The day when Republicans, and especially Trump, goes after Fox and other avowedly hard-right conservative broadcast owners for editorial decisions they make in presenting "news", then I'll consider the "public interest" argument. Yes, cable networks are not subject to the kind of regulation allowable under the "public airwaves" theory, but intentional lies and distortions are what they are and if a selective use of "public interest" is used to threaten the licenses of broadcasters Trump selects, then we no longer living in even a sham democracy. Let the FCC under Carr reimpose the "Fairness Doctrine" and let Congress let it stand, and maybe America can restore a bit of integrity to reporting and political coverage across the political and broadcast spectrum; as it should be. https://lnkd.in/eccsGHgX
Glenn Moss’ Post
More Relevant Posts
-
https://lnkd.in/diKbpNhg Trump vs. Media Moves Back to the White House President-elect has sued some networks and threatened broadcast licenses; executives brace for possible deal drama By Joe Flint and Drew FitzGerald Nov. 14, 2024 5:30 am ET Donald Trump has filed lawsuits against Disney’s ABC and Paramount Global’s PARA - CBS, railed against “fake” and “failing” news organizations, and called for the government to revoke some broadcasters’ licenses. Now, he will be bringing those grudges back to the White House. The question is whether Trump will stay in the realm of verbal attacks against news organizations and personalities—or extend into regulatory action.
Trump vs. Media Moves Back to the White House
wsj.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
If you've worked in the broadcasting or advertising industries, you'd immediately know the SNL skit last night was a red flag: Featuring a political candidate in a broadcast when others are not afforded equal time violates FCC regulations. This can be prosecuted, and since the damage is done and there is no equal time left to give, one would expect an outcome that is both swift and excruciating for the violator, in this case, CNBC. As many know, election integrity and trust in media are major issues today. So, why would NBC do such a thing? Several likely reasons come to mind: 1. They simply don't care about the consequences at any cost. 2. The consequences in terms of fines are too small; there is low chance of suspension; and / or there is low probability any consequences will be inflicted at all. 3. NBC believes it is in a morally superior position to rules and regulations. https://lnkd.in/eNqftFte
FCC commissioner claims Harris on ‘SNL’ violates ‘equal time’ rule
msn.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
A Response to "Head of FCC Rejects Donald Trump's Call to Revoke ABC Broadcast License" Dear Fellow Americans: I, today, support the FCC Chairwoman Rosenworcel's decision to reject the call from Republican Presidential nominee Mr. Trump to revoke government's broadcast license from ABC on public record. The statement by Chairwoman Rosenworcel is as follows: "The First Amendment is a cornerstone to our democracy. The Commission does not revoke licenses for broadcast stations simply because of political candidate disagrees with or dislikes content or coverage. Our job at the agency is to license broadcast stations in a manner consistent with the Constitution and the Communications Act of 1934 as well as the rules and policies we have adopted pursuing of these laws. There are no exceptions." Based on the news this evening and under the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), her statement was sent to U.S. Senator Ed Markey (D-MA) and U.S. Senator Ron Wyden (D-OR). And, I, too, agree. Mr. Trump alleges that the September 10, 2024 debate with Vice President Harris was rigged. The United States Constitution and other provisions apply to all people, nations, and tribes, regardless if a person is likable or not. No former or sitting U.S. President or any member of the American judiciary has the authority to deny a person of his or her individual and constitutional rights under the local, state, federal or international laws. Also, the laws are neither abused for self-interests nor abandoned for wrongful prosecutions. This conclusion is certainly true under the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. The FCC to this end falls under "Free Speech." Thus, the critical question before all of us good faith voters today is: Will Mr. Trump allege that the U.S. Presidential Election on Tuesday, November 5, 2024 is rigged, if these certified results hand him a second loss? Responsible leadership is leadership by our examples. Let's move forward with 47 days left: #MUTETRUMP.
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
In business, when your customers stop buying what you are sellling, either restructure your company (with great management changes) or you go out of business. This will apply to the corrupt media.
Viewership plummeted for MSNBC's "Morning Joe" broadcast after hosts Joe Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski revealed Monday that they had met with President-elect Donald Trump to "restart communications," according to Mediaite. MORE: https://bit.ly/3ZqE6uZ
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
With a general election now called, here in the UK many broadcasters and politicians are rallying behind the media bill to hurry it through parliament. Representatives from the BBC, ITV, Channel 4, Channel 5, S4C, STV Group plc, Sky, MG ALBA, and ITN all signed a statement urging politicians to pass the media bill before a change of government. The bill is essential in ensuring domestic broadcasters of TV and Radio here in the UK can remain competitive, holding the big streamers to the same standards as the broadcasters, whilst also ensuring all provide an accessible service that caters for the people. Further reading: https://lnkd.in/eS2Aws-M This bill is hugely important for the future of domestic programming, and if calling a general election is what it takes to speed important legislation through parliament, perhaps we should do it more often. #streaming #ott #media
General election 2024: Media industry calls for urgent bill passage and party manifestos
https://the-media-leader.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
As the politicians like to say, "This isn't hyperbole" . We all know that national news feeds , cable, and network Television , regardless of political orientation, garner very little "trust" from viewers. Often less than 15% "trust" is reported in surveys to viewers about what they see and hear from these sources. But when it comes to trust in "locally sourced Radio and Television" that same "trust level" jumps 4 to 5 times. Does this matter to the messaging that you communicate when marketing your products and services to existing customers and new conversions? You bet it does. Consumers actively seek out sources and messaging that they can trust. Be smart, go local. #iheartmedia https://lnkd.in/g2p5-yiX
SmithGeiger: Local TV And Radio Lead In Trust And Accuracy In Washington State.
insideradio.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
In a new brief filed with the FCC, The Media and Democracy Project joined two senators in urging the federal agency to decide on Fox Corporation's application to renew the license of WTXF, but for different reasons. #broadcasting #television #news #fox
Group urges FCC to act on WTXF license renewal
https://thedesk.net
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Great piece by Curtis LeGeyt on the importance of licensed broadcasters today. Sure the kids have all gone digital but the underlying value of our licensed broadcasters are being the counterbalance to uphold democracy. In today's digital world of fake news socially amplified mobile and in real time, this underlying value has never been more crucial to our society. https://lnkd.in/gMMexZXc
Truth under siege: How broadcasters uphold democracy in a challenging election
https://thehill.com
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
If you’ve been following C-18, the Online News Act, Michael Geist writes in his blog today that Google is considering two different proposals for the single collective to administer the projected $500 million it will contribute over the next 5 years. A glimpse into the rooms where this is happening now, with a decision to be made by June 17. Transparency, representation, and capacity to adapt to change are all at play - important questions we should be asking of all policy-making and the processes built into it.
The Behind-the-Scenes Bill C-18 Battle: How Newspapers, Big Broadcasters and the CBC Are Trying to Seize Control Over How Google Money is Allocated to Canadian Media
The Behind-the-Scenes Bill C-18 Battle: How Newspapers, Big Broadcasters and the CBC Are Trying to Seize Control Over How Google Money is Allocated to Canadian Media
https://www.michaelgeist.ca
To view or add a comment, sign in
-
Fast Company 06-27-2024NEWS Presidential debate 2024: How to watch CNN Biden- Trump event live for free without cable The live broadcast will be available online and simulcast on various websites and TV networks. Here’s what to know.
Presidential debate 2024: How to watch CNN Biden-Trump event live for free without cable
fastcompany.com
To view or add a comment, sign in