Read Chris Holmes' new blog post on the importance of flexile data schemas in #geospatial data. Chris explores how moving away from rigid XML schemas to more adaptable formats like JSON Schema & Parquet can enhance interoperability and foster innovation. https://lnkd.in/eMW3hNCq
Finally finished up my post on building Flexible Data Schemas, see https://lnkd.in/dM-jj5Ye This one was in 'draft' for awhile - I meant to finish it before the TGE workshop that kicked off the field boundary initiative (see https://lnkd.in/gQUMVUDM). The plan was to try to lay the groundwork for some things to explore with data schemas in field boundaries, and also call attention to the great work Overture Maps Foundation is doing with schemas. But we got too busy with workshop prep, and then Matthias Mohr ended up building many of the 'ideas' from the post, adapting several STAC approaches to work for more general vector in the fiboa project (https://github.org/fiboa). And Overture has been continuing to evolve their data schemas in great directions. Matthias just met with Jacob Wasserman and I think we'll see some more collaboration between projects and approaches. I believe it'll lay a foundation for any domain to take a 'bottom up' approach to defining and evolving their data schemas with Cloud-Native Geospatial Foundation formats. This post is not written to appeal to a wide audience, but I appreciate the attention of anyone wanting to work together to make geospatial data more accessible and interoperable. Not just at the 'format' level, but getting to true interoperability one level below, in a virtuous cycle with data and software as I discussed in https://lnkd.in/dTKVkEuQ