We are excited to share that the research paper of our team members and project partners Laura Bauer, Stephan Kühnel, Ilja Nastjuk, and Stefan Sackmann was accepted for publication to the Pacific Asia Journal of the Association for Information Systems (PAJAIS). The paper titled “A Multiple-Method Study on Acceptance Factors of Economic Assessment Approaches for Information Security Investments” is currently published as a preprint before it will be finally released in one of the future issues of the journal. The paper studies factors influencing the acceptance of economic assessment approaches for information security investments, using a combination of semi-structured interviews, literature reviews, and focus group sessions. The resulting typology of acceptance factors covers five dimensions, relevant to different levels of a company and its environment. The results highlight the importance of the practical use of assessment approaches for information security investments and suggest relevant directions for future research. You can access the paper free of charge here: https://lnkd.in/e6wcUd4v. More information about the journal can be found at: https://lnkd.in/epVyWyM7. The publication was produced as part of the ProBITS Projekt funded by the Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung.
Chair for Business Information Management’s Post
More Relevant Posts
-
Vice President, Talent Attraction | Helping cities, states, regions and countries to attract and retain a talented workforce
The State of Site Selection report is an absolute gold mine for anyone in #economicdevelopment. Not surprisingly, the availability of workforce is cited as the top factor impacting the site selection industry in 2024, underscoring the importance of proactive #talentattraction, retention and development efforts. But there were a few surprises this year. Check out this blog from Robyn Domber and read the full report for valuable data and Guild member takes to inform your econ dev and workforce strategies.
What’s new research without a few surprises? In our latest blog, SVP of Research Robyn Domber shares five unexpected insights from the third edition of The State of Site Selection, published by DCI and the Site Selectors Guild. https://lnkd.in/g8m6Uvv7
-
Dive deeper into the data about #FamilyPlanning #Fertility #Migration #Women #HealthServices and more
Check out our new “Featured Studies” page for research topics that go beyond a single research paper here: dhsdata.com/3S4n7ay
-
-
A very informative session by Clarivate on "A Responsible Framework for Evaluating the Societal Impact of Research". Check out the video below if you're interested in learning how to assess societal impact effectively! https://lnkd.in/dFmdaybu
-
Really pleased to have been part of the DORA (San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment; https://sfdora.org) Working Group with Stephen Curry, Ginny Barbour, Rachel Bruce, Bodo Stern, Stuart King and Zen Faulkes to create guidance on a variety of commonly used research indicators, ranging from Journal Impact Factors (JIF) to the use of the h-index, field-weighted citations, altmetrics, and more. As DORA, we have regularly been asked about how to view the use of such commonly used indicators beyond simply the JIF, so hopefully this guidance will prove useful. In addition, we identified five key principles regarding the use of quantitative information more generally: be clear, be transparent, be specific, be contextual, and be fair. Download the guidance here: bit.ly/DORAindicators (pdf).
-
Interesting study of conflict of interest statements. More standards are needed to get the most from such statements.
NEW blog post: A Digital Science study of conflict of interest statements highlights the need for a more careful appraisal of published research. The study, led by Pritha Sarkar, has uncovered a tangled web of missing statements, errors, and subterfuge. Pritha's work utilized Dimensions and the Retraction Watch database, and was presented as a poster at this year's World Conference on Research Integrity. Simon Linacre takes us through the research's key findings and their implications. 🔗 Read the post now: https://ow.ly/wfzY50TgvhQ World Conf Research Integrity #ResearchIntegrity #TrustInScience #AcademicIntegrity #ConflictOfInterest
-
-
What if you could discover the people behind Concordia’s research directly? Eloïse Fairbank explains how to use the Explore Concordia tool to find researchers by keywords and ideas! Watch the full conversation on finding a research supervisor here: https://lnkd.in/egeeCGv8
-
Final Year of Bachelor Social Science (Communication) Majoring in Public Relations at University Malaysia Sabah
Presentation for finalized Group Assignment. The research was about the effects of COVID-19 as an overview. Such a huge content for a simple title if you look at every different perspective.
-
-
In a research paper, the abstract and the introduction are adjacent sections and are known to share certain elements. However, they serve entirely different purposes. Read our latest blog post for a deep dive into the purpose of abstract and the introduction, and key differences between the two: https://ow.ly/SOQj50U51TE
-
-
So, what does SUSTICS aim to investigate? Here are the 4 main research questions of this work! More at https://lnkd.in/dVKRy2kT
-
-
In case you missed it! IIPP Research Fellow Anna Goulden and Prof Rainer Kattel explore the tools and resources used by global practitioners to support the design, implementation and evaluation of mission-oriented policies. Read their policy report here ➡️ https://lnkd.in/exd7Z8Y5
-
Und ab!
4moTolle Nachrichten!