Jeremy Caradonna’s Post

View profile for Jeremy Caradonna, graphic

City Councillor and Capital Regional District Director in Victoria, B.C. Former: policymaker (Province of BC) and Prof. of Environmental Studies (Uvic). PhD in History (JHU, 2007).

**Update for Victoria Residents** City Council has confirmed the date of the Crystal Pool referendum: 8 February 2025. As with civic elections, there will be early voting, mail-in ballots, and multiple voting locations. The City intends on sending out an informative mail-out to every residence in Victoria. There will be two questions on the referendum. Question 1 is a binding question and ask for voter consent to borrow up to $168m to build a new facility. Question 2 is non-binding and asks for voters' preference on the location (either knock-down-and-rebuild [Central Park North] or build it next to the current facility [Central Park South]). The two options have slightly different costs, timelines, and impacts. If folks want to learn more about the project, see the City's website: https://lnkd.in/gU2jzUNU. To be clear, the City is neutral on the outcome of the referendum and the materials are presented in a very neutral way. The facility would include a 50m pool, warm water pools, hot tub, sauna, gymnasia, a workout room, community meeting spaces, and more. As an individual Councillor, and member of the community, I am *not* neutral and very much want the referendum to pass. That said, I am neutral on the location question. A Crystal Pool replacement YES campaign has now formed. The website is here: letsgetcrystalclear.ca. They have even landed Olympian Simon Whitfield!! I have decided to volunteer some of my time on the Yes campaign, since replacing the Crystal Pool was a campaign promise that I made. If you would like a Yes lawn sign, or otherwise to get involved in the campaign, then see the website. If not, that's fine too, but be sure to vote, if you are a Victoria voter. Finally, it's important to understand what's at stake in the referendum. The facility is currently broken and beyond its productive lift. It badly needs replacing. If the referendum succeeds, the City will rebuild the facility. If it fails, Council has two options -- either close it down immediately or pour $10m into it to keep it on life support for a few more years, and then close it permanently. With the YMCA and McKinnon pools both set to close in 2-3 years, we are at risk of losing THREE aquatic facilities in this community. For me, the choice is clear. Investing in essential public amenities is crucial for the wellbeing of the city, and especially for the North Park neighbourhood. The facility will be around for a century and provide low-cost, low-carbon, accessible recreation and wellbeing for everyone.

  • No alternative text description for this image
Randy Riches

Project Manager at Horizon Contracting

4d

Thanks for sharing. It's crazy, to me, that this process has dragged on for so long. Construction costs have only gone up, and this community improvement is long overdue. Other than NIMBY, I'd love to hear a good reason why it shouldn't go forward ASAP.

Aerin Jacob

Director of Science and Research, Nature Conservancy of Canada

1d

Great to see this! I benefitted so much from community pools as a child, teenager, and young adult — including first aid and water safety training that I’ve used ever since. 💙

Alex Pym

Innovation Coordinator at ISL Engineering

6d

Thanks for sharing! an important referendum

See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics