- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2020 07:39:38 +0100
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Rick van Rein <rick@openfortress.nl>
- Cc: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, Roy Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>, ben@nostrum.com, aamelnikov@fastmail.fm, adam@nostrum.com, tpauly@apple.com, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
On 23.01.2020 23:29, Mark Nottingham wrote: > Hi Rick, > > I'm saying that those documents are actively under revision now, so the appropriate place to discuss it is in that effort, not as an erratum against the soon-to-be-obsoleted specification. > > Cheers, Yes. But we have to deal with the erratum in any case. I believe that what RFC 7230 says is intentional, so within the scope of the erratum we should deal with adjusting the prose referring to RFC 3986. Thus "Held For Update". Best regards, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 29 January 2020 06:40:13 UTC