An interesting interview by John Weber of Darcie Truttmann of Pinnacle Actuarial Resources, Inc. in the August issue of Best's Review. Key points:
1. New AICPA guidance requires management to better understand and support their reserve selections, especially when they differ from the actuary's central estimate. Management needs to explain why they are deviating from the central estimate if they do so.
2. The new guidance aims to increase management's confidence in actuarial estimates by encouraging more communication between management and actuaries. This may lead to actuaries' better understanding of exposures and risks, potentially improving their analysis and selections.
3. Improved communication is expected to help actuaries select appropriate benchmarks that correctly reflect the risks being estimated, leading to more accurate estimates overall.
4. When evaluating deviations from actuarial estimates, auditors should consider factors like changes in data, patterns of adverse development, and expected versus actual outcomes. Management should be prepared to explain and support these deviations.
5. The new guidance is expected to foster a more collaborative relationship between actuaries, management, and auditors and improve information sharing about risks, exposures, and changes in the company among all parties involved in the process.
https://lnkd.in/em76qFPk
It’s been an interesting decade watching predictive modeling join the syllabus to add qualifications to credentials - this next decade of adding data science and AI will be fascinating. Yet only the new credentials would seem qualified, so how do 10k+ members manage supervisory when 9k+ never took those exams?