Mike MacIntyre’s Post

View profile for Mike MacIntyre, graphic

Product Leader | Co-founder | ClimateTech | Carbon Management, Accounting & Removal

I’ve been reflecting on the differences between SaaS startups and Climate startups as I have been frequently asked "What stage/type of company are you looking for?" My initial, naive response was based on my SaaS experience "oh an early stage company with seed funding or more". The reality of how this translates in to the carbon removal space is actually quite different. Some of these are discussed below. ⏱️ Time to Market & Scaling SaaS startups can rapidly develop and launch products, iterate based on customer feedback, and scale globally with relatively low marginal costs. CDR startups face longer timelines to develop and commercialise their technologies. The initial concept often comes from a scientific research paper and to demonstrate that it will work at large scale requires overcoming many physical and logistical challenges, whether that’s building facilities, waiting from agricultural cycles or proving that the predicted outcome is actually realised in the physical environment (e.g. MRV). The Technical Readiness Levels (see below) are frequently used to highlight where different technologies are in their development maturity. 📈 Business Model & Revenue Generation SaaS startups typically rely on subscription based revenue for model for a tangible software product. Revenue is often predictable and grows rapidly with customer acquisition. CDR startups are still working out the best business models with part of the challenge being that there isn’t always a tangible product at the end of the process - CO2 locked away in the ocean or in rocks is hard to see! The primary revenue source is likely to be carbon removal credits but these can only be generated at a certain stage of maturity so grants or pre-purchase agreements are necessary to help bridge this gap. This is still a nascent market with some reputational challenges. Some technologies, like BioChar, may have also have a utilisation revenue stream but that in turn could compromise the permanence of the carbon removal. Partnership also play a key role here but that requires more of a discussion. 💰Funding & Investment The promise of rapid growth, good unit economics and high returns make SaaS startups attractive to investors. For CDR startups, Investors will likely see a lot of risk until a company has reached a certain level of technical feasibility and commercial viability. However, getting to that stage likely requires some substantial capital. A slowly evolving regulatory landscape creates additional uncertainty. The funding journey for these companies is going to be a mix of grants, early buyers (e.g. Stripe, Microsoft, etc.) and will be a bit chicken and egg. So the answer to the question “What type of company are you looking for?” Is “It depends!” But I can say that it’s one that is having a direct impact on carbon removal and is dedicated to protecting and enhancing the physical world. That’s a start 🙏

  • Technology Readiness Level: Carbon Dioxide Removal methods

Source: IDTechEx

https://www.idtechex.com/en/research-report/carbon-dioxide-removal-cdr-2024-2044-technologies-players-carbon-credit-markets-and-forecasts/1007

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics