Policy by the Numbers: UK

Policy by the Numbers

Data for policymaking from Google and friends.

Disability Confident: How can we measure if government policy is working?

Wednesday, April 15, 2015

Andy White is Employment and Working Age Manager in the Evidence & Service Impact Section at RNIB.Current UK government policy to improve employment opportunities for disabled people is based on the government’s Disability Confident campaign. Charities such as RNIB are keeping a close watch on this by measuring its impact on the employment rates of disabled people.Blind and partially sighted people are significantly less likely to be in paid employment than the general population or other disabled people. For every three registered blind and partially sighted people of working age, only one is in paid employment. Worse, blind and partially sighted people are nearly five times more likely than the general population to have had no paid work for five years.Measuring the employment rates of people registered as blind (serious sight impaired) or partially sighted (sight impaired) gives us the clearest indication of the employment status of people living with sight loss. But even among those not registered, the Labour Force Survey indicates that just over 44% of people who are described as "long term disabled with a seeing difficulty" are employed, compared with 74% of the general population.One way to increase the numbers of blind and partially sighted people in employment is to focus on increasing the supply of blind and partially sighted people to the labour market by building their attributes and capabilities, and increasing the demand for meaningful work by supporting creative employment opportunities.Another approach is to support people with sight loss to keep working—27% of non-working registered blind and partially sighted people said that the main reason for leaving their last job was the onset of sight loss or deterioration of their sight. However, 30% who were not working but who had worked in the past said that they maybe or definitely could have continued in their job given the right support.We can address this by providing blind and partially sighted people with appropriate vocational rehabilitation support, and helping employers understand the business case for job retention. This is a challenge, given that the majority of employers have a negative attitude toward employing a blind or partially sighted person.Blind and partially sighted people looking for work need specialist support on their journey towards employment. In addition to barriers common to anyone out of work for a long period, blind and partially sighted jobseekers have specific needs related to their sight loss.Research indicates that those furthest from the labour market require a more resource-intensive model of support than those who are actively seeking work. Many blind and partially sighted jobseekers fall into this category.The increased pressure on out-of-work blind and partially sighted people to join employment programmes means greater engagement in welfare to work programmes, and an increasing responsibility for the welfare to work industry to meet the specific needs of blind and partially sighted jobseekers.Government policies such as the Disability Confident campaign will only be effective when there is a sea change in the proportion of blind and partially sighted people of working age achieving greater independence through paid employment.Research about the employment status of blind and partially sighted people can be found on the Knowledge Hub section of RNIB's website. We also publish a series of evidence-based reviews, including one for people of working age, upon which this blog is based.

Google

Labels: Disabilities , Employment , English , Policy by the Numbers , Research , RNIB , UK , Vision impairment

Labels

2012
Algorithms
Analytics
Announcement
Art
Broadband
Build Economy
Cable
Case Study
Censorship
Cities
Civics
Cloud Services
Community
Competition
Connectivity
Content Creators
Copia Institute
Copyright
Courts
Create Jobs
Creativity
Cultural Exchange
Culture
Dalberg
Data
Data Localization
Data Science
Data Visualization
DataKind
Datastore
Debate
Digital Divide
Disabilities
Discovery
Discussion
Documents
Droids
Economics
Education
EFF
Elections
Employment
Encryption
English
Entrepreneurship
Ethnography
European Union
Evaluation
Event
Explore Future
Family
Fiber
Finance
Food
Foreign Aid
Free Expression
Future of Music
Global Development
GOOD Magazine
Google
Government
Government 2.0
Government Surveillance
Guardian
Hangouts on Air
Healthcare
Highlights
Housing
Hunger
Improve Lives
Inclusion
India
Innovation
Interconnection
Intermediary Liability
Internet access
Internet of Things
ISPs
Language
Lawful Access
Linguistics
M-Lab
Maps
Methodology
Mobile
Municipalities
Music
Net Neutrality
Network
News
OECD
Open Data
Oxera
Oxford Internet Institute
Policy by the Numbers
Policy Fellowship
Policymaking
Political Campaigns
Politics
Privacy
Public Data
Publishing
Research
RIAA
RNIB
Robots
San Francisco
Science
Section 215
Security
Small Business
Social good
Social Media
Society
Space Exploration
Spectrum
sports
Start-ups
States
statistics
Study
Suicide prevention
Surveillance Reform
Telecom
Theory
Traffic
Transparency
Transparency Report
Transportation
UK
Urban Innovation
Video
Vision impairment
Weekly Roundup
World Bank
Writing
Youth
Zero1

Feed

Disclaimer

The authors of these posts include Googlers and guest bloggers. Opinions expressed here do not necessarily represent Google’s views. We hope the numbers presented will inspire meaningful conversations and inform policy debates.

Company-wide

Public Policy Blog
Research Blog
Student Blog

Products

Official Android Blog
Chrome Blog
Lat Long Blog

Developers

Developers Blog
Ads Developer Blog
Android Developers Blog

Google
Privacy
Terms