Still a long old road ahead, I suspect, before we start to see Court-ordered mediations taking place in large numbers. I'm not sure that contested applications for a 'Churchill Order' will be as straightforward a business as some people are thinking. The early battles are likely to be costly to fight out.
The interesting shift will be in tactics. Because a 'forced' mediation has different dynamics to the hitherto consensual process we all know and love.
I expect a lot of parties and party representatives (where they are the 'reluctant' delegate) will be doing the bare minimum to comply - just enough to get through the day.
Mediators will need a bespoke strategy for these scenarios - how do you 'work' parties who are only there because a Judge has ordered them to turn up and participate?
I guess it's not a million miles away from having to attend a National Speed Awareness Course (where it's points on your licence if you don't show up).
Personally, I've never had to go to a Speed Awareness Course (no, really!) But I imagine those sessions are not big on user engagement. Got to feel for the Course Leader when, at the end, they flash up that slide that says: "Any Questions?"
😐
While the Churchill v Merthyr Tydfil Borough Council grabbed the headlines last year, there were a number of other developments lawyers should be aware of.
📝 Learn about these here - https://hubs.ly/Q02v7xM90
📽️ You can also watch our webinar 'Mediation Legal Landscape Update - What Lawyers Need to Know in 2024' here - https://hubs.ly/Q02v7BgR0
#mediation #disputeresolution
Mediation Case Law in 2023
learn.cedr.com