Antonio Carannante, CEng’s Post

View profile for Antonio Carannante, CEng, graphic

Senior Engineering Manager | People Leader | Talent Development | MBA Candidate

In recent months, the civil aeronautic industry has been abuzz with discussions surrounding Boeing's financial struggles and quality performance issues, notably highlighted by the grounding of the 737 MAX series following two fatal accidents and the recent incident involving a blown-away door on a 737 Max 9 over Portland, Oregon. This scrutiny has led to widespread critique of Boeing within the industry, with figures like Emirates President and Chief Sir Tim Clark expressing strong opinions on the matter (link to the interesting article below). The financial challenges Boeing faces create an opportune moment for competitors like COMAC to enter the market, while also allowing Airbus to strengthen its leadership position. While much has been said about Boeing's situation in the news, I want to emphasize the broader lesson about the repercussions of short-sighted actions. As an engineer involved in reviewing and approving parts and designs, I've experienced firsthand the challenges of convincing stakeholders about the necessity of halting or replacing components, despite potential impacts on delivery dates or costs. Safety considerations often resonate strongly with most individuals, as nobody wants to fly on a plane with defective parts. However, the Boeing situation underscores why these impacts and costs are far less significant than the potential consequences of an accident. I'm fortunate to work in a company where safety is the top priority, with a strong track record in terms of quality and adherence to safety protocols. Being part of a system that prioritizes safety gives me immense pride and satisfaction. Have you encountered similar conflicts between safety, schedule, and financial pressures in your industry? How do you navigate such challenges? Let's continue the conversation. #AerospaceEngineering #SafetyFirst #QualityManagement #CollinsAerospace #Boeing https://lnkd.in/eZnkK_kc

Boeing chief must have engineering background, Emirates boss says

Boeing chief must have engineering background, Emirates boss says

ft.com

Andrea Amodeo

Airworthiness Engineer presso Collins Aerospace

8mo

Completely agree. And just to add on the topic, someone could think Airbus and other OEMs would be happy and capitalising on Boeing's troubles. As Airbus CEO has explained, this is not the case. Aviation industry is proud of its safety record as a whole, so a safety issue with one stakeholder affects the whole sector. The reason is that the passenger, the majority of times, would not make a distinction between an aircraft manufacturer and another when buying a ticket. The passenger's perception could therefore change, deciding that flying is not worth the risk and all the efforts done by OEMs, suppliers, Regulators, MROs and airlines to bring the aviation sector where it currently is, will go completely wasted. https://www.aeronewsjournal.com/2024/03/airbus-ceo-boeings-troubles-impact.html?m=1

Like
Reply

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics