the dalit-OBC mobilisation is not the alliance between the dalits and the
OBCs, the leadership of dalits over the OBCs.
The 1990s have seen the proliferation of dalit organisations in in different states
of the country. The case of the BSP in Uttar Pradesh is most important. Though
the RPI had been influential in Uttar Pradesh like Maharshtra since the 1950s, the
rise of the BSP has been the most striking feature of dalit identity and politics in
Indi. It has been able to lead the government in Uttar Pradesh thrice with a dalit
woman Mayawati as the chief minister. The BSP was founded on April 14, 1984
by its president Kashi Ram. Before forming the BSP Kashi Ram mobilised dalits
under the banner of two organisations, i.e., the BAMCEF (All India Backward
and Minority Employees Federation) and DS4 (Dalit Soshit Samaj Sangharsh
Samiti). These were social and cultural organisations with their focus on the
mobilisation of the dalit middle classes. With the formation of the BSP, Kashi
Ram changed the social and cultural organisations into a political party – the BSP.
The BSP aimed to mobilise the majority other sections of the society, the Bahujan
Samaj, consisting of the dalits, backward class and religious minorities which
excluded the high castes like Brahmans, Rajputs, and Banias. The BSP believes
that the minority high castes have been using the votes of the majority
communities or the Bahujan Samaj. They did not let them become the leaders or
the rulers. As in a democracy it is the majority who should rule, the Bahujan
Samaj should become the ruling class. There was a need to reverse the pattern of
power game in the country; the Bahujan Samaj should no longer allow the
minority high castes to use them as the vote banks. Rather the Bahjan Samaj
should be the rulers. With this perspective the BSP contested the assembly and
parliamentary elections in several states in the country from 1985 onwards. The
BSP made its present felt in North Indian states, especially Punjab, UP, Rajasthan
and Madhya Pradesh.
The BSP has been able to consolidate its position among dalits mainly for its
strategy of electoral alliances and the public policies. The most important case of
the BSP’s electoral alliance has been in the state of UP, though it has attempted
electoral alliances in other states as well . From the 1993 assembly election of UP
onwards, the BSP has entered into alliances with the major political formulations
like Congress, the BJP and the Samajwadi Party in UP or the Akali Dal and
Congress in Punjab, which could help it win the assembly and parliamentary
elections or in the post-poll alliance which help it form the government. The first
alliance which the BSP made was with the Mulayam Singh Yadav-led
Samajwadi Party in UP in 1993 election.. The this alliance was considered as an
13
example of the unity of the Bahujan Samaj – the BSP identified with the dalits
and the Samajwadi Party with the backward classes and the minorities. This
alliance, however, continued only till the BSP withdrew support from the
Mulayam Singh Yadav-led SP-BSP government in 1995. The fall of Mulayam
Singh led-government was followed by its alliance with the BJP, which enabled
Mayawati to become the first dalit woman Chief Minister of any state.
Immediately after becoming the Chief Minister, Mayawati declared that her party
serve the serva samaj; it was shift from her earlier position where she vowed to
fight for the Bahujan Samaj. It was beginning of the BSP’s change in the electoral
or alliance strategy. In the subsequent elections, contrary to original principles, it
gave tickets even to the high castes Brahmins, Rajputs, Banias and Kayasthas
gave them representation as ministers in her government.
However, during her Chief Ministership, Mayawati introduced special policies
for dalits. The most important of these included: – Ambedkar Village
Programmes consisting of the special programmes for the welfare of the weaker
sections in the villages identified as the Ambedakar Villages on the basis of the
substantial dalit population in such villages, and naming of the public institutions
after the low caste historical personalities. It also took prompt action against those
who involved in the discriminatory activities against the dalits. The rise of the
BSP has imparted a sense of pride and confidence among the dalits in the country.
Especial focus of the BSP-led coalition governments in UP on the dalis in its
policies has created caused resentment among the non-dalits both the high castes
as well as the backward classes. The BSP has been able to counter this by change
in its alliance strategy. Unlike its initial strategy, the has been giving tickets to
high castes. In fact in the elections held in 2002 to the UP assembly election, the
largest group of the MLAs in the UP legislative election belong to the high castes.
The main criterion for forging alliance seems to be the ability of the candidates to
win the election, which could made possible by an alliance of dalits and high
castes candidates who are given tickets by the BSP.
Though the BSP contributed to the politicisation of dalits to a large extent, it
could not maintain the unity of the Bahujan Samaj. The main reason for its
success lie in the electoral strategy of the BSP.
Check Your Progress 3
Note: i) Use the space below for your answer
ii) Check your answer with model answer given at the end of unit.
14
1. What were the basic features of dalit movement in India during the 1950s and
1960s?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The social groups which have faced discrimination including untouchability are
called dalits. Last two decades have seen emergence of dalit movement in various
parts of the country. Dalit movement forms a part of social and political
movements of other social groups like environmentalists, tribals, women and
peasants and workers. Large number of organisations of dalits – social, cultural
and political have emerged in various parts of the country. The BSP is one of the
examples of such organisations. These organisations are autonomous and raise the
15
issues of dalits exclusively. The reasons for the rise of dalit movement include –
rise of a new generation of dalits which is more are articulate and conscious of the
their rights, explosion of mass media and impact of the ideas and life of Dr. B R
Ambedkar. The BSP is the most important example of a dalit party which has
carved a niche for it in north India. In Uttar Pradesh it been able to head the state
government thrice. The success of the BSP depended on its electoral strategy and
pattern of mobisation.
_______________________________________________________________________________
25.5 KEY WORDS
_________________________________________________________________
Dalits: The social groups which have faced discrimination including
untouchability are called dalits.
Dalit Movement: It means the protest of dalits against their discrimination of all
kinds and for protection of their rights.
Social Justice: It means an absence of social and economic discrimination;
conditions which are for the protection and preservation of equality, self-respect
and other rights.
_________________________________________________________________
25.5 Some Useful Books
_________________________________________________________________
Dube, Saurabh, Untouchables pasts: Religion, Identity, and Power among a
Central
Indian Community, 1780-1950, State University of New York Press,1998.
Omvedt, Gail, Reinventing Revolution: New Social Movements and Socialist
Traditions in
India, M. E. Sharpe, England, 1993,.
_, Dalits and Democratic Revolution : Dr. Ambedkar and the Dalit Movement in
Colonial India, Sage Publications, New Delhi,1994.
Mendelsohn, Oliver and Vicziany, Marika, The untouchables:Subordination,
poverty and
the in modern India, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,1998.
Pai, Sudha, Dalit Assertion and the Unfinished Democratic Revolution: Bahujan
Samaj Party in
Uttar Pradesh, New Delhi, Sage Publications, 2002.
16
_________________________________________________________________
25.7 Answers to Check Your Progress Exercise
_________________________________________________________________
Check Your Progress Exercise 1
1) Dalits are those groups which have social discrimination including
untouchability. They largely related to the economically disadvantaged groups
of the society. They belong to the Schedules Castes as enshrined in our
constitution.
2) These are related to social justice, and some of which include protest against
the discrimination of all kinds, struggle for protection of the self-respect,
payment of wages, against the forced labour, dispute over land,
implementation of the reservation policy, fight against disrespect to Dr. B. R.
Ambedkar, denial of democratic rights like casting of votes, etc.
Check Your Progress Exercise 2
1) These were single caste movements, i.e., of the Nadars, Pulayas and Ezhavas
in South; of Namsudra in West Bengal; Adi Dharm movement in Punjab and
Adi Hindu movement in UP; and Satnami movement in Madya Pradesh.
These movements were committed to self-reform rituals, advancement of
dalits’ education and access to employment under state.
2) Gandhi and Ambedkar differed in their approach to the problem of caste and
Untouchablity. According to Gandhi the untouchabilty was a corrupt form of
Hinduism and it can be eradicated by moral reform of Hindus. Ambedkar
thought that the real cause of untouchablity was the nature of Hindu religion,
and suggested that the untouchabilty and casteisms can be eradicated by the
rejecting Hinduism – in the coversion from Hinduism to other religion,
preferably Buddhism.
Check Your Progress Exercise 3
1) These were: rise of the beneficiaries, among the dalits, of the state policies
like the implementation of the universal adult franchise, reservation in the
educational and political institutions and in the government jobs. During this
phase dalits did not emerge as an independent political force; rather they were
mobilised by the major political parties like the Congress. However, a large
number of them had come under the influence of the RPI in UP and
Maharastra.
17
________________________________________________________________________
Unit 26 TRIBALS
________________________________________________________________________
Structure
26.0 Objectives
26.1 Introduction
26.2 Tribal Society and Economy
26.3 Social and Political Movements in India
26.4.1 Pre - colonial period
26.4.2 Post – colonial period
26.5 Characteristics and Consequences of Tribal Movements
26.6 Let Us Sum UP
26.7 Some Useful Books
26.8 Answers to Check Your Progress Exercises
________________________________________________________________________
26.0 OBJECTIVES
________________________________________________________________________
This unit deals with one of the social and political movements in India, i.e., the
movements of the tribals. After going through unit, you will be able to understand:
________________________________________________________________________
26.1 INTRODUCTION
________________________________________________________________________
Tribe is a colonial concept, introduced in the 19th century, by colonial authorities and
ethnographers to describe all communities of India. In the latter half of the same century,
the concept of tribe was narrowed down to the primitive groups as distinct from castes. It
was under the Government of India Act of 1935 and the Constitution of India that the
2
nomenclature of the Scheduled Tribe fully emerged. The Constitution of India does not
define a tribe. The notion of the Scheduled Tribe has two aspects. It is administratively
determined inter alia by the criteria of backwardness and remoteness – people living in
forests and on hills. They are also called adivasis – the natives. The tribals like many
other social groups have launched social and political movements for the reddressal of
their grievances.
Most of the regions except the Southern pockets, the North –western region and the
islands have witnessed several agitations of the tribals during the colonial and post –
colonial periods. During the pre-colonial period tribals rose against the regional power of
the Marathas or Rajputs. They resisted against the zamindars and non-tribal
administrators. During the colonial period they struggled against the British rule for their
autonomy. Birsa Munda revolt in Central India is best known example of this. There were
also regio-political movements resisting against the non-tribal cultural authority through
religious ideas
_______________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
The tribals are also craftsmen. Carving and body tattooing consist of the forms of arts
and crafts prevailing among the tribal people. Wall painting and drawing have emerged
as other major forms of art in recent years. In fact there has been a significant revival of
these forms of art on a commercial scale among the Warlis, Rabaris, Rathawas and
others. Basketry involves the largest number of tribes , followed by those engaged in
weaving, embroidery and pottery.
The impact of development processes, particularly education, has created a new stratum
of entrepreneurs/businessmen , teachers, administrators , engineers/doctors and members
of defence services among the tribals. Development process has also created division in
tribal society. Disparities have increased. With the loss of control over resources and
growth of population, demographic growth rate has been higher among tribes than the
national average, poverty among the tribals has also increased manifold. Barring a few
tribes or a few sections among them, the tribals remain among the most backward and
poorest sections of our populations.
In the pre-colonial period some of the tribes founded states in the territories extending
from the north-east, through middle India to western and southern India. Where they did
not found states, they were accommodated within regional political system, retaining a
great deal of autonomy and freedom. Elsewhere the tribes were reported to be in
disturbed conditions on the eve of the colonial role. For example, in western India the
tribes such as Gonds, Vills and Kolis were reportedly in a disturbed state. The tribals
often rose against regional powers such as the Marathas, Rajputs etc. The Mughals had
put down the Kolis and the Marathas had dealt with the Bhils and Gonds, with a heavy
hand. All this radically changed during the colonial period that witnessed the first major
assault on tribal autonomy and tribal's control over their resources such as land, forest,
minerals, etc. Colonialism also witnessed the dismantling of pre colonial political
structures built up by the tribals or those that accommodated them. Therefore, tribals
rebelled more often and organised movements and protests on a larger scale than any
other community during the colonial period.
The rise and establishment of the British rule saw the beginning of the first phase (1795-
1860) of the tribal uprisings which may be described as primary resistance movements.
The Santhal insurrection (1855-6) represented a transitional phase marked by the agrarian
resistance and revivalism.
In the North-East the sub-phases of tribal rebellions could be similarly
demarcated. The Garos and Hajongs who submitted to the British rule to
escape the tyranny of their zamindars, came under the influence of the Pagal
Panthi. Their chief, Tipu who became the leader of the oppressed peasantry,
founded a kingdom and was arrested. The Khasis were engaged in acts of
depredations in the plains they raided from 1787 to 1825. The Singphos,
Mishmis, Lushais, Khamptis and Daflas raided plains and killed people. The
Khasis opposed the construction of the road, and the confederation of Khasi
chiefs resisted the British attempt at the occupation of their country, led by
Tirot Singh. The British sent out expeditions to punish the Lusahis, Mishmis
etc. In middle India, this phase ended with the revolt of Maniram Dewan and
Saranga Raja of Assam in 1857.
5
The second phase (1860-1920) coincided with the onset of the intensive period of
colonialism, which saw a much deeper penetration of merchant capital, a higher
incidence of rent, etc., into tribal and peasant economies. It intensified the exploitation of
the tribes. As a result of this, there were not only a larger number of movements,
represented by such evocative native terms as mulkui larai, fituri, meli, ulgulan and
bhumakal, involving many tribes but also a far more complex type of movement, which
represented a curious mix of agrarian, religious and political issues. The Bhakti
movement with its teneth of monotheism, vegetarianism, cleanliness, abstention from
liquor, etc., was introduced by mendicants (gossainess) artisans and peasants moving into
tribal areas. Christianity also arrived and under its impact a new tribal middle classes
emerged, which was educated, conscious and self- respecting. Both Christianity and
Bhakti movement contributed in this phase to the rise of millenarian movements. The
tribal movements demonstrated, in varying degrees, tribal resistance against the assaults
on their system and their attempt to prop up its mouldering edifices. They were followed
by the socio-religious or revitalisation movements, viz, the Kherwar movement among
the Santals (1871-80), the Sardar revivalistic movement among the Mundas and
Oraons(1881-90), the Tana bhagat and Haribaba movements in Chotanagpur, the bhagat
movement in Madhya Pradesh and Bhil revivalism, which were expressive of the tribals
urge to create a new order. These two lines of the movement, through the length and
breadth of the sub-continent, revealed striking similarities, a basis unity of response to
almost the same complex of challenging forces.
The movement led by Birsa Munda (1874-1901) is the best known of the
socio-political movements of this phase because the movement sought to
establish Munda raj and independence. In its socio-religious aspects, it was
like any other bhagat movement, with the difference that it was also
influenced by Christianity, and it used both Hindu and Christian idioms to
create the Munda ideology and world view. The rebels attacked police
stations and officials, churches and missionaries. Though there was an
undercurrent of hostility against the dikus (outsiders), there was no overt
attack on them except in a couple of controversial cases. The uprising was
quelled, but its lessons were acknowledged in the passing of the
Chotanagpur tenancy act. It sought to protect the Munda land system,
6
prohibit transfer of tribal land recognise tribal right to reclaim land and
create a new administrative unit. Their revolt forced the Mewar durbar to
sign a 21-point agreement.
In the third phase from 1920 to 1947 we see three trends in tribal movements. The first
trend is the impact of the freedom struggle led by Mahatma Gandhi who mobilised some
of the major tribal groups in the national movement and reconstruction programme. The
second trend is represented by the movements centering on land and forest revival and
reform of tribal society. The third trend is reflected by the rise of movements seeking
autonomy, statehood, separation and independence led by the tribal middle class.
We may describe in brief three movements, the Tanabhagat movement among the
Oraons, the Haribaba movement among the Hos and allied tribes, and the Rajmohini
movement among the Gonds. To the Hindu peasantry steeped in the medieval bhakti
tradition, the Mahatma appeared like a bhakti preacher, and to the tribals like a bhagat.
The best known of bhagat movements was the Tanabhagat movement which started in
the manner of a nativistic movement. On April 21, 1914, an Oraon youth in his 20s, from
the Dharmesh, the Supreme God, in a dream, together with the divine power and
supernatural gifts necessary for the restoration of the Oraon raj ( this sentence to be
redone). While the tribes accepted the nationalist programme and joined the mainstream
of the national movement, they resisted against their economic and cultural exploitation.
Swaraj meant not only freedom from British rule, but also freedom from the oppression
of the dikus, money-lenders, zamindars and feudal-overlords.
In the princely states where tribals were more backward, the Praja Mandals launched
movements against the feudal order by mobilising the tribals. The tribes who responded
particularly to these movements were the Bhils, Gonds, Kharwars, Mundas and Khonds.
Most of them had a notion of property, private or communal, in land, which had been
threatened by the colonial system and feudal exploitation. The agrarian issues which
excited them were the demands for begar or veth (compulsory labour without payment)
rasal or magan (free supply of provisions for visiting officers), and exactions other than
rent (abwabs).
Two nativistic movements sought to revive the pure and pristine elements of tribal
culture. The Seng Khasi, a socio-cultural organisation of the Khasis had ben established
7
as early as 1889 to preserve the Khasi way of life. Through its platform the non-Christian
Khasis have tried to strengthen the ancient system of clan relationship, which was
disturbed by the large-scale conversion of the Khasis to Christianity. The second, the
Zeliangrong movement, started as a religio-cultural movement under Jadunang. It
assumed a political overtone and became the only movement to have established linkages
with the national freedom struggle. Under Gaidinliu it remained strongly nationalistic,
promoted tribal solidarity and demanded creation of a separate administrative unit for the
Zeliangrong people to be formed out of the territories inhabited by the constituent tribes
in the contiguous regions of Manipur, Assam and Nagaland, to which these states did not
agree.
2) Identify the main trends of the tribal movements in India during 1920-1947.
- - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - -- - - - - - - -- -- - - - -- - - - -- - - - - - - - - --- - - - - - ------- - -- - - --
- -- -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Political movements
There been attempts at articulation of the aspirations for political autonomy among the
Gonds and Bhils during the period that followed independence. The Raj Gond leaders
such as Raja Naresh Singh demanded the formation of a separate state for the adivasis to
be carved out of the tribal areas of Chattisgarh and contiguous districts of Rewa region
and Vidarbha, in a memorandum submitted before the States Reorganisation
Commission. On 19 May 1963 Narain Singh Ukey, President of the Condwana Adivasi
Seva Mandal reiterated the demand for the formation of the Gondwana state, consisting
of the Gond and other tribal regions of the Chattisgarh and contiguous districts of
Vidarbha in Maharshtra.
It was in Chotanagpur - Santal Pargana region of Bihar that the movement for political
autonomy and formation of a state really developed further. The Adivasi Mahasabha was
wound up and merged with a new regional party, the Jharkhand Party, in 1949. Behind it
were the experiences of the failure of the militant movements and of the framing of the
Constitution of India. The Jharkhand Party was thrown open, at least, in principle, to all
residents Chotanagpur. There was thus a transition from ethnicity to regionalism as the
formative factor in the movement. The period from 1952 to 1957 was in many ways the
peak period for the Jharkhand movement and party, which had emerged as the major
party in the Chotanagpur-Santal paragana region. The second general elections in 1957
had seen it extend its influence to Orissa, where it captured five seats and held the
balance of power in the state politics which was plagued by instability. It displayed
remarkable unity, laid down the law in the tribal region, could mobilise thousands of
people and take out mammoth processions at short notice. The decline of the party which
began in the early 1960s. The reasons for its decline were the following:
involvement of the tribals in the process of development;rivalry between the
advanced Christian tribals and backward non-Christian tribals arsing out of
competition on education, employment and control on the resources for
development; and, shift in the support of the non-Christian tribals from
Jharkhand to the Congress and Jana Sangha.
9
The Jharkhand Mukti Morcha emerged as a major political force in the industrial and
mining belt of Chotanagpur and in state politics after the 1980 general elections. It sought
to broad base the separatist movement by including with its ambit the peasant and
working classes. The Jharkhand is described by its ideologues as an internal colony
which is being exploited by outsiders. Even though the region accounts for 28 percent of
minerals it avails itself of only 15 per cent of the state's budget for development. The
development process itself is exploitative of the local inhabitants and outsiders have
moved in to seize all opportunities of employment.
number of tribals and a substantial section of their elite among the Khashis, Mizos, Garos
and even a section among the Nagas agreed to participate in the constitutional system of
India. Old tribes assumed new names, small tribes merged with larger tribes, and the
tribes combined to form a new ethnic-cum-territorial identity. While the processes up to
the formation of the autonomous councils or the state were almost common to all tribes,
there were differences on the question of their relationship with the nation-state. A
section of the Nagas chose the path of insurgency, followed by the Mizos, the Meiteis,
and the Tripuris. Other sections of the same tribes later preferred integration. For
example, in Nagaland the Angami, the Ao and the Sema who had played the major role in
the beginning of Naga insurgency opted for sedate regional politics. The centre of gravity
shifted from the area dominated by these tribes to the areas inhabited by the Konyak and
Lotha and now to the international border. The insurgency is now dominated by the
Hemis, and the Konyaks and Tangkhuls. In fact there has been a reaction among these
minor tribes against the dominated by the Hemis, and the Konyaks and Tangkhuls. There
is also a demand for the formation of the remote and underdeveloped Mon and Tuensang
districts into a union territory.
The Naga movement is the oldest ongoing movement for autonomy or independence. The
origin of the present Naga movement could be traced to the formation of a Naga club in
the year 1918 at Kohima with a branch at Mokokchung, which consisted mainly of the
members of emerging Naga elites, including government officials who came from the
administrative centres of Kohima and Mokokchung educated in Christian educational
institutions, and a few leading headmen of the neighbouring villages. The club discussed
social and administrative problems involving all the tribes of the Naga Hills.
The Naga Club submitted memorandum to the Simon Commission in 1929. It prayed for
keeping the hills outside the scheme of reforms and for continuing the direct British
administration of the hills In April 1945 the District Tribal Council which united the
individual tribal councils was formed in the Naga hiils at the initiative of the then Deputy
Commissioner of the Naga Hills District. The nomenclature of this Council was changed
to Naga National Council (NNC)in 1946. The Japanese fought their last battle during
World War II at Kohima, the headquarters of the Naga Hills District. The constitution of
the Naga National Council as the political forum of the Nata tribes could be considered
11
the beginning of the modern phase of the Naga movement. It gave a sense of political
unity to the Naga tribes and it and embodied the concept of Naga nationhood.
In 1946, the British Government proposed a scheme to carve out a Trust Territory
comprising the Naga Hills, the then NEFA area and a part of Burma, as a ‘Crown
Colony’ under control from London. The educated Nagas in the NNC quickly opposed
this idea of British colonisation, like the Indian National Congress, and declared that the
British must quit Naga hills when they quit India.
The objectives of the NNC have developed through many phases from autonomy to
independence. Under the in the 9-point agreement reached between the NNC and the
Government of India — represented by the late Sir Akbar Hyderi, the then Governor of
Assam on 27-29 June 1947, there were provisions for protection from land alienation,
creation of administrative autonomy and a special responsibility of the Government of
India for their implementation. The Naga movement from 1947 to 1954 in the Naga Hills
remained peaceful and constitutional. Towards the end of 1949, the Naga National
Council changed its goals favouring Independence outside India Union.
In 1954, the Naga announced the formation of the Hongkin Government that is the
‘People’s Sovereign Republic of Free Nagaland’. Violence broke out in 1954 and there
were many incedents involving the Indian army and rebels. In July 1960, a
16-point agreement was reached between Prime Minister Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru and a
Naga delegation. On 1 August 1960, Prime Minister Nehru announced in Parliament the
decision of the Government to make ‘Nagaland’ the 16th state of the Indian Union. By
this time a new group of ‘overground’ Naga leaders had emerged in Nagaland, who
formed the Nagaland Nationalist Organisation (NNO). The NNO was formed mainly by
those leaders who had been instrumental in bringing about statehood for Nagaland. In the
same way, there emerged the Democratic Party of Nagaland which was formed by those
who differed from the NNO leadership and harboured sympathy for the secessionist
underground group. However, the militant section of the Naga movement remained
underground for more than a decade between 1954 and 1964. Till 1968, several rounds of
talks were held between the underground leaders. Another landmark was the signing of
the Shillong Accord, on 11 November 1975 under the terms of which the underground
Naga accepted the Indian Constitution, the deposited their arms and government of India
in turn released Naga political prisoners and promised their rehabilitation. However,
while there has been no resumption of insurgency and more and more underground have
come over ground, renouncing violence and Nagaland has generally remained an oasis of
peace and stability in the troubled North-East, the Accord has been repudiated by Phizo
12
himself and the hostiles. The hostiles stood divided into three camps (i): the pro- Phizo
Federal Party, (ii) the group led by Mown Angami who became Vice-President of the
underground Naga national Council and who condemned the Federal party of its
reconciliation with New Delhi and denounced the insurgents for betraying Christianity
and (iii) the insurgents imbued with Moists ideology led by a Tanghkul Naga, T. Muivah
and Isak Swu who have established the National Socialist Council of Nagaland (NSCN).
There were incidence of shootouts, cross fire, murderous attacks, and indeterminate
killings between pro-Phizo and Muivah-Isak factions on the Indo-Burma borders.
Behind the permutations and combination of Naga politics one sees the changing
equations among various tribes. The Angami, Ao and Sema who played the major role in
the beginning of Naga insurgency have opted for sedate regional politics. The centre of
gravity has shifted from the area dominated by these tribes and by the Konyak and Lotha
to the international border. The insurgency is now dominated by the Hemis, and the
Konyaks and Tanghuls loyal to pro-Phizo party have been killing the Angami,
Khomengan and Chakesang. In fact there has been a reaction among these tribes against
the dominance of the advanced tribes such as the Ao, Angami, Chakesang and Lotha.
Meanwhile, the Nagaland politics have moved between the mainstream and regional
poles. The Nagaland National Organization ran the government from 1964 to 1975. In
1976 it merged with the Indian National Congress to gain a national identity. The Nagas
in the mean time have emerged as the most dynamic and progressive people in the north-
east who has built up village development board as the catlyst of rural development and
also raised a Naga regiment which fought at Kargil. And yet, the final solution to the
Naga problem is not yet in sight, though negotiations often take place between the
government of India and insurgent group to find a solution.
In the post-colonial era the pattern of alienation of tribals’ resources such as land shows a
marked change. Tribals are being displaced not only by non-tribals but also by the state
and other organisations which require land for development. They are now pitted not only
against other people but also against the state which they see as the major instrument for
displacing them from their land.
13
The tribals are asking not only for restoration of the land that they lost by invoking the
provision of the Andhra Pradesh Scheduled Area Land Transfer Regulations, 1959,
which come into force in 1963, but also the transfer of ownership and delivery of
possession in regard to the land allotted to them. Of late, they have been organised by
CPI (ML) of the People’s War Group (PWG). In February 1981 there was an unusual
spurt of forced harvesting on lands taken away from them by non-tribals, raiding of
houses of moneylenders and decamping with mortgaged valuables. The traditional
system of communication was revived to organise the tribals. Signals were exchanged by
beating the drum. The Gond durbar held on 6 February 1981 at Keslapur declared that
the problems of the tribals had come to a boiling point. The Gonds also prevented the
demarcation of land for afforestation. They had earlier reacted strongly to the scheduling
of the Lumbadars, a community of traders and moneylenders, as a tribe in 1977, because
the Lumbadars always exploited the tribals and their status as a tribe helped them to
legitimize their illegal possession of the Gonds’ land. On 20 April 1981 a conference was
planned by CPI(ML) at Indervalli. The meeting was banned and the tribals were
persuaded not to assemble there. However, they took out a procession which came into
conflict with a police force. About 15 tribals lost their lives.
________________________________________________________________________
The leadership of the tribal movements has mainly emerged from themselves.
While the leadership of the first phase emerged from the upper crust of tribal
society, that of the second rose from the lowest rung of it. The Santal
brothers were landless - Birsa Munda was a raiyat or a parja (crop-sharer)
and Govind Giri was a hali. The leadership of the third phase and post-
colonial periods was provided by the members of the upcoming tribal middle
class, both in middle India and in the North-East. They were educated people
which included priests, catechists, teachers, public servants, rural leaders
and professionals who spoke largely in secular idioms. The leadership of the
social reform movement was provided by the outsiders such as the Gandhian
workers, of the Parja Mandal agitation by outsiders like Motilal Tejawat and
of some tribal uprisings such as the Nagesia by even "Baniyas".
14
The goals of the movement ranged from the restoration of the pre-colonial
polity, service tenure (Chuar), and land (Sardar) and right in forest to
expulsion of outsiders, end of taxation, social reform, political independenc,
or establishment of the tribal raj or participation in constitutional and
democratic political apparatus, formation of tribal states, gaining equality
and end of exploitation.
The social and ethnic composition of the movements ranged from the
movement led by a single tribe to a confederacy of tribes and the castes sub-
ordinate to the tribes such as the artisans and service groups. Most of the
movements were limited to a tribe but such movements in the first phase such
as Kol and Santhal insurrections encompassed many tribal and non-tribal
groups. In the third and post-colonial period broad based political parties
emerged among the tribes, both in North-East and in middle India. The all
India tribal platforms gradually emerged in 1960s.
All tribal movements were limited in scale but they had an immediate impact on policy
which has been partly discussed above. Their impact has however to be studied
both in the short and long term perspectives. In the short run the authorities
responded by taking immediate measures to address the tribal concerns,
divise measures to protect their resources, facilitate access to the officials
etc. In the long term the colonial policy built up a framework to
institutionalise the isolation for tribals, a combination of elements of direct
and indirect rule (in princely states, in the North-East etc., a mix of legal and
administrative measures to protect land against alienation to non-tribals, and
protect customary rights in forest. There was, however, to be no development
of any kind – the missionaries were left free to manage education and health
services. It was left to the Gandhian workers and Congress ministries which
assumed office in late 1930s to institute inquires into tribals' poverty,
indebtedness and backwardness and put in place the first slew of welfare
measures.
The results of the uprisings were thus not uniform for whole of tribal India.
While in British India they achieved a non-regulation administrative system
for tribes and special agrarian laws to protect tribal land, little was done or
allowed to be done for them in princely states. However, the political agent
15
did intervene to uphold status quo rather than promote change. This
ambivalence was typical of the colonial system.
_______________________________________________________________________
26.6 LET US SUM UP
________________________________________________________________________
The tribal movements are now being characterised as identity-based movements, of
which various other issues relating to autonomy, land , forest, language and scripts are
only ramifications. It is identity that is under stress. Identity stands at the centre-stage.
This change in perception has now been made possible by people's own understanding of
the situation, their perception of growing threat to their identity, the ongoing
environmental and indigenous people's movements, and so on. The tribal movements
now are being placed within the context of power relations, the scramble for power, the
16
search for equation among various communities within a region. The tribes have
emerged as political communities, like other communities.
The tribal movements are no longer perceived as belonging to one type. The movements
arising out of the complex social situations are perceived as a mix of types and traits. So
are the causes and processes, which are now perceived as endogenous and exogenous, a
mix of issues relating to resources, culture and identity.
________________________________________________________________________
26.7 SOME USEFUL BOOKS
________________________________________________________________
Singh, K.S., (ed.) Tribal Movements in India, Vols. I &II, Delhi : Manohar,
1982, 1983.
________________________________________________________________
i) The first trend: the impact of the Indian National Movement and the
participation of the tribals in it.
ii) Confluence of the tribal movement regarding land and forest and
the movement for reform in the tribal society. ( take it to the body
of the text as well – at the relevant place.
ii) Rivalry between the advanced Christian tribals and backward non-
Christian tribals arsing out of competition on education,
employment and control on the resources for development.
4) The main goals of the tribal movements included: restoration of the pre-
UNIT 27 ENVIRONMENT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Structure
27.0 Objectives
28.0 27.1 Introduction
27.2 Historical Background
27.3.1 Man - Nature Relationship
27.3.2 Emergence of Eco-politics
27.3.3 Debate on Development and Sustainability
27.3 Major Issues
27.3.1 Role of the State
27.3.2 Role of Judiciary
27.3.3 Environment versus Livelihood
27.4 Nature of Environment Movements
27.5 Two Case Studies
27.5.1 Silent Valley Movement
27.5.2 Chipko Movement
27.6 Let Us Sum Up
27.7 Key Words
27.8 Some Useful Books/Articles
27.9 Answers to Check Your Excercies
27.0 OBJECTIVES
This unit deals with an important and so far quite neglected theme in political science,
namely; environment movements in contemporary India. After reading this unit you
should be able to:
• understand historical relationship between man and the nature, emergence of
ecopolitics and debate on development and sustainability;
1
2
• learn about the major issues addressed by the environment movements in form of the
role of the state, judiciary, Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs), people,
political parties, local bodies and legislations; and,
• outline the sources of conflicts of interest and narrate the processes of mobilization
of victims of various environmental destruction by two case studies.
27.1 INTRODUCTION
2
3
Man is one of the many species on earth. He is a major actor and component in the
environment. Nature has its own ways to create and maintain balance among its various
components. However, man has been mindlessly exploiting natural resources for
development and generating prosperity in the last centuries with the growth of
industrialisation. This has created an imbalance. In other words, the process of
development brought about by the industrial revolution has depleted the resources faster
than the natural replenishing capacity of the environment. Hence, the resulting of crisis of
the environment. In order to overcome the limitation, man has adverse consequences on
the environment. For instance, vehicles of various kinds are invented to increase the
speed of transportation and movement. The adverse effect is poisonous emissions from
vehicles causing greenhouse effect in biosphere.
In the third world or developing countries, conflict on the issue of development takes a
different form. Here the divide is between those who wish to protect the environment at
all cost and those who are committed to development at any cost. This does not mean that
the environmentalists are as such against development but plead for an eco-friendly
development. They prefer alternative or sustainable development. Eco-politics results in
the process of determining the preferred path of development.
3
4
Developing countries consist of poor and the powerless. All efforts for speedy economic
development through industrialisation in these countries have given more and more
power to the financial and political elites. Degradation of environment has occurred due
to both chronic poverty and uneven industrialisation. The general situation is such that
the elites pay only lip service to environmental values and actually go on ecological
rampaging. Even if they value environment they are often unwilling to part with the
profits. Their stock defence and ready excuse is contained in their argument about lack of
financial viability and absence of viable technical know-how to clean up (or keep clean
the environment). The debate should actually be focused on the social or environmental
cost of production versus mindless plunder of ecology for never ending profits for few.
This debate remains unresolved mainly because of an informal alliance between the
financial industrial and political-bureaucratic elites. The political system is usually
repressive of general and particularly environmental dissent. It is often expressed as well
as put down violently. Protests to safeguard the environment are often viewed and
4
5
dismissed by the elite interest. Thus, the situation in developing countries are sensitive
and crucial. Such issues as land degradation, desertification, deforestation and pollution
of air, water and soil by industries either remain ignored or inadequately and nominally
attended. All in all, the poverty, resulting degradation and insensitive political system
make the matters worse. A ray of hope lies in emergence of positive ecopolitics by green
parties and groups in Europe and micro environment movements by environmental
organizations in the developing countries. This leads us logically to explore the
relationship between the civil society, state and ecopolitics.
As is clear from the discussion in the previous section, the environment movement has
thrown up various issues regarding vital inter-domain relationships between the victims
and redressal systems existing in a society. Those who are adversely affected by the
environmental problems and are protesting and resisting against a repressive alliance of
vested interests need to be paid attention to understand the dynamics of environment
movement. First and foremost major issue is pertaining to the nature and role of the state.
Judicial option and intervention is second major issue discussed here. The third issue is
regarding the debate between environment versus livelihood.
In order to understand what role state has played, we must understand theoretical
conception and contemporary context of state. One understanding of state is that it is a
neutral space or impartial agency for resolving the conflicts of interest which occur in
market and civil society. However, Indian state’s performance for last five decades
provides contrary evidences. The Indian state has failed to play its role and hence the
civil society has to fill the void. Let us first explore the contemporary status of the state.
Ever since the ending of cold war, collapse of communism and triumph of advancing
capitalism, most nation-states are ruthlessly overrun. There has been an upsurge in global
democratic aspirations as a result of the collapse of communism. The forces of free
market are linking national economies with global economic systems. Globalisation of
5
6
politics and economy is taking place. The state is being caught in this process and is
under pressures from within and without.
It is found that the state or its counterpart in form of a local municipal body have acted in
a biased manner in the issue of environmental pollution. The issue of environmental
protection is split in two camps. One side is the ‘iron triangle’ of elitist domination in
form of ‘bureaucrats-industrialists-politicians’ and on the other are the powerless victims
of pollution and environmental degradation. Studies have shown that, instead of
operating as a mediating and balancing agency, the state functions as a party to the issue
against the interests of the people. If we see the history of legislation on pollution, we
find that first of all nobody is ready to accept the existence of this issue. The people who
are the victims of air or water pollution are left in cold with burden of proof on their
shoulders. Whether it is US Steel Mill in Gary Indiana or factories and industries in
Vapi, Ankleshwar, Nandesari and Baroda in Gujarat, when people go to complain about
the impact of pollution in form of holes in the clothes and kitchen vessels or deaths of
buffaloes or elephants by drinking polluted water, released stealthily in the nearby open
spaces, village ponds, ravines and rivers, the polluting industries’ first reaction is there is
no such problem. When potato and banana growing farmers of villages in Baroda region
of Gujarat complained about crop-destruction due to air pollution, the polluting industry
instantly disowned and disclaimed the responsibility.
The impact of pollution is first felt by the people but the ‘iron-triangle’ usually opposes
its existence. People are ultimately, left with no other option but to launch a movement
first to make an issue of the problem. It is the suffering people who find themselves in a
strange powerless and helpless situation. Organised existing public power, in form of
state and its related structures, do not help them. Hence, they launch a movement to exert
power resources in their favour by compelling the state first to recognise the existence of
issue and then make and implement preventive laws on pollution. The iron-triangle does
not stop here but enters the next arena of implementation of legislated policies and laws.
It weakens and nullifies the effect by diluting it. People’s struggle continues even at this
stage. Violation of pollution laws was not at all dealt with firmly until about the Bhopal
gas disaster occurred.
6
7
The environment movement in India has essentially passed through three phases. In the
first phase which was the longest phase, legislative hurdles were crossed. That is to say,
opposition, obstruction or dilution of pollution laws was done while being framed in
legislatures. In the second phase, opposition to implementation of already made anti-
pollution laws was experienced. Here also the iron-triangle operated in favour of the
polluters rather than in protecting the interests of the victims of pollution. In the current
phase, as a final recourse to redressal of their grievances against those polluting and
jeopardizing the increasingly fragile ecosystem, doors of the judiciary are knocked.
Eminent legal scholar Upendra Baxi (1991) has observed that, “the growth of
environmental jurisprudence in India is a very recent phenomenon. And even now it is
confined to a few activist judges, lawyers, law academics and active citizens”. Baxi has
argued that this is so mainly because “the Constitution itself is environment-blind”. The
chapter on rights in the Constitution does not explicitly state about protecting the citizens
from air and water pollution, deforestation, destruction of wild life and displacements of
habitats. Much later 42nd Amendment to the Constitution has added a provision vide
Article 48-A instructing the state to make efforts for protecting and improving the
environment, forests and wild life. Article 51-A is about the fundamental duty of the
citizens ”to protect and improve the natural environment including forests, lakes, rivers
and wild life...” The absence of environmental concerns in the Constitution is due to its
obsession with development.
7
8
project stir by Kerala Shastra Sahitya Parishad to protect the fragile Silent Valley
ecosystem in 1979 was facilitated by this landmark judicial intervention by Justice Iyer.
The apex courts at the state and central level are flooded with petitions seeking protection
of environment. This is a major achievement of enlightened judicial process. “Creative
interpretations and rulings by the courts in various cases seeking environmental justice or
compensation have expanded the scope and role of judiciary in this issue. For instance, in
Shri Ram Fertilizer case the court created “an idea of absolute liability” of manufacturer
of hazardous substances, raw material, processes or products, lest any damages are
caused to the people or workers.
27.3.3 Environment versus Livelihood
Environmental degradation is the result of a vicious circle in which most societies are so
badly caught. It is argued that development is undertaken to remove poverty and improve
the quality of life of the people. But the mode of development that is followed has turned
out to be environmentally disastrous. Instead of reducing poverty, it has increased
inequality, deprivation, marginalisation and caused extensive environmental degradation.
The growth and expansion of market-driven development strategy, be it socialist or
capitalist, is not able "to solve the very problem it creates" (Shiva; 1991:342).
Management of forest is another area where primacy of growth and basic needs outweigh
environmental concerns. The industrialists, politicians and forest bureaucrats have forged
a nexus to consume forests without any restraint.
Heavy industrialization is another potent source of pollution and threat to environment.
Unchecked industrialization has released toxic gases, chemicals, effluents and hazardous
substances into air, water and soil. Another dimension of this issue pertains to the
occupational hazards on the health and safety of the workers of some specific industries
such as chemical, petrochemical, pharmaceutical, pesticides and fertilizer. The workers
and the local population are found to be suffering from cancer, respiratory diseases,
infertility, corrosion of fingers, toes and holes in the nose (wall separating the nostrils).
There is a decline in livelihood prospects from fishing, agricultural and horticultural
activities. Such widespread impact has generated anguish among the victims and people's
movements were launched.
This discussion shows that developing societies are really caught in choiceless and
helpless situation. The market-centered and sensitive strategy of economic development
has left us with little scope of amendments. Any alteration in strategy to save the one can
8
9
9
10
We saw that the reasons for the changes in man-nature relationships are not to be traced
too far. It has become clear that quiet, widespread depletion and degradation of natural
resources is the result of pushing nature far beyond its carrying capacity by mindless
consumption. The forest communities to some extent and people in general have over-
exploited natural resources. The former have no other choice. Somehow ecological
degradation is viewed as destined and cutting trees for fuel, shelter or income, over-
grazing or over-farming in fragile eco-areas goes on undeterred or unchallenged.
Grounds for struggles are multiple.
Harsh Sethi has divided environmental responses into three types of struggles. In the first
type, the struggle addresses the issue of rights of different social strata and communities
over using resources. This type of struggle does not question the development model or
the acts of redefining man-nature relations. In the second type, we find environmental
response which struggles for legal corrections and policy shifts in resource use. At the
centre lies concern about destruction and depletion of renewable and non-renewable
resources. The normative basis of dominant development model remain unchallenged.
The third variety of response is substantive and fundamental to the issue. It invokes
ecological dimension. It aims at rejecting the dominant development model and redefine
man's relationship with the nature. However, it must be stated that the environment
struggles do not maintain typological purity once launched. These struggles have resulted
centering around different natural resources such as air, wastes, land, forest or sea.
Accordingly, they can be referred to as forest-based struggles, land use struggles, anti-big
dam struggles, anti-pollution struggles and struggles against destruction of marine
resources.
Harsh Sethi) has done an analysis of these struggles by focusing on the participants or
actors of the struggles, strategies of intervention, issues raised and focused and finally
impact or outcome of struggle in terms of grievance-redressal, policy changes effected
and conscientization. It is found that unlike other struggles, in ecological struggles fairly
representative section of society is involved as participants. However, the most adversely
affected people constitute the base of the struggle. For example, deforestation stretches
10
11
the work hours of women in collecting fuel wood and water longer, the tribals lose
benefits of forest produce, the fisherman in Goa and Kerala suffer from excessive
trawling. The victims are so dispersed and marginalised that for effective raising of
voices and redressal of grievances, they require a chain of actors from more vocal and
experienced realms of voluntary organisations, media, professionals like scientists,
researchers, doctors, engineers, lawyers, technologists, human right groups, sympathetic
and concerned policy-makers and bureaucrats. Each of these actors add strength, vigour,
guidance and direction to struggle.
11
12
Analysing and understanding the impact of movement forms important aspect of the
study. The environment movements have by and large remained “diverse and scattered”.
Their overall impact is uneven. Alongwith failures there have been successes too. The
Silent Valley movement’s impact was positive, successful and trend setting. The Doon
Valley environment movement was partly successful. But at many other places, though,
the movements are launched, intensified but not successful. Bhopal Gas disaster
successfully drew the attention of the nation and the world but it has not succeeded in
preventing hazardous products and processes (IPT; 1999). Despite the persistence of
struggles, thousands of people are displaced yearly due to large development projects.
On the other hand, the movement has made a major contribution to give centrality and
public space to the cause of environment protection. This is a historic achievement as
never before so much concern, awareness, involvement and participation was witnessed.
The government has made many policies on forests, wildlife, wastelands, water, air and
soil conservation. But there is a wide gap between the rising concern and actual action by
the state. Interestingly, no political party, trade union or peasant organizations have made
this to be their issue. The environment movements remain exposed to the dangers of gaps
between concern/thought and action; fragmented, co-optation, manipulation and
distortion by government and vested interests.
With a view to understanding the structural and functional aspects of the environment
movements two case studies are presented here. These case studies will provide a brief
account of genesis, issues, organization, ideology, leadership, mobilization, impact and
outcome of environment movements in India.
This movement originated in Kerala. It is one of the earliest landmarks in the recent
history of environment movements in the direction of preserving environment by
people’s own struggle and agitation in India. The reasons for its origin lie in Kerala
Government’s proposal to build a dam on the Kuntipuzha river in early 1970s. The
government’s concern was to generate prosperity for the state through increased
industrialisation. This was not happening because of shortage of electricity in the state.
12
13
The prime aim in building the dam was to generate power for industries. The construction
of dam was to cover 77 sq.kms. as catchment area. As a consequence, India’s richest
tropical forest, known as Silent Valley was to be flooded and submerged. It is interesting
to note that unlike in most such cases, there was no problem of displacement and
rehabilitation of the people as the dam was to be constructed at a location where there
was no human settlement. In this sense the Silent Valley movement was the first purely
and primarily fought environment movement. The odds against the movement were
heavy. The state government of Kerala was in total control of the issue as all the political
parties and industrial lobby were in full support of the scheme and backed the
government.
Kerala Shastra Sahitya Parishad (KSSP), an already existing, active, progressive local
people’s science movement group took up the challenge and steered the movement right
from its infancy to maturing into a potent people’s power. The KSSP successfully
mobilized local opinion against the dam and managed to rope in environmental experts
like botanists, zoologists of international repute like Salim Ali, well known economists
and engineers. This move strengthened the KSSP’s argument and position vis-a-vis
government’s technical teams. It forcefully presented its argument against the scheme on
the grounds of adverse environmental consequences on “a rare ecosystem, rich in
biological and genetic diversity”. The KSSP went a step ahead as a strategy and argued
that the required electricity could be generated easily by setting up thermal power
stations in dispersed locations as well as by improving the power transmission systems.
The KSSP was able to give this controversy the status of a genuine public debate far
beyond the state. National attention was drawn. It was stretched to international arena by
involving World Wildlife Fund and the International Union for the Conservation of
Nature and Natural Resources. These global bodies had joined the issue of the movement
on the grounds of protecting the lion-tailed macaque which is the rare bread of monkey,
habitant of Silent Valley. This struggle lasted quite long. Furious debates, persistent
campaigns and constant relentless lobbying through the media, parliament and expert
committees made dropping the idea of dam in Silent Valley possible. Besides, the KSSP
won the region the status of “national biosphere”. As a result of this successful
movement, the scope for challenging environmentally unviable development policies,
projects and schemes increased. This movement was preventive in nature, in the sense
that it was launched unlike in many other cases, much before the project was executed
13
14
and its impact on environment could be felt. The project was successfully opposed at
embryonic stage itself. This shows existence of already well-conscientised and informed
non-political bodies like KSSP which could get activated much before the damages are
caused. This case study also shows that environment movements require mobilisation,
involvement and orchestration of diverse mix of actors (individual and institutional)
stretching from experts to lay and local to global.
This movement was basically concerned with preservation and protection of forests. It
was an environmental movement for maintaining the ecological balance in the sub-
Himalayan region of Uttar Pradesh. Four districts of Uttarkashi, Chamoli, Tehri and Pauri
form Garhwal division and cover a total area of 27,000 sq.kms. and about 14 lakhs
population. It is interesting to note that due to migratory nature of labour there are more
females than males in this area. Employment is very low in this region. There are 97 per
cent working women as cultivators while only 72 percent men are cultivators. Males
work in army and hence women are left behind to manage land, livestock and household.
Chipko is also interpreted as feminist movement because of this. This movement
originated in the Dasohli Gram Swarajya Mandal in Gopeshwar of Chamoli district. The
movement was initiated by Gandhian Sarvodaya workers. The Sarvodaya workers were
active in this area for about 13 years through various rural reconstruction work.
The movement began on 24 April 1973. There was a historical conflict of interests over
forest and timber rights in this area between local villagers and Sarvodaya workers on
one hand and timber contractors and forest bureaucrats on the other. The contractors were
able to exert more influence over forest bureaucracy and local politicians to corner the
forest benefits. Previous to Chipko mobilisation, stirrings against government’s forest
policy and department had taken place in this region too. The forest department rejected
Sarvodaya workers’ demand for 10 ash trees per annum for its farm tools workshop set
up with the support from Khadi Gramodyog Commission. But it allotted 300 ash trees to
the Simon Company for manufacturing sports goods like tennis rackets etc. The primacy
thus was accorded to tennis rackets over the self-subsisting needs of the poor cultivator’s
ploughs. The cutting of these 300 trees by Company agent was started in March 1973.
Sarvodaya workers and 100 other villagers marched from the nearby areas to Gopeshwar.
14
15
As a result of this resistance by the villagers, the company men beat retreat. In order to
appease the protesters, the forest department showed readiness to concede one ash tree to
Sarvodaya workers, if they let the Simon Company cut trees of its original quota. The
temptation was raised to two, three, five and ten ash trees of full quota but it was rejected.
The Simon’s quota was cancelled but re-allotted in Phata Forest in other part of the
district. In June 1973, another local leader organized resistance and launched Chipko
movement. The trees were guarded by the village upto end December when permit will
automatically lose its validity.
Sunderlal Bahuguna of Uttarkhand Sarvodaya Mandal, based in Tehri Garhwal, began his
long march of 120 days on foot to spread the ideology of Chipko movement to entire
region of Himalayas. What made this movement instantly popular is a decade old history
of flash floods in this region. Mountain slopes were bared of forest covers by clear-
cutting of trees, causing quick rushing of water. Road-building activity in this region also
caused land-slides. Some mobilisation activities were already initiated before the Chipko
was launched. The flood relief work had brought the Survodaya workers and the flood-
marooned people together into a dialogical relationship regarding the environmental
degradation, disasters and conservation. This strengthened environment agenda of the
movement. In 1974, C.P. Bhatt re-launched Chipko struggle in Reni forest area. He
appealed women to hug the trees in case they come to cut them. An attempt to cut 2500
auctioned trees in Reni forest near Alaknanda river, was foiled by woman leader Gaura
Devi in village Lata. A band of about 30 women led by her saved the trees by risking
their lives. As a result of this persistence by the Chipko protesters, a government ban was
imposed on tree-cutting in Reni for ten years. Whenever need arose, these women
intermittently came out to save the trees at Gopeshwar in 1975, Bhynder valley in
January 1978, Parsari in 1979 and at Dongri Paintoli in February 1980. Thus, the Chipko
demonstrations, protests and resistance became frequent in this region.
15
16
Concern for life and livelihood, so closely linked with the environment of this region,
guided the course of the movement. Chipko succeeded in saving the local forest
resources from commercial exploitation by contractors and tried to bring local forest
wealth under the control of local village communities. The struggle, however, could not
fully succeed in preventing the “alarming depletion of forest cover” in the region which
was actually responsible for causing floods, landslides, soil erosion, drying up of local
water streams and other sources, fuel and fodder shortages etc. Hill women played major
role in this movement and gave it the character of truly people’s environment movement.
16
17
The environment movements have emerged as a result of mindless and wasteful use of
resources, irrespective of the type of political regime. A new class of environmental
haves and have nots have emerged. This has led the global human society to debate the
theme of economic development and environmental sustainability. Peoples’ movement
against the environmental degradation faces opposition from the networking of the
vested interests – the bureaucrats, industrialists and politicians. Nevertheless, the
environment movement has been able to internationalise the environmental issues, raise
the level of peoples’ consciousness about environment, and impacted on the policy
initiatives.
Biosphere : That part of earth and its atmosphere which is inhabited by living
things/beings.
Deforestation : Destruction or removal of forests by denudation or clear-cutting.
Desertification : The formation of desert in arid and semi-arid regions from
overgrazing, deforestation, poor use of land, excessive
withdrawal of ground water or climatic changes.
17
18
Green House Effect : Increasingly released carbon dioxide due to burning of fossil
fuels like coal and oil, tropical forests, causing holes in the
ozone layer which is protecting the atmosphere of earth.
Unfiltered direct heat from sun can raise the temperature on
earth, melting polar ice caps and causing floods, and
submergence of big cities like Calcutta, Mumbai, London,
New York etc.
___________________________________________________________________
27.10 ANSWERS TO CHECK YOUR PROGRESS EXCERCISES
___________________________________________________________________
18
19
1) Efforts by the legislative bodies, concerned citizens, NGOs, judiciary, etc., to protect
the environment is called as environment movement.
2)They are against the development. Instead, they plead for eco-friendly
development.
4) The judiciary in India has played very positive role in protection of the environment.
Through the judicial activism the judiciary has been able to contribute to fight against
the environmental degradation.
1) There are three kinds of environment movements. First, it addresses the issues of
various strata of the society over using the natural resources; second, it questions the
development model; and third, it focuses on the ecological dimension.
2) The linkages of the local issues of environment with the broader issue of market,
society, state, science and nature denote towards the internationalisation of the
environment issues.
3) Environment movements have been able to raise the level of peoples’ consciousness
about environment. It has led to arrest the degradation of environment, internationalise
the local environmental issues.
19
20
20
1
________________________________________________________________________
Structure
28.0 Objectives
28.1 Introduction
28.2 Workers Movements
28.2.1 Workers’ Movements in the colonial period
28.2.2 The Issues and the Types of Collective Actions
28.2.2 Workers’ Movements in the Post-colonial Period
(i ) The National Level
(ii) The Provincial Level
(iii) The Trade Unions without Political Affiliations
(iv) The Limitations of the Workers’ Movements
28.3 Peasant Movements
28.3.1 Small and Poor Peasants’ Movements
28.3.2 Rich Peasants’ and Farmers’ Movements
28.4 Impact of Liberalisation on the Workers’ and Peasant Movements
28.5 Let Us Sum Up
28.6 Some Useful Books
28.7 Answers to Check Your Progress Exercises
________________________________________________________________________
28.0 OBJECTIVES
________________________________________________________________________
Workers and peasants in India have been involved in the collective actions in order to fight
for their demands. Their collective actions like those of other social group can be included
in the social and political movements. After going through this unit, you will be able to
understand:
• Nature of the movements of the workers and peasants;
• Their demands, problems and leaderships;
• Patterns of mobilisation in the collective actions;
• Influence of these movements on the state; and
• The impact of the liberalisation on the workers and peasants.
________________________________________________________________________
1
2
28.1 INTRODUCTION
________________________________________________________________________
Workers and the peasants together form the largest groups of the Indian society. While the
workers largely belong to the exploited section, the peasants consist of both the poor and
the rich sections. These groups have been involved in the collective actions or the social
and political movements to get their demand fulfilled. The nature of the issues raised by
them or their leadership depends on the place they occupy in the economy or society. It
also depends on the fact whether the workers are engaged in the organised, unorganised,
agrarian or the industrial sectors or whether a peasant is a poor peasant or the rich peasant
operating in the mechanised capitalist economy or in the backward –feudal economy. In
this unit, we shall discuss important features of the workers and peasants movements in
India.
________________________________________________________________________
28.2 WORKERS’ MOVEMENTS
________________________________________________________________________
The workers movement in India can be divided in two phases – the pre-Independence
period and the post-Independence period.
28.2.1 Workers’ Movements in the Colonial Period
The modern working class made its appearance in India in the second half of the 19th
century with the growth of modern industries, railways, post and telegraph network,
plantation and mining. But the labour movement started in an organised way only after the
Second World War. The organised wokers’ unions are known as the trade unions. The All
India Trade Union Congress (A I T U C) was formed in 1920. Its objective was to
coordinate activities of all organisations in all the provinces of India to further the interests
of the Indian labour in economic, social and political matters. In the second half of the
1920s there was a consolidation of left ideological forces in the country. In1928 the left
wing including the communists succeeded in acquiring dominant position inside the A I T
U C. The moderates started a new organisation known as All India Trade Union Federation
(AITUF). The 1930s was not a favourable period for the growth of trade union movement
India. The communists were implicated in the Meerut Conspiracy case and the Bombay
Textiles strike of 1929 had failed. A lull marked the activities on the trade union front. The
serious economic depression of this period added to the woes of the workers further. It led
to large-scale retrenchment. The main focus of the trade union movements during this
period was maintaining wages and preventing retrenchment.
2
3
The Second World War divided the trade union leaders. The communists argued that with
the Nazi attack on the Soviet Union in 1941 the character of the war had changed from
imperialist war to people’s war. The communists were following the line of the Russian
Communist Party and thought that in the changed circumstances it was the duty of the
workers to support British war efforts. But the nationalist leaders wanted to strengthen the
national movement to overthrow the British rule from India. The ideological rift led to
another split in the trade union movement. The mounting cost of living made the workers
to realise the need of an organised effort to secure relief. In spite of the government
resorting to Defence of India Rules, which prohibited strikes and lockouts, there was a
perceptible increase in number of both unions and organised workers.
The main issues which caused the workers strikes include: wages, bonus, personnel, leave
and hours of work, violence and indiscipline, industrial and labour policies, etc. The
workers take recourse to various types of collective actions for getting their problems
redressed. These are – strikes, satyagrah, hunger strikes, bandhs and hartals, gharaos,
demonstrations, mass casual leaves, work to rule, cutting of supply of electricity, etc. The
most common form of workers’ collective action is the strike. There are examples of the
railway, jute, plantation, mine and textiles workers strikes in the pre-Independence period.
The centres of the strikes were Nagpur, Ahemadabad, Bombay, Madras, Howrah and
Calcutta. In 1920 Gandhi intervened in the strike the textile workers of Ahmedabad and
provided leadership to the workers.
3
4
radicalists had formed the United Trade Union Congress (UTUC) in 1949. After 1964
when there was a division in the Communist Party of India and Communist Party of India
(Marxist) was borne this led to a split in Communist controlled AITUC as well and in 1970
Centre for Indian Trade Union (C ITU) was borne. They are affiliated to the CPI and CMI
(M).
According to the provisional figures released by the Chief Labour Commissioner in 1994
Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh (BMS) which is an affiliate of BJP has acquired a total
membership of 31.17 lakh workers has secured the top position. The INTUC a Congress
affiliated body with a total membership of 27.06 lakh is on the second position. The third
position is enjoyed by CITU affiliated to CPM with a total membership of 17.98 lakh. The
fourth position is enjoyed by HMS. According to the provisional figures the hold of
Congress affiliated INTUC seems to have weakened. At the same time the hold of
organisations like CITU, HMS and AITUC have strengthened.
(ii) The Provincial Levels
Another remarkable development of the 1960s was the birth of trade unions of the regional
parties like the DMK and AIDMK in Madras. The Shiv Sena was born in Bombay in 1967.
It soon set up its labour wing called Bharatiya Kamgar Sena. It was generally believed that
the Shiv Sena had the backing of the industrial houses in the Bombay -Pune belt to counter
the strong influence of the Communists and Socialists in labour unions. It succeeded in
achieving this objective and its trade union established its supremacy in the Bombay region
by the mid -1970s.The predominance of the Sena -led union was successfully challenged
by Datta Samant, an eminent INTUC leader. When emergency was imposed in 1975 he
refused to tone down his militancy. He was arrested and sent to jail. Then he was a
Congress MLA. After coming out of jail when the emergency was lifted in 1977 he became
even more popular. By the end of the 1970s he became the most powerful trade union
leader in the Bombay -Pune belt. In the year1978 he left both congress and the INTUC to
set up an independent union named the Maharastra Girni Kamgar Union (MGKU). He
remained one of the most influential trade union leader in Bombay till he was murdered.
(iii) The Trade Unions without Political Affiliations
The 1960s also witnessed the emergence of independent unions or “apolitical”. They were
independent in the sense that they were not affiliated to any political party or federation.
These kinds of “apolitical” trade unions emerged out of the dissatisfaction of the workers
with the existing trade unions which were affiliated to the political parties. The leadership
of these unions has largely come from the educated middle classes. Engineering Mazdoor
Sabha led by R J Mehta is one of the earliest unions of these type-covering workers in
4
5
engineering, chemicals, printing and allied industries. Datta Samant started a number of
unions like Association of Engineering workers, Mumbai General Kamgar Union,
Maharashtra Girni Kamgar Union. Shankar Guha Neyogi and A.K.Roy also came into
limelight as leaders of independent unions. Neyogi concentrated on contract workers in the
iron –ore mines of Dalli Rajhara near Bhilai in Madhya Pradesh into a formidable union.
While AITUC and INTUC were concerned with the problems of permanent and better paid
workers of the Bhilai Steel Plant, concentrated on casual workers employed in small and
medium-scale industries in the region. Neyogi was murdered in 1990. Another example of
this type is A.K.Roy who organised coal mine workers in the Dhanbad -Jhariya belt of
Bihar. Roy`s support base was also among contract and casual labour in the coalmines. Roy
also received support from a large number of local tribal mine workers because the trade
unions operating in these areas did not satisfy them. Another important example of this
type was the Self- Employed Women’s Association (SEWA) formed by Ela Bhat. She
founded SEWA because she felt that unions in the organised sectors were not sensitive to
the problems encountered by female workers. These are not the only examples of
independent unions.
One of the most important examples of the movement launched by the union which was
unaffiliated to the political parties was the textile workers’ strike of 1982 in Mumbai.
Dissatisfied with the Rastriya Mill Mazdoor Sangh (RMMS), affiliated to the INTUC the
workers of the textile industry in Mumbai, rallied behind the MGKU-led by Datta Samant.
The workers of the textile workers of Mumbai went on indefinite strike on January 18,
1982. The demands of the workers included higher wages, making the badli (temporary)
workers permanent, allowances for leave and travel and payment for house rent. The
workers of other sectors than the textile also rallied behind Datta Samant. The Industrialists
adopted intransigent attitude towards the strike. The strike created hardships for the
workers.
The strike had its repercussion on the rural areas to which the workers belonged. The
textile workers also were the poor peasants or small farmers having links both in the cities
as well the villages. Datta Samat was able to link the rural issues like the wages of
agricultural labourer with those of the textile workers. The strike, however, did not succeed
in getting the original demands of the workers accepted. But it helped Datta Samant to
emerge as the most influential trade union leader in Bombay.
5
6
The Trade Union Movement in India is faced with many defects. Only a small fraction of
the working class is organised. Even in the organised sector a sizable chunk of workers do
not participate in Trade Union Movement Indian economy is largely agriculture based.
Small peasants and agricultural labour encounter the problems of seasonal unemployment
and low income. They are forced to go to cities in search of employment. Most of these
workers are illiterate and ignorant and under the grip of superstitions and they have a
migratory character. A large section of the workers do not exhibit much interest in trade
union movement because city life for them is a temporary condition. So they do not realise
the importance of unity among workers. Another major weakness of trade union is poor
finance. This is a fact that working class in India is a very small part of the population but
the main problem is the multiplicity of trade unions. The subscription rate by Indian
workers is very less. This makes the trade unions dependent on external finance and
influence. Yet another weakness of the trade union movement has been the dominance of
the leadership from outside. The main reason for this has been lack of education among the
workers. Mostly leadership is provided by professional politicians. It is being increasingly
felt that the working class movement should be led by persons from the ranks of the
workers who are aware of the problems and difficulties encountered by the working class.
Political leadership ignores the needs and welfare of the workers and tries to use the
organization for the interest of the political party.
Check Your Progress Exercise 1
Note: i) Use the space below for your answer.
ii) Check Your answer given at the end of the unit.
1) Identify the main issue of the workers’ movement in India.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2) What were the reasons for the rise of “apolitical” trade Unions?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3) Mention the limitations of the trade union movement in India.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6
7
Peasants are those agrarian classes which are related to agriculture as the tenants or owners
of land, and participate in the farming activities. They are a differentiated group. In the
backward and feudal agriculture they cultivate land as the tenants of the landlords. In the
more advanced agriculture, where the tenants have become the landowners following the
implementation of the of the land reforms, they are the owners of the land. The peasants
whose resources in the land are not enough to meet their basic needs, and who also work as
labourers for others apart from working on their fields are poor and small peasants. The
peasants who do not work for wages, but have enough resources relating to agriculture are
rich and middle peasants or the farmers. They either mainly depend on the family labour to
work on the land or they may combine it with the hired labour from outside the family. In
this section you will be studying the movements of the small and poor peasants as well
those of the rich peasants or the farmers.
28.3.1 Small and Poor Peasant Movements
There were several peasant movements both in the pre-Independence and post-
Independence periods. Some examples of the former are – Oudh movement (UP) in 1920,
Kheda and Bardoli (Guajarat) and Champaran (Bihar) movements and Moplah rebillions.
The main examples of the of the post-Independence period are – Telangana ( Andhra
pradesh), and Tibhaga and Naxalite (West Bengal) movements.
The peasants during the pre-Independence period were living in the miserable social and
economic conditions. They were exploited by a group of classes, e.g., landlords and their
agents, moneylenders and the officials of the colonial state. The landlords increased the
rents on the peasants continuously, took forced gifts and extracted begar from them. The
7
8
inability of the peasants to pay these multiplied due to the frequent famines and draught
which affected them adversely. They were heavily indebted to the moneylenders in order to
pay the rent and meet the needs of their subsistence. When the peasants could not pay the
rent, services or the begar, they were evicted form their land. They were also physically
tortured. Commercialisation of crops, and introduction of new land rules further worsened
their conditions.
The peasants reacted to by revolting against the landlords, moneylenders and agents of the
colonial state. Leadership in the peasant movements was provided either by the rural
intelligentsia or urban intelligentsia. Baba Ram Chand , the leader of the Oudh peasant
movement belonged to the former.
The peasants had been mobilised by some organisation. In case there was no organisation,
some kind of informal networking of the peasants and their leaders had worked as
orgnisation. This was true especially for the localised revolts. The informal networking or
the organisational structure worked in mobilisation, communication of the messages and in
planning strategies and programmes.
From the beginning of the twentieth century different political parties mobilised the
peasants in the revolts. The Congress started mobilising the peasants from the 1920s with
the purpose to broaden its support base. This enabled peasant movements which were
localised and running parallel to the national movement to merge with the latter. The
Bardoli Sataygrah of 1928, no- rent campaign were examples of such merger. But the
Congress did not encourage the conflict between the landlords and the peasants to get
sharpened. The Congress had been more interested in forging an alliance between the
landlords, peasants and other classes.
After the Civil Disobedience Movement radical nationalists and many leaders of peasant
movement started sharing the impression that the Congress was sympathetic towards the
capitalists and Zamindars.The need to evolve independent class organisations and
leadership to safeguard the interest of the peasants was being felt by them. This was under
these circumstances that the first all India peasant organisation the All India Kisan Sabha
was formed in 1936 in Lucknow under the presidentship of Swami Sahjanand Saraswati,
the founder of Bihar Pradesh Kisan Sabha. N.G.Ranga the pioneer of Kisan movement in
Andhra became its first General Secretary. The birth of an all India organization with a
programme of common demands and expressing the aspirations of the peasants all over the
country was an event of great historical significance. Very soon the branches of the All
India Kisan Sabha were established in many districts.
8
9
The formation of Congress Ministries in a majority of the provinces in early 1937 marked
the beginning of a new phase in the growth of peasant movements. The Congress had
promised radical improvement in the conditions of the peasants on the eve of elections.
There was definite increase in civil liberties, which provided better opportunities for the
mobilization of peasantry. Different Congress Ministries introduced agrarian legislations
for debt relief, restoration of lands lost during depression, for security of tenure etc. But
these measures did not affect the conditions of the peasants of lower strata. The
dissatisfaction of peasants found expression in a number of protest meetings, conferences
and demonstrations. They criticised number of anti-peasant measures taken by the
government like arrest of peasant leaders and banning peasant meetings. The outbreak of
the World War II brought the resignation of the Congress Ministries and launching of
severe repression against Kisan Sabha leaders. In the year 1939 the national convention of
the All India Kisan Sabha was presided over by Acharya Narendra Dev. In his Presidential
address he emphasised the need of separation of Kisan Sabha from Congress. According to
him a separate Kisan Sabha was necessary in order to put pressure on the Congress.
The end of the war, followed by the negotiation for the transfer of power and the
anticipation of freedom marked a new stage in the history of peasant movements.
Approaching freedom had filled the peasant movements with new spirit to assert their
rights. The analysis of some of these movements gives us sufficient insight into the nature,
social basis, achievements and limitations of the peasant movements in India.
The Tebhaga Movement of Bengal was one of such movements. The provincial Kisan
Sabha of Bengal launched this Movement in 1946. Gradually the influence of the left in
general and the communists in particular increased in the Kisan Sabha.In 1947 the
leadership of the All India Kisan Sabha went into the hands of the communists. The
communists led the provincial Kisan Sabha of Bengal also. This Movement soon took the
form of a clash between the bargardars (share-croppers) and the jotedars, the employers.
The share-croppers began to assert that they would no longer pay a half share of their crop
to their jotedars but only one- third. They also insisted that before division the crop would
be stored in their khamars (godowns) and not in that of the jotedars. Poor peasants, middle
peasants and also some sons of jotedars led the movement. The middle peasants provided
the bulk of the leaders and they supported the movement up to the end. They hoped that it
would culminate in total attack on landlordism. The rich peasants slowly detached
themselves. When the government resorted to severe repression in 1947 the movement
came to an end.
9
10
Another such movement was the Telangna Movement. It was launched in 1946 in the
princely state of Hyderabad ruled by the Nizam. This movement developed in the context
of the post- war economic crisis. This movement started as a protest against collection of
excessive revenue using force by jagirdars. In the beginning the leadership was in the hands
of the rich peasants and the movement was directed against the big absentee landlords
allied to the Nizamsahi. But very soon the initiative passed into the hands of poor peasants
and agricultural labour that started occupying lands of landlords, and wastelands and
started distributing it among them. By 1947 this movement organized a Guerilla Army
mobilizing poor peasantry and agricultural labour many of which were tribal and
untouchables. This army snatched large quantity of arms from the zamindars and drove
away the local government officials. They established their control over an area of 15,000
square miles with a population of 40,000. The administrations in these areas were run by
peasant soviets. The army of independent India succeeded in crushing the Telangna
Movement in 1951.
In 1967 there started a peasant protest at a place called Naxalbari in the Darjeeling District
of West Bengal. After two decades of independence and congress rule there was
disenchantment among people on a large scale, which found expression in Congress losing
election in eight states. But the communists had done well in both Kerala and West Bengal.
The per capita income was on decline and unemployment was on the rise. A group of
young communists due to theoretical disputes resulting from the split of the Communist
Party of India in 1964 protested CPIM`s policy of participation in 1967 election and joining
the government afterwards instead emphasised the need of armed struggle with peasantry
as the leading element. The peasant organisation of the CPIM in Darjeeling district was in
the hands of such communist leaders. The land reform policy of the government had not
succeeded in taking lands from zamindars and big farmers and distributing among poor
peasants and landless labour in any significant way. There existed discontent among
peasants. In such situation the leaders of peasant organization gave a call for establishing
the government of peasant committees, organizing armed struggle to end the ownership of
the jotedars on land and distribute it among poor peasants and landless labour. They drew
inspiration from the Telangna Movement. The Naxalbari movement reached its zenith by
the third week of May 1967. There was violence on a large scale. Naxalbari got enormous
publicity largely because it was fighting a state government wherein C.P.I.M. was a major
coalition partner and also because China believed that the Naxalites were following the
correct line.
10
11
It lasted for fifty-two days only. In July 1967 police and battalions of paramilitary forces
sent by Ajoy Mukherjee then the Chief Minister of the state, combed the whole area and
the rebellion was suppressed. Naxalbari was a minor event in terms of its durations,
intensity of resistance; area controlled or number of casualties suffered or inflicted on the
other side. On these indicators Telangna was a much bigger happening. But Naxalbari
acquired the symbol of armed peasant uprising. It had its reverberations all over the
country. After this the revolutionaries who became active in U.P., Bihar, Punjab, Kashmir,
Kerala and Andhra Pradesh came to be known as Naxalites. It emerged as a more powerful
force in Kerala, Andhra Pradesh and Bihar. The emergence of Naxalism led to the
formation of C.P.I. (Marxist Leninist) the third Communist party. This party believed that
the goal of socialism could be achieved through armed struggle, justified use of violence
for capturing lands of Zamindars and distributing them among poor peasants. The Naxalite
Movement became a reference point for those poor peasants and landless labour that got
nothing from the government except promises and whose condition showed no signs of
improvement and were suffering oppressions at the hands of rural dominant sections. They
found a ray of hope in this militant philosophy. This philosophy continues to inspire that
segment of rural population who has lived at the receiving end. At many places they are
fighting for security of employment, minimum wages, rights over a share of produce and
against sexual abuse of their women. There are instances of violence when they exercise
their right to vote. Most of the time they have to resort to violence to protect their rights
and dignity which is under threat from the land owning and dominant sections of society.
Their faith in violence is strengthened because they find the state and the police always
taking sides with the land owning dominant sections of society.
The second phase of land reforms known as the Land Ceiling Act started from 1961
onwards with the stated objective of distributing land among the landless. After the
Naxalbari Movement of 1967 and the Land Grab Movements launched in different states of
1970 the need to impose rigorous land ceiling was realized. As early as in 1969 the Home
Minister had warned that if steps were not taken to lessen agrarian tension both by the state
and central government things would go beyond control. Land Reforms was essential part
of the twenty Point Programme ofMrs Indira Gandhi during Emergency period. But in spite
of all this by 1977 only 4.04 million acres were declared surplus, out of this 2.10 million
were taken over by the government and merely 1.29 million acres were actually distributed
The much acclaimed Green Revolution did not make much of difference in their condition.
The percentage of households below poverty line in the rural areas has gone up from
38.11% in 1960-61 to 48% in 1977-78. Agricultural labour continues to be their main
11
12
income and most of the studies suggest that there has been a marked decline in both real
wages and the days of work.
Naxalite outfits are active in Andhra pradesh, Bihar, Madhya pradesh and also in newly
created states of Jharkhand and Chatisgarh. Many times they indulge in mindless militancy
but they continue to inspire the underdogs of rural society because mostly they take up the
problems faced by these sections. The government treats their armed struggle as law and
order problem and uses police and paramilitary forces to suppress them the government has
not shown the determination to address to the problems faced by the rural poor. The land
reforms carried out by the government had not succeeded in distributing land among poor
peasants and landless labour in any significant way. There have been attempts to ameliorate
the financial conditions of poor peasants, agricultural labourers and artisans in the rural
areas through funds made available by the central governments to the districts. But a major
chunk of these funds are cornered by local vested interests.
The agricultural labourers, poor peasants, contract labourers whether dalits, tribals or caste
Hindus have been struggling to assert their rights. They struggle for wages, land, and
against oppression of different types. Their movements are weak and divided. But surely it
has a potential to emerge as a powerful force and can get justice.
12
13
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________________________________
28.3.2 Rich Peasants’ and Farmers’ Movements
________________________________________________________________________
The last quarter of the twentieth century has seen the movements of a very important
social group in the rural areas known as rich peasants, farmers, kulaks or the capitalist
farmers in several regions of India. They rallied behind the farmers’ organisations in their
respective regions. These organisations are - two Bharatiya Kisan Unions (the BKUs) of
Punjab and Uttar Pradesh, Shetkari Sangathan of Maharastra, Khadyut Samaj of Gujarat,
Karnataka Rjya Raitha Sangha of Karnartaka and Vivasayigal of Tamil Nadu. The most
prominent leaders of these unions are Bhupendra Singh Mann in Punjab, Mahendra Singh
Tikait in UP, Sharad Joshi in Maharastra and Nandunjappa Swami in Karnatak. These
farmers are the most influential and resourceful sections of rural society in their respective
regions. They largely belong to the intermediate castes. They have benefited most from the
state policies especially the land reforms and the green revolution. They cultivate land with
the family labour supported by the hired-labour. They control the maximum resources in
the rural society – land, water resources, animals, modern technology like tractors, etc.
The movements of rich farmers unlike the movements of poor peasants are not directed
against any rural exploiters. In fact, a large group of them belong to the latter. These are
directed against the state and unequal terms of trade.
Their main demands have been – remunerative prices, susidised imputs, writing off loans,
lowering of electricity bills, substantial reduction in water canal charges, representation of
the farmers in the Agricultural Price Commission. With the exception of the Maharastra,
these movement did not raise the problems of the small producers. Rather, Tikait has
demanded scrapping of land ceiling laws and of the Minimum wages Act.
The most common mode of mobilisation in the farmers’ or the rich peasants’ movements
include rallies, satyagrah, road blocaked, gaon bandi (banning the entry of outsiders into
the villages) and attack on the public property. Some times these result in violence. Their
“apolitical” nature, which means their not being attached to the political parties has been
13
14
the most effective method of mobilisation, especially in the in the initial phase of the
movements.
While the farmers’ movements in India shared several common characteristics, e.g., they
raised the market-oriented demands, their “apolitical” nature, their direction against the
state, patterns of mobilisation, the BKU movement of UP was distinct in terms of
leadership and involvement of the traditional institution. Mahendra Singh Tikait, the chief
of the Uttar Pradesh BKU is also the hereditary head of the traditional caste organisation
known as the Sarva Khap of the farming Jats. His social position enabled him to become
the leader of the BKU at a time when the farmers of the UP did not have a leader of that
stature in the wake of the death of Charan Singh in 1987. Tikait was able to involve the
traditional leaderships or Khaps -chiefs of several farming castes under the banner of the
BKU. Besides, the BKU also took up the social issues like dowry in the initial phase of its
movement.
The Bharatiya Kissan Union of Mahendra Singh Tikait speaks a language that invokes
elements of Charan Singh’s discourse on agriculture. Charan Singh used to argue that there
was an urban bias in Indian planning and held it accountable for diversion of resources
from agriculture. It, however, does not go to the extent of treating industrial and urban
India agains the rural India unlike the Shetkari Sangathan of Sharad Joshi. The rich peasant
organisations do not admit any contradiction between the interests of rich peasants and the
poor agrarian classes. They argue that unremunerative prices affect both the rich and the
poor peasants. While the Shetkari Sangthan maintains a façade of India and Bharat divide
to hide the class divide in agriculture, the BKU conceals it under the cover of existing
Bhaichara (brotherhood) and peasant- proprietorship in the western U.P.
The movement of rich peasant has become an important fact of the present day Indian
reality. No political party can afford to displease them. The government’s decision to
enhance electricity rates for farmers, raising fertilizer prices are met with stiff resistance.
Many times they resort to stoppage of the supply of commodities like onion sugar or milk
to get their demands conceded. One thing has become obvious that there has been a
tremendous increase in the power of this class. They not only exploit the labour power and
control majority of land they also control levers of power like gram panchayat, zila
parishad co-operatives and educational institutions and banks to get maximum benefit from
these institution and also to maintain its dominant position in the rural area.
The rich farmers are diversifying their sources of income. Some of their income comes
from outside the agrarian sector like employment in cities, rent trade, money lending or
14
15
transport. They are also investing in small industries like sugar and rice mills as well as in
food processing.
________________________________________________________________________
28.4 THE IMPACT OF ECONOMIC LIBERALIZATION ON THE WORKERS
AND PEASANT MOVEMENTS
________________________________________________________________________
The economic reforms in the country that came to be known as liberalisation can be said to
be mainly the - 1990 development. The era of reforms started with the government of P.V.
Narsimha Rao. Since then successive governments have continued with liberalisation
agenda. The present government of Atal Behari Vajpayee is also committed to this agenda.
Among the main planks of this New Economic policy are closure of sick and loss making
public enterprises, disinvestments from and privatisation of the public sector enterprises.
There has been a marked decline in the growth rate of total employment in the organised
sector in the 1990`s as compared to 1980`s. In fact this period is known as a period of
jobless growth. Labour laws relating to job security are being changed. Many workers have
been pushed out of jobs under the voluntary retirement scheme. A practice of using
contract and casual labour in place of regular employees has become widespread. There
have been strikes by Trade Unions to protect the interests of workers in State Electricity
Boards, ITDC hotels, banks, etc. A National Renewal Fund was created as early as in 1992
to provide a social safety net to the labour force rendered jobless.
In 1994 the government of India signed the Uruguway round of the General Agreement on
Tariffs and Trade (GATT) at Maracas [Morocco] and became a member of the World
Trade Organization (WTO). This step of the government can be seen as part of the New
Economic policy. As per conditions of the GATT, developing countries including India are
under obligation to introduce subsidies -discipline. They are being asked to keep subsidies
to the farmers up to 10% of their value of output. But cutting down on subsidies is a
difficult proposition because no government wants to displease the rich farmers. They
continue to get things like irrigation waters and electricity either free or at throwaway
prices. Another G.ATT related problem faced by the farmers is introduction of patenting in
agriculture. The farmer is not automatically permitted to use farm-saved-seeds of protected
varieties to sow the next crop. He has either to pay compensation for the use of seeds saved
by him or obtain the approval of the breeder. As most of the Plant Breeders are the Multi
National Corporations (MNCs), their primary intention is maximisation of profit. This
leaves the farmers no option but to buy the seeds again. Farmers in Karnatka attacked the
15
16
farm of Cargill Seeds to register their anger. There have been protests against Terminator-
Seeds of cotton in Maharashtra and Gujrat. The response of the rich farmers` movements to
new developments like the New Economic Policy, India joining WTO has not been
undifferentiated. While Sharad Joshi in the western part of the country has supported the
new developments. Mahendra Singh Tikait in the north and Nanjundaswamy in the south
have been critical of it.
Check Your Progress Exercise 3
Note: i) Use the space below for your answer.
ii) Check Your answer given at the end of the unit.
Q. 1. Identify the main farmers’ organisations along with their main leaders and the regions
of their operation.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Q. 2. What are the main demands of the rich peasant movements?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Q. 3 What has been the impact of the New Economic Policy on the workers?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In this unit you have studied about the collective action or the social and political
movements of the workers and the peasants in India. These groups have been agitating
from the colonial period for the redressal of their grievances. They formed their
organisations and responded to the call of their leadership. The problems of the workers
included mainly wages, bonus, personnel, leave and hours of work, violence and
indiscipline, industrial and labour policies, etc. The peasants are not a homogeneous
category. The poor and small peasants are related to their vulnerable social and economic
conditions. The farmers which are also known as the rich peasants, kulaks or the capitalist
16
17
farmers are mobilised around the issues related to the developed and commercial farming.
The period from the 197os onwards has seen the rise of workers and peasants’
organisations and the movements which are not affiliated to any political party. The
farmers and peasants movements affect the political processes in India to a significant
extent.
17
18
18
19
Rather, Tikait has demanded scrapping of land ceiling laws and of the Minimum wages
Act.
3) The impact of the New Economic Policy on the workers is reflected in the following
way: deterioration in their material conditions, privatisation, retrenchment and the
Voluntary Retirement Scheme, etc.
19
UNIT 29 GLOBALISATION AND
LIBERALISATION
Structure
29.0 Objectives
29.1 Introduction
29.2 Globalisation: Meaning and Approaches
29.2.1 Meaning
29.2.2 Characteristics
29.2.3 Approaches
29.3 Globalisation and World Systems
29.3.1 The World Systems: Capitalist, Socialist and Mixed Economy
29.3.2 Transformation of the World Systems under Globalisation
29.3.3 Regionalisation of Trade and Investment Flows
29.4 Liberalisation
29.4.1 Meaning
29.4.2 Shift from State to Market
29.4.3 Facets of Liberalisation
29.5 Globalisation, Nation-State and Sovereignty
29.5.1 Shifting Conceptlon of the Natton-State and Sovereignty
29.6 Impact of Globalisation
29.6.1 Economic
29.6.2 Political
29.6.3 Cultural
29.7 Response of the Indian State\
29.7.1 Measures towards ~lobalisation
29.8 Debate on Liberalisation and Globalisation in India
29.8.1 Growth of the Economy
29.8.2 External Control
29.8.3 Impact on Unemployment and Poverty
29.8.4 Inequaltty between Rich and Poor States
29.8.5 Basic Industries and Infrastructure
29.8.6 Investment in Social Sectors
29.9 Let Us Sum Up
29.10 Some Useful Books
29.11 Answers to Check Your Progress ~ x e r c i s e s
29.0 OBJECTIVES
This unit is intended to acquaint you with a major development of our times
called globalisation and how the policy of liberalisation is integrally bound
with it. After going through this unit you will be able to:
1 l-l,,,c,,,4 A
, m-,-Pa;otn th- +~n,-l~nt -
n .
x~~ r n r r l c mlr.Lnl;nnt;n+..
Context or Indian State
Distinguish globalisation from World Systems;
Understand contemporary forms of dominance;
Grasp the reasons for and forms of the increased significance of the market;
Mark the changing role of the nation-state under globalisation;
Assess the impact of globalisation; ahd
Take into account and estimate the response of India to globalisation.
29.1 INTRODUCTION
Modem civilisation has brought profound changes in the productive capacities
of men and women, in their social relations and institutions i d the way
they have thought of themselves and the world around them. However, these
transfonnations were primarily bounded by what came to be called as the
nation-state. There were some processes that went beyond the confines of
the nation-state such as trade; expansion of capital; growth of knowledge;
spread of ideologies; affiliation to religion and beliefs; spread of culture, arts,
sports and even the rise of certain international institutions but the nation-
state remained the final court of appeal. However, the last three decades
have witnessed certain profound changes in this configuration resulting in new
and larger networks of exchange; great movement of peoples, goods and
information; transnational social and economic interaction and increasing flows
of trade, investment and culture. New economic, political and cultural institutions
have arisen. These changes have circumscribed the place and role of the
nation-state in a profound way. Increasingly our lives today are intimately
shaped by developments beyond the confines of the nation-state. Changes
in technology and information have radically altered the hitherto familiar
notions of space and time. The relationship between culture, economics and
politics is being redefined through rapid exchange of information, ideas and
knowledge. These widespread changes are attempted to be captured by the
term globalisation.
Globalists argue that there has been rapid forging of global bonds as
expressed in international trade and investment and they have superseded
and supplanted the national economy. Traditionalists, however, do not think
that the category of national economy has been supplanted by globalisation.
The transformationalists argue that although new forces of intense
interdependence and integration inform the world we are not into a single
system as yet. They feel that there is the disintegration of local and national
economies and the emergence of more mixed, interdependent and highly
uneven economies which cannot be encompassed within the fold of a single
clrctpm
Context o f I n d i a n State In the globalising world that is underway capitalism definitely holds its sway.
There is also no doubt that the present version of globalisation is a triumph
of the erstwhile capitalist system worldwide. Analysts, however, are not
agreed on :
to what extent we can characterise the global system as a new phase
of capitalism,
the specific nature of class relations under globalisation and the class blocs
that ensue therefrom, and
the relation of the market to class struggle
29.3.3 Regionalisation of Trade and Investment Flows
Recent studies indicate that while trade and oversees investment has grown
the proportion of trade to gross domestic product (GDP) has remained
steady since World War I, the pattern of domestic consumption of the
produce, to the extent possible, has not seen major change. Besides, although
there is growth in foreign direct investment (FDI) since 1980, FDI formed
only 5.2 per cent of the world's capital formation. Resources to finance
investment continue to be primarily domestic.
Even today, the international economy is characterised by the development
of regional trading and investment blocs. The most significant configurations
are USA or North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), The European
Union countries and Japan. They accounted for % of the world's GDP in
late 1990's and in 1996, 66 per cent of world trade flows although they
account for 15 per cent of the World's population. A vast section of the
underdeveloped world is out of this process. Further these three big economies
were quite closed in terms of trade interdependence and investment integration
in 1990's. When we look beyond these blocs there is little North-South
trade as yet. The manufactured imports of the Organisation for Economic
Cooperation and Development (OECD) countries in 1992 was not more
than 2.3 per a cent of the GDP of these countries.
In fact if there .is a trend visible; it is the thickening network of trade
participation within the core, the most developed countries. National economies
continue to be primary players on the scene. Between 1991 and 1996 the
USA, EU and Japan acc~untedfor 60 per cent of the world flows of
FDI.
Often the FDI flows are away from the periphery into the core of the
system. Globalisation provides the mechanisms and the rationale for agents
in the periphej to plough their investment in the developed world.
While the regional focus of the economy is inMct, there is at the same
time an attempt to forge agreements on a wider sphere of economic
exchange. They lay down codes governing these exchanges and attempt to
keep conflicts within control. The most important of these agreements was
the one to constitute the World Trade Organisation (WTO) in 1995, which
has become a major pillar of globalisation. A whole range of items which
were earlier part of the national decision are brought before the WTO, such
as agriculture and related activities, trade related investment measures (TRIMS),
trade related intellectual property rights(TRIPS), trade in services and movement
of -ns, the prevention of foreign compebtion through duties and quantitative
restrictions such as quotas, exchange controls and regulation. These agreements
do not favour subsidies. Market mechanisms are supposed to determine Globalisation and
Liberalisation
optimum pursuits.
In relation to the understanding of the world systems, we can note the
following changes under conditions of globalisation:
a) There is clearly more intense integration of the economy at the regional
level in the developed world. The national economy still holds its ground.
b) The developed world has marked the code, rules and regulations for the *
2 9.4 LIBERALISATION
In the 1980's there was a strong shift away from the State to the market
in the allocation of resources in large parts of the world. It was accompanied
by the information and communication revolution which favoured the market.
This shiil led to widespread deregulation of the economy and measures to
reduce taxes and government expenditure.
Disagre ments on the changed role of the nation state apart, there is no
7
disagreement that they function today in highly altered conditions. Nation-
states are increasingly perceived as resources to be employed in negotiations
with transnational and international agencies and to keep sub-state actors
in control. In such an understanding sovereignty becomes a bargaining chip
in multilateral and transnational negotiations. This reconceptualisation of the
role of the state allows room for its continued salience in spite of the
profound shift of power to systems of regional and global governance.
L There are a host of issues today where the ability of the state to govern
Context o f Indian State
be easily tied to the jurisdiction of individual nation-states. Such problems
as environmental pollution, depletion of the ozone layer are simply beyond
the control of individual states. No state today can monitor for long and
effectively cross border communication. Further globalisation has reinforced
such occupations as drug trade enormously. In 1990's the estimated annual
illicit drug turnover was over 400 billion US dollars equal to the gross
national product of India in 1998.
................................................................................................................
' .,JJr$jke in most of the other countries which set on reforms much earlier
1ndian liberalisation has been around for less than a decade. It makes
assessment of trends and tendencies less accurate. The debate on liberalisation
in India has squared around issues that have been central to the nationalist
agenda in India. It is not entwined in the kind of ideological debates that
marked the liberalising policies in the W s t , particularly Great Britain.
T :harnl:nnt:r\- :n TnA:n hnn .r-mnAl.r hnnn n h n l l n m m n A h;thnr)rr &am thn
Globalisation and
nationalist and Marxist perspectives and not h m alternative liberal-democratic Liberalisation
pers~ectivesas in the West.
Given the fact that the political centre, from the right to the left, has not
opposed liberalisation it enjoys widespread political consensus in India at
present. Except the communist parties and the Rashrtiya Swayam Sevak
Sangh (R.S.S.) and some of its affiliates, all the other major political parties
in India have extended their support to the liberalising measures. Anyway,
they have not been actively opposed to most of these measures. This
consensus, however, is highly precarious. The debate on the following issues
shows that this consensus cannot be taken for granted for long.
29.8.1' Growth of the Economy -
Although growth of the economy, both quantitative and qualitative, alone
cannot be the rationale for liberalisation, in a developing society like India
it cannot but be of central importance. Besides, although growth by itself
may not meet the other desirable objectives growth is absolutely central to
pursue the? Further we cannot gainsay that in the absence of liberalisation,
the trends in the economy prior to its adoption would have persisted:
f) India's compound rate of growth in the second half of 1980's was 5.8
per annum. The average rate for 1992-98 comes to 6.5 per cent per
annum. Industrial growth for the period 6as been 8.1 per cent and it
is slightly higher than 7.94 per cent that prevailed in the second half of
1980's.The growth of the industry, however, has been very unsteady. The
rate of industrial growth reached a high of 12.8 per cent in 1995-1996
but during 1996-1999 it has been low and unsteady.
ii) The fiscal deficit in the reform period has remained 5.7 per cent as
compared to 8.8 per cent of GDP in the second half of 1980's.
iii] Inflation has been on the decline during the reform period. However, the
growth of consumer index relative to the wholesale shows that food prices
and other goods of mass consumption are increasing at a faster pace
affecting the weaker sections.
iv) India has generally lagged behind in R&D effort."However, ever since
India embraced the path of liberalisation and globalisation its spending in
R&D has fallen. India spent 0.96 per cent of its GDP on R&D in 1988
which came down to 0.8% in 1999. The corresponding amount is 2-
3% of the GDP for developed countries.
v) There has been an unprecedented rise in mergers and acquisitions in the
Irpdian corporate sector after liberalisation.
fbms to make their investment
vi) After liberalisation there is more flexibility for
decisions and in choosing plant capacities. Unprecedented restructuring of
the Indian industry to meet the challenges of the global market has taken
place during the last one decade. Dilution of the MRTP act has removed
many restrictions on' corporate investments and growth.
29.8.2 External Control
The growth of the economy has definitely been favourable so far. At the
same time Indian economy has clearly tended towards monopolies and
towards integration with the global economy. In this context following trends
.;2 \risible:
Context of Indian State
9 Propotion of trade to GNP has gone up steadily from 14.1 per cent
in 1990-91 to 18.2 per cent in 1998-1999. India's economy has become
increasingly interdependent on the global economy.
n The remittances of Indians abroad has been to,the tune of 2.5 per cent
of GDP during the libearlising decade compared to just 1 per cent in
the late 1980's. In fact just prior to liberalisation these remittances were
declining. Indians are one of the major contenders in the global labour
flows today.
iiii The FDI flow to India in 1991 was $200 million while US$ 14.6 billion
worth of FDI was approved in 1997 although the actual inflow was
just $3.2 billion. Even this amount was a major advance compared
to the situation prior to liberalisation. However, out of the estimated $684
billion FDI flow worldwide in 1994, India's share was a pittance. Besides
most of the FDI flow in India so far has been directed towards the
non-manufacturing sector and for acquisition of already existing units.
iv) Liberalisation ha.$ facilitated Indian companies raising resources in western
stock exchanges. It was 2.5 per cent of the GDP during the period
1996-97 to 1998-1999.
v) MNCs have taken advantage of the new rules to increase their stake
in their existing affiliates in India. However, the thrust is still to produce
for the Indian Market. Little export-oriented FDI has hitherto come to
India.
vi) External debt has become much more manageable after embracing the
liberalising measures. A healthy foreign exchange reserve has been built
up of about U S 3 5 billions in 2000.
viii India has liberlised its trade with South Asia at a faster pace. All
quantitative restrictions have been removed on imports of 2300 items
from SAARC countries. However, given the volume of trade flows of
South Asian countries, this regional liberalisation will not make much of
a difference in the near future.
viii) Changes in Foreign Exchange Regulation Act have removed shareholding
and business restrictions. Restrictions on income repatriation have been
removed. Similarly policies related to foreign technology purchases and
licensing have been liberalised.
/ /
30.0 OBJTECTIVES
Much of the recent political debate in India has been over the issue of
secularism, from passionate defence of a secular way of life and politics,
the arguments range all the way to a complete denouncement of secular
ideals and politics. In a sense this debate is today at the heart of Indian
politics. After going through this unit, you should be able to:
Understand the meaning and historical significance of secularism;
ldentify the challenges to secularism; and
Formulate a strategy to cope with these threats.
30.1 INTRODUCTION
Secularism, along with a commitment to the ideals of democracy, equality
and freedom were some of the fundamental principles that inspired a large
section of our people to fight against British colonialism. After independence,
these values were enshrined in the Constitution, thus enjoining the state to
uphold these principles. When we look at our society closely we notice
a steady devaluation of these ideals, challenged as they are by various social,
political and economic developments. For our heterogeneous society secularism
is undoubtedly the most cherished principle. However, it is this that is
being severely challenged by communal forces. The battle lines are clearly
drawn between those who stand for a democratic society and those for
whom democracy is dispensable. Secularism is a part of the commitment
to democracy and hence worth defending and fighting for.
Context of Indian State
30.2 SECULAVSM: MEANING AND DEFINITION
We will begin this unit by attempting to understand the meaning of secularism.
In the west, secularism was part of a whole range of new ideas and
institutions that marked the end of the feudal order and the emergence of
a sovereign modem nation-state with new forms of economic organisation.
Its clearly western, and more specifically Christian orign, need not however
limit its application to other cultures. Modem western secularism was the
consequence of the search for a way out of religious wars (often between
Christians of various persuasions) and the need to separate the domain of
the state from that of the Church. Secularism has become essential for
modem democratic nation-states to ensure a strong sense of identification
with the polity based on a common sense of identity, where being a citizen
takes precedence over all other identities like family, race, class and religion.
The word secularism was coined by George Jacob Holyoake in the middle
of the nineteenth century based on the Latin word seculum. Apart from
implying a separation of the Church from the state, it also suggests freedom
to the individual. The Enlightenment in Europe heralded a new era where
Reason rather than religion, became the guiding factor for all aspects of
human life. Secular concerns, it came to be argued, are of this world, and
religion which is concerned with the unknown world was to be kept away
from this. However, this did not necessarily imply a hostile relationship
between the two, only that both are exclusive. In sharp contrast with this
position is the one that sees religion and secularism as being hndamentally
opposed to one another, in the sense that the continued presence of religion
in a society indicates its backwardness, and that ultimately, human progress
and prosperity, and the creation of a truly egalitarian society is possible only
in the absence of religion. In India, secularism is popularly understood as
the best philosophy that would enable people belonging to diverse religious
backgrounds to live together in a harmonious manner, and create a state
that would accord the same degree of respect and freedom to all religions.
Check Your Progress Exercise 1
Note: i) Use the space given below for your answers.
--- ii) Check your answers with the model answers given at the end
of the unit.
1) Why is secularism essential for a modem nation-state?
2) Who coined the, term secularism and what does it generally imply?
' 30.3 THE INDIAN CONSTITUTION AND SECULARISM Secularism a n d the
C o m m u n a l Challenge
It was to avert such disasters that the Indian state steered clear of the
practice of creating separate electorates based on religion, of reserving
constituencies and jobs for religious communitie$ reserving jobs on the basis
of religion and organizing the states of the Indian Union on the basis of
religion. Thus religion comes to be excluded from state institutions in order
to inhibit communal conflict and prevent the repetition of a Partition-like
scenario.
With the same guiding principles in mind, religion was included as a guideline
in matters of cultural import. The most outstanding of these examples is of
course the granting of separate rights to minority religious communities to
enable them to live with dignity, it was recognised that insistence on an
absolutely uniform charter of rights was not desirable nor was it necessary
for national integration. Thus secularism was adopted in India not only to
promote intercodunal solidarity but also to protect the structure of ordinary
life in India. It is in this light that we should see the Indian state's attempts
to make polygamy or child marriage illegal or to grant entry rights for Dalits
b
to Hindu temples. Critics of Indian secularism often denounce the Indian
arrangement for intervention in Hinduism and some of its oppressive
social practices on the *grounds that such actions of the state go against
P
the norms of a truly secular state, or on the grounds that such intervention
in Hindu social practices must be matched with similar interventions in the
social practices of other communities. The protection of the rights of
socioreligious groups is also interpreted as a departure from true secular
practice which the critics argue ought to be grounded in individuals.
Donald Eugene Smith in his classic study titled "India as a Secular State"
defines a secular state as "that which guarantees individual and corporate
fi-eedom of religion, deals with the individual as a citizen irrespective of his\her
religion, is not constituionally ~ 0 ~ e C t etodparticular religion, nor seeks either
to promote or interfere with religion." It is interesting to note that the term
"secular" did not originally feature in the Indian Constitution, although K.T.
Shah, a member of the Constituent Assembly tried on two occasions to
introduce the term. It was much later, as a part of the forty second
amendment in 1976, that the word secular was incorporated into the
Preamble of the Indian Constitution.
Article 25, guarantees the fieedom of conscience and the right to freely
propagate, profess and practice any religion. You might be aware of the
recent incidents of violent attacks on religious missionaries that challenged
the very basis of this right. The unfortunate victims of this violence were
the minorities, especially the Christians. The implication seems to be that
Hinduism is the most authentic religion of the Indian nation, and the presence
of all other religions specially the ones of foreign origin threaten India's
nationhood. Such an argument is obviously against the very basic assumptions
of a secular state that the Constitution sought to establish in India.
-
30.4 COMMUNAL CHALLENGES TO SECU.'LAIRIS:I?
- - -- - - .
Context o f I n d i a n State
independence, the nationalist discourse realised the fragility of the new identity
based on secular nationhood as against the more familiar identities of caste
or religion. After independence however, this nationalist project of building
a secular nation lost its popular character and ideological zeal and became
merely the ideology of the state. The ruling class failed to realise that the
Indian nation was a hgile creation and required constant cultural and political
nourishment. Nationalist accounts of history that claimed for India's past a
'composite culture' were pressed into service, the implication was that it
was the evil designs of colonialism that disrupted this harmony.
In this rendering of history there is a complete denial of the fact that much
of the power of Indian nationalism itself came not from a secular idiom '
but from forces, idioms and symbols of religion, specially from ~ i n d u i s k .
We might also add here the fact that the Congress party conducted its
politics in the pre-independence period on the basis of the idea that India
was constituted of two distinct communities, the Hindus, and the Muslims.
2) Explain briefly the reasons for and the consequences of the Congress
Party's electoral strategy in the 1980s.
There also are observers who point out that the Western concept of
Secularism is not suitable to Indian society. It means the failure of that
secularism. Ashish Nandy for example argues that the ideology and politics
of secularism as understood in the western sense have more or less exhausted
their possibilities. The western uhderstanding of secularism, he suggests, is
essentially opposed to religion and believes that only universal categories can
manage the public realm. Religion, thus is perceived of as a threat to any
modern polity by virtue of not being universal. Nandy suggests that secularism
as an ideology has failed because it is seen today as being a part of a
larger package that consists of a set of standardised ideological products
and social processes like development, mega science and national security.
Being backed by the might of the state they appear essentially as violent
ideas, because to defend any of these ideas including secularism, the state
can justifiably use violence. Nandy is critical of the fact that while the modern
nation-state appeals to the believers to keep their private faiths out of public
life it is unable to ensure that the ideologies of secularism, development and
nationalism do not themselves begin to act as faiths intolerant of others. The
role of the state in such situations is likened by Nandy to that of crusading
and inquisitorial role of religious ideologies.
Besides, the proposition that the values derived fiom the secular ideology
of a secular state would somehow be a better guide to political action and
to a less violent and richer political life than values and politics based on
religious principles. Nandy contends that objectification, scientisation, and
bureaucratic-rationality, the core principles of a modern nation-state can only
breed violence. The elite in such states view statecraft in purely secular and
amoral terms thus thinking of religion or ethnicity as hurdles to the grand
project of nation-building and state formation. Thus Nandy argues, western
concept of secularism becomes a handy adjunct to a set of legitimating core
concepts; accepting this ideology, he contend, leads to the justification and
acceptance of domination and violence perpetrated in the name of progress
and modernity. It also generates hatred and violence among the believers
3t having to face a world that is fast moving out of their grip.
\
This type of secularism has been imposed on a people who never wished
o separate religion from politics, this imposition had to be made as part
3f the requirements needed to fulfil the creation of a modem nation-state,
this however has left the ordinary people of India very unhappy, who, left
with no choice, in their fight against the brutalities of the nation inathe name
of modernitv. turn to the onlv form of religjous mlitics that modernitv would
('ontext of Indian Statc
permit, namely communal politics. Thus, it is secularism as practiced that
breeds communalism. Intolerance links the two, replacing the quality of
tolerance that characterised the traditional world organised on the basis of
religion
Manoranjan Mohanty has argued that secularism can be meaningfd only when
it becomes a part of the overall process of democratic transformation. What
we have witnessed till now in India is secularism imposed through a state
that has become in~reasinglyauthoritarian. On the contrary secularism has
to become a part af a wider struggle against socio-political domination.
Indian secularism was based on the idea that the state would maintain a
principled distance from religion but would address itself to matters rising
out of religious concerns when the need arises. However, the cardinal rule
would be that the considerations for both keeping away and for interfering
would always be non-sectarian. The problem with the Indian state's practice
of secularism has been that it has increasingly been acting out of sectarian
interests. A survey of the Constitutional provisions suggest very clearly the
fiamework of a secular state (despite certain anomalies), however, the politics,
the nature and the functioning of the Indian state seem to suggest a drift
1 away from this framework. The discrediting of democratic politics, the party
system and political institutions has created a void that has been occupied
by communal forces. This definitely is a major challenge to the secular
fiamework of the Indian state. In order to fight this challenge, the struggle
for secularism has to become part of the struggle of the ordinary people
of India for their right to a life that is dignified and politically, economically
and culturally free.
31.0 OBJECTIVES
Indian society is mkked by the inequalities on bases of caste, creed, sex,
economy; etc. India adopted a democratic set up in order to establish society
which is based on the principles of justice and equality. After going through
this unit, you will be able to understand:
/
Relationship between democracy and equality; and
Provisions in the Constitution regarding establishment of equality among
various sections of Indian Society.
I
last five decades of democratic experiment in India. Has the state in India
I
been able to meet the ideals of founding fathers of the Constitution? Has
political democracy been congruent with the given unequal social and economic
Context o f Indian State
order? Has political democracy been instrumental in advancing and realising
the ideals of social and economic demucracy? Can demucracy be contextualised
simply in terms of political participation of the majority of.citizens in electoral
process? Has the ideal of substantive democracy been advanced along-with
the procedural democracy? These are some of the questions which invite
our attention in the analysis of the problems of democracy and its functioning
vis a vis the state in India. The subsequent sections attempt to analyse the
dynamics of democracy in India especially in terms of its quest for establishing
an order based on the principle of equality and justice.
Along with the other leaders of the national movement and architects of
the Constitution 'of India, Ambedkar was quitk aware that the realisation
of the democratic ideals of equality, Ifberty and fraternity were not possible
without a strong constitutional backing. The interests and rights of the
deprived and excluded cannot be safeguarded without cdtutional mechanism. . .
The simplistic principle of equality and equal. opportunity would create a hiatus
between political democracy and social and economic democracy. Therefore,
harmony between the two appeared as requisites of democratic' state and
nation building in India.
3) ~ Which Articles provides for the protection and promotion of the cultural
rights of the minorities? Discuss.
Over the years the working of the resehation policy has shown that the
spread of the benefits has not been uniform among different groups. Therefore,
the different categories of reservation policy cannot be treated on similar
plane. If we take Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes into consideration,
we come across the fact that during the last fifty years of the working of
the Republic, the constitutional goal of social justice has not been translated
into reality. The emergence of a miniscule minority among them on account
I of socio-economic transformation and protective discrimination policy is
symbolic of empowerment. In real situation of socio-economic life, they are
far behind the other groups of the population. The practice of untouchability ,
and maintaining of ritual distance has not disappeared from the public life
particularly in rural areas. Most of the cases relating to them are not reported,
but it does not ensure the realization of the civil rights of these groups.
Segregation in residential pattern, predominant occupational pattern, high
incidence of poverty and non-ownershiplmarginal ownerslqf of land are some
of the indicators of their perpetual backwardness. Atrocities against dalits
in different parts of the country are still alarming. It is pertinent to note
here that atrocities are committed not only in states like Bihar, which
frequently occupies the popular imagination and common perception of the
people, but also and even more in relatively advanced and peaceful states
of India. So far as their rate of literacy is concerned it is far behind the
general population. A comparative kgure of literacy rate may indicate the
state of affair:
Notes: I. NSP stands for non-scheduled population and general includes all the popuhtion.
2. When, the percentage of literacy for the years 1971 and 1981 has been calculated
by dividing the literates by the total population, inclusive of the children in the
age group of 0-4,in 1991, the same has been calculated' in exclusion of the children
in the age group of .0-6.
Source: B.S. Bhargava and Avinash Sarnal "Protective Discrimination and Development of
Scheduled Castes: An Alternative Model for Good Governance". Indian Journal of Public
Administration, Vol. XLIV, No.3, Annual Issue, 1998.
Similarly, the enrolment ratio and drop-out rate in schools among the Scheduled
Castes students have been quite negative as compared to the geineral
population: All the indicaton of their backwardness suggest that the afkmtive
action programmes have not been implemented properly. The approach of
'capacity endowment' of these groups along with protective discrimination
policy has marginally altered the situation. After fifty years of the working
of the constitutional measure of protective discrimination policy, there is still
a oan hptwppn\thp rlppirpd a n a l a n d a ~ h ~ a
o r lh i p v p m p n t Thp r-recpntatinn
Context of Fndian State
of SCs and STs in the central government services speaks of the truth.
It is quite clear that they are mainly employed in Group C and Group
D services. More than fifty per cent of the Safai Karamchari (Sweeper)
come from this group, which indicate a kind of occupational continuity. ,The
notion of impurity and degradation associated with such jobs among caste
Hindus appears to be the factor of high representation of SCs and STs
and low among the upper castes.
Even if a middle class has emerged among the Scheduled Castes due to
the measure of protective discrimination policy, they do not enjoy the same
amount of honour and prestige associated with their achieved status as
enjoyed by the members of other higher castes. Moreover, a status incongruity
between their caste status and achieved status still persists.
3) What are the reasons for the inter regional differences in the rise of
backward classes?
The composition of Rajya Sabha changes every two years. The figures of Rajya Sabha have
been picked up only for those years which allow comparison with Lok Sabha. The average
for Rajya Sabha is based on these years only.
Source: CSDS Data Unit, Delhi.
Notes: Table entry stands for % of women MLAs elected to state legislatures in the relevant
elections
States did not exits; NE: No elections held in that yearlperiod; * : Two elections held
during this period. The figure given here is an average of the two; ** In 1952 the Election
Commission did not recognise women as a separate category. The figures given here are
based on name recognition and hence liable to under-reporting of women representatives.
Source: CSDS Data Unit, Delhi.
In fact, the other view-point believes that woman should get fair deal in
the democratic dispensation of the political order. In this dispensation their
presence cannot be ensured, wherein the male-dominated view persists even
in the field of modern politics. A special quota for women-in this regard
offers a substantive alternative. In fact a system of reservation for women
would provide an impetus to both the women as well as to the political
parties to give a fairer deal to nearly half the population in various units
of government. The political power and electoral calculations in favour of
the emerging dominant force of backward classes have compelled the
successive governments to direct the policy of protective discrimination in
their favour. But the women question in this category has not invited a serious
attention of the political elites. The Constitution (eighty-first Amendment) Bill,
1996 is still pending. The passage of the Bill has been scuttled by the political
parties on one pretext or the other. The basic issue, however, remains
unaddressed.
Check Your Progress Exercise 3
Note: i) Use the space given below for y o u answers.
ii) Check your answers with the model answers given at the end
of the unit.
1) Summarise the arguments for and against the reservation for women.
Democracy in Search o f
31.7 LETUS SUMUP - - - - - - - - - -- - Equality
To sum up, from the above exposition we can say that democratic experiment
in India during the last five decades has been a mix bag of success and
failure. Whereas the procedural democracy has taken deep roots in terms
of periodic elections, voter turnout and large scale participation of the people
in electoral process, we have not been able to equalise <he opportunity and
condition of a democratic structure. Inter-group equality has not been
established and there is still a vast gap between political democracy and
social and economic democracy. Affirmative action of the state in favour
of the deprived groups and communities has gone a long way towards
creating a democratic conscious among the people. The recent decades of
India are now seen as the decades of 'democratic upsurge'. Therefore,
though democracy is still in search of equality in India it has paved a way
for the democratic assertion from below. It can be concluded that democracy
from above provided to the people at the time of independence is transforming
itself in a democracy from below claimed by the people after over fifty
years of India's democratic republic.
32.0 OBJECTIVES
Crime, repression and terror have become commonly used adjectives to
describe Indian politics. Each of these aspects, however, has specific meanings
within the fiameyork of democratic theory. They are o h seen as perversions
in democracy, and manifestations of a rupture in the democratic processes.
AAer going through this unit, you will be able to understand:
How crime, repression and terror form significant contexts of Indian
politics; and
The manner in which they determine the content of Indian politics.
3 2.1 INTRODUCTION
32.1.1 The Meanings of Politics
Before one can begin talking about crime, repression and terror ifi Indian
politics, it perhaps makes sense to talk first about the meaning of 'politics'.
It is only after having understood the meaning'of politics, that we can
understand how crime, repression and terror, 'corrupt' or 'pervert' politics,
and change its meaning altogether. Generally speaking, the expression politics
refers to a distinctive space as well the activities and relationships which
characterise the space. ~ h u sin our common usage of the term we tend
to differentiate the 'political' h m other spheres of human activity which form
the private concerns of individuals and groups, viz., social, cultural, economic,
etc. Politics has generally been understood in three broad ways:
a) Politics is seen as associated with governmental activities. This understanding
of politics can perhaps be illustrated with the help of the notion of politics
as it existed in classical Greece. Politics in Greek usage pertained to
participation in decision-making and the, exercise of authority. In the
nineteen sixties, David Easton conceptualised politics as the 'authoritative
allocation of values'. For others like Bernard Crick, politics refers not
so much to authoritative decision-making, but the processes by which
decisions could be reached amiably.
Contcrt o f Indian State b) Politics is also understood as referring to the public domain, a space
which is distinguished fiom the private and personal. This domain, unlike
the private space, is concerned with activities whereby norms and rules
which govern the entire society are determined and applied through the
use of covert andlor overt coercive power.
c) There is yet another understanding of politics which seeks to change
radically the above understandings of politics. According to this
understanding, politics refers not merely to decision-making but pertains
to the manner in which power, wealth and resources. are distributed in
society. Politics is also not seen as confined to the public domain, but
as something which permeates all institutions and unfolds at every level
of social existence. We may mention here, that the feminists were the
most persuasive in this redefinition of politics, emphasising that the private
sphere including the family was also permeated with power structures.
Therefore this definition also includes in its scope, struggles by people
and movements of resistance which aim at altering the manner in which
resources are distributed in society, in order to make society more
egalitarian.
32.1.2 Transitions in Indian Politics
From politics of trust to politics of suspicion, the two decades immediately
following independence have been characterised by Rajni Kothari as 'decades
of trust'. Politics in these decades was determined by a sense of trust
between people marked by a mutual concern h d understanding about what
constituted the 'common good'. Politics was seen as an 'ethical space' where
conflicts were resolved amiably and honourably. The seventies, however,
marked according to Rajni Kothari, an 'obituary' of the politics of trust
of the preceding decades. The 'ethical space' of politics was vitiated by
violence, crime, corruption and repression, marking what Kothari calls the
'the virtual elimiiation of politics':
What we confront today is not the crisis of politics but its virtual elimination.
The last decade has marked the beginning of the Indian State that has not
only deprived society of a basic consensus, but which has eschewed any
scope of dialogue $om it. The violence, the fear, the repression, the rhetoric
of deceit and d&ublespeak, are symptoms not of crises, but of the end
of politics. (Rajni Kothari, Politics and the People: In search of a Humane
India, Ajanta Prakashan, Deihi, 1989, p.439. emphasis added)
Indian politics was no longer the democratic space where, through dialogue
and interaction, the aspirations and needs of the people could be affirmed
and resolved. The 'end of politics' is seen as the period in which the
relationship of dialogue among people as well as the people and the state,
is ruptured by crime, repression and terror as the means of conflict resolption.
Crime, repression and terror make themselves manifest in several forms. In
the sections that follow we shall examine crime, repression' and terror
respectively, as they appear as characteristics of, and provide the;contexts,
in which politics in India unfolds.
The Election Commission too has pointed out the existence of a large number
of Members of Legislative Assemblies (henceforth MLAs) having criminal
records, and the need of weeding out criminal elements fiom politics. During
the 1998 Lok Sabha elections, an eminent panel consisting of Justice Kuldip
Singh, Madhav Godbole, C. Subramaniurn and Swami Agnivesh, identified
as many as 72 Lok Sabha candidates facing serious criminal cases. It may
be said that the majority of criminals enter the electoral fray through the
medium of National and State parties, including the two large& all-India
parties. Another alarming fact is that the bulk of the criminal candidates fell
in the categories of accused of serious crimes. Thev include Dersons alreadv
Context of Indian State charge-sheeted by a judicial court or by an investigating agency and those
with long crime hiistory (Outlook, 23 February 1998, 10-11).
The dictionary meanings of 'repress' are 'to restrain', 'to keep under', 'to
put down', etc. The terms repression and repressive are more often than
not, associated with political regimes and governments, as a description of
their character and functioning. Like 'criminalisation', repression too, denotes
a disruption in democratic relationships in the domain of politics. It also
b
1 indicates the degeneration of politics as an ethical space where democratic
1 participation takes place. We have mentioned in the earlier section that Rajni
Kothari characterised the decade of the seventies as the beginning of the
period of the demise or elimination of politics, owing to a growkg criminalisation
of politics. In a similar vein, A.R. Desai spoke of the same period as
characterised by a growing 'assault' on the democratic rights of the people
by the law and order machinery of the state. This period, points out Desai,
was characterised by an 'assertion' of the large masses of the 'economically
exploited' classes, and the socially, politically and culturally oppressed sections,
of their elementary aspirations and demands for basic rights. If we recall
here the third definition of politics, i.e., as a means to distribute resources,
we may see the struggles by the large masses of the oppressed and excluded
people, as trying to effect change in the manner in which resources were
being distributed in society. They were, in other words, trying to transform
the inegalitarian political-institutional and social-cultural structures through which
'authoritative allocation of values' were being made. The struggles made
themselves manifest in various forms viz., Constitutional Court battles,
processions, strikes, dharnas, satyagrahas, and militant actions. The response
of the state was frequently to silence these voices of protest through various
measures both legal and extra-legal. These struggles by the people to radically
change the structures of power and decision making were seen by successive
governments as 'anti-social' and a threat to law and order in society. They
took recourse to a wide range of 'legal' and 'administrative' measures to
restore 'law and order', curb 'anti-social' elements, and halt the processes
of change in the existing structures of authority. There are a,nu.ber of articles
and reports which chronicle the violation of the righp of various marginalised
sections, including the dalits, the scheduled castes and scheduled tribes, the
working class, women, religious minorities, etc. They also list the various
measures - legal (including the preventive detention laws, disturbed areas iaws
etc.), and extra-legal (disappearances, encounter deaths etc.) - through which
aspirations for change were dealt with by subsequent regimes.
While the term 'terror' can be more or less accurately defined, the concept
of terrorism is less precise. Contested meanings have been attached to the
concept drawing from its history, its modem contexts, and the perspective
or vantage point from which one looks at it. In its historical origins the
term has been associated with terror by governments, notably by the French
revolutionary government against its opponents, and by the Bolsheviks in
Russia after 1917. In its contemporary usage, however, the frames of
reference seem to have shifted to cover acts of terror by the opponents
of governments and include bombings, assassinations, hostage taking and
plane hijackings. Also by the 1970s terms like international terrorism and
state terrorism gained widespread currency. While the former referred to
acts of terror by political groups outside the country in which they were
primarily active, the latter referred to (alleged) encouragement and support
by states of such acts of terrorism. In its current usage, three diverse
meanings of terror and terrorism co-exist: (a) Acts of terror which occur
;n er\n+l;fit 4rlrlnn o;h~nf;r\nc ~ x r ; t h ; n nnGnnal h n ~ ~ n A a r iemo ~nrnrn~mallcprtarian
and ethnic violence in ethnically mixed or plural societies e.g., the conflicts Crime, Repression and
Terror in Indian Politics
between Christians and Muslims in Lebanon, between Tamils and Sinhalese
in Sri Lanka, Catholics and Protestants in p or them Ireland etc. (b) Very
often, however, most acts of terror are seen as carried out by the state
itself. While Nazism and Stalinism are often cited as relevant examples, there
are and have existed repressive regimes in this century (e.g. Pinochet's Chile).
It is argued that terror and coercion often play important roles in maintaining
state domination and power. (c) Acts of terror which form a part of the
larger agenda of radical social and political change or national independence.
In these cases it is argued the 'rejection' of 'terrorist' tactics has no bearing
on questions of 'legitimacy' of the larger goals of the struggle (see Fred
Halliday, 'Terrorism', in Joel Krieger ed. The Oxford Companion to Politics
of the World, New York, 1993, 902-904).
Legal definitions of terrorism have been modified h m time to time and these
definitions have invariably cited concerns about the 'security environment' of
India. The Law Commission's recommendations in April 2000, for bringing
in a new Bill, the Prevention of Terrorism Bill, noted the absence of a
'comprehensive anti-terrorism law7 to fill in the vacuum which had &sen
after the expiry of TADA. It cited the security concerns arising from 'terrorist
violence' in Jammu and Kashmir and the North-East, and the continuing
vulnerability of Punjab to sqch violence. The proposed Bill did not become
an Act. In the context of a worldwide condemnation of terrorist violence
aAer the 11 September, 2001 bombing of the World Trade Centre towers
in New York City, and the Pentagon in Washington D.C., the government
has been able to bring in first an Ordinance to deal with terrorism, viz.,
The Prevention of Terrorism Ordinance, 2001, (POTO) and then a law
Prevention of Terrorism Act (POTA).
................................................................................................................
3) What are the Civil liberty Right groups?
About Us: Prepare 4 Civils, website is a part of Sukratu Innovations, a start up by IITians. The main theme of the company
is to develop new web services which will help people. Prepare 4 Civils is an online social networking platform intended for
the welfare of people who are preparing for Civil services examinations. The whole website was built on open-source
platform Wordpress.
Contact Details:
Disclaimer and Terms of Use: By following Creative Common License, for the welfare of large student body we are merging
all the pdf files provided by IGNOU’s course material website egyankosh and redistributing the files by giving proper credit
to IGNOU and the redistribution is based on the norms of Creative Common License. We are not commercially distributing
the files. People who are downloading these files should not be engaged in any sort of sales or commercial distribution of
these files. They can redistribute these copies freely by giving proper credit to the original author, IGNOU
(http://egyankosh.ac.in/) and “Prepare 4 Civils” (http://www.prep4civils.com/) by providing proper hyperlinks of the
websites. Any sort of clichés can be addressed at [email protected] and proper action will be taken.