Recently, the Competition Commission of India, in Re: Ayudha Foundation v. Talk Charge Technologies Pvt. Ltd (Case No. 36 of 2023) had dismissed a complaint alleging abuse of dominant position under Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002 filed against Talk Charge Technologies Pvt. Ltd. It was ruled that the market consisted of several service providers and there was insufficient evidence to prove the Informant's sole dependence on Talk Charge Technologies. The CCI observed that the complaint revolved around the additional fees imposed by Talk Charge Technologies without complete disclosure in the GST Bill. To analyze the allegation pertaining to such abuse of dominance, the relevant market was delineated as the "the market for digital payment platforms in India." The Commission noted that several domestic and global players operated within the market which indicated a competitive landscape and there was no sufficient evidence establishing that the Informant was solely dependent on Talk Charge Technologies. Therefore, it was concluded that due to the absence of dominance of Talk Charge Technologies in the relevant market, the complaint is devoid of any basis for investigating upon the allegations of abuse of dominant position and the complaint was thus, dismissed under Section 26(2) of the Act. [The full news could be accessed at: https://lnkd.in/d-A2Qb9y]
Insightful
Insightful, great research
Insightful!!
Insightful!
Thanks for sharing!
Good read!
This is indeed a great read! Thanks you for sharing it Dhruv Soni
Intresting!
Informative!
Penultimate year law student | Former Member of Moot Court Society | Criminal Law, Competition Law, Arbitration and Dispute Resolution |
5moInsightful