- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2020 09:29:09 +1100
- To: Rick van Rein <rick@openfortress.nl>
- Cc: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, Roy Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>, "Julian F. Reschke" <julian.reschke@greenbytes.de>, ben@nostrum.com, aamelnikov@fastmail.fm, adam@nostrum.com, tpauly@apple.com, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Hi Rick, I'm saying that those documents are actively under revision now, so the appropriate place to discuss it is in that effort, not as an erratum against the soon-to-be-obsoleted specification. Cheers, > On 24 Jan 2020, at 9:26 am, Rick van Rein <rick@openfortress.nl> wrote: > > Hello Mark, > >> This is better filed as an issue on the HTTP core revisions [1] than as an erratum. >> Recommending REJECT. >> 1. https://github.com/httpwg/http-core#draft-http-core-documents > > It is a mixture of technically incorrect application of RFC 3986 and > suggestions how HTTP should handle this; is what you are saying that > this is too much a mixture? > > I was not sure how to bring this forward, and still am not sure. I am > writing a positive alternative in draft-vanrein-http-unauth-user -- is > that more in line with your take on this? > > > Cheers, > > Rick van Rein > InternetWide.org -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/
Received on Thursday, 23 January 2020 22:29:23 UTC