Sean Voigt’s Post

View profile for Sean Voigt, graphic

Founder & Managing Director, Mount Koya Capital & Advisors | Co-founder, Austin Climate Hub | Co-President, Stanford Angels & Entrepreneurs | Entrepreneur and Advisor

At a time of such political uncertainty, an urgent reminder that climate-tech is a matter of national security and industrial development strategy. Without any reference to carbon or climate-change, the energy transition is a race the US and the west cannot afford to lose. Technology transitions fuel the economic and military power that shape geopolitics and the rise and fall of empires. Think: Caravel ship design and new navigation tools that underpinned Portuguese conquests of Africa and the Americas. The 1st industrial revolution fueling the rail roads, manufacturing that built the British empire. Then the US-lead second industrial revolution with oil, cars, and the economic boom associated with these. Ascendent after WWI, the US eclipsed Britain and Europe as in WWII on the back of its economic might and technology leadership. But the best analogy for the critical strategic, economic and technological importance of winning the clean energy race is microprocessor chips. In the 1950s through 70s, America’s ingenuity and capital markets seeded these technologies that changed everything, not just computers, the internet communications, but smart bombs, intelligence, satellites in the midst of the cold war. Japan and Korea’s economic miracles were tied directly to economic development policies focusing on these industries. And today, China’s claims on Taiwan are more about controlling TSMC’s chip manufacturing technology than national identity. Lets be clear. Clean energy technology is the next wave of technology that will shape this century and those that win this tech will control the economic and geopolitical order of the future. China saw this 20 years ago and has invested billions to ensure it wins the race. Today, China controls ~75% of global battery manufacturing capacity, 80 % of solar panel capacity, 58% of EVs manufactured, and 60% of the critical minerals that feed these industries. Beyond economic power, climate-technologies will also decide the future of hot and cold conflict. Think: grid resilient military bases powered by distributed energy at a time of cyber attacks on the grid.  Electric tactical vehicles with no noise signature. Battlefield batteries replacing highly exposed fuel supply chains. This isn’t speculation, this is straight from the US militaries climate-change strategy. China understands that clean energy is the inevitable future, and he who captures this prize wins the 21st century. They are cheaper, easier to deploy, with exponentially falling costs, and myriad use-case superiorities that make the obsolescence of fossil fuels inevitable. Today, 90% of all new generation capacity being added globally is renewable. We reached peak ICE vehicle in 2017. At a time when climate has become a partisan political issue, lets reframe this topic as the urgent matter of global security it is. The future of clean energy is not open to debate. But who wins this prize and, with it, the next century, is up to us.

  • No alternative text description for this image
Jessie Chen

Global League (g-l.ventures)

5mo

Climate urgency is on top of all our minds amid the political uncertainty. A quick quote here - Shell CEO Wael Sawan spoke in favor of preserving the IRA at a June event, saying that the IRA “seems to be working in terms of attracting a significant amount of capital in different states, whether it’s a red or blue state.” Nine of the top 10 districts in the U.S. that received the most amount of clean tech investment are currently represented by Republicans. https://www.climateandcapitalmedia.com/iras-391-billion-in-clean-energy-funding-makes-it-too-lucrative-for-trump-to-overhaul/

Eric Ma

Clean technology futurist

5mo

Great post, Sean!

See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics