Co-host chemistry gets better with every episode. With interview-based shows? It resets to zero with every guest. Which leads to a big problem in B2B land: The content can be boring. 3 reasons WHY this happens: 1) It's VERY hard to create chemistry between a host and a guest, even with a pre-interview. 2) Hosts typically let their guests choose the topic based on the guest's expertise. But it's really hard to know if those topics are actually interesting to your audience. 3) It's too easy for the narrative of the show to be non-existent or at least disjointed because the guests dictate the content. The most common reaction I get: "But James, what about big guests?!" ✋🛑 Bigger guests are NOT the answer. Why? Big guests don’t actually share the episode. They don’t need to! They’re big names because they ALREADY have their content systems locked in — and those systems aren’t reliant on the episode they did with you. So if you’re relying on big guests for distribution…you’re gonna be in for a rude awakening. This is why I LOVE co-hosted commentary. When 2 (or more) co-hosts who have chemistry are commenting on timely or relevant stuff in your space that’s already popped off on Twitter, LinkedIn, Reddit, YouTube, etc? You've just validated that your topic is interesting to your audience BEFORE you ever hit record. It allows for personality, chemistry, and a consistent narrative (the POVs of your co-hosts) that interview-based shows struggle to achieve. This is coming from someone who’s produced 350+ interview podcasts. That was our primary focus at Sweet Fish for over 9 years. Which is why marketing is so exciting. It's always evolving: Co-hosted commentary is the future of B2B content. What do you think? 👋 P.S. Do you prefer co-hosted shows or interview-based shows? Let me know in the comments ❤️👊
Two years ago I was looking for a co-host, but I gave up. If there's someone in Europe who's fancied the idea of being a podcast host, send me a DM. Desireability: - you enjoy the My First Million podcast and like that show's format - you have a sense of humor - you enjoy the My First Million podcast and like that show's format - have your own biz or at least been instrumental in growing one - you enjoy the My First Million podcast and like that show's format 😀 🎙
James! This is excellent insight, and I totally agree. To better prepare our thought leaders for interviews, we’ve had our friend and esteemed radio host, Carmen LaBerge, coach people on how to be a good podcast guest that gets invited back. #1 it’s a conversation, not a one-way message/billboard. P.S. Carmen is the one we discussed together earlier in the year at your Creator House about expanding the reach of her content.
PREACH! This is why Susan and I are SUPER selective with guests, and rarely invite them on. We need to know that they will match our vibe, which typically means we are already friends with them before they come on.
I've been on a never-ending journey of finding my co-host but alas it hasn't happened (yet) but I totally hear ya on the chemistry. That said, with some guests I just naturally have better chemistry. ✨ James Carbary I do think w/ Navattic's pod Revenue on the Rocks they do a great job w/ the whole co-host thing.
I feel that is exactly why it's way better when famous personalities/ business leaders do their guest-based podcasts. Considering the profile of their jobs, they have huge networks that they can bring on as guests, and therefore the chemistry is already there
"The people who come for YOUR GUEST will not come back for you" 💡 💡
Cohosted podcasts make the audience feel like they are part of a REAL conversation. People want authenticity.
"Bigger guests are NOT the answer." Invest in the long-term not one-off!
Be selective with your interview guests Chemistry matters ⚡
"Co-host chemistry gets better with every episode." chemistry makes or breaks a podcast