Syed Ikram’s Post

Being a Leader Brings Great Responsibility Leadership, at its core, is about taking responsibility not just for one's own actions but also for those of their team or community. In light of the recent Church abuse scandal where the recent Archbishop of Canterbury, Justin Welby, was under critical scrutiny and has now resigned, it brings to the forefront the importance of leader's accountability. The damaging report into a prolific child abuser's actions, associated with the Church, has shaken trust in leadership. The expectation from leaders is that they should have a moral compass guiding them to act responsibly, promptly, and transparently. Whistle-blowing is a crucial mechanism that can facilitate this culture of accountability. It provides an avenue for individuals to report misconduct and serious abuse without fear of reprisal, helping uncover actions that may otherwise remain hidden. This creates an atmosphere of openness and encourages individuals to take collective responsibility. In the realm of leadership, promoting a culture of whistle-blowing is of utmost importance. It empowers people within the organisation to act as a system of checks and balances, making leaders accountable for their actions, and driving the change necessary for organisational growth and integrity. This case serves as a stark reminder of the dire consequences when leadership fails to act responsibly, showcasing the need for more rigorous processes and encouraging the reporting of misconduct. We talk about the role of CEOs and business leaders when dealing with conflict in our article: https://lnkd.in/eERVkSxB Accountability and reporting misconduct are not signs of an organisation's weakness; rather, they are indicators of strength, resilience, and commitment to ethical standards. The willingness to face the truth, however uncomfortable, is what sets great leaders apart. Let this incident be a wake-up call for leaders across spheres to foster a culture of accountability and transparent reporting. If you need help with leadership coaching, policy writing or managing difficult conversations or situations, please speak to our team of experts: https://lnkd.in/eRxMjJwF See the full article here: https://lnkd.in/eU7ZzkU8

It is never great to see a leader have to step down from a role but it does raise some interesting questions about leadership and accountability. What could have been done differently to prevent this outcome? Helen Grimberg recently prepared a short article about the role of a CEO in managing conflict and her points remain true in situations such as this. What are your thoughts?

Recognizing and Addressing Critical Leadership Misjudgments: Key Signs and Self-Assessment Questions- Part 1 of 2 Effective leadership requires a keen sense of awareness and adaptability. However, there are times when misjudgments can severely impact an organization’s reputation and functioning. Recognizing when a situation has been mishandled to the point of irreparable damage is crucial for addressing the issues and beginning the recovery process. Here’s how leaders can identify such critical misjudgments and what questions to ask themselves. Key Signs of Irreparable Damage Severe Drop in Stakeholder Trust: If stakeholders—including employees, customers, partners, and investors—have lost trust and confidence in the organization, it indicates a deep-rooted problem. This trust erosion can manifest as a decline in engagement, negative public sentiment, or loss of business. Widespread Negative Publicity: An organization experiencing a continuous stream of negative media coverage, social media backlash, or public outcry may be facing irreparable damage. Persistent negative publicity can damage the brand’s image and make recovery challenging. Significant Financial Losses: Substantial financial setbacks, such as a drastic drop in revenue or increased operational costs due to the misjudgment, can signal severe organizational damage. Financial instability often reflects deeper issues affecting the organization's viability. Loss of Key Talent: If high-performing employees are leaving in droves or if the organization struggles to attract top talent, it may be a sign that the leadership has made critical errors that are affecting the company’s culture and stability. Unmanageable Internal Conflict: Persistent and unresolvable conflicts within the organization can indicate that leadership has failed to address underlying issues effectively. High levels of dissatisfaction and discord among employees can undermine the organization’s ability to function smoothly. Questions Leaders Should Ask Themselves What Were the Key Missteps? Reflect on the specific decisions or actions that led to the current situation. Identify where things went wrong and how these misjudgments contributed to the overall damage. How Have Stakeholders Responded? Evaluate the reactions of stakeholders to understand the extent of the damage. Are there consistent patterns in feedback, and how have these responses impacted the organization? What Is the Current State of the Organization’s Reputation? Assess the organization’s reputation in the market. Have there been significant changes in public perception or brand image that suggest irreversible harm? What Are the Financial Implications? Analyze the financial impact of the misjudgment. Have there been significant losses, and how are these affecting the organization’s overall health and future prospects? Are there signs of widespread dissatisfaction, low morale, or high turnover that indicate deep-rooted issues?

In a recent poll, we asked: What percentage of leaders in our society—political and corporate—can be fully trusted? On X (Twitter): • 75-100%: 2% • 50-75%: 7% • 25-50%: 19% • 0-25%: 72% On LinkedIn: • 75-100%: 0% • 50-75%: 10% • 25-50%: 26% • 0-25%: 64% The poll results suggest a profound crisis of trust in leadership within both political and corporate spheres. With 72% on X and 62% on LinkedIn indicating that they believe only 0-25% of leaders can be fully trusted, it reveals a significant erosion of confidence in those who hold power and influence. Not to mention, over 90% believe only 0-50% of leaders can be fully trusted. What has been the consequences of this trust deficit? Societal Distrust: • Erosion of Social Cohesion • Rise of Populism Impact on Political Systems: • Lower Voter Turnout • Policy Resistance Corporate Consequences: • Decreased Employee Morale • Decreased Customer Trust Economic and Social Stability: • Financial Market Instability • Social Divisions Broader Implications and solutions The poll underscores a critical need for rebuilding trust in leadership. ME-Vision Academy is addressing this trust deficit through several key initiatives: • LeaderTrack Real-Time Anonymous Feedback System: By implementing a real-time anonymous feedback system, we are holding leaders more accountable and making them more transparent. This initiative ensures leaders are continuously evaluated and can adapt their behaviors to better serve their teams and communities. • Mobilising Successful Leaders: ME-Vision Academy is mobilising successful leaders across countries, sectors, and levels to transform leadership standards globally. By recognising and leveraging the expertise of proven leaders, we aim to set a higher bar for leadership excellence. • Transparency and Accountability: Leaders must commit to greater transparency in their actions and decision-making processes. • Engagement and Communication: Effective communication and genuine engagement with the public and employees can bridge gaps in trust. • Ethical Leadership: Emphasising ethical behavior and integrity is crucial. • Promoting Inclusive Leadership: Encouraging diverse and inclusive leadership can help address systemic biases and build a more trustworthy leadership base that reflects the communities they serve. Conclusion The poll results highlight a pressing challenge for society: the need to restore trust in leadership. Without addressing this issue, both political and corporate institutions risk facing significant obstacles in achieving their goals and maintaining stability. Building trust is not a quick fix but a long-term commitment to integrity, transparency, and genuine engagement with the people they serve. #leadership #Trust Elmarie Groenewald Deshun Deysel Bester Janine Hills Leon Steyn Dr Augusta Dorning Dr Shirley Zinn Malik Melamu

Trust and Accountability are core tenants to any high performing organization. The City of Roseville IT department is no exception. That is why the continuous improvement of trust and accountability was one of the key discussion topics at our annual management retreat. We hear about trust and accountability often, but what do they actually mean? Let’s explore: ✅  Trust refers to the confidence and belief that someone has in another person's reliability, integrity, and competence. It involves relying on someone or something with the expectation that they will act in a trustworthy manner, fulfill their commitments, and behave with honesty and integrity. ✅ Accountability is the obligation or willingness to accept responsibility for one's actions, decisions, and their consequences. It involves being responsible for the outcomes of one's behavior and fulfilling commitments or obligations in a transparent and responsible manner. Despite their differences, trust and accountability are closely intertwined in interpersonal relationships and organizations. 📈 Building Trust through Accountability: When individuals or organizations consistently demonstrate accountability by fulfilling their commitments, taking responsibility for their actions, and being transparent about their decisions, they contribute to building trust. Accountability reassures others that they can rely on the individual or organization to act with integrity and competence, thereby strengthening trust. 🔑 Trust Enables Accountability: Trust forms the foundation upon which accountability can thrive. In environments where trust exists, individuals feel comfortable holding themselves and others accountable for their actions and decisions. They believe that accountability is not punitive but rather a means to uphold shared values and achieve common goals. So what can we do as leaders in our organization to improve trust and accountability? 1. Create an environment where open communication and transparency is highly encouraged and practiced. 2. Make sure to reinforce positive behavior. 3. Resolve conflicts and rebuild trust by taking ownership of mistakes and making amends in a transparent manner when needed. In summary, trust and accountability are interdependent elements of high performing organizations. They reinforce each other, promote transparency and integrity, and contribute to the overall effectiveness and well-being of the organization and individuals. I encourage leaders at all levels to keep trust and accountability at the core of their actions daily. #trust #accountability #leadership #WeAreRoseville

The Weight of Leadership: Leadership is work — hard work. It’s not about titles or show; it’s about accountability, competence, and getting results. When someone is appointed to a key government role, we owe it to the country to ask the right questions. The stakes are high. The U.S. government runs a $6.1 trillion budget, employs 2 million civilians, and affects 330 million lives. Mistakes here don’t just cost money — they cost trust and stability. The Constitution is clear. Article II, Section 2 says the president nominates leaders, but the Senate must confirm them. It’s a safeguard against putting unfit people in power. Leadership demands accountability, and that starts with asking tough, practical questions. What we need to know from every candidate for leadership: • What’s the largest organization you’ve managed? What did you achieve? • How many people have you led, and how did you help them succeed? • What’s the biggest budget you’ve overseen? Did you deliver results or waste money? • How do you measure success or failure? • What systems do you use to gather facts and make decisions? • How do you handle failure — yours or your team’s? • How do you decide who replaces someone who can’t do the job? These aren’t hard questions. You wouldn’t let someone drive a truck without a license, so why let them run billions of dollars and millions of lives without proof they’re qualified? > The Cost of Misinformation: Bad leadership and falsehoods hurt us all. Take the 2020 election fraud claims. Over 60 lawsuits were dismissed or dropped for lack of evidence. Audits — by Republicans and Democrats — found no widespread fraud. But lies persisted, leading to the January 6 Capitol riots, which shook public trust and cost lives. This is what happens when leaders push falsehoods instead of facts. To fight misinformation, don’t argue. Ask simple questions: • Who told you this? • What proof do they have? • Have credible sources confirmed it? Most stories fall apart when questioned. Lies don’t hold up under truth. > The Essence of Leadership: The essence of this is simple: leadership is responsibility. It’s about trust, results, and accountability. Leaders make decisions based on facts and own the outcomes. The wrong leader risks everything. The right one earns trust and delivers. Good leadership isn’t a privilege — it’s a duty. If we fail to demand accountability, we fail ourselves. #accountability #America #competence #governance #integrity #leadership #misinformation #responsibility #trust #truth #USA

Are you inviting your board to micromanage? Here's a cautionary tale from a recent client strategy session: A client, who is the board chair of a small nonprofit, faced a tricky situation. Staff members approached them with complaints about their Chief Executive Officer. They expressed concerns about the CEO's communication, presence, and qualifications. These weren't issues of legality or ethics, but frustrations about daily operations. Bringing these complaints directly to the board could lead to micromanagement. Here’s the approach we developed during our strategy session: 1️⃣ Encourage Direct Communication: We advised the board chair to have the staff speak directly with the CEO about their concerns. Open communication can resolve many issues without board intervention. 2️⃣ Offer Mediation: We suggested that if staff felt uncomfortable, they could request a meeting with both the CEO and the board chair. This way, the board chair could facilitate the conversation without overstepping their role. 3️⃣ Protect the Process: We decided not to share these informal complaints with the CEO or the board without a formal complaint. Sharing this feedback without following proper procedures could disrupt trust and operational flow. Lessons for Nonprofit Leaders: ✔️Boards Should Govern, Not Manage: The board’s role is to support and oversee the CEO, not get involved in daily staff issues. ✔️Create Clear Policies: Establish formal channels for complaints, like a whistleblower policy, and ensure regular performance reviews include anonymous staff feedback. ✔️Foster Open Communication: Encourage a culture where staff feels safe to voice concerns directly to their leaders. By keeping the board focused on governance and strategic oversight, you prevent micromanagement and empower your CEO to lead effectively. Want to learn more about maintaining this balance and enhancing your nonprofit’s leadership? Let’s connect! #NonprofitLeadership #BoardGovernance #EffectiveCommunication

When #trust is broken within an #organization, whether due to #leadership failures, interpersonal conflicts, or other reasons, it can lead to significant #challenges. Here are some key leadership and organizational challenges that arise when trust is broken: 🚶♂️ Decreased Morale and Motivation: When trust is broken, employees may feel #disillusioned, #demotivated, and #disengaged. This can result in decreased productivity, increased absenteeism, and poor morale throughout the organization. 🗣 Communication Breakdowns: Trust is essential for open and honest #communication. When trust is broken, communication channels may become strained or completely shut down. Employees may withhold #information, avoid difficult conversations, or spread rumors, leading to further misunderstandings and conflicts. 🤺 Lack of Collaboration: Trust is the foundation of effective #teamwork and #collaboration. When trust is lacking, individuals may be reluctant to share ideas, collaborate on projects, or support each other's efforts. This can hinder innovation, creativity, and problem-solving within the organization. 👣 High Turnover Rates: Broken trust can erode employee #loyalty and #commitment to the organization. Employees may feel compelled to leave the company in search of a more supportive and trustworthy work environment. High turnover rates can be costly for organizations in terms of recruitment, training, and lost institutional knowledge. 🤐 Resistance to Change: Trust is essential for successful organizational #change initiatives. When trust is broken, employees may resist change out of fear, skepticism, or a lack of confidence in leadership. This can impede the organization's ability to adapt to new #market conditions, #technology advancements, or #strategic priorities. 💥 🤬 Damage to Reputation: Trust is important not only internally but also externally. When trust is broken within an organization, it can tarnish its #reputation with customers, partners, investors, and other stakeholders. Breach of trust may result in negative publicity, loss of business opportunities, and legal ramifications. 😤 Leadership Credibility Crisis: #Leaders who are perceived as untrustworthy lose #credibility and #influence. #Employees may question their motives, decisions, and #integrity, making it difficult for leaders to inspire confidence and rally support for organizational goals. Rebuilding leadership credibility requires transparency, #accountability, and consistent actions aligned with organizational values. Addressing these challenges requires proactive leadership, a commitment to rebuilding trust, and a willingness to address underlying issues head-on. This may involve implementing transparent communication strategies, fostering a culture of accountability, providing opportunities for reconciliation and forgiveness, and demonstrating trustworthy behavior. Let me help you with trust and stress challenges. #coaching #neurocoaching #changemanagement

Three Pillars of Leadership: Trust, Confidentiality, and Professionalism In our journey as leaders, we often encounter crossroads that test our principles, especially in the realms of trust and confidentiality. One of my clients shared a recent experience which illuminated this challenge starkly for me, underscoring the profound impact our actions as leaders have on our teams and organizational culture. During a crucial hiring process, an internal candidate was inadvertently informed about their selection outcome by junior staff, circumventing the official communication channels. This incident was not a simple oversight but a reflection of a deeper, more concerning trend – a drift towards a culture where gossip and informal sharing of sensitive information prevail over professionalism and respect for confidentiality. This episode serves as a potent reminder of the core responsibilities that come with leadership. It’s not just about steering the ship towards its destination; it's about nurturing a culture of trust, maintaining the sanctity of confidentiality, and embodying the highest standards of professionalism. These are not mere words but the foundation upon which effective, respectful, and successful organizations are built. As leaders, we ascend to our positions with the implicit trust that we will safeguard the interests of our organization and its people. This includes the thoughtful handling of sensitive information. The breach of this trust not only undermines our leadership but erodes the very fabric of trust and respect that holds our teams together. It sets a precedent that can lead to discord, conflict, and a diminished sense of security among our team members. This serves as a call to action for all of us in leadership positions. We must introspect and realign our actions with the fundamental principles of trust, confidentiality, and professionalism. It's upon us to lead by example, fostering a culture where communication is transparent yet respectful of boundaries, where information is shared responsibly, and where every team member feels valued and secure. Let us embrace this moment not with defensiveness but with openness to change and improvement. Let’s work towards creating an environment where professionalism is the norm, not the exception, and where every member of our organization can thrive, secure in the knowledge that their leaders are guardians of not just the organization’s success, but also of its values and integrity. As we move forward, let's commit to being the leaders our teams deserve – leaders who inspire trust, uphold confidentiality, and embody professionalism in every action and decision. #leadership #confidentiality #trust #professionalism

Effective, Empowering Leadership DAN WILLIS La Mesa P.D. Captain (ret.) The law enforcement profession today needs more effective, empowering leadership than at any other time if agencies and officers are going to transcend our current significant challenges. In times when officers find their profession being targeted and often maligned, it is imperative for leaders to understand their current leadership abilities and where there is a need for self-improvement to enhance their positive influence more effectively. The purpose of this article is for you to take an honest look within yourself — not to use the information to judge ineffective leaders you have known. Critically evaluate yourself on each of the crucial leadership components below using a five-point scale, with one being the lowest score and five the highest, to see where you can proactively develop more proficient leadership ability. Use this as a guide for leadership development and self-improvement. Any score of three or lower indicates an area where improvement is needed. The Effective Leader’s Purpose A leader is any influential person with the ability and an intense desire to make a meaningful difference in the capacity of others to constructively contribute to the overall effectiveness, efficiency and positive community impact of the agency. Leaders are always looking for opportunities to do good and to create opportunities for others. They have a deep connection to the high purpose of public safety and consistently strive to inspire others to understand and embody the noble principles of selfless service to protect life and serve those in need. They have an intense interest in others and want to do everything possible to enable officers to have the most meaningful, fulfilling and successful career doing the most good. Click here 👉 https://lnkd.in/gMmavj_c