WorkSafe Victoria seems obsessed with Health and Safety Representatives (HSRs). HSRs are widely seen as supported or trained by trade unions which deters many employers from embracing OHS. A much better strategy is to focus on the core obligation for employers and workers to consult, engage and discuss OHS needs and solutions, regardless of HSRs. This strategy would reach more employers by cutting the perception of HSRs being trade union infiltrators. https://lnkd.in/gUy2qiQt
Consultation certainly works without HSR’s! Many of our businesses we support big and small never successfully establish HSR’s in the legislative sense, but still manage a good consultation program. This brings back memories of when I was a young HSR (non union member and early 20’s) and had the pleasure of representing HSR’s at an EBA discussion. On my way out two of the Union Reps (older men in their 40’s) struck up a conversation with me and said they would walk out with me, we were talking safety and it was exciting. We entered the lift and I have never felt so intimidated in my life, let’s just say the tone changed behind the closed doors of the lift and I walked out of there a little worse, shaken and with the opposite attitude of what they intended. I never joined their union but went on to have a very successful and collaborative approach with management and workers where we all learnt and grew together. I do think the HSR program is great for people who are keen to learn and grow in the safety space.
Totally agree Kevin. The recent HSR podcast was extremely disappointing, with WorkSafe acting as cheerleaders for the unions and at the same time ignoring the fact that 95% of businesses in Victoria are small businesses where there will never be a HSR.
Great timing as I explore this today and change up the work structure to create this exactly output.
Not all companies are big enough for dedicated HSR's. I think Worksafe Vic has lost its way a little bit. I find I am heading more to other resources because the website is harder to find info on then lets say..Safework NSW. I mean the front page says it all..
We have a Committee for consultation at Henschke, but it's not HSRs it's just individuals that are keen to represent their areas and we change them around regularly to get everyone involved.
Haven't read the full article, but I dont see the link between HSRs and PCBUs failing to meet their duty ("deters...from embracing OHS"). I have seen many employers who have actively avoided their core duties, including effective consultation, as they think it is not needed. and I have seen good HSRs advocate for their workgroups The pathological behaviour exists on both sides of the fence, and unions have their place as do well trained and supported HSRs, union or not.
"HSRs are widely seen as supported or trained by trade unions which deters many employers from embracing OHS" The age old guilt by association at play here. Low Trust (et al Covey's 'speed of trust' book)
I am an advocate of HSRs. They won’t have a bigger support person than me. However, I have a big big problem with unions running advertising and controlling nominations and training of HSRs. Most that come through that system are usually super keen to issue PINs often without proper consultation. And when I say consultation I mean more than a small email trail.
Safety Professional, OHS Consultant, Freelance Writer
9moWayne, I have long said that the imposition of a PIN is an indication of flawed consultation. I get that some industries seem to thrive on the tension and conflict from these tools but it generates distrust, suspicion, unnecessary stress and undercuts any attempt to develop and maintain an appropriate organisational/safetty culture. IMO, it irreparable damages OHS,