Shell - pretending to care about nature since at least 1966... 🤔 This book was given to my dad as a gift when he was 9 years old. I wonder how many of the species listed in this 1966 book have been severely affected by overconsumption of fossil fuels? Look inside the cover and you learn that it's actually a collaboration between Shell and bp who share the copyright and naming rights to not only this book, but also other classics like "Shell Nature Lovers Atlas" They also have the naming rights for the "Shell List of British and Irish Birds" put together by the British Ornithologists' Union - I wonder how present members might feel about that. How lovely to see fossil fuel companies are so willing to put aside their sense of competition to collaborate. Even if that is simply to try and pull the wool over the eyes of the public into thinking that they care about our environment, though not enough to have meaningfully tried to change their business model and/or invest in properly clean energy in the five and a half decades since this was published. Maddening!
What elitist, arrogant nonsense. I spent my whole career in oil and gas and the people are wonderful, intelligent, outdoor loving, hard workers who care about the environment no less than anyone else. Insulting us isn’t going to advance your agenda, Andrew. It’ll just make us push back harder.🙄
I was trying to look for the emoji on LinkedIn for ‘HORROR’ .. there isn’t one (yet).
Have you heard about the 'avian mortality' problem? Birds of prey. The LA Sierra Club head labeled industrial wind power "the Cuisinarts of the Air" decades ago. and it stuck. www.masterresource.org/environmental-issues-windpower/dear-carl-pope-what-about-cuisinarts-of-the-air/
Really early example of greenwashing! I've read 46% of regularly occurring bird spp are considered threatened with extinction, categorised as critically endangered, endangered, or bulnerable. Turtle dove, curlew, and skylark, all common in mid-20th century bird books now on Red List with severe population declines. Quite a jigsaw puzzle with habitat loss, agric. intensity, persistent chemicals and climate shifts...😔
Thanks for the book recommendation Andrew ;)
It’s basically gaslighting. It’s bloody gaslighting!!!
In the 1960s the U.K. was still desperately trying to improve local air quality due to thousands of deaths annually from the burning of coal and other solid fuels. Regular smogs in the 1950s culminated in the Great London Smog which (contemporary numbers) is thought to have killed around 12,000 people in London in a few days, with another 8,000 people dying within a year and over 100,000 suffering from severe respiratory illnesses. The clean air act was introduced and a subsequent energy transition from coal to oil and gas had a hugely beneficial effect on air quality, for city dwellers especially. We all understand that no energy source is without compromises, but to look back to those times, 58 years later, and imply there was some other ‘better’ choice that could have been made on primary energy sources in those intensely poor post-war years for heating and lighting and transportation is, well, for the birds. https://heritagecalling.com/2022/12/01/the-great-smog-of-london-1952/
Thank you for finding this. Indeed, commitment for sustainability in Shell is longstanding and strongly ingrained into the organization's DNA. 1966 was around the time when the development of Shell's gas business enabled a transformative improvement in the UK's environmental quality, saving the lives of both people and animals. Sadly in many countries this work is still ahead, but please be assured that we continue.
The good news: Trump will kill the ridiculous net zero goals, that have so many destructive effects.
Director - Senior Structural Technician - As-built Measured Building Surveyed Draughtsman
1wHowever, 'ecological' companies supporting the green agenda, blights our landscape with solar panels and wind farms, which are themselves derived from environmentally unfriendly products and techniques, predominantly produced by high polluting countries 🇨🇳🇮🇳🇺🇸